Know More News - Adam Green - ADL & Sasha Baron Cohen Want to SHUT IT DOWN!

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 22, 2019 - Know More News - Adam Green

02:25:56

ADL & Sasha Baron Cohen Want to SHUT IT DOWN!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, Adam Green here with no more news.org.
	It is November 23rd, 2019.
	No more news.
	And org.
	Pause my stuff that always pops up.
	And we are today are going to be talking about this new ADL speech given by Sasha Baron Cohen, the actor who plays Borat and Bruno and several others.
	Ollie G. And we're going to be getting into this.
	He talks about censorship and a lot about the forbidden topic from uh about 70 years ago.
	So to join me and break this down, returning guest, uh Mr. Ryan Dawson from the ANC report.
	I'm always good to talk about the forbidden topic.
	Yes.
	And uh and and you've been getting that doesn't cast doubt upon it at all that it's illegal to question, and you're not allowed to have nuance, so you'll get fired from your job and attack from every corner.
	Right.
	Put out of business, the one the one historical event that uh nobody's allowed to question.
	And uh the gor it's been coming up a lot with the whole uh Groper and Nick Fuentes stuff in the news a lot too, and uh you've got a new documentary that we're gonna get into.
	The spinning squirrel is what you're calling it, until that gets on the nickname, yeah.
	So um why don't you just tell us uh uh what's been going on with uh the censorship with you the last few days.
	The origin of spinning squirrel nickname, it's kind of funny story.
	Uh let's tell it when we get into the topic a little bit.
	Let's hear about uh the latest censorship that you've had the last few days.
	Yeah, so usually it's really weird because currently I have Facebook and YouTube, and it's usually the other way around, right?
	Usually those are always gone.
	Although they did uh delete one of my YouTube videos two days ago, but that was like no big deal, you know, for I see you got like uh only four videos up, five videos up running.
	I think two from Press TV, one from uh from Pakistan and the one I just did or whatever, but um oh the one from Scott Horton, yeah.
	That would you know that Scott Horton video is like nine years ago, but it's about Iran's nuclear weapons, or you know they don't have nuclear weapons, but the accusations of it, and everything he's saying there is still true.
	All the arguments are the same, all the excuses are the same, everything's the same.
	So the latest censorship has come a double whammy on November 19th.
	I lost AdSense and I lost PayPal on the same day.
	Now one's with Google, one's with PayPal.
	And I thought, well, that's odd.
	I've had each of them for 15 years apiece at least.
	I have PayPal since 2005, so 14 and a half years, and I think AdSense longer than that.
	And I'm like, well, what happened?
	Well, they can't tell you.
	Right.
	I go, well, uh it said they're like, well, you must have violated a term.
	I said, I haven't uh which term is that.
	Oh, well, once it's done, it's irreversible.
	I'm like, well, are you gonna tell me what exactly happened?
	Like which term I violated or whatever?
	We can't do that.
	We get the same email you do.
	I go, well, who made this decision?
	There's never an answer.
	Uh so I've been jumping around to the Oh, you can talk to Supervisor, and they're just being robot people.
	They say the same thing over and over again.
	I finally got a letter, because they sent it to an old AOL account, because again, when I made PayPal, it was 15 years ago.
	So they had sent me an email, but it was some obscure thing that I never look at.
	I go in there, they accuse me of advocating violence on an anti-war site, right?
	So I call PayPal again and I go through all the push one press two MPC stuff, and then I say, Can you show me where I'm advocating violence?
	Just somebody made that decision and their decision's final and it can't be reversed.
	That's what they they just read a script, right?
	I go, so essentially you're judge and jury.
	All you have to do is accuse somebody of something, and then say you made a decision about it, and you can kick them off, and it doesn't matter what the reason was.
	And you just say, Oh, you broke a term.
	And I asked for the evidence of this.
	Oh, it's all secret.
	So secret evidence, and they decide their judge, their jury.
	These rules don't mean anything.
	And the real reason we all know is because I criticize Israel.
	There was a guy on Twitter celebrating it.
	I'd never heard of him.
	It's some weirdo.
	He's like four foot tall and he's wearing blue paint in his picture.
	Apparently that's some new That's the same guy that uh at the beginning of the year when Jacob Wall and Mindy Robinson tried to frame me as the comet pizza arsonist.
	He was the one that when I was fighting back and defending myself, he flagged all my twit tweets that just mentioned Zionism, and that was enough for get me surprised.
	Right, yeah, it was it was stupid.
	But so just in it uh probably because of this guy, or just because you're criticizing Israel and the chosen ones, your PayPal has been this guy because they got rid of my PayPal, they got rid of my AdSense, and no AdSense means no ads on YouTube.
	Well, I already didn't have ads on YouTube, but now it's not even possible to, you know, they can just give you in you know I I thought your website.
	Oh, I don't have ads on my website either.
	But it's still a partner thing with YouTube, and so that's also gone.
	So all of that.
	So PayPal and AdSense, and they're uh coming after your uh Patreon as well.
	Yeah, they said this guy on Twitter, his Patreon will be soon.
	This guy has a long history of being uh an anti-Jew hater.
	Yeah.
	And I'm like, yeah, I am anti-Jew hate, you got that, right?
	I'm anti-any kind of hate.
	So this guy is this guy has gets no support, nobody likes him, no retweets, no likes on Twitter, but he's just like the little uh loser hall monitor that wants to go pester all these companies to try to get his uh people who are exposing him and his favorite country that he has loyalty uh shut down.
	He was defending Leon Frank.
	Yeah.
	Oh, he would he he was going crazy saying that everybody was anti-Semitic, saying that uh Epstein was Mossad.
	Well, his whole yeah, his whole Twitter from what I saw is just nothing but uh accusing people of Jew hate.
	Uh this is one of these people his whole identity is his ethnicity, and anything bad he sees anywhere uh he blames on anti-Semitism.
	But that'll work.
	Like if you call any of these uh leftist platforms and and cry anti Semite, they'll shut it down because it's easy.
	He's a hedge fund manager, he says he made some film that no one watched, and he tried to sue or he threatened to sue a victim of sexual child abuse.
	Yeah, I've heard a lot of bad stories about him.
	He's he's not a very uh popular guy.
	He's been obsessed with different people like when when I said who's this Gabe Hoffman character, everyone goes, Oh, that guy, yeah.
	This and this to me and this and this to me.
	He got me kicked off Twitter, he got me kicked off this.
	Uh he's one of these tattletale guy that likes to swing his weight around.
	He's a little little dude.
	But uh, you know, these people are obsessed with authority, they're like, ooh, he likes to threaten to sue uh threaten to sue everyone.
	Yeah on the top of his Twitters, Welp I'm getting my lawyers together, like that's his big thing to try and intimidate people.
	Yeah, he's messed with uh Titus Frost and uh some of his friends, I think.
	But uh anyway, enough about that idiot.
	Uh with that Sarnovish click, you know, and Cernovich, by the way, Pasobic too.
	He did not uh have anything to do with outing Epstein, quite the opposite.
	He sued uh to get information, the same information that Alan Dershowitz sued to try to get on one of Epstein's victims, Virginia Roberts.
	So after Dershwitz failed, then Mike Cernovich comes in and tries to get the same information.
	They want to know what she her case is on Derschwitz, right?
	And he brought Dershowitz in.
	So it's like he he's actually on the team Epstein, not anti-Epstein.
	He was on the Derschwitz side because Dershwitz has also been accused of rape and pedophilia.
	And another survivor has come out in the last four days that placed Derschwitz with young girls in Leslie Wexter's mansion.
	Leslie Wexter is a Zionist billionaire that financed Epstein's entire operation, gave him a house.
	Uh when he says he was a he's not a hedge fund manager, he just managed Leslie's money.
	That's all he really did.
	He had one client as far as anyone could tell.
	So it wasn't even a real he didn't even have a real job.
	That was just his the his explained income for his Mossad operation to go around, procure young girls, honey trap people.
	Uh but the problem was he dipped in his own stash and apparently raped thousands of women.
	And now he's dead, and all his cohorts are at large.
	But uh more let's get into this uh ADL video.
	Because it's it's about twenty minutes and you haven't watched it yet.
	Nah, I haven't seen it.
	The ADL was formed though to protect a child murdering rapist, Leon Frank.
	Yeah, and uh and this guy, Sasha Baron Cohen, his dad was uh involved with benign breath as well in uh in England.
	There you go.
	All right, well, first of all, look at this.
	It came out two days ago, it's got almost 700,000 views.
	They've of course uh ADL, which only they bring in like hundreds of millions, and they only have six thousand subscribers with all the media help and all the celebrities they have access to.
	They have the the dislikes and the likes hidden because you know what it's gonna look like, and the comments turned off because they can't handle any scrutiny or have a debate.
	They are not allowed to have free speech because you know what the people would say.
	They have to have a controlled medium.
	Yeah.
	And uh I see some people in the chat.
	Uh once once we're through this video and and giving our thoughts on this, we I will ask Ryan about uh people in the chat.
	They everybody wants to say, talk about uh the controlled demolition, talk about I haven't seen it, but we'll bring we'll talk a little bit about that and Putin and some of the stuff we disagree on.
	I mean I mean, I've known uh you've had these stances forever, it's not a surprise or anything like that.
	And uh so we disagree on on some things, I don't disagree with we don't even disagree on controlled demolition, we just disagree on how much controlled demolition, you know.
	Right, yeah.
	It doesn't matter.
	I mean, if you agree with somebody on 90% of things, and uh as long as like the main points, the main litmus test you agree on.
	I mean, let's not I don't gr agree with anybody on every single thing.
	Nobody does.
	So uh just everybody calmly a trap.
	I think they want people to argue about minutiae for infinity while you're ignoring I don't know, people caught in a van packed with bombs that belong to foreign intelligence agency.
	Like that's the avenue I want to put my time on.
	Yeah, I read the same thing.
	Let's play this ADL because this is this is really important.
	And uh here we go.
	And Ryan and I have debated that before.
	We could go on forever.
	We don't want every video to turn into a debate over controlled demolition and uh and where Putin stands on uh Zionism.
	We've done we've done it before.
	Had you on to debate Putin what?
	I don't know.
	I didn't I didn't remember doing that, but I mean had you on to debate Jeremy Roth Cushell.
	Oh, yeah, yeah.
	All he did was like say my own stuff back to me.
	Alright, well, let's get started.
	Here's the ADL, the big speech from uh Borat.
	Thank you very much.
	Thanks for everybody stood up, unnecessary, but very flattering.
	Turn it up just a tiny bit.
	So this guy is uh you know, I always say that they're double they're hypocrites and they're always doing double standards.
	They couldn't have got a worse guy to try to call for censorship and of uh offensive things or you know, edgy uh edgy comments.
	It they couldn't have found a worse spokesperson.
	It just it's like rubbing it in our faces even more.
	But here we go.
	Uh thank you, Jonathan, for your very kind words.
	Uh thank you, the anti-defamation league for this um recognition in your work in fighting racism, hate, and bigotry.
	First of all, that's not what the ADL does.
	They don't fight racism, hate, and bigotry.
	They protect Israel and protect Jews even from all criticism, whether it's legitimate or not.
	They don't even have a debate if it's legitimate.
	They promote a violent ethno state.
	Yes.
	And they work with Israel for decades close with their government.
	The idea that they're just some neutral fighting hate, fighting defamation.
	All they do is defame people.
	Why don't we start a group that is like the you know, uh calls everybody uh all their defamation against us, we just call them uh defamers.
	We could just do the same thing.
	Just call them the defamation league.
	That's what the ADL is.
	It's a defamation league.
	Exactly.
	And to be clear, when I say racism, hate and bigotry, I'm not referring to the names of Stephen Miller's Labradodles.
	Stephen Miller's uh Jewish too, by the way.
	Now I realize that some of you may be thinking, what the hell is a comedian doing speaking at a conference like this?
	Uh I certainly am.
	Um I've spent a clown's belongs to Well, they're using his celebrity, and he his dad was benign Brith, and he, you know, so I I guess it's super popular on Twitter, it's bl blowing up.
	All of them have like tens of thousands of uh retweets, and people are just you know souping this up.
	Almost his whole career is making fun of Arabs and Persians and Middle Eastern people that aren't Jewish.
	Exactly.
	Black people too, with Ollie G. Mm-hmm.
	Yeah.
	In fact, this is the first ever time that I've stood up and given a speech as my least popular character, Sasha Baron Cohen.
	Who would have thought he's like a prophet?
	I have to confess it is terrifying.
	Uh I realize that my presence here may also be unexpected for another reason.
	At times, some critics have said my comedy risks reinforcing old stereotypes.
	The truth is I've been passionate about challenging bigotry and intolerance throughout my life.
	As a teenager in England, I marched against the fascist national front and to abolish apartheid.
	As an undergraduate, I traveled around America and wrote my thesis about the civil rights movement with the help of the archives of the ADL.
	And as a comedian, I've tried to use it.
	So he's worked with the ADL for a long time, and he's always been an activist, and all of his comedy all along has been social engineering to smear certain people, and then now he's gonna decide nobody else can say any anything about uh the hypocrisy, anti-apartheid in South Africa, but it's okay in Palestine.
	Exactly, yeah.
	He basically promotes Antifa at some point too, I think, here later.
	Use my characters to get people to let down their guard and reveal what they actually believe.
	Including their own prejudice.
	Now, I'm not gonna claim that everything I've done has been for a higher purpose.
	Yes, some of my comedy, okay, probably half my comedy has been absolutely juvenile.
	Uh and the other half completely pure all, but I admit there was nothing particularly inlightening about me as Bull Rat from Kazakhstan, the first fake news journalist, uh running through a conference of mortgage brokers while I was completely naked.
	But when Bora was able to get an entire bar in Arizona to sing the jewel down the well, it did reveal people's indifference to anti-Semitism.
	When as Bruno, the gay fan Okay, let's uh have you seen that before?
	I'm sure you have, right?
	Throw the Jew down the well.
	Yeah, that's it just really shows people's agreeableness.
	They know someone's from uh or they think because he lied to everybody that he's from Kazakhstan, and they're just like, just go with it, whatever, he's harmless because nobody's really gonna turn out.
	Sorry.
	Yeah, let's play a little bit of it here.
	So I wonder how many times he had to do that to get people to agree as well.
	Well, he goes he goes to a bar and is playing music and a nice song to start with, and then all these people have been working all day and they're there drunk.
	He starts singing and they're just singing along, thinking they're being nice with this foreign guy.
	So basically, it it and then just to try to make them all look bad.
	Here we go.
	And that problem is the Jew.
	They take everybody money.
	They never give it back.
	So the Jew down twelve.
	So my country can be free.
	So my country can be free.
	You must have him by his hands.
	Then we have a big party.
