Today, Dan and Jordan take a look at how Alex Jones is dealing with the evolving situation involving the US and Iran. In this installment, Alex decides to toss analysis to the side and focus on ranting about how much he's scared of Islam. Also, Alex experiences some unfortunate tech issues.
But not knowing exactly what was going to happen, was Trump going to retaliate?
Kill us all!
Yeah, and so...
I wanted to check back in because I thought it would be pretty important to cover the January 8th episode where Alex is responding to the night prior's rockets, the missiles.
But I knew that by Monday, probably something else is going to happen.
And this is going to be sort of filtered and processed out of the news.
So I felt like...
Exactly the reason we leave these Fridays open in this way.
This is exactly what it's for.
So today we've got a little special Friday episode for you.
And before we get down to business on this, I'm going to take a little moment to say thank you to the folks who make episodes like this possible.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I enjoy the show, I like to support what these gents do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show, we would appreciate it.
The president just about five minutes ago completed a lengthy speech that went about 45 minutes where he attempted to de-escalate the situation with Iran.
We'll be playing large excerpts of that speech today.
It's okay for you to not listen to that much of Trump because you're not a guy with an audience who screams about how great Trump is and how everybody should be on board with him and he's bringing back America and all this.
He should be completely opposed to the unelected International Board of Globalists coming in and meddling, but now, because it somehow extricates Trump from some nonsense, he's all in favor of it.
Trump did call for NATO to get, quote, much more involved in the Middle East process.
His angle is pretty much exactly the same as Alex's.
Like, we're only interested in the Middle East because of energy-related concerns, and we don't really care too much now that we're supposedly energy independent.
And that's some sick shit that gives a glimpse into how these people think.
I mean, compared to the alternative of the two of them like rattling sabers or God forbid Trump militarily responding, I kind of prefer the idea of them just talking dumb shit.
I think he was just saying, we have better missiles than Iran.
I really don't think there was a joke.
I think it was more of a threat than anything else.
Also, Trump announced, quote, punishing economic sanctions that he was going to put in place, in addition to the sanctions that are already there.
This will largely hurt the Iranian people, and Alex knows that.
I know that he knows that because he's yelled about sanctions killing Iraqis many, many times in the past, when doing so has helped him attack Madeleine Albright.
Alex knows damn well what Trump is doing is engaging in economic warfare that'll tend to hurt and kill civilians in Iran, but he doesn't care.
The economic sanctions thing, just because of the way that the world works, and I'm not some sort of expert, and I don't know, but it seems really obviously fucked up to me that everybody goes apeshit if Trump murders a guy.
But everybody's like, well, it's the safe option if he imposes economic sanctions that are going to murder regular people.
Well, I'd say DrudgeReport.com is the best of the minute.
Global newspaper that's headlines accurately represent what Trump's speech was about 12 minutes long, but the buildup was 45 minutes of them with a live feed of the White House lectern or the...
This is all Alex responding to Trump's speech, and it's kind of an attempt to talk about news stuff, but it's not really what's important about this episode.
As Alex gets into the second segment of his show, he launches into a profoundly Islamophobic rant for no reason.
He dives into outright hatred that spirals out of control and will...
And the left that's always telling us that America's bad and Christianity's bad and we oppress women sycophantically worshipping something that basically puts garbage bags over women or beekeeper suits.
It fundamentally scares me, pisses me off, and makes me revile it.
I don't remember if he was very specific about the age of the people, but whatever the case, now we see that he hates to see Muslims at a hamburger place that he likes.
He doesn't want to live in a world where groups he doesn't like get to exist in public spaces.
It's just that simple with him.
This 10% thing seems to track back to a book written by a missionary named Peter Hammond called Slavery, Terrorism, and Islam.
The point of the book appears to be the countries need to keep their Muslim population under 2% because if that number gets any higher, the Muslims start to act in predictable, disruptive ways.
I read a breakdown of the book, and it's not even an idea worth engaging with, mostly because it makes no sense on its face.
Hammond is arguing that there are various levels at which Muslim populations will begin acting differently.
Like at 2%, they start to make street and prison gangs.
Or at 5%, they push for supermarkets to offer halal options.
