Paul Kersey and Sam Dixon dissect Dr. Wesley Kritz George's 1962 report, arguing that historical data on IQ gaps and brain anatomy refutes the myth of racial equality. They condemn modern egalitarianism as a delusion, citing suppressed statistics from the 1970s regarding mental retardation thresholds and attacking organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center for smearing Elon Musk. Ultimately, the hosts assert that biological inheritance drives these disparities, claiming Western civilization's decline stems from demographic shifts and the suppression of superior analytical populations while ignoring self-preservation instincts. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
The White Man's Library00:09:18
Well, ladies and gentlemen, we are back with the latest installment of what we decided to call the White Man's Library here with Radio Renaissance.
I'm joined, as always, by Sam Dixon.
I'm Paul Kersey, and we've got quite the book today to talk about.
It's one that I'm sure a lot of our listeners have never even heard of.
And Sam, I'll give the title so we can make sure we're all on the same page.
Today, we're going to talk about a book that The state of Alabama actually helped prepare in 1962, by the commission of the governor of Alabama, the biology of the race problem by Dr. Wesley Kritz George.
Sam, he was a biologist, a professor of history and embryology, emeritus, formerly head of the Department of Anatomy at the University of North Carolina Medical School.
Talk to me about how you first encountered this book.
I've encountered it back in the 1960s, not from the public.
I did not know the connection with Alabama until you brought it up.
But it was out.
It was distributed by the Putnam Letters Committee, the only group that talked about sociology and biology and really race in defense of segregation.
Most of the defense of segregation was pretty pathetic.
So, veiled references to our way of life and things like that.
And as I said before, I think people didn't want to hurt blacks' feelings.
And I can understand that I don't want to hurt their feelings either.
But, you know, we can only guide social policy by truth.
We can't guide it by feelings.
We have to go reason first.
It can be directed by some idea of morality, but you can't eliminate reality in the name of some sort of feeling, no matter how deeply you adhere to it, whether for religion or ideology or whatever.
But anyway, I read it and I was very impressed with it.
And when the idea of discussing it came out a few weeks ago, I no longer have a ready hand copy, but I glanced at what's said online about it.
And it's striking that it's attacked because the author is a segregationist and lots of anthropologists and sociologists sort of sneer at it, that the report was heavily influenced by segregationist ideology.
That modern science shows that human races are not really genetically distinct.
There are a lot of attacks on that basis that his ideas have been repudiated by so called modern science, which stands for the proposition that if you see a pygmy standing next to a blonde haired, blue eyed, six foot two Norwegian, you don't see any difference.
There's nothing different between them.
And that's literally how silly our enemies have become.
They're not silly, though, they're disgusting and they're scary.
Because people who are capable of that are capable of most anything.
Yeah, this is a book.
Obviously, it came out what?
Seven years after Brown v. Board of Education.
And I procured a copy, an actual first print edition.
And like you said, it was shocking to open up the book.
Again, the title is The Biology of the Race Problem by Wesley Critch George, PhD.
He's a biologist.
This report has been prepared by Commissioner of the Governor of Alabama, 1962.
And to me, that just.
It put a big smile on my face thinking that.
Alabama, and I can see why.
But as a practical matter, in terms of using that to change minds, it's actually a detriment.
Go into that.
It used to be a detriment that some idea was promoted by a member of the Communist Party.
That's no longer the case.
It's very unacceptable to mention somebody's communist connections or the fact that they were communists.
But the attacks on George online go on page.
I've got like four pages of them printed out in about five lines each on average.
And it's just amazing.
These people.
Resistance, the Teflon bubble they have, which wards off any fact, any argument that contradicts their really religious views.
As I've said before, this egalitarianism, this liberalism, as it's called today, is not an ideology.
It's a cult, it's a religion.
And they adhere to it by a religious leap of faith.
And I'm looking, as I sit here on my desk, at all these attacks on him.
That are coming from people who have absolutely no credentials.
Dr. George was a very famous and well known professor of anatomy at a medical school.
Those are real credentials.
Med students, pre med students, I knew them in college, they weren't like the sociology or the philosophy of the history of the political majors like I was.
They were really smart guys that knew science and math and had.
Just these very difficult courses they had to master and have to get into medical school.
And he taught, he didn't really get into medical school, he taught anatomy.
But they sneer at him and they say he had a segregationist ideology.
