Today, Dan and Jordan check in on Alex's response to the news that he lost the Connecticut case regarding Sandy Hook by another default judgement. Plus, the gents check in with plaintiff's lawyer Mark Bankston about the developments. Citations
I don't say this for theatrics, and I don't say this to scare you, but we need to go ahead and be honest about where we're at in this group psychology realm.
I'll tell you earlier today, after the big news and everything that was going on, CNN invited one of us to come on and talk to them, speak to Anderson Cooper tonight in prime time.
And I told my partner, man, hey, I think you're going to have to do it.
I don't want to give anybody the faith of, oh, the legal field's doing kumbaya and we're all starting that.
You have to understand that this is when When, you know, you go to the Westminster Dog Show and, like, a lot of people are going to have different opinions on judges of which dog is the nicest dog or whatever.
But if you just bring in a random mutt off the street with mange, like, they're all going to go, ew, what's going on here?
Like, it doesn't even fit with their schema.
And when you have a defendant who comes in and treats the court, like, just, like, as his own personal playground or whatever, like, you're going to get the same reaction from the court.
You've been researching a lot of those cases where celebrities just at one point or another decide the only way to win is not play, and they just take off and leave.
What's really ironic about Jones' situation is he was there to play, and he was trying to play whatever game he was going to play, and it was so abhorrent and offensive to the court that even his behavior there, you just don't see this that much.
We talked about it a bit at these hearings of other cases where it's happened under pretty egregious circumstances.
But to see a really a first time we've seen a celebrity high profile case end in a default with not just the celebrity walking away.
You've got to remember, he's doing this in two different cases, in two different places, on two slightly different timelines, and has to keep whatever...
Whatever shell game is happening has to be kept up in both cases on a two to three month lag timeline to stay consistent.
And as you know, like day to day, he's not going to be able to stay consistent.
So what's really bizarre, though, is that you have both sets of cases and that the conduct that ended in default judgment was totally separate conduct.
unidentified
It wasn't that, oh, what happened in Texas and our discovery was so bad that he did stuff up there and it was totally different stuff.
And the real irony of it is so much of it is they would discover stuff going on up there that's affecting their discovery.
And I'd be like, honestly, I can't even brief that to my court because I'm too busy telling them about the other stuff that's going on in my case.
You can't even keep up with it.
All this stuff you saw about Google Analytics and all the trial balances that they brought in some accountant who did a bunch of stuff, all of that.
I never even got a chance to talk to that about my court.
We were done before that even happened.
And it's stunning that if I hadn't have gotten that default judgment that I got back in September, there's absolutely no question I'd have it now just because it's unreal.
But yeah, the difference between the two cases is absolutely stunning, that he has two very different styles of law, and he lost them both.
I guess when you're in Connecticut and you're having to litigate there, there's a pretty high set of demands.
You've got to keep the briefs coming in on a really regular period.
They're really regimented.
You're showing up at monthly status conferences.
They're actually having to work really hard to try to keep their heads above water in Connecticut.
In Texas, you can go long periods where you're not before the court, and if you're a bad litigator, you can get yourself into some enormous holes during those periods of time.
But what was stunning about it is in Texas, their transgressions are mostly just an abject, like not even just a refusal, but just didn't even show up to play kind of ideas of discovery.
They didn't answer the discovery.
The court would order them to do something.
They just flat out wouldn't do it.
And then they'd expect to show up in the next hearing and everything would be okay.
In Connecticut, they actually tried to do this stuff.
And that's actually maybe what got them in more trouble.
It just took longer is that the stuff they did was really absurd.
It's really the offense and disrespect in Texas was really something.
But the absolute clown show that was what they tried to fix the situation in Connecticut was maybe even worse.
But from what is stated in those pleadings, from what I can gather from And what is stated there is that they were asked to have their accountant, their QuickBooks person, press the button on QuickBooks that produces the subsidiary ledgers and all the financial trial balances for the company.
And then a little bit later on, they discovered because of some weird irregularities in there, the enforce had to admit, well, actually, we printed that button and then we gave it to an accountant.
unidentified
And then that accountant, well, he said that the figures were misleading.
So as I listen to these hearings about what's going on in there, I'm like, honestly, like, again, the difference between the two forums, those guys are lucky they didn't even try to pull that stuff down in Texas because I would have, oh my god.
I mean, and look, I want to make clear, too, just for people who are listening here.
When I say that I'm reading the public records and I'm telling you about what's going on in Connecticut, realize, one, I don't represent those Connecticut plaintiffs, but the docket's online.
You can read all the documents.
And when I say I'm reading from public records, what I'm describing to you about an accountant going out and then making the numbers that were misleading turn correct, that's not taken from the plaintiff's pleadings.
That's taken from Infowars pleadings, right?
Like, you read Infowars pleadings and that's what they say.
They did.
unidentified
And so I don't feel like I'm telling tales out of school or anything.
Houston's got a place in a different one now, but then that Austin courthouse where he's going to be, where I grew up in Fort Bend, you look outside the direct window of the courthouse you are in, there is a giant oak tree with a straight horizontal branch that's been trained that way.
That brand, you know what that is.
It's This weird, imposing legacy of the Texas legal system staring you in the face.
And day to day to day, it stares in the face of like...
Well, I mean, that too, but also mostly just largely alienated and disenfranchised and not people who have the power of the state arrayed against them in perhaps unjust ways.
And the fact that Alex Jones is going to have to spend two weeks in that courtroom looking out that window is, you know, that's a good feeling that he has to be in that courtroom.
Okay, so you would be correct if the idea was he just didn't answer the lawsuit and I filed a default judgment and it was entered and then he found out and he's got 14 days to get up there and say, no, I want to defend the suit.
He really only has one for kind of getting inside baseball.
He really only has one appellate option.
For challenging these default judgments.
And in Texas, that's an emergency appeal known as a mandamus.
