Today, Dan and Jordan check in on how Alex Jones has handled the release of Frontline's episode about his conspiracy theories and their relation with Trump. In this installment, Alex announces the Mark of the Beast, warns of teams of Antifa hit teams coming to your home, and tries to convince his elderly listeners to become kamikaze murderers against his enemies.
I believe I first heard of them or this person through the majority report because they were talking about how his channel had a great breakdown of Dave Rubin and a lot of the trends on his channel.
Okay.
Fantastic video series about Dave Rubin.
I think it's called His Battle of Ideas, which people can check out.
And I was unaware of this, but I stumbled across Timba on Toast had a new series.
That's going on.
Three of them are out now, but I'm not sure how many total there will be.
Baseball is in a situation where it's like they either cancel the season or just contract the Marlins and just like, nah, you guys aren't a franchise anymore.
I'm more concerned about the side effects of that conversation being had by a sitting president.
The effect that has on the people who follow him, the expectations surrounding the upcoming election, all that sort of stuff is really far more what I'm concerned with.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I enjoyed the show, I'd like to support what these gents do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show.
So I thought what I would do first on this episode is discuss the actual Frontline PBS special.
Sure, sure.
I thought it was pretty well done as a whole.
I think it was pretty much what it intended to be.
For people who don't know a lot about Alex, it's a pretty good primer about what you might call his greatest hits.
There were very accurate points about his coverage of things like 9-11 and Sandy Hook and Pizzagate, but there were also a couple of glaring problems with the documentary that I think bear mentioning.
One of them is no real conversation about the Boston bombing.
And I know that maybe that's one of the pieces of his history that I'm more intimately familiar with because of looking at it.
But I think it's one of the more relevant pieces of his propaganda.
I thought that was kind of missing.
I think that's a big chapter in his life.
What are you going to do?
Maybe that's my own Piccadillo.
Second thing, I think there was an overly simplistic telling of Alex's transition to supporting Trump.
They kind of made it appear that Roger Stone just showed up and then Alex supported Trump.
I feel like that could have added something to it to point out that in July of 2015, Alex was saying that Trump is mobbed up and he's a front man for consortiums on the East Coast.
But at the same time, what I'm saying is what it intends to be is a front-facing thing for people who aren't in the weeds with a lot of these issues.
And if you look at it from that standpoint that it's almost a simplified version of things, I think they did a pretty good job.
Kudos to them.
Yeah, but one of the things that stuck out to me the most was there's one instance of an apparent misrepresentation that this documentary made.
In the passage about Alex's Sandy Hook conspiracies, they showed B-roll of InfoWars showing a picture of Adam Lanza, but the audio that was playing over it was Alex saying, quote, and the doctors he was under was an Air Force mind control doctor, and he was involved in DARPA brain interface programs and told people he was under mind control in the jail.
The audio that's being used is Alex talking about James Holmes, the Aurora movie theater shooter.
It is very true that Alex constantly would use conspiracies about James Holmes to cast doubt on the reality of the Sandy Hook shooting, but at no point in the front line piece did they make clear that the audio is not talking specifically about James Holmes.
There's no reason for them to introduce this kind of confusion.
They could have referenced James Holmes and said that was who Alex was talking about, or they could have found a different piece of audio of Alex actually talking about Lanza, but the way it's presented is kind of sloppy.
I don't think it's a major misrepresentation or an instance of deceptiveness, but I do think it's the sort of thing that a propagandist like Alex could latch onto to invalidate the piece.
If they make it look like I said this one thing about Lanza when I was actually talking about Aurora, what else did they misrepresent?
That kind of thing, you open the door to that unnecessarily.
Additionally, Anna Merlin, the author of Republic of Lies, is a great person to hear from, as was Morgan Pemmey, the co-director of Get Me Roger Stone.
Same can be said for Nancy Rosenblum, Elizabeth Williamson, and a few others.
These are people who have an external perspective on the issues that are the problem with Alex, and they're able to offer objective insights that really elevate the subject matter of the documentary.
And Nancy Rosenblum actually has the last line of the documentary, and I think that she has just...
She ends the documentary with a question of whether or not we'll be able to return to a reasonable place of sanity, and that question depends on whether or not the people who end up in positions of power can resist the urge to use conspiracy theories.
And I thought that was a really good perspective for what this documentary was, because it really does put the focus and the onus on, like, these things do work.
The second category of people are people who you absolutely should not have in this documentary.
This group includes Roger Stone, Robert Barnes, and weirdly Ann Coulter.
They add basically nothing to the piece, and you had to know that none of them were going to be worth talking to.
Barnes and Roger are kind of understandable, since you can put them in and then you can show that you're giving people associated with Infowars the opportunity to give their side to the story, but Ann Coulter is a zero.
She's basically just there to make it clear that she's not as bad as Infowars, which only serves to launder her image, which is something that PBS doesn't need to be engaging with.
Now, the third category is people who I understand having in the documentary, but were probably mishandled.
These are people who create targets for the documentary that Alex can exploit, which introduce unearned suspicion about the credibility of the reporting.
I understand talking to her, and although solid details rarely seem to come out in her interviews, she knows a lot about Infowars early days since she was deeply involved in the company.
I don't think that you should never talk to her or anything like that, but her being in this documentary at this point opens the door to Alex saying that she's trying to sue him and take his kids away, so this documentary is biased.
It's an attack piece.
The same issue exists with the former Infowars employees that they speak to.
One of them, Rob Jacobson, sued Alex for EEOC complaints a couple years ago.
