June 9, 2020’s The Alex Jones Show mocks donors with crude humor while falsely framing George Floyd protests as "agitation propaganda," ignoring police violence in Chattanooga, Jackson, and Seattle. He pushes debunked JFK conspiracy theories, dismisses credible ex-leftists, and weaponizes David Dorn’s fraudulent GoFundMe claim to attack BLM. Steve Pieczenik’s bizarre rants—like Trump secretly building a moon base with Elon Musk—further expose the show’s reliance on misinformation over facts, revealing its core strategy: fearmongering to undermine dissent while peddling pseudoscience and fringe fantasies. [Automatically generated summary]
Then finally, I'd like to say thank you to a couple people who donated in such a way as to rise above in a way that they deserve very special recognition.
And if you're out there listening and thinking, hey, I enjoyed the show.
I'd like to support with these gents, too.
You can do that by going to our website, KnowledgeFight.com, clicking the button that says support the show, or you could take that generosity and throw it in the direction of some charity in your local area that's dealing with people in need.
Got to find out what Steve Pieczenik has to say about things, that awful fraud.
So I can't not do that.
So I decided to just ignore all the time that David Knight's hosting.
Right at the end of the first hour, Alex shows up in the last segment of the first hour.
And so we will begin our investigation and exploration of June 9th when Alex comes in.
And actually, I will say, Steve Pieczenik disappointed me a little bit, but there's something else that goes on on this episode that I think is fantastic and definitely worth our time.
So we start off with Alex teasing that.
Although, he starts off with an intention of what the show is going to be, and then he almost doesn't get to it at all.
So I would say that this is a really interesting way for Alex to try and contextualize and hand wave away a bunch of videos of protesters getting hit by cars.
So, I don't know what Alex is doing, but here there's a ton of videos like what Alex is describing, and a number of them fall into slightly different circumstances.
Some of them are police who attempt to drive through people or intentionally open their door as they're passing a protester in order to hit them with it.
Other are civilians that are driving into people, and a number of those videos certainly look like attacks on protesters, but each is an individual case, and it's kind of hard for me to speak about them in a blanket sense because each one is a little bit different.
That said, within the last week or so, I can find instances of protesters being hit by cars in Chattanooga, Jackson, Michigan, and there was 55-year-old Robert Forbes who died after being struck by a car in Bakersfield.
Then, of course, there was the incident in Denver from the end of May.
It seems to be happening quite a bit.
I can't get into the specifics of all of those cases, but what I can do is discuss one recent instance of this that is very clearly a man trying to kill protesters, which illustrates how wrong and awful Alex is.
On Sunday night in Seattle, a 31-year-old man drove his car directly toward a group of protesters who stopped him with a barricade.
When his car stopped, some protesters naturally started hitting his car since he had tried to run people over.
One man who was near his open driver's side window falls to the ground, having been shot by the man who was driving the car.
The dude gets out of the car brandishing a gun.
He tried to escape by sort of mixing in with the crowd and running away, but he was ultimately subdued by protesters and then turned himself into the police.
Great, claiming that he'd been forced to shoot someone who was carjacking him.
This story doesn't match with the video, nor with the accounts of people who saw the car accelerating as he approached the mass of protesters, which doesn't make sense unless his intentions were to run people over.
So we'll wait to see what information eventually comes out on this front.
But from the information available now, it's very hard to see this as anything other than a guy trying to hit protesters with his car, failing, and then deciding to shoot someone instead.
This is disgusting stuff coming from Alex.
On one level, he knows fully well that what he's doing is providing PR cover for people who want to enact violence on people for expressing their First Amendment right to protest.
Alex knows that, and I hope it eats him up inside because he's a monster.
Well, whether or not it's sold as a tooth aid, I find it difficult to believe that Alex had a tooth extracted that morning and it's not affecting his speech at all.
It's possible, but it seems really weird.
