Today, Dan and Jordan continue their investigation of the Alex Jones Show back in 2013. In this installment, Alex returns from vacation and hits the ground running with stories of causing a "police revolt" at SXSW, grotesque fantasies of beating up Kim Jong Un, and much more.
And I do not feel the need or think it's wise for us necessarily to knee-jerk and assume what Alex's narrative is going to be, although it will be that the globalists are behind us.
So, before we get into today's episode, again, 2013, March 11th and 12th, we need to take a little moment here, Jordan, to say thank you to some people who have signed up and are supporting the show.
If you're listening and you're thinking, hey, I like this show, I'd like to support what these dudes do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show.
So last we left off in 2013, Jordan, Alex was on a large vacation.
He had been gone for over a week, and so we took the opportunity to delve into David J. Smith, a Christian identity preacher that Alex has been listening to for years.
At night, in the morning, when I get to work, I'll just pour over hundreds of articles and almost get into a...
Fractured mindset.
Where I've got so many things in my mind, it's hard to focus in on one big subject and really cover that topic in detail.
And that's a good thing at certain levels because it shows how things are interconnected, but then when you don't get to even 10% of what you want to cover, it's a real frustration.
You can really tell that Alex is kind of rusty here because he's back from vacation and, you know, his mind is still in Barton Springs or wherever he went.
He's spinning his wheels, knowing that he has a big pile of paper in front of him, but he doesn't have any narratives that have any momentum carrying over from the previous day.
Like, generally speaking, when his show has, like, you have these narratives that you built yesterday that you build upon or you pivot from.
You know, that's sort of the routine in his show, but when you come from a clean break, you know, that week-plus break has hit the skids for any narratives that he was spinning before.
His big, gigantic investigative report that he was teasing hasn't materialized, and he's just completely forgotten about it.
His take on it is that this is government tyranny on display.
My take on it is that when humans are eating out of trash cans, we have a problem whether they get a ticket for it or not.
Alex doesn't have any solutions outside of just saying that churches and charities should voluntarily solve the problem as if those groups aren't already making large contributions to housing and feeding those experiencing homelessness.
He refuses to accept that there's a better solution because the actual solution is completely against his political beliefs and Houston is actually a perfect example of that.
In 2011, Houston reached its peak in terms of the homeless population at 8,538, and punitive rules about sleeping in public and scavenging for food were not having the desired effect.
Ultimately, those rules just criminalize being homeless, so you end up incarcerating homeless people, which costs the taxpayers more, or giving them tickets they can't pay, which can ultimately lead to their incarceration, or driving them off to some other city where they can become someone else's problem.
None of the possible outcomes of that strategy offers an actual solution.
And Houston learned that lesson.
In 2010, the Department of Housing and Urban Development had chosen Houston as a priority city, based on its high rate of people living without homes.
They took the time to analyze the issues, set up some infrastructure, then in 2011 they began implementing, and their plans have paid off massively.
In 2019, the rate of homelessness has dropped in Houston by 54%, and a lot of that is directly attributable to federal assistance, and most importantly, a coordinated approach.
Since 2012, Houston has housed approximately 17,000 people.
Mike Nichols, interim CEO of the Coalition of the Homeless in Houston and Harris County, told the Texas Tribune, quote, if you have a homeless person and you put them in a permanent supportive housing and simultaneously give them social, behavioral, and health support services, 92% of them will be stable in that facility.
Houston represents a model people interested in homelessness and housing issues could learn a lot from, and many of them have.
But learning anything from it requires you to let go of your insistence that the federal government shouldn't do anything.
If you're supposedly anti-homelessness and anti-government doing anything, and you learn that federal coordination and aid has been shown to be incredibly effective in addressing the problem of homelessness, you have to either drop your anti-government position or accept that you really don't have that big of a problem not having anywhere to live.
I suspect this is the case for Alex.
This isn't a story he's covering because he cares about this man in Houston.
He just sees it as an opportunity to use this man's misfortune to attack the government, which I think is very shitty.
Also, the charges were dropped against the man in Houston, and his case actually led to a larger conversation in Houston, where Mayor Anise Parker helped usher through repeals of laws that criminalized behaviors like digging in the trash that were kind of archaic holdovers to begin with.
So what you have here is a really interesting case study that Alex is not interested in at all.
A very successful strategy that has been used to effectively help people get back on their feet in many ways.
