Knowledge Fight dissects Alex Jones’ cozy ties with Russian state media like RT, where guests—Paul Craig Roberts, Max Keiser, and others—echo anti-American claims while Jones amplifies Kremlin narratives, from falsely blaming Georgia’s 2008 conflict on NATO to praising Putin’s "greetings" as validation. His embrace of Eurasianist propaganda, including Dugan’s Foundation of Geopolitics, mirrors Russian disinformation tactics: racial division, Holocaust denial, and attacks on the UN. Though Jones brands himself a libertarian patriot, his alignment with authoritarian fringe groups reveals a hollow ideology—one that fuels domestic instability while ignoring systemic solutions like democratic socialism. [Automatically generated summary]
So what I did, Jordan, is I went back and I watched a number of instances of Alex Jones' appearances on RT.
And then also I have put together a montage of Alex Jones when he was a guest on Alexander Dugan's show right after Donald Trump was elected president.
Great.
I'm not sure what a lot of this proves, but it's an interesting glimpse.
And I want to add this glimpse into the picture even before we get started.
Yeah.
One of the things that I learned from this exploration is that there's a high incidence of Alex Jones regulars who are also regulars on RT.
People like Paul Craig Roberts is on all the time.
Gerald Salenti, Peter Schiff.
These people often go on RT and make fairly anti-American arguments.
Like, listen to this.
I'm going to start with a clip of Paul Craig Roberts, who's a guy who is on Alex's show very regularly.
Here he is on RT, and I would say this is just talking shit on America.
So the American economy is descending into a third world economy, in which the only jobs available are domestic services, such as barbers, waitresses, and bartenders.
Not least to mention so many different states within Rome and its outlying territories starting to break away from each other ideologically and really by geography.
I would posit that you having these thoughts and you having these positions is pretty reasonable, and we're doing a podcast here, and that's fine.
We can spout these things.
If you were to go on Russian television, Russian state-owned television, and say that America is not a superpower and descending into a third world country, it has a different flair to it, to me, a little bit.
Very similar to what happened in Crimea, and very similar to without the armed conflict aspect of it, something that Russia's been doing to their neighbors in small degrees for the whole time Putin's been around.
So here is Alex in the wake of the Russia-Georgia conflict on Russian television.
unidentified
While the shooting may be over, the war of words continues.
Russia has criticized the Western media for what it's called its bias field on the conflict.
But not all journalists blame Russia for the conflict.
Alex Jones from the Infowars.com website blames, or claims rather, that American viewers have been deceived by the coverage.
First off, let me say I am ashamed as an American.
I'm a loyal American who loves my country, but my country has been taken over by a private international military-industrial complex, and they launched the sneak attack on the Russian enclaves of Abkhazia and other areas, as you know, on 888 using the cover of the Olympic Games and a dastardly sneak attack on the order of Pearl Harbor in World War II.
I was watching foreign news, and I knew that the U.S.-backed Georgians, the Israeli and NATO-backed Georgians had snuck attack viciously and were hunting down and killing civilians, attacking the peacekeepers, just unprecedented crimes.
And they were reporting that Russia, it was headlines, Russia invades Georgia, Russia sneak attacks.
And our leaders went on television and said that we would have to have a new Cold War.
It was such an insult to the American people's intelligence that the United States-backed Georgia.
And I apologize as an American that we've let our government been taking over like this.
And this is not the United States that I grew up in.
The neocons in NATO, in the U.S., and Israel want to have a new Cold War.
I just hope Russia keeps troops in Georgia so no more sneak attacks can be launched because the dictator, and we know he was elected under fraud, there in Georgia, has said that he plans, he said it last week, to attack again as soon as he can.
So please, Russia does not need to leave these areas that have been part of Russia for years, Abkhazia and Ossetia, because we don't want violence.
The American people don't want this.
We want to be friends with Russia.
The Anglo-American Western New World Order System based in, of course, London and New York and D.C., they have hijacked the U.S.
They have implemented continuity of government.
They have geared up for martial law camps here.
