Know More News - Adam Green - Yahweh, God of Abraham, & the Judeo One World Religion | Know More News feat. Charles Giuliani

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 25, 2023 - Know More News - Adam Green

01:45:38

Yahweh, God of Abraham, & the Judeo One World Religion | Know More News feat. Charles Giuliani

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Adam Green here with no more news.
	It is Monday, January 23rd, 2023, and I have a powerful show for you guys today.
	We're going to be discussing Yahweh, God of Abraham, the Judeo-One World Religion, all things Christendom with one of my favorite guests.
	He's back.
	Charles Giuliani is here.
	How's it going, Charles?
	Hey, how's it going, Adam?
	Good to be here.
	Good to have you.
	I look forward, always look forward to our chats to discuss all of these things.
	So you've been posting a whole bunch of podcasts over on your Christendom, your Odyssey accounts, Truth Hurts Radio.
	And Christian.
	Yeah.
	What have you been getting into lately that we need to know about what's been on your mind front and center?
	I've been talking about the Templars.
	I just did a show on YouTube on our video on angels.
	Most people are shocked to discover how the Bible actually describes angels.
	You know, in a lot of the artwork hung up in churches and people's homes, you know, you'll see these bright, shining humanoid figures with wings.
	You know, they look so pleasant with a smile.
	That's not the picture painted in the Bible of angels.
	It's very hideous.
	They're depicted as having eyes all over them.
	One head with two faces or four faces, depending on which account you go by.
	What angels are these?
	These aren't like Archangel Gabriel.
	Well, angels fall into two classes, the seraphim and the cherubim.
	And the descriptions given of both aren't very flattering.
	They're both depicted as, again, having eyes all over themselves.
	One set has four wings.
	The other one has six wings.
	And we're told that the six wings are to cover, two of them are to cover the face, two of them are to cover the feet.
	Why?
	No explanation is given.
	And the other two are to fly.
	But as I point out, first of all, how can you fly if you have wings covering your face?
	But I guess if you have eyes all over you, that wouldn't matter.
	You could still see, right?
	But why are your feet being covered?
	What the heck is this baloney?
	And then the seraphim are said to have wheels within wheels.
	But it said, as they moved along, the wheels didn't turn.
	But yet the wheels are called whirling wheels.
	Why are they called whirling wheels if they don't even turn?
	But the wheels aren't depicted as being part of some apparatus that they sit on.
	No, it's part of their body.
	So their bodies have wheels, eyes all over, you know, six pairs of wings, and then they have either two or four faces, depending on which account you go by.
	One account says it's got the face of a lion and the face of a man.
	Then later on it says, actually, no, it's a lion, a man, an ox, and the face of a seraphim.
	Well, wait a minute.
	How can you say that the seraphim has a face of a seraphim?
	Well, what's the face of a seraphim in the first place?
	Isn't that stupid?
	It's so ridiculous.
	It sounds a lot like Serapis.
	Yeah, right, exactly.
	Greco-Egyptian demon from ancient Egypt, like so many other of their teachings.
	But anyway, nevertheless, though, you look at the description of what they supposedly look like.
	It's hideous.
	They sound like demons.
	Well, that only makes sense because we're told in the Old Testament that Yahweh sends out evil spirits, lying spirits, destroying angels.
	Those don't sound like very loving and holy angels to me.
	They sound like demons.
	In fact, what else could you call a lying spirit a deceitful spirit, right?
	In fact, it even says an evil spirit.
	And I think it's in 2 Samuel.
	He's depicted sending out an evil spirit.
	Well, that couldn't possibly be a Holy Spirit, right?
	So I ask in this presentation, what is the difference between demons and angels then?
	They both are apparently hideous looking, and Yahweh sends out evil spirits, right?
	But then, of course, we have in the book of Job, Yahweh hobnobs with the devil himself, right?
	Satan is among the children of God around the throne, and he's striking a bet up over the outcome of Job having his faith tested, take away his goods, and see if he's still faithful.
	You know, the story, right?
	But the devil's there.
	So it only makes sense that Yahweh would be sending out demons and hobnobbing with them if he's actually hanging out with the devil himself.
	But then I asked the question, what's the devil doing there at all?
	Because according to the book of Revelation, we were talking about this tonight before the show.
	Remember, we were talking about how the New Testament is taking the Old Testament and like reinventing it.
	But they're doing such a bad job at it that they're contradicting a lot of what's in the Old Testament.
	Well, this is a big one right here.
	In the book of Revelation, it says the devil, and he was cast out of heaven and his angels, one-third of all the angels fell with him.
	It said he was cast out and never was there place found for him anymore.
	In other words, when he was thrown out, that was it.
	He was never to enter again.
	But yet in the book of Job, this is a time long after the devil was thrown out of heaven, right?
	In the book of Job, the devil is up in heaven striking up this bet with Yahweh.
	So the author of Revelation really screwed up.
	He didn't get his theology correct according to his own claim.
	And compared with the book of Job, it doesn't jive.
	You can't get those two accounts to harmonize.
	The devil couldn't possibly have been in heaven in the time of Job, according to what Revelation said.
	So either Job got it wrong, we got to throw the book of Job out, or the Revelator got it wrong.
	We've got to throw the book of Revelation out.
	Either way, we got a problem.
	You got problems like this all over the place, though, right?
	Did you know that the book of Jasher is mentioned twice in the Bible?
	It's mentioned in the book of Ruth, and I think it's 1 Samuel.
	It's mentioned reverentially, as though it's an inspired book.
	Yet, if you read the book of Jasher, it gives a completely different account of Moses.
	It has Moses out to be a rebel and that the Israelites wanted to overthrow Moses and replace him with his sister Miriam, right?
	Well, obviously, that wasn't included in the canon for that reason because it conflicts with the Torah.
	But yet, according to Ruth and 1 Samuel, it should be in the canon because it's quoted from reverentially.
	Just like, you know, James, the book of James, he quotes from the book of Enoch, a prophecy of the book of Enoch, right?
	But there is no book of Enoch in the Old Testament.
	Enoch is mentioned, but there's no prophecy attributed to him in the Old Testament.
	The only place you can find that prophecy is in the book of Enoch.
	So why is James quoting a prophecy from the book of Enoch when it has been unanimously rejected all through the centuries as being inspired?
	Because it's got a lot of crazy stuff in there, right?
	Then again, the canonical books have crazy stuff too.
	But you understand my point, right?
	James accepted the book of Enoch, obviously, as inspired.
	That should be in the Bible, but it's not.
	There's so many problems like this.
	We were talking about how Jesus quotes from apocryphal books numerous times.
	And yet, those apocryphal books have been rejected.
	Christ obviously must have accepted them to be quoting from him, right?
	Man, there's no end, Adam.
	There's no end.
	The more you dig, Paul quotes from Greek poets.
	And yet he says, avoid all appearance of evil, right?
	Touch not the unclean thing.
	According to Paul, these Greek poets were pagans, so he shouldn't have been quoting from them now, should he?
	He actually attributed a quote from a Greek poet to Jesus.
	He said, as the Lord said, it's better to give than to receive.
	That's not a saying applied to Christ at all.
	It's a Greek poet.
	So there's no end.
	There's no end.
	What do you think about this?
	This is the thumbnail.
	I mean, you know, I think of the most influential thing in the last 2,000 years.
	Half the planet, the Abrahamic faiths have dominated the planet more than any other thing out there.
	It's been like humanity's main religion, these three Abrahamic faiths that started like this, depicted like this, with God telling Abraham to chop off the generally mutilate himself to show that he's in the chosen covenant cult.
	Yeah.
	Christians would say, well, that was the Old Testament.
	That's condemned now in the New Testament.
	Well, no, actually, it's not.
	Even though Paul did denounce circumcision, we have him in the book of Acts long after his conversion, participating in the circumcision ceremony in the temple.
	So how hypocritical is that?
	But it doesn't matter.
	Forget all that.
	Jesus went beyond circumcision.
	He called for becoming a eunuch for the kingdom of God's sake.
	He said, there are those who are born eunuchs.
	There were those who become eunuchs for the kingdom of God's sake.
	He that is able to receive it, let him do so.
	So Christ went way beyond just circumcision.
	He was calling for chopping off the gonads, right?
	How do they do that?
	They're doing that, though.
	That's funny, isn't it?
	They're supposed to follow all that Jesus said.
	I don't know why you have Christians with testicles.
	Just think of the if the hypothetically, the Abrahamic faiths never existed.
	And then some today, in 2023, some cult pops up and they have this practice where they identify themselves by chopping off the end of their genitals.
	What would everybody think of that?
	But yet, this is the God that everybody worships.
	This is the with his covenant where he has you slice up all the animals and his decision.
	You bless his descendants or be cursed, basically.
	And they will bring obedience to the nations.
	And it's worked through Christianity and Islam, the trifecta of Judaism, the one world religion.
	I mean, Christians are always like, oh, the one world religion or the new world order.
	Like, is that not just the Bible?
	What the Bible calls for?
	So many Christians are opposed to the new world order, and yet the dream began right there in that book.
	I will bring all nations before you.
	They will bow before you and lick the dust from the soles of your feet.
	You shall rule over them, but they shall not rule over you.
	You shall lend to them, but you shall not borrow from them.
	That is your new world order right there.
	You couldn't get more pro-new world order than that, and yet they think that their God is going to rescue them from the new world order.
	He's the one that set it up, if they want to believe he actually exists.
	Okay, he exists, but he's not your friend.
	Yeah, the Christians are like, we're against the satanic Luciferians that want a one-world religion and the Antichrist and all these things.
	Meanwhile, this is what they want.
	This is what Christianity and Judaism want.
	They want a Moshiach of the Torah to rule all the world, conquer the Gentiles, make the Gentiles his footstool, trample the wine press of the Gentiles, all of these things, smiting the Gentiles, ruling in the land of the enemy of the Gentiles.
	This is what Christians ultimately, at the end of the day, want and what rabbis obviously want.
	A Moshiach from the Torah ruling the world.
	Which is why I'm waiting for, and I know you said that you're expecting this too.
	I'm waiting for the announcement someday.
	I'm going to turn the TV on and hear the news that the most amazing thing in all of history, there has been a massive conversion of Judaism to Christianity around the world.
	And it began in Israel.
	And, you know, the Israeli government now is acknowledging Jesus was the Messiah.
	You watch.
	It's coming.
	It'll be the plot twist.
	It'll be the big character arc of the scripture that they have written here.
	Here's a little compilation I did.
	It's one minute long of John Hagee quoting Romans, Paul, and Romans.
	My buddy.
	And then an excerpt from a book I listened to called When a Jew Rules the World, written by a Christian.
	You said his name wrong, though.
	It's Joan Hagee.
	Here you go.
	He writes in that same chapter in verse 26, all Israel will be saved.
	Say that with me.
	All Israel will be saved.
