Today, Dan and Jordan go back to the past to see what Alex Jones was up to right before the public unveiling of the Tea Party. In doing so, the gents end up uncovering numerous racist narratives, and a gigantic lie about Hurricane Katrina.
If you'd like to support the show, you can do so by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking support the show, that little button there, and we would appreciate it.
He, just the other day, this is so exciting, and we want to give a very special congratulations out to him.
Him and his company, EQO, a little startup that he's working in, working on, just got awarded a $100,000 grant in order to put their new technology ideas into motion.
I feel really bad about this, because I know he and I have talked about this, but as I understand, it's something about, like, reclaiming water or something like that.
I don't remember exactly what they do, and maybe if I say it on air, it would be giving out trade secrets.
Is that your excuse?
Exactly.
But what I do remember from talking to you is it sounds like a really cool idea and something that could be very helpful in conservation and helping with the cleanliness of the world.
Whenever we talked about it, I thought it was great.
Whenever you said right after, like, he got awarded $100,000 and it's for his tech and I feel really bad about this, I swear to God I thought you were going to be like, They shouldn't have given him that money.
So today we're going over February 22nd to 24th, 2009.
Again, we're still not quite going to get to the actual emergence of the Tea Party.
But it's interesting because I think we see a couple of pieces that are very relevant to Alex's mindset right before.
The shit goes down, as it were.
And one thing that, you know, regardless of the mood of the world or anything like that, one thing about Alex is very consistent, and that is where we're going to start here on February 22nd.
They're announcing all over the country and USA Today they're putting in body scanners where you walk in and it scans your naked body and puts it in a database.
What they don't tell you is these airport scanners are to get a biometric read of your entire body so that their street corner cameras have your body's digital algorithm and can track everywhere you go with instant ID.
I don't think that necessarily they're harvesting body digital algorithms to put into street cameras.
But if they were...
Holy shit, technology would be prohibitive.
The idea that every single street camera has to be hooked up to some sort of massive database of everybody's body digital algorithm in some way that your digital body algorithm is unique.
Exactly like how, remember when that guy murdered rats who ate his potatoes, or tomatoes, and their neighbors called the cops on him, and he went to jail.
He's using coded language in order to depict this nightmare scenario wherein he's just using real-world stuff and turning it into a fantasy fear for his privileged audience.
So, we have a situation here in 2009 where we know that Alex is about to launch off on a major new adventure wherein he joins up with the Tea Party and believes himself to be the king of the Tea Party, more or less.
He's going to fold in all his Ron Paul beliefs into the burgeoning Tea Party, and it's going to take him in a different direction than he's been on already.
As we've seen these narratives from what we've covered already with the pro-Palestinian shit, the pro-net neutrality, anti-politics.
And as we covered all of that in 2015, there's one piece of it that stuck out.
And that is, one of the things that we could clearly tell was guiding Alex and motivating him to make that switch was he was seeing increased popularity.
His numbers were through the roof.
Now, would it surprise you to find out...
That his numbers were exploding right before the Tea Party broke.
And, you know, I'm talking to a lot of station owners and program directors, and I even have talked to some very big radio consultants who've contacted me, famous people in the radio industry, and they said, Alex, your time has come.
The people want you.
You would be the number one show in the country, but obviously the big corporations that own the biggest stations aren't going to let you on the air.
But they tell me that, and I've had meetings before, at the highest levels of radio, even the high-level executives are scared and know that they're not members of the elite, know that their time is numbered, know that America is dying, but that's what they're saying.
Massive calls to talk radio, especially local talk radio, you know, that is anti-New World Order, anti-globalist, pro-America, and that basically my view, your view, the reality view, is taking over and exploding.
And I mean, I'm just one small part of this, but my web numbers, our radio listener numbers, everything is just hyperbolic right now.
I would say that it's very clear from everything that's come out since.
But what happened in late 2015 and into 2016 was AstroTurf growth.
Yeah, there was automated bots that were over-inflating traffic.
And when you look at the Tea Party, it was primarily, almost entirely bankrolled by Americans for Prosperity, FreedomWorks, the Koch Brothers Foundation.
So when we look back in 2009 and we see Alex's numbers jumping hyperbolically again, it's really hard not to hear that and see, oh, the Koch brothers bought you traffic.
If we were, like, political strategists of any stripe, and we were trying to get Alex Jones to bend to our will, it would only take a couple of episodes to really suss out what he's about, white fear, generally, and what he's susceptible to, his own ego.
Those sorts of things are very easy to smell out.
So if you were, like, someone who was working for the Koch brothers in strategy, Or something like that.
And you wanted to flip Alex Jones?
It would be incredibly easy to just stroke the ego and then, I don't know, have some functionary whisper in his ear like Roger Stone has done.
They need a salesman.
Yeah.