Because, you know, you'd have numbing in the mouth and you'd have swelling.
you could you know you wouldn't want to be doing a ton of talking you'd risk dry socket issues there's all kinds of reasons why this would be unadvisable he He's been practicing this for years, though.
But the reason that I think that maybe he's not lying, the reason I think it could be true is that, you know, ways back, an old podcast I used to do, I had a root canal, and then I came immediately and did a show.
You know, I don't think Kennedy overall was a bad guy, that he was really buying into this world government business.
He did buy into the gun confiscation plan, and it got him killed.
It was the last straw when they finally said he's dead.
And a lot of people that meant well were involved in killing Kennedy.
What?
But then it was an even more evil globalist group that was behind trying to get Kennedy to do the gun confiscation that was opening up China, had this new order plan that he was actually opposing.
So that's why this gets so sophisticated and so complex.
We would have been a lot better off if they hadn't killed Kennedy.
So I didn't expect Alex's angle to now be that some good guys in the government decided to kill JFK because they meant well when they assassinated the president.
So the CIA.gov link that Alex sent to his buddies who pretend to be inside sources is not the CIA talking about Memorandum 7277 being real or a plan to disarm the citizens.
It's a link to a CIA posting in their reading room of an issue of the Minutemen's newsletter on Target from 1963, which presents 7277 as a plan to disarm the public.
It was one of the things in their newsletter that was about the plan to disarm citizens.
This is a link that Alex would have sent.
It doesn't mean anything.
So also, JFK was assassinated on November 22nd, 1963, whereas Memorandum 7277 was written and released in September 1961.
So I guess what Alex is saying is that the State Department put out this memo about desires to decrease hostilities between two major powers who could destroy the world if they went to war.
And this was the last straw for the good guys question Mark, who decided to wait over two years to kill JFK as punishment for this memorandum, which did nothing and clearly didn't succeed in de-escalating the Cold War and happened to line up with exactly when the evil globalists were going to kill them.
And that means that the good guys who mean well and the evil globalists got together on this plan to kill the president, even though one group wants to kill him for supporting gun regulation and the other wants to kill him for not supporting guns.
Like, what are you saying makes absolutely no sense?
And I guarantee that if Roger Stone weren't keeping a low profile at the moment, he'd come in there and slap Alex around for saying this kind of foolishness on air.
But what I want to do today is I want to open the phones up for leftists who've woken up to tell their stories.
People that were in Antifa, people that were in the Congress Party, people that were in Black Lives Matter, to call in and tell us your story of what you witnessed and what you saw.
So in this next clip, Alex talks a little bit about the current situation a little bit, vis-a-vis George Floyd.
And I think that you can kind of sense a lot of Alex's universal feelings about situations like these, and then also him starting to get in line with what I assume is going to be a lot of what the right wing has to say about this.
That seems to be the angle of attack that you're seeing a bit more.
I'm seeing this in some of the right-wing news sources.
And now Alex, and it's just a cheap trick, and it's meaningless.
It's ultimately meaningless.
Whether they're right or wrong, which I don't believe a lot of the things that they're saying in particular, but whether they're right or wrong is irrelevant to the larger situation.
Once it's like they even have almost a time stamp on it where it's like, okay, a week after the murder, people will be emotionally distant from it enough for us to be like, all right, he was obviously an evil guy, right?
Like we're all fine.
Now that we're all mad and we're all done with that, let's just get together and realize that the cop should be able to kill him.
There were about 12 protesters in a small town called Alamosa lining an intersection at a crosswalk.
A black truck pulls up, and it does appear that he's trying to drive through the intersection.
There's a distinction, though, in that he doesn't appear to be putting any of the protesters in danger.
He is at a complete stop, and from the video, he appears to be inching forward a little bit, but not in a way that would run anyone over or hurt anyone.
That's not cool, and definitely not something I would appreciate someone doing, but there's a big difference between that and someone speeding towards people.
I've not seen any indication that anyone is calling him a hero.
And I suspect that either Alex is making that up because it's what he wants his audience to think the left believes, or he's basing it on a couple random tweets that his intern found, which mean nothing.
