Today, Dan and Jordan check in on the present day on the Alex Jones Show and find a very bizarre but unsurprising picture. Alex is pretty all over the place, passionately defending the idea of Trump enacting martial law, extolling absurd Doomsday Prophecies, and coming off like a real gross bigot. Pretty normal stuff to hear from Alex in 2019.
Especially someone like Owen, who's like 25 himself.
These are people who have their lives ahead of them, too.
I don't see them not...
Seeing that as a cautionary example.
And then to have guests come on Alex's show, because there have been a couple little videos of this that I've seen where guests come on and make fun of Laura.
Even on Infowars.
They make fun of Alex's interview with her on Infowars.
So, Trump's going to make whatever moves he's going to make, and Alex's take on it is very strange, because he seems to be disappointed that it's not crueler.
I've been encouraging Trump since last year to declare a national emergency as commander-in-chief, and then he can direct the Defense Department money as he sees fit under that emergency.
Instead, he declared a law enforcement emergency on funding to work with Congress.
That's not a real national emergency.
Dwight D. Eisenhower in the late 50s declared this emergency when millions were coming illegally and deported them.
So it's wild to hear Alex seem like he's disappointed about how he wishes Trump's national emergency was more overtly a power grab or a display of cruelty.
I mean, it's wild in the sense that we live in the real world.
Yeah, the bill passed both houses of Congress, but was vetoed by then-President Truman.
The veto was overturned by Congress, and the bill was made law.
While the motivations of the bill were not good, it did have the byproduct of abolishing the part of the 1790 Naturalization Act, which specified that only, quote, free white persons could become naturalized citizens, thus opening the door to non-white immigrant citizens.
This created the need for a new way to exclude people, and the way that happened was a new mentality that operations like the one in 1954 reinforced, namely that non-white immigrants were probably cheating and not here legally.
The mentality that it was justified to assume Mexican immigrants were here illegally until proven otherwise became embedded in people's minds, and Operation Wetback went a long way towards solidifying that mentality.
The media covered the raids of farms and factories with breathless enthusiasm and support for INS agents and extolled their professionalism.
Meanwhile, the reality was quite different, as many detainees were beaten, had their heads shaved for identification purposes, and in one instance, quote, 88 detainees died of exposure in the 112 degree heat just past the country.
INS and their supporters justified their actions by appeals to needing to secure the southern border and by stoking fears of an invasion by Mexicans.
Whether it was the goal or not, the legacy of this operation is attaching the appearance of criminality to just being an immigrant from Latin America.
And that's the legacy that Alex is excited to see being reborn here, not in the imagined solution to his imagined immigration crisis.
So on some level, it does make sense that he speaks of Eisenhower's actions positively.
This Slate article was written in 2016, but the days since have shown it to be pretty prescient.
If the mass deportations begin as Trump has promised, the citizenship of Latinos will always be questioned.
Latinos, along with people who look Latino to law enforcement, will be forced to produce their citizenship documents on a regular basis to avoid detention or deportation.
They'll live in a poisonous atmosphere of constant suspicion, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other law enforcement will inevitably make tragic mistakes.
Children will not be exempt.
On Monday, a child died while being held in custody by immigration authorities.
He was the fifth child to die in such circumstances since December.
So I think the predictions made in that Slate article were accurate.
And Alex, hearkening to the legacy of Eisenhower to justify what he wants Trump to do is a really fucked up thing.
Well, the good news is that when we inevitably go to, let's say, war with Iran or Venezuela, we'll absolutely have learned our lesson from World War II, and we definitely won't keep Venezuelans or Iranians in fucking camps.
But I think that Alex understands that it's fucked up, and he knows that this is counter to everything that he's warned people about for his entire career, and so he tries to explain why this martial law isn't bad martial law, and I think you can tell just from this clip that he can't reconcile what he's doing.
I've made four films on martial law because Bill Clinton and others were planning martial law to take our guns using people rioting nationwide as the pretext.
This is civil emergency martial law to counter the emergency that the globalists have already brought us into.
And only an emergency can counter that.
Remember all the documents we got last year when Antifa is planning to trigger race war.
You want to put them in camps or bring them in as basically indentured servants with no rights whatsoever in fear for their lives if they try and stand up for themselves for some sort of better working conditions.
That's what you want.
That's the system that you wish to see in place.
Don't hide behind some imagined revolution that you're the counter-revolution to.
