Today, Dan and Jordan return to the past to continue their investigation into what Alex Jones was up to in 2013. In this installment, Alex goes on a vacation, so he's out of studio for a week, but before he leaves, he references an obscure and very insane pastor, which naturally sent Dan down a very weird rabbit hole that may be very revealing.
I put it on my arm, and as we were floating down the river, it was my big bit, that every time we passed somebody else, I'd point at my tattoo and be like, you on MySpace?
Today we've got a really interesting, in-depth episode to go over.
I think there's some really important stuff that we will touch on and go over today.
But before we get to any of that, I believe that we would be wise to spend a little time saying thank you to some of the people who have signed up and are supporting the show and make all this possible.
It's one of those things where I'm sure some of these names are references to things that I don't know what they are, and I'm glad it's Final Fantasy because anyone could probably slip through something.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I enjoy this show, I'd like to support what they do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the support the show button.
I think about it, because sometimes when we're doing the 2013 episodes, I'm almost like, oh, that's right, we're talking about Sandy Hook, because these are so often unrelated.
But it is interesting to think about what's bubbling around Alex Jones during this time period.
Like, he may be talking about something random and weird, but all the while in the background on YouTube, there's new Sandy Hook truth or conspiracy videos coming out.
On some level within the ranks of InfoWars, there's probably some people who are thinking, like, why aren't we more on board?
Yeah, for sure.
And you know what?
The other thing that I'm thinking about that I think is a failure of whatever we can do as an investigation is that we're not covering InfoWars nightly news.
There's actually two bills that Alex is responding to here that he has just been brought by his crack reporter, Melissa Melton, this morning.
He's completely losing his mind.
These are two bills in the Texas Senate, SB 63 and SB 64. SB 63 allowed some children to consent to receiving vaccines without parental permission.
However, the word some is doing some heavy lifting in that sentence.
According to Texas's pre-existing family codes, there are a ton of instances where a child can consent to their own health care decisions, regardless of what their parents say.
For instance, since at least 1995, a child can make their own medical decisions in cases where the child is pregnant, or if abuse is suspected, or if the child is seeking treatment related to drug addiction.
There are plenty of instances where the state rightly realizes that demanding parental consent for treatment would put a child's life at risk, so that level of consent is not required.
All SB 63 did was amend the already existing instances of when a child could consent to their own health care with specific language around vaccination.
All this did, SB 63, was to make it explicit that a child can control their own vaccination decisions in a case when a child is pregnant or has a child of their own.
That's all it did.
And it's really crazy, because in all of Alex's coverage of this, while he's freaking out and screaming about it, I didn't hear him bring up any of that stuff.
It's just him rambling about how the government's trying to kill everyone.
And then, for SB64, this is really just an amending of Texas' Human Resource Code, to say that people who work in licensed childcare facilities need to be immunized for vaccine-preventable diseases, which I think makes pretty good sense.
This amendment, SB 64, explicitly says that their policy will, quote, include procedures for facility employees to be exempt from required vaccines.
It goes on to say that it'll formulate guidelines, quote, for a facility employee.
Who is exempt from required vaccines include procedures the employee must follow to protect children under the facility's care from exposure to disease, such as the use of protective medical equipment, including gloves and masks, based on the level of risk the employee presents to children by the employee's routine and direct exposure to children.
They have a paragraph about how they need to, quote, prohibit discrimination or retaliatory action against a facility employee who is exempt from the required vaccines.
For something that's allegedly supposed to be about forcing everyone to get shots, it seems like SB 64 is going out of its way to accommodate people.
Well, but if you are being accommodating at all, then you have to go really far because you have to set in place the guidelines in order to accommodate the people who are...
But SB64 explicitly lays out that they're also talking about people who are, quote, exempt from taking required vaccines based on reasons of conscience, including a religious belief.
That bill is not forcing anyone to get shots.
It's clearly about harm reduction and protecting the health of children.
It goes out of its way to respect the political and religious beliefs that lead people to argue that they don't...
Yeah.
So, now for some comedy.
Alex explicitly says that Melissa Melton, one of his reporters, brought him that story that morning.
This is February 28th, 2013.
And that's why he's in such a fucked up mood on this show.
And trust me, he is.
He is not great on air.
Both of those bills were introduced into the Texas Senate on November 12th, 2012.
It's been a quarter of a year since those bills were introduced, and somehow his crack staff had just now figured out about them.
Now, just to be super clear about this and really illustrate my point, here is Alex Jones saying that SB63 was introduced this week.
