All Episodes
Previous Next
July 29, 2020 - Know More News - Adam Green
01:28:57
kmn LIVE feat. Billy CornPop
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, Adam Green here with No More News.org.
Thank you for joining me for a second video today, a double header.
I was on uh doing a DLive exclusive.
Well, first let me get the date.
It's uh Sunday, July 26, 2020.
Earlier this morning, I did part two in my uh series about the Holocaust burnt offering atonement ritual.
So make sure if you haven't already to check that out.
I did part one the other day.
It's top trending on BitChute.
Oops, top trending on BitChute right now, the first one.
Check definitely check out one and part two.
But today, joining me, I have got Billy Cornpop, also known as Based Yugoslavia.
He is joining me.
Thanks for joining me, Billy.
It's a pleasure to be on here, Adam.
How are you?
I'm doing well.
I'm happy that I finally got my video out this morning because I've been working on it a long time and it's uh bombshell information, in my opinion.
Yes, uh, I was I was actually going through some of the uh video, the second one you uploaded today, and um I was gonna say not very many people out there are doing a sort of research that you've done regarding um like the theological aspect of Judaism in terms of like what the more extreme uh I guess sects of Judaism are using to justify the world domination plan that Jews are engaging in today.
Yeah, that's a good way to describe what what I'm doing, actually, focusing on the more supremacist end times, uh megalomaniac uh views that these people have.
So uh I'm glad you were checking it out.
But um just to give people some background uh context and the background story of what brought us here today.
A couple weeks ago, maybe about a month ago now, I did a post up on Twitter and I said something along the lines of Syria and Iran are uh Soviet proxy states or something like that, or Soviet satellite states, and then I got a barrage of um what I describe as uh Duganist uh knots bulls, not Nazi Bolsheviks, uh just really angry and attacking me in the comments.
I uh debated all afternoon with them.
Um and one of the people that I was uh going back and forth with you suggested we have a debate, and I accepted.
So um since then that guy just pushed it too far, so I blocked him.
But we are here today to discuss.
I guess we can get into that, we can get into some other issues.
Since we have been uh texting or not texting, DMing on Twitter a bit to uh discuss the time and and uh what we're gonna talk about.
Uh I've I've learned some interesting things about your views that I got questions to pick your brain, and um yeah, and any uh comment on that on the the drama that brought us here.
Yeah, well, I I'm glad we're on better terms than how we initially started out, so to say.
And um, but I think that you know, this whole thing online where um there's certain actors that are convinced that everyone's a Duganist.
Uh you know, I'm I'm glad that you know people are finally starting to have open conversations about this sort of stuff instead of just you know name-calling, which you know I give you credit for, Adam, quite a bit.
Well, I I know what you mean about the the Duganist, because I I can guarantee you people that know about Dugan are are quick to throw the accusation out.
They throw it out to me, even though I've known about Dugan and been exposing him my videos for like I think almost like two years now.
And uh so I know that sometimes people get called a Dugan Duganist and they maybe don't even know what Dugan is, but that doesn't mean that what Dugan is saying and doing and his in his uh influence and uh aspects of the quote-unquote alt-right are uh a serious concern.
So are you not a Duganist?
So this is what I would say regarding Alexander Dugan.
I think uh so I've been aware of him since around like 2014.
I actually had a friend in real life that uh was into that sort of literature.
He wasn't a Duganist himself, but he he was the kind of person that wanted to understand Russian foreign policy, if you will.
So he believes studying Duganism was an important aspect in order to do this.
And um I would say personally that no, I'm I'm definitely not a Duganist.
I think he's uh interesting intellectual in Russia.
I think he makes certain salient point regarding like you know, America, the American Empire and things like that.
But at the end of the day, he's kind of more of a Russian imperialist, and I'm more of a Yugoslavian nationalist, if you will, so it's not really something that goes entirely with my world of view, but I understand sort of where he's coming from when he talks about Russia.
So, like the parts about how he wants America to be destroyed and to uh Putin to be a dictator in Russia and to have the Eurasian power block and to take down the like you um Keith Woods, he he got tied into this uh Twitter beef too, as well as some other people.
And uh I noticed it was a lot of uh like Iranian flags, Palestinian flags, and and people real quick to just uh really troll like behavior.
But it Dugan is an enemy of America, and his the stuff that he's written is is horrendous.
So I don't see how you could call it interesting.
Uh you you said you're anti-capitalist, and you're basic are you anti-West and anti-America too?
Oh, absolutely.
Um, you know, the way I view America is, you know, I I don't dislike the American people.
I want to make that very clear.
I think the American people are good, but I don't I think from the very beginning, since America's founding, it was founded as a essentially a Masonic shopping empire with Jewish financial elites at the very top.
That's how I believe it was founded, and I believe that uh, you know, the early colonists that helped settle America, you know, they were they were a lot of them were good men, but they were being used to serve a Jewish financial empire that dated you know much further than just the founding of America.
And I don't see the American government as a vehicle that represents the interests of not only just European Americans, but even black Americans or Hispanic Americans or anybody that's living there.
I think that uh the people that are coming to America and that have came to America throughout the centuries are being exploited by this evil financial system.
And you you said that you've got some, like you have a uh hammer and sickle, communist hammer and sickle in your your profile.
Is is that irony, or you you uh you like communism?
I'm glad you asked.
So I would say that my primary ideology uh would be closest to, I guess, you know, national socialism as espoused in my Kampf, which I'm also doing the audiobook for, by the way.
I've done many audiobooks that your audience can check out if they'd like, including Culture Critique for My Legionaries, stuff like that.
But I would say that no communism is not my you know preferred ideology, but I will say that there are certain communist leaders that I do have great respect for.
And I will just say in general that I'm willing to respect anybody who believes in what they believe in so much that they're willing to die for it.
People like Che Guevara, people like that, those are the sorts of people that command my respect, you know, the fact that they're willing to put their money where their mouth is.
It's I can't feel like that.
You can find you can find people with any belief that will that will sacrifice themselves.
Look at like the cults that think the comets flying by and they all they all drink the poison and kill themselves.
Like you respect that.
Do you respect them and their beliefs?
I mean, to a certain degree, I mean, you know, that's an extreme example, but I I would say that um, I think communism is extreme.
I I think com sorry to interrupt, but I think communism is is comes from Marx, Talmudic Marx and his rabbi family and Moses Hess, the Zionist, and it's Zionism and Communism are working uh synergistically to an end goal where it's Jewish domination of the world.
Sure, sure.
And that's that's an understandable position to have, but I would counter with this.
I'm a former Marxist myself before I became, I guess, national socialists, uh, if you will.
And um I view Marxism as just one form of socialism, and that many forms of socialism that have taken on their own unique form depending on the ethnicity taking up socialism, uh, is pretty much what happens, and you know, we should oppose Marxism.
That's how I see it.
So you're you like socialism, but you're against Marxism.
But the whole communist movement is all a manifestation of Marx and the Bolshevik revolution that's caused just mass murder in just destroyed countries, and uh it i it's interesting to me that you know, um a lot of the work of my last two videos, this Holocaust series is from the work of Christopher John Björkness, and and he has a very unpopular belief that Hitler and some of the top Nazis were Bolshevik controlled opposition.
So it's interesting that you go from Marxism to national socialism, but then people you know scoff at the idea that that you know Lenin did say too, I believe, that the easiest way to lead the opposition or to control the opposition is to lead it.
Well, I mean that's a fine opinion to have, but my only counter to that is basically um, you know, I can let I I essentially have to let your audience decide whether I'm being a sincere person or not, and that's you know, organically what I've come to.
And I mean, if you have a problem with national socialism, I'm fine with that, but we'd have to go into the weeds and you'd have to tell me ideologically what you find wrong with it, and I'd be happy to do that with you if you'd like.
Well, it's not I'm not necessarily critting uh criticizing like the nationalistic uh you know economic aspects of of Germany at that time.
I'm just saying that the whole like you understand the term uh uh Nazbol, Nazi Bolsheviks, and um in those types that are kind of online, you know, like uh that are communist, but also like Hitler, like in your profile picture, you have uh swastika and a communist thing.
Like that's the Jewish dialect uh dialectic to a degree, as as I exposed in my video this morning.
Right, but uh the main reason I have the whole you know, Yugoslavia and the Hammer and Sickle, it's it's pretty much just me paying my respects to Tito, because I think Tito was a good man, and he, you know, he ruled over my parents, he ruled over my grandparents.
My great grandparents actually fought in the Waffen SS, but that's a different story altogether.
