Know More News - Adam Green - 9/11 Towers Freefall

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 13, 2021 - Know More News - Adam Green

05:11

9/11 Towers Freefall

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	The last and possibly most conclusive piece of evidence against the official explanation is free fall.
	In any case, the near free fall speed of about 10 seconds has been confirmed by different official sources.
	The 9-11 Commission wrote that the South Tower collapsed in 10 seconds.
	Mr. Sunder from NIST has confirmed similar timings.
	The measurements have indicated that tower one collapsed in about 11 seconds and tower two collapsed in about nine seconds.
	Mr. Sunder has also acknowledged that the towers came down practically at free fall speed.
	As a result, the entire top of the building came down.
	Pretty much in free fall.
	The same admission is present in the official report.
	Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance, the building section above came down essentially in free fall.
	Furthermore, a couple of seconds more or less would not make a big difference as the time for the transfer of momentum between each collapsing floor must be considered anyway.
	As energy is drained away from the system to deform those members, it would slow down the descending mass and cause a descent at less than free fall speed.
	You're looking for a jolt.
	That this thing, if it actually comes down and hits, you should be able to see the point at which they actually impact.
	Because it would actually slow down the motion of the falling block.
	A wood block was gently wedged so that it just barely held the upper block in the static condition.
	Raising the block and dropping it, you can clearly see that the block decelerated as it hit the support, indicating that a deceleration will be noticed by a falling body by any equivalent force that could support the static weight.
	What was demonstrated by this experiment is one any upper block of material must slow down when it hits any mass or force that previously supported it.
	World Trade Centers 1, 2, and 7 did not slow down when they fell.
	Careful measurements, such as this one by David Chandler, clearly indicates that the velocity of the roof of the towers actually sped up.
	How can this be?
	After the initial failure of the penthouse on the eastern side of the building, the entire structure came crashing down to the ground in a little more than six seconds.
	David Chandler of Architects and Engineers has measured the downwards acceleration of the building from the start of the global collapse.
	The slope of the velocity graph gives the acceleration.
	Note that global collapse starts suddenly, and for the next 2.5 seconds, the building accelerates at the rate of 9.88 meters per second squared.
	In other words, the rate of collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over the first 2.5 seconds is literally indistinguishable from free fall in a vacuum.
	When architects and engineers presented NIST with these calculations, they forced them to correct their preliminary report and acknowledge the free fall of the building for the first eight stories of the collapse.
	From NIST's final report, we read, a more detailed analysis of the descent of the north face found three stages.
	The first was a slow descent with acceleration less than that of gravity that corresponded to the buckling of the exterior columns at the lower floors.
	The second stage was a free fall descent over approximately eight stories at gravitational acceleration for approximately 2.25 seconds.
	2.25 seconds is more than one-third of the global collapse.
	Once NIST had admitted the free fall for one-third of the collapse, the outcome of the debate was sealed.
	Building seven, uh the NIST reports admits fell at the rate of gravity for the first one hundred feet.
	Well, that's impossible unless there's nothing resisting it.
	NIST has always acknowledged this.
	Free fall time would be an object that has no uh structural components below it.
	And as we have seen before, the almost simultaneous removal of the supporting structure can only be obtained with a control demolition.
	The building didn't disappear so the building can fall for a hundred feet at free fall speed.
	That's impossible.
	That evidence alone would indicate that the official story doesn't hold water.
	Building seven came down and went into a sudden collapse across the full width and left of the building for 2.25 seconds, which amounted to 105 feet or eight stories, eight thirteen foot tall stories.
	It was in full freefall acceleration.
	That is impossible because in a natural collapse, columns would have to buckle.
	When columns buckle, there is a minimum resistance.
	It's asymptotic, if you know what that means.
	That means it never goes to zero.
	So it's impossible.
	So here's here's what I guess in layman's research, just get my hands here, Peter.
	So what he's saying is that uh the top floor collapses, hits the next floor, hits the next floor, hits the next floor, so it's bang bang bang bang, the weight of the upper floors.
	It would slow down.
	What I'm trying to say is it was in full free fall acceleration.
	All of its potential energy was being converted.
	Instead of what I just described, the thing just s collapsed like a pancake.

▲