Today, Dan and Jordan discuss the March 20th, 2009 episode of The Alex Jones Show. On this episode, the gents learn about an attempted martial law takeover of Schenectady, an attempt at outlawing you from having a garden, an attempt to force the population into serving the Department of Defense, and of course, how Alex is wrong about everything.
I have looked up how it's pronounced, and I have since forgotten.
I feel terrible about it, but I'll never be able to retain that information.
But either way, we appreciate it also very much.
Thank you for your support.
It would be nice.
So, Jordan, today I wanted to do a present day episode because we've been sort of, you know, we were in the past on Monday and then we had our space adventure Wednesday.
And I thought it would be good to check in on the present, but then I saw an article where Alex was saying that the shooting at that synagogue in Pittsburgh was a Marxist jihadi plot.
I know that looking at the abyss is kind of part of what this show does a lot of the time, but I think that there's even a point that it gets like, why are we doing this?
In the aftermath of our last 2009 episode, we had, I think, probably the most substantive thing that happened was Alex got a visit from the guy who started The Oath Keepers.
Which now is not something that you would want to wish on anyone.
Like, if you told me that, oh yeah, in about a week you're going to get a visit from the guy who started The Oath Keepers, I'd be like, how do I run away from this as fast as possible?
You know, I don't sit here with pleasure reminding people that over the years I have been ridiculed and laughed at about everything I've talked about only to have people later admit I was right.
I think one of the damning things, or one of the worst things, Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I don't remember exactly how that quote goes, but a lot of people with really dumb ideas take solace in the fact that they're being ridiculed because they think they're on the path to being revolutionaries.
I'm here to hit the barbed wire first every single time so everybody else can climb up over my back while I'm hanging in the barbed wire and spit on me and give me no credit after they're done climbing over me.
You know what?
I like it.
Good.
Because I'm doing this for all the innocent people out there, the New World Order's running over and hurting and killing.
And I don't care about my name, what people say and think about me, but the denial does speak to the psychology.
We're talking about martial law in New York when we get back.
When you perceive yourself this way, everything is going to be an attack.
And when you perceive yourself this way, nothing is ever going to be, like, you're never going to be able to look at the world realistically because you're not looking at yourself realistically.
Alex is deep in that mindset on this episode.
And I don't know.
It extends here.
Oh, I promise you, we'll get back to the martial law in New York.
Then the MIAC report, the modern militia movement document, it was a real document that someone gave him and he did beat WikiLeaks to releasing it by a couple days.
But he completely lied about the contents of it.
He made an elementary logical fallacy about what the inference was of the report.
I don't know enough about the etymology of those theories, but it's entirely possible that Alex Jones was a huge part of establishing the entire thing that got much larger than him very quickly.
Well, you could argue that it happened immediately because Alex was on air that day and he started screaming about how they blew up the towers and how this was the government killing its people and stuff.
I know Alex loves to use military terminology to describe players and his information warfare nonsense.
But the use of the term shock troops seemed a little strange to me.
You see, the term shock troops is an Americanization of the German word Stostrup, which is the name of the bodyguard unit specifically established to be Hitler's bodyguards.
Granted, the concept of shock troops had existed prior to Hitler, generally being a term that was used to describe offensive attack units that would sneak around and attack an enemy where they didn't expect it.
Interestingly, many scholars on combat view the strategy that ISIS uses of employing suicide bombers as a form of modern shock troop activity.
And this kind of highlights one of the reasons why Alex is using this metaphor as disturbing, but also I think it's pretty apt.
Shock troops rarely survived.
They would go in and light up the rear guard of a base or something like that, but then pretty much invariably be killed in the process.
In the West, the concept grew out of units that were referred to as Forlorn Hope Units, a name reflecting how dreadful their position was.
The idea was that these troops would go in, a whole lot of them would die or be severely wounded, but if they were lucky, they might be able to establish a position that they could then defend.
Often the soldiers would be willing to take such huge risks.
Because in many cases they were conscribed prisoners who had no choice, or because they were promised great rewards should they survive.