	That means God is not through with the Jewish people.
	And when Jesus comes back to earth, how's he coming back?
	He's coming back as the lion of the tribe of Judah.
	Judah is the word from which we get the Jewish people.
	He's coming back as a Jewish rabbi to rule and reign over the earth.
	Give the Lord praise in the house.
	Does that not sound awesome?
	He's quoting from Paul there.
	Paul actually says that.
	All Israel will be saved.
	And the Christians try to cope.
	A few minority of fringe Christians try to cope and go, oh, Israel he's talking about is us.
	We're the real Israel now.
	It very clearly says the Jews that are hardened to Jesus are the Israel that he's talking about in the context.
	And then also mentions Gentiles later, so it becomes clear that's what he's talking about.
	So it's just pure cope from them.
	He mentioned Jesus is going to come back as the lion of the tribe of Judah, the root of David, the Moshiach of the son of David, the Messiah.
	Yeah.
	Right?
	Revelation.
	This is what Jeremiah says the lion of Judah is going to do.
	Destroyer of the Gentiles is on his way, the lion.
	It's all about destroying the Gentiles.
	And then the Christians are like willing, happy sheep slaves.
	Yeah, the prophecy says that they will rule over us and we will follow their Messiah and he will judge us and rule over us, reign over us.
	And then that's a good thing.
	And they play into it and they don't see that they're playing into the Hegelian dialectic with them.
	The book of Revelation says, a sword shall come forth from his mouth with which he will smite the nations, which is the same word for Gentiles.
	That's what that means.
	You could probably do a search of nations or goim in the Bible and then just look at each one and just see one after the other about how the nations, the Gentiles, are going to be destroyed or how they're better than us and chosen and we're evil and idol worshipers and stuff.
	So here's the other second part of the clip now.
	Similar sentiment.
	This is what they're teaching.
	This is what the doctrine is.
	This is what mainstream Christianity, all the big churches are promoting this totally Judaized, pro-Zion agenda.
	They all elevate Jews to a divine status that they were once chosen and they have blessed on account of the patriarchs.
	They all do it.
	Yes, the day is coming, perhaps much sooner than most think.
	When Jesus himself will come back from heaven in blazing fire with all of his holy angels with him to establish his glorious kingdom here on earth.
	Oh, how I long for that day.
	How I long for the day when the knowledge of God covers the earth as the waters cover the sea.
	When we finally see Jesus face to face.
	How I long for that time.
	The day when a Jew rules the world.
	These are Christians that want this.
	How telling is that?
	A day when the Jew rules the world.
	You know, as I'm sure you're aware, the protocols talk about their coming sovereign Lord, right?
	Referring to the leader of the new world order, you know.
	It's talking about the same thing he's looking forward to, right?
	Their sovereign Lord.
	When he comes, when he arrives, this is the one that, if you ever saw that famous clip where the Luvovich rabbi is talking to Netanyahu back in the 90s, I think it was Schmearson.
	And he's saying, we still have much more work to be done.
	Why aren't you pushing this?
	And he's like, you know, like he's in fear.
	Oh, yes, Rabbi, I'm doing all I can.
	Clearly, you are not because Mashiach has not yet come.
	That's the one they're all talking about.
	That's the one Mr. John Hagey was talking about, this coming Messiah figure that the Christians are going to say is Jesus, you know, and the Jews will accept that.
	Oh, yeah, this is Jesus.
	Whatever it takes, as long as they get their new world order, right?
	Like Maimonides and all the rabbis say that the Christians in Islam have they've been primed and conditioned to like accept a Torah Messiah.
	At the end of the day, which is what their ultimate goal was as God's chosen people was to get all the nations to abandon idol worship and worship the God that chose them.
	Even though there's a lot of so-called anti-Zionist Christians, right?
	Well, you get so-called anti-Zionist Jews.
	I used to be big on that years ago when I saw, you know, Jewsagainstionism.com.
	I thought, wow, these, and you know, I'm sure there's a few that might be sincere, but most of those guys, they only denounce the government of Israel because it's doing what it's doing from a secular standpoint.
	They're not doing what they're doing in Yahweh's name.
	If they were to do that, then they'd have no problem with what the Israeli government is doing.
	You know what I mean?
	They could be doing the same thing as long as it's in Yahweh's name.
	That's fine.
	And so the anti-Zionist Christians, first of all, how could you really be anti-Zionist when you're embracing their main playbook?
	But nevertheless, a lot of them, most of them, are going to jump on board if they see a mass so-called conversion.
	Just like in the dark ages, right?
	You know, people would be against Jews, and then all of a sudden the Jews would claim to convert to Christianity and suddenly, oh, you're our brothers now.
	You can still run the bank and the investment firm over here.
	And you know what I mean?
	They were still playing the same game, ripping people off, rigging the economy.
	But now they're doing it in Jesus' name.
	So, you know, we don't mind.
	They're Christians now.
	They just say that magic word, I believe, or magic words.
	And, you know, now they have an opening.
	They're brought in.
	Right.
	They're happily brought in.
	And anytime they could just convert and then help direct the doctrine or not even convert and just like John Hagee's paid off a million dollars from a year, at least one year that we know of, that he didn't register as lobbying from the state of Israel, paying John Hagee.
	Or I think it was Menekem Begin got the jet for Jerry Falwell also, so they can go spread around.
	But this Christians always want to dismiss this, like, oh, this is a minor heresy.
	This is just 100 years ago, Schofield in Vatican II.
	Things have changed since then.
	But if the foundation wasn't already there, if they weren't already believers that worship the God of Israel and believe the Torah is the word of God, no non-believers are believing that Jews are chosen.
	It's only Christians that are entertaining this delusional idea that they're chosen by God, enabling them, basically.
	And all the while, oh, the Bible says that God does not play favorites.
	So no, he doesn't play favorites.
	So he can come out and say, you know, I'll bring all nations before you.
	They'll lick the dust from the soles of your feet.
	He can say that it's okay to charge usury to a Gentile, but not a fellow Jew, that you can sell roadkill to a Gentile, but not a fellow Jew, you know, on and on and on.
	And nope, he's not.
	He doesn't play favorites.
	The mental disconnect there is astonishing.
	Christians are just brain dead.
	They don't have the capacity to reason.
	It's been stolen from them because they are so sold to this book.
	You can point out the problems.
	And for the most part, it's just going right over their head.
	I've noticed on my channel, I get a lot of Christians now showing up.
	Up until recently, you know, the people commenting on there have been people that pretty much already didn't believe the Bible or had doubts or whatever.
	But now all of a sudden, I've seen Christians galore come out of the woodwork.
	And, you know, I've challenged them.
	I said, if you're so sure your faith is right, what do you have to fear?
	Go back to the beginning.
	Start listening to my videos and see why I'm saying these blasphemous things.
	You know, I'm being called blasphemer and I'm on the road to hell.
	I says, I don't want to hear your thunderbolt threats.
	They mean nothing to me.
	I'm not afraid of them.
	That's not going to do anything for me.
	If you're so loving, why aren't you offering me heaven instead of hell as a means to bring me around?
	You know, they do this all the time.
	They want to intimidate you.
	It's such crap.
	They act like they have something good to offer, and yet that's the best they can do.
	They're not even addressing the issues I'm raising.
	And you know what?
	I never hear back from them.
	They never write back, positive or negative.
	They don't write back positive because they don't want to give up their faith.
	They don't write back negative either because they know they can't count on my points.
	So their tactic is just disappear.
	They'll write me offers of the devil so they feel good in continuing to believe their fantasies.
	But at the same time, though, they listened enough to know there's something not right with this book, and they don't want to admit it.
	But that's good because I've seen this over the years where I'll talk to someone and I don't hear from them again for two or three years, but they'll come around and say, you know, when I first heard you, I thought you were crazy.
	In fact, I turned you off.
	I vowed never to listen.
	But nevertheless, you said a few things that, you know, troubled me.
	And so later on, I'd hear something else and I would think back about what you said and I'd go back and listen to one of your old shows.
	And sure enough, I started digging.
	I realized I couldn't answer some of the problems that you raised.
	For some people, it takes a while.
	It took me a while.
	It took me years to finally figure out that this thing was a bunch of crap.
	So anybody out there, if you're dealing with Christians, I have people all the time talking to me, you know, what do I do?
	I get my brother or my mother or whatever.
	Don't put pressure on them.
	Share stuff with them, especially if they asked.
	I wouldn't even bring it up, initially bring it up if you've never talked to them about it before.
	But once it's brought up, if they're resistant, don't even bring it up again.
	Drop a few bombs, you know, but do it in an amicable way.
	You don't want to get them upset because it can ruin your relationship with your friends, your family, your neighbors.
	You know, you don't want to do that.
	But give them a few things to gnar on and then back away.
	And I'm telling you, if they really are open-minded, unless they're that pig-headed type, forget it, there's no hope for them.
	But if they have any desire to really want to get to the bottom of things, drop that little seed, as the Christians like to say, plant the seed.
	And then just step back.
	And it might take a long time.
	Sometimes it's only a few months, whatever.
	But let them mull over that.
	And if they are sincere and they really mean what they say when they say they love the truth, they will come around.
	They will eventually.
	So it's never a waste of time.
	Keep sharing with them.
	But don't get discouraged if you don't see them getting excited right away because this is so entrenched in people.
	They build their life around it.
	Their whole foundation is this.
	And it's almost never going to happen in a short time.
	They've been inundated so long.
	It's just not even psychologically possible for someone to break free from it in one broad step.
	You can't.
	It's, you know, for me, it took years.
	First, I found out that organized religion was a fraud.
	And I thought that was the ultimate discovery.
	Then a little time goes by, and now I'm seeing things aren't adding up.
	You know, all this praying I'm doing, and my life just got crazier and worse.
	And I saw around me, too, other believers, their life was getting worse, even though they're praying.
	It took a lot of hard knocks and a lot of encounters with difficult passages I couldn't answer before I was finally willing.
	And what really opened the door for me, though, was finding out about the Zio thing and that it didn't just start with Herzl.
	It went way back.
	You know, once I saw how far back the Jewish problem went, now you start to wonder: hey, wait a minute, since this book isn't working for me like I thought, since all my prayers are bouncing off the ceiling, could it be?
	I never actually did look at this book critically.
	I just accepted at face value that it was God's word.
	What if I looked at it critically?
	What can I have to lose?
	If it is the truth, I'll find out, right?
	I'll find out that all these doubts and questions are groundless.
	But if it isn't the truth, it won't stand.
	And that's all it takes.
	That's all it takes.
	Have an open mind.
	Look at the thing critically.
	It will not stand.
	It cannot stand critical analysis.
	Christians don't do that.
	You know, an illustration I've been using on my channel lately is, and it works so well.
	If you're going to buy a new car, you're not just going to take what the salesman says at face value and then drive the car off the lot, right?