I'm sure he's sincere that he feels guilt about his time at InfoWars, but he continued to work there for four years after Sandy Hook, and he spent 13 years as an InfoWars employee, apparently completely fine getting paid to create complete bullshit like Endgame for a career.
He's a source that is impeachable from my perspective and from Alex's, which makes his contribution to the piece kind of pointless.
This also extends to Josh Owens, who used to work at Infowars, but then wrote that piece about how he regretted it in the New York Times.
I respect both of these dudes and their right to change their position and make amends for their active participation and profiting from conspiracy propaganda, but I'm not positive that doing it in this forum is helpful, and I think it complicates the piece.
And one of the other people that I would put in this category is the lawyer who did the deposition of Alex in the Sandy Hook case.
I don't know if that is really the...
He didn't say anything like that I think is horrible or anything, but I found his inclusion as one of the talking heads in it to be like, you know how easy this is going to be for people who like Alex to just ignore?
I'm not positive how much that is what I would consider a tactical good move.
But again, I think that Barnes and Ann Coulter absolutely don't put them in here.
I think that these other people, like the ex-employees, like Kelly, like this lawyer, I think that I understand why, and I get that this piece isn't what I would make.
Sure.
So I would say that it's an iffy decision, and I'm not positive that these people were presented in ways that make their inclusion...
If I were making this documentary, I would have curated it a lot differently.
But honestly, if I were making it, it wouldn't be as good.
The goal of the documentary is to inform the public about how conspiracy theories found their way into the mainstream through the lens of Alex's rise to fame.
Their point is accurate but some of the nuance is incorrect.
But there's no way to discuss the nuance in just an hour.
The version I would make would be an impossibility, and it probably wouldn't be digestible by a wide audience.
I thought the PBS documentary was much better than I expected it to be.
A lot of the times these things are pretty poorly or kind of sloppily done.
Outside of that one instance where they were talking about James Holmes over pictures of Adam Lanza, I didn't find anything that was like, this is explicitly stepping in it.
Maybe he's just learned from the Megyn Kelly one where he's like, all of that worry I put into whether or not she would put out me whenever I just slew a strung of N-words together.
If you want to know the secret of COVID-19 and what's coming next, and if you want to understand the permanent scientific medical dictatorship we're going under that is designed to depopulate the planet, then you need to tune in to InfoWars.com forward slash show, NewsWars.com forward slash show.
Or the band.video Alex Jones section.
That's the best feed to send out.
Go to the Alex Jones section.
Click on the left-hand corner.
Find the link to my page.
Find the live feed right there to the show.
Send that out.
That's not as censored as much.
On the internet, it's easier to get out there.
Tuesday Live, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation announces plan to microchip everyone on Earth.
BBC News and others are celebrating the brave new world of forced inoculations, contact tracers, and Mark of the Beast.
Now, I'm going to read to you from the BBC article and others, but what's so amazing is there's been a rollout at MIT, BBC, USA Today, a bunch of other tech publications, and I went this morning and spent an hour and a half just checking the authors.
All of them?
Have written for the UN, MIT, and Bill Gates.
And they all write exclusively on devices in your home that spy on you, like smart toilets and streetlights that watch and listen to you.
Dan, you know whenever you check the news and you have like Washington Post and USA Today and the New York Times and all of those, did you notice that they only cover their news?
So then he goes on to say that the people who wrote these articles about these Gates tattoos have written for the UN and Bill Gates, and they write exclusively about household spying devices like toilets.
This is kind of amazing because it's impressively meaningless.
Which authors is he talking about?
He hasn't even specified an article or even a publication yet.
So this could be referring to anyone.
How would you possibly go about checking into the alleged hour and a half research that he's basing this claim on when there's no specifics?
If you try to fact check this claim, you'll immediately run into the wall that you have no launch off point.
You could maybe, you know, find an article in USA Today that's about the right topic, but how do you know it's the right one Alex is vaguely referring to?
By being so vague, Alex has essentially said a completely unfalsifiable lie.
Because I could find a USA Today article about these, like a tattoo, smart tattoo kind of thing, and I could say like, oh, here's the author of it, and it doesn't match anything that you're saying.
So I found an article about this very idea of vaccine tattoos in Scientific American, which was written by Karen Weintraub.
A very simple search through her bylines shows that she doesn't write exclusively about appliances that are spying on you, like her January article, quote, But, like I said, this means nothing in terms of Alex's claim.
He can easily just say that this wasn't one of the articles that's part of his alleged rollout research from that morning, and we're right back to where we started.
This is one of the ways that Alex weaponizes vagueness and a refusal to provide specific details in order to create the perception that the things he's making up are based on something real.
They're not.
He's just talking shit, but he's doing it in a very sneaky way, so it makes the bullshit things he's saying almost impossible to debunk.
I was so, like, blown away by how surreal this shift is.
Because the beginning of the show starts pretty severe with this, Barnes texted me this thing, you need to email everybody, this is COVID truth, and then immediately after, look at this cute little baby!
So, we come out and we expose what they're doing, what they're up to, in January, February, March, and April, lay out exactly what they were going to do, because we had Operation Lockstep by the Rockefellers, 10 years old, exactly laying this out.
The project at Microsoft is literally nothing like what Alex is rambling about with his dystopian fever dreams.
And it's not something that's even recent.
There's an article on Microsoft, like the page that Alex pulls up, from August 2018.
and I was able to easily find an article on Quartz about this from August 2016.
I'm certain Alex would still consider this technology the work of the devil all the same, but it has nothing to do with his anti-vax coverage that he's Right, right, right.
So now, the BBC article is the one that seems to have launched this whole day's reporting, and it's a little closer to what Alex is kind of talking about.
The headline of the piece is, quote, Will Travel Be Safer by 2022?