If he's really thinking about it, he does have a march.
The trial's set.
It's staged.
It's ready to go.
And he don't want to pull the rug out from under that, maybe.
I don't know.
I think maybe something else in his calculus could be that the last time he tried to appeal an adverse ruling in the Hesselman case, he ended up owing me $25,000 for wasting my time.
So one of the things that I wanted to ask you about, because I think that I find this fairly interesting, is that the Texas cases, if I understand correctly, the defendant in that is all Alex, right?
OK, so in Texas, you have generally three defendants.
You have Jones himself and you have his two companies that are primary.
Again, at the time we filed the suit, the two companies we thought was primarily involved in Infowars, which is Free Speech Systems, LLC, Infowars, LLC.
Turns out you get into the suit.
And even though Infowars, LLC's names all over the website, as it was at that time, that company does not.
It's a paper thing.
It has no employees, no revenue, no assets, no nothing.
As far as we can tell, the other entities that are being sued up in Connecticut, for instance, Infowars Health LLC, Prison Planet TV LLC, also completely paper entities.
These were a bunch of entities that were spun off in 2013, right around the time of the divorce, to try to reorganize the business.
None of it really seemed to take off.
I don't really understand why, but they put every egg in the basket in free speech systems.
So really in terms of, that's really it.
It's Jones and Free Speech Systems.
So he has some assets personally, he has some in a corporate form.
That's, you know, it's funny when you, one of the first questions you gotta, you gotta ask the guy when you're in deposition with him.
He's got an author page on InfoWars and it's like, I am, it's, they haven't updated in a while, you know, so it's like still very much like, I am, I am most well known for my confrontations with Carl the Cuck in Abe Spillings.
You're putting off your deposition forever, and he's got pending criminal indictment and all of that.
And the thing is, yeah, they've been...
For the past three months, they've just been on Infowars making noise as much as they want, would not challenge, not whatever, and then finally a guy like Owen sits down in the chair and he's going to have to answer questions.
So, like, when he's doing these things in 2017, it's weird, though, because he becomes sort of...
And Jones is Hatchet Man for this.
Jones knows he can't talk about the family specifically.
So if he wants to talk about the families, he sends Owen Troyer out to do it.
Owen Troyer does the thing about Neil Hustle not holding this kid.
He does the video about Erica Lafferty and confronting her.
I don't know if y 'all have seen that video, but Troyer just goes off about, I don't understand what your problem is, ma 'am.
You know, I don't understand why you're not listening to men like Wolfgang Halbig and Jim Fetzer who've done the most reliable reporting possible on this event.
And I don't know why you're trying to butt heads of people who are trying to figure out what happened to your mom.
You know, when I came on this case, I was probably less busy, so I was better in touch with right-wing online media.
But, like I said, the last couple of years, too, I'm just...
Who can stomach it, right?
No offense to you guys, but for instance, I haven't been keeping up with Paul and seeing what Paul Watson's career looks like right now and how much it's still part of Infowars and what he's trying to carve out for himself, but it seemed like that's what he was doing in some way.
I figured he was going to be on the level of like a Ben Shapiro.
He was going to eventually be that kind of figure.
I've never seen a man so desperate for online engagement and just to have the rambling, clapping seals of right-wing Twitter just clap for any crap he pretends he's doing.
But the idea that you haven't been able to successfully monetize that into making yourself a star, just give it up by now because...
I swear, it's the right-wing grift right now is so easy.
I saw, not to like completely change the subject, but I saw Alex Berenson, the COVID misinfo guy, had started a substack and the dude's going to, he's bringing in a million a year on that substack, just like blogging three times a week about COVID misinfo.
And if you're Robert Barnes, how can you work this hard and not be like just the, I don't know.
Because he obviously couldn't make a Patreon, and so he tried to get on Locals, I think is the name of it, Dave Rubin and Jordan Peterson Patreon clone.
Well, you know, my mom raised me on people like Gore Vidal and some of those great debates of the 1950s and 60s where William Buckley would get in there.
And you can't help watch Alex Jones and not really feel shades of that.
Another thing, as that was all happening, like him ascending in Infowars and being Alex's lawyer, me and Jordan were both like, Alex, he's trying to take over.
It's not good if somebody who's clearly wanting to become an on-air personality talent is also the person who gets paid more the longer you're in court.
I came from a world, I'm a kind of weird guy, but I came from a world of kind of like, you know, regular lawyers who do things the regular way, even though we're like absolute pirates and going after who we go after.
But like, when we came to these people and saw like, yeah, here's just a guy who's just like...
It's really interesting because he tried to come into this lawsuit and portray himself as a First Amendment hero to be anti, you know, I'm going to take out these slaps that we're facing.
And then, like, every little other thing I've ever seen him do is go to a state without a slap law and file some crazy suit against it.
And so that's what, honestly, was, like, through my switch about Mark Randanzo getting involved in these cases.
But as you'll see from, like, the recent stuff in front of the court, When we discovered what his professional history really is, when we discovered the things that he has done in his career, all of a sudden, like, it stopped being about, like, this guy seems weird, maybe hangs around Nazis too much.
Like, this guy seems like a genuine menace to us, like, could potentially be really dangerous in this courtroom.
And so we brought a bunch of briefing about that.
And our court said, no, Mark Randanza cannot come anywhere near this state of Texas courtroom.
It will not happen.
And now there is, they have actually launched an appeal on that.
Like, you got to understand, the default judgments have been entered.
They haven't appealed those yet, but Margrandanza is appealing already.
He's a person who came up with all these corporate forms that we were talking about.
He's a corporate guy.
He arranged all of that.
And so his name's on all of that stuff.
So he's been around for age for maybe more than a decade.
I don't know.
Well, in the midst of the Fontaine case real recently after these default judgments and some other things went down, Eric Taub moved to withdrawal as his counsel and filed a motion with the court saying, I can't tell you why, because it's attorney-client communication.
