All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 23, 2022 - Know More News - Adam Green
01:29:19
Who Really Killed JFK & Why - Laurent Guyenot | Know More News LIVE w/ Adam Green
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to No More News.
I am your host, Adam Green.
Thank you so much for joining me today, Tuesday, November 22nd, 2022.
Today is the 59th anniversary of the assassination of JFK.
And it is my honor to have joining me, author from France, Laurent Guyoneau.
He has been on many times before.
And he is going to be discussing his book that he put out last year, The Unspoken Kennedy Truth.
We're going to be talking about who really killed JFK and why.
Laurent has been on several times.
He was on recently on the anniversary of 9-11 to discuss his new documentary.
He was on a few times, also discuss his books, Our God is Your God Too, but He Has Chosen Us, as well as his other fine book, Yahweh to Zion.
Happy to have him here.
Laurent, thanks for being here.
How have you been doing?
Well, thank you very much.
It's my pleasure to be here.
And I've been doing, well, I've been doing fine in one sense.
I have now a lot of time because I've been pushed out of my job.
So I have a lot of time, but much less money.
I'm sorry to hear that.
What were you doing?
And was it because of your work you got pushed out?
Because of your side job on the internet, I should say?
Yeah, I was an English teacher.
I was teaching English to high school students.
So, yeah, I enjoyed it very much.
I could try to talk to them a little bit about 9-11, the Kennedys, whatever.
I had a lot of subjects which they enjoy too.
Well, I'm not complaining.
I feel I did my best to educate students.
The great thing about being an English teacher is you can teach them English while speaking about almost any subject.
So it's, yeah, so I've been pushed out.
So how did you get pushed out?
This is, and I'm sorry to hear it.
Was it students complaining?
Was it Jewish groups knew who you were and pressured the school?
What happened there?
Well, I don't know exactly.
I really don't know exactly, but, you know, some time came from above some kind of instruction to my school saying, well, Laurent Guilhainaut cannot really… So I understand the problem, but it's not my fault, you know.
Well, I'm sure you were an excellent English teacher to your French students because your books are so impressive.
This book is only a few chapters, just over 100 pages, but so powerful, so well written, no fluff, straight to the point, full of pertinent, important information and excellently written.
I highly suggest everybody pick this up.
The link is below in the description where you can get it.
It's very inexpensive as well.
Also, you have documentary out about this as well.
You put it out two years ago now.
You know, I've been dropping the ball.
I've wanted to have you on for JFK for a few years.
And I would have missed it this year too.
I wasn't even aware it was coming up until you sent me that.
You were kind enough to send me the book and tell me and email me and say, hey, you want to do a show?
And of course, I jumped at the opportunity.
So why don't you tell us who really killed JFK and what were the reasons in your research?
Okay, well, thanks for what you said about my book.
I really appreciate it.
I try to do something short and to the point.
And I dedicated it to Michael Collins Piper because he really pioneered this line of inquiry.
But Piper's book was really thick, really big.
And I tried to get to the main points, not to get into any, not to get sidetracked and to condense the main dots that can be connected to draw a clear picture of what happened.
And also it's a book not about JFK only, as you saw.
It's about Bobby Kennedy.
It's about John Kennedy's son.
And the father, LBJ, of course.
I have a chapter on the father because, you know, the Kennedys are really a dynasty.
And the question finally, I came to realize not only who killed John Kennedy, but who killed the Kennedy dynasty, in a sense.
Because, you know, the father Joe really had in mind to build a dynasty.
He had this crazy idea that John could be president.
There's no clear statement from him, but it appears that he even imagined maybe Bobby could be president in 1968 after eight years of John.
And then why not Ted Kennedy?
So it was a whole dynasty.
And if you tie up this with the son, John Jr., then you get a really much bigger picture than the story of John Kennedy.
To go back to you.
Go ahead.
Continue.
Well, you asked me who killed John Kennedy, so I can elaborate on that.
First, I think the best is to consider there are three main theories, serious theories.
Of course, there are all kinds of crazy theories like the mafia killed Kennedy or whatever.
But if you consider the most serious theories, I think you can come down to three theories.
The first, the most classic one in what I would say mainstream conspiracy literature would be the CIA and the Pentagon killed Kennedy because he wanted to end the Cold War, because he wanted to make friends with Castro, because he messed up the Bay of Pig invasion, and so on and so on.
And so he fired Alan Dulles from the CIA and Alan Dulles took his revenge and then it was in the Warren Commission report.
So there is a whole lot of arguments to say, well, basically the CIA killed Kennedy.
Of course, not the CIA as an organization, but a kind of a rogue network within the CIA.
And that's the theory of James Douglas.
I think James Douglas did the best work to argue for that theory.
And then another theory which I first discovered from Philip Nelson's book, LBJ, the mastermind in Kennedy's assassination.
The mastermind is JFK's assassination.
And the theory that Lyndon Johnson killed, was a mastermind in killing John Kennedy is also very old, just like the CIA theory, you know, from the 1964, 67.
Even from the very beginning, especially in Texas, where people knew a bit, you know, Lyndon Johnson's profile and heard about how many people he had killed, he had ordered, killed in his life.
But Philip Nelson did a really great job to show that most probably he was the key person, at least to make sure that no investigation would lead anywhere.
And from the very first day, from the very afternoon of November 22, he was the man who called himself Dallas police.
The FBI, of course, he was friend with Edgar Hoover, so that they made sure that no investigation would go nowhere else than the lone nut theory.
They were the key person to do that.
And maybe we'll get into that later, but the way they did that was very simple.
They used the legend of Oswald as a communist agent to say everywhere around, look, if we investigate, we're going to come up with a communist conspiracy and we're going to end up in a new world war with nuclear weapons and 40 million Americans will die.
So my order are close investigation.
You know, we don't care about the truth.
We have to prevent a world war.
That was the way, you know, Lyndon Johnson kind of impressed and forced everybody to go along with the lone nut theory, which even Americans did not really believe, but they kind of got the message that maybe it's not true, but it's better to go this way, otherwise we might end up in a nuclear war.
So anyway, that's the second theory, Lyndon Johnson.
And then the third theory, which was pioneered by Michael Collins Piper, basically, is that Israel killed Kennedy.
So when we say Israel, we mean the Israeli leadership under the leadership of David Ben-Gurion, of course, with, of course, the tens of thousands of Sionim that they have in the United States, including the Jewish mafia led by Mayor Lensky, of which Jack Ruby was a member, basically.
So this, I focused on that theory.
And I think that's, I'm not saying all other, all three theories have part of the truth, you know.
But strangely, most authors focus on only one aspect.
And James Douglas, for example, whose book is really a bestseller, it's a great book, a great book about Kennedy.
But strangely, for example, he focuses on Kennedy's determination to disarm the world of nuclear weapons.
But he never mentions that Kennedy's biggest problem in that issue was with Israel, Israel's determination to get the nuclear weapon.
And today we have so much documentation.
We have all the letters exchanged between Ben-Gurion and Kennedy about the Daimona nuclear plant.
And if you read those letters, you get the sense of this incredible tension.
Because for Ben-Gurion, this was a matter of life and death for Israel.
He wrote to Kennedy, my country has a right to exist.
If we don't have a nuclear weapon, how are we going to keep all these Arab countries from pushing us back to the sea?
And from Kennedy's viewpoint, it was also non-negotiable because he was determined to stop nuclear proliferation.
So anyway, Piper focused on the Daimona issue, but there are other issues.
