Know More News - Adam Green - Israel's Great Game - Laurent Guyénot | Know More News LIVE w/ Adam Green

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 12, 2022 - Know More News - Adam Green

01:40:19

Israel's Great Game - Laurent Guyénot | Know More News LIVE w/ Adam Green

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to No More News Live.
	I am your host, Adam Green.
	Thank you so much for joining me today, Monday, September 12th, 2022.
	Still got a little bit more 9-11 content to get through because, as you guys may have known, did several streams this week on 9-11, one with Dawson, two with Thermal Detonators, some top 9-11 researchers.
	And I did a review of the brand new 9-11 documentary titled 9-11 in Israel's Great Game.
	I did a review of that three and a half hours long.
	And today we have the creator of that documentary.
	He wrote it.
	He helped direct it.
	And he is here.
	He's been here before.
	He is from France.
	He is Laurent Guyonet.
	Guillaume, sorry.
	He's been on before for videos like The Cult of Yahweh, How Yahweh Conquered Rome.
	I've read his books, which I really enjoyed.
	Our God is your God too, but he has chosen us, essays on Jewish power, as well as From Yahweh to Zion is his other video.
	And he just came out with this new 9-11 in Israel's great game.
	We're going to be discussing it.
	So thank you for being here once again, Mr. Guillaude.
	Thank you very much, Alan.
	I'm really happy to be again on your show.
	Yeah, how long has it been?
	We were talking about that before.
	I think it's been a while.
	Let's see.
	One year, 10 months ago, one year, six months ago, a year and a half ago.
	And I dropped the ball.
	I know you sent me a documentary that you did on the Mossad being behind the Kennedy assassinations.
	And I'll have to pick up on that and watch that and have you back on to discuss that as well.
	But today, the focus, I've been focusing this week on 9-11.
	You've got 9-11 in your head because of this documentary.
	Why don't you tell us about when did this come out?
	How long have you been working on it?
	Yeah, well, his documentary, I was looking for my book on Kennedy, but anyway, that's another subject.
	Well, this documentary was released one year ago in French, and then we got it translated.
	And so it just came out a few days ago.
	You were one of the very first, maybe the first to show it.
	I introduced it on the UNS review in my latest article.
	But it's brand new.
	It just came out in English.
	So I wrote the script.
	I helped a bit with the research, but it's really produced and directed by ERTV, which is the TV channel or the multimedia group of Alain Sorale in France.
	Alain Soral has publishing, you know, he publishes books and all kinds of things.
	So I'm grateful for the work of the team that made the film, put the film together, because I don't have the competence to really make a film.
	I wrote the script.
	Well, I got to say, the material about Zionist involvement is one of the best I've seen.
	It really includes a lot of the top information that I would have included in a documentary like this.
	There's also some clips that I had never seen that I thought were very shocking.
	We can discuss some more of those.
	But as you know, in the review, there was also some parts that I don't agree with, such as exactly how it was carried out with the hijackings and the planes and stuff.
	But the minutiae, arguing about exactly how it was done, I don't think is that important.
	I think as long as you get the big picture about who was behind it, why they did it, is the real issue.
	Well, yeah, it's maybe that part we should have kept it for the end of the film.
	But I didn't want to spend too much time in the film on the issue of how many planes, zero, one, two, three Planes or four or whatever.
	But as you say, it's not that important.
	But also, another question we didn't really, the question of how the towers fell down is an important question.
	We didn't get into it at all in the film.
	You know, there are still a lot of mystery.
	So, on one hand, it's maybe not that important once you understand who did it.
	But on the other hand, it's a little bit like even you know who is the murderer, it's still important to find a murder weapon because it tells you a lot about, you know, in this case, we're talking about not just one murderer, but a group.
	So, I felt it's important to discuss this issue, and I'm aware a lot of people don't agree.
	I used to be very hostile to the no-plane theory, and I'm not completely confident about this theory, but I felt it's important to bring it into the debate at least.
	And, you know, we can discuss about it.
	I'm open to all kinds of objections, and you know, but there are still quite some strong arguments, I feel, to doubt that a plane hit the first tower at least, and then the second tower, that's another question.
	Shangsville, I'm quite confident, you know, like most 9-11 skeptics or 9-11 revisionists or truthers or whatever you want to call them, most of them don't see a plane in Shangsville, and they don't see a plane in the Pentagon.
	So, it's mostly about the Twin Towers.
	You know, there is some debate within the community of 9-11 researchers.
	There's all types of theories exactly how it was carried out, but like I said, the main issue is who carried it out and why, not necessarily how it was done.
	You don't have to know every little detail how it was done as long as you can see the people that were behind it and why they did it.
	And for people that don't know, also, who is Alain Sorrell?
	Well, Alain Soral is a person who, for the last 20 years or so, maybe a little bit less, started to really take he's a kind of public figure who wrote books on sociology.
	And at some point, he started to speak quite clearly together with Dieudonnet.
	I don't know if that name sounds familiar.
	Die Donnet is a comic comedian who had trouble with the Jewish community in France, and Alain Soral supported him.
	And then together they became the most outspoken intellectuals against the power, the Jewish power in France.
	So they got into all kinds of trouble.
	Alan Soral had dozens and dozens of court cases.
	Every time he speaks, he says something.
	So he's a very courageous man who also kind of gathered a team of people and intellectuals.
	And he's very controversial, of course.
	So most of what I publish, I publish it on his website called Égalité et Réconciliation.
	It's kind of a political website talking about geopolitics and so on and really focused on the same issue as you are.
	He's the most famous anti-Zionist in France and he's been to prison or jail for speaking out about these things?
	He hasn't been to jail, but he had to exile himself into Switzerland.
	He would be in jail if he comes back to France.
	So he managed to escape to Switzerland.
	But yeah, he's the most prominent anti-Zionist intellectual in France, definitely.
	And he's very smart.
	His videos sometimes make 500,000 views.
	So he's quite well known.
	So anyway.
	Is there a lot of people in France?
	I'm sorry, go ahead.
	No.
	No, there is not because the situation in France is quite different from America.
	You cannot, for example, even question anything about the Holocaust.
	I will certainly not do it.
	You go to jail, you go to jail automatically.
	You have to say you believe, absolutely, you believe in the Holy Trinity, the 6 million, the gas chambers, and the final solution.
	That's the Holy Trinity of the Holocaust religion.
	So yeah, the situation in France, the Jewish community in France is very strong, very numerous, and very powerful.
	I think that it's the biggest Jewish community in Europe.
	And Jewish power is extremely strong here.
	This is a documentary he made, right?
	I mirrored it.
	Judaism, the religion of world domination.
	This is a banned French documentary that I re-uploaded.
	Okay.
	And he made this.
	This was really well done.
	I took some clips from this.
	Right?
	It was much further.
	This is him.
	That's him, right?
	No, no, no, no.
	Yeah, he's right here.
	That's Sorrel.
	That's him.
	Yeah, with a nice goy shirt.
	Yeah.
	All right.
	So also.
	These videos are translated in English on ERTV International.
	They have an ODC channel.
	You can listen to him with subtitles.
	He doesn't speak English, right?
	No.
	Are you like the only Frenchman that covers these issues that does speak English?
	Well, you know, French, that's really one of the problems in France.
	We're really terrible at English.
	We're the worst, you know, in Europe.
	Every year there's some kind of, you know, classification of, and we're always the worst at English.
	So that's a big problem in the French community.
	Not so many people can really read English.
	And so I kind of took, you know, that's the reason I started.
	I wrote my first book, JFK 9-11, because, you know, I got all these information from American websites and I felt, well, it's translated for the French.
	So that was my first self-appointed mission, you know, as a truth seeker.
	And then from then on, I continue to, I continue to kind of, you know, do whatever article I publish on UNS Review, mostly there, you know, I translate in French.
	And so I kind of became a little bit the specialist of 9-11 and JFK and a few topics.
	Christianity too.
	You've done a good job exposing Christianity also.
	Yeah, well, yeah, that's, you know, I have different subjects of interest that I got into.
	I started with 9-11, then I had to study, you know, American deep history going back to Kennedy.
	Then I got really fascinated by the Kennedy story.
	Then, of course, I had to study World War II and so on.
	And, you know, started to get into revisionism, revisionist history of World War II.
	You know, as I said, in a careful way, some points I cannot touch.
	And then I had some background in Christianity.
	I kind of can say I'm, you know, yeah, I have some background in biblical studies.
	So I started reading the Bible again, you know, in a different way.
	And I realized that it's something.
	It's a project for world domination.
	And I try to educate Christians to read it, you know, to take off their Christian glasses and to read what's really written in the Hebrew Bible because they put on these glasses and they read everything as allegorical.
	But I try to say, well, you can read it as you like, but it's good to know how the Jews read it.
	Because Jews read it as a program for world domination.
	And as I sometimes have to say, people answer me, well, no, because Zionists are not religious.
	I say it doesn't matter.
	Ben-Gurion was not religious, but he was biblical.
	You have to understand that the category of religion is very different from the point of view of Christians and from the point of view of Jews.
	So many Jews may not be religious.
	They don't really believe Yahweh exists as a character, but he is the embodiment or the representation of the Jewish people.
