Today, Dan and Jordan take a moment to reflect on the fact that Joe Biggs, former Infowars employee, is on trial for participating in a seditious conspiracy. The gents discuss how Biggs called into Infowars from jail the other day, then discuss some of his history with the company.
In all honesty, the only negative feelings that I have are I have seen a couple comments from people who are like, oh, we were going to say something to you, but the line was too long.
And genuinely, I want to track you down and I want to say thank you to you.
I don't know how to express...
If it were me, everybody would have been there in a group.
Hello, and make a personal connection with everyone, and it taking no time, as opposed to, in order to do that, it takes hours and hours, and that means somebody's gonna have to wait.
So, Jordan, it dawned on me that while I was taking time off that there was a major story surrounding Alex and Infowars that we haven't really covered, but it's super relevant to the news.
A lot of the minor figures around Infowars are really boring, and thus we don't really hear much from them.
Alex's business model requires him to be employing mostly a bunch of tumbleweeds, because if he had competent people in-house, they'd realize how easy his gig is, and then they'd do it better, and he'd go out of business.
He's incentivized to have a crew of serviceable disappointments at all times.
One such serviceable disappointment that we've not really covered too much is currently on trial for being part of a seditious conspiracy.
I'm referring of course to Rambo Joe Biggs.
At this point, the Oath Keepers who were on trial, including Stuart Rhodes, have been convicted of seditious conspiracy, and there are very clear evidence of some communication between Rhodes and the head of the Proud Boys, the group in which Joe Biggs is second in command.
As such, I think there's a very high probability that Biggs is going to end up being found guilty, and the fact that woke insurance underwriter Norm Pattis is his lawyer doesn't really help Joe's odds one bit.
I was like, I can't believe only 20 or 30 people are listening to this because we will, of course, be at the center of an insane sequence of events in five years.
So what brought this to the front of my mind was that on Friday, March 10th, Joe Biggs called into InfoWars and was a guest on Harrison Smith's show for an hour.
I fail to understand how he can be living in a horrible gulag and stuck in solitary confinement and also call into Infowars and be on air for a fucking hour.
Yeah, I guess, or maybe get money in his commissary or something, you know?
So I went and checked out the campaign, and he's trying to raise $250,000, and it's not even at 10% of that goal.
Fun fact, though, Gavin McGinnis is his top donor with $1,732, which is nice.
It's cool that the guy who started the gang Biggs was a part of is throwing a couple bucks at the problem and not being held responsible for his actions at all.
I'm not certain of it, but I think that Gavin's donation is a Do you know, I'm going to throw this out there, just as a person who can think clearly, all right?
So I'm not a lawyer, but I have to think that going on Infowars and making a bunch of claims that may or may not be true about your case while the case is still being tried can't be a good idea.
Multiple members of the Proud Boys have pled guilty already, and this clip of Biggs from January 6th that doesn't scream, I'm innocent.
We'll see how this all shakes out, but I suspect that Joe isn't going to be getting out of jail, and Norm Pattis is going to get that $1,732 from Gavin.
I was thinking about the state of things, and I decided that first of all...
We're going to have to listen to Joe Biggs calling in to talk to Harrison.
I mean, it is a big change in a person's life when you go from...
You know, freedom to solitary confinement for, you know, a long time.
You know, as I talk to you now, I'm sitting in a concrete room with a two-inch mattress and a window that's about a fist wide that I can see out in the toilet beside me.
I mean, you're stuck in here 22 to 23 hours a day.
First of all, it's interesting to hear how they're trying to ramp up this idea that Joe's being held in a Soviet-style gulag, and when Harrison asks how he's doing, his answer is, I'm doing pretty good.
Second, something doesn't add up about the story he's telling about his pretrial detention.
I can't reconcile the idea that he's in this terrible situation, and yet he has access to a phone for at least an hour in his cell, and no one stops him from calling into a right-wing propaganda show that is...
actively involved in spreading the conspiracy that fueled Biggs'crime, particularly given that Joe is calling into that show predominantly to promote his crime.
My position on Joe's complaints about his detention conditions are the same that I have about all other cases.