Maybe we'll get into it.
I wrote about the pro-Arab policy of Kennedy in my latest UNS article.
He wanted the right of return for Palestinians.
Yeah, he wanted the right of return for Palestinians.
And he was conducting a very pro-Arab policy.
He supported, even before he became president, he made incredibly courageous speeches supporting Arab nationalism and decolonization.
And so he was and the biggest threat, I think, I came to this conclusion that Dimona was one aspect.
It was the most urgent thing because he was pushing, Kennedy was pushing for inspection.
And if there was some serious inspection of the Dimona plant, then they would have found out that Israel had been lying all along.
Well, he knew Israel was lying also.
I saw the quotes in the book.
He knew they were lying to him.
Yeah, he knew, yeah, but he needed the proof.
So that was very urgent.
But Kennedy's pro-Israel, pro-Nasser policy was also very dangerous because Khrushchev, you know, the USSR was also pro-Nasser, pro-Arab, because they were supporting, you know, they were anti-colonialists.
So, of course, they were.
And Nasser was trying to keep a balance between getting weapons from the Russians, the Soviets, because Americans would not sell him weapons, so he had to get them somewhere.
And he was trying to keep a balance.
And Kennedy was very friendly with him.
Kennedy sent him, I think, about 10 letters in the first three months of his presidency, which was enormous.
That means, you know, this subject was very present in his mind.
And, you know, if Kennedy and Khrushchev, who were moving towards disarmament, who were moving towards detente, if they both were friendly to the Arab world, you know, what would happen to Israel?
You know, Israel would suddenly not be very important, neither for America nor for USSR.
And so they would have to go back to their minimum, you know, to the partition plan, which they never really accepted.
I see the excellent researcher and content creator Expose the Enemy is in the comments.
And he says that Israel allowed inspections, but that they had, and you write about this in your book, they set up decoys with computers and fake dials to trick the inspectors, and it actually worked.
Yeah, that was, I think, in 1962.
There was the first inspection, or even maybe 1962.
The inspectors, or even maybe before, the inspectors were fooled.
But then later on, I think it was early 1963, then news came back about, you know, from photograph, from satellite, or spy planes, whatever.
They realized something else was still going on.
So then Kennedy, that became a priority for Kennedy again.
And then he again asked for bi-annual inspections twice a year regularly, starting next month.
He wrote his last letter, I believe, to David Ben-Gurion.
And there is one very strange thing that happened when he wrote after a series of letters.
And Ben-Gurion would never answer about Dimona.
Ben-Gurion would always answer, well, you know, Nasser is a Nazi.
He wants to invade us.
He wants to do to us exactly like Hitler did to the Jews.
And my country has a right to defend itself and so on.
But he would never.
So Kennedy got a little bit hot and finally wrote him a couple of letters.
Look, you know, I want inspections starting next month.
And then when the last letter, in which Kennedy even threatened Israel, you know, very strongly, I forgot the exact words.
He gave him an ultimatum, right?
Yeah, exactly.
He gave them an ultimate.
Then the next day, that means just before receiving that letter, Ben-Gurion resigned for no known reason, except he said for personal reasons.
Nobody knows exactly why he resigned, but there is a strong suspicion that he resigned in order not to receive the letter because he never wanted to answer.
And also perhaps, and that's a theory that Colonel Kadhafi has actually expressed publicly, in order to kind of dive underground and deal with Kennedy from a different level and kind of orchestrate the killing of Kennedy.
Maybe that's a little bit too simplistic way to look at it, but I think that's pretty much...
And he said that everybody wanted to kill them and that they would have to use their brains, their big Ashkenazi brains.
They didn't say that, but their big brains to create weapons to defend themselves.
Yeah, yeah, there's a very strong.
That was a couple of months or one month after he resigned, which was he did not say it clearly, but it was clear enough that Jewish brains can build the atomic bomb.
So yeah, it was so that was probably at least that's a very clear motive.
And if you add to this, as I said, Kennedy demanding the application of Resolution 194 of the United Nations for the return of Kennedy was very serious about this, actually.
And then there's another thing we can add to that is that Robert Kennedy, who was John's Attorney General, had initiated a procedure to force the American Zionist Council to register as foreign agent.
And he was insisting, sending letter after letter.
And the lawyers of the American Zionist Council were always saying, well, we need more time.
It's very complicated.
And registering as foreign agent means absolute transparency and big limitations to the amount of money they can use to corrupt politicians.
And Kennedy actually had determined to do that even before he became president, because when he was campaigning, he realized how much they control political campaigns through their money.
There's a lot of testimonies for that.
And that was quite a serious threat also to the power of Israel within the United States.
If you think about how APAC today is controlling American politics, because the American Zionist Council kind of disappeared, but it was kind of replaced by APAC, basically.
Right.
APAC is the continuation.
The American-Israeli Political Action Committee was the lobbying arm of the Zionist American Council.
And it's unsurprising that they should Be registered as a foreign agent, if not worse, prohibited from the country for the things they were doing.
There was a lot of government pushback on them in the early days, and they did some really sketchy stuff, forging paperwork and stuff and lying about things in order to try to get approval for their lobbying arms.
But it's interesting that it used to be called the Zionist Alliance or Zionist Council.
Also, can you comment a little bit about some of the disinfo theories that they have out there as well and the people that were promoting them?
Because almost everybody does believe in some type of JFK conspiracy, but there's stuff from like Mark Lane and Oliver Stone.
Can you touch on that a bit for us?
Well, yeah, when I first got into Kennedy, you know, Kennedy research, like everybody, you know, I, of course, the first thing you come up with is the idea that it was a CIA plot.
I mean, that's the most traveled road, you know, compared to the least traveled road of Michael Collins Piper.
But then, you know, little by little, you, you, at least what I started to realize is first, you know, you read a lot of the motives, you know, the CIA had motives to kill Kennedy, okay.
But, you know, the real evidence that they did something about it is very thin in reality.
I mean, if I ask you what evidence is there that the CIA killed Kennedy, then you start to scratch your head and you think, well, everybody knows the CIA killed Kennedy, you know, but when you try to get the real arguments, you realize there's not so many.
And another thing is when you most researchers who have probed that trail finally end up at the front door of James Jesus Anglerton.
That's the one name in the CIA that everybody finally comes up with.
Because you say the CIA killed Kennedy, doesn't make any sense.
Who in the CIA killed Kennedy?
Certainly not John McCone, the director of the CIA, who was put there by Kennedy to replace Alan Dulles.
So it's not the CIA, it's somebody in the CIA.
So who?
And finally, everybody ends up talking about James Jesus Anglo-because there is evidence that he fabricated the profile of Lee R. V. Oswald as a communist agent, which, as I said, was very useful for Johnson to force everybody to give up investigating.
But who was James Jesus Anglo-Man?
Well, you know, the few books that had been written about him were quite didn't talk so much about his Israeli connection.
But the latest book written by Jefferson Morley called The Ghost, it's a very important book because it details very strongly that James Jesus Anglerton was not only the head of the counter counter-espionage branch, but he was also the head of the Israel desk at the CIA.
And he was the exclusive liaison with the Mossad.
And he had many friends at the Mossad.
He was adored by the Mossad, who built two monuments for him after he died.
He went to Israel quite a lot.
And he was a very strange guy.
He was a paranoid man, really unstable.
There he is.
Yeah, he was, I think, a very easy man to manipulate.