This is an article by the aforementioned Lina Zeldovich, who doesn't write exclusively about spying toilets.
This is a discussion about emerging technologies that could help facilitate travel in the near future, an industry that's been hit particularly hard by COVID-19.
She discusses a breakthrough in breathalyzer-type technology that's been created by Gabi Sarusi of the Ben-Gurion University in Israel.
Apparently his breathalyzer has shown a 92% accuracy rate, so it may be fairly close to being up for consideration as a means to be able to control the spread of the virus while still allowing safer, less restricted travel.
One of the other technologies that's discussed is the vaccine record tattoos that have been researched by folks at MIT, and that technology has received funding from Bill and Melinda Gates, that research.
Nothing in this article says you'll need a vaccine tattoo in order to travel in the future.
This article, honestly, is just Zeldovich's perspective on what could be coming in terms of travel.
And even the article says, quote, Travelers would present the customs officers with an entrance visa and a vaccination record.
That could be a paper card or a tiny tattoo on their arm, invisible to the naked eye but readable by an infrared scanner.
Even in her vision of what travel could look like in 2022, people would still either have a paper record of their vaccination history, or if they wanted to, they could get their tattoo of a vaccine record.
They're still saying that you need a vaccine to travel.
As it turns out, this is already the case in a lot of countries.
For instance, there are many countries, including Australia, China, and even Djibouti, that require all travelers coming from areas affected by yellow fever to have the vaccination for the condition as a requirement for entry.
Sure.
unidentified
This sort of public health protocol already exists, and honestly, the way it would most likely be implemented in the case of COVID-19 is probably the same as the yellow fever situation.
You can easily see that being the case with COVID-19.
If we develop a successful vaccine in the near future, then things return to somewhat normal.
This vaccine tattoo record has never been used on live humans, only on animal subjects, and the ultimate goal of it would be to provide records for people, quote, in the developing world where paper and electronic records are not always reliable.
The article goes on to say that, quote, For sure.
Then the article discusses innovations like good-smelling sanitizers and UV light technology that can be used to clean empty airplanes.
This article is absolutely not what Alex is reporting it as.
He's saying that it's proof positive that the Mark of the Beast is here and they're rolling out their plans, when it could just be just as valid to say that this article is about a nefarious Gates Foundation plan to flood the market with...
Bergamot and lavender-scented eco-friendly sanitizers.
And Alex keeps being like, hey, we came out and we reported that they're going to make you take this tattoo and they said they were crazy, but now they're all rolling it out.
Like, see this BBC article.
And he's talking about that timeline of the denial and the confirmation and all that stuff.
And it's a load of bullshit.
But this clip was really important to me because it helped me solve the mystery of what frustrated me and almost made me throw my computer at the beginning of the episode.
So no one is saying and has been saying that the invisible tattoo vaccine records are completely made up.
Just that they weren't, like, ready yet.
The research wasn't complete.
And that the entire narrative that people like Alex were building around them was totally nonsensical, so I don't even really care about his, oh, you deny and then confirm.
This clip was so useful to me, though, because at the end there, Alex confirms that this BBC article was written by the person that he was saying was the one who writes for Bill Gates and writes about spying appliances.
If you Google Lena Zeldovich and Bill Gates, the third thing that pops up is an article in Mosaic that she wrote back in 2017 called, quote, Reinventing the Toilet.
This article was about her traveling to Madagascar to explore a company that was developing waterless toilets, which is a very important sort of technology for the developing world where sanitation is a major concern and water resources might not be available to expend in waste removal.
So now the involvement of Bill Gates here was that in 2011 his foundation ran a challenge called the Reinvent the Toilet Challenge where they solicited ideas about how people could create sustainable sanitation in the developing world.
It was a grant contest, and this person, Virginia Gardner, she applied and won with a design that became a startup called the LuWatt, which is what this article is about.
LuWatt allows waterless toilets to operate, and then the waste is collected and can be converted into usable biogas.
And it's even supposedly odor-free, which is huge.
Yeah.
From this article about a woman who won a Gates Foundation grant to create waterless toilets to help people in Madagascar with sanitation, Alex has reported that Lena Zeldovich writes for Bill Gates and almost exclusively about spying appliances like toilets.
It's a complete fabrication that came out of his imagination and I never would have been able to figure this out.
Like what he was talking about if he hadn't specified toilets in his rambling.
This is why he needs to be as vague as possible.
Because any stray detail has the possibility of unraveling the flimsy shit his narratives are built on.
Also, to be perfectly sure that I wasn't misrepresenting things, I went to band.video and I confirmed that the Microsoft Smart Tattoo page that he showed on screen is the same one that I found that has stuff from 2018 on it.
It's not new, and it's not a related story at all.
And we almost have too much other stuff and it's kind of a trivial matter in Alex's coverage that we're just going to say, hey, he's not happy that this got taken down.
So when you laughed at Alex for saying he pulled it off, you didn't realize how complicated it is and how the conversation tree requires the other person to say various things in order for your comeback to make sense.
The ambient background violence of the communist and globalist organizations are being activated so that the police can be demonized ahead of the overthrow of local governments surrounding the White House in an attempt to drive the president from office.
I've been telling you that that's Soros' plan for the last three years from documents we exclusively got from family members.
They got high-level and even documents of brigades of groups under the command of Alexander Soros.
Soros probably financed more than 50 lawsuits against us when we got these documents and published them, but Soros is just one front guy of the larger system.
We've talked a ton about these Soros documents being absolute fakes, but I want to point out how Alex can't even tell a straight story about how he got the documents.
Because he knows that if he told the truth, his story sounds stupid.
