Knowledge Fight dissects Alex Jones’ June 7–9, 2025 special, where he mocks "technocrat" critics while defending Elon Musk’s Trump-aligned flip-flops and falsely framing ICE raids as Soros-backed false flags. Jones exaggerates protests in L.A., Epstein’s death, and Jamie White’s murder to push a "second Civil War" narrative, citing the Alien Removal Act to justify vigilantism—including masked executions—against leftists and immigrants. Dan Friesen and Jordan Holmes expose his shifting hypocrisy, from anti-tyranny rhetoric to endorsing authoritarian overreach, while linking his inflammatory claims to Minnesota’s June 9 assassination attempts. The episode reveals how Jones weaponizes fear, blurring reality with conspiracy to radicalize his audience. [Automatically generated summary]
And then she was there all day because then their plane was going to land and they were going to make it home and they were going to let the dogs out at night.
That's a shitty kind of nervousness because most of the time you would think that it's like, well, the fear is it's going to rain a bunch and my travel plans are going to be affected.
And maybe I'll be delayed or the flight will be canceled or something.
So listeners at home did not get a chance to see this, but I did do a fist bump when the bits or the track started playing and I realized we got the right one.
But then they would start claiming that Trump was going to kill migrants and that ICE was going to kill illegal aliens at demonstrations.
And as soon as he was president-elect, they would start beating the drum.
And that this summer, they would then get violent in major cities like Los Angeles, Denver, Seattle, Portland, New York, Chicago, Austin.
And that you would then start seeing attacks on Jewish centers, synagogues, museums.
And then I said you would then see the illegal aliens and their supporters getting violent.
And that Soros had bought all these Spanish-speaking radio stations to direct people with their inside sources that's now come out to go attack ICE.
And now you saw massive blow-ups and riots in multiple states, particularly in Los Angeles, with the illegal aliens and their Democrat Soros handlers attacking viciously ICE.
We also saw it in Minneapolis last week.
They were on raids to get the kidnapped children and they got some.
He said, well, I'll put them on the news.
They're minors.
They have to process it and charge the people and it's happening.
There they were trying to stop them going to get the children being held at these different NGO facilities.
So as we know from listening to this show for years, there's always going to be a summer of rage.
No matter who's in office, the globalists always love to stir things up in the summer and false flag some riots.
Over the past months, Trump's administration has been acting with a brazen impunity as it relates to rounding up immigrants and assumed immigrants.
For a while, the media tried to cover stories about legal residents being detained and sent to El Salvador, but it quickly became clear that our current government does not care about the press and recognized that the media really only has the power that they allow them to have.
People have filed suits, but it's also become somewhat clear that the Trump administration doesn't really respect courts, and Congress doesn't seem particularly interested in drawing a hard line to rein in their power.
So it's become an essentially powerless situation.
At the same time, the wanton abuse carried out by ICE has continued and escalated.
It always felt like this was the likely direction things would go with Trump taking office again, because a major part of his campaign relied on stoking xenophobic fears and anger while exaggerating the threat that immigrants pose to the community.
When they took office, unsurprisingly, there really isn't enough crime being carried out by immigrants to justify a massive power grab based on a real threat.
So the White House set out to manufacture that justification.
As NBC News reported, Trump's deputy chief of staff and flagrant bigot Stephen Miller was pissed off that the number of unauthorized immigrant arrests were too low in May 2025, so he, quote, berated and threatened to fire senior ICE officials if they didn't begin detaining 3,000 migrants a day, according to two sources who spoke to attendees.
Miller also threatened to fire leaders of field offices posting the bottom 10% of arrest numbers monthly.
This is basically a recipe for how you get law enforcement to start harassing the public.
You have a set minimum number of arrests you're supposed to make, regardless of whether or not the level of crimes being committed merit that, and then on top of that, you create a scenario where the lowest performing offices will be punished.
It's not enough to hit your minimum quota.
You need to do better than at least 10% of the other offices if you want to keep your position.
When law enforcement is incentivized like this, it always results in abuses.
If an officer needs to give out 10 tickets a day and really only encounters 6 ticket-worthy incidents a day, then at least 4 people are going to get bullshit tickets.
You end up in environments that favor police setting traps, engaging in stop-and-frisk tactics, and adopting broken Windows policing type philosophies.
The public is pretty gullible, and it moves slower than you'd like, so when this kind of momentum gets going, it takes a while for people to realize that the police are full of shit and solving non-existent problems by shaking everyone down.
But generally, a point is reached where people have had enough and start to push back against intrusive police tactics that are being employed.
We're not quite at that point yet, but it's beginning, and the protests that happened in Los Angeles around this time were a sign of beginnings of that progression.
There is a summer of rage warming up, so I'm not going to argue with Alex on that point.
But where I'm going to push back on him is the claim that the protests are just the work of the globalists like Soros paying people to riot.
People are legitimately mad about what law enforcement has become and the tactics that they're using to round up members of their community.
It's a sincere outrage, and it's an outrage that, if properly understood, Alex cannot be against.
The political philosophy he's supposed to hold dear is in direct contrast to the police state that the Trump administration is bringing in, which is why the voice of this and all protests like it must be branded as inauthentic.
These are Soros NGOs doing all this stuff.
So days prior to this episode, there was a confrontation with ICE because they showed up to raid a taco restaurant in Minneapolis called Las Cuatro Milpas.
The mayor Jacob Fry claimed that police were there in relation to a warrant for quote drugs and money laundering, but folks on the ground were very suspicious about the presence of ICE agents on the scene.
There weren't brutal attacks on the police, but one person was arrested for assaulting an officer, and in their charging documents, it's claimed that the initial raid on Las Cuatro Milpas was one of eight that law enforcement carried out on various locations that day.
They had warrants from a judge, and these raids were the result of them finding 900 pounds of crystal meth in a storage unit.
From the information they've released, it appears that the crowd were wrong about the pretty reasonable assumption that this was an immigration raid when it was really part of a larger criminal investigation.
But this incident does really highlight the situation that we're in right now.
Why was Ice there participating in serving a search warrant in this drug case?
In the current climate, it's very hard not to assume that this was an immigration raid targeting a Mexican restaurant because that's the kind of stuff that's happening now.
It would be great if the cops could just tell people this isn't about immigration.
We're here because we found 900 pounds of meth.
But at this point, I think that the police don't have enough credibility to resolve that kind of misunderstanding.
Involving ICE only deepens the credibility gap and it adds to the confusion.
It's notable that Alex is bringing this up as a specific touch point, though, because while the majority of attention about the anti-ICE protests involved Los Angeles, Minneapolis was another flashpoint, partially because of this incident and because of memories that we still have of the protests in the wake of George Floyd's murder.
Alex and the folks in his media have been successful in branding those protests as riots that left multiple cities mostly burned to the ground.
So it's important for him to do whatever he can to associate the current situation with images that he's created about that past situation.
So Minneapolis is being worked in when he's talking about LA quite heavily.
For sure.
And so I think obviously a lot of this isn't super surprising in terms of the angle that Alex is going to take on this.
But it does imply a fundamental betrayal of a lot of what he's supposed to believe.
And so I said, first thing I'm we leave the courtroom at 3 o'clock, and I say, probably a nervous breakdown by Musk.
And I really appreciate Musk, and I know that he's not been appreciated or really defended by the administration, but a big fear of mine that this could happen.
I'm no Musk MO.
But now that he's come out, so let's get to this now.
Now that he's come out last night and deleted the tweets attacking Trump, that is a retraction, basically.
Because as I keep hammering for really six months intensely, if we let the Democrats of the deep state attack Musk and destroy him and take down his companies, everybody else who isn't even close to him in power and intellect of the Titans around Trump, I mean, let's say Trump's 1,000 feet tall politically with power.
Musk is 500 feet tall.
The next biggest political muscle, money muscle around Trump, which is nothing compared with what the globalists can throw with all their collective, 90 plus percent of the billionaires are against Trump and what we're doing.
The other muscle around Trump are like 20 feet tall.
I mean, if they target Musk and run him off or hurt him so bad, he pulls out of the great job he was doing.
Judge Treebot's fruit's amazing.
They go up to the next domino and the next domino, like V, but from a bad V perspective, when he's, they get Musk.
But leaving that allusion to the side, what Alex is expressing is pathetic.
Elon is rich and powerful, and he's doing the things I like.