Because in his paranoid mind, the Mossad had convinced him, because he was basically a paranoid anti-communist.
And the Mossad had convinced him that the only way to spy the communist was through the Mossad.
because the Mossad, of course, had many contact with Soviet Jews or former Soviet Jews.
And so he got this idea that...
That's true.
They do, yeah.
But, you know, there's a lot of evidence that he was, he became really So, you know.
When he died, didn't you have a quote in the book that when he died, like, they had some, Israel honored him as like one of the greatest friends to Israel or something along those lines?
Yeah, there was a ceremony, a little bit discreet ceremony, really, but there was a ceremony involving different Mossad heads honoring him as a great friend.
So there you are, you know, the CIA, who in the CIA?
England?
Was he really CIA or was he Mossad?
So finally, you end up connecting to the CIA.
And then another thing about you were mentioning the kind of controlled opposition type of research.
When you research and you read, for example, the most typical book, I think, is James Douglas' book, because it's the bestseller today on the CIA theory.
Following up on Mark Lane's.
Mark Lane was the first, I think, with Rush to Judgment.
I think it was 1965 or something.
And what's Mark Lane's real name?
And of course, yeah, Mark Lane is Mark Levin.
I mean, he was born in Lebanon.
He's Jewish.
He worked for, what was that publishing company that we worked for?
Wasn't Michael Collins Piper associated with that and then said Mark Lane was covering it up?
Well, no, it's a complicated story.
The connection between Michael Collins Piper and Mark Lane is rather complicated.
I think the, what's the name of this journal, the American… Is it American Free Press or it's… Exactly.
The American Free Press got a court case because they were attacked in court by...
Thank you, Expose the Enemy.
John Swin.
He's all over it.
I just heard, John, that you have some videos out about this.
I'll have to check them out.
I hadn't seen those yet.
Should have sent them to me.
Sorry, continue.
Yeah.
And anyway, it's a complicated story.
I don't know the details, but Mark Lane kind of became, defended the Liberty Lobby against, oh, I forgot the name of this CIA agent.
I don't think it's in your book, but Jim Mars is another one that comes to mind.
Jim Mars was one of the top JFK quote-unquote conspiracy theorists.
And he writes books like that the Nazis are behind everything, like the Fourth Reich and stuff.
And I don't know if he ever, I doubt that he got into any Mossad connections.
He probably took it to the CIA and stopped there and didn't follow it all the way like Michael Collins Piper did.
Yeah, there's Jim Morris.
I forgot if I think I read his book, but his theory about Kennedy was killed because he wanted to end the Federal Reserve.
You hear that all the time.
Yeah, you hear that all the time, and there's no substantial evidence.
You know, it all goes down, boils down to one executive order Kennedy wrote to make a silver certificate, you know, those famous.
But there's no evidence that it was any threat at all to the Federal Reserve.
And in fact, this executive order was not cancelled after Kennedy.
I think it ran until 1980.
So that's pretty much bullshit.
And you have also, yeah, you have quite a few authors who blame the Nazi, as you said, and including the Bush.
There is one guy, I forgot his name.
He made a few films, very cheap films with a lot of cartoons.
I forgot the names of them.
And he basically blames Bush.
And of course, they put out this picture, this photo where there's some guy looking like George Bush Sr.
And Bush actually wasn't the Zionist that most people assume that he was.
No, not at all.
I think.
So that's why, you know, I went through all this.
I digested all this.
And after some time, I felt there's something strange, you know, and there's something missing.
And if you read James Douglas' book, it's so obvious what is missing because James Douglas wrote a wonderful book.
It's a wonderful portrait of Kennedy as a man who was fighting against the military-industrial complex.
And he missioned the United Nations to abolish weapons of mass destruction.
He wanted to absolutely get rid of nuclear weapons.
There's many speeches about him to the United Nations, his peace speech in June 1963, and so on and so on.
But then, as I said, I think already, James Douglas never ever mentioned that Kennedy's biggest problem on that issue was with Israel.
So what's going on?
How is it possible?
I actually corresponded with James Douglas a little bit.
I asked him, what do you think?
Why don't you mention Israel?
Well, he never answered clearly.
He just said, oh, I don't see any evidence there.
So I didn't think it's important.
Did you ask him if he read Piper's book?
Yeah, I think I did.
I forgot exactly.
I also asked him because in James Douglas' theory, which is basically the standard CIA-did-it theory, you know, same as Mark Lane, the same as many most prominent researchers, there's two things missing because James Douglas says, well, they killed Kennedy because Kennedy did not want to invade Cuba.
Oh, yeah, but they killed Kennedy and we didn't invade Cuba.
So what's going on?
So the answer of James Douglas is, yeah, that's because of Lyndon Johnson, because Lyndon Johnson was such a great man that, well, he could not expose the killers of Kennedy, of his beloved president, but at least he prevented the second part of the plot, which was to invade Cuba.
And that doesn't make any sense at all because Lyndon Johnson's fingerprints are all over the place in Kennedy.
So the idea that he prevented the military-industrial complex, he could not prevent the military-industrial complex from killing Kennedy, but he prevented the military-industrial complex from invading Cuba.
And to satisfy them, he gave them Vietnam instead.
I mean, doesn't hold up.
There's something missing.
I thought it was very interesting, too, how Israel's intelligence operations fit with assassinations.
They're well known for assassinating Arab leaders all over.
They're well known for posing as Muslims to blow up the King David Hotel or the Levant Affair or all of these different things.
And then there's the interesting part of Sirhan Sirhan, who is the supposed assassin of Kennedy's brother, and how there are so many Zionists trying, Dershowitz, one of them, trying to make the connection between Sirhan Sirhan and 9-11.
That's a big red flag to me.
It is, absolutely.
I mean, the assassination of Bobby Kennedy is very complicated.
Maybe we should not get into the details.
But basically, what we can say is at least many people don't believe anymore that Siran Siran actually killed Kennedy.
Even Robert Kennedy's son, Robert Kennedy Jr., already for more than 10 years have been claiming he does not believe his father was killed by Siran Siran.
He's trying to reopen the case against Siran and to get him out of jail.
And he used a lot of, you know, he hired lawyers and so on.
So then the question becomes, who had interest to create the narrative that Robert Kennedy was killed by a Palestinian who hated Robert Kennedy because Robert Kennedy was pro-Israel?
You know, well, the answer is simple.
And the second question is, does that narrative make any sense?
Was Robert Kennedy pro-Israel?
Of course not.
Robert Kennedy was trying to force the American Zionist Council to register as foreign agent.
Robert Kennedy, when he was campaigning in 1968, maybe he did a few nice things about Israel because he needed money like everybody does, but that's about it.
So, you know, in my book, I start with Robert Kennedy's assassination because I think it's a good way to introduce the John Kennedy assassination because we know, and this has been proven by David Talbot in his book Brothers, a very important book, where he documents very clearly that Robert Kennedy did not believe in the Warren Commission report.
And Robert Kennedy intended to reopen the investigation if he had reached the White House.
So, you know, the logic tells us that the two assassinations are connected.
And then if those who killed Kennedy surely did not want Robert Kennedy to reopen the investigation that they had, you know, covered up.
So then the next question becomes, if Robert Kennedy had managed to create a new commission, a new genuine investigation, what would he have discovered?
So those two, of course, and in fact, it's true, it's quite strange.
I forgot who made this remark, but there's a lot of books and articles about John Kennedy's assassinations.
And there are books and articles about Robert Kennedy's assassinations.