This last week, which indicates to me that he either is very comfortable making shit up that he doesn't know was introduced in November 2012, or he's totally fine lying about it.
Maybe, I mean, I'm going to go out of my way to give him the benefit of the doubt, but maybe Melissa did a shitty job and she just wanted to cover it up, so she just told him.
Like, I often find, whenever there are really bad stretches of his show where there's not a lot of content going on, oftentimes if you pay close attention, you'll find something that merits discussion and...
There is one such thing that happens during the February 27, 2013 episode that sent me on a very interesting crusade that I believe opens up a really terrifying glimpse into potential things that Alex Jones believes and offers context to some of the things that we've talked about for quite a while that I'm troubled by.
So here is that clip from the February 27 episode.
We know basically that he thinks demons walk among us, that he's in a literal battle with a literal devil, and that the rapture is happening after the tribulation.
Then that conveniently allows him to blend these ideas of religious piety and righteous trench warfare, the fantasies that he has about that, into one.
The post-trib rapture allows that.
It's great.
This clip that we just heard is part of an interview with a woman named Catherine Albrecht.
It's supposed to be about the RFID chips that are going to be put in everybody, but it quickly descends into how these RFID chips are the literal, biblical mark of the beast.
And from there, it's just a hop, skip, and a jump for them to turn the show into outright televangelism.
His name is one that only a very specific sort of person would bring up in conversation, particularly in a positive way, as someone whose opinion you should take seriously.
In 1980, David Smith founded the Church of God Evangelistic Association after he broke away from the Worldwide Church of God.
The Worldwide Church of God, in turn, was founded by Herbert Armstrong in 1931 under the name the Radio Church of God.
So Armstrong's career was characterized by doomsday predictions that routinely failed to materialize.
He had a pretty good run, and when it was all over, his influence would be pretty substantial, possibly not in the way he intended it to be, but by the mid to late 1970s, things were not going great for his church.
Armstrong's son was trying to start a splinter group, and he'd been excommunicated from the group.
Armstrong's wife had passed away, and he'd remarried a woman half a century younger than him.
Accusations of malfeasance were flying around him all over the place.
So it only makes sense that an enterprising member of that group would see it as the right time to start their own thing.
And that's exactly what David J. Smith did.
So, when Smith started his Church of God Evangelistic Association, he didn't stray too far from some of the basic tenets of Armstrong's theology.
And one of the central beliefs that he retained was Armstrong's teachings about British Israelism, which might strike you as a foreign concept.
The subject of British Israelism is a really complicated thing, and it means a bunch of different things in different contexts.
So it's important for me to be pretty clear about what we're talking about as we go through this.
At its core, British Israelism, or Anglo-Israelism, is the belief that white Anglo-Saxons, primarily those of Western European heritage, are the direct descendants of the ten lost tribes of Israel.
Proponents of the theory point to Bible stories about Jacob, later to be renamed Israel, who had 12 sons, each of whom gave birth to their own tribes, the 12 tribes of Israel.
When Solomon died, only two of these tribes, those of Judah and Benjamin, would accept the rule of Solomon's son Rehoboam.
Rehoboam was a shitty and cruel leader, and his ascent to the throne would result in what amounted to a civil war.
These two tribes that sided with him became the southern kingdom, or the kingdom of Judah, and the ten other tribes were the northern kingdom, or the kingdom of Israel.
In the 720s BCE, the Assyrians invaded and sent all those but the tribes in the southern kingdom into exile, and as the story goes, the ten tribes became lost.
However, archaeology, anthropology, and historical records do not agree with this simplistic and clear-cut version of these tribes just getting lost to history.
Many members of these tribes fled back to the southern kingdom and were reabsorbed into that population.
Others were taken back to Assyria and Medea, where they were assimilated into those cultures.
This population of the southern kingdom, Judah, was by that point constituted of the two tribes who stayed loyal to Rehoboam, as well as many of the members of the northern kingdom who had fled Right, of course.
The people are real.
The struggles are real.
The heritage is real.
But the idea that these tribes got lost is seen by most scholars as more myth than history.
The consensus opinion is that between the Assyrian invasion of the northern kingdom and the Babylonian invasion of the southern kingdom, most of the members of these tribes had become integrated into the larger identity of the kingdom of Judah or into the places where they had ended up, like Assyria.
Well, as in national history, it makes sense to put that myth together because that way you almost immediately remove the tribal identity of those, quote, lost tribes, you know?
