In this installment, Dan and Jordan experience a very weird day for Alex. He seems pretty drunk, spends a fair amount of time complaining about an Economist article he didn't read, then does an intensely anti-LGBTQ interview with Judge Joe Brown.
Unless I play an elaborate prank on you on Monday, there is a chance that you'll see me, or maybe you won't see me, and I'll see you from the bushes while you get 100 pizzas delivered to your apartment.
Yeah, I mean, sometimes whenever a plane says, it would be nice if you, of your own accord, were to wear a mask, that is exactly the same thing as the government locking you inside of your home.
So, like, I mean, he just needs to make it look like he was onto something, and, like, I guess he's gonna take whatever he can get, and I applaud him for his desperateness.
So there have been individual cases of schools or hospitals that have made...
like some kind of centralized thing that's everywhere.
The way Alex is, he's like, oh, it's happening.
It's rolling out.
What's going on here is that people like Alex enjoyed such a surge of relevance and popularity during the stretch of 2020 to 2022 when they were constantly screaming about how not cooperating with public health guidance was important.
The people who you're able to get excited on those fronts are the kind of people who need the next big thing on a fairly regular basis or else they get bored.
They need the shiny spectacle of the trucker convoys, the elaborate conspiracies about the vaccine being snake venom, the conspiracies about the vaccines killing...
That's a good one.
And so, if you're going to keep a conspiracy audience captured, you're going to need to jump around quite a bit.
But those anti-mask, anti-public health guidance days were so exciting for Alex.
The money was flowing and it was actually possible to attract new listeners since the idea that you were losing some autonomy in the face of a public health crisis...
is something that normal people can feel.
It's harder to appeal to the common person with stories of interdimensional demons trying to make your kids trans for no reason, since their mission is just to kill everyone.
Conversely, you don't have to be too far gone to feel like decisions that would be wholly individual in other contexts were becoming heavily influenced by the group's needs.
To where a mask or not does appear to be a decision that should only really involve your own needs and wants, But the variables that are really at play are the needs and concerns of the people around you.
Outbreaks and pandemics are population-level problems, so when you deal with them, you need to be mindful that some of the things that you need to do may be based on population-level concerns more than individual-level ones.
For instance, getting vaccinated does not guarantee that you won't get sick, but it does drastically limit the spread to other people.
And if those people are vaccinated too, that will limit things even more and go a long way towards helping protect the folks who can't get vaccinated, like immunocompromised people, and it will limit the transmission.
of it to the extent that it becomes substantially less of a problem.
Those people's health isn't your health.
So from a purely selfish standpoint, it doesn't feel like it should be a variable in your decision making.
And this is a feeling that can be exploited very easily by people like Alex and most of It worked really well and excited their base so much the last time, so they're desperate to try to recapture some of the magic, but the desperation's a little bit transparent.
Like, really jumping the gun on celebrating your predictions of draconian COVID lockdowns beginning.
It's not the government who's saying, okay, just ignore this disease.
People are deeply affected by seeing these deaths, by knowing they could be part of the transmission chain and old people, their parents, their grandparents could be affected by this.
And so you don't get to say, ignore what's going on here.
There will be the ability, particularly in rich countries, to open up if things are done well over the next few months.
But, for the world at large, normalcy only returns when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population.
unidentified
Tell everybody, don't rely on the fact that you had a vaccine in the past.
It will not help you this time around.
Again, we have experience with this type of vaccine in billions of people.
So yeah, the first clip is at Kathy Hochul, and it's from a few days ago, and she was not saying that the vaccine didn't work, but that there's an updated vaccine, a different vaccine.
Yeah, I get Obama, you know, like, just because he's not president anymore doesn't mean he doesn't still have, like, those political contacts and shit.
So two of these clips are from recent times, and one of them is a two-second clip that's played about 20 times.
These are paired with a longer clip of Bill Gates from three years ago to give the impression that everything is happening all over again.
It's easy to sell that impression that 2020 is happening all over again when you just play clips from 2020 and pretend that they're current, which is one of the unspoken lies Alex is passing off here.
I mean, I suppose if the idea is just like, we need to get this in you to kill you, what doesn't make sense to me, if that is the smoking gun, then it's not admitting that the last vaccine didn't work, it's admitting that the last vaccine didn't kill you.
Yeah, so it's kind of unlistenable, this beginning of the show.
