Today, Dan and Jordan come to you from the past to discuss a couple episodes of The Alex Jones Show from the even deeper past. In this installment, the gents find Alex embarking on an intense white victimhood narrative, responding to the news of a new Pope being named, and doing an iffy impression of McGruff The Crime Dog.
I'll be taking care of that in the Wednesday episode because Bye.
The only content that was really available of Alex covering it is a two-minute video that he shot in an airport where people behind him are looking very confused and very upset at...
Being in the background against their will in an Alex Jones video, I felt very sad for these people.
But he talks for about a minute about his feelings about Epstein's death, and then there's a minute of a commercial for his survival foods and water filtration.
So that's a good sign.
That does not make for an episode.
So anyway, that will be on Wednesday.
We'll have a modern day episode.
But I believe that this episode has a lot of fun in it.
I'm interested just because I was watching one of those teenage drama series with my girlfriend last night, and it was very much like I was trying to think back on my high school experience, and I didn't really have that many skin issues either.
I always assumed growing up that it was going to be, like, I'm going to get an entire pimple face because my little sister did have that experience of just, like...
Oh, man, she did the whole, you gotta buy the creams, and you gotta...
We're recording this before you take off for vacation, but you will be gone halfway across the world when this comes out, and you'll be free of any consequences.
So I wanted to, you know, get together with you and record an episode in advance, of course, because the people won't, you can't stand a whole week plus without the two of us hanging out, talking shit about Alex Jones.
Oh, and if you are listening and you'd like to support the show, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show.
The second most listened to show in this country is not Sean Hannity, and it is not certainly Glenn Beck.
It is George Norrie.
And I find him to be a very interesting individual, and he's really helped us get the word out over the years.
And I wanted to get him on about the nature of reality and where he sees humanity going and the times that he sees ahead.
Because it was George now 10 years ago.
Who started putting me on Coast to Coast AM for full shows, three hours.
And nowadays, to talk about the New World Order and prison camps and checkpoints and drones and surveillance grids and deadly vaccines, that's pretty much passe.
I tuned into two different shows on 590 yesterday, and I tuned into WLAI in San Antonio while I was out driving to work and driving back yesterday and doing some errands.
Every show was saying there's a police state takeover, the government runs Al-Qaeda, we're in deep trouble.
So Alex has George Norrie from Coast to Coast AM who's going to come up on this episode.
And Alex saying that George Norrie was the first person to give him a large platform is a perfect argument for why softball programs like Coast to Coast AM could be pretty dangerous.
So, most of the time, I don't think his show is a problem.
Like, Coast to Coast isn't a problem a lot of the time.
You'll end up with a charming eccentric or someone pitching ideas that are so far past the point of believability that they're not really threatening.
However, a platform like that, where the host has cultivated an audience full of open-minded but not that critical people, where the host has a policy of not being a hostile interviewer and letting people speak their piece, a platform like that is an ideal target for someone like Alex.
It's the greatest gift you could ever give a malignant narcissist looking to expand their flock.
With a show like Coast to Coast, the hard work needs to be done in the booking process.
You can have a loose, freewheeling, non-confrontational interview, but if you do...
You have a responsibility to not allow people on your show who are only there to poach your audience and get them into their cult.
If you encourage open-mindedness and complete naivete in your audience, you have an obligation to then protect them from malicious influences.
And that's a part of the equation that none of these people who run shows like this seem to get.
If they don't book their show very carefully, what they're basically doing is corralling gullible people into one centralized place where they can be targeted by someone with bad will.
And that seems to be at least a piece of Alex Jones's rise to prominence and relevance.
And for this and many other reasons, I would like to say that George Norrie can go Yeah.
It's a phenomenon that I don't know that necessarily a lot of these people are all that cognizant that they're engaging in.
But when you have a show like Coast to Coast AM where everything is based on a lack of evidence, like nobody has any evidence of any of the shit they're saying, and they're just open-minded to maybe this is possible, that is a breeding ground.
That is a warm Petri dish that you can introduce whatever you want into it and let it grow.
Couldn't believe it for four or five days when we first broke the MIAC, then not just the state-level report, the federal master report, and others.
And since then, there's over 100 FBI manuals and flyers given to every business you can imagine, from animal husbandry to tattoos, from barbershops to clothiers, you name it, saying blue jeans, cell phones, a sign of terrorism, but the number one sign, and it says it in the manuals, But I'm about to show you one right now.
