Knowledge Fight #553 dissects Alex Jones’ April 26–27, 2021 rants—from debunked COVID-19 claims (India’s deaths mislabeled as malnutrition, fringe Stanford mask study) to racially charged Oscar attacks and baseless depopulation conspiracy theories (Merck "withdrawal," DMX’s vaccine death). Jones pivots abruptly to turmeric ads, then promotes Nick Fuentes’ unfounded no-fly ban and Steve Quayle’s occult ramblings, exposing a pattern of desperate, evidence-free fearmongering for funding. The episode reveals how his narratives spiral into absurdity, exploiting crises while ignoring facts. [Automatically generated summary]
So what I wanted to do for this episode was I wanted to do more of the week, but I got kind of caught up in some of the Alex stuff at the beginning of the week.
Sure.
And I didn't want to, you know, get mixed up with the Giuliani got raided kind of news of the end of the week.
As a species on this planet and the big transformation for the worse that is taking place.
And here's the final equation.
If we don't have a total awakening to the fact that we're under threat and we're under attack and the globalists are building what they call a post-human world, then we don't have any shot at changing this or fixing this.
And it's been the process of industrialization.
It's been the process of modernization that has really turned us into these domesticated, ignorant creatures that don't even know how to defend ourselves or take care of ourselves.
Where I can't watch a CNN piece or even a Bill Maher piece or any of these propaganda pieces because I see the writing that's involved in it and I see the multi-layered deceptions that are involved.
The level of propaganda has gotten even more sophisticated.
Because if all the world and the globalists and all the minions are all mad dogs out there, then you just gotta keep them away from biting your children and stay away from them.
They're gonna die of their own illness or whatever.
And I'm your host, Alex Jones, promising you that this already important, informative, avant-garde transmission is now going to go to the next level.
And I'm going to shake the transmission up with more of your calls, more quick guests, and more special reports, and more live commercial-free podcasts.
You've got my commitment that here in the homestretch of going into the next level, That I will work even harder because things are moving very, very quickly and it is essential.
And because I'm going to shake things up, something I never do, I always come on the show and hit the big stories and dive right into the breaking, censored and suppressed information.
The system's fighting to make sure your family and others don't get it.
Then I usually just barely plug at the end of the hour.
If Alex has specific data on this, he should really discuss it because he just references having this data and actually talking about it could be really illuminating.
This is definitely a serious issue, and it's one that Alex is definitely right to call attention to.
But the way he calls attention to the problem of food insecurity in the developing world does a disservice to the idea of actually helping understand or solve the problem.
And that's because Alex doesn't care about the actual problem.
He cares about using the impression that he cares about it to attack people who believe that COVID-19 is an actual problem.
Food insecurity around the world is a complicated picture, and you can't just say that lockdowns in the US or Europe directly leads to worsening conditions in other countries.
For instance, this past year, countries like Kenya, Ethiopia, Uganda, India, Pakistan, and Somalia have seen incredibly severe locust swarms that have had nothing to do with coronavirus or any country's response to it.
COVID has affected the world's situation and made things worse, but there's a larger picture than just what Alex wants to cover, which is essentially, if all the businesses would just open back up, everyone would be fine.
It's really troubling to see Alex try to get into the game of pretending that COVID deaths are actually starvation deaths that are being covered up.
The basic problem here is that Alex is just making that up as a way for him to continue his denial of this major pandemic.
But even beyond that, the numbers just don't work.
Concern USA released a list at the end of 2020 of the countries facing the greatest food insecurity.
And if you compare that list to lists of countries and their COVID fatalities, you don't come away with the conclusion that Alex wants you to.
Chad is the country facing the most food insecurity, the most severe food insecurity, but there have only been 170 deaths from COVID there.
Timur Alest is number two on the list, where there have been three COVID deaths.
Madagascar is number three, where there have been 614 deaths from COVID.
Haiti is number four, where they've registered 254 COVID deaths.
