Today, Dan and Jordan see how Alex Jones is doing in the new year. It turns out that his resolution was not "stop being really weird about Muslims." Beyond that, Alex has decided to hitch his wagon to a really dumb team of cyber criminals.
I believe Alex does tell a secret at the end of this episode.
Might plague his year.
But we'll get to that when we get to it.
Last we checked in on the present day, we covered Christmas Eve.
Yes.
And we found Alex talking shit, saying that he told Roger Stone to get in touch with Julian Assange and then drunkenly throwing a hatchet around his studio.
We have a backlog, and I feel bad we need to get through some of it.
And I know everyone's itching for the longer drop.
I understand it's sort of tradition, but sometimes we need to make our way through these people who we appreciate very much who donate on the standard level.
If you'd like to support the show and what we do and become a policy wonk, you can go to our website, knowledgefight.com, click that support the show button.
Paul Joseph Watson with big breaking news joins us at the bottom of the hour.
Massive Islamic stabbings, shootings, bombings, firework attacks, rapes all over Europe celebrating the new year by burning down hundreds of cars per city.
It has been quite the Islamic uprising that is just done as an exercise of dominance over the slaves.
Because Alex is starting the year claiming that Muslims are terrorizing everyone, but there's a few things that he's intentionally forgetting to cover.
Well, for one, in Germany, a 50-year-old man was arrested after he drove his car through a group of immigrants shortly after midnight on New Year's in what is strongly suspected to be a far-right anti-immigrant attack.
Included in the list of those injured by his attack were a four-year-old boy and a ten-year-old girl.
Though the man was of Turkish descent, he was a German citizen, and he was quoted as making several racist comments while being arrested.
From an article in The Independent, The man had a clear intention to kill foreigners.
Interior Minister for the state, North Rhine-Westphalia, Herbert Rell, told German press agency DPA.
That was a clear act of racism and xenophobia.
But there was another car attack on New Year's Eve.
This one in Tokyo.
21-year-old Katsuhiro Kasakabe drove his car through the narrow street leading to...
I fucking forgot to write down the name of the shrine.
It's one of those really important shrines in Tokyo.
This was an act of terrorism, but it wasn't Muslim, so Alex is not too concerned about it.
Kusakabe declared that he had committed this act to protest the death penalty, and he refused to even defend his actions, essentially admitting that he knew he had done something horribly wrong in the name of protesting something he thought was way worse.
When you're going to go on this long jag about car attacks and Muslims stabbing people and stuff like that, it seems like this might be something relevant to fold into the conversation.
Whether it be this German guy who went on an attack specifically trying to kill immigrants, or if it's this guy who's protesting the death penalty in Japan.
Except the problem is that he wasn't a political terrorist protesting the death penalty in general.
He was protesting the death penalty as it was specifically applied to members of the Awam cult who were executed in July for their actions on March 20th, 1995.
They were a doomsday cult who believed that they were the only people who were going to an impending global war.
But they weren't this kind of like let's wait and let the war happen kind of cult.
They were a let's also go kill people and see if we can help this war start kind of cult.
In 1990, they fielded a number of candidates for office but lost, which led them to blame a conspiracy by the Freemasons and Jews for their failure.
In response, they began trying to harvest botulism toxin in order to prepare a chemical attack, which they intended to unleash on U.S. Army bases in Japan to trigger a war between Japan and the United States.
This was unsuccessful because they did a really shitty job of harvesting the botulism.
Their leader, Shoku Ashahara, was in a state of disorientation, or deterioration at this point.
He began to make his doomsday prophecies more specific, and he published a book called Declaring Myself the Christ.
Interestingly, he began to outline who exactly the enemy was, and though he'd previously listed Freemasons and Jews, now he was warning of a conspiracy between those groups and the Dutch and British royal families, which sounds weirdly familiar to me.
I don't know why.
I can't think of why, but it seems...
I feel like we've touched on this at least once, maybe once.
They attempted a number of chemical and biological attacks in the intervening years, two of which were with anthrax.
Luckily, the strains of anthrax they acquired were not ones that hurt people, so it was more or less the equivalent of stink bombs.
They were responsible for at least 10 confirmed chemical weapons attacks between late 1993 and May 1995, but the one that got them in the most trouble was the one on March 20, 1995.
At the peak of morning rush hour, five members of the cult released sarin gas in the Tokyo subways, killing 12 people and severely injuring 50 more, some of whom died later due to complications from the attack.
Surveys of the survivors found that many of them still suffer from PTSD and 20% feel unsafe on public transit.
47 survivors have been certified as disabled due to the attack.
The reason I lay all this out is because there's a bigger world out there that Alex wants no part in touching.
The attack in Germany was clearly an anti-immigrant attack that falls directly in line with Alex's rhetoric.
The attack in Japan was carried out by a young man who was protesting the death sentences of members of a doomsday cult that carried many of the same beliefs and enemies as Alex does.
He can't wrestle with these ideas without pointing out substantial problems with his own message and how he chooses to deliver it.
So instead, he aggressively stirs up hatred and fear of the vague Muslim attacks he sees happening everywhere.
