Today, Dan and Jordan discuss the March 6-8, 2009 episodes of the Alex Jones Show. Alex is coming off the big reveal of his bogus Avian Flu narrative, and that absolutely continues. In these episodes, Alex seems preoccupied with really bad examples of gun people who have been arrested, as well as a deeply over-simplified take on a profoundly tragic piece of American history.
It's not that I think people are looking at me shopping or anything like that, but I will panic about the idea of like, if I think about this more, I will be here for an hour.
And if you would like to support the show and what we do, you may do so by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking that button that says support the show.
We are making good progress towards having to do another documentary.
Alex made a big deal out of this by misquoting sources, pretending that 9-11 blogger was actually mainstream Czechoslovakian, sorry, Czech Republic news.
And I predicted very strongly that two things.
One, he was going to keep talking about this for a long time as his main narrative.
He wants to talk a lot about guns, and he uses some really bad examples to talk about them, like sort of guns plus the oppressive state that's going on.
And so the first one that he brings up is, it's bad.
So that part at the end there, as we already talked about a little bit, that idea that people are being taught that their founding fathers were terrorists, which, if you look at it objectively, they were.
That doesn't mean that their objective was evil or wrong or anything like that, but the methods they employed were terroristic.
So that's just...
I wanted to reinforce that he keeps talking about that.
He has this...
You get arrested with an arsenal of guns in your car.
That specific story is going to come up later.
But he uses that as a jump-off to talk about you get arrested for not taking vaccines.
Then he tries to pull a specific example of that, and he can't.
And the only thing he can come up with is this Kelly Rushing, who got arrested for handing out copies of Alex's DVDs.
Well, see, the way Alex presents it, this idea that you get arrested for handing out InfoWars videos, that would be, he'd have a great point if he was just charged with terrorism and arrested for that.
In reality, I'm going to read to you from the Kentucky police press release.
Quote.
Investigators with the Kentucky State Police are attempting to deal with a flood of calls coming into post after Kentucky State Police investigation was discussed on a syndicated radio program this afternoon.
On December 15, 2003, Trooper Louis Dodd arrested 53-year-old Kelly Rushing of Fredonia, Kentucky, on charges of menacing and terroristic threatening.
Rushing is accused of placing anti-government propaganda in the mailbox of Trooper Dodd.
Radio talk show host Alex Jones discussed the Rushing case on his radio show, which aired on today's date.
After the show was over, Post 1 received more than 50 calls from people airing their concerns So...
He ended up inconveniencing the emergency response system in Kentucky.
Alex Jones directly responsible for that by lying about the situation.
Now, if Alex wanted to say it shouldn't be a crime to put things in someone's mailbox that they don't want in their mailbox, we could have that conversation.
It's a different conversation, but you could have it.
He was going to shoot them with his buddies in Maine ahead of a wedding that he was going to attend.
Police pulled him over, and he had four rifles, and they freaked out and flipped out, and they were all legal semi-automatic rifles, and they still arrested him, and they're charging him, and there's no law, but they don't care.
I'm going to say that he's wrong about a number of details, but before I get into the specifics, I'm going to let Alex hang himself a little more in this next clip.
I understand why you don't like it, but you've got to suck it up a little bit in terms of that.
Because it's not like, if someone wanted to go shoot at the range or something like that to celebrate their wedding, I don't think that there's anything wrong with that.
If it makes you uncomfortable, then that's something you need to deal with.
And Bill told his neighbors the economy was going to collapse and that they needed to get storable food and buy firearms and that he had quite a bit of firearms.
The police raided his home and confiscated 15 firearms.
And they're investigating to see if he's a terrorist.
And then I can check the state's laws.
I've seen this in Texas, Ohio, you name it.
It's not even illegal.
And then we'll call the person up over and over again.
I'll have my producers, these people.
And 99% of the time, they go, oh, my lawyer says don't talk.
My lawyer says I've got to plead to this.
But wait, it's not illegal.
I know, but they're just saying that if I plead, they won't put me in prison for 20 years and I'll just be on probation.
And a few times they've fought it.
One, they've listened to me.
It's gotten to the point that I don't even call these people up anymore.
But you know what?
Let's do it again.
This week, I'm going to call...
This gentleman up, an 18-year-old city resident, is in a Massachusetts jail after state police said they found an arsenal in his truck.
Luke S. Huzinga was on his way to a wedding in Maine when a state trooper pulled him over for a minor traffic violation.
To hear Alex tell it, this innocent kid with four semiotic rifles is getting pulled over by police and shaken down for being a good citizen.
No reason to pull him over.
In reality, if you review the police report, he was pulled over because he swerved across lanes, which police often consider to be suspicious behavior.