So it's fair to say, or it is fair, that Mark Potok was talking about the possible threat that was posed by some members of the white gun-owning community.
But here, what we're seeing, Alex, as usual, is leaving out some very important context.
Mark's comments were in response to a video that was put out by a Tennessee weapons instructor by the name of James Yeager, literally saying that if Obama put forth any gun control measures, it was time to, quote, start killing people.
Mark Potok was just quoting James Yeager.
It's really indicative of the sort of gaslighting that Alex engages in all the time, what we're seeing here.
Some gun weirdo threatens to kill people.
Then someone who works at the SPLC says it would be wise to pay attention to this guy threatening to kill people and people in his community who are making similar threats.
And Alex ignores the original threat and pretends that the SPLC guy is nuts and just saying that all white people are terrorists.
This really is one of the main tricks that Alex uses on his show.
The robbing a story or comment of prior context that would make it make complete sense.
All that happened here was that Potok wrote an article about this threat and provided specific examples of other groups and individuals around the country who were making similar threats about a violent revolution that they were ready to set off.
This article that he wrote was published in Salon on January 11th, and Potok had been a guest on Hardball to discuss the topic, which Alex, I assume, is responding to.
I know that he needs to make a big deal out of every perceived slight against white people, but really, you should know what's going on here.
And you should know what actually is going on here.
Because this is what Alex is turning into all whites are terrorists.
But there's more.
The original article at the center of this whole thing, like I said, was Mark Potok responding to a video put out by James Yeager.
And once you realize who James Yeager is, everything comes into focus.
Yeager is the CEO of Tactical Response, a company that sells weapons, weapon parts, and tactical training.
They're also a sponsor of Alex's show.
Jaeger's been on the show many times, and Alex sells gun parts from his site, on his website.
Or at least he definitely did in the past.
I'm not sure if he still does.
That relationship is mysteriously undisclosed in Alex's commentary about Mark Potok, the LA Times, all of this.
And Mark Potok's article that he wrote for Salon that was an extension of this commentary is about James Yeager.
So you have this explicit connection between this all being about people explicitly threatening to kill people if there is any gun control measures passed.
So it's just, you've got a cart and horse situation that's completely, Alex is forgetting about what's actually behind the chicken and egg, if you will.
Whatever the cause and effect is, he's ignoring the cause, talking about the effect as if it exists in a vacuum.
Well, he thinks that white gun owners should be able to threaten, To kill people with no consequences, and that way they can terrorize them into doing whatever they want.
Well, what's really interesting about this is that Alex, because of the LA Times article, the Mark Podok on Slimeball, because of all that, Alex is making a big prediction.
In this next clip, we will see.
And it's pretty extreme, and I think I understand what's going on.
They've got all these movies coming out where militias attack the White House.
So they can stage a false flag, have it be incredibly immoral, what happens, blow up a nursery like Oklahoma City, whatever, and then blame it on us and say, see, we told you so.
It is coming around, to use a Star Wars analogy, coming around Yavin and is about to be cleared of fire, okay?
I mean, the Death Star is coming around.
And if you're not in your X-Wing out there right now fighting every day to expose these murdering terrorists, they're going to bring in the Red Terror.
They're panicked.
They're scared.
They know we've got the initiative, and this is history happening right now.
The Death Star is clear to fire in five seconds.
That means any minute now, any time, we're in a death struggle to back them off, to expose them, so they don't pull it off and they hold back and don't do it.
And then when they do do it, if they do do it, we're going to really be able to deal with them.
Because people now know, we've got people everywhere watching.
The minute they blow something up, folks, everyone should carry cameras on them at all times.
That his predictions of a terrorist attack are based around his militia buddies planning a terrorist attack, telling him about it, having him say that there's going to be one that they're going to blame on them.
I'm not saying that James Yeager told him about a plot that he's aware of.
I'm saying that Alex is aware of the world and these corners of the world enough to know that this The SPLC guy coming out and warning and saying, hey, this is a serious problem.
There are these white right-wing militias that it would be wise to pay attention to.
Alex knows that that's in response to things that are people he knows, people who sponsor his show.
He knows that they are the people who have made threats like that.
Mark Potok and his comments don't exist.
Devoid of context.
He's not saying this to demonize white people.
He's saying this because other people have made these threats.
