All Episodes
July 20, 2022 - Knowledge Fight
02:22:19
#704: 9/11, Part 2

Today, Dan and Jordan wrap up their look at Alex's activities from September 11, 2001 by looking at his evening broadcast.  Does Alex still think the EU was probably behind 9/11?  Can Alex be any more disrespectful than he was that morning?  Does Alex get into a fight with a special celebrity guest?   Citations Dreamy Creamy Fundraiser

Participants
Main voices
a
alex jones
21:38
d
dan friesen
01:09:33
j
joe rogan
09:20
j
jordan holmes
32:51
Appearances
m
mika brzezinski
01:41
Clips
j
jim wright
00:48
m
mark bankston
00:18
s
steve quayle
00:02
Callers
andy in kansas
00:02
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys, saying we are the bad guys.
alex jones
Knowledge fight.
unidentified
Dan and George.
Knowledge fight.
I need money.
Andy in Kansas.
alex jones
Andy in Kansas.
Stop it.
Andy in Kansas.
It's time to pray.
Andy in Kansas.
You're on the air.
unidentified
Thanks for holding us.
andy in kansas
I love your word.
alex jones
Knowledge fight.
Not knowledgefight.com.
unidentified
I love you.
dan friesen
Hey, everybody.
Welcome back to Knowledge Fight.
I'm Dan.
jordan holmes
I'm Jordan.
dan friesen
We're global dudes like to sit around, worship at the altar of Selene, and talk a little bit about Alex Jones.
jordan holmes
Oh, indeed we are.
unidentified
Dan.
dan friesen
Jordan.
jordan holmes
Dan.
dan friesen
Jordan.
jordan holmes
Quick question for you.
dan friesen
What's up?
jordan holmes
What's your bright spot today?
dan friesen
Why don't you go first?
jordan holmes
Dan, do you know what my bright spot is?
dan friesen
What's that?
Oh, God.
jordan holmes
No, it's not tennis.
It's Sarah and I went and played tennis earlier this afternoon.
dan friesen
Wonderful.
jordan holmes
Yes, Sarah Shockey, friend of the show party, and Sarah Love Wrestling.
She is good.
unidentified
Uh-oh.
jordan holmes
She's got to serve, man.
She was blasted in some that I was like, well, I'm going to take a little sit down.
dan friesen
I could see that.
I feel like she probably is a person who has about a million talents that...
Like, you just don't expect.
jordan holmes
100%.
dan friesen
Everything you accidentally...
Like, you go to, like, a knife-throwing place, and it turns out she's a dead eye.
unidentified
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
jordan holmes
No, I threw knives for a while whenever I was in college, and you're like, what?
unidentified
How do...
jordan holmes
What?
Yeah, that's what...
Yeah, she collects being good at skills.
dan friesen
Yeah, so you got your ass kicked?
jordan holmes
Uh, no!
I think we were pretty...
We were on a pretty even keel.
dan friesen
Okay, this is just your way of bragging.
jordan holmes
No, no, no, no.
Everywhere but that serve, where she was just...
dan friesen
So just acing you?
jordan holmes
Acing me!
Like it wasn't even hard.
dan friesen
What's your bright spot?
Well, as many people know, I have started to grow some plants again.
jordan holmes
Indeed.
dan friesen
And so I've got a couple of cucumbers coming up, a couple of seedlings.
I also have some grow bags with potatoes that I put in there.
And I have no faith in these potatoes to grow at all.
jordan holmes
You have no faith in yourself or in potatoes in general?
dan friesen
Myself.
I just feel like there's something weird about putting a potato in the ground and then expecting something to happen.
It's very weird.
jordan holmes
That is fair.
dan friesen
But I was just in there and I was looking at the soil and little buds are coming up out of the potato.
jordan holmes
Nice.
dan friesen
Like out of the dirt growing from the spud.
So that's really exciting.
It is.
jordan holmes
It is fun that sometimes you can really take a step back and think, you know, I bet a long time ago somebody just threw a potato and then a bunch of potatoes grew wherever it landed.
Whenever the land was filled with nothing, you just threw a potato and potatoes would show up.
dan friesen
That's magic!
I had a little compost thing going and I had a bean, I think.
A pinto bean, maybe.
I'm not sure what it was.
But yeah, I think it was a pinto bean.
It was in...
It sprouted.
jordan holmes
It was in the garbage and it still sprouted.
dan friesen
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
It was nuts.
It was just coffee grinds and dirt and it just took.
jordan holmes
It's so funny how so many plants are like, there's just no way to make this grow.
And then there are tons where you're like, stop!
Leave me alone!
Get away from me!
dan friesen
Yep.
So something that also you would yell, stop, get away from me, too, is Alex Jones.
jordan holmes
There we go!
Now that's a segue.
dan friesen
And you're going to feel that way today as we continue our part two, or we go into part two of our examination of his coverage of 9-11, 2001.
jordan holmes
Surreal.
dan friesen
We are now on to the evening show, which is 9 to midnight.
If you haven't listened to the first one, go ahead and do that, because there's some prerequisite experience.
unidentified
Does it get better?
jordan holmes
Does it get better?
No.
dan friesen
Does not.
jordan holmes
I was thinking about it after we left.
dan friesen
Get ready for a weird ride.
jordan holmes
I was thinking about it after we left, after we were done recording, and I'm just like, in my head, I really don't believe if you had told me 20 years ago, if you had...
Showed me the broadcast.
I would not have believed it was happening.
dan friesen
Right, right.
If I came up to you and I was like, hey, Alex Jones says that the EU probably did 9-11 in order to help strengthen the euro.
jordan holmes
This is before YouTube.
That's a great observation, I guess.
dan friesen
Sure.
unidentified
Absurd.
dan friesen
Yeah, there's a lot of surprises going on.
And there's some more today.
But first, before we get into any of that, let's take a little moment to say hello to some new wonks.
jordan holmes
Oh, that's a great idea.
dan friesen
So first, Frank of Frank's Beach.
Thank you so much.
You are now a policy wonk.
joe rogan
I'm a policy wonk.
jordan holmes
Thank you very much!
dan friesen
Next, Alex's atrophied sense of shame.
Thank you so much.
You are now a policy wonk.
joe rogan
I'm a policy wonk.
dan friesen
Thank you very much!
We're not too late on this.
jordan holmes
Just a little bit late.
dan friesen
But happy birthday to Rachel S. Thank you so much.
You are now a policy wonk.
joe rogan
I'm a policy wonk.
jordan holmes
Thank you very much!
dan friesen
Next, Stu from Arkansas.
Thank you so much.
You are now a policy wonk.
joe rogan
I'm a policy wonk.
jordan holmes
Thank you very much!
joe rogan
I'm a policy wonk!
jordan holmes
Thank you very much.
dan friesen
And Kirby's return to dreamy, creamy land.
Thank you so much.
You are now a policy wonk.
jordan holmes
I'm a policy wonk.
That one was well done.
unidentified
Yeah.
jordan holmes
That was a good one.
dan friesen
So before we get into the episode proper, I wanted just to give a little bit of apology and clarification, I guess.
I used the term Afghani to refer to a person on the last episode, and that is incorrect.
I was unaware of this.
I got a tweet about this, and I appreciate the person correcting me on that.
I don't know why.
I guess I...
I had no idea.
It's Afghan is the term for a person.
Afghani is a monetary unit.
Oh, sure.
It's just completely in my blind spot.
I've heard people referred to in that way in contexts and places where it didn't seem like it was offensive.
Sure.
And so I guess I had just assumed.
jordan holmes
Straight up, if you had told me, I would have told you that I swear I heard people say it on TV a few days ago.
I have no idea.
I'm glad that I didn't say it and you did.
dan friesen
I appreciate learning more, though.
jordan holmes
Yes, me too.
dan friesen
So, look, I decided that if I was going to do this episode here covering Alex's shows on 9-11, it would be important that it not just be the only way that I experience the tragedy.
jordan holmes
Sure.
dan friesen
I was alive when this happened, of course, but it's been 21 years and some of the memories have faded.
It'd be wildly incomplete for me to approach this and just rely on my own memories and Alex's bullshit.
It's not fair.
I can read documents and reports, but those are a little bit sterile and unfeeling.
And one of the unexpected things about Alex's morning show that we covered on our last episode was that he didn't seem to have a human response to the attack.
Though he said it was the most important day in like a century, the show didn't have a feeling that conveyed the gravity of what people were experiencing.
He took calls and people were crafting conspiracies out of bizarre numerology.
He had guests, but they were people who, you know, weren't that affected or they were trying to sell gold.
This all felt like a huge disrespect to the people who were living through hell, pushing their experience to the side in order to use it for your own purposes.
And I wanted to make sure that I held on to a little bit of the severity of the subject we're covering.
This is a show that's meant to be funny and entertaining, so it's easy to put on that facade of not taking things too seriously and being, like, glib.
In order to make sure I held on to some semblance of perspective, as I dealt with Alex, I decided that it would be helpful to also watch various news outlets' live coverage of the tragedy.
So I watched hours and hours of live CBS, local Fox affiliate, CNN coverage of the day.
And I have a lot of feelings.
jordan holmes
I believe you.
dan friesen
Yeah.
I was telling you that I'm a bit tired.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
Yeah.
Because you spent all night watching 9-11.
dan friesen
Not all night.
A lot of that was during the day.
jordan holmes
Sure, sure.
But I mean, it is a strange day to be like, oh, you know what I think I'll do?
I think I'll just do 9-11 again.
dan friesen
A couple times.
jordan holmes
Are you Zagami?
dan friesen
Because you did 9-11.
Yeah.
Part of it was I wanted to get a sense of the information space that Alex would have been living in before he got on air at 9pm.
I wanted to get a sense of how the media was covering it.
Because so much of Alex's entire point...
About anything is drawing broad conclusions from how he feels the media is doing something.
jordan holmes
About other people's reporting.
unidentified
Right.
dan friesen
He takes cues that he sees, imagined or not, in the media and pretends that they're the directives and marching orders of the globalists.
And so something that I felt would be kind of important was experiencing a bit of that.
And luckily...
You can find pretty much full coverage videos on YouTube.
jordan holmes
It's a pretty well documented day.
dan friesen
And there's, yeah, I found a YouTube channel that has a lot of very important days, like just straight news coverage.
jordan holmes
Oh, really?
dan friesen
Yeah, it's a very good resource.
jordan holmes
That's kind of interesting.
dan friesen
Yeah, so I didn't watch too much of that.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
Some of that will inform some of the stuff that we get into today, but I'll give you the CliffsNotes version of this.
Alex's show is really bad.
It's terrible.
We rightly criticize the media for a lot of sensationalism, and there are tons of other problems with the big networks, but for the most part, and I'm not vouching for anything they did on September 12th, but they seem to handle a lot of that coverage fairly well.
I was pretty impressed.
By the coverage as events were unfolding.
There was a respect for what was happening.
There was a restraint in leaping to conclusions.
The CBS one was the first one I watched.
And they took forever to even admit that it wasn't an accident.
unidentified
Right.
dan friesen
You know, they had a real resistance to using terminology around terrorism.
jordan holmes
We don't know who's done this.
We don't have a clear picture.
There's not enough information coming in yet.
We know this is a tragedy, but we don't know who's, you know, all that stuff.
dan friesen
Yeah, and another point that I really found, it didn't jibe with how I remembered things and how the stories are told.
About 9-11 was that there really wasn't a hard finger pointed at Bin Laden until quite a bit later.
jordan holmes
It was in the evening.
dan friesen
No, I mean in the evening there was sort of a consensus coming around that it's probably him.
This is a good suspect.
But the story that we tell is that like...
Immediately, they said it was Osama bin Laden.
And that isn't the case.
jordan holmes
Oh, no.
dan friesen
There's a Palestinian group that took responsibility for it initially, and that was a lot of the conversation of, like, is this a credible taking responsibility for this?
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
And then, you know, bin Laden is brought up as a possible person because...
jordan holmes
He attacked it before.
dan friesen
Right.
jordan holmes
Right, right, right.
Past behavior is a predictor of future events.
dan friesen
It's a bit in the MO.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
But then also, like, the possibility of state actors.
Of course.
You know, there's more of a conversation about possibilities.
And I was kind of surprised to experience that, because I thought I'd go back and it'd be like, so much Bin Laden talk, like, straight out.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
And that was not the, what do you find?
jordan holmes
Interesting.
dan friesen
Yeah.
Maybe not super earth-shattering, but a little interesting.
jordan holmes
No, I mean, that's a question that I really hadn't thought of in the past, but I don't...
Like, my memory of it, I didn't remember people even throwing around, like, here's who did it at all for a while.
Like, for at least a couple of days or so for me, it's just people were like, whoa, that was fucked up!
Terror!
You know, like, that whole thing.
They didn't actively put a name on it for a while.
dan friesen
Yeah, and I think that a large amount of the coverage that you find...
or that I was watching had to do with more with that human end of it than the who did this although as the day went on certainly there was some conversation of Who did this?
jordan holmes
Sure.
dan friesen
Some of the points that some of the people made were...
jordan holmes
Racist!
dan friesen
I didn't see as much racism as you would have expected.
Interesting.
But I did see violence.
jordan holmes
Ooh, got a lot of people...
dan friesen
Calls for blood.
jordan holmes
Blow them up!
Kill them all!
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Those I do remember happening right away.
dan friesen
Yeah, there was a former Secretary of State who was on CNN.
I can't remember who it was.
It was like Eagle Burger, I think.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
And he was like, look...
We gotta kill somebody.
Whether we can prove they were directly connected or not, we gotta go and kill somebody.
It was like, oh boy.
jordan holmes
That was what's funny about Alex saying we gotta nuke him on that earlier episode, is that I do remember being briefly a fairly mainstream thought.
People would like bandy about like, okay, so what do we do?
Do we nuke him?
Like, that kind of thing.
dan friesen
It's a visceral reaction that you have to a tragedy, like a punch that's coming.
unidentified
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
dan friesen
And the thing that I found more interesting was that that was part of Alex's response as well, because he likes to pretend that he's above that kind of emotional response, and he's into peace, and he doesn't want to expand wars.
The idea of nuking some fucking country, you can't possibly be in favor of that.
Even if you prove that their government did 9-11, you're just going to kill so many civilians.
jordan holmes
Yeah, what are you doing?
dan friesen
It's...
jordan holmes
I mean, essentially, you're declaring war on the Earth, not on people.
You know?
dan friesen
Yeah.
And so, here we are.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
That's where we're at.
Some of my thoughts.
alex jones
Gotcha.
dan friesen
And there'll be more along the way, I'm sure.
jordan holmes
We'll keep it going.
dan friesen
But here, we start Alex's evening show, and he's striking a familiar tone.
alex jones
All right.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, we're live.
It is 9-11, 9-1-1, September 11, 2001, an amply numbered date, isn't it?
dan friesen
Amply.
alex jones
We're going to be live until midnight this evening, and then more live shows throughout the early morning hours.
I have been one of those lone voices out there warning you about government-sponsored terrorism.
dan friesen
So there's, again, like an I told you so immediately in the show.
And that's really bizarre.
jordan holmes
Yeah, I was expecting it this time.
I was ready.
I was prepared for it.
I was like, I know right out the gate.
He's just going to be like, look at how right I was.
dan friesen
It seems like one of the most important things that he wants to stress.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
And to me, that seems shady.
jordan holmes
I am a prophet of doom.
Follow me, for I have predicted what has befallen us.
dan friesen
Yep.
So, Alex has been watching some of the local and national news, and he has some words.
unidentified
Interesting.
alex jones
I have the latest developments and news and information and an eyewitness joining us live from a mile and a half away from the collapsed World Trade Centers and World Trade Center number seven.
A total of five buildings that have collapsed total.
Wrong song for that.
wrong song involved so we get back i'm gonna go back to april twenty-fourth and at the baltimore sunday book and i think that's just light on secret u_s_ terror plan called human invasion pretext they said it had to be left dead people in u_s_ newspapers without a helpful way with indignation This is important information.
Your call's coming up.
Stay with us.
dan friesen
So local and national news outlets were definitely not reporting that shape charges were used to demolish the building.
That is just made up.
I'm not sure if it's accurate to say that five buildings had fallen, partially because I just don't know what the definitions we're using are.
World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7 definitely fully collapsed, and the falling debris essentially destroyed the smaller buildings 3, 4, 5, and 6. But also, there were many non-World Trade Center complex buildings that were destroyed in the attack, and it seems difficult to precisely quantify that.
For instance, the St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church was destroyed by falling debris.
I don't know if this is counted in Alex's factoring.
jordan holmes
No.
dan friesen
It's a particular, I mean, it's a minor point, I guess.
But I just don't think that five buildings is an accurate count, regardless of how you define it.
Also, it's important to note that Alex seems to also still not know the name of Operation Northwoods or want to say it or something.
jordan holmes
Strange.
dan friesen
There is a consistent non-use of that name, whereas now it's a buzzword for him.
jordan holmes
Oh, tossed around all the time.
dan friesen
Yeah.
