Today, Dan and Jordan swing back a couple days to check in on how Alex Jones celebrated the end of Reliable Sources and the fall of Stelter. As a bonus, they get to hear Alex rant excessively about how he's God's chosen leader of the Patriots. Citations Dreamy Creamy Fundraiser
So, Jordan, today we've got an episode to go over.
And here, this is, I don't know if it's unprecedented, but it's rare.
And that is that we're actually going to go back to the past, but only like a couple days before our last episode, because I realized that we missed something in terms of the catching up to the present day.
So we're going to be talking about August 19th, 2022 today.
And that is because this is the day after Brian Stelter got canceled.
You can make an argument that he's teleprompter-free, but that doesn't mean anything.
And he has a screen in front of him that producers put messages on, he has a board that shows him the collars, and he has an earpiece that the producers are talking to him throughout the show on.
The show is not uncensored because he can't swear on the radio, so by definition he's operating...
And I couldn't imagine a show that's more filtered than this one.
Just recently, with the acknowledgement of Trump taking money from Pfizer, we saw a crystal clear example of the sort of filtering Alex does to the information that's acceptable to be on his show.
This is a common thing, too.
Like, Alex will conveniently pretend to not be aware of certain things about figures he's trying to support, but when they fall slightly out of his good graces, he magically knows about all the things that should have been a big problem for him before.
We saw another glaring example of this with Bill Barr, who Alex loved, but then when he wouldn't back Trump's nonsense at the end of his presidency, Alex suddenly had information about Barr's family's ties Wow!
So he ends up rambling about grotesque topics for long stretches.
Glad to see him rocking out to a little All Along the Watchtower, though.
I mean, you know, I was thinking about that song, and it is kind of interesting to really go back in time and think about how much that type of music blew people's minds.
I mean, it's oversimplifying things a little bit, but yeah, that wonder is kind of, like, it seems, maybe it's just because it's something that is inaccessible to us and something outside of our life experience.
I'm going to throw it more towards, like, I'm longing for the days whenever a discovery was more like, you know, Pythagoras discovered A squared plus B squared, you know, and it's like, holy shit, nobody's gonna discover anything for like a thousand years after that, you know?
So with All Along the Watchtower, nobody had heard shit like that before, you know, but whenever Kanye comes out with Jesus Walks, you know, that's great, that's awesome, and it's epoch-changing, but it's not like back then, because we already had All Along the Watchtower.
If I didn't have Jesus Walks, you know, I could still listen to that shit.
We're going to plow through them all, take calls, and have a special guest in studio.
They put out a press release yesterday.
They put out a podcast with Klaus Schwab and others, and they have declared their number one enemy, InfoWars, and have said that they've hired 110,000 operatives that they called Information Warriors.
Where have we heard that term before?
The InfoWarriors.
To counter we the people.
I mean...
Man, I keep trying to explain to the listeners, they're really scared of us.
Not just me, but the fact that we've got the Death Star plans.
So I was able to find the story that Alex is talking about, and it's an article in News Punch about the World Economic Forum hiring 110,000 people to combat misinformation on social media.
This was a post that was published on August 17th, 2022, and it's based on a video published by a channel called The People's Voice.
This is just like a junior varsity-ass InfoWars channel on YouTube, and their main source is a podcast the World Economic Forum put out featuring the UN Communications Director, Melissa Fleming.
She never mentions Infowars being Klaus Schwab's number one enemy, though she does discuss efforts they were taking to push back against misinformation.
The first one she mentions is called Verified, which is done with the help of a communications firm, and it was an effort to take solid information and put it into formats that would be easy to share on social media.
The concern was that so much of the actual information that you could have was buried in inaccessible PDFs and large documents, whereas misinformation is packaged so slickly and it's optimized for engagement.
That's the entire business model for misinformation, so it's a primary concern for them, whereas the folks at the UN were a bit behind on making the information Well, I mean, their fundamental issue is that they're running up against learning is hard and chocolate is delicious.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, essentially.