They're destroying our republic.
They're destroying our freedoms.
They're coming after the free press.
And so they're using NATO expansion as a way to widen a war throughout Central Asia and then to the West through Eastern Europe and Central Europe.
And I really appreciate the fact that Russia has been restrained in all of this.
Well, in the 10th century A.D., Georgia for the first time emerged as an ethnic concept in the territories where the Georgian language was used to perform Christian rituals.
The independent Democratic Republic of Georgia was invaded by the Red Army in 1921, and Soviet government was installed.
The government of Soviet Georgia created an autonomous administrative unit for the Transcaucasian Ossetans in April 1922 called the South Ossetian Autonomous Oblast.
Historians such as Stephen F. Jones and some other folks believe that the Bolsheviks granted this autonomy to the Ossetians in exchange for their help in fighting the Democratic Republic of Georgia, since the area had never been a separate entity prior to the Russian invasion.
I mean, if you had, let's say, a situation where Canada was a sneaky power and they were trying to bolster the credibility of the remnants of the Confederacy in our country, it would be fairly similar.
It could be like, you know, Alabama was really more importantly part of the Confederacy.
And Alex went on Russian television and just supported the exact Russian line on it.
And that's kind of common.
It's kind of common, you're going to see.
Because one of the other things that is a big thorn in the side of Russia regaining a lot of the territory that it lost when the Soviet Union broke up, a lot of the power, a lot of the money that they could be making through oil reserves and stuff like that is UN sanctions.
It is a complete disaster for them because they keep encroaching on their neighbors and the UN's not thrilled with that.
Because even if you have these nationalist entities that go all and everybody's got weird unilateral treaties with each other or what have you, eventually you're going to butt up against each other.
Eventually, there's going to be some need for collective bargaining with each other because otherwise nothing will ever get done.
And just like guess what?
Once that happens and you have this national collection of nations that are getting together under some slightly different name for the exact same goal, there will be corruption within it and there will be inadequacies.
There will be times when atrocities take place and they're supposed to stop it and they fuck it up.
But the situation with the, I suppose we'll call it upside down UN?
Yeah.
The situation there is the dark universe, UN.
The situation there is if you've got a bunch of nationalist countries, eventually you're going to get into disputes of, just like we talked about with the Soviet Union, your American nationalists are going to start saying, well, Mexico was part of the United States.
So, yeah, I mean, like, that's the thing that you really butt up into when you get into Alex's views about the UN.
Because his ideas about what they were created for, obviously, not stupid.
But his ideas of what the world will end up being in his fantasy scenario don't even work necessarily.
So him coming on to RT and saying that the UN is beyond fixing and its only function is corruption, that's manna from heaven to the people, the propagandists at RT.
And with appropriate oversight and, like you say, a reasonable application of the law across the board, those things are possible on a national level, on an international level.
And that's what we should be working towards, not the dismantling of the UN that only really serves the purposes of hostile actors.
Every day, every black person that wakes up never worries about the cops because they know they're going to be treated the same way that a billionaire would be treated.
I told you that Alex Jones, a lot of his guests appear frequently as guests on RT.
And he has one guest in particular who has his own show on RT and has for years.
That is a gentleman by the name of Max Kaiser.
We know him from his cryptocurrency Max Bucks and from that one time he tried to get Alex to be reasonable about the idea of gun insurance and Alex freaked out at him.
Right, right, right.
So we know him from that.
Here is a clip of Max Kaiser and Alex Jones having a conversation.
This is on Alex's show.
And let me tell you this: Alex is smiling the biggest smile I've ever heard, ever seen, right at the beginning of this clip when Max gives him a little bit of news.
I did this thing where David Cameron ripped his shirt off at the governor's dinner, and he looked at this clip and he said, your journalists are very interesting.
The one, the Max, who ripped his shirt off is very interesting.
I just got conflated because the only thing I can think of when I hear John Leguizamo is that he did that one-man show where he played all the characters in it.
In the Western world, the dictatorship of the liberal paradigm is all too obvious when it comes to the media.
