June 13–14, 2025 finds Knowledge Fight dissecting Alex Jones’ "Patriot fifth wave" claims amid Minnesota shootings—where Tim Walz appointee Vance Bolter killed Democratic lawmakers, including Speaker Melissa Hortman, yet Jones frames it as a false flag. Ignoring the shooter’s domestic violence history and rambling letter, Alex pivots to debunking climate change with 1878 polar bear photos while real crises—military arrests, Iran-Israel escalation—go unaddressed. His obsession with conspiracies over facts reveals a pattern of denial and self-serving narratives, even as his audience eagerly consumes them. [Automatically generated summary]
Of course, a paratrooper and the founder of the Oath Keepers.
And then the main guy of all the people that got demonized: Joe Biggs, Enrico Tario, great guys.
Did absolutely nothing wrong.
Political prisoners, pardoned by the president or commuted in his case.
Put in the gulag, never broke his will, said Trump was going to win re-election, said we were turning around and came out of prison stronger because I've known this guy for a long time than before.
And he was strong then.
I think you look younger than before, Jay Six.
What the hell's going to the time machine or something?
If I'm dealing with the deal maker as what he believes Trump to be, and I see that I'm not getting the same sweetheart deal as other people, I'm staying back.
We have Anna Paulina Luna and other members of Congress saying they've been shown the intel and that this Black Lives Matter leftist commie consortium funded by the billionaires, the ChiComs, the NGOs, no kings, are planning and are dressing up like MAGA supporters to attack people tomorrow across the country.
So J6 2.0, the false flag, the Kent State.
I don't think there's a question if this is the big one.
They're going for the destabilization Podesta break up the country plan that's public and it's treasonous.
Yeah, so I'm now at the point, I think, and maybe I've been in this point for a little bit where I've heard Alex say this is the big one too many times.
What President Trump can do that's unique is he has the authority that was already provided by Congress many times, many, you know, back at the start of the founding.
The militia acts provide for calling forth the militia.
He can call all of us up and us veterans until age 64.
And I believe he should.
I think what he should say is given the reality of an invasion, of an insurrection, of a necessity to execute the laws of the union, I'm calling forth the militia, not just the National Guard, but the rest of the militia, which is the unorganized militia.
I'm going to call you together and order you to organize yourselves in your counties with the veterans instructed to take command and then organize and train the other men.
You stay in your counties until the president gives you any further orders, but you get yourselves ready.
And why that's important is then you're getting yourself trained up and organized for the inevitable October 7th style attacks that are going to be coming.
no because civic government annoys me that sounds true that if that was the conversation that would actually i'd be like yeah that's fair enough I guess you're right.
No, he would say the military men who live in that county come together, the veterans, and that's who he puts in command.
Now, he might use a National Guard general to go oversee them.
He could certainly do that.
Or an active duty Army general.
He could do that too.
Or Marine Corps.
He certainly could.
He could insert his chain of command into the state and make sure that the men are organized properly and that they're not doing anything they shouldn't be doing.
But my point is, is that he can go around the governors, like Newsom, and go around any traitorous county leader.
And let's be clear: the Podesta plan from August of 2020, which they said they're implementing this time.
If Trump didn't get it stolen, if they couldn't override him, they were going to go to full insurrection, blue state city, secede, shut down the country, and drive him from power.
Then they made the movie Civil War with a $350 million budget two years ago, released last year.
So this clip is a really good encapsulation of how not on the same page these guys are when it comes to details.
They have the same vibe, which is to overthrow democracy and install a king, but they're talking different languages.
Alex imagines a militia that's based in a sheriff because the sheriff is the highest legitimate form of law enforcement that the extreme right, states rights, kind of the extreme right-wing folks.
That ideology that he grew up in, they fetishized the sheriff.
He imagines the sheriff brings together a posse and then they do Trump's bidding.
Stewart's more in favor of just letting veterans form their own organization completely outside of any recognized chain of command under the president because that way he can become a warlord just carrying out Trump's bidding without the pesky sheriffs.
You can see from exchanges like that one how they really aren't speaking the same language, but they know they both fundamentally want the same thing.
Also, since the last time we recorded, I finally got around to seeing that Civil War movie, and it's nothing like what Alex made me think it was going to be.
I like, here's what I like: I like that on the eve of this no-kings protest that Alex is trying to discredit as being bullshit and not about the very, very thing that it is about.