Well, what for Peter's sakes is their ideology?
What gives them the power and the authority to just dismiss the statements of a professor of anatomy about the differences between the typical African brain and the typical European brain?
Just dismiss it when they're spouting things like.
Like from scientific authorities like Thomas Jefferson.
You hear this all the time and you talk to them, you know, well, Thomas Jefferson said that all men are created equal.
Well, I guess that answers that.
You have the scientific credentials of Thomas Jefferson.
How could Wesley George dare to question equality based upon actual scientific findings about the difference between the brains when Thomas Jefferson said all men are created equal and every woke person in America fervently and passionately believes on this article of faith?
And believes that don't agree with it should be burned at the stake.
The leaders will tell you that they're products of reason, that they are rational, that they're not religious, that they don't engage in superstition.
All they are is superstition, that's all they stand for.
Well, unfortunately, that's guided all of our social and international policies since the implementation of the horrific revolution that really started in the 1950s.
Brown v. Board, and then the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Immigration Act of 1965, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968.
It's only, again, you can easily dismiss it, like you said, by just quoting the author of the Declaration of Independence, which is nothing more than poetry.
And it has no bearing whatsoever on reality as it is now.
And that's what this book is focused on.
And it's a very small book, it's only about 88 pages.
I'm looking here at my copy.
You can read it carefully in an hour and a half.
It's very to the point.
It's one thing I like so much.
So many books nowadays, and including our books, they take 400 pages to make a point.
And if you can't say something in 10 minutes, it's probably not worth saying.
Yeah, I think about that abridged version by Rushton on race, evolution, and behavior.
I think that's the title.
The actual copy, the book that he put out, is four or 500 pages.
There's an abridged version of multiple editions.
And that's an accessible volume as well.
This is so great because he just comes out and clarifies all right, this horrific decision has been made.
And in the introduction, if you'd allow me to read from it, I'd like to just read a little bit and we can go from there.
When the justices abandoned former legal precedents and the historic meaning of the Constitution and based their decision in Brown v. Board of Education upon science and the opinion of authorities, they inevitably made the validity of their ruling dependent upon the truth and validity of their scientific material.
This should have been subjected to critical examination and was not.
In addition, there was a great deal of established fact and pertinent evidence bearing on the issue, which the court neglected entirely.
Mr. Dixon, this then lays into what he lays out of the arguments that would have been made if they had been allowed to be made.
That's basically what this book is.
It's a compendium of scientific facts.
Unasked Questions on Race00:10:19
And even though it was written in 1962, the scientific facts have not changed about the structure of the brain, the size of the brain.
The difference in sizes of different areas of the brain and what those areas of the brain control.
And the black race has a, on average, not all of them, but on average, they have a significantly smaller part of the brain that deals with abstract reason.
And that has never changed.
So the facts in this book, it doesn't matter that it's 64 years old.
The facts are there, the facts have never changed, the facts have never been refuted, except by this kind of silly talk, this baby talk about the Declaration of Independence and what Jesus said about science and what Karl Marx said about science.
That's the basis of their.
And I'm not saying it blasphemously, I am a Christian myself, but my particular little sect of Christianity, the Presbyterians, the Calvinists, Our guru, John Calvin, in an amazingly modern statement in the 1500s, said that if man is to understand the stars, he has to study astronomy and not the book of Genesis.
And the Bible is not a science book, nor do liberals believe in the Bible.
Most of them are atheists, or at least agnostics.
But they'll do anything, anything.
They'll say anything, embrace anything, in order to try to push this idea that everybody's equal.
In addition to that, since that book came out, we have had hundreds and probably thousands of experiments based upon the theory of human equality.
We've had busing all over America, classrooms balanced, segregation is gone.
Integration became the law of the land, enforced at federal bayonet and carried to extremes by the judiciary that even struck down neighborhood schools and said, no, you have to have balance.
We've had all those tests, and there isn't any data at all to support the theories of these people online who are sneering at Dr. George because he didn't have a degree in sociology or he didn't understand it.
The modern theory is that race doesn't exist.
Can you imagine anyone making such a statement?
When I was in school, I took anthropology.
In our textbook, even back then, I've been talking in the late 60s, the chapter on race was entitled.
The myth of race.
And my professor, who was the son of Spanish communists who unfortunately got across the border from Barcelona before Franco could get his hands on them, he was just livid when I pointed out the same thing I said earlier.
