Today, Dan and Jordan jump deep into the past to check in and see how Alex Jones was doing back in the middle of George W. Bush's presidency. In this installment, the gents explore what it means to be "above the two-party illusion," add new entries to the list of accused communists, and learn if you can still legally play musical chairs.
Look, I mean, our employee-boss relationship, I feel, is strong.
Harumph.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So it is nice to have that.
It's a huge bright spot for me because there have been times in my life where that support structure was not around and I was teetering on a knife's edge.
And to sort of reverse the sort of, just because I'm uncomfortable by you saying such positive things, you know, you've really helped me a lot, too, as a support structure.
I found episodes going back to 2003, and I find Alex almost insufferable and very boring in the present day.
I don't want to ignore him in the present day, but I also don't want to be doing a show that is constantly just looking at him in the present day, because I find that to be...
Dumb.
I think it's worthwhile as a sort of social thing.
Some of the things that are really interesting to me and I'm most excited to learn about are things like, how is Alex Jones' opposition to Bush and the Iraq War, how does it exist when Bush is in office?
We are now following the exact model used by dictators.
To intensify their hold on populations.
Whether it was Bill Clinton or George W. Bush, the agenda of the New World Order is spiraling out of control.
Years ago, I read a Pensacola News Journal article that is on Infowars.com in one of our press releases about how during a red alert, you won't be able to leave your house and have any rights.
You have a link to it.
In that story, the Marines took over.
Bill Clinton wants you to know what martial law is about.
So, I can't find the original article that Alex is talking about from the Pensacola News Journal, nor can I find articles about it on Infowars in their archives.
However, I did find a Geocities-level website that's copied and pasted what's supposedly this article, so I'm going to go off of that.
Reading the article, you can tell that what was going on there was a situation where this school called Hobbs Middle School, it was part of a partnership with Whiting Field Naval Air Station.
And the enlisted people coming to the school, it was part of them volunteering to help T. Yeah.
unidentified
They did this very basic presentation as if the military was in charge of the school to help the students better understand the issues that were facing the civilians in Kosovo at the time.
One of Whitfield's students, Julie McCool, said the presence of the military personnel in her school made the news she'd been watching from Yugoslavia seem a little more real.
from the article, what I was getting from it is not so much that they were teaching that it's cool to be in the military, but it still has the effect of rubbing off and maybe turning these people into I don't really have a position on it.
On the one hand, it could have the effect of making these youths think that the army is super cool.
But on the other hand, it also has the potential to open up the students to things they wouldn't have the chance to experience otherwise.
For instance, from this article, quote, Last year, students from Hobbs and SS Dixon Primary School communicated via email with a Coast Guard lieutenant on a cruise bound for the South Pole and had a video teleconference with their friend once she got there.
That could be a really neat opportunity for students to learn directly about all sorts of things in a way that's much more real than reading about the South Pole in a book.
I kind of was thinking it's 2003 and we're listening about Clinton and Kosovo, and while I do think that that is a very important historical thing for us to learn, it's the Iraq!
That four-year-old story was about a day when military volunteers, they created an educational experience at a middle school.
This is more or less just a press release about a youth program run by former Marines.
The Young Marines is basically a more discipline-focused version of the Scouts, and it's run by the Marine Corps League, which is a social organization for former Marines.
They basically put kids in boot camp-like conditions and have them eat MREs in order to build strength and discipline.
From everything I can tell, it's definitely an anti-drug program, but I did not get the sense that it's anti-gun.
I would have hated being in this group, and I think it seems kind of fucked up, but the only way anyone's gonna go to it is if they and their parents agree to take part in it, so I'm not gonna spend too much time complaining about their choices.
It's pretty illuminating to me, because it's really the core of Alex's fake presentation of being above two-party shit.
He's presenting a position where the conservatives out there are actually secret liberals, which is why the two parties don't matter, because they're both not far enough to the right.
It would be fine for Alex to just openly advocate that he feels alienated by politics because he's way far to the right of anything that exists in polite society.
But even in 2003, he knows that's not going to appeal to a wide audience, so he plays the game of being like, oh, the left and the right is a lie.
And you know why?
If you actually are conservative, You've got to be an extremist to the right because these really hardcore right-wing people are actually secret liberals.
