In this installment, Dan and Jordan break down Alex's recent interview with Tucker Carlson, where Alex chooses to be too serious for his own good and Tucker reveals himself to be an embarrassing level of stupid.
Okay, so I want to impose my theory on you, and you tell me what you think.
So for the past 15 years, I've been watching the feds, the FBI, the DOJ, try to destroy you.
And I've watched as no group of gatekeepers or whistleblower protectors or journalistic, you know, ethics guardians have defended you on First Amendment grounds, which is pretty shocking.
But the question has always been, why are the feds so intent on taking you out?
And here's my theory.
So the summer of 2001, you go on TV, time-stamped, and say, someone's going to fly planes to the World Trade Centers, they're going to blame Osama bin Laden, call the Bush White House, warn them.
You basically called 9-11 in detail.
You're the only one who did.
And we can prove that.
It's not a guess.
We have the tape.
I've played the tape.
9-11 happens in September.
There's a 9-11 commission immediately impaneled.
They go and interview a bunch of people in the U.S. government and outside and ask, like, were there signs of this was happening?
They don't interview you.
You're the one guy who predicted it in public.
You're the only guy who predicted it in public.
And no one calls you to ask, how the hell did you know that?
Which is the obvious question.
Then they set about trying to destroy you rather than like hailing you as a prophet or at least asking the question, how the hell did Alex Jones know in detail this was coming?
How did you know?
They never even asked you.
And then they they mobilized DOJ and FBI against you.
And I I think there's a connection between those two facts.
So this is painfully embarrassing to hear an adult who pretends to take their work seriously say.
All Tucker is basing this on is edited clips from Alex's show from 2001 that are meant to create the appearance that he predicted 9-11 in detail.
In the clip from July 2001 that seems to have blown Tucker's mind, Alex references bin Laden and the World Trade Center specifically in reference to the bombing in 1993, which al-Qaeda took credit for.
He doesn't predict that planes will be flown into the World Trade Center.
He just references the idea that the government could false flag blow up a plane, citing the Baltimore Sun.
This is just him mentioning an article that covered Operation Northwoods.
These are all very normal things for Alex to rant on and use as touch points in any one of his episodes.
The only way this even comes close to appearing like some kind of a prediction is if these pieces are edited together in order to create that image.
There's nothing impressive about Alex's alleged prediction, and it's really wild that Tucker is acting like this long past the past.
I'd already been researching false flag attacks, not just by our government, but other governments throughout history.
The Gulf of Tonkin to get us into Vietnam in 64 that was later declassified to have been staged.
And, of course, the USS Liberty between Israel and the Lyndon Baines Johnson administration wanted to get us into full war with Egypt, but the ship survived, became the most decorated ship in U.S. history because of the valiance of the crew.
And Operation Ajax, where the CIA and Kermit Roosevelt in 1953 overthrew Mohamed Mosaddegh, who was a reformist and really pro-West, but he wouldn't give them all the oil.
And they used radical Islamists to overthrow him and then put the Shah in and then overthrow the Shah.
Over and over again, there's just hundreds and hundreds of historical real-case examples of that being done by our government and other governments.
And I saw a lot of pre-programming in the news.
Oh, someone bin Laden's going to get us when he gets us.
We need to give up all of our rights.
It'll be a new America, and we've got to set up this police state.
It's funny how Tucker is imposing his own version of Alex onto him.
He's like, you've never been racist.
You just said that society is rotten.
He has this cartoon character and he's like, I'm talking to him.
You are that.
But this whole exchange is silly because we know from listening to Alex's show that the answer to Tucker's question is that God gave Alex prophetic visions that allowed him to see the future, which is where this prediction about 9-11 came from.
He's said it explicitly on multiple occasions on the show, and it's the answer that Tucker is fishing for here.
If you have Alex Jones on your show in 2025, you're not looking for a calm, measured conversation about what cues he saw in the media that led him to think 9-11 was gonna happen.
You wanna advance the social conversation about how you're in the middle of a holy war in the spirit realm, and you were attacked by a fucking demon.