He then lists countries on each level, and it makes his point make no sense at all.
In his breakdown, the U.S. is listed as having a.6% Muslim population, but we have a really big halal food market in this country.
I'm not positive that this is where this idea originates, but it's definitely something that's referenced on a lot of the Islamophobic blogs you can find that cover this 10% idea.
Everything that he's saying, like these distinctions between the categories of 2%, 5%, it's all meaningless stuff.
Because the bigger issue is that what Hammond is doing is taking these very complicated situations in different countries and different regions, and he's boiling it down to a single variable that is How many Muslims are there?
It's the sort of argument that plays really well in white nationalist and Christian identity extremist circles, but no serious person would even consider that theory as being worth a second thought.
But you see here how Alex has accepted that as truth.
It's just the reality to him that if your country goes to a 10% Muslim population, they're going to start taking over and putting in Sharia law.
This is gross rhetoric, and the end result of this kind of thinking has to either lead to war, extermination, dislocation, or eugenics program.
Alex isn't stupid enough not to realize that.
He's just fine with those things being directed towards people he doesn't want to see when he's trying to get a hamburger.
You can look directly at the interconnectedness of all of these different countries and their individual contexts and histories and all of that stuff and consider on a nuanced level what it is that it means and how it really applies to different spaces.
Or, Dan, you could estimate how many Muslims there are in a place and make long and stupid pronouncements about it.
And they're very arrogant on average, they're very full of themselves, and they think they have a right to rule me.
Well, you don't have a right to rule me.
Now, that said, I was against the wars going into the Middle East because they were adventurous and they were removing people that...
We're a lot better than what the Globals were putting in because the Globals were wanting to destabilize Islam, to break its borders, put radicals in, and then use it as a weapon against the West.
So this is a very sophisticated problem we face, but it'd be like if I was, say, Jewish.
You're a giant coward and you're afraid of engaging with people who are different than you, so you go on this weird, wild nonsense and you make up bullshit in order to justify the fact that you just want to be alone with white people.
Do you think that there's a possibility that Alex is so singularly focused and bigoted towards Muslims now in a way that he wasn't before, so now he notices them more in public than he did before?
Do you think it's possible that maybe there are more Muslims around?
Maybe that's possible.
But maybe they didn't anger him in the same way ten years ago.
You know, I didn't realize how many mattress stores there were until I needed a mattress, and then I was like, holy cow, there are mattress stores everywhere around here, but when I got to the mattress store, I know I don't even know about mattresses anymore.
And the thing that bums me out is that maybe there's no better example or representation of a culture assimilating into America than going and hanging out at a fucking mall.
We don't wear Halloween costumes in America unless it's Halloween.
We don't make women wear bags over their heads.
And then the left sycophantically loving it and promoting it and coddling it and making sure little girls wear full face masks in school and little girls take them off and the school reports from their parents and they get beaten.
It's important to remember that what sparked this rant is Alex talking about seeing two groups of people he assumed were Muslims at a hamburger place the night before.
When he's talking about how these people need to go back to their countries, and more important to Alex, stay out of his country, he's not talking about anyone who's guilty of the sort of behaviors he's describing, like killing women or pedophilia.
This is the response that he has to people he assumes are Muslims being in a restaurant.
This is a deep level of bigotry, and I want to say...
From my assessment, from everything that I know from listening to so much Alex, this is the real Alex Jones.
I needed to go to the beginning of Trump's speech that he just completed about 30 minutes ago in the last segment, but I went into a rant about the Islamification of the West and how the two things just are not compatible and how they're not adopting our ways.
They're trying to make us adopt their ways, and it's a fact.
Because when he gets the most mad at specific Muslims, it's generally a situation where he sees Muslims integrating.
He yells abstractly about Muslims and Islam in general quite a bit.
But there's something different and more intense about these rants that he goes on when he sees Muslim women at the pool supply shop or them at the hamburger store.
This is the thing.
Alex wants a holy war between Islam and Christianity.
He wants a new crusade, but he knows that in the modern, civilized world, he can't call for that.
But what he can do is create constant narratives about Islam being incompatible with the West and paint the picture that they're already in a holy war against him.