For centuries, legends about the Lost Tribes have been very popular.
One of the often-repeated myths said that the tribes were, quote, in a region situated beyond the miraculous and impassable river of Samateon, who flows for six days of the week and stops on Shabbat, when the ten tribes are forbidden to travel.
Poetic explanations abounded for why no one had found the tribes, even though people were looking really hard for them.
Then, in 1590, a book called The Ten Lost Tribes was published.
The book gave the first voice to the theory that groups like the Celts, the Germans, the Scandinavians, they were in fact the tribes of Israel that had gotten lost.
While the theory didn't go mega-viral, it did gain a little bit of traction early on, and here's where one of the most important distinctions comes into play.
In the 1600s, as this idea began to spread a little bit in Britain, it was not explicitly anti-Semitic.
The proponents of this theory believe that the people who were Jewish were the descendants of the tribes of Judah, and that the white Anglo-Saxons were the ten tribes that got lost.
So they were all Israelites.
It could definitely be described as co-opting, but at that point in history, the ideas were not being spread to deny Jewish people their heritage or to demonize them.
There were plenty of other problems with the theory back then, which we'll get into later, but anti-Semitism was not one of them.
So it was just kind of one of those, like, why is it, it's almost fitting together why we believe in our version of Christianity with why are we completely different people?
So you kind of say, well...
Now, we're also Jews, so that makes more sense in that context?
There's probably a little piece of it that's that, but I think that there's a much larger reason, which we'll get into later.
I think there's some timing issues.
So, these notions existed in small pockets for a long time, finally reaching their peak in the late 1800s and into the early 1900s.
In the early 1900s, as these theories began to take hold in the United States, that is the point where things got ugly.
Here's the final caveat I will give on the matter.
There are apparently still some churches that exist that believe in British Israelism that don't hate Jewish people, but they are the exception, not the rule.
In the 1920s in the United States, British Israel beliefs were co-opted by outright bigots and anti-Semites.
And ever since that point, the ideas have been almost their exclusive domain.
The group Christian Identity traces their roots to British Israelism.
The identity that they base their worldview on is the belief that the white race's true identity is the Lost Tribes of Israel.
Christian Identity is a loosely organized, theologically entwined, overtly white supremacist terrorist party.
It wouldn't be right to call them a group since they have a penchant for decentralization, and they follow the leaderless resistance model popularized by Louis Beam, who was an adherent of Christian Identity.
Christian identity's fingerprints are all over the history of the people behind right-wing terrorism and hate groups since the 1950s.
Their path intersects with the Klan, the Aryan Nations, the militia movement of the 90s, the American Nazi Party, and its founder, George Lincoln Rockwell.
The key difference between British Israelism in the 1600s in Britain and the 1900s in America is that whereas the prior believed that Jews were also descendants of Israel, the latter did not.
As the British Israelism beliefs became co-opted by the Christian identity movement, the narrative changed.
No longer was the theory just that white people were also Israelites.
It was now that they were the only true Israelites, and that a vast majority of the people who think they're Jewish are imposters.
Anyway, some Christian identity folks swing for the fences and argue that Jews are literally descended from the devil.
Okay.
But the more mainline position is that the Anglo-Saxons, as the tribes that got lost, carry out the pure bloodline.
The descendants of the tribe of Judah, though they believe that they're Israelites, their ancestors were actually a population of Turks who converted to Judaism as part of an elaborate plan aimed at taking out the true Israelites.
I can already hear you asking, Jordan.
What do these Turkish people have against the Anglo-Saxons?
The answer goes back to Genesis 25 and the story of Jacob and Esau.
Esau was Isaac's firstborn son, and as such, he was entitled to a larger share of the inheritance and all the rights of lineage that come along with being recognized as the firstborn.
The name for this in the Bible is Birthright.
Genesis 25 tells the story of Esau returning home very hungry from work and asking Jacob for some stew.
Jacob offers him food if Esau will give him his birthright.
Esau agrees, and the birthright is transferred to Jacob.
Esau later marries women that Isaac forbade him to marry, and then Jacob still has to pretend to be Esau in order to be bestowed with Isaac's birthright.
Blessing.
But the point is that Esau was the firstborn, and ultimately the birthright went to Jacob, and this pissed off Esau.
I'm not entirely sure how common a belief it is among the British Israel folks, but I can tell you with certainty that the version of British Israelism that David J. Smith preaches specifically believes that the Turks who decided to pass themselves off as Jews did so because they're descendants of Esau, and they've been carrying out a centuries-long con – God, that's so much work to believe that.