And I realize I'm way wrong, because in the 60s...
Yukio Mishma, the incredible novelist, he led a cult to the prime minister's house broken with samurai swords and tried to install the emperor back as supreme leader in order to get rid of all of the foreigners who would ever come to Japan.
So, I mean, my point here is that Alex is going to spend a good amount of time trying to stir up fear about Muslims throwing fireworks and stuff like that, when in reality, on New Year's Eve, we have a lot more to talk about if you want to look at other events that have happened around the world that maybe are as important, more important, I don't know.
I'm just saying, you're not looking at the big picture, Alex.
You're looking at your narrative.
Your editorial position is anti-Muslim, and therefore the only stories that you see fit to cover are these ones that you can integrate into that editorial position.
And I think it's lame, and when I first heard that, I was like, well, at least I'll get to, you know, learn a little bit more about this Japanese car attack and tell people about it.
Linking up with Trump and Putin and others that they will not allow in public schools.
The pedophile agenda of sexualizing children, that they're putting in place their own Second Amendment, and doing a lot of other really exciting things like pulling out of the global carbon tax.
And as he took office, he showed that to the world, and anyone paying attention should be incredibly worried.
Because Bolsonaro is very close with the oligarchs in the agribusiness world, who are strongly against the idea of protecting land for indigenous populations, he transferred the responsibilities involving delineating what lands are protected from the Justice Ministry to the Agriculture Ministry, headed by someone who has a clear track record of opposing native communities' arguments on the subject.
Instead of protecting these places, Bolsonaro is moving forward with a program that is in the interest of enriching the agribusiness people while forcefully integrating the indigenous quilombolas and the native Brazilians into his version of Brazilian society.
If this were being done to, I don't know, the Amish, Alex would absolutely flip out.
And I don't need to just predict that he would.
I've heard him constantly go on about how FDA regulations on Amish sold cheese.
Or an attack on their sovereignty.
This is also a direct, you know, all this stuff is also a direct attack on environmentalism, but regardless of who's getting hurt, it's being done to help big business, and will likely lead to the genocide of uncontacted tribes in the Amazon.
But, like, even beyond all that, Bolsonaro also removed the LGBT community from the list of concerns and responsibilities of the Human Rights Ministry, a sign of really bad things to come.
The new Human Rights Minister is an evangelical preacher named Damaris Alves, who believes, quote, the Brazilian family is being threatened by diversity policies.
It is indicative of things you need to look out for, things to keep an eye on, because it's going to get worse, and there's going to be humanitarian organizations that need support in order to mitigate the damage.
that's going to be caused to these communities, whether it be the LGBT folk in Brazil, whether it be these indigenous communities that he's seeking to basically destroy by way of claiming that they should integrate into society.
But that's not the concern that Alex wants to push back on, because there are a number of stories in the media about another problem with Trump's visit, and we'll get to those after Alex misunderstands those criticisms.
It is mind-blowing when I look at CNN or MSNBC or read the New York Times or any of it that it's total inversion of reality.
And so often, I don't even respond to it on air anymore because it's so brazen, it's so ridiculous, it's so insane.
We all remember, and you can pull up the photos, of Obama going into war zones and some of the troops coming up and wanting him to sign his autograph.
But the left spun it like it violated military code, and they were all going to go to jail, and people tried to find who the soldiers were and indeed get them in trouble.
I call it the chicken, S-H, you-know-what-T dimension.
That's a term I've coined.
How do you get so low that you're trying to figure out the names of Marines and Army soldiers?
You remember whenever Obama leaked that picture with him and Hillary Clinton and they were in the Situation Room watching SEAL Team 6 kill Osama Bin Laden?
Lazy, shitty, ineffectual, stupid words to make him look like he's a valuable critic of the president while at the same time supporting literally every fucking thing he does.
Mitt Romney, you can go put your own fucking face on top of that shitty car instead of your dog.
Let him drive it, you fucking garbage human being.
But also, in terms of Afghanistan, it's never been a secret that Afghanistan is very mineral rich.
50-year-old Soviet documents lay out gold and copper deposits, and in 2010, a more formal survey found that, all things considered, there's likely a trillion dollars worth of mineral resources in Afghanistan.
By 2014, Afghanistan had signed a 30-year, $3 billion contract with a Chinese state-owned mining company for their giant copper deposit that they have.
But it also awarded mining rights to their biggest iron deposits to Indian companies.
I can find no evidence of Alex's $44 billion a year number.
And honestly, considering that $1 trillion, that figure, that's not an annual figure.
And the fact that China isn't the only country in play when it comes to strip mining Afghanistan, I find it very unlikely.
That that number is accurate.
I just can't believe that that's true.
That being said, what's behind this shitty commentary is actually a very important geopolitical question, which is what is the right thing to do in terms of Afghanistan?
Obviously, as it stands now, since we can't rewrite the past, do nothing is a very bad answer, because what would happen is most likely that the terrorists wouldn't just start working to impede China's mining operation.
That's an absurd idea.
