Today, Dan and Jordan discuss all the ins and outs of what happened on the Alex Jones Show on April 25th and 26th. It's mostly Alex rehashing old narratives and lying about people who are suing him, but along the way, he finds time to his toe into some of incredibly troubling ideas.
So it'd be tough for me to think about what the earliest one is.
And it's also tough for me to think about any memories right now because I am on almost no sleep from drunk people in my new apartment complex keeping me up until 4 or 5 in the morning.
We begin on the 25th, and Alex is talking about what happened while he was in D.C., and he had a little bit of a run-in with a guest of his who he got to have an impromptu, totally, absolutely authentic and normal, not set up interview with.
Anytime we talk about that, every time you tell me he's a journalist and he has his own show, and I'm like, a guy who's tried to sell me on MaxCoin can't actually have a job.
But if you were super into Bitcoin when it was pretty profitable and you made a good amount of money off it, I don't think it would be that weird that you might want to fuck around and start your own coin.
I think we, as a joke, talk about it probably more than he does.
Still not worth much.
So over the course of just the time we've been paying attention to him, Alex has told a lot of different stories about how the globalists have tried to get him to come over to their side.
He said that Fox News executives have offered him million-dollar contracts.
He said that vaguely described people have offered him tens of million dollars to turn on the Republic and all the noble patriots that he represents.
When he was super fucked up doing that Reddit Ask Me Anything session, he also seemed to accidentally admit that none of that actually even happened when he responded to a question about being offered tons of money by the globalists by saying, it never happened.
The new version we're seeing presented today is that a Soros-connected person, who's definitely not Max Keiser, offered him millions in Bitcoin as the fabled payoff for him to sell out.
It took a year after that point in January 2009 when Bitcoin was introduced for any recorded commercial transactions to happen with Bitcoin when some dude bought two Papa John's pizzas for 10,000 Bitcoins, which would be worth approximately.
40 million dollars today crazy fun yeah fun it wouldn't be until july 2010 that bitcoin would have a value over a penny and it wasn't until april 2011 the bitcoin broke the one-to-one value ratio with the dollar at which point it began fluctuating wildly probably uh because it was a completely unregulated currency that was ripe for the picking of really shady scam artists There's a maximum of 21 million bitcoins that can ever exist in circulation.
That's an essential piece of the system and how it works.
Globalists could have offered Alex all the bitcoin that could ever exist in late 2010, and it would still only be worth $2 million, an amount Alex would be an idiot to accept.
Even if they offered him every single bitcoin at the point when bitcoin is worth a dollar each, that would only be $21 million, which Alex, by his own, like, how much money I make and what it takes to run this operation, He would run out of that money so fucking fast.
Alex recently ran into Max Keiser while drinking at the Trump Hotel in D.C., where he mentioned that he had offered Alex 10,000 Bitcoins sometime back in the past, and that Alex, had he have kept them, it would be worth $50 million today.
And so Alex's response to that is saying, I turned down $50 million, something like that.
Alex knows that this makes him look stupid for not taking them, so he needs to create a reason for him to have been skeptical about Bitcoin.
And what better way than to associate the cryptocurrency with an attempted globalist payoff?
Alex is a bimetallic, hard-currency guy from way back.
His show legitimately only exists today because of the investment of Ted Anderson in Midas Resources in the late 90s, so at no point, while Ted was still Alex's sugar daddy, could he ever have cozied up with an alternative currency.
There's no way that would have flown.
But just because Alex is in the pocket of a gold and silver salesman, that doesn't mean that a lot of the people in his orbit weren't cryptocurrency scammers.
And over the course of his career, it's been very clear that a lot of Alex's guests have tried to entice him into being the front man for a pump and dump type scheme.
It very much appears that way based on looking over the people who have tried to seduce Alex into Bitcoin.
A number of his guests have tried to get Alex to endorse Bitcoin, which would lead his audience to buying up what they can and inflating the price, whereupon these guests who talked Alex into endorsing would most likely sell at that elevated price point and leave Alex's audience holding the bag.
This is something that John McAfee has been particularly criticized about.
Promoting coins specifically to raise their value, providing pump and dump opportunities for people in the know to capitalize on.
Something that people talk about a lot.
In Bitcoin forums, you can find people discussing this openly.
Like this commenter who said this on 9pm on Christmas Eve in 2017.
Quote.
You need to stay in tune with his tweets, and that is what everyone has been doing for a while now.
And you need to be fast on buying these coins that he'll tweet, because you might get stuck in the middle of it if you're too slow of doing it.
So stay tuned and keep looking at his Twitter account, and you'll be part of his pump and dump group.
Of course, the reality is that these things happen really fast, like in a matter of minutes, oftentimes.
So what'll happen is that a lot of the times, the people watching McAfee's Twitter for clues will be too slow, and then they'll think that they're in on a scheme, but they'll be the ones who end up losing money in the scheme when the dump happens before they're ready for it.
The role that McAfee plays in these operations is almost certainly one that it appears that Alex has probably been offered to play, but not by the globalists.
For whatever reason, maybe because he's loved hard currency too much, maybe because Ted told him he couldn't, or maybe because he just didn't think Bitcoin would become worth a bunch later, Alex has pretty consistently resisted the invitations to enter the cryptocurrency world.
And I don't know if it's to his credit or not, but it's interesting to me.
But also in the video, Max is saying, like, if you'd just taken this thing I'd offered you for free right now, you'd have $50 million.