I think that, based on the context that I've gleaned from listening to the rest of this episode, I believe that Alex thinks that the CIA is running the bath party and all the people with Saddam and all this.
Saddam was allowed to get away to some island somewhere.
But he, Alex, I think he thinks that the Bath Party loyalists and folks who the CIA were trained up and all this will pretend that they weren't part of the Bath Party or whatever, and then they will become people who are the puppets for the U.S. within Iraq moving forward.
But then, based on his political ideology, he should be super against how the blanket banning of Bath Party members from all sorts of positions of influence went down.
And we know that when a state has a low threshold of gun control, where you have more liberty and some semblance of a Second Amendment left, you have the lowest crime rates.
Because even a crackhead or junkie won't invade your home when you're there, because they know there's a...
And that sort of more guns is less crime kind of thing, that's a talking point we've covered exhaustively because he talks about it all the time throughout all of his career.
It's not true.
But when I was listening to this, I felt like I can see how someone would hear that and believe it.
Yeah, I mean, it's the same way that people think about the death penalty of like, well, if the consequence is so high, then that should act as a deterrent.
In the same, you know, it makes sense of the macro where it's like, well, obviously we're not getting into a nuclear war because of mutually assured destruction.
So that's a deterrent against doing that.
But they, you know...
You're fucking hungry, man.
You know, like, that's a bigger deal than whether or not you're researching the possibility that this home, you need to do, you know, like, that kind of thing.
Anyway, this next clip I think is wild, because Alex is talking about how he doesn't feel bad for Saddam, which obviously, I guess that means that he doesn't feel bad that Saddam's missing or out of power.
Yeah, and then Alex gives voice to some stuff that I can actually, you know, appreciate.
That is that he feels bad for the citizens in Iraq.
The people on the ground who are being affected by this stuff.
But, if you pay attention to this...
This is one of these indications that you can get that, Alex, even this empathetic kind of vibe that seems really grounded and decent is actually rooted in just fervent anti-government sentiment.
Yeah, and that's part of the reason that I think it's really interesting, because he's saying a lot of the things that are right, but it doesn't feel like it comes from a place of any, like...
Solid center to it.
It doesn't feel like it's based on intrinsic belief as much as it is on...
Well, I guess it is, but the intrinsic belief is opposition to government.
Now, that's interesting, because that does fit the tone of some of the rest of his coverage throughout the show, but what it doesn't fit is the tone of one of his commercials.
unidentified
Are you prepared?
Seems that more terrorism on our soil is inevitable.
Chemical attacks, biological, nuclear, who knows for sure what dangers lie ahead for America.
Recent articles have pointed to vulnerability in our agricultural industry.
An attack on our food supply would be devastating.
Jerry Guidetti from the ARC Institute has been alerting people to this very real possibility for years.
So obviously it would be in their best interest from an advertising perspective to drum up the fears of the damage to the food chain and the food supply.
Meanwhile, Alex has an interest politically in painting that as more government and more taxes.
Maybe you haven't heard, but it's been on television.
I know schools right here in Texas, parents right here in Texas that have called in on the show about it.
It's been in the news.
Dodgeball has been banned almost nationwide.
I remember our favorite game.
In fact, the girls, the kids that weren't that big, the Runch, everybody loved Dodgeball.
I mean, everybody went hooray to play it.
Everyone loved it.
And if somebody didn't like it, that's the way sports are.
That's the way P.E. should be when you're 6 years old, 7 years old, 8 years old, 10, 12. You should play, I guess, when you're about 10 or 12. They banned it.
And then I read a report about a month ago where they arrested kids, two or three of them, criminal charges of assault, because they would meet before school.
I remember doing stuff like this, but we would wrestle.
We would wrestle and knock our teeth out and break our noses, and the coaches would come around and go, you guys watch it, you're going to get hurt.
Do that on the mats with your headgear.
Get in here, I'm giving you a swat.
You know, they'd take you to the nurse and fix your lip, and then you'd get a pop for wrestling without headgear.
But the point is, now the kids will secretly get behind the school with their dodgeballs.
Banned on campus, boys talking to girls, World Net Daily, elementary students protest restriction after showing public signs of affection.