Tucker is trying to be as soft as he can about it, but he's just opening this interview telling Alex to get into the crazy shit so he can help normalize it.
And Alex seems to want to be taken seriously instead.
It's a mismatch of energies that you see coming at each other.
He's like, tell me the fun shit.
And Alex is like, well, you know, Lyndon Baines Johnson.
And everybody's seen the July 25th where I went into detail, but actually my crew using ChatGPT scanning through all my old shows found shows in April and even before that in March where I get more specific and I said the CIA is going to fly planes into the World Trade Centers.
You've got an element of the FBI and these war game scenarios where they can remote control a 747 and they're going to crash it into the World Trade Center.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
One of the tip-offs is that this is, you know, you can tell that it's not a very impressive prediction is how tightly Alex's words are cut in order to take away context of what he might have been discussing.
As you heard that voiceover say, this was from March 6th, 2001.
But if you're saying, like, it's amazing that this guy called 9-11, then if that guy also says that the FBI was remote controlling planes, that means you are saying the FBI did remote control planes to cause 9-11.
Yeah, and I think that all of the crack investigators that have been going for the last 25 years probably would have been able to demonstrate some kind of a remote control thing.
So that was well known in the research circles that bin Laden was basically a multinational cutout used by Western intelligence agencies to destabilize areas, but also be a boogeyman that you see CNN in a mountain cave.
Magically being able to find him, but the U.S. can't kill him, and nobody else can, and I knew that CNN is literally the CIA broadcasting system.
Total mockingbird, thoroughbred, and there were hundreds and hundreds of points that went in, but okay, Bin Laden's worked for the CIA, and you got CNN interviewing him, and they're all scaring us, saying he's about to attack us, and then I remembered how Ahmad Salam, who was an Egyptian intelligence agency, Operative working for the FBI and CIA was hired to build a bomb in the early 90s to blow up the World Trade Center.
But then when they said build a real bomb, he started recording them because he started figuring out it was a setup.
And then he had that press conference where he played it.
I interviewed him a few times where the FBI said, no, just go ahead and let it go forward.
And so you start adding all that together.
They'd already tried to hit the World Trade Center before.
The World Trade Center had a lot of issues in it with asbestos and also some of the structural issues.
So they were already wanting to have a plan to get rid of it.
And then you have the CIA and FBI in the Salomon Brothers Building, Building 7, the 47-story skyscraper.
You have that right next door.
So I looked at all of it and I thought, where would the new Pearl Harbor be?
And the year before in the Project for American Century headed up by Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, Dick Cheney wrote in there that we need a new Pearl Harbor event to launch the Pax Americana.
But it wasn't an American empire of freedom and liberty and justice like Trump's trying to launch.
It was a globalist empire of military enforcement and tyranny.
It's like Alex is going out of his way to beg to be taken seriously in this interview, which is somewhat counter to what Tucker needs him to do.
understands how to read media trends.
He's a fucking prophet.
Tucker got attacked by a demon.
Alex sees the future.
We're in magic land.
And Alex is supposed to be the guy who's leading that charge and isn't ashamed to be that.
This exchange is super boring because Alex isn't playing ball.
He has no use to anyone as a media analyst or historical critic because if he's put in those boxes, you might start to question how consistent his batting average is.
You might start checking and realize that he's wrong about shit constantly and maybe you shouldn't take him seriously.
Now, as a prophet, he's pretty good.
He has a passionate delivery and he's really good at manipulating people's emotions.
He's an expert at making a million vague predictions that can be presented as one specific prediction later with the help of editors and marks like Tucker.
And prophets benefit from being in a position where they don't really have to be right much.
God gives them visions, but those can be hard to interpret.
And plus, their scary prediction might not come true thanks to them making the prediction.
Their inaccuracy might actually be proof of how effective they are as a prophet.
This is the slot Tucker needs Alex to fit in.
Not some kind of rogue academic.
This is a huge miscalculation on Alex's part in terms of what he's useful for.
When he got invited to come to the thing in Pennsylvania, the show, he played his role.
