Knowledge Fight’s #969 episode dissects Alex Jones’ September 27, 2024 show—where he peddled debunked claims like human-animal chimeras and race-specific bioweapons—while exposing his desperate crowdfunding schemes to avoid bankruptcy, including shady business restructurings. His rants on Kamala Harris’ "price controls" (actually anti-gouging measures) and misrepresentations of the APA’s True or False book reveal a pattern of cherry-picked data and outright fraud, yet his audience still cheers. The episode underscores how conspiracy culture thrives on unverified fearmongering, even as its own logic collapses. [Automatically generated summary]
There's a joke in it, where when they become really famous, there's like headlines that flash over the screen, and one of them is Drew Barrymore, Lucy Liu, and who's the third person in Charlie's Angels?
38 days, 14 hours, 52 minutes, 50 seconds for the most important election in world history.
And then once elected, the globalists have pledged publicly, the Democrats have announced civil war conditions in the next 114 days, trying to get Trump actually inaugurated in the District of Evil, D.C. This is 100 trillion times infinity, more important than the NFL and the Super Bowl, because that doesn't matter.
Yeah, so for one thing, Alex doesn't understand what breaking a story means.
He would cover articles in outlets like the BBC about genetic testing or stem cell research and then pretend that he broke that story.
It was published in another outlet.
The only thing that he broke is that he made up a ton of details about something that someone else actually reported.
But I'm having flashbacks.
Because what Alex is describing here is exactly what he said in 2017 after he was on Rogan's podcast the first time and was talking about human-animal hybrid chimeras.
You know, maybe he's been hiding in plain sight this whole time.
Maybe you and I hear breaking a story, and we immediately think journalism-style breaking a story.
But maybe he's going with the screenwriter type.
Where he's like, ah, I'm breaking the story, which means that after having gotten together with some people, we figured out the beats that are going to allow us to move forward with our bullshit.
So Alex goes on, and a lot of the beginning of this show is him reflecting a bit on how great he's been about stories, particularly things like human-animal clones.
In the fine print, like in October of 2000, three months before the poison shots rolled out, the FDA put on their website a list of possible and probable Adverse reactions to the mRNA injections that are not vaccines.
They're gene therapies.
They've had for 25 years and no one's ever approved them to the FDA because it always killed some of the test subjects.
He doesn't really, but you remember the spouse mouse?
I just, I have to say that if I ever turned on something that I was supposed to take seriously, and they were like, alright, our enemies metaphysically are bound to secretly give away all their plans, I would turn it off.
I would say, alright man, I can't take this seriously.
In just, you know, the gestation time, depending on the studies I've seen, six to eight months, and you get like a 60-pound humanoid that's got everything.
So this conspiracy is stupid, and the fact that there are over 100,000 people on the organ donor waiting list kind of illustrates why.
If we had a thriving human-cow hybrid supply full of available organs, then you would think that these people wouldn't have to wait for kidneys, for example.
There's more money in providing the organs than there is in having someone on a waiting list, so you would think that would be the case, at least.
And if there's not more money in providing the organs, then there's no reason to create the cow clone program to make more money.
Someone who's messed up and just enjoys cloning cows, I guess?
The super rich people already have easy access to organs, or easier access to organs than finding donors, so it's not like this is a system that would even help them out on that front.
This is one of the classic instances where Alex takes something that he has a kernel of reality behind, then he exaggerates it out and makes up fun sci-fi details to the story so he can sound interesting to these new audiences like Tucker's fans or Rogan's fans, but it's all bullshit.
People only seem to care about something I predict before.
Have the archivist find it.
I did it four years ago.
I said, do not take those damn PCR tests.
I told Joe Rogan when he had me on his show.
He said, sorry, it's the rules of Spotify.
And you've got to do it.
I said, I'm not doing it.
So they go, okay, we'll just act like we do it.
I said, you're not getting my DNA.
So the lady just goes and puts it.
She goes, okay.
Oh, you're clear.
I go, yeah.
I'm explaining it again.