You mean to tell me that when you see a pygmy standing next to a Norwegian, you don't see any difference?
But you go from there, very basic things.
We know that even within races, There are genetic differences that dictate susceptibility to certain diseases.
The Jewish community suffers from Tay Sachs.
We don't, but they do.
There are all kinds of differences.
Blacks suffer from sickle cell anemia.
We don't suffer from sickle cell anemia.
How can they claim that there is no such thing as race?
Race is a myth, and there's no genetic difference in the races?
How could anybody say that and not be laughed out of the classroom?
Well, they should be laughed out of the classroom, but unfortunately, this is a religion, Sam, we're talking about.
And the expiation that these acolytes and the adherents of this cult, as you called it, that they want is basically our civilization, and they don't care what happens.
The greater the amalgamation, the greater the sacrifice.
And that's one of the things that Dr. George in his book lays out as one of the most important problems he writes facing America today is Shall we pursue programs that would result?
In the mixing of the genes of the Negro race with those of the white race, and so convert the population of the U.S. into a mixed blooded people.
Before saying yes to that question, before making any revolutionary decisions relatively to so important and irreversible a matter, the information we have that bears on the issue should be carefully examined and critically evaluated.
And then he lays out his thesis.
Oh, go ahead.
Go ahead.
I heard you.
Sounds like you want to say something.
No, I was just rattling a paper.
I'm sorry.
Okay.
Okay.
He then lays out what the book is going to address.
It is the object of this study to ask certain questions of a fundamental biological nature and to see what answers are given by the facts as discovered and reported by the most credible scientists.
Some of the questions are, which are addressed in the book, one, are babies born equal in the biological sense, or are there significant differences between them before environment plays a part in molding them?
Two, what is the mechanism of biological inheritance?
Three, is the difference between the white and Negro races primarily a paint job?
Or are there differences of such fundamental mature and significance that they should be taken into consideration and deciding upon social and educational policies involving the relations of the races?
Four, are significant differences in individuals and in races hereditary, or are they produced anew in each generation by environmental influences?
And fifthly, what should we expect to be the long range results of a program that would lead to racial amalgamation?
I mean, Sam, throughout America's history, these were important questions that.
Our elected officials were even addressing when they came to who could have the franchise, who had suffrage, the way that you would allow freedom of association to exist.
We talked in a previous edition of this podcast about Wilmot Robertson's book, who in 1970, that book came out in 1972.
So this is about a decade after Dr. George's book came out.
He noted America was an 88% white nation according to the 1970 census.
And so much has happened since the subsequent publication of this book.
Subsequently, after the book came out, that America is now what, 55, 56% non Hispanic white, and you have had the black population has grown significantly from 20 to 40 million, but you've also now had Asians, Indians, Somalis, you've had so many other racial groups who've been brought here, specifically by a refugee resettlement to act as a bludgeon against the interests of whites where they're resettled.
But we now have to address so many more aspects of this question.
It's no longer just a white black question as this book was written, but it's now in the realm of where we are having to think about the questions he's bringing up in 1962.
You now have this whole it's the entire world now has been brought to the United States because we just undid our immigration laws.
And it's really extraordinary to put all that into the context of this book and where race now plays out as.
Whites are still attacked.
Look at what Mandani Sam is doing in New York City, where they consistently say that you have to have measures in place to combat systemic inequality.
Because look how much more white people make than blacks do on average.
Look at the white wealth.
Look at the value of a white home versus black.
But nobody thinks about or ever says, well, what about Asian versus white?
What about Indian versus white?
What about the only thing that counts is hating white people?
Exactly.
When you look at these arguments, one of the Journal of Constitution where I live in Atlanta, I have a series.
I think it won the Pulitzer Prize called The Color of Money.
And it consisted of blacks complaining that their houses were appraised at cheaper prices than white houses.
That if you lived in a certain white neighborhood, your house could be appraised today.
Nowadays, you might have a house in a neighborhood that would appraise at a million dollars, it's a white area.
And in the black area, the identical, physically identical house were appraised at $250,000.
And they're all complaining that I've been cheated.
They had the chairman of the county commission, they quoted him, I've been cheated.
My house ought to be worth four times what the appraisal says it is.
No one ever asked the obvious question, which is well, then you would have to pay mortgage payments that are four times as great.
