Today, Dan and Jordan head back to the past to continue their investigation into Alex Jones' path after Sandy Hook. In this installment, the gents find Alex feeling a bit in a rut, which leads to a some uncharacteristic introspection and some very characteristic idiocy.
If you like what we do and would like to support the show, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show.
But like I said, he doesn't really follow through with this.
At least not in the 21st and 22nd that I've listened to.
I see no evidence of him shaking anything up.
It is a very similar type of broadcast.
But interestingly, as an extension of him saying that he needs to mix things up and the show's kind of in a rut, he is expressing a good amount of self-awareness, which I find very interesting because it's usually pretty absent.
He makes a couple of really valid complaints about himself in this next clip.
There's the issue of the frustration of every day I come in here, and I've scanned over before I got here and then when I get here, sometimes 200 articles, usually about 100.
I've got all these video clips, all these reports, all this incredible information, all these insights to try to transmit to you, but I get so excited and go into a rant mode, and the first hour is generally the best hour for my content, and then we usually have guests on because I know that I tend to degenerate by the second and third hour.
And it's on the days where I don't have guests, where I decide to not have guests, that that becomes evident.
And I'm probably overanalyzing this.
It's just that these are extraordinary times we're in.
Very extraordinary times.
And so I must, absolutely must, get myself to the point of where I'm in control.
Because I'll say I'm going to go to your calls, I don't go to them.
Or when I do, I'll let a caller go too long.
I say I'm going to cover something in the next hour, I start covering it right then, and then never fully cover it.
I don't believe him about reading 100 articles in preparation for the show or anything like that, but some of those criticisms of himself are quite valid.
He says a couple of really fucking weird things on this episode that I think are kind of revealing of when he's being more critical and more self-aware, these sorts of ideas come to the surface.
Now, we've already heard him say that you've got to give it up to the Somali pirates, which was groundbreaking in how shocking it was to hear him be pro-Somali pirates.
But it turns out there's another group of people you've got to hand it to.
Epic, eugenesis-based, technocrat globalists who, you've got to hand it to them, have had a long-term nightmare plan and have really carried a lot of it out.
And I have sat there and watched people battle cancer.
And I've said this before, I'll say it again.
If cancer had a consciousness...
It would think it was winning.
No, you are not winning, and you do not have a right to be doing what you're doing, because your eugenics would be bad enough if you were killing the infirm and the stupid.
But you are targeting the beautiful and the intelligent and the enlightened, because you're threatened by it.
Taken outside of any context, I don't know how terrible that is.
Because, you know, he's expressing like, okay, so a parasitic system that kills its host.
I think you just described colonialism.
Sure.
I don't know how far off he is in terms of just saying things, but you can't take that outside of the context of his worldview.
Right.
And so much of his fear and so much of his rhetoric is about there being a plan to destroy whites or a plan to get rid of the middle class, which he very clearly expresses is mostly white.
All of this is an attack on the...
The gun community.
The patriots.
Like, you can't hear him say stuff like, you are attacking the beautiful and the intelligent.
Without thinking, like, you're speaking in code a little bit here.
You're saying that your eugenics would be bad if you were just dealing with the people I don't like.
Several months ago, I obtained, and I want to encourage others to do it.
If they've already done it, great.
And others should need to do this as well.
Get a hold of a microscope.
Get some rain samples.
Look at your rain under a microscope.
Look at what is falling on you.
It's mind-boggling.
I have water samples still that I have kept for several months in my refrigerator, and it's amazing what happens over the long term.
The little glass containers I have the water in, when I first collected it, with a cap on it, if you shook it up, it looked like Santa Claus should be standing in there.
And now, over the course of several months, All of those disgusting fibers and God knows what that's in there has all clumped together.
Yeah, this is just him playing little doo-doo-doo.
Yeah, it could be.
So there's those indications of those weirdnesses that come up.
But like I said, in the same way that you have that, you've got to give it to the globalist cancer bit, there are also more indications of him expressing weird ideas.
Sort of weird ideas that you kind of always feel like he believes, but doesn't really overtly say.
And this next one is about how everyone's going to be replaced by robots.
And I think underneath it is something that maybe we haven't done a good job of analyzing, but I think is a firm belief of Alex's.
So the thing that I think is interesting that's underneath that is a feeling that the globalists, at least, seem to believe, in Alex's conception, that the only value of human life is based on work.
And I think the fact that if his enemies are such that...
We're going to replace humans with robots, and then because they're not working, they're expendable, and we can kill them all with a bioweapon.
If he believes that that's what his enemies believe, then it should be contingent upon him to create such a groundswell of popular support and excitement around the idea that we aren't just our work.