He did exactly what he was supposed to do.
Yell the catchphrases, pump them up, do all that shit.
The end of this story doesn't really have a good place for you to exist in, because if you're really this dangerous, the powers shouldn't have let you get to this point.
Which indicates that he doesn't even take any of this shit seriously, because he would have seen that Bill Cooper was also predicting this, but whatever.
And all the people at the very center of our business, journalism, like, they didn't see or didn't talk publicly about any of this, like, none of this.
Plus, he's not answering any of these questions, honestly.
Tons of people in the conspiracy and right-wing world were talking about false flags coming because the experience of Oklahoma City and Waco were fresh in their minds.
And Bill Cooper had made the exact predictions that Alex did previous to him.
This is all just real sad false image building here.
I don't just say a bunch of stuff, then most of it doesn't come true.
I'm very specific on predictions, and almost all of them have come true.
I thought that it was the spinoff of the X-Files, and I wasn't even an X-Files fan, rarely watched it, called The Lone Gunman, that it turns out had come out in the spring of 2001 that I didn't even learn about because there wasn't Facebook and Twitter and X back then.
So if you didn't watch those entertainment shows, you didn't know about it.
And then six months or so after 9-11, listeners start saying...
Have you seen this?
And I had listeners send me VHS recordings off Fox TV of this episode where a criminal group in the U.S. government hijacks a jumbo jet in New York to fly it in the World Trade Center to blame it on a Central Asian terrorist so that they have a pretext to take over domestically with a police state and launch wars in the Middle East.
Then I got reached out by some of the hosts of the X-Files saying, hey, Chris Carter told us that the CIA came to him with the plot of this and asked him...
...as a TV program, and then later I corresponded with Chris Carter via email.
He talked about this in the news, like in entertainment publications, about...
Oh, Alex Jones is a really good guy.
And when they rebooted in 2016 again, he talked about the talk show host characters based on me.
So I've talked to him, some of his crew, but he said, no, I don't know why the CIA, you used to interview him, came to me and said, here's the script for this show.
So it wasn't just Alex Jones saying that a government agency was going to hijack a jet and fly to the World Trade Center.
The X-Files spinoff, The Lone Gunman.
One of its main episodes was about that specific story.
So when he says the hosts of the X-Files, what he means, he just doesn't want to say Dean Haglund, one of the lone gunmen, one of the actors who was on the show.
And actually, if you go and find the Dean Haglund interview that Alex did, Alex is trying to say, like, Chris Carter got a visit from the CIA and they told him to put this in.
Dean Hagelin specifically says, like, Chris Carter was busy trying to do the X-Files.
If you've already crossed the line from anything resembling reality and you've gone full into fictional reality, then fucking have great times with it.
Before I ask you what you think the signs are pointing to now, Like, what are your predictions for the next five years?
And then I ask you how your battles with the U.S. government are going in its attempts to silence you.
How do you, like, if you have this ability, which you do, I'm not sucking up, it's just, again, it's provable, to put together a picture, an extraordinarily accurate picture of what the future holds.
Like, what does that do to you?
How do you sleep?
And how do you live?
And, like, why haven't you totally destroyed yourself?
Like, that's not...
Those are kind of not thoughts that most people, including me, are burdened with and don't really want to be burdened with.
But, like, how do you turn off the visions of the future in your head?
But this question, this line of questioning is weak.
Complaining about how difficult it is to be a psychic, I don't think that's going to resonate with the alpha audience that Tucker likes to pretend he has.
It's beta to be stressed and feel responsibility about stuff.
Also, the reason that other people maybe aren't as convinced by the supposed evidence as Tucker is, because...
They've looked at more evidence than just that edited clip that Alex put out to market himself as a prophet.
Sure.
Possibly some people have looked at the larger picture of Alex's career and assessed more than just memes.
That isn't profitable for Tucker, so he's going to stick to this game.
I'm talking to so many people that weren't even Christian or weren't even religious or weren't even spiritual who are saying it's good versus evil.