Alex knows that, and he knows these people might fucking follow through on their threats.
It would be wise for me to protect the business to go ahead and create a preemptive narrative in case one of them does blow something up.
And if they do blow something up, then I get to make a whole bunch of money saying it was fake, and I can create a whole new season based on that.
It's best for his business, but at the same time it's also best for the terrorists.
Because, I mean, we would almost certainly have done more to investigate.
Or the FBI would have done more to investigate white nationalist terror if there weren't a massive amount of people who are supporting the fucking president, you know?
In the case that nothing happens, we're still making money.
We're still making money here.
It's the perfect thing to happen, or at least it's the perfect response for him to have to somebody saying, like, we should take this fucking seriously because these guys are planning shit and they're overtly saying what they're going to do.
So you see how easy a jump he makes there from the saying some white men engage in terrorism to being like they're saying that white people are terrorists.
Well, yeah, but in that extent, you know, why don't they call them radical Islamists?
Because they're all secretly radical Islamists.
So every brown person is a terrorist, and if he wants to maintain any kind of ideological consistency, if you call one person a terrorist in a group...
But for his listeners' purposes, he's doing it probably, I would say, I don't know how much intention, how much it's just muscle memory, but with the hopes that people will take it more seriously than it deserves to be taken.
The two of them are on the same page about a lot of political stuff, which you would know if you listen to a little bit of Coast to Coast AM, because he does let that show a little bit more than someone who is presumably impartial and just like a guy who wants to let people talk about stuff.
We've put together a video of police and all these departments saying, no, you shouldn't be able to own guns, get a dog.
And then O 'Keefe, I'm told, is under the weather, so we're going to see if we're going to have one of his other cohorts on the broadcast coming up here in about 30 minutes.
But regardless, we're going to play that video slash audio.
I went back and checked the episodes around the time that Pope Benedict stepped down as Pope when I was trying to find a good one-off episode to cover for one of our live shows.
I felt the odds were pretty strong that Alex was going to be freaking out about it.
It's big world news.
I figured he'd have an angle on it, so I just wanted to check.
But Alex was on vacation when that happened.
And as it turns out, that was the vacation we just passed here in 2013.
Benedict resigned on February 28th, 2013.
And now here on March 13th, we're getting to experience in real time Alex Jones's response to the news that there is a new pope, which I would describe as mildly interested curiosity.
This is interesting.
Because it tells me that Alex had no idea who the new pope was going to be.
But according to his own self-told backstory, he should know.
According to Alex nowadays, Leo Zagami predicted that Benedict was going to step down and even predicted Francis as the next pope.
The way Alex tells the story, it's heavily implied that Alex knew about Zagami's prediction and watched them play out in real time.
But here we see Alex wondering who the next pontiff is going to be.
I think this is probably because Alex didn't meet Leo Zagami until 2015.
Alex is just taking as truth Leo's claims that he predicted that Benedict would step down with no substantiating proof.
I can find zero proof that Leo Zagami made this prediction before Benedict resigned.
And knowing as much about him as I do, I'm very comfortable assuming that this is something he made up after the fact and pretended he'd known all along.
Most of the citations to this prediction go back to Leo's book, Pope Francis, the last pope, question mark?
Money, Masons, and Occultism and the Decline of the Catholic Church.
A further reason to be suspicious is that when Leo was on Alex's show in October 2015, he said that he knew from a high-level Vatican source that Francis was going to step down and resign after he visited his home country of Argentina, and that was going to happen in 2016.
This didn't happen, which calls into question the veracity of his sources.
Between that, every other piece of information in the world about Leo Zagami, and the fact that literally no one seems to be able to produce evidence that he actually predicted Benedict's resignation before it happened, I'm comfortable with my position that this is a load of bullshit.
And it's a load of bullshit that Alex believed when Leo told him about it, probably, again, just because Leo's Italian and fairly good at improv.
If you predicted that, that's evidence of either you do have good sources or you're the kind of crazy person who would make a fucking long shot prediction and you got the luckiest you have ever been in your life.
And knowing what I know about Leo Zagami, I'm inclined towards the latter.
No, that's a million typewriters, a million chimpanzees situation where, I mean, yeah, technically somebody could have made that prediction, and it could have come true, but damn.
That does always make me think of the reality that with the infinite number of possibilities and probabilities in the universe, it is entirely possible for one person to live their entire life and have every prediction that they've ever made come true.