Yeah, I would be, and I would be hard-pressed to see anybody, you know, you can justify property damage, but nobody on the left at these protests would ever condone that kind of shit.
That is a neo-Nazi talking point that Alex is repeating as a way of trying to make it better that they were Floyd actually died and there were possible intoxicants inside of his system.
So yada, yada.
So that's all bullshit, but it's going to work for Alex.
It's going to allow him to completely write off almost every sort of protest that it's meaningless, ultimately, but it'll work for his audience.
I think I've called in several times since I started listening in 2011, and I ended up hanging up because of the long wait, but I was really rather pleasantly surprised at how long I didn't have to this time.
First of all, that indicates to me that maybe she wasn't all that invested or all that involved if she doesn't remember what fucking country she was protesting against us bombing.
So one of the unfortunate things that happens in the age of GoFundMe-based community support is that it's a system that's very vulnerable to scams.
The St. Louis police released a statement themselves warning that there were multiple fake fundraisers for David Dorn.
And according to a June 3rd article in Fox News, quote, police say none of the pages have been authorized by his family, and authorities are in the process of taking them down.
The GoFundMe page that Alex is referring to that has under $50,000 donated to it is actually one of the pages that's listed as an example of a scam fundraiser that authorities are trying to get removed in an article on the website of KMOX out of St. Louis.
So one of the reasons that the family may not be authorizing GoFundMe pages is because Backstoppers donated $50,000 to the family to help in this hard time.
Backstoppers is an organization that provides aid for families of police, firefighters, and paramedics who were hurt or killed.
So they have a support network already in place.
I'm not certain that this amount covers all their expenses or anything like that, but it's likely a relevant factor in them not needing to crowdsource all of their assistance.
Alex is trying to present this as a case of no one caring about David Dorne, but in reality, this is a situation where a bunch of people, who knows who, decided to exploit a tragedy and profit off it.
Alex has no idea what the reality of the situation is.
So, in effect, he's lamenting that a fraudulent crowdfunding campaign didn't make enough money, which is nuts.
People talk about systematic racism in America, and they don't really, like, I don't hear no leaders, nobody talk about this as far as how generational wealth black people never got a chance to experience generational wealth because of what we went through throughout the history of America.
And that's really what's causing the, I mean, what's the effect of what we're saying right now in black communities and, you know, the bad things that we're going through.
Also, not charging these businesses tax for 10 years is not the same thing necessarily as solving the problem of how black wealth has been attacked and destroyed for generations.
And more importantly, I can find no evidence that Trump suggested this or is good God, no.
And let me ask you, George, do you believe for a second that people like Alex, who think affirmative action is a brutal attack on whites, would hear Trump come out and say that black business owners don't have to pay taxes for a decade, but white business owners do, and their response would be like, hey, it's a great idea.
No fucking chance.
Alex would call that globalist reparations or some shit.
And then it's a plan to keep the white man poor.
Alex just made this up because he's eating, and he has absolutely no response to the very real point this caller is making.
So he decides to make something up that he should be totally opposed to, but Alex thinks will placate the caller and be like, oh, I haven't heard about that.
I'm very, very racist because we ended up not doing Firepower News due to lack of crew.
And we've been trying to hire more crew, and it still hasn't worked out.
That's why for at least a month or two, we're going to have to suspend doing the latest show.
We're doing Barnes.
The show is very popular.
We just haven't been able to hire the crew or get the crew.
We're probably going to suspend that for about two months until the election so we can bring Countdown America back with Barnes.
And of course, I'm being racist against Barnes as well.
We've had a big crew problem getting enough high-quality crew in here to run the show.
So if I hire a black guy and have him on as a guest, and then we do a show as a test, and then we have to stop the show for a while, that is inherently bad.
So I mean, this is like real weird leftist ideology.
You're like calling in to say that I've engaged in an evil racist act.
But this caller who thinks they're pulling a stunt accidentally kind of highlighted a bit of proof that Alex is making stuff up to cover his own racist ass.