He did not get them from a family member exclusively.
His employee Harrison Smith found them on 4chan.
I watched the episode where Harrison shows them to Alex.
It was explicit that he'd found them on 4chan, and that the original anonymous poster had claimed that he'd found them in his brother's possessions.
His story sucks, and there's literally no way for Alex to prove their authenticity if this is how he says he found them.
So he lies.
He claims that he got them through a much more legitimate sounding means because it also makes it sound less idiotic and less transparently fake.
Yeah.
unidentified
Also, the alleged organization in those documents had nothing to do with Alexander Soros.
It was a political action committee that was run by Soros'other son, Jonathan.
But as we discussed the last time these contracts came up, that political action committee didn't even exist at the time when those documents are supposed to have been created.
In 30 seconds, Alex has lied about how he got these fake documents, lied about getting them exclusively, made up that they relate to Alexander Soros, and then asserted that all his legal trouble that he's in is actually just retribution from Soros because he exclusively covered these fake documents.
All of the lawsuits against Alex, they aren't the result of his own monstrous actions and serious damages he's caused in other people's lives.
It's payback for him being too good of a journalist and daring to take on Soros.
You can clearly see here how the details of this story seem to conveniently fit the version of this story that Alex's narcissistic ego requires.
Alex knows that the documents are fake.
He knows that it's a bullshit story so there's no reason not to weaponize it against his imagined enemies and use it to gaslight his audience into thinking that he's the victim in lawsuits where the reality is that his lies terrorized grieving families.
Joel Skousen's going to be here for the next two hours and 20 minutes, roughly, until the end of the broadcast.
He's flown here.
He's a pilot, former Marine Corps aviator from Vietnam.
He's an author.
He's one of the top experts on secure homes and real survivalism.
He's traveled the entire world.
He's up there in the top two or three people and recognized maybe the top survivalist expert for serious survivalism, not so much about the gear, but where to live and how to be prepared in a lifestyle that allows you to do it.
I've known it's the right thing to do for a long time, but I've been in pure offense mode trying to stop this.
I have to tell you now, folks, that I agree with his analysis that in the long term we're not going to stop this.
We can just mitigate it for ourselves and try to make sure that this whole...
The system we have to go through, this peace system, is not as painful as it would be, and it's about winning people's hearts and minds spiritually ahead of what's going to be coming down.
And so we'll discuss it all.
In the third and fourth hour today, I'll be co-hosting with Joel Skousen.
He has his maps.
He has his fourth edition of Strategic Relocation out.
Alex just ceding the ground to him where he's like, well, you know, it looks like this would be a good place to go, but you gotta understand there's gonna be spillover from liberal areas.
For the day, agree on the left, we are going to act like this is going down.
It's the day.
We're doing it.
The contracts will be fulfilled.
We're doing the whole thing.
It's over for humanity.
All they gotta do, all they can do, all the right-wing conservatives, all the right-wing lunacy, all they can do is go to the hills and hide and wait it out.
And while they're there, we do everything right.
And just leave them there and just be like, every time they come out, just be like, oh no, there's spillover from our liberal cities!
I don't know if Skousen's book plans for this sort of countermeasure.
So Skousen's in there, and one of the other reasons that I'm pretty sure that Alex is making some money from this is that Skousen completely contradicts Alex on Well, as you know, and we've talked before in the show, there is a satanic connection in the entire deep state and globalist conspiracy.
These things are done by revelation and guidance at the highest level, not to the intermediate yes-man, the stupid idiots that Lenin used to call them.
So Skousen is presenting that Gates is a useful idiot, whereas Alex has said repeatedly that Alex knows for sure that Gates is part of the Council of Twelve that rule the planet.
He's like, hey, you know, a lot of people think that Central and South America would be a great place to go, but that's only because they go now, and it's a nice vacation.
Don't plan the bug out based on current circumstances.
It went from half the folks I saw not wearing masks to everybody wearing them, basically, and saying, well, Trump says, but they're still mad at Trump.
But I can tell you what we already knew, but it's totally confirmed now.
Soros, Deep State, Obama-controlled, Hillary-controlled, Antifa will be the decoys, the distraction systems.
For real hit teams preparing to try to decapitate the leadership of the pro-human, pro-America movement, whether you're a corporate person, an academic, in finance, in government, in the military, you're targeted for death.
They may launch the attack next week, or they may launch it during the last days of the election, they may launch it after, but they have the safety off, the finger on the trigger, MS-13 hit squads, CHICOM hit squads, everybody.
So, it's confirmed that MS-13 and Chinese government-sponsored hit squads are going to be killing all the patriots with cover from Soros, Hillary, Obama-funded Antifa.
And the more I'm attacked, the more it means I'm in the center of the battle, in the fulcrum.
What an honor.
Now, I know you're in the fulcrum as well, and that's why you're here.
And that's why your word of mouth is king.
On this planet.
Your free will is paramount.
So remember, however you're watching or however you're listening, you amplify this transmission.
And we will win.
We'll win one way or another, but we'll win this round of the fight.
We'll have a much easier chance down the road to go through this AI challenge and not lose more than a billion people or so.
And I know that sounds like a lot, but I mean, we'll be lucky if there's 5 million people left when this is all over right now, on the current trajectory.
I mean, wow, people are going to be begging to die before this is all over, especially all you that are signing on to the New World Order, so you can act like fancy pants for a few more years and be part of the system.
I didn't want to step on Alex's estimates, but that was what I was referring to.
When Alex is talking about, like, the more I get attacked, the more I know I'm relevant, or whatever, he feels like this real sense of, I'm so important.
