In Knowledge Fight #609, Alex Jones welcomes new listeners while ranting about "globalists" (Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates) allegedly genetically predisposed to violence and child abuse, then pivots to debunked COVID vaccine claims—heart attacks in kids, a 132-country tax conspiracy, and fabricated "negative effectiveness" data like -85.71%—ignoring FDA approvals and Pfizer’s 2021 pediatric trials. He mocks Howard Beale’s Network speech, misrepresents FDA letters as vaccine bans, and attacks Kelly Poor, a teen vaccine advocate, calling her a "Judas goat," while also falsely accusing Dr. Fauci of inventing HIV. The hosts dismantle his erratic logic, from unproven conspiracy theories to transphobic errors (like claiming Rachel Levine was the first four-star admiral), exposing his reliance on sensationalism over facts. Ultimately, Jones’s episode reveals a pattern of unfounded fearmongering and product promotion, undermining credibility while peddling apocalyptic fantasies. [Automatically generated summary]
Because there's a thrill to war, there's a thrill to the battle actually starting, and the swords clashing, and the spears flying, and the daggers plunging.
But it's the worst analysis is now true.
We are now officially in a global collapse.
It's already begun, it's accelerating, and 132 countries in the last week have agreed not just to a global income tax, but to tracking everything you do in live time to then tax and control what you do and punish you with a global social credit score.
And it's all been prepared and beta tested, but it's now being announced.
132 countries didn't sign on to this global income tax agreement to create a one-world government.
Sure, sure, sure, sure.
What happened is that there have been some negotiations going on between countries and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development aimed at agreeing to a minimum corporate tax rate of 15% for countries that agree to be a part of this.
So, you can't just take your money all the way to blah, blah, blah, and keep it there, and nobody gets any money from you, you thieving pieces of shit.
Yeah, the reason to do this is because when there are countries that don't have any or have very low corporate taxation, big international businesses have a huge incentive to either actually or symbolically base their business there in order to avoid paying massive amounts of tax to their actual base countries.
What happens then is that these companies move to low-tax countries or tax shelters, and all the revenue that would be being paid back into the countries they're from to support the infrastructure and development of their home countries, it's instead just kept by the executives.
In addition to this, the plan also dealt with digital service taxes.
Countries are able to impose these taxes on companies that are based elsewhere but provide services or goods that are consumed in their country.
Part of the proposed plan had to do with shifting away from digital service taxes and what are called unilateral measures.
The United States had threatened tariffs against Austria, Britain, France, Italy, and Spain as they were part of this agreement, but were opposed to dropping their digital service tax, which would have led to redundant taxation.
The latest news is that these five countries agreed to keep their digital service taxes in place until the new tax agreement becomes active in 2023, and then they will drop them at that point.
Obviously, implementation of this is going to be a challenge, and it would be difficult to make sure that these giant companies don't just find other loopholes or just move to some of the countries that didn't agree to be a part of the arrangement.
But overall, this is definitely something Alex should be in favor of.
If his position is one that he's against these gigantic multinational corporations having free reign, then even though this deal isn't perfect, it's movement in the direction he should support.
But instead, what we see is a complete misrepresentation of what this story is even about from Alex and a lie designed to make his audience scared of this corporate tax agreement.
It's almost like he's trying to trick his listeners into opposing something that would help them and hurt big businesses.
Yeah, for somebody who's complained about how the North American Fair Trade Agreement has moved all of our jobs offshore and all this stuff, he should also be like, and we should have the money in here as well.
do not want to miss this weird energy It shocks me to discover that obscenely wealthy people believe that the poor will just eat each other alive.
It's so crazy that extremely wealthy people look down on the poor and think, well, obviously they're animals who will kill each other at a moment's notice.
So I think that what I find more interesting than even that is that Alex is having to thread a very bizarre needle here, which is that cyborgs are okay if they have free will.
Right, but if you have something implanted in you and you still have free will, uh-oh, they turn something on eventually in there that you didn't know was in that, and oops, your free will is gone.
It just totally hit me last night and this morning that the reason I've been so frustrated, and I've articulated this, but I just want to say it very, very, very, very clearly.
My frustration is that even the opposition to the New World Order does it all piecemeal.
Like they oppose this piece and that piece and this other piece.
It'd be like if I was going to physically attack you and I had hatchets in both hands and you decided that while I was hacking at you with these hatchets, I'm going to kill you in about two seconds.
And you decide to, because you're godlike, I guess.
You create a little tiny airplane that's got missiles on it that are microscopic, and you fly up and blow up one of the hairs on my leg.
That's not going to protect you.
Okay.
And that's basically what this is.
It's like a 10 trillion pound gorilla is coming at you and it's going to pull your head off and pull your arms and legs out of their sockets and then piss on you.
And you're looking at it coming at you and you're trying to sweet talk it.
The metaphor that he's trying, or what he's trying to illustrate is that people within the anti-new world order community seem to be missing the forest for the trees.
They have honed aggressive traits, is something he says, which kind of struck me as a little bit of a red flag because it kind of implies like it's genetic, their evilness.
And so you're going to wake up to that fact and you're going to understand that or you are going to die and your children are going to die with you because what you saw in Nazi Germany and what you saw in Soviet Russia and North Korea and Maoist China and Xi Jinping's China today and with the Muslims and with what happens in Africa and Latin America and all that hell and all that horror is going to look like a choir meeting.
