Today, Dan tells Jordan about how Sonja from Sweden requested they talk about a specific day from history. The gents wrestle with one of the worst terrorists probably ever, and make sense of why life is worth living even though he is allowed to live.
I just wanted to step in real quick before we start the actual episode because there's something going on here in Chicago, Illinois that I would like to draw everyone's attention to.
This episode's coming out on Monday, but on Tuesday night, if you are in Chicago, if you're one of our listeners who's in Chicago, I would like to very strongly recommend that you consider coming out on Tuesday night to At North Bar.
I don't know, I think it starts at 8. Who knows?
Look it up.
Maybe show up at like 7.30.
That's the safest way to do it.
There is an awesome show that's going on there.
Dear friends of the show, Far Out and I-9, a couple of great rappers are going to be in town doing a show there.
Jordan and I will both be out in attendance having a great time.
There's going to be some comedians who are friends of the show.
People like a Matt Riggs.
People like a Joe Fernandez.
He's not been on the show, but he has been invited.
Now I'm getting petty.
He's too busy.
But it's going to be a great show.
If you are considering something to do on Tuesday night, it starts early, so if you have to go to work on Wednesday, still an option for you.
If you want to come, we'd all love to see you there.
There's a lot of talent on that lineup.
It's going to be an amazing show.
Please consider coming.
But beyond that, please get ready to have a very heavy episode of the podcast thrust into your ears.
Today we've got a very interesting episode to go over, but before we get to it, what I would like to do is I'd like to give a shout-out to a couple of new donors who signed up with the team.
Very excited about this.
First, I'd like to say thank you to a new policy wonk.
So if you didn't pick up on this, if you're not picking up the pieces, July 22, 2011 is the day that Anders Breivik committed one of the worst terrorist attacks in Western European history.
A series of terrorist attacks across Norway.
To give you a little bit of a quick breakdown of the relevant details, on July 22, 2011, Anders Breivik killed 77 people in two separate terrorist attacks in Norway, representing the fifth deadliest terrorist attack ever in Western Europe.
At 1525 Central European Summertime, which is 3.15pm, he set off a car bomb outside...
3.15pm our time.
No, their time.
It would have been 8 a.m. our time.
8.25 a.m. our time.
He set off a car bomb outside a government building that housed the office of the Prime Minister of Norway.
The bomb he used was intentionally very similar to the one used by Timothy McVeigh at Oklahoma City.
Eight people were killed and 209 were injured.
Approximately 90 minutes later, Brevik arrived at the Norwegian Labor Party's Youth League camp on Utoya Island, having taken a ferry there while disguised as a police officer.
Brevik quickly killed the camp director and security officer, at which point he had over an hour to terrorize the people on the island before emergency services could arrive.
Though Oslo police were alerted two minutes after the first shot, their response time was greatly increased by the fact that they did not have a police helicopter which could have taken them directly to the island.
Twice during his rampage, Brevik called the police and tried to surrender, but ended up hanging up both times.
It appears that he was toying with the police because he continued killing people in between the calls and after.
Campers attempted to escape by swimming off the island, but a number of them were shot in the water by Brevik as he screamed, quote, You will die today, Marxists.
By the time the Norway police arrived, he had killed 69 people, 50 of whom were 18 years of age or younger, and he had injured 110.
When the police arrived, Brevik dropped his weapons and immediately surrendered.
When the police arrived, the terrified campers begged the officers not to kill them, since the original attack had been carried out by someone in a policeman's uniform.
Initially, there were reports of an accomplice being arrested, because the police wrongly arrested, Anzor Djukiev, a 17-year-old victim.
The rationale was that his haircut was different than it was on his ID, and they felt that his response to the attack was different than the rest of the people there.
He didn't cry or freak out, because as a child, he'd witnessed the massacres in Chechnya, and What the fuck?
Right.
So they arrested him, and reports sort of were circling, and Alex is going to get into that, the idea that there were multiple shooters, which is based on this false arrest that the police put out and accidentally made.
Thankfully, they at least did release him hours later, but still very, very dicey.
So Breivik immediately confessed to the bombing and the shootings, but refused to accept that he was wrong to do what he had done, calling it necessary.
Though initially deemed criminally insane, a follow-up report by psychologists declared him sane, and he was tried and sentenced to 21 years in prison, but...
The good news about that is once his sentence is up, they can just indefinitely extend it forever.
So that's the way the legal system apparently works in Norway, where 21 years for terrorism and murder is the highest sentence they can give.
At his trial, he spoke clearly and with conviction about how what he did was not wrong and how he had an absence of remorse.
He declared himself a modern-day Knight Templar who was resisting the invading Muslims.
Breivik showed a complete lack of remorse, but he did make one apology in court.
He apologized that he had not killed more people.
Six hours before the attack, Brevik posted a video on YouTube including a picture of him in military uniform decorated with many medals he had not earned.
In fact, he was deemed unfit for service and was never in the military.
In the video, he depicts Islam as a Trojan horse coming to destroy Europe.
If there's ever been a more open-and-shut case as it relates to right-wing racist terrorism, I'm not sure I've ever seen it.
Every single aspect of Brevik's planning could be confirmed down to the front companies he established, so it wouldn't raise suspicion when he bought masses of fertilizer to make his bomb.
After being sentenced, Brevik offered to provide information about the other cells of his alleged terrorist network, cells that probably didn't exist.
But his offer was rejected, citing completely impossible demands he was making, indicating that he, quote, doesn't know how society works.
It turns out he offered the information on the condition that Norwegian and European societies be overthrown.
In 2013, he threatened to go on a hunger strike if the prison did not give him a PlayStation 3 to replace his PlayStation 2, because the PlayStation 3 had better games.
In 2014, he threatened that he would starve himself to death if refused, quote, access to a sofa and a bigger gym, and again complained about the selection of video games he was provided.
He complained in court that he was beginning to enjoy the reality show Paradise Hotel, which he claimed was proof that he had become brain damaged.
