Today, Dan and Jordan check in on a very exhausting couple days on The Alex Jones Show. In this installment, Alex tries to launch a distasteful and racist national movement destined for failure, decides he now hates Gov. Abbott, and consoles two of his friends who've recently lost their social media.
I've been very conservative with my scoring, but I think it's possible, and I think if I were to guess, based on how this has gone so far, it'll be something floral.
And thank you so much, Eric R. Yes, thank you very much to all of you.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I enjoy the show, I'd like to support what these gents do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show, we would appreciate it.
But before we get to that, we have one more thing, one more little piece of business to take care of up top, and that can be found underneath your notebook.
A gift for you, for Jordan, since you, like other Final Fantasies, MMOs aren't for everyone, but fighting imperialism, oppressive theocracies, and a cosmic horror that's a metaphor for boomer ideology might interest you.
I found it intensely difficult to focus on doing this show for these last couple days.
And it's because of Alex.
It's his fault.
His show's not been good.
There's still some interesting things and some things that are definitely requiring of us pointing out and keeping track of, but there's so many guests on these shows and it is just like, I don't care about any of these people.
I don't care.
I couldn't...
I couldn't give a shit for a large portion of the time.
Sometimes the listening to his show goes quick because there's interesting things pretty regularly or he's being entertaining and yelling like a dum-dum.
This is the opposite.
It's just hours of listening to him interview people I don't care about.
That was a little painful.
However...
We start here on the 23rd, and I think that we start with maybe one of the more important things that's going on that Alex announces on this episode that is very bad.
So, my first and most important point here is that co-opting the dying words of George Floyd and Eric Garner, which have been a central rallying cry for the Black Lives Matter protests, that's a profoundly disrespectful and racist act.
Alex is trying to protest the fact that Texas' dumb-dumb Governor Greg Abbott is finally having to accept that his state is in trouble.
So he's making some moves to put health safety measures in place, like telling people to stay at home, possibly having some mask orders and stuff.
Alex and his buddies have already protested this.
They were the ones who were doing all those reopen protests.
Alex and Owen went out there with their bull horns back at the end of May and yelled about how the state needed to reopen.
At that point, Texas was reporting a total of 54,509 cases.
As of June 23rd, that number was 120,370 cases, having reported over 27,000 new cases in the past week alone.
Alex has done his part, and it's clearly been shown to have been dumb and a bad plan that he was pushing for.
On some level, I think he knows that the best he can really do is go back out and argue that the numbers are a lie and Texas shouldn't be afraid of clearly spiking COVID case numbers, and that's not going to get him the attention that he wants.
But if he flexes his racist muscles and tries to start a we-can't-breathe movement, maybe, just maybe, he'll anger people enough to get them to cover him and give him that attention.
It's disgraceful and desperate, and I hope that people don't take the bait and give him the free press.
We Can't Breathe is the name of an organization that already exists, whose mission statement reads, quote, Our mission is to create networks of multicultural groups imagining and building a future where people, communities, and races coexist without injustice or disparities.
Together we're creating deep change in the community through love and peaceful intentions.
Something tells me that they're going to have a bit more traction than Alex's dumb publicity stunt.
So I went to his new website, and it's pretty lame.
It's just got a bunch of InfoWars videos posted on there, and then there's some posters you can download about how masks are bad.
Here's the thing that I think is really funny, though.
All of the posters include the web address, which is wecantbreathe.news.
But in each poster, the apostrophe is included in the word can't.
If you type the URL in as it appears on those posters, you will never find Alex's website.
And that just seems like bad planning from a graphic design standpoint.
They plan to meet and have a prayer service at the Capitol, then march to the governor's mansion to demand him not mandate mask wearing.
The part that's a little scary in their write-up is this.
Any and all freedom lovers are welcome, and then in all caps, mask wearing is discouraged!
This is dangerous and irresponsible, but I'm not sure that there's a good way to actually discourage or stop them from holding the event.
I'm guessing turnout will be small, so the best move here is probably just to ignore them and not give it the attention that it's clearly designed to attract.
The goal is baiting people into giving this attention.
As you can tell...
By how Alex named this.
So the most effective response, I think, as much as it sucks because, you know, it's offensive, I think the best response strategically is just be like, alright, have your little march and just ignore it.