Therefore, there's nothing he can do that we shouldn't make excuses for.
He's a virulent transphobe who lets Nazis run free on Twitter.
So we have to accept when his feelings get hurt, he might allege that the president's a pedophile on the social media platform that he owns, then delete the tweet later and expect everyone to move on.
Alex can talk about this shit all he wants, but there's no way he can explain to the audience why Musk should ever be trusted again.
In their minds, the information he posted about Trump is not true.
And Alex's explanation for that is that Elon posted this untrue stuff to try to hurt Trump because he felt like he wasn't appreciated enough.
Even if you buy this spin, Elon's a piece of shit character who's going to do something like this again.
He's unstable.
And if you don't stroke his ego enough, he'll weaponize the social media site he owns against you.
And now Alex expects people just to forget about this whole thing because he deleted some tweets.
In this narrative, Elon looks like an unhinged, dangerous child.
And Alex looks like either a stone-cold idiot who thinks that the ends justify the means, or he's a shameless liar who wants that dangerous child's money.
This is not a good look.
All in all, this is the wrong path to be on.
And the fact that Alex needs to make a choice of how to play this is the result of him making bad conspiracy decisions many steps back.
When David Ike assessed that supporting Elon Musk was bad, this very situation is part of why that was the right move.
And Alex really only has himself to blame for being in a position where he has to carry water for the world's richest dipshit.
I feel like it's such a strange thing to be trying to defend the idea that Trump is a pedophile by getting into a horny conversation about you fucking older women as a kid.
Yeah, you know, I kept, here's what I kept imagining as I was listening to this in order to avoid negative thoughts.
I kept imagining a giant, what are those, what are those like, those diggers, you know, like the big ones with the like claw thing, and then they dig into the ground.
So I've imagined that one starting in 1913 or so and working non-stop until now.
I want you to grow up and get your head in the game so we can get this information out, and I'll retire when I see enough people that know how to get this done, because I had to come out and say, hey, we don't want World War III.
Get the message to Trump that his briefers aren't telling him about a doubling of attacks inside Russia by Ukraine and the NATO group and Lindsey Graham over there and all the rest of it.
And I guarantee you when Trump learns this he isn't going to escalate some big attack and authorize long-range attacks in Russia, which is full war.
And then everything I told you came out, I was trying to stop a goddamn fucking nuclear war.
And you lazy, stupid people on the left and the fake right and the fake populist that just always want to say they've got the answer and they know what's going on and nobody's pure but them and Misrepresent Jones is with Putin.
Jones is spouting Putin stuff.
I said it a week before Lavaroth said we've now learned Trump was giving false briefings.
I said it first.
I don't get stuff from the Russians, they get it from me.
I'm in command, I'm in charge, and when I say That out of everybody out there, everybody, I'm the most dialed in.
I have the most answers, I have the highest accuracy rate, and I don't say that because I'm on a power trip.
It's the obvious, it's dangerous as hell, and I don't want to be in this position, but I've got to be in this position.
That clip, I think, whether it's sincere or not, Alex is trying to put on the facade of being the real Alex on this show.
And I think that the last clip, it really does illustrate an essential piece of the Alex that exists inside that he probably does try to restrain because he knows it's nuts.
I'm specifically talking about the part where he's angrily yelling about how he doesn't get his talking points from the foreign minister of Russia, Sergei Lavrov.
Lavrov gets his talking points from Alex.
This is such a ridiculous thing to say, but I think it accurately conveys Alex's sense of self-importance.
He gravitates towards flagrant liars like Roger Stone and Steve Pieczenik because they're willing to stroke that sense of self-importance, essentially feeding into Alex's need to feel like he's decided the course of history.
Those dudes are using Alex because much like he thinks that Elon Musk is a weapon that his team can use against the globalists, Alex is a weapon that these folks can use against democracy.
And on some level, I'm pretty sure that Alex understands this dynamic and it's intolerable for him to accept, which is why that last clip comes into play.
He has to believe that he's the source of all truth in the world because the alternative is to accept that he's been duped over and over and over again.
If I were someone like Lavrov, I would hear Alex say that kind of thing and just laugh.
You wouldn't ever have to give him a dime and you could be pretty certain he's never going to be a threat to you because Alex believes that your actions are an expression of his influence.
When you do things that he wants you to, it's because you listen to Alex.
When you do things that he doesn't want you to, it's because Alex's sagely guidance didn't get to you in time.
By imagining himself as a figure with any power in this situation, Alex has captured himself in a net where he will have to hurt himself severely if he wants to change any of the allegiances that he's set up.
He's trapped largely by this fraudulent belief that he's in control.
That clip is short, but it's so key to understand Alex's continued support of Musk.
There are a number of reasons that Alex has given for why defending Musk at all costs is important, but this is probably closest to the real one.
Defending Elon Musk is essentially a trial run that he thinks he can entice other billionaires to support his media operation if he does a good enough job.
It's almost like a job interview or proof of concept that Alex is deeply invested proving can work.
If this media ecosystem he's built and inspired can protect Elon when Elon is acting so flagrantly out of control, so transparently corrupt, then it could be a pretty useful thing for other corrupt billionaires who want a media organization to defend them.
Alex is saying that these other corrupt billionaires would love to wade into the waters of extreme right-wing activism, and they're watching Elon closely to see how supported he is by the extreme right-wing media ecosystem.
If this media space is just going to turn on Musk when times get hard, then how can they possibly trust that this media space won't abandon them too?
Slavish defense of Musk is an investment to prove to these other billionaires that you'll have their back too.
Alex came up in a media landscape that was all about astroturfing.
The John Birch Society was a fake grassroots organization that was funded by giant manufacturing interests largely to suppress movements aimed at workers' rights and other social trends that hurt business interests.
His family was raised and suckered into that, and he took that on as the real version of conservative populism.
In contrast to that was the predominant right-wing media that dominated the field that Alex wanted to be in, namely radio.
Folks like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck were popular and they had audiences, but their stature was greatly exaggerated by giant investments by right-wing billionaires.
Their radio ads were subsidized to allow for much easier national syndication, and their profile was boosted by bulk purchase of their books to create the illusion that they were popular, best-selling authors.
They were given shows on Fox.
All of this network was essential to elevating that.
It's something I've been feeling for a while, though.
And the mentality that Alex is expressing after the Elon tweet really makes me think that there could be something here.
Months ago, I said on our show that I thought someone had maybe told Alex to clean up his act, as if he were doing a test run for something bigger, like a job on a more mainstream network.
He stopped doing his show wasted or possibly on stimulants.
He lost a bunch of weight.
And overall, he tried to make himself much more presentable.
He's still often saying insane things and talking about how God gives him visions, but there's less chaos, less hatchet throwing, and less storming off the show when he just gets in a little bit of a bad mood.
I don't know if there's anyone who's actually told Alex that if he cleaned up, they would consider funding his show, but I strongly suspect that someone has given Alex that impression.
It could be like a supposed middleman like Roger saying that if Alex makes himself a little less toxic, he could get a show with Mike Lindell.
Or maybe Tucker has been like, you can come be on my network if you just cool it a little bit.
Or maybe there's someone like Rogan explaining to Alex that if he plays a little bit of ball, there's hundreds of millions of dollars waiting to be had.
Alex knows that entire media ecosystems are viable.
It's the environment that his career started in.
So my theory is that Alex has been convinced that defending Elon Musk is like a trial period where he thinks that he's showing other billionaires what he can do.
Yeah, I mean, the problem here is I think probably the problem of any, I suppose it's the breakdown of all possible communication is that this is the possibility of a spawn con assault.
You know, like literally my defense of this guy is bought and paid for, which makes it so why would I ever believe if you were doing it just for free?
Like, ideologically, I'm defending this guy.
Doesn't matter to me because that guy bought that guy.
You know what I'm saying?
So if the SpawnCon is the same as what you're saying, it doesn't matter.
But now it feels like the opposite is true, where the water filter guy is coming to you and saying for $10,000, you will believe that fluoride is killing people.
That's why Trump doesn't really take the briefings anymore because he knows it's bull, but then he's only watching Fox News.
He watches this show sometimes.
And others, but I mean, he calls it the clips that give him clips.
You know, Baron shows him or Don Jr.
And, you know, we can get him on the phone too, and Roger talks to him almost every day, but it's just, it's very serious.