I could buy a metal detector at Academy Sporting Goods today because I bought one before.
And you can, whether you're looking for silver or gold or steel, you set it to the metal you want and you turn up its sensitivity and you can aim it at the sky and turn it all the way up and it'll go until you've got gold or whatever you want.
There's no gold in the sky.
There's no silver in the air.
There's no copper in the air.
There's no bronze.
There's no brass.
There's no steel.
There's no aluminum.
You turned it up so it misfires.
That's what they did.
But that was only scam level one to create all the fear.
There's nothing more frustrating than knowing criminals are in control and only your naivete allows them to operate.
Jim Jordan had testimony about it.
How the Communist Chinese and others and other corporations and companies did this in a free-for-all.
China didn't take the mRNA shot that erases your immune system and primes you for another attack.
No, all the Western countries did.
And then they've got your DNA on top of it so they can tailor weapons.
Remember what the Russians caught starting 10 years ago in eastern Ukraine?
They caught U.S.-NATO-funded labs claiming they were doing blood tests and stuff for the public, and they were bringing it to bio labs to, again, study how to kill Russians.
Same thing.
All confirmed.
And they denied it for a few years, and then the head of the State Department operation against Russia, Victoria Nuland, went on TV in a congressional hearing and said, yeah, we're doing that.
What's fun about DNA and swabbing it and getting it in front of scientists and being like, all right, now create a race-specific bioweapon is that when scientists who work with DNA look at DNA, they're like, race isn't real!
Years ago, old Pentagon leaders told troops to stop using mail-in genealogy DNA kits because the Communist Chinese and others are going to create specific weapons to kill them, Fox News.
Pentagon warns military personnel against at-home DNA testing kits.
So if you go read this article, the Pentagon did tell soldiers to stop taking these at-home DNA tests, but it wasn't because China was making a race-specific bioweapon.
It was because these tests were not always totally accurate, and they could create real problems for enlisted persons.
Non-enlisted people are protected by the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, which says that insurers cannot discriminate based on people's genes.
If you're the carrier of a particular condition, but you don't have it, your insurance company cannot treat you differently based on that.
However, the military is not bound by this act, and they can discriminate based on your genetic information all they want.
If you take one of these tests, you might learn something that can natechize.
negatively affect your benefits or your possibilities for advancement.
So they were kind of advising people, don't do this.
Beyond this, there's just interpersonal issues, too.
Sure.
The Navy suggested that their folks not get these tests because it could provide inconvenient news.
For instance, you could be on a deployment...
And find out some heavy stuff about underlying health conditions one of your family members might have, or if your kids are really yours, and that could have an impact on your ability to do your job.
I was immediately going to like, oh, well, yeah, obviously the military doesn't want to find out how many people are related to serial killers that work in the military.
If everyone's DNA is collected and put into a database at birth, then there's no reason to do the PCR testing in order to gather DNA.
The only people that would be useful for is people who weren't born in the US, but Alex also believes that immigrants were exempt from COVID requirements because the globalists like them so much, so that's kind of stupid.
This is one of the problems with the way that Alex handles information.
He has tons of disconnected ideas based on his flights of fancy and his need to sound smart and interesting on a daily basis.
He'll start rambling about one of these things, and in the middle of his ramble, he'll mentally connect it with another thing that he's rambled about in the past.
But sometimes that thing will contradict the point of where he started, like in this case.
There's no reason to do PCR tests to gather DNA if everyone has their DNA collected at birth.
It's an internally inconsistent story, and if you listen to that clip, you kind of hear Alex realize that as he's saying it, and then just move along.
That headline at the end there about a Chinese company is about BGI, or Beijing Genomics Institute, who has some involvement with the Chinese government, which I can see that as...
Well, and Alex isn't dealing with the fact that this isn't information that no one had.
The reason that California, as a state, didn't get involved with them as a COVID response thing that would have been easy to do, the reason was because of concerns about the very thing that Alex is talking about.
California is supposed to be the most liberal, globalist state that's in bed with China.