	And anyway, the biblical story is the national narrative.
	It's the foundation of everything, everything they see their own history as grounded on the Bible.
	And whatever happens today, they look back at the Bible.
	It's always a pattern.
	And it's always, you know, so some would say, well, God gave us Palestine.
	And some would say, like David Ben-Gurion, he would say, you know, God did not choose the Jews.
	You know, the Jews chose themselves or they chose God or whatever.
	But It doesn't make much difference.
	So anyway, I tried to really understand how Jewish people understand their own scriptures.
	And of course, I also try to understand the problem of Christianity because finally that's the problem of Christianity.
	Christians basically believe that God chose the Jews at some point.
	They do.
	That's the biggest lie in the universe.
	I mean, you cannot imagine a bigger lie.
	So as long as they keep thinking that for some reason God chose the Jews or whatever.
	Every Christian believes in the new covenant, and to believe in the new covenant, you must believe in the old covenant.
	So you believe Jews were once or still are elevated to a divine status as the one monotheistic, one true God's chosen people, and that gives them great power, absolutely.
	Yeah.
	And even in some way, you know, I say the essence of Jewish power is that the Jews gave us God.
	I mean, from the Christian point of view.
	Right.
	And Paul says it, that the Jews are entrusted with the oracles and the prophecies of God.
	And that they're the root and you're the branch and the root supports you.
	Exactly.
	So if they gave us God, we owe them everything.
	But let's get back to bring it back to 9-11.
	Although I do like how your documentary ends with some Bible verses, and it shows Netanyahu and the Rebbe and how I believe this is a Zohar plot, and we'll get into that.
	But also, you also came out with this article on UNS review, the 9-11 Double Cross Conspiracy Theory.
	Why don't you explain this to us a little bit?
	Okay.
	Well, the subtitle says, Pentagon Inside Job, World Trade Center, Israeli Job.
	So it's an attempt to try to distinguish different groups in the plot itself.
	So I start by looking at the event and focusing on the fact that there are two different events on 9-11 on September 11, 2001.
	You know, there is the attack on the Pentagon and the attack on the Twin Towers.
	And let's keep the plane crashing in Shanghai outside of the equation for simplicity.
	And basically, if you look closely at these two events, they are very different.
	And one of the idea I got from Barbara Honegger, who made a long video and she focuses on the Pentagon attack, and she says, look, the Pentagon attack is the Pentagon is a military target.
	The World Trade Center is a civil target.
	So if you want to start a war, the Pentagon attack was the new Pearl Harbor.
	You know, if you compare 9-11 to Pearl Harbor, Pearl Harbor was an attack on a military base.
	So the Pentagon attack was really the act of war that could make possible the invasion of Afghanistan to start with.
	The Twin Towers are very different.
	So the difference in the modiso parenti, the way they are made, is very different.
	If you look at the Pentagon attack, it's a quite simple scenario.
	One plane hijacked, crashed into the Pentagon, and the damage is quite limited, about 125 dead.
	So that event in itself, in my hypothesis, it's just a working hypothesis, and it can be debated.
	The Pentagon attack was really some kind of inside job from inside the Pentagon or inside the national security state.
	I don't know exactly who gave the green light for it.
	But of course, within the Pentagon, there are a lot of neocons, so Israel is also involved to some degree.
	But basically, we can consider it does make sense as an inside job.
	But on the other hand, if you look at the World Trade Center, then Israel's fingerprints are all over the place, starting with Larry Silverstein and all those people who own those buildings, who insured them, who made it possible for Larry Silverstein to get them, and the Greenberg family in there and so on.
	And then you have the dancing Israelis, and then you have so many things that if you focus only on the World Trade Center, then you can see Israel everywhere, right?
	And you can also bring in the prophecies of Netanyahu, you know, people who made prophecies that Islamists would one day bring down the Twin Towers and so on.
	And so I came out with this, and also one important point that came out in a last-minute insight.
	When you look at the planes that crashed, you know, the plane that crashed into the Twin Towers, you know, there is this famous information that they left from Boston Airport and Boston Airport was kind of subcontracting its security from an Israeli firm, which is not the case for the plane that left from Dulles Airport in Washington.
	You know, you have no trace of an Israeli firm there.
	So the plane that crashed in Pentagon left from Washington and crashed in Washington.
	So it's kind of a Washington scenario, Washington plot.
	You know, whereas the plane that left from Boston, they crashed on the Twin Towers, and you have also Israel's fingerprints in the airport where they left, or where they supposedly left.
	Okay, because at this moment, let's keep aside the question of where the planes are real or not.
	Even if they were not real, there had to be tracks of the takeoff and of the passenger list and so on.
	They had to be fabricated.
	And then I discovered another thing quite incredible.
	If you look at the list of the hijackers, there is those 14 hijackers out of 19 who were living in the Hollywood, Florida area, nearby Israeli spies, nearby 30 of those 140 Israeli spies that were arrested a little bit before 9-11.
	And I realized suddenly it's incredible those 14 hijackers, supposed hijackers, who were in contact with the Israelis.
	They are the 14 hijackers of planes, of the two planes that crashed into the Twin Towers and in Shanghai.
	And so again, you find Israel's fingerprint on the name, the identities of these 14 hijackers, but not on the five hijackers of the plane that crashed into the Pentagon.
	So you see, what I want to say is that the fingerprints of Israel are all over the place in the World Trade Center event, but on the Pentagon events is a little bit different.
	So the hypothesis I came out with is that there was a Northwood-type false flag attack organized on the Pentagon by people who basically needed some kind of pretext to invade Afghanistan.
	And Israel is not interested in Afghanistan.
	They're interested in pulling America into wars against Iraq, Iran, and so on.
	So they kind of doubled, you know, doubled on the Palestine.
	Sorry.
	They wanted to invade Palestine also over 9-11.
	Well, yeah, but the priority was Iraq.
	So they had to create such a much bigger event.
	And so that's the double-cross scenario.
	And another argument for this scenario is that after 9-11, you see really quite clearly two groups who have different projects for reprisal.
	You have people like Brzezinski, who wants to invade Afghanistan and overthrow the Talibans and nothing else, and who very strongly speaks against the notion of invading Iraq.
	And then you have the neocons that from day one say, no, no, let's go after Iraq.
	Saddam Hussein has something to do with 9-11.
	And if he doesn't, then he has these weapons of mass destruction or whatever.
	So you see two groups struggling together and one group trying to say, no, let's just invade Afghanistan.
	That's all, you know, because bin Laden is in Afghanistan.
	You know, there was an act of war coming from Afghanistan.
	We need to invade Afghanistan.
	We don't need to invade Iraq.
	This has nothing to do with it.
	So I don't know if I was clear enough, but that's how I can summarize my theory, which I kind of Introduced in the film, but a little bit more briefly.
	All right, well, it's interesting.
	I've always wondered, you know, like who were the Zionists involved?
	Who were the neocons involved?
	I've always considered, like you expressed, the idea that it was an inside job, like Alex Jones promoted so much, is almost disinformation and a false flag in itself, because it wasn't really an inside job.
	It was more of an outside Mossad job.
	And yes, Mossad is infiltrated in America with these neocons and PNAC and groups like that.
	But one question I have, though, if so, so you believe that it was like the Pentagon and the neocons was planned first and then Mossad decided to add on with the Twin Towers?
	I wouldn't put it like that because for me, the neocons are not the American establishment.
	They are Mossad.
	The neocons for me are just like Larry Silverstein.
	They are Zionim.
	You know, they are Israelis at heart.
	Maybe they have American citizenship, but their real loyalty and their real purpose in life is to work for Israel.
	Sorry.
	I don't include in the neocons, of course, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld.
	It's a little bit different.
	And I certainly don't include in the neocons Binu Brzezinski and Colin Powell and all these kinds of people.
	And I make a strong distinction between the neocons or the PNAC people, you know, all those Jewish people who created the project for a new American century, who are basically mimicking the American imperialist of the school,
	which I call the great game, you know, like Brzezinski, who are imperialist, but they're not so interested in Israel, you know, and these people come more from the Council on Foreign Relations, which I did a little bit of research on the Council on Foreign Relations, which is kind of a, you know, a very representative institution of the imperialist in America.
	And it turns out they're not very supportive of Israel in general.
	They were not before 9-11.
	They have different views, but they're quite critical of Israel in many ways.
	And they are always also very much interested in keeping good relationships with Saudi Arabia, whereas the neocons have always been pushing for pushing away Saudi Arabia and making Israel America's best friend instead of Saudi Arabia.
	So there are clear differences in their geopolitical views.
	And in my film, I include clips of Brzezinski.
	And I saw you yesterday.
	I was surprised to hear him that he spoke about Israel's nukes.
	That's true.
	That's quite impressive.
	He's one of the few who dare mention that Israel had nuclear weapons.
	And he spoke very clearly against the Iraq war.
	And it's the same with the Bush clan, the clan of George Bush Sr.
	Bush, I think Bush Sr. has got quite a bad press from 9-11 truces and so on because of his son.
	But in reality, if you study his presidency, he was quite strong against Israel.
	I mean, he really resisted the neocons' push to invade Iraq, and he tried to force Israel on the table to be reasonable in many ways with his Secretary of State, James Baker.