Alex Jones comparing his audience to this sort of a soldier is very appropriate if you just add the caveat that the war they're waging is imaginary.
Alex knows full well what he's doing to his audience with his lies and propaganda is the equivalent of mortally wounding them in battle.
They may not end up with a limp or a missing limb, but as soon as they accept his worldview of being shock troops in an imaginary war with the globalists, it's kind of the equivalent of social death in any community, except for with their fellow info warriors.
that'll further insulate them more and lead them being more interested in being his shock troops.
Yeah.
metaphor Alex is accidentally making here and I think it's really sad to think about.
It's really, it's a real fucking bummer when you realize like on some subconscious level, Alex is expressing an understanding of how much he's crippling his own listeners oh yeah this brain worm kind of idea that he's he's injecting into them well even he in his like I would say Minor understanding of the term still recognizes that the idea of the shock troops is they're going in first.
This analog and this language, especially when it's couched in the psychology that Alex is clearly manifesting on this show of like, I'm always right and everyone mocks me and I love it because I'm always right eventually.
And you guys are my foot soldiers who are out there shock trooping it up.
I think that's really, really fucked up.
And it would be fucked up if he actually was right about things.
But then when you add in that he's wrong about everything.
I mean, the picture starts to take shape of someone who just wants to destroy people's lives for money.
It feels tough to get away from that a little bit.
And so we're going to come back and play a little news clip from Capital News 9. So this is the story that he's going to weave, and he's going to weave it into, like, they're trying to put martial law in place in Schenectady, New York.
That's the big story.
And unfortunately, in Alex's telling of the introduction to the story there, he solves the mystery clearly.
Because he says that Jason Burmess is from around there, and they have a huge police corruption problem.
That's what this is about.
It's not about martial law.
It's about a deeply, deeply entrenched in corruption police department.
At the beginning of 2009, the town of Schenectady faced multiple officers who were facing termination, leaving a massive hole in their only 166 officer deep department.
According to the Daily Gazette, quote, the six officers who may be fired are Darren Lawrence, accused of drunk driving, crashing in a colony, fleeing the scene, and beating a friend to keep him from reporting the incident.
And the other ones are like DUIs, which you can kind of understand.
People fuck up sometimes.
But when you have a DUI and then you beat up somebody in order to not get arrested or, you know, you threaten to kill your ex-wife on top of it, there are things that are like, okay, we got a problem here.
So their sergeant, Eric Clifford, was caught undergoing a dental procedure while on duty.
And he told the dispatch that he was, quote, going out on a detail.
So he was still on the clock and just went and got some dental procedures done.
The head of the Civilian Complaint Review Board had quit in January, citing feelings that no one was listening to any of their complaints, any of the civilian complaints.
He even said that he felt that he was just an errand boy, like a courier delivering complaints that would then be ignored.
City Councilman Gary McCarthy said, quote, I'd like to go one week where we don't have a negative newspaper article about the department.
It's just baffling that it just keeps happening.
It's human nature that people are going to make mistakes, but this seems so institutionalized.
Schenectady Mayor Brian Stratton was kind of in a tough situation.
Here he was facing the possibility that he'd have to fire a group of police officers, and those were just the officers that they had potential grounds for dismissal for that wouldn't likely get challenged as cause for termination and result in a lawsuit.
Yeah.
unidentified
Because for better or worse, the police have a pretty fucking good union.
Absolutely support the police having a union, but you have to recognize in a situation like this when there are these bad cops that have become deeply entrenched inside the police force, the union does make it incredibly difficult in order to have – I don't know what you'd call it, but like easy solutions are very difficult in that situation because –
Yeah, but you can respect it because that protection is, of course, in a situation like policing, it could very easily be used politically and nefariously.
But it also gives you that, you know, six of one hand and a half dozen of the other where it's like you fucked up.
And you're still protected.
The same thing is true for teachers' unions in plenty of places where they have the teachers who just go to work and sit in a room all day because you can't fire them, but they can't be allowed near students.
Ultimately, Mayor Brian Stratton had just said that calling for dissolving the department and calling in county or National Guard help while they reformed the police force was a, quote, last resort.
