Today, Dan and Jordan check in on the present day of the Alex Jones Show, and what do you know, they find Alex carrying a bunch of water for outright white nationalist Rep. Steve King. A disappointing thing to find, but not too surprising.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I like what these guys do, I'd like to support the show, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com and clicking that button that says support the show.
We would appreciate it.
I'd also like to say that if any of you out there are wondering, hey, is my policy wonk induction coming?
We're probably about two weeks behind on that, so they are coming.
But we can't spend the entire beginning of the show, you know, we can't spend like ten minutes doing this or else we get into trouble.
So, Jordan, today we have got...
Oh, first of all, sorry about the weird schedule this week as opposed to Monday, Wednesday, Friday doing Tuesday, Thursday episodes.
Things were a little bit hectic and I just couldn't keep up, quite frankly.
I'll take this one.
I'll take it.
I'll own it.
You know, it is just a matter of...
There's a lot to do, especially with our last episode with all the Soros business and stuff like that.
Sometimes it's just the workload's too much.
So Tuesday, Thursday this week, we're back to normal next week.
And that is that he lost a little legal situation wherein the Sandy Hook families who are suing him will be able to get in discovery some of his financial documents and internal memos.
There's this legal situation and everybody is bringing it up to me and I wanted to be able to address it by covering whatever Alex is talking about about it.
But because it's something negative and Alex...
So, I listened to Monday, and a lot of it is just complaining about that Gillette commercial, and that's a zero for me.
And so we're not going to go over that episode, but Tuesday the 15th, there was a bit more stuff that actually interested me, and I think Merit's talking about, and so we will.
And here is an out-of-context drop from today's show.
That's ironic, too, because that's a piece of his conversation that he's having where he's defending Trump getting all those hamburgers for the football team, the Clemson football team.
So you can kind of see there at the end that a lot of the energy that's driving this is probably about Alex's own personal beef with the New York Times.
That's why Alex didn't need to talk about him, because he's never been attacked for being a white nationalist or white supremacist before, because Dan, of course, he has never said anything.
The GOP, by taking Steve King off of these committees, that's not turning on Steve King because they disagree with his positions or anything like that.
The only reason they've stripped him of his committee seats is because Randy Feenstra, the chairman of the Iowa State Senate Ways and Means Committee, had just announced his candidacy to run against King in the 2020 primary.
If they didn't have a very viable replacement waiting in the wings, they would still be dragging their feet and pretending he was just outspoken like they have for years.
There's a second reason, too, and that is because for years, Steve King served as sort of an extremist in terms of immigration policy and that sort of thing.
Politicians who wanted to curry favor with that side of the Republican Party could associate themselves with him in a way that I've seen a couple of reporters describe as like he was a kingmaker of like right-wing immigration stuff.
Yeah, so those two things together, the primary candidate that can unseat him successfully without the baggage, and the fact that he doesn't serve what role he used to serve, make him useless.
So of course they're going to throw him away now.
It has nothing to do with his white supremacy, the comments that he's making.
They would have just ignored this, as they have for years.
So Steve King has always been on some bullshit, but this current example that he's going through right now is nothing new.
Him questioning why white supremacy is considered a bad thing, then claiming that the New York Times made up the quote, that also isn't a new trick for him to pull.
Back in November 2018, the Weekly Standard reported that while speaking with potential voters at a restaurant at a campaign stop, Steve King compared immigrants to dirt.
He was talking about how some local jalapenos were grown in Mexican dirt, to which the conversation turned from literal dirt to how there's metaphorically a lot of dirt on the way to America from Mexico.
They released the tape and it said exactly what they had claimed and showed King clearly calling immigrants and asylum seekers dirt.
So when he tries to play the same gambit again with the New York Times, I don't feel like I have much interest in giving him the benefit of the doubt.
Is it possible that Steve King is such an out-of-touch bigot and white supremacist that he doesn't realize how overt the things he says are until someone else reports on his comments?
Because the evidence that Steve King is a real fucked up racist asshole go far deeper than not liking illegal immigration and being quote unquote proud of the West, as Alex is asserting.
So, Steve King served on the Iowa State Senate from 1996 to 2002, then made the jump to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2003, where he has been ever since.
Over that span of time, Representative King has said some real intensely stupid and bigoted things, and here are some of them.
Oh, also, did you know that until at least 2016, Steve King had a Confederate flag on his office desk?
Let me remind you that he's a representative for Iowa.
Which was in the Union during the Civil War.
That is absolutely not a reflection of Southern pride or whatever the fuck people like to say.