It's very, very dangerous, obviously.
So that is massive, massive news.
Now, let's go to something good Kash Patel did.
And they're doing a lot of good.
But when he does something bad and tries to tell us Jeffrey Epstein killed himself and it's open and shut or that Crooks acted alone, we know that's not true because they've seen the file.
You got to talk about it.
And that's coming up.
But Patel, breakthrough, we found, it means they've raided Fauci's phone and hard drive from early days of COVID.
So Alex can't praise Kash Patel for something good he's doing when he's also engaged in an elaborate conspiracy to cover up the death of Jeffrey Epstein.
Alex is in a war between God and the devil.
There's no gray area where the FBI director gets to be kind of good, kind of bad, depending on how Alex wants to tell a story.
If Kash Patel doesn't have the courage to tell the truth about Jeffrey Epstein, then he doesn't have the integrity to be in the position of heading the FBI.
It doesn't matter how much Fauci-related red meat he can throw to the right-wing media.
His complicity with the Epstein cover-up is complicity with the devil, according to Alex.
It's not that he has a different position on the Epstein case from Alex.
It's that he knows the truth and is willfully covering it up in order to protect the devil.
If what Alex is saying is supposed to be taken seriously at all, then Patel releasing some Fauci stuff is actually a negative because that information is tainted by being connected to him, the guy who's covering shit up for the devil.
This is the problem with this black and white character stuff.
I mean, by virtue of releasing Fauci and not Epstein, then you are rendering the Fauci stuff a distraction from the Epstein stuff, which means you should be mad dur for releasing the Fauci stuff.
And I think that choosing the venue of going on Joe Rogan's show to discuss this Fauci stuff should make you think, oh, if this is a distraction, then Joe is the perfect place for the FBI to do a distraction.
They had always been looking for Fauci's original phone and not original, but phones and devices he used while he was Fauci back in Trump one during COVID.
So, Alex is playing a clip of Jesse Waters' show on Fox, who was playing a clip of Kash Patel on Rogan.
This is a good illustration of what lazy shitheads these people are.
But I want to really zoom in on what we're listening to there.
This is the director of the FBI appearing as a guest on Joe Rogan's podcast, discussing alleged evidence that he's uncovered related to Fauci's actions in terms of the COVID pandemic.
It's not clear if there's an actual investigation that this is a part of.
And if it is, then this is the FBI director gossiping on a podcast about evidence that hasn't been made public.
Further, this is the director of the FBI saying, we found Fauci's hard drives, but I'm not going to tell you what's on them.
This is him revealing a blank slate for Rogan and his audience to draw whatever conspiracies on they want.
This is conspiracy baiting.
On top of that, Patel, in his capacity as the FBI director, is saying that a possible reason that this evidence won't end up proving all their COVID conspiracies is that Fauci may have already erased stuff from them.
This is providing a preemptive explanation for why this evidence proves the conspiracy, even if it doesn't.
Yeah, you know, it was a good respite we had because you almost forget, right?
Like those first four Trump years, it was like the most horrifying thing that ever happened.
But then the end would be Yakety Sachs and everybody'd be running around like, you know, like this is objectively a horrifying thing that Kash Patel, just being on Rogan, is objectively horrifying.
Holds his feet to the fire about all kinds of things, not letting him, like, Rogan would have to prepare like crazy in order to do this interview responsibly.
I don't think either party would be willing to do that or is even up to it.
But yeah, the fact that this exists is like it's like Yakity Sachs, but like off-tune.
Again, the Democrats wargamed in August of 2020 that if Trump won, they were unable to steal it.
They were going to activate a legal alien in Black Lives Matter and Islamic riots around the country, have blue cities and blue states secede, and cause a civil war in America.
And then when Trump, they were able to steal it, they put that on ICE.
Then when they knew he was going to win, because the poll numbers were so powerful, they began to hype.
Well, if he gets in, he's going to kill the migrants.
Tom Holman's going to mow him down.
They would never do that.
But they're going to elicit riots.
And yet, all these mayors and governors saying they're going to do it.
Colorado, you name it.
Illinois, the mayor in Chicago, and the governor.
And then the last piece is, well, they'll provide the false flag to mow down the illegals.
And I said, they'll also start killing Jews and stuff to get the heat up there.
Now, thousands of people descended in LA and attacked the ICE headquarters, attacked police, attacked everybody else for hours, knowing the police would finally have to respond.
And when the local police and the feds responded, they then jumped on their cars.
They then attacked them, trying to get somebody hurt.
And then the leftist media went, oh my God, a man died when he was run over by ICE.
The guy jumps on the man.
He wasn't even hurt.
He walks off.
But that's just them, again, classic Black Lives Matter thing, trying to get everybody angry to get riots going.
We've had eternal antibodies documents for decades.
So it's pretty easy to see that Alex supports the police response in the LA protests.
At this point, there was a car set on fire in Compton, and people had thrown some stuff at cops, which Trump and the folks in that media were calling lawless rioting.
The situation was exaggerated greatly, and in response to the threat the protests supposedly had, Trump federalized the National Guard, even though the governor of California said no.
In discussing this situation, Alex hasn't even brought that aspect of this up yet.
And this is supposed to be a major issue for him.
He spent entire days of his life yelling about how presidents can't federalize the National Guard, even in the context of national disasters, unless explicitly asked to by the state's governor.
That's one of the biggest indications of a police state being put on the public when the federal government assumes control over these entities like the National Guard.
When Alex is doing this episode, Trump hadn't yet said in the literal Marines, but it shouldn't matter.
Where things stand now should be so far past what Alex can accept.
And we clearly see that he doesn't just accept it, he supports it.
He can rationalize this shit by pointing to fake Soros Antifa contracts that one of his employees found on 4chan, but it doesn't change the fact that Alex Jones built a career pretending to be an expert on the police state only to support some of the clearest police state actions of our lifetimes.
I need to be totally clear about this.
Trump called in the National Guard against the wishes of California's governor and LA's mayor and then sent in Marines.
The governor filed suit against the Trump administration, and the court found Trump's actions to be illegal.
This decision was appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court in a case that's still pending.
In this appeal, Trump's lawyers have argued that courts cannot review the president's deployment of troops on U.S. soil.
Brett Schumate, the lawyer for Trump's DOJ, was asked if the president were to send in troops and given no justification for why they did so.
He replied, quote, there's no role for the court to play in reviewing that decision.
This is a government that's asserting some terrifying power and framing it in very irresponsible ways.
For instance, Homeland Security Secretary Christy Noam said that Trump was sending in these forces to, quote, liberate the city from the socialists.
We all know better.
And the person who most knows better is Alex Jones.
He's made millions of dollars and created multiple documentaries fear-mongering about the very actions he's eagerly supporting now.
Pretending that some protesters deserve being treated like they're in a police state doesn't let you then endorse a police state.
And I hope, like, honestly, the only thing I can wish for is that he actually is tortured by his conscience.
That's maybe my only hope that I have in life now: he actually recognizes what a piece of shit he is.
They're promising these different dates later in the month and next month to go totally ape.
It's already started as the summer cranks up towards somebody in a MAGA hat, somebody in a van, somebody in a parking garage shooting a bunch of them, and then that person conveniently gets killed.
And then they're a Trump supporter.
They're an Alex Jones supporter.
They're an Elon supporter.
It's all pre-baked.
And I've been telling you it was just moves because the Democrats wargamed it and said they'd do this.
And when they say out of a clear blue sky, Trump's going to kill migrants, ICE is going to mow them down in a protest.
I said over and over again in the last six months, I said, ICE is not raiding these demonstrations because they're traps.
They're getting them at work sites, bars, their houses, all of it.
Airports, bus terminals.
They're scaling up the amount of enforcers they've got because they've all been cut down to almost nothing.
And they had a fake right-wing bitch that though they're not really doing anything.
That was all a lie.
So they're attacking from the left and the controlled right.
And I said, then they're going to get so violent in these cities like L.A., like Denver, like Chicago.
I picked those.
That then when they've got to come out, they'll try to provocateur something.
And then as these get bigger, then they're going to roll out the white supremacist mental patient they've got ready to attack or they can't get one to do it.
They'll do it themselves and then just kill some young punk.
And they got a background on that they've been tracking and say he did it.