So you have your salesman and then you have the artificial growth in order to butter up his ego, make him feel on top of the world.
You have this spokesperson, salesperson come in and double down on that.
Maybe the meetings that he's taking with these high-end people saying his time has come.
Maybe those sorts of people are the people who are working in concert with the false growth that he's experiencing.
Yes, they're going to have Predators patrol the United States, not just the borders.
They have high-altitude blimps at 100,000 feet in Canada, the U.S. and England.
With biometric body scanning software tracking everyone in real time, they know your biometric resonance just by the way your body moves from a shoot-down position from above you.
It's like, no matter where you are, you're one second away from this blimp shooting you dead because of the way you walk and because they've scanned you and it's in a system.
You know, I just told the guys in the control room about something that I'm going to talk about this week on the air sometime.
But I don't do it to be silly.
I don't get into potty humor.
It deals with the royalty of Europe and what scum they are and how low they think the public is.
You can't make this stuff up.
I ought to give it to the weekday.
What's the name of that weekday show they've got that's only on for an hour?
It's pretty funny.
Todd and Don ought to give it to them.
I shouldn't even get into it.
The Queen of England, and it still goes on.
They claim they stopped it in 1901.
The Queen of England.
I'm not even going to say it, man.
If you Google it, it's mainstream news.
I mean, guys at the office last night didn't believe it when I told them, so they Googled it.
And my wife knew about it because she was also a history minor when she went to school in France, and so she learned about the French royalty.
You know what?
I'm not even going to get into it.
I was just joking around during the break with the guys, but it's just that the elite are such scum, ladies and gentlemen, that you can't even imagine the stuff that they're into.
I'm not going to get into it.
Maybe later this week when I have time to cover it and break it down.
To give you an idea, Tutankhamen, one of the pharaohs of Egypt, had an official nose picker.
And I'm serious.
He was so elite, and he was God on earth, so someone had to pick his nose for him.
Well, the royalty in England has a toilet attendant, and I'm just going to leave it at that.
Let's just say they don't touch toilet paper with their own hands.
It's taken care of by somebody else, and it's called the groom of the stool.
You know, the feds are paying for drills all over the country with local police.
As the AP covered in Michigan, where they call the middle school students out, blow up a bus in front of them with flashbangs, smoke it out, in some cases here in Texas, actually catch the cars on fire, and then tell the children, we're going to kill you, we're homeschoolers, and brainwash them against the Second Amendment and homeschoolers.
like where you go out and have socializing groups and stuff like that.
I think that can be very damaging to people.
But just the idea of not wanting kids to go to public school, I think that there is an argument you can make there that's not based on bullshit and propaganda.
But all of the responses that you can find from homeschooling people are defensive, which I understand, and I'm not going to come down on them too hard for that, because I would much rather come down on them for being like, why wasn't it a Muslim group?
But one of the things that I did was that I just decided to skip over an interview that Alex has with a member of the Iowa National Guard.
Alex's big narrative that he's pushing around this time is that there is this city, Arcadia, Iowa, where they're going to do this drill where, remember we talked about it.
Where they pretend to search people's houses who have volunteered to go along with the role play while they try and find this supposed armed dealer who's in the town in order to prepare them for...
If that happens.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I skipped over that, and I'm actually kind of glad I did now, because it gives us a chance to talk about it now.
Because on the 23rd, Alex Jones says this about that interview.
You know, when I had that lieutenant colonel on Greg Hapgood Friday, I was really interrogating him, and I had such an in-depth knowledge of their operations from decades of study that I can tell you, A, he is a patriot.
And he's been told everything's going to collapse, and he's got to do this, and he's very upset.
He's thinking about Granddaddy sitting him on his knee and saying, Son, a time's going to come when they're going to come after these shotguns and rifles.
Well, I think you have to look historically is that that domestic role really has been filled by the National Guard across the United States for decades.
And in Iowa, we're no different.
For instance, last summer we had incredibly historic floods.
Here in the state, the number one response force for many military is always the National Guard in their home state.
And we deployed more than 4,000 people last summer to fight floods in Iowa.
That being said, if there are other kinds of response necessary in the state, and typically the responses that we really have to do with are most of the time natural disasters.
But in the event of other disasters, let's say some kind of weapons of mass destruction or some other kind of incident, we'd be also called upon.
I mean, it's not far off where he's going with his line of badgering questions.
So, we're going to listen to more of him because it would be unfair of me to cherry pick this and be like, well, that's the one part where he wasn't crying.
Well, I remember back in 2002 seeing local newscast with the Iowa National Guard, not in drills, but out on the highways, searching cars and then telling the news cameras to turn off.
Were you in the garden then or were you aware of that?
I have video of Army and Marines with role players screaming, I'm an American, please don't put me in the camp, and the military are trying to confiscate their firearms.