Honestly, his life in prison sounds a little bit better than mine.
The attacks began at 8.25 a.m.
Austin time.
The police arrived at Utoya Island at 11.25 Austin time, at which point Brevik immediately surrendered.
Alex's show starts at 11 a.m.
Austin time and concludes at 3 p.m.
There's no reason for him not to know a good deal of information about what happened.
Because a lot of this information, while there were misreporting in terms of that second possible shooter, a lot of the stuff had already happened by the time he got off.
We should hold him to a higher standard of speculation on this episode.
So that is what happened on July 22, 2011.
And now we shall see how Alex covers this.
And then I have a whole bunch more information coming up later from some really...
Really dark research that I ended up having to do for this episode.
Alright, so essentially what we're going to do is listen to a white supremacist and find any possible way to imagine that this act is not terrorism done by a white supremacist.
The idea that he would end up getting into a prison population and probably hooking up with people and trying to get some scheme going, it seems very likely.
So he's kept in solitary confinement, but because solitary confinement is so cruel...
And so one of the things that they have to do to accommodate the fact that they can't allow him to be around other people is that they have three cells that he's in.
He has three cells.
One is like a study.
That he has.
One is a gym, and one is his, like, sleeping cell.
As I told you, there's going to be shootings at shopping malls, bombings, and it will all be triggered right during the implosion.
And they're even scripting that now, saying Al-Qaeda will strike us during an economic collapse.
So they're even getting you ready for the script.
The terrorists like to tell you what's going to happen so they get credibility when the terror attack happens.
I know their criminology and their game plan, so I'm able to predict exactly what they'll do.
I just told you yesterday, and I've told you in the last year, over and over again, the bombings will start in Europe.
They will then spread to the United States.
But it will only happen during the banker receivership takeover, so everyone will be distracted from that and run worshipping to their loving, murdering government leaders.
He's doing a lot of work in terms of trying to associate unrelated things to this event in order to further his argument, which is baseless, entirely baseless, that this is...
In terms of his prison cell, he actually won the first case, and then it was overturned in the appeals court, and the Supreme Court upheld the appeal, so they were like, no, we didn't.
It's tough to nail down and I'll do my best to explain all of it in due time.
But he's against Hitler and the Nazis before the attack because if they hadn't have tried to do this genocide that they did, and he is not a Holocaust denier at all, which I found very strange.
He thinks that because of their actions, the blowback from it created the multiculturalism and the political correct society that he is so against.
So he doesn't hate Hitler for the reasons you should.
He hates him because the aftermath of it has created the world that we live in today where there's a plurality of people's rights and things like that.
And there's the idea that people should be able to live together in peace.
Like, one of those white nationalists who's like, no, no, no, no, I don't hate black people, I just think we should have a white nation for white people, and then a black nation for black people, and then a Muslim nation for Muslim people.
There is probably a lot of bigotry underneath, but the more you dig into him and read things that people who knew him before would say, like past co-workers...
There's a consistent thread of he was a really good worker, he was very competent, but he would really get bothered and annoyed by Pakistani people dating white people and stuff like that.
Pakistani men dating white women.
And just any time Muslims would come up, he'd get mad and stuff like that.
So it seems like there's a real stick in his crawl, as it were, about those specific folk.
Even if the people blew themselves up in the cars, they will find the passports on damage, and that will be considered the immaculate, invincible passport made out of antimantium steel that Thor's hammer is made out of.
So Alex is going out on a limb and saying this is Muslim terrorists and they were abetted by the government and probably blew themselves up in the car.
All of these predictions completely wrong.
All of this is him getting on air immediately and creating a narrative that is irresponsible and based on nothing other than his quote-unquote gut or whatever.
His deep research that he does is like, every time it's stuff like this.
And it's not.
It's absolutely not.
Like right now, today, we are in a situation where in 2018, we're recording this on Sunday, there was a mass shooting this morning in Jacksonville.
In the same way that we don't have all the details while we're recording this, it would be irresponsible for us to decide who did it.
create some sort of a storyline out of that.
Right.
unidentified
You know, if we were to say, oh, look at this, another white guy shooting up the place, whether or not that is the truth that comes out, we don't know that while we're recording this.
Yeah, and I'm sorry to bring this into your life, but I do think by the time we get to the end of this, you'll understand much more fully why I think that this is...
As much as I'm mad at Sony for making me learn about this and you hear about this, I think that I'm overwhelmed by how much I appreciate her pointing us in this direction and saying, hey, what happened that day?
Because I think that we can highlight something that is very demonstrative of a big, big problem about Alex Jones that I think that we have tipped the iceberg of, perhaps, but I don't think that we've necessarily...
Dealt with in the way that we should, and we're going to over the course of this episode.
Like at the beginning of the episode, the first clip we played, he was talking about the shooting and the bombing with tones of kind of like almost excitement about it.
When the total collapse of Europe began, next they'll move to the United States and England.
And right as the banks seize the pension funds, go after the private pension funds, right as they slash benefits but increase taxes, the terror attacks will be staged so that you are distracted by that and rally around the government in fear.
They will also use it to knock off enemies.
They like to kill multiple birds with one stone.
And we're doing research right now on the leader of Norway.
So Alex is correct in one sense in that he's accurately read from reports that it was probable that Anders Breivik was trying to target the Prime Minister of Norway.
And the reason is because he had deemed him a supporter of multiculturalism and someone who is unacceptable.
I can't remember.
He has three classifications of traitors, Class A, B, and C traitors.
I can't remember which one he deemed the President or Prime Minister of Norway to be, but that was a big...
And additionally, Utoya Island, that youth camp that he targeted, was from the Labour Party, which he also deemed to be a party that supported multiculturalism.
That's why they were a target.
And also, a former politician who he deemed to be one of the big supporters of multiculturalism in Norway's past was scheduled to give a speech there.
And she did go give a speech there, but had already left by the time he got there because he got caught in traffic and shit on the way over to the island.
So the idea that, like, Alex is kind of, I mean, he's wrong about the globalists doing this.
