Know More News - Adam Green - The Judaic Practice of Telling the Truth

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 14, 2019 - Know More News - Adam Green

16:07

The Judaic Practice of Telling the Truth

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Adam Green here with no more news dot org.
	It's November 14th, 2019.
	And today we're gonna shine some light on the darkness once again.
	Starting with the Jewish practice of telling the truth and when it is permissible to be less than honest, according to Habad.org.
	We are told that a lie told to promote peace, as shall be explained, is not included at all in the prohibition of telling lies.
	So as long as they can rationalize that they're promoting peace, it's permissible and sometimes commendable to tell a lie.
	And that makes me think of peace.
	What do they refer to as peace?
	Well, according to Rabbi Yisrael Ariel from the the head of the Temple Institute gave a speech in 2015, and he says, When Maimonides says this, one of the most famous rabbis in Judaism, they have his uh a sculpture of him at the Capitol building in Washington, DC.
	Ben Shapiro is a big fan of Maimonides, and he says, When Maimonides says this, it means that it is a commandment from the Torah to take action.
	Where is it written?
	We re recently read Deuteronomy 2010.
	Quote, when thou draw us nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it.
	So when they're conquering cities and imposing the Noahide laws onto those uh Gentile cities, they consider that peace.
	What is meant by peace?
	Maimonides says that they must agree to follow the seven Noahide laws.
	So my question is if they're allowed to lie or be less than honest when they're talking about promoting peace, are they allowed to lie about what the seven Noahide laws are to it to get the whole world to adopt them, and then once they are mighty and they are strong and they can enforce everything, things will change.
	That's my uh contention.
	And he says, what is meant by peace?
	So we have a lie told to promote peace is not included, so you can lie to promote peace, is what Chabad says, and then Maimonides says that peace is the seven Noahide laws.
	So the the way I read this is you can lie about the seven Noahide laws.
	And the other instances where it's uh there are some other circumstances under which one is allowed to be deceptive in order to recoup losses that are owed to him.
	So if they have this eternal victim mentality that they've always been persecuted, they can justify that a whole lot is owed to them, and that could rationalize a whole lot of of uh lies in order to recoup losses that are owed to them.
	And the permissibility to lie, despite the above, we find that in certain circumstances it is permissible or even commendable to lie.
	So that's how they you know they got loopholes or everything, so peace or to get back what was lost to them.
	Now, uh a couple other uh shining some light on a couple other verses from the Talmud, we have uh author and researcher Michael Hoffman, I believe he wrote Judaism Strange Gods.
	He says here that Talmud Beccarat 58A is about a man who seeks to re seeks to report its race its racist hate for Gentiles.
	The truth teller is labeled a murderous pursuer and killed for seeking to report the facts.
	Not much has changed in 1500 years, except now we're banned from YouTube and PayPal instead of killed.
	So let's read this uh this verse here.
	It says, as he was leaving, that man said to the rabbi, does God perform such miracles for liars?
	He replied, Scoundrel, aren't Gentiles called donkeys as it is written, whose flesh is as the flesh of donkeys in Ezekiel.
	Rabbi saw that he was going to tell the Persian authorities, he called them donkeys.
	So a Gentile is gonna inform other Gentiles and Gentile authorities what the Talmud and what Jews really think of Christians and really think of Jesus, or any of the truth of what they really believe.
	And this Gentile, it uh he said, This man has the legal status of a pursuer, so pursuing to tell the truth about they really believe.
	And they justify that, well, if the Gentiles knew the truth about what we really believe, they would want to kill us.
	So this justifies that the Torah says, if one comes to kill you, kill him first.
	He struck him with the staff and killed him.
	So this is literally teaching that Gentiles that want to educate the world about the hate, the anti-Christian, anti-Gentile, anti-European, anti-white hatred that Jews have.
	So shining the light on their hatred, the ADL and YouTube considers hate, and you need to be censored.
	And according to the Talmud 58A, it says that anybody that wants to share the truth about what the Talmud says is should be killed.
