All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 29, 2020 - Know More News - Adam Green
18:18
Trump Signs the 'Felony Streamers Act' & Wants Repeal of Section 230 to Target 'Anti-Semitism'
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Penalties for illegal streaming shoehorned into COVID relief bill.
This is what Trump signed.
This is December 22nd.
Penalties for illegal streaming.
Let's see.
Includes measures against for-profit illegal streaming services.
So DLive makes makes a profit.
Any streaming service is for profit, because you don't, I mean, there's not just like charity streaming sites.
They all make money somehow, either with ads or by charging or something.
So DLive, uh, Twitch, any of them, YouTube, obviously.
In this 2.3 trillion spending and relief package, the bill includes changes to copyright law introduced by Republican Senator Tom Tillis less than two weeks ago.
This is a 5,000-page bill.
Nobody had time to read this.
And they sneak it in there two weeks before.
Trademark Modernization Act and the Felony Streaming Act now form part of the bill.
These include fines up to $30,000 and up to 10 years in prison for commercial operators, so like the owners of D Live, who willfully and for purpose or commercial advantage or private financial gain offer or provide to the public a digital transmission service of pirated material.
So now anybody can go on to uh D Live and start streaming, you know, one second too long of some news clip or some a clip from a movie that we're trying to break down from propaganda, and they're gonna find D Live for $30,000 unless they permanently ban you.
And it's not just the owners, they'll also go after individuals.
With today's passage of the Case Act, creators will have a voluntary, inexpensive and streamlined alternative, a small claims tribunal that will be housed within the U.S. copyright office, enabling them to defend their copyrighted works from infringement.
There's some relief that the bill doesn't include penalties for individuals found to have illegally streamed content, thus potentially criminalizing ordinary Twitch streamers or YouTubers.
Okay, my apologies.
I I got that wrong.
I read that wrong.
It doesn't include individuals.
It won't matter though, because the pressure will be on the streamers or the streaming platforms to censor anybody.
And how are you gonna stop streamers?
Streamers in is in real time.
So how can they possibly stop people from posting pirated stuff if it's streamed live?
Criticism of the claims tribunal as being potentially unaccountable and fears that fair use provisions will be ignored.
Most notably, though, the bills come under fire for including anything to do with copyright at all, particularly in a 5,000-word document, which legislators had just hours to review.
Congress should be working quickly to provide immediate COVID relief, not cramming controversial poison pill legislation into budget bills to appease special interest.
Who could these special interests be that want to shut down streaming?
Who could that be?
Well, we got Senator Republican Senator Tom Tillis is the one who introduced this bill.
Let's look into Tom Tillis a little bit here.
We got I I just did a quick little search.
Israel on his tweets and Googled.
He says here, Tom Tillis, look forward to Prime Minister Netanyahu's speech before Congress tomorrow.
You must U.S. must stand with Israel.
Oh, he's a Zionist.
He's a little Zionist uh lapdog.
What a big surprise.
I wonder who could be behind this bill.
Who's trying to shut down voices like mine on D Live with the felony streamers act.
Now it now streamers are felons.
Senator Tom says President Obama's refusal to stand up for Israel at the UN was nothing short of shameful.
Sounds like Alex Jones.
This is in 2016, referring to when Obama was leaving off office.
I believe it was Susan Rice at the UN.
Instead of on the Human Rights Council, they had a resolution to condemn Israel's illegal settlements with the Talmudic extremists taking Palestinian land.
So all of the UN wants to condemn that and have a resolution against Israel.
And by stay he's mad at Obama for not using our veto power to shut down the resolution.
America with one vote can override all the rest of them.
And this is what he says.
This is nothing short of shameful.
You know what, Tom Tillis?
It's nothing short of shameful you shilling for Israel and defending the illegal settlements and trying to use America's veto power to always protect Israel at the UN.
That's what's shameful.
And then here's a again, he says, yesterday we met with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to discuss how to strengthen the U.S. Israel relationship.
Oh, this is the guy that's behind the felony streamers act.
It gets worse.
Here he says, honored to attend the signing of the Abraham Accords, which Netanyahu just said before Christmas.
Okay, sorry.
I'm getting stop spamming the chat.
Copy and pasting and spamming the chat.
Shut up.
Honored to attend the signing of the Abraham Accords, a historic peace agreement between the United States, Israel, United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain.
A remarkable accomplishment for President Donald Trump and his administration.
Netanyahu on the day before Christmas gave a Merry Christmas announcement to uh Christians around the world said he's fulfilling biblical prophecy, bringing peace on earth with the Abraham Accords.
