Knowledge Fight dissects Alex Jones’ January 15–17, 2020 episode, where he falsely ties Virginia’s gun laws to "Antifa incel false flags," ignoring the Texas report’s focus on white racially motivated terrorism and credibly plotting neo-Nazi cells. Jones pivots from doxing a Wisconsin dentist’s racist claims to invoking Nuremberg defenses for shooting superiors, framing rallies as a "liberty movement" battleground while dismissing legal consequences. His reliance on unverified narratives—like Michelle Wolf’s deep-state jokes or abortion hypocrisy—reveals a pattern of fearmongering over accountability, culminating in absurd tactics like interviewing a baby to distract from his extremist rhetoric’s real-world dangers. [Automatically generated summary]
So he's on that trip, but the preamble to it is this three-day stretch at the end of last week.
And I think there's some trouble.
I think there's some pretty fucking hilarious things that happen, too.
But also very irresponsible, very horrible lies that Alex is putting out into the world that could have pretty bad consequences, all things considered.
But also may just be his normal standard fare, where he lies and people just incorporate.
Yeah, so we'll get into a bunch of this, but before we do that, we've got to take a moment to say thank you to Paul Walker and everybody who has signed up to support the show.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I enjoy this show, I'd like to support what these gents do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show.
Anyway, I want to say that I'm going to dismiss something that I think that everyone's probably interested in hearing a take on, which is that there have been some videos that have come out of Alex at the Women's March in D.C. He's rolling around town in his dumb tank.
These are all just videos that InfoWars has put out, and I'm not really seeing a ton of folks taking the bait and amplifying it, and I think that's a positive.
I'm not particularly interested in this frivolous and desperate attempt to get free press.
It kind of just makes me sad, like seeing a child acting out to get attention.
Namely, taking a look at Alex's behavior prior for him leaving on this East Coast trip.
A lot of Alex's focus seems to be on the upcoming Second Amendment rally in Richmond, Virginia, and his desire to preemptively declare that anything that might happen there that's bad, it's going to be a false flag.
But there's a little more depth in his bullshit than immediately meets the eye.
And I think it's wise or worthwhile for our purposes to take a look at it.
But in order to start things off, I feel like it would be best to take a little moment to discuss the lead-up to this Richmond rally and how things got to the point where we are right now.
As we've discussed a little bit in the past...
There have been some messiness going on in Virginia.
Oh, where?
It's a bit of an oversimplification to put it this way, but a pretty simple explanation for what got us where we are right now is that the 2019 Virginia elections happened.
In that election cycle, all 140 of the seats in the Virginia Senate and House of Representatives were up for re-election.
Democrats had a net gain of two seats in the Senate, which gave them a 21 to 19 majority.
In the House, the Democrats won a 55-45 majority, thus giving them control of both houses of the state legislature for the first time in 26 years.
This naturally led to the right wing becoming completely paranoid about what would come.
In an article in the Virginia Mercury, members from the new Democratic majority made it pretty clear that the largest focus of their agenda was going to be reshaping voter access laws, taking on redistricting, repealing voter ID laws, and passing no-excuse-needed early voting for everyone.
It's currently in the system it is now.
Like, you can early vote, but you have to give a...
According to polling conducted by Everytown for Gun Safety, quote, 28% of voters said that a candidate's position on gun issues was the most important issue to their vote.
And they found that voters who listed gun issues as their number one issue supported Democrats 2 to 1. That's coming from a gun safety group, however, so you might not find their polling too compelling.
Certainly, you can find other resources that argue that what drove Democratic voters out to the polls was healthcare-related policies and climate change concerns, and I think in the end, the picture becomes pretty clear that whatever you choose to focus on, the Democratic Party just had a better policy set that appealed to more people right now in Virginia.
The reason gun issues were front and center is because in May 2019, a former city employee in Virginia Beach went on a shooting spree, killing 12 people and injuring four.
That was just a few months before the elections.
But also, if you think about it, Virginia is a state with a long history of really high-profile gun deaths.
You had the shooting at the congressional baseball game in 2017, the Scalise situation.
You had the Beltway Snipers.
You had the case of Allison Parker, who was that news anchor who was shot in the middle of doing an interview.
You had the Virginia Tech shooting in 2007.
Every state has their own history of gun violence, but Virginia has experienced some of these really big, high-profile cases.
So it could make some sense that voters might want a state legislature that takes that issue head-on.
The second, SB69, makes it a misdemeanor for anyone.
You're a child.
This bill makes it a misdemeanor for anyone who is not a licensed firearm dealer.
It makes it so they can't buy more than one handgun within a 30-day period.
Even this bill has exemptions, though.
Like if you're buying a personal collection of someone's weapons, like an estate sale, you can do that.
There's also a provision for a specific license that you can apply for to not be subject to this one gun a month limit if you have a legitimate reason to need to purchase more than that, say for a business reason, like if you run an independent security company or something.
Or there's even exemptions for if your gun goes missing and you report it, you can replace that gun.
Within that one month period.
Oh, and also this totally doesn't apply to literally anyone who has a valid Virginia concealed handgun permit.
It also doesn't apply to private sales.
This is not a very severe bill, as there's a whole lot of groups of people who are exempt from it.
And even people who are not are only going to get charged with a misdemeanor if they run afoul of it.
The people who are in bigger trouble for not following the 30-day rule are licensed gun dealers who would have heavier punishments under this new bill, which makes sense, I guess.
This last bill is SB 70, which requires background checks for all gun transfers, except, again, there are a bunch of exemptions.
For instance, gun transfers between family members are exempted, as are gun transfers at gun shows and gun ranges.
The reason for exemptions for gun ranges and gun shows is because this is not about gun sales.
This is about literally handing someone a gun.
The bill is about transferring of possession of a gun to another person, and it would be kind of impossible to require that everyone at a shooting range, you know, they have to go through a background check before being able to shoot at some targets.
So anyway, those are the three bills that have been passed at the point of recording by the Virginia Senate, and they await being put into action.
There are other bills that the legislature has introduced, including military-style rifle bans and red flag laws, but it seems like fairly middle-of-the-road stuff that is...
What is actually gotten voted on at this point?
Whatever the reality of the situation is, the gun weirdo community has taken this as an all-out assault on the very basic right to have a gun.
Part of this is because these dudes don't really have a reason to exist, like the people who make a bunch of money off this stuff, unless guns are always under threat.
So it's in their best interest to create whatever controversies they can surrounding these sorts of issues.
I wouldn't be too surprised if some of the more intelligent among the right-wing extremist communities were also pretty scared about the voting rights issues that the Virginia legislature plans to take on.
The timing here is what becomes particularly troubling, though.
Because just as these bills were making their way through the legislature, an event was on the horizon that would be completely co-opted by the most extreme fringes.