But Anders Breivik absolutely was targeting these people for the reason of killing them.
Take things more seriously that don't directly involve you, or you think don't directly involve you.
Because this does.
This absolutely does.
It's fascinating to me because I always knew about Anders Breivik, and I understood that he was a bigot and committed these crimes and things like that.
But I didn't understand the full picture of it.
And I think that the media did a really terrible job of explaining what he was about and really looking at the full picture.
Because I think once you know some of the stuff that we're going to get into as this goes along, I think that you have to face the music in terms of...
What he was inspired by, what his goals were, the people who were philosophically aligned with him, things like that.
And I think you have to deal with what are the commonalities of rhetoric that are being put out by him and other folk?
And is it safe to say...
That he is the logical extension of that rhetoric.
In our 2009 investigation, one of my primary goals is to find out when Alex Jones started talking about George Soros.
And so far, as we've gone through 2009, we've not seen any mention of him.
There was one working theory, I didn't fully believe this, but there was one working theory that it was in 2014 Alex would have jumped on the Soros bandwagon because of Soros' involvement against Putin.
Well, no, there was more that Alex Soros before then would go and party in Russia, and then he was kicked out and wasn't allowed back in the country, from what I understand.
So that was one working theory.
I didn't think that was necessarily the case, but it was open for a possibility.
And because of this next clip, we now know it was at least before 2011.
Also, we told you this last week because of our sources that you could look for a criminal investigation to be opened by the George Soros Justice Department.
And I'm not saying there shouldn't be an investigation, but again, you have Satan investigating.
I mean, this is ridiculous.
James Murdoch denies misleading panel.
Reuters, Bloomberg, News of the World workers are offered jobs in Siberia.
So the old joke, we'll send you to Siberia or the North Pole.
Dow Jones outpost.
Justice Department prepares subpoenas and News Corp inquiry to feed that, of course, into Soros.
But he has, in the same way when he says, I'm going to kill you politically, he's couching his language in such a way that it's like, all stakes are off, I'm not saying shit, it doesn't mean anything, there's no consequences for me behaving this way.
I am saying this is fake, but I am also implying that it might not be fake, but I'm telling you to err on the side of this is fake, and definitely, if somebody tells you otherwise, well...
I bet what he would say is like Ross Perot had good ideas, but he was misguided, and then the globalists came in and threatened to kill him, and that's why he went out of the election.
But if a guy comes to your house and says, at gunpoint, get over there, I'm tying you up, and I'm going to rape your wife, just because he has a gun and has taken over your society doesn't mean he has a right to do it.
And we're going to have to gut up, and even if he ends up shooting us, fall down and grovel and act like we're scared, then grab the gun away.
By the way, I'm not just talking.
I've actually done that growing up in Dallas.
A knife and a gun.
Well, in one case I didn't grovel.
One time I did.
The other time I just waited and grabbed the thing away and, well, I'm not going to get into the rest of it.
But it's in the police files in Dallas and Rockwall.
The point is that you don't have a choice.
I'm not going to sit here and watch my family rape, okay?
He left Dallas and Rockwall and moved to Austin in his sophomore year of high school.
So he would have been 15, 16 at the time.
Whatever he's describing could very well be true and in police reports that are closed because he was a minor.
Those aren't accessible to public searches and things like that.
So the idea that when you do some sort of a check on Alex in terms of arrests, warrants, things like that, something doesn't come up, he straight up could have stabbed a dude in a fight.
Yeah.
When he was a minor, and it's not anywhere on his...
I think that that's a really good part of society in terms of, like, you know, you get arrested for stealing something as a kid, and once you get older, if you haven't committed more crimes, it's erased from your record or whatever.
And I also think there's something to be said for the idea of, like, what he's describing here is possibly self-defense.
So, like, if he did get into a fight with someone who had a knife and he ended up stabbing that guy or something like that with the guy's own knife, I don't think that that's murder, although also Alex Jones is an unreliable narrator.
I assume he said something like that in the Cowboys locker room.
I'm not sure.
Anyway, in this next clip, the Department of Homeland Security had previously to this, probably at some point in 2011, maybe even before that, put out some publications, some indications that they believed that one of the things to be concerned about was homegrown terrorism.
The idea of white people committing terrorist acts was something that they wanted folks to be on the lookout for.
But yes, Alex, I do think that you make up a lot of stuff.
And that's a really shitty sort of misunderstanding of what the Department of Homeland Security was trying to express.
Also, it's really funny on this episode where we now know that the terrorist attack in Norway was carried out by a white person who had strictly non-multiculturalist views that inspired him.
Yeah.
unidentified
Alex is complaining about the United States being like...
I'll give you a little bit of information about Janet Phelan.
We'll see if any of this jogs her memory where you might know her from.
So Janet Phelan's an investigative journalist who largely seems to specialize in bioweapons and has made a career out of arguing that the United States has consistently and wantonly violated biological and chemical weapons treaties.
Her appearance on Alex Jones' show today that we're talking about is largely speculative, arguing that we don't know if the research that the labs are doing in the United States are offensive or defensive, but she provides nothing to suggest that they are, in fact, offensive.
It's an appeal to an argument as flimsy as who knows.
You know, there's papers that come out, there's stories that come out that explain the research that's being done in terms of creating virulent strains of things.
And so the idea is you try and come up with as many inoculations, as many cures that you can, try and find ways around, try to mitigate the damage of it becoming weaponized.
So Janet Phelan has an interesting career behind her.
She writes for and released a book called Exile through a publication called New Eastern Outlook.
Politico describes New Eastern Outlook as, quote, a geopolitical journal published by a government-chartered Russian Academy of Sciences.
And it runs headlines like, quote, Ukraine's Ku Klux Klan, NATO's new ally.
As the United States confronted Russian ally Bashar al-Assad for using chemical weapons against Syrian children this spring, the site trumpeted, quote, proof, Turkey did 2013's sarin attack and did this one too.