So the presentation of it is, because of whatever fucking foolish ideas you had, you don't have that money now.
So it's partially the presentation of it.
I think most likely the issue is Alex's obsession with hard currency and the bimetallic nonsense.
And I probably think that there's also a good chance that it's because until late 2015, Ted Anderson was running Lightest Resources until he got his license taken away.
And so there's probably a good chance Ted just told him no.
Like, you can't have both.
You can't be both involved in a Bitcoin nonsense and my gold and silver nonsense.
And she saw the left with the police collide, the reporters and the white nationalists and the Democrats posing as white nationalists, into each other to cause the conflagration that got the woman killed.
By the way, that was total providence, synchronicity, serendipity, whatever the proper term is, that I land in D.C. on Tuesday.
I go directly from the airport.
To the White House.
It was a private meeting.
It wasn't announced until it was ongoing that the head of Twitter would be in there in a meeting being chastised for censorship.
And then sure enough, right while I'm bullhorning, there's a whole bunch of news out there that actually picked up what I was saying.
That's how the Fox host was able to repeat what I had just said.
And there's more audio of that.
The poor leftist.
Out there had their own bullhorns, two of them screaming at me trying to drown me out, but they don't know how to use them.
They don't know how to use them.
They always aim them.
Maybe I shouldn't tell them how to use a bullhorn properly.
They always aim them at the crowd as if, you know, they're little commies and they want to convince them instead of really yelling through one at full power and then bouncing it off buildings.
But that's what we were doing, and it was extremely successful, and I'm told that the president even remarked on it later.
Because despite the bulletproof clash, I was going right into the room where the meeting was actually taking place.
So that clip, the two things that I got are like, one, I legitimately don't know if I believe that he didn't know that Dorsey was going to have a meeting with Trump, or if he did.
I have no idea.
Either is weird.
Yeah.
It's gotta be one or the other, and both are weird.
So as much as I don't believe he knows how to read or analyze context or any of that stuff, I do believe that he could teach you a goddamn thing or two about how to bullhorn.
So he's on there, and he had an interview with Jack Posobiec, and they played some sort of prepackaged piece, and it had the evidence that Alex had forgotten about Trump being spied on.
And I was really excited to hear this, because I want to know what you're talking about, and then I got less excited.
So they are caught, and this is what I've obsessed on, is these key facts right now.
Here it is.
unidentified
In the wake of the Mueller probe, details continue to emerge about how the Obama administration spied on the Trump campaign ahead of the 2016 elections.
One America's Neil W. McCabe spoke to a former CIA analyst.
Larry Johnson was an analyst for both the CIA and the State Department.
He told One American News that now that the Mueller probe is closed, it is time for the American people to learn the truth about how the British government helped the Obama administration dodge the Fourth Amendment by spying on the 2016 Trump campaign for them.
It's so funny to me that Alex constantly yells about how no one has a memory except him and how the globalists exploit that to trick you, because if Alex had any memory or thought his audience did, he would never try to have another swing at making Larry C. Johnson seem like a legitimate source on anything.
In case you forgot, Larry C. Johnson is probably most memorable for being the guy who tried to spread the hoax during the 2008 presidential campaign that there was a tape of Michelle Obama railing on Whitey while appearing on a panel with Louis Farrakhan at Jeremiah Wright's Trinity Church.
He pushed the story, although he admitted that he'd never seen the tape, just talked to mysterious unnamed people who had.
The Obama campaign said, quote, no such tape exists, pointing out that Michelle had never spoken at Trinity and had never used that word.
When the tape never materialized, Johnson blamed the McCain campaign, claiming that someone had told him that McCain's people requested they not release the tape, which is bullshit.
Interestingly, Larry C. Johnson was the main source for a ton of stories that were circulating about the quote-unquote whitey tape.
Rush Limbaugh used Larry as an excuse to cover the fake story sensationally.
But what I find more interesting is that Roger fucking Stone appeared on Geraldo's Fox News show to comment on it.
There's a buzz, which I believe now to be credible, that some indelible record exists of public remarks that Michelle Obama allegedly made, which are outrageous at best, but could be termed racist, including some reference to white people as whiteys, allegedly.
Roger was using Larry C. Johnson's information as the basis for his insinuations.
And then Larry's own blog, No Quarter, posted Roger's Fox News interview, presenting it as evidence that the story was legitimate.
Looking back through time, what you see is fascinating.
Perhaps more seriously and more relevant to this episode of Alex's show, Larry C. Johnson was the source for the claim that the British intelligence group GCHQ was spying on the Trump campaign at Obama's request.
The main outlet to pick up the story and run with it was Andrew Napolitano on his show on Fox News.
This claim was so unfounded, so not backed up by actual information, and so inflammatory that it literally almost caused an international incident when Trump repeated the claims.
It legitimately threatened our international intelligence-sharing relationship with some of our longest-held and closest allies, formed in the aftermath of World War II in hopes of averting a World War III.
In the fallout, Fox News released statements condemning the coverage and took Napolitano off the air for an indefinite vacation, though he would return to air about a week later.
Here are some important things to remember about Larry C. Johnson He retired from intelligence work in 1993, 14 years before the first iPhone came out, 8 years before the release of the fucking Nintendo GameCube.
People born 5 years after he retired can legally buy booze now.
So, that should give you some sense of when he was in the game.
Two, people who knew him when he was in intelligence do not think highly of him.