That has to be related to last night's frontline thing.
So, one of the things that I think is a little bit more dangerous about this is, I mean, I think there's probably always been a light supposition of this, but on this episode here on the 29th, Alex is making it a little bit more explicit that basically the protests that you're seeing in cities like Portland are, in fact, UN-staged riots.
It would have armies of people wearing black covering their face.
They're not wearing blue helmets.
They're the academics.
And then if you resist them, oh, you're bad.
So there's got to be more rioting.
And the U.N. comes in with the Democrats to remove Trump.
And they're announcing that's their plan.
Wow!
Have we gotten them to come out in the open?
Out of desperation, we have forced them into a desperate move that even if they succeed in taking out Trump and yours truly, they'll lose a few rounds later because...
unidentified
With gun theft on the rise, it's crucial that law-abiding citizens hide their guns from criminals who are now becoming desperate.
Learn exactly how with the newly updated Hide Your Guns E-Manual.
So, Alex, I don't know if he realizes that he's already told the story about MS-13 and Chinese hit teams coming to kill Patriot leaders, because he continues trying to tease the story as if he hasn't already talked about it.
So instead of proving this, the only proof that he provides, it doesn't prove any of the things that he's saying, but he has like...
A piece of paper where he has, like, you type in a Word doc, basically, Austin police sources told me they stopped a car with a bunch of Antifa people with rifles.
I'm just going to tell you right now what's coming up.
They have teams of literal meth head drug addicts, perverts, child molesters.
That's the lowest level.
They're almost all white.
They haven't been able to recruit blacks.
Literally.
They can get a few blacks wound up and pissed off, you know, being a few white people, but they can't get them to dress up in black outfits and go, you know, burn up random stuff.
And so the almost completely white, which is an interesting point, groups under professors and government bureaucrats and big tech workers, as you keep seeing it and arrested as they're unmasked, are planning.
And they have a list of judges' houses, governors' mansions, capitals, media people, police chiefs they don't like, and they're going to come to your house, and they've already got stolen trucks.
They're going to load them up with gasoline, and they're just going to run them into your house full of gasoline, burn your house down.
They are escalating violent confrontation to set the precedent with everyone that it's normal to burn buildings down and shoot cops in the head and random citizens.
And the city of Austin...
Has their new budget, pull this up if you can, guys, and calls for blowing up the, that's in the official budget certified by the mayor, they're going to pass this, to blow up the police department as a symbol of evil and to make police then be inside other agencies under other bureaucrats' control.
So you can talk about this all day long, ladies and gentlemen.
The real story here is that one of the Austin City Council members, Jimmy Flanagan, put forward a proposal as part of the process of putting together the city's budget.
For the police department, that is.
This proposal involves splitting up the police department into five restructured departments, each with a specific mission and leadership, as opposed to it all being under one executive, the police chief.
The departments would be the emergency communications and technology, which would be involved in 911, forensics, and record keeping.
Patrol, investigations, and traffic safety.
Those three are all self-explanatory.
And then the Department of Professional Standards would handle internal affairs and training issues.
As part of the proposal, which would see these responsibilities handled by more separate entities, there was an idea to decentralize their offices from the current building that they're housed in.
One issue that Alex is ignoring here is very explicit in the proposal.
Quote, The building that houses APD headquarters and formerly housed the municipal court has long been known to be beyond the end of its useful life.
We should expedite the demolition of the APD headquarters by directing the city manager to move all remaining APD staff out of the existing headquarters building and into other underutilized city facilities.
It's an old building on very valuable real estate, which could be better used.
If the city demolished the existing building and moved the new police departments to existing city office space, that property could be better used to serve the community.
Yeah, that's a great idea.
Yeah, of course.
Yeah, that's really the biggest element of Alex's reporting that's a lie.
He's claiming that this is officially the Austin city budget that they plan to blow up the police department as some kind of virtue signal to the globalists.
But I haven't told you yet what's coming up next hour.
And I want you to call everybody you know.
This is the Paul Revere bat signal being fired up.
This is it.
They are planning and are activating the units that are not just lazing targets now.
They are actively going to judges'homes, police homes, talk show host homes, members of Congress homes, and are preparing the groups that are going to go in and burn down those places.
Then they're going to have actual professionals that kill the judges and police.
Unfortunately, even by our own measure, though, since none of them have actually worked, I think the globalists are an ineffective and pointless organization.
So Alex comes back from break, and he explains that...
The ADL and the training the ADL, or maybe the SPLC, because he mentions both of them in this clip.
The training for police departments surrounding either of their activities has woken up the police departments.
Because the ADL is apparently trying to buy all the police chiefs hookers or something.
Now, that's interesting.
But...
What's more interesting is that Alex accidentally just starts rambling and talking about people who have tried to buy him off over the course of his career.
Because when you're done, when you're out of breath, just like the end of V for Vendetta, he says the only way we're similar is we're both about to be dead.
If you tuned into our TV feed right now, you probably noticed that I've got a.300 Win Mag semi-automatic sweetheart and a.338 Lapua semi-auto sweetheart.
And I can drive nails with these at 400 yards.
And I can shoot an elephant a mile away.
And I don't have these up here to offensively do anything.
From the APD and the state police and the FBI and the Eastern District of New York.
That Antifa is 100% preparing terror attacks, I mean mass shootings, bombings, fire bombings, all over the U.S., and are even organizing and preparing, and local police have informants in the groups, and when they go tell the mayors, and they go tell the FBI, they're told, stand down.
You know, that's Barr's problem, though.
They had Bush.
The Clintons, Bush Jr., then Obama, for almost 30 years, folks.