	Like, who knows when they took these uh these little B rolls where they cut away and show the guy clapping.
	That could have been from like the other part of the song.
	So he's there trying to trick him to mock him.
	This is what he always does.
	He even dressed the colour.
	All he does is deception.
	All he does is deception, and then he's gonna wait till you see the original.
	He tried to honey trap Ron Paul.
	Like he had an interview with Ron Paul under some false pretense, and he was in like a hotel room or something, and Ron Paul's like just picks up a newspaper on the bed, and then Sasha came in like wearing lingerie or something like that, and Ron Paul's like, get out of here.
	You know, he's and then they're like, blame that on Ron Paul.
	I'm like, you took a guy and he's like seventy years old.
	I'm hell.
	You're like bigger and taller than him, and you you just lied to him and tried to no matter what he did, he was damned if he did, damned if he didn't, right?
	And also you can point out, like in that Arizona Bar film, well, nobody's xenophobic, nobody cares that you're there uh from Kazakhstan, and they're all singing along with you and they don't have a problem.
	And you could see some uncomfortable faces when he starts singing about Jews or whatever.
	But a lot of them are like, just don't cause a problem.
	Clap, go along.
	He'll leave tomorrow.
	They think it's funny.
	The guy put it in the movie because they think it's funny.
	They were going along with the whole joke.
	Yeah, they're like, oh geez, he said that, huh?
	And this setup with Ron Paul, that's you made a good point that he's he's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't.
	Because if he would have gone and and done the gay stuff, that would have been you know, destroyed his career, basically.
	Or if he like gets offended and get away from me, you know, he's homophobic and he's uh you know, closed minded.
	So the people haven't seen this.
	He tries to put a move on Ron Paul, and this was when he was running for 2012, I think.
	I'm gonna light some candles, but that's okay.
	Really loosens you up.
	She's cute, huh?
	I'm dancing.
	I used to be a dancer.
	Paul just gets away from that.
	So what is the point of this?
	You know?
	Get out of here.
	What?
	Alright, what's going on?
	This is ended.
	That guy's queerer than the blazes, he took his clothes off.
	Let's get going.
	He's queer as crazy, put a hit on me, took his clothes off.
	I couldn't even stop Rule Paul.
	It's funny that he said rule Paul.
	Right?
	I mean, can you imagine if like you don't know he's a comedian and you think there's a grown younger man like taking his clothes off in a hotel?
	You know, he got out of there as quick as he could.
	Yeah.
	And you know that uh one of the other roles that Ron Paul or that uh Sasha Barron Cohen played recently was on Netflix.
	He played a Mossad agent.
	No, of course.
	Yeah.
	I mean what he did is just illegal and traumatizing.
	You know, pulling your pants down in front of an elderly man, you know, when he's kind of trapped in there and he doesn't know you're joking or whatever.
	That's I wouldn't want someone doing that to one of my grandparents or something.
	It's all he does.
	It's all that's not funny.
	Definitely not.
	Here we go.
	And when disguised as an ultra woke developer.
	It's the people who came there to see a fight and paid money, and you know you're kissing someone, you know, that's not what they wanted.
	He talks about, oh, it's homophobia.
	Look at this.
	This is the.
	If you're kissing somebody against their will, that's actually assault.
	This guy thinks that he can lecture people about homophobia.
	Look at what he did to an Eminem at the MTV music awards.
	He comes flying in like an angel and falls right on Eminem, and the MM gets so pissed.
	I'm sorry.
	Eminem nice to meet you.
	I'm not fucking sure.
	Come on, it is.
	That's sexual assault.
	Hey, don't touch me, guys.
	Putting your asshole in front of an inch away from someone's face is sexual assault.
	Yeah, I bet it I bet that was scripted, though.
	That was probably scripted.
	I proposed building a mosque in one rural community, prompting a resident to proudly admit I am racist against Muslims.
	It showed the growing except Maybe he should go to uh Jerusalem or uh Israel and and try to trick some uh Israelis into building a mosque in their town and see if they if they say anything.
	Go there in blackface and see if you get thrown in a detention center for walking at night.
	Why don't you go pretend to be a Palestinian and have settlers set your car on fire like they did yesterday or shoot you?
	That's why I really appreciate the opportunity to be here with you.
	Today, around the world, demagogues appeal to our worst instincts.
	Conspiracy theories, once confined to the fringe, are going mainstream.
	It's as if the age demagogues play on our worst instincts, kind of like uh demagogues from the ADL that that play on everybody's fear to try to censor uh real independent journalism and criticism.
	Conspiracy theories like Russia gate and Ukraine gate.
	Yeah, well, you know, I would say that there is some Russian meddling along the world.
	The Russian gate Habs uh with Michael Flynn is a specific thing though, and it's not true and had nothing to do with them.
	That whole thing really goes back to Israel because BB uh is the one that told Kushner to tell Flynn to call Russia to call off the UN vote.
	Yeah but it should be Israel gate Flynn's tied in with the Zionists and the Chabad Russia Russians as well.
	All of them are they're one of the same essentially of evidential argument is ending and now knowledge is increasingly delegitimized and scientific consensus is dismissed.
	They're the ones doing it all though that they just projected everything that they're doing shutting down evidence uh debate and whatever the other ones were that's all what they're doing.
	Screaming pain as they beat you it's always projection.
	Exactly and hypocrisy too democracy which depends on shared truths is in retreat and autocracy which depends on shared lies is on the march.
	They're doing crimes of surging you mean like ABC and CBS covering up investigations into Jeffrey Epstein.
	Yeah.
	Child pedophilia gets a pass, whistleblowers are thrown in jail but you know uh if you want to support war and ethnostates as long as it's of Zog that's okay.
	Exactly.
	As a murderous attacks on religious and ethnic minorities.
	Now what do you mean like Israel supporting ISIS and Syria?
	That's one yep.
	Looks like he's got eye makeup on Palestinians and annexing territory in Lebanon and so here I mean it is it's like the audacity is like that's what you're doing.
	That's what you're supporting.
	That's what the ADS said so far.
	It's like they just write up what they're doing and then just go okay here's the script say that your enemy is doing it.
	dangerous trends have in common.
	I'm just a comedian and an actor.
	I'm not a scholar, but one thing is pretty clear to me.
	All this hate and violence is being facilitated by a handful of internet companies that amount to the greatest propaganda machine in history.
	So greatest propaganda, you could argue that they are the greatest propaganda because it's just basically freedom of thought, or at least hypothetically that's what it should be, but what about Hollywood and mainstream media for propaganda?
	Well, these mainstream alternative media, the Facebooks and YouTubes and stuff, they all have the same slant as the mass media, and they do support terrorism, but it's not the kind he's talking about.
	Every single one of them supported what they call they're going to get rid of unofficial news or whatever is the thing like, oh, well, these are fake news versus official news, and the official news is whatever's on TV, right?
	And all the Facebook, YouTube, whatever, they all favor what's quote unquote official news.
	Well, what's the official news promote?
	It wanted to have a no-fly zone in Ukraine.
	It wanted war in Syria, war in Yemen, war in Libya, war in Iraq, war in Afghanistan, all the tried and true everything evil.
	Venezuela.
	Everything evil.
	Yeah, Venezuela, Bolivia, all the coups anywhere, anytime anything violent is happening anywhere, they support it, they promote it, and every single one of those events is based on deception, and if you trace the deception back to its origin, it's not coming from Eskimos.
	Mm-hmm.
	from The greatest propaganda machine in history.
	Let's think about it.
	Facebook, YouTube, and Google, Twitter, and others.
	They reach billions of people.
	The algorithms these platforms depend on deliberately amplify the type of content that keeps users engaged.
	This is so stupid that he's saying this.
	Like, wasn't it already a year ago that the media was crying about the algorithms and boosting up Alex Jones?
	They changed all that.
	They're censoring everybody everywhere for some of the most mildest things, and he's up there saying it's not enough, we have to do that.
	Alex is a Zionist too.
	I mean, even the uh the official alternative media is still Zog.
	They're never gonna have an algorithm boost up like someone like me.
	No way.
	Right, right.
	Yeah.
	He's complaining about algorithms at the ADL.
	Like, that's the most most peak hypocrisy magic.
	Why don't we have a hundred percent monopoly?
	We're not gonna stop.
	They're relentless, they're not gonna stop, they're gonna keep pushing until people just start snapping, apparently.
	Because I mean, if you silence everybody's voice, how else are they gonna be able to uh how many Zionists are getting uh completely taken off of PayPal and everything else, you know?
	Yeah, they just go like, oh, it's Alex Jones and Laura Loomer, and then oh, it's it's even, but really there's like thousands and Laura Loomer handcuffed herself to a building and stuff.
	I don't know why this keeps all right.
	Here we go.
	Alice did oppose the war in Syria, though.
	Yeah, but he also made apologies for Netanyahu about it.
	He goes, Yeah, Netanyahu was uh he was involved with ISIS in Syria, and that's wrong, BB, but then he goes, I'm proud to defend BB, so it's just you know Yeah.
	It's all the China comms.
	It's the chai comms.
	And that trigger outrage and fear.
	It's why YouTube recommended videos by the conspiracist Alex Jones billions of times.
	Okay, this argument about them promoting Jones billions of times.
	It that's just the algorithm being fair and having an even playing field.
	Whatever's most popular and getting shared and has comments and thumbs up, that's what shows up in the results the way it should be.
	Yeah, and it's because if Alex tells the truth about 10% of the time, that's 10% more than the mass media.
	Right.
	And a lot of people that will tell you that are uh Mellonhead fans, they'd be like, Yeah, I watch, I ignore 90% of it, but they feel like where else can I go?
	Right?
	Because he acts as kind of a dragnet, and it takes him a long time to find um people that'll give it to you without all the nonsense.
	It's why fake news outperforms real news, because studies show that lies spread faster than truth.
	And it's no surprise that the greatest propaganda machine in history.
	The real news is lies.
	I mean, give me a war they didn't lie about.
	Give me a war they didn't lie about.
	It's this.
	And they all defended the banker bailouts, like you just pick something, they lie.
	It's just like the elitist supremacist view that what we say is the truth, and you're not even allowed to voice your uh opposition to it.
	ABC showing a gun range and saying this is footage of Syria.
	Yeah, yeah, I heard about that.
	CNN doing Saudi Arabian broadcast from Florida.
	You know, yeah, they're gonna be a little bit more than a lot of CNN said maybe a black hole, maybe a black hole swallowed the Malaysia Airliner.
	That's what Don Lamont said.
	Well, that's they also they also said two men in Georgia may have found Bigfoot.
	Tell me how that's different from Alex Jones.
	Not much.
	The lie that Jews are somehow dangerous.
	Okay, I love that.
	The long what is it?
	I spread the oldest conspiracy theory in history, the idea that Jews are dangerous.
	First of all, this is assuming that no Jews is probably their own religion, it's self-alienated because it divides the entire world into us and them.
	Right, right.
	What other religion does that?
	There's like there's all us, and then there's all these outsiders, and you can do whatever you want to them.
	Yeah, and they go, Oh, we're not trying to force you to force you to convert, but really you're not even allowed to convert.
	It's based on a bloodline.
	How about the oldest thing though?
	The oldest form of xenophobia, the oldest organizing, longest lasting apartheid, uh, comes from that interpretation of that faith.
	This idea that like if this is your premise that this is the longest conspiracy theory that that Jews might be dangerous, that means that Jews can get away with dangerous things and then assumes that Jews never do anything dangerous or bad or conspire, and that any so that any criticism is based on hate and conspiracy when they the way they're trying to frame it.
	It's just it's so it's any individual uh Jewish billionaire, Zionist, whatever that does something, they'll go, Oh, you just hate Jews in general.
	It's like, no, I hate what that person just did, you know.
	And this is what they really believe.
	Josh Hammer, uh, the other day, the guy from Daily Daily Caller, you saw his thing, right?
	I have not, but uh, you know, I've been dealing with a lot this week.
	Can you imagine, Adam, if you did some I don't know, robbed a liquor store or whatever and got arrested, and then you just said it's because you hate white people, like that wouldn't fly.
	Like, you don't speak for the entire ethnic group or anything.
	There are Jewish people that commit violent acts and crime just like anyone else.
	Yeah.
	Um, but they you know, and there are people that engage in ethnic nepotism.
	It's really clear that white supremacists don't represent all whites, and Jewish supremacists don't represent all Jews.
	Uh, but usually, you know, most people condemn any sort of supremacy.
	But and uh it'll get censored anywhere.
	But Jewish supremacy is something that you are allowed to do, allowed to engage in anywhere you feel like you will not face any consequences for it, and because of that, it's allowed to grow, and that has a backlash, which that causes anti-Semitism as a reaction to uh this ADL speech with Cohen is gonna cause more anti-Semitism than if they just shut their mouths and if they try to stop trying to censor everybody and just tried to actually like argue in good faith,
	there would be there would be so much less uh division and animosity.
	The ADL is uh engages in terrorism.
	I mean, they not only financially going after people to try and for ruin them and ruin families, they've been caught spying on American police departments, you know, stealing documents, they have engaged in criminal acts, and they're always protecting the worst.
	They're like, Well, if you belong to this tribe, it doesn't matter what you did, we're gonna say you're innocent.
	That causes anti-Semitism.
	Yeah.
	That kind of that racism begets racism.
	They never see that, they never realize like, gee, maybe people hate us because of our behavior.
	It's always not as totally irrational, and you just hate us as a biological category.
	No, not because of uh the way some of them behave.
	Like I disagree with racism, but I understand why it exists, and it exists because racism begets racism.
	If you go around saying I'm the chosen race of God and you all beneath me, and you bulldoze down people's houses and shoot children in the balls, and nothing ever happens, you know, and they see the favoritism here and you know, in universities and in whatever, you know, that is going to create a backlash.
	Yeah, the the way that they describe it as an ancient virus, a scourge that's just been around forever, it's a trope, it's a canard.
	Every single thing of it, and I feel like we just say it in every video, and they're the real supremacist ones.
	Isn't that what about the anti-Gentile?
	I mean, that's organized and written down.
	You know, like that's what it says on how to treat the goy.
	My last video that's only up on BitChute now was about uh them being chosen and all of their uh supremacist views.
	Okay, here let's continue.
	Conspiracy theory in history.
	The lie that Jews are somehow dangerous.
	As one headline put it, just think what Goebbels could have done with Facebook.
	On the internet, everything can appear equally legitimate.
	Breitbart resembles the BBC.
	The fictitious protocols of the elders of Zion look as valid as an ADL report.
	That might be the truest thing that I've heard so far.
	He's saying an LDA, an ADL report is valid.
	Yeah, yeah.
	One more time.
	Bright bar resembles the BBC.