But it's become especially brazen during the U.S. presidential race.
All the big media moguls openly supported the war criminal Hillary Clinton.
Round the clock from lies to distortions and fake polls.
They praised her political platform and assured of her inevitable win.
Meanwhile, all the front pages of every other publication portray Trump as a loser, intentionally exaggerating his supposed dark past.
His words taken out of context and repeated over and over on all media outlets.
On November 8th, the main Western media operations had already prepared their November 9 issue with Hillary's portrait on the cover and headline, Madam President.
And television programs have prepared reports praising the lady kingpin of the world financial elites.
Something went wrong.
And all the pre-scripted news packages turned a complete fiasco.
They've put everything on the line and failed miserably.
The predetermined Clinton win has suffered a death blow.
The numbers spoke for themselves.
Trump won.
No one in the U.S. mainstream media believed or wanted to believe in Trump.
No one, except for those in the scientific times, and one dynamic, highly passionate, energetic, and unrelenting journalist and documentary producer, Alex Jones, the director and editor-in-chief of InfoWars News.
It is this journalist who had the courage to show the truth of what is really going on in the United States.
Full disclosure, I working the false narratives of the mainstream media information.
He has exposed the globalist liberal ideology prevailing in a totalitarian style on the modern Western media front.
He reported on the financial elites, their stakes, and strategies during the election.
Alex Jones believes that behind all the world's media outlets, there's an ideological liberal agenda.
This world government manipulates all the prominent media systems for the sake of their own personal interests.
He was all but continually exposing the war crimes of Hillary Clinton and minimizing those of his name and his website suffered repeated denial of service attacks.
But they couldn't stop him.
His videos continue to gather hundreds of thousands of views.
Infowars.com was practically the only resource where the elections were covered thoroughly and objectively.
He didn't cut all live feeds when someone voiced criticism towards the FBI and they discussed the WikiLeaks stumps.
InfoWars has built itself to standard interests of the American people.
This media organization showed its independence from the world financial elites.
Today, when all the mainstream liberal media have utterly been discredited, revealing themselves as politics, InfoWars, along with the new independent media outlets, are becoming powerful forces in the new era and new paradigm which ushers Trump.
There's a disconnect between what his rhetoric leads to and what he thinks it leads to.
There's certainly that.
Because I don't think we can very clearly see that, you know, were he to reach the logical extension of most of the things that he espouses, you would end up pretty quickly descending into a white ethno-state where everyone's armed and everyone's afraid of each other.
I know that we can take an external view and look at it like that, but I don't think that he thinks that's the end result.
Okay.
That's the delusion that he dwells in.
I think that he believes that you're still going to end up with an equitable system where people have freedom, they have liberty, they can still vote, all that stuff.
You're just going to have businesses that are unshackled.
Like, he doesn't understand what historically has been the end result of that sort of thing.
But even then, even back then, in the nightmare that we lived in in the teens, 20s, we still had a lot of one-armed women because they didn't bother having any safety equipment in any kind of textile mills.
We still lived in a liberalist system.
We still lived in a Western democracy.
Right.
And that is what Alexander Dugan and his ilk are opposed to.
I'm very happy that Alex Jones is live with us right now.
We have been following you, Alex, for many years, including myself personally.
And when you became truly celebrated in this new era of Donald Trump, I marveled at you.
The fact that such people as yourself who embody such free and independent points of view, which are shared in reality by millions of people, Americans and worldwide, and millions of Russian people.
Even if it doesn't need to have that, you can still do the same game that Nazis do with, or Alex does with Nazi ideology, just change Jew to globalist.
You can do all the things you want to do with just changing one word.
His show probably didn't merit that, but because his involvement with Roger Stone and working it out behind the scenes, Donald Trump comes on his show and says, I won't let you down.
You're going to be very happy.
We're going to talk a lot in the future.
What have you?
And so now the external world matches Alex Jones' sense of himself.
After the election, Alex, we heard him on election night, drunk at three in the morning, saying, I have served my purpose.