Alright, I've got so much news on World War III and the economy and just masses of stuff.
I didn't go into a 45-minute breakdown of the technocracy because I didn't have news.
It was the opposite.
I was sitting here thinking, I don't need to just sit here and tell you all the problems and all the symptoms.
I need to tell you the disease, the technocracy, the eugenicists, the globalists that want the life of this technology and have now got it and don't want us to have it.
Stealing the whole future from everybody.
And if people get into what I'm into, which is happening, reality, knowing how the architecture really works, we can change it and defeat it and stop it together.
And I'm not offering some utopia like the left does.
I'm saying a lot better world that's pro-human.
Team humanity.
And Elon Musk agreed we'll call it team humanity.
There's been some buzz around that, but not enough.
I think we need to announce our team.
Not just oppose the enemy, but announce what we stand for.
My issue here is that Alex can't bring the name Team Humanity up without mentioning that he talked to Elon Musk that one time and that Elon liked the name.
I'm very disturbed by all these attempts, and I think not enough attention has been given to that latest attempt, maybe even not the latest, but the one in Long Island, New York.
Now, this was something very bizarre because there was an explosive scare.
Cops freaked out.
They responded to it.
And then all of a sudden, the media just clamped down on it, and the headline in the news was...
Elon Musk and Marjorie Taylor Greene fall for a disinformation scam and falsely reported that there were explosives.
Then you read like eight, nine, ten paragraphs down and you find the buried lead, which is insane.
And that is, apparently there was some private individual.
At this location, who was training his dog to sniff and detect explosives.
So a private individual was conducting a training exercise involving explosives, and apparently there was a false detection event.
And that triggered the law enforcement response.
No further information about this.
No further information about this bizarre individual and why he would be doing such an exercise at a location where the president who just survived two assassination attempts was to speak just hours later.
No name for this guy.
No word on whether he too had...
An intriguing travel history involving Ukraine and whatnot.
It was a nice try, and Alex will never have to answer to his audience for pushing that stupid shit, because now we're on to another attempted assassination that gets to be the third try.
In Long Island, there was a rumor that spread about police finding a bomb, but it turns out that what happened was some idiot had self-trained his dog to sniff out bombs, and his dog erroneously found a bomb.
He reported this to the police, who found that he was wrong, and then took him in for questioning on suspicion of falsely reporting a threat.
A bunch of the attention-chasing shitheads in Alex's side of the fence, like Musk and Patrick Bat-David, they ran with the story because it was the kind of story that they were going to tell anyway.
It seems entirely likely that there's no public information about this because the police questioned him, and it was a sincere mistake on his part, so they decided not to charge him.
If he imperfectly trained his dog to smell bombs and in good faith reported what he thought was...
He's operating in a space of unknown information and provides the audience with emotionally satisfying explanations for why they don't know a particular thing and then gives them a conclusion that matches up with the shit he's selling.
I mean, I will say that there is one reasonable question to ask, which is exactly how do you train your dog to sniff out explosives without access to explosives?
See what I'm saying?
There's that little question there that lingers.
But let me tell you something.
That the dog got it wrong, that gives me a lot of hope.
It would just be the same kind of behavior that they're engaged in.
But I could see a very simple explanation of this being somebody who's a Trump fan who thinks that they can provide better security than the government.
A lot of news on every front with the globalist program rolling out of the economy, the election, the hurricane, Kamala and the open borders and the scams they're running.
I'm going to be getting into it all here and so much more I haven't mentioned.
But I really cannot overstate The danger we're all in.
And the major crossroad, turning point, flashpoint, inflection point, fourth turning, political realignment, birth pains ahead of the singularity, moment of truth.
There's no way for anyone to be right or wrong about this bullshit he's rambling about.
Is it the most important time in human history?
Maybe.
Or maybe in five years, Alex will have moved on to a new brand presentation and this will look embarrassing in hindsight, so the pretend he never said it.
Yeah, I mean, it's entirely possible that the most important event that ever happened was like a volcano going off 25,000 years ago, and we don't even know about it, because all that happened was the people available felt the effects.