And it'd just be a coincidence.
And I think about how miserable you would be if you were that person.
Yeah, and if you're getting every one of your predictions right, you won't think, oh, I'm so brilliant, you'll think that you're a captive of some sort of larger fate.
The whole war on terror, as I warned you for the last 11 years...
It's about gun owners, constitutionalists, returning veterans, and now, and I already saw this in the training stuff two years ago, and I told you, white al-Qaeda, and they're now announcing whites are terrorists, and whites will probably show up to local prisons and ask to be put in prisons and ask for the state to work their kids' death and slave camps.
I mean, you know, the average American, rather than, I mean, whites know they're bad.
Whites know they're the ultimate evil on Earth.
Whites are the source of all evil.
The media tells us that.
And so this is a good thing that the ADL and Southern Poverty Law Center and LA Times and a bunch of other publications are saying whites are terrorists.
Like, it's either you're the most sensitive person in the world, you can't handle any form of criticism, or you are keenly aware of the world that you are surrounded by, the right-wing militia world.
You recognize how volatile, how dangerous those people are.
You like that about them, and you need to defend against it.
It's one of the two, and my gut tells me it's both, but more the latter.
Well, the thing that makes me agree with the latter being true more than anything else is, just like we talked about before with his support of Trump, is...
He was all about freedom, all that stuff, because it could happen to whites.
And then once you remove that backstop, none of it matters.
So that, to me, makes it so clear that it's the latter.
And the video that they put out is about going to police departments and having discussions with cops where you say, like, okay, so if I call the police, they're going to take three minutes to respond to my house.
I don't think there's anything just entirely wrong with saying it's wise to be able to defend yourself in situations when...
Appropriate law enforcement can't make it.
I don't think that there's anything, people who are responsible about having a gun at home for protection, I don't think that there's anything implicitly wrong with that.
I think there would be something dangerous about police on the job saying, well, fucking shoot people.
And he immediately invalidates their entire argument for this video.
unidentified
These officers, again, this is no fault of their own.
This is just the reality that's put in front of them.
What we didn't show is that we've asked them multiple times, you know, what do we do when X happens?
And they go, oh, you should call 911.
And then we said, okay, but what about if someone's breaking down my door and, you know, they're trying to rob me?
Oh, just, you know, call 911.
Well, I get that.
You know, we're going to call 911.
But in the time between, you know, you get to, well, you've got to call the police.
It took in some of these instances, speaking to these police officers, five times to repeat the same question before they understood even the concept that we were saying, look, we've established that you're on your way.
How do I defend myself?
And that's when you get these inexplicable explanations like throw some ammonia at it and throw some bleach at it.
You see these signs outside houses and they don't get robbed.
If somebody's breaking in my house or somebody came to my office trying to mass shooting, I'm not going to waste time calling 911 until I've killed them.
I'm going to get the gun, I'm going to go like a robot, and I'm going to instinctively shoot into their center of mass from as best a cover as I can get.
I mean, I don't know if it's quiet or loud in this case, but what it is is absolutely undercutting the intended propaganda that Project Veritas was trying to present, which I find hilarious in an interview.
If you want to basically get your tuition or get your scholarship, you've got to sign on to agree to go under Southern Poverty Law Center, written manuals.
And Aaron Dykes covered this last night.
I'm going to have him in.
Today, with their actual printouts in Wisconsin and other states, whites are to wear a white armband or wristband, like Jews wearing yellow stars, to show you're evil.
And then you, quote, have a minority, who is really the majority worldwide and now the majority in the U.S., follow you around and tell you how bad you are.
Yeah, this is just white identity shit going through the roof.
It's escalating, like it's crazy.
Not only is Alex lying about that LA Times story that he's pretending, you know, that proves that they, in quotes, are saying that all white people are terrorists, now he's come across a story of white people being forced to wear bracelets, just like the Jews, and be followed around by non-whites who yell at them about how bad they are.
I found the Aaron Dyke story that Alex is basing this reporting on, and this shit is weak.
According to Infowars and their primary source on this, which is CNS News, the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction held a seminar and was encouraging people in their VISTA program to take steps to consider how their being white puts them in a privileged position in society.
One of the examples is to wear a wristband, which would allow conversations to happen when people ask you why you're wearing a wristband.