Sixth grade girls protest, photo, herald, and news newspaper, and it shows dozens of young sixth grade girls with signs saying, allow us to talk to boys.
Smiling, pat on the shoulder, could lead to criminal charges.
So this is a story out of Portland, Peterson Elementary School in specific.
What happened was that there was a teacher at the school who witnessed some non-specified public displays of affection at recess and decided as a preventative measure that they needed to disallow girls and boys from talking during recess.
Obviously, this is taking things a little bit far, but also, Alex is completely blowing this story out of proportion, pretending that if a boy talked to a girl, he'd get arrested on criminal charges.
That's totally made up, because I suspect even Alex knows that talking about this story on the merits of it might come off as a little desperate in terms of trying to make your audience outraged.
Honestly, he's missing the forest for the trees here, and there's a much, much better story to be told.
That is the story of Sarah Maines and Hannah Guerrero, two 12-year-old girls at the school who took issue with the rule that got made and protested against it.
Sarah and Hannah straight-up formed a student committee, studied the school's rules, and figured out the proper steps to get a complaint heard.
They got all the protesting students'parents to sign off on letting them demonstrate, then held a protest to have their complaint heard.
Sarah's mother puts it so well in this article from the Herald and News.
Quote, I'm so proud of my daughter.
The hardest part was to walk into that school after protesting like that.
Also, the principal of the school said, quote, no disciplinary action would be taken against the protesters, and he's willing to hear any complaints from students and parents.
What you basically have here is a situation where a teacher possibly and probably overreacted to something that they were right to be concerned about.
This led to an overly broad rule being put in place, which got students to become active in opposition to it.
These kids learned how to appropriately and effectively have their voices heard, how to present an argument through proper channels to power.
It's honestly an amazing story, and I'm so impressed by these kids.
This story that is really inspirational is absent from coverage in places like Infowars because the story isn't real to Alex.
It's a prop, and for this to be an effective prop, he has to distort details to make it something the government was doing to these kids, as opposed to an iffy administrative decision.
It makes me kind of sad because the Infowars audience is deprived of hearing this story about students getting involved in direct civic action solely because focusing on that too much makes it clear this whole thing about flirting becoming a...
Criminal act is complete bullshit, and that bullshit is how he keeps the audience engaged in outrage.
Yeah, no, of course, because if they were to hear that the kids weren't fighting at all, they were learning, using their words, organizing, and then making a real change in the world.
That would not fit in with their, these kids are soft argument.
You know, that would be difficult for them.
It would actually make you kind of look like an idiot for fighting instead of learning and organizing and making change.
That's one of the important lessons, I think, is being deprived from the audience, and I think that's just unfair.
But that's how it's supposed to be.
Anyway, Jordan, if you want to get more depressed about thinking about the past and the present, and about how I'm a witch, I would ask you to put your mic down for this next clip.
The British government actually released foot and mouth.
In fact, two months before the outbreak, they had to admit they had contacted people, the agriculture departments in the counties, and said, get pyres ready, get lots of wood ready to burn piles of dead animals.
They said, why?
And they said, oh, well, you'll see.
And then they admitted the foot and mouth got released from Porton Down Bioweapons Lab.
They said by accident someone released it or someone stole it.
By the way, that's a level 4 bioweapons lab that has stuff that'll kill specific races of people.
There's no truth to what Alex is saying, but interestingly, in the aftermath of the 2001 foot and mouth outbreak in the UK, there were a ton of rumors flying around about how it started.
Subsequent investigations have shown that it started on a farm that was feeding its livestock untreated waste, but that didn't stop theories from flying around in the days immediately after the outbreak.
One of the popular theories was that there was a vial of this specific strain of foot and mouth that had been stolen from or accidentally released from portland.
and down a biological lab in England.
Sure.
unidentified
This is an interesting story and it follows essentially the same path as Alex's present day theories about the novel coronavirus.
At various points in the early days of the 2020 outbreak, Alex has suggested that it was intentionally or accidentally released from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and he's also discussed the use of race-specific bioweapons to bolster his claims.
So the Guardian looked at the various theories about the foot-and-mouth outbreak, and the Port-and-Down one was one of the ones that got their attention.