They didn't actually see it.
They didn't have the internet to tell them where the volcano went off.
with this kind of thing too I don't think that there's anything wrong with feeling that what's happening right now is the most important thing sure and I don't think there's anything wrong with expressing it and giving voice to it because on some level there's always a truth to that and it always looks embarrassing in hindsight sure so I don't want to shit too much on it But I do think that when there's nothing behind it...
Like, there's the pretending that we're going to get to this hard-hitting news.
If it was in, like, a faux, like, self-help style of, like, well, listen, you can't do anything about the past, so that's not that important anymore, and the future hasn't come yet, so the only thing that really is important is the present, fine.
Radio stations we're on don't like it because alarms go off when we're silent for more than 10 seconds.
Sometimes silence is deafening, isn't it?
Maybe just have a mental moment of silence here.
Just sit back and really look at what's going on.
And then look at how wonderful your children are.
Look at how beautiful the stars are, and the trees, and the moon, and the wind, and the leaves, and all the good things in life, all the enjoyment God's given you, all the fun, all the things you've been involved in, all the experiences, and just wow how magic every moment is.
I was hiking the other day on the green belt, and I was watching people come by with their dogs, and the trees, and the birds, and a frog hop by, and ribbit.
And I'm just thinking, look how interesting that person is that just walked by.
They can be old.
They can be young.
They can be ugly.
They can be handsome.
They can be pretty.
How cute and funny the dogs were.
And just everything's like so fantastic and amazing.
If you've never seen it before.
If we were an alien that came here and looked at all this.
How wild it all is.
And God made all that.
God gave you.
Your heart and your mind and your guts and your blood.
They gave you your wife.
God gave you your husband.
They gave you your children.
They gave you the flavor of that hamburger.
The smell of the flowers.
The taste of the warm coffee.
The thrill of the fight.
The thrill of the chase.
The thrill of hard work.
Just all of it.
Just beauty and magic and strength and amazing.
And what do they want to do?
lock you in a cage by yourself and brainwash you and make you feel all alone because they extract spiritual demonic power from cutting you off from God.
And I think him being dressed up like a clown and saying exactly stuff like that will teach them something very important, which is don't be like that.
Ladies and gentlemen, we stand, as I've said, at a decision point, a crossroads in civilization and history.
And the enemies of human liberty and freedom, the enemies of team humanity, have determined in the last decade that InfoWars is critical to be destroyed.
If they are going to win and dominate humanity.
And I accept the challenge and responsibility, but I can't do any of this without you.
So, I ask you to count the cost and to look at the world around you and to say, what are you doing to fight tyranny?
I'm sure you're doing a lot of things and that's good.
And I would encourage whatever you're doing, keep it going.
Many hands make light work.
You don't have to beat it by yourself, but together with God working through us, we will.
But there isn't anywhere in the fight against the globalists that you can do more than supporting President Trump and voting for President Trump and then supporting operations like InfoWars.
And there are some other operations doing great jobs, Elon Musk, Tucker Carlson, others, but they are not in the dire straits because we were attacked first the most intensely by the enemy that InfoWars is in.
Without getting into a long diatribe and explaining it all, and I've already done that, I just want to say this.
The coordinates to either keep InfoWars on the air, and even if that gets taken over and shut down coming up on November 13th, I keep saying 16th, in the sale, if they get tyrants that buy it to shut it down, we already have a lot of options and a lot of things and a lot of plans.
That I'm not going to get into here on air for obvious strategic reasons, but I will say this.
It is critical to these operations not being stifled or even hitting a speed bump or a hiccup during the critical time right after the election during the 76 days of hell to have to reconstitute and relaunch.
So, whether InfoWars continues or not, the backups are being done.
And then those will just be absorbed in if InfoWars survives.
If not, we continue.
So I ask for your aid and comfort.
I ask for your succor.
I ask for your support.
I ask for your aid in war for all of our futures at a critical juncture.