You'd have to pay taxes that are four times as great.
You want your house valued at a million dollars when you've been paying mortgages on a mortgage of a quarter of that.
So, no.
I mean, if black houses were increased in value to the level of the average white house, white owned property in Atlanta, blacks would be homeless.
Foreclosure, yeah.
But they never look at it that way.
They look at it only a way to stir up hatred, jealousy, life.
That's the only thing they look at.
Another one of the questions that wasn't asked, one of the points that wasn't made in that list of questions you read out is what is the effect ultimately, looking down the centuries, what's going to be the effect of mixing these races up?
And a lot of people will say, I have a relative who said that, oh, Sam, it doesn't matter, even if you're right.
Fighting Hate with Innovation00:05:15
If whites married in with these other people, it would only reduce the average IQ by, say, three or four points.
And that doesn't matter.
Well, the problem with that is when you move the whole bell curve over, you ratchet it over three or four points to the left, you don't lose three or four points, percentage points, say, of the people who are the inventors and geniuses.
The people who solve things, enabling mankind to break through, you eliminate 95% of them.
A small difference in IQ is the difference between Sweden, Stockholm, and Cairo.
It's a huge thing.
And humanity is driven forward by very few people, and not generally by people like me, whose abilities lie verbal and lie in things like anthropology, sociology, history, and political science, which I studied in college or.
Foreign languages, which I speak, it lies in the hands of people with the abilities of like my buddies in college, who are the pre med students, the guys that could ace organic chemistry.
Those are the guys that cure cancer.
Those are the guys that cure polio.
Those are the guys that invent the MRI machine, which enables doctors to look inside us without having to cut us open.
Those are the guys that invent light bulbs and internal combustion machines.
Inventors really are terribly underrated and politicians are overrated.
You know, Franklin Roosevelt did very little for us, but Edison did a lot for us.
It's interesting you say that.
It's interesting you say that because the Washington Post today said it makes everybody up.
The Edisons will disappear, and that's the price of mixing the race.
And yeah, I think it's apropos that you make that point because one of the things that's happened today is that one of the more Impressive innovators when it comes to SpaceX, when it comes to Tesla, when it comes to the boring company, when it comes to trying to increase transportation, when it comes to his neurological innovations that he's trying to bring about, is Elon Musk.
And he's being attacked in the Washington Post by Heidi Beirich, formerly of the SPLC.
That's a scientist, Heidi Beirich.
Because he's tweeted about race.
More than 850 times in recent months.
He's actually retweeted me three or four times.
So thank you, Elon Musk, for retweeting some of the tweets that I've put out and amplifying them.
But this has come to the attention because obviously Tesla is just absolutely fantastic in its innovations.
I'm not sure if you've ever actually had a chance to drive one or ridden in a Tesla, maybe an Uber, but there's a SpaceX IPO coming.
And you think about how.
When NASA was sidelined, basically the only way we were able to see innovation when it came to exploration of space were the rockets that Elon Musk was, he decided to start building back in 2008 to 2012.
Now, these are rockets now can go up and go out the Earth's atmosphere and then come back and land in its own geometric pattern.
It's just mind blowing what's happening with the innovations that he's pushing.
And yet at the same time, he's now being attacked by.
The former employee of the SPLC, who's the co founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism.
And she's just shocked and just appalled at how he's taken an interest in what's happening to Europe, what's happening to Australia, what's happening to his home nation of South Africa.
I hope every thoughtful person is appalled by Dr. Hayy Byrish.
I mean, she is someone who does not deal in facts.
And she's a smear artist.
She comes from an organization that bribed people in other groups to give them membership lists, to commit crimes, to enable people like Heidi Byrish to ruin people financially and professionally.
She's on that level, basically a low grade blackmailer.
She is simply repulsive.
She is disgusting.
The very idea of setting up an institute to fight hate.
Right off the bat, this is something, it's the kind of thing that comedies are made of.
Well, it's a tragedy, unfortunately, in our life.
I know, Sally.
Let's set up a commission to fight hate.
It's like some low grade sect of Christianity where someone can, let's talk about the sinners.
Let's talk about the sinners.
It's on that level, except it's worse than that level.
Trading in Jealousy and Hate00:04:41
I mean, the very idea.
Of saying, if you disagree with me on these points, you're full of hate.