Which brings us to Lobby Day.
So the group that turned this year's Lobby Day into a complete disaster is a group that's known as the Virginia Citizens Defense League.
A group that is presumably a gun rights organization.
They're very similar to a lot of gun folks we ended up and have encountered on this show, in that their actions are less lobbying and more obstructionism and extremism.
Honestly, they're probably most notable prior to this year for two large-scale media-related gaffes.
The first was when they tried to sue Katie Couric for how she edited a documentary that she made called Under the Gun.
They felt that she defamed them and sued for $12 million, which is, of course, thrown out of court.
Their other gaffe was when their president, Philip Van Cleef, got tricked by Sacha Baron Cohen in his show Who Is America?
In the segment he was in, Cohen's Mossad character got Van Cleef to promote Kindergardians, an initiative to arm schoolchildren as young as three years old.
It's legitimately embarrassing.
Van Cleve is out there singing songs promoting guns with plush animals on them to make them fun for kids.
One of them is a rocket-propelled grenade launcher, which should be a dead giveaway that this dude is fucking with you.
Van Cleve stuck around for what he described as an hours-long interview, and after it was revealed to be a Sacha Baron Cohen prank, he claimed that he only stuck around to gather intel on who was behind the video to warn the rest of the Republicans.
You shouldn't be surprised that he's still around, considering that he also didn't step down after he made some iffy comments after the Sandy Hook shooting.
He was asked by the Washington Post why people like guns like the one used in that tragedy, and he said they were, quote, fun.
This guy's a dick, which is what I'm getting at here.
Anyway, Van Cleave and the VCDL are part of the force that's behind all these counties in Virginia passing these gun sanctuary resolutions, which again are legally meaningless.
If there's one person who's at the center of the escalation of things in Virginia, I would say it's fair to say mostly Philip Van Cleave.
And because of his actions, things have now spiraled completely out of control.
Where the rhetoric is amplifying, things are escalating, Extreme groups are being drawn towards, like a moth to the flame, being drawn towards this, what could have been just a normal, hey, we like guns, kind of demonstration.
Well, if you are in Virginia, where you've long enjoyed rampant, overwhelming control to then lose an election, thinking, well, we only lost because democracy is allowed still.
Then, of course, you're going to try and basically intimidate your political opponents into inactivity.
So, in addition to the legislature being Democrats, also Governor Ralph Northam is a Democrat as well.
And that makes him evil, according to a lot of folks.
Like, hey, I'm not going to defend Northam.
He seems like a real not-great dude.
But he signed an executive order banning guns and other weapons from the site of this rally event.
And, you know, because if you really look at it, it really was becoming more or less a completely unpredictable gun rally.
So he put this ban in place, effective from Friday the 17th through Tuesday the 21st.
This executive order was also a declaration of a state of emergency based on credible intelligence that tens of thousands of people from out of state were planning to converge and that, quote, Yeah.
Yeah.
It's hard to say exactly what his credible intelligence is or was, since we aren't privy to the inner workings of Virginia law enforcement.
But if you have to go off what's publicly available, I think you should come to the conclusion that Northam's decision was more than justified.
For one thing, you have Stuart Rhodes and the Oath Keepers making the trip up to the rally.
Plenty of Oath Keepers have been arrested for things like having napalm bombs or planning to take over small towns in the past, so their involvement in something like this is definitely a red flag.
For months now, Rhodes has been talking about an impending civil war.
And even publicly, on Alex Jones' show, he's literally said that it's important for it to start while Trump is in office.
And him joining this Virginia business and agitating the way he has is definitely not good.
However, he's far from the top of the list in terms of the scarier aspects of what's going on.
There are a ton of groups that have indicated interest in attending or intentions to attend.
But in terms of people who have more concrete information about, I would say the thing that is the most alarming is a group called The Base.
In the last week, two three-person cells, allegedly members of this group called The Base, were arrested amid plans to carry out violent attacks.
Three men in Georgia were planning to murder a married couple they believed were high-level Antifa.
That would have been upsetting on its own, but what made it much more notable is that this was the second three-person group arrested within like a day.
In Maryland, another trio was arrested.
This one including a former Canadian Army member who had been exposed as having associations with white supremacist groups and then disappearing.
The FBI had this cell under surveillance, and they'd learned that one of them had made an assault rifle he'd described as a machine gun, capable of firing more than one round at a time.
These men had discussed attending the rally in Virginia, and according to a headline in Slate, quote, Neo-Nazis allegedly discussed opening fire at Virginia's pro-gon rally slated for Monday.
Governor Northam had credible intelligence of threats of violence at the rally, and this very well could have been what he was referring to.
Of course, it could very well be that there's just one of multiple instances of violent threats surrounding the event.
But whatever the case, when it comes to a group like the base, I think it's probably best not to just dismiss it as stray talk or like, hey, these guys are talking shit.
So I would say it's best not to dismiss these people and these arrests that got made.
and that's because The Base is a group that's explicitly and specifically about creating white supremacist terrorists.
They are not interested in people posting stuff online or slick media dicks like Richard Spencer.
They exist to help encourage The return of white-kaida.
Started in 2018 by a man who goes by the alias Norman Spear, the base operates encrypted online forums and message boards where aspiring soldiers for whiteness can connect with each other.
And they get to learn about a wide array of topics like lone wolf tactics and chemical weapons manufacturing.
They're steadfastly accelerationist in the sense that they want to commit acts which will provoke a backlash, which they believe will lead to their ultimate goal, which is a gigantic war that will give them the opportunity to overthrow the government, which they feel is run by...
One thing that makes the base different from your run-of-the-mill white supremacist groups is that they have an emphasis on uniting white identity and neo-Nazi groups who otherwise have some tactical or ideological differences.
Their push is that their common interest is greater than what they disagree about, so they need to work together.
This is heavily reminiscent of the Rocky Mountain Rendezvous meeting held in Estes Park, Colorado in 1992, where militia dudes, Klansmen, Neo-Nazis, and Alex's buddy Larry Pratt got together to formulate a strategy after Ruby Ridge.
Militia and right-wing extreme activity rose quite a bit in the 90s, and it's hard to imagine that Big Summit among the major players didn't have some role in that rise.
Coincidentally, Larry Pratt's Gun Owners for America is among the parties involved in the rally at Richmond, which is probably just not important at all.
But I would say one of the most fortunate things about members of violent hate groups is that they usually hate and distrust each other as much as they distrust anyone else.
You know, they're planning illegal shit, so anyone they're associating with could be a Fed, and this paranoia tends to impede their ability to organize.
Earnest attempts on the part of right-wing extremists to put their differences aside and collaborate are a very bad sign, and something that needs to be taken very seriously, I think, when you see it.