That's a message.
King would go on to remove the flag from his desk after Scott Michael Green murdered two Iowa police officers in an ambush-style killing in 2017.
Footage was found of Green being asked by other police officers to leave the Urbandale High School football game he was attending after he started waving a Confederate flag around a group of black students.
Interestingly, after Dylann Roof murdered nine churchgoers in Charleston, South Carolina, because of his racist ideology, and everybody started talking about how it's fucked up that Confederate flags are flown at state houses, King gave a speech in support of the Confederate flag, calling it a symbol of heroism.
I regret deeply that we're watching this country be divided again over a symbol.
The argument of Southern pride and that sort of thing would make way more sense than to be doing this as the representative for a Union state.
I don't know, though.
Anyway, in September 2016, he went on a little jag condemning black people for having abortions because they listened to people in the Congressional Black Caucus, saying, quote, they chose to have a Congressional Black Caucus.
They chose to have an abortion.
I would give you even money that a vast majority of mothers who say they can't afford an abortion have an iPhone, which costs money.
Then, of course, there was the time in 2018 when he went to Austria to meet with members of Austria's Freedom Party, a political party that was founded by Anton Reinhaller, a literal member of the Nazi SS.
When asked about it, he very presently said of the group, quote, if they were in America pushing the platform they push, they would be Republicans.
Of course, this was after he endorsed Faith Goldie's campaign for the mayorship of Toronto, after she had appeared on a podcast run by the Daily Stormer and repeated the 14 words of white supremacy.
It should surprise no one that he supported Faith Goldie, as King himself tweeted a paraphrasing of the 14 words, saying, quote, We can't restore our civilization with somebody else's babies.
That tweet, by the way, was retweeted by David Duke, who in all caps said, Thank God for Steve King.
This whole New York Times interview is a first, which I assume is why the GOP is reacting so out of control right now, because he's never been a white supremacist before.
In a July 2016 appearance on MSNBC right around the Republican National Convention time, Steve King extolled the virtues of white people, saying, quote, I'd ask you to go back through history and figure out where are these contributions that have been made by these other categories of people that you're talking about.
Where did any other subgroup of people contribute more to civilization?
He was later called on it and gave a whoops kind of apology, saying that he'd meant Western civilization instead of white people, which is really just a perfect example of giving up the game.
You're kind of just telling people what your dog whistles are at that point.
In July 2013, he did an interview with Newsmax, where he said of immigrants, quote, for every young undocumented immigrant who's a valedictorian, there's another hundred out there who weigh 130 pounds, and they've got calves the size of cantaloupes because they're hauling 75 pounds of marijuana across the desert.
Cool, bro.
Steve King won his first election in 2002 by whipping up nativist energy with his proposed bill to make English the official language of Iowa, which again is...
why?
That would be my response.
Why?
I don't know why that's an important issue, unless you're just trying to wedge people a little bit and drum up insecurities and fears about the other.
In 2006, he publicly declared that every day 12 Americans are killed by, quote, murderous illegal aliens and 13 more are killed by, quote, drunk driving illegals.
He was just making up statistics, but the rhetoric stuck, and you can hear the same talking point repeated all through conservative propaganda media.
I've definitely heard this exact line come out of Alex's mouth at least a dozen times.
In November 2009, he skipped his son Mick's wedding to cast a pointless vote against the Affordable Care Act.
That one might be less a point about his racism, more just a point about him being a piece of shit.
In June 2018, he told Breitbart that he didn't want Muslims working in meat factories, saying, quote, I don't want people doing that with my pork that won't eat it.
Let alone hope they go to hell for eating pork chops.
Even if his scary Muslims aren't tating the meat, what he's saying is that Muslims are joyfully preparing meat for white folk in order to ensure that by their religious code, white people go to hell.
So that same month, in June 2018, King retweeted avowed European neo-Nazi Mark Collette's tweet when he posted a Breitbart article and editorialized that, quote, 65% of Italians under the age of 35 now oppose mass immigration.
Europe is waking up.
King retweeted that, saying, quote, Europe is waking up.
Through the years, King's been a supporter of all the far-right foreign politicians that Alex also loves.
We've seen Steve King strongly support Geert Wilders, Marine Le Pen, and Viktor Orban.
And what do you know?
When he was being interviewed by those Austrian Nazi descendants I mentioned, he advocated the position that Soros was behind the Great Replacement, the theory of white Westerners being replaced culturally and demographically by immigrants.
So, this guy's a piece of shit, and he has been for his entire career.
That's kind of the point.
But, Steve King has not existed in a bubble.