There are very frequent criticisms of him that he made a habit of downplaying the threat of terrorism in the pre-9-11 days.
Emmy Award-winning investigative journalist Peter Lance, who worked with Larry, had this to say of him.
Quote, Larry, to me, is one of the great empty suits.
He's emblematic of what goes wrong in the agency, emblematic of the attitude that let 9-11 happen.
And it's not like there isn't evidence to back this up.
Allow me to read to you from a New York Times op-ed piece that Larry C. Johnson wrote on July 10th.
I think there's some salient points that he's making in terms of not allowing yourself to be caught up in sensationalism, but he's not making those points.
Larry C. Johnson is a member of the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, along with William Binney.
You'll likely be unsurprised to learn that he's a member of the faction of the organization who released the very sloppy memo that asserted to prove that the breach of the DNC couldn't have been a hack, which was used as the cornerstone of the Seth Rich conspiracy theories.
So Larry C. Johnson had his fucking fingers on that one, too.
All this is to say that Larry C. Johnson is a fucking idiot with a really long track record of being completely wrong about everything.
The last time he was even close to doing intelligence work, the Unabomber was in the middle of his bombing campaign, Tonya Harding was a year away from clubbing Nancy Kerrigan, and Kurt Cobain, Tupac, and Biggie were all still alive.
That was actually one of the more comforting things that the Mueller report gave us.
Is the realization that, just like that, Trump just tweeting out some obviously bullshit information theoretically could have ruined a relationship we have with another country, right?
But as you see over and over and over again in the Mueller report, so many times Trump does something that, if you took it literally, would be like the end of the world as we know it.
Alex is bringing back up this Trump-was-spied-on narrative, and his evidence there is the One American News Network clip that was played that interviewed Larry C. Johnson.
For Obama, and she's openly on TV admitting that they were illegally surveilling the president, and then later saying that they didn't do that, they can't even cover their butts anymore.
They're unable to do it.
And then she sends herself an email once Trump actually gets in.
She can't believe they were unable to stop him.
Saying, oh, we better follow all the laws on surveillance when she'd been quarterbacking it along with others the whole time.
And that's what our sources told us at the time.
It's all turned out to be true.
Infowars.com, two years from now, news today.
And that's why the globalists want us to shut off the air.
That's why they lie about us.
That's why they demonize us.
That's why they sue us.
That's why they do all this, because they understand that we will first break the news and make it safe for others to cover it.
This is going to be really, really big and really, really important.
But here is powers on CNN or MSNBC one more time for you, admitting it all.
unidentified
I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior people who left.
So it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy.
Of course.
That the Trump folks, if they found out how we knew what we knew about their, the staff, the Trump staffs dealing with Russians, that they would try to compromise We know that specifically from...
And it's something that conspiracy sites have tried to push periodically since early 2017.
And each time it fails to get any traction because it's kind of bullshit.
This is a clip of Evelyn Farkas, Obama's former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Russia and Ukraine, in an interview on MSNBC.
Ms. Farkas is not discussing spying on Trump and his campaign and the need to preserve that intelligence.
She's very specifically talking about how there were a lot of people at the time who were concerned that intelligence that had been gathered about Russia and their adventures into election meddling might end up missing once Trump's people got into office.
And that is what needed to be specifically preserved.
This was specifically stated to be based on the fact that, quote, This would compromise literally all of the country's intelligence capability about Russia and related issues.
Her interview on MSNBC was specifically to discuss a story in the New York Times that had come out a few days prior with the headline, quote, Obama officials race to preserve Russian trail.
So it's not like this wasn't already a larger conversation that was being had in the media.
Nothing Farkas is saying is even close to a bombshell, the way Alex is trying to present this stuff.
The New York Times article this interview is about specifically says, So Alex saying the opposite of that seems untethered to any actual real reporting to the sources that he's pointing towards.
this interview being an accidental admission of a grand conspiracy, and that is that Evelyn Farkas resigned from her deputy assistant secretary position in September 2015, at least four months before the Republican National Convention and the naming of Trump as the official candidate.
She wasn't even in any official capacity during the 2016 general election.
She's just expressing something that she, as someone who had experience in the department vis-a-vis Russia and Ukraine, was saying, okay, be careful, guys.
They're all accidentally admitting that they did all the things that I knew that they did, and I said that they did before in Tomorrow's News Today, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, buy my shit, 100% off knockout.
Memo that he had dealing with, and I was authorized to say this, because they don't care if the president knows who it is, because the president doesn't even want this to be a secret.
The memo that President Trump had when he was, the briefing he got before he interviewed Jack Dorsey of Twitter.
And the other person was one of the falsely accused Russiagate individuals who was not involved, but had worked in Eastern Europe for the CIA.
And the Clintons knew that.
He'd worked for them.
And he was brought back in.
He's been on the show before.
And he met with the president on Tuesday in the Oval Office.
And the president said, I'm going after him.
Damn the torpedoes.
If you've seen what Hillary Clinton's saying, I'm sick of these crooks.
Trump's got all the intel now.
He actually knows how they've sold us out.
And he's just got, like, total proof that they're globalist criminals that hate the country.
And I'm giving some specifics here for the deep state that's corrupt to realize how defeated you are.
I just can't help but get the thought out of my mind how absurd and laughable it would be if one of Trump's major re-election platforms was, we're finally going to put Hillary in prison.
And as listeners, you already know all these facts.
You already know this as researchers.