And it's just like, I get to a point where...
I believe that COVID is still a serious problem.
I do think that there are issues that are unresolved with it, and I'm not saying we should stop talking about COVID, but I want to stop talking about Alex talking about COVID, because it doesn't evolve.
There's nothing interesting.
It's always lies.
It's so boring to get through, and so I grow weary.
And now they're saying, oh, and if you want to come to the hospital, you've got to have it, or you want a kidney transplant, or you broke your leg, we're going to refuse you care if you ever take an experimental fraud.
When you see the way that we allow people to treat our water as a resource that can be handed out or whatnot, imagine organs, but like a million times worse.
And I would imagine, I'm not involved in the field, so I don't know this, but I would imagine there's an insanely complicated formula that calculates likely human life years that'll be gained by one person getting the transplant over another that might be, I don't know, it's messy, though, whatever the case.
Jordan, very seriously, I hope that's not the case.
You have chilled me to the core.
So there was a woman in Alberta, Canada, who was on a transplant waiting list, but was told that her place on that list was on hold unless she...
Right.
As it stands, the argument is essentially that if you're not willing to take precautions against getting COVID, then it's not unlikely that you'll be given this new organ only to get COVID and have it destroy your new heart or liver or whatever.
Now, I don't know exactly how this works in terms of people who are unable to get vaccinated for other concerns and other medical dynamics.
I don't know if they have the same impact from these.
So, this article that Alex is reading is from Gateway Pundit, and it's just about new rules that are being put in place by the Providence Medical Group, who run 51 hospitals in 7 states.
It's not the government or globalists, it's a mid-sized medical group deciding what to require of their employees.
Also, the article in Gateway Pundit...
It has to start with a disclaimer.
Quote, So your whole article is bullshit, then.
And now you've put out that bullshit, people online have spread it far and wide, and Alex is exaggerating a bunch of other bullshit based solely on what he imagines your bullshit article says.
Thank God you made that clarification, really cleaned up the mess there.
I do appreciate clarifications, because in my experience, people always look at them and go, oh, well then I shall no longer believe in the main thrust of the article.
So this article on Gateway Pundit, the claims are based on a tweet posted by an account called Chester Tam, who paid for verification and has about 6,000 followers.
He posted a screenshot of a policy update sheet that...
Totally doesn't back up the story on Gateway Pundit, nor the story that his tweet itself is pushing.
Case in point, the tweet says, Very clearly doesn't say this.
It says that caregivers need to provide proof of vaccination by November 30th.
But, quote, caregivers who choose not to receive the vaccine may submit a declination form.
If they already have an approved exemption on file, they will not need to submit a declination form.
Declination is a strange word.
They will not need to submit a declination this season.
It further says, quote, caregivers who do not obtain a COVID-19 vaccine or decline by November 30th may be removed from the hospital schedule, placed on unpaid leave, or may be subject to termination for construed noncompliance with the facility policy.
When this started flying around as a hot new COVID conspiracy talking point, Providence tried to clarify their position and reached out to this idiot on Twitter saying, caregivers can choose to decline the vaccine.
Those who do not wish to receive it simply need to submit a declination form by November 30th.
They no longer need to request approval for a medical or religious exemption as many of our states and CMS required at the height of COVID.
This policy has been our practice for many years with the flu vaccine and we are now extending this to the COVID vaccine.
This is the opposite of draconian, and it's really just an admin human resources issue.
This is them trying to make sure that they have their paperwork in order, so they have express written documentation if a staff member isn't vaccinated, probably for legal or liability reasons.
This is not a get vaccinated or be fired issue, it's a fill out this season's form or you might be suspended issue, which admittedly is way less exciting than how this Twitter user framed it, which was then blindly and irresponsibly repeated by the Gateway Pundit.
Which is now expanded upon by Alex and all these other shitheads out there.
Because these idiots refuse to read the stuff that they're basing their bullshit on, or because it's in their financial interest to pretend that they have zero reading comprehension, they got this completely 180 degrees wrong.
This was a company trying to make it easier for their employees not to be vaccinated, and even that was reported as a horrible attack on the downtrodden but heroic anti-vaxxers.
And here's my point.
It's useless to argue with someone like this idiot on Twitter or Alex or the Gateway Pundit.
