In this installment, Dan and Jordan check in to chronicle Alex's coverage of the ongoing Second American Civil War, and the looming new World War, plus a heartbreaking call from a listener who doesn't want his wife to be deported.
Now, I'm not saying that Owen Schroer enjoys flating roadkill on average, but with those dead eyes and the creepy excuse for a beard, I mean, look at him.
If you were making a movie about a guy who sucks the farts out of dead seagulls, that's what he would look like on record.
But the point is, the left would probably even say that the movie is based on true events.
So we start off this episode, and along with the various things that are going on in domestic affairs and Alex Jones' InfoWars world, there's also a conflict between Iran and Israel.
And President Trump came out again today and said Iran needs to capitulate and sign the deals to get rid of their nuclear weapons program or they are going to face regime change.
As I predicted, Netanyahu is now out saying he wants regime change.
That's the real goal.
And much of the Iranian government, military, and infrastructure is full of Israeli spies.
Now, why is that?
It's because the Shiite hereditary Muhammadan dynasty, it's royalty.
And they got run out of Iraq and Saudi Arabia by the Wahhabists in the last thousand years, and a bunch of them ran to Iran, Persia, and now they've taken over there.
Because that's what they do.
Anywhere you bring Muslims in, they end up taking over if you let them continue to rule.
They always say they're your friend until they're not.
As soon as they hit 10% of the population, they start expanding, attacking.
I don't care if it takes 500 years, they will take your property.
So this is really at the heart of what Alex's position is.
And I think it sometimes can be hard for folks to grasp, particularly because Alex pretends that he's in a war with the literal devil and everything is black and white for him.
So everybody kind of expects a simplicity.
And there's a complexity on the surface to what he's saying, but there's actually a very simple thing behind it.
Israel is a different kind of issue than the black and white stuff for him because there's some people on the extreme right wing who support Zionism and the relationship between the existence of Israel and evangelical Christianity is intertwined.
At the same time, a huge chunk of the extreme right wing are neo-Nazis, some of whom are fine with Israel existing if they can just send all the Jewish people there, while others are more into a final solution and exterminationism.
The world Alex comes from has two different branches with different relationships with Israel, and that's not the case on a lot of issues.
It's okay to be a hardline anti-abortion zealot because there's no community of pro-choice extreme right-wingers.
It's okay to be a fanatic against government regulation because the extreme right is never going to disagree with you there.
On this issue, Alex knows that regardless of what he says, he has a good chance of alienating some of his audience by being too in favor or too against Israel, which is why, for the most part, you don't see him take very strong positions on this.
The thing to understand is that he's not really pro-Israel.
He's not pro-Iran.
He's not even anti-either of these countries.
He just hates Muslims, and he wants to enforce eugenic policies on them.
In recent episodes, he's started to be a little bit more critical of Israel, probably because he can tell that his audience is suspicious of why he hasn't been.
But his position fundamentally hasn't changed.
He doesn't like Israel's actions, but he doesn't like Muslims existing.
The branches of the far-right relationship with us, yeah.
It's very, I think it's difficult territory for Alex to navigate, and that's why it's a very safe position for him to have of like, really what this is about is I hate Muslims.
It's safe for him to say that, given his audience.
So in terms of Israel and Iran fighting with each other, Alex's take on this is kind of surprising, and that is that Iran should just probably give up.
But I'll tell you this, if the Iranian regime is about to fall, Israel does not have the bunker busters, and I mean space-based ones that nobody's ever used, you know of.
If they don't use the DU meteor guns, that's just the technical layman term for it.
This is the effect of a meteor, 35,000 mile an hour.
Decapitation weapons that are meant to kill people in bunkers.
If they don't use those, there's a good chance that Iran's going to be able to get some of those nukes off the ground and into Israel, and then you're going to get a nuclear war.
So when Trump says we may have to get involved, you know the satellites on the ground people are watching all that.
The Israelis haven't been able to get in or take out those mountain bases.
unidentified
The Israelis have been able to get in or take out those mountain bases.
It only lines up more countries against it, which it wants, so it can continue to control the region and hold governments of the world hostage with nuclear war, just like the EU and NATO do with Ukraine.
It's the same system, just different power groups.
So I've been saying earlier in this episode that Alex isn't pro-Israel, and I need to refine what I mean by that.
There are a lot of people who are vocal supporters of the Israeli government and stand by the actions that the country has made.
