Dan and Jordan of Knowledge Fight dissect Alex Jones' March 3, 2026 broadcast, critiquing his misinformation on Iran's "Council of 12" and his alignment with Congressman Eric Burleson regarding Epstein files. They challenge Tucker Carlson's narrative blaming Netanyahu for the conflict while exposing Kirk Elliott Precious Metals as a fraud exploiting global chaos. The episode culminates in a heated debate between Jones and Nick Fuentes over voting Democrat to stop Trump, where Jones admits feeling like a child seeking comfort from a "baby Nazi" amidst fears of World War III, highlighting the absurdity of his political delusions. [Automatically generated summary]
I like a good complicated mechanic that never comes into play.
I love the idea of having the Billie Eilish boomerang idol, and then it's just like, and okay, well, now we didn't really use it in any boomerang fashion.
And episode 1100 mentions wearing shoes while recording.
So I demand to know if you're from one of those strange places where people wear shoes indoors all the time or if you record in a strange mudroom/slash studio combo.
You mean you do not want to be around me, but you in this situation are the person who is not wearing shoes, as opposed to you don't want to be around me in case I'm not wearing shoes.
So Alex goes on to say, like, there's layers of complexity to this, and that's just not true.
I'll grant that there are a ton of headlines coming out and news items about various attacks happening in a bunch of countries, but I think that none of that should matter for Alex.
In InfoWars terms, this situation is so fucking simple.
We're in a planetary crisis because of the war that's been launched with Iran.
This is how Alex decided to put it and how he opened the show.
So let's imagine for a second that's what he actually means.
If we're in a planetary crisis because of the war with Iran, then we should ask why that war is happening.
Trump and Israel carried out a large-scale attack, which killed the Ayatollah, which seemingly had very little plan of what to do next other than keep bombing stuff.
Before he attacked Iran, there was a relative calm, or at very least, we weren't in a planetary crisis.
So Trump's actions led us to this point.
To accept this conclusion, Alex would need to recognize that his fervent support for Trump, his blind support for every tyrannical thing his administration has done, the way he sold the audience empty promises just meant to expand Trump's ability to act as a dictator, all of that are all essential pieces of how we were brought to a planetary crisis.
Alex cried on air about how he would die for Trump, and that has led to a planetary crisis.
So maybe Alex has terrible instincts, or even worse, wants a planetary crisis.
This is why there are tons of layers of complexity, and Alex can't just look at this story as it is.
If he did, he'd have to call himself a fucking idiot for getting played by the world's most obvious con man because he liked how that con man didn't seem to mind people using slurs.
The reason there needs to be complexity now is that Alex can't deny that there's a planetary crisis.
The audience would never accept that.
So he needs to work around that reality.
Thankfully, the government is helping provide some talking points with folks like Marco Rubio coming out and saying that it was a matter of hitting Iran before they hit us.
By adding this piece to the puzzle, you can say that we were in a planetary crisis before Trump launched the attack, and it was just a matter of gaining the first move advantage in a war that was inevitable.
Trump didn't cause the planetary crisis.
He just accurately assessed that one was already happening and gave America the best chance of coming out on top.
This is an angle that Alex can try and use, but it's also paper thin.
And anyone who lived through the Iraq war era would remember Alex basing his career on rejecting these kinds of rationalizations for preemptive attacks that start sprawling wars.
There's a lot of complexity for Alex, not because the question is actually complicated, but because it's hard to tell which of these angles is going to be viable.
If he had any spine at all, he would have left Trump already and started calling for his impeachment long ago.
So it's important to understand that his primary question is, what story works best for me?
Can he use this as a breaking point with Trump without torpedoing his own credibility in the process?
Or can he come up with some narrative about how Trump was right to launch the war without losing all of the anti-war people within the audience that he's built?
It's a very difficult spot for Alex to be in, but thankfully his audience is kind of dumb and probably won't notice that he's going to do both and neither simultaneously.
I mean, I suppose it is complex for a very small group of people who get to make all the decisions, but because they suck so hard, it feels very simple for everybody else on the planet.
And they're just being like, oh, these guys got to get out of here, man.
The idea of Mark, the idea of somebody being like, oh, well, we had to hit him before Iran launched a strike on a thousand mile away country that does not come anywhere near them.
The number of small towns, my small town growing up, the number of people being like, you got to be ready.
They might be coming for us.
It should never happen again.