But now it's coming to a head, and I'm telling you.
Trump changes his mind sometimes, but right now, he fully intends to damn the torpedoes, go straight at them, and the fact that Hillary shot her mouth off and other things just means that he's probably not going to turn back now.
So that means we need to pray for the president, and we need to also understand they're going to really try to assassinate him now, or they're going to try some type of big false flag.
I mean, they're not going to take this lying down.
You hear in there, I mean, there's the sensational end to his comments, but the big point is him being like, now the president changes his mind a lot, so this might not happen, but right now he intends to.
Yeah, so when it doesn't happen, after he uses this as a rallying cry to get the dum-dums on board for this election cycle, then once it doesn't happen, Alex will be like, ah, he changes his mind, you know, at the time we were right.
Yeah, even if they are not terrorists or affiliated with the terrorist groups, simply by virtue of existing within that block, they are part of the 10%.
He's saying that once Muslims make up 10% of a country's population, they're commanded by Muhammad to start bombing people.
If you believe that, then the solution to the problem is to keep Muslim populations below 10% of any geographical region.
But how are you going to do that?
I guess one option would be forced deportations to displace people and make sure there's never enough of them somewhere to scare you.
Of course, the U.S. did this to approximately 1.3 million Mexican-Americans in 1954 with the very racially named Operation Wetback.
The consequences of that action have been unfathomable, with American citizens of Mexican heritage being forcefully displaced into unfamiliar parts of Mexico where they knew no one.
Generational wealth for countless families was completely disrupted, as were the families themselves.
This is a deep stain in our country's history and the 65 years since have shown that mass deportation does not work and the effect it has on people and communities is equivalent to terror.
If history shows us that these forced deportations based on religion or ethnicity kind of amount to ethnic cleansing, crimes against humanity, then you'd have to make sure that the Muslim population of an area never reaches 10%, so you never have to deal with, you know, getting it down below.
But legitimately, how would you ever go about doing that without some kind of eugenics?
You'd need to enact ethnic or religiously based breeding limitations, which seems like something Alex would be super against given that he spent most of his career yelling about the horrors of China's one-child policy.
The system would necessarily imply the need to set up a hierarchical system where U.S. citizens who are Muslims had human rights only so far as the non-Muslim government officials allowed them to.
What Alex would be advocating for is a totalitarian nightmare that far exceeds any of his dumbass FEMA camp fantasies and would require a ridiculously powerful centralized government in order to be put in place.
Ultimately, if the problem you think exists in the world is that there's too many Muslims and once there's a certain number of them, they kill everyone, then you are soft-pitching genocide.
This 10% number he's rattling on about is arbitrary.
It's just the focus of his bigotry.
But if you as a listener accept the premise that 10% is this magic number where trouble starts, how easy is it going to be for Alex to turn around and say, whoops, I had it wrong, that number's actually 7%?
Once you accept the logic of any number, that number can change to suit a propagandist's whim.
And no percentage is ever going to be low enough for someone like Alex to say, This is really fucked up.
I think it's what you see over and over again with all of these sorts of situations where the people on the ground probably just want to live a good life.
They want to live a stable life where their values are accepted and validated.
They can live in a community where they feel comfortable.
They can live reasonably healthy lives and be employed in some capacity that they feel gratified by.
But there are people like Alex, and there are people, you know, propagandists of all variety that create scapegoats.
And it's a very compelling and very powerful thing to exploit in somebody.
And so people like Alex, people like, I mean, historically there have been hundreds of him.
And what they do is they create this perception that X, Y, or Z group is the reason why you can't enjoy your life the way that you feel like you should, whether or not there's any truth to it.
There's obviously...
Very real reasons why people aren't able to live as comfortably and happily as they would like, but distracting from that by scapegoating some population is way easier.
So you get people to jump on board with your scapegoat and demonizing that scapegoat as if, if we can just deal with that issue, we'll have what we want.
We will have that thing that we want.
So I think that's the motivation of a lot of people who buy into this stuff.
So, in this next clip, still on the 25th here, Alex gets into, like, he teased a little bit earlier talking about Charlottesville and how everyone was actors and stuff like that, whatever.
All the Nazis were fake.
They're all globalists.
In this next clip, I think what he's doing is, I think you could fairly call it wholesale revision.
Joe Biden launches his campaign on the lie that Trump said neo-Nazis were very fine people.
You know, I...
I wondered why, when Charlottesville happened almost two years ago now, right after Trump got into office, I got sued.
And the suit against myself, Leanne McAdoo, Lee Tranahan, former congressman and others, said that we said that the Democrats killed the woman who had a heart attack or got bumped by a car.
So, Alex also, though, I think probably more importantly for our purposes, he's completely misrepresenting what he's being sued for about Charlottesville and the white supremacist rally that occurred there.
Alex isn't being sued by George Soros or the deep state or some shadowy globalist conspiracy, and he's not being sued for saying that the Democrats killed anyone.
He's being sued by one person whose name he knows better than to ever say on air again, because that person has been very consistent and public about how he's never going to settle this lawsuit.
That person is Brennan Gilmore, who's suing Alex for defaming him and causing harassment, including allegedly his own doxing, as well as a quote unknown chemical being mailed to his parents' house.
In late March 2019...
About a month ago, U.S. District Judge Norman Moon ruled that Alex's publications, as well as those of a number of other defendants, were the cause of Brendan Gilmore's alleged injuries, and as such, a First Amendment defense is inappropriate, which takes away one of Alex's only legs that he ever feels safe standing on.