Another initiative they were launching is called Paws, where they were trying to spread the message that you should stop and think before reposting something that seems too good to be true.
It excites you, so you want to post it, but maybe it's bullshit.
Take a second and think about it.
And if you still want to share it once that adrenaline wears off, go ahead.
Apparently the belief is that encouraging this sort of behavior would cut down drastically on nonsense posting.
I'm skeptical, but meh, you know, maybe it couldn't hurt.
She also does say that they've recruited 110,000 information volunteers who are applying these kinds of practices and introducing good information into misinformation spaces.
I guess Alex could consider that information warfare, and maybe he's right, but I also think it is defensive in nature.
All that being said, this podcast was released in November 2020.
It's being presented in this news punch article as if it is, and because Alex has no idea what he's talking about or covering, he thinks it's news too.
If only he'd listened to Fleming's advice about thinking before you repost something.
Ironically, maybe he would have gotten this story It's possible.
When you have a nemesis, all right, you can't be happy when your nemesis is gone because your nemesis is what pushed you to the heights that you couldn't have reached without said nemesis.
By the way, 99.9% of the monkeypox cases with no deaths in the U.S. are gay men having hundreds of sexual partners a month.
And the media is defending it, saying, we want you to go under lockdown, we want you to wear masks, but we want to continue, actually I have articles, the gay orgies.
So you've got to wear a mask, you've got to go under lockdown, they're saying coming soon, but...
These men can get together and give each other a bunch of diseases.
Man, I hope all those people like Alex Lee Moyer and Glenn Greenwald and Joe Rogan who love to carry water for Alex like the kind of messages they're steering people towards because that's pretty cool.
So while it is true that the available information does indicate that men who have sex with men are disproportionately represented in the cases of monkeypox that have been identified at this point, the way Alex is covering this is unacceptable and is essentially no different than the rhetoric you would have heard him spout in the early days of AIDS.
Yep.
unidentified
He has an intense disdain for the LGBTQ community, but he knows it's unfashionable to just be honest about that, so he finds other stories he can use as cover to express it.
An important point about this whole dynamic comes up in a CNBC article.
About 98% of patients who provided demographic information to clinics identified as men who have sex with men, according to the CDC.
That's not necessarily saying that 98% of people who have contracted monkeypox are men who have sex with men.
there may be a percentage of people who saw treatment who did not provide that demographic information.
That said, it would be slightly dishonest to say that there's not something statistically relevant here.
There do appear to be increased rates in the community of gay and bisexual men, but it's dangerous to create this association and even more dangerous to pretend that It's a complicated situation and people like Alex acting like this are going to get innocent people hurt.
I think that's what he wants.
Incidentally, there's no call for monkeypox lockdowns.
And, in fact, the reality is just the opposite of what Alex is saying.
Tedros, the head of the World Health Organization, said this at the end of last month.
Quote, for men who have sex with men, this includes for the moment.
He's talking about, like, mitigating actions.
This includes for the moment reducing your number of sexual partners, reconsidering sex with new partners, and exchanging contact details with any new partners to enable follow-up if needed.
Alex hates the LGBTQ community, so he makes up shit to attack them with, things that paint him as the victim and them as a privileged class who the system wouldn't dare even suggest inconveniencing.
He's pretending that the government is going to force good people like himself to lock down over monkeypox, but they won't even think of suggesting behavioral advice to gay men.
This is complete bullshit, because the World Health Organization has a goal of dealing with the outbreak by serving the people who are affected by it while working to minimize any stigma that's going to lead to discrimination.
Conversely, Alex's goal is that discrimination itself.
So furthering that goal is not best served by dealing with what the World Health Organization is actually doing, but rather by creating a fake storyline that conforms to your persecution complex.
And even if you want to take that and ground it a little bit, the close contact that can spread monkeypox is not something you need a hundred partners.