But um essentially he, you know, prior to him coming to power, the people of Yugoslavia, even though they were all of one ethnicity, they were massacring each other regularly, you know, over very petty cultural differences that uh were exaggerated by Western powers that you know wanted to exploit these uh holes in this in that we had amongst each other.
And I'm happy that we had someone like Tito that said, look, you're all one people.
You're all, you know, the different languages you speak are essentially different dialects.
Why don't we form together, be one powerful socialist country that isn't beholden to the USSR or the USA?
And I respect the fact that he was able to do that, and you know, there weren't a lot of good leaders like him just throughout recent history.
Throughout recent history, most people in the West have had horrible leadership in which, you know, uh they've had uh you know mass immigration forced upon them.
They've had uh what you would refer to as cultural Marxism, but you know, we understand what what we mean when we say that, and all these other things, these things did not exist for the most part in places like communist Yugoslavia, and that's my respect for them, but that's still not my preferred system.
It's just me having a more nuanced view on a system that my parents and grandparents lived under.
So it seems to me, like from listening to that, that you have like uh kind of a glorified view of Tito, which when was he in power there in the um which decade was it?
The late 50s?
See, I was after it was after World War II up until uh the 90s.
Tito was in charge that whole time.
No.
Well, yeah, he died.
He died, and then Yugoslavia was essentially broke up after that's when the war started.
So you're opposed to Bolsheviks and the Soviet Union, but you like you Yugoslavia's version of communism, basically.
Well, precisely.
I mean, here's the thing.
Like, I'm not going to sit there and pretend like the USSR, for example, wasn't completely financed by people like Jacob Schiff and uh more, you know, uh Warburg and people like that.
It was.
You know, at that very time period where the Bolshevik revolution occurred, and I have to just uh just say real quickly, Tito died in 1980.
I uh don't know how that slipped my mind.
Was he in power the whole time, though?
People like him were in power throughout the most time, but but what's important to say here is um uh forgot where I was going with this.
But um essentially, okay, yes.
So, whenever yes, at the time that which they overthrew the Tsar, communism and Marxism specifically was a vehicle that the Jews believed was very uh important to uh it was like it could be a useful vehicle for political power.
The problem with communism that I believe Jews ran into, and this happened more after World War II than prior, was the fact that because they had created uh such an authoritarian state with you know, a strongman and usually a goi strongman at the very top, if that strongman for whatever reason or the people got very upset with the system, they could easily rise up.
And we have authors like David Irving who have written extensively, for example, about how like in the Hungarian uprising of 1956, it was essentially an anti-Jewish pogrom.
And that's why, along with other events that occurred afterwards, that I believe Jews kind of saw communism at that point as like, yeah, we're not gonna do this anymore.
Actually, neoliberal, you know, c uh capitalism is actually a much more effective way of controlling the people because under communism, everybody understands the communist governments in charge, they're the ones who are oppressing you, and if they're not treating you right, you can rise up and kill them, and it's all Jews that are, you know, running this communist system.
But whenever it's capitalism, like we have here, well, you can ask 10 different people across, you know, walking the street in America, you know, who's in charge of America?
One person might say the reptilians, another person might say the Democrats, another might say the Republicans, you know, another person might say Soros, another might say Adelson.
It's way harder for them to locate to pressure points of power, and I think that's how the Jewish elites prefer it over just straight up communism.
Do you get where I'm coming from, Adam?
Yeah, I I kind of see what you're saying there.
And um, but do you think more communism, more leftist policies would be better for America at this point?
I don't really view it like that.
I I view it as who's in charge of the country.
I mean, if if America had a legitimate leader that uh you know actually cared about the people and wasn't beholden to Jewish interests, like yeah, I think socialist policies would absolutely be preferred to just having uh a capitalist system that usually just creates a bunch of cancerous middlemen.
So you're basically saying that all that matters isn't is who is in in charge.
If you had somebody let's just say hypothetically there was like a good ruling class that that wasn't just greedy and cared about the cabal and themselves and and uh that it wouldn't matter if you were living under them, whether it was capitalism or communism.
It's a it's a utopian view.
I wouldn't say utopian.
I mean, I understand every you know system is going to have its flaws, but you know, I think if you were going to get the uh best possible outcome, you'd need to have uh strong socialist policies that are not going to allow multinational corporations to exploit your country.
You know, like for example, Norway uh nationalized its oil production, and it's a very wonderful thing.
You know, why should a government agency that probably donates to Black Lives Matter, you know, supports all these LGBT causes?
Why should a multinational corporation be controlling your oil supplies if you could just have the state doing it and the profits can go directly to the people instead of just you know a bunch of multinational corporations?
That's my point.
You know, I think the real problem is who is in control, whether they're using whatever economic system that they have, communism or capitalism.
All that's important is that who's controlling it.
Because some countries could maybe work in a more free market capitalist way, but and then other, I guess you could have examples where where more socialist policies would work, but really arguing saying saying that you support communism to me means like you support where the symbol comes from.
It comes from the Bolsheviks, the Soviet Union, and these are the Marxists that are behind Black Lives Matter in Antifa and are trying to destroy America and the West and capitalism, which seems to be your agenda as well.
So that is why I gotta strongly oppose it, even though our country is controlled by the the you know who's still doesn't mean that I want us to be destroyed like Russia in a Bolshevik revolution.
So let me say this, Adam.
When you compare what's going on uh right now in terms of like the rioting and the anarchists leading Black Lives Matter, you know, to destroy all this, you know, all these uh all this public property, all this private property, and you know, just innocent bystanders who are usually tend to be white.
I do understand what you mean when you compare that to like the Bolshevik revolution.
Like I totally get that, you know, the Bolsheviks were terrorists, they were uh extremely horrible people.
I agree completely.
But my only, I guess, disagreement would be I just I don't view the very people at the top as being uh consciously neo-Bolsheviks.
I think that they're influenced primarily by Judaism, um, and mostly by a secular version of it, not from a religious one.
And I think that uh they prefer neoliberal capitalism as their avenue of oppressing the white proletariat and not Bolshevism.
That's the only difference.
But other than that, I I completely understand your sentiments, and I disagree or I agree completely that uh yeah, these uh horrible, I guess, Jews are financing this terrorism that's going on, this cultural revolution, if you will, that's taking place in America.
So let me change gears a little bit.
What do you think about Putin right now?
Because that's another big debate I'm always having with people.
I say Putin's a Zionist, he's a communist, he's KGB, he's uh you know, he's an enemy of America, and and people say, you know, a lot of like the the Spencer's and the I'm not sure about Keith Woods, but uh, you know, kind of some some of those people are like very pro-Putin, like they were chanting Russia is our friend at Charlottesville.
I know David Duke is very uh pro-Putin as well in kind of those circles.
So where's you where do you stand on Putin?
I'm glad you asked, Adam.
So I actually do not like Putin in the slightest.
I'm actually, when I was going through some of your videos uh the past few days to prepare for this, I was actually pleasantly surprised that you brought up, for example, that Putin has thrown people in prison and has passed Holocaust denial laws, which is you know extremely dystopian to do so.
I agree completely.
Why should you be punished for questioning historical events that happened almost a hundred years ago?
And then there's also the fact that Vladimir Putin actually does send National Socialist Nazbols and Stalinists uh to prison, uh and he prosecutes them heavily, and I think that's horrible what he's doing there.
So I don't like Putin.
I would prefer that a legit uh probably Stalinist-like figure would rule instead of Putin, but you know, obviously that's a lot of people.
What's with your um what was the term?
Um you you seem to like like really strong dictatorial authoritarian leaders.
Stalin or Tito.
You also said Kim Jong-il.
You see you told me uh didn't you say that you like North Korea?
I support North Korea, correct.
Yes.
See, that's just gonna blow people's minds.
How it's like he's like uh uh a god, uh dynasty godlike family where it it's it's horrible over there.
You would really like to go live in North Korea.
I think North Koreans in a lot of ways are being uh targeted by, for example, America, you know, very harshly through things like sanctions, and that if they didn't have massive amounts of sh of sanctions, they would be living in much higher living standards.
However, I would say this regarding North Koreans and as you know, with the Chinese as well, is that while our cities burn down, the Chinese and the Koreans, uh the North Koreans at least, they don't have to worry about, for example, their children getting beat up by black kids at school.
They don't have to worry about uh is today gonna be the day that I piss Off some Jew and say something anti-Semitic and my life is ruined and I can't make a living through PayPal or like Patreon, for example.
Like that's not the case.