He loves Operation names.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
Not on 9-11.
jordan holmes
Well, I mean, that is the most respectful thing he's done so far.
dan friesen
Keep Northwood's name at your mouth.
Exactly, yeah.
jordan holmes
That's about as good as we're going to get from him, I'm assuming.
dan friesen
Yeah, yeah, I would say so.
So there's some things that Alex is just wrong about.
unidentified
Sure.
dan friesen
But again, I think that there's a number of things that he's wrong about that are totally acceptable and very understandable.
alex jones
At least five towers are down.
Two of them the fourth largest buildings on the planet.
Upwards of 20,000 people are dead, at least.
Those towers held 50,000 people, thank God.
A lot of them hadn't gotten to work yet there on the East Coast at 850 when that first passenger liner smashed into the South Tower.
dan friesen
His number is higher than a lot of the numbers that were being thrown around in other news outlets, but I understand that feeling, and I understand that sense of, like I said...
You look at something like that and you can't imagine it not killing a million people.
jordan holmes
No, I mean, yeah.
It was a bit like seeing Godzilla knock down a tower and then being like, there were only a few thousand dead.
And you're like, I mean, I know that's a tragedy.
That's horrific.
But also, I really thought the entire fucking area was going to be flat ground.
dan friesen
And then you see the videos of people running from the debris cloud.
And the way that the debris cloud Envelops them.
Exactly.
It's unthinkable that you wouldn't...
I assume 20,000 people.
jordan holmes
No, totally.
dan friesen
For sure.
He is reporting it as 20,000 at least.
alex jones
Right.
dan friesen
And that's a little bit strong, but I get it.
I don't feel like...
I wanted to include something like this, and I try to, whenever there are things that he's wrong about, but he's right to be wrong about.
jordan holmes
Right, right, right.
We didn't have official numbers.
He probably shouldn't have thrown around that number that high and definitely shouldn't have confirmed at least, but...
If you had asked me, I'd have been like, yeah, sure, 20, 30, 40, that sounds right.
unidentified
Right.
dan friesen
I'm not here to nitpick Alex.
I'm not here to be like, ha ha, you got this wrong, because I could if I wanted to with that, but I would much rather spend my time on stuff like this.
alex jones
And then the towers began to collapse.
I have one of the designers in the Chicago Tribune saying, this is impossible.
We've been trying to get a hold of General Benton Parton all night, but his phone has been busy perpetually.
We actually had a structural engineer on the show today.
That is not how buildings go down in five seconds.
dan friesen
So you can see here already that Alex is claiming that he had a structural engineer on his show this morning who said it was a demolition, when in reality he had a friend of his on who had studied some engineering in college but now worked in a financial sector job.
The way Alex is seeking to solidify this talking point is for the perception to be that the guest he had on was a person who worked professionally as a structural engineer because that perception strengthens the illusion of his claims, whereas presenting his guest accurately would reveal how flimsy his shit is.
Also, this article in the Chicago Tribune, you can find it, it has the headline, quote, engineers shocked by towers collapse.
And nowhere in the article does this supposed co-designer claim that the way that the buildings collapsed was impossible.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
That's a claim that Alex is inventing from thin air.
jordan holmes
Just adding.
dan friesen
The article discusses how Les Robertson, one of the structural engineers of the Trade Center, had given a talk in Frankfurt, Germany, a week before the attacks, and had brought up that the buildings were designed to withstand The article literally says,
quote, Burns said Robertson did not elaborate on the remark.
The buildings were designed to withstand a crash from smaller planes, like a personal plane, or even up to a 707, but the jets on 9-11 were bigger and modern.
I think one of the reasons Alex is doing this is because he's not very creative.
This game isn't creative.
We can see in present day, every single mass shooting is basically the same thing.
They want your guns, the guy's on psych meds, he's an incel, there's basically just bullet points that he applies to each new shooting, regardless of the actual details.
of the real situation.
This kind of feels similar.
He did the controlled demolition secret bombs in the building conspiracy with Oklahoma City, and now, here, he has another situation where buildings were destroyed that he needs to turn into a conspiracy.
It only seems natural that he would do the same thing over again.
It's so much easier for him, particularly because whenever he's making any kind of argument, he can just say, like they did in OKC, and the audience is primed to lend whatever Alex is saying more credibility.
Looking at Alex's behavior here on 9-11, I really don't feel like he's doing anything different from what he always does.
He's got a conspiracy archetype that he's working with, and he's applying it to the current hot topic.
He has a guest whose expertise is being exaggerated in order to bolster their claims, and he's got headlines that don't say what he reports they do.
It's kind of dark, but I mean, I don't really get the sense that this is much more than another day at the office for him.
jordan holmes
It really is.
It really is.
I mean, I'm assuming that in two or three days his friend is going to be the top structural engineer in New York City.
dan friesen
One of the most prestigious.
jordan holmes
One of the most prestigious, yeah.
dan friesen
He's no longer in the financial sector.
jordan holmes
No.
dan friesen
Actually, I know what he...
I see the trick that he's doing.
Already in this episode, and it's not that.
What he's doing is he's going to try and create a bifurcated identity.
jordan holmes
Oh, okay.
dan friesen
So he'll have his friend who is a financial analyst who was there and was a first-hand account, and then there's another guest.
jordan holmes
And then his friend will also be a structural engineer, but it's not his friend, it's his other friend.
dan friesen
Well, it's implied that they're two different guests.
We had a structural engineer, and also I had a friend who was a first-hand account.
So that's a smooth way to do it.
Right, right, right.
And you don't point out that he was actually a financial advisor who may be undergrad.
jordan holmes
Yeah, it's like when somebody's an expert on MSNBC and then a few years later they show up on Fox Business with a completely different specialty and you're like, what are you fucking doing?
dan friesen
So here we see, I mean, look, this is just, I had to sit with this clip.
jordan holmes
You had to sit and think about this one for a while?
dan friesen
Yeah, it really frustrated me.
unidentified
Oh boy.
alex jones
And I was actually listening to local KLBJ radio when they had another structural engineer on from Texas A&M who did part of the analysis back in 1993 for the first World Trade Center momming, saying that this wouldn't happen.
And then the host, Jeff Ward, said, yeah, I was watching local news this morning right when it happened.
And then about 20 minutes later, 30 minutes later, when the first tower collapsed, the reporters were panicking, saying there had been a giant explosion on the bottom floor.
And the sounds are picked up by the audio tape.
But the spin machine is in overdrive, just like an Oklahoma City telling us a truck bomb outside blows out columns further back and blast them off cleanly at the bottom, making rebar and concrete disappear.
dan friesen
So you can see from that clip what I mean about the OKC stuff.
Alex wants to wrap up his talking points and references to OKC, so in order to even address any of his points, it feels like you have to completely re-litigate all of his conspiracies about the Murrah building bombing before you do so.
And I'm here to say that you don't have to do that.
This is a distraction tactic that Alex is employing, and it's totally okay to just ignore it for now.
It's not relevant to the question of whether or not bombs took down the world Right.
So I want to track this story here that Alex is telling and illustrate to you how pathetic the level of sourcing he's using is to make this point.
Alex was listening to a local show on KLBJ where the host said that he had watched an unspecified local news show where they were saying that there was a giant explosion at the bottom floor of the World Trade Center that was caught on the audio tape and now they're scrambling because there's a cover-up because it got caught to the sound.
Oh no.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
This is useless.
Even if you wanted to check on this claim, what would you do?
So we know that Jeff Ward is the KLBJ host in question, but what local TV station was he watching?
Wouldn't pretty much every local news station be running national coverage since so many of them are NBC or ABC or Fox or CBS affiliates?
Like, I watched a fair amount of the news coverage from that day, and this doesn't ring true to me at all.
But because of the vagueness of this claim, no matter what I say, Alex could just retreat to the claim that I just didn't watch the right videos.
It must have been on another channel.
I can definitely say that reporters were freaked out when the buildings collapsed.
That was because two giant skyscrapers were falling and dust clouds were racing down the streets towards them, and everyone was essentially running for their lives, having difficulty breathing in thick air.
Here, actually, is Alex's nemesis, one of his many nemeses, Mika Brzezinski, who is reporting live from New York, and she had actually taken up shelter in a school running from the buildings falling.
unidentified
Mika Brzezinski is downtown.
Mika?
Mika, Mika, come down.
mika brzezinski
Hi, Mika Brzezinski here reporting from PS89.
It's near the scene of the now collapse of what we believe to be the tower number one of the World Trade Center.
I was standing with CBS News correspondent Byron Pitts.
We were coordinating our crews in a crowd of people near the corner of Murray Avenue and the West Side Highway when the collapse occurred and literally plumes of smoke.
And gases, as the collapse happened, I'm sure you're seeing in the video, began to roll our way.
And that is when the crowd went wild.
People just began to run.
Our live trucks shut down.
Crews were running.
Reporters were running.
People were running.
And the cops literally were just waving their arms saying, go, go, go.
We are inside this school right now, actually inside a small room, trying to stay clear of the crowds that are trying to get out of the way and also the evacuation of this school.
School officials here are trying to get everybody out of the building in an orderly fashion as quickly as possible.
But again, there is so much confusion out on the street.
It is literally chaos out there.
We've got a short timeline here.
The school right now is now putting on the intercom where kids need to go to assemble classes.
Near Chambers Street, they're trying to organize the classes and get these kids out of here as safely as possible.
Right now we're dealing with the air because of the plumes of smoke and gas.
As Byron pointed out to me, we needed to move quickly because the smoke that was rolling our way and the debris as well was very thick and it could be very dangerous.
It was already a chaotic situation before the collapse happened and this is just piling more danger and damage on top of what was already a very chaotic situation.
dan friesen
I'm not sure any of the reporters were too concerned with the bullshit games Alex plays, considering many of them were huddling in a classroom where kids were trying to figure out how to reunite with their families, and everyone was worried about poison air.
I don't feel like this is Alex being at all fair.
jordan holmes
No, I'm going to go ahead and say that, yeah, this one's pretty bad.
The previous clip?
20,000?
Doesn't look so bad in comparison to this clip.
Makes things look real fucked up.
dan friesen
So, the part about the engineer from Texas A&M presents the same problem as Alex's other sourcing issues.
The details provided cannot possibly be sufficient to trace down this claim.
I went to the Texas A&M Structural Engineering Department website, and they have 15 faculty members listed.
But you can see how we're no closer to knowing anything.
I could go through all of these professors' resumes and find nothing, and well, what if the person Alex was talking about is retired or died?
Hey, guess what?
There are multiple reports and official reports that have been made about the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
I can go and find them, and I have found many of them.
Yeah, you really dropped the ball on this one, Dan.
There are a lot of built-in loopholes to the details that Alex rattles off to make them more protected from debunking.
He attempts to make people prove a negative, like that no Texas A&M professor said this, or that the local news clip he claims he heard a local radio host talk about doesn't exist.
And he does that because he couldn't do anything else.
He has to force you to do something impossible to prove him wrong, because if you were forced to establish and defend his own claims, he will fail every time.
jordan holmes
Oh, of course.
And if you get him to stay on that, he'll be like, ah, but what about the Oklahoma City bombing?
And that will try and get you to start arguing about the OKC bombing, so then you're already forgetting what you were supposed to be arguing about, which was 9-11 in the first place.
dan friesen
Yeah, it's once you're not allowed to...
He just will distract.
jordan holmes
Yeah, absolutely.
Jangling keys, throwing balls everywhere, just like anything shiny to get you away from the point.
dan friesen
Yeah, I think this is a good example of that.
alex jones
You're watching mass mind control unfold.
Whether the government was involved in it or the European Union as they roll out the euro that's partially goldback, already trading above the dollar.
jordan holmes
Still going with that.
unidentified
All right.
alex jones
Or if this was actually Osama bin Laden, I want to know why our government funded him throughout the 80s and early 90s, why his family still builds our military bases in Saudi Arabia and around the Middle East, why their family sits on the board of directors of Iridium Satellite.
I want to know why we didn't take Saddam out in 1991, 50 miles from downtown Baghdad.
dan friesen
See, we've reached the phase of Alex's reporting where he asks a bunch of distracting questions that he knows the answer to.
unidentified
Yep.
dan friesen
CIA funded bin Laden because he was fighting the communist enemy that you wanted people to fight.
The bin Laden family get a lot of construction contracts because they're not terrorists, and they run a really big construction enterprise.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
Terrorism is not like, ah, it runs in the family.
jordan holmes
It is not a family-owned business.
dan friesen
Same thing with the Iridium satellite thing.
It's just people who are doing business who happen to be related to a terrorist and aren't terrorists themselves.
In order to claim that this is nefarious or any of this stuff is nefarious, you need to provide some information other than say, like, oh, look, they're cousins!
jordan holmes
It doesn't work.
You might as well just be like, I want to know why they let Osama bin Laden into college.
I need to know why that man was allowed to go to college.
He's a terrorist.
He became a terrorist later on.
Why didn't they let him?
This is post.
You can't undo...
dan friesen
Also, as for why they didn't kill Saddam...
You got me.
I don't really have anything on that.
I don't know why...
jordan holmes
Who knows?
Honestly, why...
dan friesen
There's probably a strategic reason of some sort, maybe.
jordan holmes
You know, I don't know.
Sometimes it's like who they decide to take a shot at and who they don't is not as...
It doesn't make any sense.
You know, like, ah, we're going to try and kill this leader, but this guy?
Nah, nah, nah, we're not going to do that.
dan friesen
I'm not sure what calculus went into that.
jordan holmes
Yeah, sure.
dan friesen
So, I guess if we want to get distracted with that, this is a good way for Alex to not talk about 9-11 on 9-11.
jordan holmes
I do want to know the math on the CIA's who-do-we-kill list.
dan friesen
So, I keep coming back to this because it seems bizarre to me.
Alex seems to have no idea about anything about Operation Northwoods except for a blurb from this Baltimore Sun article that is about James Bamford who wrote this book that includes mentions of Operation Northwoods.
And it's wild!
alex jones
This is from the Baltimore Sun, posted since April on Infowars.com.
We have interviewed James Bamford, former 2020 executive, best-selling author on The Puzzle Palace on the NSA, and of course his new best-selling book, still on the New York Times bestseller list since April, Body of Secrets, a 900-page book that I've already read half of.
U.S. military leaders proposed in 1962 a secret plan to commit terrorist attacks against Americans and blame Cuba.
To create a pretext for invasion and the ouster of Communist leader Fidel Castro, according to a new book about the National Security Agency.
Now, do I support that filth bag, that Communist murder Fidel?
No, but I don't support becoming Fidel to fight Fidel.
And the main headline is a new book on NSA sheds lights on a secret U.S. terror plan called Human Invasion Pretext.
Now this is from the NSA documents, confirmed by the New York Times.
dan friesen
He seems to think the name is Cuban Invasion Pretext.
jordan holmes
It does seem that that's what he said, called...
dan friesen
Yeah.
I think he's misreading this, uh...
What appears to be a book review, maybe, that was in The Baltimore Sun.
jordan holmes
Right.
Of a book that he totally read half of already.
dan friesen
He's read half of it.
jordan holmes
Already.
Promise you.
dan friesen
He doesn't have really any handle on much of the details outside of what would be in that book review.
jordan holmes
Yeah, that does seem suspicious, doesn't it?
dan friesen
It does.
Especially considering that, you know, you're supposed to be this person who would consider a document like that one of the most important things.
Absolutely.
Furthering your cause of spreading the truth.
jordan holmes
Totally.
dan friesen
You should probably know that thing inside and outside, backwards, forwards.
I don't get the sense that he does.
jordan holmes
I'm pretty sure he has no idea what the name is, because earlier it's like maybe he forgot or he couldn't pull it right away.
This is hours later.
You should, I mean, you could have even looked at, you could have read the article in the between time.
dan friesen
Sure, organize your notes.
Yes!
Yeah, he doesn't.
unidentified
Nope.
dan friesen
But he does hit the surface level of Northwoods really hard.
jordan holmes
Okay.
alex jones
And let me read that quote to you again.
Casualty list, that means list of dead people.
In the U.S., newspapers would cause a helpful wave of indignation.
And then they admit that we could sink a passenger ship, we could blow up airliners, we could attack Guantanamo Bay and the Marines there using Army dressed up as Cubans.
I mean, they're here in this article, quotes from the documents confirmed, wanting to blow up airliners.
Now, it was signed on to...
The Joint Chiefs of Staff wanted to do it.
The Secretary of Defense wanted to do it.
And Kennedy, despite all his evils, God bless his soul, became a leader there at the end and said, no way.
In fact, I'm abolishing the CIA.
And I'm pulling us out of Noms.
jordan holmes
You people are nuts!
dan friesen
Yeah, that's a fun story.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
Yeah, I mean, we've talked about Operation Northwoods a bit in the past, and, you know, it's not what Alex is describing.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
It was fake stuff.
Not an actual attack or people dying.
The list of casualties would be fake.
jordan holmes
Yeah, they would be pretend.
They would be pretend people, not actual dead.
