Know More News - Adam Green - Know More News w/ Red Ice (Cohen, Censorship, Culture Wars)

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 28, 2019 - Know More News - Adam Green

01:10:25

Know More News w/ Red Ice (Cohen, Censorship, Culture Wars)

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello, Adam Green here with No More News.
	It's February 27, 2019.
	A lot of news going on today.
	The Cohen testimony, Alex Jones returns to Joe Rogan.
	And so it's good that I had planned to have my friend Henrik Palmgren back on the channel to discuss all the madness today.
	How are you doing, Henrik?
	Thanks for coming on.
	Thank you.
	Great to be here again.
	Very tired.
	I've done two shows already today, so this is my third one.
	Usually I don't do you know that many shows in a row, so if I'm a little bit tired of bl blurry in my thoughts and slurry, uh please excuse me, but uh I think it'll be a good show nonetheless.
	A lot of things line up here.
	Yeah, I was I'm always on the computer a lot uh during the week, especially, but uh today with the the hearings and then um the Alex Jones on Joe Rogan, I was really glued to it and couldn't even get away to walk the dogs or anything.
	I know you're always working hard too, so uh we'll try to get through all the stuff.
	I have a lot a lot of stuff noted down to to get through.
	And uh so where do you want to start?
	Oh, geez, yeah, where where do we start?
	Let's talk about the testimony a little bit then.
	Michael Cohen, and uh I didn't listen to the whole thing.
	I watched maybe a good uh hour at some portion as I was preparing some other stuff today.
	And uh it was pretty my initial analysis of watching it was pretty i it seems pretty cut and dry in terms of what the different uh parties were trying to achieve with the testimony.
	Most of the GOP wanted to obviously discredit uh Michael Cohen to make him seem as a uh not credible witness uh while the Democrat side try to uh kind of squeeze other information out of him so that you know information about Trump basically.
	But I I have to say watching this rat his backstabber, uh I who knows what he says is true.
	He he basically has lied through his entire career, it seems at some point someone asked him like, hey, you know, like you you you were aware of certain things, they asked him about certain things and it led up to this point where he had admitted that he had said certain things about uh some legal advice for something that Trump wanted to do or whatever.
	And it basically in in a roundabout way they cornered him and it came they it came out that he had basically giving him given Trump bad advice legally, but he had never or bad advice, it was illegal advice, right?
	So he had uh consulted with him and he had given him uh b bad information and stuff like that.
	So it basically the guy might be uh he's he's so corrupt and so uh uh unreliable uh as a as an attorney and as a you know witness, even that we have no idea if what he has testified to or said is actually true.
	What w my feeling was that he is basically ready to give the people that are want to squeeze information out of him.
	Uh he's willing to give them anything just to get out of it, just to have a lesson prison sentence.
	He thinks if I jump through the hoops, um maybe maybe I'll be spared or or or something like that.
	Uh but it it's I don't know, it's just he's a weird guy.
	And and and what I see when I looked at that was probably that he he must be a guy which is tied into the whole uh New York mafia, basically around that environment.
	And these boys, all of them, including Trump, are probably very well uh accustomed to this kind of climate and this kind of way of dealing with things, that this com comes as second nature to these guys.
	But when they're actually are cornered and asked about some of the things that they did, you you just see that it's just illegal issue after illegal issue, um you know, illegal advice and everything like that.
	And so either he's just a really bad lawyer, or he's just like way tied in with like the New York uh mob elite uh up there, you know.
	D did you think that Michael Cohen was comfortable up there?
	And and do you think he thought he was really his body language looked like he was uncomfortable to you?
	Yeah, he was squirming and stuff, and he even said at some point when I was listening, like, hey, I came here to like give you dirt on Trump kind of thing in a roundabout way.
	No not like not about myself.
	He this wasn't about me.
	He thought he was gonna talk all about Trump to try to uh get out as much information as he could about him to make sure that he's you know brought down or impeached or whatever they seek to to uh uh you know get out of the situation.
	But no, he was clearly very uncomfortable.
	Uh even some of the things he couldn't ask uh answer, and he even said, Oh, I don't know the answer to that.
	And then the chairman, okay, move on, like go to the next yeah, comment he's totally inept Cummings.
	God, it was like they did let him get away a few times where he was like, Oh, I can't I can't answer that.
	And it was like, okay, move moving on.
	Like that is not a legitimate answer.
	He's under oath.
	He has to answer, right?
	And but they just dropped it and moved and moved on.
	So that was I don't know, it's a weak.
	They could have squeezed way more out of this rat.
	That's what I felt.
	You know, you know what I thought was weak?
	How all of the Republicans kept saying, like, are you gonna have a book deal?
	Do you want to do a book deal as if he like can't talk about anything that happened?
	They're trying to pressure him to say that he can never, you know, go on the go on the news or ever make any money any money in the future or something.
	I thought that was a little, you know, not relevant to him coming in.
	Basically, this is a former wingman of Trump.
	He was his lawyer for ten years, I believe.
	He was there, like, you know, in all the back room deals, doing paying off his his literal uh uh porn star extramarital affairs parent.
	I mean, he was the guy.
	So you would think that he's be the insider that would be able to spill the beans, you know, they're beefing now.
	He used to lie for Trump, and now he's admitting that he lied and that he's just gonna come forward on stuff.
	And and there was some opportunities where he could have like he could have really dug into him, like said he did drugs or said you know, with Melania, he did defend him to a degree on some things.
	Yeah, yeah, he did, and and uh also at the same time, I mean I understand that kind of reasoning, I guess, by the the GOP guys, the the Republicans they basically want to see or try to understand if if it's only he's just looking after himself, right?
	And he's seeking to somehow uh be in a position where he you know can can not salvage his reputation but get out of the situation by uh I guess financially ensure that he has a life in the future because I mean his he was straight obviously obvious of his uh legal license and stuff like that.
	He's not he can't do that, so what is he gonna do when he gets out?
	I think he is self-serving this guy.
	I have to say that.
	I don't think that cle I mean clearly he was recording recorded Trump behind his back, and that's the audio tape that they released, remember to CNN.
	I don't know what that is a couple of months ago.
	And not really much was in that, uh to be honest.
	It was just a minor thing considering how much has come out since then.
	But I think he's self-serving and and a and a backstabber.
	Uh, but I do think it's indicative of the kind of environment that these boys are are going in.
	And he one thing that was interesting was the Felix Seder that brought him up, right?
	Uh that he had uh been in the previous uh office or or uh area uh where uh cohen previously was, he had been taken over the his his head office, and Trump had said he doesn't really know him.
	And and I don't know if what do you know about Freddy uh Felix Seder uh but he's uh he's this um uh uh he's a Russian uh mobster basically right he got Chabad uh man of the year for Port Washington Bad Library.
	Nice.
	I didn't know that.
	Yeah, that's funny.
	Uh his YouTube channel.
	Oh really him accepting the award, yeah, no conspiracies.
	Nice.
	Okay.
	Yeah, so the you know, classic there's guys like that, and they're way well tied into.
	I mean, you've talked about that in the past videos and past shows, that that old guard, like the those that immigrated uh into America from Russia, many of them were Jewish.
	Uh they basically set up a uh a mob network there, and that's has continued to this day, and I think that they have a lot of power uh and influence, obviously, and in including over American politics.
	The question is I don't think that they're doing the business as any mob, it kind of the mob in in New York under the Italian mob, I should say, in New York, they weren't doing the bidding of Italy, right?
	They weren't running around doing things that benefit it benefited Italy.
	And I think it's kind of similar in this situation.
	I don't think that the r uh the Russian mob, which is not really Russian, right?
	Uh, but they're running around trying to do things that benefits Russia.
	I think it's much deeper than that, and it's also um a self-serving uh network that ties into uh the globalist network, which is kind of which plays ball above the nations, basically.
	That's what I think.