But somehow, very rarely the two assassinations are connected, except under the stupid and fallacious idea of a curse, the Kennedy curse, which is of course a smokescreen.
The question is, how are they connected?
They're not connected by some kind of magic curse.
They're connected in a very different way.
And the question is, how are they connected?
That's how I started to realize that we have to look at not at only John Kennedy, and in fact, not only at Robert Kennedy either, but at the son, John Kennedy Jr.
We have to look, of course, I didn't have a chapter, I don't have a chapter on Ted Kennedy, but of course, you know, what happened to him at the Chippequidic incident in 1960, when was that, 66 or 7, I forgot.
You know, it's all connected.
And that's what's fascinating about it, that, you know, it's really a big story.
It's the killing not of a man, not of two men, but of a whole dynasty, a dynasty that had incredible potential.
Even John Kennedy Jr. in 1999, his potential for his charisma, the magic power of his name was so incredible, and he was actually a smart man.
So I got fascinated by trying to connect all these things.
And it's amazing where you outline in your book, like every aspect of this, everywhere you look, there just happens to be, you know, a Zionist here, somebody connected to Beni Bereth and the Jewish community there, you know, the Israelis saying this.
It really paints a very clear picture.
It does, yeah.
And then, of course, the big question, as you said, is you really feel there is a very strong Jewish push to prevent Israel's name to ever come up in any kind of public discussion about any of the Kennedys.
And when you dig a little bit, you see Israel's fingerprints everywhere.
So you start to realize, you know, there is, you know, they killed Kennedy, they killed the memory of Kennedy, because you realize also all this, there is a whole industry of books trying to destroy the reputation of Kennedy, John Kennedy.
I mean, you know, you know, so many books about John Kennedy and Marilyn Monroe, you know, John Kennedy's women, whatever, John Kennedy, Joe Kennedy and the mafia who stole the elections, and, you know, Joe Kennedy made his fortune by, you know, all these kinds of things when you dig a little bit, bootlegging, and when you dig a little bit, you realize there's nothing.
Well, I mean, you know, they're not saints.
Even Joe Kennedy surely made money.
You know, I mean, he made money at a time where it was easy to make, there were no rules.
So he made money like everybody else at that time.
But basically, I started to realize there's a lot of dirt constantly thrown at the Kennedys to destroy their legacy.
And the more I started to be able to filter all that, the more I started to realize John Kennedy was actually a great man.
He was a great president.
Of course, he, you know, if we look at it from 60 years, we can criticize him on this and that.
But he was a really courageous man, especially in regard to his determination not to be impressed and bought by Israel in particular.
Don't they call the Kennedys Nazis also?
They use that, sir.
They say he was addicted to drugs as well.
I see people saying in the chat.
Yeah, sure.
Well, I mean, quite often, even John Kennedy has been reproached about his father, and that's why it's also interesting to get into the father, because the father was an appeaser, you know, and the word appeaser means he wanted to avoid World War II.
He was ambassador in London in 1930, from 1935, I think, to 1938.
He was a great friend of Neuville Chamberlain, the prime minister who, before Churchill, who tried his best to avoid World War II, to appease Hitler, in a sense.
That's why they are called appeasers.
And if you study a little bit World War II, you realize, I mean, they were warmongers or appeasers.
So Roosevelt did a lot of communicate with Churchill.
The biggest warmonger, of course, was Churchill, but Churchill managed to get Roosevelt into the war.
And Joe Kennedy was, of course, loyal to Roosevelt because he was a Democrat and he was put in his position by Roosevelt.
But he really was at the point almost in 1938, 1940.
Oh, yeah, he came back in 1940 to denounce Roosevelt's illegal communication with Churchill.
They were discussing how can we bring the United States into the war.
And Joe Kennedy knew all about this.
But anyway, somehow he supported Roosevelt in 1940.
But basically, constantly, John Kennedy has been accused to be an appeaser like his father.
And in fact, in reality, John Kennedy was an appeaser.
He was a peacemaker.
He wanted to avoid a new war.
That was his most important goal in life, to end the Cold War and to avoid a new nuclear war.
And what happened during the Cuban missile crisis really showed him how close the World War was to nuclear Holocaust.
So he made it his priority to disarm the world and to end the Cold War.
So he was constantly reproached by the top brass of the Pentagon that, well, he was just an appeaser like his father.
And the word appeaser is almost like saying a Nazi, a pro-Nazi.
Actually, Johnson himself tried to destabilize him during the campaign by saying, you know, at least my father was not a pro-Nazi.
This kind of remark he constantly received.
And the funny thing is that actually John Kennedy, in fact, was very loyal to his father.
And his father's philosophy, that's why I got interested in Neville Chamberlain and the World War II, because I realized basically Joe Kennedy was doing the best he could.
He was doing what was right, trying to prevent the war.
And John Kennedy was basically, his political philosophy was, you know, inherited from his father.
And there was one detail, for example, that I think is very representative: in 1962, John Kennedy invited in the White House publicly a banquet at the presidential table and to sleep at the White House Charles Lindbergh.
And Charles Lindbergh, you know, had been demonized because he also, just like his father, just like Joe Kennedy, had been trying to avoid World War II and saying publicly, you know, there are three, he made this famous speech that destroyed his reputation.
He said, there are three forces that push us into the war.
There is Roosevelt, there is the military-industrial complex.
He didn't call it that way, but anyway, he meant, you know, and the Jews.
And the next day, there was the end of it.
You know, Charles Lindbergh was a great hero.
He crossed the Atlantic youth.
And from one day to the next, he became a Nazi.
And can you imagine John Kennedy invited him in the White House publicly in 1962?
And to me, it's very telling because together with other evidence, there is also a strong, I get the strong impression that under a longer Kennedy presidency, we would not have moved toward that Holocaust religion.
There was some kind of revisionist mood in the Kennedy presidency to kind of look at World War II in a different way.
He wanted to vindicate his father.
His father had been also demonized as an appeaser somehow.
But his father was smart enough to navigate politically.
And his father retired and pushed his sons forward.
He gave up his own political ambition.
So he was smart enough to avoid being demonized.
And he also had a good network in the media and so on.
But basically, John Kennedy, I think, had, of course, that was not his purpose to become president, but I think the whole mood of the whole vision of the world toward World War II would have been different because the Holocaust religion started after 1967.
Of course, we would not have had the six-day war and the USS civility and all that.
I was just going to say that.
Yeah, if Kennedys weren't killed, I doubt that the 1967 Six-Day War would have happened.
And USS Liberty, probably, because wasn't it LBJ that helped cover that up as well?
Well, yeah, LBJ, in the view of Philip Nelson, who wrote a good book about it, I mean, there's a lot of books today and films about the USS Liberty.
And they tend to say that, well, actually, Leonard Johnson probably did more than just cover up.
He probably planned it together with his Sionim in the White House.
There's a lot of evidence that he planned it.
Even he sent the USS Liberty there.
And from the very moment that he heard that the USS CBD managed to send an SOS and that planes were going to the rescue, he took the phone himself and called Admiral Gaius, I think, of the Sixth Float, say, call back those planes.
I want that ship down in the bottom of the ocean.
So, you know, there's strong evidence that he was deeply involved.
Yeah, of course, even the Six-Day War would never have happened because it happened only because Lyndon Johnson had greenlighted it.
And was sending them weapons and giving them unconditional support and stuff like that.
Yeah.
You know, I just had another random thought.