I mean, and also, all we're really seeing is what happens whenever you have a community that is isolated due to shit, and a disease breaks out in an isolated community.
It is going to break out of that community eventually, but as it stands right now, the only reason that it's stuck there is because of discrimination that's already inherent in the fucking system.
Bitched and whined about having to wear a mask to stop spreading disease, and now they're going to wring their hands at, oh my god, someone spreading disease doing something I don't like, instead of going into random strangers' home and spitting all over their shit, coughing in front of somebody at an abortion clinic.
Like, all of this shit, they are disease-ridden horror monsters, and they're gonna come at me with this bullshit!
World Economic Forum publicly declares an information warfare operation with information warriors to counter Infowars and other disinformation outlets.
How honored are you as the army of Infowars?
To know that you're in direct conflict and information warfare with Klaus Schwab and the New World Order.
Now do you understand why I say share the articles and videos?
Now do you understand why I say magnify what we're doing?
Because I don't want to be the best in the fight.
Because I'm not that good.
I want to stop these people.
I want to see other leaders like Tucker Carlson, Bolsonaro, Joe Rogan, and others stand up.
And they're starting to.
But you know what?
The enemy recognizes us and me.
As the number one enemy of their New World Order, I told you 20 years ago, while I was eating a chicken fried steak and drinking an iced tea 27 years ago, at Waterloo Ice House after I'd done a two-hour TV show, that I literally, talk about a vision, it was like a download, and God showed me the future, what was going to happen, and also how dangerous it would be, and said, are you ready to sign on for this?
I remember sitting there.
Yeah, alone in that restaurant and going, yes, I accept this.
It's like I was floating.
I go, yes, I accept the mission.
And it went, here's the rest of the download.
And I got slammed with the imprint of data.
And it was like, all right, soldier, you joined, get ready.
Well, the World Economic Forum, which is the mouth of the New World Order, the mouth of the UN, the mouth of the megacorporations, the mouth of the slave masters, the spokesperson for evil.
Has come out and said that their attempted world, continual, never-ending lockdown and forced injection failed.
It was still devastating.
And now there's a total rejection happening of them across the board.
And billions of rotting, poison, mRNA gene therapies that no one will take.
And their answer is a declaration of war, next-level censorship.
With 110,000 volunteers inside media and big tech, an army of Brian Stelter, Humpty Dumpty Pennywises.
So that clip brings up something that I want to stress for a second here.
So a lot is made of how Alex just makes stuff up all the time, and rightfully so.
However, it's key to recognize that he does more than just make up details and lie about concrete facts.
He also writes stories out of these fake facts that are necessary to explain them within the context of his made-up world.
For instance, here Alex has this headline that he's done zero investigation into that he's presenting as the World Economic Forum declaring war on Infowars by hiring 110,000 information volunteers to counter misinformation.
In order to bolster this story, he needs to connect it to some of his larger storylines.
In order to embellish this story, Alex says that the World Economic Forum is doing this because there's so many shots that no one wants to take and all the anti-vax people are winning the war of ideas, so they enlisted an army to crush anti-vax voices like Alex.
This is tantamount to him running a disinformation campaign against a campaign meant to fight misinformation, which makes sense.
But what's critical here is that Alex is making up the why for this story out of thin air.
He's got a piece of information, this 110,000 volunteers thing, but he has literally no other details about this story, so he's just making it up.
He doesn't realize this was a story from November 2020 before any of the vaccines were even available, which is kind of sad.
In order to make sense of why the World Economic Forum would be doing this in the present day, as Alex thinks they are, he just falls back on what version of this story would be most emotionally satisfying for himself and the audience.
That's why the rationale for their alleged action is that Alex's side is too successful and they have all these expiring vaccines that no one wants.
This explanation is a fiction that creates a sense of victory for the listeners, and more importantly, it frames their online activity as a critical part of the fight against the World Economic Forum's information volunteers.