Unfortunately for the conspiracy, they spoke to a representative at Port-and-Down who said, quote, we have never worked on foot-and-mouth.
That doesn't sound like folks admitting that it was released from there, but yet Alex is on air saying that it's been admitted.
This Guardian article also discusses the revelation that months before the outbreak, people from the Ministry of Agriculture were calling around getting quotes on the price of timber in order to burn diseased animals.
Stratfordshire Animal Health Office, part of the Ministry of Agriculture, rang round merchants in the autumn asking for quotes for timber for pyres as part of an animal contingency plan on how to deal with swine fever and foot-and-mouth outbreaks.
This is a requirement of all EU countries.
It happens every year.
So it's not something that's suspicious at all, but Alex has built it into a foot-and-mouth was intentionally released from a level 4 bioweapons lab.
So Alex does end up going to take some calls, and he gets a call from a guy, and the conversation drifts into talking about the government tracking children via cell phone.
But now that they're announcing that we're about to be tracking you, the government says, that, oh, the police locally will watch you through the FEMA command center they built.
That's the kind of thing that if you were really uncharitable and ungenerous to him, you'd be like, okay, what minority groups are you talking about here?
Is that coded language?
But it's also, if you are...
Charitable, you could be like, well, he's just saying that groups that aren't the majority, so criminals are a minority of the population.
So yeah, apparently there's a Chinese plant that's being built to get the implantator and the implants for the chip that they're going to put in everybody.
But I question whether he understands at this point fully that obsessing about the immediacy of another tragedy happening soon will also spike his ratings.
So he gets another caller, and this guy sent me down a nutso rabbit hole.
Insane.
Took too much of my time.
unidentified
Okay.
I was wondering if I may take this opportunity to see if we can get any signatures on the site that I talked to you before about, if you want to go ahead and announce it.
Luckily, the Wayback Machine exists, and I was able to find this caller's re-declaration of independence, and perhaps unsurprisingly, I did in fact find some common ground with this guy.
For instance, his first complaint reads, quote, We demand the abolishment of engaging our military in unconstitutional activities, spreading them out as the police of the world while leaving our borders wide open and unprotected.
I might have left out the part at the end about the border since it has nothing to do with the main point of unconstitutional engagements of the military, but leaving that aside, we agree that the government's gotta stop this war stuff.
Quote, We demand the abolishment of all instances of murdering citizens completely within their rights and destroying and refusing to disclose evidence in these crimes.
I would even expand that language to include non-citizen residents, but we're on the same page.
So, this whole agreeing thing falls apart pretty quick, since it immediately dovetails into complaints about UN treaties and calling for abolishing, quote, the post office, public education, and Amtrak.
Apparently, part of the redeclaration of independence is charging any individual or industry that traded with North Vietnam, China, Russia, Iraq, or any of their satellite countries with treason.
This extends to literally everyone who worked in things like steel or petroleum industries, but also to everyone who's been in elected office in...
The document demands, quote, all who served in these political positions during any of the times of armed conflict in question from the Korean War to this date be stripped of any retirement or other compensation.
I'm guessing that's in addition to the treason charges.
And it's hilarious for Alex to pretend that he's read it trying to humor this caller.
I'm certain that Alex didn't read it, but honestly, it's so much funnier to imagine that he had, and was still giving this guy a glowing review.
You see, here's how the new Declaration of Independence ends, with a suggestion of what they should do next.
Quote, we hereby petition for a renewal of government removed entirely from Washington, D.C. and reconstituted in another region of the land.
And at least temporarily at first, during its beginnings, this new government for and of the people will be situated and redeveloped from Austin, Texas, the birthplace of the new people's house with an initial.
So this guy wants to overthrow the government, reconstitute it in Austin, and have Alex and some of Alex's friends temporarily rule this new blossoming government.
So, if you Google the address that he lists as the temporary address of the new government of America, you'll find that it's listed as the publishing address for a 2005 book titled The Free Masonic Architecture of History, self-published by Eric Rainbolt.
So I felt like I was at a dead end, but my curiosity was itching too strongly.
Was this caller the person who wrote the new declaration of independence, imagining a new government forming at his house in Austin, where he gets to rule alongside Alex?