	Yeah, um he he mentioned that Putin or that uh Trump was continuing the Moscow deal while he was still running and saying that uh Russian uh collusion was uh a witch hunt.
	I thought that that was a big uh bomb that he dropped.
	Yeah, do you believe him?
	Um I mean I don't know I don't know have any strong reason not to believe him, honestly.
	I think I think that he's you know, Trump's attacked him, he lied for him long enough as his lawyer, and now he's trying to come clean because he's facing prison time.
	I mean, when you when you get somebody and you you take everything away from him and th and say you're gonna throw him in jail, people are gonna squeal.
	You know, that's how I think one of the first guy one of the first uh Congresswoman uh men said his uh opening statement was that this is how they do all of the Rico violations, and this is how mobsters are brought down as they get somebody and they get him to to spill all the beans.
	So that's what it felt like to me.
	But he's not spilling all the beans.
	He's only sli uh, you know, letting limited things out that's like kind of already known.
	You know, he he knows probably way more stuff that he would never say.
	You know, because I give out more information that would get all everybody in trouble if you don't have to.
	Exactly.
	And again, I don't know what I don't I still don't know what spurred him, initiated him to start recording Trump like this and why he turned on him to begin with.
	I think someone got to him.
	I think somewhere along the line, someone decided like, okay, let's try to squeeze out information from this guy uh against Trump.
	I mean, I I still think as much criticism, obviously, uh, that we have about Trump.
	I still think it's clear that you do have uh a competing faction, uh, another flavor of globalism which which wants him out and they're seeking uh anything, any way possible to do it.
	Um and I think that someone must have gotten to Cohen along the line at some stage.
	And then figured okay.
	The governments and the Democrats, he was thanking Cummins and Adam Schiff and Pelosi.
	So obviously he's uh um working with them fully at this point.
	Yeah, yeah.
	But again, I don't I just don't know if you can trust the guy.
	Uh you know, he seems so shifty and and and dubious that he might just be making up shit just to like try to get out of it or try to give them what they want.
	Maybe, but but you know, you might as well say that you just can't believe anything anybody in Congress says, 'cause they're all li liars at on some level too.
	Yeah, we can prove that.
	And just because he lied a lot before doesn't mean he can't, you know, he's busted now, he's facing prison time.
	I think he could, you know, be telling the truth now, now that he has nothing nothing else to lose, you know.
	That could very well be.
	Yep.
	I don't just I just don't know it.
	I I just seem you know, they as a character, um, I mean, he's a he's uh he's a rat.
	And again, I think he's yeah, I think he's tied in with that uh with a network.
	That's just this is how they operate uh in out of New York, and this is like common practice for these guys, you know what I mean?
	Yeah, um uh tr Trump oh he he was kind of alluding to the fact that he thought Trump would uh or s or Trump's people would have him killed.
	He was worried for it for his life, and then he mentioned that Trump had uh uh asked him to threaten people five hundred times, like with litigation or intimidation or something.
	And then also he mentioned that they they were working with bots and he mentioned uh Drudge Report in the poll too.
	I thought that was big, mentioning uh the fact that bots are a thing that not just their side is using, but all sides and anybody with any influence and power has.
	Interesting.
	Yeah, I I missed that.
	I don't doubt it.
	He he also called uh the Putin in the condo, like getting the Trump Moscow co condo, he just called that a PR stunt.
	He said that Felix Seder was a master at PR stunts.
	So I thought that was interesting too.
	And he said a bunch of stuff in the beginning, and I guess uh but anyway, um i i any other final thoughts on that?
	I don't want to talk about that the the whole time.
	We got a lot of stuff to get to.
	Yeah, no, not really.
	I think it was it was fairly uh uneventful.
	Is this gonna continue in a day two or three or something?
	I'm not sure.
	I imagine it'll be dragged out some more, you know.
	Uh it's not like we've heard the end of Michael Cohen.
	No, definitely not exactly.
	I just we'll have to say what comes out of it, but again, I just um I don't know.
	It's just so some something fishy with that guy.
	I just don't don't trust him for obvious reasons.
	So but we'll see.
	Maybe maybe it's maybe he's telling the truth now.
	Well, we should we should definitely be skeptical of him.
	Yeah, yeah, for sure.
	So um uh I just I'm curious real quick, you know, uh in the news this last week, the yellow vests uh have been being attacked as being anti-Semitic and they're showing all over in the news, anti-Semitism is rising all over Europe.
	Um what do you think about the idea of having a uh showing solidarity and having a yellow vest march here?
	I think it would be fun.
	I think it would be great actually.
	Uh I know some people call them, you know, the they always get hyper suspicious.
	I I saw this, you know, my days in like just you know, in the conspiracy uh field, you know, it you see a lot of people that are uh how do I put it?
	They're they're very defeatist.
	Everything is controlled as soon as something pops up that's populist, it has to be managed, it has to be.
	And and again, I don't know, I don't have hundred percent definitive proof or whatever, but I think it's a lot of good intended people that uh has gone out and marched against Macron in France, and this is spread to other parts in other parts in Europe.
	And I think it's ultimately it's a it's a good it's a good movement.
	Um I think it's a it's good to show this discontent, uh, even if it's causing instability, even if it's causing uh problems and issues.
	Let's face it, I mean, people have to wake up to to to the globalists and what what it is that they're doing.
	And I think things like this actually help.
	Uh but you think about somewhere in America, that's what you're talking about, uh Yellow West March.
	Well, you know, I just see them over there marching for so long, and yeah, I saw at first too that people were saying that they're they're controlled or it's not a real movement or something, but now it's like still going.
	The media is ignoring it for the most part, and uh they're smearing them as anti-Semites.
	So as soon as I hear that, I'm like, okay, it kind of gives them This is real.
	It kind of gives also I want to uh give my toot my horn a little bit.
	Uh a big French channel on YouTube that's a i affiliated with the Yellow Vesters, I guess, uh, copied one of my videos and translated it.
	Oh I'm I'm part of the Yellow Vest to a degree with the YouTube video.
	But just well, the guy they attacked, just quickly Adam.
	The the guy it was a completely um understandable uh attack uh on that guy because he's been advocating for things that are not good for the French people.
	And uh I don't know if he's an Israeli citizen, but basically what they the what was so anti-Semitic was about it was basically if you don't like France, if you don't like what we do, how we do things here, like go go home kind of thing, right?
	And it was like this is huge news, and oh my god, this is the proof that it's an anti-Semitic movement and stuff like that.
	But it's as usual, you know.
	As soon as you criticize someone who's Jewish, then uh they have to put it in a completely different bracket.
	I mean, let's just look at the behavior.
	The guy was clearly like undermining uh the values that most French people want in their country, right?
	And so he was called out on that.
	That's how simple it was.
	Right, yeah.
	So uh the reason I mentioned doing the yellow the yellow vest here is because like we don't it seems like we don't have much time left with the attack that that's on us uh independent think thinkers on the internet and on YouTube and stuff.
	You guys have always been under attack at Red Ice, and uh I it makes me really frustrated to read these articles that come that come out uh attacking you guys and misrepresenting what you say in your videos and just petitioning and and begging and lobbying and advocating you guys to be shut down.
	You tell me tell me a little bit about uh what it's like to be going through all this, because you guys get it rough.
	You're you're you know, they say in here you're the one of the biggest ones, they they cry about your numbers, how how much subs you have and how many views you get, and they're just uh what kind of people live their lives trying to just shut other people down with that they don't uh uh uh agree with.
	Yeah, people like that on on right wing watch, it's just uh it's kind of it's pathetic, you know.
	It's like uh because it's just so dishonest.
	I mean, it's it's and it's opportunist, it's like um immoral, it's uh it's just no honor, it's just no principle, no backbone, it's just like use every opportunity you can to slam and to uh to attack and to charge and to uh smear and you know uh defame ultimately.
	And of course, as you say, the the reason for this, uh it's because they want us uh gone from from most of the social media platforms.
	And uh, of course, if they could uh confiscate our website, I'm sure that they would do that too.