They kind of suggest that Alex thinks that the terrorists are on his side, which is hard to square with his constant rhetoric about how Obama and Hillary created all these terrorist groups, and they just do their bidding.
I thought Hillary and Obama were in bed with China, so why would their terrorist armies attack Chinese interests if we withdrew from the country?
It's crazy, because if his worldview is to be consistent, then...
Up top is the globalists, and they're controlling the chi-coms and Hillary and Obama and all these neocons and what have you who are controlling, puppet-mastering these terrorist groups.
So why would they have their tendrils attack each other?
It makes no sense.
Especially when the goal seems to be extracting minerals and making money off it.
You would understand if they fought against each other for the appearance of something.
Assuming that the terrorists will attack the CHICOMs, even though the terrorists are controlled by the globalists via proxy, and the CHICOMs are controlled by the globalists entirely.
Legitimately, the most likely outcome, if we were to withdraw and everything, is not so much that these terrorist groups would then...
Get China out of town or whatever.
But there is a decent chance that what they would do is start to take over some of these very lucrative mineral businesses.
If they were to be able to get footholds into industries or parts of the government, that sort of thing, in a very corrupt system, they could end up enriching their terrorist organizations much more and thereby become a huge threat to their neighbors.
That's the realistic outcome, unfortunately, of us withdrawing.
Now, granted, there were better plans that could have been put in place to begin with.
But what China's doing and what they've been doing is employing a strategy of soft power in Afghanistan.
They forgave the country's debts in 2004, and they're constantly working to ensure a relationship of friendship and cooperation.
Many experts have noted that their strategy includes a belief that should the country be lifted out of abject poverty, many of the problems that precipitate terrorism would cease to exist.
Whether or not their intentions are pure is a separate question.
But I think it's safe to say that bombing people indiscriminately and killing civilians isn't a great approach, and it's the one that we've been using for a really long time.
Of course, you have to worry about China's shitty human rights record and their oppressive government.
But in terms of what they've done in Afghanistan vis-a-vis investing in the natural resources there, it doesn't appear to be an evil plan.
Because they aren't...
I mean, I'm sure there's some exploitation involved.
But what they're doing isn't necessarily stealing all of this stuff.
They're paying for it.
Yeah.
There are contracts and stuff that they're putting in place where they're paying to take copper from the country, which in a...
Non-corrupt system that worked well.
What you would have is these businesses come in from out of the country, have arrangements, and based on the resources that are available in Afghanistan, they could end up becoming a very viable country.
Now, none of this is to say that I even fully understand all of China's operations.
I could be talking out of my ass.
I have no idea.
But just the broad picture of this is it seems like...
What we have here is basically that.
And the other thing to be concerned about, too, is if you believe that China is some sort of a evil, stealing all your stuff, Mr. Steal Your Stuff kind of operation, and they have all these, like, $44 billion that they're making a year in Afghanistan, if we pull out and the terrorists start attacking their interests, do you think they're just going to say, whoopsie-daisy, and run back to Beijing?
They're not.
If that is what Alex believes is the case, then us withdrawing will only lead to China getting militarily involved in Afghanistan and probably killing tons and tons of people.
Well, I mean, but at the same time, China doesn't have a history of invading countries, and the only one right now that they're super interested in is Tibet.
And making sure that everybody in Tibet knows that they're fucking Chinese and you better shut the goddamn hell up.
There's more than one way to classify information.
And more than one way to declassify it.
And as I predicted, you're going to start seeing very skilled hackers who already have the information, but they're going to parallel construct, release all the 9-11 poop on the Clintons, because they're involved too, and the Bushes.
That strap yourself in, it's going to be a wild ride is sort of hand in hand with Trump when he had that meeting with the generals.
He said this is the calm before the storm, which sort of kicked off in earnest the big QAnon, the storm meme online and all that nonsense.
So Alex is hearkening to that because he wants to reclaim...
QAnon.
He wants to take over that space, much like he tried to do with Zack, but now he's doing it in a way of like, now I know this story is going to break what the real shit is.
So there is a story that's come out about these hackers, and we'll get into it more when Alex starts to talk about it, but there's these hackers who have said they have 18,000 pages of stuff that they hacked about the 9-11, insurance policies and legal...
Okay.
Not 9-11.
And they are implying that it's going to prove that 9-11 was planned.
It was all an inside job.
And Alex is running with that.
And there's some reasons he shouldn't run with that.
But then secondly, in that clip, I think it makes perfectly clear that he's implying he has advanced knowledge of what's in those hacked documents, which no one should have because they're encrypted.
No, there have been decryption keys that have been released for a couple of the documents in order to show, like, we have something.
But Alex also should have no information, and the fact that he's implying that he does is either an indication of being in touch with people who are committing crimes or him just lying.
I would talk about the radio interview where he seemed to preemptively say, like, hey, I mean, yeah, we have a far more democratic situation there, but they're not going to investigate me, and if they do investigate me, they won't.
On October 19th, 1885, 16-year-old Frederick Trump arrived at Ellis Island.
The thing is that Ellis Island as we know it, the thing that we know about, the one where it was an immigration center run by the federal government, it didn't exist until January 1st, 1892, a good seven years later.