	And that's only one place.
	A Gentile, here's another one.
	Sanhedrin 59A says, uh Rabbi Yohanan says, a gentile who engages in Torah study is liable to receive the death penalty.
	As it is stated, quote, Moses commanded us a law, an inheritance of the congregation of Jacob, Deuteronomy 33:4, indicating that it is an inheritance for us and not for them.
	So the Talmud and the Torah and the Kabbalah is not for the Gentiles, according to that verse.
	And then it says, the Jamarah challenges, but if so, let the Tanah count this prohibition among the seven Noahides.
	The Jamarah explains, according to the one who says that the verse is referring to the Torah as an inheritance, this prohibition is included in the prohibition of robbery, as a Gentile who studies Torah robs the Jewish people of it.
	So they consider a Gentile who reads the Torah robbery, and that's a prohibition.
	Robbing the Jewish people of their inheritance.
	And the one who says that the verse is referring to the Torah is betrothed as the spelling of the Hebrew word for betrothed is similar to that of the word for inheritance.
	The punishment of a Gentile who studies Torah is like that of one who engages in intercourse with a betrothed young woman, which is execution by stoning.
	So again, another perspective is that it's robbery, and that it's uh it's like being with a young woman, which they don't seem to have a problem with in another verse I'm gonna show you, which is executed by stoning.
	So they there could possibly be Jews that still take this literally and believe that any Gentile, including myself, that shares what they really think, their hatred, their scorn, their discrimination, law discriminatory laws against Gentiles, where Gentiles in the Messianic age are when they have the power to do so will be treated as second-class citizens to share that is uh considered hate.
	To share their hate is considered hate to the ADL and YouTube and mainstream media.
	And then here is uh another perspective.
	It says uh you have therefore learned that even a Gentile who engages in Torah study is considered like a high priest.
	The reference is to a Gentile who engages in the study of their seven mitzvah, the seven Noahide laws.
	It is a mitzvah for a Gentile to study the Halakat, that's the law, that pertains to the seven Noahide mitzvah, and when he does so, he is highly regard regarded.
	So another there's a loophole, there's another line of thinking that Gentiles should study the Torah, but only insofar as to become good Noahides, which I've covered so many times in the past, I'm not gonna get deep into the Noahides, but check out the website no more news.org for more on that.
	Kabbalah supremacy, Noahide Laws, and Habad Expose.
	I'll put the links down below in the description.
	But basically, a Noahide means that you have to uh recognize the Jewish people as God's chosen that are instrumental in ushering in the uh the Messianic age, and that Gentiles will have a place in the world to come if they follow the seven Noahide laws, which uh where they consider Christianity idolatry and uh and some other stuff I won't get more into.
	Back to Habad.org, changing the truth in order to practice humility.
	For example, one may claim ignorance of certain Talmudic tractate, even if one does actually know it.
	So, in other words, in order to practice humility, in other words, to not get in trouble, Jews may claim ignorance of the Talmud, even if they do actually know what it says.
	So you may ask a Jew, oh, does it say this in the Talmud about Gentiles?
	And they go, Oh no, I don't, I don't, I never heard that, or that's not really what it means, or you're taking that literally, and you have to look at at it metaphorically.
	So this is also permitted to change the truth in order to practice humility.
	So claim ignorance, even though you know what the Talmud really says.
	Pretty despicable morality taught in this religion that it's okay to lie about what you really believe.
	And this is straight from the horse's mouth, straight from Chabad.org.
	Now we have chapter three Ishut, and it's no wonder that they'd want to claim ignorance and lie about what they actually believe and kill Gentiles that want to spread the truth about what they actually believe, because we see stuff like this.
	Chapter 3, uh verse 11.
	A father may consecrate his daughter without her knowledge while she is a minor, even when she is a Nahara, he still possesses this right, as implied by Deuteronomy 22, 16, quote, I gave my daughter to this man.
	So men can give their daughters away without their knowledge, even when she is a minor.