I mean, certainly you've heard the Army Times and the new director from Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, that they will use the National Guard under federal control for civil insurrection.
Well, you've got to remember that the National Guard, 99% of the time, if you're talking about peacetime, belongs to the state in which they are located.
Only on occasion do they become federalized.
One of those examples, of course, is being mobilized and deployed to go to war or peacekeeping or other kinds of federalized missions.
But other than that, the National Guard generally in peacetime belongs to the governor of that state.
So the idea that they're federalized, Alex gets to throw that around a lot, but what that is really in reference to is a very minuscule aspect of what they do.
Even when they go into another state for natural disaster relief efforts and stuff like that, let's say the Iowa National Guard ends up in Illinois, then they are under the aegis of the Illinois governor.
Is that true?
They're being lent to the state of Illinois, so the chain of command goes up to the Illinois governor.
So Hapgood has a lot of good answers for Alex and sort of is trying to calmly deflect his narratives and trying to be like, well, here's the real situation.
I understand what you're saying and whatever.
And it's not working and it leads to Alex getting what I would describe as hostile.
I mean, sir, you know historically there's a danger of militaries being used by the executive branch to subdue populations and there's talk of breakdown of society and rioting right now?
I mean, what I can tell you is only what we do here in Iowa, and that's to be prepared to go to war and be prepared to help people here in the United States.
So now Alex gets to what he thinks is going to be a gotcha question, which isn't, and then we will get to a lot of information that I have that clearly illustrates that Alex is...
Again, I can just tell you what I see here in front of me every day.
I see 9,500 men and women that are committed to liberty, that are committed to the United States of America, committed to the state of Iowa, doing the absolute best they can do.
We need to talk about Guns and Hurricane Katrina, because Alex is a liar.
And he's a liar in a very specific way that I think is actually interesting, and it's a story that I don't believe is very publicly out there, and I think it would do us all a good bit to our edification to understand some of the dynamics that were at play.
The idea that there was widespread gun confiscation after Hurricane Katrina is not based in reality, but in fact is a myth that was created by the NRA along with the Second Amendment Association.
They were trying to create this image of an out-of-control federal power taking advantage of a horrible tragedy in order to grab people's guns.
But the truth is infinitely more complicated than that, but the reasons for doing so are not.
The NRA's propaganda is largely propped up by an unfortunate quote from New Orleans Police Department Superintendent Edwin Compass III, who said, After struggling to retain a state of calm in a city that was 80% underwater and plagued by looting and mismanaged efforts to help survivors.
It was a clumsy, dumb thing to say, but you can understand his mental state.
Either way, he was no longer New Orleans Police Department Superintendent a few weeks later.
But the optics of it are super unfortunate, and so the NRA took some incidents like this, and they sued the New Orleans Police Department very closely after the storm.
This led to a settlement in 2008 where the New Orleans Police Department revealed that they had taken 552 guns into their headquarters between August 23, 2005, the day of the storm, and December 31, 2005.
According to police, these were mostly stolen guns that had been confiscated and abandoned guns they'd found at abandoned homes.
The terms of the settlement made it so the New Orleans Police Department had to do everything in their power to let people know that they can come and get their guns.
None of this should have happened to begin with, because, quote, in April 2006, police made firearms available to owners to claim if they could present a bill of sale or an affidavit with the weapon's serial number, which of course presents its own difficulty.
How does a person whose house flooded provide proof of ownership of a gun when that proof probably was destroyed in the flood?
Basically, the NRA's lawsuit and the settlement thereof led to the resolution that people would just have to sign an affidavit that a certain gun was theirs, and then it was.
The reason that it's important to point out that this was an issue where they were running into the New Orleans Police Department is because the investigations have shown that New Orleans Police Department has a long history of stealing people's guns in traffic stops.
Gordon Hutchinson, writing for the Louisiana Sportsman, said, quote, In the course of research for our book on the confiscation of firearms in the aftermath of the hurricane, we heard a number of similar stories.
They all follow the same vein.
A citizen is pulled over in a traffic stop.
The New Orleans Police Department officer takes a gun from the citizen and asks the citizen if they have a receipt for the gun.
When the answer is no, the gun is seized, and the citizen is informed that if they will show up at a specific precinct with proof of ownership, they can have the gun back.
When I asked a good friend, a retired New Orleans Police Department officer, about the practice, he stated that it was a fairly common practice to take guns from motorists before the hurricane.
This was an open secret in New Orleans law enforcement communities and had zero to do with Hurricane Katrina or the assistance of federal officers or the National Guard.
It was the behavior of an underfunded, understaffed, undertrained, and structurally deficient police department.
The Department of Justice did an investigation into the New Orleans Police Department and found it to be a complete mess that needed essentially a complete overhaul to be done.
From their 158-page report, quote, The deficiencies in the way the New Orleans Police Department polices the city are not simply individual but structural as well.