This is why Muslims in a pool supply shop or a hamburger stand completely fuck him up.
It's because they're proof that Muslims are perfectly compatible with our way of life.
When Alex sees Muslims engaging in the exact same behaviors as he himself is engaging in, it's a strong indication that coexistence is not only possible, but it's happening.
And that's threatening to his belief in and desire for civilizational level conflict.
Alex isn't really mad when he sees news of an Islamic extremist carrying out like...
I would suggest that when they talk about that stuff, they're not talking about movies.
They're talking about foreign policy.
They're not as petty and stupid as someone like Alex, who just gets bogged down in cultural issues and little petty grievances about women in lead roles in movies and shit.
That's not a thing that they're operating off of.
It's what we have done to the Middle East in the past 20 years.
It should be pointed out that Stonehenge is in Wiltshire, England.
It's not a site where experts believe human sacrifice was carried out.
However, there is another similar site in Germany, which is closer to what Alex is talking about.
An article in the Smithsonian includes this line, quote, It shares similarities with its famed cousin in Britain, and its builders performed many of the same rituals, though they added a new twist, human sacrifice.
The words new twist certainly should get the message across to people who study Stonehenge don't believe that it was used as a human sacrifice site.
Even in the case of the German site, they only say that human sacrifice is a likely scenario, while pointing out that the trauma of the bodies found there could have alternative explanations.
Like inner conflict, inner group conflicts, that sort of thing.
Raids.
There's one skeleton that was found around the year 2000 from Stonehenge that people, they've theorized, could be the victim of sacrifice.
But other believe that the evidence could point in plenty of other directions.
And also, the person, the skeleton is of, they would have died in around 600 AD, which is way too late for Stonehenge.
Given that this is one of the only real pieces of evidence that tends towards the conclusion of human sacrifice taking place at Stonehenge, it would be pretty irresponsible to jump to the conclusion just from that without any supporting evidence.
A lot of the beliefs that dumb people like Alex have about Stonehenge come from 17th century historians whose theories about Stonehenge being a druidic temple have been thoroughly debunked.
But these ideas are really popular for a while.
There was one stone there that was nicknamed the Slaughtering Stone, because rainwater would pool in it and turn red.
The imagination was, you know, this is proof of long-lingering blood, but it's really just the result of algae and iron.
There's a whole lot of bullshit surrounding Stonehenge, and it appears that Alex believes all of it, to the point where he's able to whip himself into a frenzy just by being near it.
I'm not going to submit to the energy force of Islam because it's creepy.
It's oppressive when I'm around it.
I don't like it.
But the energy of Christ is pure and is clean and is good and is peaceful and is the quiet place of the Most High that Psalms talks about.
And that's the place we want to go.
So I'm glad that Trump's de-escalating.
But a clash between the West and Islam has been set up and we need to wallow down the off and hope that they can fix themselves and have a reformation but it's not going to be bringing in all the muslims and us conforming to them i'm going to fight it you're going to fight it and islam will not prevail against what's left of christendom and we're about to see the biggest revival we've ever seen i believe but i'm gonna stop preaching uh good it's Stop preaching.
So he gets off this Islamophobic chunk here and starts talking about the night before and how the media was covering things.
He plays what he thinks is a gotcha clip from, I believe, MSNBC about the reporting of possible fatalities and deaths in the attack on the bases in Iraq.
And I want to play this clip because last night I'm up here and I noticed we started reporting because it was on MSNBC that, oh, Iran is saying 20 dead, 30 dead, 18 dead.
And I just said, listen, Iran's going to say that for their own domestic population.
We're not hearing those reports.
And sure enough, it turned out those were false reports, not our reports.
We were just reporting what was being reported, which is normal, but just saying we don't believe this, and thank God it wasn't true.
Let's play clip 12. MSNBC amplified fake news that Iranian attack had killed 30 U.S. soldiers.
Here it is.
unidentified
We're just getting reports now that a second wave of rocket attacks have been launched.
From Iran, the IRGC was saying that Ayatollah Khamenei, the supreme leader of this country, was in the control center coordinating these attacks.
This bit I'm not sure about, but the Iran state media is claiming that 30 U.S. soldiers have been killed in this attack.