There is an entire beautiful world we could create if we weren't.
So, in this next clip, Alex talks about his love of the John Birch Society, which...
I mean, we already know that he loves the John Birch Society, but he doesn't talk about it all that often, so I find it important to point out when he does.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, your calls and a ton of news are coming up, but I'm basically trying to break down how the world works, what the driving philosophy of the controllers are.
So they've gone for 50 years saying, oh, the John Birch Society, the lying demons, because it was only the John Birch Society.
In the 50s and 60s that was even covering any of this.
And so they would go, oh, those crazy conspiracy theorists, they say our government put Mao in.
Some kind of, hey, we're cool, we just don't like communists type of people.
They were really, really, really fucked up.
And if you look at the materials that they distributed, like especially in their early times, it gives you a good example of what they were really about.
One of the first books that they put out and was sent to all their meetings was this book called The John Franklin Letters.
And it is an insane...
Violent fantasy in sort of the same conversation as the Turner Diaries or the unintended consequences.
That sort of militia fantasy of violent revolt against a government that has gotten too collectivist or whatever.
That is a big piece of their DNA.
It was one of the first books that they ever put out and distributed.
And so when Alex talks about his dad being at least adjacent to the John Birch Society and it being a part of his childhood, it makes it very difficult for me not to imagine that the John Franklin letters was something that Alex may have had access to when he was a wee boy.
So, I mean, also the John Franklin letters, just to give some sense of what it's all about.
It was written probably, it's anonymously written, but it was most likely written by a guy named Ravilo P. Oliver, who was one of the founding members of the John Birch Society.
And he had to sort of get out of the group because he was too openly anti-Semitic and too much of a bigot.
And he would go on to join William Luther Pierce.
To form the National Alliance.
And of course, William Luther Pierce was the guy who wrote the Turner Diaries, which inspired Timothy McVeigh.
And from an interview that I was able to find, Pierce discusses his inspiration for writing the Turner Diaries was Ravillo Oliver giving him a copy of the John Franklin letters, which helped him sort of figure out how he wanted to write his book.
And so, like, a lot of that stuff, like, just the idea that it's a benign anti-communist organization that just felt like, eh, we don't like commies, is absurd.
From the beginning was a deeply fucked up propaganda strategy.
So, and also, towards the China issue, because Alex seems to be allergic to speaking in specific terms, I can't really know exactly what declassified document from the CIA is.
He's talking about that proved that the CIA put Mao into power in 1949.
But left with no real alternatives to get to the bottom of it, I just decided to read a bunch of the CIA's declassified information from the years around 1949 that involved China, and spoiler alert, none of them say that they installed Mao.
On July 22, 1948, the CIA put out a report titled In the report, the situation is described as being not very good.
The support for nationalist Chiang Kai-shek, quote, is steadily weakening because of the unsuccessful prosecution of the war under his leadership and his apparent unwillingness and inability to accomplish positive reforms.
The report describes increasing instability in the nationalist side of the Chinese Civil War, which was unlikely to be something that we could resolve no matter what we did.
The report is not pro-communist or pro-Mao in any way.
It says, quote, the prospect for the foreseeable future in China is at best an indefinite and inconclusive prolongation of the Civil War, with the authority of the national government limited to a dwindling area in the central and south China and isolated major cities in north and northeast China.
The worst prospect is complete collapse of the national government and its replacement by a Chinese communist controlled regime under Soviet influence, if not under Soviet control, and uncooperative towards the United States, if not openly hostile.
So strange that they would describe the communists coming to power as the worst case scenario in a classified document if that's exactly what they were working towards.
According to the report's assessment, the U.S. was in a really precarious position.
The U.S. had passed a bill providing aid to Chiang Kai-shek, but his government was increasingly ineffective in facing opposition not just from the communists, but also from within.
Anti-US sentiment had been growing, not only from the communists, with many thinking that the US was taking a side in a civil matter in the hopes of turning China into a giant colony.
Were the U.S. to increase the aid offered to Chiang Kai-shek, that sentiment would almost certainly have grown, and along with it, anti-shek resistance.
At the same time, the question of the USSR loomed large.
Increased aid for the nationalists could very easily result in the USSR formally and materially supporting the Chinese communists in that civil war, which could get out of hand really, really easily.
Considering a lot of these variables, the report points out that, quote, many Chinese view the U.S. aid program as prolonging the agony of rather than resolving the Civil War.
That was a sentiment that we couldn't fight, really.
There was not much we could do.