Only numbers nine and ten on the list, Afghanistan and Nigeria respectively, have over a thousand deaths total from COVID recorded.
Until early March, the U.S. was seeing more COVID deaths per day than any of these countries have had throughout the entire pandemic.
If Alex tries to redefine COVID deaths as secretly being starvation deaths, he's essentially trying to use people's deaths as a political prop for his own narratives.
This behavior is nothing new to Alex, but it should be recognized as ghoulish, and people should understand the disrespect that he's operating with towards people's...
So this is primarily being deployed right now, this narrative, because there's a lot of news coming out about India and how drastic the situation is there.
And when they starve to death and die of malnutrition, when you look at the Indians dying tens of thousands a week right now, extra, they all look like concentration camp victims.
And the common cold is killing them, and then the media tells you that COVID-19 did it.
When India is starving to death now, you can argue, well, there's a billion, 300 million Indians.
So what Alex is saying there about Indian deaths from malnutrition being called COVID, it's not based on anything other than his own feelings and guesses about things.
The situation in India with COVID is really complicated, but there are a number of driving factors that people point to in terms of what's making this period right now incredibly horrific.
The first appears to be a level of unpreparedness.
Healthcare journalist Vikas Dandekar wrote a piece recently in Stat News that explained this element of the situation like this.
Quote, India's early success in nearly flattening the COVID-19 curve in 2020 may be the cause of the current calamity.
Despite a rickety and funding-starved healthcare infrastructure, the country's ability to manage the first wave of COVID-19 looked laudable as the United States, Canada, and countries in Europe reeled under second and third waves of the pandemic.
The turnaround raised false hopes that the virus had run out of steam in India and the country would be spared a second wave.
That left people unprepared to deal with the heavy blow that was coming.
Modi declared victory and held massive political rallies.
At the same time, Hindu pilgrims amassed at the Ganges River, where, quote, as many as 2.5 million people took part with scant attention to COVID-19 safety protocols.
By the time an avalanche of criticism cut short the festival, the virus had infected thousands of pilgrims who took it home to their neighborhoods and villages.
These types of massive gatherings of people allowed for a broader spread than would have happened otherwise.
Add to that the discovery of that new strain of hyper-contagious virus in India a while back and how the healthcare infrastructure is pushed to its limit and you end up with a situation like we're seeing now, which is terrible.
But what I fail to understand, and I would love for Alex to explain this, is what's the Indian government's motive for supposedly calling these malnutrition deaths COVID?
I understand that Alex thinks that the U.S. hospitals were in a get-rich-quick scheme where they called other deaths COVID because Medicare pays them a certain amount for COVID treatment.
But does he think that's the case in every country?
Does he think that doctors in India are scamming Medicare?
Well, I mean, I suppose in his conception, any and all profiting or carpetbagging goes into one big pot for all the evil global scams around the world.
I would like to challenge Alex to produce any of that information.
I kind of have a suspicion that he's making all that up and all those details up to try and bolster this imaginary argument that malnutrition deaths in India are being called COVID deaths.
I think that's what's going on here.
Also, food insecurity is a very real issue in Venezuela, and again, the particular contributing factors are complicated.
However, it's important to recognize how even if all of Alex's imaginary conspiracy was actually happening, the numbers don't make sense.
Venezuela has recorded a total of I mean, roughly 250,000?
It's important to recognize what's going on here.
Alex is trying to argue that the deaths listed as COVID in India are actually just malnutrition deaths that are being mislabeled.
In order to defend this baseless claim, Alex points to Venezuela where there are apparently tons of malnutrition deaths.
In order for Alex's argument to make any sense, it would need to be the case that these malnutrition deaths in Venezuela were being reclassified as COVID-19 deaths because if that weren't the case, then bringing up Venezuela means absolutely nothing in this context.
Alex's brain works from memes, not information.