	Bush Jr. is a completely different profile.
	He didn't listen to his father at all.
	He listened to God and he listened to the neocons, to Dick Cheney.
	So the Bush, I call them the Bush clan, and Brzezinski and even Colin Powell, who was also coming from the Council on Foreign Relations, were basically resisting, trying to resist the incredible push of these neocons who are Israelis really, crypto-Israelis, you know, to invade Iraq.
	So the neocons were also in the Pentagon.
	So against my theory, you can object, well, you know, if it's an inside, if the Pentagon attack was an inside job within the Pentagon, the neocons, you know, these crypto-Israelis were also inside the Pentagon, yes, of course, yes.
	But still, anyway, still the big Picture in the big picture, I agree with you with you because the big event of 9-11 was the World Trade Center attack.
	If you compare the two, you know, I mean, the traumatic event was the World Trade Center attack.
	The Pentagon attack itself was just big enough to be a pretext to invade Afghanistan.
	It was not big enough to traumatize America and to put Americans into a kind of trance that they would be ready to go to war against any country that the neocons would designate as harboring terrorists.
	So, you know, focusing on the difference between those two events, focusing on the difference of reaction within the American establishment.
	And, you know, then you get this possible scenario of a double cross, of two events that were kind of one event, one small event, hijacked by Israel in a sense, and transformed into a gigantic,
	traumatic, false flag attack, which, in a sense, only Israel can come up with something like the World Trade Center attack and towers blowing up.
	You know, this is not the style of American establishment, in a sense.
	In other words, the Pentagon attack can be considered as a self-inflicted wound.
	Okay, Pentagon, they attacked themselves, they throw a missile on their own building, and then they repaired it, and it became a pretext.
	But the incredible thing about the World Trade Center, which really traumatized American people, is something completely different in scale, in style, and in the consequence it had.
	What do you think of the idea that they, I mean, you cover in your documentary that there were some Israeli agents that got the bid for the security contracts in the, I think it was in the late 80s, right?
	A couple of Israelis got the contract and then they took it away from them once they found out their history.
	So it seems like they had this plan for a long time.
	I wonder if they even built the Twin Towers with the plan to ultimately destroy them and launch this end times war between Christianity and Islam.
	Well, if we ask the question of how were the Twin Towers brought down, you know, it's still a huge mystery.
	There are different theories.
	I think the nanothermite theory just doesn't work at all.
	Why is that?
	Why do you think nanothermite doesn't work?
	Well, I'm not a specialist, but I hear a lot of people say termite or nanothermite doesn't create explosions.
	It can melt metal, but it cannot project metal beams, you know, 100 yards away.
	Not at all.
	It just doesn't create.
	It will burn and will cut through the steel.
	the Twin Towers were transformed into dust.
	And so, Not the steel, though.
	The steel was...
	Not the steel, man.
	Maybe part of the steel, I don't know.
	But in any case, I don't think termite or nanothermite.
	Maybe the reason they found nanothermite on the ground is because maybe the Tower 7 was a classic control demolition.
	The way the Tower 7 goes down is very different from the way the Twin Towers explodes.
	So maybe the nanothermite was good enough for World Trade Center 7.
	I don't know, because they did find some trace of it, it seems.
	And then you have Judy Wood theory, which I feel complete fantasy, you know.
	And then finally, you have the Mini Nukes theory, which is also quite contested.
	I don't know, I used to believe it.
	I think it was James Fetzer, Fetzer, what's his name?
	Who promoted that theory?
	Mini Nukes, you know.
	And then the other theory would be what you just mentioned, that somehow from the very beginning, the system to bring down the towers was built in, was built in the 70s.
	And then it could have been a nuclear charge under the Twin Towers.
	So technically, I don't have the competence to know if it works, but there are people who have strong arguments for that, Saying it was a built-in system, which makes sense.
	I mean, when you build skyscrapers of 110 stories high, maybe from the beginning you have to already include the system to destroy them.
	Because if you imagine they have 100-year lifespan, or even if they have 200-year lifespan, someday or another you have to destroy them.
	So maybe some system was put there.
	I think maybe that they were built to be destroyed, but I don't necessarily believe that they were built with the explosives already in them.
	As long as they're doing renovations or they're in charge of the security company, they could get a team in there and have access to the elevator shafts, which I believe they were doing elevator shaft work leading up to 9-11.
	So that's all it would take.
	But the reason I ask is because I've got all these clips of rabbis saying that 9-11 was, quote, predicted in the Zohar, and we see Netanyahu and Chabad and Ari Flesher and Chabad and just so many prophecy Edom being destroyed stuff.
	And here's Chabad's website where they basically say that the Zohar predicted that the 9-11, and then they say here, three great walls will fall and a great hall will fall in the city of Rome, which is Edom, which they call America Edom.
	The three great walls, the three buildings that were owned by Silverstein, the Twin Towers in Building 7, the two temples of Tisha Ba'av, and the Solomon Brothers building, like the Temple, and the Pentagon would be the Great Hall, will fall.
	Yeah, I agree.
	And then you have this also, this prophecy coming from Isa Harrel.
	I'm sure you got to know this one.
	He made an interview with a Christian Zionist called Michael Evans.
	And Michael even said that in 1980, he prophesied that one day Islamists would hit the phallic symbol of America.
	And the thallic symbol is the tallest building in America.
	So, yeah, it's quite possible.
	Quite possible that it was planned a long, long time ago.
	One very important characteristic of Zionists is that they have a long vision.
	You know, their time, they don't live, they have a vision of, they think in transgenerational terms.
	You know, they don't think in terms of their own lifetime.
	They think in terms of bigger time.
	That's their strength.
	That's why you have often, even within the neoconservatives, children continue the same path of their father.
	And this is also in a biblical, something biblical about it.
	They have this incredible capacity to plan things tens of years or 20 years in advance.
	Or thousands of years.
	The eclipse that you have of Brzezinski, here he is saying that Israel has nuclear weapons, which is a taboo thing that nobody does in politics.
	He also says that America shouldn't follow Israel like a blind mule.
	He also said, he said, surprisingly, that he didn't want to go into Iraq also.
	All of these were things that I was not aware of.
	So very surprised to hear that.
	I think it's a mistake to consider, for example, Brzezinski as a neoconservative.
	He's absolutely, he hates the neoconservatives.
	He belongs to what I would call the imperialist school, people who have this vision of America as a savior of the world, but their vision is not centered on Jerusalem at all.
	They are more interested in keeping friendship with the Arab world, actually.
	And so the neocons are mimicking these people.
	That's why it's easy to confuse.
	When they create a project for a new American century, they are talking the language of the American imperialists, but they are trying to redirect their vision, focusing on Jerusalem and on Israel's enemies.
	But, you know, American imperialists are not interested to destroy countries.
	Even a country like Iraq, people in the oil business, for example, because the Council on Foreign Relations is a business group, people who want to make business, they are globalists, they want to make trade, they want to trade with all the world.
	They don't care to trade with dictators.
	What they want is good deals, you know, to get the oil, to get the natural resources here and there.
	So the neocons have a different vision.
	What they want is to really destroy the nations who are the enemies of Israel, the seven nations.
	It's interesting that this number came up, seven nations.
	And it's a biblical number.
	There are seven enemy nations in Deuteronomy 7.
	I think Deuteronomy 7, Yahweh says, I will destroy those seven nations.
	And why seven nations came up, you know, after 9-11?
	This is another crypto-Zionist.
	You know, they like to throw in sometimes symbolic or well, I think they're using their prophecies as a script to follow because that's their blueprint to fulfill their end times prophecy.
	So it's not surprising.
	And the idea that Christianity and Islam, the clash of civilizations, is really Esau and Ishmael and Gog and Magog and the end times war that's required for the messianic age to commence.
	The rabbis are all saying it.
	These two derivative sister religions, spin-offs, deceptions, in my opinion, Islam and Christianity fighting each other all throughout history and to mutually destroy each other is their game plan.
	Yeah, yeah.
	This was a good one that you found.
	You start the article with this.
	I wasn't aware of this.
	Stratford, which is like CIA intelligence.
	I'm not sure if it's Mossad also.
	No, this guy is Jewish.
	Jewish.
	Yeah, he's a crypto-Zionist.
	He's not CIA.
	Stratford has nothing to do with CIA.
	I don't think so.
	I read somewhere that it's CIA, but whenever I hear, it's a little bit like who controls the media, the CIA does.
	I always feel this is kind of a false controlled opposition.
	You read on these Wikipedia pages, his parents died in Auschwitz, and he's your typical Jewish pro-Israel guy.
	A lot of people have speculated that Alex Jones is affiliated with Stratford.
	He once hired a woman named Molly Maroney, who worked for Stratford right before.
	It's based in Austin, Texas, where Alex Jones is.
	See, here's this is why I said that.
	Barron's once referred to Stratford as the shadow CIA.
	So it's been likened to the CIA.
	And this guy, George Friedman, is the founder of it.
	And in this article, on 9-11, he said the big winner today, intended or not.
	So it was intended.
	He's almost questioning, did they do this on purpose?
	If he says intended or not, is the state of Israel.
	And by the way, I have to say, this is Michael Collins Piper who first found this article.