They illustrate something about his style of broadcast that I've always wanted to kind of illustrate, but I haven't really found really good example clips that are just like, this is a boil down of him.
Here is Alex reading a headline and then patting himself on the back thinking he's covered a story.
I believe we've talked about it in a past episode, and Alex, his take on it is very stupid.
But this is another thing I wanted to demonstrate, which is...
We talk a lot about how Alex cannot stop citing movies, but what's interesting is he's also often defensive that people think that he gets all of his ideas from movies.
He went down to South by Southwest and he was trying to hand out copies of his InfoWars magazine.
If you believe his version of the story, the out-of-control Gestapo police tried to stop him and told him that he can't have bumper stickers on his car, which is clear evidence that we live in an out-and-out police state.
Most likely what actually happened is that the police told him that his car was clearly a commercial vehicle and that he was promoting his business by handing out his product, and that was prohibited in the area that he was in without a permit.
I don't see the reality of the version he's telling.
But he claims that he got into it with these guys who were trying to give him a ticket, and he got them back down.
Anyway, on this episode, Alex embellishes the story even further, to the point where now he's arguing that his actions caused a revolt within the police department.
And then they were banning our free speech in Austin or trying to order the police to do it.
We learned there was a police revolt.
I didn't hear this from the police.
I learned it from CBS.
I wonder all the cops were smiling at me when I showed up to demonstrate against the South by Southwest.
And then I later talked to CBS and they had all the big sheets from the interview.
I don't think it even aired, though, where they talked to the cops and the cops said, well, we made the determination that the ordinance does not say that they can't hand stuff out.
Now, a big fracas, though, because they had the city of Austin come down with code enforcement and try to order the police to give people tickets.
They did give warnings and then said, you know, we're not even doing that.
Now, by the time I got back to Austin, I drove back a day early because of this.
I didn't know all this, and I showed up.
About 100 people showed up real quick just off an Internet announcement, you know, for an impromptu flash demonstration.
And News 8 Austin was out there.
A bunch of others were out there.
It may have aired.
I don't really watch television, so I don't know.
I haven't looked it up, but I haven't heard about it.
So maybe, did News 8 Austin or CBS cover it?
Let's check that.
We can type Alex Jones, South by Southwest, and it'll pop up.
It is a bit of a dick move, but at the same time, there's so many problems with the way South by Southwest has run their talent relations.
There's all kinds of stories you can find about them blacklisting people for performing in venues in the city during the festival that aren't approved.
So, another thing that's happened, probably while Alex was on vacation, maybe right around this time, is that Dennis Rodman has gone over to North Korea.
And someone who, you know, whether or not they soften their present behavior, have behaved in such a way in the past that you cannot accept them as someone who you can have relations with.
Whenever everybody's like, Trump says this, and then you can go back and find a tweet from the Obama years where he says that exactly what he's doing...
If Elizabeth Warren gets elected and then she's like, also, we're bringing socialist policies into this government, but we are going to ramp up separating children from their parents at the border.
It seems like Alex has really embraced that the United States is worse than North Korea right now because he hates the policy of separating children from their families and putting them into a different account.
He thinks that's a fucking crime against humanity.
So it makes sense that maybe his dad told him some stories of science experiments that he did when he was younger, and then Alex has turned this into he was working on a particle beam and it burned his eyes green.
I was about to say, this is like, are we in the 1600s and somebody is going to Africa and coming back and being like, they're savages and we have the full dominion to take over.
I think he views North Koreans, let's say some American comes over and they end up in a pot and they're just cutting carrots in it like a Looney Tunes.
And then you got this last clip here where Alex talks about Kim Jong-un.
And I would say that this is, again, reinforcing the idea that no matter what happens, he can't really rationalize coming to any kind of agreement with him.
There's no way for Alex's position in 2013 to ever soften.
If a 12-year-old told me, or a 14-year-old even, told me that they liked our show, what I would do is ask to talk to their parents, and I would tell them...
So his whole call is about how his YouTube channel is being censored, which is kind of weird, considering that's now what Alex complains about a lot, and all the right-wing is.
Now, you know Professor Griff is in the Obama Deception, one of the more famous individuals in hip-hop out there, and one of the founders of Public Enemy.
And I know that he's an off-and-on listener, because I've heard shows where he's talked about the broadcast, where he's plugged the Obama Deception in some of his big concerts, because I've seen it in the L.A. Times.
And we're talking to one of his manager's cohort's friends, and reportedly he's on at noon today.