	Hand them the check or whatever.
	And you're going to look under the hood.
	And if you don't understand mechanics good, you're going to get a mechanic who does.
	You're going to have him come with you and look under the hood and make sure that the engine really is in solid shape and not just trust what the salesman says.
	Bible dupes never do that.
	They take what the salesman says, they drive the thing off the lot, not knowing they just bought a lemon.
	And for a lot of them, they'll go through their whole life driving this car that's ready to break down at any moment.
	It's chugging along and they're bouncing.
	You know what I mean?
	They're ignoring all of the problems with this car, thinking that they won't do that with anything else in life, right?
	They always, you know, are skeptical and questioning and not with the Bible.
	And yet that's the one thing you really need to question more than anything else because it controls everything in your life, right?
	Christians don't do anything unless it's in harmony with what the Bible says, you know?
	They won't listen to anybody.
	They won't do anything.
	They won't go anywhere.
	Not all Christians, but it's total mind control.
	It's such a vehicle for mind control.
	It's mass-minded.
	They won't go to a movie, you know.
	Adventists are big for that.
	They won't even go into a, even if it's a G-rated movie and there's absolutely nothing wrong, it's a total family-oriented movie.
	They won't see it in a theater because they're convinced that theaters are the realm of the devil.
	It's just so bizarre.
	They limit themselves so much, needlessly, you know.
	That's only one of the rotten fruits born from that.
	But it just totally takes control of a person's life and their quality of life just plummets.
	But you can't tell them that.
	They're convinced that, you know, this is the only way to go.
	But yet they're not happy.
	When I was a lay pastor and then later a student pastor, I did a lot of counseling.
	You know, I didn't advertise for that.
	It just happens that way.
	People come to you because you're their minister, you know, so they would get calls sometimes wee hours of the morning.
	I enjoyed it, though.
	You know, I like the idea of helping people.
	But I was amazed at how people that were supposed to be way beyond where I was at.
	I was only in my 20s, and I got people in their 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s calling me that I looked up to and thought were more grounded in their faith than I was.
	And I'm finding that they were miserable.
	They weren't happy.
	And I know why now, because I would just focus on the nice passages that seem to build you up, and just trust the Lord, the Lord will carry you through, blah, blah, blah.
	But they were looking at these other passages that said otherwise, and they were getting very discouraged.
	And at the time, I couldn't understand it because I was just focusing on the good stuff, you know.
	But over time, you can't avoid those forever.
	They're going to be jumping out at you off of every page.
	And you start realizing that, gee, I know I like what these passages say over here, but I got all these.
	In fact, these are greatly outnumbering the ones over here that I like.
	How do I account for this now?
	On the one hand, I'm saved if I just trust Jesus, but now I got to worry about on judgment day, I got to give an account for everything that I've ever done, even though Paul says there's no more condemnation in Christ.
	How can you frickin' say there's no more condemnation and yet you've got to give an account for everything you've ever done, good or bad?
	All your works are going to be brought up.
	It just doesn't add up.
	There's a big controversy there, a big inconsistency that, you know, most Christians will try to just sweep it under the rug and ignore it, but you can't.
	It's always there.
	And in the course of reading the book, you're going to bump into one of those passages.
	And now it's going to, I think it was really written deliberately that way.
	Some of the mistakes got in there just by incompetence and, you know, they weren't properly editing the thing.
	But I think a lot of those things were put in there on purpose to mess with you, to build you up one minute and crash you to the ground the next.
	Because one of the biggest themes in the Bible is that you're a wretched sinner, right?
	There's no hope for you unless you come to Jesus.
	But even when you come to Jesus, on the one hand, there's no more condemnation, but you still have to worry that on judgment day, I might be found unworthy.
	How can you take comfort in that?
	The Bible promises peace that passes all understanding, right?
	My peace I leave with you.
	My peace I give to you.
	Not as the world gives, give I unto you, said Jesus.
	But they don't have peace.
	They don't.
	I've never met a Christian that really had peace.
	Oh, they'll say they do because they don't want to be responsible for skewing someone away from the Lord.
	They want to make Christianity look attractive.
	So they'll actually lie.
	They don't consider it lying, though, you know, in their mind.
	But that's what they're doing.
	They're lying because they Know deep down inside, they don't have peace.
	They have all kinds of doubts and fears and anxieties.
	And the book doesn't give you peace.
	It doesn't.
	And, you know, looking back at my experience, the only reason I thought I had peace is because I hadn't experienced life enough yet.
	When I was a minister, I was in my 20s, wet behind the ears.
	I hadn't experienced life enough to realize the book really doesn't do a damn thing for you.
	I was just hyped up on those passages that I liked that made me feel good.
	And, you know, I would share with others.
	And it would make them feel good for that moment.
	But sometimes, not even two, three days later, they're calling me back again with the same discouragement when I thought I had said enough that was going to put them on the right track, right?
	Why are they discouraged again?
	I just couldn't understand it.
	But as time went on, I began to realize: wow, as you go through life more and more and you get screwed and you realize your prayers aren't getting answered, something's wrong because you're given guaranteed answered prayer promises, right?
	Ask anything in my name and I will do it.
	You know, that the father may be glorified in the son.
	Whatsoever you ask for, it will be done, Jesus said.
	He says that multiple times.
	And there's no disclaimer statement that, you know, well, I'll do anything you ask as long as blah, blah, blah, blah.
	No, there's no disclaimer statement.
	They're guarantees.
	And I saw that those guarantees just didn't add up.
	They're lies.
	Jesus lied.
	Anyway, I'm sorry, I'm going off on a big rant here, but there's so many levels to this thing, so many ways to expose this.
	But to me, this is one of the biggest ones.
	It's the failure with all of these promises that build people up to get them to think that Christianity is like a magic genie lamp.
	You know, you rub the lamp, the genie's going to appear.
	We'll give you what you want.
	That's the impression you're given.
	It is.
	James says, if one is sick among you, bring the elders together, anoint the sick, and pray over him, and the Lord will raise him up.
	Absolute guarantee.
	Do you know how many multiply billions of people through the centuries have been miserably disappointed, set up for a miserable disappointment, thinking that, oh, all I got to do is bring grandma with cancer over to the elders, pray over her with oil.
	And grandma dies anyway.
	What a sick joke that book is.
	It sets people up for miserable disappointments.
	Disappointments that, you know, obviously they're going to get disappointed anyway when grandma dies, right?
	But it builds them up for a bigger disappointment because now their hopes are raised thinking grandma's going to be healed.
	Instead of dealing with the fact that grandma is deathly ill, let's try to make life the best for her we can while she's still alive, right?
	No, you build up her hopes and your hopes only to have them crash.
	It magnifies the trauma of death even worse.
	That was done deliberately, you can bet.
	Absolutely.
	Whenever you hear a Christian get mad in the comments and say, like, you're going to burn in hell or, you know, you're going to have your day of judgment or something like that.
	It just, they're exposing and revealing that they're just controlled by fear and that they're just weak-minded and controlled by the fear of this myth that, I mean, it's almost like the scapegoat sacrifice, the mythological story of the scapegoat sacrifice of Jesus doesn't even really do anything.
	It's supposed to have some magic, blood magic power and the blood atones for the sin and the death of the righteous one, you know, the scapegoat, the Passover lamb.
	It doesn't actually do anything, though.
	It's only a Christian believe.
	The Christian has to believe that Jesus is the savior that died for their sins.
	And that's how they'll be saved.
	So it's all about getting your belief into their Hebrew prophecies.
	And that's the escape valve, too.
	When things don't work out, well, it must be because you didn't have enough faith.
	Or they'll pull the sin card.
	You must be harboring a sin in your life.
	And that's why God isn't answering your prayers.
	I'll knock it off.
	So sick of these excuses.
	I think it does bring religion, it does bring peace to some people, though.
	People that have low self-esteem and are have a lot of guilt.
	People that have a lot of guilt that have done a lot of bad things, it gives them relief.
	It gives them peace to be forgiven for just by believing in a blood magic sacrifice of an ancient Jewish superhero deity.
	But the reason why it's still not good, yes, it can do that, but so can a bottle of Jack Daniels, right?
	You know, it can numb your problems.
	Jesus junkies, man.
	Yeah, Jesus junkies.
	But it's not good because all the trappings that come with it, you wind up endorsing a philosophy that ultimately is toxic and the promises aren't real.
	So it's for that moment, if you're depressed, sure, it can help people.
	You know, a lot of people turn to it when they go through a divorce.
	Their life is traumatized and they get that sense of acceptance from their church family, you know.
	Sure, that's great.
	But you can get that from a secular source without the religious trappings, too.
	You know what I mean?
	And so in the long run, short term, yeah, it does help people, but in the long run, no, it's not good.
	And anything based on lies, it's never good.
	It's a false hope, false sense of security, you know.
	I totally agree.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And you're talking about the term anti-Zionist Christian.
	Like all Christians believe in Zionism.
	If you define Zionism as in the belief of Zion, verses all over the Old Testament about God, Yahweh, dwelling in Zion, that is his holy city.
	You worship the God of Zion.
	The law must come forth from Zion, as the scripture says.
	You're all Zionists.
	You're all a part of the Zionist agenda.
	Even all the rabbis believe that, that Christianity is part of their messianic agenda.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, there's no getting around it.
	Listen to this.
	And this is the inevitable result when the Gentiles believe in Jewish scripture.
	This is the type of stuff that you're going to get.
	So a Christian that's not for Israel, I doubt they actually love their Bible.
	And I will stand by that statement.
	If you are a Christian that doesn't love Israel, then you take your Bible way, way, way too much for granted.
	So a Christian that's not for Israel.
	So, hey, Christians, you better be pro-Israel if you're a Christian.
	I mean, Paul says all of Israel will be saved.
	There's verses all over about how salvation is of the Jews and how they're the root that supports the Christians or are grafted in.
	The worst is, you know, we talk about the verse a lot about Jesus calls the Gentile woman a dog and she goes, oh, can I just get the scraps like a dog at the table?
	And then he goes, okay, I guess I'll give the Gentiles some scraps.
	This is what Christians are, just little groveling slaves like, oh, I want the scraps of the Jews.
	I know he chose them first, and there is special people above all of us, but we want to be grafted in and we want to be chosen too.
	We want to be the new, the real Israel.
	It's so wannabe Jew, just pathetic.
	And just playing into the whole Judeo matrix by mirroring their craziness.
	It's disgusting.
	And they'll say, oh, well, that was just the common practice of the day.
	That was the way the common practice of that day.
	That's always been the Jewish mentality.
	But nevertheless, who cares if it was the common practice of the day?
	Why did Jesus talk that way, right?
	Looking down at this woman.
	And we know he looked down at Gentiles because he said elsewhere on numerous occasions that I came only for the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
	Only.
	Only.
	And we know he meant that because once again, Peter later in the book of Acts refused to sit down and eat lunch with Gentiles, right?
