All Episodes
Previous Next
April 18, 2019 - Know More News - Adam Green
46:26
Anti-Semitism Czar Press Conference Analysis
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Adam Green here with No More News.
It's April 17th, 2019.
And I want to play you this press conference from Elon Carr.
He's just got appointed to this new position, the special envoy to monitor and combat anti-Semitism, also known as the Anti-Semitism Tsar in the State Department.
But before I play the press conference in his little propaganda piece, let me give you some background info on this position.
So a while back, Congress approved this anti-Semitism envoy bill.
Eli Weasel was involved with that about genocide and U.S. policy was the uh headline in that one.
The ADL welcomed the House passage of this bill, which created this post.
Times of Israel.
Congress moves to force White House to fill vacant anti-Semitism envoy post.
So they're saying that the president has to make a nomination within 90 days, and then the Senate must approve.
So this was back in September 2018.
Trump was slow to fill a lot of positions.
Shocking, he didn't get this one filled faster, but he was forced to because JTA, the House passed a bill raising the level of anti-Semitism envoy position to ambassador.
That was January 11th, 2019.
Horitz, under Trump U.S. role to monitor combat anti-Semitism remains unfilled.
That was October 34st.
And Pompeo to hire the Jewish congressmen are urging Pompeo to hire a special envoy citing the Pittsburgh map Pittsburgh Massacre as further proof of position's importance.
And Horitz, February 5th, Trump finally fills anti-Semitism Envoy Post, names U.S. Army veteran Elon Carr.
He'll be the man to in the post after it has been left empty for two years.
U.S. President Trump set to name a Los Angeles prosecutor to be the State Department's envoy for anti-Semitism lead and he left it empty for two years, leading to protest from lawmakers and Jewish groups.
ADL was one of them.
So here he is, Elon Carr being sworn in as anti-Semitism envoy.
It speaks volumes that he is uh that breaking Israel news, the biblical perspective did an article on this because it ties in so much to Noahide Laws, which I'm gonna make a video on tomorrow, a part two to this video.
Horitz, Jewish insider noted U.S. billionaire Sheldon Adelson donated a hundred thousand dollars for cars campaign for Los Angeles County Supervisor in 2016.
So this new anti-Semitism czar is another Sheldon Adelson lackey.
Sheldon Adelson puppet pawn.
100,000 is what it took to buy him off, and now he is in charge of regulating anti-Semitism.
So Sheldon Adelson, Donald Trump back in 2015, said sheldon Adelson is looking to give big dollars to Rubio because he feels he can mold him into his perfect little puppet.
I agree.
And Rubio is Sheldon Adelson's little puppet, and that's why when Congress was shut down or the government was shut down, the Senate and Rubio's bill, the first bill SB1 was about making it illegal to boycott Israel.
Amazing.
And Sheldon Adelson, they do articles in the New Yorker and everywhere.
It's well known that he's buys the presidency.
He hasn't decided.
This was back before he decided who to go with.
Sheldon Adelson is ready to buy the presidency.
Also known as the kingmaker in the New Yorker, and he's known for being all Israel all the time.
He's the top contributor to Republican politics.
One public policy issue on his agenda, Israel.
And mind you, this is relevant because Elon Carr is his man.
All we care about is pain.
This is Adelson talking about where his loyalties lie.
All we care about is being good Zionists, being good citizens of Israel.
All we care about is being good Zionists.
Good citizens of Israel.
And this was Trump back before he started taking the Adelson money at the Republican Jewish Coalition.
Wow, is he singing a different tune now there?
He was just shilling the other day.
I did a video on it.
You're not going to support me, even though you know I'm the best thing that could ever happen to Israel.
And I I I'll be that.
And the re I know why you're not going to support me.
And you know, you're not going to support me because I don't want your money.
You don't want to give me money, okay?
But that's okay.
You want to control your own politician.
That's fine.
Well, he tweeted about it, he talked about it, but Adelson said to give over a hundred million to Israel supporting Trump.
He didn't give the full hundred million, but he got close to it.
Five million for Trump inauguration, he had seats right behind the president.
Trump inauguration drew big dollars for donors with vested interest, New York Times.
You see here Bannon Christian Zionist with Adelson and his wife Miriam, who won the presidential award.
Adelson was disappointed with Trump over Jerusalem, Jerusalem embassy move delay, and he was furious that he didn't move it right away.
So then Trump sped up the timetable and moved it immediately, as soon as possible.
Adelson offered to pay for it.
Sheldon Adelson, the casino mogul driving Trump's Middle East policy and the anti-Semitism policy.
Now, is it Sheldon Adelson's world?
It sure is.