Now, we're going to go over all of this as it unfolds, but they're all over the news saying, look for counter-strikes, look for attacks.
Reportedly, as you said, some say 15, some say 18, some say 20. We hope none, but we'll just type in, you know, U.S. troops killed, U.S. servicemen killed.
We're not sure.
But we're going to continue in there.
I can go off air again and go search it myself.
Pull all that up tonight as we're live.
But I know this.
As all this was about to break, we got a giant denial of service attack today that was definitely institutional.
So the establishment, there's not Iran launching this, does not want us on air because they know we'll just try to figure out what's going on.
But let's go ahead and go to a live Fox feed right now.
unidentified
Given the intelligence, which started to come out tonight at a top-level meeting where the Gang of Eight was given some information about what that intelligence held, and we're going to learn more about that potentially tomorrow.
And I think actually, you know, looking into initially why I jumped to the live stream was to see if he was being unfair about his own coverage about the deaths.
So in the live stream Alex did this evening on the 7th, in response to the missile attack, he had Zach back on.
For those of you new to the show, Zach was Alex's fake intelligence source who was an attempt to take over the internet space that was occupied by QAnon.
That effort and attempt to co-opt QAnon failed pretty hard, mostly since the Q people didn't like Alex at all and think he's controlled opposition, so there's really nothing he can do to win them over.
I haven't heard Zach on for a while, but interestingly, whereas in the past, Alex had been hiding his identity, his name is public now.
His name is Zachary Lee Klawan, and the credit, his official title that's given on the Chiron on Infowars is Think Tank Engineer, which I think is mysterious.
So, Zach and I have something in common, in that we both didn't finish high school.
I dropped out, but Zach was actually expelled from school for having a gun on school grounds, as reported in a 2008 article in the Herald-Tribune.
The article was about how 10 students were barred from graduation ceremonies because of explicit and threatening rap songs they'd performed and posted online, I believe, as the article is saying, on MySpace.
Apparently, they were pretty antagonistic to their rival high school, Lakewood Ranch, and the song included lyrics like, quote, Lakewood boys is gonna bleed.
Zach had been kicked out of school for having a gun the year prior.
But was still one of the rappers on this track, threatening his old school's rival.
So that tells me he's very cool.
To be clear, I'm less concerned with the rap song.
So after this, Zach enlisted in the army, and he reached the rank of specialist by 2010, which is the rank just directly above private first class.
That year, Zach went public with allegations that he'd been harassed in the service because he's a Muslim.
In an article in ABC News, Zak tells a story of being the subject of abuse as soon as basic training started, with his drill instructor singling him out and mocking the idea of him attending Islamic religious services.
He was specifically selected to portray a terrorist in training exercises.
A fellow soldier desecrated his Koran by tearing out pages and tossing them around.
They would call him, quote, raghead, sand monkey, and Zachary bin Laden.
One day, three weeks into his time at Fort Hood, Zach found a piece of paper in the windshield wiper of his truck that said, quote, Hey, carpet jockey, go back where you came from.
After the Fort Hood shooting, it got so bad that he had to be moved off the base for his own safety.
In 2010, there were memos written.
I found these memos that were written by the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense regarding Zach's allegations of harassment.
In the memos, it says, Sure!
Sure.
After this, Zach went on CNN and Al Jazeera to do interviews about how the Army had ignored his compliance about religious harassment and how there's a serious problem with Islamophobia in the military.
I found some blogs talking about him having a lawsuit against the Army, but I don't fully trust those sites, and I wasn't able to find concrete evidence of the lawsuit, though I accept it's probably true.
I don't care to comb through Zach's social media posts or anything like that, but a couple of interesting things do come up if you Google his name.
One is his LinkedIn page, which says that he's retired from the army.
I'm not positive when he left, but I would not be surprised if it wasn't too long after he started going around domestic and foreign news programs talking about how the army training includes propaganda against Islam.
Another thing you can find is a profile for Zachary Klawan on Explore Talent, a website for people looking to book acting gigs.
The page isn't very active, and honestly, I can't even really be sure that it wasn't made by someone else trying to make it look like he's an actor.
I have no fucking idea.