Not surprisingly, people were pretty against the idea, and it failed to get off the ground in any way.
And how he was willing to, if need be, look into this as a solution where they dissolve the entire police department because it would be impossible for them to root out the corrupt officers that were resulting in the population kind of being terrorized a little bit by the police force.
So now the problem of police corruption in Synecdoche was something that Mayor Stratton did not give up on and it took him until 2011 to complete his mission of forcing out entrenched officers who did things like quote spew racial slurs while fighting in a bar Or of course there was the case of Detective Jeffrey Curtis who quote became addicted to crack cocaine and stole 85 pieces of the drug from the police Department's evidence safe Curtis compromised That's not good.
In order to get around things like the limitations of the unions, he was able to find ways to convince a lot of these officers to resign.
He was able to force out ones that he could force out, and he made it his mission.
He retired having completed what he meant to do in office.
I obviously don't know everything about Schenectady politics or Brian Stratton's entire career, but from a lot of the stuff I was able to read, he seems like a really good success story.
In many ways, in terms of setting out, when you get into office, you realize, oh shit, look at all this.
Look at this mess.
Our budget is completely fucked.
The police force is a disaster.
And you set about trying to make changes.
And along the way, you make a statement like, we're willing to call in National Guard and county officers if we have to dissolve the department.
And propagandists like Alex jump all over that instead of looking at like, oh my god, there's a lot of positive reforms this person was able to make.
And he didn't actually do anything resembling martial law.
You know, people critique him, rightly, because he has...
A lot of the time, he has his sponsors on the show, and they're not announced as his sponsors, or if they are, it's just them telling stories and weaving narratives that help them sell things, like this appearance by Steve Schenk, Alex Jones' eFood Direct sponsor.
I want to bring up for the balance of this hour, before all these in-studio guests and the financial news, because it's perfect timing with all that's happening, to give us an update on what's happening in the food world, and that's Steve Schenck of the J. Michael Stevens Group, eFoodsDirect.com.
Sir, what do you think of the last three or four minutes of news I was covering?
unidentified
Well, I think it's absolutely in accord with what you and I were going to talk about with HR 875 and S425, Where they're moving on food just as you and I have talked about for the last three years.
So now we have a situation here where he has his food sponsor on who sells...
Survival buckets, basically.
Who's coming in to talk about this legislation that, Alex, we mentioned it in passing on a recent episode where you're like, why are we talking about this?
Because it was that idea of the community gardens in Tulsa, where it's just like, no, they're talking about where's the budget for upkeep and things like that.
It's not about trying to...
But now Alex has weaved this narrative into being like, they're going to try and encroach on you to such an extent that you won't be able to have a...
There's a fun little bit of internet hysteria that went around in early 2009 where conservative conspiracy theorists were trying to argue that the government was trying to take away your right to have a home garden.
Also, this bill died in committee, just like the identical bill that Rosa DeLauro introduced the year prior.
Alex wasn't complaining about it back then, I don't know why.
So also, S-425 is the other bill that...
Shank brings up.
That was the Senate version of the bill, and it too died in committee.
The last action on it was taken on February 12th, or, if you're keeping score, one month before this episode we're listening to now.
The House version was sent back to committee on February 4th.
All of this is just lies about what the text of bills say that didn't even get voted on.
The only reason they're covering this at all is because it's something that's very easy to craft into the narrative of government encroachment.
Plus, it has the added benefit of being something that's easy to twist into being about big food, like Monsanto trying to crush your home garden so you rely on them for food.
When in reality, the bill was written, it was specifically designed to regulate big interstate companies that had nothing to do with gardens.
Basically, it's just a sales pitch that allows Steve Schenck and his eFoods Direct to enjoy some of that imaginary victim status that Alex Jones loves so very much and uses to sell his shit.
If listeners, long-time listeners to the show, might recognize the name Jack Berkman, and the reason for that is we went over a long, like maybe nine, ten months ago, we went over Alex Jones trying to tell the story of a Seth Rich investigator who got shot, and it turns out that that was just a situation where he had hired another crazy guy to work with him, and then they had a little work squabble.