People being held in government detention, especially pre-trial detention, deserve dignity and humane treatment.
I think that Joe Biggs is a giant piece of shit, but that doesn't change that he's a person, and you can't hold people in abusive conditions.
If we're gonna have a state that incarcerates, we have to at least require that.
We've talked about this a little in the past, but that DC jail does have a troubling history, so it doesn't seem impossible to imagine that the conditions that Joe is in are less than ideal.
It would have been nice to see concern about these conditions from Joe or anyone at InfoWars before it affected them personally, but I guess we can't ask for a miracle.
Also, it's not lost on me how entirely supportive InfoWars is of Joe Arpaio, who might as well be the patron saint of abusing pretrial defendants in custody.
If we had a choice, if we had a choice between the prison system being reformed and Joe Biggs being stuck where he is getting the shittiest treatment possible, I'd choose the prison system every time.
Whatever complaints Joe has about his conditions in the jail should be taken seriously, not just on his behalf, but on behalf of the people held in that facility who don't have access to a large propaganda outlet to speak on.
All that being said, this has nothing to do with the reason he's being held in detention, which is storming the Capitol to try and stop the 2020 election.
Yeah.
Now, all that being said, also, on Tuesday, a federal judge denied a motion brought by another January 6th defendant, Christopher Quaglin, who claimed that his rights were violated in that D.C. jail.
That certainly doesn't mean that no one experienced anything inappropriate, but it does take into account that a lot of the general conditions that the January 6th defendants are in, and it doesn't seem like a lot of the picture that someone like Joe is painting are accurate.
And I don't know how much of that is Joe's doing and how much of it is, like, he's part of an embellish.
Yeah.
You know, like, with Infowars, Alex doesn't do, like, he never sticks to the facts.
I don't mean this to say that I don't think that anybody has been in bad conditions or anything like that, but from what I've read in a number of instances, it seems like...
The government is interested in giving them preferential treatment.
You know, just past week we found out that the FBI had been listening in to attorney-client privilege conversations and then building their prosecution based on the points that we would bring up, you know, talking to lawyers.
They shaped their prosecution in a way to, you know, make people look good or whatever.
They would see us bring up points that we thought they had in their week, like what we thought in their prosecution.
And they would go and, like, all right, we've got to make this change.
We've got to do this.
So it's been insane to know that these people are sitting here the entire time, you know, listening to these types of things and making these kinds of statements and really cheating.
She's accusing the lawyers of doing something that is a foundational violation of their legal obligations.
Yeah.
unidentified
So Joe's talking about a recent event that has put the trial temporarily on hold when prosecutors accidentally turned over confidential messages to the defense lawyers, some of it possibly containing classified information.
The FBI turned over a large spreadsheet of messages to an agent in charge of producing them for the case, and she filtered out the ones that were not germane to the case or ones that couldn't be turned over.
She messed up by not actually deleting them, instead they were on the sheet in a hidden cell.
One of the things in that hidden cell that's been disclosed of them, like one of them, there's a message where an agent was told to destroy, quote, 338 items of evidence.
But an assistant U.S. attorney has clarified that this is not related to the Proud Boys case.
According to a court filing, this related to a nearly 20-year-old case.
So it almost certainly isn't as suspicious as it's being made to sound.
The other thing that's being alleged is that these messages include references to communications between Proud Boys Zachary Rell and his then-attorney.
It really does look like this is the case, but this isn't going to stick for Rell or the Proud Boys because it's not protected communication, according to the prosecution.
As it turns out, the messages that the FBI agents were allegedly discussing were captured through the TrueLinks system.
Quote, inmates consent to monitoring of their use of the TrueLinks and electronic messages system every time they log into a TrueLinks terminal at the FTC.
In the banner warning, inmates are explicitly advised that electronic messages and system activity are subject to monitoring and retention.
Inmates are further specifically advised that electronic messages to and from an attorney are monitored and, quote, will not be treated as privileged communications and that their consent to such monitoring and information retrieval for, Sure.
That's going to be a tough hurdle for Rell and the defense to clear, because from where I'm sitting, it kind of looks like this dude just fucked up, and now they're desperately trying to get things thrown off course on a pretend technicality.
