Today, Dan and Jordan welcome back to the show reporter and author of the book on Sandy Hook, Elizabeth Williamson, to have a chat about how things are going in the trial, important take-aways, and donut-related secrets.
We're a couple dudes who like to sit around, worship at the altar of Selene from afar while we're in this hotel room, and talk a little bit about Alex Jones.
And you would think, because here's why it's my bright spot.
Because if you were a wise man who was going to testify on your own behalf, you would absolutely stick to what you said in your deposition, thus proving that you are not a liar.
My bright spot was that for the first time since I've been here, which is almost a week, I did get out for a run this morning, and it was only 90 as opposed to 101.
It was kind of fun, though, to go there early in the morning because it's a combination of people who are like you, who really want to get there before the line forms, and people who are waiting for you to buy them one and give it to them on the street.
So I have to say, you know, I worried about a little bit because As you say, writing the book, I got kind of invested in definitely the plight of the families and got to know them pretty well.
And today, listening to Mr. Crouch, Therapist who has worked with Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis, I did have a couple moments where I was, I really got a little bit emotional about, you know, what he had to say about their struggle, you know, with everything, you know, and he described this sort of two buckets.
One, you lose your son in a mass shooting.
And the second bucket, people call you a liar and say that not only...
Was he not killed in that way that he never existed?
And at one point, you know, Mr. Crouch, the therapist, was being, you know, prompted to say, well, what does that actually mean, you know, when as a parent you're kind of dealing with those claims?
And he said, you know, it's just so important to Neil and Scarlett, Jesse's parents, that he mattered.
And Jesse, in particular, has a very particular narrative, and that's that when the gunman entered his classroom and started shooting, there was a pause in the shooting where either the magazine jammed or he was reloading, and Jesse yelled, run!
And nine children ran, and they survived.
One thing that I'm sure that Neil and Scarlett will speak about is that he was actually given a fallen hero's funeral because the police recognized that as an act of heroism.
The children who survived said what had happened and that's how they knew.
That part of his life is tremendously important to Neil and Scarlett, as you can imagine.
And this idea that that would be taken from them.
The first thing they both told me, and I met them separately, but the first thing they told me was that story.
And so it's so important to them.
And to have that stripped from them, You know, and their therapist obviously described it so well.
It's like saying, you know, it's taking that last bit that someone would cling to and saying that these were his final moments.
He was a fine child and saved his classmates in his final moments.
And to think that someone, in order to sell supplements or, you know, Would take that shred from you.
You know, the thing that got me about that is the therapist As much and as powerful as that story was, when he was asked, what's the most important thing to the parents?
What's the most important thing to them?
He didn't say that he was remembered as a hero or he was remembered as somebody who saved anybody.
He choked up and he said, the most important thing to me, or the most important thing to the parents, is just to let people know, to let the world know that he lived.
Because those words were Veronique De La Rosa, who is the mother of Noah Posner, who is the youngest Sandy Hook victim.
Right after the shooting, she said the same thing to Anderson Cooper in an interview.
She said, I just want people to know that he mattered.
He mattered.
That, I don't know, something about that, now I'm going to have to take a beat here, but something about that formulation is, you know, like, it just speaks to how much is stripped from you when you lose a loved one in this way, particularly your child, that you're then kind of by yourself saying, he mattered.
I mean, really?
That just speaks to the utter desolation that these parents must feel.
And that's one reason that I think I want to ask you about a couple of questions about the trial, just because after we heard that testimony, we also saw the way that the defense behaved in their cross-examination and how the judge was not happy with their behavior.
But also a lot of regular lawyers who are watching this and are just riveted by this because...
It's such a challenging case for, you know, the family's lawyers, obviously, and certainly for Alex Jones's lawyers.
But they were saying, you know, one of the things that, you know, the unenviable position that Alex Jones's lawyer is in is that he, of course, cannot attack.
Neil and Scarlett when they testify tomorrow.
So the alternative that he has is to attack, you know, Dr. Lubit, who was the, you know, the forensic psychiatrist who had, you know, spoken with them, and to attack Mr. Crouch, their actual therapist.
So it's, you know, lower stakes to try and impeach them than to go head to head, of course, with.
Jesse's parents.
So that was sort of interesting.
But because the therapist, Mr. Crouch, was so kind of a sympathetic character himself, I mean, he actually filled up when he said that about he mattered.
He was filling up himself.
And he obviously feels very deeply...
You know, for Neil and Scarlett and for Jesse and JT, his older brother.
And so I think it was a lot more difficult than they had anticipated.
This wasn't a clinical guy.
You know, this was somebody who was really very much invested in the plight of this family.
And I think that made it super tough to kind of, on cross, come back and say, well, what about this?
And that whole thing of showing him the diagnostic manual, the DSM-5, was just a bizarre episode.