	They were unclean.
	How come Peter didn't know that Gentiles were supposed to be part of the Christian outreach?
	This is supposed to be years later, right?
	Jesus supposedly handed the reins over to the church to Peter, that he was one of the top apostles that walked and learned from Jesus.
	But somehow Paul has more say-so, the Pharisee that never met him and only had visions and saw Jesus in the scriptures.
	How would he have any influence or power or win out against actual disciples if not that the actual disciples never met Jesus either?
	They just saw Jesus in visions as Paul did.
	Right, right, right.
	Man, oh man.
	But Christians can't get around that one, you know.
	The fact that Peter didn't know that Gentiles were supposed to be clean and accepted like Jews until Paul embarrassed him publicly, and only then did he come around?
	How come if Jesus didn't know the future and know that he was going to be embarrassed, how come Jesus' dada didn't inform Jesus so he could tell Peter, oh, Peter, I got to let you know something important here because otherwise you're going to get embarrassed by Paul one day.
	You know, Gentiles are an important part of my mission.
	Christians cannot grapple with that.
	They can't explain it.
	That proves the point that Christ meant what he said when he said, I came only for the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
	He didn't care about Gentiles.
	That was interpolated later by Paul and inserted into the text, you know, to make it look like that was always part of his plan.
	It clearly was not.
	And, you know, that was how all of the first century messianic figures operated.
	All of them, which I think is what the Christ character is based on.
	He didn't even exist.
	But nevertheless, for those that accept he existed, okay, he existed.
	And he was no different than any of the other, you know, 40, 50, actually, probably several hundred messianic figures who use religion as a cloak for their insurrectionist aims.
	They all taught that same thing that Christ did.
	You know, so he was just following in suit with all these other characters.
	It just so happens that only one of them started a major religion that still continues on into this day.
	But there were scores and scores of at least 100 of them that I know of.
	There were probably a lot more that have been lost to us in history.
	There were others that were written about that we still have.
	Like Josephus mentioned several like one of the Messiah movements, but nobody noticed the one actual real Messiah movement.
	No other secular extra-biblical person wrote about it at the time.
	You think, I mean, if this is God's divine plan and he wants humanity to be saved and he wants to get his message across, you'd think that there'd be a little bit of evidence.
	They have none.
	Right.
	No contemporary evidence writing about Jesus at all.
	It's pitiful.
	Josephus did actually mention a couple messianic figures with the name Jesus, two different ones, although some think it might be the same one.
	One is called Jesus Son of Sapius, which could have been the gospel Jesus, if he existed.
	Nobody knows.
	But he does mention some details about this Jesus that do seem to jive with the character.
	But that might just mean that they borrowed that part of the story of this Jesus guy and added it to their Jesus.
	Jesus was a common name.
	Luke copied from Josephus and included a story about some other character called the Egyptian and a few other things.
	Right.
	And of course, the Egyptian, according to the gospel accounts, does tie in with Christ.
	We know he was taken to Egypt, right, when he was a baby.
	And he probably returned there quite a bit.
	And that's probably where he was educated ultimately because the Essenes had a branch secret society in Egypt called the Therapeuche.
	And that's where they sent a lot of students at a young age to go and learn.
	So that's probably where Christ got all of his wisdom from.
	So that he was able to competently debate theology with the Pharisees when he was 12 years old.
	You know, he's in the temple and they're amazed.
	Where did he learn these things?
	Christians would say, oh, well, God taught him.
	You know, knock it off.
	He was well educated, received the finest education money could buy at the time.
	Jesus was not poor.
	Sorry, Christians.
	That's another lie you were sold.
	The gospel accounts clearly reveal that he was well connected.
	He may not have had a place to lay his head of his own.
	He maybe didn't own a house, but he was never without a place to stay everywhere he went.
	And he carried a big treasury bag with him that Judas was constantly dipping into that, we're told.
	No, he was well connected with a lot of supporters.
	Let me read a couple super chats here, and then I got a few other things I want to get to.
	Yeah.
	GT Philadelphia says, awesome work, Adam and Charles.
	Nevertheless, you guys are the best.
	Lisa and Jerry.
	Thank you so much, Lisa.
	Say no to Yahweh says, angel equals messenger equals malak in Hebrew, like Malachi.
	I thought it looked kind of close to Moloch.
	Maybe they would sacrifice to Angel of Death death.
	Thanks.
	Thanks.
	Say no to Yahweh.
	Liam T. Jarrett.
	Charles, have you had any luck with book sales?
	Is writing a book on this futile?
	Hope not.
	Hope not.
	Great work.
	Oh, no, I've had quite a bit of success.
	Not necessarily with sales on Amazon.
	I sold a fair share, but most of the most of the time I'm getting requests.
	I just send it free.
	Anybody wants to email me if you want to read my book ahead?
	It's truthhurts radio at aol.com.
	Spelling hurts, H-E-R-T-Z.
	I'll be happy to send you my not only my book in the Bible.
	I got a book on, it's called The New World Disorder.
	I got a book on 9-11.
	I got a book where I go into my alternative view of ancient history, you know, that the earth suffered a major catastrophe.
	The younger Dryas, it's called, that almost wiped out all life on the planet.
	And it's pretty fascinating.
	It's not a religious or a political book.
	It's just an alternate way of looking at it.
	But it is political in the sense that I think there's been a lot of cover-up.
	There has actually been a lot of cover-up to hide our real history.
	That we had an advanced civilization long ago that was almost wiped out, not just by this natural catastrophe, but our little buddies, the Zios, the elite Jews, have wiped out society significantly in the past too.
	The close of the Bronze Age, I'm going to be doing a presentation on that coming up on my Odyssey channel.
	They did the same thing that they're doing now through the COVID vaccines, wiping out massive amounts.
	We've yet to see the full scope of this too, Adam.
	The worst is yet to come.
	We're going to see.
	Well, the vaccines.
	They're blaming It on COVID, COVID variants.
	People are dying left and right.
	I don't know if you've been noticing, but young people in their 20s, 30s, 40s, healthy on the soccer field, for example, are just dropping dead out of nowhere.
	Every day I have subscribers sending me articles every single day of this kind of thing going on.
	Sudden heart attack, where they had no history of heart trouble.
	They're young.
	They're healthy.
	This is happening at a phenomenal rate, but it's going to get worse because the effects of any vaccine don't really kick in for at least two to three years later.
	So we're only, what, two years into this now?
	By next year, this time, there's going to be a hell of a lot more deaths.
	This is part of their long-hoped for population reduction, right?
	They want to bring the population down significantly.
	They're doing it through this right now.
	In the past, they did it through other means.
	I'm going to be talking about that on a future video.
	The massive ethnic, not ethnic, but the on a global scale, actually.
	Well, it was ethnic in the sense that they killed pretty much every major population on the planet, killed off a huge segment of it.
	You know, the non-Jewish populations, right?
	They targeted China.
	They targeted the Indus Valley.
	They targeted with opium?
	No, no.
	There was, well, they probably, to some degree, that too.
	But mostly these deaths were caused by sicking, you know, the little minions like the sea peoples on cities all across the Levant, wiped them out en masse.
	Archaeological digs have confirmed that, yes, whole cities were wiped out all at once at the close of the Bronze Age.
	And if you read mainstream history books, it's a mystery.
	We don't understand why so much death was being inflicted all at once.
	This is what the Bible describes as the Hebrews going in and wiping out this city and that city.
	You know how Yahweh is commanding them, go and kill the Philistines, kill the Hittites, and blah, blah, blah.
	This is actually what happened.
	It wasn't Philistines armies going in and wiping them out.
	They were using their mercenaries that were working under them.
	In the case of the Levant, the Sea Peoples, right?
	They were the ones doing this.
	They were going on their behalf.
	They were funding all of this.
	They wanted to wipe out or at least significantly reduce the world population, just like what they're working at now.
	In ancient times, the same thing.
	And believe it or not, it went on over here in the Americas, too.
	The Adenas, the Mississippian culture, and the Hopewell culture, all of them were wiped out roughly the same time as all this was going on in all these other parts of the world.
	There was a mass population reduction.
	And I connect it all to them, believe it or not.
	They were active over here.
	A lot of people are unaware of that because they've gone to great lengths to cover this up.
	They don't want you to know this history.
	They don't want you to see that they did this in the past.
	You might start making connections with what's going on today.
	They've been at this for a long time.
	They wiped out the Maya too later on.
	They wiped out the Anasazi.
	There have been archaeological digs that show that all of a sudden out of nowhere, the Anasazi were wiped out.
	They found skeletons loaded with bones with arrows stuck in them, entire fields covered with corpses lying all over the place.
	Just massive battles had taken place that just wiped them out en masse.
	Thousands and thousands of corpses all over the field.
	This is their handiwork.
	This is what they've always done.
	This is how the Hopewell were taken out.
	They have found several areas where Hopewell was just en masse, just completely wiped out.
	This is what went on at the end of the Bronze Age in the Levant.
	It went on in China.
	It went on, again, the Indus Valley.
	I'll be getting into all of this and showing their hand every time.
	Did you know they ran through the Phoenicians?
	They hijacked the Phoenician trade monopoly, right?
	And one of the things the Phoenicians were doing was they guarded the Straits of Gibraltar because that was the only way into the Atlantic from the Mediterranean.
	They guarded it and wouldn't allow anybody to cross because they were afraid if they started venturing out, they would eventually find the little secret haven, the Americas, where they were getting a lot of gold and silver and copper.
	Copper was in big demand.
	It was the Bronze Age.
	They have actually found a lot of copper implements in Europe from the Bronze Age that chemically match copper from the Upper Peninsula in Michigan, right?
	It's the purest copper in the world.
	And, you know, copper has like a fingerprint, right?
	If you look at its chemical makeup, you can tell where it came from.
	You know, every natural source of copper has unique trace elements.
	You know, Michigan has the most pure.
	It has almost no trace elements in it, right?
	It's like 97, 98% copper.
	You don't even have to refine it in a furnace.
	It's already pure, pretty much.
	And so a lot of the bronze was cast with copper in Europe during the Bronze Age from copper that was already almost completely pure.
	And the trace elements that are in that copper match the trace elements in the Michigan copper.
	They found ancient mines in Michigan where they estimate that probably, I forget now, a million tons or half a million tons, I forget.
	But a tremendous amount of copper was removed in ancient times.
	Where did it go?
	The natives hardly used copper at all.
	They only made a few little trinkets that have been found in some burial mounds, but nothing to account for all this missing, you know, millions of tons of copper.
	And the tools that they found in these abandoned ancient mines matched tools that have been found in similar mines over in Europe that the Celts used.
	Well, we know the Celts joined forces with the Phoenicians, right?
	That they had this big extensive trade empire.
	I'm really getting off on a tangent here, but it's fascinating because the Jewish hand was involved there as well.