Alex's theory here that there's a bunch of Hollywood producers dying from suicide, I don't know if that's true, but I think he's just embellishing the story of one recent headline about the death of Steve Bing, who apparently jumped out the window of his 27th floor apartment on Monday.
There's no connection I can find to him being involved in the abuse of children, and Alex is probably pretty close to defamatory statements there if he's not careful.
A Page Six article about Bing's death quotes a number of his friends who say that he'd been battling mental illness for years, and quote, his close friends are devastated about his death, but sadly not surprised.
Other discusses trouble with drugs and the fact that he appeared really rich on the surface, but quote, he made a lot of ill-advised investments.
People imagine it's impossible to run through $600 million, but he did.
From all available information, this seems like a tragic story of someone struggling with addiction and mental illness.
Until Alex substantiates his claims in any way, this is another example of what appears to him just be him making up details about a story in order for them to fit.
Let's get into that, and then let's get into the state of affairs and Trump and where you see this all going and how folks can still find you uncensored, unfiltered at censored.tv.
This episode is not going to be incredibly long, because a lot of it is Alex just repeating nonsense that he says all the time that it would be fucking boring for us to keep going over.
And then a lot of the rest of it is just him talking to people like Gavin McGinnis, and I don't give a shit.
Him getting banned from YouTube is something I'm sure he's actually been waiting to happen for a while because you can get some promotional attention out of it.
This is not the first time Gavin's been kicked off YouTube.
In December 2018, he was booted for repeat copyright violations, and according to an article in The Verge, quote, This is around the same time that Glenn Beck's network, The Blaze, publicly distanced themselves from Gavin, most likely because he's an unfunny, fascist piece of shit.
He got back on YouTube pretty quick after that 2018 ban, and now I guess they've banned him again, this time apparently for engaging in speech that's considered incitement towards violence.
So, Project Veritas has got this new video out, and this time they got a Facebook insider blowing the whistle.
The guy's name is Zach McElroy, and according to him, he was a content moderator for Cognizant, which is a company that Facebook subcontracts to run moderation.
There are other explanations for the phenomenon he's describing, but the conclusion is reached that this is just more evidence that Facebook hates Republicans.
That's a sloppy assumption.
And if that's how the video is opening, you can't really have much faith that they're going to do much better as it goes along.
Plus, they never really get into what the civic harassment queue is, whether or not it's just things that are automatically caught by algorithms, or if it's things that are reported manually by people.
And that could make a gigantic difference in terms of what ends up in that queue.
I have no idea.
There's not enough information in this video for me.
And the rest of it is just kind of a basic-ass Veritas video where people are secretly recorded and their words taken out of context.
One woman who's interviewed seems like she may be outside a bar, and she says that she deletes conservative posts even if they're not violating the rules.
However, Veritas forgot to cut out the part where she says, quote, I don't give no fucks.
It's like one week left.
What are they gonna do?
Send me to OIP?
I don't give a fuck.
She's clearly someone who has quit and is working the last days of her job, so she doesn't care if she faces consequences for her actions, which implies that the actions she's describing would have consequences.
So this video actually proves that deleting conservative posts that are not in violation of the rules seems to be something that employees know is something they can get in trouble for.
There's another exchange that they have with a fellow moderator who's saying that she leaves up posts, like conservative posts, even if they're posts that should be taken down.
So she's kind of like almost a sympathetic person who's in this.
And then when asked who in the office she hangs out with, one of her answers is, Kevin, he's like the, insert slur for a little person, that I harass about his height.
This is just another standard as Veritas pile of trash.
If Veritas wanted to do some work that actually was meaningful, maybe they could have been like Casey Newton at The Verge, who did an expose in early 2019 about the horrible working conditions that Facebook moderators at Cognizant were subjected to.
Probably helped along by Newton's reporting, Facebook agreed to a court settlement where they would pay $52 million to compensate for the mental health issues that moderators developed from filtering horrific content on the platform, keeping all that stuff off.
From an article about this, quote, Each moderator will receive a minimum of $1,000 and will be eligible for additional compensation if they're diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder or related conditions.
This settlement covers 11,250 moderators.
That's reporting that matters and makes people's lives better.