For too long, the department has been largely indifferent to widespread violations of law and policy by its officers.
New Orleans Police Department does not have in place the basic systems known to improve public safety, ensure constitutional practices, and promote public confidence.
We found that the deficiencies that lead to constitutional violations span the operations of the entire department, from how officers are recruited, trained, supervised, and held accountable, to the operations of paid details.
In the absence of mechanisms to protect and promote civil rights, officers too frequently use excessive force and conduct illegal stops, searches, and arrests with impunity.
This isn't something that happened in Hurricane Katrina.
It was a problem for a long time.
Now, this is a systematic problem within the city's police department that was left unchecked for a long time.
Alex Jones and the NRA and their ilk don't care about that.
They only care about their imagined fantasies of out of control federal troops using the disaster to take guns, and there's a very specific reason for that.
The people in the NRA's video who had their guns taken by the police are all white.
Whereas the New Orleans Police Department generally showed an absurd biased A police department showing bias?
From that DOJ report, quote, Indeed, the limited arrest data that the department collects points to racial disparities in arrests of whites and African Americans in virtually all categories, with particularly dramatic disparities for African American youth under the age of 17. Arrest data provided by the New Orleans Police Department indicates that in 2009, the department arrested 500 African American males Great, great.
Also notable, quote, of the 27 instances between January 2009 and May 2010 in which New Orleans Police Department officers intentionally discharged their firearms at people.
All 27 of the subjects of this deadly force were African American.
So, it's very clear if you look at the pattern of the department, what was going on for a long time as they were stealing guns from black people and no one cared because they had no social power.
The officers taking guns in New Orleans weren't federal troops.
They were the same cops that had been taking people's guns in New Orleans forever.
Alex and his community make this such an important piece of their narratives because it's a classic instance of white people receiving the treatment that minorities were subjected to all the time, and they can't stand it.
Also, sorry their guns were taken away, but also 1,800 or so people died in that storm, including this.
Quote, six days after Hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans, members of the New Orleans Police Department killed two civilians, 17-year-old James Brissett and 40-year-old Ronald Madison.
Four other civilians were wounded.
All of the victims were African-American.
None were armed, nor had committed any crime.
Madison, a mentally disabled man, was shot in the back.
There's bigger issues to talk about than a couple people who had their guns taken in the same way that...
And now, granted, I don't think they should have had their guns taken, but when we do triage in a situation like this, that is absolutely the smallest deal.
So the issue that I think I really need to, when you strip some of the horrors away from it, which I know is very difficult to do, this is nothing to do with federal troops coming in or National Guard troops.
It's the byproduct of a year's deficient...
Police Department that no one has stepped in to get into line or to correct the problems of it.
They're behaving in the exact same way they behaved before the storm.
And Alex is using it as some sort of like, this is what happens when the federal government comes in.
No, sir.
This is city.
This is state-level stuff.
You are very wrong about that.
And if you want to get right with your narrative, then you have to get right with all of that.
You have to get right with the fact that this is a department that was running amok and was out of control.
Now, the further thing that Alex needs to get right about is this.
Because there was such an outcry by the NRA and these gun rights groups about this, President Bush ended up pushing through a new code, U.S. Code Title 42, Chapter 68, Subchapter 5, Code 5207, which reads, prohibition of confiscation of firearms.
No officer or employee of the United States, including any member of the uniformed services or person operating pursuant to or under color of federal law or receiving federal funds or under control of any federal official or providing services to such an
unidentified
employee, officer, or other person while acting in support of relief from a major disaster or emergency may, one, temporarily or permanently seize or authorize seizure of any firearm, the possession of which is not prohibited under federal, state, or local other than for forfeiture in compliance with federal law or as evidence in a criminal investigation.
Two, they may not require registration of any firearm for which registration is not required by federal, state, or local law.
The only limitation that's listed in this is that nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit any person from requiring the temporary surrender of a firearm as a condition for entry into a mode of transportation used for rescue or evacuation during a major disaster or emergency, provided that such temporary surrender...
Jordan, we're in 2009 listening to Alex spreading fear about the idea that the federal government is going to use disasters to come in and take guns.
After Hurricane Katrina, because of the NRA's propaganda and what they were doing, the federal government made a code that you can't do that.
You can't take guns from anybody.
No federal officer working in any sort of capacity can take...
Guns during an emergency because of the emergency status of it.
It's right there in the federal code.
If Alex Jones is going to use a federal code that he rattles off that subsection 50 blah blah blah, that one to say like, oh chemtrails are real, that's just as real you dickweed.
That's the same federal code so they can't do it.
You can't do it.
Now the other thing, I want to bring this up because it's one of the sort of like...
I believe that I think I've covered a lot of the bases of why this narrative is bullshit.
But I need to bring one more piece into this, and that is that one of the...