People who are concerned about possible trouble at the rally aren't concerned about normal law-abiding citizens carrying guns.
I would assume most of them would have no qualms with Trump supporters open carrying at a Second Amendment rally.
They have a problem with people like these neo-Nazis who are being attracted to this.
People like Alex hear the concern that there are violent white identity groups planning to attend, and he spins it by saying that the concern is really just that they think all responsible gun-owning people in America are terrorists.
For whatever reason, and I don't know how anybody could possibly guess what that is, Alex has a consistent trend of inclusion when it comes to white identity extremists.
So one of the tragedies of listening to Alex's show and understanding how he operates is that I know that even if a hundred neo-Nazis were arrested with explicit plans to attack minorities and liberals at this rally, then they all confessed.
Alex would still say that he has proof that they're all feds.
He's built a world of information that's so insulated from reality that he could make the claim, then yell nonsense about Elohim City for a while, and then pretend he's proven his point.
His audience would probably let him get away with it.
All right-wing extremists are secretly globalists.
All left-wing counter-demonstrators are also secretly minions of the globalists.
No one really exists except Alex, and everyone else is some kind of controlled agent working for a gigantic dialectic bent on Alex's guns being taken.
It's a completely nonsensical worldview, and it's completely and totally incoherent.
At least it is until you consider it through the prism of supporting right-wing extremists.
If you start to look at it in that light, I think things make a lot more sense.
We're going to get into this episode, and along the way, Alex is going to go out of his way to preemptively declare that any violence that happens at Monday's rally, if any happens, it's going to be a false flag.
The globalists are trying to start a civil war, and they want to kick it off there.
I've seen some publications glibly pointing out that Alex is pushing that angle, but I really wish they would flesh out why he's doing that.
Alex knows that people like those members of the base have been arrested, seemingly plotting to commit violent acts at the rally, and I'm certain he isn't naive enough to think that they're the only ones.
He's friends with fucking Stuart Rhodes, and he's been an associate of Larry Pratt's for years now.
He has to know that there's chatter from his side of the aisle that's very much in line with, well, if we have to fight, it'll probably start here.
He knows that.
Guests on his show have said that.
And if, God forbid, anything tragic happens, he needs an excuse in place ahead of time to make sure that no one blames his right-wing extremist friends.
This is a very difficult situation to assess, particularly from the outside.
I don't want to buy into any right-wing hype that there's going to be violence and a civil war is going to start because I think that taking them at face value plays into their narratives.
At the same time, I don't want to diminish and fail to recognize that there are a lot of very extreme people who have attached themselves to this rally and that their intentions are not good.
Personally, I hope the calmer heads prevail and the day passes without incident.
As of right now, as we're recording, I've seen some indications that people involved with the non-gun weirdo side, they're encouraging people to stay home as the chaos of the situation is way too unpredictable to risk.
As we're recording, I have no idea how things are going to shake out, but it's entirely clear that there's one side that's basically desperately pleading for something awful to happen so they can justify living out their civil war fantasies and another side saying people should stay home.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So anyway, sorry about that long rant, but I felt there's a lot of context.
Yeah, the thing I see as most worrying, or the thing that I'm most worried about at Richmond is not going to be people who are planning anything.
Not those guys, not the lunatics, but more like somebody just accidentally fires and that's it.
That seems far more...
It's not a likely thing by any stretch, but as far as scenarios go, historically it would make far more sense for some idiot to accidentally leave the safety off, and then everybody goes, active, and that's the thing.
And I should say, just for clarification, because it would be easy to paint Alex weirdly, the news of those neo-Nazi arrests doesn't happen until the 16th.
So on the 15th, Alex doesn't know about that.
He couldn't.
So what he's doing is he's breaking some big news.
So, once again, Alex is pretending he was ahead of the curve on something, when in reality, he's just making shit up.
We'll get into what Alex is calling this Texas FBI report a little bit later, but suffice it to say that literally none of the things he's saying are in that report.
This is absolutely constructed out of thin air.
Actually, it's not out of complete thin air.
Alex has not read this report.
He's only read an article about it that was posted on National File, which again is a website run by his employee, Tom Papert.
The article is on National File.
It's basically just about how the report warns about an incel rebellion while completely ignoring everything else in the report.
Spoiler alert: that's because most of the report is about how the number one domestic terrorism issue in the country is people who believe the same things as Alex Jones.
This article exists to distract from the actual point of the report and make it a story that Alex can effortlessly cover on his own show.
And this, among other stories recently, really highlights how National File is becoming a laundering house for far-right propaganda.
They are their ascendant in Alex's world, which is weird because he used to have Paul Yeah, I think Paul is not distancing himself, but definitely keeping clear of certain...
Now, it isn't that InfoWars has had some magical crystal ball.
It was that we were tracking who those people were.
And of course, law enforcement knew this as well, but the ADL was still in control and was telling us it was all Christians that were the enemy and gun owners.
Well, now all that's been thrown to the side and law enforcement's openly publishing the truth.
And the truth is, it's Antifa leftist incel needle dicks out of the problem.
And here he is on air, saying that finally law enforcement is coming out and telling the truth.
He's pretending that that truth that they're telling is that all of these mass shooters are Antifa leftist incel needle dicks.
But let me read to you from page three in the report.
Quote.
Based on the prevalence of recently conducted attacks nationwide, white racially motivated is currently the most violently active domestic terrorism type.
While other types of domestic terrorism have shown threatening or forceful behavior, the loss of life from recent WRM, white racially motivated, attacks elevates the nature of this specific threat.
Seems like if Alex thinks that this report is law enforcement finally telling the truth, then that truth is that white identity-related terrorism is the most serious problem in the domestic terrorism world.
But I thought Alex said this report was about how all the shooters were Antifa incel needle dicks.
The word Antifa exists one time in this document, and it's in the URL of a footnote in the form of a link to a New York Times article about the clashes at Berkeley back in 2017.
Literally nowhere in this document is there any indication that any of the shooters were inspired by Antifa.
As for incels, the report does note that they are a, quote, emerging domestic terrorism threat, and that this is a group to be aware of in the future based on some past attacks and, quote, extremely violent online rhetoric.
The section where the report details instances of incel-related violence includes five attacks, from 2014 to the present, and literally none of them are stories that I've ever heard Alex cover, although he probably did cover Elliot Rodger back in 2014.
I haven't listened to those episodes, but I imagine his take on it was not good.
The fact that this report mentions incels is really good for Alex because he can use that to pretend that it isn't mostly about people he agrees with.
There are four instances listed of terrorism motivated by anti-abortion beliefs.
And in recent history, Alex has expressed some leanings in favor of violence against people who work in the abortion field.
The report lists five instances of sovereign citizen-related domestic terrorism, and we've definitely seen Alex expressing some sovereign citizen-type beliefs in the past.