Put simply, this lawsuit could be...
Big trouble for Alex.
If the judge has already made clear that First Amendment complaints aren't relevant and cannot be introduced.
And he would have to find an appeals court that would take up the case because a reasonable appeals court would almost certainly be like, no, you're done fucked up.
It sounds so banal coming out of my mouth because it's something that we've just normalized, but there are appeals courts that are completely different than other appeals courts.
On the day of the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Infowars had a very serious problem on their hands.
The whole thing was terrible optics.
Alex could and would be totally fine defending people who were protesting to protect the statue of Robert E. Lee.
That's old hat for him.
But what's a little bit more of a difficult move to pull off is defending a large group of white dudes with tiki torches marching around yelling, Jews will not replace us, and blood and soil.
One of the things that's important to remember about this rally is spelled out in its name.
The rally was ostensibly about protecting this statue and preserving history, but it's probably worth mentioning that in May 2017, Richard Spencer led a rally for the same purpose there.
In July 2017, the KKK held a rally against the statue's removal there.
And in August 2017, the Unite the Right rally was held at the same place for the same alleged purpose, involving both members of the...
Klan and Richard Spencer as participants.
It's not hard to see what was being united there.
This confluence of things was a major problem for Alex.
His brand doesn't work so well when he's associating himself with literal Nazis and white supremacists, as it kind of makes his the left just calls everyone they disagree with Nazis argument fall apart.
If he's actually just hanging out and being like, look at those Nazis, they're great.
But, at the same time, he can't not have a comment about this giant culture war battle that's unfolding in front of him, particularly one where he feels the Confederacy is possibly under attack.
As we know, his family literally fought for the Confederacy.
If he comes down squarely on the side of the dudes with tiki torches and Nazi regalia, he knows that's kind of a dead end for him from a narrative perspective, particularly after the protests turn violent.
Conversely, there's no way in hell he's going to land on the side of the anti-fascist counter-demonstrators, and there's similarly no chance that his audience is going to let him sit this one out and say, I don't know what's going on here.
Literally, the only path available to him was to deny that the bad guys at Charlottesville were actually bad guys.
They were, in fact, agents of the globalists pretending to be Nazis and white supremacists.
At 1.42 p.m., James Fields Jr., a legit Nazi from way back, who was photographed at the rally proudly sporting a Vanguard America shield, rammed his car into a group of counter-demonstrators, injuring 19 people and killing Heather Heyer.
The evidence is overwhelming that this was an intentional attack.
And all the conspiracy theories trying to explain away his actions and paint him as some kind of a victim in the whole thing have been thoroughly debunked.
And he has been sentenced to life in prison.
So, as of at least 1.43pm, you had a rally that Alex can neither support nor condemn that has led to a murder.
The stakes have been raised, and in order for him to maintain his position in the marketplace of propaganda, he needs to find an angle to make this whole thing fake, and he needs to find that fast.
What he landed on is trying to discredit the person who shot the footage of Fields' car attack, who was Brennan Gilmore.
Alex's crack team of researchers, the same ones that just generally report as fact whatever bullshit they find on 4chan, dug up the fact that Gilmore had previously worked at the State Department in the U.S. Foreign Service.
This was all it took to create the narrative that this whole thing was a deep state operation to make the Patriots look bad.
Adding to the conspiracy was the fact that Gilmore worked on Tom Perriello's campaign.
Perriello was an insider, you see, and the fact that Gilmore worked for him was proof that something was up.
Of course, Perriello hadn't held an elected position since 2011 when he ended a two-year run in the House of Representatives, and he lost the 2017 Democratic primary.
Alex used these pieces of evidence to spin the conspiracy that Brennan Gilmore was evidence that the State Department was active in making the events of Charlottesville happen.
The accusations are wide-ranging, but it all seems to come back to Alex and his associates alleging that Gilmore was a Soros operative and had something to do with the chaos at the rally.
Obviously, these accusations aren't true, so Gilmore is suing Alex, and it looks like he has a pretty decent shot of the case working out.
I base that assessment on the fact that Alex and his lawyers have had to resort to really weak defenses.
Like, recently they tried to claim that Gilmore is a public figure.
So in order to prove defamation, Gilmore's lawyers would need to establish malicious intent.
Gilmore's lawyers were pretty quick to point out that Gilmore is not a public figure and wasn't until Alex and his cohorts made him one by lying about him and spreading conspiracy theories.
So that is the reality of the lawsuit that Alex is up against, that he's trying to misrepresent and create a straw man version of to talk about, because he knows better than to talk about it for real.
Because if he does, that'll just make the lawsuit that much worse.
Now, Alex saying that Heather Heyer might have died from a heart attack is a legitimate and overt example of him using a very traceable talking point.
This is something that is only expressed on Nazi message boards and outlets as an attempt to take culpability for her death away from James Fields.
This is a winking in-joke that speakers know, the people who say it, they know that it isn't true, but it's used to signal to each other that they approve of fascist murder.
The talking point is based on a misspeaking that Heather Heyer's mother made to reporters in the immediate aftermath of her daughter's death when she said Heather had a heart attack at the scene of the attack.
What she had meant to express is that doctors had told her that her daughter's heart had stopped at the scene and they'd been successful in getting it to beat again, but the success was temporary.
Miss Heyer later clarified her statement, but it didn't matter.