I mean, there's a million things that people in the government got wrong about Katrina.
But one of the things that is incredibly unfortunate, I think, because it leads into the NRA being able to pull shit like this, is that the evacuation was mandatory.
People needed to evacuate from their homes.
And one of the reasons for that is because of the fact that 80% of the city was underwater.
The fact that people were talking about how there was going to be tens of thousands of dead found in the water.
And that conversation was being had with straight, somber faces very credibly.
It was an expectation.
I don't know how we don't have a death toll that high.
Yeah.
unidentified
And if you have that sort of a situation, the possibility for chemicals and dead bodies, rotting in water, leads to a massive public health crisis that you need to clear things out.
Now the reason it's a big problem is because there aren't any concealed carry laws in New Orleans.
So if people are evacuating their homes, which is now mandatory, if they bring their guns with them, by virtue of them...
being out in public with those guns, that is now an illegal gun.
Yeah.
unidentified
So there is an issue where I think that some of these cops who were already doing it to motorists before the storm could have used that sort of almost entrapment aspect to take some people's guns.
Yeah, I mean, that goes back to why Alex is not afraid of government overreach now is because he's only really afraid of government overreach when it comes to treating white people the way that we always treat black people.
If it happens to anyone who looks like me and I feel bonded with, then I will create an entire world government conspiracy in order to justify why this is wrong when I don't give a shit if it's happening to brown people.
I don't think I've covered all of the bases of it, but the ones that are relevant to Alex's narrative and why he's a liar, I think we have a pretty good handle on it.
And we know this has been quietly being built and designed over decades.
And all these states are revolting against it, and I talk to the military, and it's just, oh no, this is for overseas, or we're only here to help with, I mean, don't you admit this could be used dual use and could acclimate the local citizenry and the population to have their guns confiscated?
All I can tell you is what our intent is, and our intent is to provide prepared soldiers so they're ready to go when it comes time for time for them to go someplace very dangerous.
For them to not only do their mission successfully, but survive and come home to their families.
Well, I mean, all I can tell you is what we do here in Iowa and what we see in our operations.
For instance, we were just asked to take part in the inauguration in Washington, D.C. Our job there was to help make sure people got in the right places.
Make sure that people are safe, and those are the kinds of missions that we're generally asked to do.
In fact, what I can tell you about the Iowa National Guard is we're generally in a state status on operations, unless, of course, we're deployed for war, then we'd be in a federal status.
But generally, if we're going to work here in the United States somewhere...
He has spent like a half hour talking to him and being very polite while Alex badgers him about nonsense, accuses him of stealing people's guns in New Orleans, when at the end there is like, nope.
Yeah, mainly because you're a fucking asshole and I hate you and I'm coming on your show to make sure that the people who would call us, who are calling us, will shut the fuck up and you're an asshole.
Because it would be very easy for him to fight back with Alex.
But I think he knows it's pointless.
At the same time, he could hang up.
But then Alex would just use that as some sort of evidence that he's afraid of my questions.
So he does the only thing he can do, which is like...
No.
Look, you're talking about federalized stuff.
You need to realize the role of the National Guard does have a federal application in certain circumstances, but generally we're under the authority of the governor of the state that we're in.
It's a no-win situation, and God bless him for trying.
He wants to preempt all of these fucking phone calls.
He's gotten enough phone calls now where he knows that somebody is spreading this bullshit around.
And when he's on those phone calls, he talks to those people and eventually at the end of the phone call, they're usually like, okay, actually, you know what?
You're a reasonable guy and that makes a lot of sense.
You're a pretty cool dude.
So he's thinking, maybe if I go on Alex's show, I can do the same with Alex.
I mean, just recently in 2018, that Senator Matt Gaetz, or a congressperson, I don't know if he's in the House or the Senate because I don't really care about him, but he went on and then people were like, why'd you do that?
He's like, yeah.
That was a mistake.
I'm not going to do that again.
I shouldn't have done that.
I think people get the message when they go on out.
Is it more important that everybody is aware of Alex in order to be wary of Alex?
Or that no one should know who Alex is?
Because we keep getting into this situation where people go on Alex's show expecting a good faith circumstance, and then they wind up getting their asses dunked on because Alex is a fucking lunatic, and there's no escape from that.
So now the only thing that I think is appropriate is people being aware of him to be wary.
Yes, absolutely.
But you have to play his game a little bit even if you're outside of it and think it's ugly.
Because there are criticisms that he makes that are valid of people who cover him.
Like the idea that they don't play the clips of me saying X, Y, or Z. Like we've talked about in the past, Brian Stelter doesn't have time to play all your clips.
So he's going to make broad generalizations.
They are accurate, but you can attack him by saying he didn't play the clips.
So a show like ours, I think, is super important because then you can be wary of him, and then when he says they don't play the clips, he goes, they do.