Of all the things that we should never forget, we should never forget some asshole in fucking some tiny town somewhere being like, oh man, they're coming for me.
And I think it's very important, especially for new listeners and viewers to understand that I will watermark this broadcast verbally, every five minutes or so, explaining that my view is this, and I was against this war.
But then I will walk through the Iranians' perspective, the Chinese perspection, the Arab perspective.
Israel, that's what I do.
And what a lot of corporate media and others do is they pick little pieces out of the show and claim this is what Jones thinks when I'm giving an Israeli perspective or an Iranian perspective or a Chinese perspective.
And that's part of the clickbait mental illness that's even more dangerous than AI deepfakes.
It's really one of the tactics that's flooding the internet with so much confusion.
From this point, Alex does not continue to watermark the show in any way at all.
He is totally right about this clickbait mental illness thing, though.
The only issue is that he's part of a media ecosystem that literally only exists because they exploit that.
All of his documentaries are largely based on taking quotes and video out of context in order to make people think they're saying something that they're not.
As someone who observes this kind of media, I do also think that Alex is right about some of the coverage that he gets from various outlets.
It's a very common thing for some meme to be going around of Alex saying something, and it's just being presented to make him look bad and it's entirely out of context.
That does happen.
There's an interesting dynamic with Alex himself, though, which is that I've seen plenty of times when someone's done him dirty with an out-of-context clip, but I've never really seen an instance of that where Alex hasn't said the same thing or worse in context at some other time.
The headline that Alex skimmed and is now incorrectly reporting on is that Israel bombed the building that houses the Assembly of Experts, which likely was an attempt to stop them from being able to name a successor.
Well, we got this Iran war expanding and spiraling and metastasizing.
We'll be getting to that in great detail today.
What it's doing in the markets, they just took out a whole bunch of the Mulas Council trying to elect a new Sauron.
But I wanted to get Representative Eric Burleson to pop in because I know he was in both the hearings and the depositions of Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton.
And it's obviously one thing a few days later to see video of it, but to be there in person to see the behind-the-scenes stuff and to see Hillary acting like she knows nothing about Ghislaine Maxwell or anybody after 2008, even though she was at her daughter's wedding and so much more after that.
We know they were heavily involved in their foundation and then the founding of it.
And I think Hillary's really committed perjury here.
If we're in a zombie outbreak, right, and I'm at a hospital and I'm charged with doing triage and somebody comes in and they're like, ah, I got a nail in my hand.
I'm like, that is really terrible.
But you're going to have to wait.
You're going to have to wait for a while because there's a lot of zombies around and they need to be handled first.
Because we got a nice confidence act from Hillary and Bill.
You know, her laughing at, oh, there's no connections to us in Pizzagate.
They divert off this pizza place that the media did.
They created a story about the pizza place, not the WikiLeaks where they say to John Podesta, and it's a woman that ran a service where you could rent kids just for fun.
Blurred Lines Between Politics and Propaganda00:15:10
I mean, it literally says that on her side, it doesn't say for what.
And she said, we're delivering seven, her name, nine seven-year-old children to the wooded facility, a retreat log cabin.
There's a hot tub by the pool.
They'll be there at this time in the pool in the hot tub for your entertainment.
But remember, they're well-trained, but they are children.
I mean, and there's hundreds of those.
These are real.
And she just acted like she doesn't know.
And I noticed that whoever was asked the question at that time started to go there.
And I could see Hillary, even though she puts on that, you know, act that she's confident, getting really scared right there because that's smoking gun stuff.
What are seven-year-olds being delivered by Uber to the woods to John Podesta for his entertainment?
And if you understand what he's doing here, it makes total sense.
This is a power test that Alex is giving his guest.
They haven't spoken before, and this guy's in Congress.
So Alex doesn't fully know if he can big dog him.
But this is a good way to find out.
Alex is making up all kinds of details about a person who rents kids, and the test is to see if the representative will play along.
If he nods along with Alex telling this story, then Alex can be pretty confident that this guy has no interest in reporting accurate stories and is willing to yes-and whatever nonsense Alex throws out.
Alex is testing the waters to see if he can lie freely with this guy.
If you don't push back on that story, then you're either insane or you're clearly indicating that you'll take on a submissive role in this role play of InfoWars pretending to be a news show.
I mean, theoretically, we have the possibility of human beings in power who would be like, regardless of my political affiliation, it is unbecoming of you to speak of such people in such a manner, right?