Also, this happened with Rell's communication, so Biggs has literally no standing to claim that his rights were violated, even if it were a valid argument for Rell.
But I'm against most of the shit in the Apple agreement that I click I agree on every time, so I'm not going to go into a court of law and expect them to give a fuck what I have to say.
Joe is one of the highest ranked leaders in a violent street gang whose entire existence is predicated on opposing anything that doesn't fall in line with defending a system organized around straight white cis men.
I know the folks like Joe would love to say that they're just wanting to defend the West.
Their initiation prayer begins by saying, quote, I'm a proud Western chauvinist and I refuse I thought it was a proud...
So incidentally, I've been reading a bit of the writings of Ravilo P. Oliver lately, and I came across an interesting passage.
Oliver, of course, was one of the 12 founding members of the John Birch Society, who would go on to become a really public anti-Semite and white supremacist, eventually finding himself as the mentor for William Luther Pierce, who would go on to write the Turner Diaries, which is the essential text of the militia groups in the 90s, upon which much of the street gang organizations, like the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, are...
There's a straight line from him to Val.
In his text, The Religion of the West, Oliver says, quote...
During the Middle Ages, our ancestors occupied the greater part of Europe, and until they discovered the American continents, they lived only in Europe.
But, despite that geographical unity, they did not generally refer to themselves as the Europeans.
For all practical purposes, furthermore, our ancestors belonged to the same division of the white race.
They, like the true Greeks and true Romans before them, were all members of the great race that we now call Indo-European or Aryan.
But they had in their language no words to designate their blood relationship and biological unity.
Thus, when they referred to the unity of which they were always conscious as something transcending the constantly shifting territorial and political divisions of Europe, they called themselves Christendom.
So to sum up the point so far, there was this group of pure, real white people, but they didn't have a word to describe their racial group, so they used the word Christendom.
Oliver goes on, quote, Christianity is a religion of the West and for all practical purposes, only of the West.
It is not, as Christians once generally believed, a universal religion.
For experience has now proved that it cannot successfully be exported to populations that are not Indo-European.
So you understand that there is a synonymous relationship here.
It's pretty critical as an underpinning to understand when dealing with groups like the Proud Boys this relationship.
The intellectual tradition that they exist within very strongly and clearly believes that the words Western and Christendom are synonymous with Aryan.
In essence, the existence of the Proud Boys is violence in and of itself.
When they show up to a protest, they're there as shock troops of that intellectual tradition aimed at intimidating or outright attacking the things that they see as being a threat to Western dominance.
And further, even leaving that context to the side, because, you know, I don't think that they sit around thinking about Ravilo P. Oliver and the tradition that they exist within.
So, the existence of these groups is rooted in violence, and the behaviors they engage in when out in public are all meant to increase the likelihood of violent confrontation breaking out.
Leaving that existential issue aside, the list of Proud Boys who have been charged with acts of violence at and after rallies is ridiculously long.
And here's the only point that really matters here.
Harrison understands that.
He knows that perfectly well.
The game they play on Infowars doesn't really work if he appears to understand the dynamics, so it goes this way.
unidentified
Oh, you're the most peaceful protester I've ever seen in my whole life.
There's nothing that you donating or not donating can do to help or hinder Joe's chances of going to jail.
He's almost certainly going to jail.
This is nonsense and also a little dramatic.
I think if you're trying to play up the political prisoner of an illegitimate regime thing, maybe it's not a great idea to make a point that Joe is somehow able to stay twice as long as you expected, guesting on a bullshit propaganda network that is supposed to be the number one enemy of the regime, the one outlet that the regime is so scared of.
Acknowledging that Joe is not only able to call in and guest on the show, but he's able to extend his appearance kind of makes it look like the detention conditions he's living in are pretty accommodating.
I mean, it wouldn't surprise me if there's a cellmate who is caught with an ounce of weed 30 years ago on his third strike and has been there and hasn't been able to make a phone call for 20 fucking years.
I wouldn't have called attention to that if I were Harrison, but he's really bad at this, so I don't expect him to understand how the optics of this are really jarring and stupid.