I almost see this as, like, for 20 years or whatever, he's been saying that the government is going to cause FEMA camps and all this stuff, and the president is a tyrant, and all of that stuff, and none of them have been, and none of them did.
So, he's supporting the guy who will do it in order to prove that he was right for 20 years.
And he's talking about it in a way that, like, you go back and you watch his old fucking movies about martial law, and you imagine him saying something like this.
It was just a congressional oversight issue of funding, and then Trump's saying he can use some discretionary funds outside of Congress with law enforcement.
If a dam broke and your town's in a valley and it flooded everything with 10 feet of water and killed half the town, your town's going to be put under an emergency by the governor, a form of martial law to stop looting for a week or two.
But also, I think we could probably come up with a hundred fucking examples of natural disasters where there have been inklings of martial law and Alex has screamed that it's the globalists trying to take over the country.
And he's using the view of the world that he's lied about and created with his rhetoric in order to justify the idea that it's anarchy and there's no laws.
Now, in this election, what I've tried to do is I've gone into some of the wards here where 82% of people don't vote.
I've gone to the working class council states of the Northwest, and I'm trying to tell them 22 million people didn't vote in our last general election.
unidentified
They don't fear us until we get up, until we organize our communities and ourselves and the people from our backgrounds as a weapon.
in politics against them.
Until we do that, they don't care.
We've been betrayed at every level.
You've all seen the betrayal of our country, the betrayal of free speech, the betrayal of our daughters in every town and city in this country.
And so when he's doing this political campaign, I think he's doing it specifically to keep agitating against Muslims and doing the things that he does and has been doing for years But now be able to be like, you guys not letting me on is disrupting the political process.
In an attempt to make the argument that these processors are not allowing political campaign donations and turn it into some issue that's much larger than it is when it really still is.
It's just about his crusade against Islam and his personal aggrievement.
Fantasies about his personal aggrievement being forced onto everybody?
And so that's all we're going to listen to of Tommy for now.
Alex gets back into his own bullshit, talking about how great martial law is, and making it pretty clear that he thinks that his audiences are sources of intelligence.
And we don't want the martial law of having to put 200,000 troops on the border or having to ignore the federal judges and the systems and to just helicopter these people back.
When we're already brought here of anarchy, and we've already got hundreds of thousands a month pouring across, and diseases, and Democrats caught child trafficking, and the breakdown of civilization and society, it's not the right, it's the duty.
And I politically use the term martial law, because we're going to be honest with people.
That's a troubling attempt to equivocate, you know?
Oh, it's bad.
That is a shocking...
I mean, it's not shocking because we know Alex, but again, it's hard to differentiate when I say shocking because I'm not shocked to hear Alex say this.
It makes me think of that Webster Tarpley article that he wrote back in 2016 warning about the idea of the...
Superficiality and the emptiness of libertarianism in terms of the Ron Paul movement and all that is the vestibule wherein we will all be led to fascism and authoritarianism.
He might have talked about it in a couple episodes that I didn't listen to, but in these three days, not a fucking mention of it, except for just dismissive, like, hey, these bills are great.
I know that we've talked about Ellis Island probably too much in past episodes, but I do think it's important to bring it up, because this is what he believes used to happen, and it's not.
He's basing a lot of his understanding and his recommendations about immigration on stuff that never has existed, just complete historical revision.
It's fascinating that one of our probably, I would say, more astonishing achievements, Ellis Island, just like the admission of so many immigrants from so many different places, was kind of like a...
An achievement or like a representation of what America was supposed to mean to the entire world.
So speaking of bad looks at the future, this next clip, Alex is in between calls, and he realizes that, like, he needs to let people know that shit is getting real for him, and he is in trouble.
Which, God, if I knew this 10 years ago back, I used to make money so easy, and I just made the money I needed to run things, and then never tried to...
Get a bunch of extra, which was just stupid.
Because now, the things I know now, if I'd have done back then, we would just be in a ten-story building and have a helicopter to go cover news, and we'd be in a much stronger position.
On the other end of your list of four things that he needs to do, he needs to stop these chemtrails, get the Air Force, shoot those sons of bitches out of the sky.
So Alex pivots to complaining more about the border because he needed to get off the topic a little bit because she just said shoot planes out of the sky.
It made me realize how much these conspiracy theories could be incredibly powerful as a cover tool for an aspiring dictator were they to want to use these as an excuse for any kind of extrajudicial killing they wanted to make.