Then he goes on Russian television a couple days later, and they basically mirror that back to him.
And he can imagine that that's how the rest of the world feels.
Which I'm also assuming why he's even more insane right now is because he's realizing they said nice things about me and now they want me to go back in the corner.
And maybe Alex has done a little like, I don't think he has because he doesn't do any research, but if he looks into what the people that are flattering him actually believe, it would be incredibly troubling for him.
There has to be a part of him that is either in complete denial about that large chunk of his audience or just he has to shy away from it entirely and only listen to voices like this that are like you are the true version of America.
You have saved the international scene and now we will rebuild an international order.
You know, I would say I think that's probably the most reasonable or relatable and human thing, though, is that, of course, you make compromises if you want to make a shit ton of money.
I think that's the trajectory of his entire career, though, because the compromises that he clearly made when he infiltrated Bohemian Grove in heavy quotes.
Right, right.
The willingness to lie and misrepresent what he saw there in order to, in his mind, take down the banking elite or what have you.
That probably, on a certain level, is a noble goal.
There is an element of it that the end goal is reordering that to some extent and making sure that people are punished for financial crimes in the same way that someone with a joint is punished.
That sort of thing is a noble goal, but once you go down the path of completely lying about them and saying they're all Satanists and amping up that rhetoric and adopting so much of this washed over anti-Semitism, what you do is you ruin the good pursuit that you have and all of the offshoots become so much more important to your audience.
But that's a brilliant move and a classic move on the part of the people who wrecked the economy that we're all pretty much aware now that the economy is fucked and it's unsustainable in its current, you know, as the stock market continues to rise, the only thing that every reasonable person should be thinking is, boy, how bad is the crash going to be?
This is maybe like, because what ended up saving the world, and maybe the world, at least America, from the depression that we had was the New Deal and FDR, and that was Democratic Socialism.
And it'd be great if we had a national party who was like, this is the way to go.
This absolutely is what we need to do and align ourselves with, instead of a national party that's like, you guys are right, but what if we don't do what you say and instead keep getting a shit ton of money from billionaires?
Well, to look at it two years ago, they were sides of the same coin, and the GOP itself is still a largely corporate beholden special interest party, and so are the Democrats.
Yes.
The GOP is already crumbling to the libertarian patriot wing or whatever of it.
And that to me spells what we will see in the coming years.
I think in the next few years, you're going to see the corporate Republican establishment completely destroyed and replaced with this hyper-nativist pro-libertarian party.
They can't understand that because their only ideology is ultimately we think that it's fine so long as when you're fighting against people like Alex Jones who are like, okay, everybody who doesn't agree with us fucks kids.
If you're ostensibly an originalist constitutional geo-peer, you can't vote for somebody who's violated the Constitution.
That's something that you can't justify.
If the guy you're voting for has been kicked out of his judgeship position twice for violating your Constitution that you fucking love so much, and then you're like, okay, yes, he's done that.
The point that I'm trying to get to, I believe, is that the left needs to get on board with that knowledge immediately.
And the time will come, and I think it'll come within the next few years, the dance of back and forth aspiring to reach across the aisle kind of stuff is not, it's not going to have any stock in trade.
Is because you have disagreed with me on that very point for months now, and finally you have come to the realization that there is no further compromise available with these people.
What I'm talking about is there will be within a matter of years, I believe, probably, and it gets exacerbated by election cycles too.
So 2018 is going to be a mess.
2020 is going to be a mess.
But I believe as we get closer to those, you're going to see a harsh swing in that direction with the people who are on the right in terms of the power base shifting.
And if people on the left don't prepare for that in some ways, they're going to get steamrolled.
Here's maybe the simplest explanation of why the Democratic Party itself is something that you should not trust in or appreciate.
And that is that imagine in 2018 that we wind up, that the Democrats wind up taking both the House and the Senate and wind up actually getting a supermajority.
If you start to look at the election results that we've seen, it's entirely possible that the anti-Trump fervor will absolutely propel the Democrats to majorities in both.