These people in in certain ways live much more or much less stressful lives than dissidents in the West, like you and I. No.
So in China, they they will throw you in jail.
If you even try to like be a journalist and write an article against the government, you can't do that.
It's even worse than than living under the ADL.
Well, it's in a different way of being oppressed by a different by your own government, not uh parasitious entity that's infiltrated and controls your government.
But let me say this, Adam.
I can respect the way that China, for example, will be open with its uh in terms of like what you're allowed to do and what you're not allowed to do.
So I'll give you an example.
Um China has a social credit system, you've probably heard of it, in which uh you know it's public information, what everyone's social credit score is, and you know, if you're in bad standing regarding your social credit score, uh you're gonna receive you know negative consequences as a result of that.
My only argument is that the West in America especially already has an undeclared social credit system.
The only difference with you know a country like China is the fact that at least with China's social credit system, the rules are straight up.
They're not ambiguous about the rules.
They'll tell you what you're allowed to do and what you're not allowed to do.
And then if you get a low social credit score, they'll tell you what you need to do to bring it back up.
In America, you piss off you know the Jews in power, you don't get to, you know, save your social credit score.
It's over, and it's over for the rest of your life.
So it's like this neoliberal system is just the most dystopian and just just horrible form of I guess totalitarianism in my view.
I would respect you know being ruled over and I guess like even a dissident under like Stalin's Russia compared to this evil empire that just you know behaves as if you know they're not actually totalitarian and that they're the most free country in the world.
What's the alternative?
Like the Eurasian communist empire.
Well, again, I'm not a Eurasianist, I'm not a Russian empire kind of guy.
I I want uh I personally want national socialism for the people of Yugoslavia, and I think if the other people of Europe are smart, they would be pushing for national socialism or something of their own version of it in their countries as well.
You know, people like the Nordic resistance movement, uh, people like Casa Pound in Italy, uh, you know, groups like that, I think are you know the way forward, I would say.
For America?
You think that would work in America?
So that was me talking specifically about Europe.
America is a whole different beast here.
I think America, I'll just be quite honest.
I think that Americans who are white and they are dissidents, we have to come to terms with the fact that white Americans are a class of people that don't, they're like the only class of people that don't receive uh civil rights act of 1964 legislation.
They're the only people that are where it's okay to discriminate openly against them.
In fact, it's something that they often brag about regarding like Goldman Sachs meetings and things like that.
They'll brag about how many white men they can you know get off the boards of directors, and which you usually just put Jewish women in.
But anyway, my point is Well, they're not white.
Well, yeah, they don't see themselves.
When they want to get the jobs, they're not white.
Exactly.
But my I think white people need to fight for to get equal rights.
They need to fight to have uh to be allowed to have their own ethnic autonomous neighborhoods, which they used to have in the past, things like covenant communities.
I think that white people in the US need to be realistic about what sort of goals they can achieve.
And if you know, I think if you're one of those people that thinks there's going to be a race war and you're gonna have an ethno state and out of and you know, and everything's gonna turn out great after, like I don't think you're living in reality and completely marginal.
Nobody really thinks that besides you know morons and agents that are pushing that kind of stuff.
At least in America, uh America, uh maybe in some European countries they could, you know, reverse reverse the trend.
But anyway, you know, when you when we you get into the debate of like communist Zionist, it's almost just like the left-right paradigm in a binary like Jewish secular run communism versus like Zionist dominated capitalism.
It's just like fighting back and forth in the Jewish dialectic.
So I don't even know why uh all the focus on saying that like you're you know you're pro-communist.
Well, again, it's not really pro-communist so much as like I will respect communist leaders that you know I think were doing generally speaking the right steps to protect their people from you know the forces of international capitalism and Zionism, which some of them exist and others don't.
And you know, I just I like to just reject both instead of having to choose one or the other.
Well, because I I don't see the reason, for example, to reject China or North Korea.
I think these are good countries.
Uh you know, I'd like to maybe see with the Soviet Union.
Same with Iran.
Well, I I think that they've got long uh the communism never fell, and that they faked it and they broke up just so that they could lull the West to sleep, so they can steal our technology, so they can have these fake splits and then they play both sides, but really they're all working together behind the scenes in long-range communist uh policies.
And it's not the communism uh in an economic way, it's the communist party that wants to destroy Gentile countries, so the combination of international communism to take the land, like the protocols and like uh uh Marx,
the tenets of Marx wrote, and I think the Illuminati even said that as well about taking the the private property and then uh consolidating it in the the Jewish-led communism and destroying the whole world with communism while building up Israel it was Zionism.
It's just either one of them is gonna lead to our disaster.
It already has.
Imagine a world without Zionism and communism.
That's the type of world I want to live in.
Well, and I understand your sentiments completely, Adam, but I would don't I would just you know kind of I guess respond to that by saying like if we look at, for example, countries like Poland on the Eastern front or on the Eastern Bloc, for example, former Eastern Bloc countries.
Uh these used to be communist states, and they obviously fell, you know, due to cold war pressure, they eventually weren't able to hold up.
And now for the most part, these are mostly NATO states in which capitalism is being uh you know reintroduced to these people.
And look, I've been to Eastern Europe fairly recently, and and from what I've seen with seeing Eastern Europeans, you know, having actual like uh European Union capitalism forced on these people is I think they're becoming worse off.
I think they're becoming more decadent.
I think they're falling victim to more and more drugs and alcohol than ever before.
They're consuming way more American television, and we know who creates that.
And um I just don't see I I am I you know, and all of these people that are current capitalist leaders of uh these eastern bloc countries all used to be communist leaders, you know, before the fall of the you of all these countries.
And my point is is I don't think that this is that the Jews really have any stake in ideological um communism.
I just think that their main focus is Judaism and focusing the uh supremacy of the world of you know Jewish world supremacism over everyone else by any means necessary.
And I think neoliberalism uh capitalism is their favorite system right now.
I think communism is something that they tried and they're like, well, it didn't work.
But this one, this system's working quite well and hurting the European people.
You sound like a typical like Antifa or SJW out of college, like, oh, you know, communism will work this time.
That wasn't real communism.
Like you're you you don't have an accent.
You're born and raised in America, so I mean don't you think that we you should listen to people that come from from uh communist countries and in how their testimony on how much of a nightmare it is.
So of course, I mean there's lots of people, for example, Alexander Scholchenitson, I think is a wonderful uh was a wonderful intellectual.
He's written some very good stuff, including uh 200 years together, which I recommend all of your audience reads.
But uh people like Scholchenitson, for example, were just as critical as on American neoliberalism as they were on Bolshevism, because they saw it as ultimately two sides of the same coin.
And that's honestly what I'm just trying to tell you as well.
And I also believe that you know, if we're going to look at the accounts of people who were, I guess, critical of their time in communist countries.
I'd like to also read the memoirs of people Who you know had a positive viewpoint, and I you know, to help get to the bottom of it.
I don't think we should only read uh one example.
You know, we should read things from all sides and try to you know get a more clear picture by seeing who the dissidents were and who were the people that actually liked the regime and try to get a better perspective that way.
Okay.
Um you sound like a pretty young guy.
I'm curious, like, where have you who who influenced you or how did you come to these concl conclusions?
Like who is uh, you know, where did you get these ideas from Yeah?
So man, it's been quite the journey because I guess this was kind of something I started in high school.
Spencer Spencer and Keith Woods and those those circles.
Actually, no.
Um initially I had uh I was the very first thing I found that introduced me to all of this was uh David Duke's My Awakening book, actually, which was just a very uh introductory book on kind of like you know what Zionism is, white nationalism, IQ differences, race, sex, all that stuff.
It was very introductory.
And then from there I kind of built on and eventually I started doing audiobooks where you know, for example, I did the audiobook of culture critique, I did one of like For My Legionaries, I've done of like Hitler's Revolution, um, things like Against Our Better Judgment by Allison Weir.
And uh forming these, you know, making these audiobooks and studying them closely has played a huge role, I guess, in kind of just uh getting me to where I am today, I would say.
So mostly just doing a lot of reading, but Keith Woods and those Spencer guys, I'll be quite honest.
I was never really a big Spencer person for the longest time.
I'm still really not.
I have nothing against him, it's just it was just never my thing to really listen to.
Who did you like to listen to?
Hmm.
I mostly listen to audiobooks, to be quite honest with you.
But I guess when I do, you know, I gotta listen to something else, and it's not an audiobook.
Maybe I'll listen to something like you know, uh TRS or something like that.
But most of the time I spend if I'm you know, if I'm not listening to music or audiobook or not listening to music, it's usually audiobooks, I would say.