Adelson said to hail Trump as likely, quote, best president for Israel ever.
And Fox News even says Trump is headed to the White House.
Did we just elect our first Jewish president?
Trust me, by almost every possible measurement, we've just elected our first Jewish president.
Hundred days a new Jewish elite rises under Trump.
There's Avi Berkowitz and all these Chabad uh Hasidic ultra Orthodox.
That's the newest Jew the new Jewish elite, and it's Donald Trump's New World Order, reminding you of Bush's New World Order.
And you see Israel on top of the flags there.
And the kingmaker Adelson, it says here the single person to whom both Prime Minister Israel, the Prime Minister of Israel, it's Netanyahu, and the President of the United States owe everything.
They owe him everything.
Okay, so now we got some background on who's funding Elon Carr and what this position is about.
Here is this little propaganda piece they put out recently about what he's gonna be doing with this new anti-Semitism envoy.
Anti-Semitism, sadly, is a story that so many Jewish families have and have internalized and digested, which is why now I'm so proud to represent internalize.
All I ever hear about in the news is anti-Semitism everywhere.
They claim everything's anti-Semitism.
And you're saying it's internalized now?
Represent the United States of America in fighting this ancient human sickness.
Again, it's ancient viral disease, a plague, it will never die.
Ancient disease, it's been around for thousands of years, followed them all over the world, but it's just everybody else's fault.
But I've gone there before, I'm not gonna get into that right now.
Continuing.
I'm Elon Car, I'm the United States Special Envoy to monitor and combat anti-Semitism.
And in that role, I advised the Secretary of State on policies and programs concerning anti-Semitism.
And I'm the diplomatic representative.
Expect a whole lot more policies and programs.
There's a ton already, and there's gonna be a whole lot more and a whole lot more incremental enforcement.
Antisemitism is defined as hostility toward or prejudice against Jews.
Either the Jewish people or the Jewish religion.
We've seen manifestations of anti-Semitism through the ages.
It can be a denying or minimizing the or it could be a fake uh Swashaka hoax crime, which there's a ton of, or the the um the bomb threats that were called in by the Israeli that made thousands of fake bomb threats.
The Holocaust.
It could be acts of violence against Jews.
We're seeing that sadly uh a lot.
Attacks on Jews because they're Jews.
It can be attacks on Jewish institutions, it could be hate speech, it can be demonized.
There's no such thing as hate speech.
Hate speech is just speech that you hate.
I'm offended by it by a lot of stuff online.
I don't run around trying to get it shut down, calling it hate speech.
If it's an incitement to violence or it's defamation, then go after it with the court of law.
But hate speech is a subjective, uh selective enforcement arbitrary term.
This is important.
Delegitimization of the state of Israel.
It can be attacks on Jewish institutions.
It could be hate speech, it can be demonization of the State of Israel, or the denial of uh the Jewish people, its right to self-determination in its ancient homeland.
And that's so their right to do whatever they want in Israel and you can't criticize it.
And that's what we're fighting against.
Anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism.
Certainly, one can anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism, so there's just no criticizing Israel at all.
Got it, guys.
Anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism.
Certainly, one can criticize any country.
Israel is no exception.
But if that criticism is unfair, or if the criticism is different than the criticism leveled against any other country.
For example, if Israel is criticized for exercising its its inalienable right to defend itself from the onslaught coming from Gaza or from Hezbollah, then that's a double standard.
And a double standard is not fair criticism of Israel.
A double standard is defined as anti-Semitism.
Double standard anti-Semitism.
So if there's it's the what about them argument.
As long as there's any other crimes going on in the world, any other injustice, they just point the finger and go, well, don't talk about us, talk about that.
Talk about everything else.
Don't look here.
Doesn't matter.
And they j there's so many different ways that they define anti-Semitism.
Here's the ADL.
What is anti-Israel, anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist?
Well, they conflate everything together and basically no criticism at all whatsoever.
They always like to say, oh, sure, of course you can criticize, but you can't say this or this or this or this or this.
Like Israel denied the right to exist.
They can argue BDS dies denies them the right.
Any any criticism delegitimizes them and it denies them the right.
They I've seen it.
Here's his press conference now.
It was a great honor to be sworn in this morning by the Secretary, and an even greater honor to work on this issue as part of an administration committed in unprecedented fashion to the fight against anti-Semitism, to the protection of the Jewish people throughout the world, and to the support for the Jewish state.
So protecting the Jewish people, kind of like how Pompeo says, God sent Trump to save Israel.
As a Christian, I certainly believe that's possible, the Secretary of State said when asked whether the president had an explicitly divine mission.
