Knowledge Fight dissects Alex Jones’ April 4–5, 2023, rants on Trump’s arrest, exposing his pivot from election conspiracy theories to transphobic claims—blaming the Tavistock Institute and George Soros while mocking Trump’s weak speech. Jones’ $10K+ mugshot fundraiser (split with m4warstore.com) and baseless "Hillary VP" insider leaks highlight financial exploitation over truth, despite his 120-day house arrest framing of Sam Montoya. The episode reveals how Jones weaponizes extremism selectively, framing opposition as "globalist disrespect," while his own history contradicts his moralizing—undermining his credibility and broader appeal. [Automatically generated summary]
I feel like I figured out why it is that the UK version is better than the others.
Greg Davies used to be a real-life teacher.
I think the fact that he spent time teaching children gave him the ability to treat these adult comedians, which are essentially the same thing, as a certain type of dismissive.
Such as, like, the type of dismissive that they barely even argue against, because it's like the teacher saying that you did wrong.
So, we start here on the 4th, and I can say within even the first clip, I knew we were in trouble, because he starts talking about how Trump's arrest is election meddling, and veers off course incredibly quickly.
This is the deep state openly flexing its muscles and letting us know that we can't vote for who we want to and that the corrupt blue cities and states are establishing an absolute tyranny over us.
And the main target, ladies and gentlemen, Is our children.
And so we'll be focused a lot today here with Judge Andrew Napolitano, Roger Stone, and many other experts joining us.
But the big picture is this.
The Tavistock Institute on record created in the 60s, the trans agenda.
It had already been planned by Aldous Huxley's brother, Julian Huxley, who ran the UN.
I would say that almost everything is pretty negotiable in terms of what is pushing forward his current bigotry, whatever is targeting the groups that he wants to target, which is what he profits off of.
They're watching us via television stations, cable stations or the internet.
You can see a shot in front of Trump Tower.
They also have shots in front of the courthouse.
We'll be intermittently going back to where President Trump at 2.15 Eastern time today, 1.15 Central time today, will be turning himself in to the George Soros installed puppet.
And the documents and articles are all out and are all confirmed that George Soros put this guy in.
He promised to arrest Trump.
And an Obama lawyer is inside his office orchestrating it all.
So when we talk about Joe Biden and his administration, it's really the third administration having some...
Trump's going to be charged with 34 felony counts, no handcuffs, no mugshot, no jail cell, because they know that image really illustrates that they are incredible criminals while there's lawlessness and murder and death in all the major blue cities.
Including New York and the same DA just this week charged a parking garage attendant who saw a man breaking into cars.
It's on surveillance footage.
He came over and the man attacked him, took the gun away, but before he took the gun away, he shot the attendant and the attendant took it away from him and shot him.
So, literally, someone pulls a gun on you, they shoot you, you pull it away and shoot them, and you get charged with attempted murder.
And illegally owning a gun, even though he didn't own the gun.
I read the indictment a few days ago on Saturday, and I just couldn't even believe it.
So one of the ways that the Trump propagandists tried to make this arrest seem more egregious was to point to this case about this parking attendant who shot an alleged robber.
It's basically adding specifics to they'll indict a ham sandwich.
So Musa Diara was on shift when he saw Rhodey Charles looking into cars and naturally thought that he was trying to find stuff to steal.
Diara confronted him, at which point Charles pulled out a gun.
Diara tried to wrestle the gun away, and in the scuffle it discharged, and Diara himself was shot.
He was still able to get the gun, and then he shot Charles twice.
Initially, when police arrived at the scene, they arrested and charged both of them with assault and attempted murder.
However, upon review of the evidence and getting a handgun, Right.
Alex doesn't need to get this story right, because his version of it feels right to the audience.
Alex's fake version of the story conforms to the picture they emotionally resonate with about how their enemies work and how rigged everything is against them.
They'll never hold Alex accountable for being full of shit, because to do that, they would need to insist that he start telling them things that don't feel satisfying, which is more important than the truth.
Yeah, and I think that you could find things to complain about, but they wouldn't line up with Alex's politics, and they wouldn't be satisfying for the audience, because they wouldn't work in service the same way of, like...
The most innocent person who got shot is indicted and being charged with attempted murder.