I thought we should have drum rolls or spotlights above the office at night to announce stuff like this because that's a globalist tactic is that they get so much chatter, so much disinfo, so much stuff going on that when you actually bring out the huge information, it just fizzles out there.
So in this next clip, Alex is telling his audience to create kill lists.
And if you pay attention to the words that he's using and the types of people that might qualify for it, you could make sense of thinking that what he's saying is make lists of people who are out protesting because they are essentially the UN troops that are trying to overthrow the country, so they belong on a kill list.
So, anybody who protests in black or whatever is basically a UN worker in a blue helmet, and they're the people who you said you would kill long ago, so you should make a list.
And if you lose any number, like, hey, if your 401k goes down because of, I guess, leftists mismanaging the COVID issues, then it's okay for you to go out and kill anyone who has done that.
I don't want you to understand where they've taken us and what they've done and that every single globalist New World Order operative at an executive level is an enemy combatant of humanity.
And once they pull the trigger, which they're beginning to...
So, as somebody who yells all the time about how much he loves God, interestingly, Alex, at this point in the episode, starts talking about how God isn't going to save them.
Sitting back and letting other cowards dictate our lives and hope some magic person comes down and fixes it for us.
No.
Everything we have when you're out in your motorboat looking at the sky or in a nice house and got a job and got a bank account that works, some man died for that.
When Tucker Carlson a year and a half ago had people come to his house, break down his door, threaten to rape and kill his wife, I never told people what happened to us for different reasons.
Multinational corporations have found and funded an army of mentally ill, drug-head, meth-head, white people mainly, to call themselves Antifa when they are fascist, and to call themselves Black Lives Matter when they work for Planned Parenthood that wants to kill black people.
At the end of the episode, he's like, this is the big news, and it's exactly the same shit that he was saying an hour and a half earlier.
He couldn't stop himself from getting into...
He just likes talking about these details and scaring people to the point where he couldn't even hold off on the big reveal until the end.
And I mean, I think a lot of that headspace largely surrounds the narcissistic response that he has to other people outside of his media bubble, paying attention to him and treating him like he's a relevant thing.
So, you know, I think that there's something interesting in that, like, Alex on the 28th wasn't really all that concerned, didn't even really mention the front line thing.
For someone like Alex, who claims to have great sources and is way ahead tomorrow's news today, you might have thought that on the 29th he'd have something about...
The fact that Trump tomorrow might be tweeting about the possibility of postponing the election.
The news I'm about to announce is the biggest news we've ever announced here on air in this crescendo of incredible developments.
And information came out last night and this morning.
And all the pieces click together.
But I will tell you this.
I am now going to carry firearms at all times.
And I normally have the shotguns and things like that in instant access pistol shape by my bed.
I'm going to have them even handier now.
Because the threat level in this country to what is known as the leadership of what's left of the American resistance to the globalist takeover is extremely serious.
So we got big news that Alex is teasing, and as a result of this news, he's going to be carrying a gun, which I think everybody just assumed you probably already were already.
Here is the giant piece of the puzzle that just went in and completed it.
President Trump tweeted that with universal mail-in voting, not absentee voting, which is good, the media tries to confuse that, 2020 will be the most inaccurate and fraudulent election in history.
It will be a great embarrassment to the USA.
Delay the election until people can properly, securely, safely vote.
I saw all that stuff this morning where it's like, Trump was just tweeting that out to distract from how the economy is the worst thing ever or whatever it is.
And I'm just sitting here just being like...
You idiots.
You fucking morons.
You better start having a plan for when he does this.
You should not have a plan for I'm sure that the Supreme Court will stop it.
The Supreme Court already stole an election in my lifetime.
I do think that I'm not as interested also in the talk of like, ah, it's a distraction from X, Y, or Z. I'm also not in the camp of He can unilaterally do this?
Trump has to say we're going to move back the election.
You've shut everything else down.
If you don't stop the mail-in ballots, they have to be declared fraudulent.
You cannot allow...
Fraudulent, made-up mail-in ballots that aren't even absentee ballots that are fake.
You have to have time to be able to go over the results and throw out what isn't good.
And they're saying if he even challenges any of this, even though massive fraud is coming out everywhere, there's newscasts about thousands of ballots stacked up at people's mailboxes with random names on them all over the country.
You can see here how smoothly Alex has transitioned into advocating for a completely anti-democratic system of government.
Because he has this fear of fraudulent votes based mostly on memes and misrepresentations of headlines like, oh, this cat got a ballot.
He's positing that the only thing that can be done to protect the country is to not have an election until all this is sorted out.
What this accomplishes is basically allowing Alex and his ilk to define the terms of a quote-unquote fair election, which is a standard that they will never reach.
Alex believes that the Democratic Party should be outlawed, so when do you think he'll ever say, alright, now it's safe to have a legitimate election?
It would never happen.
Imagine this does go down, and Trump somehow gets Congress to delay the election.
Then what?
When does the election get rescheduled to?
If the complaint is that the mail-in voting system is fraudulent, then clearly it wouldn't be until the COVID-19 situation is resolved, which could be a while.
So Trump could just be president until COVID is over?
Or does he still end his term?
What do you do?
Or, maybe since the problem is the mail-in voting system...
Trump would agree to elections only after a thorough investigation of mailman voting was done, which would definitely, like, it definitely wouldn't just end up being a politically motivated shitshow.
Trump would essentially be demanding extensive changes to voting systems in the country before an election, which isn't how this works.
It's not even worthwhile to discuss how he constantly screamed at his audience about fears of Obama calling off or delaying the election in order to stay in power in 2012 and 2016 just to highlight his hypocrisy.