And you got all these leftist videos of them in Minnesota attacking the ICE and any feds they see get attacked and they try to do raids on kidnapped kids and they're being attacked in Minneapolis, Chicago, everywhere.
And then let's play the other clip of what actually happens where the guy jumps on the car and falls off in his heart.
But then in the news and out of the other groups, oh, a protester who tried to block an ICSUV from leaving with illegals was run over and died of brain death.
So this attributing, like, oh, this protester got hit by a car and he's dead.
The Dems are saying that is meant to prime you and make sure that you, as an audience member, never believes anything that you hear from quote-unquote untrustworthy sources like the Dems or whatever.
So if you hear about atrocities and abuses being carried out against these people, that's fucking just the Dems.
So we've already talked about this, but what Alex is talking about is that Obrego Garcia, he was pulled over for speeding in Tennessee in 2022 with nine people in his car.
There's no evidence that he was human trafficking and was let go with a warning because it appears that they were heading to a work site.
After Obrego Garcia was wrongly deported to El Salvador, the courts ruled that Trump had to return him to the United States.
Trump said he couldn't do it, and then the Supreme Court ruled that it was unquestionably illegal for them to have sent him there and that he needed to be returned.
There was a specific order from a judge that he not be sent to El Salvador because that's where he fled from because his life was at risk as a child from the gangs and shit there.
So deporting him to there was specifically forbidden.
Some people might think that it's possible that the pressing of these human smuggling charges on this guy now that he's been brought back to the United States is a bit of a face-saving measure on the part of the Trump administration.
But I don't know what the truth of the case is.
Obrego Garcia pled not guilty, and I haven't seen any particularly swaying evidence that he is guilty, but I guess the government's word is good enough for Alex these days.
No more of that insisting everyone's innocent until proven guilty.
Obviously, a lot of amazing things have taken place over the course of the last few days.
Basically, Los Angeles is on fire.
An all-out New World Order globalist assault on one of our major cities here in the United States of America.
Trump has unleashed the National Guard onto Los Angeles.
I'm told that they're at least in at least three locations.
As many as 2,000 troops are to be deployed to restore order in the region.
And Gavin Newsom is standing back and whining about this massive federal violation of states' rights.
So I suppose in the mind of these leftists and the Gavin Newsoms and others, it would be better that we allow our major cities to totally burn to the ground.
These guys just need to admit that they were lying when they said they cared about states' rights because their current shit is incompatible with the beliefs that they're supposed to have.
For one thing, L.A. wasn't on fire.
This is dramatic bullshit meant to justify Trump's overreaction.
And Chase knows exactly what part he's playing in this game.
He exaggerates the situation to create the appearance that Trump had no choice.
And his violation of principles that InfoWars is supposed to hold sacred, that's actually an act of heroism.
You don't want Trump to federalize the National Guard?
What?
Do you want L.A. to continue to burn to the ground?
If there are instances where this sacred principle is violatable, then it's not a sacred principle.
And you all were full of shit.
These folks just want raw power and the exercise of that power over their enemies.
When their enemies are in office, any single thing they do is a violation of the sacred contract that is the Constitution.
If the Obama administration wants to run drills to practice interagency coordination during natural disasters, that's FEMA plotting to put all of Alex's friends into camps, and it is unacceptable.
The Constitution is super important, and everything is a violation of it because in that environment, Alex and his team are playing from a very weak position.
They hold no power, and their only real play is to constantly point to the rule book and demand that their enemies play by the letter of their interpretation of the law.
But now Alex's team is in a very strong position.
Arguably, they have all of the power in the country, and it's Alex's job to justify the use of that power.
The rule book really isn't important anymore because it actually never was.
The Constitution has served its purpose for Alex, and it would really only get in the way at this point.
Don't expect him to be circulating any petitions to reassert the 10th Amendment anytime soon.
Everything is soaked in gasoline and just ready to go up.
Yep.
And I think, well, I think that honestly the reason for that is social media because videos circulate of tiny little things where like a car gets set on fire or somebody punches somebody and that comes to characterize like the entire city.
Two million people in Chicago are all punching each other.
Well, it's also like a two-sided thing where you have the inability to really understand scale, and then on the other side of it, the bombardment of the out-of-scale videos on social media and memes and stuff.
And in less than 24 hours after unleashing the National Guard on the city, the troops are ready and deployed, and order is being restored.
But we've seen mob after mob, car burning after car burning, brick thrown after brick thrown, even protesters being run over, not because of any brutality from ICE, but because of their own just recklessness and violence and celebration of chaos.
I remember time and time again during the presidential primaries for this campaign when the Nikki Haleys were running.
We heard the same rhetoric from the left and the right, the right that was opposed to Donald Trump.
We heard that he was the chaos candidate.
And now that he's finally restoring order in the United States of America, finally dealing with the fact that we have sponsored an invasion over the course of the last four years of our very own country, our very own political class sponsoring this invasion.
Now we are seeing what has to be done to rectify the issue.
Now it is proven that there are sleeper cells to the tune of hundreds or thousands or even millions within the United States of America that can be activated by these NGOs and folks.
It is coordinated.
This is not some spontaneous reaction to animosity toward ICE because they raided a Home Depot in California.
This is just an excuse being used by the left to loot.
I mean, why is it that they had to deploy the National Guard to the fashion district of Los Angeles first?
I also don't know if Chase knows what the fashion district is, but it's not like the high-end fashion area in L.A.
It used to be called the Garment District, but some business owners came up with the idea to change the name in the 90s as a part of trying to revitalize the neighborhood.
The reason that there were protests in the fashion district is because it's mostly a wear, like a wholesale retailer area.
There are shops and stuff, but a lot of the businesses there are warehouses for apparel companies.
And ICE began raiding some of these companies.
For instance, according to In These Times, quote, roughly two dozen garment workers were detained at an ambiance apparel warehouse, which led to the president of the SEIU California, David Huerta, coming to the warehouse to see what was up, and then ICE arrested him.
This is the president of the Service Employees International Union.
And he came to check on what's going on with these workers, and I've arrested him.
So when Chase is being like, why is it in the fashion district?
Yeah, you know what's always fun about this is like it would make sense if you genuinely believe that this is the way to accomplish what you want out of like an anti-immigration thing, which is more home-grown employment, yada, yada, yada, yada, right?
If it was really about that and you really believed that doing this would accomplish that, then you would keep track.
You would have numbers.
You would know.
You would have like, okay, well, we've got this many job openings now because we deported these people.
So boom, let's come follow up next month.
Are you hiring people?
You would do these things so that later, three years for now, four years from now, whenever stuff comes up again, you could be like, I know you think it's wrong, but at the very least, it works.
Now, at first, as somebody who considers himself an InfoWarrior, after all, I do work for InfoWars.
I am a host sometimes on InfoWars.
My first inclination was, oh my goodness, there are no heroes left.
Even Bongino and Kash Patel sold out.
But I'm sending clips of Bongino and Patel to people that I know in the space.
I'm not going to say their names because I want to protect their reputation.
Who are known experts on body language interpretation.
And I'm saying, hey, what do you think of this clip?
What is the draw from this clip?
And my friend responds, somebody who's been involved in interrogations, getting information from serious violent criminals for an extended period of time, dealing with psychopaths for an extended period of time, testifying as an expert, appearing on major television shows and speaking events, talking about body language and how you can tell if someone's lying.
Only says, look, I was just as shocked as you are, but I don't see any indication that either Bongino or Kash Patel are lying in this clip.
And I've been studying them very closely.
I'm very familiar with their baseline.
I don't know what's going on here, but it's something other than lying.
Possession.
And I start looking at this, and then I watch this conversation that took place between Kash Patel and Joe Roman.
And I like Cash.
In fact, I think that his mother went to my college.
I think she started going there the year that I graduated.
Yesterday, while I was watching Alex Jones do a Saturday transmission on AJN Live on X, it occurred to me, oh my gosh, They probably came in to the FBI, immediately looked at the Epstein files.
And then we're told or realized that Jeffrey Epstein is in witness protection.
And so now they have to push the narrative that he killed himself in order to protect the fact that there's some greater goal to be accomplished with Witpro.
And I post something about this and it absolutely blows up on Axe.
And in the replies, I just see so much evidence of this.
And frankly, I'm not somebody who had investigated the Jeffrey Epstein stuff abundantly.