This seems like a shitty plan in the post-Live Strong era, since I don't think anyone is going to see a wristband and be like, hey, what's going on with that strange accessory?
VISTA stands for Volunteers in Service to America, and it's part of AmeriCorps.
Presumably since this was involved with the Department of Public Instruction, these were people who were volunteering to help with school and library-based things.
He's saying that universities and That's what the Unabomber called it, right?
Sure.
They're forcing people to do this to get their tuition.
This is a volunteer program, and even if it were a prerequisite of getting a scholarship, if the person who was in it felt that the PC demands of the program were too much for them, they could still get their volunteerism requirement fulfilled by taking another opportunity.
Or, if they had a problem with it, they could complain to their volunteer coordinator or supervisor, which is strangely not a part of this story in any way.
There's no indication that anyone who went to the seminar was complaining about this at all.
The only people who were mad about it seemed to be right-wing pundits with sketchy histories on race issues.
Neither Alex nor any other reporting on his website proves this in any way.
The manuals were written by a non-profit called the Beyond Diversity Resource Center, and I can find no connection between them and the SPLC.
Alex has created this completely false narrative about the SPLC running Elohim City and planning the Oklahoma City bombing in order to make patriots look bad, which is helpful to help create the appearance that all white terrorism is fake, but this is the second use for that narrative.
Anytime there's a social justice-type organization, Alex can immediately neutralize whatever position they make by claiming they're mixed up with the SPLC.
It doesn't matter if they are or not.
None of his listeners are going to check.
What's important is smearing them so their ideas and information aren't even considered, and whatever horrible shit you're going to make up about them becomes completely believable.
They're mixed up with the people who tried to smear whites by doing the Oklahoma City bombing.
Boom.
You could just invalidate any kind of social justice.
Is it the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction?
Is it the SPLC?
When you try to trace down the actual document from Infowars, you end up on CNS News, and then you eventually find the site where it was originally posted, which is still hyperlinked on their websites.
It takes you to a PDF that kindly explains to you that, quote, the document previously available via this URL is no longer here.
It was not a VISTA document, nor a Wisconsin DPI document.
The file that had been here was a document included in a resource packet offered to VISTA volunteers as they left a training session.
The document was not referenced in that training, and the training session was conducted by individuals external to DPI and VISTA.
Unfortunately, misconceptions and misinformation about the document are being spread by an out-of-state entity that has no...
To be absolutely clear...
No DPI official has asked, requested, or encouraged any school district educator or student to wear any wristband, and none of our VISTA volunteers have had any children put on any wristbands.
Again, no DPI official nor any VISTA volunteer has used, requested, or encouraged anyone in the school to use a wristband activity as reported, in quotes, and shared by external groups.
This is the point that I made on the Wednesday episode, in that we are absolutely complicit in the rise of right-wing terrorism.
Because do you know what?
They went...
Out of their fucking way, bending over backwards for these fucks who came up with this bullshit bad faith argument to the point where they write this statement that's still up there six fucking years later.
I'm not thrilled with the idea of these organizations that are about getting handicap accessible ramps for schools behaving in the way you and I might.
I think that it's just the thing where it's like you need to have people focusing on these propaganda outlets like us and institutions protecting themselves simultaneously in order to...
I've seen the document itself, and I don't think that there's anything really wrong with it.
The document that was put out by the Beyond Diversity Resource Center that was given to people as they left this thing, this meeting seminar that wasn't even being run by DPI or Vista.
Some of the suggestions are a little bit cheesy.
going to be, I would say that some of them might not be the most productive suggestions.
And if Alex wanted to make that kind of criticism, I really don't think there would be that big of a deal.
If he were to make an argument of they're telling people to wear bracelets in order to have conversations that will be started by the bracelet about white privilege.
You could attack this document on that front and still be on fairly solid grounds.
I think the bigger issue, though, is that you see something, you see how something so small, something so localized and minor can be spun by Alex and his community into some complete government-sanctioned SPLC-run attack on white people, which is white supremacy in action.
Like, what they're doing, that is what's going on.
One of their suggestions for reminders about addressing the privilege status that you hold in society were you to be, you happen to be white, is, quote, find a person of color who's willing to hold you accountable for addressing privilege.
There's a slight difference there, and I also think that that's a bad suggestion.
It kind of puts the onus on this accountability partner, which I feel a little weird about.