I can't tell you why.
But my continued representation would force me to violate the Texas disciplinary rules of conduct and violate my ethical duties.
Nobody knows what that means.
Nobody has any idea what the conflict is, what the unethical thing that he would be forced to do is.
You could speculate a million different ways under the sun, but from an attorney client, we don't know.
All we know is something's rotten in Denmark in terms of that relationship.
Let me give you a super benign one that I don't think it is, but this would be a super benign one.
If I'm representing a client and I've been representing them for three years or whatever in the suit, and then all of a sudden I find out for some reason that that client and who he's suing is actually somebody I used to represent.
Right?
Like, let's say I sue Infowars, right?
Or something like that.
Or let's just make it really easy, right?
Like, you come to me and you want to sue Target.
And I'm representing you suing Target.
And then somewhere in the suit, I reckon I realized, oh shit, I used to represent Target.
But I didn't know that because they must have had a different name.
They must have been named something different back then.
That could give you, that would lead to the same result.
Well, the thing that typically comes up would be this client asked me to do something six months ago, and I thought it was all above board when it happened.
And I've recently discovered facts that say that's not above board.
And now I would need to reveal it or leave.
One of the two has to happen.
unidentified
If you won't let me reveal it, then I have to leave.
Well, his feeling on that one, look, you've got to say, what his argument there is, is that that suit is against Free Speech Systems, Kit Daniels, and the company, because Kit Daniels is the one.
Alex Jones never didn't pre-approve his article or get on and say something about Parkland.
So Alex Jones isn't individually.
But it's Infowars and Kit Daniels are our defendants there.
So I was like, hey, I'm free, but hey, all your money is next door at the studio on South Lamar.
I was really surprised when I didn't get it in 2019 because I really thought I deserved it in 2019.
I thought what they did was just...
Ridiculous.
But I understood what was going on there.
We give them a chance on appeal.
We give them their whatever.
And if they come back and they decide they're going to play nice, give them another chance.
When they came back after appeal in the summer and then things just were just a mess, just falling apart, I knew something was up.
Then when they had the whole thing up in Connecticut where they released the plaintiff's information to try to depose Hillary Clinton and all the weirdness, I was like, okay, any idea that this was going to go normal, that's gone.
There's only one way it can go.
The water can only roll one day way down this hill.
And so I knew where it was going.
It's interesting.
I think I said today, obviously, as you can imagine, reporters just calling me off the hook.
And I think I said to one reporter, I always knew we were going to beat Jones.
I just didn't think it would happen in this ridiculous of a fashion.
But I think on the other end, there's the other end that it is almost kind of poetic that it demonstrates what an absolute ridiculous character he is that he won't even participate in these suits, right?
Or respect the family's ability to have their day in court against him.
None of that even happened.
It is almost fitting of like, yeah, this does show.
Yeah, I think maybe some cold comfort is that you can really look at this as him being basically a coward and not being willing to engage with this process for what you can only assume is probably a keen awareness that he was not going to win this game.
You know, I think that masculinity and bravado is such an important thing to him and just sort of being able to look at this and be like, well, you couldn't even stand up and face responsibility and prove yourself right if you were right.
I mean, I think the largest problem, though, is it seems very clear to me that once the case was brought and his lawyers actually spoke to him, he was essentially like, okay, I've lost.
And so what I managed to do is ring the end of fucking democracy out of it for an extra few years.
That is, it's very interesting that they have strung him along on this idea that he doesn't have to play fair.
I mean, I'm not, look.
When we deposed him and some of the stuff we asked him about Discovery, and I really do feel some of it was honestly, yes, I just turned this over to the lawyers.
That's why we went after the lawyers on those bits.
But I think they really did at some point.
The worm started to turn that the only way that these lawyers could convince him that their series of failures wasn't due to really bad.
Potentially actionable things on Jones' behalf.
You understand, Jones has the right to bring malpractice actions against his attorneys, right?
If that was a thing, he can do that if he thinks that there was malpractice done in the way his case was done.
I think what seems to be from what we see how the court proceedings played out is that they convinced him that, no, this wasn't a result of anything that we've done wrong.
It's because the system is rigged against you and you're in a kangaroo court and this is a show trial.
That was something he could not wait to see happen.
And when it didn't happen, and when every time his attorneys came back to him and said, you owe more money now, you have to pay because we owe more attorney's fees now, then they just convinced him, you're getting railroaded.
It's not that we're doing anything wrong.
You're getting railroaded.
And then that's what caused him after these default judgments to just, and why I feel kind of free to speak out like this, is because he just spent days on his show.
Saying that our judge was a satanic cannibal with the globalist pedophile Pizzagate people or whatever, and has now just done the worm's turn.
He's like, no, you just don't play.
Now I'm just not participating.
I'm not going to play these people's games.
And so from here on out, I'm just expecting it to be just an absolute circus.
I don't think anything's going to happen normally from here until trial.
No, I mean, that's why I have to push back on this stuff.
Why I have to come out and like...
Again, I'm doing...
Part of the reason I like to come on your show, I know it's weird and I know we cuss and we say weird stuff and maybe we're a little bit different than normal mainstream media, but the problem is it's like...
Mainstream media is really bad about getting these stories wrong, and they're really bad about just taking whatever they want and using it to do their agendas, and Jones will use that too.
So I do like to use this kind of form to say the things that are being said about the conduct of the attorneys, about the conduct of the court, about the conduct of the plaintiffs, it's bullshit.
And it's so disrespectful to see a person who has already gone through all of these links and then now gets these orders against them and is now just like, no, that's why I can't.
I have to get on here and tell you these things that are being said by Jones out of his mouth are simply not true.
I was curious if there are any consequences that he might be facing in Connecticut that are different than the possibility of what he could be facing in Texas.
