In this installment, Dan and Jordan check out Alex's first Saturday episode of Trump's second term, which is mostly about how Elon Musk is super cool, how Alex needs money bad, and how Alex ran head-first into a door in the middle of the night.
My bright spot is, we spoke about it at length, I'm sure I've bothered you already with it too much, but Fanny, my beautiful dog, she had an abscess on her face.
So this is the second stage of Alex and the right-wing media's manufactured hysteria about missing children, and it should be no surprise that Tom Homan has been so successful on this front so fast.
These children were not missing to begin with.
They just hadn't been contacted.
This was a fundamental distortion and lie about children who arrived unaccompanied to the United States and the proportion of such children who didn't show up for court dates on their their immigration status.
Between 2019 and 2023, approximately 32,000 children didn't show up for court dates.
But that same report that revealed that found that 291,000 hadn't been contacted at all.
They hadn't been contacted because there's no reason for the court to contact them unless their hearings were scheduled, so it just hadn't happened.
Folks like Alex, who love to pretend to care about serious issues and achieve the illusion that they do by lying about them, attach themselves to this 300,000 number as a way to attack Biden.
These children weren't all missing, but it was a pretty useful propaganda tool, and you heard the same bullshit being echoed by Trump and Vance on the campaign trail.
But now Trump is in office, and they need to solve this problem.
Luckily, these kids aren't actually missing, so it's super easy for Homan to contact the people they haven't contacted and then magically remove those numbers from the imaginary missing people list.
Honestly, he doesn't even have to do that.
This talking point is based on a fantasy, so Alex can just imagine that less children are missing now and then report that to the audience.
That's the entire game.
Yeah.
unidentified
When you pretend that your enemy is doing something comically evil that isn't really happening, it's super easy to solve that problem when you get in charge by stopping pretending it's happening.
I think it's important, and I've known this for three days, and I just...
I'm so busy that I should have broken this exclusive, and it still is an exclusive, and it's very important, but I have talked to some high-level people in the Trump operation, and obviously my questions were, when are you going to release the Epstein list, and when are you going to release the 9-11 secret files?
We've not really talked about 9-11 files, but Trump is open to release everything.
We'll bring that up.
But on the Epstein situation, and of course what I was told is just obvious, but once they said it, they're like, we want to get Kash Patel in because he's who Trump trusts and who we trust to actually really release it instead of the FBI director.
Previous to this, Ray, who had it, sitting on it and using it for blackmail purposes.
So Trump has said he will release it, and they said, and he is going to release it.
That's another reason they're fighting so hard to block Kosh Patel's confirmation.
He's probably the most important of them all because he is a patriot.
He is definitely an American.
He's definitely drank our Kool-Aid of 1776.
And, you know, everything's a cult in the world, folks.
I mean, everything's the group you're in.
And, you know, America has been the most successful, best.
So if you break down what Alex is saying, he's telling the audience that Trump will release the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein, but only once he has an indoctrinated member of his cult in charge of the FBI.
It's totally cool, though, because everything is a cult, so it's all just one cult or another.
This is dumb, and I reject the entire premise of Alex's argument, but also, anyone who might take this Epstein stuff seriously, they should never accept this kind of reasoning.
It feels like the only reason that you would wait until you get a loyalist cult member in power before you release some kind of secret intel is because you want to exert control over its release.
If the ultimate goal is to just literally release everything, then it doesn't matter who does it, but if you need to be selective, you might need a hand-picked cult member in there to do it.
This should really set off alarm bells, and the fact that Alex feels like he can get away with something like this on his show speaks to how poorly he's trained the audience to engage in critical thinking as it relates to what he says.
It's pretty brazen at this point, and I think it shows a pretty serious lack of respect for the audience that you can be like, oh yeah, he'll put this out, but only when someone he controls is in control.
You know, in the context of what happened when Scientology infiltrated the government and did the whole thing and deleted all those records and stuff, that makes sense because they were trying to do it on the low key.
They weren't like, hey, everybody, we're gonna get elected and then we're gonna remove all the records of all the crimes we've committed.
This has so much to do with the, like, just hiding the ball kind of nature of how Alex's coverage works.
Pretending all these principles mean something, and tricking people who are attracted to those principles into supporting your conditional worldview that really...
It's kind of just about supporting businesses and racism.
Because we have Tom Homan has found a bunch of kidnapped children and Trump is going to release the Epstein files once he has a guy he controls in position.
Now I'm going to get to our top story and that's what I'll first drill into and then I'll move to these others I just mentioned.
It is important to understand Why I am so enthusiastic about Elon Musk.
Not because I'm explaining myself, but because you need to understand this.