	I found it in his book.
	Okay, great.
	You know, I found a lot of things in his books.
	Yeah, intended or not.
	This is incredible, an incredible thing to say.
	This was on 9-11 at 1 p.m.
	New York time.
	If Israel was intended to be the big winner, that means they were behind it.
	Yeah, it's almost, he's almost saying it.
	And then he says how they'll benefit, and they absolutely did.
	They were the big winners on 9-11.
	And it's so funny because all over Twitter yesterday, I saw all these Zionists saying, oh, look, the Palestinians were celebrating.
	And, you know, never forget what the Arabs, Islamic terrorism did to you.
	They're just still running with that narrative.
	Meanwhile, Netanyahu is celebrating.
	He's the one that wanted this.
	The dancing Israelis were celebrating.
	Israel benefited from this more than anybody, getting their war on terror that Netanyahu wanted for decades.
	Yeah, so that's why I agree with people like Victor Thorne also who said the 9-11 truth movement was basically controlled opposition from the beginning.
	Because from day one, if you listen to Bin Laden, he said, I didn't do it.
	He said it very clearly.
	he said, I have nothing to do with it.
	And then you have people who say, well, who benefits?
	Who enjoys the Western world and the Muslim world coming together in a clash of civil coming against each other in a clash of civilization?
	Well, that's great for Israel.
	So it's kind of a case of what we call triangulation.
	There's somebody who's bringing against each other the Christian world or the Western world and the Muslim world.
	And 9-11 was just a godsend event for Israel.
	So from the day one, people who were skeptical about the official narrative should automatically have thought, have suspected Israel.
	And it took tremendous energy and tremendous power to direct the 9-11 truth movement in another direction.
	Yeah, to blame Bush.
	And Michael Moore, also, who his agent was Ari Emmanuel, whose father was in Sterngang, Israeli terrorists.
	He was basically blaming Bush and the Saudis for all this.
	Here's a Daily Beast article.
	Al-Qaeda believes Jews run the world with psychology.
	Here's one of the quotes that's in your documentary.
	Bin Laden, 2001 interview with a top Pakistani newspaper, said, I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an appreciable act.
	And then he says, Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent children and women.
	Here's the other one, too.
	And he said, go ahead.
	Oh, he said, you know, Americans should look for the perpetrators within themselves, within the United States, and he names the Jews.
	America is completely controlled by the Jews.
	So you got it right.
	He also said the system is totally in control of the American Jews whose first priority is Israel, not the United States.
	I mean, no lies detected.
	It is simply that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid by them with the Zionist control and the Judeo-Christian values that we have.
	Yeah, I think the biography of Bin Laden, it would be interesting to kind of really restudy, you know, really, you know, what he did, what he didn't do, because he was blamed also for the 1993 bombing of the Twin Towers.
	And, you know, it was said that he said, I did it, but apparently, no, he never said he did such things.
	It's not.
	And he even said it was the Jews and they were trying to create a clash of civilizations between Christianity and Islam.
	And he's not making that up.
	That's what I've got clip after clip and source after source of them saying this is what they believe has to happen in the end times.
	Yeah.
	Let's see.
	What was something else in here in your documentary that I wanted to touch on?
	Oh, the quote from the top neocon, Leo Strauss, it was, where he said, America needs a big military so that we can defend Israel.
	I thought that was a great find as well.
	Yeah, that's Irvin Kristol.
	I think I got that from what's his name?
	A man who wrote a book, The Transparent Cabal.
	I forgot his name.
	It's a very good book, Transparent Cabal.
	You know, also, the idea that it was two separate groups in a double cross, like maybe the Israeli tacked on the Israelis, the Zionists tacked on some more plans that the Americans weren't fully in the know about, because that's kind of how these secret agencies work.
	But they were working so closely with Israel.
	They had the Office of Special Plans and a sister group in Israel that were collaborating closely.
	So it's hard to know for sure, but either way, there's Zionists everywhere.
	Yeah, sure.
	But the story of how they infiltrated the administration and everything is a long story.
	It took some time.
	So if you go back to the 1970s, it started in the 1970s after Nixon, Dick Cheney and Dunham Rumsfeld.
	They are important in that story because they are the ones who brought in Paul Volfovich and Richard Pearl in Team B and so on, and started with them.
	They played the role of, I don't know if the word makes sense, the ushers.
	They opened the back door for the neocons to come in.
	And so little by little, they gained more and more importance.
	And then under Bush Jr., of course, they completely dominated the administration, but still not completely.
	There were still people in the State Department in particular who were quite hostile to the neoconservative, particularly in regard to Saudi Arabia, you know, because the neocons have always been pushing for accusing, blaming, demonizing Saudi Arabia, which is easy to do anyway, of course.
	And on the other hand, you have these business groups, you know, the Bush family and many family, and they were quite strong in the State Department saying, no, you know, the friendship with the Saudi dynasty is absolutely necessary for America.
	So there was still, even before 9-11, and a little bit less after 9-11, after 9-11, really, I would even wonder if the Council of Foreign Relations is now probably very much infiltrated by Zionists.
	But I read even recently that the current chairman or president of the Council on Foreign Relations even recently made an interview and he spoke against.
	He spoke quite strongly in critical terms of Israel.
	So still today, I think now the neoconservative voice is dominant.
	But if you dig a little bit, you don't hear another voice on the mainstream news, at least.
	On mainstream news, you hardly hear anybody criticizing Israel.
	But I think within the establishment of people who are trying to construct a reasonable foreign policy, there are still a lot of tension between the crypto-Zionist neocons and the traditional imperialist.
	Right.
	And I've always viewed it this way.
	It's not a monolithic power.
	They don't control everybody.
	There's different factions competing, but they are definitely one of the most influential and powerful ones.
	And they kind of transcend into many groups.
	It's funny.
	I was just looking up for Wormser, the woman who has the video.
	She was a signatory on the Clean Break document, which is just full of Zionists.
	And she says, oh, there's no dual loyalty, like kind of implying that her loyalty is to Israel and she doesn't care and she'll admit it.
	I searched that and look what comes up here.
	Zionism, crypto-Judaism, and the biblical hoax.
	It looks like one of your articles.
	Exactly.
	It's funny that that popped up.
	I don't have that article on hand, but the Clean Break, all about Israel and what America should do for Israel.
	A bunch of Zionists involved.
	It's just that their fingerprints really are all over this.
	You have a section in here called Controlled Opposition, and you point towards Loose Change, who didn't mention anything about Zionist involvement in their videos and still don't.
	They're total Burmese and Dylan Avery and Luke Radowski and all those people, they're total Zionist gatekeepers.
	Alex Jones also, you point out in this documentary, he's been instrumental in the cover-up of 9-11 as well.
	But it's not exactly true to say since day one, they were covering up the Israeli role because apparently Alex Jones blamed Israel the day after 9-11.
	You've seen this clip, right?
	No, I don't trust.
	This got 613, just like the 613 mitzvahs, 613,000 views yesterday.
	Watch this.
	Israel calls the Palestinians goim or cattle or dogs or subhuman.
	They keep them on concentration camps.
	I got video of them taking Palestinian women's tomatoes they grow and breaking their water containers and stealing.
	That's why you have this crap.
	And our children are going to die.
	We're going to get nuked because of this.
	Iran's got the nukes now.
	Syria.
	We're going to have nuclear war because Israel likes to go around bombing everybody.
	I'm sorry, it's just the facts.
	You know what?
	Actually, he's not blaming Israel for 9-11 here.
	He's saying Israel's treatment of the Palestinians is causing Arabs to attack America.
	That sounds like what he's saying.
	That's very different.
	I do have other clips, though, of Alex Jones saying this.
	Is it not enough that Israel had fingerprints all over 9-11?
	I'm telling you.
	So this is what he used to say many years ago.
	He would say Zionists were involved with 9-11.
	Rarely.
	That was one of the only times.
	And he said that after Bush was out of office and Obama was in.
	So he could criticize Obama and say he's got Rahm Emanuel and he's got Zionists around.
	But he didn't mention that much with Bush.
	He didn't.
	It was always Bush did it, inside job, Operation Northwoods.
	And you make the good case that if they would have compared 9-11 to USS Liberty, nobody would have been saying inside job.
	The fingers would have all been pointed at Mossad from the start.
	And just to show, Alex Jones used to say Zionist involvement.
	He used to call out the Israeli treatment of the Palestinians and how they call them GOI.
	They call everybody Goy, by the way.
	And now he says he doesn't have a problem with that.
	The Palestinians are the problem.
	He says it's Saudi Arabia or even completely walked back all his claims about 9-11.
	I checked out InfoWars' the videos they posted on 9-11 yesterday.
	They never bring on experts that expose the Zionist role.
	They posted James Corbett's five-minute little mini documentary.
	That's the best they can do.
	They were involved with the cover-up, and Jones has always been covering up Zionist power.
	Yeah.
	I agree.
	I agree.
	You mentioned about Louis Change, but yeah, it's the same team.
	And it's true that they portray in this video Lewis Change, which I think really had a very strong impact.
	They portray the neocons as American imperialists who just are crazy, crazy American patriots, which is absolutely not true.