So the real answer to this is that they haven't lost it because they know they're guilty.
And the only real ploy they have is to grift a little bit so dum-dums will pay their lawyers or more likely drop a ton of money into their commissary for while they're in jail.
Also, I'm not quite sure what Joe's talking about considering, as I understand, you know what, maybe there's more to it than this, but initially there was a whole wing for the January 6th defendants only.
A separate place in the jail.
But as more people have been released, Maybe he's not in a separate wing for January 6th people anymore.
Because I was thinking when he's like all these badass crazy people, it's like...
But to the people that have been swayed by the mainstream media, what is the case you would make to the average liberal out there?
Is there any way to get through to them to express...
You know, that they should also be terrified that this is happening to their fellow American, and it's for their own good and for their own decency that they should be standing up for you.
What's the appeal you would make to the people on the other side of the aisle, as it were?
So there's kind of a resignation in Joe's answer because he knows damn well that anybody who looks at the evidence will come away recognizing that he's guilty as shit.
The only folks he has half a chance with are those who are already in the cult, so why bother evangelizing?
Just paint the people that you can't convince as stupid, grift from the cult members, and move on.
Joe lived his own life, so he knows better than anyone else what he did.
If you read the indictments that have been released, it could be argued that Joe Biggs is actually the person who incited all of the planning that the Proud Boys did leading up to January 6th.
September 20th, 2020, Enrique Tarrio set up an elite group called the Ministry of Self-Defense, which included Joe Biggs.
This was a day after Biggs texted Tarrio, complaining that the Proud Boys, quote, recruit losers who want to drink, and that they should, quote, get radical and get real men.
This conversation occurred shortly after the January 6th rally was announced, and the Ministry encrypted chat is where a whole lot of shit that Joe's pretending didn't happen went down.
In theory, you could say that it looks like Joe's encouragement led to Tario going down this path.
In that group chat and others that split off from it that included Biggs, there was plenty of talk of occupying the Capitol on January 6th and talks of how it was going to be much different from their normal operations.
When Tario was arrested on January 4th, everyone tried to delete their history in the group and started a new one that didn't include Tario because everything that they were doing was totally legal and not at all involved storming the Capitol.
Also, Rufio's full name is Rufio Pan Man, a name he earned because he assaulted someone with a pan.
Joe knows damn well that he was part of these groups and that they were planning exactly what happened, except with the difference being that they wanted to stop the certification of the election, not just postpone it for a few hours.
He can fuck off with this woe-is-me shit, because let's not forget, this was Joe on January 6th.
unidentified
So we just stormed the fucking Capitol, took the motherfucking place back.
You know, it just now occurred to me, but one of the true things that I think exemplifies what they are in terms of where they are in human history is that they're still naming people based upon occupation or event.
It says, a startling document predicted January 6 Democrats...
Are missing its other warnings.
They say weeks before the 2020 election, so before the election even happened, a secret 87-page document outlined in matter-of-fact language the threat posed by Donald Trump's still-to-come campaign of election denial.
So apparently this 87-page document had gone out saying Donald Trump is going to lose the election and he's going to question the election and here's how we deal with it.
I mean...
How much do you think of January 6th was a pre-planned sting operation to get people like yourself into a position where you can be framed for a crime?
I mean, how sophisticated do you think the entrapment was in this case?
He doesn't have that fire in his belly, and I think it's easy to understand why.
He knows that pretending that this was all a setup isn't going to change anything, and who knows if it would actively hurt his case.
All he can do is spout off inaccurate info wars, talking points like how Pelosi is responsible for the decreased police presence.
It's pathetic.
I thought this guy was a proud Western chauvinist who refused to apologize for creating the modern world, not a loser little titty baby.
Also, Harrison hasn't even read this Politico article, or he's willfully lying about it.
This was about a document called Plan D, made by a think tank group called The Hub.
They were fairly certain in their prediction that no matter what happened in the election, Trump would not concede defeat, but that wasn't too risky of a guess for them to be making.
The document allowed for possible scenarios where Biden won or Trump won.