I talked to so many people I know that are professionals and they, you know, Austin's full of a lot of, you know, particularly rich people and women, you know, just becoming demon-possessed.
But when the power structure is a death cult, by increment they get deeper and deeper.
I mean, you look at these leftists, and they have hundreds of photos where they took their shot, or they had their abortion, or they want to kill Trump, and you look at them...
So I've seen more and more love in people's eyes, more and more spiritual connection to God, more and more of that quiet place of just serenity in people, and then I'm seeing more and more of the satanic energy.
And these people that are influenced by satanic energy, by literal spiritual forces, demons, they are the slaves.
And when they're not out doing evil and persecuting people, they don't even feel like they're alive, and they're desperate, and they're scared, and they're lost, and then they get driven forward by this dark force to, like, it'll be all right once you just go out and once you take these people out.
You know, it's the good people that are making you feel bad.
It's them.
Destroy them.
Then you'll have peace.
And that's the deeper understanding I've had of how this satanic system works.
And if you ask if there's anyone that you've really, like, focused on, I don't know, George Soros or Larry Fink, I mean, just the other day, I was talking to someone who knows Larry Fink really well, and I was saying, I think Larry Fink is, like, I don't know, I've never met Larry Fink, but, boy, he's responsible for a lot of suffering from my perspective.
And, you know, this person said there's no one more unhappy than Larry Fink, like, nobody.
And I was just with him in a car.
He was like screaming at someone on the phone.
This guy's made billions of dollars and personally tormented.
And I know a bunch of people because I know a lot of the people involved in things that I think are really evil.
There's too much stress sitting on the beach looking out at the vastness of the ocean wondering about God's creation and whether or not we were meant to enjoy it.
I hated this one time we went to Dubai and we went to the tallest building in the world and we were just hanging out in Infinity Pool on the top of the biggest building in the world.
So I think that there's an internal tension here that they are kissing the ass of really rich people while having, like, pretended to create this populist image of themselves and Trump and this.
And I feel like this next clip really sums up Alex's attempt at squaring the circle, and I just don't think it works.
And we were just talking last night, I hope you would repeat that, because you were asking me with some folks we were talking to about what my view is basically on the geopolitical new landscape, and I laid my view, and you said, no, I think that's dead on, and then you said basically, if you feel like repeating it, that we need to sell it very clearly, you're on this team or you're on that team, because it really is Team CHICOM, EU, globalist, new world order, that's what's left.
You know, the UK don't trust them who runs it, but they're trying to come in under a U.S. alliance.
And America and the world needs to understand there's a new international system forming.
The old one fell.
And we better decide what this new system is going to look like and who's going to be in charge of it because that's the way it is.
So think about how you'll feel when you achieve your biggest goals of all, whether it's starting a business, paying off your mortgage, sending your kids to college, having the money to pay for it.
You'll be pretty proud when you've met these essential life goals, and you should be proud.
All of us are when we do that.
But what do you do next?
So getting to the goals is one thing, but protecting them is an entirely different thing and maybe a bigger thing.
And this is where life insurance from Policy Genius comes in.
Now, Policy Genius makes finding and buying life insurance really easy.
You know, like, sometimes if you're listening to a true crime podcast, and they're talking about the tragic and horrific murder of somebody, and then they're like, and now, hello, Apron Fresh is here to, you know, you're like, oh, what you're revealing is the valuelessness that you treat life with.
And so the globalists are being destroyed by their own Frankenstein monster.
And then the EU has decided to ally with China.
And again, the UK is, at least on the surface, acting like, no, they want to be in a new Anglophile alliance with the, quote, U.S. empire.
And again, the U.S. has a limited window to get everybody on board with us and then our alliance easily with the key countries in the Middle East, Saudi Arabia, central among it, and some other alliances.
And then obviously an open economic alliance with Russia who wants an economic alliance and has more resources than any country in the world.
I mean, that is the real chessboard, and that's why the left and the globalists want to drive America and Russia apart, because geographically...
And also militarily and then also scientifically and then just raw material.