It's really complicated, but I looked into the phone numbers and addresses listed for the publishing endeavor, and I'm pretty certain that it is this dude.
This is a stupid long road for me to wander down, but the reason I still think it's important is because there's some fairly critical things that me and this guy would totally agree about.
We would both want to end the Iraq War, and we both want greater oversight on police, but it's...
Pretty crucial to recognize that despite our differences, we aren't even close to allies, nor could we ever be.
Ultimately, I want to create a world that operates better and more fairly for everyone.
And ultimately, this guy wants to be on Alex Jones' small council.
The enemy of my enemy is not my friend if they also want to establish a fucking Game of Thrones style, I'm the hand of the king for Alex Jones situation.
Your listeners who are very intelligent and very capable people, many of them have, I'm sure, computers and know how to use them very well, you can access a lot of public domain information.
It's all quite legal.
And I think that we should start a campaign of accessing as much public domain information about all these suspect broadcast individuals as we can.
Case in point, I don't know if you or your listeners are aware, but Sean Hannity was a troublemaking adolescent who came from a Long Island, New York community.
That's a very interesting thing.
Maybe that needs to be looked into further, and it tells you something about what the real makeup of this man is.
Michael Savage, who you mentioned, the guy used to hang out in the late 50s in beatnik bars in Greenwich Village, New York.
It's really interesting that you think that that's a potent way to attack these figures on the right that you don't like and apparently aren't on the right.
The reason I'm calling is I listen to you almost every day, and I understand we've got 250 million of the happiest slaves in the world living in this country, and that's why they'll never revolt.
I have revolted.
I have been thrown in jail five times.
I am now looking at a year and a half in jail plus a $1,500 fine simply because I refuse to go down the road without a driver's license.
Yeah, and the federal law actually says that, and the court rulings say that they can, you don't have to have a license for the generally accepted conveyance, but that's a horse and buggy still.
unidentified
Alex, I've used every definition coming down the pike in court, and the judge turns around, the prosecutor objects, and the judge turns around, and he says that it's okay to object, I can't use it, and the next thing I know I'm getting paraded off.
Money may be the root of all evil, but China is trying to make sure it won't be a source of SARS.
Now, they already have public service announcements here in this country of how, quote, cash is dirty and how we need to get rid of it to the safe, cashless society.
Well, the Central People's Bank of China was putting more new cash into circulation and holding used bank notes for 24 hours before putting it back on the people's hands.
The People's Daily Newspaper said on its website on Tuesday, the Communist Party mouthpiece said some banks were even sterilizing Grammy bills and showering them with ultraviolet radiation to try to kill the SARS virus, which has killed 148 people and infected more than 3,300 in China.
So weird to see how the past echoes with the present.
Like, you can dip back into 2003 and hear Alex making the exact same nonsense claims about SARS that he would eventually make about the novel coronavirus.
At this point, scientists hadn't been able to concretely isolate the SARS virus, but they did achieve that this same month, on March 22, 2003.
At this point when Alex is making the episode, it's only been a few weeks since China reported the outbreak of cases to the World Health Organization, and the situation is very much in its infancy.
The international community jumped into action and quickly identified and isolated the virus, and cautionary steps were taken to prevent the spread.
Because of collaborative action, and probably somewhat because the right-wing conspiracy movement hadn't grown to the size it has in the present day, only 774 people in the world ended up dying during the outbreak between November 2002 and July 2003.
The Toronto Star article Alex is referencing is something I can't find, but I would bet anything it was an editorial article presenting the opinion that Toronto's response to SARS has been hysterical.
You can find some people still, you know, some existing websites that express that sentiment.
It's hard to say if people there overreacted, but the greater Toronto area saw the fourth largest outbreak of SARS cases in the world behind China, Hong Kong and Taiwan.
So it really does kind of make sense that the matter there would be taken seriously in a way that might look like hysteria.
You know, I've always been, like, especially, you know, obviously now when you're thinking about it, but it...
And I think that the conversation largely has been, like, in times when we're not dealing with outbreaks and infections and stuff, people in medical communities talk about the unknown unknowns.
Because you have to figure out how it spreads, what its characteristics are, and while you're figuring that out, it's spreading.