	The fictitious protocols of the elders of Zion look as valid as an ADL report.
	Somebody should just cut just that because uh that's the only true thing he said so far.
	You know, SPLC and they went on on a full full front attack on like 2014 on me.
	I just woke up one morning like, what's all this crap?
	Everybody's like lighting up my inbox stuff is saying, guess what they're saying about you today.
	Cannibalism.
	And just like just somebody that lives in Japan in his room.
	I don't own any companies or anything in 2014.
	I'm like, what is this?
	I don't believe anything they write, because I know they lied about me, so when I see something about someone else, I'm like, yeah, whatever.
	C ADL, it's fake news.
	Yeah, but the media and the government cite them as the number one experts uh in the world on this.
	Yeah, and I really like it when someone writes like a long article about me.
	This dude Adam Holland did that, right?
	He says RT's what how was the phrase?
	R key RT's Holocaust denial and or friends with hate criminals or something like that.
	I'm like, I don't work for RT.
	I'm not friends with any criminals, and I'm not a Holocaust denier.
	So where are you getting this?
	And he did a screen cap of a video I done uh where I was talking about the Holocaust, and the first or third sentence out of my mouth, I think is I'm not denying the Holocaust.
	My issue is with the word the there are all these other genocides.
	I don't understand why this one gets all the special attention over other atrocities.
	Uh and anyway.
	That's what I liked, uh the anglican.
	But they did it wasn't a clickable video, it just had like a screen cap with the title, right?
	Uh in your your new documentary Spinning Squirrel, you talk about how they they use the term deny and how that that's disingenuous.
	I'll explain the Frank Lunt's uh methods of linguistics that they use.
	Uh-huh.
	We'll get into that.
	All right.
	And the rantings of a lunatic seem as credible as the findings of a Nobel Prize winner.
	See, that's just stupid.
	That's just like saying uh the rantings of a unic of a lunatic.
	I mean, let people decide, listen to people, and let people decide who they think is legitimate.
	The Nobel Prize is a bunch of lunatics anyway.
	I mean, Henry Kissinger got one of those.
	Like they give them to warmongering lunatics themselves.
	Right.
	They've given them to Israeli prime ministers have got Nobel Peace Prizes.
	That's how fake that is.
	We have lost it seems a shared sense of basic facts upon which democracy depends.
	When I, as the wannabe gangster Ali G asked the astronaut, Buzz Aldrin, what was it like to walk on the sun?
	The joke worked because we, the audience, shared the same facts.
	If you believe the moon landing was a hoax, the joke doesn't work.
	When Bullrat got that bar in Arizona to agree that Jews control everybody's money, and they never give it back.
	The joke worked because the audience shared the fact that the depiction of Jews as misery is a conspiracy theory originating in the Middle Ages.
	But when, thanks to social media, conspiracies take hold, it is easier for hate groups to recruit, easier for foreign intelligence agencies to interfere in our elections, and easier for a country like Myanmar to commit genocide against the Ringa.
	It's funny, he's talking about Russia interfering here.
	He mentions it again later on, but no come no uh complaints or news about uh Israel they got busted meddling in all these different countries elections.
	They am Burma is what he ought to say.
	All the companies, the calipheter, etc.
	that are involved in the divestment movement of Israel are in Burma.
	The same people.
	Now, it's actually quite shocking how easy it is to turn conspiracy thinking into violence.
	In my last show, Who is America?
	I found an educated normal guy who'd held down a good job, but who on social media repeated many of the conspiracy theories that President Trump using Twitter has spread more than 1700 times to his 67 million Twitter followers.
	The president even tweeted that he was considering designating Antifa, who are anti fascists who march against the far right as a terror organization.
	Oh my gosh.
	He's defending them saying they they're not a terror organization.
	All they do they're anti-fascists about as much as the Patriot Act is about patriotism, because it's in a name.
	They march against the far right.
	They don't march against anybody.
	They go and cause fights and they break one of the people.
	They go and vandalize people's businesses because they're a bunch of communists.
	Yeah, or just go around.
	They wear they have red and black flags standing for anarcho-communism.
	They're not anti-fascist, they're communist.
	Yeah, this is a dog whistle to communist extremist terrorists, really.
	Saying, Great job, Antifa, keep it up, keep up what you're doing.
	So, disguised as an Israeli anti-terrorism expert, Colonel Eran Morad.
	Yala, let's go.
	Disguised as him.
	I told my interviewee that at the women's march in San Francisco, Antifa were plotting to put hormones into babies' diapers in order to make them transgender.
	And this man believed it.
	I instructed him to plant small devices on three innocent people at the march and explained that when he pushed a button, he'd trigger an explosion that would kill them all.
	They weren't real explosives, of course, but he thought they were.
	I wanted to see would he actually do it?
	The answer was yes.
	He pushed the button and thought he had actually killed three human beings.
	Voltaire was right when he said those who can make it.
	Because you just told him that they're abusing babies.
	Now he might be dumb enough to believe that, but if you think some group of people are abusing innocent babies, I can see somebody getting pushed to that level.
	Yeah, plus he goes, the guy I haven't seen this or heard about this before, but he says the guy was was smart and educated and had a job or something like that.
	He was he's probably a retard, and this is entrapped.
	I doubt it.
	I mean, who's who has time to mess around with retard rallies in Antifa other than the jobless?
	And who's stupid enough to think that Antifa is gonna target the woman's march?
	Like they're basically on the same side along here.
	Who's stupid enough to think you can just put a hormone in a diaper and by touching their butt it's gonna change change their gender?
	Yeah, yeah.
	This is the same thing the FBI always does.
	They look for retards who are saying stupid stuff online, and then they send a pretty girl in to go convince him to do something.
	And it was funny.
	I thought it was interesting how when he did the bits more recently, like who is America, he he was an Israeli terrorist expert, and he he duped all of these uh Christian Zionists into doing stupid stuff and saying that he was getting giving them awards from Israel, and it just shows how much they love that, and that's their that's their sweet spot to get them to go along with his nonsense.
	Can make you commit atrocities.
	And social media lets authoritarians push absurdities to billions of people.
	Now, in their defense, these social media companies have taken some steps to reduce hate and conspiracies on their platforms.
	But these steps have been mainly superficial.
	Okay.
	They've taken some steps.
	They've been they got the ADL lab, they're doing AI, Jonathan Greenblatt brag that they're using with Facebook and Google, they're redirecting people's searches to Yad Vashem when they're looking for stuff questioning World War II.
	That they're I mean, they haven't gotten absolutely everybody off, but like they're they're darn near near close.
	And it has the opposite effect.
	Like the less dialogue you allow about the untalkable in the what do you call it, the most forbidden.
	Yeah, the unnameable thing, the less you're allowed to talk about it, um, the worse the conspiracies will be.
	Because they don't do a good job debunking the debunkers.
	All they do is call them Nazis, and that's not a real argument.
	That doesn't convince anyone, you know what I mean?
	It's just like, okay, that'll scare you into being quiet or whatever, but they're still gonna believe because they've only heard, you know, they've whatever.
	We'll get into that when we get in the squirrel, but I'm talking about this today because I believe that our pluralistic Democracies are on a precipice, and then the next twelve months and the role of social media could be determinant.
	Now British voters will go to the polls while online conspiracists promote the despicable theory of the great replacement that white Christians are being deliberately replaced by Muslim immigrants.
	Okay.
	They always say this.
	This is like they they say How is that a conspiracy?
	I mean, that is uh measurable fact.
	It's it's measurable, it's happening, it's all over the headlines.
	They say that they want it to happen, they say it's happening, they say it's a good thing, they say they want it to happen faster.
	Yeah, let's have Israel open its borders and let the Muslims pour in there.
	And and notice who he's leaving out of this equation.
	People that talk about great replacement aren't just blaming the Muslims for coming in or open borders down uh in Mexico, they're blaming his group for facilitating it all, and his group takes credit and says that they're doing it and is in all the headlines saying that they're the ones that are behind it, this is in their nature.
	Wasn't it the office of the ADL or was it the SPLC where they had a chart of the white decline and percentage chart like on behind the desk?
	It's like gaslighting.
	It's like we're doing this, but then anybody that that tries to uh disagree uh oppose it, they go, Oh, it's not happening, you're crazy.
	Like they're also saying making it about race when it's a national thing, like all Brits are being replaced by non-Brits and Americans are being replaced by non-Americans, not just the white ones.
	Uh, it's all of them.
	If you're got people pouring in from the third world, don't speak the same language, don't share the same cultural values, you are being replaced.
	And pretty it's like this them saying that it's anti-Semitic if if we were to say that they're censoring us on the internet.
	Like, no, that's not happening.
	You're not being censored.
	That's anti-Semitic conspiracy theory.
	As they do it, they say they're not doing it.
	They're fork ton double speaking psychopaths.
	Americans will vote for president while trolls and bots perpetuate the dis the disgusting lie of a Hispanic invasion.
	So, of course, there is trolls and bots online pushing pushing uh stuff, but they're he's insinuating that like nobody actually feels this way, and there's no real people sharing stuff online, like they always like to do.
	And after years of YouTube videos calling climate change a hoax, the United States is on track a year from now to formally withdraw from the Paris Accords.
	A sewer.
	First of all, the Paris Accords don't uh decrease greenhouse gas emissions anyway.
	All it does is it says up, it sets up an international body to add taxes to it.
	So you can produce whatever you're producing before, but now you gotta pay more.
	And this doesn't actually reduce the activity, it's just like raising the sales tax.
	What happens if uh let's say the sales tax is six percent and they raise it to eight, and you go to a store and buy something?
	Is the store now eating that extra two percent, or do they just raise all their prices to eight?
	Right?
	That's all that happens.
	So it's like, okay, you gotta pay this plus the tax.
	It doesn't do anything to help the environment.
	And it's a lot of chicken little nonsense anyway.
	It's like okay, let's agree that the earth is warming, whether it's man-made or not.
	Your proposed solutions don't limit greenhouse gas emissions.
	And it allows people to sell their allotments to third parties.
	So all that does is further monopolize uh agribusiness, for example.
	You remember when they were blaming cow farts for uh pollution, methane from cow farts is one of the gases, so they're like, oh, let's eat less meat.
	Well, if you're a small farmer, you can just sell your allotment to big ag, which gives them a further monopoly over distribution because hell, why should you bust your ass ranching when you can just sell your allotment, right?
	But it it gets it creates monopolies for all these giant uh industries that don't have to compete with the smaller ones because the smaller ones are gonna sell their allotments to the larger ones.
	That's what's really going on.
	Yeah, it's a scanning environment.
	Also, I I've heard that it allows uh some of the the worst offenders of carbon emissions to uh continue uh their output while America is squeezed.
	And this idea that he's blaming YouTube videos by by supposed crackpot conspiracy theorists that have no evidence and and no legitimacy, they're the ones that are convincing our top elected officials to pull out remote.
	We had a former vice president make a movie where he stole footage from the day after tomorrow and used it as if it was real ice caps melting, took pictures of Kilimanjaro in the summer and winter and compared them and go, This was 2012.
	This was 2000, whatever.
	And it was just comparing the summer versus the winter.
	Of course, it has less ice in the summer.
	You know, like he lied.
	And like when this is the thing, this word is gonna come up again.
	When you use exaggerations about even a real topic to make your point, and those exaggerations get debunked, now you've cast doubt on the whole thing.
	You guys exaggerating and saying the earth's gonna end in 12 years and stuff like that.
	That is what makes people doubt climate change.
	And that is what makes people doubt the forbidden story.
	Right.
	A sewer of bigotry and vile conspiracy theories that threaten our democracy and to some degree our planet.
	This can't possibly be what the creators of the internet had in mind.
	I believe that it's time for a fundamental rethink of social media and how it spreads hate, conspiracies, and lies.
	Fundamental, this is like throwing down the gauntlet.
	Fundamental rethink, and this isn't what the founders of the internet wanted.
	No, they wanted a worldwide network where people could could share at will, not social engineering top down from social media monopolies.
	And he's saying this at the ADL, so you know damn well what topic they want to censor on social media.
	Yeah, yeah.
	It's it's not just protecting everybody, it's protecting just them.
	I have here, watch this.
	I mean, look at their own state.
	They are guilty of everything they're accusing everyone else of saying, they're actually doing.
	Right.
	Here I got this uh Greenblatt asked what his job is.
	This is what he says.
	Uh is he says, My role, a very simple job description.
	Protect the Jewish people.
	That's what their job is to protect them from from anything.
	Doesn't say protect them from defamation.
	Or defamation from anyone else.
	Yeah, well, it's only defamation if it's not true, kinda, you know.
	So it's only defamation if it's about a Jew, if it's about a non-Jew, it doesn't matter.
	Right.
	Okay.
	Now, last month, however, Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook delivered a major speech that not surprisingly warned against new laws and regulations on companies like his.
	Well, some of these arguments are simply part of my French bullshit.
	Let's count the ways.
	First, Zuckerberg tried to portray this whole issue as choices around free expression.
	That is ludicrous.
	This is not...
	No free free expression is ludicrous, Ryan.
	Didn't you know?
	Yeah, why why would we let people make choices?
	We should tell everyone what they're supposed to think.
	And in this whole dynamic, this paradigm where like Zuckerberg, who's who's Jewish and who does tons of censoring, they're pretending like it's not happening, and he's just letting these Nazis uh you can get censored on Facebook from a post he made in 2008.
	Yeah.
	And I got kicked off for defending Mark Twain.
	Not about limiting anyone's free speech.
	This is about giving people, including some of the most This is the other thing they always say.
	What when they're they're taking away your your freedom of speech, they always say, This is free speech.
	Uh, like the double speak every single time they do it.
	They must think they're wizards or something trying psychological tricks on people.
	Anyone's free speech.
	This is about giving people, including some of the most reprehensible people on earth, the biggest platform in history to reach a third of the planet.
	Freedom of speech is not freedom of reach.
	Sadly, there will always be racist, misogynists, anti-sea mites, and child abusers.
	But I think we can all there will always be uh anti-white racist Jewish supremacists, but he doesn't list them, does he?
	There always there certainly are racists, it's the Israeli government.
	Yeah, there are certainly our child abusers and child murderers, they live in Tel Aviv.
	You know, like that gets a pass.
	Of course that gets a pass.
	They can be racist and murder people, and if you point it out, you get censored.
	I have been censored for criticizing racism and war and pedophilia.
	Because sometimes it's the privileged class that does it, and that is what gets you kicked off social media.
	I yet to see someone get kicked off for anything else.
	They let actual terrorists and stuff on there, right?
	That New Zealand shooter did Facebook Live for like 15 minutes, and you know what the result was?
	They outlawed Bit Shoot instead of Facebook.
	Recently, Twitter and Facebook, or and they've been doing it a long time.