Yeah, Dian really did a lot for Kennedy.
I think if he had lived, he would be remembered as a real shit president.
But Dian really gave him a lot of good buzz.
dan friesen
Certainly, it leads people to...
Come up with reasons for his death, and a lot of them end up...
jordan holmes
Where he's the hero.
dan friesen
Right.
Because the assassination of a president obviously would have to be pinned on the bad guy.
unidentified
Right.
dan friesen
So he must be the good guy if someone killed him.
jordan holmes
What if the good guy...
What if the assassin was the good guy and he saved the world?
We never even address that possibility.
dan friesen
Get me Doctor Strange.
jordan holmes
That's what I'm asking for.
dan friesen
So, this show, my man?
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
It's not a game.
jordan holmes
Uh-oh.
dan friesen
This is real.
jordan holmes
Is it?
dan friesen
No.
alex jones
Oh.
And I warned you on the air, this show is not a game.
This is not entertainment.
This is information.
And I warned you over and over and over again to call Washington and to write letters and tell them, we know you're behind the terrorism.
jordan holmes
Are you blaming us for 9-11?
alex jones
I do have to tell you, I'll walk into a grocery store today.
This morning, right after it happened, down the street from my house to get something, everybody announced, Alex, we know you're right.
The government blew it.
I said, I don't know if that's the case.
It may be the EU doing it.
I want to announce this could be the EU.
There are fissures and divides in this global power structure.
dan friesen
Wow.
What a time at that grocery store.
Everyone's like, Alex, you're so right.
jordan holmes
You're a hero of 9-11.
unidentified
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
You knew it.
jordan holmes
It was the government.
dan friesen
I have to correct you?
unidentified
What?
dan friesen
Might be the EU.
unidentified
That might be too crazy even for fucking us, you nutbag!
dan friesen
Alex, that doesn't make sense.
jordan holmes
What?
Oh my god.
dan friesen
Alex, this is too hard of a swing for 2001.
jordan holmes
It's too hard of a swing.
dan friesen
You're not popular enough for this yet.
jordan holmes
Not yet, not yet.
The fucking abuse of saying if you had called your senators more 9-11 wouldn't have happened.
dan friesen
There is a little bit of an undertone of that.
jordan holmes
There is an undertone of that.
If everybody had listened to me harder, this wouldn't have happened.
dan friesen
I think that's one reading of that.
There's another reading that kind of goes like, we tried our best.
I can see that.
No matter how many people called, you can have a clear conscience because you did what you could.
jordan holmes
I can't see that.
dan friesen
That's possible, but being generous.
jordan holmes
I'm going to lean more towards the ungenerous interpretation.
dan friesen
I'm being hyper-generous because what's about to happen is unthinkably awful.
jordan holmes
The pendulum has to swing so far to the generous in order to understand how bad this is.
Gotcha.
dan friesen
And whatever ill feelings you might have about him for blaming his audience for not calling senators, they are a pittance compared to what's about to happen.
So Alex has caught wind of the fact that the people on board had box cutters, the hijackers.
unidentified
Sure, sure, sure, sure.
dan friesen
And so Alex's solution is the same solution that he has for everything.
Arm somebody.
alex jones
You know, they could solve this whole hijacking thing.
Arm the pilots with those exploding air marshal bullets that any of us can buy.
It'll go through about an inch or something, but nothing more.
And put an armored bulkhead door on those aircraft.
And I'm hearing these guys supposedly hijack these planes with paper, with box cutters.
You pull a box cutter on me, and folks, I grew up in Dallas, Texas.
I've had people pull knives on me.
I've taken them away and broken their arm.
Don't brag about how I'm Mr. Tough Guy, but Dallas was rough growing up.
dan friesen
Dallas was pretty rough.
So, you know, obviously, this machismo, this I would fuck this guy up, that's to be expected for Alex.
He has a real macho problem.
But where this takes him, I think, is unforgivable.
The angle that he's taking with this in this next clip.
I was disgusted to hear this.
alex jones
I got somebody point a gun at me.
I just walked over and grabbed it.
Maybe I'm stupid.
But we've seen this in schools when people pull guns.
Teachers tackle them.
You got pilots in a plane full of people.
They supposedly had box cutters.
How do we know this?
One of the former Clinton administration people was on board.
Solicitor General's wife was on board that aircraft and called from one of the phones a cell phone.
And if you believe that no one on a plane was man enough that those pilots would give control over to a plane because somebody had a box cutter, or you believe that they would fly it in at 500 miles an hour, that thing was moving, both those planes, into that building, I got a bridge I want to sell you.
So the story we're getting there is bunk.
I can't believe that you had hundreds of sheep on those planes.
You pull a box cutter on me, you can't kill me with it!
Go ahead and cut me!
I'm coming in.
Maybe a double-edged stiletto-style dagger might be more deadly if the person was good with a knife, but still, I'm coming at you.
And any man would do that.
Any woman would do that.
dan friesen
So there's a lot of uncertainty in terms of the details of exactly how these hijackings went, so I'm not going to dip too far into that pool, but there's something I think it's important to point out.
On the evening of 9-11, Alex is getting on his nationally syndicated radio show and arguing that the people who died on those hijacked planes were cowards and not big strong boys like him.
That's completely disgusting.
jordan holmes
Years, years, years after this.
After 9-11.
More than a decade.
Mark Wahlberg would say the same thing, and still people would be like, that's fucking awful, you monster.
And he didn't even say it as bad as Alex did on the day!
dan friesen
I'm not really caught up on all of Mark Wahlberg's comments, but my understanding is just that it wouldn't have happened if he was there.
Right.
unidentified
And...
dan friesen
I don't know why, but somehow that's kind of okay, because that's not impugning the people who are on board as much as it is elevating yourself.
jordan holmes
Right, right, right.
Which people were rightly criticizing him for.
dan friesen
Sure.
jordan holmes
Alex is doing both.
dan friesen
Right.
jordan holmes
Alex is elevating himself and calling everybody else cowards.
dan friesen
Right.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
They are not man or woman enough to do what is human nature.
jordan holmes
Right.
On the day.
On the day of their...
dan friesen
I find this gross.
unidentified
I don't know how to live life with these people alive.
dan friesen
Look, I've never been in a hijacking situation, but I think I can imagine some scenarios where you wouldn't think it was a good idea to attack the terrorists who have taken over the plane.
For one thing, it's unlikely that you'd think that they were going to crash the plane into a building.
A lot of hijackings are done to hold hostages for financial gains or to spread political messages, and I can see thinking that you might survive the ordeal, like they might just land in Cuba or something.
jordan holmes
I mean, if you have a knowledge of plane history over time, you're like, oh shit, there were actually a lot of hijackings for a while, and most everybody lived!
dan friesen
That ended without casualties.
jordan holmes
No casualties at all, yeah.
dan friesen
If it's a heist type of...
to make the situation worse by trying to fight back since you could be increasing the chance that the plane crashes.
jordan holmes
And you or someone else is killed.
Yeah.
dan friesen
In hindsight...
It's easy to see how the people on those planes were essentially doomed, but it seems so unfair and disrespectful to take this kind of a tone, particularly less than 24 hours after the attacks.
Alex is so gross.
jordan holmes
It's that impulse, though, that they all have, the people who are like, oh, this tragedy happens, give somebody a gun there.
You know, give a teacher a gun in school.
Like, all of those things.
It's because what they're really doing is expressing their fantasy of give me a gun.
Let me go back in time in that situation so I can personally be a hero.
Right.
unidentified
Because I know everything that would have happened so I can be the winner.
dan friesen
There is a bit of that.
jordan holmes
There's absolute...
It is self-aggrandizement.
If you are saying give teachers a gun to protect students, you are saying I could protect everybody if I had a gun.
That's what you're really saying.
And that's what he's saying right there.
I can fight off a hijacker.
I can fight off a terrorist.
I can do it all.
Just put me in there.
dan friesen
I find it less abhorrent.
To say, I could do these things.
It's maybe an expression of narcissism.
It's maybe wrong.
It's definitely not the time for it.
The night of 9-11?
jordan holmes
No.
dan friesen
But there is something different about it being presented as...
I don't believe this story because any human who isn't a complete pile of shit coward would have taken over the plane from the hijackers.
I find that to be a...
It's a bridge too far, man.
jordan holmes
I'm going to play Daria here for you.
Maybe he was just thinking that's a hopeful thought.
dan friesen
Yeah.
Let's get him under oath.
Let's see what he says.
So Alex takes some calls.
And one guy calls in, and Alex wants his take, but unfortunately he does not give the right take.
And so Alex has to sort of try and...
jordan holmes
Has to juice his take a little bit.
dan friesen
Has to finesse him into the right place.
jordan holmes
Gotcha.
alex jones
Jim in Virginia, what do you think happened here today?
unidentified
In what respect?
alex jones
Well, your gut level from all the evidence we brought here out on the air before this happened, predicting it, and all the evidence we've been collating, who do you think's behind this?
unidentified
Oh, well.
It could be Hussein, but the people that probably had most of the money and could have pulled it off would be probably Iran.
alex jones
Yeah, but who stands to gain from this?
unidentified
That is something we're asking ourselves here, and we really haven't come up with anything.
alex jones
Okay, I'll tell you who stands to gain from it.
unidentified
Well, the New World War.
alex jones
Washington.
The markets were already imploding on Friday and Monday.
They were already talking about suspending trading.
But even more than Washington, there is a fisher in the New World Order reported by our scholars.
jordan holmes
A fisher?
alex jones
Dr. Coleman, Dr. Kaufman, Dr. Monteith, General Parton.
We're talking about the EU, and what are they doing right now?
Rolling out the EU currency, delivering it to stores and banks.
dan friesen
Yeah, man.
jordan holmes
He's really pushing the EU did 9-11 on 9-11!
dan friesen
And he's pretending that he's getting this analysis from all these people.
jordan holmes
I mean...
dan friesen
He is not getting it.
I know for one, he's said multiple times on the show he can't get a hold of Benton.
jordan holmes
He can't get a hold of him.
He's perpetually busy.
dan friesen
Yeah, his phone's been busy all day, so...
jordan holmes
So now he's telling us that this guy has given him information that there's a fissure in the globalist camp.
And that has led to the EU...
Flying planes into the World Trade Center.
dan friesen
I would say, first of all, fuck you.
jordan holmes
Did they try a letter first?
dan friesen
Second, why should I have any faith that your dumb, dumb friends have any idea if the globalists are getting along?
jordan holmes
I mean, because they...
dan friesen
Do they get Us Weekly or Globalist Us?
jordan holmes
There's a Maxim magazine, but just for globalists.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
dan friesen
Oh my god.
Yeah, I think this is dumb.
But it is really funny to see Alex be like, oh, that answer's not good.
jordan holmes
10 sex tips for the globalist in your life.
dan friesen
Gotta try and get this guy to say EU.
So yeah, man, he's really into the EU.
alex jones
So we're watching the destruction, ladies and gentlemen.
I don't know who did it.
Was it Bin Laden acting alone?
20% chance.
Was it this government?
30% chance.
jordan holmes
Didn't you say it was in 98?
alex jones
Was the EU and their operatives and hired psychopaths or brain control subjects?
50% chance.
Now that's my analysis, and frankly, I've never been wrong.
I wish I was wrong every day.
dan friesen
Congratulations, your wish has been granted.
jordan holmes
Yeah, you are wrong every day.
dan friesen
You are so wrong.
jordan holmes
Every single day.
dan friesen
50% chance it was the EU.
jordan holmes
I do not need a genie to grant that wish.
dan friesen
Earlier in the day, 98% chance it was our government.
The globalists in our government.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
So Alex, earlier in the day, had Jim Wright, his buddy, who was in a tower nearby and had witnessed the attack, who may have studied engineering in college.
jordan holmes
Maybe.
dan friesen
He had him on, and it blossomed into a, oh, hey, this is probably a controlled demolition thing.
jordan holmes
Of course.
dan friesen
And so, just for good measure, Alex has him back on.
jordan holmes
So the EU did the controlled demolition.
unidentified
Yep.
jordan holmes
Okay.
dan friesen
You bet.
So, yep.
unidentified
So the EU had people going into the buildings?
Mm-hmm.
Okay.
jordan holmes
All right.
unidentified
All right.
Okay.
jordan holmes
I'm sorry.
unidentified
I'm sorry.
dan friesen
I don't know why you're confused.
jordan holmes
I'm sorry.
dan friesen
So Jim is back, and Alex has new bomb evidence for him to sign off on.
unidentified
Okay.
alex jones
Now, Jimmy, you have a degree in engineering, and without me even prompting you, your wife called me here at home, and we have the interview of that post on the website right now, and said, you know, Alex, Jimmy was there.
And then she gave us her cell phone number.
We got in touch with you as you were literally walking amongst the charred bodies that were piling up.
You, on your own accord, said that it was the most beautifully done demolition job you've ever seen.
Now I'm hearing it on local and national radio, and we've heard reports that this morning there was a reporter out front as one building was smoking and the other one was smoking, that as the first one collapsed, there was an explosion, a huge explosion at the bottom.
The reporter jumped for cover.
The structural engineer who designed the building is in the Chicago Tribune, just out on InfoWars.com, and the viewers, the listeners would like to see that, saying there's no way this could happen.
He designed it to take the 777 hit.
I mean, that plane wasn't out at the time, but it would take, you know, bigger than any plane that's been designed at this time.
It might even chop the top of the building off, but those things are very strong buildings.
Instead, you see a perfect falling, and then as the top is disturbed, some sloughing off.
What were your comments there as a degreed person in structural engineering?
jim wright
Well, both myself and actually one of my colleagues who's also in construction engineering, we watched it, and both of our comments was that the building fell so perfectly.
vertically.
unidentified
There was no leaning.
jim wright
It just came straight down, which is a very hard thing to accomplish with a structural steel building because the steel tends to bend.
dan friesen
So we listened to the morning show, and at no point during those interviews was Jim walking through burning corpses that were piling up.
That's a disgusting, grotesque, and exploitative image that Alex is painting, and he should be ashamed that that was his instinct, to do something like that.
But in this clip, you can see the larger game that Alex is playing.
He's got his structural engineering expert back on so he can lay out this new bombing evidence for him and hopefully get a more full-throated endorsement of the conspiracy ideas that Alex is pushing.
You can tell so clearly how Alex is listing this stuff off for Jim as if to explain for him what he wants Jim to say in response.
Alex is essentially trying to exploit his family friend here and he's doing it using intentional misrepresentations of sources and meaningless Yeah.
a local radio guy say about a local news piece that he allegedly saw yeah it It's ridiculous.
jordan holmes
Yeah, I mean, the way he's talking to him is like, this is the type of coaching you do off-air.
So on-air, it sounds natural when they actually say the shit that you want them to.
dan friesen
Or it's like in an interrogation room.
jordan holmes
Yeah, absolutely.
No, if I was in the room with him, I'd be like, objection, leading the witness, your honor.
Like, this is very obvious.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
Jim should be saying, do I need a lawyer?
jordan holmes
Yeah, absolutely.
Do I need a lawyer?
No, you're not under arrest.
dan friesen
You're good.
You're good.
So, I mentioned that there was a little bit of a repeated thing about the idea that bodies were burning and flaming and people were jumping on fire and stuff in the morning show.
And he's still on that tip.
And I think that there's something admirable, knowing nothing else about Jim Wright, in that he does try and moderate this a little bit.
alex jones
Jimmy, the bodies, the burning bodies, the people coming out of the buildings, what did you see?
jim wright
Well, it was a little bit of an exaggeration to say.
I walked among them.
I went out the opposite side of our building, but we did see bodies.
dan friesen
He is at least trying to not play along with the parts of Alex's shit that is clearly exploitative.
And this kind of feeling of like, well, maybe this guy isn't so bad.
A part of it comes from this clip.
alex jones
Anything else you'd like to add, Jim Wright?
jim wright
Just pray and hope for the people that are in that building still trying to save people or the people that are trapped.
Nothing could be more frightening.
alex jones
All right, Jimmy Wright, I really appreciate you joining us.
dan friesen
So yeah, that's the first time that that kind of concern has been voiced.
unidentified
Yep.
jordan holmes
And Alex's response to it was, okay, fine, moving on, dickwad.
Way to give me nothing.
dan friesen
Well, but look at what's being said.
Jim is pointing out that some people are still trapped.
That's an awareness that Alex's listeners wouldn't have.
jordan holmes
Yep.
dan friesen
Up till this point.
He's not reported on anything like that, on the circumstances on the ground, the human tragedy that's happening.
And it's because it's not important to him.
jordan holmes
No, and it's not his movie.
It's not his movie of the person walking through dead bodies and the flames and the wreckage and there are no survivors.
Because if there are no survivors, you don't have to worry about helping people.
dan friesen
Right, you just have to worry about Klaus Schwab, who Alex won't know about for another 20 years.
jordan holmes
You got it.
Yep.
dan friesen
But is the big bad guy in the world.
jordan holmes
If you talk about survivors, you have to start saving and helping people.
dan friesen
Well, or at least you have to explain why you're not concerned.
jordan holmes
Yeah, or why you don't give a fuck.