When Ms. Hayers gave her initial statement, she expressed uncertainty and said that she was waiting on the medical examiner's report.
When that report came out, it was clear that Heather died from blunt force trauma.
The only people who would come anywhere close to suggesting that Heather died from a heart attack, particularly in 2019, are doing so to very specifically signal to white supremacists and Nazis that they are on their side.
That is code.
And Alex is using it.
Now...
I also accept a possibility that Alex is fucking stupid.
I think that there's a chance that some of his researchers, in heavy quotes, are using this code, and Alex doesn't know that.
And the fact that it's become almost like a meme, kind of, is important for what's being transmitted when it's said.
So now to the question of police ordering a stand-down and kenneling protesters, which Alex seems to think is all he said, and that's all my coverage was.
He's saying that they kenneled these protesters and counter-protesters together.
This is a little bit more of an open question than I actually wish it was.
This one bums me out a little.
There are valid criticisms of the police department, and some of them are pretty close to what Alex is claiming.
But the context and surrounding information and the way Alex presents his narratives make it so Alex is still pretty much full of shit.
The police chief in Charlottesville, as well as the city spokesperson and mayor, have all gone on record and explicitly said that there was no stand-down order put out that day.
The ACLU has theorized that the police were hanging back and waiting for violence to break out so that they could have a reason to clear the area, knowing that violence was inevitable.
That theory seems fairly plausible, but also hasn't been proven to have been an actual stand-down strategy, anything like that the police were employing.
So, factcheck.org researched the claims of a police stand-down, and not too surprisingly, the only evidence they found for it comes from Your Newswire and truthuncensored.net, two completely full of shit conspiracy websites.
The two sites feature a quote from an alleged Charlottesville police officer, who is anonymous, of course.
And you're saying it's a really good quote, but there's one piece of it that you probably don't understand that actually makes this a very bad quote as a fake quote.
One of the reasons that this, you can tell that this is obviously a fake cop making a fake statement, is because he says that they weren't allowed to arrest anyone without asking the mayor.
This is an intrinsic misunderstanding of how the city of Charlottesville civic structure works.
And any cop with any information about the departmental operations would absolutely not make that mistake.
Charlottesville operates under a city manager form of government where the mayor is not voted into office, but is selected by elected city council members.
The position of mayor is largely ceremonial.
ceremonial in terms of duties and would have literally no authority over whether or not to arrest anyone at a protest.
This is a glaring example of this being clearly erroneous insider information.
It's clearly disseminated to produce a false narrative, not to report fact.
The mayor just presides over city council meetings and stuff like that.
And the thing is, that fake anonymous cop's bullshit story doesn't match any other documented reality, but it does closely match up with Alex's spin on the rally.
I have almost zero doubt that when Alex says the police have come out and admitted that there was a stand-down, literally the only thing he's basing that on is this fake anonymous quote published on a couple of bullshit conspiracy sites that his interns frequent to steal content.
But now here's where things get a little bit murky.
In March 2018, a FOIA request made public an internal police memo from August 7th, days before the Charlottesville rally.
In the memo, there was discussion of how the permit for the rally had been granted with a prediction of 400 people attending, but that intelligence gathered indicated that it would be way more people than that and that violence was a very likely outcome.
The memo explicitly said, quote, Officers should keep close watch of the crowd members who are exhibiting behaviors which could become violent.
Officers should make arrests when appropriate for unlawful behavior and should use issued flex cuffs as restraints.
Granted, this plan was not followed through on, owing largely to shitty communication and contradictory orders, many of which seemed to prioritize police officers' safety over civilian safety.
Police allocated manpower in horrible fashion, and there seemed to be almost no coordination or shared responsibilities between the Charlottesville Police Department and Virginia State Police, who served basically as park security as opposed to getting involved in active crowd control, which was desperately needed.
There was no stand-down order, but there was terrible policing going on there.
Police Chief Al Thomas was alleged to have said, quote, let them fight.
It'll make it easier to declare an unlawful assembly, as the rally was starting to turn ugly.
But even this doesn't constitute a stand-down order.
Also, Thomas insists he didn't say that, and his position was that he wanted to, quote, see how things played out.
And in their deficiencies and in their failures to manage the crowd appropriately, they did end up having counter-demonstrators and the people who were awful.
Ended up in close proximity to each other, which is something that had they planned appropriately and followed the plan as was stated in that August 7th release, it might not have gone that poorly.
And if he started the fight, the police made them collide together.
That's what Trump said.
That turns into Trump's white supremacist.
So they think this lie got exposed a year and a half ago.
We exposed it, so they got pissed.
We got in the middle of their talking points that we were going to point out that the Democrats did orchestrate this, and we got documents showing that Democrats had orchestrated other riots in Maryland, which would be very powerful in court.
Also, if I'm the globalist in this situation, and we're playing poker, and one guy has hundreds of decks, and I have a few cards, my thought is going to be, I don't want to play this game.
But I think what I want to point out here very importantly is this was on the 25th.
Alex is re-bringing up his Governor Northam wants to kill babies after they're born kind of rhetoric, which is a big thing that he's been pushing lately.
And last night, as we're recording this, on Friday night, Trump...
Or Saturday night, excuse me.
Trump had a rally in Green Bay, which he did instead of going to face criticism at the correspondence dinner.
But at the rally, Trump talked about the idea that after babies are born, they wrap them up, and then the mother and the doctor decide whether or not to execute it.
I think you could make a pretty robust argument just from like...