	They banned Palestinian accounts, and then Twitter announced that they weren't gonna be taking political ads anymore.
	And just the other day I saw a political ad from like the IDF or something like the IDF promoting their uh their war agenda.
	So again, different they they don't have to abide by the rules they force on everybody else.
	Exactly.
	And every time you have that favored status type of thing, that causes anti-Semitism.
	That is the main argument of any anti-Semite I've ever met, has always been like, well, look at this, and they can point to some sort of legitimate things, like, yeah, but I just my thing is well, that ain't all Jews, that's this group of uh people with a Zionist ideology.
	But you know, after a while, people stop differentiating, they just go nah, it's them, you know.
	That the behavior of Zionists is the main cause, maybe the sole cause of anti-Semitism.
	Also, these social media companies have uh publishing uh immunity so that they can uh not be held accountable for what people post, and it's like the new public forum, they're quasi-government, and uh and he's gonna say that you have the freedom of speech, but not the freedom of reach.
	So what they're gonna do is actively discriminate against views they they deem inappropriate or they don't like.
	So it's been doing that anyway.
	It's not equal access, it's discrimination based on people's political views.
	And we all know they just shut it down, it's beyond just hitting the handbrake, they'll just erase people they don't like.
	Yeah.
	People self-censor because they know what you can't say.
	The biggest platform in history to reach a third of the planet.
	Freedom of speech is not freedom of reach.
	Sadly, there will always be racist, misogynists, anti-Semites and child abusers.
	But I think I love how he they do this on purpose.
	Anti-Semites and child abusers, right next to each other.
	You make the same thing.
	And have sent thousands of Ukrainians and people from the former Soviet republics into Israel as sex slaves to have zero rights, and then rather than helping the victims and going after the brothel owners and kidnappers, they deported the uh the women who were getting raped and beaten because they were quote unquote uh illegal aliens.
	Yeah.
	It's no accident that he puts anti-Semites and child abusers right next to each other.
	They just had a group of terrorists setting cars on fire in the West Bank today.
	And no news on the three-letter networks.
	The only way you could hear that news is through social media.
	That's why they're scared of it.
	Every day I see a new video of some migrants or some uh person of color beating up some white person, ganging up on them, something like that, and then it's not covered, never covered anywhere.
	But if it was ever the other way around, it would be top story, all the news people for weeks.
	They think that we don't notice this.
	Well, they do no, they know you notice it and they want racism because they need it to justify their existence as the ADL.
	They're trying to create they're trying to make white people lose it and become racist.
	They're doing it on purpose.
	Right.
	So that they can raise more money and they are desperate for another Tim McVay.
	Yeah.
	We can un agree that we should not be giving bigots and pedophiles a free platform to amplify their views and target their victims.
	Like Bobby Weinstein.
	Bigot.
	Bigot means intolerant of other people's beliefs.
	So he's calling you a bigot as he's intolerant of your beliefs, you have to be censored, and then and then combining uh bigots and what was it, pedophiles.
	Yeah, pedophiles.
	They get rid of half of Hollywood because they're the ones with the casting couch.
	Right, right, right.
	Second, Mark Zuckerberg claimed that new limits on what's posted on social media would be to pull back on free expression.
	This is utter nonsense.
	The first amendments Did he really just say quotes when he said pull back on free expression?
	Like this in this guy's not even American either.
	This guy's from England and wants to come over here and say you can't criticize my people, my country.
	Like foreigners coming in and trying to change our laws, basically.
	Says that, and I quote, Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech.
	However, this does not apply to private businesses like Facebook.
	We're not asking these companies to disappear.
	No, because the rest of the sentence there is because it's an inalienable right, that means there's right that cannot be alienated, not by private enterprise either.
	Yeah, what is it?
	Ma muh free market, muh, muh capitalism.
	Go build your own Google.
	They won't they won't do everything they can to keep you off the app stores and shut.
	These are these are monopoly companies that are quasi-government, subsidy by the govern uh subsidized by the government, the de facto public sphere or public forum.
	Mm-hmm.
	Some some woman with 90,000 Twitter followers.
	When someone does build their own, they go and shut it down.
	Right.
	That's what happened to Sue.
	Gab's got in a bunch of trouble too.
	Boundaries of free speech across society.
	We just want them to be responsible on their platforms.
	Responsible.
	If a neo Nazi comes goose stepping into a restaurant and starts threatening other customers and saying he wants to kill Jews, would the owner of the restaurant, a private business, be required to serve him an elegant eight course meal?
	Okay.
	Doesn't matter if you add racism to it.
	Say that again, disrupting and yelling.
	Is that what you're saying?
	I mean, if he came in and saying he said he's threatening the customers and stuff, you threaten people, you get thrown out.
	Or if you're yelling, or if you're just disr uh uh bothering other customers, they'll throw you out.
	Singing horny, I love you really loud, and you can get thrown out.
	That is so different than reporting news.
	If you don't want to watch someone's YouTube channel, change the channel.
	If somebody's saying uh n what you think is neo-Nazi uh stuff online, block them.
	That's all you gotta do is block them, you won't hear it.
	The other thing is when they say neo-Nazi, that's basically anybody they don't like because that's just an all-encompassing term for whatever.
	I'll call people Nazis that want to censor me.
	Are there, right?
	Anyone that calls for censorship is a Nazi.
	So how's that for uh you know, infinite regress?
	Hey, they're the book burners, right?
	So isn't that uh doesn't that make Sasha a Nazi?
	Definitely Nazi comment, Sasha Cohen or me.
	Like which has more in common, the ADL or me with Nazis, right?
	I'm not supporting the departheid state and ethnic cleansing and racial purity or any of that.
	They are.
	They're Zionazis, Ashkenazis, and they're literally passing laws because they don't have any influence.
	They're passing laws that we can't say that they're racist.
	It's anti-Semitic to say that they're racist or to compare them to Nazis.
	I mean, you don't get more peak hypocrisy than that.
	They're not acting like Nazis, the Nazis were acting like them.
	Because they've been doing this older than that.
	Yeah I I said that's peak hypocrisy, but Sheldon Adelson getting uh anti-Semitism czar who he funds to go enforce around the world that you can't talk about them having dual loyalty.
	Really?
	Adelson passing laws that you can't criticize his loyalty to Israel.
	Can we have dual citizenship with uh North Koreans?
	And put them in charge and putting in the same amount of representation, how long would that last?
	No.
	Oh, the I just saw.
	I mean, we're basically they're trying to turn us into a co-country.
	Uh they're they want to open an FDA office in Israel, I just saw is the latest news.
	Dan Crenshaw wants to change the first amendment to say criticizing Israel should not be covered for free speech.
	It already isn't online.
	You know, to a degree.
	But they want to just none.
	You're not allowed to criticize his state.
	Alright, so no matter what they do, they have snipers shooting children in the balls.
	Which I can't imagine any regime in all of history that's ever instructed its army to shoot children in the balls.
	But uh you can't say, hey, I think that's wrong, stop shooting kids in the balls.
	Can we get a hashtag, you know, stop ball shooting?
	Like, there's only one place that does it, and they do it every Friday, and that's Israel.
	That's right.
	Of course not.
	The restaurant owner has every legal right, and indeed I would argue a moral obligation to kick that Nazi out.
	See, a better comparison would be I'm sending you a letter in the mail or picking up making a phone call, having a group chat on on a phone line, and them saying we can't talk about those things together.
	That would be a better comparison.
	Or or because you're uh talking to your neighbors about what you think is uh is a is a problem with a foreign country, and then they come and say, Oh, you're not getting gas and electric anymore.
	Like these are more like utilities.
	Or in the restaurant and they're just Republicans or libertarians or something, and the restaurant owner says, You're a Nazi, get out.
	Yeah.
	That's more like what's going on.
	People are doing nothing wrong, but they have this loophole saying, Well, we're allowed to get rid of Nazis.
	So now all I have to do is accuse whoever I don't like of being a Nazi, and I can kick them off of anything I want.
	Yep.
	That's that's the game plan.
	And so what's happening?
	Yeah.
	Oops.
	Now, third.
	Monk Zuckerberg seemed to equate regulation of companies like his to the actions of the most repressive societies.
	Yes.
	Incredible.
	This from one of the six people who decide what information so much of the world sees.
	Zuckerberg said Facebook.
	He doesn't s decide what people sees.
	He's letting people put out the information they want.
	And if it spreads and people want to see it, that's just kind of the way it is.
	Right?
	They can't they can't win this through argumentation.
	It's like, look, it's not it doesn't matter how many how much pro pedophile stuff there could ever be.
	Our our society is not not gonna accept that.
	You know, and there are people on the left pushing that, so that's not just some made up thing.
	But it's like you can win that argument of why pedophilia is wrong, why murder is wrong, why stealing is wrong.
	Like y it's the it's overwhelming that the people participating on Facebook or VK or whatever are gonna knock that down.
	It's some other untouchable topic that can't be won through argumentation.
	Exactly.
	Yeah, they can't have a debate, that's why they have to shut down their opposition.
	Sunda Pichay at Google at its parent company Alphabet, Larry Page and Sergey Brynn, Brynn's ex-sister-in-law, Susan Wajiski at YouTube, and Jack Dorsey at Twitter.
	The silicon six.
	All billionaires, all Americans, all Jews.
	All something else in common.
	Almost all of them are something else, too.
	I thought he was about to get real tropey there for a second.
	This is full of dog whistles, this whole thing.
	You know, it's all like, oh, we should be able to like it's all opposite speech, you know.
	It's Frank Luntz.
	Yeah.
	These six people are all Americans, all the you know those anti those Nazi anti-Semite Zuckerbergs and Sergi Brin's and Larry Pages, who get they've all got ADL awards, basically.
	And ADL works is already working so close with all these groups.
	It's like you're already Zionists, but you're not Zionists enough.
	That's the this whole speech.
	Boosting their share price than about protecting democracy.
	Protecting democracy means censoring the uh the fourth estate, the independent media.
	Who what who was it that said there are not weapons of mass destruction, right?
	The web.
	Every single, every single three-letter network said they were WMDs, promoted around the lies from Judith Miller about uh mobile weapons labs, showed the speech from Colin Powell, the mock anthrax.
	By the way, the origin of that lie came from Israeli security forces To James Woolsey, somebody that Epstein blackmailed Clinton into putting in charge of the CIA.
	He's the former DCI.
	Then that was uh spread around by newspapers and uh groups like PNAC and the Newark Observer, which is owned by the Kushners, you know, like who has Netanyahu's sleeping at their house.
	Like, they don't like people being able to speak online because they get exposed.
	Oh, you mean Israel stole nuclear weapons from the United States?
	Oh, you mean Israel's been attacking US ships?
	Oh, they've been blowing up hotels and trains and embassies, and they're engaged in terrorism too.
	I didn't know that because it was never on CNN.
	But it's, you know, you can read about what they really do.
	And that is why they want to censor the internet.
	It has nothing to do with going after pedophiles and terrorists.
	These people are the biggest human traffickers and terrorists the world has ever seen.
	The CIA is bringing in more drugs than any drug cartel.
	And the ones that are allowed to be in Mexico and stuff, like these things can't be sustained without government.
	The Afghan war has caused a $64 billion heroin train.
	It's all for profit.
	You know, he's talking about for probably it costs eighty-one thousand dollars per year per prisoner in California right now.
	Yeah, for profit.
	Yeah, that's what the drug war was so much about was filling filling the prisons.
	You know, it seems like this whole thing.
	32,000 is for the prisoners' health care.
	$32,000 a year.
	That's what it costs when you let government get the bill.
	Well, private companies are doing it too.
	This whole state was together.
	I mean, that's the whole thing.
	Like, who pays that private company?
	Right.
	The state.
	This whole speech seems like a panic.
	Like the Goyem, no, we have to shut it down.
	They know what we're up to, and we have to censor everybody.
	And it's just like they can't help themselves.
	That they they don't have any self-realization about what they're doing and how to like, you know, it's just like they're they're shooting themselves.
	Put it online and dissect it the way we're doing now.
	Yeah.
	And in in total, I think that there's gonna be a lot more eyes seeing the people that that because a lot of people are doing uh reviews of this, it's gonna actually have a negative impact.
	This is ideological imperialism.
	Six unelected individuals in Silicon Valley imposing their vision on the rest of the world.
	Well, we should just put the ADL in charge, right?
	That's so different.
	That's so different than uh Jeff Zucker and James Goldstone and Sumner Rothschild and like that's like six people and they run all the uh three-letter networks.
	Yeah, let's give it give it back to them completely.
	And none of them were elected.
	Right.
	Yeah, unelected.
	Well, let's just have state government and only the elected officials get to put out the information.
	Like this guy, he's he's not American, he does not understand freedom.
	He hates freedom.
	He literally hates our freedom.
	The ADL is an anti-American hate group.
	I think anybody that comes after First Amendment should just be thrown out of the country.
	Yep.
	The world unaccountable to any government and acting like they're a bomb for the reach of law.
	It's like we're living in the Roman Empire, and Mark Zuckerberg is Caesar.
	At least that would explain his haircut.
	Now, here's an idea.
	Instead of letting the Silicon Six decide the fate of the world, let our elected representatives voted for by the people of every democracy in the world have at least some say.
	They do have say.
	They should, I believe there is laws, and if not, they should have laws about like doxing and revenge porn and pedophilia and real incitement to violence.
	These are the type of things I don't think anybody is having a problem with.
	But that's not what they're going after.
	That's not what they shut things down for.
	I mean, we already enforced those, and we have antitrust laws.
	We have defamation laws too.
	They've got defamation laws too.
	Every state has them already.
	So if the Anti-Defamation League doesn't bring up lawsuits to clear people through the court system of defamation, they just decide to censor you preemptively.
	Oh, God.
	Fourth, Zuckerberg speaks of welcoming a diversity of ideas.
	And last year he gave us an example.
	He said that he found posts denying the Holocaust deeply offensive, but he didn't think Facebook should take them down because I think there are things that different people get wrong.
	At this very moment, there are some.
	Don't you think it's better for people to post that so other people can reply to it and explain why they're wrong?
	Right.
	No, he doesn't.
	I mean, isn't dialogue and sunshine the way to get rid of things like that?
	I don't know how many people like who thought a missile hit the Pentagon.
	I didn't reverse all of it, but by just me being able to make videos and talk about it with them, a good chunk of those people changed their minds.
	And a lot with a lot of hoax stuff.
	Like that's you can you can take that out with the conversation.
	It's the fact that you're not allowed to talk about it, that there's laws against it and all that.
	That's why people doubt it, right?
	And because they can't have dialogue about it, and then someone like me, I don't why should I roll the dice and argue with this person because just breathing the same air is gonna get you to sync with them, you know.
	And so it metastasizes.