Chiang Kai-shek was doing a terrible job of running the war, and he was doing a horrible job of inspiring his side with a positive vision of what comes after the war.
The CIA assessments and reports for this time are in full acknowledgement of the uphill battle that would be involved in trying to somehow help him win the Civil War, and how even if the U.S. was able to lead him to victory, it would likely not be a good thing, since his government was completely unstable, in all likelihood he wouldn't be able to effectively govern the country.
If we were to get involved, it would likely involve a full military commitment, as well as a pretty high level of us forcing reforms on his nationalist government, which would be basically turning China into a U.S. colony.
This sort of thing would obviously trigger a backlash from the Soviet Union, who have a strategic interest in their neighbor not being a U.S. puppet state.
The issue of the U.S. position and the rise of the Communist Party in China is an infinitely complex one, but I can find no evidence that the CIA put Mao into power.
The best argument you could make is that the U.S. didn't determine that it was in their best interests to enter a full-scale war in order to support Chiang Kai-shek and the nationalists.
If that's the argument Alex wants to make, then by all means, he should make it.
I suspect he doesn't present this situation honestly, because if he did, he would be advocating for a foreign war, specifically in the interest of nation-building and imprinting U.S. foreign policy on another country, which he presumably is supposed to be against.
The idea that the CIA installed Mao into power, it's the exclusive domain of insane anti-communist propagandists.
At the time, strident anti-communists wanted the U.S. to get militarily involved against the communists because it would create a problem for Stalin on his eastern border.
When the U.S. didn't pursue that strategy because of its obvious horrible consequences that it would have brought, they interpreted that as the U.S. not wanting to apply that eastern pressure on Stalin, which was then translated into being active support for the communist regimes in the USSR and China.
That's all that's going on here.
It's revisionist history oversimplification in order to create a way in which this supports...
And I'm like, hey, the plan is they're going to say he's Lincoln.
They're going to start a civil war.
And so the entire program is set up, though, to where they'll artificially represent the states and call it Confederate.
When the states of the Declaration of Independence and the people can reconstitute the government whenever they want, they want to bill it federal government against the states and the evil whites.
That's the new targets, the bullet training, the manuals.
They want a false billet.
It's us minorities and a loving socialist government against the evil white right-wingers.
So there's going to be a civil war, and the right-wing side is going to be manufactured, because they're going to create this whole war, and all of it is just to demonize his side or something.
I mean, I guess probably, if I had to guess, because I don't think he really lays this out specifically, it would be by, like, tricking some people on Alex's side to falling in with the paradigm and getting involved in the war.
So they would be duped into it.
Okay.
Or just, like, I guess, agent provocateurs starting up militias.
Uh-huh.
You know, he already thinks that all people who are in the Klan are feds and shit like that.
I mean, the thing is, if you knew what I knew, which isn't hard to know, if you understood my mind and understood the history, we could defeat them very quickly.
So, when he's saying that, though, that's not what he's saying.
He's saying that if you understood the code that I understand, much like Leo Zagami having the only true code that Jesus would have, as proven by the Vatican, if you understood that code, they could defeat the globalists very easily.
Do you understand how this thinking could go very poorly?
You have a guy who's the arbiter of a completely unexplainable plan that these evil globalists are doing.
And you don't debate these sorts of things.
You just are automatically against whatever they're for.
So if he is the guy who understands in a way that, like, if only you understood this would be so easy.
If only you could see all that I see.
The globalists believe X. So you should be against X. It might just be a really good way to get people to believe something foolishly and unquestioningly.
Because even if you take that thinking anywhere...
Like, okay, fine.
So you get rid of all the people who disagree with you, all of the globalists, and now all you're left with are the right-wing patriots that you love to hang out with so much.
I mean, you see the same thing happening in the right wing a lot.
I imagine it probably does happen in the left, too, but I don't pay nearly as much attention to pundits on the left as I do Alex and his stupid world.
But the way they all turn on each other, the way Alex tried to declare war on Ben Shapiro, the time that Alex had Jason Kessler, the guy who organized the Charlottesville Unite the Right rally on, and tried to accuse him of being a Fed on air.
It's always weird when he does one of these introspective episodes because it feels like in trying to figure out his enemies, he is trying to figure out himself.
But publicly telling you he's trying to figure out himself.
I think that this next clip is probably one of the most overt problems that I have with this episode.
And I think that it's Alex undercutting pretty much all of his own beliefs.
I know that I've said that before in the past, like, whenever there's something that's, like, really deeply in conflict with his primary brand and the way he tries to present himself.
But something he says in this clip makes me think, like, boo.