	But it's again regarding that specific article, it's it's a way for them to basically take something which happened which was to completely unrelated to the topics and issues that was addressed in the video.
	So in the video, uh the argument, the point was that uh Lana made was that we have all these uh behaviors, if you will, that has been um charged by by these leftists, these nutball ultra-globalists that are writing articles like this, uh as being far-right extremism, right?
	So things like if you want a large family, you're a far-right extremist, if you if you do things that are ultimately you know good for for Europeans, you're you're a far-right extremist.
	I can remember all the points on the shape.
	Yeah, the whole premise was that the things that that you they're claiming are extreme are not extreme.
	You're saying that we're not extreme, and then they spin it in the article as if and I watched the video and I and I thought it was great.
	Great, great.
	Yeah, it was it was fun, right?
	It was it was just uh yeah, it was fun.
	We try to produce a little bit differently, and it's it it's it's fun to kind of make fun of how uptight and how stale and just uh neurotic these people are, right?
	In terms of like, hey, like every little damn thing is like right-wing extremism, right?
	They're so they're so polarized.
	You have to be on their page on every single issue.
	And if you break ranks, if you dare to question, if you have a different view, if you're not anti-white and and want to like destroy white people and turn them into a minority in their own countries, then you're a right wing extremist, right?
	So we the argument was like, hey, relax, it's fine, like we laughed at that issue.
	Like don't they will call anything that they don't agree with right wing terrorism, uh, right wing extremism.
	But going to terrorism, what they did in this article is to tie together with something which is completely unrelated.
	Now, if Lana had said in the video, I think it's good that people go out and they uh they stalk up on weapons and bombs and try to bomb people and murder as many people as possible, and that's not right wing extremism.
	Now, if she has said that, then I would understand the headline.
	Uh but she didn't say that.
	Uh and it was she never brought up anything about violence or anything, doing anything which is illegal or anything like that, right?
	So they're using the example of the story that came out where the government tells us we we still don't know, we don't know what happened, we don't know who the individual is, not much information has come out.
	But allegedly, allegedly, some guy had claimed that he's a white nationalist, and he said that he wanted to kill as many people as possible.
	Uh it does that entail uh uh white people too, then, or what does that even mean, right?
	So the government releases information like this, and we're all supposed to believe it without any evidence, or or the fact that he would be aligned with anyone.
	He can be literally anybody.
	This guy could literally be an agent.
	It could be a staged thing, it could be a sting operation, uh, it can be a false flag, it can be but the end uh end point is nothing came out, nothing happened, right?
	Um so they take they take that opportunity because of timing and saying that Lana is advocating, sorry, Lana is advocating for that kind of behavior, or or say that it's not extremism, which is just it's just dishonest and it's just wrong.
	It's just it's not true.
	It's like it's a straw man argument, and it's uh pretty sad that these people have nothing else to do to sit around and whine and complain.
	So they're deliberately lying about the meaning of your video and the intent behind your video to get you shut down and put you out of business and silence you uh on on the free and open space, the only way you can communicate with uh with the world on these monopoly tech companies.
	So your video is all about how all of these things aren't extreme.
	And as an example, like here's one of them.
	If you say that there's uh only two genders, that's extreme.
	That's a that's white ring extremists.
	So it's all these things that are just is crazy, and then they spin it that you say right here that holding extremist ideologies makes someone a healthy human being.
	Yeah, as if the video was you're extreme and that's great.
	Like that's not what that was not the message.
	The point the point is that they're trying to claim that they're extremists, but our argument is no, they're not extremists, they're just uh and but but this is the thing.
	I I think it's that these people actually cannot follow the argument.
	Um it's but it's actually possible that they are so I mean, we know that these people, these people's minds are already made up.
	They can it's not only these people, there's people who write like the alternative influencers network, you know, the Becca Lewis of this world and these women that are sitting around and like watching and tracking YouTubers and how extreme they are and what relationships they have, and you know, this is how they pay their mortgage, these people.
	This is this is how they get paid, right?
	But they're actually they're so brainwashed and and convinced of their own ideology that they can literally sit around and watch hundreds and hundreds of hundreds of hours of YouTubers, and literally not a single thing is enter into their mind where they say, you know what, I I I agree with that.
	That's that's a good point, actually.
	Like, nothing, right?
	So I mean, I know that they're paid to smear and and and all that stuff, but it's almost like because we make fun of it and say, Oh, this makes your right wing extremism.
	They go in with the attitude watching a video like that, oh my god, I can't believe it.
	They're trying to justify all these horrible things that we've talked about over the years.
	Uh and they can't they cannot actually use their logic and put themselves outside of that and just say, you know what, they're actually there's some points here that are right.
	It it's it's true that that has nothing to do with the right wing extremism.
	It's just uh it's it's just you know, normal things which have just you know shifted, they've shifted the paradigm so much so far, you know, to the left with all this cultural Marxism and political correctness that it's like uh it's it's it's nothing there, right?
	But again, they they're dishonest and their their job is to to smear.
	And this is also what gets them clicks, obviously, right?
	They they love to use thumbnails of Lana all the time because they know it's it's clickbait, that's what it is, and it gets them clicks and views and hits, you know.
	Well, what's funny is that one of the comments uh uh uh I saw was like, oh, she's so white that uh because it almost like you guys did something with the color to like take all the all the color out of her or something, right?
	Yeah, and it was the style as the effect, style, which was like we we just preserved the black and the white and the red, and if people know what color schemes that is, it's also to make fun of that whole situation, right?
	Who uh black, white, and red, who use that color combination, right?
	It's a it's a it's a joke.
	But I thought it looked pretty cool, actually.
	It looked kind of uh, I thought it was a neat effect.
	I was wondering how you did that.
	So yeah, eating a steak.
	So they're saying that you're claiming that everything like people can just read read an article like that and then go watch the video, and anybody with a brain should know right away that they're deliberately misleading in uh in it with the intent to just shut shut down your voice because it's a threat to the establishment and the people that that's funding them and that they're working for.
	Yeah.
	I think they don't like that we make fun of it as well, right?
	They have to that they're so stu they're so stale and stiff and uptight.
	I mean, they're like they're like chur the new church ladies that Jim Goad says.
	They're they're they're they're like these uh completely vehement uh conservative Christians, how they were back in the 80s about uh people listening to rock music or something.
	I don't know if you're recall that, but you know, there's this era that leftists like to make fun of, right?
	That the oh my god, these uptight conservatives and they think music is bad and blah, blah, blah.
	This is how I see these people.
	They're they're super like if you claim that you're right-wing because you like steak, I mean that's a re that's it's pathetic, it's ridiculous.
	And it's fun because you can make fun of that.
	And so we we like to make fun of these people.
	And I think that they can't take that.
	They don't stand it.
	So what they do is character assassination, and then they try to utilize the situation also politically, right?
	To say, get them off the internet.
	And and and it's always this kvetching and whining on views and clicks and how many subscribers we have, or something like that.
	It's like these people are losers.
	They're boring losers.
	That if you have a better argument, go make your own videos, and and we can we can duke it out that way.
	But they don't, they just complain.
	They're just whiners.
	You you see me here.
	I I I I'm not the top comment, but it's showing up at the top for me.
	I said another epic heavy hitter with Lana and Henrik on the green screen.
	They also claim yoga is white supremacy.
	That was another that's a Fox News headline I saw that they were claiming that yoga was white supremacy.
	And then conspiracy theorists, anti-Semitic, white supremacy, Nazi labels is all they have.
	It really is so manipulative how they think that they can just apply these labels and and that that's that's all they have to do.
	There's no debate necessary, and they just do them incessantly and repetitively until everybody you know is conditioned to repeat it essentially.
	Exactly.
	And I think what they don't understand either is that at this point it's so stupid and so ridiculous and so over the top from their point of view that it's it's fun to bait these people as well.