Now, why is the Democratic Party the worst party that you want to have that?
Because they have fought for still won't impeach Trump.
Well, and they haven't fought for voting rights nearly as strongly enough.
Like, even with the results that we're seeing, even with the clear sentiment of a large portion of the population that shit's not going the way it should, if you have people who are disenfranchised, if you have people who are kicked off voter rolls, if you have these extreme gerrymandering situations, you're not going to be able to have the people's voice accurately displayed in the vote.
Of course not.
And the Democrats are complicit in that, too.
I mean, it's very easy to blame gerrymandering on the opposite party, but it's both parties.
No, ultimately, whenever they so you can always find this shit somewhere where it's like, and people say there's no difference between Democrats and Republicans when you go into certain social issues, which is absolutely true.
The problem is that the underlying factors which have contributed to those social issues, those are the things that Democrats and Republicans have ideologically agreed on in the past.
When you talk about African American rights in regards to just police shootings and the way that they're incarcerated at a higher rate, yeah, Democrats don't want that to occur.
But Democrats are part of the reason it did.
Like, that's the reason that people say there's no difference between Democrats and Republicans, is because, sure, you can reactively say that we don't want all of this shit to happen.
But if you are part of the reason it happened, then you got a lot of shit that you should be fighting for much harder.
And in the same civil war, which was started 16 years ago in our country, the forces of good power have also been victorious.
But that's why we understand that today we are all in the same situation, whether it be Russians, Americans, or Europeans.
The globalists do not represent America.
They are the enemy of the American people.
And when you tell people Addressing your supporters, it sounds like a call to all the people worldwide to shake off the dominance of the globalist elites and establish in each of our countries our own American order in America, Russian order in Russia, Turkish order in Turkey, and this war and struggle is what unites us.
Prior to a certain point, the global corporations, transnational corporations, the globalist elites, were presented to us as the voice of the United States.
But thanks to Trump's victory, we now know that there is a difference difference between the American people, that's you, that's those who are the resistance to the globalist dictatorship, the political elites, which organize color revolutions against us.
And they, the Soroses, the Clintons, the Obama administration, the so-called deep state organized color revolutions against Trump, refusing to recognize the democratic victory of the American people.
Well, there's a difference between fomenting them and supported people or perpetrating them outright.
There's a thin line.
But when you're trying to say that there has been an attempt to make a color revolution in America against Trump, at this point in history, after the election, there was only the women's march and the immediate anti-Trump march, which were not color revolutions.
you understand what i'm saying this underlies course well this underlies that there is a c there is a there's a perception that this peaceful protesting is a color revolution yeah And if you believe that, then you have to believe that what they're complaining about in these other countries, Georgia, for example, that Alex is certainly a scholar on, Ukraine, that these color revolutions that happened probably were just peaceful protests.
We have to engage in dialogue in terms of what do we want to build instead of globalism, another global volunteer.
This time, to build us not in opposition to NASA, not in opposition to Russia, not in opposition to Turkey, not so that we fight each other to protect our narrow national interests, which is what the globalists impose on us to fight with each other.
A civil war, we have to avoid this.
Still not allowing Alexander.
The communication and dialogue between us, exchange of ideas and differences.
Dugan has got to be laughing in the middle of this interview.
Because I'm going to read this from this big think article.
To see what Dugan might advocate specifically, we can look to his best-selling book, The Foundation of Geopolitics from 1997, which had particular success among Russian military and, according to foreign policy and Dugan's own words, is assigned as a textbook at Russian military universities.
The book outlines a vision for Russia in the 21st century that would lead to Eurasia's formation, but also includes specific strategies for defeating or neutralizing the United States.
These include destabilization and disinformation campaigns, using Russian special forces and asymmetrical warfare, alliances between U.S. and countries like Germany and France.
On page 367 of the first edition of the book, Dugan explains, quote, it is essentially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity.
They've never succeeded.
All kinds of separatism and ethnic, social, and radical conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements, extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the United States.
It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics.