	Like shutting conversation down doesn't prevent conspiracy, it just throws gas on it.
	Absolutely.
	I'm looking for one of the clips.
	I th I thought I had it on this computer where he jokes about saying that the Jays did 9-11.
	That we'll get into that too, some of the double standards, because he made his whole career on smearing people, uh, smearing people racially and uh being controversial and edgy and stuff, and then now he's gonna come and say, let's shut down shut it all down.
	He makes the jump from Israel to the Jays.
	That's what they always do.
	Right.
	Anything Israel does, you're like, oh, you're blaming the Jays.
	No, not blaming the Jays, you're blaming the state.
	And they know better.
	They do it anyway.
	...on Facebook.
	And Google still takes you to the most repulsive Holocaust denial sites with a simple click.
	One of the heads of Google, in fact, told me that these...
	Simple.
	I think that's true.
	Say that again.
	I don't think that's true.
	I think if you go and research the Holocaust, you're gonna get the standard story.
	Oh, if you if you Google here, we could do it right now, we could do a test.
	Yeah.
	We're going to do Google and just do Holocaust.
	Introduction.
	Encyclopedia, history, Wikipedia, The Guardian, The Atlantic.
	Simple simple click.
	What if what about if you're museums, you know?
	Revision.
	Hmm.
	Conspiracy theories, denial, like it's all anti-revisionist stuff.
	Not only that, but I've got a clip of Jonathan Greenblatt admitting that they work with Google to that when somebody searches for something about World War II, it redirects them to Yad Vishem.
	So he's just lying.
	Both sides of the issue.
	This is madness.
	To quote Edward R. Murrow, one cannot accept that there are on every story two equal and logical sides to an argument.
	We have unfortunately millions of pieces of evidence for the Holocaust.
	It is an historical fact.
	And denying it is not some random opinion.
	Those who deny the Holocaust aim to encourage another one.
	How about that line, bro?
	Those who deny the Holocaust aim to encourage another one.
	But the thing is, uh actually the the kind of storybook version of black and white evil with no nuance is how we ended up with more wars because the way the warmongers and liars that have caused a lot of wars in the Middle East that have already happened and millions of people are dead, always their thing is so-and-so's a new Hitler.
	Right?
	Achmasinajad's a new Hitler, Gaddafi's a new Hitler, Saddam's a new Hitler.
	They use that story to create more wars and mass genocide, not to prevent it.
	And and this is conflating anybody who questions their magic number and the whole narrative is encouraging a genocide.
	Questi saying that you think a genocide didn't happen does not mean that you want a genocide to happen.
	It's so silly too, because it's like you're saying the Well, I'm gonna talk about this later again when we when the whole thing's over, I'll get in the whole thing, but uh it's not a fact, it's a series of facts, you know, and some of those wrong.
	As with anything, if was the civil war, the revolutionary war, with whatever.
	No one's saying there was no civil war or something like that.
	But if we're gonna talk about Andersonville or something and how many uh Yankees died in that prison or whatever, you know, it's okay to try and figure out uh what the numbers are or whatever, and it's okay to disagree.
	You're a denier, you think it didn't happen.
	You think it didn't, it never happened.
	That's what Barbara is.
	There's no Andersonville, you're right.
	Never nobody starved.
	Or like they'll let's say the same thing with 911.
	They think 911 was a hoax.
	Right.
	They use these words.
	So if you question any part of 911 at all, like uh, you know, known hijackers being financed by the Saudi crown, oh you're denying 911.
	You're denying 911.
	You're a nine eleven denier.
	You're saying nothing happened.
	Yeah.
	And the weird thing is there are a few people who really do believe in holograms and stuff, but you know, and I'm sure there's somebody that maybe that thinks there was no Holocaust at all.
	But I mean to lump in all of 911 truth or revisionists in with you know denial is ridiculous.
	Here's uh Jonathan Greenblatt telling the truth about what's going on, and this was months ago, maybe six months ago.
	With Google on using AI to We work with with Google on using AI to try to interrupt cyber hate before it happens.
	We work with YouTube to have we to get them to change their algorithms so it lessens the likelihood that a young person's gonna run into some of these anti Semitic conspiratorial videos.
	We work with Facebook on trying to use a redirect method, so when you search for Holocaust as a hoax, you get directed to like a Yad Vashem page.
	So the Okay, so that's that's what's really happening.
	I'd be fine with uh trying to curb hate, but that's not what they really do.
	Conspiracy theories.
	That means great great replacement, they say it's conspiracy, nine eleven's conspiracy, Zog or or uh Zionism is a conspiracy.
	You can't talk about it.
	Not agreeing with their conspiracies, though.
	They have plenty of their own conspiracies about WMDs and the latter, and you know, that's okay.
	Whatever the mass media wants to say, like this crap about the uh phone call to Ukraine, right?
	How long do they talk about that?
	You end up, you know who was really corrupt?
	Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, right?
	It's uh it's it's pro wrestling.
	It's play fighting.
	But it's just something to keep the plebs entertained.
	Uh Zelinski and Trump both basically said in that in that message that they're surrounded by Chabad.
	They both got the same friends.
	That's that's my takeaway.
	The Holocaust, like that's such a fringe topic anyway.
	Like w Holocaust and podophiles, right?
	Like that's the thing that's lumped in with uh, you know, every other topic.
	Like, well, how about this super extreme example?
	Uh what if a Nazi went into a restaurant yelling at me?
	Like that's one, a false equivalency and analogy, and two, it you you're talking about nonsense.
	Who the hell does that?
	You know, those kind of people are so rare and few you can name them.
	Yeah, this the this fake uh they act like they're just Nazis and white supremacist everywhere.
	I I've never seen any.
	It they act like they're they're all over the place.
	It's just completely manufactured.
	So this is the states is hyperactively anti-racist.
	This is uh Borat in his movie uh talking about uh he's allowed to joke about these things, he's allowed to say these things.
	He insists we not fly in case the Jews repeated their attack of 911.
	So it's alright for him to say this kind of stuff, but if uh I were to say Jews did 911 on Twitter, they want to censor me.
	It's also conflating things and be like, see, that's what they those people about 911, they're suffering the Jews, the Jews.
	Right, right.
	As if it was just all of them, even though it's Yeah, if they all got in a big meeting room smoking cigars.
	Yeah.
	Right.
	Oh, wait.
	Here we go.
	That's that's not the one I wanted to play.
	He incited a riot, lovely.
	Still, Zuckerberg says that people should decide what is credible, not tech companies.
	But at a time when two-thirds of millennials say, didn't he just say the cyber six should not be deciding everything?
	Yeah, yeah.
	Now he wants them to.
	He would know what they want to do is they want the ADL full control.
	I guess I guess they're dragging their feet and not just giving it.
	The ADL is partnered with YouTube, so they can go around and flag any kind of it like the ADL, you know, I've been censored a zillion times.
	Allison Weir, if Americans knew, right?
	They focus almost solely on uh Israel's crimes in Palestine.
	That's all they talk about.
	And they got thrown off YouTube.
	Why?
	They only had like five videos.
	And they kicked them off.
	The ADL decides.
	The first day the ADL partnered with YouTube, I was kicked off.
	As in December of 2008.
	2017.
	Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Twitter, and ADL announced lab to engineer new solutions to stop cyber.
	What are they up?
	What is he up there covetching about?
	Why is the ADL getting to decide what hatred is when they have such a long reputation of promoting hatred?
	A small Jewish supremacist group that works for Israel is going to be in charge of regulating all of the social media companies monopolies in the world.
	We're handing the keys over to racial supremacists.
	With the tech supremacy and uh cybersecurity big time, too.
	They're going to start coming after everybody.
	They already are coming after websites too.
	It doesn't end at social media.
	They're going to make it criminal.
	They want to close your bank account.
	Yep.
	Wait, this.
	So where are we?
	Here we go.
	I haven't even heard of Auschwitz.
	How are they supposed to know what's credible?
	How are they supposed to know they haven't heard that he's complaining that kids haven't heard about Auschwitz?
	Well, have they heard about uh I think Holodomore is uh anniversary today?
	Do they know about uh all the people that died in World War One and World War Adam earlier when I was talking about Andersonville, which happened in the United States?
	How many people know that versus Auschwitz in America?
	I guarantee you, if they've never heard of Auschwitz, they've never heard of Andersonville, you know, like that it that happened in the Civil War, right?
	They we don't even know our own history.
	Like, there are people who don't know history, but they what history they do know, the one thing they're gonna learn first is gonna be the Holocaust.
	Right, yeah.
	Not a whole more, not genocide of Native Americans, not the Irish potato famine, not any of these other horrible things.
	It's no, that's the special one.
	You see these people do like interview man on the streets and stuff like Jimmy Kimmel or just YouTubers and stuff.
	People the average person out there is like doesn't know anything, they don't even know the three branches of government or the most like basic fundamental things uh knowledge in California almost every time.
	Okay, well, let's can't can't argue with that.
	How are they supposed to know what's credible?
	How are they supposed to know that the lie is a lie?
	There is such a thing as objective truth, facts do exist.
	And if these internet companies really want to make a difference, they should hire enough monitors to actually monitor, work closely with groups like the ADL and the NAACP, insist on facts and purge these lies and conspiracies from their platforms.
	Purge the lies and conspiracies, work with the ADL to purge the lies and conspiracies.
	Where are we in clown world?
	They already work with the ADL.
	Why is he complaining?
	We need to be having conferences where we say get the ADL the hell out of here.
	Stop working with with these companies.
	And yet they protect criminals.
	Exactly.
	Now, fifth, when discussing the difficulty of removing content, Zuckerberg.
	Mark Zuckerberg asked, where do you draw the line?
	Yes, drawing the line can be difficult.
	But here's what he's really saying.
	Removing more of these lies and conspiracies is just too expensive.
	These are the richest companies in the world, and they have the best engineers in the world.
	They could fix these problems if they wanted to.
	They already are.
	Twitter could deploy an algorithm to remove more white supremacist hate speech.
	But they have reportedly haven't, because it would eject some very prominent politicians from their platform.
	So now he's basically calling on even politicians to be uh censored from the internet.
	Yeah.
	I mean, they they're scared of that.
	They're scared of the Tulsi Gabbards and stuff who are calling for investigate for releasing the files on Saudi Arabia on 9-11, which would mean which it would in hand release all files, by the way.
	I think he's talking about Trump Trump the m the most, though.
	Of course.
	This guy's a lefty.
	Yeah.
	But the lefties don't like her either.
	Some of them.
	Maybe that wouldn't be such a bad thing.
	Let's kick them off.
	Kick everybody off of uh Twitter.
	This guy is psyched.
	The truth is these companies won't fundamentally change because their entire business model relies on generating more engagement, and nothing generates more engagement than lies, fear, and outrage.
	So it's time to finally call these companies what they really are.
	The largest publishers in history.
	So here's an idea for them.
	Abide by basic standards and practices, just like newspapers, magazines, and TV news do every day.
	We have standards and practices in television and the movies.
	There are certain things we cannot say or do.
	In England, I was told that Ali G could not curse when he appeared before 9 p.m.
	Here in the US, the Motion Picture Association of America regulates and rates what we see.
	I've had scenes in my movies cut or reduced to abide by those standards.
	I'm pretty sure you can't have pornography on Facebook.
	They already do have standards.
	They have rules like that already.
	And you're not supposed to be using it unless you're 13.
	Yeah, that's another another rule too.
	All these false equivalencies.
	For what cinemas and television channels can show, then surely companies that publish material to billions of people should have to abide basically.
	Companies that publish material, they don't publish anything.
	It's allowing people a platform.
	It's the people's platform.
	And that person is held responsible.
	If you publish some story that's complete bull or promote violence or whatever, you can get arrested.
	Yeah.
	Exactly.
	I mean, they've used Facebook and all as evidence.
	You know, like, well, you said something, something on Facebook, and that's used in court to prosecute these people.
	Oh, let's drive it all underground.
	That'll work so well.
	Yeah.
	Standards and practices too.
	Everybody radicalize each other in uh echo chambers.
	Take now take the issue of political ads on which Facebook have been resolute.
	Fortunately, Twitter finally banned them.
	And Google, today I read, is making changes too.
	But if you pay them, Facebook will run any political ad you want, even if it's a lie.
	And they'll even help you micro-target those lies to their users for maximum effect.
	Under this twisted logic.
	So hold on, what he's doing there, if you can't do political ads on Twitter, like post the your your YouTube video or your 2020 election campaign or something.
	What you're forcing people to do is to say, well, now it goes back to how it was where you have to have an enormous amount of money and buy an ad on TV.
	You know, lay leveling the playing field and saying like the Tulsies, the the uh the lower tier candidates or whatever can have a voice on Twitter or Facebook, right?
	But uh what he wants to have is no, you gotta buy airtime from the uh established sinister six of CNN, ABC, CBS, Fox, etc.
	Yeah, and and he's like there they allow them to use advertising and micro-targeting.
	It's like that's that's how what they those are their tools that they let everybody else use.
	So they want to have special rules for people that size them.
	It prevents grassroots uh campaigning too.
	Like if I wanted to run for Congress, assuming I wasn't banned on everything, I could put ads up on YouTube and Facebook and uh Twitter, etc., and probably get elected.
	But if I had to pay for TV ads, no, I don't have the initial capital do it.
	Most people who would like to run for political office, the main reason they can't is initial capital.
	But and it's for advertising, so you just can't get your name out there.
	Even if most people would agree with your ideas, you don't have the reach.
	This gives you the ability to have the reach.
	Right?
	That would change the kind of people we have in elected office.
	And they're scared of that.
	They want it to stay how it is.
	Yeah.
	If Facebook were around in the 1930s, it would have allowed Hitler to post 30 second ads on his solution to the Jewish problem.
	Okay.
	That's the same thing.
	Hitler got elected anyway, without any social media.
	If there had been social media, someone could have pointed out where Hitler was going wrong.
	Yeah, I also I saw on Twitter that Hitler also wrote like an op-ed, or they they published one of his uh essays in uh the New York Times, and he was also on the cover of Time, he was man of the year.
	Hitler was able to sway so many people because the Treaty of Versailles was terrible, they did take Danzik away.
	They stole lands where German speaking people lived and gave it to Poland or France, and those people were pissed off based on what happened to them post-World War One.
	Hitler is a result of that, not the cause of it.
	And another important thing to know is he says uh that that Facebook would allow Hitler to post uh his advertisements on the the Jewish question, the final solution.
	Um they wouldn't say everything that I've yeah, that that's that's total that's calling for the death of people.
	That's illegal.
	You'd go to prison for that.
	But let's everything I've seen is that the it was Zionists that coined the terms JQ Jewish question and final solution, and the final solution to the Jewish question to Zionist was immigrate to the homeland in Palestine and in the world.