Yeah.
dan friesen
So, Alex takes more calls, and he gets a guy who brings up an idea that Alex will take to quite a bit in the future, and that is...
jordan holmes
The Super EU.
dan friesen
No.
The planes were remote-controlled.
jordan holmes
Ah, yes.
unidentified
And I'll tell you what, this whole thing looked too complicated.
And I just wonder what the chances are that, you know, the technology exists.
Those aircraft operate totally on electronics that the aircraft weren't fixed.
I wonder if we will ever find that out.
alex jones
Well, you know, it's funny you bring that up, Jim or John.
unidentified
That's okay.
alex jones
Did you see on my website the Fox television piece about the second episode of The Lone Gunman this year?
You know, the X-File type show?
unidentified
I missed that, Alex.
I'm sorry.
alex jones
A secret government agency takes control of an airplane, my computer, and tries to crash it into the world.
Trade Center.
Because just like Governor Keating's brother writing that book, Final Jihad, three years before the Oklahoma City bombing, where he mentions Mr. McVeigh and the Alford P. Federal Building, they like to brag, don't they?
unidentified
Yes, the technology's there, the satellites are in place.
dan friesen
So look, the Lone Gunman episode doesn't prove shit, but it's the kind of evidence that Alex really loves.
Oh, it's the best.
Because it blows people's minds.
unidentified
What?
dan friesen
Right.
And that book by Keating, he could have easily put in the McVeigh and those details after the fact.
Yeah, 100%.
Three years prior.
That's all Oklahoma City conspiracy lore nonsense.
jordan holmes
It's very important to pretend it is.
dan friesen
It's a load of shit.
jordan holmes
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
dan friesen
So Alex has got basically nothing, but it's exciting that nothing.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
These are exciting pieces of nothing.
jordan holmes
It is a little bit of proving 9-11 was fake by...
Pointing to a Mandela effect of the Berenstain Bears, you know?
And you're like, see?
dan friesen
I gotta be honest, I'm convinced.
jordan holmes
Yeah, I mean, well, if it's spelled differently then, then I guess you're right.
unidentified
Yep.
dan friesen
So now this next clip blew my mind.
jordan holmes
Okay.
dan friesen
I could not have been prepared for this.
jordan holmes
Okay.
alex jones
I told you we'd have wide open phones, and we do have wide open phones.
We're about to go back to John in Kingsville, Clayton in Missouri, Cindy in West Virginia, Mary in Oklahoma, Daryl in...
Texas and others.
But coming up in about 5-10 minutes, we have an unexpected guest that's going to be joining us.
We already had an eyewitness on.
It was in the World Financial Center right next door to the World Trade Center towers.
This unexpected guest is my friend, Joe Rogan.
dan friesen
What?
jordan holmes
Joe Rogan.
Don't.
No.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
No, no, no, no, no, Dan.
Dan?
Do not tell me.
That Joe Rogan was on Alex Jones' show on the night of 9-11.
unidentified
Dan, there are four guys, okay?
jordan holmes
We need more guys.
dan friesen
We need more.
jordan holmes
We love people because they keep fucking showing up everywhere!
dan friesen
It's so bizarre to me, though.
You know, you have Rogan showing up on...
But I guess it's kind of different because Richard Belzer was on the day of the Boston bombing.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
But that was just a coincidence.
He was there and then he decided to stick around because there was a bombing happening.
jordan holmes
Yeah, and he was having fun.
He was the Bells.
dan friesen
Whereas this is Rogan coming on because there was a bombing and he wants to talk about it.
jordan holmes
Why isn't this known?
Why isn't this known?
Why isn't he talking about it?
dan friesen
Whenever he talks about his friendship with that, he's like, the night of 9-11.
jordan holmes
I feel like that's a notable moment.
unidentified
That is a remarkable thing that I would tell people.
dan friesen
You always remember where you were on the evening of 9-11.
jordan holmes
I was on InfoWars.
How do you not say that?
dan friesen
That's weird.
jordan holmes
Why is this?
dan friesen
I wasn't ready for that.
jordan holmes
He's not on, he can't be on.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
I was expecting literally any, I was like ready for Nugent.
I was ready for anybody.
But I can't believe that on 9-11, Joe fucking Rogan.
dan friesen
2001 Rogan, too.
jordan holmes
Fucking news radio Rogan.
No, this was a few years after that had already been canceled.
dan friesen
This is Fear Factor Rogan.
jordan holmes
This is Fear Factor Rogan.
You're right, you're right.
dan friesen
Yeah, this is yelling at people, Rogan.
jordan holmes
I don't know the, I don't know, no, you made this up.
I refuse.
I believe you have gone back in time and forced these two men together to justify our life.
dan friesen
If I could manifest things, I would not do that.
jordan holmes
Please don't.
dan friesen
So Alex has basically convinced himself of his own conspiracies.
unidentified
Sure.
And before I let you go, Alex, I wanted to say to the listeners, get on the phone.
The first thing I did today was I called Senator Utterson and Senator Graham.
And voiced my concerns about what happened today.
They need to hear from us right now more than ever.
alex jones
And are you letting them know that you smell a rat?
unidentified
Yes, sir, I sure did.
I let them know what I thought about the building imploding also.
Obviously imploding.
alex jones
Well, you just heard a structural engineer and the designers in the Chicago Tribune saying that couldn't happen.
unidentified
It sure did.
alex jones
Yeah, because of shape charges at the columns at the base.
dan friesen
So none of that's real.
I mean, he had a friend of his who knows a little bit about engineering.
At best, an amateur engineer.
jordan holmes
Which is not a thing.
dan friesen
Sure.
jordan holmes
I mean, unless he's a model train guy.
dan friesen
Maybe.
jordan holmes
Ah, he could be.
dan friesen
I don't know what Jim's got going on in his basement.
jordan holmes
Probably a building.
dan friesen
Maybe.
So, yeah, you got that.
Congratulations.
That's not much to go on.
jordan holmes
Not a lot.
dan friesen
And then you have a lie about a Chicago Tribune article.
jordan holmes
You got a big lie, yeah.
dan friesen
Great.
jordan holmes
Well, it's confirmed.
dan friesen
There's nothing here.
There's literally nothing.
jordan holmes
But it's loud nothing.
dan friesen
True.
And it's interesting nothing, like the lone gunman.
It's fun.
jordan holmes
The thought, the impulse that a human being would have to think after hours after two planes took down the World Trade Center.
dan friesen
And you think 20,000 plus people are dead.
jordan holmes
You call Lindsey Graham.
To tell him that there were charges on the bottom of the building.
dan friesen
Because I misread or I didn't read a Chicago Tribune article that Alex is lying to me about.
jordan holmes
Right, right, right, right.
And then Alex says, they need that now more than ever.
Yes, right now.
That is the first thing that our Congress people...
dan friesen
If not now, when?
jordan holmes
Exactly.
They'll never do anything about it if it weren't for this guy.
dan friesen
So Alex is just misusing sources and shit, but it's also intentional.
It's very clearly intentional.
alex jones
Two large passenger planes, medium-sized, slammed into both the South and North Tower of the World Trade Center today.
We had a structural engineer on, the designer...
in the Chicago Tribune that that is impossible what happened.
Only shaped charges at the bottom could cause that.
jordan holmes
That's what he's saying?
alex jones
Kevin Booth's brother-in-law, who I know very well, who is an investment guy that works in the financial tower, said that explosions obviously did go off.
He was an eyewitness several hundred yards away from it.
The buildings came down.
We had the Pentagon being attacked.
dan friesen
You simply would not act like this if you were a sincere person acting with honest motives.
If your goal was to deliver the facts or even the facts as you see them, you would not mess around and fake your sources like this.
This isn't sloppiness.
This can only really be the product of intentional deception.
There are two giant manipulations that Alex is trying to pull off in that clip.
The first is the way he discusses the Chicago Tribune article.
The engineers who designed the World Trade Center didn't say that this was impossible, but now Alex is saying that and adding in language that makes it sound like this source included them saying that only shaped charges could do this.
He includes that as an extension of his sentence where he's relaying the alleged comments from this engineer, so anyone listening would obviously think this was Alex continuing to convey what was in this Tribune article, when in reality it's just Alex making shit up.
jordan holmes
Yeah, if you read it, then there would be quotation marks around a certain spot, and then it would be a comma, and then his editorializing would continue.
But if you're listening to it, you don't know where those scare quotes are, and there you go.
dan friesen
This isn't something he's doing on accident.
It's to make his shit talk appear like it's reporting that's based on something.
The second thing that Alex is doing is the way he's characterizing his interview with Jim Wright.
You can see in that 40-second clip, he mentions talking to Jim twice, but he's trying to make it seem like these mentions are about two different people that he's interviewed.
One mention is of a family friend who was a first-hand witness to the attack, and the other is a structural engineer.
If you were just trying to recap for anyone tuning in, you wouldn't present things this way.
He mentions a structural engineer that he had on, then lies about the Tribune article, then talks about his friend who's an investment banker and first-hand witness.
of Jim's interview are separated because Alex is hoping to disconnect these ideas in his listener's mind in order to make the narrative stick easier.
Right.
unidentified
The first hand witness, Jim Wright, who's an investment banker and friend of Alex's, should be something interesting that happened on the show but ultimately it should be forgotten.
dan friesen
All Alex wants the audience to remember is that there was a seemingly very knowledgeable structural engineer whose name doesn't really matter who was on Alex's show on the day of 9-11 who said that the building had to have had explore Yeah.
Alex does this kind of shit all the time.
In his deposition for the Texas Sandy Hook case, there was a particularly good illustration of this same behavior.
mark bankston
Mr. Jones, before we break, I asked you about your statement about what state police officers were threatened.
And you told me Mr. Halbig and maybe somebody else.
unidentified
Correct?
Mm-hmm.
Okay.
School investigation experts were threatened.
Who was that?
alex jones
It wasn't just Halbig.
I remember there was some other groups and people asking questions and some other professors other than Fetzer.
I wasn't really going off what Fetzer said.
unidentified
Okay.
mark bankston
And then you said that in addition to those two groups, that some school safety experts had been threatened.
unidentified
Who was that?
alex jones
I think I was talking about Halbig.
jordan holmes
Right.
mark bankston
I mean, all of these are talking about Halbig, right?
unidentified
No.
dan friesen
This is one of Alex's very common tactics where he'll take one piece of information, obscure it, and then multiply it into a bunch of different places and pieces of information in order to create the appearance that he has so much more evidence than he actually does.
In that clip from his deposition, he knew that if he just said that Wolfgang Halbig had been threatened, it would seem like a very specific incident that relates to one person who was also harassing victims' family members.
But through Alex's rhetorical magic, you now have the specter of state police, school investigation experts, and school safety experts that had been threatened, and this creates the appearance of a giant coordinated effort to intimidate the people who would be in a position to challenge the official narrative of what happened at Sandy Hook.
This is an effective tool to use because if you aren't paying close attention or if you haven't listened to the episode where various things are alleged to have happened, you may just passively accept that Alex has a ton of details that he's working off of when that's definitely not the case.
You assume that he has this structural engineer, professional, and a friend who's a first-hand witness.
We're the same person, and he's not a structural engineer.
jordan holmes
It helps that you're listening to it on the radio.
Otherwise, you would have to...
Like, if you were seeing this in real life, his friend would be wearing a nice suit, investment bankery, and then he's like, ah, the structural engineer, and his friend would go behind the curtain, put a little cap on and a mustache, and be like, ah, I'm the structural engineer friend!
Yeah, on the radio, you get away with that a lot easier.
dan friesen
Right, right.
And so, like, in the same way that Alex wants this to appear, like, there's a number of things, not just...
Wolfgang Halbig whining.
He wants that appearance because the actual reality sucks and it doesn't work for him.
The actual reality of his interview with Jim Wright also doesn't work.
And so he has to obscure it and create multiple tendrils that he can use for different things out of it.
And that's something that he does a bit.
And that's one of the things that's actually really difficult to trace down.
It's one of the tactics that he uses that it's...
It requires having listened to a ton of his shit in order to be like, that's where this is coming from.
And we're kind of fortunate that this is kind of self-contained to some extent.
He's referencing this thing that happened earlier in the day and we listened to that episode.
Right.
unidentified
And so that helps make that track down easier.
dan friesen
But he does this a lot with things that are like, well, I'll never be able to know what the fuck he's talking about.
jordan holmes
No, this is one of the things that I think is probably the most common and maybe useful tool of media literacy at all is just understanding what people are saying when they say experts.
You know, like you read any number of different things about any number of different things and they're quoting experts and the people who are there quoting...
Don't trust...
Quote, experts.
dan friesen
Ever.
jordan holmes
On anything.
dan friesen
Well, conditionally trust.
jordan holmes
Conditionally trust, though.
But not whenever Alex is saying it.
dan friesen
So, expert in fix-em-ups at a news radio station.
jordan holmes
Fix-em-ups at a news radio station.
dan friesen
Tech guy.
jordan holmes
They did do the space episode one time.
Well, he did destroy everybody.
dan friesen
Joe Gorelli.
jordan holmes
Yep.
dan friesen
Oh, come on.
The line you're supposed to...
Your last name's Gorelli?
Joe Rogan is on, and Alex gives him quite an intro.
alex jones
Here to give us the Hollywood perspective is my good buddy who knows all about the globalists, Joe Rogan.
He, of course, was one of the top guys on the popular syndicated show, News Radio, and now the host of Fear Factor, with all the stunts, number one rated show on television.
And I was honored with Kevin Booth, making a film with Joe, told us he wanted to come on.
I am just really excited about having Joe Rogan on.
Joe, it's good to talk to you.
joe rogan
Hey, Alex, what's going on, man?
dan friesen
I don't want to sound like a dick, because I love news radio, and I think Rogan was great in his role, but you're kidding yourself if you say he was one of the top guys on that show.
alex jones
Yeah.
dan friesen
It was an ensemble cast, but you're high if you think that he was in the varsity level of that ensemble.
jordan holmes
I mean, fifth!
joe rogan
Fifth!
jordan holmes
Maybe!
dan friesen
I actually sat down and thought about this for quite a while.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
I think he's, at best, sixth banana.
jordan holmes
Yeah, you think so?
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
Let's see.
dan friesen
Dave Foley and Phil Hartman are tied for first.
jordan holmes
Sure.
dan friesen
Maura Tierney is right below that.
jordan holmes
100%.
She's amazing.
dan friesen
Yeah.
And in the, like...
The clump of the top of the ensemble.
Then there's the people who have storylines that are pretty consistently featured.
So you have Vicky Lewis, you have Andy Dick, and you have Jimmy James.
jordan holmes
Yeah, Stephen Root.
dan friesen
And then underneath that you have Candy Alexander and Joe Rogan.
jordan holmes
Because Candy Alexander was fucking brutally underused.
dan friesen
She was fantastic.
Yeah, I agree.
And you can make an argument that Rogan may have also been somewhat underused.
jordan holmes
No, I think Rogan was used exactly the right amount, because any more and he would be exactly like Rogan, which is annoying and really bothersome to me.
dan friesen
It's very possible.
Yeah, an argument can be made that he was accurately used.
jordan holmes
I would say so!
dan friesen
But, um...
jordan holmes
Yeah, man, Steven Root is...
Sneak...
Watching news radio then, I would not have thought, one, Steven Root is going to look better 30 years later.
dan friesen
Sure.
jordan holmes
And two, he's going to have the career that maybe I envy the most out of anybody ever.
dan friesen
He's a solid actor.
jordan holmes
And he's amazing.
dan friesen
Yeah.
So yeah, sixth banana probably.
Although, I mean, it's a memorable moment, certainly.
unidentified
Oh, sure.
dan friesen
Two Vulcain is one of the big...
jordan holmes
All time.
unidentified
Yeah.
Not many beyond that.
dan friesen
Well, there was that, he's part of that, we're just talking about the shaft.
jordan holmes
That is true.
dan friesen
I can dig it.
jordan holmes
Yeah, yeah, that one was good.
dan friesen
He was a part of that exchange.
jordan holmes
That was a great morning meeting.
dan friesen
His timing was good.
jordan holmes
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Me want to be big, strong refrigerator man, but refrigerator, so messy.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
So very messy.
dan friesen
He had some wins, but come on, guys.
Come on.
unidentified
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
No, no, no, no, no.
jordan holmes
I mean, Phil Hartman, if you even breathe without saying Phil Hartman and NewsRadio in the same sentence, I'm bothersome.
dan friesen
If you said Andy Dick was one of the top guys on NewsRadio...
jordan holmes
I might fight you.
dan friesen
No, I would agree with that.
jordan holmes
I disagree.
I disagree.
dan friesen
Matthew is featured constantly.
jordan holmes
I understand.
dan friesen
There's always stuff going on with Matthew.
jordan holmes
Well, yes, but anybody could...
Well, I will admit...