	There's another layer on top of it where I think people who are who are actually aren't that extreme kind of get a kick out of uh making fun of this uh by both by posing but also kind of uh exaggerate, turning up the volume even more to trigger them.
	It's fun to trigger them if you see it like what you're doing makes them mad.
	You want to do it a little bit more just to kind of irritate them.
	Exactly.
	And they they cannot understand that that's done with uh what's the term with the with the like a sparkle in our eyes, that that that's actually a nid uh and a nod, a wink, right?
	It's like uh they do that to us too, though.
	That's what BuzzFeed does when they do these articles attacking white people, like they're trying to trigger and get a response.
	I think they get off on that.
	Yeah, oh no, definitely, of course.
	And I think that there's a yeah, I think that there's a valuable uh uh um strategy in it for them there because the more the more over the top they can be in their anti-whiteness, those who are pro-white, they get angry and and defensive uh for obvious obvious reason.
	They can call us uh uh retards and genetic misfits and god no your your uh DNA is an abomination.
	I mean, these are actual real concepts that are.
	They have no culture, you know, they can stereotype anything.
	The double standards have just have just gotta end.
	And the hypocrisy of them always saying, like, even though we don't say anything that's supremacists, they'll just exposing uh you know crimes of Israel or Zionism, they'll just say you're a white supremacist immediately, even if you've never said one thing even about race in your life, you know?
	Yeah, yeah.
	And And I think that they so they up the ante, they turn up the volume a little bit, which might trigger us and we do the same.
	So yes, there is a there is a radicalization process in that, uh, but it's also uh you know an exaggeration kind of from from both sides a little bit.
	But what I think is necessary is that there is a serious and a real complaint behind that that we actually have, right?
	Of what it is that's happening and how we're beginning to be treated uh and and where this is going.
	If you if you connect the dots and see their true trajectory of this, uh you know, the the the very anti-white media narrative that's running right now.
	So it's a serious allegation that we come with.
	And it's serious that they're doing this because it's not just fun at the end of this.
	But I think it's necessary to also kind of attempt to expose them in the sense that do things which trigger them to use these words all the time and to go over the top.
	Because it does help to deflect and disarm these words to a certain extent.
	Because they have not been since – if they were completely 100% honest and factual and sincere in their criticism – the word choice that they were using in order to criticize us, I would have had more respect for them.
	But the fact is that they they don't, they just it's like this alarm button they just press, and it's it's there's no like like volume um setting on it.
	It's just always like the loudest that it can be.
	It's very malicious and like um and uh deceptive, very manipulative.
	Like do you ever read hit pieces on you and go like, wow, this sounds really good.
	I bet this is duping people, and people are just soaking this up, even though it and you know in your head it's it's misrepresentation and it's not true.
	Do you ever do that?
	Read it and think, God, this is this is gonna fool some people.
	I know it does.
	Uh sadly.
	I I I know that people buy it, and because they don't go check out the source and uh and there some of them are are pretty good writers, right?
	They can they can spin something.
	I've seen um videos and stuff like that on I think it was NBC most recently, they take things out of context and put it together, and I'm like, yeah, I see what they did.
	That actually makes um the art the sentence you just said makes it sound like uh like we're just totally irrational and just deluded.
	I I I can't I have that ability to put myself outside like of my own space of everything that I know and and just try to kind of consume some material as I'm just watching it for the first time and I'm like apolitical, right?
	So I I I do that and I have that ability, and I see that sometimes.
	Uh so what what I end up doing is okay, I need to be better at the arguments, we need to be sharper certain things, we need to.
	But you can always be taken out of context.
	You can have a preface, something that's five minutes long, and then you deliver a line, right?
	And so, but if you just take that line straight out, it just sounds crazy, right?
	NBC did this recently.
	We were talking about South Africa, and we were proving that there was a policy in South Africa where they intentionally look the other way for farm murders, for example, and that many young people at these farmer uh at these farms, white farmers, uh, they're they're targeted by this violence and they are murdered.
	So a line that they pulled out where Lana said it, and was they uh they attack white white kids, uh, and it's like an injustice.
	I I forget the exact one, but they put it together with a completely different segment that it sounded like we it they had cut out the South Africa part, so it sounded like it was an America or something like that, and we were just saying, like out of the blue, that white white k children are just being bur murdered by non-whites in America.
	You know, that's how they uh made it sound like, and it's like that's totally ridiculous, and it's outrageous, and it's it's but it's wrong, right?
	It's it's just not true.
	That's not what we said.
	That was just recently on on MBC News.
	That was like maybe a month ago, month and a half, maybe, yeah.
	Yeah.
	Do you guys ever consider have you considered suing anybody for some defamation?
	Because like, you know, they've they've uh they're constantly going after your ability to to fund yourself, and and that's what they're trying to do is remove all incentive um for us, and they even then they don't hide it, they say these people are allowed to fund their hate.
	That's how they phrase it.
	That you're funding hate.
	It's like, no, we are giving our interpretation on the news, and that's our right to do so.
	And they they just want to shut that down.
	There's a special place in in hell in Hades for people that go around not debating people or making videos, refuting people's arguments, but just you know, lobbying tech companies to to go after you.
	And it works.
	The the The tech companies bow to this pressure.
	They do.
	They do.
	They just smear, it's out of context, it's straw man arguments, it's uh misquotations, misrepresentations.
	Uh, but it's intentional.
	And and I I just I know that this is not new either.
	I mean, this is what these people do.
	This is how they pay their mortgages.
	They just they lie, they just make shit up about people, and this is this is how they make a living.
	It's it's unbelievable.
	But uh, you know, we're not the only ones targeted, and we're it's it's also not new historically.
	I think we're in a different situation because of uh how kind of twisted the modern world and the West has become overall, so it's a kind of a new phenomena.
	But they were lying like this about uh all kinds of stuff in the past, you know, these journalists.
	It's the most dishonest uh disgusting feel of work that you can be.
	He could be the best, it could be one of the um you know most uh optimal situations where you share the truth with the world and stuff.
	But these people are ultimately they're puppets of the globalists.
	They're they're they're they're they're uh like the court jester, right?
	That just run around and and try to create diversion and clicks and attention and and and uh entertainment temporarily so that business can go on as usual with the globalists so that they will fit they will face zero opposition and zero um you know organized um yeah, opposition basically to what it is that they're doing.
	Uh it it but they're also trying to scare people, as you say, into submission so that they see if they can turn someone into an example, you know, by deplatforming them, by firing them from their job, uh, by kicking them off payment processors, by shutting down their bank accounts as we've started to see now.
	By saying they have to resign from Congress for just mentioning APEC.
	Yeah exactly.
	All of it, right?
	All of those issues.
	Um they will they they use that you know against uh against us, right?
	And and uh I suing, I don't know, it's a lot of these people they do have they do have like Soros style money behind them, right?
	Right, yeah.
	And I and I and I don't think it's the right time to do it.
	Now I see this as a long game, and and this is this is far from over.
	Uh we are not going to go away.
	People who criticize the things that we do are not going to be become quiet.
	This is just going to get worse.
	Their worldview that they're pushing on us is ultimately failing.
	And as Greg Johnson said on my show today, he was just banned.
	He has all his books kicked off uh booted off from Amazon.
	Uh, you know, all the books, everything.
	His whole publishing company.
	Boom, that's it.
	They're off of Amazon right now, so you can't sell them there.
	He said, We are basically like the fire alarm to a world that's on fire.
	And what these people want to do is to take out the out the batteries of the fire alarm and throw them away and hope that the fire will just you know not spread, basically.
	That that's the situation we're in.
	The world that they're creating is one of chaos and violence, upheaval and destabilization.
	And we're here to warn people against where this is going.
	We don't want violence.
	We don't want these things.
	Uh, but these people are experts, they're propagandists, they have psychological techniques, they're social engineers.
	They've been doing this for decades now, some of these people, and they're very clever and they're very smart, not everyone there, but many are, and they know how to spin it and how to turn things to continue to manipulate the masses.