	And I think today it's become more and more known that the neocons is really a Jewish movement, which they became imperialists just from the point from the time in 1967 when they realized that American imperialism was good for Israel as long as it is directed to the Middle East against Israel's enemies.
	The chat is saying James Corbett doesn't really go after Zionists much either.
	And that's true.
	And it's a good point.
	These neocons like Douglas Fythe, I think, I'm not sure if it was Richard Pearl or one of the other ones, but they were charged.
	You cover this in your documentary.
	They were charged with sending secrets and classified information to Israel.
	Oh, yeah.
	I mean, Richard Pearl has been accused by the FBI even from a long time ago, from the early 1970s.
	He was first accused by the FBI to give documents to the Israeli embassy.
	Richard Pearl is really the boss of Paul Volfovich and Douglas Feiss.
	And all these people, interestingly also, I wrote another article called 9-11 was a Strossian coup, because I think it's interesting to look at Leo Strauss, Leo Strauss.
	He was the mentor of Irving Kristol and all those neocons.
	And Leo Strauss is often portrayed as an American imperialist.
	There's a new book actually I saw on Amazon with a big American flag and Leo Strauss and the American Empire.
	And you get the idea that Leo Strauss is an intellectual who has this vision of American imperialism.
	But that's not the real Leo Strauss.
	That's not the Leo Strauss that the neocons know.
	The neocons, they know another Leo Stross, the Leo Strauss who spoke to them in conferences and some of his conferences to Jewish audiences have been published.
	And one of them is called Why We Remain Jews.
	And this conference is absolutely incredible because there you have Leo Strauss, who is supposed to be an American imperialist, explaining to his Jewish audience why we have to remain Jews.
	We have to go back to the faith of our fathers, by which he means not faith in God, but faith in the destiny of the Jews to control the world.
	Basically, that's what he's saying.
	So it's the same as the dual, the mask.
	The neocons have a mask, and they put this mask also on their mentor, Leo Stross.
	And it's always, it's the same with 9-11.
	9-11 was an inside job created by the American imperialists who want to control the world.
	But no, if you take off the mask, you see Israel.
	Oh, and you guys want to know something funny, by the way?
	Guess who sent me your video?
	It was Duvid that sent me this, your documentary.
	Duvid's a Jewish guy that's been on my show a bunch of times.
	Oh.
	He was impressed by it and thinks that you're on to something.
	Also on the neocons, they admire Plato's noble lie, the idea where you have to manufacture myths to control the masses as well, which is what they did with Christianity and Judaism also, following Plato's Noble Lie.
	And they really admire and try to emulate Machiavelli and say, Machiavelli, you cover in your documentary, there's an article that Machiavelli was following like Jewish instinct or something like that.
	Well, there's one disciple of Leo Stross, I think it's Michael, I forgot his name, he wrote an article saying, was Machiavelli a crypto-Jew?
	Because what he says is so typically Jewish, he must have been a Jew.
	So, yeah, Leo Strauss is a very mysterious person.
	Everybody says, you know, it's hard to understand what he really says, what he really means, and so on.
	But in fact, I think it's not so difficult.
	Just he never speaks, he never writes his own opinion.
	He may speak them, and then you find his real opinions in conferences that have been recorded and then written down.
	But in his books, he talks about all those great philosophers, and he used them to say his own vision.
	You know, saying it's not me who say this is Plato or it's Machiavelli or whatever.
	But, you know, he has his own understanding of Plato or Machiavelli or Hobbes or whatever.
	He was a specialist of Thomas Hobbes at the beginning.
	So, you know, whatever he says about Plato is just Strauss's Plato, not necessarily the real Plato.
	Just wanted to show you guys Alex Jones now, just to see.
	He made his career.
	He was Mr. 9-11 Truth.
	He put out documentary after documentary, always omitting all of the Zionist connections.
	He basically said it once or twice ever.
	This is all he was able to muster on 9-11.
	He puts up this short six-minute video from James Corbett that's been around forever and one video about the 28 pages.
	This guy has such a big audience.
	Same with Luke Radowski, same with these other people.
	If they wanted to, they could wake up so many people to the Zionist Mossad role in 9-11 and they don't do it.
	And we need to put the pressure on these frauds for covering this up.
	Yeah, you just have to say, who is Larry Silverstein?
	You just have a few things to say that he used to call Netanyahu every Sunday.
	That's in Aret's newspaper.
	He was a big donator of the Jewish appeal.
	Anyway, he is a Zionist, and he's a scion.
	I think the notion of scion is very important to understand those people.
	Sion is the term that Viktor Ostrovsky made popular in his book by way of deception.
	He was a former Mossad agent, and he spoke about how the Mossad works.
	And he said they work through the Sionim, people who are ready to help the Mossad in whatever capacity they can, doing something illegal for the Mossad without asking questions.
	And then Gordon Thomas also spoke about them in his book, Gideon's Gideon's Spies.
	And he said, in America, there are 15,000 of them.
	So Silverstein belongs to this category of top Sionim.
	They are ready to help Israel.
	Of course, they want also to get something in return, and he got a lot of profit from it.
	But that's how it works.
	They would do something for Israel.
	And, of course, they would also profit from whatever they do.
	And all these people in the World Trade Center, you know, around Frank Lowy, you know, Silverstein, the Lauderberg family, Ronald Lauder, all these people whose fingerprints are all over the event of the World Trade Center, they are best understood, I think, through this notion of Zionim.
	You know, whatever Netanyahu calls Silverstein every week, what does he tell him?
	You know, can you give me a hand to organize this or that?
	Or I'll send you somebody to discuss something important with you or whatever.
	Well, Silverstein was the head of one of the top Jewish fundraising organizations in New York as well.
	And Netanyahu brags and is known for his influence over America, which he even brags.
	There was a clip recently.
	He did an interview with Ben Shapiro.
	He brags that his father was the first one to kind of basically take co-opt America in both sides of the aisle to get them to be pro-Israel.
	He brags about this.
	We say we're called anti-Semites and conspiracy theorists, but of course, they're allowed to brag about it.
	Yeah.
	No, just so people can see Alex Jones now.
	He was always Bush did 9-11.
	It was an inside job, which is a misnomer because it should have been saying it's a Mossad job.
	He once said Zionists had their fingerprints all over it, but then in later years, he says, oh, it's the Saudis or he won't mention Israel.
	Watch this.
	They all know they did it with Saudi Arabia.
	Who put together 9-11?
	Saudi Arabia, the Muslims.
	Oh, my God.
	To say who put it together and say Saudi Arabia is total misdirection.
	By themselves more than anybody.
	So they want to invade these other countries.
	How did it happen in the U.S.?
	I mean, the U.S. wasn't involved.
	Of course.
	What are you saying?
	Who was involved?
	Who were the key players?
	Sorry.
	One interesting point to know.
	I knew that, but I kind of forgot.
	And I realized again recently is that Osama bin Laden, his main goal in life was to kick the Saudi monarchy out, or at least to kick the Americans out of Saudi Arabia.
	This is in my article.
	He had a manifest.
	I think he published it in 1993.
	His goal was to kick the Americans out of the holy land of Saudi Arabia and to kick the Saudi corrupted dynasty.
	So that's why they chose Bin Laden because the Saudis maybe were also interested to get rid of Bin Laden.
	That may have been one reason why they picked up Bin Laden as the Patsy somehow, because the Bush were also friends with, I mean, a lot of people wanted to do something for the Saudis, maybe.
	Remember, Bin Laden said the Saudis supported Bin Laden is absolutely nonsense.
	Absolutely absurd.
	Remember, CNN did a bin Laden interview in a cave shortly before 9-11.
	And let's see if I can show this right here.
	Oh, that's not it.
	And where he said, America's support for Israel, the occupation of Palestine, America's bases all over Saudi Arabia, this was his big concern.
	So I can see why he would be somebody that they would want to set up as a patsy for this.
	Yeah.
	Okay, let's finish what else he says here.
	Here's a 9-11.
	It's totally compartmentalized.
	So you run a drill of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon being attacked on that day.
	And then I would just get bullied online and by leftist publications going, Jones hates Muslims.
	Jones is a racist.
	He's a different kind of thing.
	Alex Jones told everybody that Trump was going to expose 9-11.
	And not only did he not do that, but he blocked the release of lawsuits that families had that want to sue Saudi Arabia.
	Yeah.
	Real.
	It's not saying Bush even did it.
	It's 2017.
	Doesn't it blow your mind that people still think that 9-11 happened the way it was.
	We'll get to that.
	9-11.
	Operation Northridge is 100% proof.
	Isn't that crazy?
	Let's get back to that.
	It's declassified.
	2000.
	And that's not saying Islamic terrorism is real.
	It's not saying Bush even did it.
	Some super dark state group, which Congress now has a 28 pages, vindicating 9-11 truthers, that Saudi Arabia with people that they had gotten to convert to Islam and paid off with their trillions.
	They got trillions, had joined them in some larger plan to blame Iraq and other countries that were non-radical so Saudi Arabia could take them over.
	So Saudi Arabia could take them over.
	This is on Joe Rogan podcast, the biggest show in the world.
	All he has to say is like what he used to say, there were Zionist fingerprints all over it, but he doesn't say that.