But we haven't been in contact with him in a few days, and they're on tour, and there's a bunch of stuff going on.
So we'll see if that happens in the second hour today.
So this is a really interesting clip to me, because I hear this sentiment coming up from Alex more and more frequently in this 2013 stretch of time that we're going over.
He knows he's right about everything.
And he's super fucking frustrated because no one else seems to think that he's right about everything.
One conclusion a person in that situation could reach is that they're not in fact right about everything and that their feelings that they are might be based in delusions of grandeur.
Alex is unwilling to consider that possibility, so he goes the other route.
There's just too much news and the struggles of being a radio host are so straining that he doesn't have the time to explain it all to people so they can be free.
Here's how I know he's full of shit.
He's been on air for like 18 years at this point.
He's had plenty of time to explain the globalist plan in exhaustive detail and impart literally all the information he would need to make clear his day that he is right.
If he wanted to, he could take an entire week of his show and just get into the weeds with it.
Like really lay out the names, dates, and specific citations and everything.
That would be 15 hours on air.
And if that isn't enough, he can go into overdrive.
He has literally no one stopping him from broadcasting exactly as long as it takes for him to coherently teach his class.
The reason he doesn't do this is that he doesn't want to show his cards and have his audience know where he's getting his ideas from.
Some of it's just made up.
Some of it's clear misrepresentations of things that are real.
And some of it, probably more than anyone should be comfortable with, is just the protocols of the elders of Zion.
Alex knows damn well that he can just yell about Carol Quigley or John P. Holdren and then move on to another topic without anyone getting too suspicious.
But if you were really to dive in and try to analyze those texts and make his points, his argument would crumble in real time in front of his audience.
The second reason he doesn't do it is that it would be painfully boring to the audience that he's cultivated.
Tons of the people you talk to who have ever listened to Alex's show, they say things like, I don't know if I agree with him, but it's fun when he yells.
Alex knows that to keep an audience, which allows him to continue making ad revenue, he needs to yell and distract and jump from topic to topic.
He needs to keep a steady supply of white identity-fueled outrage coming in the form of misleading and overly simplified headlines.
If he really buckled down and tried to get into the details, he knows damn well that half his audience is turning the dial, and there go his plans to buy a new boat.
Market pressures dictate that in order to maintain his standard of living, he can't even try to take the time to explain the quote-unquote globalist playbook that he's convinced himself he understands better than anyone else on Earth.
But there was a time when that wasn't the case.
In his early days on radio, he was so much freer, unbeholden to these advertising pressures.
Here's what I'm getting at.
He's had a radio show and a video camera this whole career.
If at any point in that career he wanted to lay out his proof and actually do a focused, coherent type of breakdown of this, he absolutely could have.
And yet he hasn't.
Endgame was an attempt at it, and I guess, but that documentary is completely full of shit and fails to prove any of his arguments.
If anything in what he was saying were true...
He could have done this at any point in his life.
It's not like the globalist plan is some new development.
You're bringing up like, oh, there's this new thing.
But those are all just wrinkles.
Those are all new distractions.
The base of it is the same.
It's always been the same.
There's nothing that he's doing now that he couldn't have done ten years ago in terms of firmly laying all this stuff out.
And I'm probably a little too sensitive about this.
But clips like this really piss me off.
Because I think they show how much of a con man he is.
Possibly even more so than his gross salesman clips.
These are the clips where Alex tries to explain away why his show isn't what he pretends it is by creating fake excuses for why he's not doing a better job.
He can't fully explain the Globalist playbook to you because he has to plug sponsors.
Presumably, by extension, he hasn't already fully laid out the Globalist playbook because every day he comes into work for the last 18 years, he's had to plug sponsors.
In reality, he hasn't explained this Globalist playbook because he knows that he's making most of it up.
The wheels inside wheels and plans inside plans he sees the globalists crafting are tenuous connections that he imagines lurking behind completely unrelated headlines he skimmed in an altered state or whatever he was describing at the beginning of this episode.
All that stuff is in his head.
So he doesn't lay it out because if he did it would be too obvious to people.
So, we talked a little bit in the past about State Department Memorandum 7277, but it's been a long time since we have, so I felt maybe it was time for a little brush up.
So, for those who haven't listened to our entire back catalog, Memorandum 7277 was a document that was drafted by the U.S. State Department and released in September 1961.