Sorry to interject here, but, you know, we're talking about all of the Mark Lanes, the Jim Marrs, all of these other theories that distract you away from the Mossad role.
Look who was getting all the media attention and leading the conspiracy theory march on the 50-year anniversary back in 2013.
Alex Jones.
Surprise, surprise, Mr. Zionist gatekeeper himself, who Piper's book came out in 1995 before Alex Jones even got on the air.
He had plenty of time.
Every year he could have had on Piper to talk about this book and get into this, and he never did.
What does that tell you?
Yeah, because the case, I mean, of course, people can have right to say, well, no, the evidence is not strong enough, but there is absolute censorship.
The theory that Israel might be connected, the very possibility to discuss that theory is completely banned.
They call you anti-Semite, and then they don't even have to address it.
They can just label you and ignore you.
Yeah.
That's the way they do with everything.
That's the treatment I get all the time.
Yeah.
And Michael Collins Piper, you know, we can criticize him on this, on that point, but basically he had the guts to write a book.
He had the brain to.
He really added up so many elements.
And he started doing this in, I think, his book came in, the first edition came in 1992, I think, and the last edition, 1996.
And the last edition was about 700 pages.
And even after that, new evidence came, new declassified documents, new books, new perspectives.
And so the case against Israel is getting stronger and stronger.
And now I think, you know, Ron Hunt endorsed that theory.
And quite a lot of people endorse that theory.
I got very nice comments on my Amazon page, on the Amazon page of that book, The Unspoken Kennedy Truth, by Peter Jenny, by Philip Nelson.
So the theory is getting more, it's starting to be more known.
And I'm quite confident sooner or later this will become quite evident.
I've been aware of.
Especially.
Go ahead.
Sorry, especially since the very character of Israel is becoming more and more obvious.
You know, in the 1960s, we didn't know the nature of Israel.
We didn't know about all these false flag events.
We didn't know so many books.
We didn't have the internet to do all this research on them, independent researchers.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Even just, I think, one year or two years ago came this book by Ronan Bergman called Rise and Kill First.
And this book documents all the targeted assassinations done by Israel.
And one interesting thing is that in his introduction, he explains how he could get so many testimonies of former Mossad or former secret agents about what they did.
And he said, well, it's very simple.
Israelis are very proud of that.
They like to brag.
In other countries, when you assassinate somebody in an ugly way, you don't brag about it.
But in Israel, people are very easily led to talk about it.
So these kind of books now show the real character of Israel.
They have no inhibition to do this kind of thing.
Anybody who gets in the way of Israel deserves to be killed.
It's a moral duty to assassinate anybody who gets in the way of Israel.
So Kennedy did get in the way of Israel.
He deserves to be killed from the Zionist point of view.
And I'm quite sure many educated Israelis know about it.
They don't talk about it publicly, but I'm quite confident they do.
I've covered this rise and kill first doctrine before.
This actually comes from Judaism.
They believe that all Gentiles, as Esau, are born hating them.
It's like a law of nature.
So they're justified in their mind to use deception and to attack first, pretending that it's self-defense.
So anybody that opposes them, they're justified to rise and kill first.
This is what Ronan Bergman wrote about in 2018.
Also, Viktor Ostrovsky talks much about war by deception, another Zoharic doctrine that they have to be deceptive, trickery.
When I was in Palestine, West Bank, back in 2018, we visited the Yasser Arafat Museum and then even went down below, I think it was the same place, went down below in the bunker where he was at for a long time during, I think, the second intifada.
And he was eventually, they believe he was poisoned by somebody that was an agent inside the bunker with him.
That's the theory.
And in your book, you write that there was actually a plot to have a mind-controlled hypnotized Palestinian assassinate Yasser Arafat, which is very similar to what happened with Bobby Kennedy.
And also in the museum, they had a big display on the wall of just so many pictures and stories of all of these Arab leaders that were assassinated by the Zionists, by the Zionist terrorist groups, and the IDF even, which is also a terrorist group.
And letter bombs, you know, buying agents off, so many different ways.
This is their M.O. Yeah, and as you say, it's there in the biblical DNA.
From my viewpoint, you know, the Jewish mentality, the DNA is biblical.
And in the Bible, you have this book of Esther.
I call it preventive vengeance.
Rise and kill first means, you know, as soon as you suspect somebody might want to do you harm, just rise and kill him.
So it's, you know, it's morally completely okay, more than okay.
It's, you know, a moral duty to eliminate.
That's The DNA of Zionism.
And as you say, it's because it's basically biblical.
And to have the idea that you're chosen by God, that gives you a lot of chutzpah to do a lot of things and feel justified doing it.
Sure, especially since Yave told you to do so all over the place in the Bible.
Yave asked them to get rid of all to genocide people who get in their way.
And when you feel like you have a prophetic destiny, you're chosen and you have a prophetic destiny to heal the world or rule the world or all the various things, that will also encourage these type of activities.
Yeah.
But unfortunately, America itself has become like this too.
Well, we are highly infiltrated with this Judeo-Christian values, I guess we could call them.
Exactly.
Yeah, very biblical.
This has finally, how do you say, rubbed off on the American psyche, which is very biblical, too.
If anybody has any questions, you can send them to us through Odyssey Super Chats.
We have one here.
It says from Mario, Z17, $10.
Glad to be on time for a stream.
Happy to have you here on today's high noon stream.
Any other topics on the top of your head that you'd like to get into in this last half hour that we have now?
You're asking me?
Yes, yes.
Well, I don't know.
Do you want to say, shall I say a word about John Kennedy Jr.?
Sure.
Absolutely.
It's an interesting topic.
I have a whole chapter about him.
The Sirhan Sirhan and the MKUltra hypnosis is interesting to me.
Some people will say that's far-fetched, but I mean, this is not out of the realm of possibility at all.
Well, it is far-fetched in a sense, but when you look at it, clearly, you cannot avoid to admit, for example, that Siran Siran does not remember having killed Robert Kennedy.
You know, psychiatrists, experts, you know, in psychiatry have examined him, and they conclude it's true he does not remember.
He does not remember.
So he was in a state of trance.
And so quite a few psychiatrists concluded he must have been hypnotized.
His eyes, right?
They wrote about his eyes look glazed over when he was supposedly doing the assassination.
Yeah, so how was he brainwashed is still quite a mystery.
But as you mentioned, people bring up MK Ultra to explain it, and that's true.
The CIA did a lot of research on how to program a killer, a Manchurian candidate.
You know, that's the standard name based on the book and the film about this thing.
What people often try to often forget is that MK Ultra was not ruled by Nazis, but by Jews, basically.
The guy who ran this program was, what's his name, Ginsburg.
Anyway, he was a Hungarian Jew.
So there were a lot of Jews in this program, not Nazi.
There was no Nazis at all.
And an interesting thing in Ronal Bergman's book, Rise and Kill First, is that he documents what you said in 1968, just a few months before Robert Kennedy was assassinated.
They did exactly that.
They tried to program a Palestinian prisoner.
They chose, you know, they studied who can be easily hypnotized and they finally found the ideal prisoner.
They programmed him and then they sent him back to wherever Yasser Arafat was.
And they believed that with a kind of trigger, he would, you know, pull his gun and shoot Yasser Afat.
It didn't not work, but at least that's evidence that they were experimenting, they were doing this kind of thing.
And so whether it's possible or not is open to debate.
But if you study Siran Siran's case, it really looks like it succeeded.