That does not even really matter right now because Alex, what he's doing is so transparently dangerous that even engaging with it as something normal is wrong.
Our show is generally about entertaining Alex's stupid ideas and trying to understand where they come from and what he's misrepresenting in order to grasp a better understanding of the misinformation ecosystem that he's a part of.
In this case, fuck that.
Alex is cheerleading a direct assault on the idea of a democratically elected government in this country and that's crossing a line that I cannot tolerate.
Trump suggesting postponing the election is a red line that's being crossed, where people need to start taking this very seriously and considering what this could mean for the future.
Alex endorsing it should tell you something that everyone...
And that's what he sees as being possible now, and he's going to fight like hell in order to...
He's already kind of implied it, but it's been, like, in instances where it's, like, abstract and Trump doesn't appear to be involved in Alex's fantasies.
And there's no way you guys don't see the Republican Senate going along with this.
There's no way you don't see Mitch fucking McConnell making the goddamn Merrick Garland argument of, no, we should wait until ba-ba-ba-ba-ba until the results of the election are fucking in.
And then the Supreme Court validates it and says that because we can't be guaranteed...
And then they've got MS-13, Chi-Com teams, and other groups ready to carry out real operations, and they're going to stage massive terror attacks and blame patriots during all of this and then call it a race war.
That's why Trump and the Pentagon, unless they want to totally lose the country, are going to have to themselves, in the rightful authority, do what George Washington would do.
You know what George Washington would do, President Trump.
unidentified
Warning, if you're drowning in debt you can't afford.
It is essential that if they start this physical war and they're killing us, it's essential that you go after their leadership.
And again, ladies and gentlemen, that means a lot of you that are businessmen, a lot of you that are former military and very serious people, you might be 70 years old.
You're going to have to get on that airplane.
And you're going to have to go find these people on your mission.
And you are totally expendable.
Gut up and stop being a coward and get out there and get the job done.
Now, we've gone so far down this rat hole now that we're facing a communist uprising, the total destruction of the country, that I'm now having to get on air and just start going in the doomsday switches here, ladies and gentlemen.
We can beat these people with our bare hands, ladies and gentlemen.
When they go to restaurants, and when they go to sleep at night, and when they go for a walk, they're the ones that are going to be hunted.
Long after I've gone and shoveled into my grave.
You need to understand that, ladies and gentlemen, that that's when the real fight starts.
I hope we don't have to go down this path, but I'm having to now get up here and tell you.
I think you already all know it anyways, don't you?
Where we are.
But I'll tell you this, it's good knowing all of you.
All the great stations, the sponsors, the listeners, all of us as a family, black, white, old, young, all of us together, just wanting justice and freedom up against these slimy, murdering, pedophile devil worshippers.
And it's sad to see how soft our countrymen have become, but that's okay.
Because we're going under judgment, just like the Bible says, and it's a history book, it mirrors the Roman histories and the rest of them, that every time Israel became decadent and evil, they got judged and went into captivity.
Roger Stone is going to look at the election and Trump's response to the mail-in fraud.
He's going to be looking at the election with us and discussing whether Trump should move and how that would be done to postpone the election until the fraud is stopped.
Trump has to do it.
He can't just walk into the machine gun fire and not have a big confrontation with them when they're lawlessly doing this.
For those of you that just joined us, Trump tweeted out today that that's indeed where they're going.
So, Alex has been making up stuff and misrepresenting things around the protester in Austin, Garrett Foster, who was shot.
And again, this is an invalidation of Alex's Second Amendment beliefs, because he believes that Foster just holding a gun means that he was threatening the person and deserved to be shot.
They have armed vehicles going around with men in pickup trucks, stopping traffic in downtown Austin, other areas, pointing guns at people, and the police are being told to stand down.
One man who kept doing this in front of police headquarters, in front of the city council, was shot dead last weekend when he pulled a gun on a man in his car while they had it blocked off, and the man was pointing an AK-47 at the innocent citizen.
We still don't know the man's name who turned himself into police and was released.
Probably not white is the reason that they're not releasing the information.
There's plenty of reasons to defend privacy in this instance from the perspective of the police station.
But Alex, with no information, because he's a huge racist, has decided that it doesn't fit the narrative that it was a white person, and so they're not telling you who it is.
Because I guarantee you, if you say, Roger Stone has a message to Donald Trump, what you say...
What you already reported, whatever else you want to add to him about going on the offense, what he needs to do, I want you, because you're already fired up, but I want you to take a big shot of espresso when you come back in five minutes.
I want Roger Stone briefs Trump on 2020 when we come back with Roger Stone.
This is going to get to President Trump, because you, the listeners, are badass, and you're going to share those links.
And then a whole lot of it is also just him trying to sell a shirt because he wants to appeal his case and he needs a million dollars to appeal his case, which is great.
So another thing is that Roger wants Trump to not submit to a debate, which is funny considering that all of these people keep yelling about how the left can't debate and they refuse to debate and Biden won't debate.
Donald Trump is an amazing debater because he's a showman.
He knows how to make a simple point and get people to understand it.
He doesn't get lost in the weeds.
But I don't know that he should agree to a debate schedule laid out by the Presidential Commission on Debates because it is not appointed by the President, it is not a commission, and it's not about debates.
As the President of the United States, he can command where and when he wants to debate.
He can say...
Hey, Joe, I'm doing it on Fox next Thursday.
Are you going to be there or not?
He can just choose when and how he debates.
What you don't need is the Presidential Commission on Debates inserting their moderator, because we've seen in the past what happens when the moderator is in the tank.