Whenever you get a fascist dictator in power, there's always going to be a...
A thinly veiled excuse to remove political enemies or start wars that are going to improve your situation or just distract people from their day-to-day problems, which you are exploiting.
Well, I mean, go back through the justifications for any number of fucking cullings or genocides or whatever you like and go deep further down and you find a ridiculous conspiracy theory that doesn't really make any goddamn sense in the first place.
Anyway, Alex takes one more call, and I think it's interesting that the way this works out is that he's in the middle of doing a plug for his products, and then he goes to the call, and let's see how that plays out.
And it totally could be reasonable because if you were a long-time listener of Alex's show and you got a hold of Alex on the air and you forgot what you were going to say, you know to buy yourself time by just plugging his shit.
So, first, I want to point out that Alex has made the classic mistake here, and I think we've seen signs of it, but it's very overt here on this episode that he's going full-on Christian doomsday preacher.
Which is a dead end for propagandists, and I don't see that going well for him.
If I had to guess, it's a reflection of his diminished reach.
His radio presence is way smaller than he pretends it is.
He's not allowed on any normal social media platforms anymore, so he's forced to really only exist in the ones mostly populated by other people who've been kicked off Facebook and Twitter for their white identity and anti-LGBTQ and anti-Islam agitating.
I have a strong suspicion that a lot of the audience he finds himself still able to reach may also have some inclinations towards absurd Christian end-times fantasies, which would understandably lead Alex to tailor his coverage more in that direction.
So you always look for a motivation that makes sense.
Follow Occam's razor.
It usually will...
It'll be your North Star with Alex.
But he's always been a bit of a religious zealot, but it feels like the last couple years are a markedly different kind of version of that.
In other periods we've covered in his career, he has a religious streak, but it's nothing close to this level of doomsday prophecy, that he is saying the beast system is here, it's upon us.
Beyond that, it's nice to see Alex explaining that idea that he had about the devil taking over for God for an hour, which we've heard him introduce on the past episode only to be cut off by a commercial break.
I can say categorically and with no hesitation that this is not what motivated him to resist the globalists earlier in his career.
Back in the early 2000s, his worry was about the globalists creating a one-world government which would rule forever, with no hope of a revolution against it succeeding.
He imagined they would create a prison planet, hence the name of his website.
He didn't think they were going to take over for a year.
Initially, the thought that he had and he was expressing scared me.
But when I reflected on it more, I'm kind of softening to it.
Because though what Alex is saying is very troubling to hear anyone say to their audience, I think in many ways it represents a de-escalation of his rhetoric.
If this system is prophesied to only be in power for a year, then it stands to reason that you could wait it out.
And maybe the best plan of action is doomsday prepping behavior as opposed to attacking your perceived enemies.
I'm not sure that Alex's audience, having been whipped up into a frenzy as they have already been, will notice that strategic opportunity.
But it's interesting to me to see the tyranny that he's now trying to scathe.
Gara's audience about has a built-in end date.
That kind of is a trap door for his audience to have some sort of a hope.
unidentified
I mean, I suppose, but it's, it doesn't make any sense if you believe in I mean...
But there is a feeling that I have that that is at least...
Something that allows for a healthier approach to be taken by his audience.
In the sense that doomsday prepping is a little paranoid and maybe misguided in a lot of cases, but the ideas of storing canned food and having water and maybe growing plants, stuff like that, is not...
That's not that unhealthy.
And if you direct the energy that Alex scares you into doing that, as opposed to, I don't know, trying to...
Now, later in Revelation 17, verses 11 and 12, it does say, quote...
The beast who was and now is not is an eighth king.
He belongs to the seven and is going to his destruction.
The ten horns you saw are the ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but who for one hour will receive authority as kings along with the beast.
There's no amount of research that I can do to prove that he's wrong.
And his imagined code isn't the right way to read the text.
So I kind of came to an impasse.
I'm just like, well, that's what you think, Alex.
But that doesn't mean we can't discuss things a little bit more and try and explore what he's doing.
Revelation is one of the highest profile examples ever of a genre known as apocalyptic literature.
The genre took roots in early Jewish writings, and the texts had primarily two functions that they served.
The first was to explain why previous prophecies hadn't been fulfilled, and the second was to make a sense of the awful conditions people were living in when presumably God is good and all-powerful.