When there's a story about malnutrition in the right-wing media, the meme the audience has been trained to respond to is just bring up Venezuela.
Alex has no point that he's even making here, but he knows that if he just says it's like Venezuela, the listeners will just nod in agreement thinking something was said.
He said, "Oh, it's never gonna end and masks will be like wearing seatbelts." This is a Paul Joseph Watson article on Infowars, and I found this to be a great opportunity to illustrate how Infowars misleads and doesn't actually cover the news that they're even pretending to.
The second half of this article that Paul wrote is just the standard anti-mask stuff that you find in pretty much any article on their website that has to do with masks, so I'm just going to ignore all that.
The actual headline is, quote, health experts encourage CDC to implement permanent mask mandates.
This article does not link to the BBC or CNN.
In fact the entire story is based on one article from the Providence Journal.
This is an outlet from Rhode Island, published in December 2020, with the headline, quote, Thinking about life without a mask?
Leaving aside the fact that this is almost five months old as an article and InfoWars is pretending it's news, if you look deeper into how the original article is misrepresented, you get an even better sense of the propaganda that's being deployed here.
The two experts that were consulted for this Providence Journal article are Dr. Nicole Alexander Scott and Dr. Leonard A. Murmel.
Neither of them at any point seem to be encouraging the CDC to make mask wearing permanent or mandatory, as the headline might lead you to think.
Here's the part of the Infowars article that quotes Dr. Alexander Scott.
Quote, we have seen benefits of masking that occur, health director Dr. Nicole Alexander Scott told the Providence Journal.
So there may be a new form of normalcy where masks don't necessarily have to go away.
This is all good and well, as that passage does appear in the actual article.
However, consider that Infowars lead.
Their first line of the story is, quote, health experts are insisting that the CDC should implement permanent mask mandates even after the COVID-19 pandemic ends.
That doesn't seem like Alexander Scott is insisting that the CDC implement anything, just commenting that there may be a utility in continued mask wearing, obviously to cut down on transmission of annual flus.
This sensationalizing of almost half a year old comments made by a Rhode Island doctor that Alex and Paul Joseph Watson have never heard of before, that's bad enough.
But if you go read the actual article, there's another quote from Alexander Scott that Paul is intentionally leaving out of the article because it doesn't serve the purposes of the propaganda.
Alexander Scott said state health officials have much to consider before taking a final position on whether mask wearing should continue after the pandemic.
Quote, I want to reserve the ability to research and see what are some of the things that we've introduced because of the pandemic that are valuable to continue, she said, adding she hopes the public would see the benefits of mask wearing if its continuance is recommended.
Quote, my hope would be that folks would see the value of continuing that, she said.
It's unlikely to be a definitive mandate, but we want to be driven by the data and the science.
Yeah, that's like, what if your heartless, soulless, monstrous corporate boss forces you to go to work regardless of whether or not you're feeling ill?
Perhaps, instead of the old ways before the pandemic where you would just show up to work and sneeze all over everything, you should try wearing a mask!
That position clearly articulated in the original article is completely misrepresented by the Infowars article because they are liars who are doing this for profit.
Oh, no.
Quote, his sentiments were echoed by Dr. Leonard A. Merble, medical director of epidemiology and infection control at Rhode Island Hospital, who said making people wear masks all the time was worth it to stop the spread of the viruses other than COVID-19.
Quote, Quote, It would not surprise me if that became a recommendation from the CDC, he said.
It's a pretty low price to pay to try to reduce the risk to oneself and particularly loved ones who may be at a particular risk for these sorts of infections causing harm, he added.
It would not surprise him if the CDC made a recommendation to continue wearing masks.
Does that justify the lead?
Quote, health experts are insisting that the CDC should implement permanent mask mandates even after the COVID-19 pandemic ends?
And it gets even worse in the case of Dr. Mermel as well because he also said some stuff that Paul is just conveniently ignoring.