Promoting Alex's content isn't just about getting new people into his revenue streams and selling his dumb pills, it's actually fighting back against Klaus Schwab's cyber army who are only even being enlisted because you all were too powerful with your previous posting of Alex's content to begin with.
This narrative works really well for Alex on a couple fronts, but it's completely made up.
The simple detail that the podcast that's the basis for this entire story came out in November 2020 reveals it all to just be shit that Alex is making up to stroke his own ego and convince the listeners to continue working as his unpaid social media team.
It really also brings into sharp focus the idea of what a joke this notion of critical thinking in conspiracy and like Alex Jones-y communities are.
Did any of these folks and their great leader, Alex, stop to ask themselves, what's the context of this?
Is there an actual story here?
No, it's convenient.
It's saying what you want it to say, and so you will not only accept it as real and true and current, you'll embellish and make up details about it to make it even more perfect for your...
I do appreciate anybody who gets a piece of information and then instantly is like, well, that explains this other thing that it doesn't have anything to do with.
I enjoy that because there's nothing in between.
You'd think there would be something in between, but no, you're just like, ah, that explains that.
Because if you want to talk about a Rosetta Stone, if you want to talk about a skeleton key, if you want to talk about something that really illustrates who we're up against and their hubris, their smugness, their bravado, it's this clip.
But one of the things that Sam Harris was talking about was that the corruption that you can find with Biden and Hunter Biden, it doesn't come anywhere close to what Trump...
Well, yeah.
Is involved in.
So, these kinds of arguments about the corruption and the concerns about it are kind of weird and dumb.
There's nothing that somebody would find unfamiliar if they had just listened to the whole Rich Dad, Poor Dad series, and then watched Alex Jones' cell sit, and they'd be like, oh yeah, no, yeah.
So there's a lot of theories about exactly why Stelter and Reliable Sources got canceled, and it's unclear what the precise reasons are, but I think everyone is pretty comfortable with the idea that it's part of the aftermath of the Warner Brothers Discovery merger that was finalized back in April.
There have been all sorts of cuts made throughout their properties like HBO Max, and this is actually part of a larger story about big corporate media consolidation, but Alex is completely missing the forest for the trees.
He hates Brian Stelter, and the story he wants to tell about this is that Stelter is a failure who got fired because nobody liked him and his show had no viewers.
That's a story that's emotionally satisfying for Alex, and it's what the listeners want to hear.
There's more to the story, though, but it doesn't matter because, you know, he's the tip of the spear.
He's the king of big tech.
And media watchdoggery and just missing this entirely.
What a great time for somebody like Alex to really dig into what happens whenever media is monopolized and how the powers that be, whenever they become a smaller group and a smaller number, all of them with control over the media, a number of companies, let's say, smaller than 10. And those companies have CEOs and they all meet in back rooms.
And they control the media, literally.
It would be a great time for somebody who is a conspiracy theorist to talk about that.
And I'm glad you did, because I am addicted to the Weather Channel.
unidentified
I watch a lot of cable news.
Hold on just a minute.
I'm not done.
CNN has taken a very strong position on global warming that it is a consensus.
Well, there is no consensus in science.
Science isn't a vote.
Science is about facts.
And if you get down to the hard-cold facts, there's no question about it.
Climate change is not happening.
There is no significant...
Man-made global warming now.
There hasn't been any in the past, and there's no reason to expect any in the future.
There's a whole lot of baloney, and yes, it has become a big political point of the Democratic Party and part of their platform, and I regret it's become political instead of scientific, but the science...
I guess that appeals to Alex in some way, but it's actually so counter to the perception of media that is essential to sell Infowars as the alternative to it.
So this is one of Alex's old rants about Stelter that he just had to replay, probably because he can't be bothered to put any energy into the show today.
Thankfully, there are these old clips of him putting a little gusto into his Stelter hate.
But this actually is a curious clip to play on the day after Stelter's show's been cancelled and he's out at CNN.