What Trump arrived at was known as Castle Garden Immigration Depot, which was run by the state of New York.
The federal government had to take over the operation after a ton of incidents of unnecessary deaths, reports of state workers stealing indiscriminately.
And overall, just outright corruption was found.
Gotcha.
unidentified
Castle Garden was the first immigration facility in the United States.
And between 1820 and 1892, an approximated 11 million immigrants arrived and became Americans.
That's over 152,000 per year or 418 per day.
The story of Trump being quarantined for three months is categorically not true.
Immigration records from that time are very precise, so we know exactly when he arrived.
And Gwenda Blair's 2000 book, The Trumps, Three Generations That Built an Empire, explicitly lays out how mere hours after Frederick Trump arrived at Castle Garden, he met a German-speaking barber who was looking to hire an assistant, and that Frederick began working for him the next day and stayed for six years in his employment.
Well, in the Ebola episode we went over from 2014, we heard him lie about Ellis Island and the idea that all these people were turned away because of all the sicknesses and stuff, and we've lost that because we want the sicknesses to come in.
So this is really just trying to enrich his already existing false narrative of Ellis Island being...
Exactly like our immigration.
What he's doing is he's trying to apologize for detention centers.
Like, he's trying to present this idea of, like, you're mad that these kids are being held in camps, but in reality, they've been doing that this whole time, when that's not true.
If you look at the history of Ellis Island, how few people were turned away, and how quickly people got through, and were just, now you're American.
You don't have a good case to make, though, if you look at the reality and you try and use that to indicate some sort of, like, it's always been this way about immigration.
So the state-federal friction there is just one other point I wanted to highlight.
But the bigger point is this story about Frederick Trump isn't true.
And the only place he probably could be getting it from is maybe associates of Trump's or something like that who are telling him these tall tales that absolutely don't match history.
I also tried to track that down, possibly, about trying to find possible sources of where that story could have come from, like the idea of Frederick Trump being quarantined and stuff like that.
I expected maybe to find a blog or something like that, but I can't find any backup for that.
I imagine that in the course of the years that Ellis Island and Castle Garden were open and all that stuff, I'm certain that probably there were instances of people who were held for a really long time.
Because even that, that innocuous lie that Frederick Trump was quarantined for three months at Ellis Island is in service of white nationalism.
Like, even that, that seems so disconnected from Alex's sort of...
Like I said, the editorial position that he has is one of anti-Islam, and therefore all the stories he wants to cover and chooses to cover are these instances of...
A Muslim running over someone with a car as opposed to these other instances of people running over people with cars.
In the same way, this seems so outside of that editorial position.
But in reality, it really does undercut a dismissal of the concerns of immigrants who Alex classifies as all non-white, and therefore a scourge and a menace coming to America.
But at the same time, she was talking about how the parliament is the most important piece of these states, and you retain them, and that sort of thing.
So his argument falls flat.
I tried to find this story, and I don't know what he's talking about.
But I will say, number one, no one is interested in overthrowing Angela Merkel.
She's already announced she's stepping down as Chancellor.
So no one who just doesn't like her is going to waste their resources on a very dangerous coup attempt.
So I can't find any indication of what Alex is talking about here.
I can't find any articles on it, even on Infowars' website.
And any internet search fails to bring up any story that seems like he might be covering.
There was one story I found that was about 200 German police officers.
mafia operation right them breaking up a mafia ring oh okay and so it's like oh that's interesting but it has nothing to do with merkel and and the 200 officers weren't arrested they were the ones doing the arresting but that 200 number was in there yeah So that was one possibility.
I don't think that's it.
However, back in October, a group of six men were arrested for forming a far-right terror cell called Revolution Sheminists, which aspired to overthrow Angela Merkel.
But they weren't doing it from a she's a globalist and traitor position.
They wanted to install a far-right ethnostate.
The name Revolution Shemnitz is a reference to the city shemnitz, a city that had been the scene of violent protests in the aftermath of a stabbing that was done by a migrant.
The protests more or less deteriorated into mob violence and Nazi salutes were being thrown around very liberally.
Following these protests, members of Revolution Shemnitz began attacking immigrants with glass bottles and stun guns pretty regularly in what prosecutors have described as practice runs for their planned larger-scale attack to come.
They planned an attack with assault rifles and high-grade weapons for October 3rd, the day when Germans celebrate the anniversary of the country's reunification.
The message could not have been more clear, that their primary terrorist motivation was to undo that unification.
The police had intercepted communications and had been watching the group, and when it became clear that this was their plan, they made their move and arrested the conspirators before they could murder tons of non-white people in the interest of pushing their...
I'm certain that there are probably more people who conspired against Angela Merkel over the years.
But this is the only thing I can come up with that seems to match Alex's story.
The numbers aren't right, but the themes are there.
And these are people who are neo-Nazis.
These are Nazis, man.
Like, straight up.
It's not a stretch to say that.
They are people who beat up immigrants and had plans to attack politicians and citizens with assault rifles on the celebration of Reunification Day in order to help bring in a white ethnostate.