That's possible.
Or at the very least, he could be like, try not being insane.
You know, but this one, him just being like, hey, Podesta's crazy, right?
I mean, Podesta was another individual that did come up.
But he, look, there's so many people that are connected to the Clintons.
And frankly, Hillary had amnesia on almost every connection and every interaction.
So she distanced herself from quite a lot of it.
In fact, she seemed to be living her life in such a way that everything revolves around her and she doesn't really pay much attention to what's happening in the lives of the people around her.
In fact, I asked the question, you know, I mean, one would think that she cares about her daughter.
Her daughter was traveling with Ghelaine Maxwell and traveling with Jeffrey Epstein.
They were at the wedding at Morocco, the famous wedding where Bill was in likely that's the location where he's in the hot tub.
And she was only 21 years old at that time.
Well, that would put her in an age that would make her potentially a victim.
And so I'd ask Hillary, did you ever consider that Chelsea might have been a victim?
And did you ask her questions?
Now that you know, well, she refused to really answer that question.
She really fell back on that she, you know, all of this happened at a time when she was not involved, did not have a relationship, and she had no idea what was going on.
This guy who's a member of Congress is creating a fantasy about Chelsea Clinton being abused by Epstein and Maxwell and then asking Hillary about it in a deposition.
Then he's going on a dipshits radio show to complain about how Hillary didn't seem concerned about that possibility that he invented enough.
These people are fucking clowns and this kind of shit makes a mockery of what's actually, you know, it means to care about a subject like this.
Do you think your daughter was abused by Epstein?
Isn't like a random question that it's appropriate for a congressperson to ask someone unless that person is specifically there to talk about that possibility.
If that is the premise of the deposition, then it makes sense.
There's no reason that this guy would ask Hillary that question except to try to piss her off or to get a disappointing reaction from her that he can try and weaponize on media and social media later.
And there's no reason to think that someone who believes themselves to be capable of holding public office wouldn't understand that.
Beyond the horrifying ghoulishness to remove all of that out of the way, which is so much.
Even then, it's like, okay, so you've painted her as the most powerful person in the world who can fucking destroy everything, while at the same time, her daughter is at risk at all times.
And then we get all the Epstein files, and I've literally seen 500 of them where it says things like delivering the sex slave to the Hyatt, had to beat up the sex slave later, didn't carry out the mission right, did carry out the mission right.
We got one piece of pizza that's glowing and really you're going to enjoy it.
It's really loving.
But at 70, you're going to have to share it and slicely, you know, thinly slice it on where we women.
Well, you bought my baby.
Do you want to buy more?
And real Epstein emails.
And we got Kash Patel saying there's nothing to investigate.
I think that's one thing that's really pissed off constituents.
I already studied Trump, already knew all about him, already knew the socialites.
I knew Trump had nothing to do with underage girls, very little to do with Epstein except being fellow socialites in New York and Florida.
And so just overall, there have been some Republicans that have been really pushing and doing a great job, I think.
And I think the administration has unduly demonized them for wanting to get to the bottom of this where they're just being moral and doing what their constituents want.
You know, it's like when it's such relativity, you know, whenever people have adjusted their baseline to where it's like, oh, that's not even, don't even worry about that.
He's just demonizing people who are looking into something.
He's just trying to make sure that people who are investigating something are hated by all, you know, and so he's using his power to make people hate him.
I think that we have way too much confidence in the FBI and the Department of Justice and their ability to pull this off and to do a thorough investigation.
I mean, the longer that the physics, the more that I'm convinced that government is not the answer to our problems.
I really think that getting these documents released, I hope that your listening audience and people that can dedicate time to this are going to do the job that the government has no desire to do, really.
Like, I get people not believing in the government's ability to get things done, but it's wild to hear this kind of thing coming from someone who's an elected politician and is literally one of the government bureaucrats that he's complaining about.
This guy, Eric Burleson, has only been in Congress on the federal level since 2023, but he's been in the Missouri Congress since 2009.
He's new to the federal level of political bureaucracy, but he's a longtime government person.
He's not like freshly realizing that, oh my God, things are slow.
His position seems downright cynical, where he's like, well, the government can't hold child traffickers accountable, so hopefully we can release a bunch of documents and then vigilantes can do the rest.
That's what someone in Congress is saying, which should help make clear how blurred the line is between government official and online shit talker.
Because here's the deal.