The way he fell was pretty spectacular.
unidentified
Yes.
jordan holmes
He knew how to fall.
dan friesen
Him and Vicky Lewis.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
Like, they were the zaniness on the show.
unidentified
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Totally.
dan friesen
And so, like, they were featured a lot because you need that.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
That dynamic.
unidentified
The ball.
dan friesen
You need the chaos.
jordan holmes
The ball episode where they throw...
unidentified
Yeah.
jordan holmes
That one.
Yeah.
dan friesen
The complaint box.
jordan holmes
Oh, God.
The complaint box is the greatest episode of TV.
That and the door.
The cane, of course.
Absolutely.
dan friesen
Or the smoking one.
jordan holmes
This one displeases me.
dan friesen
This one I'll keep.
This one I'll keep.
unidentified
Oh, man.
dan friesen
Anyway, enough news radio talk, because we've got to talk to Rogan.
Yeah.
So, Alex, you know, he started out the morning show wanting people to know that he predicted this.
He started out the evening show talking about how he predicted this.
Now he's going to start off this interview with making Rogan admit that Alex predicted this.
alex jones
Joe, you know I was predicting this, telling you all about it.
joe rogan
Well, you know, you do predict that the government is doing these things, but I mean, you don't believe that there's people in other countries that hate us?
alex jones
Oh, I know there are, but I know this.
MSNBC, Bin Laden comes home to roost.
His CIA ties are only the beginning of the story, MSNBC.
joe rogan
Well, I mean, he supposedly had CIA ties when he was working for the CIA, but that doesn't mean that he didn't, like, get angry when he was working with the CIA and decided that that's when he decided to hate America.
alex jones
Well, now they're saying it could be Iraq.
joe rogan
To deal with the CIA is pretty ridiculous.
alex jones
No, I hear you.
Now they're saying it could be Iraq.
They're saying it could be anybody.
It could be Iran.
My question is, why didn't we take Baghdad in 1991?
dan friesen
So, if I had a ton more time to prepare this episode, I would have made a supercut of every time Alex reads that headline about Bin Laden coming home to roost.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
It's been probably a hundred times he's used it, and he's never actually discussed the content of the article or how, you know, he glosses over about how it's about the 1993 bombing.
jordan holmes
Right, right, right.
dan friesen
He's got the headline, and optically, that's as good as any evidence, so whatever.
Alex throws that headline at Joe, who has the most common-sense reply that Bin Laden Bin Laden may have been working with the CIA in the past, but to think that he still is would be ridiculous.
Alex should disagree with this, but he can't really support his own argument, so he just gives up on that point to Joe, who essentially wins.
And then he moves on to his next talking point about how he should have killed Saddam and taken over Baghdad in the last Gulf War.
What's going on is that Alex has a few conversation paths as options, and he went down one with Joe, which turned out to be a dead end.
To distract the audience from realizing that it is a dead end and Alex has nothing to say about this article that he's constantly bringing up, he pivots to a completely different subject.
This is disorienting if you're taking the conversation seriously and think there's a coherent point going on here.
Alex is saying that he's been predicting this and that the government...
uses these kinds of events to accrue power, which Rogan agrees with.
At this point in the day, there's already some talk about bin Laden being responsible going on, so Alex trots out this article from 1998 to demonstrate that he's correct and that even if bin Laden did it, it was still the government.
Joe points out that this doesn't prove that bin Laden is working with the CIA now, which is at the crux of what Alex is suggesting by bringing up that article, and then Alex completely crumbles and starts talking about Saddam.
This is not a normal or rational conversation or interview path, because it's neither of these things.
It's an attempt to get Joe to mirror Alex's talking points, which failed in its first attempt, so Alex tried another road.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
That's what's going on.
jordan holmes
Yeah, it is interesting to me that he didn't immediately bring up that the EU did it, because the EU is the most likely...
It's 50% over both Iraq...
And the government.
dan friesen
Well, Joe Rogan is no people at the grocery store.
jordan holmes
So why wouldn't Alex be like, hey man, I'm hearing...
Germany did it.
What are you thinking?
The EU, they're just launching this currency.
Germany, they've been coming for us in the past, right?
dan friesen
Why not?
I think that Alex maybe wants to ease into it a little bit.
You don't want to throw that at Rogan right off the bat.
You don't want to blow his mind.
jordan holmes
Maybe he knows that it sounds crazy to even Joe Rogan.
dan friesen
I don't know.
Maybe he thinks that Rogan will...
Bite down on that cyanide capsule if he hears that it's the EU.
Are you kidding me?
I can't deal with this reality.
jordan holmes
It is funny because the way Alex talks makes you feel like he's going down in this hedge maze, you know, where he's turning down this corner and he's like, well, nothing there, so I'm going to go back around that.
But if you listen to the totality, it's more like...
We're in the hedge maze.
And he's just creating bullshit as you go along, and you're trying to get to a conversation, and there's nowhere to go.
It's just a maze.
unidentified
Yep.
dan friesen
That's about it.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
So, Alex wants the Hollywood response to what's going on.
And I'm going to apologize in advance.
There's a slur in here.
Our slur coming up.
jordan holmes
Oh, boy.
dan friesen
And here's what Joe sees.
alex jones
What are your friends out in Hollywood saying about all this?
joe rogan
You know, people are freaking out.
I mean, there's a bunch of people that take the reproach.
It's like, hey, let's bomb everybody.
There's always going to be that.
jordan holmes
That was Alex.
He said Newcomb.
joe rogan
The racist approach.
People assume that everybody of Middle Eastern descent is responsible for this, and you hear a lot of racial slurs, and you hear it everywhere from all sorts of different people.
alex jones
Yeah, I've been hearing camel jockeys and all those terms on mainstream radio.
dan friesen
Yeah, no, absolutely.
unidentified
I just heard it on your show.
dan friesen
And also, I have not included it, but there have been some callers who have said things that border on definite slurs.
I would say that they are pejorative terms.
jordan holmes
That's a good word.
Pejorative is a great euphemism for a fuck-off word.
dan friesen
So, Alex, if you really look at the way that Joe is criticizing...
The media.
jordan holmes
Yeah, he's criticizing Alex.
dan friesen
Yeah, Alex falls into that.
unidentified
He's saying it's Alex.
dan friesen
Perhaps more so even than a large percentage of the media that I watch.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
I don't...
I mean, there was not that much...
I mean, there was some saber rattling.
Right.
But not as much as you might have expected.
jordan holmes
I think we need to nuke him!
That's what Alex said!
dan friesen
Immediately.
jordan holmes
Top of a nuke on him!
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
Jesus!
dan friesen
There was less of that, except for that Secretary of State.
jordan holmes
That guy's nuts.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
Gotta kill someone.
jordan holmes
Gotta kill somebody.
dan friesen
Yeah, that was an outlier.
jordan holmes
What a psycho.
dan friesen
So you were like, hey, why won't he say it's the EU?
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
And if you just waited a little while, we would have gotten there.
jordan holmes
All right, all right.
dan friesen
And your theory might have been correct.
alex jones
Joe, what about the EU run by the Germans?
They're rolling out their new currency.
Stock markets are already crashing globally.
The EU was up against the dollar.
You know, everything is about currency speculation.
A lot of the evidence I'm getting from my sources say this could be an EU move, and look how they attacked our very financial center to destroy the dollar.
joe rogan
Wait a minute.
Let me get this straight.
You think that this was Europe attacking America to destroy our economy?
jordan holmes
Yeah.
alex jones
I know that in Davos, Switzerland, eight months ago, they announced that they were going to be preeminent.
The dollar was going down.
jordan holmes
That's what he thinks.
alex jones
And there's been a global fight going on.
joe rogan
I think, you know, until we have any evidence of who did this, anything else is just irresponsible speculation.
alex jones
Joe, my point is we have to ask who is behind this.
You talk about irresponsible speculation.
Look at the mainstream media.
They're out there saying a hundred different people did it.
dan friesen
I think that Joe, his response is alright.
You know, because there is a, what are you talking about?
He clearly doesn't believe him.
unidentified
Right.
dan friesen
He clearly doesn't agree.
unidentified
Absolutely not.
dan friesen
And he's being polite in the pushback in terms of like, this is irresponsible speculation, basically.
unidentified
Right, right, right, right.
dan friesen
And I think that that's, you know, there's something to tip the old cap.
unidentified
Sure, sure.
jordan holmes
I mean, listen, we're already, the problems that need to be solved.
Happen way before we get to Joe giving anybody a lesson in ethics and journalism.
Okay, so I'm not going to complain about that.
dan friesen
Well, here's something that I was surprised about.
I mean, first of all, I was surprised that Joe was here.
And then second, I was surprised that as I was listening to this, I think that Joe Rogan, at this point, is who he thinks he is now.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
In 2001, Joe Rogan is...
His self-perception in 2022.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
Because he can push back on Alex.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
And this doesn't go well.
unidentified
Ooh.
dan friesen
This interview goes bad.
unidentified
Ooh.
jordan holmes
That's nice.
dan friesen
On 9-11.
jordan holmes
That's, boy, all the jokes that I won't make.
dan friesen
It's really surreal to know what we're about to discuss and recognize that this is the evening of 9-11.
When we were doing our last episode...
jordan holmes
Sometimes scenarios are so big, so vast, that the universe is...
You think about the pale blue dot.
Carl Sagan talking about the pale blue dot.
Carl Sagan would be like, fucking no way is Joe Rogan showing up on 9-11.
What the...
What the fuck are we talking about?
Blow this shit up!
Nuke the dot!
That's what Carl Sagan is saying about this appearance.
That's what I'm telling everybody right now.
dan friesen
Yeah, it's like if Alex was doing his show and Pearl Harbor happened and he has Milton Berle on to tell him, hey, calm down.
Stop.
jordan holmes
No, I think it was South America.
What is wrong with you?
dan friesen
Yeah.
Absurd.
So, Alex, you know, he's not like the commies.
The commies want to kill people.
And here, again, Joe pushes back on some stuff Alex is throwing out.
alex jones
It looks like they did shoot down that plane outside Pittsburgh.
joe rogan
Well, yeah, well, I mean, I can't say I'm glad they did it, but, you know, if it costs fewer lives, then I guess it was the right thing to do it.
alex jones
Well, Joe, I'm all up front.
I mean, the communists have killed 200 million people, but the colleges tell you they're cool.
So I care about human life, but...
joe rogan
You know, I don't think colleges tell you communists are cool.
I think they tell you that the idea of socialism is cool because socialism is what, you know, a lot of, you know, educational people want.
They want us to share wealth and share, you know, I think it's ridiculous, but I think it's the ideal that they support not communists itself and not, you know, ruthless communist dictatorships and what they do to their people.
alex jones
Well, they called him Uncle Joe Stalin until the 1950s in the newspapers.
joe rogan
Yeah, well.
unidentified
Yeah, well.
jordan holmes
I've heard that from that.
Yeah, well, I have heard from my own mouth many a time.
unidentified
Yeah, well.
jordan holmes
All right.
dan friesen
I guess if you're hinging your conspiracy and your rebuttal to my point is they called him Uncle Joe.
jordan holmes
Well, okay.
dan friesen
You're on solid ground, baby.
jordan holmes
Moving on then.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
Yep.
dan friesen
I think that Joe appears to be far more capable of critical thinking.
He appears to be far more able to hold his own.
He has a centered, grounded position of a thought.
jordan holmes
Yep.
dan friesen
He's not going to be bullied by Alex into being like, whoa, maybe it is the EU.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
Holy shit.
jordan holmes
Don't get old.
I think that's the lesson we're learning here.
Don't get old.
Everybody who gets old winds up sucking later on.
unidentified
No, no.
dan friesen
I know he liked weed, I'm pretty sure, even back then.
jordan holmes
Yeah, of course.
unidentified
I would assume.
jordan holmes
No, no, no, no.
I'm not going to say that doing drugs for 30 years has messed his brain up.
unidentified
No, no, no.
dan friesen
I'm not saying that either.
unidentified
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
dan friesen
I'm saying that maybe one of the drugs he did, did it.
jordan holmes
Oh.
dan friesen
We'll never know which.
jordan holmes
You don't think so?
dan friesen
Well, I mean, how would you judge?
jordan holmes
Well, I mean, we don't know if he licked Toad with Tyson.
dan friesen
Again, it's not the same as licking Toad.
jordan holmes
I'm sorry.
I'm still going to use the colloquial term.
dan friesen
Fair enough.
jordan holmes
Because you can't say doing Toad, and I don't want to say snorting Toad or smoking Toad.
dan friesen
I feel like Toad is not a culprit here.
jordan holmes
Okay.
You want to say DMT?
dan friesen
No, I don't want to say that either.
I feel like he's got to have done a ton of like...
Other weird things that no one's ever heard of.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
Like chemicals.
unidentified
Right.
dan friesen
Experimental chemicals and stuff.
jordan holmes
Here's what I'm going to say.
I'm going to say it has nothing to do with drugs.
And I'm going to say the number one drug that would cause something like this is surrounding yourself with yes men and people like Alex Jones who will consistently reinforce your position regardless of whatever it is that you are saying, thus leading you down to a lazy thought pattern because you never have to try.
dan friesen
That's true.
That could be a part of it.
Also, cultivating a fan base full of people who don't challenge you in terms of staying on some kind of a critical path, I think, is probably corrosive.
jordan holmes
If he had just done drugs and not become famous, I think he would be a better person.
dan friesen
If people still made him own up to hosting the man show.
unidentified
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Or being on InfoWars on 9-11!
dan friesen
Boy, that's weird.
So yeah, Rogan is not playing ball with Alex, really.
And so Alex can bring up something that Joe can respond to and be like, well, Joe's response can just be like, well, I don't know about that.
They're not into communist dictators.
They're just some of these socialist ideas.
Medicare.
jordan holmes
Right, right, right.
dan friesen
Social Security.
jordan holmes
I do like he's like, which I think are fucking stupid, but whatever, those smart people, those educational people.
dan friesen
I think he thinks Social Security is probably fine, but he's talking about redistribution and whatever.
But whatever that is, Alex is realizing that this is not going to work.
So I'm going to have to blindside him.
And so he tries to with the Northwood stuff.
jordan holmes
Gotcha.
alex jones
I had James Bamford, former 2020 executive on.
Different network from you.
You're NBC.
But it says, new book on NSA shows light on secrets, U.S. terror plan called Cuban Invasion Pretext by Scott Chain and Tom Bowman.
It says here, this is the Baltimore Sun, also New York Times.
They wanted to, quote, casualty list, that means numbers of dead, in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of indignation.
They wanted to blow up passenger airliners, attack the Marines at Guantanamo, using Army dressed up as Cubans as a pretext to invade Cuba.
Now, Kennedy said no.
Six months later, his head was sloppy Joe's.
Joe, how do you respond to that?
I know you're a web guy.
You can read the stories and hear the clips.
joe rogan
Well, you know, I've heard any million number of different theories on why and how Kennedy was assassinated and by who.
I suspect one of them out there is true.
I suspect the government probably had something to do with it.
But as far as that, I mean...
alex jones
But Joe, not even the Kennedy thing.
It's confirmed NSA documents.
The Joint Chiefs of Staff signed on to it.
dan friesen
So Alex has already realized that Joe is clearly not in favor of declaring that the globalists or the EU did 9-11, and Alex has no argument to make that they did, so he's in a tough position.
He knows that Joe isn't a pushover in 2001 and that he has his own celebrity and he isn't 100% bought into Alex's shit like the other guests Alex has had on 9-11.
That's tough because if he starts asking too many questions about why Alex believes the things he's saying or what proof he has to base his claims on, it might become clear that Alex is just making shit up.
So Alex goes on offense.
This clip is him putting Joe in a completely unfair and unwinnable situation.
Joe has expressed that he doesn't think the government necessarily did this and questions Alex's idea about a possible motive.
So instead of arguing that point, Alex throws Operation Northwoods at him.
Joe doesn't know about this document.
He's never read it.
So this conversation has to happen entirely on Alex's terms or not at all.
Joe has to accept Alex's framing and details or say, I haven't read that, so I can't have this conversation.
The latter option is more responsible, but also isn't super productive in a radio interview setting.
Plus, if you know Alex, you know he's not going to respect that.
He's just going to have the conversation anyway.
Alex is forcing Joe to engage with something he knows nothing about, which supposedly proves that the government had plans approved to do a 9-11 back in the 60s.
So from an optics standpoint, Alex is making it Joe's responsibility to debunk this document before they can even really begin to talk about the actual matter at hand, which is impossible.
jordan holmes
Yeah, sometimes whenever moving the goalposts isn't going to work for you, what you have to do is switch to playing highlight.
dan friesen
Right.
jordan holmes
So you're like, ah, football's really hard.
I'm not going to do that shit.
Highly it is, buddy.
dan friesen
Or that old Thomas Jefferson quote.
Whenever they start figuring out the answers, that's when I change the questions.
unidentified
Ah!
jordan holmes
That was a great Thomas Jefferson quote.
dan friesen
Yep.
This is, what Alex is doing, is in essence the same thing he does in terms of using OKC as cover for the 9-11 bomb theories.