And, quote, exclusive, Trump apologized to Russia for Syrian attack.
The Budapest Beacon said that the New Eastern Outlook is, quote, known to be Kremlin-backed, a Russian propaganda outlet targeting foreign audiences.
An article in Sputnik with the headline, quote, Here's how Putin and healthy diet made Russian...
In China, a hit was based on an article from the New Eastern Outlook.
It is a front for a Russian state think tank, the Academy of Sciences, that puts out pro-Russian propaganda for foreign audiences.
Andrei Vichik, one of the main forces behind New Eastern Outlook, wrote an article in 2015 titled, quote, How to Fight Western Propaganda, where he argues that...
Andre goes on to ask, quote, Do we counter the tactics and strategy of the destructive and ruthless empire with our honesty, with research, with telling and writing meticulously investigative facts?
We should try to be as truthful as we can, but our message should often be, quote, abridged, so the billions, not just the selected few, can understand it.
He's one of the main people behind the New Eastern Outlook, and his article here very clearly lays out, like, yeah, we should try and tell the truth, but abridged truth ain't truth, buddy.
Advocating for that is advocating for a murkiness effect.
So that's the publication that she works for and released a book through, which is a Russian foreign propaganda front that has a dicey relationship with the truth.
They're secretly level 2. I think it has to do with the level of defense that's around it, like whether or not they have to be deep underground and shit like that.
So he talks about mousepox, and he actually talks about it multiple times on this episode, this idea that there's really dangerous mousepox, and he's like, it's mainstream news.
So I looked into it, and I found the article he's probably talking about.
So I found the article he's talking about, about the danger of mousepox, I'm assuming, because it sort of matches his...
His narrative.
It's true that there was an article, and there's a headline in the New York Times that reads, quote, bioterror researchers build a more lethal mousepox.
That is a fucking scary headline, but it seems pretty likely that Alex didn't read the rest of the article.
The article is about how researchers spliced a single gene into the existing mousepox virus that would make it super lethal in an effort to test preventative measures they had concocted, because it's often how we develop protections for humans.
Yeah.
unidentified
Quote, "The scientists said that the results showed that the best defenses proved quite effective in preventing deadly disease not only in mice but probably in humans exposed So that's a really huge...
So Alex keeps trying to get people scared about the prospect of these diseases like mousepox getting out.
But from the article, quote, the leaders of the research said that the lethal mouse virus would have no effect on humans, even if it somehow escaped from the laboratory, which they said was safeguarded at biosafety level three.
Quote, Do you mean the director of prologue to all zombie movies?
Many experiments have shown that mousepox does not cause disease in humans, he said.
Quote, experts said both the threat of such developments and the federal response seem part of the theoretical debate, not something to worry about for now.
They split over whether the research was prudent.
So any kind of arguments that happen in the actual scientific community, we're like, is this worth it?
So now we get back to the Norway situation, where a little bit later in the show, Alex has no reason to not know a lot of the details about it, other than him not really caring to, not really caring to do his job as a journalist.
The latest on the Oslo, Norway blast targeting the Prime Minister's office, massive vehicle bomb report, people trapped, eyewitnesses, total chaos, helpers of the global jihad claim responsibility.
Hey, guess what I know from reading his goddamn manifesto?
He bought the guns in Norway.
Legally.
You can buy guns except for automatic weapons in Norway.
They just have some standards, like in terms of if you're going to buy a gun, you need to have some training courses, and you need to give a valid reason for why you would want it.
Some of the reasons that they allow are hunting, sports, recreation, self-defense.
The outrageously long document lays out his answer.
Anti-political correctness, anti-feminism, anti-Islam, and pro-hard-right nationalism clear as day.
It even describes exactly why he committed these terrorist attacks, how he planned the attacks for nine years before carrying them out, and how he lamented that he had to work alone because he couldn't risk anyone else being involved because, you know, you can't risk that sort of thing.
Whether or not they might give up to police or whether or not it would be a risk for them to know...
So, I set out to read Anders Breivik's manifesto, and I was immediately overwhelmed by the length.
I braced myself and dug in, but ultimately had to concede there was no way I was ever going to read all this bullshit.
I made it through a couple hundred pages at least, but hundreds of pages go by with rambling complaints about history, ranging from decrying the evils of cultural Marxism to citing crimes Muslims committed in the 1100s as proof that Islam is incompatible with Western democracy.
But though I skimmed some of it, like I said, I read at least a couple hundred pages of this thing.
You don't need to read this whole document to see shocking parallels with Alex Jones'worldview.
For instance, on page 13, he says, Or, you can skip to page 29 where you find this.
Quote, Oh, do you mean...
The current assault is in part a continuation of a century-old effort to destroy traditional European structures, the very foundation of European culture.
Indeed, the feminization of European culture is nearly completed, and the last bastion of male domination, the police force and military, is under assault.
Breivik decries cultural Marxism as a, quote, quiet revolution propagating a European hate ideology with the goal of destroying Western civilization, and which was anti-God, anti-Christian, anti-family, anti-nationalist, anti-patriot, anti-conservative, anti-hereditarian, anti-ethnocentric, anti-masculine, anti-tradition, and anti-morality.
Now, cultural Marxism is this idea that you could just replace globalists whenever he says cultural Marxism because it's the same idea that Alex Jones puts out into the world.
For those who don't know, cultural Marxism is this idea that classical economic Marxist ideas had to do largely with the redistribution of power, that sort of thing, the redistribution of economic power.
Really into the cultural Marxist idea is the idea of multiculturalism, feminism, race rights, those sorts of things have to do with a cultural version of Marxism wherein you're trying to redistribute the power forcefully.
Is that the idea that everybody should have an equitable existence, wherein there is no domination by any one of these groups of all the others, that is a stealth way of creating that Soviet-era communism, which, again, economic system, the issue is the government.
Right.
It was the oligarchy that caused everybody to starve to death, which, once again, we live in such.
On page 47, he makes the same argument that Alex does about how their opponents refuse to engage with ideas and just shut them down by calling them bigots.