On the episode where we were talking about Alex telling that story and, like, covering it as news, I was like, I don't know enough about Jack Berkman to say that he's a dirty propagandist.
I now do.
I'd like to go back in time and retroactively affirm that on our old episode.
So consider that me giving notice to that old episode.
If you go back and listen to that old episode in a week, it'll have like a little combo breaker part where you're like, yep, bullshit, conservative propagandist, moving on.
But he also has that story that he pitched on, we heard it on Monday's episode, where he has this forced volunteering bill that, if you recall, Alex is reporting on the introduced version of the bill as opposed to the past version of the bill that had the sort of mandatory service aspect of it stripped out from it.
All over the country, Obama has, and of course Bush started all of this, but flawlessly, seamlessly, they're continuing it, like relay runners passing a baton.
That they are going to have martial law in the states and cities and the tent cities and FEMA camps and forced service.
They have a law that's now passed the House, but separately the Army issued a directive a few weeks ago for a million-person civilian army that will be under a draft.
It says compulsory.
It doesn't say draft.
It says compulsory service.
18 to 24. And that you will be directed inside the United States or anywhere else on the planet, including war zones.
So these poor little Obamanoids and everybody else, I guess for that matter, will be directed.
They also have a Senior Corps, a Green Corps, where they will decide what you're going to be and do, and then you will serve them.
It's very complicated, because what he's doing now is he's trying to combine things, like different things, and then make them seem like the same thing.
So he's talking about, like, he mentioned a Department of Defense directive in there, and then talked about a bunch of other bullshit that I can't even figure out where he's getting all that other stuff.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Made enough.
Some of the things about, like, war zones and stuff like that, that's from the Department of Defense directive, which we'll talk about in a minute.
But then, without...
He's still mentioning that he's shifting topics.
He's like, I passed the house!
And what passed the house is that stripped-down version of, what was it, House Resolution 1388.
So, like, he's trying to play fast and loose with all these details, pretending that it's all the same, and none of it's real, and none of it matters!
Management retains the authority to direct and assign civilian employees, either voluntary or involuntary, or on an unexpected basis to accomplish DOD missions domestically or internationally.
And it says that you will be forced to deploy.
So there you have it, exactly what they said they were going to do decades ago.
And the part that Alex is cherry-picking that quote because it says mandatory or willing or unwilling reassignment and stuff like that.
And he doesn't read what came right before that in the text.
DoD civilian employees in EE or NCE positions may be directed to accept deployment requirements of the position.
However, whenever possible, the DoD civilian expeditionary workforce will be asked to serve expeditionary requirements voluntarily.
Now, the important thing there is EE means emergency essential, and NCE means non-combat essential, which is to say that the position is essential but doesn't involve combat.
This is entirely about essential positions and how we will try to accommodate you as best as possible.
We want this to be voluntary, but because these positions are essential, we might have to reorganize in such a way where you go to a position you don't necessarily want to be in.
The civilian expeditionary workforce accepts volunteers.
But if you go to their website and you read their FAQ page, there is a question, quote, as a volunteer, are there any negative consequences if I decline an opportunity?
The answer, quote, As an employee volunteer, you cannot be directed to serve an expeditionary requirement.
It's almost like all of these people have already thought of the things that he is going to bitch about and have written them into the rules so that he cannot bitch about them, and yet somehow he still does!
So in Steve Watson's article, he writes at the beginning of the article, quote, The Defense Department has established a civilian expeditionary workforce that will see American civilians trained and equipped to deploy overseas in support of the worldwide military missions.
Problem is...
DoD Directive 140410 is really just an updating of an already existing directive.
You can easily find a version of it from 1992, which still explicitly includes nearly identical language about the deployment of civilian employees of the Department of Defense.
Also, I found one from April 1992, so we can't even say Bill Clinton.
You know, it was done under Reagan.
Also, I found a revision of their manual regarding civilian employees for the Defense Department from 1988, you can find online.