We've dealt with this interview with Hapgood, who did not cry.
Alex is lying about that.
He was a classy gentleman.
And now we get back to the 23rd, and Alex is back on his bullshit, trying to make you super scared, but...
While he's trying to make you super scared, he's trying to build in a back door because he knows that all the things he's making you afraid about aren't going to happen.
Now, let me add, if you try to take me to some sports stadium, you try to drag me off the back of a flatback truck like they're doing with the military drills right now, folks, I'm not going there for my family to be raped and killed.
Okay?
It's not going to happen.
So back off.
Stand down.
Do the right thing yourself morally.
Get yourselves ready, and then we can avert this.
If we get ready and prepared and geared up and get the word out politically, they will back off of this, and they'll just say it was a bad recession.
And all they're going to do is call it a bad recession when what it really was was a manufactured event to try and test whether or not they're going to be able to steal your guns.
And whenever they don't steal your guns, you'll know it's because we stopped it because they didn't steal your guns and they're lying to you about it just being a bad recession.
It really isn't that it was just a bad recession.
It's caused by 20 years of terrible fucking management after the deregulation of...
It's self-confirming propaganda, which is the most dangerous sort because if you're dumb, you'll just buy into it and you'll be like, okay, well, no matter what...
You don't realize that no matter what outcome, Alex gets to pretend he's right.
Because you had people like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh, who are much more mainline...
Republican, conservative folk.
Where you had Glenn Beck coming in with not the same sort of libertarian fury that Alex has, but he had much more of a corner of the market that was not the same as a Hannity.
I would put him closer to the Neil Bortz camp, which doesn't mean anything to you.
I used to, when I managed a movie theater, a lot of my time had to be spent, like, ordering supplies, scheduling movies for the next week, you know, planning the schedule of...
What theater movies would be in, making schedules for the employees, doing payroll, balancing drawers, counting the safe, stuff like that.
So I ended up back in the office for large portions of the day when I was the manager because my responsibilities were somewhat...
Administrative for the most part.
And so I would end up being there and you close a movie theater at like 2 in the morning.
Your last movies start at midnight.
You end up getting out of there at 2. And by the time it gets to be about like 10, there's not that much to do a lot of the time except...
Make sure everything's running smoothly.
Do your paperwork and stuff like that.
So I'd be back in the office and I'd just listen to tons of conservative radio.
I would listen to the station, 93.9 The Eagle.
And they had Glenn Beck.
They had Hannity.
And then towards the evenings they would have Neil Bortz.
And then they'd have my main man, who I still think is really awesome, Phil Hendry.
He wasn't a conservative, but I don't know what he was doing on this station.
So, Phil Hendry, one of the things that blew my mind was he would do his own callers or his own interviews would be himself.
So, he's doing himself as the straight man host, wacky interview subject who would say something fucking inflammatory, and then he would take calls and be bullies.
He had one character who was Ted's of Beverly Hills.
So I'd listen to that, and then Coast to Coast AM would come on, so I'd listen to the ghost stuff.
Yeah.
Because of the Phil Hendry and Coast to Coast, which are palatable shows, I ended up listening to that station more and more, which is why I got the Neil Bortz stuff in, and that's why I know about him.
But all this is to say that at that time, Glenn Beck was a relevant figure.
And I think that Alex Jones is a little bit jealous, because...
He's being much more successful and much more penetrating in the mainstream.
Glenn Beck is.
So towards the end of this episode here on February 23rd, Alex has a clip of Glenn Beck's that he's particularly mad about.
And he decides to play it.
And I don't want to...
We're going to listen to a little bit of the Glenn Beck portion.
But I think it's really interesting to hear Alex's response at the end of it.
That's much more telling, I believe.
And also it's really interesting to hear Glenn Beck sound like future Alex Jones as opposed to Alex's narrative where he's like, Glenn Beck is always ripping me off.
That's tied into what would happen in the Middle East is also tied in to just running over Europe.
Europe itself is teetering with Muslim extremists as well.
How does the world stand without America standing there and being prepared to deal with it?
Glenn, you know, this is a very important point that you brought up.
What happens with America not there is exactly what happens when the teacher leaves the classroom.
A lot of these people go wild, and I'm talking in particular in the Muslim world.
And what you have in Western Europe in particular is they are no longer going to be able to be embarrassed how we interact with them or how we think about them and how they deal with this threat over there.
They're going to fold like a cheap wallet.
They already are falling.
We saw with Ikear Wilders where they wouldn't let him in to speak.
And he got invited to the House of Parliament.
So this is a big problem.
And bin Laden also said that his goal was to cripple us economically.
The United States has funded the drug war to go after cartels that aren't paying their cut.
That's why Mexico is collapsing.
The bankers...
We told you this before.
We told you oil was $147 a barrel.