What do you think Duke would say about uh hearing that his book woke you up and then now you like communism?
So Duke is an interesting bag.
I mean, I still disagree on a lot of things that he says, for example.
But I remember I was listening to a stream that Duke did where he was on JF Garipe's show.
I think this is maybe like a year or two ago, and he talked about how he actually visited the communist party in Russia, and they actually invited him to do a speech there.
He did, and then they were talking to him afterwards about how like they were opposed to concepts like race mixing, and you know, they were kind of like more um I guess appreciative of like stop men like Stalin and I guess like uh Brezhnev and stuff like that.
So I don't know what Duke would think.
I'd like to talk to Duke one day.
I mean, he was kind of the guy who woke me up, but I've definitely strayed quite a bit from his original path that he kind of took when he was running as governor of Louisiana.
So I I asked you when you were talking about Tito Ummy the other day.
I I said, have you read New Lies for Old?
And you said you haven't.
This is uh Anatoli Golitsin.
He also wrote the Perestroika deception about how uh communism uses disinformation to fake um that they're weak when they're strong.
And uh I read the chapter about Tito for you.
I got I was wondering if I could share a couple of the highlights and let me know, get your comment on them.
So is this one of the uh KGB defectors that you were talking to me about privately earlier?
Yes.
Sure, I'll I'll preface that I you know I obviously have to do my research, and I don't trust a lot of KGB defectors, you know, just because I have a feeling that a lot of times they were swayed by like the CIA and things like that, and I don't trust the CIA either, but sure, we can definitely go over it and I'll check it out.
Would you can you see the screen?
Yeah.
Okay.
So the chapters, the first disinformation operation, the Soviet Yugoslav quote dispute of 1958 to 60.
And that is when uh Tito was in.
I think it was 57 to 62.
So I I got it right.
I didn't make a fool of myself.
The late 50s, early 60s.
So it says here that Tito Stalin split throws up a number number of further points that either cast additional doubt on the authenticity of the dispute, and then he says this disinformation operation illustrates the disinformation technique and its purposes and operation was intended to serve.
Says um they still Yugoslavia still kept the greatest cooperation with all the socialist countries, and by remaining formally outside of the bloc, Yugoslavia could contribute more effectively to the furtherance of the objectives of the common long-range Leninist policy.
So you get the concept that they use disinformation, pretend like they split up really so they can just uh like when it it seems like Yugoslavia is clashing with the Soviet Union, then America swoops in, and then they can infiltrate America.
See the technique, faking so I understand the proposal that's you know being put across by this author.
It's just my I guess rebuttal to this would be is that um he's just making a claim, he's not citing anything, and you know, these I'm not done.
Okay.
This is this is uh his evidence.
He says Yugoslavia recognized East Germany, the the communist East Germany when they split Yugoslavia honored the promises of support that had been secretly given to the Soviets, and the Soviets did not cancel agreements or sever economic economic relations with um during this Stalin and Tito split.
Right, I don't I don't this I'm not saying that never happened.
In fact, I agree that this you're correct.
That is an event that occurred.
So I'm just saying, like, I think Tito and is was a secret communist, and they hyped up the division when really they were still working together behind the scenes.
Well, I don't think I don't think he was secret about being a communist.
I mean, he definitely was, you know, he had his own brand of communism, but it was not Marxism, is my point.
How was it not Marxism?
Would there be communism without Marxism?
I think you can have certain kinds of communism, absolutely, communist countries that aren't uh just completely devoted to what Marx was talking about.
And a lot of socialists have made very salient critiques about uh Marxism, uh, mostly especially the fact that Marxism itself doesn't really offer a clear uh definition of what he actually wanted after like the revolution was over.
He just you know, his his proposal in terms of like what Marx I will still say this to this day, Marx made some very, very salient critiques that were true about capitalism, for example, and how uh it was something that was harming humanity, but he didn't offer any coherent solution, and he kind of for the most part just left that up for a lot of people to just decide on their own, and uh and decide on their own, they did.
People like Tito, people like Mao, uh, people like Pol Pot, they all had their own unique ways of fulfilling uh what they viewed as true communism, is what I would say.
The Soviet Union tried to enforce their version on uh everybody, and even if they had minor differences, they a lot of them were still along with the the communist uh bloc.
But here it says their statements are not only comp so the Yugoslavian statements are not only compatible with the long-range communist policy, they are clear expression of many of the most important elements in it.
Criticism of Tito for accepting American aid, but then he was secretly working with the Soviets.
Yugoslavia's position in the United Nations here to facilitate between support for and uh there's only like one more page, support of the United States and support for the Soviet Union on vital issues such as the German treaty, colonialism, disarmament, reorganization of the structure of the UN, and the seeding of communist China, Yugoslavia consistently supported the Soviet position.
So that's another thing.
When they broke up um the USSR, they got all these new countries that could vote at the UN, so they had more influence, more seats at the UN.
That's another benefit.
And here's the last, the closing part.
Despite the existence of an alleged dispute, Khrushchev, while on his way to Albania, sent a greetings telegram to Tito, And for no apparent reason there was a sudden improvement in the Soviet Yugoslav relations in 1960, and they had open reconciliation followed in 1961.
So basically they just kind of split off for like a couple years and then went back to him.
Well, my my claim was never that like Yugoslavia, you know, stopped making uh you know private discussions you know with different countries, including the USSR.
My only point was that Yugoslavia was not like completely dependent on the USSR or the USA.
They were able to strategically make deals with other countries that geopolitically put them in a position where they weren't in a chokehold by someone like the USR or the USA.
That's my only point.
Now, obviously, all of these countries and every country on earth has back channels with other countries.
It's just how it is.
Like if you think, for example, uh Israel and Iran.
Like Israel and Iran, of course, they have secret ways of talking to each other, and so does every other you know, pair of countries on earth.
That's just how it is.
But that doesn't, in my opinion, signify that one country is just automatically controlling the other just because secret relationships and deals exist.
Okay, that's that's true.
And um here's something that will maybe hit close to home for you with your uh love for Tito here.
The second major objective of this fake split was to prepare the Yugoslav leaders for a special strategic role by building up their image as independence.
So um it's easier, it's easier to control the people in the countries that they fake the split with, because then they think, oh, we got a nationalist leader and they're standing up to the to uh the Soviet Union, and then it gets them to get military packs to the United States where they can spy, steal the technology and that kind of stuff.
Strength of the nationalist feeling in the Yugoslav population, the Yugoslav Party itself, an open surrender to the Yugoslav leaders to the bloc.
So instead of being under Stalin, they pretend got to pretend to be independent.
This is what he's saying here.
The requirements of the long-range policy could have caused them severe problems, both their followers and their opponents inside Yugoslavia.
Have you have you heard of this?
Any of this before?
About no, this is this is the first time I've honestly been hurting it, but again, he's using certain words like you know, could have caused a problem.
It's like, okay, but you know, you're not you know, that's not definitive.
It's like, yes, you know, there's a million variables that could have forever changed, you know, the outcome of Yugoslavian history, but it's it's hard to be super uh accurate when you're doing this speculation in hindsight.
That's all I'm trying to say.
Anatoli Golitz, if you read his books, has made tons of predictions, and he's basically either uh a legit uh uh uh whistleblower defector, or he's a prophet because he's gotten so many predictions right.
And uh after reading his book, it really may opens up the world, looking at the world in a different way when you understand the communist uh disinformation plan where they kind of like how Russia and China kind of seem like they're oppose each other, but they're really were I'm sorry, Russia and Israel have a fake split to a degree right now where people tell me I'm crazy because I say that Netanyahu is working with Hab or that Putin is working with Chabad and Netanyahu.
Yeah, and I think it's you know, people who tell you you're crazy that uh you know Putin has these demonstrable ties to Zionist leaders, I think they're people that don't want to admit that just you know Putin has more Zionist chains, balls and chains connected to him than they want to admit.
And I think that's just a general problem we saw, for example, with people that were pushing very hard for Trump in like you know, during the 2016 election, you know, they wanted a lot of people want to believe that there's this very powerful man out there that uh you know.
The savior complex.
And you know, you have to be realistic about who these people who's actually, you know, uh who has demonstrable ties to the Jews and who doesn't.
And Putin, he absolutely does.
And he uh you can see by who he jails and which dissidents he goes after, uh, what he actually thinks of certain things like actual communists that aren't faithful to the Jewish cause, is what I would say.
So let's uh shift gears to another defector.