And this is what this uh shill here, Tom Tillis is saying.
Here he is saying he's posting, he's writing op eds in the times of Israel about boycotting BDS or about uh you know making BDS illegal.
So he's obviously a Zionist agent.
ADL, ADL leaders and activists come to Washington, DC for the 2015 National Leadership Summit.
Guess who went?
Tom Tillis.
ADL's mission to go advocate in the Senate to Tom Tillis.
This Tom Tillis, the Israeli agent, ADL, APEC are coming after streaming.
No surprise there, right, guys?
Every single time streamers, the felony streamers act.
So now when I want to like they're they're gonna be able to say, DLive, you better ban this person because they're uh streaming copyrighted material, even though it's fair use, it's for its added value, it's um for educational purposes.
They'll be like, oh, but you're accepting uh lemon, so you know you can't play anything longer than 10 seconds, which is nothing more than an excuse for them to target and go after and suppress streamers.
And they're trying to use this explains section 230.
Remember, Trump was saying he'll he'll veto the this bill if it doesn't include section a repeal of section 230.
230 is the clause that gives social media platforms and streaming companies a immunity from getting sued.
So they're not held accountable for content that's uploaded on their platform.
So they want to repeal that.
Do you know what would happen if Section 230 would be up uh repealed?
The ADL and all of these hundreds of Jewish organizations would be suing me for everything I say and trying to put people like me out of business.
That's what they would do.
Or they would just threaten to sue Google or YouTube or DLive or BitChute or whatever.
If they don't ban everybody that they want, they will sue you.
That's what that's what will happen.
You don't believe it's not true?
Here is Zionist, U.S. Senator Joe Lieberman, who went and spoke at a Chabad Lubavich conference and Said, you guys got more power than the CIA.
I shouldn't say this, but you guys got more power than the CIA.
His daughter makes a leah and goes to Israel.
They want to repeal Section 230.
They want to enact this felony streamers act to shut it down on the internet.
Yeah, one view on the video.
Oh, well, this is somebody else posted it.
Going on recently in the relationship of President Trump with social media, particularly Twitter.
So I wanted to ask you if you support the executive order that exposes social networks to liability for content posted on their platforms.
Yeah, I support the President Trump's goal.
I don't know what what he did was effective.
And here's what I mean.
I I've been focused on this for other reasons.
I'll take it in a minute.
There's this section 230 of what we call the communications decency act, a great name for a law.
It's been on the books for quite a while.
It essentially says that uh internet companies, social media companies have no liability for content.
In other words, they're not like a newspaper which can be sued uh for material they print.
See, they want to sue all the social uh every company on the internet to censor anybody that they want.
They'll pass this international holocaust remembrance alliance definition of anti-Semitism, and they'll say, You're not following that.
That's the law that uh the State Department says that's in Trump's executive order.
This violates this policy in Germany.
You get you get messages like that, like, oh, this isn't allowed in a foreign country.
Um, or even a TV station.
And uh I first confronted this um oh a few years ago when it became pretty clear to me that a lot of terrorism was being stimulated on the internet, but it's a social media and oh, the terror the white supremacist terrorists that are anti-Semites.
We need to repeal two thirty so we can sue all these companies.
Remember uh Sasha Baron Cohen at the ADL said that he wants to hold ADLs thinks that their job is to hold social media accountable.
Social media companies are accountable to the Jews and Israel at the ADL and the Benai Brith.
That's the reality.
The people that will will send and to say that they control anything is considered anti-Semitic by their own definition that they're trying to to enforce everywhere.
And the social media companies were taking no responsibility for it.
The same is true today of anti-Semitism.
Uh I spent a fair amount of time looking into the backgrounds of the Oh, what do you know?
Trump is wanting to get rid of 230 with his Chabad Lubovich buddy Joe Lieberman to stop anti-Semitism.
Are you guys tired of winning with Trump?
After these parts, I mean, already with Trump, there's no excuse for anybody still supporting him.
But even after the pardons of all these people, even after signing this bill, even after the 230 and the executive orders, anybody still supporting Trump at this point is either oh, just complete complete trash.
Complete trash.
Yeah, 2018 and 19 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Powerway, California.
And there's no evidence that either one of them belonged to a neo-Nazi or a racist or a hate organization.
But there was a lot of evidence that they were inflamed by what they were following on the internet.
And inflamed by what they were following on the internet.
So so imagine you know, Chabad Lubavitch or or corrupt politicians that are connected to APEC do something bad, and then somebody like me exposes it.
I read from the Torah from the Torah and the Talmud and the Zohar and exp in play clips of rabbis, and that inflames people, people get mad at at detestable beliefs and activities.