These people are who I would call pro-Israel.
Alex isn't that, but he's still kind of pro-Israel.
But it's a conditional thing.
He wouldn't be pro-Israel if Trump and Netanyahu were fighting.
But as it stands, the two sides to him are Israel and Muslims.
And Alex really hates Muslims.
What he's saying is a very pro-Israel message, but he's trying to muddy the water to make himself look more reasonable.
He's saying that Iran should just give up because Israel has all this superior weaponry and they're essentially holding the world hostage with the prospect of nuclear war.
Alex is saying, remain a hostage, which seems really weird coming from him.
And then at the end of the clip, he compares this to NATO and Ukraine, where NATO keeps the fight going in Ukraine in order to antagonize Russia to hold the world hostage to possible nuclear war.
This seems like the worst thing Alex could possibly do, because it makes it clear how differently he handles these two situations.
There's zero ambiguity about Alex's support for Russia, and he has no problem picking a side there.
Alex was just invited to speak at a Russian summit about the world in 2050, where he said that the only advice that he had for them was keep it up.
That's supposed to be just another globalist destabilization effort, but it would be impossible to watch this show and think that he's a neutral observer, equally annoyed by NATO and Ukraine as well as Russia.
Alex probably doesn't realize it while he's talking, but by using this as a comparable situation, he's accidentally making it clear how different his positions are on these crises.
Like, he's not telling Russia, give up, submit to the EU and NATO, remain a hostage.
This is a destabilization effort or whatever.
He's actively going and doing like government summits with Sergei Lavrov and shit.
Yeah, like you would imagine, or at least I imagine, a lot of the times you go, I am not necessarily interested in the government's choices so much as the actions that they are taking.
You know, like I don't particularly care who's in the government if the government is killing all these people.
First thing, you got to stop the killing all those people thing, right?
Like if it was a white president of Israel and he was like, hey, guess what?
I think for him, I don't know exactly what the sticking point is, but I think that this whole, it's a globalist distraction meant to create tension and hold people hostage to a nuclear war is a very convenient thing for him to use, and he uses it in both directions.
he doesn't mean any of that.
No, there's not a prescriptive value to it.
In the case of Ukraine and Russia, he supports the side that is antagonizing and possibly could kick off that nuclear war.
Trump has announced it, and he always said he was going to do this, get the hardened criminals first, the human traffickers, the smugglers, the drug dealers, the convicts of armed robbery, murder, and deport them.
But they've got different identities.
They're hiding out.
They're arresting up to 1,000 of them a day.
But Trump knows they're bringing all these illegals to be a permanent underclass and to vote illegally and to change the electoral college proportion in the districts.
So he understands this is a promise he's got to keep.
He's done a great job sealing the border, 96% sealed.
That broke his record from his first administration, 94%.
So he's announced that, and it's already started, just the last week, there's an 800% increase in non-criminal aliens.
That's how the media spun it.
They're all criminal here illegally, but meaning they don't have fact sheets.
That's already up 800% in the last week.
And so they're going and they're grabbing everybody that's illegal, and they're going to be deported.
And this is what has to be done.
And it's going to be painful.
There's some nice people that are here.
Sorry, illegal.
This is part of a larger plan.
I love a glass of water.
But if you want to stick somebody's head under the water, I don't like water.
So I'm not against all these migrants and people.
And I know Biden and all of us had come here.
You know, they gave out Social Security numbers to him.
That's all come out.
The government did illegally.
And this is part of a giant lawless operation.
So you may individually be a nice person in many cases.
I'm sorry.
We can't survive as a nation by allowing 20-something million people to be here illegally.
You got to leave.
And the corporate media is spinning it.
Oh, look, Trump's a hypocrite.
He's actually increased people coming in on work visas.
Well, he always said that.
You're not going to be here illegally, but we do need some foreign workers and some super populists are like, no, we need a total moratorium.
I tend to agree with you.
My point is that's not what Trump ran on.
He does what he says, but you're about to see millions and millions deported.
I don't think there's any value in preaching about how the Trump administration is doing awful things in terms of immigration enforcement.
It's criminal and it's meant to terrorize vulnerable communities.
I'm interested in this clip because of what it highlights about how this propaganda works.
In order to get the ball rolling and amass public support, Alex needed to demonize immigrants in such a way as to suggest that every person you see on the street that you suspect isn't from here is probably a mass murderer.