From the Providence Journal article, quote, Flu was dampened significantly in the Southern Hemisphere in those countries that had aggressive public health measures to reduce COVID risks, such as social distancing and masking, Mermel said.
The Southern Hemisphere acts as a sort of time machine, with its winter and flu season coming six months ahead of the winter in the Northern Hemisphere.
Preliminary data shows the United States having a quiet flu season, with recorded cases lower than each of the last six years, at the same point in the season, Mermel said.
Quote, at the moment, what we're seeing mirrors what we've seen in the Southern Hemisphere.
Let's hope that continues to be the case.
No guarantee, he said.
Quote, right now we are, for this time of year, seeing very low prevalence.
But again, it's very early, so it's hard to know what to make of that.
Uh, wow.
In the underlying article that Paul is covering dishonestly, both of the experts cited gave very general comments to the effect that it's possible that wearing masks could be helpful at lowering cases of the flu.
But it was too early to say that we should let data lead us to our eventual conclusion.
Neither of them were saying that the CDC needs to make mask wearing permanent.
No one was demanding any kind of mandatory mask laws.
This is pretty much always the case with Infowars articles.
There may be an actual news outlet story that they're basing their coverage on, but the version they're covering is a funhouse mirror of the real thing, distorted so it'll fit the bullshit narratives they want to push.
I chose to cover this one a little more specifically because it's pretty glaring, and it's super embarrassing that Paul didn't check the date on the Providence Journal article before cranking out his outrage blog post.
It's honestly hilarious.
And here's another paragraph from Paul's article, just because I like to poke.
Keep in mind that experts that he's referencing are Two doctors in Rhode Island who spoke to a local paper five months ago.
This is from Paul's article that came out this week.
Quote, medical professionals are still attempting to have mask mandates become part of the new normal despite Dr. Anthony Fauci acknowledging yesterday that it would be common sense for the CDC to start relaxing measures.
You know how sometimes I'm like, Dan, we can't let scientists name stuff because they accidentally name it really intimidating things, or we can't let scientists talk to journalists the same way they would to other scientists because other people...
It's a completely fictitious presentation of something that did happen in as much as two doctors in Rhode Island talked to a local paper five months ago.
If you're paying attention, you'll notice that these headlines, these three headlines are all just different dumb blogs writing their own headline about the same underlying story.
A supposed Stanford study that says that masks are bad.
If you're not paying attention, as Alex's audience almost never is, it might appear that there's a flood of studies showing that masks are dangerous, and you were right all along to be against them.
That's the impression Alex is trying to create by repeatedly hitting the same story as if it's three different stories.
Also, this paper about masks was written by a guy named Baruch Vanschelboim, who is a, quote, visiting scholar on matters unrelated to this paper between 2015 and 2016 at Stanford.
Other than that, he has no connection with Stanford, and Stanford has requested a correction to take their name off this bullshit.
This is an important point to bring up.
People like Alex and the right-wing media hate authoritative sources.
The mainstream media is the enemy of the people, and the universities are just full of liars trying to push the globalist agenda.
And yet...
Whenever they have the opportunity to pretend that one of their narratives is backed by the authority that comes- Top scientists!
Yeah, whenever they can back their thing with the appealing to the authority of a real mainstream or academic institution, they trip over their feet trying to associate their ideas with a respectable source.
This paper was published in a journal called Medical Hypotheses, which is basically exactly what it sounds like, an outlet for fringe nonsense and unsubstantiated ideas.
This paper is trash, and the conclusion runs at odds with dozens of other more rigorously designed studies, and it's being falsely attributed to Stanford in order to elevate its credibility.
This is basically the norm when it comes to information sources that InfoWars uses.
Alex is just making up this entire story about why Merck decided to spend their efforts to develop a COVID vaccine.
In reality, if you actually read their statements, it was a situation where they had two candidate vaccines, which the test subjects responded well to, but, quote, The immune responses were inferior to those seen following natural infection and those reported for other SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccines.