	The phrase final solution comes from William Tecumseh Sherman talking about American Indians.
	Oh, really?
	So they appropriate.
	They put them on trains, they put the Apache on trains and sent into Florida in concentration camps.
	How many people knew that?
	That happened in the United States by the United States to uh people that live in North America, and kids don't know about it.
	They've heard the name Geronimo only because of Warner Brothers' cartoon characters jumping out of trains and saying Geronimo, but they don't know why.
	You know, that's about American Indian history, and that that's a real genocide, you know, and that's uh on something that our government did, and they don't know about it.
	But we know what happened to a foreign people in a foreign country uh in World War II, and you should, but you should know all this history if you want to see the balance though, but the reason you don't know is because you don't have the atrocity propaganda, soap and lampshades and stuff.
	Like that is what did it.
	Right, yeah.
	And the other thing is I'm all for yeah, I'm all for like learning about any atrocity.
	You should know it.
	We've got fifty-four or more Holocaust museums in America for what happened to foreign people in Germany, and no museums for American Indians and that Holocaust.
	Done by our own government.
	But the the way that they spin everything, it's like there's there'll be info that actually is damning to them, and they'll spin it like it's somehow uh advantageous to them.
	The final solution of the Jewish problem was to go to Palestine.
	That's what I've read.
	I believe it was Herzl or Top Zionist, maybe it was Weitzman.
	And that one too was the Indian question.
	It was the only good Indians a dead Indian and all that.
	They put bounties on people uh where you could collect money for murdering people.
	And that was gone on in California uh right up until World War One.
	They put the last Yani Indian In a museum and put in the newspaper Stone Age Man found, right?
	He died of a fever from contact.
	They'd already wiped out his entire family.
	Like this is in our own history.
	Family Planning Act, sterilizing American Indians until the 1970s and black people.
	No, you don't get to learn about that.
	You learn about the 15 ovens or whatever.
	So here one more time, and I've got one last point to make on the show.
	It would have allowed if Facebook were around in the 1930s, it would have allowed Hitler to post 30 second ads on his solution to the Jewish problem.
	Okay, so uh everything I've heard, and correct me if I'm wrong, I'm open to seeing uh if if this is not true, but isn't the like actual documents and proof of them planning some kind of uh extermination?
	I've heard that that's flimsy and that that that uh there's not uh evidence out there for that.
	There was never it was never like a order, it happened in stages, and there's different deaths in different areas for different reasons.
	One of the worst, well, I'll just start talking about it.
	The on as far as camps in Germany, and there are as there are none, and there are not claimed to have been any homicidal gas chambers in any of the tw uh 16 camps in Germany.
	Uh the the camp the most death was definitely a Bergen Belsen, and that was because of a typhoid epidemic, which you get from getting contaminated water.
	Uh and that had happened as the US was firebombing Dresden and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people and going through they blew up the water treatment facilities, and so not just the camp, but Germans in general had uh had uh contaminated water,
	and there was an outbreak of typhoid, which is when you see these horrible videos of all these emaciated bone skinny people, they're that thin because you get dysentery, like chronic diarrhea until you die, you dehydrate and die from typhus, and hundreds of thousands of people died in that camp that the Germans had just moved from other camps uh to try to save only because they're using for slave labor,
	and I mean that's not exonerate them or anything, but the worst deaths from that uh were compounded upon by allied bombings, right?
	So that wasn't in order or whatever, but they're definitely Himmler and others, yes, they were liquidating Jews and communists and any, you know, they killed people, obviously.
	But uh it wasn't so simple as like Hitler said, kill all the Jews, or whatever.
	That's not true.
	He's saying he's saying making it seem like oh Hitler and uh would have advertised it on Facebook, but really there was there was nothing even remotely like that.
	And the idea that the term it was more or less like uh they argued about it, actually, like the Catholic Church, which helps kind of finance the Nazis, did not want euthanasia for handicapped people, for example, and the Germans like we need these beds for our injured soldiers, get rid of some of these prisoners.
	You know, it's a very callous, horrible kind of decision making, whatever, but they debated it back and forth.
	And Hitler decided not to do it because the money from the church uh was more important than the beds or whatever, anyway.
	It's the uh Irving's Hitler's War is a good book on all that, but they did get an influx of two million Russian prisoners when they intercepted the plans of Russia uh was about to turn on Germany, so Germany hit first.
	Everyone said it was so stupid to open up a war on two fronts.
	Well, that was gonna happen anyway, because the Russians are doing it.
	They caught them in offensive positions, that's why they were able to give them such a devastating blow.
	But the influx of that many PMWs was too much for the camps to handle.
	I mean, they didn't even have winter gear for their front line.
	How do you think the prisoners got treated?
	And a lot of people died from the elements and starvation, and it was horrible.
	It was war, wartime is a very difficult time.
	It's war, it's horrible, but it was equally horrible of what the Soviets were doing to their prisoners and what the Japanese did, and what everyone was everybody killed civilians, everybody, yeah, everybody bombed.
	Well, the Americans nuked dropped nuclear bombs on civilian cities, yeah.
	Uh 3.5 million people starved to death in Bengal.
	The British just let them starve.
	Like, well, you know, British people are more important.
	We got to sacrifice this group, you know, and they just starved.
	Uh so those kind of things happened.
	But the the thing is the allies and the fascists, they all participated in this callous behavior.
	So It wasn't the type of government that mattered.
	Communists did it, fascists did it, Imperialists did it.
	All of them did it.
	And it's so funny, they're fighting all over Northern Africa and stuff like why.
	Oh yeah, because the French and British colonized half the planet.
	Like that that gets a pass, right?
	It's unreal.
	And it's like we're not picking teams here.
	You just need to look at it and say, look, this happened, that happened, and all of it was terrible, and we should never have a World War II again.
	But you cannot put all the blame on Adolf or whatever.
	Stalin and these other characters were monsters.
	All of them.
	And but then he's gonna lie and say that they would have put I mean this is this is such insane rhetoric to say they would have put 30-second ads of the final solution.
	And then there's the whole transfer agreement, too.
	So they were actually putting that uh that plan.
	If there had been social media, the lies that created World War One and all could have broke before it got started.
	If there had been uh active social media before the second Gulf War in Iraq, maybe that could have been debunked.
	YouTube didn't exist in 2003, neither did Facebook.
	If we had had people in real time be able to say there are no WMDs, this is why they're really doing it.
	It's in Israel's own policy papers that they want to use America to topple Iraq and blah blah blah blah blah.
	If that had come out, it might have prevented the war.
	Look at what the British Parliament voted against going to war with Syria because of social media, and the Americans could not put boots on the ground.
	Obama could not put boots on the ground in Syria because he couldn't get a consensus because they don't control them, they don't have monopoly of the lies anymore.
	Of information about you know, they're not gonna be able to do that.
	That's where they have to shut it down.
	Yeah, the reason they had to shut it down, the reason they couldn't get it going was because of social media.
	And and lo and behold, they tried to blame Benghazi on social media, right?
	That's not why there is Benghazi.
	There was already two prior attempts on Ambassador Stevens' life before the riot that killed him, right?
	So it had nothing to do with the internet video that made fun of Mohammed or whatever Hillary Clinton blamed it on.
	You know, this is such lies.
	Like social media has a lot of dumb shit on it, but it also has some truthful stuff.
	The mass media doesn't, and you also have to see the effect that social media has on mass media.
	Mass media knows it can get called out, so that's why social media is kind of pushing them to be a little bit more honest or at least slow down the lies.
	And you look at the debates and stuff, they're like, oh, go to fact checker right after.
	Where do people do that?
	They do it online.
	You know, it's like you can show somebody say a position, blah, blah, blah, and two seconds letter B position, right?
	When Jon Stewart and these late night comedians who had a huge impact on uh the direction of elections, they were able to go to YouTube and sites like that, grab videos of somebody saying one thing, then saying the opposite, put them back to back, right?
	They're able to show the public that because of the internet.
	If it just died on a CN, unless you're just sitting there with a VCR every day, it's just gone, right?
	Now we can compare things immediately.
	Well, what did you say at that time?
	Pull it up, it's right there.
	But not if you let the three-letter networks control everything.
	I mean, these people were suppressing stories on serial pedophiles.
	And I want to know this.
	When they squashed that story from a Roebok about Jeff Epstein, because they're like, oh, we'll lose access to the palace or whatever, stupid excuse.
	But did you inform the police that you knew this was happening?
	Did you inform the local authorities that there was a billionaire pedophile that was you know raping young women, and we have this long interview, pictures, evidence, everything.
	Fine, you don't want to do the story, but did you tell them?
	I want to know.
	Yeah, the the whole Epstein situation really shows the the level of uh Zog control.
	Um what was I gonna say?
	Oh, yeah, I uh you made a point that I was gonna make too, and I thought that I think they haven't gotten more in Syria, and they haven't got uh even despite trying several uh possible false flag uh provoc pro uh trying to provoke a war in Iran.
	Um it's because of social media that they they can't get away with it right now.
	That's why they have to try to get everybody off completely.
	And uh and Trump isn't these people that think like oh Trump do something.
	Trump just the other day when oh he said I opened an Apple factory, and I think it was Texas.
	So Apple and Tim Cook, who says he's gonna get all this anti-Semitic hate off, he gets ADL awards as well.
	I think he got this the same award last year, actually.
	Tim Cook from Apple.
	So we're gonna make these parts in Texas.
	Yeah, you ship the slave labor into Texas.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Alright, here we got a couple more minutes of this, like four more minutes, let's get through it.
	Facebook.
	Start fact checking political ads before you run them.
	Stop micro targeted lies.
	They do that.
	You you do a paid promotion on Facebook, it they you have to go has to be go through a review process.
	Maybe not for truth for all politicians, but it does they do have a review process and they do scan it with algorithms.
	I I mean this is I kinda I can't believe I'm gonna agree with Zuckerberg on something, but here we go.
	This almost makes me think Zuckerberg is good in a way.
	There's always something worse.
	I mean, they're all trash, but what he said to AOC was correct.
	If you go on and put up an ad that is not truthful, someone can point out where you lied in your ad immediately afterward, and then you look worse than ever.
	You look stupid, exactly.
	The way it's supposed to do.
	Well, they all they really want to do is prevent ads from ever seeing light of day that they don't like.
	Oh, he that's that's what he's gonna say here in a second.
	one of the most authoritarian lines of the whole speech.
	Immediately, and when the ads are false, give back the money and don't publish them.
	Thank you.
	Here's another good practice.
	Slow down.
	Every single post does not need to be published immediately.
	Oscar Wilde once said we Okay, there we go.
	Every single so our posts don't need to be published immediately.
	They have to have their uh fact checkers decide uh if every single post-not even possible.
	Do you know how many posts go up per second on these things?
	Like we can't robots can't do it, we don't have enough people, that is not possible.
	And news is such a timely thing.
	There's information spreads so fast, and sometimes a lie does get spread all over the place.
	That's why people do have to have due diligence.
	But if you're the type of person that spreads lies all the time, eventually people realize that you're not credible and they stop listening to you.
	But the other thing, all of these ideas that he has, is this guy really sitting at home and and creating bullet points of what he thinks how he's gonna save the world by censoring the internet, or did he just get handed a script straight from the ADL saying, here here, you're a celebrity, you're popular, push all this stuff, and they're just they're so stupid that they don't see how much this is gonna backfire that it's a good thing.
	Oh, this guy's from an edgy comedian, so you know he's not pro-censorship.
	Like, no, it's censorship in one direction.
	And everyone knows.
	Everyone knows what this is about.
	Right.
	Oscar Wilde once said we live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessity.
	But let me ask you, is having every thought or video posted instantly online, even if it's racist or criminal or murderous, really a necessity?
	Of course not.
	The shooter who massacred Muslims in New Zealand.
	Hold on.
	Imagine if they have some kind of delay process where you where every post you do or every video you put up has to be well, YouTube already does analyze it for with keywords and AI and everything.
	But how would the internet even work on social media?
	It's like somebody responds to your comment and you have to wait hours until you can respond because their minders have to see it first.
	This is just not even a plausible thing.
	People would quit using the platform if it was that bad too.
	He's gonna talk about the New Zealand shooter, and I can guess what he's gonna say before he says it.
	Uh this is my reply to that.
	That guy was gathering was living in an echo chamber deep in the darkest rooms of 4chan or whatever, where a lot of people got banned and placed.
	Had they been allowed to interact with the normal public, maybe many of them would have changed their minds.
	But again, they get no dialogue.
	They think, oh, no one can argue with me, that's why they're censoring me and they put me in and I can only post in 4chan.
	Well, it becomes an echo chamber of of uh, you know, the worst elements.
	But if they were allowed on something, where someone like me or Adam would have talked to them and go, uh well, actually, you know, this isn't true because da da.
	Like, I don't know how many people I've talked to about mu IQ and stuff like that and changed their mind.
	Right.
	But uh it's hard to have that dialogue because if they're not allowed to say what they think and their side of it, how is someone else supposed to come along and argue back?
	Right?
	When you force people into echo chambers and they're always going to be there, you're creating uh the the worst environment possible.
	And and there, I don't think they're retarded, so I think they know exactly what they're doing here.
	Live streamed his atrocity on Facebook, where it then spread across the internet and was viewed likely millions of times.
	It was a snuff film brought to you by social media.
	Why can't we have more of a delay?
	So that this trial is a very important thing.
	Brought to you by a psychopath that went and shot a bunch of people.
	Right.
	Right.
	They never blame the people that actually do something.
	He's just gonna say, shut it all down because one guy snapped out of uh seven billion people on the planet.
	That video is used as evidence against him, too.
	You know, whether or not there was a second shooter or not, which could have been, you know, if if that had happened, that video would have been vital evidence.
	Yeah.
	And stopped before it's posted in the first place.
	That's impossible.
	You can't stop things before they happen.
	Finally, Zuckerberg said that social media companies should live up to their responsibilities.
	But he's totally silent about what should happen when they don't.
	By now, it's pretty clear they cannot be trusted to regulate themselves.
	As with the industrial revolution, it's time for regulation and legislation to curb the greed of these high-tech robber barons.
	Curb the greed.
	That's why YouTube lost uh how much money when they change the algorithm so that uh they were burying uh in videos that they would more likely watch.
	They're doing this thing now, like is your video for kids or not?
	You know, yeah.
	I don't mind that.
	It's a little annoying to be like, no, every time.
	Like, can I just have no all or button or whatever?
	But um ultimately that's really up to parents, man.
	I've got kids, I don't just let them do whatever on YouTube, you know, like in every other industry, a company can be held liable when their product is defective.
	When engines explode or seatbelts malfunction, car companies recall tens of thousands of vehicles at a cost of billions of dollars.
