All Episodes
Previous Next
July 6, 2022 - Know More News - Adam Green
16:13
9/11 Twin Towers Video Goes Mega Viral On Twitter
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This video that went epically viral on Twitter went out It was posted on June 30th by this woman Shannon Crawford Who appears to be a QAnon Trump supporting grandma She had about I think 4,500
subs when she posted this clip this this short two-minute compilation that I edited 2016 2017 it was the first video in a playlist in a playlist that I have posted here with several 9-11 twin towers physics related videos that I compiled from other documentaries she posted this the other day and got 840,000
views almost a million views on this Twitter account that is much smaller than mine one-fifth the size of mine and I've posted the videos like this many videos like this that have never gotten anywhere near this many views so apparently this account was able to skirt around the shadow banning suppression algorithm 36 or 37,000
on this video so in honor of it going viral and look when uh my video that I posted on September 11th 2020 41,000 views nowhere near as much as this but just just check it out real quick in honor of the going viral all the way down I
was watching it and we're on it floor by floors that are popping out all the way down all of a sudden it was like bang bang bang bang bang like bullet shots I saw from the corner boom boom boom boom boom boom boom boom boom
just like 20 straight hits just went down and as the bombs were going people just started running and I sat there and watched bombs and then I just turned around and I just started running for my life because at that point the world trade center was coming right down from the corner boom boom boom boom boom boom boom the whole building just went and as the bombs were going people just started running and I sat there and watched a few of them explode
"48 stars are well trades andrelated status, so, you can grow over if you don't want to SHA-1 do you want either?
"The only way that a building can accelerate as it collapses is by having
pre-engineered, precisely timed and precisely placed explosives, in other words controlled demolition." So a lot of first-hand witnesses who were there, and they all thought it was bombs, they all thought it was a controlled demolition, even I think it was Dan Rather on the news that said it as well.
And I think 9/11 is a massive cover-up with Zionist fingerprints all over it.
And so 37,000 views, apparently I'm not the only one, apparently I'm not the only one, 840,000 views on this.
Crazy how viral this went.
A lot of people are suspicious.
And 9/11 is one of the gateways to people learning about Zionism, at least it was for me.
And we can watch another, here's part two of this playlist.
you know i put years ago i went out and did on the street interviews with people on 9-11 at Golden Gate Bridge and other places.
I did this several years.
I had a little tablet with all these clips on it, and I would show people and then ask them what they thought.
Their explanation on what caused the complete destruction of the towers does not exist.
Within more than 10,000 pages filled with technical data of relative importance, in a footnote on page 82 of the NIST report, we read.
The focus of the investigation was on the sequence of events from the instant of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for each tower.
For brevity of this report, the sequence is referred to as the probable collapse sequence, although it does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached and collapse became inevitable.
With the simple word inevitable, NIST purports to have explained the total destruction of 80,000 tons of a perfectly healthy steel structure upon itself.
The next three experiments are real-world examples intended to see if, indeed, as NIST simply assumed, a collapse would be inevitable.
Will the collapse of these structures continue to accelerate?
And is collapse really inevitable?
Based on these three real-world examples, an accelerated, straight-down collapse of the structure certainly is not inevitable.
The area below the damage zone where the planes flew in and where the fire was, that area below that, those 80 or 90 stories, 80,000 tons of structural steel, was not damaged in any way.
Yet you stood there and watched it destroy itself, wiping out floor by floor all 287 structural columns as if they didn't exist underneath the damaged zone.
When a well-known debunking website wrote to NIST asking for a clarification on the sequence of the collapses, it received a similar answer.
NIST did not describe the specific sequence of events after global collapse initiated.
This astonishing statement has been repeated by NIST over and over again under the most surprising of justifications.
Once the collapse initiated, the video evidence is rather clear.
It was not stopped by the floors below, so there was no calculation that we did to demonstrate that, though, what is clear from the good videos.
It collapsed so fast it was as if the floors below straight down into their own footprint as if they almost weren't even there.
Here's another one showing the physics of it with some experiments showing how the inertia slows down.
Dropping the steel block first on the floors that met co-deflection yielded a very different result.
So I reduced the number of planks which didn't meet deflection criteria, and still the block decelerated and eventually stopped.
Five sheets of glass were broken in that test.
The only thing that I've found that is even similar to what we're doing are people who are trying to disprove 9-11 being a terrorist attack.
I have literally found probably 10 websites using an example of dropping a bowling ball through panes of glass to explain why the Twin Towers is a conspiracy.
Plastic pizza cover supports as my columns.
Dropping about 15% of the floor system on the lower structure always demonstrated a deceleration.
I even removed the upper plastic supports to make the falling floors denser.
And if there's any skeptics out there, just make a little model and show me the physics of it's all to scale.
Show me the physics of a collapse happening and then the whole thing collapsing all the way down with so little resistance it's as if it wasn't there.
I wanted to make the weakest walls possible even if it didn't meet deflection codes.
So I used paper and matchsticks for my walls.
Raving the upper floors and dropping them on the lower floors, I didn't get the results I was looking for.
Instead of accelerating down like Tower 1, the upper floors decelerated, even on the weakest of supports.
But since the towers were burning, I set my Model on fire in the hope of replicating the motions observed with them.