The defense lawyer was trying to catch the therapist in like a...
You don't know the exact definition of PTSD, do you?
So the first thing he did was he tried to bring up the definition to the therapist and realized that he had brought the wrong version of the DSM, which was an issue.
So then he went to the APA's website to try and find the definition in the DSM-5.
However, he found the APA's summary definition of the DSM-5.
And in so doing, revealed that he had no idea what he was talking about.
The therapist went, I don't think I know what you're showing me.
And isn't it funny, like, no matter who you're watching, it's a public performance.
And so you're kind of cringing, no matter, you know, like, just taking out, you know, lawyers for the defense, lawyers for the plaintiffs, you know, just taking all that out.
It's a public performance.
So whenever anyone stumbles, or there's some kind of, you know, Weird, awkward thing that happens.
You're just sort of vicariously cringing for them, regardless of where you are on the case at hand.
And so, yes, in that one, I was like, oh my gosh, how did that happen?
On the one hand, it's pretty daring to do this sort of ad hoc, I'm going to look something up, and I'm going to find it, and I'm going to present it in open court.
But you were sort of...
I found myself thinking, well, he is a therapist, and the DSM is something that therapists consult routinely.
So if you thought that you were going to call these definitions into question, maybe just go out to the bookstore.
And, you know, I think he's kind of like, from what the Texas Monthly reporter was telling me, they are, and the lawyers for the families, that he's kind of like a well-known family name around here.
He had been...
An assistant U.S. attorney who was appointed by Eric Holder.
I think, Jordan, you picked up on that when I was tweeting that about his history.
And that it's not a matter of, you know, okay, sometimes it's, you know, this person will pay you or what have you.
There's some idea here that...
You know, that thing that lawyers say, you know, everybody deserves a defense.
Yeah, that moment came after, you know, the judge had admonished him yet again, and he was losing that battle over exhibits, and he was feeling frustrated because, who knows, maybe in his mind he genuinely felt like he'd been done dirty, I don't know, but it just felt like a kind of, like, volcanic frustration that happened right there.
And for, you know, if he's like this kind of well-bred guy that, you know, we're hearing...
Not to ask you a question that might be uncomfortable, but exactly how many times have you felt like you and the judge are both moms really trying to handle unruly children?
I mean, just his behavior and the, you know, relatively rare occasions he turns up for the proceedings.
It's like this kid who has stalled out in middle school, you know?
I mean, even...
The whole idea that he's traveling around surrounded by bodyguards, I'm sort of thinking like a high school hallway and, you know, he's sort of like bought lunch for the whole football team.
So, yeah, I mean, I spent a lot of time with him, but it was in 2018.
So, I think, and also, I think in the heat of the, you know, like, publicity moment, I think he just sees, as you said, you know, I think he just sees people recording him as generic media, as an audience, you know, like, sort of faceless audience.
And so he was talking to, he did ask John from Hearst, you know, where are you from?
And John told him and he seemed to think, okay, this guy's safe to talk to.
And in fact, props to John because he did ask him, so what is this medical condition that your lawyers are saying is keeping you from being here?
It really did take a while for me to remember, whenever the bodyguards were sitting next to me, it took me a while for me to remember, like, they can't bring guns into the courtroom.
I really never thought I would be surprised at what happened, but for some reason, I really thought when it actually came to being in the courtroom, There's no way they would behave like the way, like, they had to have prepared.
So, one thing is that, first of all, I get this sense from Reynold, his lawyer, that...
He feels like, oh, I'm not sure what I got myself into.
I think that that explosion with flipping the bird and all that was a sort of expression of that.
I think today what happened to him with the DSM was another.
I think he feels like, oh my God, I don't know what I got myself into.
The idea that he was trying to kind of waffle about actually whether Jones would testify or not when he's been saying on his show.
Like, I'm so keen to testify.
And then he had to go check with him.
I think these are all sort of, you know, indications that, oh boy, you know, he should have known what he was getting himself into, but I don't think he was fully prepared for that.
And that's not exactly a knock on him, because is anyone ever fully prepared for things that Alex Jones does?
I'm going to have a disagreement with you there real quick.
I feel like...
Any kind of preparation, any kind of preparation, even the slightest amount, does not wind up with you having ten minutes left to call your main witness as to whether or not they will take the stand.
I think he's actually, you can tell that he is a criminal prosecutor by the way he cross-examines the witnesses.
He's pretty aggressive.
He also just kind of rolls with it when the judge kind of slaps him down on the various things like we talked about.
He's pretty quick on his feet coming back from that kind of thing.
But that's not to say that this is going well because, boy, it's just, even if no one said a word, just the idea of Alex Jones and a Sandy Hook family.
You don't have to say a word to know that this is probably going to be a tough, tough rodeo.