But it does come up, and who knows what that means.
I can find no indication that Zach has any relation to the military at this point in his life, other than that he used to be a specialist in the army.
I can find no evidence that he was in the intelligence field, and honestly, a lot of that stuff just seems to be made up.
My heart goes out to him for the harassment he said he had to endure while he was enlisted, but I can't help but wonder how he could possibly be the type of person who would go on the news and do interviews about anti-Muslim bigotry in the army, and also the type of person who would be okay associating with Alex Jones, an extreme anti-Muslim bigot.
I could speculate on that, but it would be kind of pointless.
As it stands now, I just don't think that there's any reason to take anything he's saying to Alex seriously.
He was formerly in the military, but so what?
So was the dude who lived next door to me when I was 19, who I smoked weed with.
Also, you could see a situation where, because of his experiences, because of the inaction on the part of the army, he could have a really serious resentment against the United States government and the army itself.
Here is where I think everything gets incredibly suspicious, and all of the pieces sort of come together.
Alex has earlier said that there was this denial-of-service attack going on on Infowars.
Alex earlier got caught on a hot bike.
Zach is a suspicious character.
All of that merges into play in this next clip.
Put your mic down for this because this is so fucked up.
unidentified
The point in the accurate intel is that they are targeting, and let's say they, when you talk about cuts forces, when you talk about individuals who happen to be in the country, around the world, who are well-trained, and getting orders is to attack social media influencers, media influencers, protectors of America, people who have a platform, political figures.
and eventually with the fatwa, the bounty on the president of the United States.
It's possible that Zach was listening to him, looking for clues of ways to build on the narrative, and he's operating completely on his own.
It's also possible that when Alex called him earlier, before having him on, he was saying, like, alright, look, the angle we're going with is that Iranians are going to be attacking me.
And so Zach is presenting his intel like that.
It's possible that it's a collaborative effort.
It's possible that Zach is just...
Intuitive enough to understand.
The fact that Alex thinks his mic is off and says this is pretty good is fucked up.
I was listening to this, and I just thought, like...
I mean, first of all, it's interesting.
Now that we know who Zach is, to get a picture of him and see how incongruous what he's doing now is with what he was doing, let's say, eight years ago.
So he comes back on the 8th and he starts taking some calls.
And he gets a caller from Finland who says some really fucked up things.
unidentified
What Infowars is doing is like a church mission.
A church is where people gather to find and to get revelations from God, to pray and to get revelation, and then you get a mission based on that, and you go out and you act.
And that is, in my opinion, what Infowars is doing, and I really do believe it is important that we start tithing.
Granted, this is a completely symbolic gesture and means nothing from a legal perspective, but I would say it's a pretty good indication of the mood.
Mary McCord, the legal director for the Georgetown University Law Center's Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection, recently wrote a piece in the Washington Post that had an interesting take on this gun sanctuary trend that's going on.
From the article, quote, Virginia state law prohibits local governments from enacting ordinances or resolutions that are inconsistent with state laws, and more directly, specifically prohibits local governments from regulating firearms.
So the article goes on to mention that an 1886 Supreme Court ruling, Presser v.
Illinois, ruled that the Second Amendment, quote, does not prevent the prohibition of private paramilitary organizations, which it's noted are actually illegal, according to the constitutions of 48 states, including Virginia.
This is a problem, because at this point in the episode, like I said, Alex is on the phone with this guy who's literally talking about how he's organizing a private militia.
This is a public discussion of an explicit crime and a violation of the Virginia Constitution.
People like Alex and the Oath Keepers are whipping gun weirdos into a complete frenzy that could lead to dangerous results.
Their argument is bad.
Local governments can't do anything close to what they're pretending they can.
And if a local government is in opposition to the laws of the state, their only real recourse is to challenge the state law in court, which would likely not work in this case.
They kind of know that that path wouldn't work.
So it looks like they're committed to angling for some kind of a standoff, which is a really bad sign.
And also, Alex can fuck himself with that pretty much everyone supported Eisenhower sending in the National Guard to protect the black students in Little Rock when the schools were desegregated bullshit.
Maybe it's because a whole lot of people were super racist and not in favor of integration.