They either are too dumb to understand the things they read or they care so little about accuracy that they just repeat whatever shit is convenient for their current hustles without ever checking if the information is correct.
It's pointless to argue, but it's critical to understand this dynamic of how information is being misused and exploited for the benefit of these liars.
Understand this dynamic, and when you encounter someone using this kind of behavior to push their narratives, you can just write them off.
They're poor stewards of the public's attention and the information they're pretending to disseminate, and you're never going to get decent information from someone who acts like this.
It's indicative of being disqualified from being trusted, honestly.
I mean, nowadays, really, the subject of media literacy has become so highly complicated because...
Everything is now kind of media.
When it once was trying to understand where newspapers get their sources, what is this based on, the reporting, the editorial positions of the paper, now it's like, who's this anonymous person on Twitter?
He was informed that he was stealing another account's screenshot from a person named The Predicament, who has even less followers.
They got into a back and forth, and I think it's really illuminating.
So this idiot asks The Predicament, quote, Did you see the response from Providence Hospital?
She replies, quote, Yes, I received something similar and added it to my post.
This idiot then asks, quote, Does this seem like a backpedaling response?
Not sure if I buy it.
She responds, quote, good question.
The original letter was undoubtedly meant to be coercive.
These shitheads have a screenshot of a perfectly clear notification from this hospital system that does not say that people need to be vaccinated, and the only reason these shitheads think it does is because that's what they want it to say.
When the hospital system sends them a clarification that wouldn't be necessary if these shitheads were good faith actors, they see it as the hospital backpedaling.
They got exposed, so they're changing their tune, except that their tune is exactly the same as it was in the initial screenshot.
Providence hospitals went out of their way to clarify this issue because they were under the assumption that some of the people who were Ha ha!
The attempt to helpfully explain what these shitheads were getting wrong was experienced and interpreted as an attempt by the hospital to cover its ass.
Because these Twitter shitheads were just too good at being detectives, and the whole case was being blown wide open, so Providence Hospital was scared.
This is how these folks are going to act, and pretending to take their point seriously or pretending to believe that they take their own point seriously is a losing game.
No matter what you do, if you're in the position of the hospital of Eventually it will lead to coverage like this on Infowars where you're being accused of murder.
It's just a choice of whether or not you want your attempts to clarify the situation to be added to the conspiracy.
That's the only agency you have in this whole thing.
He either is not able to understand what he's reading in the screenshot, or he is such a malicious actor that he understands that it doesn't say this, but he can trick people into thinking that it does.
Yeah.
unidentified
And there's proof of the pudding in the eating that neither the Gateway Pundit nor Alex cared to see if there was any veracity to what this person was saying on Twitter.
I think we've moved past the idea of even rational thought.
Or irrational thought.
We're purely in addict behavior right now because you can see the way that these people are acting.
It's to get what they want.
It's the desire that they're reaching.
Even this conversation, the Twitter conversation, I find interesting because they both want to feel smart and they feel so fucking stupid because they just read this letter.
It says the exact opposite of what they wanted to say.
They have a structure, the Economist Group does, that...
It doesn't allow for single ownership.
From their website, quote, Alex doesn't know anything about the subject he's covering,
and is in fact just throwing out anti-Semitic talking points about the Rothschilds that he vaguely recalls, which ironically is part of Mike's book, an attempt to push back on this.
From 1789, all of the columnists has a global emphasis on scope, and about two-thirds of 75 staff and journalists are based in London, borough of Westminster, and it's still owned by the Rothschild family.
Also, Alex accidentally cold-read that, uh, to the extent that Evelyn Rothschild was a member of the board at The Economist, like, it ended 40 years ago.
He wasn't the whole owner, which is what Alex is claiming.
He was the chairman of the board of directors until 86, or whatever it was, what exact year.
Alex is fucking stupid.
And also, Evelyn Rothschild died last year.
At the end there, Alex uses some words that I know he would never use from the top of his head, so it's pretty easy to Google it and see where he's reading from.
Alex says, quote, The Economist has a global emphasis and scope, but two-thirds of the 75 staff journalists are based in the London borough of Westminster, and it's still owned by the Rothschild family.
That's what Alex said.
He would never use words like borough, global emphasis and scope.
As he read through this Wiki page, he started to realize that he's wrong, and even just consulting a source like Wikipedia would call into serious question his knowledge of the subject.