You know, the ironic thing is it hadn't occurred to me until I was watching him and then put it together that he was a criminal defense lawyer and then started thinking about what, or no, a criminal prosecutor.
And then started thinking about what they do and then I started thinking...
96% of cases go to a plea bargain in that kind of court.
So this is probably a guy who's really good at doing paperwork and negotiating with other lawyers as to what's an acceptable sentence.
But on the other side, you know, in some of these personal injury cases or, you know, lawyers who are tort lawyers, in fact, the father of Josh Koskov, who represents the Sandy Hook families in Connecticut, his dad has since passed away, but I interviewed him for the book.
And he said, you know, one of the funny things that has happened is that people settle so frequently that We get less and less time in the courtroom.
So one of the reasons that this is catnip for the legal community is that you have two sets of lawyers who actually have a decent amount of courtroom experience.
And so it is kind of fascinating to see Raynall kind of...
And then that determination to kind of roll back the clock and say, This is a defamation trial.
No, it's not.
You lost that because you had complete contempt for the judicial system.
So you lost your opportunity to make this a free speech case because you didn't wind up...
At trial because you would not comply with any, you know, not any, but most of the court orders and most of, you know, what you're supposed to do to prepare for that trial.
So that ship has sailed and now here you are in a damages trial and you're trying to turn it into a signal test of free speech, which I think most people would have been, you know, interested in.
That didn't happen because he stonewalled his way into a damages trial.
And so he is where he is.
And I think both he and his lawyer wish they were in a different place, but they're not.
Yeah, that's the thing that I find so frustrating about a lot of the responses that I see from people who are not necessarily paying that close of attention.
Not recognizing that Alex absolutely would have gotten a trial on the merits if he just cooperated in any way.
It's so frustrating to hear that point be made and then people just not hear it, not listen, not understand that the only reason that this is happening is because of...
I really almost want every article written about it to begin with a timeline of the number of times that Alex could have just apologized and stopped with no lawsuit whatsoever, could have just made a public apology and stopped with no lawsuit whatsoever, and then the number of times that once the lawsuit was brought, they could have done any...
Billion number of things to keep it from getting to where we are now.
And instead, everybody keeps writing like, the families are seeking damages.
I have labored with that just in writing my stories, trying to say all the time that what they really want is...
I mean, this is the altruistic thing here.
They really are trying to shine a light on the fact that the lies around Sandy Hook, and here I'm like...
You know, talking about what I talk about in my book and that's that, you know...
It really was a foundational story of how misinformation has kind of taken hold in our discourse, you know, because it just went from, and Alex was at the center of a lot of this, you know, it went from that to Pizzagate, to QAnon, to coronavirus myths, to the Stop the Steal campaign, to the January 6th insurrection.
And, you know, his fingerprints are on Pretty much all of those.
Oh, and you can throw Charlottesville into the mix, too.
Absolutely.
So, you know, his fingerprints are all over those developments.
And so in that sense, this is kind of it really is a kind of fake news on trial type thing.
Yeah, because I do think that there's a lot of things that probably need clarification from the jury's point of view that maybe the lawyers aren't aware of.
And so I think that's really helpful, but I think, like, based on the trend of the questions we've been seeing, they could ask some really messed up things to Alex.
Well, maybe not messed up, like, you know, bizarre or anything, but, like, pointed questions that he does not want to answer, and then he appears to be evasive to the jury's own questions.
Like, he puts himself in a really, really dangerous position there.
Which is what he did in his custody trial, remember?
That was where, you know, it was like his ex-wife had attorneys who really knew how to get under his skin, and he finally just exploded.
I talked with Charlie Warzel about that because he was in the courtroom, and he was saying if it would have been a regular thing, a bailiff would have escorted him out.
I wouldn't rule out the possibility that Raynal, his lawyer, is working on him right now just to say, Alex, unless you're going to prostrate yourself before the court and abjectly apologize.
There's probably not a lot you can say that's going to help you.
Oh my god, Dan, you, you, how many, I mean, you remember better than I do, but how many times did Alex, in a softball, t-ball interview where his questions were answered for him, how many times did he say, I've never lied on purpose?
Confirmation bias is like the most elementary term for her.
I can't even imagine.
I'm sure that came off to her as like, either do you have any idea of what I do, what my area of study is, or are you just purposely trying to belittle me?
Yeah, but again, he has to attack people like that because he cannot attack the families.
So, you know, to kind of try to, you know...
Impeach her or belittle her or make her seem like she doesn't have the gravitas that she has, I think is just, at some levels, it's strategic because he really cannot lay a finger on Neil and Scarlett.
It's weird, though, because I think on some level, the attempts at impeaching the psychiatrists and the therapists, I don't think it's really easy to see that.