Unlike steel, my paper walls burned until they could no longer support the deadloads and then began to accelerate.
But soon that downward motion was arrested and then stopped until the fire weakened the next paper wall.
This continued for quite some time, but never did I witness the acceleration and total destruction of the entire system like we did on September 11th.
The End Wow!
And that is this week's nerd war.
That 12-pound nerd ball fell from a height of 14 feet and broke four sheets of one-quarter of an inch thick glass spaced three inches apart.
Let's see, what's the next one?
More experiments.
This is what it looked like.
Firecrackers.
That's what it looked like we witnessed.
Like firecrackers, just like the witnesses said.
Project projectiles flying out.
The problem was, I was using basic fuse and firecrackers, which are very difficult to time and control.
But if I had remote control wireless detonators, I think I could replicate the motions they saw.
It was floor by floor instead of poppin'out.
'It was as if they had detonated… As if there was a plan to take down a building.
Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom…' Notice that as soon as the walls are blown, the top uniformly accelerates down, just like the towers.
And when there's a delay, the top's downward motion stops.
It can't continue the downward motion until the walls blow.
But the force from the pancake and pile driver experiments doesn't match the motions, and therefore it's wrong.
Yet my demolition experiment did.
Something like 10 seconds, both towers down in 10 seconds.
Highly suspicious.
Everybody's initial thoughts.
As if a demolition team set on this when you see the old demolitions of these old buildings.
It looks like one of those scenes of an old building being purposely dynamited and blown up.
It didn't fall over.
It looked as if somebody put TNT all throughout that building.
Anybody who's ever watched a building being demolished on purpose knows that if you're going to do this, you have to get at the under-infrastructure of a building and bring it down.
This was clearly the way the structure is collapsing.
This was the result of something that was planned.
This is not, it's not actually thought it on the day.
The first tower just happened to collapse.
The same people lying about this are telling you there's nothing to see with Jeffrey Epstein.
The people covering up the Epstein blackmail network are the same people covering up this.
Still going.
In exactly the same way.
How they accomplished this, we don't know.
The tower would not have collapsed absent some tremendous trauma.
Absolutely.
I am reasonably sure that it was not the impact of the planet Warmader.
Something ignited.
There's bombs that went off before either plane hit the Twin Towers as well.
That's been proven.
Maybe they had.
That was an incredible.
That was an incredible explosion.
That does not cause from a.
I agree with you.
It could have been something that was planted or a bomb planet in the building.
Yeah.
The second tower just spawned down.
They had it wired for explosives, obviously.
Oh, my God.
That was a bomb that did that.
Oh, God.
Look at that.
That was a fucking bomb that did that.
There's no goddamn way that could have happened.
And that did look like there was an explosion as it went down.
It went up.
I mean, that wasn't because the building lost its structural integrity.
All right, so that's just a little playlist there.
Very happy that this video got 840,000 views.
It just shows you how many people out there that could be exposed if they were only exposed to some of my videos and I was not so heavily suppressed if I wasn't so censored everywhere, if I wasn't shadow Banned and throttled with the algorithms, like how much people could wake up so fast because we got the truth on our side.
I mean, like, Twitter, my timeline on Twitter is full of stuff like this.
Rose Rothstein, follow and join me in the fight against anti-Semitism and in supporting Israel.
Promoted, paid-for million-dollar organization ads all over Twitter to promote this kind of stuff.
Here's a video, a little clip I saw.
This guy, Alex Stein, this comedian guy that does these funny stunts.
He was getting protested by a Jewish trans activist.
And listen to what they said.
They say, I thought it was Shabos to the Goyam, but it's Shonda of the Goyam.
So you're an embarrassment in front of the Goyam is what he says here.
You know what?
I got the shorter version.
Oh, wait.
there it is I love you, though.
I hope you put chump on a trans girl's dick.
Hope you choke on a trans girl's D. Look at the Hebrew writing on the sign.
Trans activists.
Trans girl's D. Wow, that's sweet, bro.
I want you to live a long, prosperous life.
Yeah, and I hope you die.
That's what they want me to do.
Shonda.
Takuno Lam.
Shonda for the Goyam.
Wow.
Shonda for the Goyam.
He says he doesn't know what it is, but he says, wow.
Wow.
That's what they want me to do.
Shonda.
Shonda for the Goyam.
Wow.
I don't even know what that quite means, but I know this.
I know that you're a good person.
I'm not.
Sean, so he says, you're an embarrassment in front of the Goyam.
Pot calling the kettle black, much.
Lack of self-awareness, much.
It's a Shonda.
I know that's one of Al's favorite words.
Shonda.
I wonder if people in the Jewish community think you're an embarrassment.
Telling him to choke on a trans dick.
I don't even know what that quite means, but I know this.
I know that you're a good person.
I'm not.
Not to you.
Not a good person.
I'm not a good person.
Thank you.
I broke your chock on a dick.
I love you.
So, Alex Stein being promoted because of his funny, funny videos and his courage.
He actually got the clips of the Drag Queen show a while back, too.
He follows me on Twitter.
He retweeted this.
Maybe I'll have to get him on the show.
He has a show called Conspiracy Castle.
I'll see if he's in high demand right now.
We'll see if he'll come on.
That could be an interesting show.
▲
Export Selection