It's going to look like Sunday school.
It's going to look like grandma knitting you a pair of mittens.
And there's something quite freeing about that, isn't it?
I mean, the left tries to harass me and lie about me and thinks I care what they say or what they do.
They're all in the process of being made homeless in a long, protracted collapse and then being put in an emergency center camp where they're basically injected with soft kills till they die.
And those of us that fight this are actually going to be the opposition, most of us doing better than even people that serve the system.
Yeah, I mean, this looks like if you could see inside his mind, he's just got a refrigerator with a bunch of magnets in kind of half words and he's just mixing them all together and whatever comes out comes out.
And then once all of the left who are in the camps die because of the soft-kill weapons, the globalists will come to the survivors who are the tough, rugged individualists and be like, we were just trying to separate the weak from you.
They've announced the injection of five and up, and then there'll be newborns with the deadly shot that embraces their immune system and the rest of it.
And they're announcing they're going to do it at schools, and they're going to force it.
And that's going to cause violence.
And they're going to say then the people that resist are terrorist.
And that's why they put it on the books as the main direct, not a law, but the regulations, that the main mission of the FBI and the military and the CIA is crushing people that don't accept lockdowns and those that don't accept open borders, just Americans, and that they are going to come and they're going to arrest everybody and start killing people.
Now, that's going to trigger a giant civil war.
And that's going to kill what's left of the military and the FBI, which I don't want because you know the cities to quit, getting all the firefighters to quit, the teachers to quit.
That's so they can put their people in.
And then if you get into war with those people, it's like killing zombies.
Scott, one of our great producers, made the point this morning.
He said, you know, this is really the shot heard around the world because when they start the forcible injection of children and the first child has a heart attack or microcarditis, which is already happening in the studies, they've been suppressing it, but it's come out.
Now they have to admit it.
Oh, we better not give it in 12s and ups.
Even the FDA said because it's causing massive numbers, not rare, but massive heart attacks and strokes and other things.
And so they just had those people resign.
They said, you know what?
You resign.
So the next group now resigned.
Now the third group has resigned.
It almost has gotten no coverage.
And Biden just came out last night and said, we are going to start inoculating on Halloween.
He said this a few months ago, and he just announced it again.
All the bills are called 666 to track you and trace you.
And, you know, oh, the World Health Organization says 6.6 billion shots.
6.66 shots have been given.
6 billion, 660 million.
They just put their little calling card.
You know, like when the army would kill you in Vietnam, they'd leave the Ace of Spage card.
Well, their calling card is 666 in Halloween.
Every year on Halloween, the left announces their, you know, horrible stuff doing because it's a trick.
A couple of quick things, though, in this Do Merit rebuttal.
The first thing is that actually the evidence of a connection between the COVID vaccine and myocarditis is actually becoming weaker the more information that we gather.
One of the main studies that was used as support for that claim was from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute and the headline that claimed that one out of 1,000 people vaccinated developed myocarditis.
This was from a pre-print study and in the process of peer reviews discovered that they'd used the wrong number for the total number of vaccines administered, which wildly threw off their results.
They'd based their number on 32 myocarditis incidents in 32,379 vaccinations when the number was actually 845,930 vaccinations.
This study was retracted by the authors who apologized for the error, but people like Alex and the Gateway pundit who screamed about it have never acknowledged this retraction.
There's not a cover-up of people having heart attacks.
It's something that was seen as a possible side effect and examined, and large data set analyses have not substantiated that there is a significant increased risk of myocarditis or pericarditis in people who've been vaccinated.
Although, as more information comes along, the understanding of these things will develop.
I have no idea who Alex is talking about when he says that there are people covering up vaccine-related resignations, but if he wants to get more specific, I'll look at it at that point.
I'm pretty sure he's just talking about that story from a while back where two people at the FDA resigned and then Alex has decided to exaggerate it.
Also, according to the White House, the actual timetable of vaccinations for children aged 5 to 11, quote, will depend on the independent FDA and CDC process and timeline, but our planning efforts mean that we'll be ready to begin getting shots in arms in the days following the final CDC recommendation.
In the same press release, they mentioned that the CDC's committee meeting to discuss this is scheduled for November 3rd, 2nd and 3rd.
So I'm going to guess they're going to miss the spooky deadline of Halloween for this evil plan.
COVID teams can vaccinate pupils against parents' wishes, schools told.
Now, there's no law in Australia.
There's no law in Canada.
There's no law in the UK.
There's no law in the EU.
There's no law in Singapore.
There's no law in Latin American countries as well.
But they're just doing it.
The same global directive.
You're going to do it.
Boy, that sounds like the kind of thing I'd want to do if I was a teacher is inject children with something that causes convulsions and death and heart attacks and blood clots and strokes so that dad comes up to the school and well, you know what dad does to you.
And see when dad does that, oh my god.
Oh my God.
The anti-vax terrorist just went and ran over or shot or stabbed the school nurse.
Yeah, and so that headline that Alex is basing this preemptive defense of killing school nurses on is from The Guardian, and it's an article from September over a month ago.
This article just has to do with how vaccinations would be carried out in schools in England.