	There was an epigrapher from Harvard University named Barry Fell.
	He's dead now, but he wrote a series of books back in the 80s and 90s.
	One of them describes a plaque that he found in Wyoming that marked where a trading post was.
	And the plaque, when you translate it, it's written in ancient Ogam inscriptions.
	When you translate it, it says, no usury allowed.
	What is that doing in Wyoming from the Bronze Age, right?
	It was dated to the Bronze Age.
	There was trade going on with copper.
	They actually found copper ingots in the Upper Peninsula shaped in the form of ox hides, which is the shape that was used during the Bronze Age for trade in copper.
	They found an inscription up right over the border in Canada in a town called Peterborough that translates.
	It's also in, well, it's in several languages.
	It's in Libyan.
	The Libyans also worked with the Phoenicians, right?
	But it's also in Ogum.
	And it says stranded here during a trade, copper trade venture or whatever, you know.
	So it's telling that, you know, their ship broke.
	They were waiting for someone else to come and pick them up or whatever.
	They couldn't return with their hoard of copper that they came here for.
	But this all connects.
	This all shows that this was going on.
	Anyway, it's a long story.
	I'm going off into a big tangent here, but the tribe or the Zios, the ancient Zayos, had their hand in the copper trade.
	And then later, when people started turning to iron, it was now discovered how to smelt iron.
	You needed a much higher temperature to melt the iron.
	But once people started figuring out how to do that and that iron was much stronger, they were turning away from copper now.
	And the Jews of the day were furious about this because that's where their bread and butter was.
	Now that everyone's turning to iron instead, they were so furious that they attacked all of these Bronze Age cultures now that were trading in copper because it was ruining their bread and butter.
	You see what I'm saying?
	They wiped them out.
	And even though things did turn over to iron by wiping these cultures out, they stepped forward now and took over the iron market so that these other cultures that were already well established would not be able to, you know, take control of this market.
	They would have been driven out.
	Anyway.
	Okay, a couple more super chats, and then I got some other things to go over with you.
	Odyssey View says, thank you, Adam and Charles.
	Charles has two great channels on Odyssey, Truth Hurts, Radio, and Christendom 2.
	Pagan Bear says, great work, great show, Adam and Charles.
	As soon as I work, I will give you more.
	Thank you, Pagan Bear.
	Liam T. Jarrett, does Charles think Christianity was a Jewish psyop from the world?
	Oh, yes, absolutely.
	No question about it.
	There's precious few, actually, precious few things that have arisen over the past several millennia that haven't been their creation, but definitely Christianity.
	It's got their fingerprints completely all over it.
	No doubt about it.
	I think the Jesus myth idea developed like not all in one instant.
	I think it kind of evolved and progressed over time.
	And I think maybe at the initial stages, they didn't conceive the Jesus suffering Messiah character immediately as, okay, he should be rejected and go to the Gentiles.
	But at some point, they did progress it and add in that it's going to be.
	Well, originally, it was created just to exploit Jews, right?
	They wanted to get them on board with the insurrectionist movement under the cover of a religion.
	But then Paul played a big role in this when he started reaching out to Gentiles and they saw the potential.
	At first, they hated the idea, right?
	We don't want unclean Gentile.
	But then when they saw it.
	Supposedly, that's what we're told, but maybe they really did.
	When the rabbis believe Peter and Paul are like their double secret agents, like right, that's always, yeah.
	I mean, when we talk about them, anything's possible, although they're doublespeak.
	They wanted to convert us to be Noahide, God-fearers.
	That's what they call Gentiles before Christianity.
	God-fearers.
	They wanted you to fear their God because that gives them power and control over you.
	And that's what Christians became.
	He's a good God-fearing man.
	He fears the, he trembles before the God of Israel, Yahweh, that chose in his chosen people.
	You know, that's another thing that poisons the well, too, with a lot of Christians is they think that they're so moral.
	They're really not because they believe that killing babies is okay as long as Yahweh commands it.
	But here's the real problem.
	As a Christian, they believe in doing what's good, you know, living a moral life, right?
	Because A, they're afraid of hell, or B, they desire heaven.
	Usually it's a combination of the two.
	But here's the problem.
	Should they find out down the line that their religion is a fraud?
	Now they've lost all good reason to be moral now.
	A lot of former Christians go off the deep end and become moral reprobates, right?
	Because their reason for doing good things was based on a lie.
	Whereas they should have been taught and should have been conducting themselves to do what's right because it is right.
	Not because they want to go to heaven or they want to avoid hell.
	The Bible actually sets you up to go off the deep end morally once you find out it's a lie.
	I think that's another reason that they have created that religion that way and put fear in people.
	And, you know, your motive for doing what's right should never be a fear of punishment or a desire for a reward.
	The only reward you should ever desire for doing what's right is to put a smile on someone else's face when you're doing something that's going to benefit them as well as you.
	You know what I mean?
	That's where real happiness is.
	It's not in accumulating wealth or pleasing this deity or avoiding the horror that will come from that deity if you don't do what he says.
	It should come from wanting to please others.
	That's really where happiness is.
	But look at the scum that run our world, right?
	The Zios.
	They've always taught us that, oh, no, happiness is grabbing as much as you can as quick as you can.
	Doesn't matter how many people you're going to step on to get ahead.
	That's their philosophy.
	You've accomplished something if you've screwed someone over.
	I really took him for a ride.
	Look what I got now.
	That brings you happiness, you wretch.
	That's not even human, is it?
	These people aren't even human.
	Oh, I think they are.
	I don't give them.
	No, no, no.
	I don't think they have superpowers.
	They're not human.
	I'm not talking the David Icke lizard thing.
	No.
	But they're not human in the sense that they've lost their humanity if they even had it to begin with.
	I think a lot of them have had it ingrained in them that they're better than everyone else from when they were very young.
	So they never really had a conscience to begin with.
	And that's what being human is, right?
	To have a conscience, to actually care about other people.
	So in that sense, no, I don't consider them human.
	They might as well be from another planet.
	They're aliens.
	They don't have human decency, compassion, understanding, consideration.
	I don't even consider them human, even though they actually are, you know, quote, human.
	Okay, a couple more super chats.
	Variety Channel says, out of the Roman and Greek philosophers, who does Charles believe has the best ethical teachings?
	Christians have little chance of dropping their cult without a superior ideology.
	I think the Greeks had a lot going on, actually.
	Well, even the Egyptians before them.
	In fact, you find wisdom in all cultures, I think, can come up with some wisdom.
	Sure.
	Sure.
	And good ethical teachings.
	Right.
	You don't need a holy book, just basic common sense.
	What I just said, if you have the philosophy of trying to make life as best as it can be for you and those around you, if everybody did that, we'd be living in a relative paradise right now.
	But no, our world works the opposite way.
	Screw everybody so just the few at the top can get ahead.
	That's always been the Zio way.
	That's why the world is messed up and will always be messed up as long as they're running it.
	We got to take it back from them.
	It's them or us.
	The Christians that get so angry in the comments, too.
	And it's like, what are you so worried about?
	Like, you're a believer.
	You're a true believer.
	You're going to go to heaven.
	We're going to get ours.
	Our punishment will come.
	It's going to be so bad, worse than anything you can say to me online, any mean thing you want to say or lie you want to make up about me.
	But that's not good enough that they're going to be in heaven and we're going to face the consequences.
	They have to try to take a pacifier from a baby.
	Yeah, but this is the thing is that Christians are taught to be universal, but also individualistic, that they care about personal salvation, not like the, you know, everybody's well-being and a collective national type of redemption.
	But they believe in looking out for themselves and their own personal salvation, their own personal happiness.
	Right.
	Right.
	Let's see.
	Okay.
	Odyssey View says, no, Charles does not think Jesus is real.
	In his recent podcast this past week, he elaborates on it.
	Is that true?
	Yeah.
	You talked about Jesus being a myth in your podcast.
	Right.
	But the way I do my YouTube thing is I just assume that he is because it's just more fun.
	You know, my position is: okay, Christians, you believe Jesus is real?
	Fine.
	Let's look at what Jesus said.
	You can prove that he was a scam artist and not worthy of your belief.
	And if you can get him to that point where they can see that Jesus lied and, you know, said a lot of false things and quoted from pagan sources and claimed that it was from God, once you can get them to see that, then you can start showing them, look, there's no reason to believe he ever even existed.
	We have nothing to go on except this book that you can now clearly see contradicts itself.
	That's all we have to go on.
	Nothing else.
	Nothing.
	Dr. Richard Carrier, who's one of the world's foremost experts on the Jesus myth, he says that he doesn't think that arguing Jesus is a myth is the best way to wake up Christians.
	He thinks it's better to approach it other ways than to argue that he was a myth, actually.
	It's not the best way to wake people up, he says.
	And even him, he leaves the possibility that there could be some kernel of some person and then just completely embellished.
	And still everything else is true.
	They took the scriptures from the Old Testament, but that there was just some person.
	That's true with all the biblical characters.
	In fact, I'm going to be talking about the Hyksos and how the Moses character, he didn't exist, but Akhnaten fits the bill precisely as I'll demonstrate.
	And I think that's what the Moses myth was based on, the real Akhnaten, the real person.
	You can do that with all the biblical characters.
	David matches up with another Egyptian pharaoh.
	I'll be getting into that.
	Solomon matches up with another Egyptian pharaoh.
	So they were just reinventing those stories and acting like they were kings that reigned in, you know, in ancient Judea.
	There was no king that reigned at that time in ancient Judea.
	They just made it up.
	They drew the story from Hyksosian kings, or what I like to call the proto-Hebrews who reigned in Egypt.
	You know, they got Solomon with all this gold, right?
	There's no king that ever reigned there that had a lot of gold.
	There were kings that reigned in Egypt that had a lot of gold, and they got a lot of that gold by stealing it from the Egyptians.
	And that's the story you can even get from the Bible, you know?
	The story of Joseph, all the wealth he accumulated by ripping off the Egyptians and leaving them penniless.
	That happened.
	We can show that that happened.
	Oh, wait.
	Wait till I get to that.
	You're going to love this, Adam.
	I show how there actually was a famine in ancient Egypt, and they created the famine by damming up the Nile upriver.
	And then they wouldn't allow anyone to go near it so they could see what was actually causing the famine.
	The famine didn't happen from a drought.
	It happened from the Nile flooding and destroying all the croplands.
	That was done deliberately.
	I'll be getting into that.
	That's a fascinating discussion.
	So there is some truth to the biblical story of the famine, you know, under Joseph.
	There was somebody called Yosef in ancient Egypt who matches the Joseph character precisely.
	There's another candidate, too.
	I think that the Joseph story was based on actually two different people, just like Jesus was based on several people.
	Like, you know, we were talking before the show about Judas of Gamala or Galilee.
	And then there was Judas Crestus, whose followers were called Christians.