His story is an interesting story that is very demonstrative of the deterioration of the conservative body politic in this country.
And in order to understand a little more about how that's the case, it's important to follow the money.
If you look at the information that's public about Steve King and who's donating to him, you see an interesting picture.
He also got $10,000 from the John Bolton Political Action Committee, which seems suspicious, but I don't know what to make of also.
But, if you look at his past fundraising, you also see a very interesting trend, namely that his numbers are pretty normal for most years, then take a massive spike in the 2012 election.
He goes from $1.02 million raised in the 2010 cycle to $3.8 million just two years later.
A lot of that money, over 250,000 of it, came from an organization called Club for Growth, which sounds like a really fun, nice name for an organization.
In reality, the group is a far-right fundraising outfit whose activities went into overdrive in 2012 as they funneled at least $10 million to then-governor of Wisconsin, Scott Walker, both to oppose his recall vote and support his initiative to strip collective bargaining protections and cripple unions.
What's not so of interest is in 2012, they were the recipient of tons of money from Koch Network funds, like Freedom Partners.
The NRA gave Steve King $11,300 and the Family Research Council and Koch Industries chipped in $10,000 each, along with tons of other suspiciously named political action committees that clearly aren't fronts.
There's a huge push in the 2012 election to retain what gains had been made in the previous four years by the weirdo Tea Party wing of the Republican Party, and to not succumb to dwindling support and enthusiasm.
That definitely was happening at that point.
Part of this was a massive cash infusion in the coffers of various people who were carrying the banner of what the people funding the Tea Party were into, and Steve King was absolutely one of the main figures.
Based on that swelling of his money, it's really hard to think that that's not the case.
You see that exact same pattern when you look into the money going into other Tea Party candidates.
Louie Gohmert is a bit of an exception because he was a Republican running in Texas, so his race was pretty much a sure thing.
But Michelle Bachman is another great case.
She raised just under $3.5 million in the 2008 election.
Then that number skyrocketed to $13.5 million in 2010 and $15 million in 2012.
Who's Michelle Bachman's top donor throughout her career?
You guessed it, the Club for Growth.
Who's Ted Cruz's all-time top donor?
The Club for Growth.
Who's Rand Paul's career-spanning top donor?
The Club for Growth.
with over $100,000 of the total he's received from them coming in the 2012 cycle.
There is a concerted effort on the part of very rich conservative interests to shift the politics of the right to a more extreme version of conservatism in the 2012 election cycle and before, but that was crunch time.
That's not news.
It's not even news to say that Steve King was a big part of that.
But it's important for our purposes, because it demonstrates the sort of thing that they were interested in being part of that shift.
The fact that an outright white supremacist was among their top guys should tell you everything that you need to know about what they wanted the Overton window to move towards at that time.
Well, if you're pretty far-right, hard-right, and you have a guy who's an outright fascist, white supremacist creep, you look like you're pretty close to the middle in comparison.
So that's a role that he served, and I think almost everybody who understood politics to an extent knew that that's the role he served, and why Republicans would never take target at him.
And now we've come to a point where he's no longer needed.
I think it's a real bad slip-up because that implies that ideas that King espouses are talking points.
And the fact that Alex seems to be very familiar with them to the point of claiming to know what he meant to say in this interview and the fact that King's rhetoric matches up with Alex really well seems to imply that they might be getting talked.
If there's one thing I know in all of our episodes together, if there's one thing I know, it's that you've always been so unfair to white supremacists.
It's the anatomy of how the New York Times deceives.
How they twist.
And then once they put out one big lie and define someone as something, they then attach the false thing to real things they've said, thus defining saying that illegal aliens have double the crime rate of the average citizen.
That's FBI's own numbers.
That becomes the white supremacist statement.
And then out of that, they've set the new precedent.
To have the Republicans grovel in fear and throw them under the bus and go virtue signal.
It can't be more overstated how wrong he is in the direction that he's taking it.
The only people who are going out of their way to try and be...
Quote, fair and shit like that are liberal, well, you know, media outlets that just don't want to call racism racism because they're afraid it'll offend somebody.
And this notion, this thing that he's putting forth, and he said it a couple times now, this immigrants commit twice the crimes.
I mean, we just have to dispel with this.
The Oxford Criminology and Criminal Justice Research Unit did a study on immigration and crime in 2017 that reflected a bunch of different studies that have been done, compiled into one that poured over all the data.
And here are some excerpts.
Quote, Quantitative research has consistently shown that being foreign-born is negatively associated with crime overall and is not significantly associated with committing either violent or property crime.