The streets have been taken over by roving gangs of Hispanic military-aged men who are all also getting free stuff from the government.
They're probably voting.
It was a terror campaign because it was meant to justify terror against immigrants.
He was deploying that type of rhetoric that was needed for the audience to take proactive steps to bring about the situation we see in front of us now.
He needed Trump to win in order for this white nationalist march to begin, and a large part of catalyzing that was making the audience think that they were facing an existential threat from every immigrant.
But now the program is rolling, and Alex and the Trump administration don't really need that kind of support anymore.
As the reality is setting in, people are starting to see people they know, people they go to church with, people they work with, being directly affected by the actions of ICE, and public sentiment is starting to drift against the Trump administration's approach to this issue.
The people were promised that Trump would escalate his enforcement of the law, but it was to catch the mass murderers who had taken over the streets.
This was a deal that people thought they were making.
There were no mass murderers who had taken over the streets, though, and most of this enforcement is being used to snatch up the person you go to church with or you might see at a bar, which is leading to disillusionment.
People aren't going to buy the whole they're just using extreme measures to catch the murderer's angle when people can see that's not who's getting arrested and there's data backing that up.
So Alex needs to deploy a softer kind of demonization, one that takes into account the empathetic feelings that you might feel for the person that you know who got snatched up by ICE.
Sure, they might be a good person individually, but there's a bigger picture here.
There's a greater good that you just need to accept it.
The earlier type of messaging Alex was using was meant to incite the audience, whereas this is meant to pacify.
Because the actions Trump is carrying out based on the last incitement, they're horrifying to see play out in front of you.
This is the messaging that he feels he needs to use in order to override the feelings of empathy that he's worried that the audience could experience.
And what this basically is, is the terrorist edging paradigm.
Sure.
You know, you're working real hard to incite people and get them all, and then you're getting too close to busting, and so you go into the pacification cooldown period.
Yeah.
And that's a disgusting thing to see in this context.
I want to shift gears out of this into the No Kings protest.
The man that they've reportedly captured is supposedly this Vance Bolter who killed the state senator and her husband and then wounded critically the state rep and their spouse.
And the whole weirdness around this and how the, quote, roommate, but he's also got a wife, comes out and says, oh, he's a Trump supporter.
And then, oh, also Alex Jones, InfoWars.
Boy, just two weeks ago, I said, I wonder if there'll be some shootings of politicians.
The same guy was in front of the news crying, reading the text messages.
To me, it looks like bad acting.
I'm not saying he's lying or it's fake or he doesn't think that the supposed shooter didn't text message him from his phone, but the shooter shows up in a rubber mask and a police car.
And then, you know, all of this.
I mean, is a Tim Walls appointee?
His wife is a Democrat.
He's been a Democrat, but oh, now he's MAGA.
And everybody just takes what the roommate says as gospel.
Alex's position on what he thinks about the Minnesota shooter's roommate is incoherent.
On the one hand, Alex thinks this is really bad acting, but on the other hand, he says that he might believe that he was really reading his roommate's texts to the media.
The path that coffee takes to get into the cup is the same path that decaf took to get there.
In the case of the shooter's roommate, if he's acting, then there's reason for him to be acting.
If he's acting, he's playing a role, and someone has enlisted him to play that role.
An actor telling news reporters that an accused murderer liked Inforwards doesn't pop up in the same way that a person who believes that he's reading his roommate's last text to the news pops up.
The paths are different.
The latter person is a normal person who could exist, like a Starbucks cup that's filled with decaf.
The actor person requires a complicated scenario, full of people doing things that they don't normally do.
It would be like if your Starbucks cup was full of Minestrone soup.
Someone had to do that.
It's crazy that that happened.
What's the acting supposed to be if this roommate was answering questions honestly to the news based on the information that he had at his disposal?
What is the acting?
What's the bad acting?
Is it just he's hamming it up?
He's pretending to be more emotional about these texts that he really got from his roommate?
So this guy would either have to eventually stop believing that he was reading his friend's texts or never have believed he was reading his friend's texts in the first place.
What I'm trying to say is this is something that Alex is trying to make look like a tiny little difference of like, hey, the little opinion difference.
And in reality, it is a shockingly huge chasm between these two things.
I mean, literally, we can get the archivist or Chase or anybody around here.
Six months ago, two months ago, a month ago, last week, I said, are you going to have somebody go shoot people during the No Kings demonstration and then blame Trump, blame me, blame the Border Patrol, blame ICE?