Thus, he just injects his own claim into the source, presenting it and pretending that it's the source talking instead of it just being his own desperate ass trying to look It's honestly pretty pathetic, but definitely slightly less pathetic than listening to Alex, liking him, and allowing him to gaslight you like this.
And you know what's crazy about it is that I would bet five minutes after he said that, Alex remembers the Wikipedia page saying that it's still owned by the Rothschild.
Right, you make a very interesting antagonist when they can make a compelling argument for why they're right, but they are wrong.
In many ways, it's kind of, you know, what creates a good villain is a kernel, or at very least, the belief held by themselves that they're the good guy.
And at the same time, create empathy for the people who aren't villains who are in the same position as the folks who are suffering from the things that that villain was.
If that characteristic is true of somebody else, then you're kind of, you know, you have a responsibility to either hate that person or explain why you don't.
Because men aren't supposed to spend their time looking at simulated war and getting obsessed with that.
You're supposed to spend your time in reality.
And the instincts you have for calculus and plays and information, like a football game or a basketball game, is what you're meant to do in business and life for your family and your country and your nation and your world and your people.
I like Mike Tyson because he's anti-globalist now.
And I've been on his show and he's been on mine.
I like Mike Tyson, but I don't care that Mike Tyson can knock people's heads off.
The real war is understanding the globalist operation and its energy and is building our own systems in a pro-human future.
The real war is getting our sperm count that's 90 plus percent down back to full power.
Okay, no aspersions cast on the religion that I was going to use as an example, but we know there's Christianity, there's Islam, there's Judaism, there's Hinduism, there's Buddhism.
If you take the Buddhist, you'll notice there is no deity.
It's a system of philosophy, but it is entitled to the respect of a religion, and it's a historic one, it's an ancient one.
I'm sorry.
Slam dunk.
And these are new converts who are zealously attempting to force this new religion down everybody's throat and make it the official religion of the country.
If you go to an American building, government building, consulate, senate, or whatever, I'm not saying it.
But you just came out with a new project, Veritas, but now James O 'Keefe, with his program, that major corporations tell their employees, you can't wear crosses, and they're like, well, why is this LGBT festooned everywhere?
You can't have a nativity scene in City Hall or the courthouse, but you can have a rainbow flag hung from the 11th floor of a federal building in D.C. put up there by government employees, the sidewalks, crosswalks painted in rainbow.
Because LGBTQ isn't a religion, having a rainbow flag up at a state capitol building is not in any way comparable to having religious iconography up.
The state sanctioning, respecting, and defending the rights of LGBTQ folk is not the same as the state supporting a particular religion over another.
This guy's a judge, so I know that he doesn't not understand this.
This is for show.
The other thought I had is how malleable all this stuff is depending on what the bigots need on any particular day.
What is helpful to scare their audience into marginalizing and hating the group they need them to hate?
That is the key.
In order to justify the indefensible transphobia and homophobia of their content and community, Alex and Joe need to turn LGBTQ into a religion.
They don't hate anyone.
They're just against the formation of this state cult that's using gay people and trans people to bring in their tyranny.
It's a Trojan horse that they're using.
But it wasn't so long ago, in fact just a few years, since Alex was primarily focused on hating Muslims.
The trans panic wasn't hot in his audience yet, so the prime scapegoat was Muslims and Islam.
However, he can't hate a religion.
That's just definitely outside the spirit of the freedom this country.
Yeah.
So that's what they did in that case, in order to make that hate and bigotry into something that's slightly more palatable and doesn't clearly offend the sensibilities of what freedom in America means.
But what we have right now is people who are not so brave, and they want to be protected because they do not perceive that they can do this themselves.
So when you have people who are so fearful that they are willing to give up their freedom in exchange for safety, you have a problem.
Now, if you analyze the 20th century, probably the most safe place for anybody outside of being in disfaith or, say, Jewish or a gypsy, was Nazi Germany in the early 30s.
They had probably the lowest crime rate of any society.
unidentified
Tehibo Tea Club's original Pure Patti Arco Super Tea come from the only tree in the world that fungles.
So when Alex said, you have the floor, you have 17 minutes, that's because he was just going to skip these other radio breaks.
So this is not 17 minutes later.
This is pretty close to where we were.
But yeah, there's a couple of things in there, I think, that he's playing fast and loose with, and stuff that I kind of don't quite grasp his point on.