And you need to understand that he is under massive attack, second only to Trump, because he is strategically, if I had his money and his power and his wide-spectrum brain, where he has just an expert on so many things, I mean, it's true.
Maverick, genius, genius.
I mean, you can't deny it.
Let me look at it.
They keep saying, oh, it's a fluke.
He did the best at this, and a fluke at that, and a fluke at this, and a fluke at this, and a fluke at this.
Yeah, come on.
There's 100 flukes.
Just shut up.
But the reason I am so supportive of Musk, and it's explained to you, you need to be, is because everything he does is exactly what I would do.
And I am.
The leading expert on the globalist New World Order system.
So the top story of the day is that you need to understand and respect that Alex likes Elon Musk because he projects his feelings upon him, and he pretends they're the same person.
I need you to understand that I'm not kissing this billionaire's ass because he's a billionaire and he's doing a lot of stuff that I like and I think that maybe I can get some power by association and proximity.
Musk is categorically assaulting every pillar of that parasitic death cult.
Post-industrial depopulation grid.
That's its goal.
That's its plan.
Because if you get rid of almost all the people and go back to like a dark ages and the general public lives, who's left on little farms with no electricity, and you have these compact government, elite, corporate city-states that have super advanced technology, and then there's literally giant hovering, you know, robot ships with high-tech weapons that keep anybody, you know.
It gets out of line in line.
And then you have a global government that no one can ever emerge, no one can ever develop technology as a rival that could threaten your monopoly.
So it's the ultimate monopoly.
And when you heard that, you go, that's the Hunger Games.
Well, before they wrote those books and before it was movies, I was describing it like that because that's how they describe it.
He's a super rich dude who builds rockets and works with the British government, but is secretly a Nazi who plans to use those rockets to attack London.
If Alex is so unaware of his surroundings and shit when he wakes up in the middle of the night as to cause this kind of wound to himself, I don't know if I trust his memory of all those times that he's pretended to tell the...
Time in the middle of the night.
Like, I don't think any of this can, like, coexist.
So we talked about Herman von Rumpi on our last episode and how he was given the title of Count in Belgium after his career in politics had ended in 2015.
But he doesn't come from a noble family history.
Alex brought him up as being the King of Luxembourg here because he's mixed up people.
He's thinking of Jean-Claude Juncker, who is also not the King of Luxembourg, but his family is from there.
Junker's family, his dad was a steel worker until the Nazis invaded Luxembourg and forced him into military service.
So basically, Alex doesn't know the difference between the European Council and the European Commission, and in his confusion, he's taken the fact that Herman von Rumpi was given an honorary title after his time in politics and expanded that out to pretend that everyone in the EU are descended from royalty and that Jean-Claude Junker is the king of Luxembourg, which Alex thinks is part of France.
It is all interesting to have this kind of background, though.
He definitely has a lot of knowledge on these subjects.
Hitler had a plan to set up a European Union, have the first 10 countries with the first 10 they had.
He was going to put Edward VIII, the King of England, who had to advocate because he was German and lived in Germany for part of World War II and fled to Spain.
And they said, oh, he advocated because he married an American woman who was also a big Nazi.
No, it was because he was a Nazi.
I don't want to say the EU is Nazi.
I'm just explaining the history.
So the EU was a Hitler plan.
They were going to put everything on the throne.
The deep state, globalists, British intel, fooled him, put him in, set them all up.
They even set up the king, flip-flopped on them last minute.
That's why Neville Chamberlain stood down and let the Nazis do whatever they were doing because he'd been told to do that by the elites.
And then they set him up and removed him, and then they brought in Churchill, and the rest is history.
So, the EU Parliament is not ceremonial, and all you need to understand is how hard Alex pushed for Nigel Farage and other UKIP members to get elected to it.
That should tell you all you need to know about, like, whether he thinks it's ceremonial or not.
It seems to matter who's in Parliament, like, during that season of content.
So this sucks to have to constantly point out, but Alex fundamentally has no understanding of how the EU structure works.
There's an EU parliament which is elected directly by the public.
Each member country has a certain number of MEPs based on their portion of the EU population that is made up by their country, with some provisions built in to make sure it's not just the larger states dictating every decision.
The other legislative body in the EU is the Council of the European Union.
This is a group that's made up of 27 representatives, one from each member state.
These people are representatives of the state's individual governments, which makes them indirectly elected, in that if you elect new leadership in your country, they have the ability to appoint a new member to this Council of the EU.
So these two bodies exist mostly to give a thumbs up or down to laws that have been presented by the European Commission.
This body has the ability to initiate actions, whereas the other two bodies act based on the European Commission's moves.