Ladies and gentlemen, we have breaking intel that feeds into all the other big reports we've been bringing you from law enforcement and others that they're not just fire bombings of federal and state courthouses and thousands of buildings being burned down, people being shot at.
We now have major leftist groups funded by Soros and the Democrats, like the Sunrise Movement, recently renamed from their previous communist name, activating not just college but high school students and even middle school students to carry out violence.
These are all Maoist youth brigades.
You think your child's joining an anti-racism group?
You think you're joining some progressive group?
And then they get programmed online.
By the left to carry out sexual blackmail, that's on video, communist attacks, and we have footage of this recorded inside the Zoom meetings, and so they are...
Alex will bring that up over and over and over and over and over again about how this video is them telling people to hit people and conservatives with hammers.
The payoff to that is amazing.
It's so stupid.
Before we get to that, Alex plays a little bit of the video because Millie Weaver's Skype stops working.
And so they play a little bit of this Zoom call, the edited portions of it, and it's very obvious if you're listening.
That what it is, is people talking about a planned demonstration that was to keep Mitch McConnell up really late.
That right there is a perfect encapsulation of Alex's racism.
He sees this young non-white woman who's just out talking about protesting to get the voice of her generation heard, and for no other reason than the fact that she's not white, he implies that she's not from America.
He knows nothing about her than what he can tell visually, and for him, seeing a non-white person is something that he associates with them not being from here, with them not having the same rights to speak out or advocate change that someone who looks like himself does.
This is very consistent in Alex's rhetoric.
He gives a ton of lip service to all the points that he has to hit, like saying that we all have red blood, and he's careful to not say racial slurs for the most part, but he does not believe that white and non-white people have the same right to be in this country and to be treated as equals.
Alex sees everyone as members of the groups that he can visually determine and treat differently.
He sees women in hijabs at the pool supply store and experiences that as a sign that Muslims are refusing to assimilate.
He sees this non-white woman discussing a protest outside Mitch McConnell's house and he experiences it as her being someone the white people were nice enough to let into the country who's being ungrateful.
This is not a small point, though Alex might think that that slip-up is kind of minor.
It actually reveals a whole lot about how his mind operates subconsciously.
He has an ingrained belief that non-white people don't belong in America and the ones who are here should be thankful that white people allow them to be here and should be required to go along with whatever circumstances they find themselves in.
Put simply, on a deep level, Alex doesn't believe in equal rights in this country.
So Millie is talking about this Zoom call, which from everything that they've provided is just people talking about a protest outside Mitch McConnell's house to keep him awake.
Or maybe even some other places, but with the strategy of waking people up in order to inconvenience them, to get them to take your point seriously.
Look, on one side, we have the heroes, the men, decked out in military gear with no badge numbers or any appearance that can identify them, with their faces completely covered and only their eyes visible, firing non-lethal munitions, forcing people to breathe an unconscionable amount of tear gas.
On one side and on the other, you have these people with, what, a spoon and a pan, Dan?
They are training your children to disagree with the guys who have all the guns.
It's an alarming juxtaposition where Alex is talking about how we're all going to die, we're past the point of no return, MS-13 kill teams are showing up, and you need to, 70-year-old veteran, you need to sacrifice yourself in a suicide mission against Soros or whatever.
And then he's like, yeah, the proof that we're being targeted is people with no...
If there wasn't a pretty decent track record of people who are at least inspired partially by Infowars causing damage in society, this would be the most hilarious self-parody I could imagine.
But the real-world ramifications of this stuff is scary.
You know, I already told the crew, I said, I want to come in tonight at 7 to 9 to a special commercial free live show, but I don't think I'm going to do it.
It's so wild that we have, like, over and over again, he starts shows with, like, I have so much to get to, I'm just gonna tease it, because if I don't, you know, it's not making a big enough deal of it, and then every time it ends with, I haven't done my job.
I might be working on a slight theory that Alex had a weird relative who maybe terrified him as a child who was into Santeria or into Satan or something like that.
And a lot of this stuff is maybe unresolved.
unprocessed feelings that he has about being a young child and a scary, distant relative or something who is like, oh, no, they're into the devil or something, some sort of some sort of undealt with trauma surrounding.
I mean, I would have had no reason to assume that some of his family members were into the devil if he hadn't just said that.
Alex doesn't know the reality that the rest of us live in because we haven't made a deal with the devil.
We don't have race memory.
We don't have these DNA memories.
Do you know why Alex does?
Because...
Thousands of years ago, in the American South, whenever they were allowed to roam free, his ancestor made a deal with the devil to live forever and pass on from firstborn son to firstborn son, and that line has never ended, and now we are here with Alex Jones, who is the only person who can see all of this because he's the only one who's actually made a deal with the devil, Dan.
I know that some people have wanted longer episodes, so I'm glad to be able to provide that, but...
There's an interesting thing that I think you can see here, and that is that all three of these episodes are distinctly different.
The second two definitely both quite violent in nature, but there is a psycho rollercoaster that Alex is going on, and the 28th is...
Fairly normal.
Business as usual.
I'm going to pimp Joel Skousen's book for a long time.
Granted, there's still a lot of trouble around.
Everything is bad.
Antifa Soros documents, whatever.
And then on the 29th, Alex is high from his attention.
And it leads to embellishing and exaggerating this MS-13 Chinese hit team story to the point where he...
It just descends into only 5 million people are going to survive this and we're going down fast and all this.
And then by the 30th, Trump has given him all he needs to continue this.
He continues that based off of Trump's insinuation that we should postpone the election and mask off entirely Alex's fully in favor of this.
He's been given the excuse to take on that position, as opposed to what you would expect from someone who pretends to have the principles that he does, which would be, we now must fight this.