Stuart Rhodes is asking for a president to have a singular army that he has unilateral control over with no oversight whatsoever.
I think that people are a little jaded and desensitized in a way that it hasn't felt like in a long time.
I think that Alex's stuff feels a little bit sillier in 2025 than it did certainly even just a few years ago.
Sure.
But yeah, apparently some commies are going to dress up like Trump supporters in order to attack other commies in order to make Trump supporters look like they want to attack commies.
He went to the houses of a state senator and a state representative and killed the representative and her husband and wounded the senator and state senator and his wife.
We also have the No Kings Democrat Party ChiCom consortium with reportedly over a thousand locations to have disruption and violent uprisings that have already begun in many parts of the country as we go into day number eight of the political violence promised by the Democrat Party.
And then as soon as I saw this break about three hours ago, two Democrat lawmakers and their spouses shot, one lawmaker dead, her husband dead, the other two in critical condition.
I thought, let me look up their voting record.
And they had been Democrats that were coming over to the Republican Party and reportedly about to join the Republican Party.
And one of them particularly had just voted to not give me legal aliens free health care coverage.
And I immediately thought, oh, I wonder if it's kind of part two of how the Democrat Party's even got bills named after the shooter of the New York healthcare insurance company executive.
We've got polls of Democrats with 80% praising it.
It's like there's more killings.
I was just guessing that.
And now the police identified that the reported alleged shooter, who they chased off the scene, so they're pretty, 99% is him, is a Tim Walsh high-level appointee and a no kings organizer and had a bunch of the flyers in his car.
So back in the day when events like this would happen, the people coming up with the talking points to call the shooting a false flag were rightly relegated to really dark corners of the internet, like low-traffic message boards.
Alex had a real purpose because he was one of the only people with a real show and he built up a fake persona as the guy who reads white papers and secret documents.
So he had a unique ability to pass off things that he read on those dumb message boards as something other than what it was.
He gave a gravitas to it just by the uniqueness of his position.
He was in that special position where he could take these talking points from fully extreme places.
He could launder them into slightly less offensive packages so they could reach a possibly wider audience who wouldn't know the kind of shit that they were engaging with.
But like so many Americans, technology has rendered his job obsolete.
Twitter is just all of that now.
It's the home for extreme right-wing talking points like the old message boards.
It's a place with a gullible, wider audience of people ready to be drawn in by slightly sanitized versions of those extreme talking points.
And it's a place where everyone is just as legitimate as anybody else.
Most people don't even use their real names, so if they want to tell you that they have a doctorate in political science, I'd like to see you disprove it.
Who knows?
Who knows who this fucking ding-dong is with a fake name?
All of this stuff Alex is saying about his immediate reaction to the shootings in Minnesota very well may be his actual thoughts, but they're also exactly what everyone on his side posted on Twitter to try and deflect any questions or responsibility being aimed in their direction.
No one knew what was going on or who this guy was, but the targets were Democrat lawmakers, and it's very easy as an impulse for people to assume the motive from the target.
Alex and all of his ilk, they knew fully well that they were going to need to be on the defensive, because it makes the most sense that a rampaging right-wing guy would kill Democratic lawmakers, particularly in a state where the state house was at a complete tie, with both parties having 67 members in office until the shooting.
Alex and all of his contemporaries knew that it's critical to import, it's very important to avoid any possible insinuation that their rhetoric and incitement had any part of leading up to this crime being carried out.
So it's key to start fucking with that wet cement before it dries.
You need to get to work.
Whatever little things they can come up with have to be weaved into a narrative.
So they hope that they can make it strong enough to hold up against the weight of any facts that come to bear upon it once those facts are known.
So you have these little tidbits of things that Alex found on Twitter.
The first story that Alex has is about this state house member who was assassinated, Melissa Hortman.
According to Alex's version, she was becoming a Republican and she'd voted against giving undocumented immigrants free health care.
This has to do with Hortman's recent vote for SSFH1, a bill that would strip undocumented people over the age of 18 from being eligible for participation in Minnesota care.
To give a little background context on this, Minnesota's legislature had been in the process of trying to pass a two-year budget, and in May they announced that they had reached an agreement.
Part of that agreement was the cutting of Minnesota care access for the undocumented immigrants, but this budget agreement doesn't just become law because the party leaders, they all agreed on it.
In Minnesota, the members of the state house and senate don't vote on the full budget as a yes or no bill, like one thing.