Pre-exile prophets issued prophecies that had come to pass partially, like, for instance, the Jewish people returned from exile in Babylon.
But though parts had come true, other parts had not.
This introduced a problem that needed to be sorted out, so the prophets reinterpreted these older prophecies to show that the, quote, promised glories of the renewed kingdom were yet to come.
The older prophets had also predicted an invasion of Judah by enemies from the north, which never came to pass.
Thus, Ezekiel reinterpreted that as the final assault by Gog upon Jerusalem, which from that point onward has become a consistent feature of apocalyptic.
Right, so these earlier prophecies by, like, Jeremiah that were saying that there was going to be an invasion of Judah that never ended up happening were reinterpreted as the end times that were still yet to come in order to make sense of why part of the prophecy came true and the other part didn't.
Yeah, yeah, it's the ancient times version of the guy who did math and he was like, I figured out that the date of our prophecy, the world ending is bad, and then it comes and it's gone, and then it's like, well, I...
I got my math wrong, so let's rewrite this whole thing.
There was a higher social purpose that they were probably working towards, which I'll get into in a second.
So...
Jeremiah prophesied that the Messianic Kingdom would return within 70 years.
But when that time passed and nothing changed, Daniel reinterpreted years to mean a different span of time, which was almost at its end.
The apocalypse of Baruch and Ezra both attempt to reinterpret this prophecy again when the span of time had passed and the Messianic Kingdom didn't arrive.
So this is a consistent thread that goes throughout the tradition.
So to the second feature, I think it's pretty self-explanatory.
Conditions for the common person in the 500s BCE were not very great, especially compared to what they would have expected given the prophecies about the lavish kingdom that was to come.
Many people suffered, which felt out of line with previous prophecies, so an explanation was needed to show people that the prosperity and good life that they had longed for was still on the horizon.
This tradition of literature evolved over the years until the writing of Daniel, which is considered to be the first fully mature apocalyptic text.
Daniel's a really interesting text because of the question of authorship.
It's ascribed to as being written by Daniel, the one who lived through the lion's den.
But scholars don't believe that this is possible, and the date that they give the text is 167 to 163 BCE, somewhere in there.
One of the chief reasons for this is that there's a weird thing that happens in the text as it relates to the accuracy of prophecies.
Everything that Daniel predicts at the beginning of the book matches up with historical events, but at the point of the book where he predicts the circumstances of the death of Antiochus IV, everything falls apart.
He gets the death of Antiochus wrong, and then he predicts a war that never happened.
And in general, the predictions past that point in the book are markedly detached from what we know from the historical record in stark opposition to the beginning of the book.
Scholars believe the book was written during this period and should be understood in this context.
At the time, Antiochus represented an existential threat to the Jewish community, so the prophecy of his death and the coming kingdom served to give the people a sense of hope in a rather dark time.
And to reinforce the credibility of the sense of hope, the author of Daniel used Daniel as the hero of that text, which allowed him to use things that he knew from history as predictions Daniel would have made of the hundreds of years that had happened in between.
It has to be approached and understood within the canon of apocalyptic literature, mostly because the book entirely relies on the apocalyptic tradition and makes tons of references to it.
Revelation is held up by the final battle ideas that trace back to Ezekiel, reinterpreting prophecies of wars that never came to be.
It uses prophecy as a tool of political speech, in the same vein that Daniel did.
It's an insanely complicated thing that many people spend lifetime studying, and no one who takes scholarship seriously believes it's wise to look at any of these books as containing literal or coded messages that we should use to predict the future.
That is a silly thing to do.
That said, a whole lot of people have tried to do just that.
What?
unidentified
At this point, I was going to list off all the What?
For anybody with the sort of recorded history that we have, even of just the last 20 years, you could say, to have that history and still have the balls to try and make revelation-based predictions about the future, it just seems like you have to be...
It sounds like the Supreme Douglas Adams bit, the scam apocalypse guy who accidentally gets it right.
You know, like the guy who's scamming everybody, and then on the day that it's supposed to happen, he's like, oh, goddammit, is somebody fucking with me today?
So all of these people have been wrong, and Alex will be wrong as well, and he's foolish to go down this path because it doesn't lead to anything other than having to revise your prediction once it doesn't come true.
I do admire on some level that he's resisted the urge to say a specific date.