	He should be, and people still think, oh, he's waking people up.
	He's not a Zionist shill, people will still say.
	This guy is high-level gatekeeping disinformation agent.
	Yeah.
	But, you know, as I try to explain in my article and a little bit in the film, but I don't get too much into it in the film, is that the fact that the idea that 9-11 is an inside job is, of course, not completely false.
	And the truth of it probably is more into the Pentagon attack.
	You know, the Pentagon attack may have been primarily designed as a pretext to invade Afghanistan.
	And maybe, you know, partly to get rid of Bin Laden, who was a declared enemy of the Saudis.
	So it's a little bit complicated, and it's easy for people like Alex Jones to point, to have argument to say, look, this was an inside job.
	Because it's hard to blame, for example, the Pentagon attack on Israel.
	You know, I mean, it has to be organized from within the Pentagon to some extent, right?
	I mean, how can you send a missile or whatever on the Pentagon if there is not orders coming from at least Donald Rumsfeld, you know, the defense secretary or somebody in very high position to greenlight such operation.
	So there is an inside job dimension, but it's the smallest dimension of 9-11.
	The big dimension of 9-11 is the World Trade Center event, and that's pure 100% Israeli.
	That's the theory I try to propose.
	Okay, look, you should have included this clip in your documentary.
	Let me share this with you.
	That brought us low economically, morally.
	We went to war against a guy who had absolutely nothing to do with 9-11.
	It was a total pretext.
	It's inexplicable.
	And there you go to Cheney.
	There you go to Bush.
	There you go to the Jewish neocons who wanted to remake the world.
	Maybe I can say that because I'm Jewish and to bring about a certain result.
	Okay.
	I'm not really sure.
	I'm not really sure that.
	Can't say that all these Jews are Jewish.
	No, Jewish neocons is a no-no, you cannot say this.
	In fact, today I read somewhere, I forgot.
	Oh, yeah, in a comment under my article, somebody mentioned that somebody said even neocons now is a term that you should not say because everybody knows they're Jewish, so it becomes an anti-Semitic term to say neocons.
	Yeah, that's pretty funny.
	I've talked about that before.
	I remember covering it.
	I tried searching it the other day, actually, and they're saying don't use, oh, neocons.
	Yeah, they're saying neocons is an anti-Semitic dog whistle, so you're not even allowed to use that anymore.
	Even though, what is it?
	White man's burden is the name.
	White man's burden.
	Here's how red.
	Which is funny because neocon itself was a label that the crypto-Zionists used as a mask.
	It's a false identity.
	They are not conservatives at all.
	You know, they are revolutionaries, the neocons.
	They are not conservatives at all.
	So, you know, they use this label as a kind of a mask.
	But because the mask, everybody knows who is behind the mask now.
	Everybody knows the neocons are Jewish.
	So now they say, well, no, you cannot call us neocons anymore.
	Even though it's them who call themselves neocons at the beginning.
	And here's Horetz' white man's burden, Which is funny that they're blaming white men when it's Jewish.
	It's like fellow white man meme.
	The Iraq war was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing for President Bush to change the course of history.
	Krauthaumer and Crystal and so many others, Thomas Friedman.
	And then there's this one, George Tenet, drunk in Bandar Bush's pool, screaming about the Jews.
	He says they're setting, quote, they're setting me up.
	The bastards are setting me up.
	He says he's not going to take the hit.
	According to one witness, he mocked the neoconservatives in the Bush administration and their alignment with the right wing of Israel's political establishment.
	That's Netanyahu and Laikud, referring to them with exasperation as the Jews.
	Interesting.
	He was the CIA director, right?
	He was the head of the CIA, saying the Jews were trying to set him up and that they were behind this.
	Yeah, exactly.
	So they did exactly the same as they used to do under President Gerald Ford, create Office of Special Plans to bypass, because the CIA, George Tennett, did not want to blame Iraq, right?
	I think after 9-11.
	And so they created this Office of Special Plans with Wolfowitz and Richard Pearl and so on to try to link 9-11 to Iraq and to kind of push Tenet aside.
	Interesting.
	Oh, I think this is the one.
	Yes, this Leo Strauss article, this is the one where he talks about Israel.
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	That's in French.
	I don't know this argument.
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, this is your documentary.
	How long have you been working on this, by the way?
	You wrote the script for it.
	Well, I wrote the script, and then the one guy who made the film, he found a lot of the images by himself.
	He found really incredible things.
	And so, yeah, I just wrote the script, basically.
	And in all their papers, they're so clear that this is about Israel.
	It's always about Israel.
	And then they cover this up.
	We've got a few super chats to read.
	And before we close it out here, I don't want to go too long with you.
	And I do want to get you back on to get more into Christianity and your book.
	And I don't know when the JFK anniversary is, but I'll definitely have to watch your documentary and talk about that when it comes around.
	Yeah, I was looking for my book.
	I have a book.
	I think I should send it to you or if you can find it.
	It's called The Unspoken Kennedy Truth.
	I have here the French version.
	It says, who cursed the Kennedys?
	You know, it's all about the Kennedys, John, Robert, the father, the son, and the whole story of who cursed the Kennedy, the Kennedy curse, and you can guess who.
	Mossad?
	Well, the Jews, yeah.
	Well, not all Jews.
	Wasn't it Mossad that most likely did the hit on him?
	Yeah, well, I follow, you know, I dedicated this book to Michael Collins Piper.
	I'm on the same line, but then I explore a little bit more also about Robert Kennedy.
	And I link the Kennedys to the father.
	The story of the father is very important because the Kennedy brothers were very much their father's sons.
	And Joe Kennedy, the patriarch, his story about the World War II was very important in the mind of the Jewish enemies of the Kennedys.
	They knew very much that the Kennedy dynasty is of one mind with Joe Kennedy and his vision of the Jewish responsibility in World War II and so on.
	So I get a lot of things around the Kennedy assassinations to understand more and about also the assassination of John's son, which I think who I think was assassinated in 1999.
	Oh, you don't think that he's secretly alive and QAnon and working with Trump?
	No, I don't.
	I was tempted to believe that one day.
	I would have loved it.
	People are mentally ill that believe that QAnon nonsense.
	Did you see how they were all I changed my mind about QAnon thanks to you, Adam, because at some point, Yeah, I really appreciate what you did on QAnon in general and the way you exposed this.
	Because in France, you know, as we said at the beginning, French people don't read enough English.
	So a lot of people around me were really worshipping Trump and believing in the QAnon thing.
	And I had to educate them a little bit.
	And I was educated by you on that point.
	Awesome.
	Here was just last year.
	Hundreds of QAnon supporters gather in Dallas expecting the return of JFK Jr.
	This is this is how bad the brainwashing is.
	Just like Christianity, the QAnon people are Kabbalistic, controlled opposition, trusting the plan.
	Trusting the plan that some Messiah savior is going to come and usher in a utopia, a prophetic utopia.
	But let's hit these super chats because I don't...
	They focus on the enemies, the psychopath and the pedophiles and the satanists and because you need to build up enemies, but you need to create enemies, make people look in one direction and not in the instead of talking about the Torah or Jews, they say, oh, it's the Khazarians.
	It's the fake Jews that are the problem.
	The Khazarians are the conspiracy.
	It's not the Torah.
	It's the Satanist and the Khazarians.
	Especially coming from the Christians, because Christians don't like you.
	You criticize the Torah, they're Old Testament.
	So they always try to say, no, it's not the Torah, it's the Talmud, it's the Kabbalah.
	I say, well, I don't know much about the Kabbalah or the Talmud, and I don't think Netanyahu and these kind of people read much of the Torah, Their mind frame is very biblical.
	Well, the whole Jewish identity derives from the Bible and the stories in the Bible.
	Whether they're religious or secular, it doesn't really matter because they still, if they consider themselves Jews, their identity is coming from the Jewish identity, which comes from the Bible, the fake stories in the Torah.
	All right.
	Let's do these super chats.
	That's a very important point.
	First one from So, hi from France, Banjour, Laurent.
	Hello, Adam.
	Please, next guest should be Pierre Hillard.
	He wrote excellent books and Yusuf Hindi too.
	Ask Laurent if he knows them.
	Do you know Pierre Hillard?
	Yeah, I do.
	Okay.
	I'm not familiar with those names at all.
	No more lies says, thank you for having Laurent here.
	And I know I'm not pronouncing that right.
	How do you pronounce your name, your first name in France, in French?
	Well, you're getting better.
	You're getting better.
	Laurent Guillennot.
	Laurent Guillennot.
	Guillennot.
	Laurent.
	All right.
	I am Amalek says, if a branch doesn't produce fruit, burn it.
	Jesus cured a fig tree that did not have fruit, and figs represent the fruit from the tree of knowledge in the form of Christ, body, the control opposition, who is Satan to the Kabbalist.
	Yes, that sounds like some of Bjorknes' analysis there.
	And I do think he is exposing the esoteric secrets of the creation of Christianity.
	Have you seen any of my shows with Bjorknes?
	Bjorknes, no, I don't think so.
	Is he not sure I know who he is, actually?
	Okay.
	Thor's rune says, been reading Laurent's book, Our God is Your God 2, after you showed it on your show, Adam.