They vote on each piece individually.
Thus, even though they had this agreement for the budget, it could still lead to fights down the road or potential compromises needing to be made between lawmakers.
Democrats in the House were trying very hard to get the Republicans to budge on the Minnesota care issue, but it was very clear that this was a hard line for the GOP.
The GOP also made it fairly clear that they were willing to shut down the government and not vote to pass other areas of the budget if they didn't get their way on this part, which is part of why it ended up passing.
Hortman was the only member of the DFL to vote for the bill, but it would have passed with or without.
Like if she had just abstained, it would have passed.
I can't say for sure, but I really suspect that she voted the way that she did as a sign of good faith, given her role as the caucus leader and the former Speaker of the State House.
Given other recent votes that she made, like voting against trans athlete bans and women's sports, I'm not convinced of Alex's insinuation that she was just about to switch parties.
Alex is using this narrative to suggest that she was killed by Democrats as a punishment for not towing the line.
That is why this piece he has pulled from Twitter.
The next thing Alex is repeating from memes that he saw was that the alleged shooter was a high-level Tim Walz appointee and a no-kings organizer.
The shooter did have no Kings flyers in his car, but that's not evidence that he was an organizer for these protests or even involved.
The question of the shooter being a Tim Walz appointee is an interesting one, though, because there's some truth to that.
Alex says that he was a high-level appointee, but how high-level is high-level?
What does that mean?
He was a member of the Minnesota Workforce Development Board.
Alex says that Walls appointed him to be on this board because that's supposed to create this connection between him and Walls that can't be explained.
Like, why would Walls choose this guy of all people to put on this board, this high-level appointment?
What Alex fails to report is that the shooter was appointed to the board by former governor Mark Dayton in 2016 for a three-year term, and Walls just re-upped his appointment in 2019.
There's no reason to assume that Walls even really knew who this guy was.
This is the level of appointment that might be relegated to a lower-level stashing decision.
Alex is using this narrative to imply that Walls was in on the killing, probably as the person pulling the strings.
The specific details of how Alex wants to play this story aren't totally clear yet, but the implications you're supposed to come away from this intro with are one, the entire country is on fire because of the LA protests.
And two, the shootings of these lawmakers and their families in Minnesota are false flags that were carried out by the left, likely targeting one of their own who they knew was going to defect to the Patriot side soon, probably orchestrated by Tim Walz.
But I think that if you're Alex, there is probably like a pretty strange feeling you get when you see that news of I have been ramping up for a while that this is the day that the wave of Patriot fifth wave breaks and God is pointing us towards this date and this is these protests are going to be the ones where the commies take over a thousand areas of the country.
Yeah.
I just think that you probably have to wake up and see that and be like, oh shit.
I think that if you're able to like directly minimize and spin political assassinations that easily, then I mean, one of the things that I think is incredibly shocking is like how it hasn't been that long, and it does not feel like this is a story that is anymore.
Well, I mean, hey, you know, Kyle Kinan had a really great bit where he was talking about how one of his favorite genres of film is, oh no, the president's been kidnapped, and that's just not fun to watch anymore.
Now you're just kind of like, well, I mean, man, it's tough out there.
Alex is tripping all over himself reading this tweet, and I'm pretty sure the reason why is that he doesn't want to accidentally read something that doesn't work for the narrative.
All that's important right now is that Walls appointed him to a position, and we need to make that position look prestigious.
Alex can't get any of the words in the name of the board correct, probably because he knows that anyone would hear the name of that board and instantly know that it's probably a volunteer kind of thing.
And the White House and Pentagon fear they're going to try to have a Tiananmen Square moment at one of these parades today in D.C. where people run out and jump in front of the tanks and try to act like they're being attacked by tanks or something.
Like we saw with the senator out in California confronting Noam during a TV interview she was doing inside a federal building running up, hey, I'm going to get you.
So they would touch him and say, who are you?
And he would fight them and he could say he was being oppressed.
They're just trying to trigger some type of Tiananmen Square event or Kent State event.
That's really what they want, but people are really seeing through this now.
So, I've heard this come up a lot on Alex's show in this time period: this fear of the left creating a Kent State or Tiananmen Square moment and how that's bad for Trump's optics.
I wouldn't worry about that too much if I were him.
Like, we've seen a lot of horrible shit in the past year: pictures and videos that crystallize the severity of the moment.