I don't believe that someone like Alex, who presents himself the way he does, with the belief set that he has, should ever be indicating that he believes that some people deserve to be slaves.
I mean, a very simple test of any kind of partisan leaning or any plans or anything like that is, will this only benefit the people who agree with me, or will this benefit everybody?
And it seems like the only thing Alex is interested in is benefiting people who agree with him.
There is a sense of, again, he's using the globalists to express that position, but there is still a willingness to engage with that idea and it defining value, which is weird.
Yeah, this all sounds a little bit to me like when I get really insecure and depressed and I'm like, man, I don't know, why am I even doing any of this stuff?
I'm not any good at this.
I'm terrible.
And it's just like I direct it towards me and he seems to direct it towards the globalists making him feel bad, you know?
You've got Karl Rove saying, open the borders, world government, socialism is good, the Tea Party is evil, and it's weak, and it's dead, and it's over.
And you've got the same thing coming out of the WWE.
That's because the Tea Party is the only hope.
The ideas of the real Tea Party.
The real libertarian constitutional rediscovery of America.
I do like how he's even, he's still using coded words for a black sheriff that he appreciates, where he's like, see, unlike the other, he's smart and well-spoken, and you're like, dude, you know what that means!
Clark told Jones listeners that he would consider any federal order to confiscate guns as an act of tyranny.
He also said, I don't want to get shot.
He's not stupid.
And said that he would refuse to enforce it in the county.
You don't like this, do you, that we're now having this discussion, do you?
See, we win.
We force the initiative.
We go on the offense and make you respond to us.
You don't control reality anymore, you viper.
Let's continue.
I believe that if somebody tried to enforce something of that magnitude, you would see the second coming of an American revolution, the likes of which would make the first revolution pale with comparison, the sheriff urged.
That comment did not sit well with hacks at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel who accused Clark of engaging in attention-grabbing media appearances on a conspiracy-peddling radio show.
Is the descending into the mud with these people who are bad faith actors, who are just trying to either create their own brand, their own popularity, rise their stars, and doing so by making sensational, irresponsible, horrible claims that then you cover.
It's literally what happened in 2008 that got us to where we are right now.
The birther shit.
Nobody would even have questioned.
Nobody would ever have thought about that unless the media took these bullshit bad faith actors who became our fucking president seriously and then repeated their claims.
I mean, simply put, the easiest way to differentiate us in this type of coverage is we don't have that...
50-50 rule of like, well, if we have somebody on our show who's going to say that obviously the birther conspiracy is racist bullshit, then we have to have somebody else on our show who's going to say that the racist...
I've been obsessed with this, dreaming about it at night for 17. I know the whole game plan.
I know it better than the people at the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, because 99% of them are compartmentalized.
There are very few people, even in the power structure, that know how this whole thing's meant to go down.
It's so complex, I can't even articulate it to you.
Okay?
I'm not bragging about this.
I know the whole plan, because I've probably read 30 books on the Soviets.
I've probably read 10 books on the pre-Soviet era.
I've probably read 15 books on the Tsars.
I've probably read 100 books on the Nazis.
I've probably read 50 books on the Vatican.
I've read 25 or more books on British history, on Roman history, on African history.
I've read probably over 1,000 history books on these subjects, and I know what the globalists are doing and how they've integrated all these systems of control.
I'm not saying that there's anything good or bad, unappealing or appealing about a smaller or larger neck, and I'm not trying to make Alex feel bad at all.
I've not heard that formulation of gluten intolerance, but I don't know if this is still something he has, like an intolerance to gluten.
I'm not sure.
This is the first time I've ever heard him bring that up.
Also relevant in terms of not just making fun of his neck or anything like that, but because it's within the context of almost a testimonial for his supplements.
I haven't taken them all, but I've been getting back on the InfoWars Life products, and all my arms and neck have been shrinking, been getting smaller.
He's indicating that he's losing weight from these...
So sometime in between 2013 and the present...
Perhaps when he stopped taking Longevity products, his neck got freakishly large.
I honestly actually think that that is just his way around arguments that's like, well, why are you unhealthy if you take all of your health supplements?
So we've reached the end here, and I think that this is a bit of a, you know, I think Alex is right when he started the first episode on the 21st that he needs to mix things up.
He is in a bit of a rut.
There is a little bit of staleness to his show in 2013.
And, you know, still not really talking much about Sandy Hook here at this point.
And I wonder if those two things are going to join together.
The desire to mix things up.
Is it possible that maybe being really fucking irresponsible in his reporting about dumbass conspiracy theories that he's already sort of danced around and dipped his toe into a little bit, is that going to be what he decides to do to mix things up?