There's been a big scandal at Cognizant, but you never would see Project Veritas even coming close to it.
They don't cover actual things.
They produce fraudulent hatchet pieces for profit.
Thus, it's not surprising that Zach McElroy has already put up a GoFundMe page.
So what Zuckerberg has essentially done here is he's subcontracted out his...
Bias to these third-party companies like the one that Zach worked for, this Facebook Cognizant outfit, which is where all these content reviewers do their business, because Zuckerberg wants maybe plausible deniability or a degree of separation from the family.
James O 'Keefe is making an interesting point, but it relies on a large, unproven assumption.
In order for this argument to fly, he needs to demonstrate that Facebook subcontracted Cognizant in order for them to express the bias he wanted for Facebook that allows for conservative targeting that he wants to happen on the platform but also keeps his hands clean.
James O 'Keefe has not demonstrated this at all, so it would be easy to accept literally every piece of evidence that he's presented and believe that this is a problem with Cognizant and not with Facebook.
That's one of the reasons why this is incredibly sloppy reporting.
It doesn't mean anything.
There's another huge problem with this story, and that is that at the end of 2019, it was pretty widely reported that Cognizant Technology Solutions was getting out of the content moderating business.
They laid off 6,000 employees and told their investors in a financial operations call, quote, within one subset of the content operations business, our work is largely focused on determining whether certain content violates client standards and can involve objectionable materials.
We've determined that this subset of our work is not in line with our strategic vision for the company.
In response to the news, Facebook's VP of Scaled Operations, Aaron Chandra, told BBC, quote, We respect Cognizant's decision to exit some of its content review services for social media platforms.
They had a $100 million per year deal to run these moderation facilities.
And that sounds like a ton, but you gotta understand, Cognizant is a huge and diverse company.
It was announced in the fall of 2019 that their content moderator work would be phased out over 2020, which seriously calls into question a lot of the content and arguments put forth in O 'Keefe's video and this interview.
Leaving that aside, of course some people are not required to wear masks.
For instance, in California, people who are hearing impaired or who are communicating with someone who needs to read lips can take off their mask in a store to communicate.
People who are at restaurants and are able to sit at least six feet away from other parties aren't required to be masked while eating.
People who are doing outdoor recreational activity don't have to wear masks as long as they can stay distanced from others.
There are folks who have legitimate medical, mental health, or developmental disabilities that make it so they could not wear masks safely, and those people are exempt from the requirement, but honestly, if you have a medical issue that makes it so you can't wear a mask, it seems like you might not risk going into places that there are high concentrations of people during an active pandemic,
This is the angle that Alex is going with, though.
There are these exemptions, so let's pretend we all have those exemptions, and then we'll get around this thing, which is like...
Because he's decided to run this We Can't Breathe march, he's kind of really going hard on this mask exemption thing, and it's just kind of childish and sad, but it's also so serious.
There's a hundred unexamined things that you just go about your life and you don't realize are taken care of by everyone deciding to chip in and pay for taxes.
And it's the same thing with this, too.
The government says you've got to wear masks when you go inside businesses.
There is a collective communal responsibility that you're taking care of there.
And that's another thing.
I didn't cut any clips of this because it was just so consistent and so...
But Alex is also being like, studies have shown that masks don't protect you.
And it's just like, well, yes, that's a straw man argument.
No one is arguing that wearing a mask will protect you necessarily.
And I think the comparison between taxes gets a little bit murkier, too, because so much of our tax money goes to things like war and the military, and there are a number of people who, like, there are ways to take a conscientious stance of non-payment of taxes.
That, you know, you take a risk of having to go to prison if you do that, but...
There are people who have that kind of principled stance, and I think that there isn't an analog for that in terms of this.
Because the feeling is you're drawing attention to yourself by wearing this accessory, where in reality you would be drawing attention to yourself by not wearing it.
So I think there's something interesting about this idea that California was going to put in this mask requirement and then Texas would follow and thus Governor Newsom is now the governor of California.
An underlying element of this is that Texas would be just following California's lead, but what if I were to tell you that California was not the first state to require masks in public?
California's order went into place on June 18th, but because I live in Illinois, I know that we've had that shit going since May 1st.