When Eric was trying to get elected, you can bet he didn't try to appeal to voters this way.
He didn't try to get into Congress based on a we can't do anything platform.
In fact, his election website says, quote, I have experience identifying holes in our system and working quickly to fix them.
As President Trump fought election integrity at the national level, I battled it on the state level by spearheading legislation to clean up rampant initiative petitions and referendums.
He literally says, quote, I'm proud of my record, but now I'm taking the fight for freedom to D.C. I'm going to Washington to clean house.
I say this as a podcaster and as a fellow Missourian.
I mean, on the other hand, he has been elected many times in Missouri before.
So it wouldn't surprise me if everybody already knew that he was a gigantic piece of shit and that they want him to be there to say stuff like, I can't help you.
But the Justice Department made it we can only search 10 items at a time, both in the public database and the one that Congress can see, and broke the links and the photos, videos, though we found a way to find them.
So it's the searchability function.
When I've talked to IT people, it's done on purpose to limit it to 10.
It makes it easier for the database actually to search at all, just like Google does.
So they're deliberately making it hard to search, which again, who runs around the FBI's security parameters and all their computers?
The claim that Alex is making there is that Ghelane Maxwell's sister ran, quote, the security parameters and all the FBI's computers, which is another power test for this guest.
If he believes Alex, then Alex can say anything.
He probably isn't going to push back because realistically, what is Alex even saying?
The first question that you need to ask is, which sister is Alex talking about?
Robert Maxwell had nine children, and Ghelane wasn't the only daughter.
It's most likely that Alex is talking about her two sisters, Isabel and Christine, who founded an early search engine called Magellan in 1993, which was then bought by Excite in 1996.
This is an interesting piece of information, but does that justify and back up Alex's claim at all?
So there were a bunch of memes going around dipshit social media last week that claimed that Isabel Maxwell ran Amber Alerts or the program that sends out warnings about missing children.
This was not true, and it was likely based on a confusion of a company called Comtech, which is involved with Amber Alerts, and one called ComTouch, which is not, but is connected to Isabel and is a British cybersecurity company.
Anyway, this congressman has just flipped over to Alex and shown his little belly, clearly messaging to him that his mind is ready to be blown by whatever not true but exciting thing Alex wants to tell him.
Did you know that Ghillain Maxwell's sister ran all the security parameters of the FBI?
Yeah, there's now talk of, we know there's special ops there, but actual ground invasion is on the table.
I mean, I know Trump wants to leave it on the table so they don't underestimate us, but obviously Congress will need to vote on this if we're going to have a ground invasion.
We can say some of it might not be right, y'all have our opinions.
But this is definitely in his perspective America first.
So is Venezuela.
It's destroying the old globalist order.
We're acting unilaterally, which we should as a nation in our interest.
And so I had grave concerns as the founder of Blackwater did, and even the chairman of the Joint Chief said there's a lot of downsides to roll the dice.
I think the president did this from a place of thinking it's the right thing to do.
But I agree now that this has happened, I hope the regime falls quickly, or we realize they're not going to fall and pull back quickly.
Or Congress votes and we go to the American people.
He should go to the American people.
Maybe he should do a poll and see what they want.
But it's definitely a historic moment.
And indefinitely, he has destroyed the old globalist order.
They might disagree with what Trump's doing, but that's just because they're misinterpreting what he's doing and they don't understand how it helps America.
See, I think that his behavior and what you're describing wouldn't look that different because there's a chance that he actually just doesn't want to pee on that table.
That's the easy W. Right now, I want to just say that I 100% agree with Tucker Carlson that Benjamin Netanyahu, who's been in power 25 plus years, he's out of control.
He's super unpopular.
And he is manipulating us into all of this.
And it's as I said over the weekend.
I said Saturday.
Notice Israel struck first during the day.
The U.S. never attacks during the day in these things in a major operation.
And clearly, they precipitated and jumped the gun to force us into it.
In fact, have the archivists find that, please, from Saturday.
So this is a great dodge for Alex and Tucker, but it's not really real.
The idea for the folks like Alex and Tucker, who they can see the writing on the wall and they know that they've overcommitted to Trump is that they need a scapegoat.
Attacking Iran and starting this war is definitely something that Trump did.
But Israel and Netanyahu forced him to.
That's the angle that Alex thinks is going to fly and the position that he's doubling down on with Tucker.