As it stands, quote, in cases where parents withhold consent but the child wants to go ahead, the guidelines say the vaccination teams will determine if the child is able to make an informed decision known as gillic competence and make every effort to contact a parent and check before they proceed.
This only relates to students between the ages of 12 and 15, and it's a pretty narrow window of application.
If a parent doesn't want their child to get vaccinated and the child also doesn't want to be vaccinated, there is no vaccination.
If a child and a parent disagree, the first effort will be to determine if the child is gillic competent to make their own medical decisions.
If they are not deemed competent, then they will not be vaccinated.
And the parents' word stands.
If they are deemed competent, then they will be vaccinated.
But before that, every effort goes into trying to reach agreement between the child and their parent.
This article has absolutely nothing to do with students in any other country.
It has nothing to do with anyone being forced to be vaccinated.
And the way Alex is reporting this story, he's almost tailor-made to incite someone toward the very violence he's pretending to not be in favor of.
I also would like a follow-up in a week when he's in a little better mood and everyone's not going to die and see what happened other than he's not crabby.
And all the scientists that were even on their payroll, you know, almost all of them went public.
I mean, it's like they always say, oh, it's a consensus.
All the scientists say this stuff works great.
No, basically 99% of the scientists, including the FDA, the CDC, all of them that believed in the poison vaccines and the tainted vaccines and the human cloning and all that, but they thought it was really, you know, to develop life extension for themselves and others.
Now they're like, wait, we're really just going to kill everybody?
And a lot of people reward for that, but they're saying, you know, we're not going to get away with this.
And that is that all of the scientists who were in favor of the shots at the FDA and the CDC and all these places have turned on the vaccines and are now coming out with it.
And part of the reason that they're coming out against them is that they've realized that the plan isn't just to kill 90% of the population.
Like, if I was growing up, say I was 11 or 12, and my dad was pretty unstable, but every time he had a hangover at the breakfast table before I went to school, he would say, you're going to die if you go to school today.
But yeah, he can see the devil because the devil is running through his hands, which is something that is only allowed in a power that is the people who are above Bill Gates, which implies that that is the level that Alex belongs on, but he has rejected it to help you, Jordan, to help you see the light so he can tell you who the demons are.
Like, I wish that I could go back in time and have a recording of me hearing that for the first time because the blurt laugh that I made, I don't know if I could ever recreate it.
And then they're just going to cut the food off next and collapse the country and say, if you want food, you're going to have to come do whatever we say.
And you politically have to renounce yourself and say you were wrong and admit you were a fraud.
They have that truth and reconciliation communist thing they do.
If I had to filter that through my, like, what he could be possibly talking about, I'm going to guess that at some point he had an offer from a network like Fox News that recognized that he had a lot of talent and he was somebody who maybe they could find a place for on the network.
And what would need to happen before they could have him on is, or before they could have a contract, is some kind of a public cleaning up of his image.
I think that Del Close might be a better actor than this because Alex starts talking about how he got this offer of the Truth and Reconciliation Committee.
And he starts talking about how he was in these boardrooms.
And then it turns into him talking about how he lived that scene in Network.
You know, like in the big boardrooms in D.C., the big boardrooms in New York, the big boardrooms in Los Angeles.
I've been in them all.
When I say all those cities, and you know, you get the little Howard Beale speech.
Remember Howard Beale and Network gets that speech?
You think you just messed up a business deal, Mr. Beale?
It's not a business deal, Mr. Beal.
This is a church.
This is a system, and you are a unit of this church.
And Mr. Beale, in the final equation, we're going to destroy your soul.
That's what we traffic in, Mr. Beal.
You have meddled with the tidal forces of nature, Mr. Beale, and you must atone.
Do I got your attention there, Mr. Beale?
You get up there on your little 12-inch screen every night and you talk about countries and borders and nations and peoples.
There are no nations.
There are no peoples, Mr. Beale.
There is only a spectrum of corporations and companies.
And each of us is just a little piece of that larger whole.
And you see, you're obsolete, Mr. Beal.
You're non-essential, Mr. Beale.
And we're going to kill you, Mr. Beale.
We're going to give you the same speech they've given throughout history, and we're going to claim this time it's for a good cause and we are the savers of the world.
But the truth is, Mr. Beal, we don't like you because you're smarter and better looking than us, and you're connected to God, and we want to hurt you in a ritual and pull your teeth out while you beg for mommy and then kill you.
So, the first obvious thing that jumps out as a sign that Alex is making this story up is he's saying that people in Africa and Latin American countries get time outside based on their Social Security number.
I don't know when the Social Security Administration expanded operations to include the entire world, but unless that happened and I didn't hear about it, Social Security numbers are just something that people in the United States have.
For someone who's so concerned about immigration-related issues, Alex should really know this super basic thing that intersects with student visas and foreign workers and all these things that he yells about all the time.
But the image of people being grouped by Social Security numbers is kind of a big part of his long-standing FEMA camp narrative.
So the Financial Times has a tracker on their website that updates on COVID lockdown policies on a country-by-country basis.
They have this whole big paper where a number of political scientists from Oxford developed what they call a stringency index.
All the precise details of it are too complicated for us to get into here, but suffice it to say that they took indicators like school closings, restrictions on gatherings, and stay-at-home requirements into consideration, and they created a means of quantifying lockdown restrictions.