	It only seems fair to say to Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter, your product is defective.
	You are obliged to fix it no matter how much it costs, and no matter how many moderators you need to employ.
	No matter what, you have to shut it down.
	Free speech is defective.
	Allowing people to express themselves is defective.
	How about all the people who get censored over nothing that are like myself?
	I just got kicked off PayPal.
	I lost all my memberships, my t-shirt company was hooked into that, my movie uh films were sold through that.
	Uh my stream lab chats.
	Vimeo took five thousand dollars worth of sales, took away all my over nothing, and it admitted in writing that each of the terms they'd actually listed in the contract that they ignored, I had not violated.
	I never advocated violence, I never advocated prejudice, I wasn't selling guns or C BD or you know any of that.
	I didn't have obscenities.
	So what was it?
	Well, what it was is I criticized Israel.
	Well, that's not in the terms, doesn't matter.
	That's why they're being sued.
	Well, they're they're giving them ideas, they want to change the terms to do that.
	In every then write, I want them to.
	I want them to say you're not allowed to criticize Israel.
	Just make let everyone see the truth.
	If you're gonna censor people for that, then put it in the terms.
	Otherwise, you're breaking contract law.
	Right.
	In in sorry, in every other industry, you can be sued for the harm you Cause publishers can be sued for libel.
	People can be sued for defamation.
	Yeah, they're exactly.
	So sue people for defamation if they're lying about people.
	If I'm lying about the ADL censoring people and working with Israel and doing all these things, then sue me.
	Also, it's they're not publishing, it's more like a phone company.
	You know, if I say something crazy to you on the phone, I'm the one breaking the law, not the phone company.
	Right.
	And you can be held accountable.
	He's acting like there's no laws.
	Just completely every the reason this 20 minute video is taking almost two hours.
	Well, you're not allowed to talk.
	Nothing but lies.
	I've been sued many times.
	I'm being sued right now.
	All that's because all he does is deceive people with and do like uh racist stereotypes, basically.
	He's constantly breaking the law.
	I mean, he just took his pants off in front of like a 75-year-old man.
	And he secretly records people and and and deceives them and stuff like that.
	That's exposing yourself.
	You just dropped off uh uh with that MTV thing or whatever the hell that was with his bare ass, you know, you know.
	You know, who saw that coming?
	You're just exposing yourself to people, and you're talking about kids could watch that.
	Kids did watch that.
	The the double standard, too.
	Um just recently it was in the news that a group of guys dressed up like rabbis and were handing out flyers in Colorado, and the ADL is investigating as a hate crime, but then Sasha Barron Cohen goes and does the same thing, dresses up like all these other different people to f to fool people and deceive, and he goes and gets ADL awards, like again with the the double standards.
	By someone whose name I won't mention because he might sue me again.
	But social media companies are largely protected from liability for the content their users post, no matter how indecent it is, by section two thirty of get ready for it, the communications decency act.
	It's absurd.
	Fortunately, internet companies can now be held responsible for pailes who use their site to target children.
	So I say, let's also hold these companies responsible for those who use their sites to advocate for the mass murder of children because of their race or religion.
	Are they talking about uh abortion?
	Uh is that talking about Israel killing Palestinian kids?
	Yeah, the snakes.
	What's the the government official in Israel that talked about all of them are snakes and they're all gonna grow up and be terrorists?
	Because of their race or religion.
	Yeah, her party just won a considerable chunk too.
	Thank you.
	And maybe fines are not enough.
	Maybe it's time to tell Mark Zuckerberg and the CEOs of these companies, you already allowed one foreign power to interfere in our elections.
	Yeah, Israel does that was never uh confirmed.
	He's talking about Russia and ignoring Israel messing with Cambridge Analytica and Cy Group and and all of that kind of stuff.
	How about every single year all the primary winners go and kiss the ring at APAC?
	Right, right.
	No, that no com it's anti-Semitic to bring that up, but he's gonna, you know, use uh Russia meddling on social media and not name Israel and and Apex, like or uh a troll farm on Facebook versus the largest lobby in the United States.
	Right.
	Who get caught bribing uh credit card bundling, you've all seen everyone needs to see, which came out on social media, by the way, the video about the lobby.
	Oh, yeah, Al Jazeera the lobby, yeah.
	Yep.
	You already version on about Britain British politics and an American one.
	There's two movies.
	Yeah, I got him up at no more news.org at the bottom.
	You already facilitated one genocide in Myanmar.
	Do it again, and you go to jail.
	Hmm?
	You just blame a genocide on social media?
	Yeah, yeah, he did.
	Pretty sure governments did that.
	Yeah, no, it's it's social media, it's being able to post on Twitter is ca cause that there's a meme now.
	What's next?
	Genocide?
	Have you seen that?
	Or heard of that's what they say is anything, you know, any even the most mild criticism that's true.
	Well, that slippery slope will lead to another Holocaust.
	That's their argument.
	Uh time and time again.
	In the end, it all comes down to what kind of world we want.
	In his speech, Zuckerberg said that one of his main goals is to uphold as wide a definition of freedom of expression as possible.
	It sounds good.
	Yet our freedoms are not only an end in themselves, they're also the means to another end.
	As you say here in the US, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
	But today these rights are threatened by hate, conspiracies, and lies.
	Hate conspiracies and lies.
	So is it there a rule that somebody everybody has to love you?
	You can't be hated.
	What if you do awful things?
	Are people not allowed to say mean things about you online?
	Are we gonna live in a why can't I hate the New Zealand shooter or Jeffrey Epstein?
	Why not?
	That they hate us, they hate so-called uh neo-Nazis and white supremacists that are everywhere that they make up in their heads.
	That's just a label they put on anybody that opposes their own ethnic cleansing of children.
	The Democrats hate Trump, the the Republicans hate Hillary.
	Should we just ban everybody?
	It you don't okay.
	So allow me to leave you with a suggestion for a different aim for society.
	It's had enough suggestions.
	The ultimate aim of society should be to make sure that people are not targeted, not harassed, and not murdered because of who they are, where they come from, who they love, or how they pray.
	This whole thing should be juxtaposed with Israeli snipers shooting kids.
	It's like, oh, people should not be targeted.
	That's exactly I mean, this is such a dog whistle.
	They target people because of who they are and who they pray to and where they live.
	That's exactly what the Israeli state that the ADL supports 100% is doing.
	What they say, this is the same language or word that they use in the anti-Semitism uh definition.
	Targeting the Jewish state.
	Targeting means just like saying anything about them.
	You could say, oh, you're targeting them.
	Saying the Jewish state is anti-Semitic, you are equating an ethnic group with what a government does.
	That is itself a collective judgment and a prejudice.
	And they always try to make it seem like all the criticism is just, it has no legitimacy and it's all just based on hate.
	So they know the motive.
	To even say that I'm not motivated by anti-Semitism and hate, they call that anti-Semitic.
	To deny that you're anti-Semitic is anti-Semitic.
	They used to be, anti-Semitism used to be people who don't like Jews.
	Now it's whoever Jews don't like is the sort of joke that goes around.
	But Zionists are making that joke a reality.
	Would you like some protection so you're not targeted by the loser we talked about in the beginning that's going after all of your payment processors?
	Do you feel targeted?
	I have been targeted.
	My family, they kick my wife off PayPal too.
	She doesn't even have a website.
	Everything wants to have a means of making a living.
	That if you speak against them, yeah, they want to put it out of business.
	This is the other talking point.
	Who they love or how they pray.
	They they try to make it seem like it's just because of who they are that you hate them.
	You hate them just because they're Jewish, which is not the case.
	Maybe with very the smallest point zero something percent of actual dispsychos out there.
	Maybe it is true, but for the vast majority, that's not.
	It's not just because of how they were born.
	But then he says how they pray.
	Who you pray to and what religion and what you believe is an idol ideology.
	You can choose to believe it or you can choose not to believe it.
	So how can it it's not immune from criticism what you what religion you are?
	Judaism in the Talmud and the Kabbalah and Zohar has all types of and even uh the Quran and people could argue with Christianity as well.
	Yeah, what if under an a religious umbrella people are teaching hate and prejudice?
	You can't criticize it because it's that's how they pray.
	Yeah, I oh no, if it's a religion, then it's okay to be hateful and prejudice.
	Mm-hmm.
	That's what they're saying.
	If you follow the logic.
	Hey, I can uh I can bulldoze down this house and steal this land because God said so.
	It's my religion, yeah, exactly.
	They can't criticize me because it's my religion.
	Good point.
	If we make that our aim, if we prioritize truth over lies, tolerance over prejudice, empathy over indifference, and experts over tolerance for everybody unless you disagree with us, then you're then they're intolerant.
	Ignorance.
	Everything he just said is inverse.
	The ADL is the opposite of everything he just said.
	Tolerance over prejudice.
	And experts over ignoramuses.
	And they're ignorant.
	They're the experts.
	Anyone that you know, we're just ignoruses, okay.
	Jonathan Greenblatt and Abe Foxman and all these people, the ADL, they're the expats because they get to go on a mainstream media.
	Nobody's buying it.
	Oh, they're the experts, huh?
	That's why me by myself that's supported by it support was supported by super chats and small donations.
	I've got a far bigger platform on YouTube than the ADL, Media Matters, SPLC, all these people, but they're the experts.
	Because self, you know, self-entitled chosen ones, self-entitled experts.
	Then maybe just maybe we can stop the greatest propaganda machine in history.
	We can save democracy.
	We can still have a place for free speech.
	The Jewish ADL and this Englishman ADL, son of a Benign Brith member, is going to save our democracy, Ryan.
	A live action troll.
	Yeah.
	That exposes himself to elderly men and kids.
	And free expression.
	And that's free expression.
	And most importantly, my Yeah, degeneracy, that's okay.
	My jokes will still work.
	Thank you very much.
	My jokes will still work.
	I'm gonna have my cake and eat it too.
	Okay, that's the end of that's the end of him.
	He looks like a vampire.
	So uh tell us about spinning squirrel with the g- I wanted to get you on the is it finished yet?
	Is it out?
	Where can people watch it?
	Because this special uh or did you get back to video instead of a freeze of that evil looking here?
	Follow you, you're censored.
	Rye Liberty on Twitter, ANC report is the website, Ryan Dawson on YouTube.
	Um I had a couple tweets.
	And by the way, there's like a two years worth of video on Bit shoot.
	So even though my the reason my videos except for those like five are set to private right now, is because the mass flaggers are out there doing what they do.
	So I'm like, okay, I'll just take them away.
	Most of the relevant stuff has been in the last year or two, and all of those are on BitChute.
	So you can still watch it over there.
	Rob Schneider's been saying some good stuff about uh free speech here, uh celebrity, which I think he's talking directly to Sasha Barron Cohen, and he says here for those supposed liberals who throw out their tired, you can't yell fire in a crowded theater, there are already laws in place for that, as well as for threats of violence.
	America's most brilliant and linguistic intellectual Noam Chomsky says it best.
	He says, if you're really in favor of free speech, then you're in favor for freedom of speech for precisely the views you despise.
	So ADL Yeah, Goebbels was in favor of free speech for views he liked, which is exactly what the ADL is saying.
	We got uh The Guardian is doing a new hit piece trying to get red eyes kicked off of Facebook, and this is the double standard.
	She's saying they're supremacist and in uh hateful.
	This is her tweet.
	This is the woman that wrote the article.
	It's kind of interesting to watch white men struggle with the narrative that they are inherently criminal by dint of their identity.
	So of course red eyes should be kicked off.
	They're standing up for European uh heritage, and they should know she just said that white people are inherently criminal.
	Exactly.
	By that because of their identity.
	This is the I mean everyone should go and flag that tweet as hate speech.
	Do what they do.
	Yep.
	I've talked to her before.
	Oh my gosh.
	I have interviewed her before.
	And after the interview, she went on this long anti-white screed.
	What really?
	Yeah.
	Because because me being Indian, she thought, oh, I'll agree with her.
	I'm like, I don't agree with that at all.
	I had to take her shit down off my site.
	It was uh just trash.
	Yeah.
	Wong.
	Her name was Wong.
	She used to live in California.
	And and here so Cohen exposed.
	Oh, yeah, he's lecturing us about anti-Semitism when he's just all he does is racial stereotypes and and deceiving people.
	You couldn't have had a worse uh figurehead for this.
	And look, here's Daily Beast uses ADL speech to tear apart Muck Mark Zuckerberg.
	I did a video on this months ago.
	There were so many articles attacking him, saying that he's enabling uh Nazis and Holocaust deniers.
	And look at this.
	Thank you, ADL.
	Your international leadership award.
	Like he's a leader.
	And then 30,000 likes in Whitney Webb.
	Weird that you get this award after you start playing a massad agent on TV on Netflix.
	Do you remember when uh Kate Winslit set made this joke like oh if you want to get an Oscar or whatever, you gotta do a Holocaust movie.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	And then she did and she did.
	Right.
	No, that's true.
	I've I've heard that.
	If you want to get an ADL award, pretend to be in the Massad.
	Yeah.
	Bizarrely, they're letting me give a speech.
	Yeah, it is pretty bizarre.
	Who else would they get?
	I don't know.
	But they're all clowns.
	Okay.
	Uh so is that David Fromm?
	I just saw the David From old speech writer of a big thing.
	Alright, well.
	Uh let's wrap it up.
	Oh, yeah, yeah, that's right.
	I have to pee and we're over two hours.
	I told you an hour before.
	I know you're up late.
	Well, Squirrel will the I put a beta version out.
	I just took that down today because I'm gonna be putting the alpha version up before Thanksgiving so people can watch it with their families.
	Alright.
	Uh people I promised that we would talk uh.
	If you gotta use the bathroom, I can hold the floor for a while.
	Okay.
	Or I can come back on, it's no big deal.
	Well, I mean, the last two times you're on, we we basically debated a little bit on uh control revolution.
	And and I'm just not gonna go.
	So I wouldn't mind if I come back actually.
	Alright, okay.
	Well thank you for coming on.
	I'm sorry for uh all the shit you've been dealing with with uh the censorship.
	Hey, I appreciate you giving me a voice when uh when I'm down, and I'll remind everybody like the second or third time I got kicked off YouTube and I didn't have a channel anymore, and this was when Adam's channel was quite small, he was one of the only people to say Ryan Dawson just had everything removed from YouTube.
	So and I saw that.
	Made me feel better.
	I was in an airport in San Francisco, yeah, hang together or hang separate.
	I got you back too if it ever comes your way, man.
	Assuming I'm still around.
	I know, yeah.
	It's gonna be it it I get tired of doing these videos, honestly, where it's just like talking about the censorship.
	You've got to come to um our meeting of the band.
	We're gonna have a physical meeting in May of uh of everyone that's been kicked off of everything.