Unfortunately, Trump held a press conference and literally said, quote, based on the way the negotiation was going, I thought they were going to attack first.
If anything, I might have forced Israel's hand.
So I guess we're now in a position where Trump is a liar or I mean, it's nice of him to handle this stuff for us.
Clearly, like Eric Prince warned and the choice staff had Kane said, this is murky water.
And I remember growing up, my dad would tell me, hey, your friends someday will take you out in the woods and a river or a creek or the beach, and there'll be people jumping off cliffs in the water and stuff.
And if you can't see the bottom and you haven't gone and checked, don't jump off because your foot broke his back and my brother broke his leg.
And you're hearing this when you're five years old.
Okay, dad, okay.
Then all of a sudden you're 14 years old with older kids and the kid jumps off and compound fractures jumps into murky water.
In fact, what makes it such an apt comparison is that there are any number of choices that Trump could have made, even within the metaphor, that would be bad, but would still be better than putting one's dick in a hole.
And by the way, I forgot to bring this up with you.
I wanted to get you on about Tucker Carlson, who I agree with, exposing these gold companies, ripping people off.
We've said exactly the same thing, and we've explained, though, I watched his documentary, it's great, but it makes it so technical.
It's very simple.
If someone's selling you gold at wholesale price, you can check the price and know you're getting the best deal.
That's what Elliot does.
It's so simple to just explain this.
Anybody can verify it instead of going through a huge breakdown of it.
But hopefully, in the next few days, you'll come on and do the deep dive on that molar part of his documentary and get your take on it because you've been harping on this.
But that's a separate issue being our sponsor.
You're also an economist and a really smart guy.
As you warned, they would probably close the straight over moose.
It has been closed by the insurance companies just by attacks on ships, some of which have been damaged and sunk.
So, what's happening in the markets, obviously, the stock market's way down, gold and silver way down.
But as you predicted a month ago, when they drove silver down, it would just bounce back up.
I believe that this is going to bounce way back because of all the fundamentals.
So, Dr. Elliott, a lot to hit here.
You're with Kirk Elliott Precious Metals, the largest silver and gold broker in the U.S. because you have the highest ratings, the best prices, and best service.
KAPM.com forward slash gold, 720-605-3900.
And as you told folks two weeks ago, we believe this is a buying opportunity when they artificially drove down silver with naked shorting.
You know, it's interesting how I can't remember Alex ever having Kirk Elliott on and saying that it was a sell-off opportunity.
They can pretend that he's a straight-up gold salesman who's just looking out for you as a customer, but it really does feel like every time he's on, it's a buying opportunity.
Yeah, you can tell how stagnant the customer pool is becoming for folks like Alex and Kirk when a huge part of their marketing strategy has to be: we're not like those other scam gold businesses.
Yep, they aren't getting enough new gullible eyes on their shit, and too many people have been burned by their scams or know people who have been burned.
So, their advertising requires defensiveness, and that's a bad sign.
And to be clear, I'm agnostic on precious metals as a thing to invest in.
It seems like the sort of thing where almost everyone is scamming people, but there are probably some companies that aren't a scam.
As Alex likes to say, you can judge a tree by its fruits.
And as far as Alex's fruits are concerned with his past gold sponsors, we can say indisputably that he has no problem working for and promoting someone who's actively defrauding customers.
If he could base his career on working with Midas Resources, there's no reason to think that he would demand the people he work with now be above board.
But it is legal for you to buy gold from them and for them not to buy it until maybe the price goes down a little bit and then they buy that gold and they pocket the difference.
And when you hear a pitch like that, it makes you start to hear the things that Alex is saying in a way that's like, oh, you make more money when there's trouble.
I'm about to lay out the latest developments in really this new world war we're in.
And I said that over a year ago.
I was the first to say it, and now they've had the big war planners in Europe, in Russia, in China, in the U.S. basically say we're in a new world war.
And I want to explain what this new world war is.
In the CIA's own documents, their own war games, they called the Cold War World War III.
So you remember that time whenever America dropped a bomb and instantly vaporized like 50,000 people.
And then we're like, well, we got to do that again.
And then they instantly vaporized like another 50,000 people.
And then we spent the next 80 years making those instant vaporization weapons so much stronger.
And now that we have reached the probability of one of those used, you saying that means that you and I are going to watch millions of people instantly disappear.
I have to fight every instinct of self-preservation I've got because if you panic and run, it's like the pain induction box test in Dune, the novel, also in the film.