When the police pulled Luke over, they found his responses to questions to be evasive, and being that it was 12.20 in the morning and he had swerved, that could be an indication of impairment or worse.
They had him get out of the truck and patted him down, which turned up bullets on his person.
So they searched his truck.
four rifles.
They found a rifle with a night scope added, which of course is perfect for those late nights at the shooting range with your buddies.
In 2016, Luke Huizinga was arrested after his living girlfriend told police he, quote, assaulted her, including chaining her up against her will and engaging in bondage-type sex.
His friend Joshua McGuire told police to be careful when they went to arrest him because he's always armed.
Quote, McGuire called Huizinga a prepper who may want to go down in a blaze of glory, according to the arrest affidavit.
The home turned out to hold a trove of weapons, gun parts, pounds of black powder and milk crates, ammo containers, and a bin that held thousands of rounds of ammunition.
For hunting.
Along with the items, police say they found a sound suppressor, referred to as a silencer, made from the metal body of a maglite flashlight.
In the basement, authorities said they found 80% AK-style gun receivers, which serve as frames for the gun's other parts.
That with a few mechanical alterations in additional parts could be made into working firearms.
In some cases, those types of receivers, sometimes referred to as blanks, don't hold serial numbers that are used to track their ownership and can be purchased online.
You were driving around with a bunch of guns and a minor in your car.
An unrelated minor.
The way he tells that story, there's literally no way for this Roger Ressler to be over 18. He says he's a few years younger than him, but also says he would later go to UT.
So he's clearly talking about a time when this kid was in high school.
If your definition of when a country goes down the toilet is, I can't ride around at 18 with four to seven guns in the backseat and a minor in the car with no supervising adult.
When I can't do that, I know this country's gone down the toilet, Dan.
They watch these shows, and so then when they're in your house, I had a carpet cleaner one time try to call the police on me for a shotgun on the wall.
The other story he tells is he put a bunch of guns in his car because he was going to go on a trip, like a hunting trip or something like that, when he was a younger man.
And then...
The police came while he was away because a neighbor called because he was putting all these guns in his car.
And he's like, oh my god, isn't this just tyranny?
And I'm like, yeah, neighbors are nosy.
That's hack stand-up material.
You know, like, yeah, old bitty next door won't stop getting in your business.
That's kind of like, that's a trope of bad television, bad stand-up, just the idea of nosy neighbors.
And gets to what we knew he was going to do, which is talking more about this Baxter International slash biotest mix-up that happened, which again wasn't Baxter's fault.
What happened is Baxter Pharmaceuticals, based in the U.S., Mailed to 18 of its subsidiary factories in Europe with the orders to mix H5N1 avian flu virus, the deadly type that kills more than 60% of the people that come in contact with it.
And the scientists that are reporting on this in the Canadian, French, German, Czech news, we have quotes in stories we've written up on Infowars.com that link to all this, that are kind of boil-downs of all this news.
So, the only real evolution of the narrative is now there's 18 places, which, again, is just a reflection of the places that got things from this lab in the Czech Republic.
Well, there's three countries that were named in the original articles, but that doesn't mean there weren't multiple places, like multiple sites in Germany or Austria or Slovenia that could have gotten the samples from.
So, the 18 number, I'm not super...
I didn't want to dig more into this narrative, because...
I know what the truth is of the bigger picture.
So if there were 18 places, yeah, absolutely, that's possible, but they were all places that got things from Biotest, the lab in the Czech Republic.
So this all is just like, okay, you're...
And saying that you have all this linked boil-downs of the news and stuff like that, it's like you have 9-11 blogger being misrepresented by Paul Joseph Watson.
We don't need to beat a dead horse about this, but...
My prediction is correct.
He's talking about it a bunch.
I don't have a bunch of it in because he brings it up a bit.
Well, the thing that he does that's really insidious is immediately after saying biotest, he says, Baxter, which is based in the U.S., which gives you the idea that Baxter, based in the U.S., Sent the samples, not the laboratory in the Czech Republic sending those samples.
You can just Google HIV hepatitis in factor eight into Google and you'll get hundreds of news articles, MSNBC pieces where they admit that Bayer, the big parent company of a bunch of these conglomerates, knowingly for years, and this was ongoing until 2000, All over the world, shipped out HIV-filled Factor VIII blood clotting agent that's injected.
Now, what's interesting here is the mainstream European press, big newspapers, the Czech Republic and others are saying, was this done on purpose to cause a pandemic because Baxter separately is trying to get approval for a bird flu vaccine?
Baxter was, you know, working on a H5N1 vaccine, but they wouldn't actually get approval for it until October of 2009.