I felt it was important to walk through some of that differentiation between British Israelism and what it's become, because David Smith would admit that he believes in British Israelism.
But in reality, taken on the merits of his beliefs, he is far closer to being a Christian identity preacher than he is to being one of the pro-Jewish eccentrics espousing British Yeah.
Put simply, Herbert Armstrong was one of the largest proponents of the British Israelism theory in America, long after the point it was very discredited, and long after the idea had taken hold as a large piece of white supremacist rhetoric in the United States.
Herbert Armstrong, whose worldwide church of God...
Which is where David J. Smith came from.
That original church didn't start until 1931.
In 1920s is when the Christian identity movement started to co-opt British Israelism.
So the idea that this is all after these ideas had already become very associated with overt anti-Semite...
David J. Smith did differentiate himself from Armstrong's church a little bit, in that he added in a ton of preaching about conspiracy theories, particularly about the dangers of communism and the creation of a one-world government.
The Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group.
He uses the same sources as Alex does, like Nundere Call It Conspiracy and W. Cleon Skousen.
He even seems to admire a lot of the same people.
There's so much in Alex Jones here, and a lot of his work long predates Alex ever getting on air.
I can't say with any certainty that a ton of Alex's ideas come from David J. Smith, but there's enough interesting parallels that it really makes you start to wonder.
For instance, David J. Smith was operating out of Waxahachie, Texas in the early 1980s.
Alex was born in 1974, and in the early 80s, he lived in Dallas, Texas, a city less than 30 miles north of Waxahachie.
Waxahachie, in fact, is right in between the city of Dallas and Freestone County, where Alex's dad owned a fair share of mineral interests.
Just as Armstrong's ministry began as a radio televangelism operation, that was part of David Smith's work, too, as he ran a radio show called Newswatch Magazine, whose shortwave signal almost definitely reached Dallas and Freestone County.
I'd like to take that a step back.
It definitely reached those, because shortwave is designed to go long distances.
So as I was going over this stuff and looking into David J. Smith, I couldn't shake the feeling there was something really big here that Alex let slip by referencing David J. Smith as being someone who said that Texas would be safe during the...
I needed to know more, so I sat down, and like I said, I listened to tons of David J. Smith's radio sermons.
I lost count of how many hours of his rambling I've listened to, but from what I've listened to, I find it very difficult to imagine that Alex didn't listen to this show.
There's just far too many things that overlap, far too many little details that seem insanely suspicious.
So what I've done here is I've compiled from my God knows how many hours of listening to this dumbass preach a bunch of clips that I think are going to walk us through an experience that we can see if this is convincing to you or to the listeners that there is...
What I am going to hopefully demonstrate, or what I'm going to attempt to demonstrate, is first of all that David J. Smith is a proto-Alex Jones, that he was doing Alex's show before Alex was.
And then secondarily, I would like to give people a glimpse...
Into what sort of show Alex was listening to if he listened to David J. Smith's show.
Because it's not just New World Order conspiracies.
There are other things being discussed on this show that I think would be really weird to imagine that Alex thinks is okay.
So the first thing I'd like to demonstrate with these clips is that David J. Smith is the sort of British Israelism preacher who believes that most Jews aren't Jews.
This is a huge problem, since this distinction puts him much closer to the Christian identity side of things than just the British Israelism side of things.
And I believe that that's important to nail down, because that is how I look at this David J. Smith, and I don't want people to think that that is undeserved.
And make no mistake about it, he sees them as the villains in the story of world history.
In this next clip, Smith explains how Eastern European Jews, who he feels are descendants of Esau, are responsible for many of the things that he thinks are bad in the world, including international communism.
Yeah, you know it's really bad whenever he can't even say the word Jew, period, without giving you the hard J. Like, any time he says Jew, it's a racial slur.
And in case you need it spelled out a little more explicitly, here's David J. Smith explaining that modern-day Jews, particularly Eastern Europe, It is now Esau and his descent coming up claiming to be God's chosen people when they are not.
unidentified
And now we want to go into some scriptures and find out whether this is true or not.
Because the Jews of Eastern Europe are the ones who are behind the push for world government.
So, in Smith's conception, these Eastern European imposter Jewish folk...
They're creating international communism and socialism with the explicit goal of taking back Esau's birthright that was given to Jacob and then, according to Smith, carried on by the United States and Britain.
There's a very blunt denial of Jewish identity that's happening throughout Smith's sermons.