So as we've seen, there is a trend in Alex's coverage around times when emotions are particularly hot, when things are happening, like a Trump impeachment or something like that.
Well, there's that, and there is the globalists are going to start pulling false flags, which is preemptive cover for in case some right-wing shithead goes out and bombs something.
Meanwhile, I said this last week, and now they've got Peter Strzok and all the usual suspects from the FBI.
All over TV saying Republicans are going to start killing people, bombing people, shooting people.
It's imminent.
That means they've got meth-head mental patients that are schizophrenic in hotel rooms right now with literal MKUltra programming, which is a real thing.
It's all come out in the news.
Telling them that they're the messiah and they're going to save the earth.
It's a well-known brainwashing pattern.
That's one of them.
The CIA just apologized to Canada for the seeking immunity last week for more than 10,000 children they kidnapped in the 60s, 70s, and 80s, and they were trying to create mind-control assassins with them.
The Fox News, again, was Friday.
Look it up.
I mean, they created armies of these people.
Sirhan Sirhan drugged up.
He didn't shoot Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in the back.
So, they got Sirhan Sirhans and John Hinckley Jr.'s.
In the hotel rooms, in the farms, you know, in the woods, they've got them outside the cities and outside the towns, ready to roll them in with truck bombs and just machine gun attacks and everything else.
And this is the flash face.
Indite Trump, start blowing stuff up.
And if I was evil, and if I was them, and the same group that runs things today, did Oklahoma City and so much more, Hopefully we can stop them by talking about this, but they've got the truck bombs loaded right now.
You can bet your bottom dollar in this coup against America.
You heard Alex kind of tip his hand there a bit when he was starting to say, if I were them.
Which is a pretty strong giveaway that most of his predictions about his imaginary enemies are just his own fantasies and what he would like to do to punish people that he doesn't like.
That story that Alex is talking about with the U.S. seeking immunity in a Canadian case is interesting, but he's making up pretty much all of the details.
There aren't armies of mind-controlled patsies, and there never were.
This is a pretty narrow case about whether or not the US can be sued in a Canadian court for things that were done between the 40s and 60s and the MKUltra experiments.
Normally, states have sovereign immunity, and so if these people wanted to sue the US government, the appropriate place to do that would be in US courts.
But in 1982, Canada passed the State Immunity Act, which is being argued that it allows people to sue a foreign government when there are cases of bodily injury involved.
The question is whether or not this act is retroactive, whether it applies, and other various legal technicalities.
I know that Alex's version is more fun and all, but it only exists in his imagination.
In reality, the only reason he's even doing this whole presentation is because he's fairly sure that one of his compatriots is likely to want to try to blow up a building or commit some other act of horrific domestic terrorism, so this is just further preemptive damage control for that.
In case it happens, he has a built-in narrative and clips he can point to saying, I called it.
And they go, we have the highest suicide rate, we have the highest death rate, because almost half of them in studies are sex workers and are in a really destructive lifestyle, in a sex cult, and they're killing themselves and they're being killed, not by us, but by their pimps and all this.
And then they point at conservatives.
Thinking we want to run around and, quote, hurt people in drag, or we want to ban books.
But Penthouse doesn't tell, hey, if you're in a backyard and a man next door invites you in his shed and wants to give you a blowjob, go ahead and go over it.
And Oprah's comments were about how difficult it is to wrestle with having been abused as a child because of the confusion that comes along with it.
Alex is lying to demonize an already vulnerable population and run cover for the fact that the GOP, particularly in Florida, are actively banning a ton of books that aren't pedophilic but are just things that make white conservatives Very uncomfortable.
Alex is doing this because he wants those kind of books banned, but he also knows that calling for banning books that make him uncomfortable looks really bad, so he just pretends it's about something that's a little bit more defensible, even though the thing he claims it about, it's not happening.
So there is a higher rate of participation in sex work among trans women than the general population, but that's not a major contributor to the suicide rate that people discuss.
The first thing to keep in mind is that when people are talking about these statistics, they're not talking about suicide rates.
They're talking about attempted suicide rates.
Death records don't...
include sexual orientation or gender identity typically so that gathering that information is not something that most of these studies have been able to capture they deal with attempted suicides or you know desire to attempt which is important because that means that studies and surveys can capture the influences that led to that decision yeah a 2020 study in the journal of interpersonal violence found that microaggressions and familial emotional neglect are two of the highest contributing factors generally speaking.