But as it relates to Alex Jones and all these people who would try to weaponize Revelation for their own end, I would like to quote to them Deuteronomy 18, verse 21 and 22. Oh, that was all about laws and shit.
Quote, And if thou say in thine heart, how shall we know the word which the Lord hath not spoken?
When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously, thou shalt not be afraid of him.
Yeah, if the Deuteronomy is telling us that the mark of someone who is a false prophet is he says things that don't come to pass, Alex, you, sir, are biblically a false prophet.
Maybe not on an otherworldly level, but on a this-worldly level, you should be afraid of them.
So, Alex, despite what we kind of understand about apocalyptic literature and how revelation is a really fucking stupid thing to use to make future predictions, Alex still is on that tip.
Headline, top scientists, 5G, hundreds of respected scientists, sound the alarm and the effects of 5G networks, go up nationwide.
LA Times admits, gives you cancer, but they don't care, because they've got a plan, and you ain't part of it, and the plan is to kill you and your family.
You can't yell like they're going to kill you over Steely Dan or something.
It wasn't Steely Dan, but still.
So you might notice there that was a little aggressive going out to break.
And I think that there's a trend that I'm starting to notice that characterizes almost all of his ad breaks in this episode.
And it's something that I've seen a lot of from him in the present day.
With shocking regularity, he goes out to break yelling about how the globalists want to kill you and your family, ramping up the fear that he's trying to create in his listeners.
Meanwhile, when he returns from break, he generally doesn't have that same intensity and terror.
Most frequently, he comes back from break bragging about his own victimhood.
Like this segment right here that ended like that, it began with him playing a supercut of people on the street being nice to him while he talked over the video saying stuff like, this is why they banned me, implying that he's just too popular, everyone loves him, and the globalists had to...
The question of where Alex's 5G fears land on the scale of crazy versus reasonable is a little bit hard to answer.
I can't deny that there are many scientists who have expressed concern about the increased exposure to radio frequencies and how they could have unintended health consequences.
So it doesn't seem like it's something that Alex is making up out of thin air.
The problem with thinking that Alex might be on a sort of reasonable tip here is when you get into the details.
The reason these scientists are concerned about the increased health risk has to do with the increase in the number of transmitters which would be putting out these frequencies.
Now, what's interesting about their specific complaints is that they're not just talking about 5G as what they're concerned about.
The scientists who are talking about this stuff pretty regularly make a point that it would be just as bad with 2G, 3G, 4G, or Wi-Fi.
The problem for them is all wireless communication.
So for Alex to accurately champion the cause of the scientists he's using as a source, he would have to take it to that level.
And if he got rid of wireless communications, he wouldn't be able to use that sweet earpiece that he uses for his staff to talk to him and give him updates and shit.
So the issue is that Alex is reporting this as if it's a new story at all.
He posted an article on InfoWars over the weekend with the headline, quote, hundreds of respected scientists sound the alarm about health effects as 5G networks go up nationwide.
Which definitely gives the sense that these scientists are currently sounding the alarm, which is not the case.
That happened back on September 13, 2017, when 180 scientists and doctors appealed to the European Union about 5G, asking them to put a moratorium on rolling out the technology until there were appropriate studies done about its safety.
They were appealing to the EU because the EU had spent a whole shit ton of money making preparations and researching for 5G, so it seemed like a good place to go.
In response to their petition, the EU clarified that, quote, So if you understand that response, it's saying that the EU member states have the sovereign decision of whether or not to adopt 5G.
It runs counter to his idea of the EU taking away state sovereignty.
Ultimately, the more I look into 5G, the question of it, the less concerned I am about it, and the more I feel like this is a manufactured freak-out narrative that Alex is basing.
A small kernel of truth on, and he's just jumping from there into irresponsibility.
One of the big things that Alex and Anti-5G point to as evidence of their side of the argument is that the International Agency for Research on Cancer has listed radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as, quote, possibly carcinogenic to humans.
Things like aluminum production or the Epstein-Barr virus are listed as carcinogenic as they've been shown to be directly linked to cancer.
Anabolic steroids or working as a hairdresser or barber are listed as possibly or probably carcinogenic as is eating red meat or drinking beverages hotter than 65 degrees Celsius.
The definition for inclusion in that group is, quote, there is some evidence that it can cause cancer in humans, but at present it is far from conclusive.
This context is really important, since it explains what researchers mean when they say certain things.