An animal will pull its hand out of a box if it's being massive pain.
But a human can control itself if it is a human and just cut it off and just say it doesn't matter.
And just understand that that's not real.
And that's where we are right now.
The only way to win this game is not to play.
And you've got all these factions that want to attack Trump just because he's Trump over the war.
And all the other factions want to say you're a traitor if you don't support total war.
There's a major tug of war in the administration over this war.
You know, actual gambler like roulette, poker, blackjack, slot machines.
But I mean, I've gone and done it to see what it's like here and there.
I probably gambled like 10 times in Vegas, a few times on cruise ships.
You spend a little bit of money.
You decide I'm going to spend this much.
You go do it.
And then a few times, you know, my wife's winning, or I start winning, and I'm like, you know what?
I just won $2,000 above what I've done.
But These 20 degenerate gamblers, it's when they're down that they double down and go mortgage the house or whatever.
And it's just you don't gamble with other people's lives.
And I know we put Trump in to be bold, but he said they all said JD Vance said, Telsey Gabbard said, they all said, We don't want regime change in Iran.
And vote for us and we won't do that.
And then they did it.
So it's just one more thing broken.
And it is Israel that's driving the bus here.
Nick Foyne says, joined us in about 20 minutes from now.
Yeah, you know, I think a lot of people historically who've been given visions and messages from God, whenever they were in their darkest times and it looked like the messages weren't shaking out right, God would be like, hey, don't worry about it.
This sucks right now, but we're getting to a better place in the end.
It feels like Alex's God is kind of more like, Niener, Niener, Niener.
But I wouldn't turn my back on him, if you know what I mean.
But he came out and then said, no, Israel decided to strike, and then without our authorization, but we knew they were going to hit us right after that because we gave them the weapons.
So we went ahead and we joined in.
And what he was doing was saying, hey, we didn't start this.
It's Israel.
And we already know that.
So that's a big deal.
And we got drug into this.
And now there's major heat over that.
So Trump's doing damage control because Trump always wants to be in charge.
But I, okay, I wasn't going to release this information.
And you think, you know, he's the best thing since slice bread.
It's not right to have a foreign government and foreign power that we've allied with, that we give money and weapons to, that has pissed off the Pentagon so bad that they came out and said, not just them, but the Pentagon as well, no, Israel hit them before we knew, so we had to go in.
And Marco Rubio said it multiple times.
And then the damage control, oh, no, the Israel lobby, that's not right.
And Trump goes, yeah, that's not right.
I'm the boss.
I made the call.
Israel just punked our president.
And how does this affect JD Vance?
Very smart.
Stood up for me when he wasn't even a senator running for office, saying it was wrong.
I was de-platformed when nobody else would.
I've met him.
I've talked to him.
Very smart.
He would make a great president over Gavin Newsom.
And that's really what we should be thinking about: the midterms and the presidential election.
I find myself in the same situation that I've been in so often, which is whenever somebody tells me that we need to really fucking forget what's happening right now and focus on the midterms, I know I'm being fucked.
This should be the freedom that you get right now whenever everybody else is like, oh, I'm trying to figure out why I voted for Trump now that he's doing stuff that I don't.
Now you have Thomas Massey, who has transcended party lines with his dogged insistence on releasing the Epstein files and probably will be a bit against the war in Iran.
And it is the low-IQ attacks on Jews in Israel because Jews aren't one month with a group that fosters much of this because the average Jew is an evil or corruptor involved in some evil thing.
And then when they see all this craziness and all this wild-eyedness, the social engineers over in Israel use that to get Jews, a lot of which are wealthy, to empower the Jewish globalist mind control mafia, whatever you want to call it.
You know, something that's incredibly arm for control.
Whereas I just want a big tent for everybody.
I mean, I absolutely want to recruit all the Jews over to populism and freedom and team humanity.
I mean, I listen to Bob Dylan's songs and read his writings and agree with 99% of it, not the people that know Bob Dylan behind the scenes.
Wait, And, you know, he becomes a Christian in the 80s.
He becomes an anti-globalist in the early 90s.
Then he decides it's all bull, becomes a liberal again, now becomes a conservative again.
You know, it's like, I want the Jews on Team Humanity.
Like, I guess there were other times where you could be like, ah, maybe we have differences, but we can still create stuff because I also don't like the capital gains tax or something like that.