According to CNN, the first state to require masks in public settings was New Jersey, back on April 8th.
So, according to Alex's logic, Phil Murphy is currently the governor of New Jersey, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, New York, New Mexico, Michigan, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Kentucky, Illinois, Hawaii, D.C., Delaware, Connecticut, and California.
Persons who are hearing impaired are communicating with a person who is hearing impaired, or the ability to see the mouth is essential.
Just tell them you're deaf.
Persons for whom wearing a face covering would create a risk for the person related to the work as determined by local, state, federal, and regulations and work-safe guidelines.
You know, when you're willing to die for your cause, slash pretend you have a disability, you know, that's what the, you know, the Boston Tea Party was not about that.
That last part is really interesting, the last part of his clip.
It's not entirely made up, but the story he's talking about wasn't California.
It was in Oregon.
This was a specific thing in Lincoln County in Oregon, population 49,000, which is 90% white and less than 1% black.
The reasoning behind what they did, where they made an exemption for people of color to not have to wear masks, the reasoning is explained by Trevor Logan, a professor at Ohio State.
Quote, wearing a mask seems like a reasonable response unless you just sort of take American society out of it.
When you can't do that, you're basically telling people to look dangerous given racial stereotypes that are out there.
After the raving media picked up on this story and started reporting on it, the Lincoln County Board was flooded with calls from people yelling at them about how this was racist against white people.
Quote, we passed this last week and didn't hear much, and then all of a sudden our call center blows up with people just yelling at whoever answers the phone, Lincoln County Commission and Spokesman Casey Miller said.
So they withdrew the exemption.
Whatever you think about the exemption, whether it was a completely stupid idea or it was well-intentioned but misguided, one thing we can be sure of is that Alex has no idea what he's talking about.
He said it was the state of California, when in reality it's a small county in Oregon who's already reversed the exemption.
As is so often the case, Alex is angrily misreporting about a story that is no longer even current.
So, we have one more clip here from the 23rd, and it's Alex as a guest who I've never heard on before, and I couldn't even be bothered to look into him, and I actually turned off the episode.
Ghost in the Machine is a philosophical text, and this dude's analysis of it is basically proof only that he's not equipped to handle dense material.
The book itself is Arthur Kessler's attempt to explore the duality of the human, the difference in the mind and body being in the same unit.
How can a creature so advanced and capable of such intellect also be a creature that's prone to thoughtless violence and whims of nonsensical passion?
That's the central question that's being dealt with in this tract.
In the book, he has one section titled, quote, The Ritual of Sacrifice, wherein he discusses the history in human history of human sacrifice.
Here's how that section opens.
Quote, anthropologists have paid far too little attention to the earliest ubiquitous manifestations of the delusionary streak in the human psyche, the institution of human sacrifice, the ritual killing of children, virgins, kings, and heroes to placate and flatter the gods.
It's found at the dawn of civilization in every part of the world.
It persisted through the height of antique civilizations and pre-Columbian cultures and is sporadically still being practiced in the remote corners of the world.
The usual attitude is to dismiss this subject as a sinister curiosity belonging to the dark superstitions of the past, but this attitude begs the question of the universality of the phenomenon, ignores the clues that it provides to the delusional streak in man's mental structure and its relevance to the problems of the present.
In the context of the book Kessler uses the phenomenon as, quote, early symptoms of the split between reason and emotion-based beliefs, which produces the delusional streak running through history.
According to his belief, quote, the refusal to accept death either as a natural or as a final phenomenon populated the world with witches, ghosts, ancestral spirits, gods, demigods, angels, and devils.
The air became saturated with invisible presences, as in a mental home.
Most of them were malevolent and vengeful, or at least capricious, unpredictable, insatiable in their demands.
They had to be worshipped, cajoled, appropriated, or, if possible, coerced.
Hence the insane gesture of Abraham, the ubiquity of humanity.
The holy massacres which have continued ever since.
If anything, this book encourages the pursuit of a cure for what he calls this delusional streak.
Since left unchecked, Kessler believes that this could result in human self-extinction.
When they're ordering books, like when you open a new branch of the library, are librarians like, oh, well, we obviously have to get the lesser magic books.
The reason I couldn't come up with a good name and James Woods kept sticking out in my head is that James Woods is the right guy, but he wouldn't go on InfoWars.