There are two things about Siran Siran.
One thing is that he was hypnotized.
He doesn't remember anything.
He doesn't even remember wanting to kill Kennedy.
And then the other thing is that probably he never reached Kennedy with his gun.
And so there is a strong suspicion.
Well, there is evidence that it was a second shooter.
Because Siran was always in front of Robert Kennedy, at least two or three feet in front of him.
But the fatal bullet were shot right behind Kennedy's head, two inches at the most.
And so this cannot be Siran's gun.
And so the suspicions go toward Eugene Caesar, who was a kind of security guy who was just behind Robert Kennedy at the time.
Well, I mean, there's a lot of mystery and it's always difficult to talk about this because people who don't know about it might think it's completely crazy.
But you have to look at the evidence.
And if you take seriously people like Robert Kennedy Jr., who I think is quite a smart man, he studied it very carefully.
And he's not alone.
There are a few people who were in the room.
One guy who actually got a bullet in his head, but survived.
I forgot his name.
He's also been involved in trying to reopen the investigation on Robert Kennedy's death.
What a coincidence that both of these assassinations have anomalies and magical bullets on the trajectories.
And the number, you talk about the number of shots fired exceeded the bullets that he had in his gun.
What about he testified that he actually didn't, that he liked Bobby Kennedy?
He was very confused.
He was a very confused man.
And he was convinced by his lawyer to plead guilty.
He was said just like they do that, they did that to the supposed assassin of Martin Ludwig II.
If you plead guilty, you might save your life.
So he pleaded guilty.
And he made some stupid remarks sometimes under the pressure, saying, Yeah, I premeditated this for 20 years.
I mean, he made some stupid remarks which were recorded and which sounded like he admitted.
But in fact, soon after, he started to say, Well, if you tell me I did it, I can agree with, but the fact is, I don't remember.
And then later investigations showed that probably his bullets never reached Kennedy.
So, you know, there were sightings of him at firing ranges with suspicious people.
There was interesting things that he was writing in his notebook that looked like he had been programmed or something.
Can you get into that a bit?
Yeah, well, yeah.
He wrote, he was also into esoteric occult research.
So he might have been used in that kind of environment.
And in his notebook, he wrote RFK must die, RFK must die, you know, repetitive lines.
And when he was shown these notebooks, he said, well, yes, that's my writing, but I don't remember writing it.
And there's one interesting clue in his notebook.
At some point, he mentioned a name DiSalvo.
And Di Salvo was a serial killer that was successfully exposed by a deprogrammer, an hypnotist called his name escapes me.
But that kind of looks like some clue that he had been programmed by the same hypnotist.
And this very hypnotist, I can quickly find his name, is known to have bragged about having solved the Di Salvo case.
So out of the blue, Di Salvo appears in Siran's notebook for no reason, except that probably he might have heard his programmer included.
That's a clue.
That's no evidence of a theory.
And what about the fact that they tried to all portray him as a Muslim extremist, but he was from a Christian family?
Is that correct?
Yeah.
The hypnotist that I was talking about is William Joseph Bryan Jr.
Well, Siran was actually a Christian, yes.
But as you said, since 1968 and very much again after 9-11, there were books claiming that Siran Siran was a prototype or the forerunner of the Islamist terrorists who come to the United States and kill and destroy.
And yeah, they usually forget to mention that Siran was a Christian.
So there's been a lot of that's another thing that you feel is strange.
What do they have constantly to bring?
You have even articles in Aretz telling you how much Robert Kennedy loved Israel and he was killed because of his love for Israel.
Make it all about them.
Yeah.
Very similar to how they say, oh, you were attacked on 9-11 because of Israel.
Oh, I was going to make one other point there, too.
Forget it.
Go ahead.
No, well, that's about it.
I mean, if you want, as I said, I can get into John Kennedy Jr. a little bit if you should.
Okay.
Well, John Kennedy Jr.'s death is very mysterious.
And to be honest, there is no absolute proof that he was assassinated.
There's just plenty of proof that the investigation was full of, was very secretive, conducted under national security conditions.
No photographs.
The bodies were incinerated, which was very strange for the Kennedys.
They were Catholics.
No Kennedy would ever get incinerated.
There's so many things in the investigation that proves at least that there was a cover-up.
We don't know exactly what they were covering up.
And then there are testimonies of people who heard the plane blow up and so on.
But I think the most important things to know about John Kennedy Jr., well, I would say three things.
First, he was a smart guy.
He was a nice guy.
He was not the cheap playboy that he had been portrayed.
He was a handsome man, like his father, maybe he liked beautiful women.
But basically, he was a really nice guy.
He had integrity.
He had integrity, exactly.
And he worshipped his father.
He was raised by his mother in the worship of his father.
There are many stories.
When he was a boy, he would listen to the records of his father's speech.
Whenever a friend come to his room, he would say, do you want to listen to my father?
I mean, he really worshipped his father, and his mother educated him to worship, I mean, to learn about his father.
His mother brought John Kennedy's friends to teach him about it.
So that's another thing.
And he was very knowledgeable about the research on Kennedy's death.
And he created this magazine called George, which was actually the most conspiracy-oriented mainstream magazine you can imagine.
He interviewed Oliver Stone about his film.
He published many interviews and articles connected to conspiracy theories regarding the TWA 800.
So he was really oriented in that research.
And then the next thing that you really have to know is that in 1999, he was just about to enter politics.
He was incredibly popular in New York, so he would have run for governor or for mayor.
And Hillary Clinton was also positioned, was also a candidate.
And from his friends' testimonies, we get a clear sense that as soon as he would have entered politics, he would have aimed for the presidency maybe in 10 or 15 or 20 years.
And his personality, his charisma, his name would have made him very easy, would have made it very easy for him to go very far.
He had just won the California primary right before he was shot.
Well, that's Robert Kennedy.
I'm talking here about John Kennedy.
Sorry.
Sorry.
He was president.
I thought, I'm sorry, I misheard.
Yeah, yeah, but it's a very similar situation because there's absolutely no doubt that if John Kennedy Jr. had ever reached the White House, there is absolutely no doubt that he would have done something to really find the truth about his father.
Actually, Robert Michael Collins Piper claims that John Kennedy Jr. sent him a note saying thank you for his book.
An unsigned note, not even handwritten.
But Michael Collins Pipe will say the note came from the address at the back of the envelope was the address of the magazine George.
So he understood this was John Kennedy Jr.
You know, I don't know.
I'm just saying.
Just reporting what he said, right?
Yeah, that's quite possible.
I mean, Piper did not claim more than what he said, so he didn't say he was not absolutely sure, but he thought that that's probably true.
It would make sense.
If you look at, it's interesting because the magazine George, published by John Kennedy Jr., they are very hard to find.
I couldn't get copies of any.
You can find some to buy on eBay at very expensive price, but for some reason they all disappeared.
And it would be very interesting to read.
For example, John Kennedy Jr. always had his own interviews in this magazine, and he interviewed people and he always asked them, what would you do if you were president?
There was a kind of, you know, every, was it a, it was a weekly, weekly magazine, you know, every week there was this special interview.
What would you do if you were president?
So it sounds like he was trying to get ideas what he would do.
Are you still there?
Yeah.
Okay.
Why don't we get into a little bit of Jack Ruby?
Because that's one of the, you know, many people know that name.
Why don't you get into some of what your book covers about him?
You have a whole chapter on him, right?
Yeah, yeah, you're right.