Or it could be spreading.
Or it might be spreading faster than you think.
It's a terrifying thing.
I agree with you.
Almost levels of hysteria become more rational the more you think about it.
I remember some people that I knew were going through some steps that I would say were maybe a little bit further than I would have even at the beginning of dealing with the 2020 situation.
I kind of was like, you guys are going a little far with this.
And their response was, I'd rather do this And look stupid later than not do it and feel like, oh, I could have taken preventative measures.
Yeah, and it's also just, but I mean, part of it is just the very fact that so many fucking people don't not just not understand evolution, but believe in it entirely.
It's just like, you realize that if a virus spreads, it's going to reproduce Billions of times in a very short period of time, which exponentially increases the possibility of mutation and adaptation to our measures against it.
It is a constant battle.
Even now, if we defeat COVID-19 to the extent that we would all love it, if we don't completely eradicate it, it is going to mutate and it can come back.
Anytime!
You know, like, it's a real terrifying reality, and most people are like, eh, it's probably witches.
And I think if, you know, I don't know, I guess if Trump was president and the conspiracy community existed the way it does now in 2003, SARS might have been a much bigger problem.
You think about so many of the, you know, like you think about Ebola outbreaks.
You think about those things that happened in the past that, in retrospect, you realize were handled by people who understood and were serious about the problem instead of actively exacerbating it.
And the people who are causing problems should be held responsible in the courts.
Now I know my analysis has been dead on all along.
Worse than I thought.
Frankly, and it's freaking me out.
I know the nature of the globalists.
Watching serial killer, control freak demons build a cage for humanity is very energizing.
I just am energized to resist them.
I've asked God to make me a vessel to fight the New World Order, and sometimes I just think there's too much.
I mean, I'm just too energized.
I've got all the information, I know what they're doing, I know what their plans are, what their operations are, and like my mouth, my speech centers cannot, I don't think, articulate the globalist program properly to you.
Anyone who listens to our show with any regularity has heard that speech.
It's one that Alex gives pretty frequently when he gets in a wistful, contemplative mood.
Yesterday he was confused, but today all the pieces have come together and he's more certain than ever that his analysis has been right all along, and it's worse than he thought.
That's an interesting experience to imagine having when something groundbreaking happens, but to go back to a random episode of his show from 18 years ago and see him pretending to have the same epiphany that he does regularly on his show nowadays, it's a little annoying.
also another reason I pulled this clip is because Alex makes a reference to God and to demons but I think you can tell how much different that feels than how he Oh, yeah.
To my ears...
Listening to this, it kind of comes off like a man who has religious inclinations but isn't a zealot.
It feels like a person calling his enemies demons as a pejorative insult, not as a description that's meant to be taken literally.
It's weird to think about, but maybe Alex meant it to be heard as literal all along, and people were just giving him an unasked-for benefit of the doubt.
These guys aren't talking about undocumented immigrants or people who came here through improper channels or people who overstayed a visa.
They're just talking about the blanket category of people who are immigrants, and this conversation is outrageously white nationalist at its core.
This caller is puzzling over how immigrants managed to get driver's licenses, which is a bit silly.
And then Alex shoots the moon by arguing that immigrants are coming to be controlled by, quote, Barrio bosses and instructed to take, quote, our rights away.
The coded language is almost comically transparent here, and this walks hand-in-hand with the white nationalist ideas about the great replacement that get thrown around in more recent times.
This is the way that conversation was had back then, and it's basically indistinguishable from white supremacist positions on immigration.
And then the host will say, well, actually, he is supporting that.
And the guy will go, oh, well, I still don't like this guy.
Get him off here.
want to turn my guns in.
I mean, they don't say that, but they say everything else up to that.
Uh-huh.
unidentified
So they're in a delusional world, and I can be on Pacifica Radio or something with all the, what you would And they're all calling and agreeing, making good points, admitting the Democrats are corrupt too, because if you're not hypocritical, they'll wake up.
These people are used as caricatures of strawman arguments, presenting things that are valid complaints about Alex.
He uses these imaginary dumb callers as puppets to introduce these ideas like that he's a racist, because then it's a lot easier to mock and discredit those ideas like that he's a racist.