	But time is not on their side.
	Our side, we're we're advancing, we're winning.
	And that is the reason why the globalists, why the establishment, and why these little puppets that are running around defending them are so adamant about shutting down the voices that are critical, the dissenting voices, because they know on some level that we are managed, we manage to reach people, people can listen to our message, and we are convincing people because it matches actually match up with reality, unlike their view that they're pushing, right?
	So they're just trying to silence the the those warning about where it is that's coming so that so that the agenda will go through, and that white people specifically, as we're talking talking about that right now, uh, that white people won't be able to defend themselves against the crimes that we are being subjected to.
	Replacement population uh and and and uh immigration policy, which is intended to make us minorities in our own countries, you know?
	Vilification, the white the white male vilification.
	And they like to say it's a conspiracy theory, but that like BuzzFeed will say, Oh, it's a conspiracy theory, but then also always attack white people at the same time.
	Uh I did a video recently called uh BuzzFeed had a new anti-white article out saying that 18 tweets that prove that white people actually do have culture, and this uh journalist, I guess you could call her that just collects anti-white tweets, did a privacy complaint, filed a privacy complaint just for reading her name as the the journalist at Buzzfeed.
	And you guys I saw you were celebrating a while back.
	BuzzFeed attacks you regularly, right?
	Them and a few others like Daily Beast and who are some of the other uh biggest haters out there.
	Yeah, uh Vox has done a couple of pieces.
	I think Inc.
	uh no, so uh Mick Raw story.
	What about Raw story?
	Yeah, Ross Story does quite a bit too.
	Uh Mick, but they went under a lot of the uh and again uh a lot of the these people are getting fired from these positions.
	Huffington Post has done a lot right um on us as well.
	That's what I was gonna say.
	They were all having layoffs and they're not they're losing money and stuff, so you guys are always celebrating about that, right?
	It's funny though, because it's like I don't know, it's uh it's I I as I said before, I didn't kind of finish that turn of thought, but I see it as a l as a long game, right?
	A long long uh uh agenda here, uh wearing it for the long haul and temporarily in the in the short term, uh yes, it's hurting us, it's it's hitting uh you know hard, it it is difficult, it's uh it's blackpilling, it you know, it it's easy to get um you know down about this kind of stuff, but but ultimately I ultimately I don't because I know that we are on a trajectory which is far better off than they are.
	They're in power.
	Most of these people are in charge, right?
	But it's also a machine that's breaking down in front of our eyes, and so it's not uh they're not on a uh it's not a rising sun, it's a setting sun for these people, right?
	And and I think that they know that on some level, and that's why they become so defensive.
	That's why they become so irritated with people who point this out, and they think just as long as I can shut up the messenger, the message will go away.
	And we know that that's just not true.
	Uh YouTube just implemented some new uh striking policies.
	It what would if they if they kick everybody off of YouTube and we have to go to uh alternative platforms, d we'll be losing, wouldn't you think?
	All it takes is really kicking us off of YouTube, like uh Tommy Robinson just recently was kicked off of Twitter, Jacob Wall was kicked off of Twitter.
	Uh all of these Zionists are being kicked off.
	What w what's your take on all that?
	Yeah, I mean it's they i it is true that many of the people who are you know far left or whatever uh they don't they don't make a distinction between a Zionist and an anti Zionist.
	They do it should be pointed out that they see us all as the same they they all see us as enemies.
	Uh if you're as you said before, if you're slightly conservative, even though you might be hyper pro-Israel, you're a super uh fanboy about Zionism and it's the greatest thing, uh, but if you're critical of immigration, then you're you're an enemy, right?
	Oh in some cases it could even be not for these leftists that if you're pro-Israel, it means that you're pro-nationalism, therefore you're you're an enemy, right?
	But they don't make it a distinction.
	W many of us do because we have different you know, factions within this and we pinpoint different sources as the problem, right?
	They can go around and say Islam is the problem, you know, and then we well, who's bringing in the Muslims into the West, right?
	And uh who's been why are the Muslims leaving their home countries and so bombing them?
	It's uh you know, they so it's a different way of approaching the problem.
	But but when it comes to these leftists specifically that we're talking about, they don't make that distinction.
	So they're happy nonetheless to see all of the all of these people go.
	Uh but what is interesting is that from our perspective, it's very rarely that they the people who are who are critical of Israel are rarely mentioned in news stories and things like that when they talk about censorship, right?
	I for example, I saw a piece on on Breitbard, uh where they talk about pay uh SPLC working together with PayPal.
	And that this is a perfect example.
	Uh Breitbart, they know about us, they've written about us in the past, different articles that we're complaining, I think at that point, but uh I've never seen any of any anything favorable from from Braithport about us.
	But they what I'm saying is that they m they are trying to create the stress and effect, but only with selected outlets.
	They're all happy to see us go, right?
	All these leftists.
	But at the end of the day, I think that this kosher servative branch, the the uh Israel first nationalists out there, uh they are seeking to make themselves into the suppressed uh uh voices and never mention outlets like us.
	They pretend it doesn't happen.
	Same thing with Alex Jones.
	Remember, he knew he followed me on Twitter.
	I uh sent him messages directly um saying we were banned from PayPal, uh you should highlight this, you might be next, and this kind of stuff.
	They never touched it, right?
	And then it happens to them, and then they're in this bubble of where they just think it's them who who's been subjected to censorship, where when that's clearly not true.
	So I think that there is a there is an overarching agenda that if the if uh this is what the enemy does, they control both sides, right?
	They control all the different sides, but we're actually a side which is outside of that because we actually go to the root of the problem and criticize that.
	Yes, we I match up with some of these kosher servatives of some issues.
	I don't think Islam in the West is a good idea.
	I agree with a lot of those things, but again, as we said, I think it's just a matter of what level do you go to?
	How far, how far down the rabbit hole do you descend and look at the problem, right?
	Uh and some I think are genuine.
	Uh some I think they just haven't looked at it further, others are probably not.
	They're probably might be paid or they might be intentionally uh avoiding those issues, they might be aware of it in some level, right?
	I don't know.
	But what I'm saying is I think that I think they're trying to create this kind of a cog version of nationalism and conservatism, which is going to be lifted out now as the suppressed and censored uh uh version, if you will.
	And so it's kind of like Ben Shapiro.
	Um he's he's a guy that still gets enough mainstream exposure to become a and known alternative, if you say what I'm saying.
	I see like Daily Wire recommended here and there, he has shows on Fox News and stuff like that, right?
	They uh Cernovich, he goes on ABC and does interviews or whatever the hell it was MBC.
	They're still kind of circuit circuling circulating uh the mainstream media sphere enough to get the kind of attention uh to be visibly exposed as uh as an outsider as a suppressed outlet, and I think that's gonna chat.
	So so when the tide turns, because believe me, it's going to, people are gonna get sick and fed up with all this leftism, the liberal garbage, SJW, nuts, PC culture.
	It people are gonna be fed up with it.
	And when they do, the the I think that the power behind the scenes are gonna make damn sure that when that discontent really starts to bubble up, there's this acceptable number of outlets out there that you can go to that you're aware of, right?
	But they won't mention red eyes, they won't mention no more news, and there's many others they won't mention.
	They deplatform us just the same, but we're just not going to get that exposure because we deal with some of the real issues, you know what I mean?
	Yeah, I I've been uh skirting some scrutiny, actually.
	Um I've SPLC did a little thing on me, but it was really kind of just an attack on Owen Schreuer.
	But besides that, uh the more mainstream people haven't done any attacks yet.
	So I'm still waiting for that, I guess.
	And you know, yeah, I've got huge problems with all the with all the Zionist uh right wingers, but uh you don't ever hear me saying Alex Jones needs to be shut down, he he makes money, he should I you never hear me saying that kind of stuff.
	You hear me going, look at this clip of him saying this, and this is why he's wrong.