Mean murderous pimps strangely did Yeah.
Not even close.
The Trevor Project has also done a ton of work in this field, and this is one of the things that's very consistent.
Their 2022 survey found that if LGBTQ youth have a high level of familial support, their risk of attempting was more than cut in half.
In addition to that familial support, acceptance and support in schools are also important variables that are associated with decreased suicidality.
We would be remiss if we didn't also mention that this Trevor Project survey found that 60% of respondents wanted mental health care but did not receive it.
There's a certain amount of the statistic that has nothing to do with someone being trans or non-binary, but just with everyday mental health problems that end up not being able to be something they seek help for, often due to financial inability or concerns that parents won't give their permission to seek treatment, or even concerns that they'll be outed if they seek treatment.
To the extent that trans folks are sex workers, some of them want to be in that field and good for them.
Others feel they have no other viable options, which is not helped by the phenomenon of employment discrimination.
Additionally, many LGBTQ folk resort to sex work because they're kicked out of their homes by unaccepting parents and find themselves on the street.
In many ways, a lot of the roads go back to the impact that having supportive and accepting family members has and the negative impact that not having that has.
I can't relate by any stretch to an infinite number of situations, but when I was, I don't know, 15, 16...
I had recognized that I was bipolar type 1. And I did not tell my parents or seek help until I was 23 because, one, I was worried that they weren't going to believe me and instead put me in some kind of church version of that.
You know, just that idea of like...
If I do say this, there is a possibility that I will be actively harmed by my family or kicked out.
And that's on a small scale.
And that, of course, leads to, well, I don't have value.
I don't have worth.
And at any point in time, if I act like who I am, I will be punished and hurt for it.
So people like Kevin McCarthy may feel the need to give some kind of knee-jerk support to Trump to avoid alienating his fans right now.
This is not a status quo that can remain for long.
The 2024 general election is a presidential election, but a whole lot of members of Congress are also up for re-election, and you can bet your bottom dollar that they know that a sure path to losing is connecting their campaign to supporting Trump in his legal case, which will only get nastier and messier as things go along.
And as it stands, the GOP only has a four-member majority.
So that shit is tight.
In the Senate, there are 34 seats that are up for grabs.
Only 11 of these seats are currently held by members of the GOP.
a little bit less to lose but the margins are very slim in the senate so you don't want to lose anything no most of those republicans in the senate are pretty safe gop uh places they're probably not going to lose so you're probably going to see a little bit more willingness to fuck around from people like ted cruz and josh holly sure who are both up for re-election but house members are probably going to be way more cautious even beyond just electoral concerns most of these folks don't want their political existence tied to a guy who's probably going to be convicted for these crimes because
that creates the risk that their entire identity will be caught up in trying to absolve trump at the expense of being able to spend that political capital in some other fight that they care more about i mean they don't give a shit about this guy Imagine if your campaign has to be entirely, I'm going to pardon the imprisoned former president.
The GOP folks in office will care about Trump until he's no longer potentially politically useful in the same way that they all hated him until he was the inevitable GOP candidate in 2016.
Once the downside outweighs the potential benefit, they won't care.
But for Alex, it's interesting because he likely has a different calculation.
For Alex, the more likely it is that Trump goes to jail, the more appealing it is to support him.
If Trump goes to jail, the narrative basically writes itself for Alex.
He could scream from the mountaintop about how the rightful leader who was sent to prison because he was too great of a threat to the globalists.
From the narrative perspective, Trump going to jail is the best thing that could happen for Alex right now.
And because he would be incarcerated and there would be a limited ability for him to necessarily disseminate messages and what have you, Alex could control the narrative so well.
There's so much game he could play there.
In the same way that Carrie with Mark Richards in prison.
Also, the Trump campaign is fundraising off of a mugshot they made because they didn't give him a mugshot because they wanted to deny him the image of what they're trying to do, put him in jail for 136 years.
And so we made a mock mugshot of Trump that I think is just as good as his.
His is excellent as well.
It's both fundraisers for Trump and for us.
So do you want to support Trump?
They'll get the shirt from them, but also get the limited edition shirt at m4warstore.com.
Ours is very similar.
Ours says political prisoner and has him in a mugshot photo.