The official title of the document was Freedom from War, the United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.
It's important to read this document with two considerations in mind.
The first is that this is a Cold War-era document.
The point of the document was to provide a possible plan of action to the UN at the 16th General Assembly in hopes of beginning a fruitful negotiation with the Soviet Union that could help avoid mutually assured destruction.
We've mentioned it many times, but we were legitimately on the brink of the world ending more than once in the span of those years.
And sensible people saw it as the highest priority to avoid that possible outcome.
If we live, all of us, if we all live in peace by way of complete disarmament, why the fuck wouldn't we do that?
Isn't that a better outcome than everyone dying for no reason?
I remember the guy in the Soviet Union who received the medal for literally saving the entire Earth and then was hidden in Siberia and his story fucking suppressed for as long as humanly possible.
Though it was never put into place and ultimately is a meaningless document in terms of any government, it did lay some important groundwork toward later negotiations like the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1968.
So in many ways, you could actually see it as an important show of good faith from our side that actually was built upon later to make the world a safer place.
I think that if you look at it through that historical context, you see it as probably a very important document that...
It has led to good things, but not something that's enforceable in any way or actually been carried out.
It was a suggestion that was discussed, and no one was like, eh, who cares?
It's unclear from the text of the memorandum if it would even affect citizens' weapons at all.
It's really mostly about disarming the U.S. and Soviet Union and scaling back their arsenals and armies while simultaneously strengthening a U.N. peacekeeping force that could ideally avert future large-scale crises between countries.
And that also does have the nuclear idea, like states can't persist.
You can't trust literally any word in those documents, because they all mean the exact opposite of what they say they mean, which I happen to determine what that means.
Alex is saying that the John Birch Society and the, quote, old-timers were warning about this, which is interesting phrasing.
I'm positive that the John Birch Society brought it up before this point, but the earliest definitive time I can find them talking about Memorandum 7277 is when then-president and former Alex Jones guest John McManus brought it up in a John Birch Society bulletin titled Whose Side Are They On?
The Minutemen were an extremist anti-communist group ran by a guy by the name of Robert Depew.
Depew had been a member of the John Birch Society, but decided that they weren't into action the same way he was, so he broke off and started the Minutemen in 1961.
That didn't stop him from re-infiltrating the John Birch Society with his Minutemen after the fact.
This was actually a common strategy among the explicitly violent right wing of the day.
The congressional record from 1963 includes Senator Thomas Ketchel introducing into the record a passage from the cross and the flag.
Quote, followers of mine who have access to our literature should attend the John Birch Society meetings in their communities.
Do not be aggressive and do not be offensive.
Do not do anything to embarrass the Birch leadership, but always have a pocket full of literature and materials which you can hand out to interested people who might want to make a deeper study into the communist menace.
The more extreme groups saw the John Birch Society as fertile recruiting ground, since if you out there enough to join the JBS, there's a good chance you were only a little nudge away from signing up for the harder stuff.
It should be noted out that The Cross and the Flag was a publication put out by Gerald L.K. Smith, the founder of the America First Party, which was a party that was supposedly just isolationist but was crawling with Nazis and Nazi sympathizers.
In 1944, the party advocated for the deportation of U.S. Jews and the sterilization of those who would not leave.
Smith himself was an outright Nazi who spent a lot of his time after World War II lobbying for the pardoning of Nazis convicted at Nuremberg.
So he ran for president, and he got less than 2,000 votes in the 1944 election.
So then Smith renamed his party from the America First Party.
He renamed it the Christian Nationalist Crusade, under whose name he published the cross and the flag, which is what was put in the congressional record.
The Christian Nationalist Crusade also published Henry Ford's International Jew and promoted the Protocols of the Elders of Zion as absolutely authentic.
They hated Jews, communism, immigrants, and jazz, presumably because it had to do with black people.
Gerald L.K. Smith was a Nazi, and he was one of the main figures behind the early days of Christian identity.
The Christian Nationalist Crusade is also associated with the Minutemen.
A 1964 news article describes Minuteman founder Robert Depew as, quote, the handsome, black-haired Missourian, and, quote, soft-spoken and articulate, which I only mention because it's important to realize that the media has always done this with right-wing extremists.
Depew taught that the communist menace was coming, and probably already here, all around, and so the only thing to do was to organize guerrilla groups to fight back.
Naturally, this just turned into anti-government fanaticism and right-wing terrorism, because it always does.