I can't pretend that I know all the details of the Bubba Wallace situation, but I'm pretty comfortable with saying that Alex doesn't either.
He spends a lot of time on this episode going on about how Wallace is trying to get attention for himself and make a hoax hate crime.
I'm not particularly concerned with Alex's theories about this because he has the very basic facts of the story wrong.
Wallace didn't report the noose.
Someone who worked in his garage found it and reported it to NASCAR.
Wallace himself only found out about it after NASCAR's president, Steve Phelps, contacted him to inform him of what had been found.
Ultimately, an investigation determined that the noose had been there since at least 2019, but there was no way for the guy at the garage to have known that.
He was part of Wallace's team, and they had just been transferred to that garage.
The guy who found it checked out the other garages before reporting on it and found that no other garages have door pulls that are tied like a noose, which was part of what caused alarm.
When it was discovered that this wasn't an attack that targeted him, Wallace said, That's bullshit!
There are a lot of people with a lot of questions.
Yeah.
unidentified
Further investigation of those cases is needed for sure.
But even without that, it's easy to see how the world's circumstances make it so something like a noose being found in the NASCAR garage that happens to be used by a black driver.
That's not something you can.
really ignore, particularly if you're NASCAR.
Yeah.
unidentified
Like the way that the chain of information rolled with someone finding this, checking the other garages to see if like.
So Alex now, he's doing his march on Sunday at the Capitol in Austin, but he wants this to be a nationwide movement, which, spoiler alert, it's not going to be.
This Sunday, your Capitol, your city council, your county seat, you may be one person, you may be ten people.
But if you've got a real church, you should go have your open-air church service.
Even if you believe the COVID hoax, that's the safest place to be, out in the sunshine and preach the First Amendment, which is free speech and religion.
So that's why we're having this rally for free speech and open-air church service.
Everybody's welcome, whether you're Christian or not.
This Sunday at the Texas Capitol in the governor's mansion is approximately 300 yards away.
We're going to march up there and just say, shame on you, Abbott.
If I could, I'd have a little agency in the IRS that's just sending people around waiting for this kind of stuff with a little signature on losing your tax-exempt status.
Just waiting there.
The moment he's like, and that's why we should vote.
When I first saw it on social media, I thought there was about an 80% chance that Alex would be tricked by the fake mask exemption cards that were going around.
And it looks like he has.
This should come as no surprise, seeing as he had Dr. Rima Labo and General Stubblebine.
So this card went viral online, but it's a meaningless piece of paper.
There's no backing of the Department of Justice or the ADA to carrying this card, and refusing someone to enter into your store who's carrying that card and not wearing a mask would result in no penalty whatsoever.
The card has a website on it, the FTBA, or the Freedom to Breathe Agency.
This is not a real entity, and their website links to a shitty Wix page that's already been taken down.
That sounds right.
All that was there, like that website in its original form, it was just there to data harvest and solicit donations.
It's just yet another right-wing griff trying to take advantage of vulnerable people who are scared about the pandemic, but are also super weird and paranoid.
As it turns out, the Freedom to Breathe Agency is just an alias of another recently created group called the Anti-Mask Task Force.
I guess they thought that their new name sounded better and was more conducive to them pulling off this card hoax.
So the Donct manipulated video of a couple of toddlers to create a parody that was supposed to look like a CNN report out of it.
The video itself shows a black and white toddler recognizing each other and running towards each other to embrace.
The version that the doc put out was made to appear that this was a CNN report and the chyron said, quote, terrified toddler runs away from racist baby.
And it suggests that the white baby is a Trump supporter.
From a very basic level, I can see how this could fall under the heading of being satire and protected by free speech, but even if that's his argument, the satire is really bad.
He's trying to suggest that CNN would cover this story as a case of a racist baby, but CNN did in fact cover the video when it came out, and they covered it as a heartwarming human interest story where these two babies are friends.
The impression that the doc was hoping to express with his supposed satire piece is directly contradicted by reality, so it fails to really be satire as much as it is just race-baiting and white victimhood propaganda.
I swear to you, if I could, I would start a consulting...
If anybody was interested, I would start a consulting firm purely for judges and the like on what satire is.