The idea of trying to start from scratch on new vaccine candidates when there are already other promising vaccines coming to market, that would have been a waste of resources.
Sure.
That's just completely made up from his imagination and it's fun.
I'm sure the audience enjoys it, but it's not real.
So, Alex, I would say that probably his main narrative is trying to rationalize the COVID deaths in India and recontextualize them as what he's calling malnutrition deaths.
The reality of COVID in India right now is really scary, and it should be something that creates feelings of concern and care for the people in India, and also creates a real sense of the stakes that people are facing when it comes to the virus.
These realizations are dangerous for Alex, because his entire last year of work has been dedicated to minimizing the COVID pandemic for profit, and to help his god-king Trump not look bad.
The Infowars audience cannot be allowed to think that the human tragedy in India is real because that threatens the bottom line of Alex's operations.
Thus, you see what you see here.
It's a complete rewriting of the situation.
You can keep the feelings of concern and care for the people of India, but you're being lied to about why you should care.
It's not about the virus, it's about malnutrition.
You can keep that human effort.
Yeah.
chain breakdown.
The actual headline is, quote, World Food Program's David Beasley warns of dire famines in Africa, Middle East, if COVID-19 supply chain's damage continues.
But you see how Alex amended the headline to add India in there because he needs to make it look like that for the narrative to stick.
The word India doesn't appear in that article at all.
And even this article isn't just about COVID.
It's also about other influences on food insecurity, like the flooding that was happening in Sudan and the massive locust swarms.
It's a complicated humanitarian issue that demands attention, but Alex is attempting to hijack that attention and use it as a prop for his COVID denialist narratives.
Yeah, the fundamental thing that the right wing has to do first is, you know, everybody knows, your family members, people you know, you're like, how is it that these people who are in person and in conversation so empathetic and caring and kind, how is it that on large national issues, they're fucking monsters?
And it's like the right wing has to redirect that empathy.
Otherwise...
People will never buy.
People are never going to be like, hey, yeah, I think we should steal money from the poor and kill them.
You know, you have to redirect it so they don't even care.
I think Prince Charles should publicly hang himself.
I think Ted Turner should publicly hang himself.
And if they would all go...
To one of their ranches and just have a public international thing and say, we want to kill you.
We want to save the Earth.
We're going to start with ourselves.
And if Bill Gates just took an ice pick and just started ramming it in his throat, hey, humanity, with blood spewing, I would say, well, I respect that man.
Maybe he's right.
Then we can have the drones launch with the nerve gas and start the operation, which is the final mop-up operation, which I told you about a long time ago.
Now they're admitting it.
The drones are ready with the nerve gas for you and your family.
This is Regina King, some actress that won an Oscar who's all pissed off up there with an angry look at face because she's a good person and she's up against those bad white people.
And I tell you, if there hadn't been the proper ruling, she'd have been putting her boots on to march against those white people.
She'll never march against Bill Gates or Hollywood.
She'll never actually stand up for any black people.
No, she'll just make millions of dollars.
Wear fancy $5,000 dresses and drive around in Ferraris and fly around in private jets and then bitch about evil America that produced so much wealth.
lives like this while Africans are starving to death by the tens of thousands every day.
He doesn't know anything about her as a person or No!
be involved in.
All he sees is a black woman saying something that he doesn't like, and his response is racist outrage.
So in her intro speech, King mentioned how difficult the last year has been and how if the Chauvin verdict had been different, she might have traded in her heels for a little marching boots.
This statement is experienced by Alex as her saying she would have been marching against evil white people because everything in his life Yeah, it does seem like the people...
So I don't know what this has to do with vaccines.
This is just Mike took some pictures of masks and swabs and stuff.
And in reference to the moving stuff and the swabs, that's not from studies.
That was from a TikTok video that came out in January.
It's been pretty debunked by scientists, but the underlying claim of that video is that people were being intentionally given Morgellons disease with the COVID swabs.