Naturally, this is a figure that changes for any given country over time, but the lockdown tracker is regularly updated, and the only two countries in Africa over a 75 out of 100 are Uganda and Namibia.
And in Latin America, there are just two also, and it's Venezuela and Argentina.
Of those countries, only Namibia and Venezuela are over an 85.
Looking over the qualifications and rankings, if you had a country making people stay inside for all but two hours in a week, it would have to be over 85 on the scale, just on how highly they would score in all of the other categories.
From some reporting I've seen, Venezuela is actually closer to what Alex is saying, but he's still wrong.
The government in Venezuela had been trying, and they'd implemented what was a 7x7 plan, where they would alternate weeks of strict lockdown rules and lax lockdown rules.
During the lax weeks, most businesses and public spaces could operate normally, but during strict weeks, only essential businesses were open.
And I can't find any evidence of people being forced to stay inside their homes or anything.
The government also had been operating a fuel distribution schedule since the end of last year, where vehicles could be fueled on specific days based on the last number of their license plates.
But also, according to the outlet Venezuela analysis, quote, Maduro also announced that the country would suspend its 7x7 model that saw a week of strict lockdown followed by a week of more relaxed measures.
Instead, barring any outbreaks, the country would abide by looser measures from the start of November until the end of the year as part of an attempt to boost economic activity.
So very recently, this whole plan was kind of put by the wayside.
Yeah, anyway, I don't know what Alex is reporting on, but Alex was just rambling about the devil and nonsense for a bunch of this episode, and I kind of wanted to learn something.
The whole Joint Chiefs of Staff could be walked out and hung right now.
Nothing's going to happen because they've got even more evil people and more evil people behind them, and that's part of the plan.
Now, that doesn't mean we let them take us to FEMA camps and kill us.
This is the discussion has to happen.
We got a case of Nazi Germany on steroids.
We got a case of Leninist Russia on PCP and steroids.
I mean, we are, we are.
We are going under Maoist control.
What Mao did is the model forcing you off the land, mass starvation for decades.
I mean, you understand, they want to crush us.
They want to humiliate Americans.
And they can't hear your guns, so they're going to take your food and medicine away.
We've been hit by a biological attack.
The globalists made their move.
We're in the middle of a biological war with mega corporations and the world government, and the chairman of the board is a fallen off-world entity, interdimensional entity.
And if somebody was like, a horseman called death, somebody claimed, if somebody was just like, hey, you didn't do the fucking work, you'd be like, how dare you accuse me of not doing the work?
And it was given to us to have dominion over it, but the establishment has decided that that is not going to be allowed to happen.
And so to create a self-fulfilling prophecy, they have greased the skids for the collapse of humanity so that those of us that have not collapsed will be tempted in the end to join with the dark side to save ourselves and help exterminate the giant, out-of-control third-world populations that will be traveling across the earth like an army of locusts chewing everything down to the bone.
World War Z ain't got nothing on what it'll actually look like, but they'll have hot blood pumping through their veins.
What if, now, here's what if, and this is going to blow Alex's mind, all right?
What if we subvert the globalists' plan by instead of starting a civil war over immigrants, we accept them, and then we all get together and fight against the globalists together?
So if their goal is to start a civil war and the immigrants are the way to do it, then you subvert their plan by just enjoying and liking the immigrants.
Yeah, it does feel like a lot of this show today is just him trying to express that he is filled with nothing but violent rage and the impotence, his inability to express it in anything resembling a healthy manner is just what we're seeing through work.
He's just hoping that somebody that listens to his show will cause some kind of a disaster that he can call a false flag and then he can get that cycle going.
Yep.
But he can't do anything on his own without it just he's in a boring hole of anger and violence.
No, I mean, you see what he's doing and it is absolutely the case that like when we his first description of the night before is like, oh, you guys are all just boogaloo boys now.
That's what it is.
You're just saying that the Civil War is not a problem.
And it's got the stamp on it that they've talked about so much, August 23rd, 2021.
And this is what Biden's talking about.
And this is the testing on babies and children that you've heard about that they rolled out after they started injecting adults.
And they knew that, well, if we inject children right away with an experimental shot, our scientists know it's not been approved in experimental.
They won't buy that it's been approved by the public.
They're going to say it's illegal.
They're not going to go along with this.
Let's just give them a chance, a false choice.
Let's tell the scientists, okay, we'll just do 18 and up, and then we'll do down to 12, and then we'll do down to five, and then we'll test it on babies.
And I know the lawyers that are involved in this will be breaking very, very soon in Texas and other areas.
They've had massive deaths, myocardius, and headaches that then lead to basically brain bleeds, horrible migraines that then lead to strokes.
So what's going on is Alex's mind has been blown, and he's acting like a violent little baby on this episode because he found a letter from the FDA to Pfizer and BioNTech that their biologics license application had been approved.
And so I thought I would just read to you from page five of this document: STNBL 125742 forward slash 0.666.
It's the annual report, annual stats report on post-marking study requirement commitments.
And it talks about deferring pediatric study C4591001 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the approved vaccine in children 12 years through 15 years.
And that's commentary in children 12 years through 15 years of age.
And it goes on, and they describe how it's approved in the year 2023 or 2024.
But see, that's the legal mind game is.
They're saying it's approved, but it's actually approved in the future when they think they're going to approve it.
See how that works?