The kind of stuff that the characters in that Civil War movie that Alex didn't watch would capture and give them PTSD.
At the beginning of all this, Trump said that he could shoot someone on the street and not lose support.
He could run over someone in a tank, and I don't think it would matter.
Nope.
The reason that Alex brings this up a lot is because he knows that it's a possible way that the extreme right could lose popular support.
If Trump were to roll over someone in a tank, Alex is afraid that the more normy side of the GOP would finally say enough is enough, and that could erode the power base.
In order for that not to happen, Alex needs to create an atmosphere where Trump driving over someone in a tank is acceptable.
The easiest way to do that is to preemptively declare that any Kent State or Tiananmen Square type moment is staged by the protesters to make Trump look bad.
Normally, seeing someone run over by a tank would probably bum you out and make you feel mad at the force that the tank represents because it's a brutal dictator thing.
And you have an empathetic human response to that.
True.
By preemptively invalidating any possible event like this from being real, Alex is allowing his audience to cheer on the force that would drive over someone in a tank while getting to pretend that they're still the type of people who wouldn't support that kind of thing.
They wanted to get run over by the tank, really.
That's you know, I don't love watching this person get run over by a tank.
Yeah, I mean, it doesn't really matter if you run them over with the tank as long as you get the pick because they, the guy didn't get run over with the tank.
They, I mean, you can't prove it, but they totally murdered that guy later.
Like, they just asked him to move out of the way, and then because they don't know who he is or where he's from, and we have no further information about him, one thing you could probably infer from that is that guy is super dead.
Uh, uh, but I, you know, like you understand that the Tiananmen Square moment can't be manufactured unless the one guy driving the tank is like doing it.
Like, you could just be like, hey, guys, we're not going to do it.
We're just not going to do it.
We're not.
Everybody will get out of our tanks.
We'll go shake the guy's hands.
We'll have a good time.
Like, you have to be running over people with tanks to be the Tiananmen Square moment.
And now they aren't really trying to take it into high gear.
And you're going to have also a lot of lone crazies inside the Democrat Party system that are going to go out and carry out events themselves.
You already saw in Pennsylvania a crazed leftist because the governor Shapiro wasn't communist enough for him going and firebombing his house while he was in it and burning down a large portion of it.
So earlier this year, a guy named Cody Ballmer threw a Molotov cocktail into Josh Shapiro's home, and I guess Alex has decided that it's because he was a commie and Shapiro wasn't commie enough for him.
Cody Ballmer, who's a registered as an unaffiliated voter, had always been politically interested and considered himself more of an independent than anything else, but tried to convince the family to vote for Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election, said his brother.
I'm not even trying to say that he's a Trump guy or anything like that.
This was a man who's in the grips of some serious mental health problems.
If you read what his family has said in interviews, it's clear that he'd been in and out of hospitals and frequently resisted taking prescribed meds.
It's very sad, and he seemed to have also taken an interest in Gaza.
But just like with him trying to get his family to vote for Trump, I don't think that's a coherent part of any political identity.
CBS News released the text of the 911 call that he made after setting Shapiro's house on fire.
And he says, quote, I don't really have an emergency.
I would like to apologize.
Governor Josh Shapiro needs to know that Cody Ballmer will not take part in his plans for what he wants to do to the Palestinian people.
He needs to leave my family alone.
He needs to get his eyes off my daughters.
And he needs to stop having my friends killed.
Like he killed, he had Manny killed two weeks ago or last week on Saturday.
He was a guy who was struggling, but also a guy with a pretty clear history of domestic violence.
So don't get me wrong.
I don't want to make him out to be some kind of tragic figure.
He seems like a violent, abusive, mentally unwell guy.
But what he doesn't seem like is a commie who was just mad that Josh Shapiro wasn't commie enough.
But Alex is right about something, and that is that these stories just come and go in the media, which is ironically why Alex can get away with playing the game that he's playing here, calling this guy a commie who's just mad that Josh Shapiro wasn't commie enough.
Yeah, I mean, like, it's so hard with these political things because people talk about like an ideology motivating people in this regard, but that's that's really awfully vague.
Like, nobody's motivated on either side by like, oh, we need a 2% progressive additional tax on, you know what I mean?
Like, it's when we're here, these guys are violent people regardless of what political party they're in.
It just so happens that one political party is willing to use them in the way that they want to be used.