I mean, what you've described so far, though, I cannot imagine the nightmare after all of the legal aspects are over.
Just that, like...
Okay, let's apportion what it is that we need to give to people through two different courts, through two different lawsuits, through multiple plaintiffs, through all of this stuff.
They're going to have to find a really, really evil accountant to get out of some of that shit.
Alright, now that the 1998 and conversation with Mark Bankston is out of the way, I feel like I'm in an emotional place where I can actually get to this.
Everyone that has stood up to the globalist deep state is being indicted.
They're being SWAT teamed.
They're being denied trial by juries.
They're being imprisoned.
This is the weaponization of the judiciary in this country.
There are still pools of honorable people in the judiciary like you're seeing in the Kenosha case with the judge there who's actually doing a fair trial.
But in all the Soros-controlled zones like Austin, Texas and New Haven, Connecticut, you see naked corruption, mafia-level organized crime, in my view, from the judiciary.
Just complete lawlessness.
And here's a great example of that overhead shot, please, on this November 15th, Monday transmission.
Look at this headline out of the Associated Press.
But whatever you have to do in order to make your own victimhood, losing these cases by default judgment, you have to fit it into a larger narrative, and that's a perfect way to do it.
So, Alex is, I think he's trying to pretend that he didn't actually lose these cases, which is fun.
Look at this headline out of the Associated Press.
Alex Jones loses lawsuit over Sandy Hook hoax conspiracy.
Now, what really happened?
This came out again back in October, the last default in Austin.
Now it's November.
Default there.
But before I show you this, what's happening in Connecticut, father of Sandy Hook victim wins defamation lawsuit against Alex Jones.
That's from 2019.
Now, did I lose the suit?
It says, a father of victim of the Sandy Hook Elementary massacre has won defamation lawsuit against the authors of a book that claimed the shooting never happened.
And it goes on to say, I've lost the suit.
I'm not in the book.
I didn't lose that suit.
Didn't happen.
We contacted AP.
They said, sue us.
We're not changing it.
That's the level here.
If anyone wants to understand what's going on against Infowars that we deal with.
So Alex is correct that default judgments are uncommon, but that's just, you know, because most people accept their responsibility to take part in legal proceedings.
And Alex should be super aware of this since his buddy John McAfee had a default judgment against him in the civil case regarding his neighbor in Belize who was murdered.
Forcing a default judgment is one of the preferred strategies of high-profile people who don't want to have to engage with the legal system in civil cases like R. Kelly and Cuba Gooding Jr. did.
It's not hard to think that Alex is refusing to cooperate with the discovery process because he has something he really doesn't want to be public, like the exact nature of his finances or sources of funding.
There's probably a good chance he knew he was going to lose these cases if they ever went to trial, so if you're going to lose anyway, why not protect your business secrets and simultaneously create a situation where you can claim you weren't actually found guilty?
This is a good PR strategy, but it probably won't matter.
And it doesn't affect the real world.
He's going to be on the hook for so much money, and it's already too late, generally, for him to do all that much about it.
He might be able to get some kind of appeals going, but...
I mean, from what I understand, appellate judges are somehow even more unconcerned with human life than most other judges.
So, like, them getting two judges in two different states, having to send them cases that they default judged upon, an appeals court is going to be like...
We gotta take this one up.
I need to wait another three years for me to handle this shit.
That's such a disgusting expression of Alex's out-of-control narcissism.
Like, how dare he be so self-centered that he thinks that when you hear the word Sandy Hook, the first thing you think of is him.
I study Alex for a living, and he's not even the first thing I think of when I think of Sandy Hook.
He's just an absolute monster who can't experience anything in life unless it revolves around himself.
And it honestly kind of makes me sad, because ultimately what you end up realizing is that there's a fair amount of people in the world who base their political beliefs on what they think is researched information, but it's really just the product of Alex's moody, narcissistic outbursts.
So Alex will probably end up getting double defaulted in this case, but again, it's going to be his fault if he does.
The next phase of the trial is about determining what is a fitting financial penalty, and if Alex doesn't cooperate with Discovery on this part, like by refusing to turn over the appropriate financial documents, he can fuck around and get another default judgment.
He won't if he cooperates, though.
He has every ability to, he has every opportunity to.
And he can talk big all he wants, but I have absolutely zero doubt that he would quit if he didn't have the flashy studio, the weird pill line that he runs himself, the ability to travel wherever he wants and buy things like tanks, the ability to pay a staff to gather headlines for him and work out all the technical aspects of the show.
he would quit in a second if he didn't have those things.
He would be losing essentially all of the things that allow him to pretend to be a legitimate show and sets him apart from any dumb asshole on YouTube Yep.
As someone who watches this show, I think it would be a fascinating narrative arc.
I don't think it's gonna happen, though.
I just don't think Alex has the humility to go back to being a DIY guy.
So people ask, how am I doing when I get demonized and I get lied about and I get put through kangaroo courts?
And I'm like, well, how do you think the children are?
The country being forced to wear a mask over their faces with teachers, taping them to their heads and screaming at them and telling them that they're bad because they're white.
Part of me wants to say that's probably bullshit, but it's actually possible that that happened.
Okay.
Tornadoes are super deadly, but there have been documented cases of people being inside cars that are actually picked up by tornadoes and they survive.
But I don't think it's a super common thing, although there are plenty of tornadoes in Texas.
It's conceivable.
I don't believe it, but I'm open to the possibility of it being true.
Me and my buddy, Nicky Gifts, one of the things that we were taken aback by is how, like, yeah, a lot of the stuff in these episodes are things that happen to, you know, people in school.
I mean, it does seem like he's living in a never-ending The Days of Our Lives episode where everybody has an evil twin and shit's going crazy all the time.
We live in a country run by the United Nations and absolutely ruthless private families.
And I have even...
NBC News and others reporting that, okay, it's true, there is a heart attack drug being added to the children's vaccine, but it's not for heart problems, it's as a base to the shot.