Probably not enough to suggest he's a full-on adherent, but enough to make me think he doesn't want to talk about their violence.
But more importantly, this report highlights white racially motivated domestic terrorism as the largest threat in the field, specifically pointing out how a lot of it is driven by a belief in the Great Replacement Conspiracy, which Alex is fully on board with.
The report is an overview of different sorts of domestic terror threats that exist in the country.
It's not really biased towards one particular viewpoint, if you read it.
You could say that they're singling out white people, but there's also a section on black racially motivated terrorism in there, too.
You could say that they're singling out right-wing anti-government people, but there's also a section about anarchist-motivated violence, as well as environmental and animal rights action.
It's a broad analysis, but if you actually read the report, it would be literally impossible to escape the conclusion that is spelled out at the beginning of the report, namely that white racially motivated domestic terrorism is the most violently active type in the country.
Alex cannot allow that to be the conclusion people come away with, so instead of engaging with the report at all, the only information allowed on his show comes from the National File article Yeah.
This is an act of running interference for white racially motivated domestic terrorism.
If you're endorsing this report and claiming that the conclusion is that all these shooters are Antifa leftist incel needle dicks, You're gaslighting your audience, and you're trying to cover up the reality that white nationalism and white supremacy, it's a severe problem, and it's getting worse.
See, this is where you get into that, like, if you look at this through the prism of supporting these sorts of things, like white racially motivated extremist behavior, everything makes sense.
I'd have to review the numbers, but I would be willing to bet that there have been some years that some single issue motivated stuff might have been larger.
This report was produced by the Texas Fusion Center, so Alex should absolutely hate every single thing about it.
From a 2012 article by Kurt Nimmo on Infowars, quote, Fusion Centers not only violate the constitutional rights of Americans, but also are a colossal waste of taxpayer money.
Anyone who listened to Infowars in the pre-Trump years knows that a very consistent aspect of their content was that fusion centers were hubs of evil and they needed to be destroyed.
A lot of that was based on how these centers were able to collaboratively collect intelligence and compile it to recognize trends that might be missed by police departments working independently.
It's brazen because if you're talking to somebody about this report and they're not fully on board with you and they're like, that's not what the report says.
And every time we go, oh, that's crazy, that's dangerous, they go, oh, we don't mean that.
So they're just getting you in the habit of hearing that term, emergency, and then the emergency begins to expand.
You're like, why would they want to pick a fight with gun owners?
Why would they be so incendiary?
Well, that's the whole point.
And then we learned from the Bernie Sanders campaign operative that they're going to burn down Milwaukee at the DNC, where InfoWars will be, where I will be.
If Sanders doesn't get the nomination, and then if Trump wins, they're going to burn it there, and the fires will spread from that summer of rage across the nation.
There will be an overthrow of the government.
Law enforcement will be under communist control and they will then arrest white males and put them in re-education camps.
Alex is reading this headline from a story that Mike Adams posted on Natural News.
This article is really just about how he was on a radio show talking about the research he'd done into how the governor was going to shut all this shit down and seize everyone's guns.
I listened to that interview, and at no point do these dudes prove anything.
Literally all of it is, hey, well, I heard this from a highly credible, high-level source.
It's all that bullshit.
The reason that it's all vague nonsense about anonymous sources is because Mike Adams hadn't done any research.
As is very often the case, he'd fallen for an internet hoax.
That interview was posted on YouTube on December 19th, and just six days prior, the white nationalist radio host Hal Turner had launched a completely fabricated narrative that Governor Northam had, quote, allegedly ordered a small cadre of staffers to begin the process for determining how to cut off electricity, telephones, faxes, cell phones, as well as the internet in areas where he plans to send Virginia National Guard troops to forcibly seize guns.
From there, bots amplified the story on social media, and there was a bit of a game of telephone to where the pieces got morphed and embellished, ultimately leading to Mike Adams presenting his angle with the UN replacing the Virginia National Guard and making up his own details about how to describe the martial law that would be enacted.
I've seen this sort of thing from InfoWars before.
One of the ways they launder hoaxes that they pick up on is to slightly change some trivial details so they can deny that it traces back to the clear hoax source.
Where James O 'Keefe's band of idiots caught a Bernie staffer saying some fucked up things on camera.
I watched about as much of the video as I can tolerate, but O 'Keefe's sweaty shots where he's just talking into a camera are unbearable.
I just cannot handle it.
As best as I can tell, a Sanders staffer whose position in the campaign is unclear, like what level they're at, said some stuff about being in favor of gulags and re-education camps.
I don't particularly care about this because James O 'Keefe has shown himself to be the biggest weasel in the game.
Nothing he puts out even deserves a second's consideration.
And even if he didn't present this stuff manipulatively like he usually does...
It's very easy for me to say the stuff that staffer was saying is horrible and I don't support it.
He could have Nancy Pelosi screaming awful things into his face about how he's going to murder his family, and I'd still be like, he probably deceptively ended in that shit.
The entire shtick that O 'Keefe is working with here is called a composition fallacy.
He's found a low-level person in the Sanders campaign, probably just someone involved in organizing and knocking on doors in Iowa, and he caught him at a bar saying some fucked up stuff.
From there, the implication is pushed that what this guy said is actually what everyone in the Sanders campaign believes, and probably Sanders himself.
This is the entire bit, and honestly, more than anything else, all this reveals to me is that the big-money donors who fund Project Veritas are becoming more worried about Bernie's numbers, and they see him as an actual threat now, as opposed to when they just focus on Biden.
Yeah, that's one of the things that everybody who is opposed to Bernie really, really hates is it's really tough to paint him as this guy who's a sleeper cell after a 45-year career of saying the exact same thing over and over again.
I will not now nor ever care about what James O 'Keefe does.
If he had an actual story that wasn't based on manipulative practices or fudging details, he would do everything in his power to keep his name off it.
I think that's a good life strategy to employ, is anything that has the name Project Veritas or James O 'Keefe on it is absolute bullshit until it's verified or vetted through another outlet that has standards.
You know that a media organization is desperate for content when they pull out the can you find Iran on a map card.
If this were a segment on a late night comedy show, it would be a little cheap and dumb, but Alex is pretending he's doing a show that means something, and yet he still thinks a segment like this is a good use of his time.
There are just essential problems with a bit like this.
The first is that knowing where a country is on a map is not an indication of knowledge or lack of knowledge about the current issues surrounding that country.
You could be fairly well-read on the issues in the Middle East and not know exactly where countries are geographically.
But even then, their idea of, well, I know something you don't know, so I'm smarter than you and I can talk down to you, is so ridiculous because that means, okay, well now, what if I know something you don't know that then the tables are turned and you just have to deal with it?