Kind of like saying a man can be a woman, and then he's also a four-star admiral now, so the first woman is a four-star admiral.
I've definitely heard Alex try to claim that the Pfizer vaccine hadn't actually been approved yet, but I never knew what his evidence was because it's absolutely not true.
This is still from that FDA letter, and it's a section that Alex is misreading.
This is a paragraph where they're requiring Pfizer and BioNTech to submit a yearly report with the title, quote, annual status report of post-marketing study requirement/slash commitments.
In the letter, they're setting out guidelines and requirements for what the company will have to do to maintain its license.
And one of those things is post-marketing studies.
The letter says, quote, we are deferring submission of your pediatric studies for ages younger than 16 years for this application because this product is ready for approval for use in individuals 16 years of age and older, and the pediatric studies for younger ages have not yet been completed.
The section that Alex is reading is referencing one of the studies on children aged 12 to 15 that has its results pending.
And the final report on that is to be submitted by October 31st, probably where Alex got Halloween from, 2023.
There is a full study on children aged 6 months to 12 years that has a final report due on May 31st, 2024, and one on infants under 6 months that's supposed to be done by October 31st, 2024.
That doesn't mean that it'll definitely take until then, but that's the proposed timetable.
But Alex is trying to pretend that those dates are set in stone as when these things will be known, and that's when they'll be approved.
And since then, Pfizer has released the results of a phase 2/3 study that reflects a very positive response in children aged 5 through 11.
Quote, in participants 5 to 11 years of age, the vaccine was safe, well tolerated, and showed robust neutralizing antibody responses.
Just this week, the FDA looked at the data Pfizer had collected in their study, and NPR reported that they said that, quote, kids-sized doses of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine appear highly effective at preventing symptomatic infections in elementary school children and cause no unexpected safety issues.
Anyway, Alex has this letter that has some dates on it, and I guess he's just misinterpreted them and decided it's a conspiracy.
Sure.
Also, it's fascinating how the only crutch he has to fall back on is transphobia.
Like, he's got to take this swing at Rachel Levine for no reason.
I think he's mad because he's decided that they're saying that she's the first woman four-star admiral, but that's not true, and people aren't saying that.
And I just, I find his bigotry boring, and it's awful.
And it's the only crutch he has to fall back on because this is so weak.
This, as being the evidence of his conspiracy, these dates that he's taking out of context in this approval letter for the biologics license for Pfizer to do interstate commerce with their vaccine.
Be like, if you walk through a car lot and say you don't have any cars and there's no cars in the car lot, and the self-man goes, look at all these beautiful cars right here.
Starts kicking the air.
And he goes, I'm kicking the tire of this Mercedes right here.
There's no car there.
And he goes, yes, it is.
And he goes, I say it is.
And then five more crazy people walk out of the little sales shop and go, look at all these pickup trucks here.
If I'm not mistaken, Alex spends most of his show saying that his enemies are demons and of the devil.
He spent most of this show saying that.
Probably explains why in his dumb fantasies he imagines the Pope would act the same way.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So, like, there's a primary thing that Alex is doing throughout this episode, like, with this fantasies of blowing up mRNA factories and then talking about, like, what does dad do when he goes and runs over the school nurse?
He's preemptively creating a way for people in his communities to see the inevitable result of his rhetoric and the worldview that they profit off of as actually being the actions of their enemies.
And it's, you know, we see this over and over and over again with Alex.
The smug condescension towards me for not instantly believing that he's telling the truth about a plan that he is going to change tomorrow is so fucking infuriating.
So going back to the beginning of this when Alex was talking about the FDA letter, at the beginning of this clip, he's just playing games with the dates and information.
These dates are estimates and deadlines for when specific randomized triple-blind studies need to be done.
It doesn't mean that that's when they will be done, nor is it reflective of when preliminary information will be available from these trials.
For instance, that exact deferred pediatric study that Alex is referring to, C4591007, was the one that was meant to look at the vaccine's effectiveness in children aged six months to 12 years.
According to this letter, that data shouldn't be available until May 31st, 2024.
However, the Vaccines and Related Biological Product Advisory Committee at Pfizer just released a briefing document for their meeting that's going to be held on October 26th, 2021.
And you can find all the preliminary data from that study in their briefing document.
This is the data that we talked about earlier that Pfizer released an initial press release for back in September and has since been reviewed by the FDA for the kid-sized doses.
What Alex is doing is taking a month-old letter that has some dates in it that he doesn't understand, and then he's waving his arms around and yelling about how they haven't released the data that he's too lazy to go and find.
This is just sloppy, meaningless work that's meant to create the impression of something, and it's all meaningless.
I think he probably did watch Squid Game, and that's exactly what he's doing because anything that's in pop culture and is a movie at the time he's speaking is something he will be describing to you.
John Oliver, all of them attack me on a routine basis.
Jones sells unapproved supplements by the FDA.
That's like saying the church down the street is unapproved.
It's not run by the state-run religion.
No, the Food and Drug Administration Congress found when they tried to take over the supplement industry in the mid-90s that they had no jurisdiction over it.
So the FDA largely doesn't care about supplements unless something is actually dangerous.
Typically, supplements get in trouble with the FTC because they end up making unproven and almost always not true claims about their products in the marketing materials, which is what's covered by the Federal Trade Commission.