So the idea that was pitched by his guest on the last episode, the lady who lost her medical license for being crazy years prior, the idea that they had stockpiles of this flu vaccine that they needed to sell, thus they create this pandemic, it doesn't fly because they didn't get approval until October.
Now the idea that they did this in order to get approval...
For the vaccine that they were creating also doesn't make sense.
Because, like I said, this all happened at the beginning of February.
Alex is reporting on it a month later.
They wouldn't get approval for another six months after this.
So the idea that they were trying to fast-track that somehow doesn't track.
Like, they were already in the process of getting it through.
They'd gotten preliminary approvals for Baxter.
And it didn't speed up the process at all.
If anything, it probably caused them to have to take slower steps.
Because, as we learned from the investigation from the Office of Nuclear Safety in the Czech Republic, one of the things they found was that AVIR Green Hills was applying pressure to biotest to make things move faster for their research in January of 2009.
So the fact that that was part of the conclusions that they found probably led them to have to slow things down a little bit, leading to them getting approval.
No, but this is where things are going to get real bad.
And part of the reason is that Alex is talking about a real thing, but he is really being unfair about it.
So in the early 1980s, there was an outbreak of cases of AIDS that appeared to be directly related to the use of blood products, particularly Factor VIII, which is a clotting factor drug used by hemophiliacs to make it so their blood can clot properly.
They have to take injections of this clotting factor, usually two to three times a week, or else they'll end up with internal bleeding, or if they get a cut, it won't stop bleeding.
So, as such, a lot of the blood product that was being collected in the late 70s, early 80s was contaminated with the as-yet-unidentified HIV.
Many hemophiliacs contracted AIDS from their clotting injections, and overall, there's no way to talk about this without being straightforward and saying this is an absolute tragedy.
Once proper testing was available in October of 1984, the CDC was reporting that 74% of hemophiliacs treated with the old version of factor VIII had tested positive for HIV.
Where this tragedy becomes compounded is that Cutter Biological, a unit of Bayer, continued selling that version of Factor VIII, even though a new, safer, heat-treated version had become available.
They introduced this new version of Factor VIII in February 1984 and did not fully stop selling the old, dangerous version until July 1985.
Alex says that it continued through 2000, and that is not correct.
Alex, when he talks about this Factor VIII scandal, there's a number of important things he's intentionally leaving out, which are big parts of the context.
The first is that companies, of which Bayer is particularly at fault, but Baxter International is in the mix, too.
They did ship these potentially tainted blood products out with foreknowledge.
But Alex is playing fast and loose about what they might have had foreknowledge of.
One of the things that has to be understood is that the time period Alex is discussing when blood product from people with HIV was being used to make Factor VIII was when Reagan was in office.
He was president through pretty much the entire 1980s, which is when the AIDS crisis was at its most tragic.
And one of the things that made it worse was that Reagan was someone who was staunchly opposed to any governmental regulation, including ones related to public health.
So he was resistant to putting things in place that would have helped.
Just because of the lack of awareness and maybe naivete on the part of people before they knew what the problem was.
Right.
Further, it should be noted that the cause of AIDS was not known for years after the medical community began researching it.
From a June 24, 1983 publication from the National Institutes of Health, quote, So even there, in June of 1983, they're saying they don't know, but it looks like this is what it is.
That is important because that means that there is not a consensus.
That means that there are people who are holding out and saying, I don't know if we've proved that.
Right.
And not like we have today where there's the deniers, the HIV deniers, people like that.
Large sections of the legitimate medical community are still not convinced.
Even once the medical community figured out that this was the primary means for transmission, even in the National Institute of Health's May 10, 1985 release, they highlight another issue.
Quote, Because the time from infection to onset may be several years, persons exposed to the virus through transfusion before institution of the self-deferential guidelines for blood donors in 1983 and screening of blood for antibody in 1985 may remain at risk of AIDS.
Before 1983, there were no standards in place regarding blood donation.
It was a further two years after that that donation centers implemented screenings.
So in 1983, what they ended up doing was voluntary questions that they'll ask people.
One of the main reasons that society at large didn't take this crisis seriously is that initially it was only affecting the gay community, who at the time were much more marginalized than they are today.
Early on, the disease was called GRID, or Gay-Related Immunodeficiency Disease, and as late as June 1982, doctors were speculating that, quote, behavioral elements of the homosexual lifestyle were the cause, even suggesting that the disease might be caused by use of amyl nitrates, or poppers.
When hemophiliacs and others who had received blood transfusions, some as young as 20, Right.
It was more likely that these cases were caused by an unrelated immune system suppression related to their existing conditions.