So, we go from that very serious reporting, very serious, hard-hitting stuff from Caitlin, to Alex formally predicting that there's going to be a false flag.
The gun owners are the evil terrorists, they're the white supremacists, and they run the same operation we saw the Democrat-controlled state police did a couple years ago in Charlottesville.
And even listeners are like, Alex, this is going to be more hardcore than you're even saying.
Why aren't you making a bigger deal out of it?
And I was just not wanting to escalate things and hoping the deep state would back down.
But more and more, it becomes very clear they're going to try to pull something.
In Virginia.
And it all starts basically on the 20th.
They're going to try to put provocateurs into the crowds.
They're going to try to stage something so he can declare a larger emergency and begin gun confiscation across the state in an attempt to trigger a civil war.
Well, you're going to get hung up like crazy on this next clip because Alex makes a very bizarre recommendation and then tries to prove that the left are really the violent ones.
Obviously, they try to go out and confiscate guns federally.
As a nation, we'd have to stand up to that.
The governor's trying it, and people are like Muhammad Gandhi, and turn them in?
They won't be able to start their civil war.
But they'll just provoke a turret, maybe have a sniper shoot some anti-gunners.
I mean, this is their playbook.
And they're failing on every other front.
They already sent somebody to try to kill all the patriot Republicans at their baseball game.
They're saying be violent to Republicans.
They're saying kill Trump and his family.
They're saying kill me.
They go to Tucker Carlson's house.
And now the FBI and state police in Texas have put out reports saying their Antifa incels planning terrorism nationwide to usher in a collapse of the government and trigger a civil war.
But more importantly, that list of incidents he's talking about with the left being violent is sad.
The Steve Scalise shooting was in June 2017, and there's literally no evidence that anyone, quote, sent him to shoot those guys.
It seemed like his motivation was an intense hatred of Republicans more than anything else, and Alex is way out of line, implying that he was some kind of an assassin sent by the globalists.
If Alex got deposed about that allegation, he would 100% say he's talking about his feelings.
He feels like the shooter was sent to kill the Patriots.
I have no idea what he's talking about with people saying to kill Trump or to kill Alex.
That's too nonspecific for me to work with.
A small group of protesters went to Tucker Carlson's house in November 2018 and spent about 10 minutes chanting stuff.
Tucker wasn't even home.
He claimed that the protesters were threatening to pipe bomb his house, but according to people who were there, this is a misrepresentation of the protesters evoking the pipe bombs of the MAGA bomber and the recent synagogue shooting as a reason for why they were protesting his particular brand of rhetoric.
As they were leaving, one straggler spray-painted an anarchist A on his driveway, which other protesters expressed their disapproval with.
The incident was completely blown out of proportion by the right-wing media, and again, happened over a year ago.
We have a good governor, a great governor in Texas, but if the Dems turn the state blue, and they're close to it, and they tried something like this, and wanted to have a big riot, and wanted to blame it on President Trump, And they came to take my guns.
At this point, I would turn them in knowing they were wanting a civil war.
Then that would trigger such a political movement, the state would wake up and go back red.
And I'm not telling people turn your guns in in Virginia.
That's a decision you've got to make.
I'm simply saying we need to try to fix this peacefully.
We're winning politically.
That's why they want to overturn the chess table and trigger a war with law enforcement.
I strongly suspect that Alex is saying he would comply with a state-level gun ban because he knows that many of the folks on the right are very publicly talking about shooting cops who come to take their guns.
This feels like an attempt at presenting a moderate public face, knowing that the work has already been done in terms of radicalizing enough people to make the world super dangerous.
Although, I have heard in some recent episodes, some people pushing back on him for this stance of, like, I would turn my guns in.
I have no idea why my audience feels like I would shoot a cop in the face if they said to take my guns, other than the past, I don't know, ten years where I've said that it's our constitutional duty to shoot a cop in the face if they come to try and take your guns.
If you come to try and take, you literally said, if you come for my guns, I will shoot you.
And he's already declaring an emergency to just get the idea of an emergency going in your head so the deep state can trigger some type of civil unrest that leads to civil war in the region and martial law saying that President Trump is to blame and then removing him while the Senate...
Is in session next week with the trial of the president.
All the planets are aligning right now, and our intel was the governor was planning this, and now you see it's beginning to unfold.
This is a Jussie Smollett-type false flag, but a billion times bigger.
I believe they're not going to be getting away with it.
You notice they also have the new Project Veritas bombshell videos with this operative for Sanders, right out of the Weatherman.
Handbook saying we're going to put people in camps.
We're going to be violent.
The only way to deal with Trump supporters is violence.
You have the Texas Domestic Terrorism Threat Assessment saying incel leftist Antifa are the main terror threat and they track how all over the country it's been Antifa incels carrying out almost all of the mass shootings.
So in that clip you can kind of see the anatomy of this conspiracy cycle.
And I think that Alex isn't super comfortable with all of the pieces of it yet, and so that's why you can kind of see his brain trying to jump from one to the other to connect them.
The end message Alex wants his audience to get is that the left, particularly Antifa and Cell Demons, are coming to put you in a FEMA camp.
I suspect that this is at least partially based on Alex realizing that yelling about Hillary is not going to sustain him this election cycle, and that his best play is probably to really amp up fear of Bernie.
Even though in 2016 he wouldn't stop talking about how unfairly Bernie was treated when he was trying to use that to attack Hillary, and in the past...
He's called Bernie the only good senator on the left because he worked with Ron Paul in getting oversight for the Federal Reserve, but who cares about any of that?
So you really need to have some pieces in place to support that conclusion.
Luckily, this bullshit artist, James O 'Keefe, put out a thing related to Bernie and Gulag, so that's a good start.
And ooh, this Texas threat assessment came out.
And it mentions incels, so we can just pretend that the whole thing is about Antifa incels doing all the violence, and that should help back up the fear that the audience should feel based on this O 'Keefe video.
Now, to make it all feel super immediate and like it's an imminent crisis, let's mix in some of the stuff we ripped off from Hal Turner's hoax about Governor Northam declaring martial law to seize guns, and for good measure just throw in some stuff about how this has to do with getting rid of Trump, getting him out of office.
You're good to go.
This is what's going on here.
These are the pieces of the narrative that are meant to drive towards the desired conclusion.
It seems like what he thinks he's doing, or maybe doesn't think he's doing, but what he's functionally doing, is trying to give people who otherwise would be against domestic terrorists the safety of saying, well...
Because they're not domestic terrorists on my side, and they're the ones on their side to make it look like my side is bad, when the theoretical civil war does start, I'm fighting a defensive war, not I'm part of America and the right wing is the one who's doing it.
And the rationalization for that largely has to do with, if we don't do this, the leftist Antifa incel demons are going to put you and your family in a FEMA camp.