If you believe Russia's our greatest enemy, if you are working full-time to divide the United States from Russia, you are acting against the interests of the United States.
You hate the United States.
You hate the West.
You want to see it fall.
They hate Russia because it's a white Christian country.
That's a fact.
Why Russia?
And all of this, once you take three steps back, makes perfect sense.
Like, we have a lot of people in our country.
Working actively for the destruction of the West, of Christian civilization.
So that's just a fact.
People don't like it when you say that, but they don't like it when you say it because it's absolutely true.
And the farther you get from the United States, that's one of the great benefits of travel, the more obvious it is.
You don't know you're married to an alcoholic until you go on vacation without that person.
You're like, oh shit.
I'm married to an alcoholic.
Like, you can't see any of this when you're in the middle of it, but when you leave, it's like, oh my gosh.
They always manage to do it, and that's the thing that they do so well because it's what everybody kind of gets pushed into of like, oh, they hate Russia, Russia's our enemy, or it's like, I've got to be 100% clear on this.
Considering all of the white Christian countries, or countries that Tucker would classify as white Christian countries that aren't treated the same way because they haven't invaded their neighbors constantly and they aren't run by a guy who's very clearly an emperor.
And then, of course, you nurtured American journalist Gonzalo Lira to death and then celebrated that.
And, of course, we have the would-be assassin down in Mar-a-Lago, who is a big leftist, connected to all these intelligence agencies, recruiting hundreds of fighters for Ukraine, an American, then he comes back.
Well, look, I'm reluctant to talk like this, because I think this is even a little bit disrespectful of the fact that someone died, and that is tragic.
Trump had a lot of fraud baked in, but Trump won in such a landslide, he beat her.
And then a lot of Republicans and conservatives and populists thought Trump was going to win for sure, so we didn't have as big a turnout, so they were able to steal 2020.
But there was such a giant landslide this time, it overrode.
The mail-in ballots, the dead people, the illegal aliens voting, all of that they ran out of bullets.
So it's fun how Alex just starts off on an unrelated topic here because it kind of feels connected to what Tucker was saying, and he really doesn't know how to respond directly to that.
Tucker said the U.S. is like a 60-year-old trying to pick up a young woman at a bar.
The country is oblivious to the fact that it doesn't have the abilities that it once had.
It's over the hill.
As Toby Keith might put it, it's not as good as it once was.
If you follow Tucker's thought, he's saying that the US needs to know its role and submit to Russia.
We can't beat Russia, so Russia makes the rules.
If they want to invade Ukraine, we don't have a say in that because we can't beat them.
Alex should not agree with this.
He also supports Putin, but the way that Tucker's articulating this is defeatist, and it's a bit anti-patriotic.
To relate it back to Toby Keith, Alex can believe that the US is not as good as it once was, but he has to believe that it's as good once as it ever was.
We can kick any country's ass if we put our mind to it and actually try, because the USA is the best, even at our worst.
Without this feeling, Alex's entire worldview crumbles right in front of him.
Putin has a distinct advantage in this conflict that Tucker seems to be ignoring, which is that he's acting in violation of international law and norms.
He invaded a neighboring country and seized territory, which he's able to get away with because other countries are scared that a full military response would prompt him to escalate things to nuclear weapons.
The US is one of those countries that's scared, and they have to tiptoe around the conflict as opposed to addressing it directly, which is a disadvantage.
Putin knows that unless there's a justification for these NATO countries entering the war as active participants, it's probably not going to happen, and his place in the world stage is going to be unchanged.
He's already seen as an undemocratic dictator by most of the world, and him giving up on this war, it's not going to improve that image.
So long as he doesn't invade a NATO country or do something that would cause the larger powers to get involved, there's no real upside to him not acting like an emperor.
Tucker's take on this is strange, and it's kind of hard to square with any kind of America-first ideas, but you can see that Alex knows he needs to buy some time before responding to this.
Well, I think, in essence, a large part of, like, what's behind Tucker and Alex and all of, you know, like, where they're coming from is that they just don't really believe in sovereignty of other countries.