	Thank you for having Guyana on today.
	Yeah, I don't know if you know, but I do plug your book quite a lot when it comes up.
	Great, thanks.
	So you can send me my check whenever you're ready.
	Ali Abba says, excellent guest.
	Does anyone know why was the U.S. military interested in going to Afghanistan?
	Well, I explained that a little bit in my book, in my article and in the documentary.
	Well, basically, Afghanistan has always been a very important place for those I call the great Gamers.
	You know, the Great Game was a concept coming from the British imperialists.
	And what it means is that they have to use Afghanistan and all kinds of other nations like Iran to prevent Russia from becoming the dominant power in Europe.
	That's always an obsession with these imperialists, whether they are British or Brzezinski-type imperialists.
	Brzezinski is a Polish russophobic guy, and his obsession is also to prevent, was, because he's dead now, was to prevent Russia from dominating Europe.
	So Afghanistan has always been an important place to create chaos there.
	And of course, there are pipelines, issues there, and so on and so on.
	Pipeline, opium fields, lithium, natural gas, and stuff like that.
	And that's a great point.
	I wasn't aware of that.
	Brzezinski was opposed to a Eurasian bloc led by Russia, which is like what Dugan and Putin wanted to do.
	His most famous book is called The Grand Chessboard, right?
	The Grand Chessboard is almost a copy of the name Great Game.
	You have to check the Great Game.
	It's a doctrine, a geostrategic doctrine coming from the British in the 19th century.
	They used the Ottoman Empire to try to prevent Russia from expanding into Europe.
	And that's exactly what they're doing today with Ukraine.
	It's a very old, ancient obsession of the British and Anglo-American imperialists, and Brzezinski in particular.
	And I suspect that's the reason why Brzezinski became so prominent, is that somehow Israel is kind of felt this is a good imperialist geostrategy if we can redirect it against not Afghanistan, but against Iraq and so on.
	But yeah, I think, well, it's a little bit mysterious why Afghanistan is so important, but it has always been so important for the British and the American to keep Afghanistan as a buffer state, a buffer state,
	to prevent the unification of the vision of actually, you've heard about this intellectual whose daughter was killed in Russia recently, Dugin.
	Alexander Dugin, you know, his doctrine is Eurasian.
	You know, some Russians have a vision, which I basically think is a good vision, that someday or another Europe should escape the domination of America and reconcile itself with Russia and create a big entity under the civilizational power of Russia somehow.
	In Europe, we have no other solution.
	I don't want Russia to take over all of Europe, though, because that'll be...
	And I think the Zionists would be happy to help them do that if it involves taking down America.
	Yeah, I understand.
	But seeing things from France, I think Europe is dead.
	Europe is spiritually dead.
	There is no civilization.
	So if you have the choice between, it's always a choice between something bad and something less bad.
	There's no ideal solution.
	But the influence of Russia over Europe probably is a good thing at this moment.
	Of course, I understand what you mean.
	We don't know where that will go ultimately.
	But at this moment, Europe is completely dominated by the United States.
	And Russia is completely dominated by Chabad and the Russian Orthodox Church.
	Well, yeah, that's another issue.
	Maybe we can make a whole program about it.
	Right, yeah.
	Okay, well, I think we disagree there.
	I'm very against Dugan's.
	It's not necessarily.
	I don't.
	Yeah, it's just nuance.
	Got it.
	Okay, a couple more super chats here.
	Zayo Free says, ask Laurent about Willie Rodriguez being thrown to ceiling several levels below.
	Seismograp shows two distinct explosions seconds Apart, low-level blast, then demo.
	I don't think your documentary didn't get into bombs in the buildings or the controlled demolition, so I could see why you wouldn't include the William Rodriguez stuff.
	But yeah, 9-11 truthers are well aware of him.
	What?
	Yeah.
	What?
	Are you going to say something?
	No, no, I'm not a specialist of this kind of question.
	I'm more trying to look at it from above and who benefits and these kind of things.
	But my understanding of the technicalities of 9-11 is limited, and I'm open to all.
	Well, Rodriguez was a whistleblower who said that he felt a bomb, a big bomb, go off before the first plane hit.
	And I do have audio clips of recordings showing that people heard a bomb.
	They believed it was in the basement or in the concourse where the subway is.
	And then you hear the plane hits a few seconds after that.
	So that's proof of that there's a conspiracy just in itself right there.
	There's so many different...
	And he was awarded by George Bush at some point before it became a...
	Yeah.
	Right.
	Right.
	Okay.
	Ali Abbas says, who are the imperialists today, which politicians?
	Hard question.
	I think if you search a little bit, I think I found it quite useful to go into the website of the Council on Foreign Relations and you will be surprised and then read articles of their magazine Foreign Affairs and you'll be surprised to hear to read things critical of Israel sometimes.
	They made, for example, recently a report that tried to also reconstruct a good relationship between America and the Arab world.
	So this kind of American establishment exists, but they don't have a voice in the news media today.
	They have been weakened.
	Well, the Zionists, their power has only grown because of 9-11.
	Exactly.
	But hopefully there's still this kind of people.
	And, you know, of course, I agree with you about Trump in general, but in the Trump environment, there may be people who would like to redirect American geopolitics in a not-so-pro-Israel way.
	But I don't know much about that.
	Ziofree says, AG agree, Zionists using end times prophecy to show Christ Zios that they are in real power.
	With God's blessing, be on their side or else reinforces Zionist Chabad base that they are unstoppable.
	That's true.
	You see, the rabbis often say, you know, God is on our side and we're the light.
	Anybody against us is the darkness.
	And Bush said the same thing.
	You're either with us or you're with the terrorists.
	This like this dichotomy where anybody that opposes them is a terrorist and the bad guys.
	Very similar.
	One point I've made sometimes is that it's very easy for the Zionists to manipulate America because there is a very common mind frame because America is also very biblical in its way to look at our own history.
	You know, the Pilgrim Fathers going into this new promised land.
	This is very Old Testament.
	This is very biblical.
	And so there is a very strong community of vision between Israel and America.
	You know, which is a little bit Christianity in Europe is a little bit different.
	At least Catholic Christianity is a little bit different.
	But American Christianity from its foundation, you know, with the Pilgrim Fathers is very biblically oriented.
	And so that's why I think it's very easy for the Zionists to manipulate America because they know exactly how Americans think.
	They think biblically, you know, exactly like them.
	Yep.
	And like you say in your book, the Torah is a blind spot for Christians.
	They're Torah shills is the term I like to call them.
	So, you know, you say in your book that they read these verses that are about the destruction of the Gentiles and they think that they're going to be the ones that win.
	So they've been completely deceived With this Jewish prophecy hoax.
	Okay, next question.
	Ziofree, Zios know U.S. citizens are useful idiots with media help steer support to benefit Israel.
	Have the stupid goys pay money with blood doing dirty work for small hats.
	Refugees will add to the chaos and destroy Edom.
	And yeah, and I'll add, it is the prophecy that Esau and Edom will live by the sword and serve their brother.
	So getting us to fight their wars and spread the Torah around the world is all playing into their hands ultimately.
	Yeah.
	You got comments on that or should I go to the next one?
	Well, if you mention Esau, I always think there is a pattern in the Bible about deception, which can be seen as a pattern for the neocons.
	Esau, Jacob coming to his father, say, look, Jacob coming to his father and saying, look, I'm Esau.
	I am Esau.
	So it's a little bit like the neocons, you know, saying, look, I'm American.
	I'm American.
	Right.
	There's definitely a trend and a theme of Jacob deceiving his father.
	This is where in the Zohar, they're citing that verse, commentary on that verse of Jacob's deception.
	That's where you get Mossad's motto, which is war by deception.
	Actually, now I remember you made a whole, you made maybe a couple of videos on that.
	Yeah.
	Also, the theme in the Bible of the power behind the throne, the influencing the Gentile leaders to serve their willing and having a Gentile front man also to almost be scapegoated and to be the figurehead when they're the power behind the scenes is also what you see in the story of Joseph and Esther and elsewhere.
	Yeah.
	Okay, from Clotin Conrad.
	Hello, Adam.
	Can you ask Mr. Guyano which he prefers?
	I'm going to butcher these words.
	P-E-U-G-E-O-T, Citrion, or Renault.
	What are those?
	Drinks or names?
	What?
	Maybe there are car brands of cars?
	Look, right here.
	P. Goitz?
	Yeah, Citrion or Renault.
	I don't care about cars, really.
	Okay, they're cars.
	Yeah, French cars.
	Okay.
	Got it.
	All right.
	Ziofree, was an audit going on to be present the next day from the Pentagon on 1 trillion missing, missing through theft, stolen incompetence, etc., convenient attack.
	What are your thoughts on the missing trillions that Rumsfeld announced the day before 9-11?
	Well, I don't have any, you know, really special insight on that.
	But yeah, of course, I try to say that Pentagon attack was an Israeli job, but I mean, an inside job.
	But of course, Israel was all over the place.
	And Dov Zakheim was the controller who was supposed to solve this missing trillions.
	And 9-11 came very useful to get rid of all those accounting people who were trying to make sense of this.
	So it's still a little bit mysterious to me.