It's an attempt to force someone to complete some other task before you get to the real issue that you're supposed to be talking about.
It's like Alex is an NPC in a video game sending you on a fetch quest in the middle of the main mission, but it's a poorly designed game, so you kind of know that once you finish that side quest, they're just going to send you on another.
It's going to be a long time until you get to the main mission.
It's going to take a lot of patience to have any actual conversation with Alex.
It's just going to keep throwing out, oh no, I need an amulet if we're going to go into this cave or whatever the fuck.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
It's annoying.
jordan holmes
You want to know what my Kennedy conspiracy theory is?
dan friesen
Please.
jordan holmes
My conspiracy theory is this.
dan friesen
Wait, wait, wait.
Let me...
You?
jordan holmes
No.
No, no, no.
It's even worse.
dan friesen
Oh, boy.
jordan holmes
It's the government that is disseminating conspiracy theories because they don't want people to know how easy it is to just murder the president.
Like, honestly, if you look back at American history, there have been at least four should-have-been-murdered presidents that weren't murdered.
dan friesen
That's true.
jordan holmes
You know, you've got Andrew Jackson twice.
Two guns jammed in his face.
Should have had his head blown off.
dan friesen
Teddy Roosevelt.
jordan holmes
Teddy Roosevelt, gone.
Ronald Reagan, out of here.
dan friesen
Yeah, those were not sophisticated plans.
jordan holmes
No, you do not need a sophisticated plan.
You can just shoot them.
They're just dudes.
I'm not saying...
I'm not just...
Obviously...
dan friesen
Obviously not.
Obviously not.
Saying that.
Obviously not.
jordan holmes
But it is not a complicated process.
But you can hear it in Joe's voice, too.
He's like...
There are so many things.
There's so many moving parts.
There's got to be a complicated plan behind it.
There's got to be somebody with money behind it.
It's got to be that Ocean's Eleven heist.
And it can really just be a dude who's like...
dan friesen
None of those other ones were.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
And for what it's worth, I mean, even the...
I mean, there was some planning and conspiracy involved in the Lincoln assassination.
jordan holmes
Yeah, of course.
Not like, oh, we got to get Russia involved.
dan friesen
Yeah.
That is interesting.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
I mean, I don't believe your premise.
jordan holmes
No, I'm not saying the government is actually doing that.
dan friesen
But it is interesting to think about how there's an expectation that that has to be the most Byzantine thing.
jordan holmes
Yeah, no, everybody thinks that it should be really, really hard to assassinate the president of South.
But if you look back at assassinations that worked and didn't work, all you really need is the chutzpah to try, and maybe the chips will fall where they may.
dan friesen
Well, I'm going to need you to go on Rogan while we're in Austin.
And ask him about this period.
jordan holmes
I think that's a good one.
dan friesen
So, look.
Alex can't handle this interview.
Alex has some thoughts about Hollywood.
And unfortunately, Joe is in Hollywood.
alex jones
What does this do for our image-oriented country?
What actions might Hollywood take to help prompt things up?
joe rogan
I don't think Hollywood ever should be in a position to take any actions whatsoever.
Hollywood is about entertainment and making money.
You know, Hollywood trying to prop things up I think is pretty ridiculous.
alex jones
But they're kind of doing that.
You know, they're taking a lot of federal money on some of these Army scripts and stuff.
joe rogan
Are they really?
alex jones
Oh, yeah.
Movies like Pearl Harbor?
Yeah, exactly.
joe rogan
They take Army money in what way?
alex jones
All the free equipment, and then the Army tells them how to write the script and what to do and what to take out?
joe rogan
Well, you know what?
I highly doubt the Army tells them what to do and what to take out.
I think they do probably tell them that they can't have the Army or the military viewed in a poor way, like displayed in a poor way.
But I highly doubt they give them money.
For them, it's also good publicity, though.
You have to realize, I mean, for recruitment...
To watch a movie like Pearl Harbor where the kids join the Navy and become heroes, you know, for an impressionable young kid, now that might be just the push that they need to get them into the armed services.
alex jones
Yeah, it created a glut of people wanting to fly F-14s when Tom Cruise made Top Gun.
joe rogan
Yeah, no, absolutely.
And the military is well aware of that.
dan friesen
Yeah, so Alex is arguing against his own point.
jordan holmes
Yeah, I'm confused as to why Alex thinks that this is a conversation he's having.
dan friesen
Because he fucking crumbled.
He tried to make a claim.
Rogan was like, nah, that doesn't track.
I don't think that.
No way.
jordan holmes
Okay, next try.
What else do I got in my...
He's just pulling bags.
He's got a bag of candies.
And he's just throwing them at Joe Rogan.
Like, does this one taste good?
Does this one taste good?
dan friesen
Let's see if the media tastes good.
jordan holmes
Okay.
joe rogan
And what the media's there for...
It's a business to make money.
And as soon as it falters in any way, shape, or form, they will adjust it and correct it and put it back in a position to make money.
Whether that means hiring attractive people to work as news anchors or sprucing up the soundtrack or doing whatever the hell they have to do, they're there to get ratings.
Now, look at what's going on with shark attacks.
There's less shark attacks this year than any other year before, but they've locked onto it as a point of focus, and now they talk about it constantly.
alex jones
And then suddenly you see HBO re-airing Jaws every night.
joe rogan
Right.
Well, it's all about what is working.
Right now what is working is shark attacks.
Today what is working is terrorist attacks.
And whatever is working...
jordan holmes
That is working today.
joe rogan
That's what the media is.
jordan holmes
Did you just say...
joe rogan
The idea that people have that the media is controlled by some secret government agencies and it's all just propaganda to ensure that people get conformed to the police state, that's ridiculous.
I know all the people behind these shows.
They don't care about anything but funny.
They want ratings.
They want 18 to 49. That's what they want.
People who are 18 years old to 49. And whatever gets them, that's what will be on.
alex jones
Yeah, but Joe, you do Mad TV and News Radio and host Fairfax, the number one show.
jordan holmes
And the Man Show.
alex jones
A lot of those media anchors may not say it to your face, but they're counsel on fine relations members.
They go off to Bilderberg Group meetings that are now...
Well, we know Ted Turner gave a billion bucks to the U.N. I mean, come on.
dan friesen
Look, Alex is not being able to handle what are basically simple rebuttals to his points.
This is bad.
jordan holmes
Yeah, this is an embarrassing show.
This is a man going like...
Eh, come on.
That doesn't make that much sense.
And Alex going, eh, you're right.
dan friesen
Well, what's interesting is that Alex can't be too mean to Joe because he is the host of...
Fear Factor.
Yeah, one of the top rated shows in the country.
jordan holmes
For real.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
It was huge.
dan friesen
It's weird to think back on that.
Yeah, it was winning its time slot.
jordan holmes
Oh, yeah.
dan friesen
People loved watching him yell at people so they would eat bugs.
jordan holmes
Everybody who was ever making fun of the Pet Rock fad is like, man...
Fear Factor is way worse than that shit.
dan friesen
I mean, it didn't last long.
jordan holmes
No, that's true.
dan friesen
The ratings crumbled pretty fast.
But, yeah, it was a phenomenon.
But, yeah, I think that there's something really interesting going on here, and that is that because Alex can't really fight with him all that much without risking the friendship of a really famous guy.
Right.
jordan holmes
More important than gold.
dan friesen
Yeah, he has to, like...
Sure.
pushes back in the most like obvious way yeah alex has no rebuttals for this anything is his arguments are flimsy and paper thin he's making up these people who are controlling things and going to Bilderberg yeah and all this stuff and because of that He just has to give up on all these points.
He can't keep arguing without revealing that he doesn't have a second step to this argument.
jordan holmes
Or even really a first step based on...
He doesn't have feet.
He doesn't have enough feet to step with.
dan friesen
And it's really depressing.
I mean, first of all, seeing Alex this incompetent is not great.
But then seeing Joe this able to navigate this territory and obviously he didn't...
points to what Alex was saying.
jordan holmes
And show a little frustration while he's doing it.
dan friesen
Sure.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
Not let Alex just get away with whatever nonsense he's saying.
Right.
unidentified
And I think maybe part of that dynamic is that he's on Alex's show.
dan friesen
If he's on his own show, he wants Alex to be...
jordan holmes
Yeah, wind him up.
Get going.
Get crazier.
Do more of what you want to do.
I'm here for entertainment.
dan friesen
He doesn't really benefit from Alex's ratings being better.
Right, right, right, right, right.
jordan holmes
Oh, man.
I just don't know how you live...
The day we're talking about was 9-11, correct?
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
And this is happening on that day.
Yep.
dan friesen
I wasn't planning to remind you of that for a little bit longer.
jordan holmes
Terrorist attacks are working today.
unidentified
Yeah.
jordan holmes
Is such a thing to say.
unidentified
Mm-hmm.
jordan holmes
On 9-11.
dan friesen
It's really weird because it's also in the context of that, like, why is everyone talking about shark attacks?
jordan holmes
Sure, yeah.
dan friesen
Because it's what's working.
jordan holmes
It's a media creation.
dan friesen
It's in the zeitgeist or whatever.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
Sure.
jordan holmes
Wow.
dan friesen
It's a little different when there was...
jordan holmes
Tiny bit.
dan friesen
Well, I mean, I feel like you'd have to be really bizarrely disconnected from how humans work in order to be like, why is everyone talking about terrorist attacks today?
jordan holmes
Yeah, that would have to be insane.
That would be an insane thing to do.
Oh, well, terrorist attacks are what's driving money now.
dan friesen
I understand being critical of people talking about sharks.
unidentified
Sure.
jordan holmes
I agree.
We kill more sharks than they kill us, and they're better.
dan friesen
This one's different.
jordan holmes
Very different.
dan friesen
So, Alex, really, if he knew what he was doing at all, he would just bail on talking about anything that has to do with the media or the entertainment industry, but he can't.
alex jones
Joe, just for you, because we're all about the documentation, I'm going to post stories about the Justice Department writing scripts for Law& Order.
joe rogan
Really?
jordan holmes
Dun-dun.
alex jones
Yes.
joe rogan
And where did this come from?
alex jones
Oh, ABC, NBC, MSN...
joe rogan
ABC and NBC have admitted that the Justice Department writes scripts for Law& Order?
alex jones
Yeah, so you're out there...
joe rogan
Why Law& Order?
alex jones
Do what?
joe rogan
Why Law and Order?
alex jones
A bunch of those shows.
joe rogan
It really has nothing to do with keeping people in line or, you know, the agenda of the world order.
alex jones
Oh, yeah, showing you phony court proceedings where the judge is the boss.
It violates the Constitution.
Look, I didn't write it.
I mean, they did.
joe rogan
Okay, well, I would be more than happy to read it, but obviously I can't comment on it until I read it.
You know, I do know people who run television shows.
I know a lot of people who run a lot of the top-rated shows.
I know the guy who invented, who wants to marry a multimillionaire and all these other crazy shows that are on television.
And despite what people think of the motives of all these people putting these shows on for, you know, larger, grander, eviler reasons.
dan friesen
Yeah.
Why would ABC have anything to say about Law& Order being how it was written?
That wasn't on ABC.
jordan holmes
Wow.
dan friesen
It's an NBC show.
jordan holmes
You know, ABC is trying to, they're trying to take Law and Order down a peg.
You know, ABC's got a scoop on their NBC rivals about how they're letting the government write their shows.
dan friesen
Was W thinking about making Dick Wolf the Attorney General?
jordan holmes
I mean, what he's, what Rogan is not allowing for is the possibility that the government was writing these scripts because W had a particular thing that he liked Law and Order to do.
You know?
Listen, we find out now every day more of what the Queen is doing extrajudicially.
She's influencing laws and shit.
They're getting away with murdering animals on their shit, doing all that.
Why couldn't W be like, hey, listen, I want the next storyline for Law& Order to be.
I think that's a reasonable thought.
dan friesen
So you're thinking it's the DOJ is making requests to tailor entertainment for the president as opposed to it being a nefarious conspiracy.
jordan holmes
Nope, I'm just 100% a man going like, I wish I had control over law and order.
dan friesen
They're ripping the wrong stories from the headlines.
jordan holmes
Why not?
dan friesen
I've found more entertaining headlines for them to cover.
jordan holmes
The government has used...
More power for less important shit.
dan friesen
You're not wrong.
But yeah, Joe's not buying that shit.
And this, again, Alex, he's drawn to this topic that he should avoid it.
Just stop it.
joe rogan
That's literally all they do.
And then they bring them to the people who run the networks who I've also met.
None of these people are evil.
None of these people are working for the government.
They're all hustlers.
They're all putting things in front of you that they think you'll buy, you know?
It's a guy walking on the street, "Hey man, you want to buy a watch?" That's what the network executive is.
It's just in a grander scale.
It's sitcoms, it's variety shows, it's reality shows, whatever it is, it's just there to get your attention and to get your money.
It's just there, so you'll tune in and buy a Toyota truck or, you know, a Tide detergent.
That's what it's there for.
That's all it's there for.
So all this crazy notion that the government is, you know, using us like puppets through the media is ridiculous.
I'm deep, deep, deep inside the media, okay?
alex jones
No, just because you did that.
joe rogan
I know exactly what goes on.
I know who these people are.
jordan holmes
I'm the host of Fear Factor.
alex jones
I'm going to start emailing you the stories.
joe rogan
Okay, but I'm telling you.
jordan holmes
I'm friends with Weinstein.
joe rogan
These stories are very suspect.
I don't necessarily believe them.
I think they sound like a ridiculous notion.
unidentified
Okay.
joe rogan
I don't think people would do that.
alex jones
Henry Kissinger and others, and I have the news stories here, were on TV tonight.
Saying we need to give up our liberties for security.
Do you agree that we should give up our liberties?
joe rogan
Are we on TV tonight?
dan friesen
It's a little bit...
jordan holmes
That's a jarring...
dan friesen
Well, it's because Alex needed to retreat to safer territory.
This was going very poorly for him because Joe's not buying it.
He has expertise and he's in those worlds.
He understands...
And he's being self-deprecating even with like...
I know that that's my job.
That's why I have a show.
It's interesting.
For people, they want to watch me yell at people, and then it helps sell products.
He's not disillusioned about this.
It's just sort of a crass, materialist explanation of what TV is.
jordan holmes
I hosted clubs for years.
My job is to sell drinks, not to be funny.
That's the deal.
dan friesen
And so, Alex can't handle that.
He doesn't have enough...
And so you transition over to safer territory, which is like Kissinger.
jordan holmes
Kissinger's there!
dan friesen
I saw Kissinger's interview on CNN, and he didn't say that.
unidentified
No.
dan friesen
Again, we're in this situation where I can point that out, and Alex can say, like, oh, it must have been on another channel, and we're back where we started.
jordan holmes
Sure.
dan friesen
It doesn't really matter, though, because this was just something Alex threw out to change the subject.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
Alex realized he was losing this government controls the media stuff, and, you know, whatever.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
Alex really isn't used to his quote-unquote experts using their expertise to combat him.
unidentified
Right.
jordan holmes
He doesn't appreciate it.
He's like, no, no, no, you're not supposed to actually be an expert.
I'm just calling you one, okay?
You're the host of Fear Factor.
dan friesen
I've been in these rooms.
I've met these executives.
jordan holmes
No, that doesn't sound true.
dan friesen
I've negotiated.
jordan holmes
Nah, you're just the host of Fear Factor.
dan friesen
Okay.
So, this is fun.
alex jones
Joe, Joe, if Hollywood isn't about manipulating perception, why are they so outrageously against the Second Amendment and peddling misinformation?
joe rogan
What do you mean?
jordan holmes
Good question.
alex jones
I mean, come on, all of them.
They're just up there, just out of control, 24-7, turning your guns.
joe rogan
I'm telling you, Hollywood is not about misinformation.
Hollywood is about tricking you.
Hollywood is about misinformation when it comes to relationships, like how rosy and perfect they are for Father Knows Best people.
Do you know why?
Because when people come home from a day that sucks, when they work a hard day's work and they come home and they have a beer, they don't want to see depressing things.
dan friesen
Fair enough.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
unidentified
All right.
dan friesen
Yeah, I love that moment for Alex, though.
I love that.
When he's like, the media's against the Second Amendment.
What are you talking about?
He has no examples.
unidentified
He's just like, you know how they're all day out of control.
jordan holmes
Out of control with their Second Amendment hatred.
dan friesen
Not a single example.
jordan holmes
Every time I look at the TV, I feel like they don't like the Second Amendment.
dan friesen
Right.
Whenever there isn't...
Two guns on screen.
unidentified
Yeah.
jordan holmes
I was watching Married with Children and they solved a problem in less than 30 minutes via some sort of communication as opposed to a gunshot.
unidentified
Boo.
dan friesen
So Alex is losing everything here.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
Joe is dancing circles around him with minimal effort.
jordan holmes
I mean, boy.
Really don't have to work that hard.
dan friesen
No.
And so Alex really needs to basically discredit Joe by giving him an ulterior motive.
alex jones
Sure.