It didn't specifically predict January 6th more than it predicted the kind of environment where in an event like that could happen.
For the most part, this document that this Politico article is about is it covers what Democrats needed to do to make the country's democracy more healthy, like dealing with how the Senate is absurdly biased towards lower population, generally rural GOP voting states, or how the Electoral College is an outdated institution that has gone against the popular vote twice since 2000.
The last time it had happened before that, That, consider this, was 1888.
The document was a warning that if the Democratic Party got back into power, they needed to behave like it was a, quote, fleeting once-in-a-generation or perhaps lifetime opportunity to revise the political system, which I think is probably fair.
I think it's probably a fair assessment for them to have made.
Anyway, Harrison is just making up a story about this Politico article that he hasn't read in service of making it seem like January 6th was a huge inside job and that Joe Biggs was set up.
He knows it's bullshit, but if he dealt with reality truthfully, he'd have to ask Joe hard questions, and that's bad for business.
They claim this was a pre-planned insurrection coup.
There were it was an armed insurrection coup, but there were no arms and it was preplanned, but also it was inspired by Trump's speech that afternoon, which they tried to impeach him for.
I mean, even on its face, even with no extra evidence that we have, the plethora of evidence that we have showing what really happened that day, just on the on the basis of their claims, it's inconsistent.
The arms were waiting at an Oathkeeper safehouse just outside D.C. because they knew that they couldn't open carry on Capitol grounds in this circumstance.
The plan was to have someone deliver the arms to the Patriots if shit popped off and Trump deputized the militias to be his personal army.
Oathkeeper leader Stuart Rhodes, who was convicted of seditious conspiracy, was seen meeting with Proud Boy leader and Joe Biggs' best buddy Enrique Tarrio in a parking structure on January 5th, which really does imply some sort of working relationship.
Point is, the fact that they had the announcement Yeah.
Much of the action carried out by people like the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys was demonstrably pre-planned.
Their encrypted group chats really lay that out pretty clearly.
Simultaneously, Trump's speech saying that everyone should go to the Capitol probably made a lot of people more likely to make the trek than they would have otherwise, so this is a combination of pre-planning and circumstance.
Harrison's argument doesn't make sense, and he isn't so dumb that he doesn't understand this.
He's just really bad at laying out these arguments.
Joe is really low energy, making excuses for why he's going to be found guilty.
It's a biased jury in D.C. The courts are corrupt.
My rights have been violated.
None of it's based in reality, and none of it means anything.
It's honestly a really strange interview because it's hard to imagine a lawyer telling their client that calling into Infowars from jail while awaiting trial is a good idea.
It can't be good for the case for the defendant to smear the ongoing proceedings on a platform that actively promoted the events leading up to January 6th while he's being interviewed by a guy who watched the events of that day unfold and celebrated exuberantly.
You would think that if you were going to take this kind of a swing, Like, make a splash.
The former Infowars employee on trial for a seditious conspiracy called into the show and was a guest for an hour, and I would bet that most people listening to our podcast had no idea that it even happened.
The first is obviously to raise money for Joe's Give, Send, Go.
The second goal is more important to people like Harrison and Alex, which is to do everything possible to turn the people who will go to jail for January 6th into martyrs and blameless political prisoners.
This is a trend you see catching on with hero stories about the various defendants on trial and near canonization of Ashley Babbitt.
In real time, we can see a false mythology being created that'll be added to the massive tome of patriotism.
Yeah.
And that's kind of fun, I guess, from an academic standpoint.
It's a little bit different than waiting for the next season.
in as much as reckoning with this and recognizing some of these dynamics can help you experience them the next time.
Right.
unidentified
So I think that there's, well, I guess watching the first season of Yellow Jackets prepares you I don't know what you can do to stop this cycle of creating these false mythologies that end up reinforcing patriot lore or whatever.
You can try and understand it, call it out where you can, and I think the most important thing is just be sure to reinforce your own connection to reality.
But for now, I want to leave this to the side and jump into another topic that I think is under-discussed, which is Joe Biggs' career at InfoWars.
Many people who ended up at Infowars got there by winning a contest or coming in second place in a contest or by coming in third place in a contest or just by entering a contest.