Well, and it gives them the ability to both say that they're against domestic terrorism while at the same time fight a terrorist war, I guess, of some sort, you know?
He's declared first an emergency at the Capitol, then the grounds, because people are coming with guns, introducing the idea of a civil emergency.
Right as the President's trial will undoubtedly be taking place next week in D.C., we'll be there covering both.
That's how critical this is.
Basically, my whole main crew is going to be there.
We're going to have 15 people there.
We're going to go to your calls in one minute.
I just want to say that it takes a lot of money to do this.
We are expending our backup reserves to do it.
We are going to have a security team of quite a few people up there, including police officers from the locales, and I'll just leave it at that, because this is a major threat area for everybody.
Okay, I'm just going to leave it at that.
We need to fund our operation.
Ultimate Fish Oil is back.
When I say ultimate, it's from the natural fjords, salmon.
It's easy for Alex to say that Governor Northam declared an emergency because people were going to bring guns to the rally, but that's not really being precise enough with your language.
If people were just going to show up to peacefully assemble and carry guns, there's no doubt that it would not have been an issue.
This is technically about people bringing guns, but it's more specifically about these sorts of people who are planning to bring those guns.
Because of people like Alex, who've been building up the perception that the next civil war is about to start because Virginia is considering some mild gun regulations, A lot of really extreme folks have been drawn into the picture.
This entire thing has completely spiraled out of control to the point where I don't even think the gun supporters even really know what to expect.
You have this double talk that's meant to be this kind of winking all over the place.
You have people from the Pulaski County Second Amendment Coalition putting out statements stressing that if you're going to do illegal shit, you need to stay home.
And at the same time, you have Philip Van Cleve saying, quote, It's ironic that this is about gun rights and the governor is trying to take away our ability to carry guns.
How ironic is that?
He keeps poking the bear, you know?
This sort of super extreme but self-contradictory messaging is a recipe for a chaotic situation.
It's a real-life and way more volatile version of Alex rambling out pornographically vivid descriptions of killing his enemies and then insisting this is all about the information war.
It allows him to antagonize and wink at the extreme members of the audience while reassuring the less extreme listeners that this is really just about the info.
Same sort of dynamic is being played by some of these people who are involved with the gun side of the rally.
They're signaling to extreme folks while playing the, like, hey, this is about the info war.
But I don't believe that people like Alex, people like Stuart Rhodes are unaware of that element of it.
And that's why they need to present it as they're trying to demonize all gun owners as opposed to discussing the very real fringe extreme element that's being attracted.
Because they don't have a defense for that.
And they also don't want to denounce those people.
So, the guy says, the audience member, if a bunch of guys over 60 just shoot cops that come to take guns, we'll lose some old-timers, but a problem be solved.
And Stuart Rhodes, of course, he says, better answer is sheriffs being behind you, but I agree with that sentiment.
Alex is a close associate to Stuart Rhodes for years, and I have definitely heard callers on Alex's show express that exact same sentiment that that guy in the audience said.
I mean, the idea that Alex thinks that no one is going to shoot, like, thinks that it's a good idea to shoot cops.
And so I'm just asking, how do we somehow not let this happen?
unidentified
I wish I had the answer for you, Alex, because everything I could possibly give you as a possible answer is something that there's going to be a counter to.
And I just think at the end of the day, there's going to be people there that are going to try to start something.
And the Patriots side of things, I just think there's going to be people there knowing that there's going to be passionate people there, knowing there's going to be Patriots there to try to initiate something like you've been talking about.
I probably talked about this too much, but this is one of the ways that Alex makes sure that no matter what happens, he gets to present himself as the winner and the hero in this situation.
If, God forbid, something bad happens at the rally, he's on record pretending he's proven to his audience that the globalists are going to false flags.
He's been proven right.
If nothing happens, he gets to pretend that he and his patriot buddies were just so strong and intimidating that the globalists had to call an audible.
Decided not to false flag after all.
No matter what, Alex's rhetoric and his ability to keep his audience convinced he knows what he's talking about remains intact, and he's able to move forward.
This is a game to him.
And it's really fucked up considering the stakes and what he's doing to people.
First of all, the people shouldn't be voting in counties to declare sanctuary cities.
They ought to be arresting this guy.
Obama's running this program.
I got people all over the place, friends, cops, military.
Obama's running this thing, and Obama's still running our government.
There's people in high places in the government, and they're told to ignore Trump or they'll indict them.
And people are just scared and people are just frustrated.
But I tell you this, Alex, if they go ahead and go along with this, I'm going to roll with it because the American people are stupid for putting up with it.
But no, I'm not going to go door-to-door confiscating.
What they're going to do, they'll probably go away quietly and just have people like me pull you over and grab your guns and put you in jail.
So apparently Obama's still running the government, and I don't think that's what Alex wanted to hear, because that's something that Alex has said before, but that's not this season's content.
That's the kind of thing you want to bring up when there's deep state intrigue kind of narratives going around.
Like when you need an easy to digest explanation for why your hero Trump isn't doing any of the stuff you want him to.
That's when you trot out the Obama still running the government stuff.
This season, right now, it's patriot masturbation season.
Content where you're making excuses for things and throwing blame on people who are clearly not running the government doesn't play that well when you're trying to get people whipped into a frenzy about standing up to the gun grabbers.
Alex was looking for something more along the lines of, I know a hundred cops will kill their superiors before taking guns.
And these voting machines, these voting machines are what, these people get awfully elected and they say, well, the people voted for this and so now we're going to take your arms.
This is the big test case.
There is bills all over this country and they're ready to dump them as soon as this thing...
If it doesn't go off the hinges, they're going to go ahead and force these other states, and you're going to see there's a bunch of sleeper cells all in this country.
And it's sad, and I hate to see it, but like I said, if they pass the law, I'm going to arrest you, and I'm going to charge you, and I'm going to do what they told me to do.
The Texas Domestic Terrorism Threat Assessment put out a huge report on the number one terror threat, 48 pages long, and it mirrors what the FBI came out and said, that the main threat is leftist Antifa, ladies and gentlemen, and that they are going out doing the majority of the mass shootings consciously to blame the Second Amendment.
I do believe that there was a time, maybe even right when Trump was elected, that maybe, just maybe, Rudy Giuliani could have been the Attorney General.
I think those would be some of the most amazing confirmation hearings imaginable for an entertainment standpoint.
But in terms of that being a feasible plan, there's just no way that's fucking ever going to happen.
Also, Trump didn't stop talking about Hillary's emails because he has them.
He stopped talking about them because he got what he wanted out of talking about them.
And bringing them back up now doesn't do him any good.
He's not running against Hillary, so bringing up her emails would be kind of a weak move.