We had Judge Edward Napolitano on yesterday saying the plan is to bring Hillary in as the VP during the election, then have Biden step down towards a high level.
But also, if you have the same big bad, then you have to have sort of smaller bads that are still a threat that you can handle, and then the big bad is always kind of getting away, and there's a bomb in his chair.
All of it quarterbacked by this Soros legal institute they set up where they let hardened criminals out and murderers out and don't even charge them or let them go.
So Alex is still lying about the parking attendant story.
I say lying even though he probably has no idea what the reality is because I know that even if he heard that the charges had been dropped, he'd still tell his audience the same story.
It doesn't matter.
It satisfies what it needs to satisfy, which is the emotional needs of the audience.
As for the Sex Fiend case, that is a little bit more of a mess.
The situation is this man named Justin Washington was offered a plea deal where he would get 30 days in jail and 5 years probation on a rape charge, being pled down to a charge of coercion.
A spokesperson for the DA's office said that they had consulted with sex crimes prosecutors who had been in contact with the victim and their family, and that the plea deal was partially in service of finding a way to hold Washington responsible, but make it so the victim would not have to testify.
The amount of evidence prosecutors had forced them to reduce the charges from first degree rape and first degree sexual abuse to third degree, which dropped Washington's bail to $12,000, which he was able to meet.
He had no prior arrests and made all court appearances, so it doesn't seem that outlandish that he would be offered to be able to be released on bail.
However, just a few days before he was said to be sentenced, he went on an assault spree.
This is pretty awful.
It's ridiculous.
He was climbing up people's fire escapes and masturbating, looking in their windows and stuff.
It's awful, and naturally the DA's office has moved to retract the plea deal.
Alex and his ilk are pretty obsessed at the moment with delegitimizing Alvin Bragg and the Manhattan DA's office, so whatever appearance of wrongdoing will be naturally blown out of proportion.
But it's important to keep in mind that Alex doesn't care at all about this parking attendant or any of Washington's victims.
This is literally only an issue for Alex because it helps him make Trump look less guilty.
For instance, to my knowledge, Alex has never spoken about Stephen Broderick.
Broderick was an Austin, Travis County Sheriff's deputy who was charged in 2020 with sexually assaulting a child.
While he was out on bond, he committed a triple murder.
His victims, including his ex-wife and his stepdaughter, who was the victim in the sexual assault case.
So, I mean, like, DA's offices...
Right.
It's not a situation that's unique to the Manhattan DA's office, and it's definitely not just something that we should accept as an inevitability of life, but on the flip side, if people truly are innocent until proven guilty, it does not make sense to take someone with no prior convictions and deny them bail.
The sweetheart deal that was offered to Washington wasn't related to the ability to commit further crimes, but that's the story how it needs to be told for Alex, because he only...
He needs the story to prop up the Trump is a victim narrative.
You know what I'm saying?
He got out on bail.
It wasn't the sweetheart deal or whatever that allowed that.
And the sweetheart deal wasn't what reduced his bail.
It feels like what you're saying to me is if a bunch of people try and do what they feel they can do within the system to respect the needs of a victim while, I mean, I guess being part of the legal system, you need to be able to see the future to make sure that you're doing everything perfectly right and that mistakes like this don't happen.
Not sure about that, but Sam Montoya was filming for InfoWars when he stormed the Capitol, and it would be hard to say that his actions, which he caught on film himself, didn't help him get charged.
For instance, there was that part where he yelled, quote, Or the part where he did a plug for the Infowars store while he was entering the Capitol building.
Anyway, he was sentenced to 120 days of house arrest, three years probation, and 60 hours of community service.
He better remember to do that community service, too, since that's why Owen Schroyer got charged with anything.
He didn't do his community service from his previous plea agreement over disrupting Congress, so he was technically trespassing just by being at the Capitol on January 6th.
He hasn't been sentenced yet, but I'm sure it's just going to be a slap on the wrist.
Also, I mean, like, look.
Sam Montoya is a cameraman, so there better be some breaking news at his house.
unidentified
I don't know how he's going to be helping the InfoWars.
They've got a local racist Democrat district attorney in Atlanta who is doing everything in her power to indict me over an absolutely perfect phone call, even more perfect than the one I made with the president of Ukraine.
Remember, I kept saying, that's a perfect call.