Chase's premise here is that he consulted with a friend of his who knows body language who watched Bongino and Patel talking about how Epstein killed himself and said they're not lying.
This is a really tough pill to swallow because Bongino and Patel are supposed to be Trump guys.
And all the Trump guys are supposed to think that Epstein was murdered.
Therefore, they must be lying.
And yet this body language friend said they weren't.
So there has to be another explanation.
Chase thinks about it for a while and he has this revelation while watching Alex's dumb show.
What if Epstein is in witness protection?
Now here's why Chase is stupid.
If Bongino and Patel know that Epstein was in witness protection, then they would still be lying when they told everyone that Epstein killed himself.
Patel literally said, quote, you know a suicide when you see one and that's what this is.
Bongino said, quote, he killed himself.
You want me to get, I've seen the whole file.
He killed himself.
What Chase has done is he's introduced a non-sequitur into his storyline.
People are basically debating whether A or B is true.
A is that Epstein killed himself and B is that he did not.
Alex and all his media buddies are insistent on B, but Bongino and Patel are saying A.
It's possible that they're lying when they say A, but that means that you'd have to treat them as conspirators.
And eventually that means you'd have to treat Trump as an active participant in this cover-up.
So that is not a good option.
Plus, the body language guy says they're not lying about believing A.
So Chase is saying, what about C?
C isn't even on the table in the conversation.
And if you think about it for just a second, it's actually already contained as a subset of B.
It's inside B.
It's not a new option.
If Epstein is in witness protection, that means he didn't kill himself.
It's still B. Also, it really should be obvious to Chase that if he pursues this line of reasoning too far, he's going to end up saying that Epstein's a hero in this story.
I get why Chase wants to sound interesting and why it's really uncomfortable as an idea to say that Bongino and Patel are lying, but Chase doesn't understand the implications of the things that he's suggesting.
This is what I'm talking about when I say that he's a good first step guy, but his shit falls apart really fast if you take a second to think about it.
And the Infowar is so based on not needing like real examination of the ideas that you put forth.
And I started looking into the witness protection program that exists both here in the United States of America as well as the Israeli one.
And they'll do things like plastic surgery and change the way that you look so that you can hide in plain sight basically anywhere in the world that you need to in order to protect your identity.
And then you look into the fact that he had Saudi Arabian passports with different names on them, and he was traveling all over the world, and he had multiple passports from the United States of America, and it's just all so bizarre.
And then this week, Alan Dershowitz is coming out and saying that Ghislaine Maxwell should be pardoned because she was just as much a victim of Jeffrey Epstein as anybody else.
I'm thinking to myself calling for the pardon of perhaps the only person in the world that was important to Jeffrey Epstein in the context of the fact that they're coming out and pushing that Jeffrey Epstein actually killed himself when we know it's abundantly unlikely that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself.
Oh, he's in witness protection.
And maybe part of the deal was that Ghislaine would get out and be reunited with him somewhere else.
But like the general idea that is getting across is if you are a person who's like, hey, we don't need to share any more information about Epstein, it's because that information is about you.
We're going into day four of the publicly funded by the Democrat and Deep State Soros uprisings.
The documents, the funding numbers, who's funding it, how they're running it is all public.
We also have Democrat leaders, senators, congresspeople, mayors saying, oh, we run the rapid response force to ICE.
The communist mayor said, oh, no, we are deploying.
The city directs these people.
Meanwhile, you have the backdrop of new scum and the rest of them.
Senator Murphy and others saying this is totally peaceful.
Not mostly peaceful.
They're calling it totally normal.
Illegal aliens running around burning everything down in communists and looting stores and beating and stabbing and trying to kill police, raining rocks down on them.
And you know what's coming next.
You know it's all in the podesta battle plan.
Somebody's going to mow down a bunch of them and they're going to blame ICE.
The bullets will come from behind the police from a high-rise or an apartment complex or a parking garage or out of a van.
They'll be found a dead Trump supporter.
It's all been scripted, all been prepared.
And I have compilations of myself in the last six months saying specifically, probably in LA, probably in June.
This is real criminal uprising by the Democratic Party with their plan to create nationwide chaos.
This is just the trigger.
And then launch it nationwide.
And now we have Senator Murphy and others saying this is the beginning.
They want nationwide uprisings.
It's already happening in Houston and Minneapolis and Seattle and Chicago.
Feds going anywhere, even on drug raids, are being overwhelmed and attacked.
Crowds come up and say, we're going to murder you.
We're going to shoot you in the head and start throwing bottles at them.
And the feds evacuate.
Been showing you this for two weeks, and I told you this is the buildup.
This is the escalation.
Anti-voting number campuses.
All these attacks.
How did we know exactly what would happen?
Getting chills right now.
Because John Podesta in August of 2020 said if Trump was able to win the election, they couldn't steal it.
A big article in the New York Times that they had war gamed, nationwide uprisings, blue cities and states all seceding and forming their new government.
So the police in L.A. were pretty clear that they could handle the situation and they didn't need federal help.
The governor is literally suing Trump for calling in the National Guard against his wishes, which pretty perfectly sums up the dynamic that played out.
There's a protest locally in LA that has a couple of hotspots and that the police can handle.
Videos of these hotspots circulate on social media, and then the right-wing pundits start sensationalizing them.
They create the appearance that L.A. is on fire by pretending that the things captured in the little hotspot videos represent what it's like all over the city.
And this false appearance gives Trump a justification to send in troops to quell this rebellion that doesn't really exist.
The authorities on the ground in the state can tell Trump's folks, we don't need your help, but everyone can see these social media videos and the drumbeat narrative put in place by the right-wing media is that it's complete chaos everywhere in L.A. Of course they need Trump's help.
And if they're saying that they don't, that must be proof that they're secretly trying to help the rioters.
Also, the crime rate in Austin hasn't tripled and the people in office aren't avowed Marxists.
Alex's employee, Jamie White, was killed outside his home on March 9th.
Since we last discussed this story, there have been some arrests in the case.
A 17-year-old named Eloy Camarillo has been charged in the case.
And according to Fox Austin, he admitted that he was part of a group that wanted to steal Jamie's car and joyride it and then shot Jamie when he caught them in the act.
Another 17-year-old and two 15-year-olds were also arrested.
All the stuff, other stuff there about being anti-American, Metcha La Raza, Mexican supremacists, that's all coming from Alex's imagination.
The kernel of information that he's working with that is true is that there was a rap song that was reportedly found on one of the suspects' phones that included the lyric quote, white boy came outside, hit his damn ass with a nine.
And it's interesting because he is white boy in the sense that he is a white person.
Going back over six months and through to today of me laying out exactly what is happening now and the final piece, the mass shooting or truck bombing.
And they like a mass shooting, but because they can blame guns as well then, but they may go with a truck bomb because a smaller Merc team can do it.
Or you can even have a two-man Merck team do it and then use a driverless truck to roll it in and they'll put a dead body of a MAGA person that they've drugged and taken over their identity.
And then, of course, they'll find the ID and stuff in the bomb wreckage.
So that's the secondary attack.
The third attack profile is a mass shooting or bombing of a black church or college.
They pre-programmed that.
You've been warned.
We're not playing games here.
There's a reason they want me off the air because I got their number.
And they've got it set for this weekend as the start of the nationwide uprising, the Democrat Party groups, the anti-food coalition say.
And then not this weekend, but the next one is the big one they're saying.
All this scripted, all this prepared.
So we're talking about 13 days from now in the latter part of June is when this is going to go absolutely next level.
And they've already triggered these NGOs.
They've already given them their orders.
And so it's very hard to pull this back.
And of course, you have the illegal aliens and others bringing their children wrapped in Mexican flags to the violent mob riots, insurrections, and using them as human shields so they can then put that all over the Spanish-speaking media and wave the bloody shirt to cause more rage.
If you have any deductive understanding or any logic, anybody bringing their child in a stroller to a burning city mob is a criminal, in my view.
Democrat leaders, senators, mayors, you name it, praising him.
And Governor Newsom about what an evil man Trump is.
And come get me, Tom Homan.
Come get me.
As he brags that it's all a big sanctuary state to protect this lawless activity.
That's what Governor Murphy said.
He goes, I got legal aliens living with me.
Come get me.
I'm a human smuggler.
Come get me.
The mayor of Denver, we're going to have uprisings.
We're going to physically block ice when they come in here.