On January 26th, 1968, seven Minutemen members were arrested for planning to blow up the City Hall, Police Department, and power stations of Redmond, Washington.
Arresting officers found firebombs, dynamite, blasting caps, guns, and masks that they planned to use in their campaign, supposedly against communism.
It came out in court that it was all part of a plan to cause distraction and chaos so they could rob four area banks and bring in about $100,000.
Robert Depew was charged with conspiracy since he was the group's leader, but he went into hiding, only to be caught and charged in 1969.
Because he was the leader of a white terrorist group, though, he only ended up serving about three years of his 11-year sentence.
Two years prior to that event being broken up, 19 members of the Minutemen were arrested in process of carrying out a terrorist attack on some camps they supposedly thought were full of communists in the Northeast.
The police had been tipped off and raided their cell locations and, quote, seized a massive arsenal of mortars, grenades, bazookas, machine guns, semi-automatic rifles, and close to a million rounds of ammunition.
These people were not trying to fight communism.
They were extreme right-wing terrorists.
Ramparts quotes the defector of the group as saying, quote, after you take their five phases of training, you find out that you want to overthrow the government by force and violence and do away with about half of the people in the United States.
What had allegedly started out as a defensive fraternal organization to fight off the coming communist invasion had to turn radical and offensive when that invasion never came.
They had plans to assassinate politicians and commit a chemical weapons attack on the UN building.
They rationalized that attacking the government was the same as attacking communists since the government was already a communist entity, as proven by everything that's happened since the New Deal.
Put simply, the Minutemen were Alex Jones' kind of guys, but he does not want people to think that they were his kind of guys.
After their formation in 1961, it quickly became a catch-all organization, the Minutemen did, for people all over the extreme right who wanted the possibility of violence in their life.
Tons of Minutemen were legit Nazis as well as Klan members.
Two state coordinators for the Minutemen were former Grand Dragons of the Klan.
Their membership roles also included an interesting overlap with members of the Church of Jesus Christ Christian, which is run by Wesley Swift, the man who more or less created the Christian identity movement in the United States.
One of his ministers was a Minuteman, and that's not a coincidence.
Much like the John Birch Society, the Minutemen distributed publications to their members.
In this case, however, it was stuff like a handbook that taught members how to make incendiary weapons and anti-vehicular mines, recipes for Molotov cocktails and nerve gas.
These were sort of the things that the Minutemen were distributing.
They also put out a periodical called On Target.
On Target, I'm not entirely sure, was the first, but it was very early.
As a publication that was spreading the conspiracy that Memorandum 7277 was an attempt to take Americans' guns.
Their November 1, 1963 issue is titled, quote, New Drive to Disarm America, and it discusses a recent symposium that was held to discuss illicit international arms trade.
The publication makes a specific point that the attendees were all members of the Council on Foreign Relations, and that, quote, of the 92 people who spoke during this four-day conference, nearly all fit into one of the following categories.
One, known and identified communists.
Two, persons who have belonged to and supported numerous communist fronts.
Three, people who have made it a habit to support and be affiliated with various ultra-liberal peace and disarmament groups.
And four, individuals who are paid employees of the U.S. Disarmament Agency.
Given how loose we know their definition of communist is, those four descriptions could literally include everyone who's not a minute man.
The pamphlet goes on to complain about Memorandum 7277, how everyone getting their guns taken is going to happen, and the next thing you know, we've got a new world order going under the UN.
A full five and a half of the ten pages of that newsletter is just the names and home addresses of people who attended that arms trade symposium, which leads me to another important part.
Doxing is not a new strategy of the extreme right wing.
So it's important to recognize that when Alex Jones says things like, the old timers, this is probably who he's talking about.
He's probably talking about the Minutemen, and he knows not to bring up them by name.
How is it possible for Alex to argue that JFK was both the president who introduced the globalist disarmament plan for global government and also the guy who was killed by the globalists for being the last real president?
It's things like this that really highlight how inconsistent Alex's conspiracies are, even to each other.
And it does go to the, like, using John Birch Society.
As a recruitment place for more extreme groups, it's the same thing.
If you're in for whatever Alex is selling, it really doesn't matter if it's crazier.
You're already in the place where you are self-selected as a candidate to believe bullshit.
So why care about this thing making sense?
JFK can both be a hero who's killed by the globalists for being into America and the one who introduced the UN plan to disarm the entire world.
Doesn't matter.