All I can say to all of this is, I know you're a smart guy.
I know you know about the New World Order.
You're doing very well in this whole system, and I'm not even saying, you know, your show is bad compared to all the rest, and it's your First Amendment right, people's right to watch it or turn it off.
So I don't get into all of that stuff, but you don't have to defend this system that is trying to trample our rights.
dan friesen
So there is this idea that he's within the system.
jordan holmes
I understand that you have to say what you have to say to keep your corporate overlords happy.
dan friesen
Yeah, you're within this globalist Hollywood system, and so that's why you're not agreeing with me 100%.
That's really not fair.
Why even have the conversation then?
Like, what's the point?
jordan holmes
Right.
What makes the Roadrunner and Wile E. Coyote's relationship interesting is that the Roadrunner is very, very fast.
The coyote's attempts to attack it are scaled correctly.
And that's their overcomplication is what makes the problem.
You wouldn't watch the show if it was the wily coyote versus a turtle.
And the turtle wasn't moving very fast and the wily coyote still blew himself up.
You could just step over.
And grab the turtle.
dan friesen
You could.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
You don't have to paint a whole extra road on a brick wall, you know?
You can just...
dan friesen
I would say that that dynamic is part of why this isn't electric.
unidentified
Yeah.
jordan holmes
I would agree.
dan friesen
Radio.
But it's fun for me in a way that a lot of these interviews aren't.
unidentified
Right.
dan friesen
And that's because you see Joe...
Being his highest self, sort of.
I don't actually know if I can back that up.
There may be a better version of him somewhere.
jordan holmes
Give me examples of the media.
dan friesen
This is a pretty good version of him for the people that we've seen.
jordan holmes
If you're going to represent yourself on Infowars, this is the best way to do it.
dan friesen
And if you're going to represent yourself as Joe Rogan, this is a good representation of him compared to every other version of him we've seen.
jordan holmes
Right.
unidentified
He's very, very Joe Rogan-y as opposed to We're walking a very slippery slope with trying to protect ourselves and trying to make sure that the government doesn't take personal freedoms away from us while we're protecting ourselves.
alex jones
Joe, I agree with you, but let's take Santa Clarita.
Two weeks ago, four East German APCs go in.
I have the photos and the video from the L.A. Times.
jordan holmes
Sorry, what?
alex jones
They're firing M60 machine guns into the wrong houses.
I mean, that is not America.
Guys in black uniforms and black APCs.
joe rogan
That's what you just said, right?
You said it was Germany?
alex jones
They were driving East German APCs.
joe rogan
And this happened in Germany?
alex jones
No, this happened just north of L.A. You heard about it.
joe rogan
No, I didn't.
alex jones
The guy's house burning down, the APCs, the shootout.
joe rogan
Well, I mean, what are you saying?
You're saying that this guy has military equipment?
alex jones
No, the police.
It's L.A. Times.
Four black...
East German APCs that used to oppress the East German people were bought a few years ago.
They're in the neighborhood shooting up the wrong houses, going nuts.
It turns out they shot their own officers and then tried to frame this guy they killed with it.
That's in the L.A. Times.
joe rogan
Well, I didn't read that.
I don't know what that story's about, but what does that have to do with, you know, the government taking away our liberties by blowing up gigantic buildings and killing possibly tens of thousands?
alex jones
Well, come back to Austin, Joe, and when you do, I'll take you downtown and show you lines of black APCs and face-scanning cameras.
dan friesen
I'm not totally sure what this has to do with the larger topic or what that response even was, but it makes sense that Joe's confused by Alex throwing this new story into the mix because it's a total nonstop.
Alex is lying about that situation that occurred in Santa Clarita.
Police arrived to search the home of a guy named James Allen Beck, who was a felon that the authorities had learned from neighbors who were worried that he was stockpiling weapons and ammo, which he can't do.
And there were some reports that he was going around impersonating a police officer.
jordan holmes
That's not good.
dan friesen
From the LA Times, quote, Deputy Hagop, also nicknamed Jake Kurdesian, was among scores of officers who flocked to the scene.
He was shot and killed within minutes of arriving.
Alex says to Joe that the police shot their own officer and then framed Beck, which was reported in the LA Times, which is an absolute lie.
And it's a necessary lie, because if Alex discussed the situation in its real form, it wouldn't be so black and white, and it would become much harder for Alex to use for his talking points.
Beck opened fire on the officers and killed this sheriff's deputy, which led to the police returning fire.
They were a bit unprepared for this turn of events and shot a number of rounds into the adjoining house, though no one was killed.
The people whose house was shot into, they sued and they were awarded $200,000 eventually, so they got some restitution.
Through it all, Beck continued shooting probably thousands of rounds.
He had a huge cache of weapons, so he was even firing at news helicopters, and it was just a huge mess.
jordan holmes
Jesus.
dan friesen
He shot at people for hours until the police tried to shoot a tear gas canister in, which may have started a fire.
While the fire burned, Beck continued firing his guns until the roof collapsed.
jordan holmes
Wow.
dan friesen
Well, there's criticism that can be made of the police and ATF response, absolutely.
The preparedness, not great.
There probably is some lessons to be learned in the post-action.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
For sure.
But because of this baseline similarity that the situation has to Waco, conspiracy theorists latched onto the event as being the same thing all over again.
jordan holmes
Sure, sure.
dan friesen
It got a fair amount of news coverage, but really wasn't that big of a story outside of this extreme right-wing media circle like Alex, and it's mostly just because they used it as a reminiscent thing of Waco.
And that's why Joe has no idea what he's talking about, but to Alex this seems like a giant.
unidentified
Huge.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
dan friesen
You can see that discrepancy.
jordan holmes
Yeah, I gotcha.
dan friesen
So, I've said some positive things about Joe, but...
jordan holmes
It's time for that to go away!
dan friesen
Well, not really.
It's just that I disagree.
I just don't necessarily agree with his perspective.
alex jones
Joe, here's the question.
And really, don't dodge it.
If we find out Iraq did it, what should we do?
joe rogan
We should bomb them.
I'm not going to dodge that at all.
If we find out absolutely positively, without a doubt, that someone's guilty, they should die.
That's absolutely a fact.
I'm all for ridding the world and the United States, for that matter, of people who are evil.
You know?
I mean, if we can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that someone is guilty, I'm all for the death penalty.
It's whether or not we can do that that is the real question.
And that, I think, is just as much, if not more, of a threat to the liberty of the people of this country.
alex jones
Joe, do you want to stay with us and take some calls?
joe rogan
Sure, absolutely.
unidentified
What?
dan friesen
So, I think that, I mean, obviously, I get where he's coming from.
He also...
Earlier, decried people being kind of warmongery.
jordan holmes
Sure.
dan friesen
And I think that, I don't know, I understand the feeling that there's a need for war based on a terrorist attack like that.
jordan holmes
Sure, sure, sure, sure.
dan friesen
I understand that, particularly that evening.
I get it.
I don't know if I agree fully, because I don't think it solves the problem, and you end up killing a ton more people.
Civilians.
jordan holmes
So, no.
Now, if I understand correctly...
dan friesen
It's not...
It doesn't seem productive.
jordan holmes
Are you trying to say that so far, up to this point, war does not seem to have solved problems?
dan friesen
I would say war...
What is it good for?
unidentified
You know what?
jordan holmes
I'm going to go even one step further.
Dan, might you even be saying that perhaps it is war itself that led Osama bin Laden to committing these terrorist acts in the first place, thereby meaning that if we were to start another war, only guaranteeing that yet another Osama bin Laden in several years will come by and blow up something else?
Are you saying that maybe this is a cycle that happens over and over and over again that people stupid like Joe Rogan and the motherfuckers say?
dan friesen
Good God.
jordan holmes
Is it something like that?
unidentified
Yeah.
jordan holmes
What is it good for?
dan friesen
Absolutely nothing.
Say it again.
jordan holmes
Ah, damn it!
dan friesen
So, this is unfortunate for Joe.
He wasn't listening to Alex's show earlier because he critiqued something that Alex did earlier.
jordan holmes
Oh, no.
dan friesen
Oh, boy.
alex jones
Like the NSA didn't know they were doing this and like they could take over these planes with box cutters.
I'm sure you've heard that, Joe, that...
People called in from cell phones on board.
They were hijacking it with box cutters.
joe rogan
Yeah, I did hear that.
And my comment to that to a friend of mine was, you know, people were like, well, why didn't they fight?
Well, they might have been told that all that was going to happen was that they were going to bring the plane back to Kennedy Airport.
They were going to make a political statement.
I mean, we don't know what they told these pastors.
They totally lulled them into a false sense of security.
They're not going to tell them, hey, we're going to crash into the World Trade Center and kill you.
alex jones
Yeah, but, Joe, I mean...
joe rogan
I'm just saying that a lot of people are actually questioning the courage of the people on board.
Until you're in a situation like that, I don't think you can judge.
dan friesen
Yeah, you know who was doing that?
The guy you're talking to.
jordan holmes
Yeah, yeah.
I appreciate that all of Joe Rogan's criticisms about the media in response to Alex saying that the media is doing something are criticisms of Alex's media.
dan friesen
And Alex is essentially doing far more extreme versions of it than Joe's probably seeing other places.
jordan holmes
Yeah, totally.
dan friesen
Also, I mean, it bears mentioning, like, Alex is...
Definitely advocating for bombing Iraq more than...
Or at least that's a conversation that's come up a lot more here than it has at this point on other shows.
jordan holmes
Anywhere else.
Nobody else is even talking about Iraq yet.
dan friesen
Well, I mean, that one Secretary of State could have included Iraq in his and we've got to kill somebody.
jordan holmes
We've got to blow somebody up.
Yeah, but nobody...
I don't think anybody was on the nation's tip.
Like, let's throw this on a fucking government.
dan friesen
It's weird.
It's weird to have...
We have Alex eventually become this guy who's like anti-Iraq war and all that becomes such a piece of his identity and he's really very much like maybe that's the option.
Let's nuke Iraq if they did it.
jordan holmes
It does appear that the only thing stopping Alex from being the cause of all the things he complains about is that He wasn't there to make the decision.
Like, if he was there to...
He can't complain about the Iraq War.
If he was there to make the decision, he would have bombed him.
He can't complain about this.
If he was there to make the decision, he would have done that.
He can't complain about the power grid because if he was there, he would have done, you know?
dan friesen
Well, I think he would have bombed Iraq if he could prove that they did it.
But proving things means nothing to Alex.
jordan holmes
There we go.
dan friesen
So I think if he were in a position of power, he could very easily prove whatever he wanted to prove if it was expedient towards whatever he wanted to do.
jordan holmes
Yeah, man, that is almost word for word what someone did.
dan friesen
Yep.
So Joe, to his credit, doesn't want to see the UN take over the US courts, which is great.
jordan holmes
Sure.
I think I do.
Ours are bad.
dan friesen
Also, to Joe's credit, he doesn't seem to like the Constitution much.
unidentified
They're going to take whoever it is, Osama bin Laden or whoever it is, they're going to put them under the International Criminal Court, and all the people in the United States of America are going to say, oh, isn't this wonderful?
Now, I've got a couple other ones.
alex jones
Meanwhile, Joe, the criminal court does not allow juries.
You can't face your accuser.
Double Jeopardy is reinstalled.
They can hold you for 30 years without a trial.
Do you support the UN taking control of our court system?
joe rogan
Well, of course I don't.
I don't support, you know, any...
Look, I don't support the Constitution as it stands right now.
I think the Constitution should reflect the will of the people.
And because it's a piece of paper that was printed a long time ago, I think there's certain things that our forefathers wanted to put in the Constitution, and they didn't.
Like, they wanted to put a 2% tax ceiling.
That would be 2% would be the highest tax you have to pay.
But they didn't put it in there because they could never conceive of it getting that high.
There's a lot of things that are in our Constitution.
What our Constitution reflects is it should reflect the will of the people.
alex jones
Well, you could have mobocracy.
We need a rule of law and a republic.
dan friesen
That tax thing isn't what I would have gone with as an example, but the point stands.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
I mean, you could have gone with slaves.
dan friesen
Sure.
There's a...
There's a recognition that the Constitution is an imperfect document.
unidentified
Right.
dan friesen
And that's foreboding to Alex.
jordan holmes
That is crazy.
dan friesen
It's very weird to hear someone say, like, you know what?
Fuck the Constitution on Alex's show.
jordan holmes
Yeah, that is odd.
dan friesen
Yeah.
So, this next clip, Jordan.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
It's a bit long.
It's about three minutes.
Oh, no.
jordan holmes
If you cut a three-minute clip, that's not good.
dan friesen
Well, it's because there's an argument.
unidentified
Ah.
dan friesen
They get into a fight.
jordan holmes
Okay.
Now I'm interested.
dan friesen
I gotta say...
I admire Rogan for being able to have this conversation.
I do not admire him for doing it on 9-11.
jordan holmes
I really am struggling again with this.
Okay, I'm fine.
I'm removing the fact that it's 9-11 on the day from my...
dan friesen
You should try...
jordan holmes
I can't engage with this with the understanding.
dan friesen
It's hard to get through it otherwise.
jordan holmes
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
alex jones
We're having a spirited debater tonight, and Joe is not defending the New World Order.
He just simply doesn't think things are as bad as we're covering.
Probably because he's not here every day, Joe, in the trenches covering the documents.
joe rogan
This is my take on you, and you know you're my friend and I love you and everything, but this is my take on you.
You do yourself a disservice by saying that you're absolutely positive about things that I don't think you are.
I think by saying that you know the answer to everything, you make the whole notion ridiculous.
The whole notion that you're this guy that uncovers all these conspiracies, you have the exact answer to everything, is pretty ludicrous.
alex jones
Now, Joe, since you are aggressive, I'm going to counter you.
joe rogan
There's a lot of disinformation, I absolutely agree with that.
There's a lot of disinformation by our own government, by the media, by all sorts of things, but I don't think you know the answer to all of it.
alex jones
Okay, Joe, I know this.
joe rogan
And you say you do, and that's where you lose credibility with a lot of intelligent people.
alex jones
Joe, I know this.
jordan holmes
Just there, though.
That's the only place.
alex jones
These are some of the private arguments we've had.
Joe, I'm here to tell you right now that Ritalin clogs more neuroreceptors than cocaine.
70% when cocaine does 50%.
It's very damaging.
It shrinks brains.
It expands parts.
It retards the growth in children.
joe rogan
What are you talking about?
alex jones
Hold on.
Let me finish and tell you where I'm going with this.
And I've had the neuroscientist, the brain surgeon on, to cover it.
I've read about how they're putting cancer viruses in the vaccines across the board.
Why cancer is exploding.
I've gone right down the line on all of this.
We evidence it ad nauseam.
So to just sit there and say, I claim I have all the answers.
I know gun control is wrong.
I know SWAT teams are raiding innocent people's houses.
I know the military's hitting whole neighborhoods here in Texas searching for drugs that the government ships in, and that's been proven even in Esquire magazine.
I've interviewed former CIA officers that shipped it in.
I don't make any of this stuff.
Joe, I have the newscast of Oklahoma City with them bringing the unexploded bombs out of a building.
I've had the former head of Air Force Weapons Development on this show to say that building was blown out, not in.
When I'm not making this stuff up, Joe, you just can't admit how far we've slipped down into it, so you're telling me I'm doing a disservice, and it's not true.
joe rogan
I think you're doing yourself a disservice, and I think a lot of things that you do are fantastic.
I think you've got a huge heart.
I think you're a really, really competent guy, and you've got a lot of balls, and that's what this country needs, is someone who will stand in front of Janet Rito and question her on what happened at Waco.
I agree with you on that.
I agree with you on when you have proof, the way you have conviction, the way you have courage, and you go after it.
I think everybody admires that.
I think it's a fantastic thing that you do.
when I think you lose me is when I think you use something that's based on speculation you do use something that may or may not be true you stated as an absolute and a fact when any intelligent person listening Okay, Joe, I'll tell you this.
dan friesen
So, look, this is a pretty scathing critique of Alex.
But I also think it's too generous.
jordan holmes
It's way too generous.
dan friesen
Yeah.
I think you take things that are speculative and you act like you're convinced of them.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
That is a pretty...
Because I think it's very accurate.
jordan holmes
Yeah, it's 100% accurate.
dan friesen
But the problem that I have is when you limit it to speculation and things that you aren't fully convinced of because he's straight up lying and making things up.
jordan holmes
Yeah, I was going to say.
dan friesen
There's that.
jordan holmes
Joe is doing him a disservice because...
He's not acknowledging Alex's greatest talent, which is lying on command about anything, anytime, for no reason.
dan friesen
Right.
jordan holmes
Or for whatever reason.
dan friesen
Rattling off a bunch of topics that are essentially all over the place.
jordan holmes
Totally.
dan friesen
So he just throws all these things on the ground, and you're supposed to pick them up and organize them and debunk the things he's saying.
jordan holmes
Do this for me.
dan friesen
In order to substantiate your claim that he...