And it's very hard to imagine that a person could listen to him for any stretch of time and not get these messages loud and clear.
White people are the real Israelites and God's chosen people.
And the Jews are trying to create a world government system in order to deprive white people of their rightful place in the world and their birthright.
So, just like that, not only do you have an enemy on the world stage, an explicit battlefield between two forces, you have an enemy that's keenly aware of their evil and deceit.
You remove the possibility that maybe Smith is the first person to discover all this stuff, so the Jewish people don't know what they're up to and what's going on.
No.
They know what they're doing, and they know that it's evil.
That sort of thinking can only lead to one conclusion.
And you know what?
David Smith doesn't shy away from that natural conclusion.
Like, if you understand that clip, he's saying that the extermination of Jews will happen, and it's a necessary part of reaching his religion's final positive state of affairs.
Keep in mind, these are old recordings, but not pre-World War II old.
It's very clear that what David Smith is preaching and the idea that Alex might look at this guy as anything other than a kind of bland, milquetoast, but sincere hate preacher is incredibly scary.
I believe, based on his New World Order ideas, there is still some of that, like the New World Order orchestrated things and what have you.
But even leaving that aside, yeah, if his idea is that Obadiah tells us that Ephraim and Manasseh, that's what he believes to be the United States and Britain, are going to be the light with which...
The sons of Esau are burnt up and none shall survive.
So, now, I want to get back to exactly what this birthright is that Smith feels is under attack by these Jewish people who are secretly the descendants of Esau who want their birthright back.
It's not some kind of fruitfulness or prosperity or national success like you might hope it is.
It's explicitly world domination.
According to Smith's interpretation of scripture, God gave his birthright to white people, which gave them all manner of blessings.
They are entitled to enslave non-white people.
They're entitled to all the natural resources of the earth, even in countries that aren't their own.
They have their run of the show.
Earlier I mentioned that even back in the 1600s in Britain, these British Israelite beliefs didn't come from a good place.
And even if they weren't motivated by anti-Semitism, here's where this sort of comes in.
British Israelism, in its early formation, is largely seen as a way that ostensibly Christian people could rationalize the booming period of British colonialism.
In the late 1500s into the early 1600s, that's right in the period that's known as the First British Empire that began to take shape, as Britain prioritized colonizing as much of the world as possible, as opposed to fighting with other European countries like Spain over areas that had already been colonized.
In December 1600, the East India Company was founded, which would go on to be a massive force of colonialism through many corners of the world.
What the British, and many other countries as well, were doing was immoral on its face.
They were going into territory that was inhabited and claiming it as their own, often enslaving or killing the native populations that didn't get on board with the program.
But simultaneously, the country and the people were trying to retain the moral high ground that what they were doing wasn't horribly evil.
Because according to what they profess to believe, if you look at it through that prism, it absolutely was horribly evil.
This is the birthright that David J. Smith preaches about.
The birthright that white people have to dominate the world.
In this sermon, he expressly points out former colonies gaining independence as being counter to his version of biblical prophecies, and thus is proof that the sons of Esau are on the march.
In other sermons, he expands on his feelings about Rhodesia and South Africa, and he's very clear that he supports the apartheid governments in those countries.
Though Rhodesia had become Zimbabwe already, South Africa is still very much under apartheid rule when he's giving these sermons, and he's all about it.
It's profoundly fucked up to hear, especially considering the prism of history and the baby in the background.
But notice now in verse 24. And Noah awoke from his wine, so he came out of his drunken stupor and knew what his younger son, now this wasn't the actual son, but it should have been grandson, had done unto him.
And he said, Cursed be Canaan.
This was the son of Ham.
He had done something to Noah while he was in a drunken stupor that literally set the course of history.
And notice what happened.
A servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.
Now this is what we would call basically the African race of people that settle Africa.
Ham.
And God literally said that they would become servants.
So if you're keeping score, David Smith believes that there needs to be a righteous extermination of the Jews, who aren't really Jews, that white people should rule the world, and that black people are permanent slaves because someone pranked Noah while he was drunk one time.
I think I've already said this on this episode, but it bears repeating.
David Smith is a complete white supremacist and an insane idiot.
Now that we've established some of these really dangerous and fucked up ideas that David Smith preaches, and if Alex was listening to this show, he was listening to stuff like this.
And the whole world is set up strategically right now for that final conflict between international socialism-communism, which calls itself atheism, but it's not.
unidentified
It's those who control it worship Lucifer by name.