Mayor of Chicago, we're going to fight you.
The view.
We're going to be ready to fight and die.
Oh, no, it's not calls for violence or anything.
Trump said, go to the Capitol peacefully and protest peacefully on January 6th, but they banned him on Twitter and everywhere, so he couldn't be seen saying that.
Is Alex really tone-policing the Democrats about using terms like fight?
This is silly, but more to the point, it has to come off as very un-alpha to his alpha-ness-obsessed audience.
Alex screams about how he's in a war and he longs for the sweet embrace of fighting constantly on the show.
So if you're a listener, it should come off as really weak for him to be this sensitive about comments from Democrats.
Plus, Alex sells shirts with Trump on them that say fight, fight, fight.
And just before January 6th popped off, Trump said in his speech, quote, and we fight.
We fight like hell.
And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore.
Two sentences later, he told the crowd to go down to the Capitol so they could help the Republicans, quote, try to give them the kind of pride and boldness they need to take back our country.
So my point is that Alex could cut this shit right out, but also that he needs to put on his big boy pants.
If he wants to live in a world where he gets to spend full segments of his show pornographically describing violence he wants to carry out against people like Brian Stelter, then he needs to suck it up and not be such a snowflake when other people are using the word fight.
It makes him come off like a loser little titty baby.
Also, it should be fairly easy to note that if you're not afraid of using the word fight, but you are very interested in using the words, everybody be peaceful, you're probably lying.
I have no idea what Gavin Newsom is supposed to do with Jamie White's murder, which happened in Texas or Denver homicide rates, but I guess this is all really just an expression of Alex's xenophobia.
There's no publicly available information about two of the people arrested in White's case because they're 15 years old.
Alex is taking advantage of that fact that the police, they can't release information on juveniles, so you can just make up whatever picture of them that he wants.
And that other guy did record a rap lyric that I mentioned, but it's hard to say if it was a racial thing.
He said, quote, white boy came outside.
It could be a reference to his name.
Like he would, presumably the guy who shot him would have seen a news story and been able to figure out Jamie's white, Jamie White's name.
So it seems like double entendre is possible.
Who knows?
As for Denver, their homicide and violent crime rates have dropped in the last year.
The problem with Alex's explanation is that they've been dropping every year since 2020.
So Trump's terrorizing immigrants isn't what's driving that drop.
In many places, crimes increased in the aftermath of COVID, which makes sense.
As time has gone on, the rates are dropping back to pre-pandemic levels.
And Alex is playing a fun game where he pretends that moving towards a white nationalist state is really what's behind dropping crime when it's really recovery from COVID.
Literally, we just saw the kickoff of the first play of the game.
And the rest is going to happen.
It's going to unfold.
There's no putting this genie in the bottle.
The genie is out and it's not going back in.
There are people in the Southwest, Southern California, who have been planning and waiting for this for decades.
And they see this as like a Stalingrad.
This is a do or die.
They are going to continue this.
If they are pushed off of one highway, they're just going to atomize and go into smaller cells and continue the anarchy, arson attacks, things like that.
It's sort of like a puddle of mercury.
If you have one big blob of mercury and you hit it with a hammer, you don't get rid of the mercury.
You just split into a thousand little pieces of mercury.
And that's what's going to happen when the National Guard confronts these guys.
They're just going to move a few blocks away and start setting garages and empty cars on fire.
So we'll get the pictures of arson attacks all night.
So Alex choosing to have Matt Bracken on here is an intentional, inflammatory move.
Matt Bracken is a man who's obsessed with the idea that a race war is inevitable, and he's someone who's prone to speaking pretty irresponsibly.
For example, on December 31st, 2020, he took to Alex's show to advocate the Patriots storm the Capitol on January 6th, which went on to happen about a week later.
This was really suspicious, and the connection this implied between Alex and foreknowledge about what his friends like Stuart Rhodes and Enrique Tario, as well as his former employee Joe Biggs, were planning to do that day was way too strong.
Alex had to bench Bracken and pretend not to know him for a while until that whole thing blew over.
And now I guess it's safe to have him back on again.
But he's a good hand in terms of civil unrest situations.
He's going to over-dramatize everything, and the story will always have that racial undertone that Alex's audience craves.
One of Bracken's big points on this show is that Hispanic people in the LAPD can't be trusted to not be loyal to the protesters, and there's going to be a civil war within the police that breaks down on ethnic lines.
And I'm sure they'll have the corporate fact checker say it's not true because it hasn't been officially said by somebody.
If you remember going back when President Trump was president-elect and Biden started the authorization of massive heavy missile attacks inside Russia, I said, within a week, Russia will say we're basically in World War III with the U.S. You would see other leaders say that.
And actually, three days later, they did say that.
And we're in a war with Russia.
You know, the New York Times few months ago finally admitted that and said the U.S. ran the whole thing.
And two weeks ago, you had the U.S. envoy General Kellogg say, look, we are in a proxy war.
We've been officially unofficially at war with Russia and this needs to stop.
So when I make this announcement, I'm making it first.
The second American Civil War has started.
You can market today.
And it is the globalist and the internationalist and the blackrock, ChiCom, radical Islamic, communist, NGO alliance.
It's losing its power worldwide, but now it wants to grab control of pieces of the U.S.
And then totally open the door up to turn us into their new third world base.
And then you have sane people in Europe, the United States, the UK, Australia, New Zealand trying to get our governments back and trying to bring back basic civilization and new process and freedom.
And Trump is the leader of that worldwide movement, 1776 worldwide.
And people need to learn the players and learn what we're up against, or we're going to continue to have escalating crises and war.
This rhetoric is insanely dangerous, and it plays hand in hand with Alex's preemptive damage control about calling all shootings that might happen against protesters a false flag.
With one hand, he's insisting that the globalists are about to pull a false flag at a protest.
And with the other hand, he's telling everyone that the war is on and it's time to shoot.
There's no excuse I can think of to send this kind of messaging in tandem, except if you're interested in inciting people towards committing acts of domestic terror because you feel like you've laid the groundwork to where you could blame it on your enemies and use that terror you stoked to add to your own political power.
I'm sure that at some other point, Alex has said that a civil war has started and it's happening, but this feels unique.
Like this, mark the day the civil war has started.
Sure.
That's like a guy saying, I see the whites in their eyes.
I would prefer if I was to hear somebody saying, like, ah, the civil war has begun.
I would prefer it if that was a person who was on the team that did not have any guns as opposed to the one with a lot of guns, many of which are unregistered.
We're going to have to have this very, the info war is going to be key here because it's going to, people will have to understand this is an invasion.
And, you know, whether it's an invasion like Normandy or whether it's an invasion of stealth where the fighters are brought across under Biden and then 10 or 20 million to get their weapons once they're here, you know, it's still an invasion.
And the guarantee clause of the Constitution gives the president not only the right, but the responsibility to repel an invasion.
And the Alien Removal Act, which is on the books, also gives him the right to deport anybody, you know, any foreigner over the any foreign male over the age of 15 who prevents a threat.
You're gone.
It's right in the Alien Removal Act.
It doesn't require a declared war.
There's the URA clause in the Alien Removal Act, which is basically, you know, widens it wide open to where they will use it today.
So the key thing is not to blunder in there heavy and like you conquer Baghdad, but then what?
Right?
The key is going to be preparing the ground in the information war so that people clearly understand who the traitors are.
The traitors are the ones who are helping the invaders.
I can't really count the number of times Alex has said this is the big one.
The globalists are making their move, but this still does feel somewhat different because it's in the context of a civil war that Alex has declared is started.
If the civil war is started and the globalists are making their big move, there's literally no other message you should take if you take Alex seriously than now is the time to shoot people.
Matt Bracken is right on here that sending in tanks and a huge display of force into LA would be counterproductive.
And what they really need to do is more thoroughly demonize immigrants so they can start accusing people who support immigrant rights of being traitors.
As it stands now, they can really only use this authoritarian push to detain and deport non-citizens.
But if you're able to radicalize things to the point where even the act of standing up for immigrants is traitorous to the United States, you can disappear whoever you want.
Matt Brecken is giving great advice here on how to create a police state and facilitate a campaign of ethnic cleansing in the United States.
Yeah, you know, it is kind of interesting when you think about it.
There was, you know, there's a blueprint for how to make the blacklists of the communists and, you know, get them out of here, make sure that they never get work.