That's because if anything Alex was saying meant anything, then it shouldn't have been so simple to remove him from his perch.
How important is Stelter to the globalist plots if he can just be fired?
Honestly, knowing that Stelter was just axed over business considerations and it didn't cause widespread chaos among the globalists kind of makes this entire presentation that Alex is putting on seem pretty stupid.
It seems so weird to hear how worked up Alex was about Stelter in these clips now that we're on the other side because now that Stelter is out, Alex just seems like a worked up baby who is so mad that someone was criticizing him that he decided to make up a bunch of stuff about them being central to the globalist plans.
When Alex is saying all this shit about Stelter, none of it has any connection to reality.
It's just Alex trying to put some kind of an elevated appearance onto his petulant anger.
He knows well enough that if he got on his show and started yelling and lashing out about how he doesn't like people being critical of him his audience would rightly see him as the weak child he is inside.
By masking that immature insecurity with over-the-top pronouncements about Stelter probably being a pedophile and how he's a betrayer whatever that means Alex is able to protect himself from being seen for what he is which is a hypersensitive loser.
Now, the issue is that the audience doesn't really realize that they're just watching Alex play out a psychodrama on air and may think that he's actually saying something about Stelter as opposed to just yelling about his own hurt feelings.
They form opinions, post things on social media, and even harass Stelter over things that Alex says as if there was anything behind it other than Alex being a baby with a boo-boo.
Anyway, I probably would have played a different clip on this episode if I were him.
Seems dumb to portray Stelter as some kind of a big, high-level, big bad guy the day after his show ended with no real pushback or fanfare.
Seems like that should have been a much harder-fought victory, if anything Alex was saying meant anything.
When you choose your enemies, you know, to be of the demonic realm, you know, like, you think TV is a great choice because it's so big and it's so, you know, like, oh, it's TV.
But it's really not that big.
It's not as big as you might think because you can just get fired.
Like, you can't claim that if you...
Didn't get the job at a Denny's.
You can't claim that the manager is the Antichrist.
Because eventually he's just not going to be the manager anymore.
No, it reminded me of that time that, you remember Hannibal's bit where he played his own joke and just vibed with it as, uh, yeah, it reminded me of that quite a bit.
Yeah, I mean, I feel like as far as ways to end your five o 'clock on a Friday, you know, instead of doing the whistle, you just start playing that clip, and you're gonna leave with a bit of a smile.
And he wants to know how Alex finds the time to read so much.
This is a bummer.
unidentified
I wanted to say I'm very excited when your new book comes out at the end of the month.
Now, I admit that I normally read Kindle books and am highly addicted to the Internet.
And my cell phone is always amazing, like so many of us are.
By ordering your hard book, and I can't wait to read the physical book, it made me have an epiphany that I'm so bombarded with information, I'll admit I'm in a trance of a low attention span.
Now, you read so much, sir.
You digest so much information.
I would love if you could share with me and the audience how you find so much time to read, suggestions on how we can use the Internet, use our cell phones, in a way that promotes enlightenment, but also a way that promotes a long-term attention span.
Do you speed read, or what would you recommend to focus our attention span so we can...
Take the time to read entire books.
Do we have a cyber-free Sunday?
Get away from the internet.
How do you recommend, because it's a strong part of the information war, to manage information, sir?
So this reminds me of a conversation I had with a comic years ago who was really proud of their ability to do crowd work and respond to hecklers.
In reality, they weren't that good, but they were very confident, and they explained to me that there are only a few possible types of responses you need to be ready to have.
You can respond to something with an angry slash mean retort, a nice retort, or a confused retort.
As long as you had one of each of these in your pocket ready to go, you could respond to just about anything an audience can throw at you.
Yeah, that's all good and well, but what it's actually doing is taking the act of responding in the moment on stage and reducing it to a parlor trick.
You're creating the illusion of being in the moment and fast on your feet.