Is convinced of things that aren't fully proven or whatever.
unidentified
Right, right, right.
dan friesen
You now have to debunk all of these hundred things that he's thrown out.
And it's like, all right, man.
It's childish.
jordan holmes
It's a way of arguing that is like...
It is the way that people who don't want to do homework argue in a group project where you're the person who does all the work, you know?
It's like...
Everything that they do is just saying a bunch of shit at you.
And you're like, goddammit, now I have to learn about this.
Now I have to learn about this.
Now I have to learn about this.
Now I have to learn about this, man.
Fuck you!
And he's not learning anything.
unidentified
No.
jordan holmes
It's all on you.
dan friesen
It is.
So Alex brings up some of the books and what have you.
And Rogan isn't really convinced of a lot of the book sources.
Because books sometimes are dumb.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
I've read more than one.
dan friesen
He brings up one dumb book.
joe rogan
Behold a Pale White Horse.
Have you ever read that?
alex jones
Yeah, a lot of misinformation.
joe rogan
There's a lot of crazy stuff in there about the government having alien bases on the dark side of the moon.
alex jones
Yeah, see, Joe, you've fallen for something here.
We don't talk about that.
We talk about...
Okay, let me give you something.
joe rogan
What I'm just saying is there's a lot of books like that.
alex jones
Joe, what would you do if you found out the U.N. took over 70% of our landmass on October 18th of 2000?
joe rogan
They took over 70% of our United States landmass?
alex jones
Yes.
joe rogan
In what way?
How do they take over?
alex jones
You can read the actual treaty at Infowars.com or listen to an interview with Congressman Ron Paul.
They signed over the country to the U.N., sir.
joe rogan
Well, you know, again, I'd have to read that to comment on it.
alex jones
Well, I got a Washington Post word from three weeks ago under the U.N. gavel admitting they claim they run our courts and are going to get rid of juries.
And the National Bar Association in Chicago, Chicago Tribune, agrees.
dan friesen
Okay.
jordan holmes
That's why it's so unfair to have a conversation like this with somebody on a radio show.
unidentified
Yeah.
jordan holmes
Because Alex is not at all talking to you at all.
Not even a little bit.
What you have to say is meaningless.
What he's doing is posturing for the listeners.
dan friesen
He's posturing and then he's being very unsuccessful if you're paying attention.
And then second, he's also just trying to throw you off.
unidentified
Absolutely.
dan friesen
He's throwing out these things all over the place that you can't possibly have any idea what he's talking about in order to fluster you so you look less grounded in the criticisms that you're making.
Yeah.
unidentified
If you're Rogan.
dan friesen
It's basically like you're having an argument with.
someone you're talking about uh i don't know uh interest rates sure and then they're i don't know they're like did you know that mice are actually little people yeah i know that this is in the baltimore sun i can prove it right what sure okay Did you know the UN has 70% of America's land?
jordan holmes
Fine.
No.
Yes?
Bad.
unidentified
Good?
dan friesen
Did you know that they are getting rid of juries?
jordan holmes
Sure!
Fine!
No!
Yes!
I have only no response to this.
dan friesen
Yeah.
So Joe tries to just reprimand Alex for, like...
jordan holmes
Being an asshole?
dan friesen
Well, his inability to accept that there are things he doesn't know.
jordan holmes
He does have that inability.
dan friesen
And I think that's fair.
And then Alex does what you'd expect.
He acts like a little baby.
jordan holmes
Yeah, that sounds about right.
alex jones
We didn't punish these terrorists before, and that's why this is happening regardless.
joe rogan
Now, this is saying that it's definitely these, quote-unquote, these terrorists.
We don't know who it is.
Just like in Oklahoma City, we didn't know who it is.
alex jones
Oh, we all heard it was McVeigh acting alone.
The feds won't release the blow.
joe rogan
Yeah, well, we didn't hear that initially.
alex jones
Surveillance cameras.
joe rogan
The initial reports, they were looking for Islamic fundamentalist terrorists.
That was the initial reports out of Oklahoma City.
alex jones
No, I know.
I remember.
joe rogan
Okay, but that's what I'm talking about right now.
We're talking about something that happened today, and you're already saying these terrorists, we should have done something to these terrorists.
You even said yourself that it could have been European, trying to screw up our stock market.
We don't know who this is.
alex jones
Yeah, but when I said that, you laughed.
I think that's really important.
joe rogan
It's really important to admit that we don't know yet.
alex jones
That's what you don't do.
joe rogan
I have a problem with you, my friend.
alex jones
A lot of it aims that direction.
joe rogan
You don't know.
Well, you don't.
alex jones
I guess I don't know anything.
unidentified
I'll just sit here.
alex jones
I'll just sit here as the black scheme-ass thugs run over me.
joe rogan
These terrorists, but we don't know who these terrorists are.
alex jones
Well, let's just go ahead and give up our rights.
Let's just go ahead and give up our rights and let the UN run everything and then we'll be all right.
dan friesen
Fuck you.
jordan holmes
Jesus Christ, man.
dan friesen
What a petulant dick.
jordan holmes
I'm not saying that.
Oh, God.
unidentified
What?
dan friesen
Just the worst.
jordan holmes
The worst person to talk to.
Just the worst.
dan friesen
Because Joe's making a fine point and bringing back up the, like, why are you saying that this terrorist attack is the result of us not punishing other terrorists in the past when, first of all, you think all of those past terrorist events are fake.
jordan holmes
Exactly.
dan friesen
And you think the EU did this to destabilize things to roll out the euro.
jordan holmes
Correct.
dan friesen
What the fuck are you talking about?
jordan holmes
We need to punish the terrorists.
dan friesen
You don't know things and that's okay.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
This happened today.
Yeah.
Wah!
Let's give up our freedom!
jordan holmes
Oh, fine!
I'll quit!
I'll go home, I'm gonna take my ball, and I'm gonna never love America again!
How about that?
dan friesen
What I wanna do is never come back here again.
Flash forward.
jordan holmes
Flash forward, yes.
That's great.
dan friesen
What a prick.
jordan holmes
God, if only Joe had stayed mad at Alex for every day since 9-11.
That was...
Oh, goddammit!
dan friesen
Sneaky snake.
jordan holmes
Goddammit!
That was Joe's 9-11.
Honestly, it changed him forever.
dan friesen
There was an opportunity.
So Joe leaves.
They don't leave on terrible terms.
You know, they're still friends.
But there's definitely a misunderstanding between them.
There's definitely a...
jordan holmes
Tension.
dan friesen
Did not see eye to eye.
jordan holmes
I would normally say it's an emotional day, but apparently for neither of these guys, it is.
dan friesen
I think Rogan was given definitely a good bit of recognition of the loss and the tragedy.
I may not have cut those clips as much.
I think it's more interesting that they had this fight on 9-11.
jordan holmes
This is 9-11.
I just don't understand.
Every time I come back to the thought like, oh, Dan, you know what we do?
And have done for a long time.
Surprise!
Joe Rogan and Alex Jones got into a fight on 9-11.
Surprise!
You know how we've done this thing for five years and the only thing that I could say that would really make you go, that's probably not ever possible, is Joe Rogan and Alex Jones got into a fight on 9-11.
dan friesen
I think that's one of the wonders of this...
This entertainment space, whatever it is that Alex is doing.
You can do 700 episodes of this and still be like, what the fuck is happening?
jordan holmes
What the fuck just happened?
No!
No!
I want to scream!
dan friesen
So, predictably, Joe leaves.
jordan holmes
Yes.
dan friesen
And now Alex has to take control of the narrative.
jordan holmes
Yeah, yeah, yeah, totally.
alex jones
You know, I sit there and I watch this and it's the same thing with our public.
There are a lot of good people out there, a lot of good police, a lot of good military, a lot of good, you know, number one TV host, but they just can't face the system.
And, you know, going out to dinner with Joe and stuff, he'll sit there, and I know Joe's going to hear this tape later, or he's listening live right now, because I know Kevin's going to post on his website, and Joe just kept saying at dinner and stuff, man, I know it's an act, I know you don't totally believe all this, come on, tell me it's an act.
I'm like, no, this stuff's real, Joe.
Here's the evidence, here's the evidence.
He agrees with a lot of it, but he just can't go all the way, and that's the problem.
dan friesen
Yeah, man, he just can't face it.
It's just not man enough to face things the way that I do.
jordan holmes
What could you possibly get out of a relationship with a person like Alex that justifies everything that he's done?
dan friesen
I mean, look, I used to, back when I was in college and such, I used to hang out with some people that maybe, eh, they were a little bit annoying, but they usually had weed.
Maybe that's what's going on here.
jordan holmes
Sure, but you didn't have the weed that they came to you for.
And then you were like, you're my best friend.
dan friesen
Yeah, I don't know.
I can't imagine that Alex is interpersonally so generous and caring and gives you the perfect birthday gift every year.
jordan holmes
I know!
dan friesen
I can't imagine what it is that would make somebody...
jordan holmes
I mean, maybe if Alex had pulled him from the bottom of a lake while he was drowning, I would say you get a couple of years out of that.
dan friesen
Yeah, I've checked with the actuaries.
You get six and a half years.
jordan holmes
Six and a half years?
See, now that seems fine.
Six and a half seems right.
25 years of friendship.
When this happened on 9-11!
dan friesen
I think that Joe probably stopped listening after he got off.
jordan holmes
Totally!
dan friesen
Didn't hear Alex talking shit.
jordan holmes
That's the basis of their friendship, is that Joe cannot listen to Alex.
dan friesen
Blissfully unaware of anything that Alex does for a living.
jordan holmes
Must.
Must be.
That has to be almost...
Maybe there's a contract that they signed.
unidentified
Yeah.
jordan holmes
The moment Alex started doing the show.
Don't ever listen.
Don't ask me any questions about it, and we're good.
dan friesen
Hey, Joe, our relationship is successful because you have just created an image of what I do in your head based on what you want it to be, and I don't penetrate that reality.
jordan holmes
Can you imagine if Alex had come back with, Joe, you do yourself a disservice by creating fantastic versions of the people around you, giving them a higher sense of value towards yourself and generosity from their spirit.
Yeah.
unidentified
Yeah, who's doing a disservice now, asshole?
dan friesen
Hey, Joe, 20 years from now, I'm going to threaten to gut you like a pig and expose some private details about your children.
jordan holmes
That's right.
dan friesen
And then you're going to have me back on your show.
jordan holmes
Yep, yep, yep.
dan friesen
We're going to have a psychically abusive friendship.
jordan holmes
I mean, for 25 years.
That's just crazy.
dan friesen
Very sad.
jordan holmes
That's crazy.
dan friesen
So, Alex takes more calls, and one of them is a bit confused about that Rogan appearance.
jordan holmes
Sure, as he would be.
alex jones
Look, all I know is Joe Rogan called Kevin Booth, my buddy, and called me and said, I want to come on, and this guy's number one host on television, and he tells me he agrees with a lot of the stuff I say.
We're friends.
You know, Joe listens to the show.
He just can't believe all this stuff.
He believes a lot of it.
The Second Amendment's good.
The feds killed Kennedy.
Stuff like that.
He just can't go all the way.
He doesn't want to admit that his picturesque Hollywood life is in jeopardy.
dan friesen
He's a coward.
He doesn't want to give up the trappings of fame and the glitz and glamour of Hollywood.
He wants to hold on to that.
What?
jordan holmes
I mean, in Joe's mind, does he think that Alex...
Is criticizing him in the same way that Joe is criticizing Alex when he says, you're relying on conjecture and bullshit.
Does Joe take that as a legitimate criticism?
I wouldn't.
Because that's a fucking dirty insult.
dan friesen
It's horrible.
jordan holmes
It's a personal attack on you.
dan friesen
Essentially, it's saying your character is such that you value material and selfish pleasures over saving the world.
jordan holmes
Yeah, it is him saying, listen, Joe's a nice guy, but he's a rich prick.
Like, that's what you're saying!
dan friesen
Yeah.
unidentified
How is that not an offensive thing to hear?
dan friesen
He knows a lot of stuff.
And he probably has a suspicion that what I'm saying is totally true.
But...
unidentified
I mean, but even then, in your conspiracies...
jordan holmes
The top executives are the people doing the thing, and we know that Joe knows those people, and now you are saying that he is too much of a coward to stand up to them.
Why aren't you just taking the step and going, he's part of the system.
dan friesen
He's complicit.
Well, because he'll talk to Alex.
jordan holmes
Because he'll keep talking to Alex.
dan friesen
And for 20 years, he'll be right there, almost ready, but so attached to this successful life that he can't go full hog over the...
We have fought and died, so we have liberty, so we have an open society.
alex jones
Now we're not about to give it all up because somebody punched us in the nose.
We're going to strike back whoever did it.
And, Lewis, I think we know who did it, don't we?
The New World Order.
jordan holmes
Oh my god!
dan friesen
Yep.
jordan holmes
I think we know who did it.
98% certain it's the New World Order, EU, Iran, Iraq, the United States government, Osama, whomever, whatever, Germany.
alex jones
Yeah.
jordan holmes
100% certain it's the New World Order.
dan friesen
Yep.
Ending the show proving Joe correct.
jordan holmes
Wild.
dan friesen
So...
jordan holmes
What a day!
dan friesen
Wow.
jordan holmes
What a fucking...
dan friesen
I don't think there's any way you could necessarily expect a whole lot of this.
I think that content-wise, the morning show was wacky.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
And all over the place.
unidentified
And then this was something.
jordan holmes
I just...
unidentified
You know...
jordan holmes
You can take the day off.
dan friesen
You can.
You can take the evening off.
You already did a show.
jordan holmes
You can do it.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
You can just say no.
dan friesen
Yep.
jordan holmes
You know?
You have a choice.
dan friesen
There's no need for you to do another three hours if an hour plus of it is going to be arguing with Joe Rogan.
This is disrespectful.
jordan holmes
I don't even know.
I don't know.
That this exists is disrespectful.
dan friesen
It really is.
jordan holmes
That it's happened boggles my mind.
If they had made this, like, ten years later as a, hey, what would it be like if we did a show on 9-11?
dan friesen
Right, right, right.
jordan holmes
I would say that is a disrespectful thing to do.
For them to do it on...
Ah!
Oh, man.
Go Boston, go New York.
That's what it...
Jesus Christ.
dan friesen
Yeah, I mean, the mind reels, and I...
I don't really have anything to say.
I think these episodes speak for themselves.
jordan holmes
I don't know if it's possible to sum up.
dan friesen
I think that as much criticism as you may give the media, which is deserved, a lot of it is very deserved, nobody did a worse job than Alex.
Alex completely whiffed on every count with his 9-11 coverage.
This sucked.
It was disrespectful.
It was disgusting.
The way he focused largely on the grotesque images of burning bodies and people jumping.
jordan holmes
And himself.
dan friesen
The way he essentially called the people who died in the planes cowards for not taking back over the plane.
unidentified
Jesus.
dan friesen
Just abhorrent behavior all around.
The value, I think, of watching this and seeing this...
Is that you do see a very concrete example of the beginning of that narrative.
The bombs in the building narrative, and you see what it's based on.
You see the friend who becomes a world-class structural engineer.
You see the Chicago Tribune article that's being lied about.
You see this...
Apocryphal local news story that he heard a local radio host talking about.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
And you see these pieces, these disparate pieces coming together that you know five years later are going to be presented not as what they are, but as like...
The world's top structural engineer came on and gave me a schematic, a breakdown with all of the equations about how this was impossible.
The chemical testing, you know, all of this.
And yeah, it's going, it's like, this is what Alex's conspiracies are.
Yep.
unidentified
At core, this is what they are.
jordan holmes
It was all there in the beginning.
Because there wasn't anything there to begin with.
dan friesen
It's a whim.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
And the most real thing is probably Alex and Joe fighting.
jordan holmes
I mean, yeah.
Yeah, that's the only thing that it felt like Alex actually gave a genuine shit about.
Being threatened.
dan friesen
Yeah, being threatened with the reality of not knowing things.
jordan holmes
Yeah, with not being the person who's the smartest person on the show.
unidentified
Yeah.
Wow.
dan friesen
So, Jordan.
jordan holmes
Yes, Dan.
dan friesen
This has been a ride.
jordan holmes
It has been a fucking rollercoaster, my friend.
dan friesen
But we'll be back.
jordan holmes
Indeed we will.
dan friesen
For another episode at a later date.
But until then, we have a website.
jordan holmes
We do.
It's knowledgefight.com.
dan friesen
We're also on Twitter.
jordan holmes
We are on Twitter.
It's at knowledge underscore fight and I go to bed, Jordan.
dan friesen
Yep, we'll be back.
But until then, I'm Neo.
I'm Leo.
I'm DZX Clark.
I'm Derry Brownfield.
That's it.
Derry Brownfield.
steve quayle
And now here comes the sex robots.
alex jones
Andy in Kansas, you're on the air.
dan friesen
Thanks for holding.
unidentified
Hello, Alex.
jordan holmes
I'm a first-time caller.
mika brzezinski
I'm a huge fan.
unidentified
I love your work.
Export Selection