And you go research, it has nothing to do with being a base.
So the drug in question here is tromethamine, and it's being put into the Pfizer vaccines.
That's definitely true, but it's not related to heart attacks.
And the explanation of replacing saline, it's a little more complicated than Alex is making it seem.
For one thing, tromethamine has been an ingredient in the Moderna vaccine all along, and the reason is really straightforward.
Tromethamine is a very effective preservative, and it helps increase drugs' shelf life.
This is actually a really big deal because one of the arguments that Pfizer has made about being unable to send their vaccine to many parts of the developing world is that it has, as Reuters put it, a, quote, strict storage requirement at ultra-low temperatures, which this will help address.
Tromethamine is used as a stabilizing ingredient in many vaccines and even a homologue, a diabetes medication.
Reuters notes that it's also used as a stabilizer in many fragrances and cosmetic products.
As for the part about replacing saline, it's not that it's replacing saline solution the way that Alex is sort of implying.
That saline is just salt and water, and it can help use to clean wounds or reduce dehydration.
The saline that's being replaced by the tromethamine is phosphate-buffered saline, which is a very different thing that has a very different effect from the standard saline solutions.
Phosphate-buffered saline has disodium hydrogen phosphate added to it, and this has the effect of helping stabilize the pH level of a solution that it's added to.
However, for the needs of this vaccine, tromethamine can do what PBS can do and then some, so it makes more sense to switch that up.
The thing about this being a heart attack drug is also kind of dubious, the tromethamine itself.
Tromethamine isn't a drug, really, that you'd give to someone to effectively reduce their risk of having a heart attack.
The primary connection between this drug and cardiac issues is that tromethamine is used to treat metabolic acidosis, which is a common side effect that someone may experience if they're having cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.
It's not that tromethamine addresses the heart attack.
It's used to deal with a common side effect of the bypass surgery itself.
In the interest of total fairness, it is true that a small amount of heart attacks are thought to possibly be due to metabolic acidosis, but the causal link is a little bit iffy, and there's an important qualifier.
Tromethamine doesn't really help with heart attacks per se, it just helps with metabolic acidosis, which is a condition where a person's body is too acidic, or where the kidneys can't filter the acids in the body quickly enough to keep the acid base level in check.
Typically, this connection between metabolic acidosis and a person having a heart attack is seen in the elderly, who are experiencing difficulty with other organs, like the kidney, and generally the situation is that someone has late-stage chronic kidney disease.
So it's not really relevant to the story that Alex is trying to tell.
Also, let's not forget that this doesn't even work as a conspiracy theory for Alex.
The point of the globalist's plans with the vaccine is supposed to be to kill everyone off.
So what sense does it make for them to create a vaccine that gives people heart attacks and then change the formula to include something that would stop people from having heart attacks?
So, Stephanie Rule absolutely doesn't make millions a year at NBC, although I'm sure she does fine.
If Alex wants to talk about how she's really rich, he should, but it's not so much about her salary from NBC.
It should be a conversation of her activity in the world of hedge funds, which I'm pretty sure brought in way more money than anything that she's done on NBC.
Yeah, she did say that average Americans can afford to handle inflation, and while she's probably right about most of the people in her circle, that came off as a painfully unaware statement.
She's gotten a lot of backlash, and rightfully so.
I'm not sure that her making dumb comments on NBC is really the hard-hitting news that Alex likes to imagine he covers, but...
I don't know.
I'd probably just leave this alone with him and deal with the more pressing issue.
Yeah, if you're just bored for the day, then you can engage and get some points off of that, and then it's all forgotten the next day, so who fucking cares?
But I don't think that you get any closer to achieving that by talking about the individual instances and making a big deal out of the individual times people say stupid shit.
So, according to Payscale, the average salary for news anchors at NBC is $69,317, with the high range being $110,000.
No one has presented a shred of evidence to prove that she makes 18 times the high end of the salary range, but that's the salary that's listed for her on one of those very sketchy celebrity net worth type sites.
The $2 million is the figure that you'll get from Legit, is the name of the website, and it's run out of Nigeria.
Most likely, Alex chose this one because all the other sites that you can find, they cite significantly lower salaries for her, and it just doesn't work for the point that he's trying to make.
A lot of them have figures like $200,000 a year.
Alex is just talking shit about this two million a year nonsense, and I think part of the reason that he thinks that this is even within the realm of possibility might be that he makes millions a year.
That's just a guess on my part, but it's funny to think that he's doing this story about how out of touch Stephanie Ruhle is, and he might be just exposing how out of touch he is.
So you're just mad about Jennifer Rubin going on an MSNBC show and saying that there should be rules where news outlets shouldn't be able to call Republicans normal anymore.
This is a far cry from Alex literally advocating for the outlawing of the Democratic Party on multiple occasions, and again, such a trivial story to be spending time on.
At times it feels like his show is just a grouchy old man who gets mad at cable news and he wants to yell about it.
I mean, but if one day we just woke up and you were about to listen to the show and all of a sudden you just heard Lionel, Lionel, Lionel, Lionel and Alex came out and was like I hate book bags on the train!
Now, when we talked to Mark Bankston, one of the things that we discussed was the bank records and the way Alex saw fit to have an accountant clean them up a little bit.
They defaulted us mainly for saying that the accounting firm, it's a well-known, respected accounting firm, gave them They demanded our financial records, which you wouldn't think you'd get in a civil defamation case.
It shouldn't be about what I said or did.
And so I said, no, just give it to them.
They're planning to default us, and I want to make them do it all the way.
And then they just said, this isn't your real finances.
And we said, well, you can't prove a negative.
I mean, it is.
And they said, well, it's not a QuickBooks file.
It's a spreadsheet.
I talked to like four accountants, different accounting firms, about this.
And they said, this is fraud.
And we talked to all those accounting firms.