You you told me that you can't remember the exact word, but you dislike Yuri Bezmanov.
I I find that very much interesting.
I would say he's been so accurate on so much and has talked about such Important things.
What could you possibly not like in Yuri Bezmanov?
So one of the main things when I was skimming through his autobiography that really and I've talked to you about this in private was when he wrote about the fact that um when he was in the USSR and was a high ranking official there, he had a certain, I guess, fetish for I guess darker skinned women.
Uh I guess Eurasian women, we should say.
And um when he wanted to, when he put his desires out there to these public, you know, to these uh Soviet officials that he wanted to marry a darker woman who was not of Slavic ancestry like himself, they were extremely adamant against this idea and and told him, like, look, you're a white Russian, you're gonna marry a white Russian woman, and that's how it's gonna be.
And uh, he says in his own autobiography that that was one of uh his main motivations for leaving the US and uh marrying a black woman once he got to the US.
And you know, when I hear that the USSR was pushing values like that onto people, it's hard for me to be upset, you know.
Generally speaking, I don't think that race mixing is a policy that the government should endorse.
Aaron Powell But but this has nothing to do with the stuff that Yuri Bezmanov talked about.
You you do you don't like him just because he he liked girl black girls or girls of color, or he fell in love with with some girl?
That that's that's enough reason to hate him.
No.
My point is that Yuri measures freedom as in you know who he can kind of be with, you know, in terms of like who he can date and things like that.
No, no, no.
You you want to be authoritarian, tell people that they can't uh marry who they want to marry if a girl has darker skin than you.
I understand that you know, when you put a lot of you know, people of different races in a room, things like that are going to happen and develop feelings for each other, and I'm telling you that the government has a role to not allow these situations to happen in the first place and to not create more interracial couples than there already are.
Because ultimately, even if it's something that you really want to do really bad, you have to think about the consequences that this is going to have for your children and your grandchildren as a result of doing such a thing.
That's my point.
You know, when you have a mixed race child, for example, who's half black, half white.
If the child gets um, let's say he gets uh what's it called, doukemia, and he needs a bone marrow transplant.
Well, guess what?
There's going to be very few people that are going to be ident or genetically uh compatible for a bone marrow transplant, and it's not going to turn out very well for the children.
I think that's a pretty extreme example as to why you should tell people.
I mean, you understand like mixed-race children, you know, they have a lot of identity issues, and and they often feel like they don't belong, and you know, a lot of them are very difficult.
Definitely I I'm disgusted by the largely Jewish agenda that they talk about in culture of critique and that we see you know every single time in the advertisements, how they're always pushing for it's basically to breed Edom out of existence, is what what according to their prophecies, which they would like Calurgi plan, which is funded by you know Rothschild and Warburg as well.
So but but there's a there's a big difference between just you know not having the media constantly promoting European people to to mix away, breed away their existence and not allowing people to you know, two adults, a man and a woman to love who they want to love.
Okay, but I mean you understand, like, you know, because I believe you're kind of an American nationalist to a certain extent.
You can correct me if I'm wrong, but I mean, even if you look at your own country's history, most states in America by their own state their own state governments all individually created laws that essentially ban miscegenation on the state level.
So I mean, even if you're against communism and all that, even America, the capitalist you know, empire.
I'm for freedom, though.
I'm against those laws.
I'm I'm for freedom.
I think if people like just say, even what if for some reason I just you know moved to some other country and I fell in love with some girl down in Mexico or something, like it would be awful.
Or imagine if that was you and the government and the law and society wouldn't let you be with that person just because of color of your skin.
Like this is a this is a really radical uh belief, in my opinion.
Well, you're not wrong.
I and But the only thing is I never denied being a radical, Adam.
That's the only difference here.
So you're a proud radical, okay.
Well, you gotta be a fanatic.
Why?
Well, you know, if you're not ready to die for your beliefs, then you're not really living, if you ask me.
Well, you have to stand for something or you'll fall for anything.
But I mean, there's there's plenty of things to to die for, but like I don't uh it's weird to me that you keep bringing that up.
That that saying is that your mantra.
What the uh you need to die for your beliefs.
No, that's a uh just something that I heard from a George Lincoln Rockwell speech that is always stuck very home in my heart, I would say.
So you would die for communism?
Well, no, I'm not a communist, but I respect people that would die for communism because you know, at least at least they're willing, you know, to die for something that they think is true, and I can again I can respect that much more than someone who isn't willing to risk anything and just wants to stay home or just wants to work 40 hours a week and just you know uh get home and get high and watch TV.
I can respect someone, a communist revolutionary far more than just a neoliberal passive consumer that's just getting excited about the next Marvel movie to watch.
Well, I mean, I I guess I agree to a degree with that, that people that are distracted by sports and in television and not paying attention to uh important things.
Definitely I I don't have respect for people like that.
But I mean, it's hard to say that I respect a radical communist that wants to overthrow um my my country and and the world and and dictate and be authoritarian and and not allow you to have freedom.
You're from America.
Where's your spirit of freedom?
Well, I've told you, you know, we're ideologically I come from, but I was just curious, you know, if I kind of I guess more or less identify more as a national socialist, what would it be fair to label you as?
What do you think would be the most accurate, you know, ideological position?
You have to ask me on a issue by issue basis, because I don't fit in any of the categories that they have.
Sure, but okay, we can be a little bit more specific.
Would you say on the topic of economics, you tend to be more of a classical liberal?
Uh would you say you're more of a total free market?
I think with total absolute libertarian style free market, that corporations will exploit the whole world and there'll be monopolies and all types of stuff.
And yeah, I've heard their arguments that, oh, it's government that creates all monopolies.
I think that there needs to be a balance, and I think it needs to be uh I mean it's a bit of a pipe dream when you look at America, but in a foreign populace and a media that people trust the right kind of media, which we're so far from that right now, which is why we're in such a disaster.
But uh what were you asking the original question?
The economic, oh, classical liberal.
Uh I think we already have such socialist policies in America, like welfare.
I mean, to a certain extent we do, but I would I would argue that um for the most part, like things like you know, we have socialism for people like the uh underclass that really doesn't work, people that live in section eight uh housing apartments and are on, you know, government welfare the second they're born to the second they die.
And then we also have large uh, I guess socialism in terms of like corporate welfare for the richest people on earth who, for example, have made a ton of money off of the COVID crisis and the recent rioting, which has destroyed a lot of small businesses, but has kept large businesses like Amazon, you know, stronger than ever.
So my only point is is that you know, I think under neoliberalism, you're going to get socialism for the worst people in society, and I am only advocating for a form of socialism which rewards the genuine proletariat and not just the people that don't Want to do anything at the very top and the very bottom.
When did you get so interested into talking about uh this kind of stuff?
Like you did you you said you were a Marxist.
Like, did you go to college and become a Marxist from like professors there or something?
No, actually quite the opposite.
So I'm actually an electrician right now.
I'm in a union.
I've been uh working quite a bit overtime lately, so that's why I haven't had as much time to work on my audiobooks.
But no, I started out as a Marxist early on, I would say in my teenage years, and then around the age of 17 is when I started reading all of this kind of like white nationalist literature, and I started to, I guess, reject Marxism.
And then when I started, I went to community college for two years, and as I was taking general ed courses about like things like sociology, things like history, uh, I found out very, very fast that these social sciences were essentially like a humiliation ritual for white people.
And what I mean by that specifically is they hurl all of these obnoxious and obviously false accusations that are meant to uh I guess you know destroy the reputation of the entire white race.
And they worded in such a way during the lectures that unless you are essentially a straight out and out national socialist, it's very hard to actually raise your hand and give the you know the professor an actual quality rebuttal that would shut them up and show that what they're saying is just uh garbage that's mostly funded by very rich Jews.
So what do you think about that?
Well, I you know, I've got um expose the enemy.com.
He he's been trying to explain to me about how it's uh a lot of the capitalists, Zionist Jews are controlling the whole communist angle.
So it it's the dialectic.
So really uh joining either side it is kind of irrelevant.
It's exposing the power structure, which is the most important thing.
That's why you're kind of you're debating back and forth in the paradigm.
Well, here's the here's my only thing that I would ask you, Adam.
It's that see, I appreciate what you do in terms of like, you know, you spend a lot of time, you've definitely put in your hours in you know, exposing the Jewish agenda, you know, exposing what these orthodox rabbis are conspiring in privately and showing what these Jewish corporations and every intellectuals are doing publicly.
My only thing is though, is once you've informed everybody, where do you go from there?