Let's somehow subcontract an organization that we're not involved in at all to make a printout that ends up being handed out to people at one seminar that's not even being run by the Wisconsin DPI or the VISTA program or AmeriCorps.
Also, I would be remiss if I didn't point out that CNS News is owned by the Media Research Center, which is a conservative propaganda outlet that has received tons of funding from the Bradley Foundation, the Scaife Foundation, and ExxonMobil, thanks to their climate denial.
They are not a good source of information.
It is a straight-up right-wing misinformation campaign operation.
And that's where Alex is pulling for the beginning of the story.
That's his source for the InfoWars article.
And so that's where we're at.
This is just the thinnest fucking worst white victimhood type bullshit.
But it's what you expect.
You start to see this narrative and this season taking shape.
The last season was before Alex went on vacation.
It was all star fuckery.
It was all just like, I'm getting big name people on here.
We're having celebrities.
It's going to be awesome.
And now he comes back.
And I get the very strong sense that it is going to be a lot of white identity issues.
So while it's true that Adolf Hitler was awarded the Iron Cross First Class in the First World War, it's Nazi propaganda that painted him as a war hero, when reality does not back that up.
One of the problems with sorting out the reality of Hitler's military history in World War I is that no one knew who he was.
No one knew he was going to become Hitler back then, so there aren't intricate records of his life as a normal run-of-the-mill soldier.
What was known is that he was a runner during the war, and that he was awarded the Iron Cross First Class, so those two facts were accepted to mean that he was the sort of message carrier who ran across the front lines and dodged machine gun fire to get the orders where they needed to be.
That is not true.
There were two varieties of runners in the German military in World War I. There were those who were on the front lines, carrying orders through dangerous terrain, and office workers, who delivered messages between the offices in the regimental headquarters, far away from the fighting.
Hitler was the second kind of runner during the war.
Historians have noted that it's likely that he was given the First Class Award after a battle where messengers were particularly important, and it was likely that his inclusion in the award recipients was the result of him having close association with the higher-ranked officers due to him being stationed inside the headquarters.
Alex is confusing things also about how many Iron Cross First Class medals were given out.
He's thinking of the highest ranking, the Grand Cross, of which only 19 were ever given out.
Between 1870 and 1918, 5.7 million Iron Cross First and Second Class medals were given out.
And while the Second Class ones were definitely more commonly awarded, the First Class weren't some kind of super rare thing.
Some numbers I've seen have put the number of recipients at about 165,000, which would be just short of 10 of them being awarded every day between 1870 and 1918.
Alex is making these comments in the context of a rant that he's doing about how Hitler's evil.
But it's also saying that he's super brave.
It's supposed to be making some kind of point that...
I'm not actually sure what point he hoped to make, to be honest.
But it really highlights something that I think is super fucked up.
Alex Jones believes Nazi versions of history.
It was part of Hitler's propaganda that he was a war hero, and it was an essential piece of his appeal to the people, and a lot of the German public believed it.
By the time Alex is on air here in 2013, historians and researchers had debunked this myth, and yet here Alex is, still preaching to his audience about the positive parts of Hitler.
This is a trend.
It's not just an isolated incident.
Alex is very inclined to believe Nazi propaganda between this, the stuff about the Hitler was set up, the, the peace treaty, the, the, the, the Rothschild's share at Waterloo, him directly taking a story that was amplified and put into its sort of canonical form by a Goebbels film.
There's a lot of Nazi history that's revisionist, not based on reality that Alex accepts whole cloth as real.
When you say, because we've heard him say it a million times, but when you say you've read a hundred books on World War II, there aren't a hundred books on World War II that don't include 30 books at least of Nazi propaganda.
Might just seep in, and you know, I've got all of the correct history up, but for some reason, there's this one story that's only in this one Nazi propaganda history book.
I'll let him off the hook a tiny bit just because you brought up the books on this one because a lot of people didn't actually look through the records enough to figure out what kind of runner Hitler was until fairly recent to this episode.
Yeah.
unidentified
Like it's not like it's something that's been a part of scholarship for 50 years and Alex has just written that off.
You gotta give it up to the Nazis who are struggling with finding out that their hero wasn't a hero.
So at this point in the episode, Alex gets back to this narrative about the handout that was given that says that white people need to wear bracelets and find a minority to yell at them.
He updates this narrative and now extends it.
You can see...
That he has taken the kernel that he's already established and now is embellishing upon that theme in order to make it far more universal than it actually is.