But to Alex's question, the FDA actually has a lot to say about milk.
There are guidelines about companies approved to ship milk, rules about the factories that produce milk.
They even have a 447-page guide on what exactly grade A milk is.
It's a long document.
As for oranges, yeah, the FDA has thoughts there too.
There are rules about orange juice, like pasteurized from concentrate, what can be called orange juice, what can't.
There's a rule that artificially colored oranges must be labeled as such in plain view on its bulk labeling or on, quote, a counter card sign or other appropriate device bearing prominently and conspicuously the fact that the oranges are artificially colored.
There's a 1973 declaration that made it official.
What was marmalade?
And because there's a controversy about using citrus fruits and marmalade because you have to add more sweetener.
And maybe that's not marmalade anymore.
That one starts.
That 1973 declaration starts, quote, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, no standard of identity has been established for marmalade.
This FDA letter giving a license to BioNTech and Pfizer to market their vaccine is just impossible for him to cover and do justice to.
He found some dates in the letter and decided that he knew what they meant, and he's used them to jump to the conclusion that the Pfizer vaccine isn't actually FDA approved.
And the media is lying to you, saying that it is because they plan to approve it in 2024 when the tests mentioned in the letter are done.
This lying that the media is doing, Alex compared that to a prisoner situation and Rachel Levine, which again is two stories that do nothing but highlight and push Alex's transphobia.
The story about the trans woman impregnating a fellow inmate at a California prison isn't a real story.
PolitiFact described the situation like this: quote, an image of what looks like a pregnant inmate in an orange jumpsuit is being shared on social media with this description.
Quote, California inmate pregnant after being forced to share prison cell with transgender woman.
PolitiFact, they reached out to Terry Thornton, the deputy press secretary for the California Department of Corrections, who confirmed that there were pregnant women in custody, but quote, they were pregnant when they were admitted to state prison.
This is just a transphobic backlash to California passing the Transgender Respect Agency and Dignity Act, which quote, allows incarcerated transgender, non-binary, and intersex people to request to be housed in a men's prison or a women's prison that is consistent with their gender identity.
Alex most likely saw this meme or was made aware of it because Stephen Crowder did a segment on it, which got him kicked off YouTube, you know, because the story wasn't real and it was essentially just anti-trans propaganda designed only to spread hate.
As it turns out, the story, and even possibly the meme, originated from a story spread by a member of the Women's Liberation Front, which is a group that NBC described as, quote, a self-described radical feminist organization best known for its opposition to transgender rights.
In 2019, representatives from the Women's Liberation Front were part of a panel hosted by the Heritage Foundation, where members said such gems as calling acceptance of trans people, quote, a social contagion.
So anyway, this is the information flow that Alex uses to get some of his reporting, and it's shit.
It's just meant to spread and justify the spreading of bigotry.
But instead, we have this whole snowball rolling downhill and getting to a point where, you know, Alex is just repeating these Not true stories as true as justification for why it's so hard for him to do his job because, oh, this FDA letter.
That's the first thing I'm going to play if I want to get around some videos.
That just shows clips of just some of the national TV sporting events news programs telling you that the propaganda about it being safe and effective is paid for by Pfizer, but it's a little bitty proviso, and they have a 30-minute or hour-long news program giving you a bunch of lies.
I don't know what this proves, especially if you can find these same networks like CNN or ABC or CBS running stories that are negative about Pfizer, like all of them did when they were fined $2.3 billion in the Bexter scandal back in 2008.
Yeah, and those years and years where you did not disclose or disclosed irregularly that you were brought to us by a gold coal company who has been censured.
Yeah, I wonder about the ethics of that compared to the ethics of the clear disclosure of Pfizer sponsoring some news programs.
I've told the laboratory that will not go named because we'll lose them.
And we've had them for a long time.
People will harass them until we don't ever tell you about where a lot of this stuff we have making it, but it's all tested and jumps through all the hoops.
Everything's gone.
But Brain Force Ultra Has amazing organic concentrated ingredients in it, and it's hard to get those ingredients.
So I've told them just as fast as you can make it.
When it comes in, there's normally we order like 10,000 bottles at a time.
I said, I don't care if 500 come in.
If you have the ingredients, even though it costs us more to set up and run a batch, if it's a smaller batch, I don't care.
I immediately thought of the story that they fucked up where it's like because there is the dropping antibody total, they're bullshitting us and being like, your entire immune system is going away.
So, this story is based on a blog post on a website called The Expose, which I guess is some kind of an upstart Infowars type of anti-mainstream media media outlet from the UK.
They have an article that Greg Reese uses as a source in his video with the headline, quote, new UK Health Security Agency report proves without a shadow of a doubt that COVID-19 vaccines do not work and have negative effectiveness as low as minus 66%.
So, I figured I'd go and find this blog and see what they were working with.
In Greg's video, he shows a particularly jarring spreadsheet from the blog post, which claims to be from a UK Health Security Agency report showing negative rates of vaccine effectiveness.
So I go to the blog, and the first thing that actually shocked me was that this post is actually arguing that getting vaccinated makes you more likely to get COVID.
The negative effectiveness is what that's how they're describing it.
So I found the actual HSA report that this came from.
And guess what?
This blog added the vaccine effectiveness column.
That's a stat that just made up and they photoshopped into this thing that they're presenting as a reference to this official document.