Trump is here to save the Jews.
Not America first, not MAGA.
He's here to save a foreign country.
And we got uh Michelle Bachman saying, quote, never seen a more godly biblical president.
And uh Judge Janine was on Fox News saying that he's fulfilling prophecy.
He is like King Cyrus, like Netanyahu carried him, uh compared him to Cyrus as well, who allegedly helped them rebuild the the second temple.
Okay, continuing on.
And our priorities as we go forward will be to address the growing uh attacks against Jewish communities that we're seeing throughout many parts of the world.
A recent survey shows that nearly 80% of the Jews of Europe regard anti-Semitism as a growing problem in their country.
Well, when the media is constantly saying, Oh, the stats are going up and there's all these crimes, and they focus and cherry pick on certain things and push the narrative in the media, pushing the hysteria, pushing the fear-mongering, making this SPLC ADL more donations.
They're fear pedaling, and they're doing it for political reasons to shut down their opposition with guys like this, so they can and that's what this anti-Semitism envoys has been about.
They've just been like record keeping and trying to keep these stats and show that they're all inflated and stuff.
Continue.
Oh, and notice uh the I don't know if this was just by chance, but the nice little uh hex uh seal of Solomon here in the stars is very visible for this speech.
And are afraid for their safety.
So our concern is going to be first of all to reduce the feelings of insecurity among Jewish communities throughout the world.
Oh, we're gonna make the whole world feel safe.
Jews are gonna feel safer on the world, not at forget the white people, forget all the other races.
It's just we're gonna take care of this one special people.
They're they're totally unique, they're separate from we can't pass laws and have just anti-racism or anti-discrimination envoys.
It has to be special.
Special.
Second of all, we're gonna be looking at the indoctrination of anti-Semitic hate In the next generation.
So in those Maybe they should look at the indoctrination of Gentile hate or Jewish supremacy.
They don't ever do that, do they?
No.
When you talk about that, even though there's overwhelming evidence there, they just call you a supremacist with the psychological projection and inversion.
Anti-Semitic hate in the next generation.
So in those countries and in those regions where uh textbooks are purveying anti-Semitic uh hate uh to children, that's going to be a a top focus uh as we go forward.
So they're gonna be taking control of all the textbooks around the world so they can teach their versions of history and their narrative is the official narrative.
We are going to uh focus relentlessly on uh eradicating this false distinction between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism.
Relentlessly, I've been saying this for a while.
I did documentaries months ago about it, the truth about anti-Semitism.
I've been pushing talking about these anti-Semitic things, almost beating a dead horse, and now they're saying it from the straight the anti-Semitisms are saying it in his own words.
Relentlessly going to make this distinction, this false distinction that anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitic.
Eradicating this false distinction between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism.
Uh the Secretary could not have been clearer.
He stood before 18,000 activists at the APAC policy conference just two weeks ago, and he declared, I quote, let me go on the record, anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism.
So, friends, let me go on record.
Anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism.
Huge applaud line to that one.
We saw this coming up.
The Trump administration opposes it unequivocally, and we will fight for it relentlessly.
There you go.
The Trump administration opposes and they will fight relentlessly and unequivocally and zero tolerance, no criticism of Israel.
And this has been uh, you know, now our Secretary of State saying it, our anti-Semitism are saying it, Trump is saying it, but we've seen it going around, this is the new narrative they're pushing.
Here's the latest trend in Zionism, anti-Semitism, or opinion, anti-Zionism is the new anti-Semitism, says Britain's ex-chief rabbi Haritz.
Anti-Zionism is the new anti-Semitism, says Netanyahu in Vienna Conference.
Netanyahu, anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism are one and the same.
He got he went over and got Macron to say it too.
Anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism, warns Emmanuel Macron.
They're just getting the whole world to say no criticism of Israel allowed.
Tablet.
Anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism, get over it.
I've got a bunch of headlines of Jews and the media disputing this as well.
And of course, at ZPAC, excuse me, CPAC, why anti-Zionism is a form of anti-Semitism and a threat to national security.
So it's national security concern.
We can never criticize Israel.
Center for Security Policy sponsored, the panel at CPAC.
God, CPAC was so infiltrated and subverted.
Anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism.
That will be our uh our rallying cry as we go forward to fight this ancient scourge that sadly is on the rise today and must be combated.
And we're very proud that that this department and this administration is focused in unprecedented fashion on doing that.
Thank you.
An individual has a right to buy or not buy what they please.
So now he said he was asked about BDS.
This is his BS response.
So an individual has a right to buy or not buy what they please.
However, if there is an organized movement to economically strangle the state of Israel, um that is anti-Semitic.