You can't spend money, and you can't spread the word, and you can't pray, I say that humbly because it's the truth, for an organization that is on record more effective against the enemy or that the enemy hates more than this operation.
And we try to make it easy.
Go to thealexjonesstore.com, get the amazing 50-plus designer t-shirts that spread the word, and help you meet like-minded people in the third dimension on the ground, and fund this show, or whatever comes after it.
There really isn't a way that Alex could make it more clear on air that he's redirecting finances and reorganizing his business in likely illegal ways to avoid the consequences of the bankruptcy court.
Prior to this, he had his supplements through InfoWars Life or InfoWars Health, but to protect that revenue stream, his dad and brother-in-law have created Dr. Jones Naturals.
He used to sell his own shirts and merch, but now there's the AlexJonesStore.com, run by his former knife sponsor and a guy who's probably going to jail for assaulting the police on January 6th.
Alex's admission here isn't that he's doing all of this to avoid the bankruptcy.
That's been obvious this whole time to anyone who's paying attention.
The admission he accidentally made in that clip is that none of these businesses are real.
If they succeed in retaining the rights to InfoWars, these companies will be absorbed back into InfoWars because the reason they were created has been subliminal.
I think he's admitting to straight-up criminal stuff here.
I do think that without being too much of a dick about it, I think that...
I don't know if the attempts to, like, crowdfund to buy Infowars, I'm not sure if those have the potential to make enough money to compete with the kind of backing that Alex has.
I don't think it's impossible to have that kind of backing to compete with Alex.
But I think the potential of a lot of stuff that I've seen on, like, Twitter, I think it's fun.
Sure.
And what have you, and disrespectful to Alex, which is great.
Just type in Kamala calls for price controls again.
And I bet it comes up, the video clip.
But she gave him a speech two days ago and she just announced price controls again.
And then I didn't even see it anywhere.
I'm just guessing.
I bet somebody did.
Harris talks economic plan price controls if Americans can trust her.
Scroll down.
What's the date on that?
I guess she'd know.
This was a spell.
Oh, God, she did it again.
I didn't even know about this one.
Get me that one.
So yesterday, she did it on another show.
I saw her.
See where she gave a speech Wednesday.
It was said live, so like 2.30 Central.
She's giving a speech and says it.
So we already found one.
Wow, well, get me that one.
So see, why is that not a bigger deal?
I didn't even know about that clip.
So in the last 48 hours that I know of, she's called for price controls twice again, and I'm on the news cycle like flies on you know what, or white on rice.
And I hadn't seen that.
So that means we're not making it a big issue.
The damn witch just did it again.
But see, that's how it works.
The first time I freaked out and ran around like a chick with my head cut off, the next time, a couple months later, I'm like, hey guys, get that.
So this is a really sad display for someone who's trying to be taken seriously.
He's already said that he thinks Twitter is a search engine and now he's having the crew search Twitter for a video he half remembers seeing.
They find some other clip in a tweet Alex hasn't seen and without watching it or knowing what it is at all, he decides that it's Harris pushing for price controls yet again.
He hasn't watched the clip, he's barely even seen the tweet, and yet he's running with this reporting.
This is pathetic work.
So I found the tweet, and the clip doesn't include Harris pushing for price controls.
She's asked by an MSNBC reporter about her stance against price gouging and how some have accused her of wanting price controls.
She expresses that she's not going to equivocate about how she's opposed to companies raising prices specifically to exploit people's desperation.
It's a fair point that she's making, and it's probably in Alex's best interest to just jump to conclusions about the tweet instead of playing it cold, because I think he wouldn't be able to...
I think before COVID, before we all spent two years in lockdown and shit, I was far more understanding of people being like, germs, they could be anywhere.
Uh-oh, George Soros is buying radio stations to control what I see, says the insane billionaire who bought a social media site so he could control what people see.
Elon has been so successful in what Alex is pretending Soros is doing that Alex thinks Twitter is a competent search engine.
Also, if Alex had read these stories that he's scanning the headlines of, he would know that the approval speed for naturalization requests isn't really up.