	If a girl is older than three years and one day, she can be consecrated through sexual relations with her father's consent.
	How is it how can you justify that it's moral for a father to give his three-year girl away to be married through sexual relations?
	And this is Chabad.org.
	I just took this screenshot the other day.
	This is still up.
	Just like you go to Noahide.org and it says that you will be decapitated if you don't go along with the seven Noahide laws.
	And then we have she should be below this age if her father has consecrated through sexual relations the marriage bond is not established.
	So all these clauses again, and in the, you know, critics will say, oh, well, you're not taking this in context, and this is just one of the arguments, but just the fact that any rabbi ever was saying this kind of thing for the sake of argument or not, it shows where their heads at.
	And then it says here, here's the little uh disclaimer that they have.
	For until the age of three, the relations are not considered sexual in nature.
	This by no means insinuates that they are s insignificant or potentially harmful, only that they are not sexual.
	So, you know, read into that as you will.
	And then now, just to see a little bit of the hatred and the hypocrisy, Josh Hammer, the Hebrew hammer, says, quote, uh tweeted the other day on November 12th, two days ago, Jew hatred is inherent in the European DNA.
	And they're talking about this is a response to the European Union who is requ requiring the country of origin labeling on products that are made in the occupied West Bank.
	And then uh I saw Ted Cruz retweeted this, and he said, Oh, they're they're making it this is uh discrimination towards Jews because they're making them label it just because they're Jews.
	It has nothing to do with them being Jews, it has to do with military and civilian occupation, that them continuing continued defiance of building um so-called settlements, occupying uh towns and villages in Palestinian territory in the occupied West Bank.
	That's what it's about, not just because they're Jews, but this guy, Josh Hammer, is Jewish, he's the editor at large of Ben Shapiro's Daily Wire.
	And uh he took down this tweet, he was getting ratioed hard and realized that uh he's being a little too honest.
	You shouldn't take the mask off and let the Gentiles know how you really feel.
	And just imagine if this was the other way around.
	Well, for one, if it was the other way around, it would be true because well, well, not Jew DNA, but uh Judaism.
	You can definitely make a strong case that Gentile hatred is inherent in Judaism.
	And that's what that was my retweet when I shared this.
	But um to say that all Europeans just have some intrinsic, inherent hatred of Jews in their DNA, is uh is is pretty astonishing that he would tweet this.
	And if it was the other way around, it would be just universally you'd be kicked off of Twitter, you'd be kicked off the internet, you'd be labeled an anti Semite, you'd be blacklisted from all these groups, but there seems to be a double standard where they can get away with their Gentile hatred, and Gentiles that cover it, somehow the ADL and their groups say that you're the hateful ones.
	You're it's in all of it is just an anti Semitic conspiracy theory, of course, their go to thing.
	And of course, uh same, oh and he's got a check mark as well.
	Josh Hammer says, I am Jewish proudly.
	I advocate every single day of my life for the Jewish people and for the Jewish state of Israel.
	This guy is an American citizen.
	Would it be a trope to say that he has dual loyalty or even more loyalty to the international Jewry or the Jewish state?
	He says it proudly.
	He advocates every single day for the Jewish state of Israel.
	But it's considered anti-Semitism.
	You go to state.gov.
	The official definition of anti-Semitism is that it's considered hate to say that they have dual loyalty or even more loyalty or even some loyalty to the state of Israel, even though we all know it's true.
	Such hypocrisy, such double standards, completely unacceptable.
	Just wanted to do a quick video and shine the light on some of this darkness.
	Let me know what you guys think in the comments about these verses.
	Am I wrong?
	Am I right?
	Am I am I missing some context?
	Uh do you agree that it's hateful, that's a double standard, that this should be unacceptable?
	Make sure to, if you uh appreciate videos like this and value my content, uh make sure to sub and bookmark and sign up for the email list to no more news.org.
	Uh, all your support is greatly appreciated.
	There's a contact page, the donate page, and until next time, I will see you guys in the next one.

▲