They said, yeah, you can't give somebody a QuickBook account because a QuickBook account's a database.
It goes back to the beginning of our QuickBooks over 20 years ago.
They said from this date to that date.
So what you do is you take it out and put it into a spreadsheet.
That's what I'm defaulted for is a spreadsheet scan of...
Every transaction at this company.
And you think, that's outrageous that you would even let them do that.
Folks, they were always going to default us.
And they're always going to do it at the appeals court level, too.
I've known that.
I'm just going to illustrate the whole thing for everybody.
And then that gives us the time to move forward and fight the globalists.
This is not my battle.
This is not my war.
This is kind of like a rabid chihuahua that has Rabies is biting me in the leg.
And I've got a pack of wolves tearing my children apart.
Somebody needs to call QuickBooks because, I mean, obviously they had this massive oversight where you can't choose what dates you want to print out the files from.
There's no way.
When you go into the QuickBooks software, you can only download all of your finances or none.
It's blustery nonsense until there's a decision, and then once he loses or is going to lose, it's a turning tail and being like, I didn't really care about that at all.
I learned about this 20 minutes before I went on air.
And quite frankly, I've got all this incredible news that needs to be covered.
And I just, I really think that what's happening to me and to Infowars, I mean, I know it's a symptom of the disease of globalism and the disease of corruption and decadence in this country and in the world in general.
And really, of the end of the country as we know it.
Now, it can be rebooted, hopefully, but the country, for all intents and purposes, is gone.
This is modern warfare we're under, and the country itself is being bankrupted and dissolved.
And if I spend my time tactically talking to HBO or talking to the Wall Street Journal or running around trying to defend myself from the fake things they've launched against me, we're going to lose the whole country and the planet.
So, the implication of what Alex is saying is that if he doesn't stay focused on the work that he's doing, the very specific work that he's doing, all hope for the planet is lost.
And you say, oh, well, they'll never get away with that.
Really?
Really?
They are getting away with all of it, but separately.
Let me tell you how you can fight back against this, because we're very close to winning, and the globalists see info wars as the tip of the spear, and rightfully so.
And I'm very proud to be the tip of the spear, and I'm very honored to be in this position, because I want to be a champion for liberty.
I want to be a champion for freedom.
I asked to get in the arena, and I asked for this fight, and I expect a lot more to happen.
But I also know in the end, these evildoers will be punished and will be defeated across the board.
I know they're going to stage false flags and try to blame me for them and others.
They already have, like January 6th.
And I understand that somebody's got to not be a coward to stand up to these people.
So I'm doing it.
All I ask is that you pray for us and you spread the word about the broadcast and you financially support us so we can go into this fight strong and give it our 110%.
So please pray for InfoWars.
Please pray for me.
Please pray for my family.
And please pray that I be given focus and clarity and a calm, steady heart and mind and hand.
I got an interview with General Flynn Saturday down in San Antonio, and he was speaking to a crowd of 5,000 people at a big event being held at Cornerstone Church, Pastor Hagee's church.
And I really respected and liked the general a long time ago, but I didn't know him, and I've gotten to know him the last few years.
and I think he's a great guy and the type of person that can be George Washington 2.0.
And I quite frankly think he's...
Better suited than somebody like Trump.
Because he understands it's a globalist New World Order operation.
Now, I think I actually agree with Alex that Flynn could be another George Washington, but from my perspective, it's the dark version of our first president.
Flynn made some comments that we're going to get into later when he was speaking at the Cornerstone Church in San Antonio just before this.
But it's also important to note that it wasn't just like a speech at a church.
It was part of the fairly QAnon-leaning Reawaken America tour.
Other speakers included Mike Lindell, Roger Stone, the Q Patriot Street Fighter, former Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne, and of course, Stella Emanuel, the ivermectin doctor who believes that we're living in revelation and also has a promo code on her website so Alex's listeners can get 5% off their drug purchases.
Yeah, it's so fucked up, I don't really even know how to engage with it.
Like, these are the people gathering who yell about the Constitution all the time, and they're hero-worshipping a lunatic ex-general who's advocating something in direct opposition to the First Amendment.
Our constitutional duty, which of course is to overthrow the United States government and turn this into theocracy, just like the founders intended when they wrote that constitution that specifically outlawed that.
I really am blown away that these people with the Constitution in their fucking pockets are looking up at General Flynn, say, obvious bullshit about nothing and thinking, I want to overthrow democracy for that.
But they don't have the people that live in those cities.
Maintain their control through election fraud, and they know that.
Victory.
Florida School District ends mask mandate after an eight-year-old girl told them they should be in prison.
Palm Beach County School District has ended a mask mandate just days after a second-grade girl told school board officials they should all rot in jail for forcing children to wear face coverings against their will.
This is a fun story, and I can see how Alex would want to present the idea that this second grader shamed a school board, and that's the impetus to stop a mask mandate in his Palm Beach County schools, but that's just not true.
The state of Florida's Department of Health had released an order that prohibited schools from having mask mandates unless parents could opt out of them.
This school district, however, decided to go against that order.
The second grader Alex is talking about is the daughter of a woman named Bailey Lachelles, and for about two months, she'd been suspended for refusing to wear a mask at school.
Ultimately, it wasn't her activism or the mom having her eight-year-old daughter go on Fox News shows that ended the school district's mask mandate.
The decision was based on a court ruling that was made that determined that the school district was in violation of the Department of Health's order and the fact that children could now be vaccinated and that local COVID rates had fallen dramatically.
since that decision was made to not let parents opt out of children wearing masks.
It's fun to imagine that a second grader yelled at a school board and they were so taken aback by the truth she was spitting at them that they cowered and stopped requiring masks I'm going to throw this out here.
For any content that reinforces their bullshit, that they will grab up anyone, anywhere, who has fulfilled any part of their narrative, and put them on TV.