Who is to say that people can't organize together?
There can't be a movement and organized movement to boycott.
I've seen so many organized boycotts.
I mean, you can't have a boycott If you can't organize, they're setting up this mental gymnastics semantics to try to do this lawyer speak to to justify this, but we have every right to boycott Israel and to organize however we please to do boycotts.
And the the administration has gone on the record for as as being opposed unequivocally to the BDS movement.
And the idea that that uh somehow um uh there can be movements organized to uh to to deny Israel its its uh legitimacy.
See, there it is, legitimacy.
So boy they they go on and argue too, the people in the press here.
It's all about legitimacy.
Any criticism, any boycott, anything you say, oh you're delegitimizing, that's anti-Semitic.
The semantics games they're playing.
And and not to allow Israel to participate in economic commerce in the world, sure, that is.
Hatred of the Jewish state is hatred of the Jewish people, and that's something that's very clear, and that's it.
So if you criticize Israel, they call it hatred, any criticism at all, it's hatred, and then it's hate speech, and then that means you hate Jews too.
So it's just like boop-boop boop.
That is our policy.
Well, but so you're convinced that BDS is actually hatred of the Jewish state and not just opposition to the government of the Jewish state's policy.
So, like I said, a person can decide what they want to buy, but if there is a movement that is dedicated to strangling the Jewish state out of existence, that is anti-Semitism.
See, so they say BDS is strangling them out of existence.
Why blowing them off the map, wiping them off the map, all this stuff?
It's just like no, and I'll show you how he lies about it.
So it's okay for one person to decide that he doesn't he or she doesn't want to buy, but if two people talk about it together, that's a conspiracy or more, that's a conspiracy, and that's bad.
And that's then it's no law, then it becomes anti-Semitic.
Well, the BDS movement is well known.
This isn't a uh, you know, a ragtag group.
I mean, there are yeah, it's well known and they're terrified about it.
You the Al Jazeera documentary about the Israeli lobby, there's plenty of undercover footage of them saying, Oh, this snuck up on us, and this is bad PR, and this is hurting.
It's not hurting them financially, but it could, and it's all about the branding and people's view of it.
Or there are international organizations, there are websites, it's organized, and the and the stated goals are clear.
Oh my god, there's no organization, no websites allowed to do anything against Israel, they're gonna shut it down.
Here, and the stated goals on the website of the of the BDS.
This is the big lie.
The stated goals on the website.
And the stated goals on the website of the of the BDS movement is to deny the state of Israel economic prosperity and uh and to not deny legitimacy, and that is anti-Semitism.
See, legitimacy.
So anything you say, I could say, oh, you know, Israel doesn't do this.
Oh, you're saying that's ill illegitimate.
You're saying they're not legitimate.
And then he goes, it's on their website.
So here's the BDS movement.net dot uh net.
And then he says, Oh, it says on their website that they want to hurt them economically.
That's the point of a boycott.
Punish them, put pressure on them, non-violent protests to force them to comply with international law.
That's what this is about.
So BDS says here, God, the boycott, divestment, sanctions movement works to end international support for Israel's oppression of Palestinians and pressure Israel to comply with international law.
That's what it says.
Totally legitimate.
And it says South African anti-apartheid com right inspired, so they're there.
This is how they brought down South Africa was with um boycotts and sanctions.
And it's funny, you know, the Israeli lobby is always lobbying to have and advocating for sanctions on other countries, but no, they're gonna shut it down and make it illegal for people and companies to decide in America that they choose to not do business with a foreign state.
So that's a big fat lie that he got caught in.
Um, just to follow up on that question, do you make a distinction between uh boycott and Israel per se and boycott in products that produced in the settlements that's considered illegal under international law?
So refusing to buy products made by Jewish communities and wanting to buy products made by Arab communities that live next door to each other, uh, seems to me to be discriminatory.
Uh that seems pretty clear to me.
So you can't boycott Israel or it's discriminatory.
You can't decide to do business with uh West Bank Palestinian uh businesses.
It you have to buy from the Israeli companies in the settlements and the illegal settlements too, or it's discrimination.
No, no, no.
God, they got it so bad.
This is settlements.
Settlements under international law is illegal.
So I'm just uh I'm trying to figure out from a legal point of view.
Do you see that okay?
Is it is it considered like I said, if two communities are living side by side and and one refuses to buy from Jews and one wants to buy from non-Jews, I think that's pretty clear what that is.
If I'm going to call it Robert, I'll quote we should have freedom of association.
You have the right to buy and sell whoever you want to.
Very quickly, on Omar Berguti, uh, he would deny the entry into the United States yesterday.