Quote, all discussion can be sabotaged with the simple technique of shouting slogans, prejudice, myth, racism, Islamophobia.
Take the struggle from the common battlefield of argument into the opponent's camp.
His self-esteem as a member of civilized society that abhors ugly things like prejudice and Islamophobia.
Are you recognizing in this manifesto not only everything that represents modern Alex Jones, but also so much that represents the modern-day right?
If one of the soldiers in Anders Breivik's army that he imagines existing, which doesn't, gets arrested, Breivik has a whole speech prepared for them in his manifesto to recite in court.
The speech that he has for them, it includes the Thomas Jefferson quote, the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants, which coincidentally is something Alex Jones says at least once per show.
Probably a coincidence that the other quote that he has in his speech that these people are supposed to read in court is Mark Twain's quote, during a time of change, the patriot is a scarce man.
He's hated and scorned.
When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him when it costs nothing to be a patriot.
For then, it costs nothing to be a patriot.
Which, again, is something that Alex says all the fucking time.
These people are using the exact same tropes in terms of pushing their idea of what they want the world to be and how to justify their actions.
All of this is exactly what Alex would be in line with.
Whether he would be fucking...
I wouldn't say brave enough, because that has a positive connotation, but whether or not he would have the wherewithal to actually say things like, what I would like is Islam to be gone, what I would like is an ethnically homogenous people to be around me, whether or not he has the...
I would say foolishness, because he knows that he's trying to make money off this stuff.
This is what I'm talking about when I said I didn't understand.
Like, I knew he was a bigot terrorist and all that stuff, but reading through this manifesto in as much as I did is a terrifying experience because what you see, and I'm not saying that all of these people have read his manifesto and are going off of it.
That would be fucking stupid of me to assume.
But what you see are proto-talking points.
Of the alt-right world that we are experiencing right now.
And again, the reason that it's so complicated, because we're specifically talking about him, is because he, in his manifesto, is very specifically anti-Nazi.
Although it should be noted that while he was in prison, he did come out and say, I'm a Nazi now.
The traction that had been gained by organizations like Rebel Media, people like Jack Posobiec.
People like Lauren Southern, all of the anti-immigrant sentiment that has come to be such a part of our political dialogue that it shouldn't be.
These negative and ill-meaning bad faith actors that are clogging up our political discourse, including our goddamn president, whether or not they know it, I believe that they are very, very inspired by the manifesto that Anders Breivik put out.
And I don't think in any way that he was the beginning of any of these thoughts.
Don't get me wrong.
I'm not suggesting that.
But I think that his martyrdom in quotes that neo-Nazis, anti-Muslim folk experienced, led to an elevation of a lot of the talking points.
He was just talking about ethics in gaming journalism.
Right.
I think he got a lot more traction than maybe even he realizes.
It's just fucking jarring to see specific people mentioned in the manifesto that Alex Jones...
Respects and loves.
It's jarring to see the exact talking points if you just replace cultural Marxists with globalists.
It's fucking insane.
So the similarities that we're seeing here are very, very troubling.
I think that's fair to say.
I don't know why I'm asking for confirmation.
Of course they are.
You're looking at me like, Dan, how dare you?
And that's fair.
So they're really troubling because now it's time to explain the name of his manifesto.
It's called 2083, A European Declaration of Independence, because toward the tail end of his very long, very dumb document, Anders Breivik lays out his vision of what will happen in the future, namely a three-phase European civil war, which he believed he would help start, leading to the white Europeans reclaiming their world in 2083.
And he's the prisoner who has the longest sentence in that sort of confinement ever.
Because, I mean, if you read his manifesto, it's fucking clear his planning.
He was doing this for years.
He started a company specifically to get enough money.
In order to do the attack.
He ended up getting like 2 million...
I don't remember the currency in Norway.
I apologize.
But it would be hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of money from this company and then walked away from it because he was just trying to raise the money in order to fund his ability to plan this attack that didn't happen for nine years after.
It's a ludicrous level of very specific information.
Anybody who wants to be like, this was something that the globalists set up, or something like that, they're not engaging with the very, very available information that comes from him.
No, even less than that, like 14. But I also feel like people who do these sorts of things, I would be pretty comfortable in assuming that they kind of create a heroic mythology around themselves.
Yeah, one thing that he can guarantee is that he's seen more racism coming from Pakistanis and Arabs towards white people than ever white people against Pakistanis and Muslims.
But the reason that he did is because his dad was in business, and he got in a deal with a couple of individual Arabic people, and the deal went bad.
And the dad, I guess, complained so much that his middle school child sort of extrapolated and generalized that to all people who were Arabic or Muslims.
You read this manifesto and the stuff he talks about from his childhood.
I think there's a little kernel of that.
So that hatred was already there.
I don't want to psychoanalyze and say, you don't care about the Serbian bombings and stuff like that, because I don't really give a shit.
That's not as important as how fucked up this fucking document is.
Yeah.
unidentified
Quote, if we had executed, let's say, 100,000 Marxist intellectuals in Western Europe after World War II and banned all forms of Marxist doctrine, God, how do you do that mental gymnastics?
Your ultimate point, if I understand it correctly, is that if you actually believe any of this shit, if you put this rhetoric out, then this is the only way.
I'm not saying that his actions are logical, because they fucking aren't.
But if you stipulate Alex Jones' worldview...
There's no reason not to dedicate yourself for years to planning some sort of event that you think is going to kick off a civil war in Europe against the multiculturalist forces that you think are ruining white European culture.
Breivik gives advice on assassinations in his manifesto.
Quote, it's much more rational and pragmatical to focus on the easier unprotected targets instead of sacrificing good men on an impossible target.
Going on to explain that the best targets are cultural Marxist professors.
Quote, the operational goal should be to execute five Category B traitors within two hours.
Plan ahead so you're prepared to assault five targets in succession.
You'll usually always be caught, so instead of going home and waiting for someone to knock on your door, move swiftly.