This commission is made up of the College of Commissioners, who are appointed fairly undemocratically to be fair.
They're selected by the Council of the EU and are accountable to Parliament, who can dismiss all of them if they want to.
Parliament can just say, this college of commissioners need new people.
There's an executive group called the European Commission and the two legislative bodies called Parliament and the Council of the European Union.
But there's another entity that's called the European Council, which is comprised of the elected leaders of each member state.
Right.
unidentified
This group has a similar name to the Council of the EU, but it's completely different, and it's mostly responsible just for setting the general direction of the EU.
Within this structure, you have a fairly robust and complicated system of direct and pseudo-direct representation, where the parliament is directly elected by the people in various EU countries, and the European Council is made up of the elected leaders of each state.
Each state's elected government can send their representatives to the Council of the European Union, who then select the members of the European Commission.
The European Commission fills the role of proposing legislation and policy, which is then debated by the Parliament and the Council.
Then off to the side, the European Council exists as a diplomatic body containing the leaders of each state.
It's complicated, and some of the names are too close to each other, but it's not nearly as unaccountable as Alex tries to make it out to be.
I don't really have any faith that he understands how any of this...
organizational stuff works, given that he thinks that Herman von Rumpi is the king of Luxembourg.
Yeah.
unidentified
Also, the EU didn't throw out the Romanian elections.
They'd already, at this point, right now, when we're recording, and when Alex is recording, They'd already rescheduled to redo the election on May 4th.
Sure.
And the president has stepped down.
He'd intended to stay in office until the new election, but there were some concerns that that would be against the Constitution for him to do that, since he would be exceeding his term limit.
But based on the information that's been provided, I don't see any reason to believe that the nullification of the initial election results was part of some kind of grand EU plot.
And they haven't said they're going to throw out the election if AFD wins in Germany.
There's been some talk of trying to ban them as a political party because their existence is somewhat anti-democratic in nature.
And it's against the Constitution, according to some people in Germany.
But that's not a position that has much traction.
And I don't think that most people who are in leadership positions would do that because it has such a potential to just blow back.
I'm not saying that you should never ban things, but in this case, there's a tactical kind of consideration that that is exactly what they would want you to do.
The smart thing to do is not ban it, but make it harder, because most people are going to be lazier, and they'll just naturally kind of be like, ah, it's too much work.
Gates has been caught giving billions of dollars to these dark money groups to not just give 50 million, it was a lot more than that, to Harris a few months ago.
They're giving money to go after RFK Jr. with fake news and fake signatures of fake doctors.
And then Congress is talking about it.
It's on CNN.
Oh, up to 17,000 medical doctors signed a petition that RFK Jr. is a danger to your health.
And a quack.
And then I went on there yesterday and signed up as Dr. Alex Jones instead of everybody else.
That's what it is.
It's fake.
And you look at who funds it.
Right there, and I'll get to the group, it's Bill Gates' group.
Leaving aside if any of this story is accurate or not, I would like to remind you of the Great Barrington Declaration.
This was a big press release put out by a bunch of scientists who were saying that herd immunity was the best way to get through COVID.
They opposed shutdowns of any businesses or schools and all manner of mitigation practices.
They were like, no way.
There were a lot of dipshits in Alex's world who were opposed to all this stuff like shutting down schools, but they were pretty fringe idiots at the beginning, whereas this Great Barrington Declaration had the appearance of mainstream science being behind it.
The declaration was paid for by the Koch-affiliated libertarian think tank, the American Institute for Economic Research, and it claimed to have been signed off on by tens of thousands of scientists and people in the medical field.
Alex is talking about a petition to oppose RFK's nomination that was put out by a group called the Committee to Protect Healthcare, which Bill Gates doesn't run, nor is he on the board of directors.
They do have an open petition that you can just fill out, so it could be exploited.
But in the highlighted text on the form, it says, quote, submissions are reviewed before being added to the official count.
The progress bar on the top of this screen does not represent the official count.
So the fundamental difference between this and the Great Barrington Declaration thing is that Alex's folks, all they've shown is that you can submit fake names to this petition.
With the Barrington one...
They accepted those names and reposted them, which there's no indication that the anti-RFK petition has done.
It's like trying to report that someone fell for your trick by pointing out how you tried to pull a trick.
There's no payoff to this.
There's no reveal.
It's just that you pressed enter with a fake name.
The Committee to Protect Healthcare has received funding from the 1630 Fund, which is a subsidiary of Arabella Advisors, which you might call a Democrat dark money entity.
I'm not into that, and I'm not interested in it, but it doesn't really prove any of Alex's underlying claims.