Said it like five times last week.
And, oh, now here it is.
And CBS just knows what question to ask about the full exchange coming up.
But here's just part of it.
Watch the body language of the CBS reporter and then him.
And then he kind of looks down like it's notes and says, oh, InfoWars, all guiltless.
Yeah, yeah, InfoWars.
I mean, this is ridiculous.
Watch this.
unidentified
And did he listen to any particular podcasts or TV shows or anything online that concerns you?
No one cares that the shooter was a fan of Infowars.
Maybe that would have been an interesting topic 10 years ago, but Elon Musk does Hitler salutes at Trump rallies now, and there are no consequences for it.
Beyond just the fact that I think that this story has died down considerably in terms of the attention you think that a political assassination might get.
But then secondarily, I really think it's a bigger deal when Alex says something funny or like cries.
Like that gets more attention than the fact that this guy was a fan of his.
I mean, if you stop and dwell on these two things, if you stop and think, whenever Alex cries and says, I've turned on Trump, he gets a million articles about how great it is that people can turn on Trump.
And I think it's more for that pacification and reassurance of the audience than it is like he's actually concerned about people thinking this guy was a fan of his.
He just doesn't want the listener to associate with the motives that this guy clearly had.
Like, am I supposed to believe by this point Alex still hasn't learned that the people in the shooter's wife, that she had in the car were her children?
In order for me to believe that Alex doesn't know this, I'd have to also accept that Alex is wholly uncurious about this story, and he's trying to give the impression on his show that he's very curious about it.
And I think this is maybe my personal failing, right?
But for him to not have been the exact thing that he was, right?
For this conspiracy to have been whatever it needed to be to function that wound up with this result require believing so many different unusual and borderline impossible things happened in a row that even if you believed it to be true, it's just too much effort.
Go with the official story and move on with your life, right?
It's the difference between having a sincere curiosity and a drive towards questioning events that happen in the world and just wanting to use that costume.
And the shooter supposedly likes Trump, the elect shooter, and he really likes InfoWars.
And then some comments about InfoWars.
Oh, I know it's not really true, but I like it too.
Oh, well, let's call David Carlson.
Maybe he's just a wacky, goofy guy.
Maybe he just comes off like a dear netlights.
Maybe he just comes off as very disingenuous.
Maybe he just comes off like he's reading off a script.
Like when the cops show up at Jesse Smollett's house, he's got a little string around his neck, a fake scratch of makeup on his face, singing 23 below zero at 2.30 at night.
He went to subway that wasn't even open.
And that two men jump out, put MA hats on him, pour bleach on him, call in the N-word, and say, MAGA.
I said, that's fake.
And I was right.
And I'm not saying this guy's reading on a script.
And it is a crime to file a false police report and that stuff.
So, you know, there are consequences that should come along with that.
But I think it is funny-ish that he had to serve some time in jail, and Alex has not faced any kind of consequences like that for the things that he does.
Jesse Smollett wasn't a weird guy who was sincere, but just seemed like he was reading off a script.
He was a guy who carried out a hoax.
This is the opposite type of example Alex should be pulling out based on the argument he's trying to make about this roommate.
Alex is saying that he's not saying the roommate is an actor, but it's his opinion that he's an actor.
And I would reply to that, what's the difference?
This is a show where we're supposed to think that Alex knowing what time it is in the middle of the night is proof that God chose him to fight the devil.
So his opinions tend to carry a lot of weight.
A normal person could make a distinction between a fact they're reporting and an opinion, but this show only exists because Alex has made those things the same.
They're indistinguishable.
Also, Alex is he very clearly said that people should call David Carlson in that clip.
I'm not sure if he meant to say that, but he can't be that irresponsible.
He literally said the guy's name and said, let's call him.
And I was given Vegas Patsy information that I had to sign a non-disclosure with law firms, and the Fed's got involved, and I'm not supposed to talk about it, and I agreed not to, so I'm not going to.
But let's just say I know a lot.
And that was a Saudi Arabian operation with the deep state.
Trouble over there at Stage of Coup against those guys.
Vance Bolter arrested last night, turned himself in, out in the field to the SWAT team.
And he's an appointee by Walls.
His wife's a Democrat.
I'll show you a registration.
All of that.
And then we are told by his roommate that he's a big Trump supporter and likes InfoWars.
That's the first thing the media is told.