He advises using a flamethrower should you, I don't know, let's say, try and attack a meeting of multiculturalist politicians, noting that, quote, a severely burned category A or B traitor will in reality become a living symbol of what awaits individuals guilty of trying to sell their own people into Islamic slavery.
They will act as a deterrent and contribute to spread fear in the hearts of the rest of the traitors and will thus cause more ideological damage than that of a dead body.
He or she will become a living testament to what will happen to any and all category A and B traitors, and everyone will learn that high treason is not without rickety.
He thinks that journalists are traitors, just like Alex.
There are annual gatherings for journalists in all Western European countries.
These gatherings are considered the most attractive targets for large-scale shock attacks due to the amount and quality of Category B traders.
He also legitimately advocates using weapons of mass destruction against multiculturalism.
Quote, Other types of weapons of mass destruction, biological and chemical, must be considered as realistic options as well.
He includes dozens of pages of very specific instructions on how to make bombs.
He includes a detailed breakdown of all the various medals people would be awarded for killing traitors once his revolution kicks off.
He includes insanely complicated operation plans for attacks as extreme as bombing power plants.
He spends countless hours of his life putting together this manifesto, and it's clear from the text that he knew when he was writing it that he was going to kill a bunch of people.
He wrote this manifesto and carried out his attacks because he believed the same things that Alex Jones does.
Namely, that Muslims are a destructive force and they will destroy Western culture.
And they're being aided and abetted by a traitorous government force.
Anders Breivik calls them cultural Marxists.
Alex calls them globalists.
But they're talking about exactly the same thing.
Here's why this is all of the utmost importance.
Anders Breivik, his manifesto, and his attacks represent, as I've said, the logical end result of the rhetoric that both he and Alex Jones employ.
They believe nearly identical things about the world, but one of them is willing to put those beliefs into action.
The other mostly wants to make money off trying to coax others into doing the dirty work for him.
As relevant as this is to our fucking world and Alex Jones, it's really important to note that this is the entire philosophy from the beginning of America.
Because Anders Breivik's 1,500-page manifesto, at about page 1,410, starts to lay out something of a weird diary documenting his journey towards his perceived martyrdom.
Noting that he started working on this manifesto in 2006, five years before the eventual attack.
So he started in 2006 on his manifesto and this compendium, as he calls it.
He had started...
On his actual planning for the attack four years prior to that.
So he's nine years of planning, five for the manifesto.
But this diary, dude, it gives such a weird fucking picture.
And these dates that he describes are fucking surreal.
When you consider that he knew as he was writing this, the eventual end goal is he's going to kill a bunch of people for his perceived slights that he has about multiculturalism.
When you read this, you get a very disappointing, sad picture of a person.
From January 2010, quote, Regret to admit I've become notorious as a downloader of pirated movies, series, and games, etc.
But I have noticed an increasing number of sites have been closed down lately.
Stealing is bad, I admit, but then again, when you've devoted your entire life to a good cause, you can allow yourself some naughtiness, especially if it can contribute to your lack of funds.
He ultimately fails to find any guns to buy in Prague, but reassures himself that, quote, regardless of the outcome of this mission, I've had a great vacation and have experienced most of the historical sites and a lot of amazing architecture.
I've also partied a lot with the people I met at the hostel.
Look, that's not my kind of thing, but I might have died on this trip, so I gotta fuck.
It's like, dude.
Just fucking live your life.
Stop it with this shit.
So, from a November 2010 post, quote, I'm currently watching Dexter.
The series is about a forensic mass murderer.
Quite hilarious.
Oh, I'm also playing Fallout 3 New Vegas at the moment after finishing Bioshock 2. I'm going to try the new World of Warcraft Cataclysm when it's released in December.
I'm trying to avoid relationships as it would complicate my plans and may jeopardize my operation.
And I don't feel comfortable manipulating girls anymore into one-night stands.
I'm not that person anymore.
I did screw two girls in Prague.
This is where I brought this up already.
I did screw two girls in Prague, though, but that was mainly because it was a realistic chance that I would end up dead during the process of establishing a weapons connection.
I won't make any effort to try and completely justify it, though.
Human males are imperfect by default, and they're plagued by their biological needs.
Nevertheless, screwing around outside of marriage is, after all, a relative.
Could you- Could you- It is essential that you do what is required to keep morale and motivation at high level, especially just prior to Operation Critical Moments.
I've reserved €2,000 from my operations budget, which I intend to spend on high-quality model escort girl one week prior to execution of the mission.
I'll probably arrange that just before or after I attend my final Martyr's Mass at Frogner Church.
It will contribute to ease my mind, as I imagine I will be tense and very nervous.
It's easier to face death if you know you're biologically, mentally, and spiritually at ease.
Right, and then also, the only thing, like, not the only thing, but one of the things that I felt when I read that passage is like, How fucking horrible is it to put that sex worker through that?
Like, she doesn't know the context of all this.
The idea that she went and did a job and then maybe a couple weeks later that person murdered all these people.
Quote, approximately four years ago in 2006, just before I started writing this compendium, I decided to move from my apartment in Frogner, one of the most pricey areas in Oslo, home to my mother.
So he was living with his mom the entire time that he was making this compendium and planning his attack.
Oh, and also, he was doing steroids the whole time he was planning this attack.
Quote, initiated third steroid test cycle, three weeks on Wistrol tabs, 40 milligrams a day, followed by three weeks of DBOL tabs, 40 milligrams per day.
Weight increased from 86 kilograms to 93 kilograms.
No side effects cycle completed with great success.
I have never in my life been more physically fit than I am today.
Strength increased by 30 to 50 percent, which will prove useful.
There's a bunch of instances of him talking about his steroid use.
And then even beyond that, he talks about stacking ephedrine with caffeine.
So he's on just sort of over-the-counter speed and steroids the entire time, which does, if you look at the science, has increased...
You sort of parse through the little details that you can find in his manifesto, and it starts to make crystal clear the entrenched bigotry that he already has inside him, the diminished capabilities and capacity that he has based on his drug use, the clear psychopathy that he has that you can just glean from his own writing.