You're faking being clever because you know that you aren't clever enough to be it for real and you're terrified of being seen as not clever and getting caught in the moment of being like, oh, I don't know what to say.
This is kind of what Alex is doing with this globalist playbook idea.
He's constructed a couple of stock responses to world events that he's decided to call the globalist playbook and it's basically just his crutch so he never has to appear like he doesn't know what's going on.
Think of a tragic event as the equivalent of someone heckling in terms of how to interpret Alex's show and the narrative.
He needs to be able to respond to it quickly, or else he'll risk showing weakness to the audience.
So just like that comic I knew, Alex has preloaded responses to stuff.
Instead of angry, nice, or confused retorts, Alex has things like false flag, it was secretly Antifa, or elaborate deep state plotting.
These are go-to responses he can whip out to apply to any situation, and he can then rationalize based on some detail and be like, oh, this is...
Alex has nothing to say, and he hasn't read anything.
It's pretty telling that this guy asks this question, and Alex's first response isn't that he reads all day every day, because I think even he would know that that's silly.
His response is just that he knows everything already, so he can see things happening in the world and then make stories up about them.
Considering Alex's track record of being super wrong about almost everything he's ever called a play from the Globalist playbook, this should really worry the caller and the audience, but they're not paying attention.
Alex satisfies their emotional needs with rants like the one about Stelter, and their need to feel like a part of something important with the nonsense about fighting Yeah, that caller scares me a lot, because...
But really what I do is, I scan InfoWars, I scan a bunch of mainline sites, I scan legislation, I go and look at what Jack Posobiec's saying, I look at what Mike Cernovich is saying, I look at what Ron Paul's saying, what Senator Paul's saying, I look at what DeSantis is saying, and I just quickly...
Scan through all of that, but I already know the globalist agenda from reading their books, reading Klaus Schwab's statements, and knowing what they're doing.
And I really go back to the key books written by the population controllers and the statements put out by Brzezinski and the books written by Brzezinski and Henry Kissinger and the program.
And so once you know that, it's pretty much reading the same thing over and over again.
This would be a huge red flag to anybody who's listening to Alex's show.
I mean, like, he has basically these old texts.
That I don't know if he's even read or not, or if he's just, like, taking them in by way of, like, John Birch society literature that demonized those books.
No, I totally agree, and I'm going to tell a personal story right now.
I'm never told, because the Holy Spirit wants me to.
There's been three times in my life where I was under incredible attack, and I went to see my dad, and where we prayed, and literally within hours it happened.
Well, the Dutch East India Company dissolved around the time that Cornelius Vanderbilt, sort of the founder of that family's great fortune, was a child.
So, Alex gets another call who's a little spiritual.
unidentified
I enjoy your product, and I look forward to receiving your product.
Alex, this is a message for all the infiltrators, the FBI, the CIA, the New World Order, Chris Schwab and his economic forum who are listening right now.
I love you, first of all, Alex.
First of all, we are decentralizing, Infowars is decentralizing your power and control.
Alex Jones, you have been chosen by our Lord to be the leader in the front.
You are the member of the body.
You represent the body against the left.
And the right wing who are taking us, who are manipulating us in the direction that they have been using to maintain control.
George Washington warned us against the power of political parties in replacing our nationality.
You're standing up against them.
You have been chosen.
The majority of the masses support Infowars.
Obviously, there are those who are against you, but they cannot stand against the masses of us because we are using the power of our Lord, which is through quantum communication.
Brother, I totally want you to continue, but what do you make of Klaus Schwab declaring information warfare against us and saying he's going to launch InfoWarriors?
Yeah, and that guy in Austin sticks out in the memory because he was the one person that I have encountered in the wild, really, that has been somebody who is an Infowars supporter.
I think everyone in the world is starting to wake up to that fact right now, that the Federal Reserve fiat currency system is what's responsible for all the problems in the world right now.
And people are talking about silver and gold mines going into private business as banks, since they have the vaults already, and they tie a crypto card to gold and silver.