So this caller jokingly accuses Alex of being racist for stopping the show Firepower, which featured his only black on-air talent, Will Johnson.
Alex claims that he stopped doing that show because they couldn't find the crew.
It's just a crew thing.
But in his defense, he actually disproves his own claim.
While he's trying to defend himself, Alex disproves this.
Barnes' show started after Firepower ended.
Whatever crew Barnes is using could easily be handling Firepower, so the crew excuse just doesn't work.
For some reason, Alex did not value Firepower as much as he values the possibility of doing another show.
But it gets worse.
The other host of Firepower was Tom Pappert.
If you go to bam.video, you'll see an entire section of the site dedicated to Tom Pappard and his dumb blog, National File.
Will Johnson, the other host of Firepower, still runs his own thing called Unite America First, which there are no links to on Bam.video.
Will still has his own YouTube channel, and he's posted stuff that sounds really Alex Jonesy as recently as today.
There is absolutely no reason that his self-produced content couldn't still be platformed on banned.video unless there's another reason that Alex isn't doing so.
I'm not saying this is proof of Alex being racist, although he is, but it definitely calls into question the argument that he didn't have the crew to keep Will around.
Meme World, Tommy Robinson, David Ike, and Caitlin Bennett, they all have pages on banned.video, and those are just third-party produced content.
So it's really suspicious that Will Johnson doesn't have a page himself.
It could be a personal thing.
I can imagine Alex sucks to work with, but I don't believe the crew thing at all.
And honestly, I think that what happened was at one of these Trump rallies, Will Johnson was the guy who got interviewed by like CBS News, and then it got really embarrassing when everyone pointed out that was an Infowars reporter that you interviewed, and he didn't announce himself as an InfoWars reporter.
I think that was really not good.
And maybe Will Johnson was like, if it's going to be bad for me to express my opinion or whatever, I don't want to be associated.
Honestly, my first thought is less anything to do with Alex, because I think he actually would really love having a black host that he do the whole thing with.
But it's probably more an indictment of how racist InfoWars viewers are.
How could you sustain a show that nobody's watching because everybody who's on InfoWars is a fucking racist?
Look, dude, I would say that based on viewership and whatever you're putting in versus what you're getting out in terms of ratings and all that stuff, you have every reason to cancel that show.
If you're just using it on a straight calculus, I don't see that being a racist decision in and of itself, although not canceling Owen or David Knight's shows probably sketchy, but they've been around forever.
So, you know, you could grandfather them into the allowed to be bad ranks or whatever.
But it's more notable to me that he doesn't have a page on banned.video and Tom Papert does.
Yeah, I would be very surprised for a leftist to call in and then provide Alex a platform to advertise his other shows and do so very quietly and patiently.
So in this next clip, Alex gets another caller, and this guy has some suspicions about Mike Pence because Mike Pence is apparently too kind and too nice to beat Budijudge.
Well, yeah, like when Buddha Jej was getting up in the polls, you know, they asked Pence about a couple things that Buddha Jeze had said, and he just said that he was like a nice guy and that they had worked together on a couple different bills, you know.
And I'm not saying he should talk bad about him or anything, but like, I don't know.
I just don't know if I trust Pence because, I mean, honestly, I feel like if Rand Paul was the vice president, more people would come to his base, you know.
The new one, there's not even enough money in it to do 40% off or 50% off.
So here is the new write-up.
It's finally here.
Introducing the new survival shield X2 spray available for 33% off $19.95 intro pricing at InfowarStore.com.
Plus have been asking us for months to develop an iodine spray made with our exclusive deep earth crystal nascent iodine.
After extensive development, it's finally here.
Introducing the first of its kind, nascent iodine spray made with true atomic iodine.
Our proprietary new aerodyne technology allows us to harness the full power of ancient iodine crystals from below 7,000 feet in the Earth's surface in the ultimate spray formula.
I've been using X2 spray every day the last few months and I really feel good.