	It'll be a nice party.
	It's like they're doing it so slowly that if it that like we're getting acclimated to it, but if they just did everybody at once, it everybody might flip out and actually organize in real life and uh try to get something on.
	Oh uh here, the people so many people in the chat.
	Um how about since you brought on Mick West on 9-11?
	I think this is fair.
	How about you have on another time you have him debate somebody from the other side?
	Like who?
	I don't know.
	Chandler?
	Um d I just think that that would be uh in better in better taste than on 9-11 to have.
	Yeah, what people don't know is I've asked the other side to do that, and none of them will.
	And I've asked them to come just talk to me, and they just won't do it.
	So if I uh maybe Chandler, maybe he'll do it.
	Um and we just Nelson's the one, you know, he actually he agrees with me that a plane did hit the Pentagon, you know, so I'm like, okay.
	Well, that's not what I was talking.
	I was talking about for building seven or whatever.
	I'm all down for that, assuming I still have a channel, you know.
	Right.
	So I know you're worth it.
	Well, I don't agree with Mick West.
	All we were doing was trashing the Alaska study because the Alaska study is shit.
	That doesn't mean it wasn't C D. It just means that that, if you're pointing to that as the proof of it, that's not gonna hurt your movement.
	That's gonna that's gonna uh hurt it, not help it.
	I mean, well, how come you took down the comments?
	Because there were people in there saying spinning squirrel crap and that were trying to get me kicked off, so I stuck it on BitChute and I said, comment all you want.
	That was a time because what you know I don't mind.
	I leave that crap up all the time.
	People say shit about me all day, every day on every video.
	But that video I had people coming in and it was had to do with his crap on Discord, and they just started saying outrageous, you know, I forbidden whatever.
	And the video after this that I explained what had happened.
	And the comments were there for like three days or something.
	I didn't even read them.
	Uh, but when I looked at it, like the first like page of shit wasn't even about 9 11 stuff.
	So I was like, okay, I can't like deal with this.
	This can get me kicked off YouTube, so I said approve only, which hid all the comments.
	I can flip them back on, but I have to go through and pick out all the really stupid ones first.
	And I just never had time and didn't care afterward.
	Yeah, you you know that's gonna piss people off.
	It's not a good look to make west on and if you want to go spurred on it.
	I give my Skype out and anybody's free to debate.
	So instead of writing a bunch of comments and not getting any feedback, come on Skype and debate me on 9-11.
	None of them ever do it.
	Well, I know that you're always uh open uh open to debate people, and I had you on to debate uh Putin, we disagree.
	That's another spot we disagree, but you know, I I don't focus to to dwell on that guy, it took a year and a half for them to do that.
	He got on and got trash.
	Like the points I made about Syria, etc., they did there was no counter argument.
	Like there's been an anti-Putin screed in Zog Media the entire time.
	They blame Russia for the elections, not the Israelis.
	Uh he has they're like, whatever he does, it's not enough.
	Well, how come he has bombed Tel Aviv?
	Like retarded shit like that.
	That's kind of a straw man, though.
	That that's a straw, I think that's a straw man to say well.
	I can show you the Twitter back and forth.
	How come he hasn't bombed Tel Aviv?
	That was the thing.
	I'm like, are you insane?
	Well, Russia.
	That's not the strongest evidence that people are providing why Putin is uh in bed with Zog and helped.
	Well, I haven't got any good evidence from any of the people that have been arguing with me.
	So well, I know so if anybody wants to debate Dawson on the down, I will host it or whatever.
	Did you see did you see my video about uh Putin and and Chabad?
	I haven't, but I know he takes pictures with rabbis and stuff, but I think what is what Russia does a lot of shilling.
	Yeah, whatever Russia does, I think Putin is a nationalist and he does in whatever's in Russia's interest.
	If that overlaps with Israel, it doesn't bother him at all.
	Don't think that, like, ooh, Russia and China, they're the opposition to American imperialism.
	That's all crap.
	Russia will do whatever is in Russian interest.
	But there are things he would not capitulate on.
	He helped build Iran's nuclear program.
	Israel did not want that.
	They did an air campaign blowing up ISIS and preventing uh total takeover in Syria.
	Israel did not want that.
	Uh they wouldn't.
	But before you go point by point, Iran, he's uh the argument is he's war profiting, he's selling them weapons, but not the most advanced weapons, and they've accused Russia of giving them like bad codes or something so that Israel can still uh can still get them with the money.
	Well, he built up their their nuclear program.
	That's where the scientists that were assassinated by the Israelis, and remember they sent sucks that in there to stop them.
	They wouldn't have had a program at all if it wasn't for the Russians providing the tech in the first place.
	And to say, like, oh, it's not the best weapons, like only some, he didn't have to give them any weapons.
	No one else is selling it to him.
	If they didn't have anti-air defense from Russia and Syria right now, they'd be completely toast.
	Like, what are they blocking the Israeli missiles with?
	Right?
	They're using the S200 and 300 radar combined with the Pansia M1 and book and book uh defense.
	That's how they've been able to prevent them.
	That's how they shot down an Israeli plane was with an S200.
	All that's Russian technology.
	So those things there's more things that they oppose them on than they cuck on.
	And they're gonna cuck on stuff.
	If it's in Russia's interest, Putin doesn't give a damn if it helps Israel or not.
	They're not anti Israel, but they're not controlled by Israel either.
	He's doing things in the interest of his state.
	But they trust me, they did not want someone throwing oligarchs in prison that took generations to build and put in place.
	Billionaires.
	And the argument I got was we didn't get all of them.
	He doesn't have to get any of them.
	Well, uh, that's that's what I've heard is he got rid of some but still kept some others.
	Would you agree that he's at least working with some others?
	Like you can't just throw people in jail.
	He's not a dictator.
	You have to actually find a crime and convict him, and it's hard to do to billionaires, and most of them just ran away.
	And there's no extradition treaties.
	And Russia was just going after him.
	That's why they're sustained that whole Lip Minko affair that they tried to blame on Putin, but was actually Boris Borzovsky.
	That uh overdose of polonium from Litvanenko was uh the Russian oligarchs that he had kicked out who were exiled, smuggling in nuclear material that they got from Israel into the UK.
	And so what do they say?
	Oh, how do you explain this?
	Oh, the KGB came and poisoned this guy with polonium.
	Do you know how stupid that story sounds?
	Like if you want to kill someone, stab them, throw them out a window, shoot them.
	You don't use an 11 million dollar traceable radioactive poison.
	He died from polonium because he got exposure.
	He died from a botched operation, a smuggling operation.
	And the only way they could explain it was to say, oh, maybe the Russians put it there and poisoned him.
	And then later he had this scripple case.
	Well, I don't want to get too far into the just this the little specific detail.
	I'm I'm not even sure exactly what you're talking about, so I wouldn't be able to do that.
	Litvanenko was a huge ordeal about polonium smuggling into the UK and Boris Borzovsky and his media outlet, which he owns, he's best friends with Rupert Murdoch and the rest of them.
	Like they are enemies with Putin.
	You really think that Putin and Netanyahu are enemies.
	They seem awful friendly to me.
	No, BB is uh BB is more pragmatic.
	He knows uh he doesn't like Putin opposing him in Syria.
	But one thing they negotiated, for example, is uh during South Osedia event.
	Remember that with Georgia?
	They uh the defense system that the they were using uh had Israeli codes or and so or Iranian codes, excuse me.
	And so Putin got uh Israel to exchange that to him so he can know their defense system.
	So they're willing to do whatever whenever it's in Russian interest, but the claim is that uh Zog rules Russia, that's just bullshit.
	Zog rules the United States.
	Like, show me where they're getting Russia to do stuff against their own interests.
	They get America to do stuff against its own interest all the time.
	But every time they're cooperating with Russia, it seems like either both benefit or Russia benefits.
	They're not going against their own interest.
	So if you're gonna own somebody, be like, oh, you're fully Zog, they hate him.
	The enemy number one, the smear cane campaign for the last eight years or so has been against Russia.
	It's Putin specifically.
	There are plenty of other people under him that are totally cucked to Israel.
	Uh you know, his Dugan type, that's his Putin's John Bolton, I call him.
	They're terrible.
	Uh but this sort of black and white world, we're like, oh, Russia good, America bad, or China good.
	They all China's terrible.
	Russia's terrible.
	The United States is terrible, but the U.S. works doesn't even do it.
	They're not even an imperial power for their own people.
	They do it for the Israelis.
	We spent trillions of dollars on pointless wars in the Middle East for Israel.
	Well, let me let me talk here a second, Ryan.
	Middle mid person of the year, Israel votes Vladimir Putin.
	If he was a threat or opposed to Israel, I don't see that happening.
	I see him shaking hands and be and seeming very friendly with Netanyahu that's middle Israel.
	I don't know why it says that.
	All the here's RT 2016.
	Israelis vote Putin as their person of the year 2015 as well.
	Uh he's friendly with Chabad.
	Yep.
	And and just because it's like they're playing some, you know, full spectrum dominance controlling both sides, like puzzle pieces in the Middle East.
	You have your Heroes and your villains.
	I think they're working together.
	I think Putin's gonna screw the Arabs.
	I think Putin's on board with the uh the Belt and Road Initiative and the Zionists.
	Oh, he has rolled over.
	Hold on, hold on.
	Right.
	The Sanhedrin is calling on him and Trump to rebuild the temple and and he's always bending the knee and shilling to Chabad and Zionist powers.
	He's cucking the Zionist power because of the American sanctions on Russia.
	He knows goddamn well that you have to uh bow to the master if you want sanction relief.
	And they've really squeezed him on that.
	And now he's turning direction.
	But that's from American pressure on Israel's behalf to force Russia that direction.
	Alright.
	Why do we have sanctions on Russia?
	Why?
	I I don't know exactly.
	So and sometimes they won't support the war in Syria.
	Sometimes there's decisions that are made and things happen and you don't understand uh w what the implications of those were until uh many years after.
	So the we will see, you know, ten years from now we will see how all of this uh pans out.
	I think it's an interesting debate.
	Um I d I don't think anybody a hundred percent knows knows for sure.
	Um, but uh you know, I think we we talked about it enough.
	I want to read the case.
	Well, there's some pretty big geopolitical events, the war in Syria, nuclear issues with Iran and opposing them on Ukraine that are are just much more massive than person of the year, which is like uh window dressing crap.
	Doesn't matter.
	Like they did not want him throwing Zog billionaires in jail.
	They did not want him supporting the Syrian government in Syria uh taking down uh missiles and things that were shot at them and still doing so.
	And people are mad like, oh, he hasn't stopped the Israelis enough.
	He's promised to do it last time and he hasn't done it.
	Well well, has he really done any has he stopped or even tried to get Israel to stop bombing Syria?
	He all of the Syrian anti-air defense that works has been provided to them by the Russians.
	And and how about he's always protected uh Latakia, but he hasn't done shit about uh like when they go through Jordan or Iraqi airspace and bomb Abu Kamal or something.
	What's he supposed to do?
	Right?
	He would not break the uh blockade on oil, Iran did, Russia didn't.
	Uh but Russia, like how it's kind of like what do you done for me lately?
	Excuse.
	How much do they owe you?
	How much has Syria or Iran or any of them gone in and helped them fight the Chechens?
	Nothing, right?
	So you think it's in his it's in Putin's best interest to stay to not really criticize Israel or any of the stuff that they're doing to go along with all of it?
	He's gotta he has to do it where he can and he has to have a line.
	He's not gonna give up the Russian base on the Mediterranean, he's not gonna allow that.
	But if it's like, oh, will you sell us some drone check or something?
	Sure, he'll buy it because they're good drones.
	He's not opposed to it.
	He doesn't care about Palestinians, he doesn't care about Syrians either.
	He cares about Russia's interests that happen to overlap with some of Syria's interests.
	But if he was totally beholden to Israel, he just wouldn't be there at all.
	Like America.
	Well, well, to say like totally beholden is kind of setting the bar really hard.
	Has Putin ever said anything to try to stop Israel from bombing Syria?
	Oh, absolutely.
	And he not only just said stuff, he provided Syria with the air defense to uh block the missiles and and the radar and everything else.
	I mean, he's been very active on that and fighting ISIS.
	Very but I mean, is he outspoken?
	Is he outspoken like you and I are against Israel?
	Or is he just kind of stay quiet and he's kind of let me no way?
	Like the Malaysian uh prime minister.
	There you go.
	No, no, definitely not that level.
	Alright.
	Well, it's late there.
	Thank you for coming on.
	Um I hope I hope to look forward to seeing uh some seeing you debate um some people.
	I'm not the the greatest expert on Russia, so if you think instead of criticizing me, why don't you call up Ryan and I wish they would just uh write their piece or article and send me the link, whatever, and be like, God damn Shill, you don't believe exactly what I do.
	How come you're not a mind reader and know what I think and say what I think without me even talking to you about it?
	That's like some Brendan O'Connell crap.
	Yeah, yeah, I don't I don't like uh all the shill being thrown around all the time.
	And trust me, all those guys will stab you in the back.
	Or already have.
	Oh yeah, they have, they have.
	I'm I told you that from day one.
	All right, Ryan.
	I stabbed people in the front.
	Dude, I'm sorry.
	This video, and sorry to the audience too.
	This whole like something with my OBS, you're, you're you probably have been noticing.
	It just keeps popping bigger and smaller.
	I just got a message from a friend saying the same thing has happened to him.
	I know so I can fix that later.
	I'm going to bed.
	I've had that problem.
	So well, guys, thank you for watching.
	Uh let us know in the comments what you think.
	Support it maybe squirrel to Facebook.
	Check out the website.
	Say that again.
	I'm gonna upload Spinning Squirrel to Facebook.
	Right, yes.
	Check out Dawson's spinning squirrel documentary.
	It is uh some great stuff.
	I saw your interview you did with uh Cole the other day, too.
	Yeah, and Cole's is more knowledgeable without about um most of that niche topic than I am.
	And we're on the same page there.
	We're not denying a Holocaust, but there are definitely a lot of silly exaggerations, and I think you have to get rid of those, otherwise the whole thing looks ridiculous, right?
	So no matter what, they'd be like, you're denying the Holocaust, and I goddamn it.
	So spinning squirrels on your bit shoot right now.
	No, well, I can put it back on.
	The beta version is, but because uh I have a better one, I just gotta let it render and all.
	So if people can wait a day, it'll be on there tomorrow.
	Yeah, it'll probably take four days to to render on there to sometimes, yeah.
	All right, guys.
	Well, thank you for coming on and uh and breaking down this ADL lies with me.
	That was fun.
	Uh I will uh let's wrap it up here.
	I'm gonna do the outro.
	Thanks for watching, guys.
	I will see you in the next one.
	Thanks, Al.

▲