Anyway, I just think this is interesting because one of the things that I want to pay closer attention to and really highlight more is these instances where Alex has direct overlap with these more terroristic sides of the anti-communist world.
Tuesday, the 12th day of March, 2013, and Professor Griff, one of the great granddaddies, one of the icons, one of the founders of rap and what is hip-hop.
I mean, you can't really think of anybody out there except a couple other guys who are up there at the top of the mountain.
They were a really successful group pretty immediately with the 1987 release of their debut album Yo Bum Rush The Show, which was well received critically and by hip-hop fans.
In between the release of that album and their second album, Professor Griff gave an interview in the UK where he said that, quote, there's no place for gays.
Also, quote, Jews are responsible for most of the wickedness in the world, which many people suspect is him quoting Henry Ford's anti-Semitic publication, The International Jew.
And, quote, if Palestinians took up arms, went into Israel and killed all the Jews, it would be all right.
Professor Griff's unbridled bigotry got him kicked out of the group right as their wave was beginning to crest.
In the aftermath, Griff played the role of pretending to apologize so he could be Public Enemy's Minister of Truth again.
As recently as 2018, he's made public comments about Ashkenazi Jews as being intrinsically evil and that it's just common knowledge now.
People write books about it.
So I'm not entirely sure if I believe he was ever sorry for any of the awful shit that he did.
Incidentally, in that interview that referenced there from 2018, the book that Griff cites to argue that this is just common knowledge You know, that these Ashkenazi Jews are all evil.
While I don't have the time to read that book, I will say that one of the reviews of it is illuminating.
Quote, This book lifts the lid on the conspiracies and details of how the public has been duped.
It includes the complete protocols of the learned elders of Zion, which is a big scoop, as the Jews do not want the general public to know their plans for world domination.
I looked into it a little more, and what do you know?
One of the arguments put forth in that book is that the people alive today who call themselves Jews are actually the descendants of Esau.
Crazy to hear Professor Graf amplifying and promoting the same anti-Semitic conspiracies that are spread by people like Pastor David J. Smith and that are at the heart of the Christian identity movement.
Weird.
Putting out their first album in 1987 does put Public Enemy in the earlier parts of hip-hop history, but there are a lot of people who came before them, like Grandmaster Flash, The Sugarhill Gang, Curtis Blow.
Run DMC's first album came out three years before Public Enemy's first album.
What I'm saying is that while Public Enemy holds a very important place in the history of the genre, they're considered to be in the second wave of the evolution, when the old-school aesthetics branched off into a ton of sub-genres.
So in this next clip, Alex mentions that the public enemy is going to get into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and then says something that can't possibly be true.
It would literally be impossible for him to have been following Professor Griff since he was 11, considering Public Enemy didn't form until 1986 when Alex was 12. I have a hard time believing that Alex, as an 11-year-old, was super into an obscure member of the Nation of Islam halfway across the world, I think when he was 11, he was a world-class stalker, maybe?
I don't know.
Also, I don't think that Alex would be into early public enemy.
Their first album was deeply black nationalist, and from everything Alex claims to believe in, he is super against that.
They explicitly endorsed Farrakhan on their 1987 single, Bring the Noise, so I don't know how Alex could pretend not to know what they're about.
Also, it's wild to think that Professor Griff was part of the group when they got inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, considering he was kicked out and he almost legitimately ruined all of their careers.
It's actually really interesting, the news radio episode in this context now, because literally what goes on is Phil Hartman's character rails about the dangers and evils of hip-hop.
And then when Chuck D., the celebrity, comes on, he's like, I love hip-hop and you are amazing.
A whole lot of this interview, I should tell you, is just Alex and Professor Griff.
It's just Griff laying out his theory that the powers that be are trying to feminize the black man through hip-hop.
His evidence of this seems to be his belief that Will Smith and Quincy Jones are gay, which is something that he insinuates heavily but is very careful not to say explicitly, which is a strategy that I think Griff has been forced to get pretty good at over the years.
The rest of it is just vague accusations of generalized mind control and Illuminati conspiracies in the music industry.
Interestingly, Griff's arguments about these are less rooted in his personal experience than they are in him hearing Alex Jones and David Icke yell about the topic, at which point he tried to make his experiences mirror their narratives.
From listening to him speak, it's really hard for me to not think that this is just basically Alex interviewing a marginal celebrity about how they've used his narratives in their own life.