The conspiracy was so dumb and evidence was so laughable that this one didn't really stick, but it did get a lot of viral attention, so it kind of makes sense for someone like Alex or Mike to try and, you know, wander it a little bit.
See if you can whitewash it a tiny bit, put a respectable face on, see if you can make some money off this fake TikTok video.
So if you go and look at the Natural News article this is about, you can tell that Mike is even a little self-conscious about this.
In a caption for the microscope image supposedly of a fiber in some mask he was looking at, he adds, quote, We do not know why these fibers are there, and we are not claiming them to be morgellons.
I applaud that attempt to be taken seriously, although I think it's difficult when one of the other captions for an image of a mask says, quote, some areas of the carbon fiber strands appear to surround exact looking objects, but they might simply be bump textures in the white fiber layer.
This is essentially what I would call self-driven narrative escalation that Mike is engaging in.
In the first instance, you implant the idea that something might be really suspicious or there might be a totally normal explanation for it.
When you touch back on the idea, the normal explanation is gone and the speculation entirely revolves around the suspicious possibility where the burden of the conversation becomes disproving that this is an egg sack instead of the responsibility of being on Mike to prove that it's not a bump.
That's basically the propagandist magic trick that they're playing, where the burden of proof is ignored and made your problem instead of theirs.
Without using this rhetorical trick in ones like it, people like Alex and Mike's game would collapse immediately, because they can't defend anything that they say to any kind of reasonable standard of proof.
So I think that Mike, his progression from the initial article where he posted these pictures to the Monday blog post that overhyped and escalated things, I thought that was...
pretty irresponsible.
And now, if you listen to this, his appearance on Alex's show is going to be taking things even a step further.
So in the original post with the pictures, the game was asking questions.
It even ends with a declaration that, quote, we don't know all the answers.
It's all about making you worried about microscopic images and speculating about what they could be while hiding behind a very clear statement that we don't know what these things are.
Then, by Monday, Mike's tone had changed.
Gone was the declaration that the answers are still unclear, and in its place was this declaration.
It's clear that the masks and swabs are transferring materials to the body, not merely sampling materials or filtering materials.
In other words, masks and swabs are themselves medical interventions with unknown health consequences.
It seems like, with no new information and no real explanation at all, Mike had gone from questioning to definitively stating things.
And now, here he is on Alex's show, escalating these definitive statements that he can't back up at all.
This is how the game is played for these people.
They're liars, and their lies escalate, because that's how you continue to profit off them.
It's a well-established game that they've played many, many times, and we've watched.
It's fun how it's almost like a glitch in humanity.
Where we never really think about how much we rely on shame just to like...
To the point where if you have no shame, it's almost like a glitch in the matrix.
Like, you can just get away with anything.
Because people just assume that a human being, if they said it's over for humanity, there will only be lone survivors, and then was so wrong they didn't get to go back on the show for a while, for them to come back and make a similar claim in the opposite direction, a human being would feel shame over this.
This is something that went around on social media, but there's no evidence that DMX got the COVID vaccine, and even if he did, which they don't even know, there's no way you could prove that it contributed or caused his death.
This is just disgraceful.
Anyway, we have one last clip of Mike, and he can fuck himself, and I hope he's gone for long times.
You know, something that really should be more annoying is that how often he says that he's transcended things and that he's above it or all that stuff.
I'm going to be very calm here because this is so important and so huge and so illegal and so over the top that if we just put this information out there, it'll become normalized.
We must soak this in.
We must cogitate on it.
We must mull it around psychologically, spiritually.
We should pray about this because this is all now.
One stack of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24. One inch tall stack of 24 stacks, this is just today's news, is so mind-blowing, so key, so important that I shudder at even trying to properly document it.
So I will just direct you in this segment.
To what the big stories are, in my view, and then I will humbly try to cover it as best I can.