Whether or not there's mental deterioration and that sort of thing.
What you're doing is a danger to people.
You being in office is a severe danger to people's safety.
Whether it's reproductive rights workers who now have to worry about tons of people believing that they're executing babies and that it's justified to shoot and bomb them as has been done in the past.
Or whether it's Muslims who have...
People who are emboldened by Trump, like Alex, coming out and expressing that there can only be under 10% of a population being Muslim or else they will bomb all of us.
I think that you could make a pretty robust argument that Trump being an officer is a danger to the safety of a lot of people.
But of course, if you tried to make those arguments, Alex and his propaganda cohorts would be like...
I was not super surprised by hearing Alex's talk about Charlottesville the way he was talking about it, because that's fairly in line with the stuff he said in the past.
And that is that I think Alex is trying to present the idea that all of the Nazis and white supremacists that were at Charlottesville were not only actors, were not only Democratic deep state operatives.
He's so mad about these imaginary gay people who are dressed up like Nazis just so he doesn't have to deal with the fact that there are a bunch of white supremacists and Nazis that love the same guy he loves for the same reasons.
And I love the idea that he's doing that sort of disparagingly to the people of the South who he claims he loves so much and everyone else thinks are stupid.
But much like those Soros Antifa documents, I would love for him to try and introduce this into court.
So, in this next clip, Alex talks about this Democrats pretending to be Nazis plan.
I want you to listen to this and just think about how overly complicated this is, as opposed to the idea that there are actual white supremacists and Nazis.
Because the Democrat plan is to have leftists posing as Nazis announce events, get real Nazis to come to it, all in blue cities, then reporters will come to cover it.
So at the beginning of this episode, I pointed out that Alex ran into Max Keiser, and the two of them had a little talk about Bitcoin and stuff like that.
They talk about a lot of stuff.
But at the end of the episode, the third hour is just Alex playing his interview with Max Keiser.
The only difference between him being, like, Obama's going to cancel the election and Democrats should give up this election is that he's kind of being, like, it should be their choice.
But there shouldn't be an election, but it should be their choice.
So we get to the 26th, and Alex gets back to talking about how he has those three sources, but he won't tell you who they are, even though they said he could.
It's just amazing the context we've got, how we can just walk into any of these offices, any of these facilities, and talk to folks, and they just give us the intel.
And I was told, go ahead and release who told me this, but I'm not going to do it.
You know, the only thing that I could imagine is possible, and I don't think this is the case, but the only explanation I can come up with is Alex is trying to rope-a-dope the media into saying, like, you don't have any fucking sources, and then he pulls out, boom, here's who it is.
But then, once they do that, you pull out your name of your real source, and then you get to be like, the mainstream media always lies.
They say that I don't have sources.
Well, I do have a source.
And in that way, you can sort of reclaim all the times you've been lying in the past, be like, I could have done this any time, or something like that.
You can create some sort of a...
A propaganda coup out of it.
Again, I don't think that's what Alex is doing, but I do see a potential strategy someone could be employing like that.
Hoping someone falls into the trap and be like, they're fake news, they say I lie, they're lying.
So, like the last episode ended with a really long interview with Max Keiser, Alex also spends a large portion of the beginning of this episode playing Hannity's interview with Trump.
So, Hannity had an interview with Trump on Fox News, and Alex just plays a ton of it.
And here is Alex setting up, getting into, like, he's about to go to that interview.
But in the first 15 minutes or so, he gets into the deep state, the attempted coup, and the counter-strikes that are planned, and the fact that they are pushing for indictments and they have all the evidence.
But I know they have the evidence because I was there researching and watching it all in the last three years.
We were the first show to say they were illegally spying on Trump.
You gotta understand, if Alex is using these as reinforcing that narrative, he doesn't have anything.
In the same way that if he's trying to say that the globalists play in Charlottesville, and I have the proof, it's these contracts I found on 4chan with Soros, he doesn't have something real.
If you start with this, that's bad.
That's like if you are a stand-up.
And your opener is shit.
I don't have faith that minute three is going to get good.
You don't open with shit if you have something better.
So that's why I think that one of the people he's pretending he talked to might have been Stephen Miller, because he specifically is implying that Miller watches his show.
But Alex doesn't like QAnon because QAnon doesn't like him.
So even if they can find common cause in terms of, you know, putting forth the argument that there's a bunch of arrests coming, Hillary is going to get locked up, you know, there is overlap to some of it.
But Alex would never allow QAnon to hate him and be on the same team as him.
So that should sort of give you a sense of, like, I still think there's a dangerous confluence of the two of them, and, like, the rhetoric overlapping can be pretty bad.
I think it's a negative net effect.
But the possibility of the two sort of audiences...
And the idea of Alex ever being like, Q is legit, we gotta fucking go on board with this.
Which makes it kind of feel like when he says Muslims can't ever be over 10% in a population, it's coming from a person as opposed to it being like a political talk show, which makes it damning.
This sounds very Gamergate kind of situation, where it's like, listen to the way he talks about that, listen to the way he talks about the Highwaymen and certain movies, and he's just got that kind of like...
Joy towards collecting something that is underappreciated.
That kind of thing.
And then that is part of that funneling into that hard rights white nationalism.
So, in this next clip, Alex likes to talk about how Trump is giving up a lot in order to be president, like his businesses are suffering and those sorts of things.
There's a parallel to the 2013 stuff that we're looking at.