And the other political party is trying to keep them from being used that way, but, you know, maybe not keeping them healthy in order to, you know, like there's, there's a reason that they're vulnerable enough to be used in that kind of regard.
We already know from interviews with the shooter's roommate and longtime best friend that he was a fan of InfoWars.
He was an active viewer of the show, so it's a reasonable question to ask if he's listening to this episode.
He would have to know that Alex would cover this shooting.
And if you're a real InfoWarrior, you probably think Alex can come up with the best spin to make sure that Trump and the extreme right don't get any blame for the shootings.
It's hard for me to imagine that he wouldn't be listening and maybe taking cues from what Alex is saying.
Like here, Alex is saying maybe it's good that the guy's alive so he could tell us who put him up to it.
More so than in almost any other case that we've come across before, at least in my memory.
I get the feeling that this shooting has synergy with the right-wing media space.
The timing and the impetus of the attack was pretty much scripted on Alex's show.
And the broader social media world that he's a part of all were in the same kind of line, hyping up the 14th as the day that this shit kicks off and all that.
The social media world and Alex as a mouthpiece crafted an explanation for how this wasn't the right wing's fault by latching onto this tenuous connection with Tim Walz.
And it seems to me like this guy most likely wrote a letter to the FBI that was meant to piggyback on these conspiracies that were being pitched by folks like Alex and tons of other dipshits on social media.
I have to call out that I'm making some pretty large logic leaps there, and a fair amount of this could be off.
But this is how it feels to listen to this episode.
Like Alex is coaching a murderer how to spin his crimes not to implicate the larger information war.
It's funny that, like, it wouldn't occur to anybody in the regular media.
You know, they would write it down as, oh, this is rambling and filled with conspiracy theories, as opposed to looking at it and being like, oh, this is Alex's episode from yesterday.
Right, but even the, like, you know, just to be totally clear, the Tim Wall's connection conspiracy stuff is not, like, unique to Alex.
Sure.
I just am pretty sure based on the way his roommate described it, I think he probably would be listening to InfoWars the day after he kills two state lawmakers.
Absolutely.
So if Alex is getting it from Twitter and then this guy's getting it from that or he's getting it straight from Twitter, who cares?
No one said that Alex made up that Bilderberg was meeting in Virginia.
Someone pulled the fire alarm in the hotel he was staying in, and Alex got all scared and freaked out about how they were trying to smoke him out of his room.
And people made fun of him for making that up.
I can understand how he'd want to reclaim that story because it's a bit embarrassing.
Yeah, I mean, you know, what do you, now that you're against the whole no kings, why not have a bunch of kings?
I think that's the way to go.
There's never been a situation in my understanding, like in my reading of history, where a large group of aristocrats holding all of the power and wealth have done poorly for the major population.
You know, like, I think, I don't know if the clip that I played fully encapsulates it, but I think this person had a little bit of a dramatic flair to themselves.
Sure.
But I also think they're young.
And I think that it's kind of dumb to be an adult and criticize young people for being too dramatic.
This is literally what he's called martial law, the carrying out of domestic police duties by military troops.
A man was running to get to an appointment with the VA, and he didn't realize that he'd entered a taped-off area.
He didn't hear the Marines when they told him to stop because he had his headphones in.
So when they got him to the ground, they put him in the zip ties.
He was held over two hours and then he was released without charges.
This is so far past what Alex can accept that there's no real point in even maintaining the illusion that he cared about the stuff that he used to pretend he cared about.
He never gave a shit about posse comitatus.
It was all about exerting power.
That was the way that he felt he was able to exert some kind of power.
Well, we don't have mallets with the past written on them.
Because if we had mallets with the past written on them, and then whenever you do something and the past is like, nah-uh, and you get hit with the mallet, then you remember the past.
And they're really trying to figure out how to blame these lawmakers getting shot to Republicans, but it's a Tim Waltz staffer appointee.
Police saw him, identified him, shooting at them.
I think it's the same to say he's the guy.
Alleged.
And he's got all the no-king stuff in the police car if he runs off.
The fake police or the real police car he somehow got.
So we've got lots of Mexican flags all over the country.
We got feeds here for you.
The Tim Walz, though, appears to be politically motivated, but I wonder if he's going to put any news statements out now about it being his staffer, his senior appointee on the labor board for the state.
I mean, it would be worse for him strategically if instead of inspiring people to murder their political opponents, he inspired them to jump thinking they can fly.