The technical meaning of possibly to the IARC is different than what it means conversationally, and Alex and his cohorts are taking advantage of that difference of definition and manipulating people.
For something to be in the possibly category, there has to be some kind of a study that has indicated it's possible that it's connected, but nothing is substantiated.
So it is a smaller list than you think, but it is wild that aloe vera and pickles are in there.
So the LA Times article Alex is talking about there, also about the 5G stuff, is from August 8, 2016.
And it talks about a study that was done which exposed rats to tons of radiofrequency radiation and found, quote, small increases in tumors in male rats.
And makes it clear that, quote, extrapolating the results to humans gets complicated.
A good way to sum the article comes from a quote they include.
Quote, I don't think it's clear that there are health risks, but it's also not clear that there are no health risks, says Lika Kifitis, an epidemiology professor at UCLA's Fielding School of Public Health who has studied the effects of cell phone use.
That's why they're bringing in the 1.8 billion Muslims that are incompatible, and that's why the great law of Europe and the great law of America now is don't talk about what Muslims are doing.
I mean, his argument boils down to about a seventh of the entire population of the human race is fundamentally incompatible with the other six-sevenths of it.
In this next clip, Alex explains his feelings on Islam and himself and his team, I guess.
This is troubling and disturbing.
But I also think that you can see this consistent trend that he does, where earlier in the episode he was talking about how he doesn't want martial law, but the globalists are making them do it.
And I understand there's a larger globalist plan for a clash of civilizations.
But if your daughter gets kicked down a subway stairs by a group of Islamicists because they think, you know, that she's a profane, you know, dog creature because she's a Christian or whatever, the police and the media try to cover it up and that's wrong.
And so if a horde of radical Islamists are coming down your French street, or you're having your crosses taken down on the coastline of Greece, because it's offensive to Muslims, that's war and that's racism.
We already know from covering stuff that I don't know what specific story he's talking about or if there even is one with the woman being kicked downstairs.
But I know that that cross story he's lying about, we've talked about that.
That doesn't give me much hope that the other stories are being accurately reported here.
So if that's your justification for why Islam is at war with you, you're starting off on a bad foot.
You know, I was listening to that and I was thinking maybe our solution for shitty propaganda and how awful our media is as a whole is not deplatforming people.
What it is is putting a referee...
In every live broadcast room.
So when he's like, oh, and your daughter gets kicked out, there's just a giant whistle, and he's like, emotional manipulation, next.
But it doesn't change the fact if you're on the receiving end of it.
And capitulating to it, and going along and saying, oh, Islam's great, it's a religion of peace, there isn't a clash of civilizations happening, only adds the globalist program.
We must be honest about the cancer that has become Islam in this current permutation.
And the fact that the globalism is a cancer.
And the fact that the left's system is cancer.
And the fact that mainline churches that just want to be country clubs have become cancers.
But at the same time, in the context of talking about apocalyptic fantasies at the beginning of the episode, you get the sense that there's something really fucked up that he's communicating.
And I didn't understand exactly what he was getting at, other than just filling time.
Demonizing people and saying it's not our fault that we're demonizing you.
You made us do this to you.
And I didn't understand the track that was being laid until he starts playing a video that Tommy Robinson sent him.
In whatever video you're about to play, I imagine him as Dick Van Dyke doing a shitty Cockney accent, wearing a Nazi uniform, and that's how I'm going to imagine.
So I've watched the video that he sent Alex of his event, Tommy Robinson did, and I thought about it long and hard, and there's only one thing I really want to say, and I think I've said it before, but I'd like to double and triple down on it, and that is, fuck Tommy Robinson.
Tommy's currently engaged in some kind of publicity stunt tour where he's pretending he's running for office.
Then he shows up in towns to give pretend stump speeches.
In his video, he specifies that he's going to White!
Yeah, in everything of the video I've seen, I'd be hard-pressed to find two non-white people in the footage.
He specifically even says that he's avoiding places with Muslim populations so he can speak to his people.
Given Tommy's career, his beliefs, his lifelong pattern of criminality, his lifelong association with Nazi and white supremacist groups, his documented history of resorted to violence, and the fact that his entire brand is based on his flagrant Islamophobia, it's not hard to see what he's doing.
He knows goddamn well that he doesn't have a chance of winning a fucking dog-catcher election, and this political campaign is the perfect ruse to carry out his anti-Muslim, anti-Islam agitation, particularly now that he's been kicked off social media.