It's a very important piece of evidence.
It's probably the most important piece of the puzzle because for two reasons, because, you know, Jack Ruby is Israel.
I mean, Jack Ruby's hand is Israel's hand, and I'll explain why.
And then another reason is because, strangely, there are very, very few books about Jack Ruby.
There's only one book, actually, a serious book about Jack Ruby, written by Seth Cantor, who was a Dallas reporter who knew Jack Ruby personally, actually.
And this only book about Jack Ruby is the only book where you can learn that Jack Ruby was not a Sicilian Mafiozi Mafiozo, you know, from Chicago.
He was actually a part of the Jewish underworld, the co-chair Nostra or whatever you want to call it, led by Mayor Lansky.
There's evidence coming from even the Los Angeles police that Jack Ruby was connected to Mike Cohen, who was a gangster, a Los Angeles gangster, Hollywood gangster, who even wrote his own memoirs, and who was very proud to have helped Israel in the 1940s by smuggling weapons to the Agana and the Irgun.
So Jack Ruby was connected to...
We keep calling him Jack Ruby.
We should address him, I think, by his actual name.
What was his actual name?
Yeah, that's, of course, nobody knows what his actual name is.
His actual name is Jacob Leon Rubinstein.
Oh, imagine that.
Jacob Rubinstein.
Okay.
Suddenly that doesn't sound Sicilian anymore.
He doesn't.
No.
Yeah.
And if anybody doesn't know, he is the one that killed Oswald when he was being transferred from the jailhouse or what is it, to the sheriff's station, to the jail?
Exactly, yeah.
And there's an interesting tidbit about that in the book, too.
Could you touch on that?
Like, who suggested it?
Yeah, I think in Jack Ruby's pocket or his flat, we found a note by Sam Bloom.
I mean, the whole visit of Kennedy in Dallas was itself organized by the Dallas Citizens Council, which is a Jewish, basically some kind of Jewish business group.
Hold on, stop there.
Stop there.
Just so people hear that again.
A Jewish organization is the one that set up the visit to Dallas.
It was not officially a Jewish organization, but it was headed by the business, the Jewish businessman, in particular Sam Bloom and a few others who I have their names in my book.
It's kind of strange because it was not an official presidential visit.
It was more a visit, you know, it was the beginning of the presidential campaign in some way.
And anyway, the whole thing was organized by the Dallas Citizens Council.
And you can look up at the Dallas Citizens' Council, even on Wikipedia, you will clearly see who was heading that.
So Sam Bloom was a public relations man who, we believe, called and strongly suggested to the Dallas police that They take out Oswald and let everybody know at what time they take him out so that the news people can get good pictures and something to show on TV.
So, you know, he kind of pressured the police, Dallas police, to move Oswald exactly at the point at the time when Ruby, Jack Ruby, would be there with his gun.
And we even don't even know how Jack Ruby could get in there.
We know he claimed to be there as translator for Israeli journalist because he spoke Yiddish.
You know, Jack Ruby spoke Yiddish with his, you know, imagine that.
And of course, no, no Israeli needed to be translated in Yiddish, but that was he was very actually, he said to his, after he was arrested, he said to his lawyer and to his rabbi, I did it for the Jews.
Oh, man.
I mean, that's easy.
That's fully documented.
He was not a very smart man, and he almost spilled the beans, you know, and he made comments.
He made even these comments.
I wanted to show that Jews have guts, you know, or this kind of stupid comments.
So he was not trying to hide his Jewish identity.
He was very proud of it.
But the GFK researchers are trying to hide his Jewish identity.
It's interesting.
He said that he did it for the Jews because when Trump was president, he promised the release of JFK files, and some of them did get released, but he also kept a bunch classified.
And I remember one of the ones that was released, it was interviewing some Cuban gangsters or something, and they said something along the lines of that the Jews are taking care of it or we're getting our guns from the Jews or something along those lines.
And I thought that was interesting.
Do you have any thoughts on Trump's blocking the declassification of the rest of the files?
No, I don't have any special thoughts.
I really doubt there would be really something so revealing in the archives.
I cannot imagine that they would have left something.
But they want to keep them blocked.
There could be something there.
You never know.
It could open up a thread that would unravel.
Yeah, at least what could be there, quite likely, is the proof that Oswald was innocent.
And that in itself would be a problem.
And remember, everybody, he said he was a Patsy.
He said he was a Patsy.
And then he was killed by a Jewish mobster.
Yeah.
And there is a thing I've heard that there are testimonies of people in the school book depository where Oswald was supposed to have shot Kennedy from.
Testimonies from people in there who said, no, at the time we heard the shots, he was sitting drinking his soda, something like that.
So these kind of things might be in the archive.
And if this came out, of course, this would create quite a big, it would kind of force another new commission, new investigation, or whatever.
And who knows what they could not again pull out the mafia and all the whole same old stories.
We just had a super chat come in from Jack Handy, $25.
He says, well, President Trump, sorry, just President Trump blocked the scheduled release of declassified documents related to the JFK assassination, saying that living persons could be damaged by the documents if made public.
And do you know more details, which I already asked?
So very likely there could have been something there.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Interesting.
Yeah.
Good thing they had Zion Don in office to block it.
Yeah.
So let's see.
Oh, I think we got another one here.
Oh, wait, no, that's the same one I already read.
High Impact Flick says, much love to you, Adam.
Thanks for your tireless work.
Don't let the winers get you down.
Thank you so much, Brian.
You're the best.
And Ziofree says, AG exposing the Zios for the goys.
AG and Laurent, of course, doing it.
Oh, and by the way, just so everybody knows, I've dropped the link in the chat.
I'll do it again.
But all of the B-roll I've been playing throughout this interview is all from Laurent's documentary.
It's got 24,000 views on his Odyssey.
I see it mirrored all over on Odyssey and BitChute, even some on YouTube as well.
It's really helping get the message out there.
I think Michael Collins Piper would be very pleased that you have kept his research alive and given it new legs and new life.
And everybody should check it out.
You narrate this one as well?
Yeah, in English, yeah.
I did the English narration with my French accent.
Sorry.
Your accent's almost non-existent.
Since the first time I talked to you, your English really has improved.
And your writing is, nobody could tell that your English is your second language.
Yeah, you know what?
When you're an English teacher teaching English to French students, your English gets terrible because you have to articulate so much and you have to limit your vocabulary.
So since I'm not a teacher anymore, it gets better.
Let's see here.
I'm kind of just scrolling through the book to see if there's any of the other highlights that I wanted to touch on before we run out of time here.
But go ahead, continue.
There's one funny thing that came clearer to me recently is also the role of Abraham Zapruder.
That's an interesting character.
Everybody knows the name Zapruder because he's the one who filmed Kennedy's assassination live with his amateur 8mm camera.
But actually, of course, his name was Abraham Zaprudo, so I don't need to tell you what kind of Abraham, you say?
Abraham.
Yeah, Abraham, right, exactly.
Zapruder.
That doesn't sound Presbyterian.
No, it doesn't.
Actually, I wouldn't know what it sounds.
Is it Jewish?
Zapruder is a Jewish surname?
It is.
Yeah, of course it is.
Imagine that.
And amazing how they kept it hidden for years, too.
Yeah, something else I wanted to mention is how the JFK assassination is where the CIA rolled out this conspiracy theory term that they used.