Is it possible, Dan, that might be an incentive for people who want to get on TV?
I think the problem with me not having kids is that I don't get the thank you from the kids that I don't have that I didn't later on go tell jokes about them or talk about them on this podcast or something along those lines.
Yeah, I get a sense that there's a little bit of disappointment on Alex's part that his daughter would not be his proxy in this fight that he wants to have so he could get a lot of attention.
Are you telling me that you don't want to go to school, stand up in front of all of your friends, and tell them that your dad, Alex Jones, says he thinks that this is all bullshit?
You're telling me that at this very delicate moment in the sort of maturation process, you don't want to alienate yourself from literally everybody around you because you're taking a stand publicly for my bullshit?
I would have a tough time processing Alex talking about this eight-year-old that he admires and being like, well, that's what I wanted my daughter to do.
Well, I'm not sure if it's a blackmail threat, but it makes it clear that if you don't do the things that I want you to do, there'll be disappointment.
Exactly.
And it's kind of, like, there's a similarity in it.
And when you did talk about using nebulizer and nebulized peroxide, it didn't really get across how effective it is.
My wife and I were exceedingly sick, and we used X2, two drops of X2, and you have to really cut it down on the peroxide.
Recommend the food-safe, the food-grade peroxide, 12%, and cut it down like exceedingly light.
And every time we use it, it just cleans the lungs, it cleans the sinuses, because that's where the majority of the infection is going to transfer into us, is through the sinuses and then down the throat and then into the lungs.
And people just need to know.
I think if you interviewed Dr. David Bronstein, it'd be pretty enlightening because his clinic was basically built on that.
For some context, the type of hydrogen peroxide most people would be getting from the store is 3% hydrogen peroxide, and food grade is 35%.
There are some medicinal uses that make some sense, but pretty much all of them are strictly topical applications, like softening corns or disinfecting small cuts.
But even in these cases, it's got to be super diluted, which is why the stuff you buy at the store is 3%.
I hate that I have to say this, but just because this guy is saying you should nebulize and inhale this bleach cocktail instead of drink it, that doesn't make it any more safe.
This definitely can still be toxic, particularly if you mess up your measurements when you're diluting.
I would say that Alex has no idea who David Bronstein is, and he was just bluffing when the caller asked, but in this case he might actually know who that dude is, since one of Alex's anti-vax compatriots, Dr. Mercola, has promoted him in the past.
So it's possible that Alex does know, but man, fucked up, fucked up call.
I'm consistently blown away because the one truth about humanity that has stayed consistent through our entire history is when people feel bad, a lot of them are going to try and solve it with poison.
That's a very weird thing that has stayed with us from the very fucking beginning.
I hate that I have to say this, but there are not studies that show that inhaling hydrogen peroxide through your nose clears out COVID before it has a chance to hurt you.
There's no compelling evidence or actual studies that show this conclusion, but there's some ideas that it's possible.
Even then, doing a nasal rinse with a diluted solution is a bit different than inhaling hydrogen peroxide, which there is no evidence is effective.
And in September, actually, the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America released a statement warning people that regardless of what you've seen on social media, do not put hydrogen peroxide in your inhalers.
But in his show, Black Books, there was a moment where he's really, really sick, and he's by himself, and he looks over at his oven, and he sees the oven cleaner and goes, if you can clean an oven, you can clean me.
And I feel like that's so much of how people think.
I think because we have asymmetrical warfare against us, and they're using our good graces and our politeness against us in terms of basically murdering and genocide us, I think we need to see, and I think there must be enough data and information out there to start.
doing some Nuremberg II hangings.
I think once you start doing one or two of those, that the people that are kind of like, well, they told me to do it, they're gonna realize that they are culpable for Sure.
Once they see that, hey, this is for real, and their life is on the line, I think that would be a major turning point.
So there's never been sort of like a opposition party that's kind of a minority that decides to then overthrow the government and through the government...
Justify their actions despite them being incredibly immoral.
I mean, I wouldn't be surprised if at a certain point he's like, let's overthrow the Texas governor and install the lieutenant governor as the supreme overlord of the Texas fucking ethnostate.
We're gonna have to first overthrow the government so we're gonna kill a bunch of henchmen first, civilians, people not involved, people who don't even really care.
This is only news because Alex doesn't understand the topics that he covers.
It's not surprising to see the possibility of a COVID variant showing changes in its spike protein, and that's actually a large part of what made the Delta variant more transmissible than the Alpha strain.
French officials are investigating a new strain that they've detected, but it's not entirely clear as of yet how different this strain is going to end up being.
According to an article in Reuters, it looks like researchers are interested in how he can possibly hide from PCR tests, since, quote, several of the patients delivered negative PCR tests and returned a positive result only from samples taken from blood or deep in the respiratory system.
However, even if this does end up being the case, quote, France's health ministry said late on Monday that early analysis did not suggest the mutation was more contagious or more deadly than earlier versions of the virus.
There's a lot of information yet to be learned about this variant, and it very well may turn out that it's not a huge deal and that the vaccines we have are still effective against it.
So it could end up being more or less an academic issue.
Or it could turn out that its ability to evade PCR tests means that an alternative screening method might be needed in some cases.
It's also possible that significant enough mutations to the spike protein would make it resistant to the vaccines, but it's way too early to jump to that conclusion, and that's what Alex is essentially doing, and he's saying that it's intentional.
Are you telling me that it's way too early to jump to the conclusion that Bill Gates financed the creation of a new variant of COVID in order to continue killing people and blame the patriots, even though the vaccine he's already given us...
Having to spend time and energy knowing we didn't do the things they said and telling lawyers they're going to default to us years ago.
And then when the lawyers are like, nobody's ever given them all their bank accounts.
This judge is crazy.
I said, give them all to them, but they're going to default.
Still did it.
Because I wanted to show the world all that and make them sit there and follow their political orders to engage in such outlandish, incredible corruption.