They believe in it for the United States, but they don't really believe in, like, the...
You know, Tucker and Alex believe that Russia is strong enough to not be food, whereas Ukraine isn't, and we shouldn't be supporting food over predator.
The Pentagon wrote an assessment saying that they calculated that if we gave weapons to Ukraine that allowed the Ukrainian military or our military using Ukraine as a proxy to hit targets within Russia, they judged the likelihood of a nuclear exchange at 50%.
And they did it anyway.
At that point, like, you should be in prison for the criminally insane.
That the Pentagon, under Joe Biden, assessed, like, because they assess the likelihood of everything, or they guess.
You know, they guess.
They sort of work out how they think things will progress.
But in every scenario, globally, they do this.
This is what they do at the Pentagon.
And they assessed that if we gave certain weapons, weapons that allowed the Ukrainians to strike targets within Russia, if we did that, which we did, the chance of a nuclear exchange, a nuclear holocaust that killed everybody on Earth, would be 50%.
So assuming that everything that Tucker said there is true, then consider what the conclusion would be.
If someone is likely to use nuclear weapons, you should do whatever they want.
Might makes right.
This is a profoundly shallow and dumb perspective on international relations, and when you throw in that supernatural forces shit to it, Tucker really sounds like someone who thinks he's doing children's television.
So I found an article in Pravda covering this Pentagon document that Tucker's talking about.
Actually, it was covering Tucker telling Alex about the document.
The U.S. didn't do an assessment that found that if they supplied weapons to Ukraine, it would lead to a 50% chance of Putin using nukes.
This is a misrepresentation of a story about how a Russian general named Sergei Surovkin, he really wanted to use a tactical nuke to stop the October 2022 advance that Ukrainian forces were making towards Kherson.
U.S. intelligence overheard this and upgraded their assessment for the likelihood of nuclear weapons being used from about 10% to 50%.
In response to this, the U.S. under Biden advocated that the Ukrainian forces ease up so as to not risk triggering this general's desired plan to use tactical nukes.
There's no real consensus on whether or not that guy's plan would have been adopted, but the fact that he was pushing that made U.S. leaders raise their concerns, and now Tucker is lying about those circumstances in order to prop up Putin.
This is such a sidebar, and I'll stop in one sentence, but those of us who grew up in the 70s and 80s remember that all the opponents to nuclear power were furry armpit dumb people and all the Greenpeace people.
And so you're just like, oh, shut up.
Nuclear is obviously the solution.
You just don't understand science.
How can you be against climate change and also against nuclear power?
And if somebody's able to kill Trump now, people better hope he doesn't get struck by a bolt of lightning because the bad guys will get to blame.
That's why so many people that have kind of been on the fence to the establishment but were working with the globalists because that was the system are enthusiastically joining Trump and Elon because they understand that this is the only game in town for people that aren't delusional.
So you can say a lot of stuff about Trump and make up plenty of reasons to support him if you want, but claiming that he's stabilizing as a force, that does not work.
It's interesting that Tucker has concluded that the assassination attempts were elaborate globalist conspiracies, because that definitely hasn't been proven.
He gets around the need for proof with that, come on, it's obvious, that act, but that's fucking full of shit.
You see this mirrored and celebrated with Alex, where he's saying that the globalists better hope that Trump doesn't get struck by lightning, because they'll end up getting blamed.
If the globalists get blamed for Trump getting struck by lightning, then the people have been fooled and they're not operating off of any kind of solid information base, and that is what Alex is pumped about.
He's helped rot the information economy so bad that a lot of people operate off conclusions now, and they're willing to accept any explanation for why things are happening if they adhere to the conclusions that they already have.
The globalists will want to kill Trump as a tenant of the far-right faith now, so if Trump dies, then people will be willing to accept any explanation of his death that adheres to that tenant of their faith.
If he has a heart attack, the people will still blame the globalists.
This is not working off reality.
In essence, Alex and Tucker are relishing the fact that they live in a completely malleable and fake information economy where nothing they say really matters, so long as it's in service of their narrative.