If you're the jury and not see that as being an attack on the lived experience of Neil and Scarlett.
I think that that, you know, because they were not, I think what he was relying on is that they would be much colder and more clinical than they actually were.
If he would have been someone like that, it would have been.
You know, that would have been a great strategy, but because the man himself was so sympathetic, and because he had worked, you know, he was a sort of integral part of the community around Newtown, and he had worked with first responders, and he had very much lived the tragedy and the aftermath.
He was not the kind of basic, you know, hired gun expert at all.
That was one of the big things that backfired on the defense lawyer was when he was trying to almost say, like, because you're part of the community, you're so biased in their favor, you could never be an impartial witness.
And instead of, like, saying, instead of successfully getting the jury to be like, ah, this guy's biased, the jury was like, yeah, fucking right, man!
I mean, it would be impossible, I think, to be, well, not impossible because we've seen it, but I was going to say it would be nearly impossible to be in that community when those events happened and not feel an absolute empathy for everyone involved.
I mean, it's just, that's kind of part of being a human being, right?
So, again, that was...
I don't know.
I was sort of shaking my head because I don't really...
Wrap this up before too long, but I wanted to just say, I guess, and I'm sure you're on the same page with this, and I'm sure you have some thoughts on the matter of making sure that this all stays squarely focused on what this is actually about, as opposed to...
And I know that you're someone who deeply appreciates what this is really about and what Neil and Scarlett have gone through, as well as many other parents and community and family members.
I mean, that is, I know that there was this sort of like, you know, whoa, you know, kind of sense in the courtroom when it became apparent that, you know, quite likely Jones will testify, although I still think there is a possibility he won't.
But I think the whole thing of, it is super unfortunate when it comes to the families because It's going to be super traumatic for them to sort of share that day and share the same space with him.
I'm sure they'll do everything they can to insulate them from being in the same place while he's testifying or what have you.
But I couldn't agree with you more.
This is a proceeding that has lots of aspects.
There's the legal part, the intellectual part of it, the competition of it, and all of that.
And I think in covering that and in thinking about it and being part of it and being immersed in it, it's easy to forget that this is about the parents.
Of a child who was murdered in cold blood after saving the lives of nine of his classmates.
And then his parents, as we said at the top, having that story to cling to and having thousands of people tear that narrative for them by saying it didn't happen.
You can intellectually know how...
Nuts that is.
But at the same time, and how ridiculous and how it should be a non-factor, right?
But it is, as the psychologist testified today, it is a factor.
You know, no one likes to feel misapprehended, even on a minor thing.
And to have somebody take that precious...
You know, narrative and, you know, everything that your child was away from you.
I mean, that's really what this is about.
And it's also about the broader thing, and that's that the families are doing this, not because they even expect that they're going to see any kind of, you know, monetary recompense from this, but really as, and I know this from talking with them for years for my book.
They are trying to send a message.
They really are trying to say, if this can happen to us, this could happen to your community.
Not the shooting, although God knows that could happen, but this idea that misinformation and disinformation and the scrambling of everything that we hold sacred when it comes to establishing truth and relying on facts.
It could come for you in your community.
It could happen to your family.
Blaring red signal that they are trying to send to people.
This is a problem.
If you didn't notice it around us, maybe you noticed it around January 6th.
Maybe you saw it around coronavirus.
These are all the same phenomenon.
And they're really trying to raise awareness here.
And we should be thanking them for that because...
Of all the people who should be spared having to have an additional burden of standing for something in America, it should be these grieving families.
And here they are saying, this is important, and please pay attention.
you know, being in the presence of someone who has abused you or You know, or that you've fought with in the past or that, you know, a person who means kind of trauma to you, right?
So, you know, I don't know about you, but I get kind of shaky and nervous and, you know, it's really scary.
And I actually do think, you know, hearing the two, the psychiatrist and their therapist say that today, they're scared.
I believe that.
That is absolutely true.
It's because it's heaped on top of what happened to them.
Everything was torn out from under them.
They lost all sense of control.
And now they lost their child.
Your whole world is thrown off its axis, and now, you know, they've lost control even over the story of how he died and his heroism and his last moments.
Well, it's amazing because, you know, you would think like, okay, the lawsuit, that's additionally traumatizing.
Actually not.
What has happened is this has been four years of stonewalling and fighting and tooth and nail on the part of Alex.
So that's...
That's the traumatic thing.
It's the four years of trying to drag this out, trying to use every trick in the book, you know, all of that.
Does he have a right to defend himself?
Sure he does.
But that's not exactly what he was doing.
Well, he actually doesn't.
Yeah.
But that, you know, that...
It wasn't a fair fight from the beginning.
So to then turn around after four years of extending this pain and then say, well, you'd all be healed if you didn't sue me, is sort of the height of cynicism.