	Like, no, that kind of lot logical uh argumentative stuff, not just trying to get everybody else shut down.
	I don't even want the the left to shut down.
	But uh speaking of being shut down, uh Jacob Wall, you had me on about a month ago after he did his dirty trick and uh said I was the pizza gate arsonist and then tried to get all of his people, he said attention patriots censor this guy Adam Green, because he's attacking me with his uh alt-right Nazis or something like that when he was the one doing the dirty trick on me.
	So it was great to see his him getting suspended and nobody defending him besides like Cernovich and Pasobic and you know a few Zionist friends of his.
	Yeah, it sure came around, didn't it?
	Haha, like that's how it feels.
	Again, I don't want it to happen.
	I I I will still say that.
	Despite as unhinged as this guy is, and clearly like mental issues or whatever, I still don't want him banned.
	It was funny that it happened, but I don't want him banned, right?
	I I do uh I think we've talked about this before, Adam, but it's kind of the same way that Laura Loomer goes in front of the Twitter office and and puts his yellow star on her on her jacket, and he says, Oh my god, Louis Farrakhan is still on Twitter, why kind of thing?
	They're basically just exacerbating the problem, they're just begging for censorship.
	Um that's obviously not the the they should beg for or beg, but they should advocate for them being included instead, and so that the goalpost of the uh discourse increases, not diminishes, right?
	So they in in one way these people, even though some of them might be well-intended, but some of these conservatives, they still are useful idiots in that regard because they bring attention to what these leftists do over here that also should justify banning.
	That's like shrinking um the goalpost of what's going to be okay to talk about.
	And that's obviously that's disaster, right?
	So they're in that sense that many of them are part of the problem, you know?
	Yeah, and this is the same thing I've been saying for a while with when it comes to anti-Semitism, that the right is always pointing the finger at the left claiming they're anti-Semitic, and then the left also points to the right and Trump and says they're they're anti-Semitic.
	So when uh Omar said her stuff about APEC, her tweets, and they all went crazy on her calling her an anti-Semite and that she needs to resign.
	The left response was that's not anti-Semitic.
	It was no, you're Semitic because you said this tweet about Soros and and uh Stayer or is that his name?
	John Stayer, I think it is, and uh uh Katzenberg or some other Jewish billionaire.
	So you're an anti-Semite.
	And it's like, hold on, none of this is anti-Semitic, talking about Adelson and Apex and Soros and Katzenberg and Sabin and these people, it's a fact, it's all over the Jewish press that they are highly influential on American politics.
	But it serves a purpose, right?
	Look, look at the circus now that it's creating.
	No one is talking about the real issues and the real this is what they do.
	They offer up a phony uh light or or a fake version of complaints and criticisms, which could easily be dismissed by the other side, right?
	So they can put well that's nonsense and ridiculous.
	So that's anti-Semitic, blah, blah, blah.
	None of it really is, but no one is addressing the the actual information, the real issues, the the real problems that are out there.
	And so, but they've created a diversion effectively.
	And it's just like it's getting all the attention, it's the the buzzes around.
	It's like it's uh it's a circus, right?
	It's just uh clowns and the and the court jesters are standing around juggling uh while nothing is actually being achieved because they're both operating on on false phony premises, right?
	So I I hear this all the time.
	They go, Oh, if you say these people are Zionists and the Zionists are are uh controlling things, then how is Alex Jones censored?
	How is Tommy Robinson and Jacob Wall and Larry Laura Loomer and all these people, you know, the latest Project Veritas came out today saying that they're uh th throttling conservative accounts, a Facebook insider that said that they're oh I believe it.
	But yeah, she said the point people she pointed out were Cernovich and um who else?
	Daily Wire and one other ones, Crowder, Steven Crowder.
	So, you know, all Zionists.
	So do you think that it's they're they're the left is propping up the controlled opposition with the censorship that makes them like the victims and gives them publicity, or do you think it's just a real battle and they s that there's opposition to Zionists and they're trying to shut them down and and silence them because they're leftists and that's just what leftists do.
	That's the way they operate.
	Yeah, I I think that they are uh absolutely one hard again.
	As I said, they see they do see us all the same.
	You know, if you if you talk about the fact that you hate uh seeing white people discriminated against and um you know that we don't have a say in in immu the immigration policies in our countries or something like that, uh they see you as an enemy.
	If you talk about those things in a d in and in addition to the problem with Zionism or Israeli power, they see you as an enemy.
	You're from Sweden.
	You're from Sweden, the land of Barbara Spector, where she says that right?
	Yeah, that's where she said that said that that she's gonna come in and that she's gonna be resented for it, and she it's her role to make your country of Swedish men not Swedish anymore.
	Yeah, it's uh it's outrageous.
	It's a crime, it's a crime against human it's uh it's uh actually genocide.
	If you look at the convention that it says in the UN convention against uh genocide, it says that if you uh scheme or plan or even create a mental uh uh uh was an environment, I guess, for lack of a better word, I I paraphrasing here now, um,
	that actually creates uh or or will result in lower births and things like this, or a c a climate where you uh you're demeaned or you're not um you know, when they talk about the with Swedes don't have a culture or we don't really exist and things, these are mental uh uh you know, not crimes, but they're they're they're they are they're slurs that causes people and children even uh to like feel bad about who they are.
	It It helps to lower their self-esteem.
	Uh they don't feel you know, they don't feel pride about who they are, you know.
	These are things that actually create real mental consequences, right?
	So they're actually in violation uh you know of this convention.
	It's a it's a crime, it should be pointed out.
	But again, it's a lot of people.
	It's just the immoral thing to do to try to want to interfere with other people.
	Like just imagine it ever happening in in other countries, like uh in a Chinese country or you know, whatever, you know, a country in South America.
	Remember Tibet?
	Remember Tibet?
	Every everyone in the West came out when the Chinese invaded Tibet, and rightfully so, they should have, right?
	But it's basically we can come at the same okay, it wasn't uh it's not a physical invasion of an army, but the end result is is around about the same way.
	It's it's an eradication of the culture, it's uh it's uh being imposed by a different way of life, it's being told to shut up and and in some cases even put down with uh violence and stuff like that if you try to protest.
	And and in the West, we basically have the same thing.
	We're being doxxed and deplatformed, we lose us we lose our jobs.
	If we st speak up against the wrong things, there's real tangible danger that you're not going to be able to take care of yourself or your family in the West today.
	There's a it's a climate of fear and harassment against people who break ranks with the political politically correct establishment, right?
	So back to this article, it's so disturbing that the SPLC, this this terrorist organ, anti-white terror terrorist organization that Southern Poverty Law Center, and groups like ADL are working with all these big tech companies to censor all of the internet for the whole world and working with like PayPal is essentially a monopoly to do credit card uh payments online, right?
	There's not other big alternatives.
	And if there is, they'll go write articles saying, ooh, they got kicked off of here, but they're still over here.
	You better do something too.
	Like they won't ever stop until you're uh you can't pay any bills, can't put gas in your car, can't feed yourself.
	Unless you know, you want to speak your mind and read the news and and you know, give your opinions on the world.
	You can't do that because they because they deem called you a special word.
	They called you hate as if it's illegal, not saying that you do hate, but that's it's illegal to hate.
	It's illegal to have emotions or to to think of something a certain way.
	Yeah, it it's it's it's really scary.
	I mean, it's it's uh uh you know, it's a cliche almost, right, at this point to to talk about Orwell or Orwellian or you know, stuff like that.
	It's like we it's been beaten to death.
	I get it.
	But it's like that's really what what is happening.
	We're living under a the truth ministry, and they're they're rewriting our vocabulary, they're rewriting things historically.
	I mean, look at even how John Wayne was attacked recently for his comments, right?
	Um he he made uh comments, which was sound and uh reasonable.
	That's how many people thought back then.
	And now they're going to w write him out of the history books.
	TV channels are gonna stop showing his movies on the TV anymore, right?