But I think more importantly is all the very one-to-one parallels with Alex.
So you look at that and you see the possibility of, if I had those thought patterns, it's entirely possible that I would have committed some sort of crime.
I don't think that, of course, I don't think that mental illness is fully responsible for his actions, in the same way that I don't think that the rhetoric and the narratives that are very similar to Alex's rhetoric and narratives, I don't think they're 100% to blame for his actions.
There's a very complicated booyah bays going on here, this stew of things.
And the only reason that I think it's super duper important to our stuff is that the narratives are the part that you can change.
Seven people killed by the bomb blast, two seriously injured.
Police are saying they believe the person responsible for the bomb to be a foreigner, according to BBC.
Well, they arrest you over there if you criticize foreigners.
But the attacker...
God, I wish we could arrest you.
Now arrested.
Look, Norwegian.
There you go.
White Al-Qaeda hit and hit hard.
Right when they come out and say, White Al-Qaeda's going to hit, and they show the white people with blue eyes in the headdresses, boom, they're hitting.
So this is also just making a straw man out of the DHS reports and stuff like that.
The only thing he could possibly be hearkening back to is, like, years prior, there was that John Walker Lind, who was the white guy who left his privileged life.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I recall.
And fought alongside, but he got fucking arrested in 2001.
There are 7 billion people on this dumb, stupid fucking planet that we're destroying.
It is at least, I suppose, a positive that it's like, out of 7 billion people, it takes that many people to generate this kind of level of psychopath monster?
So, the reason that last clip is particularly important to me is because Alex Jones gets a lot of mileage out of this term, white al-Qaeda, that he uses.
So the reason that it's really important to me is that he gets a lot of mileage out of the ambiguity that he usually uses with him.
Because when he talks about white Al-Qaeda in that last clip, he makes it very clear what he's talking about is white people joining Al-Qaeda.
And that is the kernel and that's the general use of that term.
However, later, not in this episode, but later as time goes on, he'll repurpose that term into being a way to mock the idea of right-wing white terrorism.
The idea that's like, oh, they're just using white people now like it's white Al-Qaeda.
But in this episode...
In that last clip, he made very clear he's specifically talking about white people joining up with Al-Qaeda, which is what the globalists are doing to make everyone scared of white people.
That's the narrative that he's putting forth, which is clunky and pretty bad.
Especially considering the truth that we know about this attack, which was primarily motivated by a guy who hates Muslims and thinks that a group that could be described similarly to the globalist is helping them overrun Europe, which is exactly what Alex Jones thinks about the world.
This next clip is a damning indictment of Alex Jones because what he's doing is a business meeting on air with Paul Joseph Watson trying to spin the narrative that they want to put out on the website without Paul Joseph Watson's side of the conversation.
I don't know why he didn't do this in the commercial break that he is clearly coming out of.
But whatever the case, here is Alex Jones being the worst fucking content producer in the world.
It's late in the show, so I don't know exactly all of the news that had come out, but he's already dealing with it as, like, coordinated but separate attacks when it was the same guy.
Right as the bankers implode Europe and get ready to implode the United States, they stage these provocateur events to make you rally around and worship them.
Watson.
Hey, Watson, are you there, buddy?
Okay, I'm live on air right now.
You're not punched up.
I called you on my globalist tracking iPhone.
We're using a jack-in-of-the-matrix here.
But obviously, look, we don't have the crew, but I'm asking listeners now, as I ask you, because this is what really impresses people that aren't awake, who don't know the research.
They do get impressed by precision predictions.
Remember I said white al-Qaeda would strike right as they fully imploded Europe?
And that they would have a rollout of white al-Qaeda starting with soft-target shootings and bombings in Europe that would then move to the United States?
And I've been predicting this, I don't know, for over a year now with exact precision because I was gauging their propaganda.
And then at the same time, when Bob Chapman's coming on, Alex gets a call from someone in Norway who's a listener who was there when the bomb went off.
And I've predicted that in the past, so use the fact that I predicted that in the past to make an article that sums all of this up and make it look like I made a really amazing prediction, even though I'm ignoring the fact that details are still...
By this time that he's now on air, this is like in the third hour of the show, it's all over in Norway time.
Anders Breivik has laid his weapons down and been arrested.
Presumably, the news reports are reporting that.
Now, I'll also say that because of what we've already talked about, the victim who was arrested as a supposed accomplice, that fake news, if you will, might be being reported.
So that's something that he should...
Take a step back from, but it's understandable if he wants to use that in his narratives.
Which at the same time, like, everybody's actually, like, the idea of arresting that guy in that moment does make sense to you because if you're a Norwegian cop...
How could you possibly deal with this in a rational matter in the moment, you know?
Like, you're just throwing shit at the wall at that point, just like, I see something, I don't know what to do!
And even then, now the more I think about it, the more I'm like, if you kill that guy, if you kill that guy in the moment while you're on that island, He's a hero.
That's one of the points that I had hoped to get to, is that the entirety, if you look at the big picture of this story, all it does is disprove everything Anders Breivik believed in.
That allows him to have correspondence with the outside world, watch reality shows, have an electronic typewriter so he can write his manifestos and things like that.
It's a living indictment of what he believes in.
The fact that societies are able to deal with someone like him and not be like, you know what?
So, you know who was trying to start a World War III scenario?
Anders fucking Breivik.
It's clear.
That's what he was doing.
Phase one of his three-phase war involves these flash attacks, one of which he perpetrated, which was in order to kick off this three-stage European civil war that would lead with the repression of Islam as a whole.
So Alex being like the globalist's plan to do this, like, no, you are right.
You're right in terms of the idea, but you're wrong because...
It was the idea of someone who believes the same things you do actually doing it.
Logistics portion of his manifesto, Anders Breivik talks about the idea of hooking up with Al-Qaeda because he could buy weapons from them or something like that.