And guess what?
That's already fraud.
They're already deceiving by way of manipulating the information because they want you to think that this vaccine effectiveness statistic is something that the HSA tracked.
It's something that they thought was relevant and it comes from official sources.
What this blog has done is take the numbers of these columns and create their own stat.
They're taking the COVID case rate per 100,000 of vaccinated people and dividing it by the rate of people who are unvaccinated and then presenting that as a meaningful stat for some reason.
Remember how I said that they claimed a negative 85.71% effectiveness rate for people between 40 and 49?
That was because they took the rate of 1,281.8 per 100,000, which is the figure for vaccinated people in that age range, and they divide it by 690.2, which is the rate of unvaccinated people.
The result is 1.8571, which is how they got to their figure, and it's completely meaningless as a statistic.
However, if you look at this meaningless statistic, this helps explain why they deleted those two rows of data from the spreadsheet before they posted it on their blog.
These were the rates for the groups of people under 18 and those between 18 and 29.
People between 18 and 29 showed a significantly lower rate of cases among vaccinated people, but the under 18 group was through the fucking roof.
People under 18 had a rate of 278.8 per 100,000 among the vaccinated and 2,325.7 per 100,000 among the unvaccinated.
Yeah, immediately you see how these data points would be a slight problem for the argument that this blog was trying to make based on their weird calculation they did and presented dishonestly.
This would not be something they could explain, so they delete it and they pass the information along.
No need for their readers to see those data points.
They might look for more information about what these numbers actually capture, and then they'll find out that I created an entire column and deleted rows.
So they cut out one other thing, and that was a note that's directly under this spreadsheet in the original post in the HSA report, which says, Interpretation of the case rates in vaccinated and unvaccinated population is particularly susceptible to changes in denominator and should be interpreted with extra caution.
This blog did the exact opposite.
And then Greg Reese found it, didn't look further into the data at all, and decided to use it in a bullshit video about how everyone won't have an immune system next year.
And that, according to Alex, is the best work that he's ever done.
You know, it's not usual for the health ministry to put out a study and then write, you know, like, and we think these results should be interpreted with reckless abandon.
In fact, if you just make up bullshit whole cloth out of these, that's what we want you to do.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, we are back into hour number three, and I'm just going to hammer through all the news that I've already been eating around the edges of in the last two hours for you right now.
First off, let's go back to where we begun and recap.
Official FDA letter that tells you that the Pfizer shot is approved, says that in the year 2026, they may approve it.
The letter that Alex is citing is that letter the FDA sent to Pfizer to approve their license to sell a biological product over state lines.
In addition to that, it included tentative timeframes for when various studies about other questions of post-market effectiveness had to be completed.
It is not in any way saying that the Pfizer vaccine will not be approved until 2026.
This is a fabrication of Alex not being able to understand things that he reads.
It's really simple.
Back in August, the FDA approved the Pfizer vaccine for use in people 16 and older, generally, just as a whole.
Additionally, they extended the emergency use authorization for people between the ages of 12 and 15, and that is pending a full authorization, which they now are starting to get the data on is probably forthcoming.
It's like getting news: you have a terminal brain tumor, you'll be dead in one month.
I mean, for our culture and society, this is just like we should all be walking around in sackcloth, just throwing ourselves on the ground, asking God for forgiveness, stopping all this.
Because we turn from our wicked ways, seek God's face, he will heal our land.
Oh, and this is something I wanted to say earlier.
I've been really like a computer working, trying to figure out the answer to all of this.
And it really is simple.
We have to change our heart, change our soul, surrender to God, and then go out and warn everybody and not comply with the system, but also point out that they're going to stage false flags to blame on the liberty movement to start a physical civil war and force the fight.
And that's why they're coming after the children now with experimental shots is to kill them so that some die and that so people then take action into their own hands.
Just like in V for Vendetta when they killed a little girl and that's it.
So we have really, you know, nailed into these stories that he's been nibbling around the edges of, or we've gotten distracted rambling about predicting false flags and making references to movies.
If you're out there and you're somebody who like buys brain forcers on, don't like question whether this whole worldview and information space is toxic and leads to things like, I don't know, blowing up an MRA, mRNA factory or whatever.
So as the recap continues, Alex claims that he's shown that Biden has a plan to forcibly vaccinate children, which Alex is really trying hard to brand as the shot herd around the world.
So in reality, Alex has shown that the approval process for people under 16 is moving forward in the United States and that Pfizer released their preliminary data showing that the vaccine is effective in younger people.
Alex also found an article from the UK about how students who want to get vaccinated but whose parents don't want them to can be vaccinated.
The article is very explicit that no one is being forced to do anything.
So in this recap, Alex is 0 for 2.
So now apparently there's going to be troops that are going to be at the schools vaccinating children.
That's a whole other subject, ladies and gentlemen, of the real American history.
So that's where all this is going, ladies and gentlemen.
And it's on.
And I want to get this 1 trillion percent clear.
I'm not going to kill any cops.
I'm not going to kill any FBI agents.
I'm not going to kill any CIA people.
I'm not going to attack the military or bureaucrats or Klaus Schwab or any of them.
The good, the bad, and the ugly will be sorted out by God.
But they are going to stage false flags.
Everything is set.
The stage is set.