It would be easy to assume that this is true of Joe, but that would be incorrect.
Joe Biggs came into the Infowars orbit in 2013 in a pretty fascinating way.
On June 18, 2013, journalist Michael Hastings died in a car accident that became a bit of a conspiracy theory.
Hastings had done some bombshell work in his young career, with his Polk Award-winning Rolling Stone article, The Runaway General, more or less directly leading to the resignation of General Stanley McChrystal.
Beyond that, he did a lot of work surrounding the war in Iraq and was very critical of many aspects of U.S. foreign policy.
It's hard not to think that he had a really promising career ahead of him, and his loss deprived the world.
world of someone who had a lot of talent and potential.
It turns out Hastings was embedded in Iraq with some U.S. soldiers a number of years prior, back in 2008, and guess who was one of those soldiers?
Staff Sergeant Joe Biggs.
Apparently, the two of them had become friendly and kept in touch a little after Joe had retired from the service.
After Hastings'death, Joe made it his business to be the face of the Hastings'death conspiracy team, framing himself as a close, close friend of Hastings.
The day after Hastings' death, Joe tweeted at a KTLA reporter, and from there went on any platform that would have him, including Fox News, RT, Megyn Kelly, and of course, Infowars.
What makes Joe's story something more than just a tall tale that you would just probably need to ignore is that he was in possession of an email that Hastings sent to him the day before his death.
It was an email that he sent to his colleagues, but for some reason, Joe Biggs was BCC'd on it, and it was the infamous message where he said, quote, I am onto a big story, and I need to go off the radar for a bit.
Shortly thereafter, he was dead in what appeared to many to be suspicious circumstances.
Joe believed that this was all the proof you needed to make a conspiracy, so he took it upon himself to show the reporter at KTLA this email, who did manage to confirm that the email was real with the help of Hastings' co-workers.
It was apparently authentic, and weirdly, Joe was copied on it for reasons that I have no idea, and I don't think anyone will ever know.
But none of these colleagues wanted to talk, which Joe obviously understood to mean that they were scared, but he wasn't.
Joe was a big, strong man who would go on to lead a street gang and fail to overthrow the country, so he was more than ready to get all of the attention he could out of his alleged good friend
death on June 26th 2013 Joe went on Infowars for the first time and told Alex about the basics of the story but things wouldn't really kick into high gear until he made his return trip on July 11th this interview is textbook Alex and it's a really fantastic example of how you can see Alex integrating information people give him and turning it into conspiracy fodder in real time as such I thought it would be a good use of our time to check in on that interview Sounds good to me.
I was aware of the story at the time, but it's specifically one of those stories where it's like, well, yeah, you're going to get a conspiracy out of that.
Yeah, and I would say that I'm not entirely sure how I would gauge this, like how much might have started out from good intentions, but it did not stay good intentions for very long.
And I think this July 11th interview is an indication of how...
How reckless and disrespectful he is being with his behavior surrounding this story.
I mean, basically, long and short of this is I just want to demonstrate that for as long as Joe's been around, he's a pile of shit.
Staff Sergeant Joseph Biggs, 82nd Airborne Combat in Iraq, Afghanistan.
And it was, what, 2008 he first was embedded with.
A well-known war reporter, certainly now, and one of the editors over at Rolling Stone magazine who really brought down one of the top generals.
And, of course, that was McChrystal.
Now, a few weeks ago, his car, most of you know the story, blew up while driving down the street, and the engine shot down the road the other direction.
And I talked to a well-known reporter, Nomi Prince, who lives nearby.
She said the tree wasn't really damaged.
And it looked like, from the photos, it came up to rest against it.
Then we learned he was getting death threats.
Hours before he said, I'm going to go into hiding off the radar, I've got my biggest story ever.
Listen, if I ever come on air and say, I'm getting threats, I'm going off the radar, I'm about to break my biggest story ever, and my car blows up...
Man, I want an investigation, and I said on air a few weeks ago, I said it's a very low probability that this wasn't some type of car bomb.