We go out and tell them, hey, the masks are never coming off until you say no.
That gives you bacterial pneumonia.
It psychologically screws up children.
And it doesn't protect you.
And...
Carlson is now saying that you need to go out and just like you see somebody beating their kid at Walmart, you need to say, hey, you need to stop that.
Quite frankly, you're their parent.
The kid's out of control.
Maybe they need a good spat.
Maybe he's being too liberal there.
The point is, this is child abuse.
More like you see somebody breaking the skin at Walmart.
It is so easy to see how quickly the party of personal responsibility turns into the party of fascistly attack children because their parents can't take care of them.
Medical doctors all over the world, from Germany to Canada, that say this are being arrested by the police.
That's coming up.
German police ransacked the house of doctor after he provides evidence in court that children are endangered in their mental, physical, and spiritual well-being by the obligation to wear face masks.
Interestingly, I found an article on Gateway Pundit that's clearly about the same story, but with a slightly different headline.
Quote, German police ransacked the home of Judge after he agrees with evidence in court that children are endangered in their mental, physical, and spiritual well-being by the obligation to wear face masks.
I can't find any news sources on this that I actually find credible about the story, but the narrative as presented on Gateway Pundit type outlets is that this judge named Christian Detmer had his house raided as retaliation for ruling that COVID-19 related cautionary measures like masks could not be enforced in schools.
It does seem like this ruling did happen.
I think I can be comfortable with some of the reports that I've seen on that.
Although the impact and the scope of its applicability or if it would stand up to a hearing in a higher court, that remains an open question.
I can't find any information about a possible raid that I feel comfortable believing some and I suspend judgment on this until there's more details.
That said, Alex is telling the wrong version of this story.
He said it's a doctor who provided evidence, when the story is that it's a judge who handed down the opinion in the case.
I suspect one of Alex's interns found the story on a site like Daily General News before it was spun correctly, so he's reporting the wrong version of the story here.
Because the population is so huge that you can do inhaled steroid and 100% of the time helps you, knocks it out.
They're not telling them any of that.
They're shipping them tens of millions of doses of AstraZeneca that's even banned in the U.S., is not authorized in the U.S. Biden's going to dump Europe's banned vaccine on the Indians!
First things first, the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine was actually developed by the Serum Institute of India and is produced there under the name CovaShield.
That vaccine has always been approved for use in India, and India wasn't one of the countries that suspended it.
The reason we're sending a bunch to India is because in order to make sure the vaccines could get made, countries like the United States agreed to purchase a ton of them in advance.
Along the way, various countries got to decide which they would approve for use in their country, and it resulted in the situation we're in now, where we have a ton of doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine, but it's not approved for use in the United States.
It is effective, and India can use it, and they've chosen It's one of their approved vaccines, so it makes sense to send it to them as opposed to letting it go to waste.
Alex can do that fake laughing nonsense all they want.
Also, just to be clear, it is not like they're putting them all in boxes right now and they're getting all these little vials and millions of vials and all these big boxes and they're going to put them on a ship.
Schools around the world are banning people working there who've taken the experimental mRNA gene therapy because it can cause the spread of real viruses.
That's even your precious Wall Street Journal and NPR reporting that.
They're intimidating, going to witnesses in the Chauvin trial and throwing pig blood on what they think's their house at Pighead's, and going to the jurors' houses, we now learned.
Somebody had leaked it, that's why they voted, and went along with the mob intimidating them.
Whether you think Chauvin was guilty or not, he's got to go free.
I don't care if he's black or white because of that.
I've still seen no evidence of any jury intimidation in the Chauvin case, but Alex is specifically lying about one comment that was reported where someone referred to as a Chauvin juror said, quote, I did not want to go through all the rioting and destruction again, and I was concerned about people coming to my house if they were not happy with the verdict.
Liars like Jack Posobiec started passing it along on social media, and the story spread pretty far that way, and it's almost certainly what Alex is covering as real news here.