The Council on Foreign Relations actually advocates the creation of a one-world government.
Now, the ultimate implication of this is that all power would be centralized into a single global authority, national identities, and boundaries would be eliminated.
in 1897 those exact plans were laid down in writing.
In the entire CFR lexicon, that's their terminology, their language, there is no term of revulsion that repulses them carrying a meaning so deep as America first.
End of quote.
He says the Council on Foreign Relations hates the term America should be first.
We're the greatest nation on earth.
We should stay first.
The Council on Foreign Relations hates that terminology.
Because you see, all the way back to Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Illuminati, they said there must be equality, brotherhood, and fraternity of all people.
They want to take controls of a world government and reduce all people in America to that of the third and fourth world countries so all people will be equal.
I am amazed by, like, that guy can turn, well, so many of these dudes can turn this idea of like, hey, I...
Maybe let's not go crazy on the, like, America first and maybe bring other countries and everybody into the fold and bring everybody up to this equal place instead of, you know, keeping all of them down and turn that into what they're trying to do is kill everybody in America and make us all poor.
Forget about that stuff because then you get into it.
America first and those sorts of ideas really are just a backstop against people developing fully on their moral path towards actualization of we're all people.
Anyway, if you really want to look at this, the overlap between Alex Jones and David Smith runs very deep.
For another thing, they both preach constantly about how the New World Order is trying to disarm the population in order to take over.
They said that they would have to carry out an operation to solve this problem was to create conditions in the United States of America under some pretext to disarm and confiscate all weapons from the people.
Like, almost any conspiracy that Alex Jones believes about the Illuminati or New World Order or world government is echoed in the sermons of David J. Smith.
The Federal Reserve is evil.
Taxation is theft.
They want to destroy your families.
The mainstream churches have been infiltrated by the New World Order.
There's so much substantive overlap.
But if I'm being honest, that piece of their overlap was less interesting to me than some of the more subtle connections that you can find if you pay close attention.
For one...
David Smith has the exact same habit that Alex Jones does of using fake documents to support his arguments.
We already heard him say the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is real, and in this next clip, he uses another fake document to make his argument.
Some within that movement prefer to call him Satan.
Albert Pike did, who laid down the final 100-year program for world government that would be achieved by the end of the 20th century.
These rules of revolution said they would take over the mass media in the United States of America and program the minds of the people so that it would turn it against patriots, it would turn it against Christians who wanted to be faithful to Jesus Christ, and it would turn the mass public's mind against those individuals who believed in the Constitution of the United States.
I happen to know that there's over 700 banks in the United States, according to Senator Ron Paul, not Senator, but House of Representatives member, that are now in danger of collapse.
And yet the government won't breathe a word because if they breathe...
Which companies or which banks they were, you and I would go have a run on them and ensure their collapse, because you and I don't want to lose our money.
So you've got financial collapse narratives, which are so central to Alex's paranoia that he pushes, and they're being defended by appeals to Ron Paul.
Now, Ron Paul's a pretty common person for weirdo militia types to support, so maybe this one isn't too bizarre.
But I think this next one, a little more specific.
I've literally never heard anyone other than Alex Jones reference Lindsay Williams.
That's not entirely true.
I'm sorry.
I've also heard people on Alex's message board reference Lindsay Williams as a con man that they never wanted to hear on the show as a guest ever again.
Beyond that, it's just Alex and David J. Smith.
These connections are pretty compelling, right?
I feel like we've gotten some insane parallels, both in content and belief, style, substance, references, people.
Like, Lindsay Williams being referenced by both these dudes is insane to me.
Like, when I was listening through that sermon, I was like, what?
This creature is trying to make a point, and then he vaguely cites the congressional record, but doesn't really get into it.
Instead, he relates his point to a movie.
It's insane.
That's exactly the rhetorical style that Alex employs.
And to me, that feels like a little bit of a fingerprint.
It's the sort of thing that you could, like, if you listen to a ton of it, you might adopt that into your subconscious.
Especially if you're a younger person listening to a ton of this.
And so if you listen to a preacher who had these verbal patterns, it would make sense that you might...
Be like, well, I just compare things to movies to make my point instead.
And, you know, I don't know if that's...
This is certainly not concrete, but it's enough that along with all of the other stuff, you kind of got to look at a lot of these similarities as piling up to mountains of circumstantial evidence.
I mean, it seems more like, based on what we're going through here, it sounds to me like David Smith is so fucking stupid and crazy that he inadvertently shot Alex like a missile into America.