That's a normal human reaction to hate evil, to hate people that want to enslave you and think you're subhuman beast, only here to serve them.
Oh, but that might, and this is what it the terms of hate speech are on YouTube that you can't incite hatred towards a religion, it says.
If I point out something bad in a religion, somebody out there might hate it.
That's not my fault.
That's the religion's fault.
As long as what I'm saying is telling the truth, that's all that matters.
But just to go to show the agenda behind 230 is to go after anti-Semites.
Therefore, we've got to find a way to force um social media companies to uh to begin to take some responsibility for what goes over their uh media.
Uh it's not easy just because of the enormity of how many posts.
As if they're not social media isn't already censoring so much, it's already a giant massive scandal.
Book burnings beyond anything we've ever seen, uh the magnitude we'd have we've ever seen.
And then they're still clamoring for more.
Still want more.
They want a complete shutdown, complete control out of uh uh what anybody says, complete censorship and uh rule with an iron grip.
For a while, I was in an argument with YouTube about uh uh videos of the radical sheikh Alaki who was ultimately killed by American drone, uh, to get him off of YouTube because we had evidence that was stimulating terrorist action here, because he spoke English.
And uh you know, they'll make a long story short.
The people at YouTube uh said to me, Well, how can we tell?
What we're putting up is a regular sermon of his or it's jihadist.
And I said, No, you can tell.
And uh, pressure now.
There'll be a movement in Congress, which will probably be more effective to repeal or amend the so-called section 230.
And um, I think the the social media companies have such phenomenal technological capability that they could figure out a way to do this.
The Congress did amend this law to provide some kind of liability for social media companies when uh their uh vehicles were being used to uh bring about um sexual abuse of children, basically.
And if they can do it there, they can do it in other areas like uh terrorism and antisemitism.
There you go.
Terrorism and anti-Semitism again, how they conflate like as if those things are the same thing.
Not liking Jewish supremacist, not liking uh the Talmud is is anti not liking your enslavement is the same as terrorism, conflating anti-Semitism and terrorism.
That's what section 230 is about.
You know what?
I'm gonna look and see if I can find Lieberman.
I bet you if I just do a search for Chabad, I'll find it.
Or CIA, that's how I can find it.
Watch this.
CIA Twitter.
Perfect.
I used to say that Chabad was sending out more Schluchim than McDonald's was opening new.
This is the international conference of Chabad Lubavitch with Lieberman, who is uh who is gonna be Gore's VP.
And Schluckem is emissaries, it's Chabad Lubavitchers with that go out with a family and and start uh synagogues in countries all over the world so that they can convert the Gentiles to be Noahides and get Jews to be observant.
I used to say that Chabad was sending out more Schluchim than McDonald's was opening new hamburger places.
He's way beyond that now.
Um I also uh and here I have to be careful what I say.
I once said that it seemed to me uh as somebody involved in national security matters that Chabad actually was developing a larger worldwide organization than the CIA.
Habab, larger international organization than the CIA.
A. Bye.
Thank you.
That's who we're talking about.
That's who wants to uh speaking at the conference, the top conference for Chabad Lubavitch.
Look at the people involved with the felony streamers act in section 230, advocating for these things.
Every single time, guys, the full shutdown.
This is what they want.
This is what they want.
The rebuke of his people shall he take away from off all the earth.
They believe that nobody shall be able to criticize them.
They that will be Amalek, they will be destroyed.
The memory of them will be erased from history, and all will be left is a few Noahides to be Shabos Goys to serve them.
And then and then, of course, the life extension technology, the robots, the genetic modification, all of that stuff.
I forgot to show this, but here is uh Charles Jared Kushner with the Rebbe.
Here is or that's Jared Kushner, I'm not sure.
I think they mislabeled it.
And here's the dad.
Come on.
The dad's not coming up.
Charles Kushner, that's who just got the uh the the pardon.
So they got power of the pardon.
They're they're behind the felony streamers act, they're behind the uh section two thirty that Trump was pushing for.
But yeah, what white supremacy, white privilege, right?
That's that's the big threat.
Pure projection, pure deception and scapegoating, trying to destroy Esau, Amalek, and Edom.
That's all it is.
A depraved temple cult, the Judeo-Christian temple cult.
So who we're dealing with here.
Tonight, we're honored to have with us the former director of the CIA, a dear friend of mine, Jim Wolsey.
The director of the CIA also attends Chabad-Lubavich International Conferences.
Thank you.
The Schluchem of Chabad Lubovich.
They're everywhere.
▲
Export Selection