I mean, there are Russian companies that paid for troll accounts that specifically fomented race division on both sides as white nationalists and as black nationalists.
And a lot of this fits suspiciously the philosophies and the plan laid out by Alexander Dugan in a book that he wrote in 1997 as a vision for Russia in the 21st century.
Also, I mean, if you want to talk about asymmetrical warfare, you can't get better than InfoWars.
No.
In terms of what we've been talking about already, the idea of branding your enemies as demons.
I've read these things and they don't say what he acts like they say.
So the fact that he is talking about how these globalists put out these things about how they're going to poison the water supply and they think you're too stupid to read them.
It's like, Alex, you're misrepresenting those.
Meanwhile, the guy that you're talking to did put out a book that very clearly, unfortunately, we couldn't have known until now has laid out what happened to us last year.
There may be more important figures that I'm unaware of who have espoused similar things to him.
That's entirely possible.
I would say the only reason that he comes up so much in terms of our investigation is he is a very legitimate philosopher in terms of putting out philosophy books and geopolitical strategy books.
And he exists in InfoWars.
He exists as someone who Alex Jones clearly has interacted with.
He's on Alex's show.
Alex has been on his show.
And the fact that he's on Alexander Dugan's show fairly close after the election means to me that they were in contact before.
Of course.
And not only that, I have to assume that other people that Alex Jones is in, or in his periphery, were in touch with him.
People like the Paul Craig Robertses, people who are the guests on RT that Alex also has on his show.
robert david steels those types of people were probably there's a i can't see a world where there isn't some communication between these folks And that doesn't mean that there's some sort of crazy conspiracy.
That just means they were in contact before the reveal the prestige, as it were, which is Alex going on Dugan Show.
I was able to take it, put it into pop culture, make it interesting, and now people understand the score.
More and more people see it, and that's why the political elites tamporting right now.
And that's why it's so exciting to see humanity coming out of the dark ages into the true information age and seeing the internet that the globalists hijacked from DARPA that they thought would be a tool of surveillance and control and seeing it all blow up in their face.
It's a very magic time to be alive.
We have the initiative, but we just can't let these globalist nihilists start a nuclear war in some type of fit because Hitler in his bunker in 1945, as the Russians were closing in from the East and the Allies from the Americas from the West, if he would have had nukes, he would have launched him and blown up the world.
So the problem is we have Hitlers today, Hitler-type psyches that'll overturn the whole world in their power.
Another child tweeting back at him or responding to him or a dictator who is clearly cleverer than most of the other world leaders that we're dealing with, despite his rampant James Bond villain aspect.
Like, if the CIA did know that Hitler escaped to South America and lived out his years as some sort of like fake monk or whatever, I believe that's what some people believe.
I haven't done too deep a dive into it.
But if they did lie about it and say that he died, I don't really think that's the biggest lie in the world.
I think history should correct it, but at the same time, I don't think that's nefarious.
Our quest to stay in control and to keep on willing to ensure that better minds in the intelligence agencies, the military, and other airs, who really I've been critical of previously, but who've been the unsung heroes behind the scenes, not just here, but also in Russia, blocking the globalists from their megalomaniacal activities.
And that's really the most important point I could make.
unidentified
Alex, I have one question for you.
And my question is, you crazy, bro.
How you ever get over the stereotype, the wrong stern type, that Russia is still the Soviet Union?
So, real quick, before we get back into that, because there is some truth to the idea that the oligarchs did wield very corrupt power in Russia for a time, but the idea has had perhaps the longest-running stretch of the worst governments for man, they are amazing at it.
But I want to point out the true comedy of Alex Jones being on Russian television, and some guy asks him, how do you disabuse yourself of the wrong notion that Russia is still the Soviet Union on the show of a guy who has espoused the creation of the Eurasian Union, which is essentially the recreation of the Soviet Union?
Well, I just study history, and I mean, if you know what you're supported by multinationals, just like China was a couple hundred years ago when it was under colonial control, and it was basically manipulated.