So this is just a small sample of the things that I've heard from Smith's sermons.
There are plenty, plenty more of examples of direct overlap with Alex on tons of issues.
I could play you hours of Smith talking and sounding exactly like Alex, but ultimately all that can prove is that they believe similar things and, you know, there's similarities, there's timeline patterns, but that's a completely unsatisfying conclusion for me.
I needed to figure out if there was a stronger connection between these two, so I kept looking.
Something that we've left unexamined for too long is Alex's presence on shortwave radio.
For those unaware, shortwave signals exist in a band of frequencies that can be broadcast for huge distances.
Whereas a radio signal might only be capable of being picked up in like a 20-mile radius from the transmitter, large shortwave transmitters can push a signal out that could be received easily through the entire United States and further.
Alex always used to tell his audience to set up their own transmitters to broadcast his show, which that would definitely help him playing on more frequencies, but it wouldn't do anything to help expand his geographical reach.
Alex only needs one shortwave transmitter to broadcast his show all over the United States, and in Canada, and in Mexico.
And that station that does that work is WWCR out of Nashville, Tennessee.
WWCR has an official partnership with Genesis Communications Network, and a number of their shows are broadcast from that hub.
Some of the other shows that have been on that network include The Hour of the Time, which was Bill Cooper's show before he died.
They have a show on there called The Intelligence Report.
I don't believe that's on anymore, but it was hosted by Mark from Michigan, a notorious militia agitator who would call into Alex's show and had appeared as a guest on Alex's show as well.
Jack McLam had a show on WWCR.
If you forget, McLam was a frequent Alex Jones guest who tried to create a patriot utopia in rural Idaho, along with militia lunatic and hardcore Christian identity follower Bo Gritz.
Bo Gritz also had a show on WWCR called Freedom Call.
They aired a show called Radio Free America, which was sponsored by the Liberty Lobby and Spotlight Magazine, the anti-Semitic rag where Alex's main Bilderberg source, Jim Tucker, worked for years.
WWCR also broadcasted Scriptures for America.
A radio program hosted by Pete Peters, the Christian identity preacher who organized the fascist organizing summit, the Rocky Mountain Rendezvous, which was attended by Aryan Nations leader Louis Beam, popularizer of the leaderless resistance, and frequent Alex Jones guest and Alex Jones sponsor Larry Pratt of Gun Owners for America.
WWCR also broadcasts David J. Smith's Newswatch magazine.
WWCR is a pretty extremist Christian outlet with heavy ties to extremes on the right wing and the militia patriot community.
And you can see that from just so many of the shows they air that they have explicit or subtle ties to Alex and his worldview.
The idea that David J. Smith's show was broadcast on the same transmitter station on shortwave as Alex and all of these...
We only have one guest today because I want to have plenty of time to cover the news and have open phones in the first, third, and fourth hour today.
Pastor David J. Smith.
From Waxahachie, Texas, fighting the New World Order for more than 30 years, will be joining us on air to talk about his neck of the woods nearby the Baptist Bible School in East Texas, where they have Homeland Security come in and tell members of the staff that they'll be arrested and charged with espionage if they speak about the Bill of Rights and Constitution.
That's a little bit of a sort of mischaracterization of what's going on.
He's also really, he's speaking really loosely to make it sound like David J. Smith's church has anything to do with this church that's allegedly having homeland security.
And it's more just an issue of like this church was preaching politics and you run your risk of your tax-exempt status being taken away if you advocate for...
Or against specific policies, ways to vote, candidates, because you want to keep those things discreet.
It's very easy to see how, if you're running a church, you could election medal fairly easily, especially in local elections.
It would be very easy to set up a machine if churches were allowed to be political tools.
Red Beckman was a bigwig in early Christian identity circles, which strongly indicates that he was into the British Israelism thing as a concept.
This is further indicated by his contention that non-whites are mud people, which he says, which we clearly have heard David J. Smith say that black people, because of a prank on Noah, are servants for perpetuity.
Especially considering we've heard this guy call in other periods of time, like more recently, and Alex's brand has completely changed to the point where he can't say things like, don't call people Black Beast.
So we get David J. Smith coming in, and it's not really...
That great of an interview.
Alex is trying to get him to reinforce the ideas that he has about the clergy response teams, which is essentially the notion that Alex has that FEMA has placed infiltrators in churches in order to get them to go along with putting people in camps.