It was going to go down below $50, and it did, to cripple and cause insurrection and rebellion worldwide.
And this is World War III.
This is the New World Order bringing in financial collapse against the U.S., against everybody.
And they're busy telling you about the Muslim extremists they engineered back in the 80s are going to get us if the U.S. doesn't continue to be the policeman of the world.
So the bottom line is, invade the world or we're all dead.
What the Rand Corporation said three months ago about how they need to start a giant...
And so my new operating thesis, based on that especially, and based on Alex's saying that his traffic is spiking wildly, is he's going to get up in his head a little bit.
His ego is going to get the better of him.
And when he sees Glenn Beck becoming the figure of the Tea Party, he's not going to be able to stand it.
He hates Glenn Beck.
He's going to start adopting some of the things that Glenn Beck is putting out into the world a little bit more, such as that anti-Muslim sentiment that we heard there that is not super persistent in Alex Jones in 2008.
Of course.
Of course.
In 2009, but his particular hatred and distrust of Muslims is not as focused as just even that Glenn Beck clip was.
You put your child in a public school, you're asking for it.
They do one thing wrong.
They raise their voice.
The police write them a ticket for disturbing the peace.
Then they call them before a judge.
It's all legalese.
They order the family to sign an agreement that the child's on probation.
A contract, and the next time your child's late to class, they go to jail.
And then federal and state money kicks in, and then if they can say your child's mentally ill and put them on Prozac or Ritalin, they go from getting $3,000 or $4,000 a month in these facilities to, in some cases, as much as $10,000.
Pennsylvania rocked by jailing kids for cash scandal.
At a friend's sleepover more than a year ago, 14-year-old Philip Schwartley pocketed change from unlocked vehicles in the neighborhood by buying...
Chips and soft drinks.
The cops caught him.
There was no need for an attorney, said Phelps' mother, Amy Schwartley, who thought at most the judge would slap her son with a fine or community service.
But she was shocked to find her eighth grade handcuffed and shackled in the courtroom and sentenced to a youth detention center.
Then he was shipped to a boarding school for troubled teens for nine months.
Now see, they give the whitewash ones here.
You can read the local Pennsylvania articles late to class three times.
Posting a joke about the principal under her free speech.
So he's saying that this CNN article is a whitewash, and it's not.
I have it here in front of me.
He just didn't scroll down far enough on the page.
The article talks about a 15-year-old named Hillary Transdu.
She was sent to a wilderness camp for mocking an assistant principal on her MySpace page.
This judge also whisked 13-year-old Shane Bly, who was accused of trespassing in a vacant building, from his parents and confined him in a boot camp for two weekends.
He sentenced Kurt Kroger, 17 years old, to detention in five months of boot camp for helping a friend steal DVDs from Walmart.
This is a situation where in 2008, judges Michael Conahan and Mark Ciaverelli were accused and found guilty of accepting money in return for imposing harsh injunctions on juveniles to increase occupancy at for-profit detention centers.
What?
unidentified
Which is really kind of just a kid's bop version of the prison industry as a whole.
Yeah, so this one guy, Sia Varelli, who's sort of the main focus of this, They found that he and Conahan had taken illegal payments of nearly $1 million from the youth center.
Now, the phenomenon of incarcerating and institutionalizing children is not something that's new, nor is it something unique to this case in Pennsylvania.
Black youths are five times more likely to be incarcerated, and this is just something that goes on in pretty much every state with no charismatic propagandists screaming about how it's a globalist attempt to break up the families.
But Alex doesn't care about that.
He cares about this case in Pennsylvania.
And it may be because it's in the news and he's lazy and it's just an easy thing for him to talk about, but I would suggest that there's something else that's more relevant to him, namely that this judge, the city he was in, Wilkes Bar, is 92.3% white.
As is always the case with Alex, he does not care about the problem at all until he feels it's hurting white people, at which point he screams blood.
murder about it and never recognizes that the black activists that he actively ignores or straight up impugns have been trying to draw attention to these same problems for years.
In short, if I could summate this anyway, I would say Alex Jones is a gigantic flaming racist.
But do you see how there are multiple narratives on this episode that he's going through that all intertwine with this same business line of like, they're doing it to white people.
Whatever it is, the gun confiscation in Katrina, that's that same thing.
This, you know, kids being sent to detention centers because it's profitable.
I don't remember who it was, but someone I saw posted an argument that was along the lines of, because the media is so fucking lazy and won't do their job, the idea that there is a tape like that, were it to come out, they would then be forced to...
Be like, Trump is a racist.
Like, the media would then have to cover it that way because they're so reductive and can only call someone racist if they hear them saying the N-word.
So, like, the idea is maybe it would force the media into a box where they couldn't do this dance around, like, is he racist?
A year in jail, and then you read what happened to these kids.
Some of them die in custody.