The problem is that this person wasn't a juror in the trial.
She was an alternate juror who played absolutely no role in the deciding of the case, and the comment was taken out of context.
The full context of that quote is her response to a question posed by a local Minneapolis news outlet about whether or not she wanted to be a juror.
Quote, I had mixed feelings.
There was a question on the questionnaire about that, and I didn't know.
Because the reason at that time was, obviously, I didn't know what the outcome was going to be.
So I felt like either way the outcome was, you're going to disappoint one group or the other.
So I didn't want to go through this whole rioting and destruction again, and, you know, a little concerned about people outside my house if they weren't happy with the verdict.
I would assume he's not, since the simpler explanation is that he's a public figure who made a big deal out of an altercation he initiated on a plane like six months ago.
That is going to be one of those, you know, in those montages where they do like, oh, the greatest generation kind of shit, and they go through all that, and they go through the big moments of history.
That is going, 50 years from now, 50 years from now, that will be in the reels.
And I would read his books 25 years ago, 20 years ago, and say quite entertaining, and I knew a lot of it was true, but I thought some of the conclusions he came to were a little extreme.
Zombies also have the evil spiritual entity known as demon possession, okay?
Because there is no rationale with a zombie.
The best way to explain zombies' bloodlust is this, the appetite of demons expressed through humans.
It should be astonishing to people that the richest people in the world, not all of them, but some of them, are into occult ceremonies where they have to drink, you know, blood.
That's...
That's extracted from a tortured child.
Now, that's sick.
But that's the appetite of demons expressed through humans.
The ancient world dealt with monsters, mythological and real.
And this is something that is really important to get through.
The disease will basically destroy the human defenses.
God gave us defenses as humans.
To resist the devil and he will flee.
But when you're inviting, or what's the word I want?
Embracing abject demon possession, giving yourself over to be inhabited by the demons who then become your inhabitants.
It's a two-fold.
What I'm saying, Jim, is they can induce zombie-ism, at least the appetite for human flesh, but End of the thing, it's both hands, right hand and left hand.
And the left hand simply is the evil spiritual possession of that zombie.
Shouldn't Christians all uniformly be like, we can't be associated with this?
Because if we really do allow zombies, people are going to put that together with the rest of the bullshit we believe, and they're going to be like, maybe Christianity's stupid.
And actually, I got the sense from listening to this that Alex's whole story about him seeing fish people with sad human eyes is a story he cribbed from Steve Quayle.
The difference between, let's say, my position and the ancient aliens' position...
My position is the fallen angels, a third of them, came to Earth, basically had sex with Earth women, this is before Noah's flood, and corrupted the entire gene pool of the planet.
And by the way, that's in the Book of Enoch that people used to say wasn't true, and then they tried to suppress the Dead Sea Scrolls, but it got leaked out.
I've talked to some of the folks that are involved, and it's all in there.
So they got 2,000-year-old Skrulls saying that.
unidentified
Wait, you talked to some people who were involved in the leaking of the Dead Sea Skrulls?
So, Steve is this guy who, like, I really think that, I mean, we've listened to him a little bit in the past, and he has a worse version of thinking he's a prophet than Alex.
I don't know what the deal is here with this phone exactly, but there's the website infowarsphone.com, and it redirects to a website satellite phone store.
I don't know if they have an Infowars promotion going on, but if they do, they're keeping Infowars and Alex's name the fuck off it.
That must have been a really rough marketing meeting for that company whenever they're getting together, having like, okay, I got Alex on the hook for about 5K.
Anyway, Jordan, this has been our exploration of the beginning of the week on Alex's show.
I'm excited to see the response to the Giuliani raid, and I apologize that we don't have that on this episode, but it was just too much with this bulk of...
No, we're either going to have to focus a lot on the Giuliani raid, or it's going to be one of those things where he mentions it, says that it's unfair, and then does not speak of it anymore.