So you can have Drudge and Walls and all of them come out and say, oh, it's a MAGA maniac.
And you go into this guy's MO and background, there's none of that there.
And the police, they know that the police car he had had a bunch of No King's flyers in it.
And then what was I predicting?
Attacks on illegal alien demonstrations, black churches that were pre-programming that, and or Governor Whitmer kidnapping or shooting of Democrat politicians, blamed on MAGA.
The Democrats would shoot their own people and blame us.
Now, I don't know exactly what's going on here, but Vance Bolter's wife, the police thought it was suspicious in a car full of other people with guns and ammo and passports.
So it's very possible that Alex said that there could be another Whitmer type of event, but he's lying by saying that that was a main focus of his predictions.
He was constantly screaming about false flag mass shootings and car bombings at immigration or Gaza protests and about attacks on black churches.
If you listened to his show in the months prior to this, these predictions would have been beaten into your head.
And now what Alex is doing is that he's trying to insert what actually happened into that set of predictions.
This is a little sleight of hand trick that he uses to retroactively make himself look like a prophet, because if you're listening to this show, you'll hear him say that he's been predicting these things for months, and you'll remember him predicting the shootings at protests.
You'll be sure that he predicted that a ton, so by grouping the shootings at Democrats' houses, Whitmer type events, by grouping it in with that, Alex is banking on the audience, applying that memory to the whole collection of predictions when the thing that he was stressing the most did not happen and was part of his weird race war obsession.
And they got a couple others from the week before where I was, and I don't know if they haven't seen these yet.
I'm just told what's in them.
I know I said last week at least twice.
Somebody shoots some Democrats up, and then magically they find they're on their phone or laptop, and they're a big listener of the show.
And that's what we're now seeing.
So, wow, what a coincidence that I'd say that just last week, and now that's what we're treated to.
Here it is.
There are hardcore anti-foot subgroups that are 100% funded by the CIA, and I showed the documents earlier.
I'll go back over those with the new information that are tacitly taking responsibility and cheering everybody on for bombings, firebombings, assaults, attacks all over the country.
Hardcore communists are almost all academics.
And they get direct funding from Alexander Soros, and you can prove that.
And you know cops are going to get killed in the next week.
So first off, this clip from the 12th doesn't predict the Democrats are going to get shot.
He's saying cops are going to get shot.
This is a different prediction entirely.
Second, and more importantly, this clip from the 12th is edited.
The original context of what Alex was saying was about him supporting police violence, and he was trying to make excuses for Eric Adams' flagrant corruption because he's cooperating with Trump and ICE.
Here is the larger context of that same clip that Alex just played.
In South Austin and cut off to get some gas, and there were homeless people running around with baseball bats, faces bleeding, half naked, killing each other in the streets.
And it was like I was in a zombie apocalypse.
I'm sorry, I'm ranting.
I got to get to the news.
It's just they flipped a switch.
They defunded the police.
They started prosecuting cops that defended themselves.
And the police tell us all this, too.
I mean, I see it.
The cops tell me all this.
And if a cop, if it's anywhere questionable, you know, where a suspect overpowers the police, gets out of handcuffs, they try to grab the cop's gun.
It's on video.
This is a case in Austin.
Cop pulls the gun away, shoots the guy.
Jose Garza indicts you.
Who's going to go do jobs like this?
You ever been out in the middle of the night and had five dudes jump you?
And then you pull your gun and shoot one, and then they say, well, you shouldn't have done that.
We're going to indict you.
Well, you go out in the middle of the night and he says then.
So they know what they're doing to break down society.
So I'm going to get to the Iran situation coming up, but I'm going to hit the really big domestic thing right now.
Okay.
There are hardcore anti-foot subgroups that are 100% funded by the CIA, and I showed the documents earlier.
I'll go back over those with the new information that are tacitly taking responsibility and cheering everybody on for bombings, firebombings, assaults, attacks all over the country, but particularly New York.
And they're promising because Eric Adams pledged that he would help Holman, and he's done a half-assed job, but he's not having the cops block the feds doing constitutional duty.
So, because he's in a balancing act in New York, but he, of all the blue cities, he, you know, did what he said he was going to do overall.
And for that, they had the fake political charges that Biden put on and dropped.
So, that clip has now been edited to retroactively make it look like Alex is predicting that the globalists are going to kill some democratic politicians and blame him, except even the edited version doesn't make that point, but there's still all of this stuff edited out to change the image of what Alex was saying in that clip.