You can hear Alex essentially laying out that him arguing that the Republican Party is corrupt is a way to get liberals who can admit that the Democrats are corrupt to wake up.
This is a strategy, and it's meant to make Alex look closer to the middle, where this hypothetical Democrat is.
The idea is for him to paint a picture where he and this liberal have more in common than they think, and they only don't...
I think so, that they're more in common because these two corrupt political parties have told them that they're not similar.
This is not true.
Alex is light years to the right of the GOP, so what he's actually doing is trying to pull disaffected people of either party towards the extreme right.
For people already in the Republican Party, this could mean becoming extremely right-wing.
For Democrats, this might mean becoming a jaded political nihilist, maybe embracing the GOP, or just not voting for Democratic candidates.
Ultimately, the political end result of the project Alex is engaging in is this.
It's always about dragging people to the right while pretending there is no right or left, which serves the political interests of whichever viable political entity is furthest to the right.
Which, I can, but you can totally see that kind of...
Being attractive, especially at that time, whenever you look at the fact that both political parties are like...
War is great, and let's do it all the time.
And you're like, what's the fucking point of having either of these political parties if we're just going to wind up with a mission accomplished banner?
Because there are a lot of people who are right in the exact place that they need to be to hear a message like that and get sent down a road they don't know they're going down.
Alex does talk a bit about 9-11 on this episode, but not in a way that I felt like this is where we're going to start picking into it.
So as I look through the 2003 stuff, when he gets into more of it, 9-11 will definitely be more of a topic than has been in our show in the past.
But I can't talk about it today because Alex, as he's talking about these callers that he gets on radio stations, he ends up talking about being on a show out in the UK, right?
And this, you got a call from a warden, a jail guard.
And this is when, this is evidence that this show used to be a family show.
It's such an annoying habit of so many people to tell you a story where somebody is acting so over-the-top unreasonably that it's impossible to believe.
And you knew, before he even started, he was full of shit.
There is an Oklahoma family who are begging oil and a bunch of other stuff who are actually involved in the founding of the John Burr Society.
But the John Burr Society overall is good.
Certainly early on.
Not the Birchers, but other conservative groups have been used by the bankers.
They'll tell some good conservative military man, that guy's a communist, go take him out, and they'll go do it and later take him out for plausible deniability.
You know, so many of our troops over there in Iraq now really are risking their lives and living in a third-world cesspool, a bombed-out Stone Age system because they really believe in this country.
Yes, sir.
But it is evil.
Does that mean the troops are evil?
No, it means they're ignorant.
Thanks for the call, Spencer.
I appreciate the call.
Yeah, I should have gotten into that.
Man, I had an article, big mainstream article on that family, how they funded the John Birchers and all the different things they do and how they are big supporters of Bush.
This is where we learn that Saddam Hussein may be on a beach.
unidentified
Hey, Alex.
My name is Nick.
Hi, Nick.
I've been here for about 22 years.
Just a little information about Saddam Hussein.
On the 14th of this past month, the Gulf News out of Dubai and the Iranian News Service both reported that the U.S. had reached an agreement with Russia for $5 billion in cash and credit to get Saddam and 100 of his closest followers out.
This past Thursday on Univision, one broadcast through the middle of the day said that Saddam Hussein had been spotted in Cuba with his family.
We have one last clip here, because Alex takes another call, and this person is into the Birch Society, and so there's a little bit more conversation about that.
I think this is kind of interesting.
unidentified
First, let me say something about the John Birch Society.
And I was going over some old ones the other day that go back into 98. And here they were telling about this threat of the World Trade Towers being bombed.
And this is all a connection with...
Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden, and on and on and on.
I would assume that those issues of the John Birch Society magazine that the caller is referring to, I think they have to do with the other time the World Trade Center was bombed back in 1993.
I've noticed that a lot of conspiracy thinkers tend to ignore that that happened, because it helps to make sense of why people would have been talking about terrorists attacking the World Trade Center before 9-11.
Yeah, I would imagine the reason that he didn't make it to the four-year university was he couldn't keep himself from plagiarizing anything and everything in his sight.
I will still also be keeping up on the present day, and I promise our next episode, we'll check in and see what Alex is up to, whatever his dumbass is talking about in the present.