	He was crucified by Pontius Pilate.
	A lot of the details of his story match up with Christ precisely.
	So, you know, we see the same pattern where they made up a character based on real figures, sometimes multiple people, you know, were combined into one character.
	And that's what we see with Moses, David.
	You know, I'm going to be pointing all this out later.
	You can actually show the parallels with the biblical stories to something that really did happen.
	They just twisted it like they always do, don't they?
	They like to give themselves a history that they never had, you know, and make themselves look like victims when they were the victimizers.
	They were in Egypt because they were enslaved.
	No, they were in Egypt as the enslavers.
	Under Hyksos' reign, the Egyptians lived a horrible, depraved, degraded life because they raped their economy, as they've done with every other country they've ever controlled, right?
	They suck it dry, which is why they were thrown out of so many countries in Europe in the Middle Ages, right?
	That's what the Passover story basically is.
	Conquering, convincing that your God is the all-powerful God of the Egyptian gods, you know, aren't real.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Killing all their firstborns because he hardened Pharaoh's heart.
	Here's another question from Andrew Mida.
	I greatly appreciate both of you and your work, Charles.
	Is there any evidence that Israel got its name from combining the gods of Isis, Rarah, El, and Israel equals Israel?
	Thank you.
	Yeah, yeah, I would say so.
	A lot of ancient Hebrew words use that L, you know, Danielle, Ezekiel, L. So it is a compound word.
	El.
	And where did L come from?
	Yeah, like everything else, they stole that too.
	El was the chief god of the Canaanites.
	Yahweh is stolen.
	That was the name of the tribe, the Shasu that, you know, they stole from.
	And Yahweh had a female companion, too.
	Her name was Ashira.
	Ashira is actually used several times in the Old Testament, but the translators disguised it so that you wouldn't catch on that Yahweh originally had this female companion.
	They did mention this female companion, but they've hidden it in the English translations.
	Aleph the Nemesis says, what's Charles think about the arguments of Neanderthal ancestry admixture being one of the major distinctions between Jews and white Europeans?
	Yeah, I actually have a set of notes on that.
	I'll be presenting down the line.
	Yeah, there's pretty good evidence of that, that there were the Neanderthals and the Cro-Magna.
	Are they the Neanderthals?
	It looks that way.
	Yeah.
	I don't say, you know, absolutely definitively, but I present some pretty compelling evidence to show that, yeah, there were these two different groups and they grew out of that group.
	And so, you know, when I say they're not human, obviously they're human.
	But in their modus operandi, going back to very ancient times.
	In the series I have coming up, I don't know, probably in the next month or two, I'll be getting into it.
	I've got a few other things I want to cover first, but I will be talking about this.
	I've managed to trace them back in Egypt, even before the Hyksos occupation, going back to at least 2,500 BC.
	And then even before that, it looks like they were active in ancient Persia going back to about 3000 BC.
	So we're looking at about 5,000 years ago.
	They weren't called Hebrews, but they were the ancestors of, you know, the proto-Hebrews, I guess you could call them, because their modus operandi, the things they were doing, infiltrating the Persian government, leaving the people destitute, and they were hated by the Persians.
	They were called foreigners, invaders from, just like the Egyptians referred to the Hyksos.
	They didn't call them Hyksos.
	That's a Greek word that was used later.
	They called them the Asiatics, right?
	Well, that's what the Persians referred to this same group of people.
	The Asurs is what they were known as.
	But they also said that, you know, they referred to them as Asiatics.
	So they came from the same area.
	When the Hyksos were expelled from Egypt, it said they sent them back from whence they came to Shalem, specifically the city of Shalem, which is the ancient name for Jerusalem.
	Need any more be said on the matter?
	You know.
	So they've been around.
	They've been at this for a long time.
	They're carrying on an age-old game that they've been playing.
	But the reason why Masonry refers to Egypt all the time, they trace their origin back to Egypt, is because that was the first real successful, long-term reign that they enjoyed, where they were able to rule over the Egyptians and suck off of them, live high off the hog while the Egyptians lived in desperate poverty.
	That was the first great success.
	And so that's why Masonry and other secret societies, the Rosicrucians, in fact, the Rosicrucians idolized Akhnaten out of all the Egyptian pharaohs.
	He was the last of the great Hyksosian pharaohs.
	And he's the one who imposed monotheism, right?
	The worship of the one true God.
	All the other gods were banished.
	What does that sound like?
	That's all that's what they've ever done.
	Everywhere they've gone, right?
	They've denounced all the other gods as evil.
	Only our God is the good God.
	Worship our God alone.
	It's interesting that that God that Akhnaten was pushing, Aten, if you transliterate, transliterate Aten into Hebrew, it becomes Aden or Adon.
	And Adonai is one of the names given to Yahweh by the Hebrews.
	Adonai and Aten is the same God.
	In fact, Yahweh is depicted as a sun god in the Old Testament, numerous places.
	It said that he rides his chariot across the heavens.
	Well, that's the solar deity, right?
	And his sun chariot.
	You know, he shines as bright as the sun.
	Glorious is he in the heavens, you know, describing him as a sun figure over and over and over.
	We even have the phrase sun of righteousness mentioned in the book of Malachi.
	And it's not spelled S-O-N, it's S-U-N, sun of righteousness.
	So Yahweh is the sun god.
	That's the one that was advocated by Akhnaten.
	Anyway.
	I'll be getting into that in the future.
	William T. Jarrett says, Christianity as the great melting pot to wipe out Europeans.
	Do you see that, Charles?
	Yeah, and it's done a lot of wiping out over the centuries, hasn't it?
	Look how many people were slaughtered during the Dark Ages with the Inquisition, right?
	Hunted down like dogs if they didn't bow before his Sephardic holiness in the Vatican, right?
	Pope after Pope, most of them were Sephardic Jews.
	And so they didn't care that you rendered obedience to him in the form of a representative of Jesus.
	The fact is, he was a Jew, and they pawned off their God just like they did on the Egyptians under the imagery of a sun deity, but it was still their God, right?
	The name Aten is Adenai.
	The same thing when they ruled over Europe through the Vatican, they were pushing the same God, right?
	In fact, this is interesting.
	Look at a lot of ancient, even modern Catholic art does this too.
	They depict their God, Yahweh, as a sun, as a disk.
	A lot of the saints have that yellow little halo behind their head, either over their head or behind.
	Sometimes it's a halo.
	It still represents the sun.
	Other times it's an actual round yellow globe behind their head.
	It's the freaking sun, right?
	Look at, you don't see this so much now, but traditionally when the mass was performed, the priests would hold up what's called a monstrance.
	And in the center was this round disc, the round wafer, right, in the shape of the sun.
	And then all around it were these radiating brass spokes sticking out.
	That represents the radiating sunbeams, you know, shooting out from this center.
	So what they're telling you is this round wafer is supposed to be Jesus himself, right?
	Transubstantiation means that when you eat this bread, you're literally eating their God because the bread magically is transformed into Jesus.
	It's not just representing him, it is him.
	And so when they would hold it up, the congregation would bow their head in reverence because that's their God.
	It's the sun god.
	The monstrance was this radiating solar disk.
	You know what I'm saying?
	So this is just a resurrection of the old Aknatian Atenistic religion of Adonai or Aden or Aten.
	You can trace a direct line, not only with all these symbols being reused, but you can also trace a direct line genetically going back.
	I'm going to be talking about that too.
	The Hyksos, even though the last great emperor or king of Egypt was Akhnaten, the Hyksos were always there, always influencing.
	Even after they were thrown out, there were still a lot of Hyksos that still lived there.
	They would change their name so they could still influence banking enterprises.
	And Cleopatra was a Hyksos.
	She was a descendant of the Hyksos.
	I'm going to be getting into all of this.
	It's going to take quite a while.
	It's quite a few sets of notes to go through, but it's fascinating.
	It took me a while.
	I was just getting bits and pieces here and there.
	And I'm like, wow, I wonder if there's a connection.
	And the more I would dig, I finally realized, yes, there's been an unbroken line.
	These scoundrels have been running this world non-stop for thousands of years.
	They have created so much Havoc.
	They funded the Babylonians, right?
	The Babylonian Empire, which was succeeded by the Persian Empire, which was succeeded by the Macedonians, and then the Romans.
	All the time they were funding these people.
	They personally funded Alexander the Great.
	Alexander the Great later offered the Jewish bankers that supported him Samaria as a place where they could move to and be tax exempt for the rest of their lives as a reward for funding him.
	But then, all of a sudden, he dies mysteriously at a very young age.
	We're told it was a drunken spree.
	No, no, no, no.
	They killed him because he realized that this empire he built wasn't for himself.
	He was building it for them.
	And when he wasn't going along with the game plan, they offed him.
	They were behind all these world empires.
	These were attempts of theirs to take control of the world for themselves.
	And when it didn't work, they'd sick another empire on them.
	They'd build up another one that would take control.
	Okay, let's see.
	If you're on good behavior now, you know, we'll let you continue on.
	And if they turned against them, bang, they'd build up somebody else, come in and have them take over.
	Our history has been so completely tarnished by these people.
	They've reaped so much havoc.
	They've destroyed so many of our people over the centuries.
	At what point are we going to put our feet down and say never again?
	That's what they say about the phony Holocaust that never happened to them.
	We need to say that about the real Holocausts that have been happening to us.
	This thing, Adam, it goes so freaking deep, man.
	It's way beyond what even a lot of people who think that they're Jew-wise, a lot of people don't have the slightest clue just how bad this thing is.
	It's a monster.
	These people have gotten away with way too much.
	And look what they're doing to us now with the COVID thing, the World Economic Forum.
	They want a global currency, a digital currency.
	You get that going?
	We're done.
	We're done.
	They will be able to exercise totalitarianism on every single person on the planet.
	You don't play ball with them and do what you're told.
	They will shut you out.
	You will have no access to any funds.
	There won't be any physical currency anymore, right?
	They're going to do what they did in 33.
	They're going to ban private ownership of gold.
	So even though you might have some coins stored away, you're not going to be able to spend them.
	The minute you try to do so, you're going to be arrested, right?
	Under FDR, you faced either a $10,000 fine.
	That was a hell of a lot of money back then.
	It's still a pretty good chunk now, but it was like a million dollars back then, right?
	A hundred thousand dollar fine or a 10-year prison sentence or both.
	So everybody out of fear handed in their gold.
	And where did it go?
	Right into their pockets.
	And then you know what the little SOB does later?
	Less than a year later, he devaluates the U.S. dollar by 59% that people traded their gold in for.
	This is what they did to the Egyptians.
	It's what they've done to every other country they've stuck their nose in.
	And it's what they're doing to us right now.
	They're devaluating our dollar.
	They're raising the cost of everything through the roof to deliberately, deliberately collapse the economy, the world economy.
	And when that happens, that's when they're going to introduce their little global digital currency system.