Even having listened to the rest of this, I still don't understand some of the points.
But when you're talking about the giving up freedom for safety or whatever, he's talking about things like civil rights.
Now, if you analyze the 20th century, probably the most safe place for anybody outside of being in this faith or, say, Jewish or a gypsy was Nazi Germany in the early 30s.
They had probably the lowest crime rate of any society in the Western world.
At that point.
But there were some severe problems with surrendering your personal liberty to some autocrats.
So one of the things that I can't really suss out, and he never speaks plainly about, so I don't really know, but it seems to me that the lie he's talking about is that gay people exist.
I can see the complaint, in heavy quotes, from people like Joe Brown being like, there is a preferable or a positive presentation of LGBTQ folk in the media, generally speaking.
And if he wants to be mad about that, I guess he just wants media that's hostile.
In the 60s, when I was a kid and fucking people a lot, I was a lot happier, and on TV, there was a lot more abuse directed towards marginalized groups.
And people are making me aware of the behaviors that I engage in and profit from that are directly related to the fucking over of these marginalized people, and I'm kind of tired of that.
So I think you should shut up, and my freedoms are being taken away.
Well, we are being shown that we have a common enemy, those who are against the traditional nuclear family, decency, morality, ethics, and good governance.
Black, white, brown, red, yellow, we can all come together to impose this new imposition of a modern secular religion that threatens the very thing that allowed them to arise in this country.
So we have to protect our system at all costs, and we need to turn everybody out of office who supports this.
Yeah, I'm struggling to find a way to contextualize this that isn't Joe Brown throwing out fighting words and I don't give a shit if I trip him and he falls and breaks his nose.
See, this joking fuck and Alex's drunk ass talking about subjects that are essentially about extermination and elimination of LGBTQ people, at least from public spaces, if not from the entirety of our society.
This is a comically childish understanding of how attractive...
Oh, not for nothing, maybe Joe is bringing his own baggage into this.
He's twice divorced and was arrested in 2014 for contempt of court during a child support hearing.
He did five days in jail, and when he got out, he compared himself to Nelson Mandela, which made a lot of people think that the whole thing was a publicity stunt, since he was involved in a very unpopular run for district attorney at the time, and he needed the press.
He's essentially in a position where he gave up his ability to practice law by placing himself on the disability inactive list rather than face a disciplinary hearing where he would almost certainly have been disbarred.
That case is still on hold, and he'll have to face it if he's not.
he ever comes off that inactive list so he's basically just like a voluntarily disbarred person yeah also he's running for mayor of memphis currently and even with the name recognition of being a very famous tv judge he's polling really low and there's about zero chance he's going to win that good this dude is just a straight up pile of shit yeah i never liked his show judge mass that this was way better and he seems like a miserable hate-filled person thus it's no surprise that he and drunk-ass alex are hitting it off so well yeah talking about their hatred of uh
unidentified
lgbtq folk yeah yeah yeah i i I don't know if there's anything more, like, straight up just, you're no longer supposed to live in our world than being like, they ruined my favorite sport, girl watch it.
So, see, this is our collateral damage to our system.
They have a right to advocate doing it, but we have a right to oppose it.
So what they're trying to do is strip our right to oppose it.
So they use the system for purposes that are...
Way of doing things would not allow them to get because they could not convince the public that it's just a way to go, to give up boys and girls 101A and give up girl watching and boy watching.
It's fascinating that he's so bent out of shape about this idea that he's not allowed to hate gay people when he's on a completely anti-LGBTQ platform, a violently anti-LGBTQ program in the form of Infowars.
They're having this conversation openly.
He has the ability to run for the fucking mayor of Memphis position and no one's stopping him.
He can say whatever the fuck he wants.
And guess what?
Everyone else can say the same shit that they want in opposition to you.
And unfortunately, more people are against you.
You fuck.
Because your views are outdated.
They're awful and they don't...
They don't match up well with the actual idea of freedom and liberty.
Like, I don't think we should have other laws written until we figure out why it is that it can be legal, and yet we still have to keep people in prison.
So anyway, that's the breaking news is that Alex is at an airport probably going to Hawaii and decided that he had to...
Preemptively, before any of the actual information and the evidence that's laid out in this expose, before any of that came out, he had to do damage control preemptively because Russell Brand agrees with some of the stuff that he says.