He can go to predominantly white working-class areas and give campaign speeches, which he knows will be disrupted eventually, which will then give him the perfect optics to continue his bullshit for another cycle.
Before he even got involved in politics, he'd been arrested three times for violent acts, including one time in 2005 when he assaulted an off-duty cop who tried to break up an altercation between him and his girlfriend, who was issued a citation for being in possession of cocaine.
And his behavior has gotten less safe for kids to be around since then.
I do not endorse the people throwing rocks at Tommy.
I strongly disapprove of non-milkshake-related violence.
So Alex is going to make a big deal out of Tommy's very manipulative video about what happened to him and how Islam is evil.
We're not going to listen to much of it because, like I said, fuck Tommy Robinson.
I'm not interested in deconstructing what he's all about.
I think we all pretty much see his game for what it is.
There are a couple points, though, where Alex's commentary on the video drifts into territory where it becomes relevant for us to discuss.
So there are a few of those clips in here, and you'll hear a little bit of Tommy's video under Alex talking, which is mostly just I explain this for context.
Here is Alex playing the video and commenting over it, and I think he says something that's very telling.
Or at least with your descriptions of some of these dicks.
So one of the things that's important to point out is that Alex is playing this video that highlights this conflagration that happened at a Tommy Robinson rally.
If you know Tommy's history, if you know what he's all about, this is exactly what he was begging to happen.
None of that is to say that the event is staged or fake or anything like that, but it's exactly the sort of optics Tommy begs for because it's the kindling for the fire that he knows how to build.
So we get off the Tommy Robinson stuff, and I just really think that it's woefully transparent, and it evokes in Alex exactly what it's supposed to evoke, which is this idea of a race war, more or less.
Global warming is going to cause the third world to collapse and they're all going to come here.
Then the globalists put in economic systems on record meant to collapse things and then open the borders up and build refugee centers and then tell you it's because everybody's underwater.
And no one can grow crops.
And everyone's dead.
And the world's ending in 12 years unless you do exactly what de Blasio and AOC and Beto say.
It's all coordinated.
And countries like Spain that actually implemented the same Green Deal a decade ago, they now have 50% unemployment in people under 30. Something like 25% unemployment in general.
So it's also worth noting that Spain is a country with some of the best protections for employees in the world.
Until 2012, it was the law that if you fired a permanent employee, you had to pay them 45 days' worth of wages for every year they worked for you.
Naturally, this made businesses look for ways to get around having to treat employees like valuable people so they could find a loophole, which they did.
By hiring people as temps who don't qualify for the protections that permanent employees do, they got around this law.
An estimate from El Pai says that 25% of the workforce is made up of these temporary employees who are not included as employed in official statistics.
A considerable amount are not considered in the statistics because of their temporary status.
The percentage is even higher among the youth, as you might expect, which explains why the youth unemployment rate is substantially higher from just visually looking at it.
And on a personal level, I can attest that I was a temp at Groupon for like two years before I complained enough about how they were exploiting me that I got hired as an actual employee.
So it's not like this shit isn't being done by anyone who can get away with it.
Obviously, there are other factors to consider, but these are a couple of the really big ones that Alex is conveniently not bringing up when he brings up these claims.
Because if he did, they would undercut the idea that the globalists implemented green technologies as a plan to take over the economy and destroy the country, because that's not true.
That isn't what happened.
It just is a way that he can interpret statistics that are even outdated.
Is he seems to be making an argument that places like Venezuela and Africa should be, based on natural resources, they should be the countries that are the best and the highest, and the reason that they're not is because they have inferior cultures.
So, mic down for this, because you've got to experience sort of how he's making this argument.
But it very much is based in a position and a belief that there is relative value of cultures, and Central American, South American, African cultures were intrinsically inferior.
thing on a past episode, but he's more clearly talking about it and more clearly saying that we are in the end times.
We've already heard him say in the past that Muslims are incompatible with his version of what he wants in society, but he's laying it out pretty hard here.
We've heard him...
Sort of turned tail on his ideas about martial law being bad, even.
We've heard that before, but he's now being so bootlickery and so enthusiastic about Trump doing that with the Insurrection Act and all that.
Well, one of the things that I've repeated over and over again is one of the reasons that I find Alex to be a figure worth talking about at all is because he is that weak link of right-wing propaganda that says the quiet part too loud.
Now he's saying the loud part way too loud, you know?