And even Trump knows that.
Honestly, this dude who Alex is presenting as a real wise insider by virtue of him saying that he's a cop in Virginia really seems like a regular-ass Alex Jones listener.
Just a dude with some dumb ideas he's presenting as the truth.
This caller clearly wants to talk to Alex about stuff that may or may not be cool to talk about on air.
So that's awesome.
He's clearly struggling to speak without saying the wrong thing, so Alex's why is to cut him off before he went too far.
Also, Alex calls for that stack after saying that Antifa and Soros are terrorists, suspiciously absent from that stack of news of the articles about the two groups of members of the base who were arrested.
I'm just being a dick.
Those arrests weren't reported until the day after, so he would have no reason to know about it at this point.
It's just funny, though, that those stories are going to be coming out the next day.
And what Alex is working with is fake Soros Antifa contracts his intern found on 4chan.
I'm not exactly sure what this caller is trying to suggest about this active shooter hoax, but I assume he thinks that this is what happened.
The Globals are trying to push these bills through a state legislature that already absolutely has enough votes to pass them, but in order to make sure, they create a hoax active shooting at a middle school in Virginia to grease the wheels.
According to WTVR, local news in Henrico County, the police received the alert about the shooting through their new text to 911 capability.
Because people can just text things in, there's often not an ability to confirm things or ask follow-up questions before you need to act.
If someone texts to 911 that there's an active shooting and you're the dispatcher, there's no chance in hell you're going to wait around and see if they reply to your response text before sending out units.
But the problem there is that the police get the phone numbers of the people sending the text, and they trace it to a 12-year-old girl who goes to the school in question.
So I guess then the conspiracy has to be that the globalists used this 12-year-old girl's phone number to text in the hoax.
So I guess the conspiracy has to be that the globalists stole this girl's phone and used it to send the hoax message from the school without anyone noticing anything weird like a globalist in the classroom.
Another problem is that this shooting scare happened on Monday, January 13th.
By the evening of the 13th, it was clear that this was a situation where someone had texted an erroneous scare.
It was all over the news that night that this wasn't a real act of shooting.
The Virginia Senate didn't vote on these bills until Thursday the 16th.
The motive makes no sense.
The supposed process of how this would be some kind of an elaborate setup makes no sense.
It's two disconnected events that are easily explained on their own and actually become pretty nonsensical when you try to connect them.
At least they are if you think even a little bit.
But Alex's audience and Alex aren't big thinkers.
They both kind of have to do with guns, these two things, and Alex has trained these dum-dums in his audience to think that everything that happens is part of a grand conspiracy.
That snapshot, Alex saying isn't that convenient, perfectly captures what an idiot he is.
He has no idea what this caller is talking about.
He doesn't know anything about this story.
Yet he's perfectly happy to reinforce this kind of thinking.
The kind of thinking that just randomly connects independent things in order to build conspiracies.
So in this next clip, Alex is talking about how individual officers in the military or in the police, if they get an order that they think is unlawful, they should shoot their superior.
that the Nuremberg defense doesn't work, and there are manuals given to Marines and to members of the Army when they graduate boot camp explaining that they need to know that a lawful order is lawful, they need to study the Constitution, Bill of Rights, and that they need to not follow orders that are unlawful.
Say if your captain says, line up these women and children and blow their heads off, you don't do that.
You turn and shoot him in the head, and then it goes from there, from legal orders down to stuff where, Just a quick reminder that Trump has recently pardoned war criminals.
He declares an emergency to make it look like it's criminal so he can declare a bigger emergency once they trigger a crisis.
And now they admit that's their plan.
So it's all materializing, ladies and gentlemen.
But your word of mouth with a chain reaction about banned.video at Infowars.com forward slash show, those links to live feeds can exponentially, via text message and word of mouth, even outside of the censored YouTube and Twitter and all that, get to everybody, which is starting to happen, so we have a countervailing narrative of what really goes on.
Because if they stage something, they're going to try to cover up what happened.
They were able, when an Antifa operative shot all those folks at that Walmart in South Texas to cover up, he was Antifa and a big anti-human leftist.
It's now in the state police report that just came out.
Alex does not give a fuck about the El Paso shooter, except to the extent that it helps him create white identity propaganda.
He doesn't care about this guy's victims.
He doesn't care about the pain he caused.
Fuck, man, he doesn't even know his name.
And more to the point, Alex is completely lying about what the Texas threat assessment says about Patrick Cruzius.
For one...
He's one of the examples listed in the section about white racially motivated terrorism.
Here's what the report says about him.
Quote, The report also points out that
there have been at least two international attacks, one on a synagogue in Germany and one in a mosque in Norway, where the shooters, quote, were inspired by his actions or demonstrated similar tactics.
There's nothing in this report about Antifa, nothing about Satan, nothing about any of that.
Alex Jones is a bald-faced liar, pretending this racist mass shooter wasn't motivated by the exact same shit he talks about on his show all the time.
I can't put it any simpler than this.
Alex Jones is an intellectual coward of the worst sort.
Also, the word Satan doesn't appear anywhere in the report, nor does the word devil, nor does occult.
The word pagan shows up twice, only in the context of white supremacists adopting pagan symbols.
The point here is that Alex is talking about something very serious, and it relates to people being killed.
This is not a matter to take lightly, because 22 people died at that Walmart, and countless lives were changed for the worse that day.
To take that event and lie about it just to demonize your imaginary enemies and further radicalize your listeners towards the conclusion that there's no such thing as white identity-motivated terrorism?
That's the act of a monster.
And Alex does not care.
He doesn't even care enough to...
He doesn't even read the report.
He just says he read it and makes shit up about it.
They've had the deep state and the entire corporate media write thousands of articles, some of which were published in hundreds and hundreds of newspapers apiece, to get Trump to come out against Infowars in a belief that if the president ever came out against Infowars, that would turn his main base off against him, and that would turn me against the president.
I don't think anyone has ever wanted Trump to denounce Infowars because they want to alienate him from his base.
I think it's generally more been a thing where it's completely unacceptable for the president of a country to think Alex Jones is anything other than a liar and a fraud.
There was, of course, the case of Erica Lafferty, whose mother was the principal of Sandy Hook Elementary.
She was very offended when Trump was elected that he'd been on with Alex, the same person who'd said on air that her mother wasn't really killed.
And to be clear, her mother died trying to save the children in that school.
And Alex called her, as well as Erica, actors working for the globalists trying to take his guns.
You can kind of understand why she might be interested in the president of the country distancing himself from someone like that.
And then you just have your garden variety of reasons to want Trump away from Infowars.
Namely, that the information that Alex puts out is bad.
It's usually factually completely wrong and almost always has a kernel of white supremacy buried in it.