If you understand what they're saying properly, Alex saying that people will blame the globalists if Trump gets struck by lightning is a serious insult about the people listening's critical thinking skills.
Yeah, you know what's interesting is I think one of the underlying assumptions that I never really examine too often is that Tucker is assuming that they want to get away with it.
You know?
Like, he's assuming if you are doing something, you want to get...
If you are doing a crime, you want to get away with said crime so that nobody can pin it on you.
As opposed to being like...
Like, I'm willing to die for this.
You know?
Like, what's his...
Wilhelm, right?
Like, those guys had tuberculosis and cyanide pills.
Like, the idea was not, we're gonna make it through this and we'll sneak away and get away with it.
Well, yeah, I think that kind of intersects with the weirdness of how that hit my ears with him being like, things would have been worse for the assassins if they'd succeeded.
So in a way, it's fortuitous that I'm here today because you were here while I was talking to my lawyer right before we started taping.
We got some really big news that in Connecticut, the Supreme Court said we're not even hearing your appeal now because it was so strong, the kangaroo show trial that was going through there a few years ago.
So Alex, obviously, I think half of this show was supposed to be about how he's a prophet, and then the other half was supposed to be about lying about the Sandy Hook case.
And what they did was, with all these PR firms and massive thousands of articles sometimes a month and hundreds of TV programs a year, they built a straw man once I was censored off the internet in the last seven years.
Still on my website in fullwords.com, still on some talk radio, but it was the verboten thing.
People had to go get underground.
They could then build a straw man of things I had supposedly done I never did.
And then when I wasn't defended other than people like you, it set the precedent to then come after everybody else, including President Trump, when he was taking off everything on January 6th.
So people couldn't hear him saying be peaceful before or during and after.
Like, where are the people who will stand up for the foundational right that separates a free man from a slave, which is the right to say what you think?
And the parents find out the school's been putting them in a database, giving them a social worker, sending them to special school times with peer pressure of other kids that have been put in a cult for sterilization, transhumanism.
Alex is like, my case is going to be thin here, and I'm going to need to get y 'all excited, so I'm going to do some transphobia here and get everyone on board.
If you commit a crime, you should be criminally charged for it, and the state has to prove that you did it, at which point you're convicted and punished.
So Tucker is getting mad about a fake version of Alex's case because he has two really false premises that he's working with.
The first is that the government sued Alex, and the second is that he was sued because he offended someone.
Neither of these things are true, but if you pretend that the government sued Alex because he offended someone...
It's really easy to champion his cause as some kind of a free speech thing, which is why they're doing this dumb bullshit.
These dicks can't make any of their arguments on the merits, so they just create these fake versions of what happened to get mad about and make themselves the victim of everything.
His theory that he's operating off of, and the reason why half of the show is supposed to be about Alex being a prophet, and then the other half is supposed to be about the Sandy Hook case and how he's been wronged, is because Tucker's theory is that Alex predicted 9-11, and this is the culmination of the government trying to punish him for that.
That's the premise that Tucker is trying to put forth.
And then multiple governments throughout that time period have been putting together a very slow plan regardless of their partisan status that would eventually...
25 years later, culminate in the moderate lessening of his quality of life.
In retrospect, did you ever think when they awarded a judgment against you equivalent to the GDP of India, did you ever think, like, maybe I should...
Keep my visions to myself and not, like, next time I see 9-11 coming, I just shouldn't say anything because people who predict the future accurately are always punished for it.
behavior around Sandy Hook, and if you look at what he actually did, his behaviors, I think it's so indefensible that the only way that Tucker can swing this is pretend that it's connected to 9-11 and Alex predicting it.
I hated so much about the coverage during the trial, the coverage now.
And then the assumption that everybody has of like, well, in bankruptcy and appeals and all this stuff, the judgment's going to go down and it's not really the amount of money.
Because what is so important about the judgment is that 14 regular ass people were explained in very exhausting detail what this man did.
And 14 people went...
Fuck that guy $1.5 billion.
That's you.