Like, I'll just be there, I'll just have complete written summaries of why something is or is not satire, and then we can deal with the First Amendment.
Ultimately, whether or not this video is satire is probably the least of the doc's issues.
According to an article in Forbes, the parents of the children are suing Carpe Donctum, real name Logan Cook, for using altered footage of their children without permission to create a video that was a quote, advertisement and political propaganda.
One of the parents' lawyers said, quote, the fact that Twitter and Facebook disabled this fake video within 24 hours of President Trump and his campaign tweeting it, coupled with Twitter permanently banning Cook.
is very strong evidence that a jury will likely find that all of these people broke the law by using this video as advertisement and political propaganda.
It's tough to say which direction this is going to break, but even if the lawsuit isn't successful, it's important to remember that Carpe Donctum is a huge piece of shit, and the parents of the children that he used in a race-baiting propaganda video to support Trump don't want their kids being used like that, which makes a lot of sense.
So, Alex gets to Carpe Donctum a little bit down the road, but before he does, he has another interview, which is with a lady named Bonnie Kudlip, who apparently used to work on Abbott's, Governor Abbott's campaign, but now works overnight doing stocking at an HEB grocery store, but doesn't work there anymore because she refused to wear a mask and got fired.
I don't care.
This seems to me to be someone who's just there to talk shit about...
But Bonnie Kudlip, who I've met before at a Second Amendment rally...
I saw her when she was behind a desk there, and then I went out to, you know, during a break, she came in and was sitting down, telling her story about being fired from a major grocery store chain here in Texas, HEB, for being an overnight stalker, and saying, I don't want to wear a mask, I'm exempt from it, I have asthma.
And then she starts getting up, she has crutches under the desk.
She's like, oh yeah, I broke my foot pulling the pallets.
That's another reason they fired me.
And HEB's known for no workers' comp.
It's as close to slave labor as you can get.
Terrible company.
Terrible people.
People that own it.
Family knew them way back at Baylor.
Just horrible scum of the earth.
But that's a side issue.
Now you've worked inside there.
Recap the story and the parts that you didn't tell folks about your foot getting broken, dragging around this mask.
I have no idea what's true about this story about this woman being fired for not wearing a mask.
I have no idea.
If she is someone who has a legitimate condition that would exempt her from wearing a mask, then I assume that she should have a pretty decent wrongful termination claim.
but at this point, all I have to go on is that she's saying these things on Infowars, which doesn't really fill me with a lot of confidence.
What I find more interesting is how detached from any real semblance of principles Alex is here.
He wants to evoke sympathy for Kudlip, so he's talking about how HEB didn't pay her workman's comp, but if I'm not mistaken, based on his political positions, he shouldn't believe that employers should be required to pay that kind of compensation at all.
Workers enter into a contract of employment aware of risks involved, and forcing an employer to pay for any clumsiness or carelessness of his employees, that's an undue burden, and it's a breach of the freedom of association.
His professed libertarian ideas should make him believe that Bonnie had no right to the job if she wasn't doing it to the satisfaction of her employer.
She entered into the contract with the employer and she breached the terms of it by refusing to wear a mask.
Yep.
This is one of the reasons that libertarianism is pretty tough to defend in the real world.
Alex, standing by his principles that he pretends to have, would require him to side with HEB over Bonnie, even if she is very sympathetic and has a broken foot.
The very safety nets that we have to protect someone from being unjustly fired or to force a company to pay for on-the-job injuries, they only exist because of the work of people Alex would call demonic globalist communists.
Go fuck yourself, Alex.
You want to live in the world that your enemies create.
This is another one of those things where it just feels like Alex is trying to cash in on some sort of attention that these people have, like, a flicker.
There's a little bit of a window where it's like, and even Carpe Donctum says something to the effect of, like, It's really nice to talk to you whenever there's chaos.
And it kind of feels like, yes, the only time that you are valuable to Alex is when you get banned from something.
And he can hopefully get a little bit of that attention.
Anybody who wants a channel out there that is a known quantity, obviously we put random people on, they'll get us sued, but we're going to have a forum on there where it's like third party, just like the Section 230.
It kind of feels like this was the first time that they really did get together in a writer's room and toss around ideas, and all of the ideas were like...