If an undocumented immigrant is arrested for a criminal offense, it tends to be for a misdemeanor.
Additionally, immigrants who have access to social services are less likely to engage in crime than those who live in communities where such access is not available.
That last part is completely obvious, given that being charged with a crime might jeopardize their access to essential services, which is entirely against their interests.
The study further found that foreign-born victims of crimes are much less likely to report crimes against them because of fears of being mistreated by the police or being deported.
Some statistics they found, from pouring over all the data, between 2005 and 2010, the incarceration rate rose 16% among U.S. citizens, but only 7% on foreign-born non-citizens.
They studied Alex's own hometown to see if there was any pattern.
Between newly arriving immigrants in crime and found, quote, using Austin City tract level analysis and the city police department's crime records from 2004 to 2006, Mansfield found no relationship between new immigration and serious property crime rates.
They posited that new arrivals might have revitalized neighborhoods by causing a bottom-up growth among Mexican immigrant commercial enterprises in the city.
They reviewed violent crime statistics in cities with high drug and homicide issues like Miami and San Diego and found that immigrants were not the people committing these crimes, but in many cases, second-generation immigrants were.
So they refined the data analysis and found that places with higher rates of financial security, which is to say jobs and access to social services, the crime rate was lower than average cities.
This effect of poverty is mitigated by access to social services and employment, those sorts of things being around.
It has no relation – What I would find, like, this would be such an interesting experiment, is were the consequences for misdemeanors and, you know, like, nonviolent crimes equal for white people as they are for, you know, undocumented immigrants?
This has always been the case for first-generation immigrants.
It's always been like, dude, we're scraping to get by in your fucking country.
We know that it's not our home, but...
Goddammit, we're trying to make it our home.
And so we're going to go out of our way to do everything possible to kind of try and fit into this.
Like, when they talk about the bastardization or, like, it's awful all of this diversity and we don't have enough white representation, every time the immigrants wind up coming in and making a place infinitely better.
You can find a hundred studies that get into the minutia of exactly how the idea that immigrants commit more crimes than citizens is wrong.
But we can leave that here for now.
The only study that seems to indicate that immigrants commit more crime comes from the Crime Prevention Research Center and asserts that, quote, undocumented immigrants are at least 146% more likely to be convicted of crime than the control subset that was used.
It's not about paying necessarily, but I'm gonna throw the data out here because it relies on arrest numbers from 1985 to 2017 in Arizona, where we know that Joe Arpaio was busy presiding over the most racially predatory police department in recent memory in Arizona's most populous city.
I'm not sure how much that skews the data, but I'm sure it does.
I'm sure it at least is a factor in it, so I'm going to go ahead and say I don't accept that study.
Yeah, for all of the arrests that undocumented immigrants had in Arizona, if you just arrested Joe Arpaio each time he committed a crime, it would reverse by a margin of two to one.
So that's really what's going on there, I believe.
It should come as no surprise, especially based on all that, that you could start to put the pieces together, you understand, oh, he's lying about immigrants committing more crimes and stuff like that.
It should surprise nobody that Alex immediately decides to start season two of Caravan Paranoia.
I'm going to say, what surprises me more than anything else is that he didn't double down on that, like, yeah, I don't get why it's wrong to say you're a white nationalist.
They go see Machete, and then they see Don Johnson being depicted as a white racist, and they realize, they're like, I'm going to be hired as a drug smuggler for the cartels.
I think the part about him taking issue with Robert Rodriguez dating white women is kind of like, that being in his list of complaints, it strikes the ear as strange.
So Alex is manifesting a lot of these sort of white protectionist ideas, whether it's insulting Robert Rodriguez or complaining that leftists are working for these drug cartels as mules because they saw Machete, or...
Spouting these bullshit things about crime statistics among immigrants.
So you got that.
And so after he gets a little bit of that out of his system, manifesting these white identity ideas, he gets right back to defending Steve King.
So Steve King got up to the podium on the House floor and swore that he wasn't a racist and made sure everyone knows that there's no tape of him saying these things that the New York Times is claiming.
His case in general is very unconvincing, as he says, quote, So I'm going to tell you that the words are likely what I said, but I want to...
But I want to read it to you the way I believe I said it.
And that's this.
White supremacist, white nationalist, Western civilization.
How did that language become offensive?
First of all, he keeps saying, this is what I believe I said.
But his track record on these things is pretty shitty.
And he's not offering anything that is in any way any more convincing than what the New York Times has offered.
Secondly, just adding Western civilization in the middle of the quote in no way makes it better.