Like, he can be wealthy forever, but he can never be a guy who's like, look at my bank account, because by saying, look at my bank account, he's going to lose that, you know?
It's fun how much contact Alex has had in the past with Trump and how it varies wildly depending on his mood.
When he's depressed and down in the dumps, they've only talked a few times.
It's crazy that the globalists think that he's Trump's brain.
But when he's feeling a little bit manic, like today, Alex is basically a government agent working off the books to give Trump targets.
Neither of these things are probably accurate, but they tell you a lot about Alex's headspace, and it seems safe to assume that the head trauma makes him feel important.
Also, the Star Destroyers and Imperial probe droids were the bad guys in Star Wars.
Gamera is a turtle that flies whenever it goes inside of its shell and then all four of its openings turn into jets and it spins through the air like that and is a friend to children.
Instead, you're coming on here and kicking your little feet around, talking about how, man, no one wants to watch me because I whine all the time because I'm a gun.
It's not just realalexjones.com that's a clone of thealexjonesstore.com, but when you go to realalexjones.com and get all the great supplements, all the great Patriot gear, all the incredible things, big sale going right now that ends on Monday, that supports the Alex Jones network that we've got to have as a backup, and then if Infowars survives, we'll just roll into it.
There's a new bigger studio that's almost done and a lot more, so we can have guests and all the rest of it.
We can be shut down as early as next month.
I'll do an update at the end with some latest information.
Here today as well, but support the Alex Jones Network by going and getting great products at realalexjones.com.
It's like the X account, but it's a URL, great shopping cart.
So that's quite an arrangement Alex has been able to work out for himself.
So I'm supposed to believe that the Alex Jones store is a completely separate company that has nothing to do with Alex, and they've been so gracious as to let him clone their website and put it at a different URL that somehow gets money to a different place, sending that money to the Alex Jones network, which is owned by Alex's employee, Chase Geiser.
This is a weird business move if you're the Alex Jones store.
If this site is just a clone of the Alex Jones store, then you're really just buying the same products from the same people who are shipping it to you all the same.
But somehow this new URL moves money around differently.
Yeah.
unidentified
If you were the totally real person who runs Alex Jones store, who definitely isn't Alex, I really think that this, if Alex were doing this, is something you could sue him for.
The reason that he can get away with faking all of this stuff is because, in legal terms, he doesn't actually own it.
So, all of these people, theoretically, if they had a backbone, could just go...
I now own your stuff, Alex.
No.
And then Alex would have to try and sue them to prove that he owns the fake companies that he says he does not own in order to reattain ownership of the companies he no longer owns.
I mean, but you know, like, he's got this set up the way, like, a cartel has it set up, but the thing that he doesn't have that the cartel does is that if you get out of line, the cartel will murder you and your family and everybody you've ever met.
Alex can't even bother you if you're out of state.
A couple years ago, a big known manufacturer in Texas that does a lot of private labeling and creates some of the best stuff out there was trying to get a hold of me.
And want me to be a sponsorship and all the rest of it.
I just didn't get around to it.
Well, they ended up going and working with some other people I know that are great folks and trying to get a hold of me.
And I just said to those people, I said, you go ahead and launch a site.
You can use jonescbd.com.
You notice the names or things I say.
I named this, you know, Ultra Green.
I mean, that's, you know, but it's not my company.
And they just said, we'll give it to you for our cost.
You know, the cost of making it.
We'll give it to your sponsor since you didn't take the deal.
And then the sponsor just puts a little bit on there as well.
Yeah, or at the very least, you've put your son in the position where, historically, whenever we think about fraud cases very similar to this, there's a...
Weak link in the chain that gives everybody all the information that they need.
So I looked up all the paperwork with the Secretary of State, but there wasn't really any need for me to do that because this company is on his LinkedIn page.
Whereas in this case, by not mentioning that your son, whose business you've blatantly given to him, is successful, you're just revealing it's your own business.
We're so used to a level of nepotism that is realistically unacceptable if you want things to function properly that I would be willing to be like, oh yeah, your son, of course you gave him like $10 million to start a company and it's moderately successful.
One of the things that you talk about with the cartels and a lot of the legitimate businesses that they end up being entangled with in Mexico and in South American countries, it's because of a competency in terms of that structure.
Whereas Alex is like a...
Dupelo version of it.
It's like a kid's toy version of cartel money laundering shit.
It is so much like, sometimes whenever you're reading about that, they're like, and also, because of the way we hire people, because of the way we do business, we had the most legitimately successful boat racing company in America, and then top...
And you're like, oh, because you applied the same skills that got you to be a big cartel.
In the same way, Alex is applying the same skills, and they're all laziness-based.