On January 4th, 1983, the CDC held a public meeting to discuss opportunities to limit infections.
They discussed how blood banks should ask donors questions about their sexual behavior and run the blood through tests for things like hepatitis B antibodies, since there was no test for AIDS at the time.
And there seemed to be a correlation between hepatitis and AIDS.
So many at the meeting were not convinced that AIDS was a blood-borne disease yet and resisted these suggestions.
Additionally, quote, Dennis Donahue, director of the FDA's Division of Blood and Blood Products, stated that research on processes for inactivating viruses and blood products was underway.
Donahue was hoping to find a way to get virus and blood products to be safe as opposed to making the existing blood supply free of viruses, which is the definition of backwards thinking.
But it is something that they ended up doing with pretty decent results.
There's a heat treatment that they were able to do on new samples that came through, but they couldn't do it with the stuff that had already been processed.
You'd have to do the heat treatment on the constituent parts of the ingredients into the factor eight as opposed to the factor eight once it's already combined.
They did find that that was a way that they could get around the fact that they didn't have a test screening for what they were trying to keep out of the supply.
And so that helped in the short term, but then once there were tests.
Anyway, in early 1984, HIV was discovered and hypothesized as the causal agent of AIDS.
And by the middle of 1985, all blood banks and plasma centers implemented early screening tests.
However, in October 1984, the CDC announced that the laboratory experiments showed that heat treatment process inactivated HIV.
So there was a little bit of period there where that was the solution.
So in 2003, a New York Times article came out about how Bayer and their subsidiary, Cutter Biological, sold millions of dollars worth of clotting factor to Asia and Latin American countries.
Bayer, speaking on behalf of Cutter, commented to the New York Times, quote, Cutter had continued to sell the old medicine, that statement said, because some customers doubted the new drug's effectiveness and because some countries were slow to approve its sale.
The company also said that a shortage of plasma used to make the medicine had kept Cutter from manufacturing more of the new product.
Quote, decisions made nearly two decades ago were based on the best scientific information of the time and were consistent with the regulations in place, the statement said.
As it relates to regulations, that's probably a fair point.
And to the point of fears about the effectiveness is absolutely something that's backed up by history.
Yeah.
unidentified
From an article in the Irish Times, quote, Fractionators, that's blood product manufacturers, were more fearful in 1984 of side effects caused by a heat treatment process that killed HIV than of the virus itself, a senior British fractionator said yesterday.
Dr. James Smith told the inquiry that their dominant fear then was that heat-treated products might cause a dangerous thrombogenetic reaction in patients.
This position gradually changed from mid-1984, he said.
But thrombogenesity remained a major...
So there is reason to believe to some extent that people were hesitant to adopt this new, safer version.
Right.
I don't care necessarily about that argument because the documents that have come out of Cutter's internal workings do show a bit of a callousness to the idea of like, let's see if we can find markets that will still buy.
This is a human tragedy that really, really, really, really, really bummed me out reading about.
And there's...
I stopped short of calling it evil, but it's pretty evil.
But there is an argument to be made that they could find scientists and doctors who weren't crazy, who disputed the idea that their blood products could cause HIV.
So I don't – you know what?
I don't know what to do with it except to say...
This is the reality of the situation.
This is what happened.
It's awful.
It hurt and killed a lot of people.
The reason it wasn't taken more seriously is the marginalization of the homosexual community and the bottom line, dollars.
And the lack of regulation.
That's the base of this story.
And Alex using it to be, like, justifying his idea that the globalists are going to set off a bioweapon because they gave all these people AIDS in the 80s is not fair.
This is a tragedy, and he's trying to capitalize off it in a way that's deeply disrespectful to the people who hurt the most.
And I think that a lot of businesses, when allowed to behave that way, do.
This is another example of it, but it's just much, much, much more depressing and much sadder and with such awful consequences for families.
Because these are people in cultures, like I was reading about in Taiwan, there were a bunch of people who ended up getting HIV from the clotting factor.
And in the culture, they were blamed for getting this disease.
It would break up families.
Because people were not taking...
Like, the parents of these people who got it would think there was something wrong with their kid.
And, like, it's just such a tragedy.
So that was a really dark bit of research that I did.
But I think it's very important, because Alex does bring up this Factor VIII stuff a lot.
And his narrative is wrong, but the story is real.
And that is...
That's always an unfortunate place to come with Alex, where you have to be like, well, yeah, that did happen, but you're not looking at the picture.
But I guess as a result of you knowing that for the past 35 years the elite have told me things, you allowed me on your show to tell you, because I had a contact from them eight months ago and was told everything that the elite planned to do in the world for the next year to a year and a half.