I'm still kind of amazed that anybody becomes a Nazi.
We're so normalized to it now, but isn't it kind of weird that people still become Nazis?
Especially in Germany.
To a certain extent, after the first...
World War, whenever everybody economically destroyed Germany and left everybody so fucked, you know, you're like, well, a nationalist far-right movement is going to arise when everybody's that fucked.
But now everybody's doing so much better and there are still people trying to be Nazis?
I mean, I guess you can, anybody can deny the Holocaust anywhere.
It just seems strange to deny the Holocaust and say that that's, like, Nazis weren't bad, but at the same time actively try and kill people who are Jewish.
Or immigrants.
Yeah, aren't you kind of just, aren't you the very proof that the Holocaust did happen?
See, I agree with you, but the only reason I don't like that is because it seems to put actual guilt on them as opposed to abstract guilt, which I don't care.
Another reason he can't keep track of it is because he would also have to keep track of how many of these incidents happened under Boris Johnson and all of these things in order to compare.
And every time that we've delved into those waters and talked about how he always screams about how there's all these acid attacks, and we go over the statistics and talk about the reality of who are the people who are doing these acid attacks, why are they doing them, all that stuff, it never matches his narrative.
He never wants to get into the reality and the individual instances because it's a problem for him.
He just wants to yell about these things in a vague sense in order to make you scared of the idea that the Muslims are winning and that Paul lives in London, Stan.
These non-whites making neighborhoods is a cancer.
So there's this story about these burning cars on New Year's Eve.
99 burned cars in a city in France.
Which Alex earlier said, per city.
It's like, which implies it's every city.
I don't know about that.
So just for fun, because Alex is talking about car burnings and I want to illustrate how easy it is to take any headline or story and use it however you want.
I present you with this news story out of Goldsboro, North Carolina from January 2nd, 2019 quote, police are investigating what appears to be a hate crime after a Goldsboro, North Carolina family's SUV was set on fire because their daughter who is white was dated Oh, come on.
The girl's mother said that while the family slept, two of their cars were covered with swastikas and racist language, and a third car was set on fire.
In the aftermath, the daughter had to stay with family out of state, and the family had to wrestle with the idea that their child was unsafe because she decided to date outside her race.
Go ahead.
Look into recent arsons in the United States.
There's plenty of them.
There's Victor Nelson Rosado, who was arrested on December 30th in Midland, Texas, right in Alex's backyard because he set a woman's house on fire.
Interestingly, he was also charged with felony stalking, something he'd been arrested for twice and charged for.
Or twice in the past.
The woman who owned the property told officers that Rosado had previously slashed her car tires and vandalized her vehicles and home.
Or how about Loretta Bailey from Manchester, Pennsylvania whose ex-boyfriend was arrested for burning down her house right after she had broken up with him.
He started out small, just vandalizing her truck on Thanksgiving, which led to her attempting to get a protective order against him.
Ultimately, this didn't work out because he just kept avoiding the officers who were trying to serve him with papers, and then he burned down her house.
Or there's this guy in Hialeah, Florida, who committed suicide on New Year's Day 2019, but was sure to set his house on fire before he did.
You see, his girlfriend had recently separated from him, but she didn't feel safe going to retrieve her possessions from his house alone, so she called the police to escort her over.
Which led to them contacting the ex-boyfriend to make sure he knew what the situation was and everything went smoothly.
After getting this update that the police and her were coming to get her possessions, he set his house and car on fire to make sure that she couldn't reclaim her possessions.
Then there was Nicholas Cole, the 20-year-old guy from Albany, New York, who set someone's car on fire on New Year's Eve after getting into an unspecified dispute with them.
Or there's George Husky of York, South Carolina, who is due to turn himself in to begin serving a 90-day sentence he'd received for a domestic Oh, that's, that's, that's really, I needed that so bad after that list.
Yeah.
Point is...
These are just some of the arson-related incidents that have happened in the United States in the last few days.
A whole lot of them involve domestic violence, which, as you already pointed out, is strange.
The story goes even further to make things explicit, saying this, quote, is a perfect illustration of how mass migration and integration has completely failed.
Now, I don't know a whole lot about The Intelligence Fusion, but...
I glanced over their Twitter feed, and it seems like maybe people who are doing some work, it seems like they're doing something.
I don't know enough about them to...
To give any kind of decision on them or anything like that.
But looking over their account, showed me a few stories they've covered that Alex and PJW certainly aren't getting near.
From January 3rd, 2019, quote, earlier this week, flyers were placed on vehicles in central Ferndale, Michigan, by a white supremacist group.
Flyers had messages regarding the need to, quote, take back America.
Or there was a tweet from January 2nd, 2019, quote, in 2018, Chicago saw a drop in murders for the second year in a row, with 100 fewer murders than 2017.
Police credit investments at data-driven policing and the creation of strategic decision support centers for the drop.
unidentified
Oh, Alex, do you want to talk about how things are getting better in Chicago?
The point is, they're the only source of actual primary information in Paul Joseph Watson's story.