	If they get away with that, there's going to be no escaping from it.
	I played a video the other day of a rabbi talking about how Edom will be destroyed with pestilence.
	He said it over and over again.
	Yes, extermination, pestilence, all the anti-Semites are all going to die in the end.
	Here's another super chat from Liam T. Jared.
	He says, Charles, do you think we know?
	Hold on.
	Do you think we know we who know this can maybe make a new religion to combat this?
	Is man homo religioso, meaning inherently religious?
	Yeah.
	Well, go ahead.
	You know, I'm of the opinion that you don't need a religion.
	I mean, I'm open to the idea that something could have put us here.
	I don't know.
	But quite frankly, it's not of any significance to me because if something put us here, it either doesn't exist anymore or it has no power.
	Either way, it's of no use to us in this world.
	Maybe if there's an afterlife, we'll have the answer someday.
	But for right now, we've got to deal with real issues in a real way.
	So let's concentrate more on fixing this mess and ousting the lies that have held us back for so long, getting rid of the whole system completely and taking control back of our world.
	That's what we need to focus on.
	When we do that, if and when we do that, then we can start working on that.
	But, you know, until then, I really, I don't see any religion at all as being an answer to our problems because you can pray to your telephone pole outside.
	You can pray to Neptune, whatever.
	Pick any God of your choice that's ever been invented.
	None of them are going to do anything for you.
	We have to fix it ourselves.
	The ones who are getting screwed have to take the initiative to fix it.
	If you start calling out for some sky fairy to rescue you, you're doing the same thing the Christians do.
	You're depending and hoping for something that's never going to happen.
	It's not.
	The only time people have ever fixed anything in this world that has gone wrong for them is when they stood up and took initiative to fix it themselves.
	You know, it would be nice, wouldn't it, though?
	If you could call on this heavenly cavalry to come in and, you know, but that's not reality.
	It's not.
	I know.
	What are you going to do?
	Like, what do you need a God for?
	You have to worship something?
	You have to pray to something.
	You have to sacrifice things.
	Like, that's all that you really do with God.
	That's what God does for you.
	So it's like, do you have to have another made-up deity to replace Yahweh?
	I don't think you do.
	Like, the only way that religion would be the answer for humanity would be if the religion was real.
	And I don't see any real religions out there, just man speaking on behalf of God, telling you what he wants.
	I think if God was real, there wouldn't be religions.
	It would be known and it would just be a thing and you wouldn't have to have faith.
	So that's kind of my take on that.
	I thought I turned the volume down on this stupid phone.
	Any entity, supernatural entity that exists, if it's truly loving and worthy of worship, would not accept worship, would not require worship, would not actually reject worship and say, what are you doing?
	Would your father expect you when he comes home at night with tonight's supper?
	Or when you were little kids, would he say, okay, supper's ready, but before you can eat, I want you to bawl before me.
	Is that love, really?
	That's the epitome of arrogance, right?
	You know, narcissism, right?
	No.
	Any God that is desperate for worship doesn't deserve to be worshipped.
	And what kind of deity is just like, oh, I'm so lonely.
	I need to create some people so they can, you know, I can test them if they believe in me and love me or not.
	Like, that is not the way the world is working, That there's some guy, some Abrahamic God testing you on if you believe in Jewish prophets.
	The book of Revelation depicts the heavenly scene of the Redeemed standing around the throne, and it says they will worship God day and night forever and ever.
	Really?
	Is that your view of heaven?
	Is that the kind of God that you look up to?
	The one that is going to expect you to sit around a throne and do nothing.
	You want to live forever so you can do that?
	What the heck?
	How do people not see through that?
	That is so twisted.
	Wow, man.
	No, thanks.
	Here's one I shared today.
	This is from a book I'm reading called Paul the Mythmaker.
	It says the first 10 bishops of the Jerusalem church, as Gibbon pointed out by citing Eusebius, who is a third-century church father historian.
	And Gibbon is history of the decline and the fall of the Roman Empire.
	It's like a big book on Rome.
	It says, the first 10 bishops of the Jerusalem church were all circumcised Jews.
	They kept the Jewish dietary laws and the Jewish Sabbaths and festivals, including the Day of Atonement.
	That's showing that they did not regard the death of Jesus as replacing the Day of Atonement, he says.
	So this is, and this is what the rabbis believe, too.
	They believe that Peter is a secret Jewish agent and he went and he's a rabbi and he went and set up the church in Rome for the benefits, ultimate benefit of the Jews.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Well, I mean, there's actually no evidence that Peter even went to Rome.
	That's kind of like the Catholic Church.
	I agree.
	I agree.
	Yeah.
	In fact, Paul in his epistle to the Romans, he greeted several people by name, but he never mentioned Peter once.
	That's awful, awfully strange.
	But even if Peter went to Rome, we have no evidence that he ever served any high position there.
	In his own epistles, he referred to himself as but an elder, meaning I'm not any high position.
	I'm just an elder, you know.
	So the idea that he was Pope, yeah, no.
	I do, I do agree with you.
	I don't think that he even really set it up.
	That's just what the tradition is.
	Sure.
	Here's a verse I came across today.
	Jesus was teaching in their synagogues and everyone praised him.
	He went to Nazareth where he'd been brought up, and on the Sabbath day, he went into the synagogue as was his custom.
	And he read from the scroll of the prophet Isaiah.
	And so just Jesus, you know, your regular observant attending synagogue, which was his custom.
	He was circumcised on the eighth day according to the traditions.
	He attended the Hanukkah and Passover festivals at the temple.
	Never missed one.
	Yeah.
	And this is what the character that Christians worship.
	They are worshiping the king of the Jews.
	And tell me that's not like a Jewish, Jewish messianism has taken over the world, has conquered the Western world.
	Is that even like a controversial statement?
	Is that not just blatantly true?
	A Jewish cult has taken over the world through Christianity, which is the worship of a sacrificed Jewish Savior.
	Yeah.
	And if it isn't Christianity here, it's Islam in the Middle East.
	They worship Jesus in a way, too.
	They believe he's a Moshiach and a prophet.
	Yeah.
	It's the same book.
	Even though Muslims don't use the Bible, you know, they have the Quran, they still have a profound respect for all the biblical characters.
	And do you know how many times the Quran refers to Israel as the rightful land of the Jews that God gave them?
	In the people of the book.
	Yeah, yeah, right.
	Come on, knock it off.
	The rabbis believe Islam is a perfect Noahideism.
	They're Noahide compliant.
	And that Maimonides says them included with Christianity, they're preparing the world for the messianic age according to God's plan.
	And by the way, it's not just the Christian world, the Muslim world, and the Jewish world.
	Even a lot of non-Abrahamic believers, non-Abrahamic people that aren't even religious, have a profound respect for the Bible, right?
	I know a lot of people that are absolutely as a-religious as you can get, and yet they still think, oh, the Bible's a good book.
	So you can easily see how they're going to be suckered in, too.
	They're going to, if they see some great movement and wow, wow, this is changing world history, they're going to be on board to some degree, you know.
	You have to come to a point where you realize the Bible is not only full of crap.
	You know, this is not just a book of myths.
	It is an extremely dangerous and detestable book.
	That it's God is to be abhorred.
	If you don't hate the Bible, you don't understand it.
	You have to come to the point where you recognize it as absolutely evil, toxic, and literally hate that God.
	I despise the thing.
	I mentioned this years ago when I was doing it.
	He existed.
	Well, yeah, yeah.
	But I still hate what the thing stands for, right?
	The whole, you know, the whole persona of Yahweh is just evil.
	I detest it.
	When I first found out about the Bible being a scam, I pulled out an old Bible that I had from years ago, and I ripped out one page at a time until I was done with the whole book.
	I use it for toilet paper.
	I got a lot of commentary.
	Yeah, there's BPA and ink.
	You're rubbing it all over your.
	Yeah, yeah, I know, I know.
	It still made me feel good, though.
	I had to do it.
	I was just so angry at how deceived I was.
	I went through phases.
	You literally wiped your butt with the Bible.
	That's what you're telling me right now.
	It's the most blasphemous thing I've ever heard, Charles.
	You know, that's the most Christian.
	You're of the devil.
	Knock it off.
	What's worse, wiping your butt with it or rolling it up and smoking weed?
	Now that could be dangerous, you take it in the breathing in the veins.
	I wouldn't recommend that, but it does make good toilet paper, though.
	It's a little thin.
	I don't know.
	I like to fold it over a few times, you know.
	Okay, that's gross.
	Let's listen to Congresswoman Lauren Bober talk about Jesus and Satan.
	And one thing that I love, just an analogy, maybe it's true, maybe it's not, about the second coming of Jesus.
	I've heard stories of people believing that Christians are going to be hiding out in caves and just lockdown.
	Maybe it's a lockdown.
	Maybe it's a government lockdown, but they're shut in and they beg for Jesus to come back.
	He comes back and rescues them.
	I don't think that that's the way it's going to be.
	If the Old Testament is a type and a shadow of the New Testament.
	Can you believe we have sitting Congress people talking like this?
	Like, this is really what's front and center in their mind is Jesus' second coming when Jesus comes back.
	You know, to be honest, though, I really don't think there's any politician out there that really buys it.
	They just know that it's a good way to succor people because a lot of their constituents are into it.
	I'm serious.
	At that Level, I honestly don't think any of them.
	They could just elect people and prop up people that already sincerely believe these things, that literally worship.
	I mean, it could be some, yeah, but my experience is some of both, I think.
	When it comes to religious leaders, I know for a fact a good many of them do.
	Local ministers, maybe, yes, you know what?
	But church leaders, administrators, they know it's a fraud every bit as much as we do, but they know it's very, a very profitable enterprise.
	I mean, look at what Pope Leo X once said: what a great blessing this myth of Christianity has been to us.
	You know, it was a Pope saying that.
	No, I've dealt with enough of them personally to know that that's why a lot of them are so hateful, right?
	They don't believe in any of that crap.
	They're not moral, you know.
	They're just ripping people off and lying to them, scamming them, just like politicians are doing.
	This guy's jackets, leather jacket, too.
	Such a typical youth pastor.
	Look, this guy has here.
	Life is worship.
	Have you heard more of a slavish motto than that?
	Life is worship.
	Yeah, right.
	Life's all about getting down on your knees for the God of Yahweh, the God of Israel.
	He comes back and rescues them.
	I don't think that that's the way it's going to be.
	If the Old Testament is a type and a shadow of the New Testament and you look at the Exodus from Egypt, Pharaoh, he was the one who called for God to get his people.
	He said, get your people out of here.
	And I believe if that type of shadow is true for the New Testament, the church, God's people, will be out in such a great force that Satan himself will call for the second coming of Jesus.
	You say, I cannot do a thing in this earth with your people here.
	You come and get them.
	Come on.
	Isn't that great?
	That is amazing.
	Oh, that's so great.
	Look at this.