He's still saying exactly the same thing as the original quote.
So my point is, just to put a fine button on it, that even in his apology, he's making clear that what he's saying is exactly what everyone's accusing him of saying.
And it could not be more clear.
So in this next clip, Alex defends Steve King by kind of using white supremacy to defend him, which is weird.
So, in case, you know, I think in our episode one of the things that I'm really trying to do is highlight how Alex Jones defending Steve King is really him defending himself.
Because the two of them are the same.
They're very similar in terms of what they believe, what they stand for.
In the same way that Steve King existed in the world of politics to be the guy that you can look less extreme next to, Alex Jones in the world of media existed in the exact same capacity.
So it's interesting when Alex Jones actually does all my work for me and compares himself to...
That's a very basic white nationalist talking point.
The idea of, like, how can we be so bad if everyone wants to be here, which kind of just serves to try to rewrite and undo all the history of how did those countries get to be so great.
First of all, there's that.
But even after we deal, like, just on an economic, monetary level, but even before we talk about that, you have to unpack his language, and he's saying white Christian nations.
So it's just taken as read and assumed for Alex that America is a white Christian nation, which is kind of against the...
Look, if black people didn't want to be here so bad, why did they get on those boats in the 1700s, Dan?
Why did they do it, huh?
They must have wanted to come here in shackles and chains.
They must have wanted to be thrown off those boats whenever they were caught in illegal slave trade and die miserably drowning underneath the fucking sea.
That must be because they love white Christian nations so much!
Well, that's one piece of it, and then even if you flash forward to the modern day, the exploiting of the world's resources that we've been able to do over decades and decades and generations that have led us to Yeah, why, countries that we've pillaged and exploited over the years.
So this idea that if we're so bad, why do people want to come here?
It's because of the things that we've been able to afford based on education.
If we're so bad, why is it that all these people from all of the nations wherein we stole all of their resources Why is it that when we strip-mined all of South Africa and destroyed so many fucking lives...
France is going to the highest level of martial law under EU dictatorship.
But the good news is, all over the world, nation-states are pulling out, particularly Brazil, where they've got a guy even more well-spoken than Trump, and who comes off as even more authentic.
I suppose his direct comparison would be when Trump said, you can grab him by the pussy, and I moved on her like a bitch, he would prefer to hear, Bolsonaro say, I don't want you to get raped because you're not attractive enough for me.
I wouldn't rape you.
That's what he wished Trump would have said.
He wished Trump would have said, no, I wouldn't have raped those girls because they weren't attractive enough for me.
Over Monday, when he's complaining about Gillette and all that stuff, I think that we would have much more of a critique based on his horrible chauvinist nonsense.
Whereas this episode has so much more race and his whiteness being defended.
So that just is more prevalent in the conversation.
Well, that's the real kicker, is you can have radical Islamic preachers preaching murder the police, blow things up, and they're protected, but then Michael Savage can't fly into the UK, and there's been discussions of banning me, and then people inside the UK, they're talking about not letting them leave the country extrajudicially, or not let them travel around.
I mean, this is real Nazi Germany type stuff.
I mean, that's what Nazis did, was give you an ID for folks that don't know that said where you could go.
unidentified
Yeah, where are your papers?
Exactly.
And that became somewhat of a joke amongst Western nations post-Second World War, but it seems like the lessons haven't been learned.
So if I understand correctly, his argument is that nations should have sovereignty, and they should be able to enforce their borders, which is why it's okay for America to keep out whatever immigrants we decide are bad.
I think he just knows that the audience is probably not prone to pick up on those sorts of things and they are just going to cheerlead their team and their team is his team.
And then it leads to Alex giving us a revelation about his own life vis-a-vis poisoning.
unidentified
And it has been said that Trump does eat a lot of fast food, especially now at this point, because of the low risk of having his food contaminated, which, you know, I don't think any of us can really accept.
That's the picture that we see in the present day, and I wish I could get more worked up about it, because the things that he's talking about are fucking awful.
Like, the defense of white supremacy is awful.
The apologizing for someone...
And making really dumb, bad excuses for someone like Steve King is awful.
And I'm not super interested in it past looking at it, discussing it, whatever.
Because it's what he is.
It's what Alex is.
The act of it isn't really that impressive or interesting.
It's just like, well, should have seen that coming.
Of course, but that is one of the issues, is that you get this fatigue, and it becomes normalized, where your reaction to Alex being an out-and-out white supremacist...
And pretending he's not is dismissive.
It's just like, yeah, of course that's what he's going to do.