So now they're saying that the BDS leader was denied entry into the United States.
This is beyond the special representative's portfolio.
I understand, but Mr. BDS.
I'm certain you probably know how familiar with with the console.
Okay, then we'll follow up with you.
Thank you.
It's the Los Angeles Times Tracy.
Um hi, thank you.
Um I'm a little bewildered at how you don't see a distinction between Jewish settlements and Arab villages in the West Bank.
There's a re those are different communities, and the Israeli one is there illegally under international law.
I'm gonna try to go at the same question my colleagues have been asking in a different way.
Do you not see a distinction between anti-Semitism and the criticism of an opposition to policies of the Israeli government?
So that's a very different question.
And yes, absolutely criticism of a country.
Um criticism of the policies of any country, whether it's the state of Israel or of the United States, is uh is entirely proper and can't be regarded as as uh as being as being inappropriate.
However, um, as you may know, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of anti-Semitism gives as a specific example the application of double standards to the state of Israel.
And so if Israel is criticized in a way that no other country in a similar circumstance is criticized, yes, that is anti-Semitism.
So he doesn't answer her question.
She asked, how do you not see the difference between illegal settlements and uh criticism or no, he says criticism of the state of Israel, the policies of the government, and he says, Well, the international holocaust defines anti-Semitism as the double standard thing again.
So again, you can't criticize us because there's something else going on somewhere else in the world.
This double standard is such a non-argument.
Imagine being in uh in court and say that you're one in for murder and you just stand up and go, There's other murders in the world, so don't talk about my murder.
And this this idea that the Holocaust International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance gets to define anti-Semitism for the whole country doesn't seem doesn't seem right to me.
And they have all the same language with the double the double standard.
This is right word for word, the same thing they have on the State Department, US State Department, the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act.
That was back in 2004 when they started tracking all this kind of stuff.
And the special envoy to monitor and global anti-Semitism Review Act, defining anti-Semitism, U.S. Department of State.
So no targeting of the state of Israel is considered uh anti-Semitism.
So you can't target.
That means you can't criticize.
You can't say that they're conspiring to harm humanity.
So even if they are conspiring, you're not allowed to say it, because it's anti-Semitic.
When things go wrong, they can't ever be blamed for it.
And you're not allowed to use any things that they say are canards or tropes or stereotypes or negative character traits.
So they just got can get away with anything You can't if they can be greedy, you can't call them greedy because that's a stereotype, even if they are being greedy.
You can't call it because it's uh stereotype that they got over thousands of years.
Like you it's circular logic, and it's just all these twisted ways of getting it so they can't be criticized.
Another one is again with the stereotypes, you're not allowed to talk about power.
So no matter how much power they have, how much uh overrepresentation, how much bragging that we're just jealous of their success.
We're not allowed to talk about their power.
We're not allowed to talk about the myth of a world Jewish conspiracy.
I've covered the the Zionist conspiracy many times, and it's not a theory.
It's they're open about it, it's their end times prophecy about rule Supreme Court of Mankind, like Ben Gurion said.
You're not allowed to talk about controlling the media economy, government, or other societal institutions.
So any of this conspiracies, control, they're gonna say all of this is anti-Semitic, which they're saying it they're condemning it, and that they're unequivocally oppose it and all this stuff.
Claiming that Israel is racist, you're not allowed to do that.
Whether they're racist or not, not allowed to compare them to Nazis, not allowed to use any symbols, not allowed to talk about loyalty to Israel or to priority of Jews worldwide, then interest of their own nations.
So just complete, can't criticize them for anything.
This double speak how they go, sure you could criticize, but then they but have all these stipulations and terms, and then they're clear to say here anti-Semitic acts are criminal when they are defined so by law.
So it's not law here quite yet, but they already got it defined for when they want to make anti-Semitism illegal.
They have they have they'll use this definition.
And they're always dismissing everything as conspiracy theory, anti-Semitic, and it's conspiracy theory.
The the one-two knockout punch.
So these definitions have already been in bills that are in the law.
Obama signs anti-BDS bill into law.
This was in 2015.
For EU anti-Semitism, it's HR 672, combating European Antisemitism Act of 2017 became law.
Obama signed it.
Here it is, and it's the same language, same as this Holocaust group, and same as on the State Department, talking about loyalty, talking about um, talking about or even acts wrongdoing.
So they can't be responsible for any wrongdoings for real or imagined wrongdoings as a as a group, demonizing de uh dehumanizing, stereotypical allegations.
So not allowed to talk about power as a collective or any conspiracy.
This is the law.
This is anti-Semitic to talk about facts and statistics.