I don't want to descend too deeply into this issue, but you know who was super not into Eisenhower sending the National Guard to protect these students?
Six years after Eisenhower sent in the guard, then-governor of Alabama, George Wallace, held his Stand in the Schoolhouse Door event, where racists tried to keep schools segregated by physically blocking black students from entering.
This was part of his philosophy, which, if you recall, was segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.
I bring this up because Wallace physically tried to stop black kids from going to school in 1963, which brought him a bunch of attention.
It also required JFK to federalize the Alabama National Guard to get Wallace to stop being an asshole.
Wallace being a national star among racists after this point, he really rose in ascendancy.
And he parlayed that into presidential runs in 1964 and 1935.
So many of Alex's spiritual ancestors were George Wallace supporters.
Gary Allen, the guy who wrote Alex Jones' favorite book, None Dare Call It Conspiracy, served as Wallace's speechwriter during both of his presidential campaigns.
George Wallace's campaign deployed rhetoric that mirrored that of the John Birch Society.
And he actually said, I have no problem with the John Birch Society.
And his staff was full of Birchers.
And he almost chose a notorious Bircher, Ezra Taft Benson, as his running mate.
Benson, as a prominent Mormon and anti-communist, provides a link to W. Cleon Skousen.
The George Wallace campaigns for president are inexorable from the swamp from which Alex's worldview emerged.
It takes some brass balls for him to pretend that pretty much everyone was for Eisenhower calling in the National Guard when almost literally everyone he admires and considers a hero of modern history actively fought against that.
And for the man who wanted to do the opposite.
Which again, I should remind you, is keeping black kids out of school.
There is no part of what he believes about the world that isn't in some way very closely related to George Wallace's campaign that also is connected to all kinds of other...
Now, Alex gets to talking about his legal troubles, his court cases.
He believes that these legal sanctions that they're applying are just because they know they can't win the case, so they're trying to destroy him that way.
Which is like, well, just behave differently then, and they can't.
That would be one...
I don't understand.
He's also being sued by Brendan Gilmore, who is a guy who Alex defamed after the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville.
And I believe, based on this clip, that there might be some news coming out about that.
In September 2018, Governor Jerry Brown signed two bills that were aimed at adjusting how children were treated by the courts.
One of them, Senate Bill 439, made it so, except in cases of murder or rape, people younger than 12 cannot be prosecuted in court.
They're still obviously subject to some kind of process, whether it's child welfare reviews or psychiatric screenings.
It's just that the state recognizes that it's probably not cool to treat an 11-year-old like they're old enough to be exposed to a criminal justice system.
The second bill, Senate Bill 1391, makes it so you can't try someone younger than 16 as an adult.
They would still be tried for their crimes, but they would be sent to a juvenile facility instead of an adult prison if convicted.
The juvenile justice system already has mechanisms in place to hold someone after they turn 18 if the circumstances require it.
So it's not like these offenders would just be getting a free pass if they commit a crime at 17 or whatever.
This is what Alex has turned into a narrative that you can't arrest minors in California.
I think it might be fair to say that in addition to lying Alex is also being kind of a racist here.
According to an article in the Sacramento Bee, Jerry Brown said it was a hard choice to sign this bill, but he was swayed to sign the bill based on, quote, stark racial and geographic disparity and how young men and women are treated who have committed similar crimes.
Part of what these bills aim to do is to work against a trend of criminalizing behaviors in young non-white people whose actions you might call precocious or a mistake were they white.
This is part of the conversation surrounding these bills, so assuming Alex knows anything about the subject he's talking about, he should know that.
And he's staunchly opposed to the bills, and is trying to encourage his audience to hate the bills by lying about what they do.
What I'm saying is, ultimately, he either has no idea what he's talking about, or he does, and he's lying about bills meant to make the juvenile justice system more fair and equitable.
Because if you start pulling that thread, then you go all the way back and you're like, the very beginning of the criminal justice system is purely discriminatory.
The UN says have iodine deficiency and have had mental disabilities from it.
But the latest numbers I've got from the National Institute of Health, because Wikipedia has changed its entry and removed it, probably because we were talking about it.