You know, when all these people already know about the Jews, but they don't have a realistic way of combating them, you know, knowing literally becomes only half the battle.
And I think personally you need to have a coherent worldview like something like National Socialism in order to present to other people, or else they're just going to get very blackpilled and they're going to just think that there's you know no hope and it's just going to be despair because they don't have any legitimate political vehicle to use as their way of freeing themselves from these uh Jewish capitalist oppressors.
Well, I guess that's a that's a fair criticism.
I wouldn't disagree with you too much there.
I do specialize in what I'm interested in, and I'm interested in learning the psychopathic uh Judaism and Zionism and the Zionist agenda.
And this I'm basically out of my element here.
I don't know.
I'm if you watch follow my work, you know that I'm I'm never talking about or debating capitalism versus communism or uh national socialism or this kind of stuff.
This isn't really my forte.
But um at this point, I don't think joining up with communism is gonna be the answer to defeat the Jewish power structure.
That's just falling into you know the left hand instead of the right the right hand.
Well, this is what I would say in terms of what uh I believe outside of you know third positionism and national socialism, I would say that my views are very similar to that of uh the late Francis Parker Yaqui, and that I believe that dissidents like me,
like you, we need to reach out and create uh mutually beneficial alliances with you know anti-capitalists, anti-Zionists across the world, and we need to destroy global Jewish power if we're ever going to be able to come to any sort of real agreement amongst the different races on virtually everything.
You know, I understand That, for example, um maybe for you know, maybe Europeans and Turkish people are not always going to be on the best terms with each other for historical reasons.
But at the same time, I want a world where we can settle these sorts of differences without having a Jewish referee in the middle trying to basically give us the dialectic that you know they have already pre-approved for us so that Jews can somehow come out on top.
I want to work with anybody willing to destroy Zionism and capitalism because I think those are uh the main tools that Jews have decided to use not in the 21st century.
Only Zionism and capitalism, not also communism.
Well, no, Adam, because it's been much more destructive.
I don't think that well, that's that's very arguable.
And and again, I don't think that Jews like communism anymore.
I mean, certain, you know, there's certain Jews out there that obviously uh have memorable and nostalgic feelings towards people like Lenin and Trotsky, but you know, you asked any Jew about Stalin or like you know, these sorts of people that were cracked hard on these Jews, even under communism, and they will tell you they don't like these people and that these were uh goy strongmen that were out of control, and that's my point.
Goyish strongmen.
I did a video a couple weeks ago, the tribal roots of Antifa um all about Jewish communism, and still to this day behind you know, like when I think of communism and defeating capitalism, I think of Bolshevik Revolution, I think of uh South Africa, and it seems to me that that is like kind of the narrative that you're helping perpetuate.
So I I like actually that you brought up South Africa because it actually it's relevant to my point, which is that you know, who funded what went on in South Africa, Nelson Mandel and the ANC, for example.
Well, you had Jews like Nicky Oppenheimer who you know have a monopoly on the whole diamond industry in the world.
And you know, they and you had like he would pay men like Joe Slovo, for example, who was a communist Jew that helped Melson Mandela and probably wrote a lot of his speeches, I presume.
And but here's the thing.
Once uh, you know, Nelson Mandel was able to come into power, he didn't become like this hard-line communist.
Like he essentially just, you know, actually, what's ironic is the apartheid government prior to uh Nelson Mandela coming to power, they were actually economically way more socialist than Mandela himself.
Nandela was a communist who the second he got elected and got into power, he just allowed South Africa to get exploited by multinational corporations a hundred times more than the apartheid regime ever did.
So, I mean, he was one of those people that larped as a communist, but he just opened his entire uh country up to just essentially be exploited by rich Jews and Anglo-Saxons.
And on top of that, in South Africa now to this day, uh, you know, the rich Jews and Anglo-Saxons that live in South Africa, they're doing fine, they're prospering just fine.
But it's the Boer proletariat that's being hunted down and murdered every single day in these farms because they're being instigated by these capitalist bosses that rule over South Africa to use the boar as a scapegoat, even though these are workers who want to just you know make crops on their farm to help feed the country.
All right.
Um what do you think of the last?
I know you didn't get a chance to watch all of it.
I I wouldn't expect you to, it just premiered today, but you watched my uh part one and in some of part two of the last uh Holocaust videos.
What's your uh your take on that?
The the Holocaust ritual information.
Billy, you there?
Yeah, can you hear me?
Yeah.
All right, cool.
So yeah, I did actually take uh a few notes regarding this.
Um I think it was very cool, like you know, some of the some of the things you were bringing up, like in terms of like the numbers uh and everything.
I was gonna say to add on to uh the first video that uh a good thing that you should cover in the future is um you've probably have you heard of the book Controversy of Zion by uh Douglas Reed?
Absolutely.
Yeah, I have it right here right next to me on my desk, and uh I'm rereading it for the Second time I'm about halfway through.
I quoted or I read about three pages from it today in the video, so you can look forward to that when you finish it.
Yes.
What's your point about it?
In controversy of Zion, Reed spends an entire chapter talking about how Jews lie all the time on like censuses.
So it's he, you know, he uses a lot of different censuses of Jews in many countries to kind of make the point that it's very difficult to unlike even know what the real Jewish population is.
It could actually be way higher than what they claim, and it could potentially be you know a little bit lower.
And you know, I think that a lot of people pretend, you know, Holocaust historians, they make this claim that because uh, for example, Hitler was not able or because they weren't able to find mass graves in lots of parts of the Eastern Front where they claim a lot of millions of Jews were exterminated by the Germans.
Um they claim that, oh, well, we can't find them, so they must have just you know, they must have been killed, and we just haven't found the bodies yet.
Well, my retort would be how do we know a lot of them didn't flee to the USSR?
How do we know a lot of them didn't go to like uh you know Israel?
Which I think they did, and I think the evidence kind of shows that in retrospect.
And I also wanted to bring up you might want to know this as well, Adam, that um, and this is could be a good topic to cover on the way uh maybe in the future as well, that one of the very first Holocaust revisionists was actually uh who's you know who helped create the first literature ever uh debunking the Holocaust.
Uh it was written by a French communist who was actually in Ospich, uh ironically, for helping Jews escape what he you know viewed as persecution by Nazis.
But what ended up happening is during his time in Oswich, you know, he lived through the whole thing, he made it out alive, obviously, but then he started hearing all of these stories by you know, quote unquote Holocaust survivors about what happened, and he decided to write his own description of what he experienced at the camps, and he essentially um came to the conclusion that these people are lying.
You know, these camps obviously weren't great, but he's like, I was in there as a communist, and they weren't doing this absurd shit to me, and they weren't really he didn't see it happening to other people as well.
So I would definitely I would say definitely that would be something good to talk about as well in the future.
But in terms of like the stuff that the um I guess like ultra-orthodox rabbis have came up with for uh rationalizations for I guess creating the Holocaust myth and expanding upon it, I think you're doing very good work there, and I would say that um it's you know it's kind of weird.
It's it's interesting getting to those kooky sects of I guess Judaism, like for example, Rabbi Ovedia Yosef, who I'm sure you've covered heavily on your program, you know, he belongs to this uh kind of he has this kind of more uncommon belief among Jews, especially among secular Jews, that uh he believed the Holocaust was God's way of punishing Jews for essentially being communists in Germany.
So I was just curious what your take was on you know, like stuff like that that certain Jews promote it.
Well, they consider he said that their souls were rein reincarnated because they had sinned and that they needed to atone.
And I don't even I don't know if it's just that they're communists, just that they're they don't follow the Torah and the Talmud and listen and are under the rabbinical control.
That's all it takes to consider them, you know, bad Jews in their view.
No, definitely, and I think um it's very good to look at the internal debates that go on between the different factions of Judaism, because there definitely are different factions, in my opinion.
I think that um, you know, Jews, you know, people like the Lakutniks, people like the Zionist mainstream left wing, they have a lot of very different strategies on how they want to pursue world Jewish domination, but you know, they have major disagreements.
So I mean, I'm sure, like, you know, for example, what's your take on the Iran deal?
Like, why do you think Obama was so big into that and then Trump ripped it up?
I'm just curious about it.
Like, what's your explanation for that?
Oh, geez, such an unexpected question.
Um, yeah, because there was a lot of Jews.
Remember, they signed the letter saying that they they didn't want him to leave the deal, I think it was, or was it they signed the letter saying for Obama to not make the deal?
Might have been both.
I can't even remember now.
I think it was both.
Yeah, there was significant on both sides.
Yeah.
Well, um, maybe they thought that the deal I think it kind of they're split just along party lines.