The private market, the free private market can just compete for people's trust and serviceability and start creating a parallel banking system.
What they want is they want to toss us an idea of some type of digital fiat currency as if, I mean, only a fool is going to accept anything that they take after all of the death and destruction that they've caused for decades and decades.
I appreciate it when tech bros and all those stupid people invent things that we already invented a long time ago and then they put a new name on it and you're like, oh, you're a genius!
You know, like that kind of thing.
I really don't appreciate it whenever we do have like a history where people did the step-by-step thing that you're recommending and you can go back and you can read about how it turned out.
And so when you read a line that says X, you're like, well, maybe it's trying to trick me into thinking X. Maybe what this book is actually saying is Y. Why is it that nobody believes in the double bluff of books?
The reason I believe that we're going to win is because you can see that the way they've had this thing all planned, they weren't expecting this much pushback.
They weren't expecting this much fines.
They were definitely expecting more people to take the vaccine, which tells me that...
We want people to be independent and lead themselves, but if they believe things that are different to what we believe, we must, for their own good, lead them.
No, they don't want somebody who's a leader who's going to listen to the people, who's going to synthesize information, and then ultimately is going to take responsibility for the decision that they make.
So I think that Greg is trying to point to the idea that cows are sacred in Hindu culture, which is dumb because they're specifically, like, they don't slaughter and eat cows because they're considered sacred.
nothingness and creating the earth and light and all that stuff yeah it's not until genesis 1 24 that land animals are created and that's after birds and quite a bit after vegetables sure there's no mention of beef but humans are said to be lords over the natural world interestingly though god does say quote i give you every seed bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it they will be yours for food
Anyway, the Bible doesn't start with a passage about beef, and it's really embarrassing for Greg to just yes-and that shit.
So there are definitely some connections between the caste system and rates of vegetarianism and traditional Indian culture, but what Greg is doing is oversimplifying things in a way that is specifically designed to compare one-to-one with modern-day Infowars talking points, like how Klaus Schwab wants you to eat bugs.
Many of the lower classes We're not...
So they wouldn't have been concerned with the dietary restrictions that largely stemmed from Hindu beliefs and nonviolence.
Conversely, many of the Brahmins were actually, you know, their priests and members of the scholarly class, and as you might expect, they were more observant people in terms of Hinduism.
The phenomenon you see when you look at historical trends related to the caste system and vegetarianism is actually that the higher someone is in caste, the more likely they are to be vegetarian.
It's actually the reverse of what Greg is saying.
But this doesn't work for the Klaus Schwab wants you to eat bugs thing.
So he's pretending that there's no Hindu belief in this do no harm thing.
And they're just trying to trick poor people into eating plants so they could save the cows for themselves.
I mean, that's the thing that they really are, you know, we talk about how they're lying and they don't give a shit and they're making everything up.
But what we're really not talking about is if they did face any challenge on the way to publishing one of those stories, they would give up and they would do a different story.
No, because I don't think he actually thinks this.
He wants the audience to think he looks at things this way because it's so noble and selfless.
In reality, what Greg Rees is talking about is far more accurate.
It's like, what we need to do is find a way to land this plane without a crash.
And so you all need to give us a bunch of money so Alex...
Yeah.
Well, the McAfee documentary...
Well, I mean, his life as a documentary didn't end.
Well, I guess Alex thinks he got Epstein'd or whatever.
I don't fucking know.
Anyway, Alex takes more calls with Greg Reese, and this call is awesome.
unidentified
Greg's comment about the lesions of the Info Warriors, I'm thinking that maybe that ought to be something that is a response to Klaus Schwab's 100,000 Info Checkers, so to speak.
And that it might also be a way to add a little money to the checking account at InfoWars is if you had just a real, not subscriber, just a basic membership, 10 bucks.
Get up for that.
We get a little decal that I can proudly put in a little short class on our ethics.