	Sometimes I wonder, you know, Donald Rumsfeld talked about this missing trillions on September 10th, right?
	The day before the attacks.
	But I suppose he felt he had to speak about it before, because if he didn't speak about it before, some people might claim that 9-11 was for the purpose of hiding this.
	So if he said it before, then that would neutralize this argument.
	But on the other hand, I also thought maybe it's possible that the missing trillion were not missing before 9-11.
	Maybe they went missing after, you know, or maybe 9-11 was a way to create a big hole in the accounting books.
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	I see a lot of people posting about that yesterday.
	It's a very kind of safe, you know, entry-level type of 9-11 conspiracy detail to bring up.
	I don't bring it up a lot because I've heard it explained that it wasn't that there was trillions missing, but just that the accounting wasn't accounting for it.
	So he was criticizing the accounting and the tracking of money.
	And also the idea that it's like a cover-up of Pentagon financing makes it seem like this is an American conspiracy also and not an outside job.
	But there very likely could be some conspiracy involving the trillions.
	I see it as a little bit of a kosher detail that people like to talk about.
	Well, I mean, it's a lot of money, but it's, you know.
	Well, it wasn't actually necessarily missing.
	It just wasn't accounted for also.
	And I've heard some explanations for that.
	So anyway, next one, Lars Norman, what's up, Lars?
	Says, if you compile the most germane facts into a bullet point presentation with a few paragraphs and maybe one or two graphics, I will print and distribute pamphlets.
	How many goys will distribute printed materials?
	200 views and 50 is not enough.
	But the only way to censor print media is with arrests.
	Are you talking about on 9-11?
	I think putting together some pamphlets or business cards with some simple stuff would be a great idea.
	In fact, with all the censorship going on, that's going to be the only option.
	What do you think about that, Laurent?
	Well, I don't know.
	Everybody can do what they can do.
	I might do a small book on 9-11 one of these days, you know, trying to put together a few articles.
	And I like to try, like I did with Kennedy with my recent book, to do something not very thick, you know, like Michael Collins Piper's books are too big, you know, for most people.
	So it's useful to do something small to get to the main points.
	And yeah, I think that's a good idea.
	I'm going to be doing some more stuff on exposing the Christian deception that I may do something like that for, some pamphlets to hand out.
	And that goes along with the question that was just asked by Rilly Gothful.
	Exceptional show, will Laurent be releasing a new book anytime soon?
	Not soon, no, but someday, sure.
	Ali Abbas says Adam's work on January 6th is also unmatched.
	Thank you so much, Ali.
	Treasure Planet says, Adam, this might be off topic, but could you get Vargness on your show sometimes?
	He woke me up to how destructive Christianity really is.
	You know, I asked him a while back if he would come on, and he says he doesn't do interviews anymore, but I do like him exposing Christianity for sure.
	A couple more here.
	Paper Jesus says, looking forward to being on the show tomorrow.
	Yes, my friend Paper Jesus will be on tomorrow.
	We're going to be exposing Christianity.
	That'll be, I think it's at 7 Eastern.
	So tune in for that.
	And while I'm on the topic, let me do a little plug for my debate on Wednesday on the 14th.
	Adam Green versus David Patrick Harry.
	Is Christianity true?
	So you guys will want to tune into that.
	That'll be on the Crucible on YouTube.
	And he runs the channel The Church of the Eternal Logos.
	So you guys are going to definitely want to tune in for that.
	Tonight, I'm going to watch Jay Dyer vs.
	Ryan Dawson, theism versus anti-theism.
	So you guys can join me in the chat there.
	And a couple more here, Laurent, before we wrap it up.
	Hi, Adam.
	Can you ask Laurent what he thinks about the TO Lois attack and Charlie Hebdo attack?
	It looks like a direct kosher attack from the Sionim Zionists.
	Sure, it does.
	But it would be too long to try to get into.
	You've written a book on Charlie Hebdo before or contributed to a book?
	Well, yeah, I've contributed to Kevin Barrett's book.
	He wrote a book.
	Kevin Barrett speaks French fluently and he got very interested in the French false flag terror attacks like the Charlie Hebdo one and another one.
	So I did one chapter, not directly about Charlie Hebdo, but about another thing that happened before called the Mohamed Mira affair.
	So yeah, but I cannot comment now.
	It's too long.
	It's a very, very fascinating story.
	Okay, and last question from last German TV.
	Do you think the trauma story of 9-11, everybody above 10 years knows where they were on that day, will no be replaced by COVID trauma, at least for younger generation?
	Isn't the fight against climate change, great reset, hyperinflation more present nowadays than the war against Islam?
	Yeah, I would say that it is, But we shouldn't forget the 9-11 deception, though, because it's incredibly important.
	And in the grand scheme of things, it's probably could be more important than climate change and great reset and stuff.
	Only time will tell.
	Your thoughts?
	And I got an interesting comment under my article on YouTube's review.
	Somebody said, well, Americans will forget, maybe, but people who have been the Iraqis will never forget.
	The Afghans will never forget, you know, and the Arab world will never forget.
	So the truth will someday maybe come from Iranians and, you know, other nations.
	You know, some nations have been really completely destroyed after 9-11.
	Libya also is the destruction of Libya with a consequence of 9-11, and Syrians also to some extent.
	And much of the Arab world doesn't think that it was done by Islamic terrorism.
	They believe it was basically Israel behind it.
	Mossad.
	Yeah, I think so.
	That doesn't appear in the polls that we can read here and there, but I think that's true.
	I think in the Arab world.
	Anyway, whatever.
	It used to appear in polls, but then they stopped doing polls like that because it didn't look good.
	Exactly.
	Okay, and last one now, Ziofree says, Has Laurent been on any mainstream media shows in Europe?
	Are you familiar with Ryan Dawson?
	Has the French version of the ADL gone after him?
	No comment.
	I don't like to talk about it.
	No, I don't like to talk about potential problems I'll get.
	I think it brings bad luck, so I don't.
	But no, I've never been on any mainstream show.
	Yeah.
	Of course.
	Yeah.
	Have you been on many American-speaking shows besides mine?
	No.
	Basically, I publish on Youons Review.
	I've been interviewed one time on No Life Radio.
	Kevin Barrett, I think, has interviewed me once or twice.
	Yeah, I've been a couple, but not very much.
	My English is also not that great, although it's pretty good.
	I feel like your English is much better this time than I remember in past interviews.
	Yeah, it got better because for the last two months I've been getting back into 9-11 and sometimes I kind of have to practice it.
	I do practice written English because I continue to write in English, but speaking sometimes is a little bit difficult.
	Wow.
	Well, I tip my hat to you that you're able to speak so well in English because my French is absolutely non-existent.
	All right, well, that is all we have for the super chats.
	I enjoyed our discussion.
	I was happy to do it again.
	Everybody, definitely check out the documentary 9-11 in Israel's Great Game.
	The link will be in the description below.
	Sub to Laurent's Odyssey channel as well to see the rest of his videos about JFK.
	I highly recommend his books, Yahweh is Ion, and Our God is Your God too, but He has chosen us, especially the chapter on the Holy Hook is very good in my opinion.
	And any final parting words for us, Laurent, before we close it out?
	No, well, I want to thank you, Adam.
	I think it was, I think we agree.
	We have a little bit some differences, but basically, I really like what you're doing.
	I think you're doing really tremendous work, and I really admire what you're doing.
	And I was very happy that you invited me.
	So anytime you can.
	Sorry, it's been so long.
	I've been meaning to get you back on.
	I'm just really bad with scheduling guests, and I got my own things going on in my head.
	But I'll have to get you on again.
	It won't be so long the next time you're on.
	Oh, I think he froze.
	Yep, he froze.
	All right.
	Well, we'll close it out.
	Thank you.
	Oh, no, I think my internet froze.
	No.
	Wow.
	Okay, I'm just going to close it out.
	Thanks, everybody, for watching.
	Yeah, we're still recording.
	My internet is doing just this thing where it completely cuts out all the way and then comes back after a minute or so.
	So this is recording.
	This will be up on the archive on BitChute and on Odyssey.
	I look forward to seeing what you guys have to say in the comments.
	Give us a like, subscribe on Telegram, Gab, BitChute, Odyssey, Thumbs up, share your thoughts in the comments, subscribe, share, and I will be back tomorrow with another show with Paper Jesus.
	And check out the debate on Wednesday.
	Debating is Christianity True with the Church of the Eternal Logos Logos.
	Thank you, everybody, and see you again tomorrow.
	Okay, we lost service.
	My internet cut out there, but Lauron is back, and I'll fix it to edit up when I put up the archive.
	But I'm sorry, any final parting words before we close it out?
	Well, I don't know if you heard my parting words.
	I just wanted to thank you.
	Did you get that?
	No, I don't think so.
	No, okay.
	I just wanted to say I think you're doing a great job.
	And yeah, it's really wonderful that you can interview so many people and bring in so many different viewpoints.
	And we don't agree on everything exactly, but basically we're really, I feel we're on the same team, you know, somehow with the same understanding of who's the enemy.
	So anyway, thanks a lot.
	It was really, I enjoyed speaking.
	And so you can call me back anytime.
	All right.
	I'll definitely have you on again soon.
	Thanks for coming on.

▲