So we now have this bill that he's lying about in the House that is completely different.
He's reporting on a different version of the bill than passed.
Which I call lying.
And then we have this Department of Defense Directive 140410, which doesn't say what he's saying.
He's conveniently not explaining what civilian workforce means, because it serves his purpose of the idea of, like, Obama is going to come and force you into service.
He's going to take your kids, and then they're going to sass you at the dinner table.
And even then, for some people, that might be like, Obama's going to come to your home, he's going to give you training, and he's going to pay you $40,000 a year.
My entire job, because there was funding for service-based curriculum, was to go through the entire catalog of courses at the University of Missouri and try and find ones that could have a volunteer aspect added to the course.
Yeah, yeah.
There's an easy application of volunteering five hours a week at a clinic or something like that.
It was hot in the sense of, like, this idea, this paradigm.
Well, it wasn't the entire university.
Just in the service-loading department.
But within that department, there was this idea of, we have an opportunity to get people to help where they can, volunteer their time, which is a positive thing for everybody, and they'll also get college credit from doing those things.
It's an interesting way to go about it, but I think there's a net positive to it because you could also have really positive experiences while volunteering and retain it as a piece of your ethos after college.
There's a lot of stuff like that.
I think there's a lot of people in the world who would probably volunteer if it was easier.
Like, the point of entry is difficult because you've got to find a place you believe in.
You've got to go through a process of, like, saying, hey, I want to volunteer.
And then you don't know if it's like, all right, put on a cloak.
So, Bob Chapman's here to tell you the only place to put your money, gold and silver, conveniently on a show broadcast on Genesis Communications that's owned by Ted Anderson, who also owns Midas Resources, and started the Genesis Communications Network as a marketing arm for Midas.
He's there to serve as a fake expert about the economy, talk a bunch of shit about how terrible things are, tell you you need gold, and then magically Ted shows up to sell you gold.
So here's the part of it where they tell you...
unidentified
Now, when I was raping South Africa, the thing that I knew most was that gold was the place to go.
I run a newsletter called The International Forecaster, and I would like to forecast that there will be rioting and tyranny in America by the summer of 2010.
So in the middle of this, they get into just nonsense conversation about how Alex is scared about everything, and then Alex starts yelling at Bob about how manly he is.
I don't understand how the time somebody tried to mug me in Dallas, I feigned like, oh my God, I'm scared, and started getting down on my knees and grabbed the gun out and literally stomped that guy's head into putty.
And then people think I'm making that up, like I made up going to Bohemian Grove, or I made up breaking the MIAC report, or I made up founding 9-11 Truth, or I made up making the Obama deception.
I'm about action.
And the people are so cowardly, Bob, they think I'm making it up that I've taken guns away from people.
It doesn't matter because Ted Anderson bought gold at $8.90 and is passing on the $70-plus savings on the francs and on the sovereigns and other coins.
Let's bring Ted Anderson in right now.
How good of a deal is that Bob Chapman that he bought into gold when it was down at $8.90 and now at...
I don't know about the stroke of genius, because I think any dummy could figure out that if gold drops right now with what's going on in Washington, D.C. Alright, whatever.
Yeah, man, I can't imagine anybody listening to this in a non-completely passive way, because I could understand if it's background noise and you don't realize it, but I can't imagine anyone listening to more than one episode of this show.
And not being like, oh my god, look at these guys running the scam!
Just the Bob Chapman, Ted Anderson vignettes, I guess.
Those little set pieces alone should be like, I can't trust these dudes.
Even not knowing that Midas rips people off.
Even not knowing that.
Even not knowing that a couple years later than this, after this point, Ted Anderson will have his gold bouillon license taken away for dishonest trading.
Even not knowing those things, you just hear something like this, and you're like, oh, this is a fucking setup.
Which makes it weirder that, like, Bob is coming in with, like, it was up 60 or whatever.
Because that's not enough to matter for the kind of investors who are listening.
Like the people who are listening...
probably couldn't afford an ounce of gold.
And if you buy an ounce of gold for like, what, 800 something dollars and it goes up 60, are you just going to sell it then?