	It's uh this is why they they tear down statues, they change the names of schools and streets, right?
	This it's uh it's a transformation of the entire culture, and it's the eradication of of white people, of Westerners in our own lands.
	They're replacing historical characters with a multicultural range of characters and and uh in our TV shows and movies.
	They're trying to uh Jedi mind trick us into thinking that there was never a time when when our countries belonged to only our own people, you know what I mean?
	And uh, you know, it's getting so crazy that you can't even find somebody to host the Oscars anymore.
	You know, Kevin Hart got attacked for I don't I don't know if it was some jokes or something he said about um non-straight people.
	Yeah.
	Um and then and then the Oscars, you know, uh did you watch any of the Oscars?
	Yeah, I did I did actually was hilarious.
	God Jesus.
	It's uh I mean it's so it was it's cringed beyond like 9,000.
	I can't I could it was so cringy and so didactic, right?
	Every little issue is political, and most of it is frankly just anti-white, right?
	It was oh it's always about uh lifting out immigrants and women and you know, it's like feminism, SJW bullshit, and and it and they're all taking you know stabs at the current environment and uh you know how bad Trump is, and it's it's all they they just they go on repeat to these these leftists, right?
	And they're the whole thing is embarrassing.
	The whole Oscars is just uh farce and a fraud at this point.
	And I I was surprised that it didn't go to Black Panther, the best picture.
	Uh But Green Book was not far behind in the sense that it was like about the reversals of a role of a servant, right?
	So it's all I don't know, it's just messages and everything.
	It's just steeped in leftism and and just political correctness and it's just nauseating.
	And that's why they're losing uh numbers, right?
	The Oscars is actually declining year every year that goes by, fewer people are watching it and and engaging it because they just normal people just they're sick and fed up being um uh what's the word uh not dictated to, but they're being sh they get these messages shoved down their throat all the time.
	Uh I think most people are sick of it, to be honest.
	Well, some people, some people love it.
	They love they love it, what's what's happening.
	Um I I did a video about the Oscars, because I watched Black Black Klansmen uh a few days, it just came out on Red Box, and uh I actually watched a lot of the Oscars stuff.
	I watched Black Klansmen and uh the one with Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga and even Bohemian Rhapsody, you know, all the the top ones, because I love watching Hollywood stuff to decipher the propaganda as well as Netflix, because there's so much of it.
	And blacks black clansmen, I was just absolutely disgusted.
	Just the fact that they're they're making this movie in the first place, and then how they portray the um all the white people in it, like every white people person in the movie was a villain, just about, and they make them look so over the top, stupid and degenerate and just like a caricature of the worst racist uh you can imagine.
	And just like imagine if the Jesse Smollett case didn't get uh shown to be a hoax, and you know, black people across the United States are are seeing KKK movies of racist people saying horribly racist stuff, they're hearing that MAGA people are beating up uh Jesse Smollett's like what are they trying to do?
	Well, they're to try to instigate hatred against white people so that when we become a minority, which we're slated to do with current levels of immigration, we will be a hated, recented minority that is going to be subject subject uh subjected to violence, like we see in South Africa.
	That's the end game.
	Uh turning us into a minority and also um rallying all the different minority groups into a collective majority that can be turned turned against uh white and western society.
	That's what the end goal is.
	That's why the media has this it's a constant whip on white people, it's white people's fault, it's white people's reason that you're poor, it's white people that's holding you down, right?
	I mean, that creates anger.
	But Buzzfeed had an article, 37 things that white people ruined in 2018 or something like that.
	And yet they that they're constantly saying you're a conspiracy theorist if you say that there's any any type of propaganda or agenda against white people.
	The as the I did a video two weeks ago, the SPLC's anti-white agenda in the new documentary on Netflix about the alt right, it shows Mark Potok's office on the wall is a note where it says US population, and it shows it going down from 90% in the 50s all the way down to 62%, and then like w what what is that but like a psychopathic serial killer like obsession of trying to erase white people?
	And there was an old presentation I I got a clip of in the video where they go, like, yeah, this has been planned for a long time.
	It's like what's going on here.
	I mean, that just settles the whole thing of what it is that the goal of the SPLC is because every policy, everything they talk about, everything that they bring attention to, everything that they highlight and write articles about is effectively about shutting down white people's ability to demonstrate and to show people what it is that's happening and what it is that they're doing, right?
	They're using this organization as a means to make sure that we won't fight back, that we will lay down and and be removed from the the his the stage of history, if you will, without ever have putting up a fight, right?
	That that's what it is, that's what it's about.
	And and an article like that or article, a note like that completely, completely demonstrates what the agenda is and what the goal is, right?
	It's to make sure that white people become a minority.
	And why?
	Well, because there's ethnic interests that want to make sure that white people are removed as a potential competitor as a uh as a pesky opposer to the kind of policies that they want to bring into the future.
	I I think they're they're there there's many layers to it, but I think at the end of the day, I think that the people who are pulling the strings and whatnot, uh, they do see white people as an as an obstacle to this plan.
	They they see I know that they see most racial gr uh di differences as that, but they they are prioritizing white people.
	If they manage to remove whites, yes, then they might go move on to you know try to merge Asians with like Africans or something.
	Who knows, right?
	And that could very well be.
	But right now, it it's it's we that are being targeted 100%.
	And I hope that all the other racial groups out there can see this.
	They can actually put their prejudice to the side and see what it is that's happening and join us in the fight, because if we are removed, well, they're gonna come to come for you next, right?
	I mean, the globalists want to homogenize the population.
	They want to make sure we're all we all look the same, sound the same, think the same, behave the same.
	It will basically make us a algorithmic pro uh have no diversity manageable uh programmable species.
	No diversity, exactly zero, right?
	So they notice how it's a flip all the time.
	It's it's everything's flipped on his head.
	They they say it's diversity, diversity, diversity, and then what the end result is that they want is monoculture, right?
	So it's it's always flipped, whatever they call for and and say it's almost always the opposite to it.
	It's just standard projection, you know.
	Well well, you know, I I had noticed on these videos that I do this one about the SPLC and about black Klansmen, you know.
	I'm saying, like, you know, who why are these people trying to get everybody riled up with one another?
	And um, I get a lot of support from minorities actually.
	I have uh Muslims, Arabs, Mexicans, Asians, all types of people that they understand.
	We do too.
	Yeah, and they say it in the comments like I'm a black man, and I go check the thumbnail, it's a real real account, and he goes, I see what's going on, this is wrong.
	And then I did the video about uh who's behind behind the hip hop industry, and they just love that too.
	They're like, Thank you for this.
	Like, you know, the people that really helped wreck uh black culture and with the all the cocaine and then you know the degenerate rap music.
	You know, they understand that we're all under attack and we have some common enemies.
	Absolutely, yeah, but it's very difficult.
	I mean, in most cases, um that's why I think organizations like the SPLC and media and stuff like that, that like that they like turning things into just a black and a white issue.
	It's always we can talk about immigration.
	I can talk about Islamic immigration or like a uh an Arab population coming into Sweden as a problem.
	Somehow the media obviously spins it there like I hate black people, like they'll always like turn it back to that.
	It's almost like it always that's the default base position, right?
	And they try to utilize that.
	In ultimately black clansmen, they had a ton of not just black and white uh division, but a lot of Jewish propaganda in there as well.
	Yeah, I'm not surprised.
	I mean, Spike Lee is totally bought and paid for.
	He's uh he is a if anybody is a race baiter, it's it's definitely that guy.
	But again, he knows who pays his his bills, he knows who's the producer, he knows who's funds funds this stuff, right?
	And they don't view themselves as white.
	Um it's ethnic warfare.
	Uh it's propaganda and information warfare, and it's ultimately designed to um to to perform genocide against a specific group.
	That's how I see it.
	Right.
	Do you think Trump is gonna last question?
	I know uh you've we've both had long days, we're gonna end it in an hour.
	But last question do you think Trump is gonna step in and do anything to the tech companies or to do anything about this censorship?