One specific Griff does offer is in that clip is a book called Mind Control in the United States written by Steven Jacobson.
This book and Jacobson and all other mediums try to make the argument that the problem with people today is that they're being taught things that are not true.
How can we possibly navigate the world around us if everywhere we're turned we're confronted with things that are not true?
Quote, "Man is a blend of indigenous ape forms and the celestial beings who arrived upon the planet and adapted to the primate organic body because of the greater dexterity possessed by the hand and thumb.
They cohabitated with the primate forms and the progeny was the first true man.
The inheritance of animal traits still lingers in man, making so many spiritual beings beastly Okay, so if I understand correctly, humans didn't evolve, but apes met venom?
This is a painfully stupid book, full of appeals to occult knowledge and psychic abilities.
It's also weirdly fairly anti-communist, but that kind of makes sense when you read the postscript.
Quote, I received a copy of Gary Allen's None Dare Call It Conspiracy.
I began to study the conspiracy theory of history.
He cites none dare call it conspiracy ten times in the footnotes, along with W. Cleon Skousen's Naked Capitalist.
The politics are the same old anti-communist conspiracy bullshit we see at the source of all of these people's worldviews, with just a little bit of fun New Age horse shit added on top.
I'm listening to this Professor Griff interview, and already he's cited two completely insane, full of bullshit books, and he's cited them as authoritative sources.
So I think it's pretty safe to assume that he's not a guy who has a very rigorous fact-checking or critical analysis routine in place that he goes through before he decides to believe something.
Also, small point, he's been an overt anti-Semite for decades.
So when he's out here talking about mind control and the New World Order and the Illuminati...
You have to be a complete idiot to not use available context clues to deduce there's a very high likelihood that he believes the New World Order is run by Jews.
It might be a productive question for Alex to ask that, but I suspect he's worried what the answer might be, and he doesn't want that on the show.
Even between, like, Professor Griff, the book he cites ends up citing none dare call it conspiracy and scowsing a ton and also thinks that evolution isn't true because angels.
So Alex has this interview with Professor Griff, and they have a great time.
I had a chance a while back to hear this gentleman on Coast to Coast AM, and I've been wanting to get him on, and I've kind of told my producers but then forgotten about it a while back, and I guess it fell through, and then Richard Reeves came in and he said, you know, Dr. Glidden, who we're a big fan of, and he's here on the Genesis Network.
Dr. Peter Glidden, he says this is a guy you really ought to interview, who's worked with Longevity and others a whole bunch of times.
We'll have him break down the story to sue the Food and Drug Administration to make them back off trying to shut down being able to buy vitamins and minerals and supplements over the counter.
I mean, if you have one illness from a supplement, it's national news.
This show is so insane, because I'm listening to this episode, and Alex says that his next guest is Yongevity's lawyer, and my response is, yeah, that makes sense.
I'm no longer even close to shocked that Alex's medical guests all seem to have financial ties to one of his main sponsors, so why should it be any surprise that his legal experts do, too?
What I'm more interested in here, though, is that Alex's claim there at the end that if you get one person sick from supplements, that's a huge news story.
According to a 2015 study in the New England Journal of Medicine, at least 23,000 people get sent to the emergency room every year for reasons that are directly traced back to I'm glad that we've seen that statistic.
The author of the study, who's a doctor at the CDC, was quick to point out that it's way more likely that this is an underestimation than an exaggeration of the problem.
One of the main problems is that because of the Dietary Supplements, Health, and Education Act of 1994, the FDA is forbidden from reviewing supplements before they're sold.
They can only intervene sometimes when the supplement is shown to be dangerous.
This applies also to not just the supplements themselves, but also to packaging.
That 2015 study found that a significant number of the injuries from supplements came from children who could easily access the pills because they weren't required to be in childproof packaging.
A 2017 Business Insider article reports that the supplement industry is a $37 billion market.
When you look at it in that context, it starts to make sense why it's almost entirely unregulated.
Selling people false hope and ineffective pills is an evergreen business model, and these people have a whole lot to lose if the government starts to take the issue seriously.
The big companies in a $37 billion industry are very well positioned to hire all the attorneys and lobbyists they need to make sure that their business stays unregulated and they can continue to basically defraud naive people.
There are so many problems with people taking supplements, even beyond just the pure some-of-them-can-hurt-or-kill-you angle.
When people take supplements, they often don't tell doctors about them when they're asked if they're on any medications, since people don't consider them to be medications.