And then you've made $60.
I don't think the investment in gold doesn't make sense to his audience.
It really doesn't, except for the fraud of the economic collect, which is why that's the selling point that they use, as opposed to it being a smart investment, you can make a little bit of money in it.
They're trying to claim we're a bunch of cop killers when there's no evidence of that, because we're the real American people who want liberty, who want freedom, understand that we have a new world order taking over our nation, and they're very afraid of popular culture.
Further popularizing the message of liberty, and Amy Allen's gone a long way towards doing that, and she's here in Austin, Texas for South by Southwest.
We'll tell you about some of the shows that are coming up with her, but it's great to have you here in Austin, Texas with us.
And folks from the campaign, like Oath Keepers, have spun off and are getting tens of thousands of police and military to go public and say, I'm not going to violate my oath.
I'm not going to confiscate guns.
I'm not going to put people in FEMA camps.
I'm not going to go along with the Military Commissions Act to grab American citizens.
There is a huge awakening.
We have police sending us all these internal...
Documents where they're trying to covertly demonize us, showing that the establishment is scared of the American people and knows that we have a chance of bringing the International Crime Syndicate to justice.
Now, tell folks how you woke up to Liberty, a little bit about yourself, and then Jason Bermas had you in a few nights ago on the Info Warrior show that he does from 9 to midnight out of this same studio.
And I didn't know about this, that right after you were on my show...
It looks like this has happened to me, but they've been punching me and telling me, shut up.
But beating you with a crowbar and then not stealing anything.
So it takes him a minute and three seconds into talking with her in order to bring up this beating story, which is a little quick, I think, in an interview, possibly.
I can only go based on her telling of the event and the way that people have used it.
Amy broke the story today on the Alex Jones Show online internet show.
She says the police told her the attackers were most likely illegal and did little, if anything, to investigate the brutal attack.
Amy was leaving a recording studio in downtown LA when three Hispanic thugs attacked her at random.
They were simply looking for a white person to attack.
I believe that Amy was the victim of an assault, and I think that's horrible.
However, I take issue with all the assumptions people make about the situation.
That blurb saying it was a racially motivated attack against her because she was a white woman?
That was from Stormfront.
The Ron Paul forums and the New World Order people, their take on it was that Amy was told not to talk about revolution in her music, and she refused, so they sent a Latino hit squad to punish her.
My problem with that is that her 2002 debut album was called I Would Start a Revolution If I Could Get Up in the Morning.
The first single on the album was literally just titled Revolution, and it was produced by goddamn Randy Jackson and Mark Ronson.
One of the tracks on the album featured an appearance by Pharoah Monch, who was cool in 2002.
He had it.
Also, the attack happened in 2008.
So six years after she put out an album called I Would Start a Revolution If I Could Get Up in the Morning, these New World Order Alex Jones-y types are putting out this idea that she was threatened because she wrote a song or she was putting out music that had revolution in it, which is nonsense.
I feel bad for her being in this situation where there is an entire world trying to galvanize race-based hatred or New World Order fear based on her being the victim of a crime.
I can't imagine any historical scenario where a rabble-rousing group of white people would take the attack of a white woman and then turn it into a reason to demonize a population.
She was raised in a family that was paranoid about the New World Order and wanted to secede from the Union in Montana.
This is very telling, as Montana, along with Idaho, was a hotbed of white nationalist separatist communities in the 1990s.
The Montana Freemen engaged in an 81-day standoff with the FBI after the land where they would hold their mock trials was foreclosed upon.
The militia of Montana was super active at the time, and their ideology is shockingly similar to Alex's and the little glimpse that we get into Amy's family of origin.
this little bit of info that we have, but the fact that Amy describes her mother's belief system this way, the timeline, and the fact that they were in an unspecified town in Montana leads me to believe there's a high likelihood that Amy grew up in a white nationalist militia.
Again, I can't say this for sure, Yeah.
The 1990s, Montana, anti-government sentiment, fear of the New World Order, those are all Those are red flags.
So again, I want to make this totally clear, lest it sound like I'm making some sort of an attack on her.