I think that he's maybe seeing that the trend in the right-wing world, there's a growing popularity of folks who are more like Nick Fuentes and are more openly critical of Israel.
And the way that Alex has tried to play this game where he's like, look, I don't like Netanyahu, but I don't want Muslims coming here.
Yeah, I imagine as Christianity, the actual, the religion, religion, becomes less important to that subset of people who want to destroy the world, then, yeah, it would be harder to make that same leap that so many Republicans do, which is just like, we support Israel because that's where the end of the world's going to start.
I would have liked it if they didn't just go like, ah, the gas crisis happened in the 70s and then Jimmy Carter and yada yada yada.
What are you going to do?
You know, it would have been nice if they gave you some context for all the things that were going on so you don't believe in bullshit when you grow up.
But I don't know if somebody being like, you know what else?
We've got a major update in the Governor Tim Tampon Dispenser Walls situation and the man they caught dressed up like a police officer with a stolen police car.
They said it's one of their police cars.
They just killed a state senator and her husband and shot and almost killed a state rep and other spouse.
We actually have a clip I forgot to play of the senator where she talks about, no, we're not going to vote for illegal aliens to get health care.
And she was leading the Democrat group that was against that.
And so was the other state rep that was shot.
So very, very interesting now.
And we'll go to that video here in a moment.
But first, Minnesota shooting suspect Carr had no king flyers and sickening manifesto with targets.
Police warrant the suspect of Minnesota shooting had a list of targets that include Representative Melissa Hortman and Senator John Hoffman, who both got shot.
Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were killed.
So you can see how Alex has crafted this narrative into being primarily about Tim Walz, not about the shooter or even the victims.
This is how he jumped back into the story by saying that they have an update on the Tim Walz situation.
The messaging is very clear here.
The goal is to pin this on walls, which is exactly what the shooter ended up trying to do.
Beyond that, Alex is just making shit up and reaching bad conclusions here.
For one thing, the car that the shooter used wasn't a stolen police car.
Alex has just assumed that because the police said that the car looked a lot like a police car.
Second, Melissa Hortman was a member of the Minnesota state house, and the other target, John Hoffman, was in the state Senate, but Alex has them mixed up.
Hortman wasn't leading the Democratic group that was opposed to extending Minnesota care to undocumented immigrants.
She was the only member of her party who voted that way.
Alex is making up a story about them because it adds to the intrigue of the whole thing and because he's a monstrous liar.
Also, I think that long pause at the end of the clip was because Alex didn't know if he should read the part about the shooter's target list being a bunch of Democratic politicians and abortion rights advocates.
I suspect he got to that line in the story and he couldn't tell in the moment if that helped or hurt the narrative.
The rest of this news report goes on to talk about how the GOP wouldn't budge on this provision, so nothing was going to happen unless somebody, one of the Democrats voted for it or didn't vote.
This provision was necessary for them.
And so when she's talking about that, she's very emotional about the fact that she made this vote that was against what she believed in.
She is not somebody who's like, oh, I think I'm going to leave the Democratic Party.
I'm leading this resistance to fuck over immigrants or whatever.
And this is ghoulshit.
This, to me, is disgusting.
When Alex says word is she was going to leave the Democratic Party, now her spirit has left the earth or whatever, he should apologize immediately after that clip ends.
America is supposed to be in a civil war that kicked off all these no-kings protests that are happening while Alex is on air that he's supposed to be monitoring.
Multiple lawmakers in Minnesota were the targets of assassination the night before.
Israel and Iran are bombing each other.
And Alex is arguing with no one about climate change memes.
Who's he trying to convince?
Does anyone in his audience care about sea levels at this point?
Is there possibly a single Infowars listener who might be swayed by Al Gore?
This game is dead because there is no battle that Alex needs to be fighting here.
Trump is all about the big corporations and he doesn't give a shit about environmentalism.
So Alex doesn't need to be out here trying to run propaganda against regulation and climate considerations.
It was just a lot of fun because while that clip was going on, the tail end of it had me with a bunch of different images of me in a cartoon scenario where I'm peeing all of my stuff.
I felt like it was, it is the InfoWars version of an Adams Family Values whenever they have, when they're at summer camp and they send them to the small house where all the Disney films are.
Like it was very much like, you know what?
I'm going to return to a safer, more idyllic place, and I'm just going to watch Disney films.