That's what all of us would say.
That's the thing about the jury trial, and that's what I wanted the coverage to be.
If you had sat through this trial, you would go fuck that guy to the tune of $1.5 billion.
Then when they win the show trial that was already fixed, these PR firms come out of Newark and Connecticut and go, we've been doing this for years.
We exposed Jones.
We did this.
We helped get this big win.
Blah, blah, blah.
Then, this undercover video comes out that is in a predator sexting trolling operation in D.C., which the guy was never implicated in, but that's how he got caught up in the trolling operation.
This Oblevis person, CIA and FBI, it's confirmed, says, well, we investigated Alex Jones for years at the FBI.
Then he went on to the CIA.
That's where he's currently.
And he said, we couldn't find anything criminal on him, so we went to the Sandy Hook people with law firms and we developed this plan with this narrative to take him down.
And now we're in the process of shutting him down.
And the person says, well, are you still trying to put him in prison?
No, we've just destroyed his name and destroyed who he is.
It's all on video.
It's online.
Just type in FBI, CIA agent admits to running Sandy Hook framed job of Alex Jones.
And to prop up this stupid theory that Alex predicted 9-11 has been punished ever since for being a vision prophet guy, you need to create fake versions of the criticism that's leveled at Alex.
So we spent approximately zero time and zero money as a country trying to figure out why would Adam Lanza murder all these children?
We're all against murdering children.
Some of us are against murdering all children, including in foreign countries and here in abortion clinics, we're just against murdering kids, okay?
So I'm not going to cede the moral high ground on kids to ghouls like this.
So, okay.
But we have no idea why Adam Land's doing this.
No one's trying to find out.
You instead are being blamed, or the father of four kids, for the murder of all these kids when you had literally nothing to do with the murder at all.
And the actual murderer is probably brain fried and SSRIs or whatever the cause.
You gotta stay in the pocket with this shit, because this is clearly, like...
This is for us, man.
This is for us to like, oh, I'm so mad that he would say this nonsense because then we've wasted our time listening to him talk about it and then feeling things about it.
Yeah, there's legitimately no way for him to have engaged with any of the content and any of the stuff that has happened and come away with these conclusions.
Look, I just want to refer you to the very first moments of this conversation when I pointed out once again for the hundredth time you called 9-11 in detail before 9-11.
So that is like...
Just from my perspective as an outsider and someone who knows you, that's like the defining fact of your life.
That's the first sentence of your obituary.
No one did that.
Only you.
That fact, I think, is responsible for everything that has come after.
If I got attacked by a thing that other people believe to be fictional, the next thing that would happen is everything in my life would be about how that fictional thing is real.
And I think that at some point I pray I'm wrong, but there's going to be an act of violence.
Ethnic-inspired violence, hate-inspired violence, actual hate, like killing people, and I really hope I'm wrong, but I feel like this is real, and that that event will be used to shut down free speech.
But also, it's fascinating how Tucker's convinced that all this racial hatred, like the Klan members or white supremacists, it's all fake.
But he thinks that Russia is hated because they're a white Christian country.
It's strange how the racism expressed by white people is fake, but the racism he imagines is directed towards white people is the biggest problem in the world.
I think these guys come off as real pieces of shit.
And I think they're stupid.
But also, I think this is boring.
I think there was an electricity to the other times that Tucker and Alex have gone up against each other or done a show together.
And I think that it's a miscommunication of Tucker really wanting this premise to be pushed.
Which is, you are a prophet, you predicted 9-11, and now all of the bad things that people think about you is because the devil is trying to punish you for trying to save humanity from 9-11.
Second thing that's crazy, Tucker did not feel that he needed to give Alex that context, that he could just spring this insane plan, this insane idea on Alex, and Alex would be like, absolutely.
Now, this should really be insulting to Alex.
Yes.
Because...
You were assumed to be so dumb that you'd be like, well, obviously the CIA did this because I predicted 9-11.
He's trying not to come off as conceited or something to Tucker's audience, not realizing that that ruins the game that they're supposed to be playing.