Dr. Steve Pieczenik of SteveMachinik.com, author, researcher, work in the State Department, psychological warfare, ransom of major operations, including regime change.
If he just joined us, I'd like him to start over so he's not up against the break with what we're witnessing with George Floyd, what the Democrats are doing, the bowing, the kneeling, the mask, all of this classic cult programming behavior, and what he expects them to pull next.
What we're really witnessing is a mad magazine version of agitation propaganda.
And the reason I say that with a smile is because I'm crazy.
He's not very bright.
Neither are the leaders of the Democratic Party.
And what you're seeing is a parody of what agitation propaganda is supposed to be.
People like myself who've been in the business of agitation propaganda, we normally create all kinds of disturbances and send things on fire.
And we know exactly what it is we want to do.
We want to polarize the country to the extent that the police force comes in and basically engages that populace in some form of covert or overt warfare.
The best trick that they can think of is to attack the murder victim that they think that this is all about.
But it's not going to be effective in any way.
They can probably harden their base up a little bit with this and make them feel better for hating the protests and the protesters.
But I can't imagine anyone who understands what's going on being swayed by this at all and seeing it as anything other than like a complete disconnect from reality.
And if you want to play this game, choose another person who's been killed by the police.
More realistically put, and Steve obviously couldn't say that about every single person.
No, no.
So, yeah, I don't know.
I think that Steve's a dumb-dumb, and this is stupid, but it's a way to try and use the veneer of his psych warfare nonsense to apply to the situation and be like, this is a classic old ring-a-ding.
He used to do this all the time back in Honduras or whatever.
I honestly don't understand the perspective of like, yes, the president was considering and talking about doing something that would be dangerous and is completely wrong, but you should let him do it.
Like, for people, for someone who's a quote-unquote respected expert on Alex Jones' show to be like coming in and being like, we need Lockheed Martin guys in the administration.
We need to get Esper out and replace him with somebody from Lockheed Martin because Esper dared open his mouth when Trump was going to do something really bad.
And I mean, I guess, honestly, the problem is that we're trying to hold on to a little bit of sanity while watching something that's increasingly insane.
And that's ultimately going to lead to this sort of friction of like, wait, wait, wait, wait.
You guys, you can't prove that Trump said, hey, Musk, do this.
Also, Elon Musk's rocket stuff long predates Trump being in office.
Now, that being said, I think you responded to a very fitting, appropriate thing, and that is that the anti-war people, presumably, are sitting here talking about space war.
You can say they've got a deal, him and Musk, to actually, in like a year, they've already got robots up on the moon with these 3D printers, and they're already building a base on the dark side of the moon for the Martians.
America is going to release all these suppressed technologies, disruptive technologies, as they're called.
That's why a lot of the corrupt power structures are so upset.
But a lot of other groups are very, very excited.
And I was told by folks that were in the meetings with the president and Musk, and I was told, go ahead and talk about it, that they've already got a little base on the dark side of the moon.
They've got 3D printers ready.
They've got a bunch of other stuff to do a test rocket to Mars.
In the next couple of years, they're just going to announce it.
And then they're going to have man go.
And then the excitement around that is exactly what we need.
Alex, we want you to randomly talk about this with Steve Pieczenik on your stupid radio show after you get mouth surgery and eat a bunch of onion rings.
That's actually the last clip that we have because their interview sort of winds to an uneventful end, and then Paul Joseph Watson takes over for the fourth hour.
I'm very tempted to get those coconut drinks and force another hour out of this, but I'm not going to.
So, yeah, I mean, I guess the message that I come away from this with, as I look at it through trying to see Alex within his context, I see a concerted effort to try and invalidate the protests and invalidate what he thinks is the core of it while he's missing the point entirely.
And to me, that suggests that he's worried about it.
And I mean, the stuff about really making a big deal out of the guy who shot the guy in the truck, you know, that obviously is something that does, you know, the guy should have the consequences that come to people who shoot people.