If you're they're a Democrat that likes Obama, then they were for the deal, and if they're they're uh Republican and like Trump that they're against the deal, like what do I think of the deal?
I think that we were probably better off with it, I would say, because it all the Zionists that seem the most evil to me were all for ripping it up, and I see Trump as their you know, it's like their favorite thing.
Trump brags, oh the the Adelson says the best thing I've done is is the biggest thing I've done for the Jews is ripping up that nuclear deal, and it's like if if the deal was a bad deal and it's gonna allow them to create nukes and and attack us, then then I'm against it, but it seems to me like it just kinda in inflame the situation.
And okay, so here's my take on what I believe happened regarding the Iran deal.
And it's uh, you know, your audience can decide whether I'm full of shit or not.
So essentially I came down to the opinion that the Iran deal was something led by, I guess the more democrat leaning secular Jews, in which they wanted to play the long term game with Iran, if you will.
They believed that an all out war with Iran, you know, with a mountainous country filled with ninety million people would have been disastrous and it would not have been anything close to like the Iraq war, for example.
And I believe that these liberal Jews wanted to essentially utilize uh free markets and introducing these into you know, you introducing new Western markets into Iran as a you know, as a tool of subverting it from the inside.
And the Lakudnik kind of Jews, they were the kinds that essentially wanted to just like, no, let's invade Iran, let's do it, like, you know, screw your optics, I'm going in, like there's they're those kinds of Jews.
And I think personally that the Iranian or the Jews that were siding with uh Obama were a lot smarter.
And because they were they understand that capitalism, neoliberalism is a much deadlier weapon than an all-out war.
You can survive from war, you can survive from nukes.
But once your country's been subverted by neoliberal capitalism and your people are, you know, hooked on Netflix, hooked on you know, whatever's on TV, hooked on junk food and hooked on just every horrible vice known to man.
That's a and they don't even know that they're, you know, they think that they're free on top of all that.
That's the best possible system for them.
And that's why I don't think that they the Jews in power, ex even the liberal ones aren't fans of communism.
That's that's what I would say.
Well, it's interesting, um, and we'll probably wrap it up with with this topic, but that we're on Iran because this is kind of what started, you know, led to the whole thing, as I talked about in the introduction with uh my posts on Twitter a couple weeks ago about Iran.
You know, it's so funny.
I got such backlash from from that crew, and I'm not even sure to what extent you're actually in that crew, but such backlash for questioning that Iran could be being played by the communist faction the of the of the left hand of the Jewish power structure and it or if they're secretly just playing controlled opposition to Israel.
I I'm not an expert in the Israel Iran relations.
I was just saying that if they're if Iran is dependent on Russia and working with Russia, well, Putin and BB are really allies, and that's ultimately their together.
So either Iran's gonna get destroyed or they're just playing a role uh in the situation.
But it's funny because I was getting attacked so much by by that crew online, and then I was also getting like crazy emails from a guy saying, Oh, Iran is Marxist and they're really you're go you're playing into the Israel, Iran, um dispute and really they're working together, and it's like so uh I'm not making you know total conclusions on what I think is going on there.
I need to research it more.
Uh uh one of my friends, vigilante intelligence is supposed to be coming out with a documentary about Iran and that situation.
So maybe I will get into that next more so, but I know ripping up the deal the deal made us more uh More of an alliance and an understanding and more peaceful relations with Iran.
And I don't think the Zionists wanted that.
They wanted to rip up the deal.
They wanted Trump to label them terrorists.
They wanted to increase the sanctions because they're trying to provoke them into some kind of attack.
And who knows why?
Maybe it's because they want to, you know, set off the Gog and Magog war and pin Russia and China and Iran against America and have some big World War III, then Israel's going to emerge the winner.
I I can speculate.
I don't claim to know for sure.
But your thoughts.
Yeah, so you know, it's hard to be, or I want I want to be as neutral as possible on Iran.
And I know that because I am a Muslim, it can be a little hard for some people to believe, but you know, I think Iran is ultimately a country that they do have self-autonomy for the most part.
They are people, you know, they have a government that does care.
They have a deep state that does genuinely care about their people.
And I always hear I always get suspicious when I hear that.
Because when has that ever really been the case in history that the government really cares about the people and doesn't have a deep state?
Well, my I'm not saying they don't have a deep state.
I'm saying they have a deep state that puts the interests of the actual Iranian people over things like you know, world Jewish power, for example.
That's the point I'm trying to make.
They have a government for them and buy them.
Zionist power.
Well, not just lip service, but you know, they have done some critic, you know, they they fund Israel's uh greatest enemies in the Middle East, groups like Hezbollah, groups like Hamas.
And you know, whenever Iraq was invaded by America and America was able to get rid of Saddam Hussein and then it created a power vacuum in there, Iran was able to play a brilliant move of using all that momentum that America had done by creating the power vacuum uh by essentially using uh Iranian proxies to destroy uh ISIS and their affiliates,
which you know, ISIS we know who funds them, and they were essentially able to turn Iran in or not Iran, Iraq into a state that is much more friendly towards you know the Shia state of Iran.
So I think this was a brilliant move done by the Iranians.
I think the Iranians are some of the only people on earth that are legitimately standing up to world Zionism, and because of that, they're gonna get my respect from me.
Well, it does seem on the surface that they are, I'll give you that.
But there's I think there's some good reasons to believe that that could just be uh the controlled opposition.
That you know how they like to have the dialectic, they like to have the boogeyman so Israel can justify you know increased speding and and more fear-mongering and and that kind of stuff.
But you know, I want to back you up.
You mentioned uh we know who funds ISIS.
Um who do you think who do you think is behind ISIS?
Well, if we look at the words of General Kasim Solomani, he said that Wahhabism has Jewish roots, and I'm inclined to believe that.
Wahhabism is essentially this very extremist and perverted ideology of Islam that is funded by primarily the CIA, by Saudi Arabia, and it's supported in many ways directly and indirectly by Israel.
So what I mean by that with the last part is for example, when ISIS fighters were getting killed near the Israeli-Syrian border, for example, there were tons of news articles stating how Israeli hospitals would treat these ISIS agents for free.
And they would, you know, nurse them back to health and be like, all right, go fight Assad now.
And you know, that's what I'm talking about.
The fact that these are, for the most part, in my opinion, these are mercenaries for world Jewish power.
So um I agree with you about the the Saudi Arabia um theory that they're uh crypto Jews, you know, you hear that a lot.
Uh I don't know, I wouldn't bet 100% my life on it, but I definitely wouldn't doubt it either.
And even if they're not crypto Jews, they're going along with the Zionist agenda.
Exactly.
Saudi Arabia.
That's what matters.
Yeah.
But um it and yeah, a lot of a lot of people say, you know, ISIS is funded by or backed by Mossad and backed by Zionist in in the West.
And uh but then we also hear that, oh, Putin's the hero because he defeated ISIS and saved Assad.
Well, aren't Netanyahu and Putin allies.
So who's to say that Putin isn't behind ISIS as well?
Many of the ISIS fighters come for our Chechens.
Well, that's that's my point.
I mean, I would for starters, I think that a lot of pro-Russian people tend to play up the role that Russia played in, I guess, destroying ISIS in that area when I think most of the credit goes to Assad's military and you know, uh proxies like Hezbollah that you know played a big role in liberating uh a lot of innocent Christians and Muslims that were being tortured and murdered by these ISIS by these ISIS fighters.
So I mean, my general thing would be that um again, you just you can't trust Putin.
Putin is kind of like this wild card I see going on, and all I can tell you.
You're a wild card, because I would assume you to be one of these big Putin supporters, given your other stances, but you're not.
So you're quite the anomaly, I gotta say.
Well, I'm intellectually honest.
You know, I've seen what Putin, you know, I a lot of people like to point to what world leaders say, and I don't like that very much.
I prefer to look at what they do.
Because Trump, for example, will say lots of very uh agreeable stuff all the time, especially when he's tweeting out stuff.
But I prefer to look at the actions.
You know, when he tweets for work for white workers of the proletariat, but then he actually does things like pardon Rubishin, for example, who owned an entire meat packing plant in Iowa that exclusively hired illegal aliens.
Well, that tells a lot about his character than about what he says rhetoric wise.
I agree, yeah.
And judge people with yeah, obviously don't take the their open public statements as face value because there's there is 3D chess going on, but it's not uh QAnon and the deep and the white hats taking out the deep state.
It's 4D, 5D chess being played on all of us on the grand chess board with their puppets leading countries.