He has perfect predictions because they all come from the elite.
Now, when he says the elite, it's important to point this out.
If you read John Birch Society stuff and if you read None Dare Call It Conspiracy, the elites and the insiders are the terms that he uses and they use for the globalists.
And I remember very well that John F. Kennedy, the President of the United States of America, decided one day he'd buck the elite, change over the currency, and do away with the Federal Reserve.
How did it go?
Well, it didn't take long for him to get shot.
unidentified
So there was no sense in the world in me arguing with him.
Just to pause for a second, he has more to say, but what you have here is Lindsay Williams getting a call from the globalists who are like, you're saying too much, you need to calm down.
So, he does.
He goes along with what the globalists tell him to do.
If Alex Jones is like this truth teller who's bold and fighting the globalists, I don't know if he really wants to be associated with someone who gets a call from the globalists.
Agreed to shut down my website, which you won't find it there any longer.
But that's not the important thing.
The important part is what I can do in helping you who are listening to this program today know everything that the elite told me for the next year and a year and a half that they plan to do.
Because after this gentleman and I came to agreement, he said, now, chaplain, if you'll do these simple things, he said, we'll let you alone.
We'll let you go ahead and talk like you want to.
Well, at that point, I asked him, I decided I'd be friendly.
I said, how's your family?
Your wife?
Where have you been living since I saw you 25 years ago?
He became quite polite.
And at that point, I began asking him questions.
And for 45 minutes' time, he talked with me on the phone.
If you can imagine, Alex, again, I must say, I put on my britches just like you do every morning.
I could kind of believe, like, if he wasn't just such an outright liar, I could kind of believe that he had a conversation with someone and it went like that.
Like, that's Lindsay Williams' creation of this conversation where the guy is like, this is going to fall out.
The bottom's falling out.
it can't because that's an outrageously inflated price that oil was at so I believe that but then the rest of that is such horseshit that's that's like a like a bad movie like it The telling of a tall tale, for sure.
I called this guy, he threatened me, I asked him about his family, and then he was like, his guard was down, and then I found out everything that's gonna happen for the next year, so I can tell you.
Isn't that, like, going to get you another phone call?
And maybe, like, revealing on air that you done bamboozled the globalists, maybe they aren't going to give you a chance next time, Lindsay.
Shouldn't that be part of your consideration?
If you're like, oh, JFK got killed for going up against them, but I'm going to use information I clandestinely got from this phone call on the Alex Jones show.
Mark my words, you are going to see, six months, nine months, maximum one year from now, a total, complete collapse of the United States dollar and the economic system in this country.
Prepare yourself for it.
I was told by one of the insiders themselves that it's going to happen, and you can depend on the fact.
If I was the globalist, like, on a bad day, you're like, shit, what am I going to do?
I don't feel like being a globalist anymore.
I'm just struggling.
Oh, you know what I'll do?
I will call up Lindsay Williams and I will threaten him and I will tell him all kinds of random ass shit and it's going to be hilarious to watch it disseminate through that whole network of idiots.
And it's going to be programs like yours that see it brought back, because the only thing that these people fear is the masses waking up, and that's what you're doing for them, Alex.
My eight DVD set, which I didn't even talk about a moment ago, one of them is entitled Vaccinations and deals with the problem this gentleman just called in about.
Again, I beg of you.
800-321-2900.
And one of the DVDs on my big eight pack concerns that.
And the other thing about that is because he's talking about the I know about what the next year is going to bring.
There's an immediacy to it.
He's really trying to push these DVDs.
So, of course, I mean, Lindsay Williams is on selling his hot bullshit.
All of it is a prelude to his, you need to buy this, these DVDs.
And of course, Alex's avian flu slash factor eight sort of narratives weave in perfectly because lo and behold, Lindsay Williams has one of those eight DVDs that's about this.
Because Alex's people rising up legitimately means militias coming into effect, more Oklahoma City bombing type events, which leads to a crackdown and militarization of police.
The mentality that Alex Jones sort of puts out into the world...
Actually precipitates the things that his rhetoric is against.
A little bit shorter, but I think one of the reasons is because I had to read a lot of NIH documents and stuff like that, and it was really emotionally exhausting, so I cut it off here.
Yeah.
unidentified
I felt like that might take us longer to get through than it did.
If anyone feels like I gave short shrift to the HIV-AIDS crisis, I apologize that I didn't, you know, we didn't deal with it holistically in the big picture.
But I think some of that is because it doesn't fit all of it into the narrative that we're talking about.
But I want to make sure people understand that if you felt that way, I apologize.
I don't think that what we talked about did service to how bad a lot of the policies of the time were.