And then they have they talk about how urgent need to protect all these things, and not allowed to it's it's the exact same language, word for word, across all of these different places.
And then they gotta uh do all this tracking in Europe so they can justify more crackdowns.
Also, there was House Res 72.
This was rejecting anti-Israel and anti-Semitic hatred in the United States and around the world by Lee Zeldon, a ZOA puppet.
We're not a puppet, but proud member.
And uh one of these terms you we see a lot here is the loyal to Israel.
We're not allowed to talk about their loyalty to Israel.
Here's Dershowitz, Epstein Dershowitz on uh Trump's favorite show, Fox Five Fox and Friends, or Fox Five is his favorite show, talking about it.
The assumption that Jews always have a dual loyalty and that they they only support uh Israel is a form of anti-Semitism and has to be resisted.
There's also a canard that's out there, very big about loyalty.
The Jews are not loyal.
Not loyal to their community, but not loyal to their country.
30% of the American people to this day believe Jews are more loyal to Israel than the United States.
In Europe, it's 60, 70%.
In Poland, 60% believe that 10,000 Jews are not loyal to Poland.
In Norway, the 5,000 Jews, it's 70%.
So that's a canard, which goes to the essence that you can't trust Jews, you can't rely on them.
Yeah, Abe Foxman from the ADL says that, oh, yeah, we don't have any loyalty.
The ADL formerly of the ADL Bene Breth, Beni Brith, the like f secret society, Jewish secret society.
The oldest Jewish service organization in the world, they got lodges and stuff like Freemasons, and they are committed to the security and continuity of the Jewish people and the state of Israel.
But no, they don't have any loyalty to a foreign country.
Don't you're not allowed to say that.
That's hateful.
That's anti-Semitic.
And then we even have uh the Jewish chair at Wake Forest, Barry Trachtenberg, it went in front of Congress and refuted this idea that it's it's anti-Semitic to say that they're more loyal to Israel.
When we think about the State Department definition, which seeks to codify what anti-Semitism is, the State Department definition claims that uh stating that a particular Jewish person has more loyalty to the state of Israel than they do to their own country is necessarily an example of anti-Semitism.
Where the truth is that that's one of the fundamental premises of Zionism.
And if you go back and look at the statements, say of Theodore Herzl, who's wrote really what's considered the founding text of Zionism, he argued very clearly that Jews are one people, and therefore it's useful useless for them to be patriots to the countries in which they reside.
Jews are one people, and therefore it's useful useless for them to be patriots to the countries in which they reside.
So there's times when a statement um like that is contained in the definition of the State Department, would actually undermine the founding premises of Zionism itself.
Well, they're continuing to have it both ways, though.
It's a fundamental principle of Zionism, according to Theodore Herzl, that uh Jews are one people and that you do have loyalty to Israel, but then they're gonna say we're not allowed to talk about the loyalty.
And then so they had this uh this Lee Zeldon was trying to pass this condemning anti-Semitism bill because Ilhan Omar dared to acknowledge that APEC exists and has a lot of influence in Congress and that money buys influence in Washington, and she mentioned dual loyalty too, and they sure vindicated her with the outrage that they had.
And then they forced, they did a procedural maneuver.
The GOP in the House elevates anti-Semitism as a political issue.
They tacked it on to some other bill.
And then there was also this bill, uh, House Res 41 rejecting white nationalism white supremacy.
This was in response to uh Steve King, I believe his name is, and in this bill, the anti-white supremacy bill, they literally say that Jewish interests that dominate the government were referred to as the Zionist occupied government or Zag, the media banking and entertainment industries.
So you're not allowed to talk about this.
They're they're going after it, and this bill, too, the Zi that you can't talk about Zionist occupied government.
And another definition, Huffington Post here, Abe Foxman, you just saw a second ago, conspiracy theories, anti-Semitism, and the delegitimization of Israel, all their buzzwords and conflating things to silence all criticism and uh delegitimization.
The three D's is the test to see if it's anti-Semitic or not, according to this head of Jewish agency.
The three Ds are delegitimization, demonization, and double standards.
Again, so you're not allowed to criticize, not allowed to criticize, not allowed to criticize.
They think they're so smart with this, but I mean it's so obvious.
New definition, deliver delegitimization of Israel or holding it to a double standard, are actions that would be deemed anti-Semitic.
Man, that was like the worst stutter I've ever done.
Several Western government agencies, including the foreign of in foreign and justice ministries of US Britain and Germany, already have policies that deem anti-Zionism a discriminatory practice.
That uniquely denies Jews the right to govern themselves.
They're governing themselves.
They want to govern the whole world.
That's the problem.