	And why the hell hasn't he done it already?
	You know, his buddy uh Alex Jones had had this trouble.
	It's it's so clear in the media with uh I mean it seems like all the Zionists are getting taken down at this point.
	Why won't he do anything?
	And and when he does, is this like Hegelian dialectic, it's actually gonna end up we're the ones that are gonna suffer from it, and then he's gonna save the Zionists and just all the anti-Semites are gonna be left out to dry, because Trump Trump administration is all over the anti-Semitism stuff right now.
	Yeah, that's actually a really good point.
	And and it could be that's uh somehow at the end that there's uh um you know, as they say, two steps forward, one back, right?
	Uh and so when they take that one step back, that you know, the only the selected people will be included in that step back, and people will believe, oh great, we solved it, it's all fine now.
	Or or maybe I mean at some point there is going to be a class action lawsuit.
	Um it's just a matter of time.
	Um but I think it's going to come from people that have um you know ha have the means at their uh at their disposal.
	Uh sure, class action law lawsuits can include a lot of people, but let's say let's say that Breitbart and uh you know uh the Blaze wire, the Blaze, uh Gateway pundit, and all these media companies go together, right, to sue um to sue Facebook and YouTube, uh Twitter, or you know, something like that.
	They will never include us in that, right?
	They will never they will never touch us, they will never recognize that we ever have were censored by them as well, right?
	So it's this exclusionary, and it's fine, they could do whatever the hell they want.
	It's not that it's not we're gonna whine about it or whatever.
	Uh, but in many regards, these people are close enough to the establishment.
	As I said before, they get enough play in the mainstream, and in many cases, not even that uh negatively, you know, they get enough play so that people know that they're there as the acceptable uh go-to solution to vent if you're critical of the system, right?
	They're they're effectively building up a new mainstream media uh uh right now.
	And of course, we we want to be part of that.
	We want to try to uh you know be up there and and and share the the news with the world and and see explain how we see things.
	Uh but it it is a little tight-knit community of these koshervatives, and it's like it's the secret agreement that they never touch on anybody that uh talk about the forbid the real forbidden things, but they they sure kove about censorship and that we're being suppressed and all this stuff, uh, but they won't recognize people that are further down the wrong than them.
	And and my point has always been I'm fine, I'm fine with them being there.
	I'm I'm fine with uh highlighting this for people uh when when they get censored.
	I'm there to back these people up, I'm there to uh call to talk about how outrageous it is and all that kind of stuff, right?
	But they will never extend that olives branch back to us, you know what I mean?
	And that's that's this.
	Well, they want to censor a bunch of Zionists that connected to Alex Jones were the behind getting me suspended for two weeks uh last month.
	Yeah, you know, and and Cernovich and all these big Zionists saw what was going on when that happened.
	Nobody stepped up and said, Hey, this is wrong, this is stupid, this is hypocritical, but then now they're crying that Jacob Wall got suspended.
	So I've got no sympathy.
	One last thing, Joe Rogan uh in Alex Jones was just on Joe Rogan.
	He said the first time, my theory that the right is using the censor the right is convincing the left to censor Alex Jones to usher in censorship.
	And he called it the blue buds, uh the Joe Joe Rogan said this.
	Alex Jones said this that he thinks the right, the blue blood Republicans, the old guard, I think is the quote he used, are using the left, convincing the left who is usually more free speech.
	I guess that's what that's what he said.
	I don't know if that's true.
	But um to start ushering in the censorship calling for it.
	So after him.
	A false flag to use him as the beta test to bring in the new censorship, like exactly what I've been saying.
	And Glenn Beck just had Crowder on crying that his live stream of the Oscars got taken down.
	But they don't ever say anything about what?
	He's right to complain, though.
	I mean, that's absolutely right.
	I I again I agree with him there.
	He it's it's outrageous the fact that he was he had a super successful stream on YouTube, a lot of people are watching it, they're laughing at this stuff, they're making fun of it.
	Uh it's beautiful, right?
	But then he gets hit with a copyright strike.
	It's outrageous, you know.
	It's outrageous, but it's also outrageous that they only talk about when conservatives are sensitive.
	Uh uh.
	But they don't ever talk about when they want the Zionists and the anti-Semites to be kicked off, though.
	So they're they're hypocrites and both sides are hypocrites.
	They are.
	They are.
	Um we're the only true free speech uh advocates here, it seems like, you know, when push comes to shelving it well when it comes down to it.
	And these people are so pathetic and childish too.
	They they actually cannot debate you on the issues or actually talk about the facts.
	They're like emotional little girls that just run away screaming if you if you've uh talked about something that they don't like.
	It's just pathetic, uh, to be honest.
	But uh one last thing that you mentioned I want to comment on is I I think Trump is not going to do anything.
	Uh it's just it's not gonna happen.
	His presidency is over.
	The thing that I was excited about when it came to uh his presidency was the the you know the the criticism of the kind of the PC culture, and sure he only went so far, but it was good.
	It helped to break things up a little bit.
	That that that was one thing that was like it was fun, it was more fun.
	Let me put it that way.
	It's much more fun than all these other Normal regular politicians and stuff like that.
	But all the things that I thought would come in the wake of it hasn't happened.
	He he he has put Israel first.
	A lot of things have happened for them, which is good for them.
	But ultimately, we don't have a wall.
	We have no change in the immigration policy.
	And I think he's going to say nothing about these tech companies.
	Because either one, he's controlled by the ball.
	Someone uh threatened him along the way, and he found out who the real boss is, and he knows he'd better count out to them.
	Or this was the plan to begin with.
	It was uh all fake and phony, and they they did it uh to get people to vote for him and at the same time discredit the whole mainstream media establishment to try to build something new out of the ashes of that and have a new kind of uh uh conservative uh right wing wave that's going to rise in opposition to that, but again, that wave is just gonna go so far, you know.
	I don't know.
	It could be either one of those two, but nonetheless, uh Trump is not going to do anything.
	Uh we can't look to him for uh for any kind of a help at this point.
	Would would you would we even want him to do anything?
	Or like it could be that all of this was planned all along and that this was scripted and that like now that now the conservatives are cheering for him to step in and do something, and then that's gonna be what you know ends up uh being the downfall of all of all of us.
	But I believe I just said that a second ago.
	Yeah, you can so it would be like uh he he goes in and and and like establishes like okay, you can't do this, but but but but if you talk about this, yeah, then it's okay, then you can remove them, right?
	You you talk about he might manage to kind of lock down the uh I mean we can't talk about it now anyway, so I guess it doesn't matter, but it but it might uh set in stone the things that you can talk about and and really exclude all the other other stuff, maybe or something.
	Right.
	Time will tell.
	Time will tell.
	It's definitely crazy.
	A lot of news happening.
	I'm sure you've been real busy.
	You you've been doing a great job.
	I was happy to see that you guys did the video with Lana.
	The Lana green screens are so powerful.
	It had been a while.
	I was wondering when you're coming out with another one, so I was glad to see that.
	It took me way too long to do those, Adam.
	Jesus.
	It's it's uh it's frustrating, but it's it's a lot of fun, don't get me wrong.
	But it's uh time-wise, Jesus.
	It it's you know how how hard it is to work with video and how long it takes.
	Um but it's worth it.
	Well, look at the views, it's already doing much better than than the average the average views.
	So uh those are the ones that that really make a difference, and you know it's making a different difference because you got the haters out there trying to shut you down.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	Well, thank you, Adam.
	Really appreciate that.
	Yeah, thanks for coming on, Henrik.
	Henrik from Red Ice.
	Uh oops, not that one.
	What's your what's your uh Red Ice TV?
	Make sure to follow everywhere.
	You're close to uh 300K.
	Hope you make it before uh right wing watch has their way with you and the and PayPal and all that.
	But uh thanks for coming on, Henrik.
	Everyone, thanks for watching.
	I'm Adam Green with No More News.

▲