This says the IDD is concerned a public health problem worldwide affecting all groups of people of which children and lactating women are the most vulnerable categories.
At a global scale, approximately 2 million people suffer ion deficiency of which approximately 50 million present the clinical manifestation.
And I'm going to go into the Wikipedia entries and see who removed that because it had links to government reports saying 3.2 billion and I know we even did shows on that about a month ago and showed it.
But billions get brain damage, they admit it, and then someone went into Wikipedia, because we just spent the last few segments looking it up, and removed it out.
And now I went and found it, we went and found it, actually the boom operator found it, in the National Institutes of Health.
First, I love the idea of Alex pulling out a Sherlock Holmes pipe and playing detective, pouring through the edits on Wikipedia to see who took down his three billion statistic.
I have no idea what he's talking about, and honestly, it's totally possible he's just misremembering something he read on Wikipedia, or that he's embellished the number to begin with, or it's an out-of-date source or something, because there's a lot of progress that's been made globally in terms of iodine deficiency.
Alex is absolutely correct that there are serious problems that come from iodine deficiency, including physical and mental disabilities.
And that, according to a recent report from UNICEF, the number of people suffering from iodine-related things, it is probably close to about 2 billion worldwide.
However, it's important to understand where these 2 billion people are.
People suffering from iodine deficiency are almost exclusively in the developing world.
Countries that practice salt iodization eliminate almost all iodine deficiency.
And between 1990 and 2000, 34 countries achieved the elimination of iodine deficiency through universal salt iodization.
This is a very effective solution to the problem.
And generally, the countries where this is the biggest issue are countries that have economic barriers to importing iodized salt or with producing it domestically.
Or there's another issue like they're war-torn to the point where implementing these sorts of programs is just unviable.
It's a problem that many good people, including the UN, are working towards solving.
Vast numbers of people with iodine deficiency or who are at an increased risk for it are in India, Pakistan, Sudan, and Afghanistan.
According to the CDC, quote, iodine deficiency disorders, goiter, cretinism, stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, and retarded physical and intellectual development have been virtually eliminated through the iodization of salt.
This is important because Alex is only talking about any of this because he's trying to sell his iodine pills.
And the way he's trying to pretend that they're important is by citing the statistic that 2 billion people worldwide are iodine deficient.
But the thing is, the people who are iodine deficient are almost entirely not a part of the market that Alex is selling to.
He's trying to take a very serious issue that people in developing countries are struggling with and that the UN is working to resolve, and he's using it as a prop to try and convince his audience that maybe there's something wrong with them that iodine pills can solve.
This is super abusive marketing.
There is a slight decrease in iodine intake in the United States population that experts and people who look into this stuff have noted, but that's kind of a part, it's probably due to the sea salt trend.
Sea salt doesn't generally contain iodine, so people who are using mostly sea salt, they're not taking in as much iodine as they would if they just used table salt, and they should be doing that.
Also, certain diets have increased in popularity recently, like veganism, and those also increase your risk for decreased iodine intake based on the things that would be part of your diet.
I find it unlikely, though, that there are many vegans in Alex's audience.
So Alex talks about some articles here about iodine, and I have responses to both of them that are just like, this is such sloppy, amateurish bullshit.
That first article he's talking about about China from 1996 makes sense.
The Chinese government only introduced a salt iodization program in 1995, before which point their population was at a very high risk of deficiency.
Since that point, iodine deficiency has become a much smaller problem in the country, though some problems do remain.
Large rural population.
Also, when you talk about China, it's a gigantic country with a huge population.
They all live in a lot of different locales.
China's learned that the different provinces have different requirements.
So in 2018, China announced that they were going to enact different iodine standards depending on local needs.
For instance, some coastal areas have diets that are higher in iodine-rich foods, so their requirements for supplementation would be lower than people inland.
And you can end up with...
Some studies have shown that some of the population is actually getting too much iodine, which also isn't healthy.
So really what China is doing is trying to make some tweaks to the program based on results.
As for the article about pregnancies, that also makes total sense.
When someone is pregnant, their dietary needs change, what with another person growing inside them.
Some estimates are that their iodine intake should increase around 50%, and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that people take iodine supplements while pregnant and nursing just to be safe.