But because nobody actually stopped it and it was just kind of like, I don't know, a bunch of idiots, there's no blueprint for how to stop it.
Same thing with other globalist parties around the world.
So they're all going to utilitarianism.
They're all going to total censorship.
They're all going to arresting their opposition.
They're all going to activating the big groups they brought in of federal populations that burn things down if the population ever tries to get back control.
And so that's where we are now.
And they were going to push Trump, as Podesta said in that big war game that I've harped on thousands of times in the last five years, five years in August, because they were so honest about what they would do.
Hab insurrections, have uprisings, force Trump to go in, try to restore order, break down the country, bare minimum crash economy, then organize a coalition of enough states to demand the federal government's surrender, basically.
So this is terrorism.
Get the F out of L.A. or we'll burn it down, says the congresswoman, the governor.
Come get me.
Arrest me.
Make me the martyr.
They believe they're still going to beat us.
This is their absolute break-the-glass plan that they've had on the books for a long time.
For the entirety of Alex's career that I've been aware of, you know, all the episodes that I've heard from the early days, he's been a guy who used Rex 84 as the proof that the government has a plan to round up right-wingers and put them into camps.
In the same way that Operation Northwoods is the real-world thing that serves as the basis for all the thousands of imaginary false flags Alex has uncovered over the years, Rex 84 is the real world thing that proves that FEMA was going to come and get him because he's too patriotic.
No ifs, ands, or buts.
It was bad, and it was part of the globalists' plans.
Here's just a little taste of Alex talking about it in 2006.
In my first documentary film that I produced, America Destroyed by Design, we didn't just go show the handover of the Panama Canal and, of course, the Long Beach Naval Base to the Chi-Coms.
We also played clips from the 1986 Iran concert hearings where Congressman Jack Brooks from Texas goes to Oliver North: hey, what about this plan?
Of course, in the name of dealing with illegal aliens, even then, that was the plan.
We'll build camps, say it's for illegal aliens, and then put political dissonance in it.
And he says, what's this plan about putting political dissidents in camps here in America that I saw in Miami papers?
We ought to get that clip and play it.
And the committee chairman, Inouway, who's still up there, Brooks is dead now, says we cannot talk about that now.
We'll talk about that if you'd like in executive session.
A lot of that was later declassified was Operation Rex 84.
So now they're telling us, oh, we're building all these camps for illegal aliens.
And then they're saying, oh, you know, because most Americans want to do something about the illegal aliens, but that's just the surface.
And they say, oh, even in the Houston Chronicle.
And it's going to be during crises for American citizens.
And to be clear, this retelling is the Infowars version of Rex 84, not the real world one.
The globalists wanted to create camps that they could use to imprison political dissenters.
And the way that they tried to sell it to the public was by saying that they were to house undocumented immigrants.
The public would be more inclined to see that as a benign use for the camps.
So the globalists could get them built.
And by that point, they could use them to secretly scoop up Alex and all the people like him who were opposed to the new world order and the police state that they sought to impose.
This was during the Reagan administration.
So the political dissenters that were targeted by Rex 84, that plan, they were obviously socialists and left-wingers.
But Alex understood that if this kind of treatment could be applied to them, it could be applied to right-wingers just as easily.
Wait, so you're saying like some sort of, imagine there was some sort of company that was making a database of some sort of all a certain type of people.
Right.
You're saying that you could also draw the conclusion from these information that they might expand that out?
I mean, well, in a way, it makes it almost like a life cycle of a butterfly, you know, right?
Like you start out because it's profitable to open up this space where you're anti-tyranny, but then because of what you do and what you actually believe, you lead to tyranny.
And then because you've learned the tyranny, well, you might as well be pro-tyranny.
You know what I'm saying?
You don't want to be on the other side of tyranny.
Anti-tyranny is only cool when you're not in tyranny.
No, but I can advance the interests of everybody and the protection of everybody from the police state.
But all I really care about is the straight white males, Christians part.
That's all I really care about.
But I can make it look like I'm fighting for everyone.
And then over time, the moth comes to realize, like, hey, there's an option where I can just look out for the interests of straight white males, Christian males.
So, Alex, I honestly think that after saying that we're in a civil war and after saying all this other crazy shit, this is deeply, deeply irresponsible.
This is their absolute break-the-glass plan that they've had on the books for a long time.
Reagan knew about it when it was embryonic.
So they had the response to it, Rex 84.
Well, here's the deal: Trump wants stability, controlled borders, not having a war.
He doesn't want totalitarianism.
He wants to turn the country around.
But when groups bring you warfare and don't follow the rule of law or even the rules of war, terrorism, they have brought us here.
And they think that when Trump's forced to respond and your force responds, the military's forced to respond and choose a side, the globalist anarchy collapse into the country, nuclear war, you name it, that we'll just balk and that they're going to have us go to our knees and capitulate and then let them have their long victory bringing in more illegals for congressional apportionment and voting.
You know, just the main message I think that has to get out is to pin the traitors on the side of the invaders.
You put like those memes of making Newsom's face next to the guy with the Mexican flag on the burning car.
That has to be an image that is in every American's mind.
He is on the side of these invaders.
Biden and Mallorcus brought in 10 to 20 million new young fighting-age men into this country, unarmed, knowing they can be armed later, and they are the invaders.
Anybody who is supporting the invaders is a traitor.
So it's a very powerful word.
I call them the two T's, treason and traitor.
Hang traitor around Bass's neck.
Hang traitor around Newsom's neck so that when people see him talking about, oh, our poor community, you are talking about the invaders.
You are supporting the invaders against the people who are trying to restore our country.
And this is going to be an easy message to get out if our network talking heads will stop focusing on minutiae and look at the big issues like Article 4, Section 4, the guarantee clause.
Federal government must stop invasions, though the president has great power through that.
And the Alien Removal Act, Sedition Acts, there's a lot that can be done, but the intellectual argument has to be made that we are on the right side.
And the people supporting the invaders are traitors.
And there will also be targeted assassinations of enemies.
Like it'll begin with like gangland type of hits where you just have an opportunity to take out your enemy because you know that the police are basically overwhelmed and unable to respond.
There won't be any chance to collect evidence, etc.
So you'll see a lot of targeted hits.
This could also involve hits against police at their own homes, you know, DHS or ICE officials at their own homes.
So, you know, in this day and age, with Google street maps, you can find a picture of a guy's house from above from the street, mark it.
One guy can mark it, you know, with something like a spray pane on the sidewalk.
Somebody else comes along with the Molotov cocktail.
This is the beginning of a modern urban dirty war.
Less than a week after this show, there were two targeted assassination attempts at the home of Minnesota lawmakers.
One was successful in killing the Minnesota House Speaker and her husband.
The other one only wounding Minnesota State Senator John Huffman and his wife.
The killer had a list of other potential targets who were political figures, and he probably would have attempted to kill more of them if he hadn't been interrupted at his second location.
He escaped and led law enforcement on a long manhunt before getting caught on the 16th.
And the time that he was on the run, media outlets interviewed his roommate who shared his last text that he got from the killer that said, quote, I love you guys.
I made some choices, and you guys don't know anything about this, but I'm going to be gone for a while.
Maybe dead shortly.
In another interview, the roommate was asked if the killer was into any particular media, and the first thing that he brought up was that the dude was a big fan of InfoWars.
When I first heard about the story, I didn't immediately assume that the shooter was a fan of InfoWars.
It's important to understand that possibility doesn't mean the same thing as proof.
So even if it seemed like something that someone who listened to InfoWars might do, that doesn't really mean anything.
When I watched the interviews with the roommate, things clicked a little bit more into place.
As Alex has been covering the protests in LA, he's been painting a very severe picture.
He's also been mentioning Minneapolis a lot as a way to re-evoke emotional memories about the George Floyd protests.
He's been saying that we're in a real civil war.
And while interviewing Matt Bracken, Matt essentially describes an attack someone could make on a public official.
He's saying that that's what the globalists might do.
But if you're hearing this show and you think that there's a civil war that's broken out, it kind of makes sense that Bracken's commentary sounds more like a pitch meeting.
And when I heard that the roommate read his last text from the shooter, one particular word jumped out at me, and that was choices.
I've made some choices.
It made me think of a video that Alex plays at the beginning of most of his shows.