And the northern ten tribes of Israel split away from the tribe of Judah and Benjamin because Solomon's son, Rehoboam, would not give them relief from taxation.
So they rebelled, and they became a separate nation.
But that wasn't nearly the only slight that he made against the people, the tribes, that led them to be like, fuck this.
We are not...
Taxation was a part of it, but it certainly wasn't the whole story.
But it is interesting that you take that piece of it and you make it so central because you're hanging out with Red Beckman and all of these anti-tax agitators.
So that's the important piece.
That's why those ten tribes are like, fuck this noise.
It's a rewriting.
But, you know, it's interesting that Alex is not pushing back on it.
So you have the things that I was looking for all along.
When you go in and you look in to David J. Smith, you find so much heavy overlap.
You find so much, with the one exception being this British-Israelist beliefs, that Alex doesn't profess.
But there's so much overlap between the conception of the New World Order, the sources, the people, the narratives.
All of it matches up so much, but it doesn't amount to that.
Much.
Then you find that they're on the same shortwave station, and that his broadcast was, you know, he was operating out of the city 30 miles away from Alex's childhood home.
And you're like, God damn it, there's so much here that seems very similar, but it's not really definitive.
Now you listen to the two of them talk.
And Alex says that he's learned so much from him in the last 16 to 17 years since he's woken up and listened to David J. Smith's show.
Yeah, it does seem like all that he really did was listen to David Smith's show and go, maybe instead of Jew, I say globalist, and I'll make a shit ton of money.
But I also think that Alex is smart enough to know that if I am to be open about a lot of this stuff and where I'm getting these ideas from, people would be able to trace it down too easily.
And then they'd be like, oh, oh, dude.
Oh, my friend.
You are getting your ideas from a white supremacist preacher, anti-Semite of the highest order, complete fucking weirdo.
And Alex doesn't want that.
He wants to be seen as these ideas coming from an intellectual place.
But I think that this is a piece of his inspiration.
I think it's a piece of his backstory that is unexamined.
And it's something that you don't really realize until Alex phones it in for a week and you're like, hey, who's that preacher he's talking about?
And then you dig in and you find this stuff.
It's very interesting to me.
So before we get out of here, there's something else I want to address, and I think it's probably been in the background of everybody's head as we've been going through this, and that is how much Alex Jones talks about birthright.
And the fact that it's so central to David Smith's philosophy, theology, ideology.
Alex constantly, in the present day, talks about Trump reasserting America's birthright in the world.
And for a very long time, I just took that to mean, like, eh, whatever.
I took that to be along the same lines as his 1776 2.0, or whatever.
I took that to mean, like, America is a completely different country than anything that's ever existed before, and hooray.
But when I listen to hours and hours and hours of David J. Smith...
And he's constantly harping on the idea that Jacob got the birthright from Esau, and Esau has been trying to take it back by way of international communism creating a new world order, a world government.
And the specific wording of it is just too much for me to think is a coincidence.
You know, the context in which he's talking about the birthright being re-invoked really sounds a lot more like David J. Smith's version of the birthright than fanciful ideas that I might have had of like vague notions of what he's talking about.
So I come to the end of this episode and it's a little bit unsatisfying still on one level because I don't feel...
What we've learned today obviously puts a little bit of a context onto that.
A possible context.
But even separate from that...
We have also heard him talk about birthright a ton since this inauguration day when we covered that.
And the context in which he has talked about it has never made it clearer.
And the only thing that...
Suggests a slight clearing up of what he's talking about.
Is looking at how that word is used by somebody who clearly he thinks is an icon and is someone who he's been aware of for over a decade and a half.
At the point of 2008 when he had him on.
You trace that back, it's like he's 15, 16 years old when he first came in contact with David J. Smith.
So, I don't know.
It's a little bit open as a question of how much exactly Alex is in line with him.
But from my assessment, in looking at Alex Jones the way I have over the course of our podcast, I mean, I can't prove it, but boy, it feels like he uses terms like birthright in the way he does as code.
One thing that I keep thinking about in the context of today is how Superman helped stop the Ku Klux Klan.
In the 50s on the radio, they had an investigation, or some dude infiltrated the KKK.
Right, right.
And he used Superman's radio serial to reveal how stupid the KKK was.
You know, like, the leader is the Grand Dragon, and it turned them into more of a laughingstock, that their secret rituals were actually just fucking stupid cosplay.
So, I guess what I would say is, as far as I know, that baby who was crying in the background of some of David J. Smith's sermons, I don't think that baby has killed anybody.