It's not a surprise at all that Alex could find an article about iodine in pregnancy.
It just doesn't say what he's pretending, it says.
Again, big point, this is all about sales.
Nothing he's saying depicts reality, but he's trying to create a sense in his listeners that they themselves might be iodine deficient.
And it's a grand plot by the globalists to dumb everyone down.
This narrative only exists to get them to buy his pills.
So he calls in, and I don't know exactly what point he was trying to make, but Alex...
I think what happened is that he forgot who this caller was.
I think he forgot that he called in and had some judgmental words for Alex, but then he hears the voice and he remembers, and Alex starts screaming at him.
Then, Alex assumes that Liberal is a Muslim because he's criticizing Alex's horrific anti-Islam rant from the beginning of the show, so he starts just yelling about how bad Muslims are.
There's no reason, like, based on the things that Liberal has said on the show to assume that he's Muslim.
This is just a performance.
Alex is doing this intentionally, not because he's so overcome by passion.
He's sure able to rein it in when it's time to get to the breaks.
It's not so crazy that he starts swearing on air.
Like, this is just a disgusting piece of shit person putting on an act.
So when he comes back, Alex comes back from that break, and he does allow Liberal to talk.
The caller, he lays out his point, which I think could be summed up as saying that there's a reason that there's a tension between Muslims and Christians, and that reason is propaganda.
And Alex has a responsibility to his audience to do a better job covering the topic.
Alex admits that there are good Muslims, but there's also political Islam that's evil.
And so he decides that what he's going to do is he's going to get up from the desk and go to a big map, and he's going to show the spread of Islam on the map.
I want to show people, and then we'll show a map of the whole world, now that we've seen this map, but like a whole map of the planet laid out about where we were 1,400 years ago.
Thanks.
I guess nobody heard me about it.
Bring me a mic.
Well, the boom on the red will bring me a mic, so I appreciate that, sir.
Whatever your opinion on Trump ordering the killing of Soleimani, I think we can all agree that the most cringe thing to come out of it was the avalanche of normie-tier World War III memes.
When Alex gets back, he tries to claim that Liberal's point was that Alex is pretending that Islam is expansionist, but it's really Christianity that's expanding, which wasn't what Liberal was saying at all.
I suspect that this is one part Alex just trying to save face about that blow-up we just listened to, and another part of him having no ability to synthesize information that people are giving to him.
I don't know who this new, like, this boom operator is who doesn't have a name, and Alex doesn't seem to know who his name is, but he brings him up multiple times on this episode.
White American men shouldn't be allowed to do something while at the same time telling people why the Islamic nation shouldn't be allowed to do something.
But the thing that I think is notable is that at no point, I mean, they even talk about him being on a couple days ago, and at no point do they talk about how he denied the Holocaust.
Alex is kind of expressing a little bit of shame, but he's trying to co-opt and adjust how he responds to it.
And he's trying to rationalize...
Yeah, I mean, that would help.
That would help.
So, I wanted to do this episode because I wanted to check in on this evolving situation and Alex's response to it, and you see that the response is really just aggressive Islamophobia.
Like, now this has transitioned, and the show is just Alex freaking out and screaming about how bad Islam is.
And I don't know entirely if that alone would have been worth an episode.
But Alex having Zach on the live stream, I think certainly makes it more interesting to me.
These are the things, too, that really are important to understand.
When Alex screams about Islam...
And like grooming gangs in the UK and stuff like that.
You can deconstruct that and you can talk about like why he's wrong about these things.
And that's important.
But I think more important is understanding that him seeing Muslims in public in places that are indicative of integration, like you said, being at the mall, being at a pool supply shop, enjoying a nice hamburger meal.
Those are the sorts of things that drive him crazy and lead to this sort of an outburst.
It's the proof of integration.
It's the proof of coexistence that infuriate him.
Because maybe those are indications that we can get along.
That everybody can just be fine with each other.
And he can't handle that because he wants a holy war.
There was a bit of a running joke throughout it that every time Polster was on, his name would come up on the screen, he would be a different enthusiast.
He was an excitable guy.
So Polster was a hat enthusiast because he was helping Trey run his charity hat business.