	Isn't that great?
	Isn't that great?
	Satan's going to beg God for Jesus to come back.
	Isn't that great?
	What a joke, man.
	And he's like, oh, yeah, whatever.
	Wow.
	Whether they believe what they're saying or not.
	just such crap Do me like Jesus.
	Do me like Jesus.
	He's my friend.
	Oh, do me like Jesus.
	I haven't heard this hymn before.
	Do me like Jesus.
	Do me like Jesus?
	I think so.
	Oh, man.
	That is so twisted.
	You got to be kidding.
	It is good once in a while for karmic relief, if nothing else.
	Look, Satanic is trending.
	Oh, geez.
	Satanic panic, man.
	Does Satanic not just work as God's controlled opposition to scare you into worshiping the God of Israel?
	Oh, pushing you towards Jesus.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Satan is the best friend of Yahweh.
	Brings in most of his converts.
	Of course, I argue that Satan is Yahweh.
	How many people do you know in the Bible that have been murdered by Satan?
	And yet, look how many were murdered by Yahweh, right?
	Directly and indirectly.
	He was either murdering himself personally or commanding others to kill for him.
	There's a book called, I think it's called Stained with Blood.
	It's pretty good.
	You know, it goes through all the lists of people that Yahweh supposedly killed.
	I think it totals to like 20 million.
	And that doesn't include the flood where we're not given a figure, right?
	That's just, if you add all the numbers together, all the people that Yahweh has directly or indirectly killed, it comes out to like 20 million.
	And yet, how many people has the devil killed in the Bible?
	How many has he personally killed?
	None.
	None, not one.
	So will the real devil please stand up?
	Well, the devil's working for God.
	He created him, he allows him to exist.
	Yeah.
	He doesn't destroy him.
	What are they waiting for?
	If God came to conquer death and to die for our sins and defeat the devil, how come he has to come back?
	If he didn't finish the job, he's got to come back for round two.
	Right.
	I just started a series on the doctrine of salvation on my YouTube channel.
	And I pointed out how, according to the official story, when the devil rebelled, Yahweh didn't just kick him out of heaven.
	It says he was cast down to the earth.
	Yahweh sent the devil here.
	And then the devil tempts Eve with a tree or a piece of fruit from a tree that Yahweh placed right there in the middle of the garden.
	Yeah, the devil rules over this earth.
	That's what they believe.
	He rules over the earth.
	That was his punishment.
	Is he got sent here to the one world that we know exists?
	You know, our reality, our planet.
	Our loving God sent the devil to be in charge of everything.
	He sent him here.
	And then he put the tree that the devil used to tempt Eve, knowing in advance, right, that all this was going to happen.
	So I use the illustration.
	If I know a guy wants to kill a bunch of people, he's a psycho mass murderer, and I hand him a loaded gun.
	Am I exempt from guilt when he goes out and kills people?
	I'm just as guilty as he is, right?
	You might even be able to argue that I'm more guilty if I knew in advance that he was going to do this.
	Yahweh gave the gun, right?
	He put the devil here in the first place.
	And then he gives him the gun.
	And somehow it's the devil's fault.
	And it's Eve's fault and Adam for eating the fruit.
	No, it's the psycho that set this whole thing up.
	That's your plan of salvation.
	You want to talk about the Hegelian dialectic, right?
	Where you set up a catastrophe, and then when the catastrophe hits, you step in and say, oh, I've got the solution here.
	Yahweh did that.
	The whole story of the plan of salvation is Yahweh setting up the disaster and then coming along with the solution to the disaster.
	Oh, man, snap out of it, Bible dupes.
	You've been so completely suckered.
	So that's bogus.
	So it is ridiculous.
	Oh, like I said, I hate that book.
	I don't just not believe it.
	I despise the thing.
	There's nothing to like about that book at all.
	Oh, there's a few good things in there, sure.
	You can say the same thing about the Quran.
	How come Bible believers don't love the Quran?
	There's nice things in there, too.
	There's also a lot of crap.
	Well, your Bible has a lot of crap, too.
	So what makes your book any better than theirs and vice versa?
	It's all crap out the window with it.
	And nothing unique too, Adam, right?
	If this book was dropped from the heavens From the all-knowing, all-wise, all-loving God.
	Don't you think that the whole thing would be unique?
	But none of it is.
	None of it.
	Everything was stolen from pre-existing religions, twisted up a little bit, you know.
	But you can see where all of it came from somewhere else.
	It was just rewritten from the Old Testament and based on the Old Testament.
	All you got to do is look in Daniel, Isaiah, Zachariah, Wisdom of Solomon, Psalms, to passages in just a few books, and you could almost read out the complete gospel narrative.
	Right.
	No, but I'm saying even the Old Testament was borrowed from pre-existing religions, right?
	The whole creation story, you've got the same thing with the rib in the epic of Gilgamesh, you know.
	You've got to see even in the original garden, too.
	That's a Greek myth.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	There's a Sumerian tablet that actually shows a man and a woman standing on either side of a tree, and there's a snakehead coming out of the tree behind the woman's ear, like it's whispering in her ear, and they're both holding a fruit in their hand.
	You know, I mean, come on.
	This is thousands of years before the Bible ever came around.
	It's all plagiarism, the whole thing, you know.
	The Babylonian Gilgamesh epic has its, you know, every culture had a flood story, right?
	But theirs is most close to the biblical one.
	So you can see that the Bible copied mostly from Gilgamesh.
	It has the hero Utna Pishtim send out a dove when they're on the boat, you know, to go look and see if there's land and it comes back with an olive branch in its beak, just like the freaking Noah story.
	Wow, man.
	So many parallels, you know.
	Nothing.
	The Jews believe that the nations, the Goyam, were evil unless they worship the God of Israel, the God that chose the Jews and serve them, basically, and be obedient to them and their God.
	And Christians willfully accept this belief that we're born evil and that we're evil if we don't believe in the God of Israel.
	We won't have morals if it's not for the Hebrew Torah.
	This is so degrading.
	This is so cuckolding.
	Not only are we naturally evil, right?
	And that all our righteousness is as filthy rags.
	Our every attempt to do anything good is bad automatically in God's eyes, right?
	The one who is the mass murderer in the Bible, the child murderer, right?
	Is telling us that our actions are all evil.
	But it goes worse than that.
	It's not just that we as grown adults are evil.
	We were evil, not just from the womb.
	We were evil from before we were born.
	Not just as babies, as fetuses, right?
	David says, before I was conceived, I mean, Esau was evil in the womb.
	Huh?
	Esau represents the Gentiles.
	Jacob is the Jews.
	And Esau was born evil in the womb.
	Oh, yeah.
	Yeah.
	Yahweh hated him before he was even born.
	Right, right.
	Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.
	When in fact, Jacob was the friggin' scumbag.
	Esau was the decent one who was truthful, right?
	And that's Paul uses that to prove the point that God shows mercy to whom he will have mercy.
	Yeah, the Gentiles.
	He likens the Gentiles to Esau in that verse.
	Exactly.
	Right.
	Oh, yeah.
	Yeah.
	But the whole idea is that does it really matter how you live your life, whether you're a good person and you actually have faith in Jesus?
	It really doesn't matter if God has chosen to not have mercy on you, right?
	Ultimately, your choice doesn't matter.
	Your actions don't matter.
	It's what Yahweh chooses.
	If he hated you from birth, you're screwed.
	No matter how many good works you did in God's name and had faith in Jesus and his shed blood for you.
	You're going to be lost if he chose you to be lost, just like he did with Esau.
	Unbelievable, man.
	Wow.
	The New Testament says that the only unforgivable sin is one who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit.
	So saying that the Jewish Holy Ghost isn't real or is nonsense is worse than abusing children or mass murder or, you know, I love that one.
	That's why all you have to do is not believe in the unbelievable Bible.
	And you are just as evil as a mass murderer, a rapist, you know, a thief.
	You're going to share the same fate when all you're guilty of, according to Yahweh, is, hey, I can't believe in that book.
	It's full of crap.
	That's it.
	You're lost now.
	You might as well have been a murderer your whole life.
	Get the hell out of here.
	This is crap.
	And every day on Twitter, I see the argument, Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life.
	Like, oh, the Jewish book says that it's the truth because it's the truth.
	It's like, oh, that's all it does to convince you that something's true.
	When in fact, what truth is in there, actually?
	It's so full of crap, man.
	Everything, everything.
	Even the good stuff, if you look at it closely, it's not so good, right?
	Jesus is said to have been an advocate of child rights because he said, anyone who hurts one of these little ones, it'll be better if he had a millstone.
	Yeah, millstone around the neck.
	Tied around his neck and thrown into the.
	But if you look at the context of that, he's not advocating child rights across the board.
	He actually says, if anyone hurts any of these little ones who do not believe in me.
	So he was only concerned about the children that believed in him.
	The rest of them, he didn't care.
	Sickening, man.
	A few more super chats and then we'll wrap it up here.
	We're over what I told him we'd go.
	Yeah.
	Lisa, GT Philadelphia says, well said, Charles.
	Sentinel says, true.
	Thank you.
	My channel says Charles should be a history teacher in school.
	Liam T. Jarrett said, if Charles could play us a tune, that'd be great.
	Gathered requests from poor people who can't tip for some play us a tune.
	Oh, I think they're talking about my guitar in the background.
	Oh, you got a guitar behind you?
	No, we don't have time for that.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	We're not going to have an impromptu concert.
	Maybe I'll do that in one of my videos or something.
	Yeah.
	Sing us a Bible hymn on the guitar.
	Hallelujah.
	Oh, I used to play him.
	I used to play him.
	Change your filter says, Yahweh planting and funding criminals since Genesis.
	Planting and funding criminals since Genesis.
	That's true.
	All right.
	I think that's all we have for tonight.
	I don't want to go too long.
	We'll have to have Charles back on again soon.
	Everybody, if you're not following him, Odyssey.
	Truth Hurts Radio, spelled right there.
	And on YouTube at Christendom, spelled with a dumb.
	Spelled the correct way, the correct spelling and pronunciation.
	All right.
	Any final words before we close out?
	No, just that if I lost anybody with my long diatribe on the Bronze Age thing, I'm going to be getting into that in exquisite detail coming up in the next month or two.
	And it's going to take a while to get through it all, but I will thoroughly document all of this.
	And you'll see why I said that if it didn't make sense yet.
	But they did have their hand.
	Sorry, all right.
	Thank you, Charles, for coming on.
	Thanks, everybody, for the donations tonight and the support.
	Look forward to seeing what you guys have to say in the comments.
	Coming up this week on Thursday, I have the Jew function, the Kabbalah's from Jew Function.
	Two of them are coming on in the morning, and then at night, I have a debate with a Protestant Christian on the Crucible.
	And so it's going to be a busy Thursday this week.
	So, love you all.
	Hope you guys all have a nice night.

▲