And from my research, I mean, you guys know more than I do, obviously being in Russia, but some of those corrupt kingpins and people, some were worse than others, just made deals to exploit the resources and the people.
And then Russia started coming out of that with the collapse of the Soviet Union, and then basically was then able to kick the oligarchs out who thought they'd just privatize Russia and exploit it.
You've still got problems, obviously, with corruption, like everybody does, but you're coming out of it, coming up from the bottom like a swimmer coming towards the surface.
And the United States is still kind of hitting the bottom.
And hopefully we can follow Russia's lead and come back up to the surface as well.
unidentified
You know how you get up from the bottom of the infrastructure.
Stabilize families, stabilize the Russian culture, resuscitate it from the long communist nightmare, and bring a true free market, more Renaissance innovation back, which I welcome and think is a wonderful thing.
And I think Americans fundamentally look at what we always learned about Russia, some of it true, some of it not, and it's corruption and it's authoritarianism.
And we see those very authoritarianisms being set up here.
Instead of having a lot of government where Obama tells Africa you can't have cars and air conditioning when I'm fasting on a jumbo jet.
We fundamentally reject the new world order of the globalist, of the eugenicist, of the vestigial British Empire, not the British people, but the British Empire itself.
Look at how the EU and this whole global system is being rejected from the very place it sprouted, England.
I mean, the Brits aren't bad people.
They've been exploiting for this global empire, and they're understanding it now as well.
So there's a huge awakening, and I think it started with people like Barry Goldwater, Ron Paul, Alexander Schultz and Eitson understood it.
And we're different people from different perspectives seeing the same thing because it's not comedy comes in threes.
We're seeing the real world and the globalists can't stand it.
But as a little bit of a punchline, I'm going to go through some of these RT videos that I didn't pull clips from because, you know, I can't get everything taken.
You can find all these on YouTube.
The UN is a Nazi movement.
These are clips put out by RT with Alex Jones, and these are the headlines that they've given them, as if they're using him as propaganda.
And when you look at the fact that he is willing to push the Russian version of history on Russian television, and RT has now been forced to sign up as a foreign agent.
Well, when you talk about collusion, so what exactly practically is the difference between collusion and cooperation, right?
Now, collusion would suggest that prior to pulling off all of these narratives, they discussed it and reacted accordingly and put out the same things, similar timing.
At the same time, cooperation just suggests, I see this person with similar motives.
So who fucking cares whether or not it is collusion or cooperation?
They need to be fought and destroyed in the same regard.
So whether or not you want to say that whether or not you want to say that Alex is on the payroll is immaterial to actually solving the issue, which is that Alex is beholden at least and ultimately is on the payroll.
Like whenever you get an inflated viewership number, you're going to get better ads shit.
You're going to get better exposure in the same way that Trump got $2 billion worth of free advertisement from our shitty.
Yeah, exactly.
In the same way, it doesn't fucking matter where or whether or not it's a direct payout.
So many people are aware that the issue is, like with the opioid crisis, regardless of whether or not you are on the right or the left, everybody is aware people are overdosing.
Everybody is kind of aware that there was a massive advertisement campaign based on these companies that wanted to sell extremely addictive heroin to many people.
They're just so smart, or at least they're clever enough.
They have a low-level cunning to convince a massive section of the population that it is, in fact, the people who are trying to help them who are the cause of their problem.
And that is the sleight of hand that will destroy the human race.
But the other piece of it that is more dangerous, I think he does agree with Alex on, and that is some of the geopolitical ideas that he has in terms of rejiggering power dynamics and getting away from the UN and those sorts of things, which, again, I mean, we've gone over this already even in this episode.
The UN is problematic in many ways, but it is necessary and would come up no matter what alignment you have in terms of nationalism, globalism, all this stuff.
So it's the question of like – But that is the neutralization of America that is sought by these quote-unquote anti-globalist powers that really aren't against globalists so much as they are against the encroachment of the U.N. which is holding up international sanctions against encroaching on your fucking neighbors like you did in Georgia and Ukraine.