That's why they're setting this all up.
Okay, and then to wrap up uh Elon's press conference, there's a little more.
Now, by the way, we're not talking about censorship here.
We're talking about calling it what it is.
Nobody is suggesting that simply because something is anti-Semitic, uh, people don't have a right to say it.
Sometimes people have a right to say it, depending on context, depending on place.
Sometimes people have a right to to express hate speech.
They're they're trying real hard.
So he he says, oh, well, this isn't the law, we're not censoring it.
You can say all this, but you're just it's hate speech and it's anti anti-Semitic, so you'll get kicked off of uh social media.
It's not the government do it, it's just Twitter and Facebook and YouTube, you know.
If the government defines anti-Semitism of this, and then the social media companies go to the government to find out what they should censor, what what the definition is, it's it's gone.
It for all intents and purposes.
If it's not on the the internet, not on the social media monopolies that are already working with the ADL and the SBLC, then it you're not getting the message out there to the masses.
Right, the Nazis marched in Skokie.
But then, oh yeah, Nazis, of course.
But we have to call it what it is.
And if it is anti Semitism, then it's call it what it is.
So you're not gonna criticize them at all, and we're gonna call it what it is, and we're gonna condemn it everywhere.
It, you know, I mean, it's the whole it they try to say incrementally this is coming.
You know it is.
I've been predicting it, it's been continuing on, unfolding before our eyes.
And it's anti-Semitism, and we are going to be unequivocal in calling it what it is when we see it.
Because you can't fight something unless you're they're saying it needs to have consequences.
Anti-Semitism needs to have consequences, it has to we need to have zero tolerance, stuff like that.
You know, I mean, we're blurring the lines here.
Unless you're willing to define it and to call it out for it, and we're gonna call be calling it out wherever we see it.
I mean again off the back of my colleagues' questions, just to clarify, so the legal elements about where Jewish settlements stand in international law as opposed to Arab Vitages makes no difference to you whatsoever.
Well, as you know, there is a uh a peace plan being being worked on currently, hasn't been unveiled.
Uh the United States is has long cared about this issue and on resolving the issues between Israel and its Palestinian neighbors in a way that's fair for everybody.
Sure.
Resolution of those issues is not going to come about by attempting to strangle the Jews out of existence in their communities.
That's so the ADL said the same thing.
They said boycott will do no good to bring peace and to solve the problem in Israel.
Funny, they're all for boycotting other people that are so called anti-Semitic.
But when if boycotts don't work for you, though, I see how it is.
The double standard again.
By attempting to strangle the Jews out of existence.
And then he says, Oh, boycotts don't work, that's not going to help the situation for peace.
Yeah, neither does taking the goal on and annexing the West Bank right before saying that you're gonna annex the West Bank right before the election, or declaring your capital and moving the embassy in Jerusalem.
None of this stuff does helps peace.
Neither does pulling all of the uh uh funding for the refugees in Palestine for the Pali Palestinians refugees.
So yeah, you can you can do all that stuff, and that's okay, but oh you guys, you guys are the ones trying to bring peace.
Sure.
That's not how you're gonna get peace.
And so I want to thank the administration for focusing on this issue and and all the work the White House is doing to try to really promote a uh a plan that would that would finally uh uh have get get us to uh an agreement where the Israelis and the Palestinians can live side by side in peace.
Side by side, but they're they're announcing some of the details now.
It's essentially Netanyahu's peace plan, it's all for Israel, and uh there's not gonna be a Palestinian state in this this peace plan that's gonna be coming now, they say after Ramadan in June, I believe.
Keep pushing it back.
It was supposed to come after the election after Netanyahu got re-elected.
Uh there's another source of anti-Semitism.
You mentioned the Nazis and Skokie.
This is like the only positive question.
There's another source of anti-Semitism.
You mentioned the Nazis and Skokie.
And it's this white nationalism or white supremacist.
Are you also going it is that would you are you also gonna be focused on that?
Is that also a growing problem?
We talk about growing anti-Semitism, and could you discuss that uh a little bit how it fits into your portfolio?
Certainly.
It it is a growing problem.
Yes, please tell us how you're gonna go after the white people and how uh the Gentiles are eternal guilt, the etern eternal guilt of the Gentiles.
Tell us about that.
Tell us about how uh they are talking about Zog controlling the government.
In fact, while some of the attacks on Jews in the world are coming from the left or from radical Islam, many are coming from the extreme right as well.
And so we're seeing that by the way here in this country, and we're seeing that elsewhere.
Of course, we just had a despicable massacre of worshippers at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh.
And that was from someone who came from a place of one can say supremacism.
Look, Jew hatred is Jew hatred.