And one other quick point earlier when I forgot what I was saying, the way that they connect Sirhan Sirhan and JFK to 9-11, very similar to they're trying to make the death of Bobby about, oh, his support for Israel, just like the anthrax letters on 9-11 that said, oh, Israel, death to Israel, to kind of make them instrumental in all of it.
But go ahead, continue about Zapruder.
Sorry.
Well, one thing that some person made me realize, there's something very strange about the Zapruder film is that at the moment when Kennedy's head explodes, do you see the camera shaking or trembling or not at all?
That in itself is quite incredible.
Like he knew it was going to happen.
I saw it in the chat.
He was there to document the event.
Exactly, exactly.
And he's often presented as a Kennedy fan.
Kennedy fan who saw with his own eyes Kennedy's brain explode and didn't budge.
That's kind of strange.
And the other things that few people know is that his offices, he was a clothes manufacturer.
And his offices were in the Daltex building, which means the Dallas Textile Building.
And in fact, the shots, some shots came from behind, and the fatal shot came from the front, from the Grassy Knoll.
But some shots did come from behind, but they didn't come from the school book depository.
They came from the Daltex building, exactly where Abraham Zapruder's offices were.
What a coincidence.
Expose the Enemy says that Time magazine, who had lots of links to the CIA, I know, and maybe Israeli or Zionist links too.
I'm not sure.
Time magazine bought the rights to the Zapruder film and kept it hidden for years.
That's very, very suspicious and sketchy, to say the least.
They published a few stills of the film, but not in the right order, in such a way that you could not see that Kennedy's head was moving backward.
And Zapruder got $120,000 for that, which would be, today would be almost a million dollars.
And his family, two or three years ago, after years of court case, got, I think, $1.5 million of indemnity from the government because the government kept the film for some time.
I mean, you wonder, you know, whenever there's some kind of money to do, that's like the twin, you know, that's like Larry Silverstein.
Yeah, or the put options, yeah, before 9-11, right?
You do something for Israel, you know.
It's the principle of the Siam.
You know, they do something for Israel, but if they can get some, you know, a few bucks out of it, why not?
That's how it works.
Right.
And the plan to have him come that day.
Also, going back to Bobby Kennedy, there's stuff in your book about how he didn't walk through the crowd like he usually did and said he went to some pantry room and who had him do that.
It's just like these, every single time these things kind of link back to, oh, once again, it's a usual suspect.
Yeah, that's not very clear, actually.
I forgot who.
It's not extremely clear.
There's still a lot of mystery about Robert Kennedy.
One thing is sure, he was very unconcerned about his own security.
In fact, from some of his words, we get a feeling he expected to die and maybe almost he wanted to die.
I mean, the Kennedys were like that.
Even John Kennedy, there's a lot of remark that shows that he knew he might get shot one day, but they were not too much concerned by their own life.
And Robert Kennedy definitely, I mean, when you see how he was campaigning, you know, on top of a car, and in my film, there's this short sequence where he is campaigning.
I think it's in Chinatown somewhere.
And then you hear those firecrackers.
And everybody's, you know, getting afraid this might be a gunshot.
And Bobby Kennedy hardly budged, you know.
just looks up and continues so that's Yeah, he was a man to avenge his brother, but with maybe a fat, you know, maybe a sense that he might not join his brother.
I just had a really interesting thought, too.
You're aware of all the QAnon people, the delusional QAnon people.
They think that Kennedy Jr. faked his plane crash death and that he's secretly working with Trump and then he's going to come back and they're going to take out the deep state.
And literally, so many people believe this that hundreds of QAnon followers show up at Daly Plaza thinking that, oh, today's the day that he's going to reveal himself.
And then, you know, because I'm QAnon to me is just a Zionist, Kabbalistic, controlled opposition, basically a semi-Zionist Christian cult.
And then they've got this weird Kennedy tie-in like that.
Just odd.
I wanted to mention that.
Yeah, it's interesting.
I'm not sure if Q Allen is a Zionist psychop, but definitely it's a psy-op.
And it's interesting that they use the sense that there is a cult, there is a popular cult of Kennedy, you know, a little bit like, you know, a lot of people are very fond of the Kennedys.
There is this kind of royalty image of the Kennedys.
So John Kennedy Jr., he was so handsome, so promising.
And his death, there is some kind of religious sentiment, you know, about him that they used.
They thought, oh, yeah, why not?
let's pretend Kennedy is not dead.
That will surely work, just like Elvis Presley is not dead.
That can work.
So they use that in because they knew the Kennedy image is so powerful.
There's a religious quality to it.
So, yeah.
Well, you know, to wrap it up, I just wanted to say I think it's atrocious that so many people have been kept in the dark.
Everybody hears, oh, he was killed because he didn't want to go into the Cuban Missile Crisis, or he didn't want to start a war, or Kennedy was trying to end the Federal Reserve because he gave a secret society speech.
But they don't know about him opposing the American Zionist Council.
They don't know about the Israeli nuclear ambitions, which they eventually did.
And it's been kept secret all this time.
It's just all lies, stolen technology.
Stolen technology, by the way, by Israeli spy Arnon Milkon, who did the JFK produce the JFK movie.
And all that should be front and center, but it's been covered up and buried.
And I really appreciate that you're keeping this alive and helping to educate people on this unspoken Kennedy truth that everybody is scared to talk about because the chosen ones could do no wrong.
They've never had any conspiracies.
They would never assassinate anybody for their benefit.
We're an hour and a half.
Final thoughts and where everybody can find your stuff and help close this out.
Well, you mentioned my book there.
You mentioned my film.
You know, I write on the UNS review, UNS.com, UNZ, if you want to read my article.
And as far as the final word, I would say also few people know that Kennedy was really a great president.
This I came to realize little by little, you know, after you filter from all this dirt that is thrown into him to assassinate his memory, in a sense.
You know, it's like a posthumous assassination.
And actually, recently, I was just reading a book that came out.
It's by Monica Wiesak called America's Last President.
I recommend that book.
It's a really nice book to get a sense of who was really John Kennedy and what America lost when he was assassinated.
And if you compare John Kennedy to Lyndon Johnson, you get really a sense of good and evil, light and darkness, because Lyndon Johnson was really the man who completely put America under the spell of the psychotic psychopathic nation, as I call Israel.
So I think it's also interesting to really get to know who was really Kennedy, what he really wanted to do, what he tried to do as a president.
And this book by Monica Wiesak is a good introduction.
All right.
Laurent Guilleno, thank you so much for coming on.
Everybody, the links are in the description.
I've been putting them in the chat.
Pick up the book.
It's only $12.
It's an easy, great, fantastic read.
Support this man.
He is in France where covering these things could put him at risk of being imprisoned and or charged or definitely attacked.
He recently had his, they took his job for covering issues like this.
So we need to stand up and support people that are willing to call out the sacred cows, let's say.
So support my channel as well.
Subscribe star.
You can support through Odyssey.
You can support.
I can't wait to see what you guys all have to say in the comments.
This will be up on BitChute in Odyssey very soon.
Thank you, Laurent, once again.
I hope to have you on again soon.
Maybe talk some more Christian-controlled opposition.
You know, that's my interested topic as of late.
And you cover that in your book as well.
Another book you guys could pick up to help support.
Yahweh to Zion, and Our God is your God too, but he has chosen us.
Essays on the forbidden subject, Jewish power.
Thank you, Laurent.
Okay.
Yeah, thank you very much, Adam.
Okay.
Thank you, everybody, for watching and supporting.
I will see you guys all again very soon.
▲
Export Selection