Okay, so there have been multiple investigations done about the crash, and experts have been very clear that there's nothing about the facts of the case that would make you think that there was a bomb in the car.
The contents of automobiles are very flammable, as it turns out, and you can look at a car going on fire rapidly and think that it looks like an explosive device, but it is almost certainly not.
Alex has made up his mind here, though, and is establishing set talking points for the story that are not based in reality.
Also, the email that Hastings sent did say that he was going off the radar, but he didn't say that he was onto his biggest story ever.
He might have said that to other people, though, because There's a little piece that Alex and Joe don't address here of the story because I think that they probably don't know it, and even if they did, it doesn't fit their narrative, so they wouldn't bring it up.
Michael Hastings had a history of bipolar episodes, and his brother has come out and given his story about the lead-up to Hastings' death.
Taken along with the other information that's available, his death really doesn't look that suspicious anymore.
In an interview with Salon, his brother said, quote, I rule out foul play entirely.
I might have been...
He also explained what that means.
"A few days before he died, Mike called me and I got the impression that he was having a manic episode, similar to one he had had 15 years ago, which he had referred to in his writing.
At the time, drugs had been involved and I suspected that might be the case again.
I immediately booked a flight to LA for the next day with the thought that maybe I could convince him to come back to Vermont to dry out or, less likely, get him to go to detox rehab there in LA.
When I got to LA and I saw him, I immediately realized that he was not going to go willingly.
I started to make arrangements with our other brother to fly out and help me possibly force Mike into checking himself into a hospital.
I thought that I'd at least convinced Mike to just stay in his apartment and chill out for the next few days, but he snuck out on me while I was sleeping.
He crashed his car before anyone could do anything to help him.
Michael was 14 years sober, or so it was believed, but his brother had a strong suspicion that he was using again, on top of very likely having a manic episode.
In 1999, he'd been institutionalized for rehab, having abused prescription drugs, including stimulants.
His brother told the police that Michael didn't have suicidal tendencies, but that he quote, believed he was invincible, believing he could jump from a balcony and be okay.
Prior to the tragic crash, Michael's family was trying to get him help, and it clearly didn't work, unfortunately.
Based on the behaviors people can have when they're in a manic episode, particularly if they're also using stimulants, they might make grandiose statements that aren't totally connected to reality.
If he told someone he was onto the biggest story ever, that...
Could have been his mania talking, and that's probably why his colleagues didn't take that email that he sent them as anything too serious.
But for Alex and Biggs, they don't have the context, and so they think that everyone just must be too scared to talk about it.
Michael's brother was there, and he knew what was going on.
Michael's widow came on CNN and said, quote, you know, my gut here was that this is just a really tragic accident, and I'm very unlucky, and the world was very unlucky.
These were the people who were actually close to Michael and cared about him and were respecting his memory in the wake of his death.
Joe Biggs knew Hastings from his military days and they clearly kept in touch somehow, but he's overplaying that shit in order to cash in on his supposed good friend's death.
It's pretty gross stuff.
But it shouldn't be surprising.
Joe Biggs has been a piece of shit the entire time he's been in the public eye.
From his introduction to the right-wing media, to his Pizzagate shit, to his Jade Helm coverage, to his leadership in a gang that tried to overturn an election.
I said, we need to go talk to the police and the fire department, and if they're told not to talk to people, and I said this on air over and over again, and if they try to suppress the police reports, the first reports, I said, ladies and gentlemen, it means national security pressure was put on them.
This is NDAA type stuff.
And again, ladies and gentlemen, I happen to know through family connections and things that there have been federal hit teams in this country.
They don't even have to hire organized crime for a very long time.
When you consider her CNN interview and blanket dismissal of conspiracy theories around the death, it really doesn't seem like Biggs is accurately conveying what she said, which is disrespectful.
All of this is based on just things that Joe Biggs is saying.
There's no corroborating evidence on this at all, and it's so weird how the details changed as he talked to Alex Moore.
Same thing for the looking under the car.
There's no evidence that Joe's providing of this, and all reporting on this traces back solely to him, although I think he does obliquely cite a news crew in L.A. or something.
But I don't know, that's not verifiable.