It's all prepared because they're coming at our children with violence, with death and a needle.
And they need to turn the issue around and say it's the patriots that are terrorists.
That's why in the official terrorism policy of the U.S. government that's been hijacked and controlled by the globalists, that protesting vaccines or lockdowns is terrorism.
That's what I just keep trying to get to: where's the Congress?
Where's Ron Paul?
Where's Rand Paul?
Where's any of these people?
Trump, I have the video I didn't play it yesterday.
You know, said, oh, if I was president still, I could get the public to take the shots.
I mean, it's just, it's just hopeless.
He means well.
He's proud of himself.
He thinks he did a good thing.
He said the damn shot's effective.
It's pure crap.
And so, you know, I want Trump to get good Republicans elected and stuff, and he's a force of good overall.
And I'm not deluding myself that he's a good guy.
He is a good guy, but I'm not deluding myself to think that.
I mean, Trump is so optimistic and believes in the guy that basically developed the idea of the secret before Oprah Wemphrey and all them basically idea of the secret.
But 99% of the time, if you precede a statement with I'm not deluding myself and then follow that statement with repeating I'm not deluding myself, you are deluding yourself.
Also, I think that this is drifting into cyborgs with free will territory, where it's like Alex desperately trying to come up with ways for Trump not to be evil, though he's complicit because of his pride and ego in something that will kill all of our children.
Some of Alex's worst work, I would say, in the past has come in his relationship with students, people who are under the age of 18, whether they're victims of school shootings, his behavior towards them.
Sure.
People like a David Hogg, let's say.
Or, you know, whenever he drifts into targeting children, it doesn't go well.
So he doesn't get to talking about this high schooler for a while because he has to come back from break and talk about how, like, you know, you and me, listener.
It would be really funny if he had four possible scenarios, and one of them might be a really bad one if there was high technology and high fascism, and one might be a low technology.
And also when Alex first started talking about Fauci and said that he'd done the research on him and he was a hero.
He was one of the best because he thought that he was siding with Trump on some stuff and then that got dropped really fast.
If Alex had known since childhood that Fauci invented HIV, I would think that that would have been something that would have come up on the moment that his name popped forward.
Yeah, I mean, certainly when Steve is like, I went to college with him.
Because you're thinking, oh, they'll just get in trouble.
Man, we're going to win.
We're going to take it all back.
No, they already thought that through.
Unless Senator Paul and Senator Hawley and all of them come out and say, Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, they'll only be arrested and expose the whole agenda and how they cooked it up at Wuhan and how they released it and how they've done the whole thing.
They're going to hold us hostage with more bioweapons.
That's why Rand Paul and them won't go all the way.
Paul's getting close and they'll probably kill him.
I'm in God's hands, but I just want you to understand that some men are going to have to be willing to die to stop this.
Okay.
And that just means don't go out and blow up a federal building.
Don't go out and blow up a Pfizer building.
Don't go, you know, they're going to do that and blame us.
Don't worry.
You got to be willing to pick it and speak out and call and talk radio and go to state houses.
And I'll tell you the best news I've heard in a long time.
And this is what's really going to fix it.
And I've got to be careful how I tell this because it's in confidence.
And so I'll just leave it like this.
I'm confirmed that at ABC News and CNN and other places that people's wives mainly are leaving their husbands over the vaccine over them lying about it in MASH.
Family members are, and I'm not saying this is good, but like brothers go and show up, like 50-year-old men and beat their brother up because they're on TV doing this.
I mean, people are, families, they're taking this very, very serious.
But then you listen to it in context, and I don't know how you could hear that any other way than Alex sort of saying it might be okay for you to kill your family.
I don't think you can hear that as anything other than a sort of a tenuous justification or say, hey, look, I don't judge what you do within your family if that thing is murder.
And this is a phenomenon that's been seen and known before.
It actually happened some in Nazi Germany that when they try to have even a train killer German shepherd attack children, it would usually attack its handler.
German shepherds, again, even though they're male, have a maternal instinct that why would you kill, why would you hurt a small person?
What is this person doing?
The dog thinks it's a human.
It thinks that this is in a pack.
And if a dog saw somebody steal some food from you or do something wrong and then you went and beat their brains out, the dog might agree because it thinks, well, that's somebody stealing our food.
But if you're just beating people up for no reason, the dog doesn't see justice in that.
I would say that the same person who believes this kind of stuff is not the person you should listen to about whether or not it's okay to kill your family.
So she created a resource where people who wanted to get vaccinated and they had parents who were maybe into QAnon or some kind of an anti-vax belief, they could find the resources to find a shot if they wanted to and were responsible enough and were deemed, you know, competent enough to make their own decisions in whatever state or city they happened to be in.
And now Alex is talking about, you know.
Hey, look, how do we do this without getting violent?
But also, they're going to destroy civilization anyway.
There have been very little actual bits of meat on the bone.
Yeah.
It's been mostly rambling, Alex having little freakouts, him being on an energy roller coaster of like, you know, real weird, taking his turbo force or brain force and getting like real kind of tangential and then hitting a wall.
Everything slows down.
He did not do a good job.
And so this is why he has to end the show like this.
He got to maybe skimming a couple headlines, getting mad about the devil, putting a target on a high schooler, telling people maybe it's okay to kill your families.
I mean, applauding Greg Reese for doing terrible work.