This is all an act, and everyone involved in producing this knows that they're lying.
You cannot play this edited clip of Alex making this prediction that isn't even the right prediction without knowing, oh, we are fucking lying.
This is a thing that occurs to me now because we live in the present that he doesn't have back then.
But you can no longer say that intelligence agencies are working against Trump, right?
Ah, because the simplest and most obvious thing that any intelligence agency working against Trump could do would just be release the Epstein list, right?
And then Trump sends in the military, and then behind the military, behind ICE, from an apartment, or from a van, or from a high-rise, or from a...
A Trump supporter, supposedly, who will be found dead.
They'll be found dead.
Maybe three or four of them.
Will open fire into these crowds.
And then that gives the pretext because all of this, as I told you, will blow up in their face once they start the riots unless they have the final ingredient.
And it's not just I can extrapolate that out with deduction and knowing the enemy operations over the decades.
I call it revolutions like Operation Gladio in Europe.
I like that this now gives the impression that it's possible for prophets to have like B-side prophecies.
You know, like, that one was pretty good.
But that's not my top-tier prophecy shit.
You know, like, that one was like, yeah, you are going to get some McDonald's, but that's not really that good of a prophecy because you were probably going to go anyways, right?
I wanted to call and talk about the illegal immigration.
You know, I know you know there's a whole lot of good people that are here, and I want to know if there's anything, like I married an illegal, and I want to know if there's any proactive steps that we could take to maybe get on a list of, you know, leave this one alone or whatever.
We've been in the system trying to get, we've gone through two lawyers, we've spent thousands of dollars, and just the speed of the government.
So if you legally try to get here, it's super hard.
But if you come illegally, the Democrats came out just last week, what we already knew, they were giving them all social security numbers.
Right.
And then the NGOs give them other people Social Security numbers to steal money, and the NGOs keep part of it.
So the crime is so massive, the gangrene is so bad that they're going to have to hurt some people that aren't bad because if they don't, the whole country goes down.
So Alex should realize in the moment that he's talking to this guy that the fact that his wife does not have access to all of these things that illegals are supposed to get is kind of proof that his claims are bullshit.
This guy is living the experience of trying to do things, quote unquote, the right way.
And he's saying, how do I make clear that we're the good ones?
My family's been here since the original 13 call, you know, and she, you know, she did come here illegally, but now she's, I mean, it's been 20 years, almost 20 years since she's been here.
And she's been in the system for over 10, 12 years.
We've been married for seven or eight now.
And we just, like I said, we've spent thousands and thousands of dollars, and now just because of the speed of the government, we're at risk of getting...
Well, what does that do to my family?
Is he going to deport me and my kids and grandkids?
I mean, you know, it is something that I think people imagine in themselves, that idea of like, I will compromise my belief systems for the greater good.
You know, like if I'm put into this situation where, you know, like, fuck it, like during the civil rights struggle, you know, like I want to go further.
I want to go deeper.
But you know what?
We've got this compromise.
This is going to do the best for the greater good.
And time is going to go on and we're going to be able to keep fighting and keep doing this stuff.
But I am going to sacrifice what I personally believe for the greater good, right?
And then to see the greater good come about.
That's, it's, you know, it's what you're supposed to dream of, really.
To sacrifice your belief system and then to discover that not only have you not made the greater good, but you've made everything worse and now you're going to be punished for it is just horrifying.
Like to do that to somebody, like this guy, we have to assume sincerity in some sooner or later.
Well, no, he couldn't have imagined that because it was just for the mass murderers that had taken over the streets and all the gangs who had taken over cities and stuff.
Yeah, because people like Alex had been successful in inciting this level of fear that got him to the point where he would essentially vote in someone who would kick his wife out of the country.
Yep.
So it's just bleak.
You get calls like this periodically, and like it's very difficult to hear something like this and Alex's response being so, I don't really care.
Kind of like, hey, sorry you're going through this, but it's just kind of what we have to do.
It's tough because it's a little bit, it's a little bit like if you've talked to a grandparent who's been conned, who's been taking in for a couple of grand, you know, like there's, there's people at the Walgreens who buy these gift cards and they have to put up signs now.
Like if somebody's asking you to buy gift cards, it's probably a scam.
You know, like that's what it is because so many people get scammed.
And at the same time, you're like, nobody from the government is Dick Boz6969, man.