And it doesn't matter if it's clothed in the language of the left or clothed in the language of the right.
We're going to be calling it out for what it is, and we're going to be fighting it.
So they're gonna not allow any criticism of Israel or Zionism from the left or for the right.
It's all delegitimized de delegitimizing Israel, according to them.
And uh and we're gonna be fighting it fairly and in equal measure, regardless of the ideological spectrum from which it comes.
Do you see them in some ways these this extreme left and extreme right as kind of mirror images of each other?
I think every kind of of uh anti Semitic manifest No, they're just both right, and they know the truth of what's going on here about the subversion of our country for a foreign state and a foreign Zionist biblical end time Zionist prophecy agenda.
Manifestation is different.
Uh there's also anti-Semitism among radical Islam.
They're all different, but what they have in common is they threaten the safety and the survival of the Jewish people, and that is unacceptable from the standpoint of the United States.
Having covered the Israeli-Palestine issues for like many other people in this room for a very, very long time.
Uh, we know that US uh former President Jimmy Carter uh did refer to Israel as an apartheid state, that it's more of uh of a of a human rights issue, especially with in terms of policy and a lot of things that Trump's administration has done, moving the US Embassy, uh recognizing the sovereignty of Israel over the Golden Heights as you know, not recognized under the international community.
Can you tell me why you think Israeli settlements in a boycott, which was reminiscent of sort of South African uh sanctions issues and divestment is an anti-Semitic issue specifically, and not really one of more of a human rights or two peoples that need to get along.
I think any comparison between the State of Israel and apartheid is offensive to its core.
So instead of answering her question, he takes her premise and just says that's offensive, and it's so offensive that he refused to even answer the question.
So again, remember in the language, you're not allowed to compare them to Nazis, you're not allowed to say that they're racist at all.
And anyone who makes that comparison uh needs to check their facts.
Um Israel is is a an exemplar of a democracy with democratic values, where all citizens of Israel not only vote, but have representation in the Knesset, including by the way, in the election we saw just yesterday.
And so any notion that that the State of Israel, which is a shining example of of a democracy and a shining example of an American ally, one of our one of our best allies, uh any suggestion that the State of Israel any in any way, even remotely, reflects apartheid is uh is offensive.
One more that we're we're done.
Well, uh Jimmy Carter said it.
Are you are you a is he an anti-Semite?
Are you offended by him?
We're done.
Thanks for now.
Thank you.
Thanks.
And then he runs away, no more questions.
So a democracy in the Middle East.
This racist new law makes me ashamed to be Israeli.
The Jewish state law, Haritz, it's not racism, it's Jewish law.
It's systematic.
Netanyahu reported to say legal system in Israel based on the Talmud.
As Jews, we reject the myth that it's anti-Semitic to call Israel racist, that's the independent.
Netanyahu says Israel is, quote, nation state of the Jewish people and them alone.
Does that sound like a democracy to you?
Choosing not to veto Obama lets anti-settlement resolution pass at UN Security Council.
So these settlements that are all over the West Bank have been voted illegal by by the world by the United Nations many times for a long time.
The United States was vetoing this these resolutions to protect Israel because they're you know the US has veto power.
But over Obama uh Obama's UN ambassador on the way out, decided to she uh abstained from voting, she didn't veto, and they allowed it to pass.
So Elon Carr is a Sheldon Adelson puppet.
He's cracking down on any criticism of Israel so they can get away with anything they want with impunity.
And I can't why do they need to put all this in place?
Seems like they're trying to implement part as part of their Zionist end game, they're trying to implement no criticism of Israel.
One so they can get away with whatever they want.
And two, so that this is partly implementing Noahide laws where you cannot criticize the temple, the rabbis, the Torah, the Jewish state, the Jewish people.
You're not allowed to criticize any of it in this new Noahide world religion, new world order.
I'm going to get into that in part two tomorrow, where I'm going to talk about how Elon Carr recently met with Trump in Jewish groups.
And here I'll show you the little detail here.
Elon Carr, the State Department's anti-Semitism Envoy, and Rabbi Levi Shemtov, who directs American Friends of Lubavitch, Chabad, just met recently.
And I'm going to cover that tomorrow in part two, so stay tuned for that.
I'm Adam Green with No More News.
Thank you for watching.
Make sure to like, share, subscribe, hit the notification bell.
If you want to support content like this, you this content is valuable to you, and you want to see more of it, check out in the description box below for the PayPal and Patreon links.
No more news is 100% listener funded.
I can't do it without you, and every dollar helps.
That's all for now.
See you guys tomorrow with part two.
Take care.
▲
Export Selection