Is there any uh other notes you had from my uh my Holocaust videos that stood out to you or you thought I should add or you disagree with?
Did I lose you?
Oh, yeah, I'm right here.
Can you hear me?
I I didn't hear you.
I was muted.
I just didn't want to cause any more noise while you were talking.
Oh, I'm not hearing any noise, don't worry about it.
All right, cool.
So I noticed you were quoting uh Norman Finkelstein from the Holocaust, his book The Holocaust Industry as well, in the first video.
Now, I think here's what I would say.
I Finkelstein to me, after because I've I've done a lot of research on him throughout the years, I would say he's a mixed bag.
And mostly because I think he lies about the Holocaust being a factual event that occurred, but at the same time, he does correctly point out that yes, it is an entire industry meant to provide as many incentives as possible for Jews to claim that they were survivors of like you know, these unbelievably sounding uh atrocities.
So there is definitely some truth to that, but it would be nice to do some uh exposing on him of that in that aspect because you know, if you look at a lot of uh firsthand testimony accounts of the Holocaust, and you've seen this before, I'm sure, they're just the most unrealistic stories imaginable.
Like, you know, things like masturbation machines, things like um, you know, roller coasters that you know just throw Jews into an oven once you know it gets off, you know, once the roller coaster is done riding, things like being thrown in a cage with a barren eagle, things like um, you know, seeing uh, for example, a night by Ellie Wiesel.
Uh Ellie says that he he sees like that Nazis would grab Jewish babies, smash them against the wall, and essentially throw them in a burning fire pit that just was always burning like dead Jews, and that any time they were uh cream or anytime they were put in the ovens and their bodies were cremated, the smoke coming out would be a different color depending on what nationality of Jew was being burned at the time.
It's these are outrageous, outrageous uh state, you know, uh I guess testimonies that they were making, and very few people are out there uh exposing this sort of stuff.
So I'd include a lot of that stuff maybe in your stuff for the future would make some very good content, Adam.
Yeah, um Finkelstein, I I recently just reread um his book, The Holocaust Industry, and I and I quoted basically from the first page that's saying that uh just his real general introductory introductory criticism of the Holocaust and and the narrative and the dogmas of it.
And he does call out uh Weasel as a as a weasel liar and that supported books that were written that were fraudulent, uh stories that didn't happen by frauds, and you know, there's always frauds getting busted, making up that they were uh Holocaust survivors.
There's also a quote in it that Binkelstein says, My mom asked if uh there's so many survivors, like what were they doing?
You know, if there if there was an extermination plan, why are there so many survivors?
That's what his mother said, apparently.
But um, I didn't know that.
That's uh he he definitely he's very critical, but he definitely doesn't uh go all the way.
And I just had a thought today, actually, is that I want to try to send him my latest two videos on this to get his his take on it.
Be interesting to see uh if he would watch and respond.
Yeah, I mean, I I'm not sure if he's still a professor at DePaul University, but yeah, I mean, if you maybe if you sent it to him at his university email and you know, respectfully said, Hey, what do you think of this work that I made?
He might definitely uh you know, he might he might talk to you, he might not.
I mean, it depends.
This guy might uh feel like associating with any one of us might be something that he just can't do.
Who knows?
I mean, the the stuff that I show to put together this uh this conspiracy is just like overwhelming evidence of the that Jacob and the Esau and the Jamal the Gematria and the I mean is it what would he what would be his response to like the six million,
the mystical Kabbalah six million number being everywhere decades before the war broke out, and and even Holocaust term being used and stuff, and all the Zionists saying that they wanted anti-Semitism and how the Talmud calls for the same thing and all the Purim uh parallels and stuff.
Like I'd like to hear uh him dismiss it.
Yeah, that would be quite interesting, but um, you know what's funny is when I cover this, people get so angry and they say, Oh, that's uh that's a kosher version of history, or this that's Jewish propaganda, and it's it just boggles my mind because the the theory that I'm putting out is that the Zionist orchestrated the whole thing, and and they're calling that kosher.
It that implicates the Zionist even more so in the narrative that I'm putting out right now than their narrative.
My narrative exonerates the German people more than their narrative.
Well, this is a classic tactic that they use, and it's not even something that just started even in this century.
So, what I mean by that is uh when I did the audiobook for For My Legionaries, for example, uh that was a story of Cornelius, it was an autobiography of Cornelio Cordrianu, and him essentially setting up an orthodox Christian Romanian version of fascism.
And you know, uh eventually he would become like his uh the Iron Guard would become the most popular party in Romania.
But, you know, during the meantime, uh conservative publications in newspapers.
Uh, after I did some archival research, I found out that many of these Romanian newspapers were referring to him as you know, a communist, as a secret communist, a secret Marxist, uh that he was secret- No, Kudrianu, as like a secret communist, like a secret Marxist, a secret Jew.
You know, they were doing all the same stuff, and this is kind of what they do.
They want uh to sully anybody's reputation if they're actually trying to uh attack Jewish power in a way that's effective.
So it doesn't shock me at all that people are freaking, you know, people who uh pretend to be very concerned that just want to help you are getting super mad just because you're trying to have a more nuanced view on you know something that supposedly happened over a hundred years ago.
That's just how these Jews operate, unfortunately.
Yes, I know for a fact there's there's Jewish trolls, Hosborough calling me a Jew and you know, making up stuff because I I know for a fact because they attacked my Instagram a while back.
One day they were all spamming that I'm a Nazi and an anti-Semite, and then the next day they're all saying I'm a Jew.
So they really do try to attack you from both sides and and throw everything at the wall and see what sticks.
Yep.
So uh yeah.
Oh, yeah.
And this is uh a passage that actually uh Adolf Hitler brings up very early on, I believe in chapter two of Mind Kampf.
It's that uh, you know, he noticed that the press when they found someone they didn't like, they would just throw any lies that they could, just as many as they could at them, and they would just hope that something would stick.
And if they didn't find anything real about you, they'll just make up something until it eventually does stick.
And that's the same tactic that I'm noticing now.
Absolutely.
Yep.
All right.
Uh Billy Cornpop.
I I enjoyed the talk.
It's definitely a change of pace for uh for what I'm used to.
I appreciate you uh being cordial and coming on.
I agree.
Can I say one thing real quick real fast?
So I just want to show for a YouTube channel that has actually uh helped me quite a bit in my journey.
Uh this guy's name is Tamster Witnat, and uh he mostly specializes in philosophy and politics, but he helps people with really finding a very coherent, like philosophical worldview of themselves, and I think it's essentially very critical to, I guess, you know, if you want to eventually have a coherent worldview that you can use to argue against other people and try to convert them to your way of thinking.
So I would definitely say check him out.
But other than that, uh so what do you what are you shilling for?
What is this guy promoting?
It's a YouTube channel.
What's a witnat?
I think it's a playoff the term wig nat, but he's a very, very uh well-spoken guy, very intelligent.
I believe he has uh he's a former theologist, I want to say.
I could be wrong though, but he went to I believe seminary school, and he is one of the smartest people I have ever heard regarding philosophy.
Like I think he's one of a very underrated YouTuber regarding that, and uh he makes very good content.
And I would just say also, just really quick before I go, if you could follow me on Telegram at SiegeToday123, that's where you can find all of my stuff, including my audiobooks and everything.
My Twitter is always going to be temporary, so if you want to know where I'm always at, just check my telegram.
But Adam, yes, I appreciate you for having me on the show.
It's been awesome.
And uh, you know, anytime you want to talk, uh my door is always open.
Like you've been a very good host here.
Well, thank you.
Um yeah, uh, you I like to be uh stay true to my word.
I said I would uh have a debate, and uh I'm glad we finally got to uh do it.
Um just just uh for the record, I've never heard of this YouTube channel, and cornpop just uh brought it up right now, but but here it is.
I just looked it up, and uh he might he's still on YouTube, so I guess everybody knows that he must be uh a gatekeeper in a shill and a government agent.
Just kidding, of course.
All right, well, I will put those links in the description on Bit Shoot when I get it up.
Uh I may uh wait a day just so it doesn't uh overshadow the the big stream that I just did this morning.
I want to try to get that on the front list, but I will get it up on Bit Shute, and uh appreciate you coming on to discuss these these issues that I don't normally uh get deep into.
But that was uh Billy Cornpop and your telegram.
I'll put the telegram link in the in the bit shoot.
All right, thank you, Billy.
Thank you, everybody, for watching.
I'm Adam Green with No More News, and I will see you guys again very soon.
▲
Export Selection