But, I mean, honestly, that one could be true.
Michael was having a manic episode news on stimulants, so I wouldn't be surprised if he had a seriously heightened state of paranoia.
It's possible that he could have been seen looking under his car, but I don't think that means anything.
There's any number of variables that could explain that being true, if it's even true.
Also, maybe the LAPD couldn't disclose information to a random dude calling, which now Joe is letting Alex report to the audience as proof that they're in on the cover-up.
I appreciate that Alex described him with the two things that I think he would be described as the least in real life, which is good friend and good American.
Joe has no idea if the family wanted a cremation or if, in fact, Michael himself did.
He's just guessing.
Further, he's allowing Alex to create these absurd conspiracy talking points off the things he's saying, and that's unacceptable.
I mean, like, and these were things that became conspiracy theory talking points.
Joe says that the coroner said they released the body, but the family hadn't received it.
But the time frame of these conversations isn't clear.
But Alex jumps in and puts two and two together that this means that they had to get rid of the body because if they didn't, it would test positive for explosive remnants.
This is how Alex operates, and it's not as a sincere interviewer.
He has a conclusion in mind that he's already decided to push as his narrative.
In this case, it's that Michael Hastings was killed by a car bomb as retribution for his reporting or to stop him from reporting on the thing he was working on at the time.
Everything that Joe says, or any guest says really, will be filtered through that narrative, and Alex will be constantly working to try and make whatever is said fit the narrative.
Alex hears Joe say nonsense about the body.
And Alex decides to jump to the conclusion that the body is missing.
So now the question is, why is the body missing?
Within the narrative, what's the reason someone would lose the body?
It's obviously to cover up for the explosives.
That's the story Alex is writing as a way to make every piece of information conform to his narrative, but none of it's real.
Yeah, I'm not going to claim some sort of expertise, but if I have understood all of the car bombings that I've ever studied in the past, like the ones in, what was it, like Ohio?
The fucking Troubles?
You use a car bomb...
To publicly assassinate somebody and send a message that you have assassinated that person.
You do not car bomb somebody and then cover it up.
There was a huge conspiracy blitz around the idea that they hadn't, which was reported by a local news person in San Diego named Kim Dvorak, based on something she heard from a...
Quote, close family friend, who I would bet anything is Joe Biggs.
One is that Joe is allowing Alex to distort and twist everything he's saying in service of a bizarre and unhinged conspiracy that he should know better than to do that.
This is not a sincere, uh, actor at work.
And then Alex...
You can see the way that he's working.
You know, you can see the way that he's taking these little pieces and then recontextualizing them, reframing them.
Ooh, the body's missing!
Yeah.
And trying to get it into ways that he can work with it.
I think that that kind of creates a perception of like, oh, you guys knew each other, but maybe they weren't as close as, you know, not talking for three months.
Alex, do not wait for that invitation from the family to come, because I don't think, based on everything that I've seen, I do not think they would be interested in you coming down to investigate.
I mean, everything I read about it, I think a lot of people specifically keep InfoWars out of a lot of people's credits in order to give them the air of a big bad.
Like, Roger Stone, in every article in 2018, none of them were like, Roger Stone...
Yeah, and Stuart Rhodes' group was the Oath Keepers about former police and military folks, and Joe Biggs is a retired staff sergeant, so he was almost certainly connected with the Oath Keepers.
Yeah, I mean, ultimately that's going to be the problem with all the prosecution for January 6th and all that stuff is that the people who have the ability to make one happen again are the only ones not receiving consequences for it.
So, yeah, Joe just allows Alex to basically hijack and take over this entire thing as a conspiracy, and he seems like an incredibly willing participant in it.
Yeah, why aren't people coming to their aid and stopping Donald from hurting them while they make passage through the United States to where they're safe?
The amount of times we jump back and forth through different eras and see these people have bare-knuckled, knock-down, drag-out fights with themselves from ten years ago.
And actually, I had kind of intended for this to be more all-encompassing.
I ended up talking a little bit about the Jade Helm stuff and the Pizzagate stuff in more detail, but I realize I think we talked about the Pizzagate already.