When Trump was in office, he almost doubled the processing time that applications were subject to because his administration wanted to make it harder for people to become citizens so they could be disenfranchised.
Trump's xenophobic policies created a problem, which was increased processing time and a huge backlog of applicants.
And now Biden is cutting through some of that red tape to sort of...
Yeah, if there's anything that everybody should be able to agree on, it's that no matter how fast the United States government's bureaucracy may be reported as moving, it is not moving fast.
So this is an op-ed piece in The Intercept that was covered in Zero Head that Alex is whining about, where the writer discusses linguistic history and how the term migrant or migratory wasn't generally used in terms of people until fairly recently.
that had patterns of movement, and in some ways the labeling of people as migrants assumes that they are always migrants, which is to say that they're not incorporated into the whole of where they arrived.
And so there is an interesting point that's brought up by this.
The word is somewhat fitting for seasonal workers who would come up from Mexico and then return, but that term doesn't describe the population that it's being applied to now.
This isn't some woke lecture that's being forced on Alex.
It's a good point that writer Debbie Nathan makes, and I'm going to reflect on this language use on this front, thanks to...
What I read in the article and points that were made.
I use the word migrant a lot as a catch-all term, and there's probably a better word that I could use in a lot of those instances.
Sure.
And I did not realize that.
So, it's a good point.
Anyway, Alex is mad about this because he's constantly searching for new things to be mad about and hates immigrants.
Which, again, that's my favorite way of describing anybody.
Oh, this unelected language cop.
That's good stuff.
But at the same time, like...
Their meaning of the word has nothing to do with your understanding of the definition of the word, the popular usage of the word, the historical context of the word.
They have stolen the sounds that that word symbolizes to you and turned it into foreigner.
Finishing up, I was just hitting on these UN-affiliated groups now, and the media and the professors saying, oh, now the word migrant they told us to use, you're not supposed to use that word now, it's racist.
Well, that dovetails with this article from Infowars.com.
Links right to the announcement yesterday.
American Psychological Association tells children that asking questions is a form of disinformation.
They say if it's a school or mainstream media, do not ask questions.
Yeah, so if you go to the Infowars article that Alex references, it actually doesn't link to the American Psychological Association, but it pretends to.
Instead, if you click the link that appears to go to their primary source, it takes you to a Substack post on a blog called Armageddon Prose, written by somebody named Ben Barty.
So anyway, on his blog post, he doesn't link first to the APA either.
Instead, he links to another substack, which sets the framework for what the APA set.
Only after that is there a link to the actual document.
As it turns out, it's not an announcement or a document.
It's a book called, quote, True or False, The Science of Perception, Misinformation, and Disinformation.
It's a landing page where you can buy that book.
This other substack covered the blurb on the page where you can buy the book, and this seemingly very not racist guy covered it again on Armageddon Prose, and then Alex covered his blog post on Infowars, which he is now talking about.
You know what I like about the horrible laundering system that we have that gets this kind of stuff all the way up to Fox News eventually?
What I do like is that even people like Infowars have to be trolling around, fighting that, going like, man, I can't believe this guy found a way to be mad at this book.
That's amazing.
It's impressive to get that mad about something that is not possible to get mad at.
Well, I think that there's a pretty good, clear reason.
Why they're mad about this.
Sure.
And I'll talk about that here in a second.
But I want to make the point that none of what is going on here, none of what's in Alex's coverage of this or any of the stuff that he links to on the Infowars thing, none of it...
It's supported by the underlying material.
This is not for children.
It's a preteen or young teen focused book, according to the blurb.
And they never say that asking questions is intolerable disinformation.
And this is what it all links back to.
Like, all of this, Alex links to the blog.
The blog links to another blog and the associated, the AAPA book sales website.
So following this train of sources, you go InfoWars, blog, APA.
It takes you right back to the primary.
In fact, the page to buy the book, it links to a seven-page excerpt from the book that includes a note for adults reading, quote, Definitions of critical thinking vary, but most focus on a number of different cognitive skills, including the ability to analyze and think rationally about it.