I knew all this.
I told them all that.
I remember, again, I was sitting there one time when they deposed me in Texas, and they're like, you don't take this very seriously.
You don't know this is serious.
Later, I was driving home and called my dad up, and I was laughing.
I'm like, these people have no idea that I already know all about this stuff.
That I was born researching this information and actually hearing family talk about things that they witnessed themselves.
And what is it about white people the globalists don't like?
Well, the Christian ethos and what happened in the West about 500 years ago, the Renaissance, the idea of empowering the average person, people having basic rights.
People having free speech, people having a right to a jury, the Gutenberg printing press, books.
It doesn't make any sense because this caller and Alex have the story backwards.
They're saying that these hundred kids in Virginia were given adult doses of the vaccine, three times what they were supposed to get, but that's not true.
In reality, according to a story in the Washington Post, quote, the doses of Pfizer vaccine given at the clinic were diluted more than recommended, according to the health department.
It's not clear if this is what happened in this other case, but in another incident in Lewden County, Virginia, a pharmacy was administering incorrect doses to children, but their mistake kind of makes sense if you don't think about it too much.
Children's doses are one-third of the standard dose.
So you might think that you could dilute one-third of a standard dose, and just like that, you've cooked up a child's dose.
If I were one of the people who designed the vaccine, the knowledge that some pharmacist was just like, oh, well, if I have three little cups, I'll just pour a little bit of this vaccine in there, each one.
Saying, you know, about 50% of what I'm saying is true, the other 50% isn't true, and just rebuttling what he can and then confirming what I have found.
So, I responded to that in kind six months later after he sent me that.
And I got fired on 11-23-2010 after Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Google, all of them called up Orlando Examiner and said, if you want to fire this guy, we're going to terminate our contract with you.
My voice being silent for about 11 years, everything y 'all are going through, I've went through, it's a battle we got on our hands, but it's surprising I got on your show.
And that's why the Democratic Party and these billionaire philanthropists, as they call themselves, have been financing the attacks on the Second Amendment and on the First Amendment in this country and financing an attack on the judiciary.
They have been buying up the judges.
They have been buying up the courts.
They've been paying for all the DAs.
They've been putting in the county attorneys as well and even the state attorney generals.
They admit this.
And the witch hunts against their political opposition are now legion.
And that's all that's happened here.
I have spent millions of dollars fighting these fraudulent Sandy Hook lawsuits against me.
And they never wanted me to have my real day in court in front of a jury.
It's too dangerous for the establishment that uses those dead children to try to destroy the First Amendment, not just the Second Amendment.
And so we gave them all of our documents, all of our bank records, things that had nothing to do with a defamation suit.
And the judge in Texas and the judge in Connecticut in lockstep said, Jones has failed to give us documents and it's simply not true.
All of this is because the establishment is in its death throes and it's lost control of the American people.
And so they think if they can target leaders of the populist opposition and demonize us and do all sorts of corrupt things to us, that that's going to intimidate other people to not stand up politically against them.
That's not going to work.
It's just like when Hitler bombs civilian targets in England.
And the general public went from being 90% against a war to 90 plus percent for a war.
And so that's what's happening is, this is nothing but the judicial system being weaponized, trying to intimidate me and others, and it's not going to work.
I'm going to work harder, I'm going to put out more films, I'm going to do more interviews, and I'm going to continue with my pro-America freedom advocacy, and I'm not going to be silenced.
I'm going to need to see Alex cite some sources on this 90% against to 90% for figure in terms of British support for the war, because I can't find anything that comes close to that.
There was a spike in morale and support for the war at the end of the Blitz, but it also coincided with when the Soviet Union officially entered the war, so these motivators could be working in concert together.
Also, there was a spike when the U.S. joined the war, so I mean, like, there's...
Anyway, the point Alex is making about Germany hoping to demoralize the British with a blitz, but that only making them more in favor of the war is maybe somewhat accurate, but only if you interpret it really generously.
Also, an important point is that the enthusiasm in Britain went up when the blitz ended, not while the bombing campaign was still active.
This dynamic kind of hurts Alex's metaphor, but I don't want to split too many hairs.
It's something that he brings up over and over and over again.
He only really has maybe a hundred sort of word blocks that he uses.
What you talked about how the left and wokeism is a new religion.
Klaus Schwab came out two days ago and gave a speech.
The head of the WTO, Bilderberg Group, Davos Group.
I mean, he's the head of all those globalist organizations.
He's really like the world corporate president, the chairman of the board.
And he openly said, we're creating a new religion of the earth, and that's how we're going to unify everybody.
It's a religion where humans are bad and evil, and they, the high priest, are going to make sure that they suppress us and control us for the good of the earth.
I mean, this is a very authoritarian system.
So can you elaborate?
On your point about how they are an oppressive religion that wants control of our bodies, that's a really good point.
unidentified
When you take a look at this from a biblical worldview, that's the endgame for Lucifer and for Satan.
Now we're going to get into some theology because...
That's what is going to happen with the advent of the Antichrist.
He is going to be a superstar that is going to unify the world, that is going to usher in a one-world religion, one-world economy, and one-world system.
I'm not saying that we are literally living in the book of Revelation right now, because there are some precursors that need to take place according to the Bible, but we are literally watching right now is...
The Bible would refer it to as the spirit of the Antichrist, because this is the grand finale before the second coming of Jesus Christ.
When people think that they can dictate and control and know what's best for your own babies over you as a parent, how the hell could you ever allow that?
And that is exactly why they didn't want it to come out in the trial because they knew if the jury knew this, they exactly knew that possibly this guy deserved to get shot because Kyle Rittenhouse was a minor when Joseph Rosenbaum was charging him from behind.
It's like if I liked murdering people and then I pushed somebody off a cliff and then I was in court and they were like, ah, but did you know this guy was also a murderer?