This very interesting thing where the past and the present have weird intersections, and that is...
At the end of this week, this 25th and 26th, Alex seems to be real into the idea of his intersections with other media figures.
So whether it's, I talked to Max Keiser at the Trump Hotel, or I did an interview with Eric Bolling, or Trump did this interview with Sean Hannity and he's saying a lot of similar stuff to me.
There's the same thing with Alex being obsessed for a week back in the past of he went on Piers Morgan's show.
So there is a little bit of a navel-gazing grind that Alex is in.
So there's not a whole lot.
But on the 26th, he says this.
And this is like, again, in the same way we were talking about earlier, that this is so overtly awful that it's inexcusable.
Even the local officials in LA and New York City have to admit it's illegal aliens spreading the measles and pertussis, whooping cough, but it doesn't matter.
People that have had the vaccines are getting it.
So they're saying, oh, get another shot.
Well, wait, I got one a year ago.
The vaccines are scams.
They don't protect you.
They're Trojan horses for other things.
But the point is, you bring in illegals from collapsed rural countries, they're going to spread the real thing.
The truth is, running water and hygiene had eradicated these things.
Now we bring in the third world, it's back.
But then even Trump comes out and says, we need to all take measles shots.
No, we need to stop the illegal aliens that are not even being...
Which at least is internally consistent with his...
Yeah, I guess.
But I want to make this perfectly clear before I get into any information here.
What Alex Jones just did in that last clip is a style of propaganda that would have been right at home in the Third Reich.
Claiming that immigrants and asylum seekers are spreading disease and causing outbreaks is a time-tested way to dehumanize a population in such a way as to treat them like things with no rights while maintaining the comfortable illusion that you're only killing them because if you don't, they'll get your community sick.
This is something that we've seen in history.
Never at good times.
Now, in terms of information, there are no experts who are saying that the current upticks we're seeing in measles and whooping cough are due to immigrants coming in who are spreading the disease.
Nazis and white nationalists online are spreading memes saying that.
But any epidemiologist or researcher at the CDC will tell you very clearly that these outbreaks are the result of people not getting their children vaccinated.
And I will tell you that they aren't getting their children vaccinated because they believe the bullshit people like Alex Jones...
And Donald Trump have been telling them for years.
The substance of what Alex is saying here doesn't even deserve discussion.
It's a soft plea to ethnic cleansing, and it's not even the first such plea Alex has made in this episode of our show.
This sort of rhetoric deserves condemnation, denunciation, and to be remembered the next time a white nationalist terrorist commits an act motivated by fears about immigration.
Rhetoric like this allows those fears to feel real and to feel pressing, and it allows the response of murder to feel justified.
Whether it's packaged as arguments that once Muslims make up 10% of the population, then they attack, or if it comes in the form of arguments that refugees from Central America are causing outbreaks by coming to the country, no matter the particular shape it takes on any given day, the message underneath is the same.
People who are not like you are a threat to you and your rightful future to sit atop an unbalanced ethnic power structure.
It really bothers me and it bums me out.
But when we hear like two different pitches to ethnic cleansing within a two day span on his show, two things that are really reminiscent of propaganda that gets people killed.
It's really, really hard for me to step back.
Maintain my position that this is somehow a coincidence, and somehow he's just so stupid.
He doesn't realize the sort of things that he's saying.
Like, oh, maybe his researchers, they know, and he's being fooled.
That might be why he's on the side of the line that he is.
I think that probably you can't.
I think that probably is on the wrong side of free speech.
But it's not on the wrong side of free speech necessarily to say these things that are inspirational to quote-unquote lone wolf.
To say these sorts of things to make people feel like it's a ticking time bomb until there are enough Muslims around that they will hurt you.
To say that every one of these immigrants that's coming in is a potential carrier of smallpox.
We're concerned about the idea of people not getting vaccinated leading to the re-emergence of things like polio and smallpox.
But if you take Alex's rhetoric, every single person who's coming here illegally...
Is a potential for that to come?
If you introduce these ideas to your audience, then, I mean, you know that there's some percentage of them who are going to rightfully interpret that as you saying that these people existing is a threat to you.
When he was talking about that being like they want to take your kids and they're vampires and they're only trying to acclimate your children so they can kidnap them later.
And then an hour later he has a caller who says, I think I should be able to go in and shoot them.
I should take one into the parking lot and kill them.
He doesn't bat an eyelash.
And then...
In subsequent episodes, he continues with the rhetoric that he was saying about Drag Queen Storytime.
So, like, when we have stuff like that, you just...
You recognize, like, it's hard to phrase it any other way than just, like, it doesn't seem like he cares.
I don't want to succumb to despair, but I think a lot of this stuff looks real bad, and part of the reason why I feel a little bit more gloomy than usual is probably because of the fucking neighbors keeping me up all weekend.
I think that there's a possibility for moving forward positively, but, man, every time I'm forced to listen to Hours of Alex in the present day, it just, man, man, this show is bad.
This show is dangerous.
Like, beneath the surface of the, like, sort of extensible political talk and, like, Trump is awesome kind of stuff, these soft pitches to ethnic cleansing being buried in there.
Are really, really fucking troubling.
And I just don't know how to not take that as seriously as it deserves to be treated.
And then I also just don't know how to respond appropriately to it.
I've never thought about that.
I've never thought about being in a position where I see what, if left to its own devices, could easily spiral into, all right, Muslims aren't allowed to breed.