It's just unacceptable for the head of state to think that Alex is someone deserving of anything other than condemnation.
You don't need a deep state to motivate people to arrive at that conclusion.
I don't need to be loved by the couple of organizers of a rally who are going to sit up there and talk to a crowd, but the media is not going to pick up a damn word you say.
It's you that has the power of what your message is, not how you let them put you in a box.
It's the amateur nature of a lot of political activists, and then they look at somebody who's been very, very successful with our audience that gets it, rebooting America, but we're always being led by a bunch of political novices.
The Democrats are chi-com, enemy-funded, and are literally trying to bring the entire country down and are trying to trigger a civil war.
And the average conservative activist around the country can't even get their act together.
Meanwhile, the main groups that have financed Trump and had some of the biggest fundraisers for him for six months have been trying to get me to go on speaking tours and do these big events.
And I was so busy, I said no until I realized, wait a minute.
The big smart Republicans that helped get Trump in, they know where the liberty movement's going.
They get this is the future.
They're smart enough to want to enforce.
But the very grassroots we awoken, a bunch of them, are trying to be the new politicos.
We're starting to get to a point that as a citizen who's sworn an oath publicly to defend my family and your family and our honor, that we need to be very peaceful and very focused and very active right now.
And then we have to understand that if we don't bust our ass to get in these people's face and really let them know we're watching them, that...
The Chi-Coms and the globalists know they can sit this out.
They think they can.
And so they are intending to start a shooting war in the country.
And there's a good chance it's going to start.
So we better start having a discussion about what we're going to do.
So that's that.
And if the president would have arrested some of the deep state, gosh, he's got plenty to do it.
And let the chips fall where they may.
If they try to bring out some dirt on some of the Trump people, nobody's going to care, as long as he's pro-American.
It's just that we're not in normal situations now.
And the Democrats are a bunch of insane meth-heads who...
So the only reason I highlight this is it does seem like towards the end of his shows lately, these sorts of conversations are becoming far more normal.
Now, Dan, I'm not saying that we tease things regularly, but so far I would have opened the show with that because I'd be willing to go through a lot more of that earlier stuff with a better attitude.
It is all just still in service of the exact same thing, which is preemptive justifications for if there is violence that appears to be originating in the right-wing spheres.
On the surface, this is Alex saying that America is more important than any other country in the world.
We decide the destiny of the planet, which is just stupid.
If you would have asked some blowhard subject of the crown during any of the fallen empires in the course of human history, they would have said the exact same thing.
It's a myopic view of things, and moreover, it's just childish.
Yeah, he literally said, quote, America is where the battle is for good and evil.
We have both here being...
Because we're destined to decide the destiny of the planet.
If we're destined to decide the destiny of the planet, that's not something that can really be true of more than one country.
That's a unique attribute of America, according to this line of thinking.
That's how destinies work.
The structure of Alex's statement is saying that because we are a country with this unique attribute, there's both good and evil here, which heavily implies that in his mind, other countries are either solely good or solely evil.
I don't think Alex consciously thinks this, but I definitely think it's a subconscious belief he holds.
And guess what?
It's pretty fucking easy to guess which countries are good and which are evil.
So it turns out, and I didn't know this, but it turns out that God has created the United States as a Hunger Games-type battleground to see whether good or evil wins in the end.
I think Alex knows that based on what the reporting is on the group, that there's a possibility that there are other trios of people in other places or other small groups attacking a black church or a gay bar are things that are in line with what sort of neo-Nazin-ish.
That clip's stupid and has nothing to do with anything, but as I was listening to this episode, I looked at the time on it and I realized that I hadn't cut any clips in a while, so I figured I'd just give you a little taste of how the first half hour of this show is and how stupid everything is.
Alex is preaching real hard, but it's a real standard boring kind of thing.
Like, it's all the bullshit about our ancestors wanting us to go to the stars and how Alex doesn't love his fancy cars.
He's in a deep hole, and legitimately the only thing close to real I've heard him touch on is him making clear in that clip we just played, you know, where he's saying, they're gonna kill Trump.
I think that it's clear that he's aware of those Nazi arrests, but he won't directly cover the story.
It's my sense that he's...
You know, he's building up to make those arrests part of his false flag narrative.
You know, that the globalists are putting out stories about these arrests, which probably aren't real, in order to precondition the country for a rash of fascist, racist violence, just secretly just being carried out by Antifa incel needle dicks or whatever.
This is shameful shit, and it's a really boring episode.
Honestly, it's...
like, and if you're looking for a demented televangelist, it's kind of serviceable in the sense that at least he's clearly an idiot and he's calling out real people like Tim Cook, which is kind of fun.
But as a half hour stretch of a show that's pretending to be a real serious news show, I find it exhausting, especially considering that he's mostly doing this to ramp up to running interference for literal neo-Nazi terror cells and seemingly unable to Yeah, it does seem like rather than deal with...
It's been a long time since I've read the Bible, and I'm a bit rusty on whether or not God has a grudging respect for people who are willfully evil, so I'm going to leave that aside.
But I do think it might be worth pointing out that on many occasions, Alex has talked about having a grudging respect for people like David Rockefeller, who are the heads of the evil globalists, whereas he just hates the followers who know better and sign up with evil anyway.
Basically, what I'm saying is that when Alex is trying to personify God, it seems like a lot of his own personality gets wrapped up in the presentation.
Again, the revolutionary war started in Massachusetts, which, despite Alex's claim, is not the same place as Virginia.
There wasn't even a battle in Virginia until the Battle of Great Bridge, which was December 9th, 1775, a full eight months after Lexington and Concord.
It seems like Alex is actually the one obsessed with pretending history repeats when he's got history wrong.
He's also completely wrong about the Civil War.
All mainline historians recognize the beginning of the Civil War being when the Confederate Army opened fire on Fort Sumter, which is not in Virginia, but is actually in South Carolina.
That was in April 1861, and it wasn't until a month later that there were some smaller battles, some off the coast of Virginia, but those weren't where the war started, nor were they pivotal moments in the Civil War.
If I had to guess, Alex might be thinking that the Civil War started in Virginia because that was where the first big land battle, the Battle of Bull Run, took place.
But that wasn't until July 1861, three months into open hostilities.
This was a big Confederate victory, so maybe he thinks that's where it all started, but that doesn't really make sense since Fort Sumter, that attack was an absolute Confederate victory.
What I'm getting at is that Alex's view of history is incoherent.
And he's just trying to bluff his way around, pretending that all the big wars in U.S. history started in Virginia to lend credence to his bullshit about the globalists wanting to kick off a civil war on Monday.
So, instead of talking about Governor Northam's press conference, and instead of touching on this story about these neo-Nazi arrests at all, Alex just starts rambling about Governor Northam and talking about how he wants to kill him.