This one was more perfect.
Nobody said, sir, you shouldn't say that.
Many people are on the phone.
Or hung up and discussed because of something I inappropriately said.
Because nothing was said wrong.
In fact, at the end of the call, we agreed to continue our conversation about election fraud.
And election fraud, specifically in Georgia, at a later time.
Many people on the phone, including lots of lawyers, nobody found anything wrong with that perfect call until a book promotion tour.
There's something so pure about the moment of Alex listening to the speech that he hasn't listened to before, but he's built up as the most important, historic kind of, like, we will fight them on the beaches.
She said that I falsified my financial statements, but in fact we're proving and will prove that my financial statements were substantially more than we submitted, not less.
And in all cases have a strong disqualment clause in them, which tells the institutions that may look at that if they want to, not to rely on the statement.
But they've got a problem with their case because, number one, I'm...
Very under-leveraged.
They can't believe it.
All the stuff they read and gave.
And have very little debt relative to the value of assets.
And importantly, not one bank has lost even one dollar.
She was investigating me to save banks and very good lawyers.
But they didn't lose a dollar with us during this period of time.
In fact, the banks we're talking about made almost $200 million off Donald Trump, and they liked me very much.
Which, I mean, I think is inarguably a bad thing for the rest of the world is the fact that they...
Only showed parts of the speeches where Trump accidentally said something meaningful as opposed to an hour-long ramble session like this where he's like, let me explain why I am not guilty of campaign finance charges.
Well, I think it's fair to say he backed down some of the election and backed down on the shots, but if he didn't go to New York, they would say he was guilty and absconding, and they could probably get a federal warrant and bypass that.
So I think going and facing his false accusers and saying he's not guilty...
I think that's kind of his right to do that.
I don't know if it's fair to say that was bad.
unidentified
Well, maybe it's right, but to me, it's just like he choked again.
And, you know, he gave up on the Jan Sixers, and his best friend, Paul Manafort, is still in jail.
I don't appreciate the amount of climate damage he did just so he could hop over to New York and say, I'm sorry for forcing myself to be arrested for all the crimes I committed and then flying back.
But yeah, I mean, it is like this is the benefit of operating like a criminal organization is these people have hitched their wagons to you and if they let go for a second, they're in open waters and sharks can come after them whenever they want, you know?
I'm just simply saying, they're going after him fraudulently now.
We cannot support that, even if you don't like Trump.
unidentified
No, I agree they're going after him, but he spoke 95% of the time on his ego and how they molested his underwear, and then five minutes on all the other...
His adjacency to power has made him so much money, and he understands how fruitful that game is.
He's addicted.
He's stuck in that space, and he can't get away from it.
It's fascinating.
It's such a case study.
If you just squint really hard so you can't see all the horrific bigotry and all these other things that are factors in Alex's content, such a fascinating case study of...
The damage that comes with having a brand that's being above politics and then recognizing how profitable it is to be invested in this electoral politics, but at the same time being unwilling to shed the veneer, the false character that you had at the beginning.
Your ego won't allow it, and your wallet can't resist it.
The thought occurs to me that if I were to hear somebody talk about their indictment and then also talk about their underwear, I would think, this is an interesting person who shouldn't be president.
Well, listen, I had Judge Andrew DiPolotano on yesterday.
He talked to top Democrat fundraisers, top people.
He told me I could say it on air, but not the who-who.
And they said they actually want Trump because they think they can beat him.
And so that's basically what's going on.
They did this to energize Trump with his base.
So that Trump is the nominee to actually stop DeSantis.
The whole time we thought they wanted DeSantis, it looks like they want Trump, but it's super complex Machiavelli, and it's not like the globalists know everything.
Which is what the high-level people told Andrew Napolitano, which he said Alex could say on air but not say the names of the really elite people who said this.
So there's a really standard manipulation technique that Alex is employing there where he responds to a different point than what the caller brought up.
To this point in the show, the only specific, like I mentioned, that Alex has even given is that Rachel Maddow said that Which Alex has now turned into like a media blackout.
It would be an easy dodge within his narratives and stuff, but it would open a second stage of like, are you ready to defend that against somebody who may have a rebuttal?
And that's why he can't really make that argument against the Locker Up being like, oh, those are fake and these are real, because these are real, you know?