I'm not saying anything about her based on what...
I'm just saying that I don't believe in any way that someone who grew up in Montana in the 90s in a family that was afraid of the NWO doesn't have some awareness of white nationalist militias.
The next clip is just her talking more about her mom, but it's kind of the same thing, except she says she was stockpiling food, so it doesn't really add anything to it.
Best case scenario, Jesse Ventura took $9 million in order to not speak out against a war that he's philosophically and principally against and ended up leading to tons and tons of civilian deaths.
And so that makes him a coward.
Worst case scenario, all this is a lie.
Maybe that's the best case scenario.
I don't know.
Anyway, I don't think Jesse Ventura would appreciate Alex saying shit like this on air.
I do have a song on the record, actually, about that.
Briefly, I don't have a whole song about it, but all of my work is part of me in it, so yes, I believe in...
unidentified
Right now, the gun culture is a big issue, Amy.
Right now, in the small town of Versailles, Missouri, that's where Dave and Joyce Raleigh have their Power Hour show.
A friend of mine told me last night, he called me and said the teachers in Versailles School are teaching the kids that guns are bad and making them write essays on it in their classwork now.
The gun culture is very important right now because I just got a report from a very credible source that in the Versailles schools, they're trying to get kids to think guns are bad and if your dad hunts, you're bad.
I know for a fact that that is not the case because...
I've been to Versailles, and everybody there loves guns.
Any place in Missouri, largely, any city that isn't Columbia, St. Louis, or Kansas City is going to be full of that guy.
I want to try to let you know about local law A for Albany County.
They're trying to sneak this through.
It says they're regulating the purchase of ammunition.
And what it is, when you start reading this, it's on albanycounty.com.
Right on their website, you go to local law legislature.
And here, I'm just going to read section 5 real quick.
A record shall be kept by the dealer of each sale of ammunition, which shall show the type, caliber, and quantity of ammunition sold, the name and address of the person receiving the same, the caliber, make, model, manufacturer's name, and serial number of the firearm for which the purchaser is purchasing ammunition.
If you want to just take a little step backwards here, because I know that everyone's very touchy about the idea of any kind of regulation of guns leads to a registration and then they're going to take all our guns away.
So I don't have a lot to say about this law, because from what I can tell, it didn't pass.
And it was a local regulation that would be completely legal and not violate the Second Amendment, even if it did pass.
All I really want to point out here is that Alex is absolutely not breaking this scoop.
You can find an article about the proposed law that was posted on the NRA's website that uses the exact language this caller is using and links to the URL that he's trying to read to Alex on air.
That post was from the morning of March 20, 2009.
This isn't a scoop, it's just Alex picking up NRA's sloppy seconds.
And perhaps most importantly, it has nothing to do with the story that Alex is misrepresenting out of Schenectady.
Though the cities are about half an hour away by car and good traffic, they're not the same city.
Schenectady is in Schenectady County, whereas Albany is in Albany County, so they're not even in the same county.
So, interestingly, what you have here is Alex Jones starting the broadcast by talking about how he's always right and everyone attacks him for being right all the time because the truth comes out and he was right all along, but he's up against that barbed wire and everyone's climbed over him.
Now, towards the end of the show, he gets these two stories that he's juggling.
Well, one of them he's juggling and then this other one gets introduced and he runs with it without reading anything about it.
That last clip is so self-satisfied.
Like, I have now done my work, and they will attack me, and I will be proven right.
Like, he set up the theme of the show at the beginning of I am unjustly demonized for being right all the time, and now, at the end here, he's demonstrated that he's right all the time, and now I welcome the attacks that will come.
There's a lot of nonsense, but I've chosen just two clips to end the show because I think they're demonstrative of how endemic this idea of not reading things and sort of wallowing around in ignorance.
Presenting and masquerading itself as wisdom is everywhere.
All of these people in Alex Jones' world, no matter how credibly they present themselves, are guilty of the exact same crimes.
So here's the first one where he talks about Obama's national security director.