We've talked about this before, but in the context, this current context, I wanted to play this clip again.
We've drawn them out of their rat holes to do all of this.
The Soros scum and the Soros DA, all of them, they're filth.
They're disgusting tyrants.
Just like judges in Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia.
They're disgusting.
And it's like we're in the dark and they got night vision.
We're in a pitch black arena with no light and they've got their illuminators on and they can see us and we can't see them.
Well, guess what?
I walked over with my listeners collectively and pulled the switch and turned the lights on.
The real war's here with the Globalist and Soros and Obama and the New World Order and BlackRock.
They have declared war on us and we accept the challenge.
We're taking the country back.
Their attacks on Trump, their law fair, all the criminal activity.
How'd that work out for them?
They were dumb enough to brag.
Remember, everywhere, it'll be over for Trump when this mugshot comes out in Georgia.
We're finally getting it.
Every channel, remember?
It's the end.
The mug shot.
And then Trump nails it with a beyond Clint Eastwood, badass American eagle gaze of total defiance that everybody looks at and knows deep down.
That's the alpha male.
That's the badass.
That's the defiant real person.
You can't fake that look.
And then when they shot him, he got even more of that look.
Except the lips pulled down and the teeth bared and the eyes bugging out.
Yes.
Yes, we get to see who's really who at times like this, don't we?
And now the bad guys are going to find out who's really who, aren't you?
Because the veneer of civilization is burning off.
And all the posers and all the thugs and all the boys who thought they had this country on its knees and cowed are now just beginning to understand that they have awoken the terrible giant.
I feel like if you were listening to this show and took it at all seriously, then that video would leave you in a position where you felt you had to make some choices.
When I started this episode, I said I was going to make a grand statement, and here it comes.
I'm not saying that Alex is fully responsible for the murders and attempted murders of those Minnesota lawmakers, but I am saying that the way that he behaves on air makes those kind of acts more likely to happen.
And there's no way that anyone could convince me that Alex doesn't understand that.
I think that there is probably at least some connection between the behavior that he's engaging in on air and those murders.
I don't think that Alex meant to.
He doesn't know who these lawmakers are.
It's not like he gives a shit, but I don't believe for a second that he doesn't understand the potential ramifications and the types of behavior that he's trying to elicit from people.
And we don't always see follow-through.
There's not always a news story that is the consequence of someone taking action because of Alex's inspiration.
Sure.
But from what I've seen of this case, it seems like, well, this is probably one of the times that it happened.
That's why these days before that false flag are so important to educate people about who is right and who is wrong in this situation, that this is sedition.
They are seceding from the federal government and they are siding with the invaders.
The people who defend the invaders are traitors.
Traitors traditionally did not get the firing squad that an honorable soldier would get.
Traitors were hung.
Okay?
They were not given the respect of a firing squad.
And so hanging the label traitor on somebody is very loaded and very powerful.
But that's exactly what they are.
And that's why we have to use the T-word traitor for these people.
So that when things come to a boiling point, you're going to be on one side or the other side.
All right, Matt Bragg's with us about another 10 minutes or so.
And folks, these clips on the play next segment that just came out are insane.
Democrat leaders saying storm ice facilities.
I mean, this is it.
I'm telling you, I can see it intellectually, informationally, but I'm just, I usually get a chill once a week when I say something I know is really important and I just, it hits me.
I'm getting chills every 10 seconds right now.
I mean, my spidey senses is danger, danger.
You know, when Lord of the Rings, when goblins are near, sting starts glowing.
In the 65 riot, there are a lot of personal histories.
There was not even a SWAT team yet.
A riot squad, kind of, maybe some shields, batons, but there was no SWAT team.
But there are a lot of anecdotal histories of police going four to a car, three or four to a police car, and bringing their own deer rifles.
And if they saw somebody engaged in an arson attack, they would drop them.
This wasn't in a police report.
People just shut up.
They just shot and shut up.
So the police in 65, there were no smartphones around to catch them in the act.
So if you want to stop arsonists, you have to shoot arsonists.
You can't let them walk down the street preparing Molotov cocktails to throw into the furniture store.
But in this era, that'll never happen.
The police will never be authorized deadly force, even against arsonists.
So what's going to happen is vigilantes are going to do that instead.
And this is going to become a rifle war.
I wrote about this pretty extensively in When the Music Stops, How America's Cities Will Explode in Violence.
When the police are not able to clear roads or protect neighborhoods, suburban vigilantes are going to do it on their own.
And they're going to do it wearing Balaclavas, IRA style, and they are going to shoot anybody they think is an arsonist or an insurrectionist from the other side.
I'm not excusing it.
I'm just saying, based on my study of history, particularly Northern Ireland, this is what's going to happen.
So urban, I mean, suburban vigilantes are going to step up and kill people because the cops, they have smartphones that are going to get them in trouble and stuff.
And in that scenario, we will win, though I'm not endorsing it, but here's the problem.
The left is so under mind control that even though they're burning down buildings and killing people, when people start defending their property and things, they will spin each one of those like a George Floyd and use that to expand the burning down around the country.
So let's look at one of the main groups, and then they always create a new front group, Black Lives Matter, you name it.
If you look at No Kings that popped up a few months ago saying Trump's a king, and you look at the big globalist billionaires that fund it and their aims and their goals, and I'll show you some of the other funding to it.
This is a front group for hundreds of NGOs, but you track each one of them, got massive money from the Department of Energy, the EPA, USAID, that all means CIA.
And they've got maps of what they're going to do starting on June 14th.
This is just the warm-up right now, as I warned you.
So you may notice that Alex is saying that the No Kings protest is set to be the big event, that the LA protests are just the dress rehearsal for.
This is just the beginning, and that's when it's really kicking off.
So that's taking place on June 14th, which happens to be the day when the lawmakers in Minnesota were assassinated.
And the guy who did it had no kings flyers in his car.
Since the murders, it came out in his charging document that on June 9th, the shooter made a bunch of purchases related to carrying out the attack, like the fake license plate to label his car as a police vehicle and ammo.
That happens to be the day that this episode that we're listening to is from, where Alex is declaring the Civil War has begun.
No, I mean, it's interesting because ultimately what we're all going to have to wrestle with is an amount of helplessness in the face of overwhelming power.
And the question of winning is not possible, so it's just endurance.
And so in order to endure through what's going to come, you got to accept that shit's going to get dark.
And shit's going to get dark as a consequence of the things that people have done.
Not as like a surprise, things are suddenly getting dark.
And then second, in terms of this specific case, Alex, I think, has some overlap with this guy's path towards targeted assassinations of political figures on the specific date.
I think that there appears to be connection here.
Sure.
And I believe, and something that we've talked about a ton, Alex does this every day.
Like, this is, I've called this boilerplate.
Sure.
This is what he does.
And 99 times out of 100, it doesn't lead to someone shooting someone else.
But that hundredth time it does.
And that's the problem.
He can hide behind, you know, the 99 times where someone doesn't follow through with anything to pretend that there is no toxic and dangerous influence that the games that he plays have.
I mean, I think the hard part about it for a lot of people is the conversation is like, oh, well, because 99 out of 100 times blank, you know, when in reality, it's like because he did it three times, he's going to do it 100 times, which means this is going to happen.
So this is an inevitability of the one time that it was allowed to happen.
Well, but also the 99 Times is an illusion because there are cases of things that just don't rise to the level of making headlines.
Sure.
Like who knows how much domestic violence or fights or stabbings or whatever come out of people being driven to a point where they feel like they have to do something because Alex is telling them the Civil War has started and this is the big one.
I've thought about this for a long time because throughout history, there's always been implements of torture, right?
That are ostensibly to get information out of somebody.
And I've always thought, you know what?
This is just a way of excusing psychosadists who are allowed to get into a position of power and then exercise their weird pleasure thing, right?
Because I genuinely think anything that you could achieve with any amount of torture, I could get the exact same level and of efficacy from just yelling at people at the right intervals of time.
Like, I'm very loud, and I could really make it uncomfortable for people.
You know, and that's because torture doesn't even work.
It doesn't get accurate information.
It's just about hurting people.
That's all it is.
That's all it ever has been.
It's about weird people trying to get their torture shit out.
And that's why, whenever I hear him say stuff like that, I think there's no element of torture that could ever get me to believe that that is not the dumbest shit I've ever heard in my entire life.