Others come out totally mind-blown.
They hop them up.
They're away from their parents.
They're on Prozac, Ritalin.
They start having seizures, and they put them in a mental institution.
Oh, then the cash really racks up.
And after the kid's done, 18 years old, totally brain-fried, shock therapy, they throw them out on the street, and that's the people you laugh at that have the sign saying, we'll work for food.
Most of them aren't even winos.
I've talked to them.
They've been in mental institutions.
And I go, tell me your story.
When I was 12, I got in a fist fight, and the guy was 32, looks like he's 60. I'm going to do a documentary on these guys.
unidentified
And I got in a fight at the back of the school, and then they put me in juvenile and started drugging me.
And another person who's stupid is a caller that he gets here on the 24th.
This caller calls in and lists off what he would describe as the big globalists.
See if you see a name missing from this list.
unidentified
I think the Rockefellers, the DuPonts, the Rothschilds, the Nobels, the royal family in England, the Dutch royal family with Dutch shell, the descendants of Armand Hammer, including Al Gore, who's one of the biggest shareholders in Occidental Petroleum.
These companies over the last 200 to the last 70 years have raped the world, caused these problems, and they've been able to profit handsomely by that.
But it's interesting, and one of the things, if people, I've gotten some people who are concerned that Alex being taken off the internet is going to somehow ruin our show or something like that.
Rest assured, I have at least two years of episodes of his show on my external hard drive that I have not listened to.
I've been front-loading a lot of downloading.
So we have plenty of stuff to go over because I need to know this.
In the same way that I needed to know what happened during the election for him coming into Team Trump.
I need to know when Soros happens.
That is something that I will not quit this show.
Even if you turn into the next Alex Jones and leave the show, I will keep doing it on my own until I figure out when the fuck did he start hating George Soros.
Alex says three things about support or non-support that are very interesting.
unidentified
Well, let me bring it to a crux for you because this is what I think it is.
If Fox has, for years, been following orders and beating the drums of war for a conflict with Iran, and now with the assaults by Israel, it looks like that may be on the horizon.
So if they now have faker puppet news frontmen like Beck painting these crazy real scenarios on Fox, like the Bubba effect, alongside guests at a retired CIA...
And military paid TV pundits, is that not an imminent sign of times to come in the very, very near future as you speak of everything?
If we don't stand against this tyranny right now, they're showing us what they're going to do.
He says, I'm fighting the New World Order, and the New World Order is Iran and Iraq, and they really do have WMDs, and now they're saying Iran has WMDs.
And I'm no fan of a lot of stuff Iran does, but the point is the IAEA is there.
This is non-weapons grade what they're making.
And Israel admitted in Israeli papers last week, we read it on air out of the papers, that they're staging assassinations and bombings to try to destabilize Iran.
So, in one sentence, in one fell swoop there, he hates Michael Savage, or doesn't support Michael Savage, thinks he's trying to get a war with Iran going.
He believes that Iran is within the confines of the IEA.
I want to understand that point of view, where it's like, I have no beliefs other...
I have no, like, central life lies other than...
Whites are better than blacks.
And so I will let everything go.
I will play team sports forever.
But if Trump was like, hey, white supremacists are bad, which he only even kind of begrudgingly half said, which everybody already knew was a lie, the only thing that would get people that support Trump off the Trump train is him being like, I am going to make Martin Luther King Jr.
And my mind is rattling around because I was thinking about, like, other issues that are negotiable to some extent and why it wouldn't really matter.
I was thinking about things like...
I don't know, welfare or something like that.
And what I kept coming to in my head, like with whatever issue you want to talk about, is that it's the same reason that I left philosophy as a major in college.
I was a philosophy major, and then I started to take a bunch of logic classes, and I loved the formality and concreteness of logic.
The only thing that you would be able to argue about is whether or not the premises are good.
Like, do the premises that lead to the conclusion, does it make sense?
And that's so subjective in terms of who's arguing, what's going on.
The only reason I bring this up is because that's the same feeling that I get about a lot of the issues outside of...
Whiteness is rightness.
All those other things, you could make an argument that supports white identity for or against welfare.
You could create a public school system improvement argument based on white supremacy and against white supremacy.
You could do all of that.
The only thing you can't do is make an argument for a pluralistic society full of acceptance.
And that's why it's the only non-negotiable thing.
And it's reinforced by the idea that if we allow multiculturalism to creep into our society, what it's going to do is going to diminish the whiteness and make it impure or whatever.
And to them, to those people who believe those things, that's something that can't be undone.
And that's why they so vociferously defend the idea of their whiteness.
Because they're trying to come and take it away and eventually it'll be gone and we can't get it back.
To be fair, what I was putting forth was also super vague, because I'm not willing to come up with on the fly what the arguments for and against certain policies are, but it's very easy to imagine what they could be.