But a feature of this propaganda and stuff is also making you feel like you're not going to be the target of the extreme escalation that you're trying to put on other people.
And anybody who's listened to Alex's show for longer than a few years would know that that is a big part of his world.
The whole 2009 PNAC or MIAC document and all of this stuff is, you know, hey, you want to do all this stuff to terrorists, but it's just going to be turned around on you.
Everyone should have known better, and Alex should know better, but he doesn't because he doesn't care.
Our time of tranquility is over, and we are living in an age of change.
We're living through what President Biden, on a visit to my country in March, called an inflection point.
A time of transformation, he said, that comes once every five or six generations.
Now, like it or not, you are graduating into that inflection point.
What is this inflection point?
What is this upheaval which is going to the roots of humanity itself?
There are many ways to describe this transformational moment, but I think they all come down to one fundamental question.
Does capitalist democracy still work?
That's the question being posed around kitchen tables in my country and this one, as parents wonder if our children can count on capitalist democracy's essential promise of a future more prosperous than our present.
It is the question being posed by our shrinking glaciers and our warming oceans, which are asking us, wordlessly but emphatically, if democratic societies can rise to the existential challenge of climate change.
So first off, this is a commencement speech that Christia Freeland gave in 2023 at Fenway Park.
It's a northeastern university in Boston.
So I don't know what Canadian graduates' demographics have to do with this.
Second, if you've ever heard a speech before, you probably wonder if her speech includes an answer to the question, does capitalist democracy still work?
Literally right after where Alex's clip cuts off, she says, quote, now these are of course huge and fundamental challenges, but I'm not here to counsel despair or retreat.
Yeats famously said of another generation that came of age in a liminal moment that the best lacked all conviction while the worst were full of passionate intensity.
Spend a few minutes on social media and you may be tempted to adopt that as an apt description of our time.
But I disagree.
Indeed, I disagree with passionate intensity.
You have to be a real dipshit to hear that snippet of her speech and think that the answer was that no, capitalist democracies have run their course.
You have to be so stupid to hear that and not understand, hey, what's the format of a commencement speech?
That's the question being posed around kitchen tables in my country and this one, as parents wonder if our children can count on capitalist democracy's essential promise of a future more prosperous than our present.
It is the question being posed in the muddy and bloodied trenches of Bakhmut as Ukraine's brave Democrats resist the invading forces of Putin's dictatorship.
And it is the question being posed by our shrinking glaciers and our warming oceans, which are asking us wordlessly but emphatically.
So part of that editing out has to do with it being anti-Putin, but the other part is that it overcomplicates the narrative that Alex is trying to sell.
He's trying to paint the picture that Freeland is saying that because of climate change, everyone needs to give up capitalist democracy.
And by editing out the part where it makes it clear that climate change was just one item on a list of challenges we're facing, Alex has created a straw man for him to argue with because he's a lying, lazy dipshit.
Also, it is just funny that the part that's cut it out there is the part that's critical of Putin.
I think that it's funny that Alex traffics in that kind of information and then yells about how the dinosaur media always lies and all this inaccurate information.
You're just pulling dumb shit from Twitter and desperately licking Russian boots.
And the reason that I think that this is a good place for us to wrap up is that at the beginning of this episode, we're talking about Alex trying to make Iran and Israel and Russia and Ukraine these kind of comparable situations where it's globalist destabilizations trying to hold the world hostage and what have you.
He has Victor boot on and launders his reputation because he's a high-level Russian guy who he wants to be friends with.
But also, it's very difficult for me to think of: hey, here's this guy who's an international arms dealer who was held prisoner and then was exchanged for Britney Grinier in a high-profile prisoner exchange that the Russian government worked out.
He's gone back.
He is now a politician, elected official in Russia, and he's just randomly for fun going on infowars and spreading geopolitical propaganda.
It seems difficult to imagine that that path leads to a guy who's just fucking with Alex Steve Pachenik style.
It seems more like, hey, here's a media opportunity.
Alex is desperate and will put on anybody, especially if they're Russian.
Yeah, it is a question of, like, how important is geography really in terms of how we process things?
Because the way that this assassination has felt like, it's felt like people are treating it the same way they would treat a political assassination in a different country.
You know, like, is it really just like, oh, well, Minnesota's Minnesota.
It's its own place.
Right.
Because we would always have, we would have imagined for the longest time, if there was a political, political assassination in the United States, it would be huge.