Now, Breitbart did cover this story too, and to their credit, they at least did link through to one actual French source, Le Parisien, which includes the line, quote, in the lot, some vehicles were most likely burned for insurance scam attempts.
This is something that comes up over and over again from experts when we look into the issue of vehicle burnings in Europe in particular.
The vast majority of them are the result of insurance scams.
Alex has every reason to know this.
But still perpetuates the idea that this is the work of some sort of group of Muslim immigrants trying to terrorize the public, which there's no evidence to support, even on Alex's own website.
This is a pure expression of Infowars' editorial position of demonizing immigrants, Muslims, and of supporting white nationalism.
Roger Stone initially was very supportive of Jerome Corsi, but now apparently there's been some backstage beef.
And the two of them are feuding.
Roger, because he has no other social media, put up on Instagram a really ugly picture of Jerome Corsi and this thing about how he's a snake in the grass.
I mean, if you look at how Roger left the Trump campaign with the idea of him saying that he quit and Trump saying he got fired in order to create the appearance that they weren't working on the same page.
Based on our never seeing Twilight, that is a completely accurate metaphor.
Don't come at me.
I just don't care.
It could be a fake beef.
It could be real.
I'm not charmed by this.
I'm not interested.
Although I am slightly interested in the idea that whatever the situation is, Alex has decided to be like, I'm doubling, tripling, quadrupling down on Roger.
This one time he's a CIA operative, but at the same time, literally everything he said before this moment is still valid and perfect for my narratives.
Talking about how, like, we gotta get Kushner out of there.
He's an evil influence.
Like, who gives a shit?
All these people are liars.
It doesn't matter if they're fighting with each other or working together.
It doesn't fucking matter.
Who gives a shit?
The only possibility...
that I see as being interesting from this and I see no indication of this being forthcoming is that as they start to fight with each other One of them could reveal something accidentally.
Like the idea of what they were doing in the lead up to the 2016 election.
Like that idea.
These people who were clearly coordinating with each other in some way.
Right, because Roger Stone and Jerome Corsi are both well familiar with game theory and have decided that the best way for both of them to win is for them to cooperate.
So he thinks that he's doing his same game that he always plays, which is tell what the story is, but what I'm going to say about it is what I'm teasing.
On New Year's Eve, a hacker, a group of hackers, calling themselves the Dark Overlord, announced that they'd hacked 18,000 pages of emails and disclosure agreements from Hiscox, which is an insurer, Lloyd's of London, another insurer, and Hush Blackwell, a law firm, regarding 9-11.
They dropped the encrypted files for download, with keys to decrypt a couple of the files, and those ones that they released aren't really all that damning.
This group is saying that unless their demands are met...
And they're paid a ransom through Bitcoin.
They will slowly release more decryption keys to reveal more sensitive information.
They've even invited China, Russia, and even terrorist organizations like ISIS to bid to receive the documents, which should tell you that they're definitely really cool and clearly have America's best interests at heart.
It's a classic cyber blackmail operation, and there's no evidence as of right now that anything in those supposed 18,000 documents actually prove anything.
In fact, Lloyds of London and Hush Blackwell both confirmed that they reviewed their cybersecurity and there was no evidence that they'd been breached.
But it's unclear if this has anything to do with that necessarily.
It possibly could.
Whatever the reality of this story is remains to be seen.
But as of right now, there is no reason to report this as coming proof that 9-11 is a false flag.
The Dark Overlord has a history of cyber extortion.
It's kind of what they do.
And a representative of the UK National Cyber Security Center points out that while evidence of the stolen data is often provided by this group, quote, the volume and sensitivity of the data may be exaggerated to maximize impact.
This is what extortionists do.
They make the idea of the perceived damage that would be done by not complying with their demands seem devastating, whether or not what they have lives up to that expectation.
From an article in Forbes, quote, You know, in terms of like Hiscox and that.
Makes me want to believe that they've refused to pay the ransoms.
So this is kind of just a pressure tactic from the Dark Overlord to force the ransom issue.
That is what cybersecurity experts and people who have studied the tactics of extortionists on the internet do believe.
And so everybody who's actually chimed in on this and like...
You know, official capacities, people who know what's going on are like, yeah, this just seems like a pattern that the Dark Overlord has because, spoiler alert, their group or a person, it's unclear, who's existed for a long time, they leaked a season of Orange is the New Black that they had hacked.
But it also indicates to me that it is obviously more than one person, because I think the character of the different things that they've done over the years have been so different.
It's all extortion-related, basically.
But having the goods or not having the goods have been so variable between different campaigns, in quotes, that it makes me think there's probably some people who...
So the idea here is that with these 9-11 documents that they have, they're presenting it in a way that is like, this will bring down this corrupt system and prove that 9-11 is a false flag and all this shit.
But it could just be that they have these insurance...
It could very well be that they hacked insurance memos and stuff like that from people in long, protracted court cases that don't demonstrate that 9-11 was fake, but might be embarrassing to people or might be their private business in the streets and stuff like that.
No one wants that, but it's the over-promising that you hope will get you your extortion demand.
Now, the other thing that's important to consider about this is that they're asking for Bitcoin, which is a red flag.