And sociologically, I can look at that and say the only way to beat the Antichrist system is true, decentralized, personal relationship with Jesus Christ, not through the megachurch, not through the Vatican.
Individual relationship with Christ.
And what does the globalists want to shut down?
Small churches, individuals.
They hate real Christianity.
The Muslims do, everybody, because it's the answer.
God gave us the plan.
It's real.
And now as I've gotten older and I'm literally given prophetic understanding of the future, I realize God gives us free will, but he cheats.
And I don't mean that in a cheat-cheat way, but he puts us into a combat zone and gives us a boot camp and an instruction manual and tells us the rules.
Like a video game, you know, you can have the cheat file on how to be invincible.
And what's crazy is God puts us in here and goes, look, I gave you free will, but here's the cheat file.
And we say, ah, listen to what you say, including myself, because I always catch myself, I've got to be strong.
I've got to beat the New World Order.
But when I just lay back and go, no, you got to do it.
Tell me what to do.
And it's just like, and then everything is just calm victory.
And it's because Alex doesn't believe in his own religious shit, or else he would listen.
If you believe that God's given you a cheat code to get around free will and all this shit, where you've turned life into a video game and that God is the one giving you these commands, you're going to listen to him.
When you're on a show where the elephant in the room is that your chosen leader bombed Iran and probably started another Iraq war, you can't be like, haha, I have visions of the future.
Just like it is amazing that there is no governing body for saying absolutely batshit.
But like, you know what I mean?
Like I like if there was, if I was going to create a god, it would just be somebody who like flicked you on the head whenever you said something insane.
Like, there are universities that don't even allow white people.
That is, that is like, you know, like that, that whenever you're leaving information out, it's because you feel like if somebody had that information, they would make a choice that you did not want them to make.
So by leaving that information out, that person will make a choice that you did want them to make, right?
This is the opposite.
This is when you're like, please, I am a baby.
Please give me what I want, or I will cry and be sad.
Again, I want you to quantify before we go to these clips and unpack this and what you think's coming next, what you predict next, how we can stop this.
We already said we can't, but we still got to try.
I think you're right.
I'm about to evacuate South America or something.
That's where all the globalists are going.
But here's my question.
Looking at all of this, is there?
I want you to think about this.
You already said no.
What could we do?
A peaceful demonstration?
I don't know, hang something on our doorway or Liberals will say mass strike.
I don't want to join them in that because you're allowed with Islam.
There's a good way to get Trump off this destructive course we're on and then maybe describe to people as you predict to the future where this course takes us.
Anyway, he, you know, Nick is, I don't know, I don't know if I would do anything different in his position, but it's kind of embarrassing him being on Infowars now.
And I think that both of these interviews that Alex has, both this and with the congressperson, are just, they are bad and they're embarrassing for the other party because Alex is acting in a way that a normal person should be like, this is fucking stupid.
But he has reached basically the end point of where all of this should go for people who are in like Alex's camp, which is like, okay, the fucking outsider renegade candidate is just another illusion.
So I think that anybody, I don't know who would, but anybody who thinks like, hey, Nick wants to vote Democrat, there's some possibility of alliance or there's some possibility of like, it's the same mentality that like the Harris campaign would engage in with Dick Cheney endorsing them.
Well, I mean, it's not as if we've ever seen in the past the Republicans reject somebody and then vote for Democrats, and then the Democrats go, we have to get more Republicans, and then they move further to the right, and then in response, the Republicans go further in the right, and then, wait, wait, wait, that's how we got here.
The only way really to fight back, I think, against this kind of mentality, and I think it would be a fool's errand to do because I think it would blow up in your face.
But if the Nazis are going to go left and vote Democrat, then the left should go very left.
If they're in a position where they're openly talking about sticking it to the GOP with a corrective vote in the midterms, then you need to punish them.
Well, I mean, yeah, the irony of all of it is that the irony of all of this, all of this, is that right now, Nick Fuentes is saying in 1991, we need to vote for Clinton.
No, I well, yes, he deserves more immediate negatives.
Yeah, but I think there's got to be something that's really hard, really hard to deal with for someone who has as much narcissism and pride as him to know that you have supplicated yourself in this way to a child.
Now, when I'm trying to salvage it with people, I get attacked as a liberal, which is when these people doing that don't even can't even find I ran on a fucking map.
If I'm at a playground next week and I'm just like crying, asking a six-year-old to console me, that's about where I feel like we're at on this show right now.