Universities all over the United States are telling whites that they're inherently evil and bad and making them wear white armbands to symbolize that they're bad and having them agree under AmeriCorps and they have to agree then to get their tuition.
To be followed, quote, by a minority to explain to them how inherently bad it is to be white.
And I'll be honest, I did not take a ton of clips from the 14th that would have been illuminating of this racism, because it's stuff he says all the time.
The thing about it that I think of when talking about a show or an entertainment show or a new show or anything of that value is naturally we have said that Alex is a racist a lot.
And I can understand why it would get boring or why it would feel repetitive, but it can never not be mentioned.
It has to be consistently mentioned over and over and over again because you can't for a moment forget.
Alex is almost dismissive of the conspiracies about the Jesuits running the Catholic Church and being involved in New World Order stuff, which he does believe now.
No, I halfway expected him to be like, that'll fuel the fire of Jesuits thinking that they run the, when everybody knows it's the Jews, and you're like, wait, what?
So Aaron Dykes is expressing that the globalists, they have this whole system in place, and when they bring up race issues, they're pushing our buttons.
That makes what was once a fanciful story about how cool Alex's dad is into a crime.
Alex is referring to Dr. Erwin Speer, who taught in the botany and biology departments at UT Austin from 1953 to 1994.
I've read some reviews from students that were posted in the alumni magazines, and from everything I can tell about him, he sounds like a great teacher.
From a 2011 interview with someone who took his class 40 years prior.
It made such an impression on him that he singled this Erwin Spear out as, like, an important teacher.
Quote, He inspired us.
He was a very difficult teacher, but he made it very easy to have appointments with him to discuss anything we didn't understand.
And his exams.
I think it was the first time that I was taking exams where you had to really think.
You didn't just regurgitate information.
Dr. Speer was so challenging and yet so stimulating and started many of us on the right road to how to study, how to prepare for exams, and how to appreciate what we were learning.
That's why I stuck with medical technology, with organic chemistry.
That's a great teacher right there.
Someone who changes people's lives with learning.
I know from Alex's dad's dental license that he was born in 1950, so he'd have to be about 17 when this meeting allegedly happened.
Right?
Because he's still in high school, a junior.
A junior would be 17 or 18. Roughly.
So that would be 1967.
Well, I happened to find a copy of an article from the Austin Daily Texan from March 20, 1968, where they talked to Erwin Speer, and his title is listed as, quote, Associate Professor of Botany.
Also, from a copy of the UT student publication, The Alcalde, from October 1964.
Also lists him as an associate professor in biology.
So from 1964 to 1968, he was an associate professor of biology.
Associate professors are typically professors that are on the tenure track, working their way towards becoming full professors at an academic institution.
They've paid their dues as an assistant professor, and now they're in that middle step before they're given tenure.
There's absolutely no shame in being an associate professor, even if you're for a long time, because it's a super competitive rank to achieve at most top-tier schools, and UT Austin is not a bad school.
I point all this out because that's the position that Dr. Irwin Speer would have to have been in when Alex's dad would have been the age he's supposed to have had this completely not true meeting with.
There's literally zero reason to believe that the globalists are having associate professors working their way towards their tenure, take a little break from their scholastic duties to try and recruit high schoolers into their nefarious eugenics plaza.
To put this plainly, this story is accusing a specific person of being involved in a plot against humanity.
It's a conspiracy.
And Erwin Spear, in this story Alex is telling, is trying to recruit people with the specific goal of committing genocide and crimes against humanity.
I'm sure Alex feels like he's safe because Erwin Spear died in 2002.
But still, this is some shady shit Alex is doing.
This story absolutely didn't happen.
There's no way.
There's no way associate professor Erwin Speer is taking time to like, hey, David Jones, future dentist, I'm going to try and enlist you in my globalist eugenics plot.
You know it's like Hitler, but I'm not like Hitler.
I'm going to play it anyway, because I think there's something worthwhile in it.
There is a point to it.
The point where Alex was really defensive is minutes before this, and actually before a commercial break.
But I think this clip really highlights Alex kind of losing it.
Like, this guy is making decent criticism of him, and not doing it aggressively, just saying, like, hey, I think this is a, you know, you should know that you say that all of these, you know, the globalists do divide and conquer, but I listen to you, and I hear you dividing people into groups.