Because right now, Bitcoin's going through some trouble.
There's no specified amount, which implies that the amount would be known to the people at those organizations or whatever, which does also imply previous contact.
So there's a lot going on here that, like, it has the look of someone who, well, obviously the Dark Overlord is an extortion operation.
So you have that.
And then you have on top of that a history of often over-promising and under-delivering.
And then you have asking for the money in Bitcoin, which makes you think that if the Dark Overlord is a group, then what you have is probably the lesser part of that group, or maybe the weaker part of that group, because they're asking for it in Bitcoin, as opposed to one of these other more safe, more protected, less traceable.
Were someone to be a benevolent hacker in some way and come up with that information and leak it through channels that could vet it and there'd be an actual...
I don't know.
What would it be?
It would be unprecedented in many ways.
That sort of operation that involved really committed, principled journalists, that sort of thing, if that were the path it went, I'd be interested in that somewhat.
The fact that it's some unnamed hacker or collective that is looking to enrich themselves and offering to sell this to ISIS, it makes me think like...
But that's the flip side of it, is like, let's imagine they do have proof that 9-11 was fake, and someone in the cabal pays the ransom, and then no one ever knows.
I know we're sort of dancing around a ton of issues, but all of them are important in their own way because they're all demonstrative of how if you just critically think about this for a second...
ZeroHedge.com up on NewsWars.com and InfoWars.com.
This is a big deal.
Not just this story, but how...
Hackers can get into these systems and then use it.
And then the fact that Trump has said, look out, I'll release the 9-11 info on the Clintons and the Bushes.
And Trump has come out and said, there's more than one way to declassify your illegal spying on me and how you funded the Taliban and Al-Qaeda and now ISIS.
And I've said for a good year.
Trump should just, through patriots and U.S. intelligence agencies that already have all this, put it out as if they're hackers.
And then have the cover story that they're putting a ransom out to these companies.
But really it's just a way to bring attention to it and then release it.
Because they can't release it.
These law firms, no matter what happens, they're not going to release it.
But if you wanted to change the legacy to a complicated legacy, all it would take is for him to declassify JFK documents that prove that the government was behind it, and prove that 9-11, the government was behind it, and then him die.
Instead, he has hired a group or perhaps created a group of hackers, which over the past couple of years has been a cyber extortion group, all at the behest of Trump, in order to build a backstory so he can then release the 9-11 was an inside job story through them.
He's going to spell it out in the next clip, but what he's saying is that these are good people within the intelligence community who are doing this, but they can't do it themselves with the documents, so they create this parallel construction of this hacking narrative.
These hackers have done this in order for it to be deflected onto that for their actions, which they need to do because they're good people within...
A hacking collective known as the Dark Overlords, or Patriots in U.S. Intelligence, oh sorry, announced on New Year's Eve that it had broken into the computer systems, you mean they had it all day one, of the law firm and obtained files related to the September 11th attacks.
What did I tell you about a month ago?
You can go pull the interviews up.
I said get ready for all the 9-11 stuff to come out.
It's why you never go along with blackmail, because generally when someone's blackmailing you, if you give in to the first stage of the blackmail, that act will be used as the second stage of blackmail.
So you just take the hit the first time someone threatens you.
He might still be in touch with Steve Pachanek or maybe Roger's doing this.
Who knows?
One of his dumb assholes who he talks to behind the scenes has created this narrative for him that it's the good guys in intelligence who are doing this because it fits so much into his spy movie reality.
Like, most of this last year, in terms of his Zach narratives and stuff like that, it's always been an embracing of how popular QAnon is on the internet, but never wanting to get in with it because he wants to own it.
It is weird knowing the full context, because were you to not have the full context of his jealousy, pettiness, his need to get attention, combined with the fact that QAnon is far more popular amongst his own fans than even he is at this point, if you didn't realize that, you'd think that he was coming up with a completely normal conspiracy.
Whereas within the full context, we realize how pathetic and weak bullshit this really is.
Because QAnon's bullshit is pathetic and weak as well.
Well, they could find it with a quick Google search.
But I think what you add to it from our show and the time that we've spent looking at Alex, you see, even if you take the reality of QAnon out of this, you do have consistent trends of Alex being so jealous of this internet world that he doesn't have ownership of.
These 4chan places and Reddit, these communities where he's not able to dictate the...
You know, it's the same thing that he used to feel about the mainstream media.
Like in 2009, there's so many resentments that he doesn't control the narrative.
We don't control this.
And even as Trump was coming into relevance in 2015, there were so many times that him and Owen Troyer would be like, now the mainstream media, you don't control what we're talking about.
We do.
That sort of thing.
And I think there's a snake eating its own tail in some ways in terms of the alternative media.
That Alex now recognizes that the alternative stuff is also out of his control.
We kind of see what Alex's take on it is, and what he's saying is really dangerous, only in a sense that, like, when Guccifer 2.0 started to come around...
no one really understood what it was.
Yeah.
unidentified
But then as investigation started to happen, and they started to trace the VPNs and like the, the logins of the person presenting themselves as Goose for 2.0.