Whatever the definition, the goal is to help students develop a questioning approach to information so that they can arrive at an unbiased judgment about its accuracy.
That's the only time the question appears in that sample section.
The InfoWars article and then Alex, by extension, are taking their reporting entirely from the Armageddon Pros blog...
In its headline, quote, APA's children's literature, disinformation can be spread by asking a question.
This doesn't appear in the APA page selling the book.
It's a construct entirely of Ben Barty's interpretations and feelings.
But if you go to the second Substack post that he links to in his post, they actually read the book, and that blog includes the passage that this is all being based on.
It's absent from Ben's blog and also from Alex's coverage, but if you go an unnecessary third step deeper, you can find what they're talking about.
And the problem is that this book very accurately and dangerously conveys the entire game that Alex plays.
From the book, quote, It might be disinformation, especially if the person asking doesn't have facts to support what they're implying, or if they can't even answer their own question.
Disinformation spread through questions can be used to challenge scientific evidence, even when there's no proof that the data are wrong.
This makes me think of...
Darren Beattie, when he was on earlier, asking a question about, is this person possible?
If people more widely understood this tactic for spreading bullshit ideas, Alex wouldn't have a career, and neither would any of these dipshits in the whole ecosystem that he lives in.
They know it, so they have to create disinformation about people who are trying to help people understand this dynamic, which is why this guy gets mad on the blog and which is why Alex is covering him getting mad on the blog and misreporting it this way to his audience.
What's interesting is Alex's insistence that he's covering the actual source document here, when he's covering a substack covering another substack.
Why didn't he go one step deeper and just report on that second substack that actually read the book and has the information available on it, as opposed to the substack that he did use as a source which doesn't have any of this stuff?
I suspect it's because the writer of the Infowars article wanted to use some of Ben's language and some of his lines, like this one that they do quote from Ben's blog about the...
Quote, Quote, This is the subspecies of human, parentheses loosely defined, that aspires to be the gods of the brave new world, argues Ben Barty of Armageddon prose about Toner and her ilk.
Also, just before that part that Alex quoted on the blog, Ben also said, quote, look at those Adderall reptile eyes on this bitch, Jacqueline B. Toner.
Yeah, no, it makes perfect sense because it gives you the two things that you really want, which is it gives you the chance to say you've cited a source so you feel like a real journalist, despite the fact that you haven't, and it gives you the chance to quote people who say things that you would say but that you wouldn't be allowed to say if you were a journalist, so you get to be like, ha-ha, see, I didn't even say it!
If he looked into this at all, he'd know that one of the sample pages is actually a big list of statements that it asks the reader to assess as true or false.
Bulls get angry when they see red, or swimming after eating causes cramps.
It's an illustration of statements that are false, but a lot of people probably believe because of the way information has been transmitted over time.
A lot of well-meaning misunderstandings or mistakes have contributed to a lot of people having incorrect perceptions, and that's okay.
You can build from there, typically by asking questions, which this book encourages you to do.
Alex is committing a deep fraud in order to...
Not have people question what he's doing.
Protecting the business by not allowing this influence in that calls out the game he's playing.
And so Kamala comes out over a month ago and says, these corporations gouging people, we're going to lower prices by not letting them overcharge you.
Now, our country is still so competitive, unless it's something like insurance or things that the government's got involved in that are oligopolies, that's groups that work to form monopolies, that most stuff's very competitive.
There's hundreds of thousands of groups and people producing potatoes.
There's hundreds of thousands of people, probably more.
Own cows.
I mean, there's a lot of people that only have like 20 acres and they got five cows and they have a few babies a year and every few years they sell a couple cows and, you know, you get $5,000 or so.
It's a little extra money to pay the property tax.
I would guess, let me just randomly guess.
I bet the number of people just randomly in the United States out of 350 million raising cows, type in the number of Americans raising cows.
Like, Alex has given the people who are behind the boards enough ability to just Google shit and put something on the screen that sometimes it's a problem for him.