So he talks about the idea of getting involved with terrorist groups, but at the same time...
What motivated this man to do what he did is the same rhetoric that informs most of Trump's support.
Most of the MAGA base.
I don't like painting with a broad brush.
Not everyone is beholden to all the same propaganda, but the people who put out most of the influential media Are exactly in line with everything that's in this manifesto.
If I read their documents and they were like, oh, shit, in the same way that reading his manifesto was, I would probably have to take a moment of pause.
So in this next clip, we've come to the point of the show where the news reports are clearly saying that this was a white guy, a blonde guy, who carried out this attack and may have had...
I saw it in the tea leaves from all the data I integrate.
I could see the scripting.
Ladies and gentlemen, right-wingers in Europe absolutely hate the Muslims and try 24-7 to kick them out and are tried by government tribunals for saying, rout the Muslims.
If you think right-wing militia groups and people are working with the Muslims, ladies and gentlemen, I've got a bridge I want to sell you.
Okay, Paul, now I'm getting freaked out.
You've got to admit, Paul, did I not absolutely 100% call this?
The thing that I think he hates more is the multiculturalism and that...
Cultural Marxist, which is code for globalists, which is code for Alex's worldview.
So I do think that he hates Muslims and was primarily motivated by that.
But the primary motivation is also washed up into that worldview that you could easily ascribe to being, he's afraid of the globalists allowing Muslims in.
It's the same thing.
In the same way, I know I'm making a really fine line here, but it's the same thing where it's like you want to call him a Nazi, but in his manifesto he's clearly anti-Nazi and Hitler, so it becomes more complicated.
You want to say that he just hates Muslims, and yes, he does hate Muslims, but there's another layer to it that is more what he's motivated by, which is the traitorous government people who are allowing the Muslims in.
And the only reason I feel the need to make that fine a point is because it...
Is accurately reporting what he believes, and it makes it more similar to Alex.
Because if your experience of the world, like, legitimately is trumped by propaganda and is trumped by, like, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
He's cool.
He's cool.
Don't get me wrong.
He's cool.
But what you need to know about is cultural Marxism.
What you need to know is about the globalists who want to flood our country.
Well, they also want more Daves, too, though, as is in the manifesto, and Alex, this is part of his rhetoric, the idea that they want more Daves and Mohammeds in here because they'll all vote for multiculturalist or globalist people.
And, and if you don't believe that, then that's on you.
I think, I think most people understand that, but like we talk about, there's that 40. There's that hard 40. But even then, with those people, I would say that 98% of people are like, no matter who is affected by the propaganda, 98% of people in their own lives, in their own small place, just want to be kind.
And unfortunately, the 2% is somehow capable, like the psychopaths, are somehow capable of creating this propaganda that can convince people who otherwise would not want to harm someone.
There's a reason that 40% of the country doesn't murder people.
There are only a certain amount of logical fallacies that exist because of how the structure of arguments work.
In the same way, propaganda only works maybe 15 different ways.
There aren't a lot of ways that are compelling to make an argument that are emotionally manipulative.
There is a finite number of ways that people can trick you into forgetting your higher brain and going with emotion.
So what I would recommend...
And the reason that 2% doesn't scare me too much is that I hope as we evolve and as society gets better and better as we go along, which I hope we will, those...
But those sorts of things, if we just start to understand them a little better, the appeals to demography, the appeals to unproven...
The appeals to us versus them.
Those sorts of things.
If we just take a second, if everyone just starts to understand, oh, this is how propagandists manipulate people, there's a decent chance that we could undo a lot of the damage that that 2% can do.
I mean, just the point being is that how is it that we educate people when the 2% is so insistent about not educating people and yet those 2% are billionaires?
I sincerely believe this, and I believe this based on all of the research that I consistently do, and all of the like...
Alex's primary sources, like digging into it.
I really think that all it takes is a charismatic, decently matched version of what he does in order to completely destroy all of the stuff that he does.
You know, all of the propaganda can be diffused.
All of the propaganda can be diffused to a certain amount of people by discussing why the propaganda exists, where it comes from, what its intent is.
And where the problem is.
Propaganda can't exist like that in a world where the inverse is there.
And so when you have people who push back against it, which I think is incredibly important, I'm not just saying that because it's kind of what we do, but pushing back against that will help defuse all this stuff.
I think this conversation is certainly very valid, but at the same time, we wouldn't be having it if it weren't for...
A lot of feelings that we're having because of the content that we've been covering.
And how very clear, like I can't stress enough, if you take the time to go read all the stuff that I've read, that I've tried to express as best I can on this podcast without just sitting here and reading you his whole goddamn manifesto.
If you go and read it, you will only see parallels to the world that we talk about and Alex Jones.
So in this situation, when he's living in 2011, when he's living with a black president, when he's living with all of these ideas that he can't handle, of course he's terrified because he thinks, finally, white people are going to get treated like this.
And now he's totally fine with this impression because he knows, fuck it, white people are going to be fine, even though he's wrong, even though he's utterly and completely wrong, even though white people are more damaged currently by what he thinks makes sense for white people, he still thinks that by virtue of having a white supremacist in office, he's going to be fine.
Well, he's rich, though, so he's probably going to be fine.
And when you eat that pudding, what you find out is that...
All it is is white fear.
All it is is this is coming for us, guys, if we don't push back against it, but let's also, at the same time, not really care about the actual victims.
It's a legitimate reality that it needs to be summarily...
Dismissed as a whole to the point where the people who are susceptible to this propaganda have to accept for 30 years until they start building Confederate monuments again in order to make sure that, you know, it's going to require that.
But I've dropped the ball on a couple of requests that have come in and I've forgotten about it and I feel fucking terrible about it and I need a reminder.
No, yeah, that one where you called a timeout in the Cavs game, David Blatt, and you were like, we need to call a timeout, but you didn't have any timeouts left, and then LeBron overturned you, but the refs didn't see it, and he fired a fucking buzzer beater that was against the rules, and Derrick Rose was still great at the time anyway!