I do not care to defend Kissinger, nor would I presume to say that he didn't absolutely have more influence than I'm comfortable with him having, even after he left his formal positions in government.
Now, that said, the shit that Jim Mars is saying here is complete bullshit.
If you read the opening remarks from James Jordan, I'm sorry, James Jones, you find that he says, quote, There's no indication from the transcript that he's speaking literally, or if that's just a little wink and nod kind of joke to open the speech.
Even leaving that aside, it's important to consider what he's actually saying.
Although Walt Rostro was technically the first national security director, many see Kissinger as the person who most defined what that position was.
those people weren't in some way still in an advisory capacity working for folks.
Right.
unidentified
Like, it's pretty clear if you look at stuff, there are – There are indications that they help advise on who should be on the National Security Council, even after they aren't the director or anything like that.
But I think it's a little bit of a stretch to say that this guy's speaking literally.
Okay, so what happens is Kissinger says something, then he whispers in Brent Scowcraft's ear, and then he goes and talks to Sandy Berger, who then tells me what to do.
The idea that he's saying it's filtered down through Scowcraft and Berger, that's...
The language indicates to me the filtering down is the lineage of the position.
It's not this literal thing.
So Jim Mars, I don't think it's...
I understand what he wants to do here.
I'm not going to hate the player.
I'm not going to hate anything.
I understand what you're doing.
But you're demonstrating an inability to wrestle with context.
Because also the rest of this speech that Jones gave at the CFR was about the idea that he wanted to help reshape the department.
So there was a hearkening to legacy at the beginning of it, speaking to ways that the modern challenges of the world are such that a different approach might be necessary.
So there's kind of a thematic element to it that exists in the speech.
You cannot ever use nuance when talking to these idiots.
You can't do it.
They just don't understand it.
They can't read, they don't understand it.
Anyway, we have one more clip of Jim Mars, and this should show you kind of how he does his work.
unidentified
And people need to take a close look at this.
And I'll be frank, I have not looked at it even this close, but I know just from what I've seen and by glancing over some of the paragraphs and some of the clauses in this proposed legislation, essentially it's going to mean you can't have a garden.
Well, I mean, civics is super important for Alex's use, too, because, like, if his audience, or even if he...
While not lying, had an awareness of how bills are passed, what amendments mean, and stuff like that, he couldn't spin most of the stories that he spits.
These ideas that he has now that he's talking about, like, oh, if they succeed in suing me, the Sandy Hook families succeed in suing me, then the First Amendment's gone.
That doesn't work that way, man.
Anybody who has a basic understanding of how our government operates would hear that and be like...
Again, March 22nd, not worth talking about, so that's off the table.
But I really think, I wish that those Jim Mars things that I think are important and demonstrative of how stupid everyone is, and how fast and loose they are with details, and how they just report shit that they don't even really know anything about.
I think it's important, but I wish they weren't in there, because there's such a satisfying arc to Alex's blowhardy, I'm the victim and I'm always...
To the end of the episode where he's completely misrepresenting two stories and saying they're connected.
He doesn't care about her music except that Ron Paul song, and I'm sure he doesn't actually even like it.
But the other thing that I need to make clear, I don't know if I did a good enough job about this, I read a bunch of interviews with Amy because I wanted more context.
I wanted to understand what else...
Crime was a big part of her career.
She talks about how afterwards she really valued things differently and stuff like that.
And in every interview that I can find with her, she doesn't talk about it being some sort of government hit.
She doesn't talk about it being Mexican gangbangers or anything like that.
All of that are details that come from this interview that have been extrapolated by Ron Paul Forum, Stormfront, all of these other places.
That's not something that she talks about in interviews with music publications or any other interview that I've seen with her.
So I don't think that she is on that tip.
It doesn't seem that way.
It seems like other people are putting that there for her.
And meanwhile, their fear about they're coming for women while they repeatedly tell her how hot she is in a circumstance that that's not really relevant to why they're there.
And at the same time, all these people create the perception of they are animals.
Meanwhile, Alex literally said, I'm a vicious animal on the show.
Talking about beating some guys heading to the ground.