And then further, the guy's other criticism is like...
You just try and, like, you use fear-mongering all the time.
And so here's Alex's, a bit of his response to it.
I think the biggest reason that I think it's worthwhile to play this is that it demonstrates how confronting Alex, even when you're correct, is not worth it.
And that's something you've got to understand, is you've got to deal with him with kid gloves, but also there's no way to do that, because the level of sensitivity that he has around issues that are threatening to him are just to the point where you can't even approach without triggering that response.
Do you know what's fun is that this is almost like his preemptive defense of white nationalist terror is he's going on this long diatribe about how Ted Anderson is so great and his gold sales are amazing all the while at least at least A little bit aware that Ted Anderson is a shady motherfucker.
Alex, I know we have a very difficult power balance relationship between us, but in some ways, I am your boss, and at the very least, I'm your colleague.
Alex seems to want to beat up on him and not let him talk in very interesting ways.
Alex is on this whole white identity thing on these two days, and so what he wants to riff on is the idea that any time you say anything, people call you racist.
So I've also, from all this, sort of deduced that maybe if Alex is fine bullying Ted and he's fine with letting out on air that they're there to talk about longevity issues, which is a different sponsor, maybe they are the same company.
And this next clip kind of makes me feel like that...
I think that's why when he said that we're writing ad copy for you, that is where legal reasons get into, oh, that's why legal reasons exist, that's illegal.
Yeah, but it does indicate just such a strong connection between the two that is so much deeper than what they would.
And when you recognize that the relationship between them is so much deeper, it makes all of the other times that he so embarrassingly sells gold so much more suspicious.
Like all of the financial collapse narratives that he's talking about with Bob Chapman that immediately lead into, and now Ted's here to sell gold.
It all is just like, it's so gross.
So fucking gross.
So we have one more clip, and it's about a story that had come out that Michael Moore is apparently trying to work towards getting photos from Sandy Hook released.
Because he has the belief that if you see...
The reality of this situation, it will lead you to recognize the severity of the situation that we're dealing with.
So, you see, I know that it seems like there has been nothing throughout this course.
Of this episode about the main idea that we're looking at in 2013, which is the progression in Sandy Hook.
But here we have, at the end of this March 14th episode, him saying, like, oh, Michael Moore wants these photos to come out, which would shock people into recognizing the real tragedy and the fucking awful situation that can be brought about by gun violence.
I need to defend from that.
The only way I can do that, if those photos come out, is to say that they're Photoshopped photos.
And if I do that, then I might as well go all the way and say this is a staged event.
Now, he's still not saying they're actors, but boy, this is close.
And it's a jump.
It's a jump.
Because we've been listening to this, and there has not been, like in the last couple episodes from 2013, any indication that he's going in that direction.
This seems to be like a pretty out-of-nowhere jump.
I don't know what that will pretend, but I do think that this white identity shit that he's deeply on, this prediction that there's going to be a coming false flag that he's using to preemptively justify in case some of his buddies start doing some shit, I think a lot of that is tied in.
I think all of it is, there's a tapestry that is being woven, and I think his Sandy Hook denial is a part of it.
Yeah.
unidentified
And it can't be understood outside of those other, those contextual pieces.
I'd be interested to know, and it's impossible to quantify this or even measure it, but the The thought that I have is like, what if it wasn't Michael Moore specifically?
In listening to this period of time, I'd not heard Alex surrender the fourth hour to somebody.
Other than one of his employees, because there was that patch back in, I think it was in 2009, we tried to do Four Hours, and he had people like David Knight or Rob Jacobson.
His employees would do the Fourth Hour, as if it was InfoWars Nightly News.
Well, the thing that I am most excited for, Dan, is, and I think this might be a first, but your prediction that the Boston bombing is where shit's going to start getting wild?
Yeah.
Is starting to sound true.
I think so.
Every time we've made a prediction at all in the past, suddenly you've got to give it up to the Somali pirates.
But this time, it really does look like we're getting a solid, we're getting a hanging cement mixer curveball right at the goddamn belt.
But you know, because history is prelude, what is going to happen is that he's going to start saying that Sandy Hook was a false flag and that there were actors.
There's something that people don't actually know and that is that there are a bunch of episodes of our podcast that we've released that are buried in the past.
If you're listening to this in 2019, there are like 200 episodes that we have that you can only access if you have a time machine and you travel back to...