Because what if it does turn out that people are able to trace these hacks?
People are able to trace the people behind it?
Someone accidentally didn't sign into their VPN one time and you got the laptop where the hacking happened?
Like, there is a decent chance that it could turn out you are now associating yourself and telling a story about something that links you to a fucking international felony.
We don't know how this story is going to play out, and it'll be interesting to see how it does, because there's a real decent chance this is going to be a fart in the wind, and it'll be a nothing.
Much like the Antifa Soros documents and stuff like that, which Alex will just later bring up as proof of things without ever being anything meaningful.
But that's why the people who are so manipulatively trying to deflect attention from the WikiLeaks and the DNC hacks, that's why Seth Rich is such an important piece of their narrative.
It's because he would fit that mold of someone inside who was a whistleblower, but they have no evidence of that.
But that's why they are so disgraceful on that front.
But Trump thought that the terrorists had bombs on the planes, because he was suspicious about the idea of...
The iron and steel girders.
It wasn't about the idea that the building fell down.
If you listen to the actual interviews, it's about the penetration into the building.
He was talking about how the windows were so narrow in World Trade Center buildings, and it was because of all of the iron.
He's talking about how the building was built from the outside in, in terms of the structure of it.
There were so many steel beams that they couldn't have wide windows.
And that's what he was talking about.
He's talking about the idea that it's strange that a plane was able to fly into it and penetrate those steel beams.
He suggested that there were bombs, not That there were bombs at the bottom or whatever to bring the building down, but that the planes had bombs also to increase the impact in order to allow them to penetrate those steel beams.
It seems like if you're flying really, really fast, and I don't know a lot about physics, and hey, you know what?
Maybe this one time.
Because Trump is a real estate magnate, even though he's a complete failure in a pile of shit, and he doesn't pay his contractors, perhaps he has some engineering that I don't have.
Also, in an interview hours after the attacks, he said, quote, 40 Wall Street actually was the second tallest building in downtown Manhattan, Trump replied.
And it was actually before the World Trade Center was the tallest.
And then when they built the World Trade Center, it became known as the second tallest.
And now it's the tallest.
Also for fun, just to be petty, even after 9-11, 40 Wall Street wasn't the tallest building in downtown Manhattan.
That honor goes to 70 Prime.
So Trump's building, he was bragging about, wasn't even the tallest.
But on 9-11, hours after the attack, his response was, well, now my building's the tallest.
And then the added layer on that that's really fun, and I don't think this means anything, but it's super fucking weird, is that Roger Stone, through Black Manafort and Stone, his old lobbying group, they used to do a ton of work.
So before all of that, Roger Stone was involved in lobbying for this brutal fucking dictator who embezzled a ton of money and also had a habit, I don't know if you know this, of taking political dissidents in the middle of the night and then dismembering their bodies.
I know that within a week this is just going to become a waypoint for him.
It's just going to become another little...
Narrative that didn't work out that he will yell back about whenever he wants to reinforce another point in the future.
Of course.
It's a bummer.
It's a bummer.
And then I think this is something that we don't talk about a ton generally because it's never as explicit, but what we've talked about a little bit already is that this is such a pathetic attempt to reclaim QAnon stuff that it's...
It's a see-through bummer.
I don't know how to put it.
I leave this cold because on one level I'm super happy about the idea that in the same way that on Christmas Eve Alex said that he told Roger to talk to Assange.
Four, they have proof that Hillary Clinton was in the World Trade Center and the only reason that she lost the presidency was because she died in 2001.
Hillary was in the building, but she precipitated the 9-11 attacks because she needed the circumstances with which she could do...
The exact necessary pagan ritual in the basement with Linda Bloodworth Thomas, the producer of Designing Women.
They did a witch ceremony in the basement while the building was coming down because they needed that much loss of blood in order to provide the pagan sacrament that she would be required to have in order to lose the 2016 election.
Because the world in its real form is so bad and not going the way he wants, he is forced to demonize Muslims who throw fireworks and stuff like that, or...
Lionize and make a hero out of Bolsonaro, who's someone who he definitely shouldn't.
I think it's good content and everything, and checking in with Alex and seeing where he's at, but if he's bringing this to the beginning of the year, I mean, there's like seven to ten things we've talked about that he's just way off on, and then his big story is this cyber espionage group as he's presenting it, which is actually an extortion racket.
If they weren't extortion blackmailers on the cybernet right now, they would have been kidnappers in the 90s when Mel Gibson was making movies about it.
Because once you start tossing 9-11 around and documents proving that it was an inside job, even if you're lying, a lot more people are paying attention, man.
The only consistent trend we've seen throughout Alex Jones' entire career is knowing laughter presages him being the most wrong any human being could ever be.
And so it would be irresponsible of me to launch into a, like...
The website and the wiki and all that stuff will cover the information that we are able to cover in a meaningful way.
But to say it's comprehensive, I do appreciate that, and I think it's comprehensive to some extent, but I don't want to oversell it and say, like, because we haven't covered the Boston bombing, but Alex's stuff is there, and that will be there once we cover it.