Unfortunately, even if they're not medications, they can definitely interfere with real medicine.
St. John's Wort, for example, can severely impair the effectiveness of antibiotics, birth control, and other drugs.
If doctors don't know you're taking it, they can prescribe you something for an infection and you'll be basically just getting no treatment.
When the antibiotics don't work, people are then likely to take it as proof that traditional medicine doesn't work and become more drawn to supplements as if it's actual medical care.
There have been plenty of deaths tied to supplement use and plenty more where supplements played a part in the death and it wasn't caught by doctors.
For Alex to pretend that this isn't the case is disgraceful.
And the only reason he would be doing that is either because he doesn't know what he's talking about or because he's a bought and paid shill for a supplement company.
But I could buy in 2013 since he's probably not...
Overdoing the longevity supplements that he'd be convinced by their propaganda, too, of like, hey, these are actually good for you and blah, blah, blah.
This lawyer that Alex is interviewing here on the show is a guy by the name of Jonathan Emord.
And from everything I can tell, he's basically just made a career out of taking on cases that seek to cripple government regulation of non-medical medicine.
His claim to fame is that he's beaten the FDA in court more than anybody else, and I guess I believe that's probably true.
In 2010, he won a suit against the FDA that allowed supplement companies to make, quote, qualified health claims about their products.
Thus, they can say that their product might help with a certain condition or reduce the risk of it, but they also have to include a disclaimer that says, quote, scientific evidence concerning this claim is inconclusive.
Based on its review, the FDA does not agree.
That's a pretty big win, since most people don't read disclaimers.
He's been involved in a number of other similar lawsuits, and because of it, he's become something of a hero in the supplement world.
His litigation has genuinely allowed them all sorts of wiggle room that they need in order to defraud tons of people totally legally.
In most of his lawsuits, EMARD is representing an organization called the Alliance for Natural Health USA.
And the main cases use Dirk Peterson and Sandy Shaw as their defendants.
Pearson and Shaw are supplement designers who make their money by licensing their products to companies who sell them.
So it goes like this.
The Federal Trade Commission wants to enforce a rule, like, you can't make health claims about your product unless you have two clinical trials to serve as the basis for your claim.
Then, EMORD's law office will petition the FTC, saying, quote, FTC requirements have a chilling effect on Pearson and Shaw, who have ordered their licensees not to communicate to the public on labels and labeling or in advertising any claim of association between the products they sell and immune system enhancement, loss or relief of temporary irregularity for fear that the FTC will deem the claims deceptive advertising.
I'm using quotes because I was reading from his 2011 petition to the FTC.
By framing the argument this way, by saying it's a free speech thing, they can't speak to their customers, by doing it that way, the supplement industry sets up a win-win situation.
The FTC can agree with their petition and allow them to make scientifically unsupported claims, or the FTC can disagree, and then they can go around yelling It's a trap.
Quack Watch lists this sort of framing as one of the main hallmarks of questionable organizations, saying it is, quote, nothing more than a ploy to persuade legislators to permit the marketing of quack methods without legal restraints.
Another hallmark that they use of questionable organizations is that the organization opposes proven health measures, like fluoridation.
According to Source Watch, the Alliance for Natural Health USA was a founding member of the Fluoride Action Network, so it sounds like that's two strikes.
For a third strike, let's just go ahead and say that Jonathan E. Moore is a member of the Longevity Hall of Fame, which is something to insane.
Anyway, Jonathan Neymard is the lawyer that the supplement industry calls whenever the FDA or FTC is suggesting a rule that would advance public health but hurt their business.
He's also a lawyer for Longevity, but the only cases I could find of him representing them aren't even for supplement-related stuff.
So when Alex was earlier complaining about how he doesn't have the time to get the globalist playbook out and he needs his show to be longer, he solves one problem.
But I do think that we're in a lull before, the calm before the storm.
Because I think it's coming.
I think that some people...
I have speculated about this, and I think some other people have as well, that it becomes deeply entwined with the Boston bombing that happens in April.
So we're in this March stretch where I don't know if a ton is going to happen, but it does offer us these great insights into Alex's former position on Kim Jong-un.
I mean, why would they stop doing the exact same propaganda tricks if they are continuing to work?
Of course there are parallels between...
I mean, fucking the beginning of the protocols of the elders of Zion worked so well that they just kept on rolling with it, and we still haven't figured out a fix for it.