Right off the bat, you know that someone that says that is a screwball.
Well, it's important what you're saying because it ties into your comments about the people who actually push forward.
And this article the Washington Post put out today on April 24th, 2026, it's on the cover of the Washington Post, ladies and gentlemen, but you can access it by going to your Google machine and typing in Elon Musk's near daily online posts about race.
Are turning off some fans.
The billionaire posted 850 times on the topic in recent months, almost tripled the rate for the previous two years.
Well, I say he has some catching up to do.
So great job, Mr. Musk.
I've long been a big fan of Elon Musk.
I'm a longtime shareholder of Tesla.
I'm eagerly awaiting, Sam, the introduction of the SpaceX IPO, which this article is really upset about.
And I know we're talking about Dr. George's book, but this really dovetails into what you're talking about those people who have the capability of pushing civilization further and what.
Impedes our moving forward is obviously this belief that the races, that in racial equality, that we are all equal, that as you stated to start, that the Thomas Jefferson Declaration of Independence poetry, and that's all it is life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, and the all men are created equal nonsense.
That mindset has, it's almost been a governor keeping us from really accelerating.
To the future, and just being like, hey, why did we believe that for so long?
Oh, Thomas Jefferson wrote that in the Declaration of Independence.
And the genetic impact of all this stuff.
Blacks are worse off today in many respects than they were in 1954.
As we said before, not only has there been no study that showed that integration, raising the rates in the schools, ever helped them, there's no study that shows that.
If there were, we'd hear about it.
And not only is the rate of Black homeownership lower today, And then it was when they passed the Fair Housing Act.
But I think part of the reason that is that the birth rate among university educated black women is among the lowest of all categories.
And we had this huge welfare program without any strings attached that allowed the criminal class, the black race, to have huge families, while the leader element, the smarter element, was having tiny families or no families at all.
So in three generations, they have downbred the blacks.
Who really didn't have the reserves we had when they downbred us, too.
But it's not as immediate as it was to blacks who couldn't afford that.
But where is this to end?
Heidi Byrish and people like her, Herbert Aptecker, use another one, the guy that wrote America's Dilemma, Gunnar Murdahl.
These people trade in jealousy and hate.
They themselves, when they point the finger at somebody else as a hater, that's at least three fingers pointing back at them because their whole political ideology is based upon hating.
Rather than anybody feeling gratitude for the kind of people that created that light bulb and the internal combustion machine and air conditioning and all the things that make our lives livable, penicillin creates resentment and hatred.
The whole idea is you'll never hear someone say, well, all men are created equal.
When they're looking downward, the people that really trade in this, like Heidi and Nirdal, it's all designed to make you look up at the people above you and hate them.
That's the driving force of it.
And in the long run, it is catastrophic.
It is deadly to the human race and to civilization, but they don't care because they're motivated by these base motivations.
And then, in the case of this envy that they push, You know, it's a human defect addressed in the 10th commandment, thou shalt not covet.
But that what they're into is coveting, constantly stirring up envy, coveting, covetousness, resentment, jealousy.
Fact-Free Ideologies as Religion00:07:53
This is what they trade in.
These are the waters they fish in.
Well, speaking of which, I think you're really going to find just, I want to read a couple of the paragraphs here because this conversation has gone in a very interesting way because you set it up.
To this article, because here you have a guy who's doing so much innovation, but also he's taking a particularly keen interest, Sam, into what's happened to his home nation of South Africa, when the exact same problems that Dr. George was talking about in 1962 in the United States have happened, on a far more tragic scale, for the white minority that voted to give up power and to give the franchise to blacks, who vastly outnumbered them,
and the consequences for a nation where.
Every, every foreshadowing, every prediction that whites had of what was going to happen with black self rule in South Africa has come true.
And I mean, in many cases, this is South Africa under white rule, under apartheid.
And again, I wasn't a fan of apartheid the more you learn about it.
You need complete and utter separation.
But I believe the first open heart transplant occurred in South Africa.
They had a space program in the 1980s, they had a first rate.
Air Force with unbelievable fighter jets.
Now they have, I think, four aircraft in their Air Force that are actually operational.
They didn't have nuclear submarines, but they had a formidable Navy.
And they actually had nuclear weapons that they dismantled in 1992 and 1993, and a program that is fascinating to read about before the handover to blacks in 1994 to Nelson Mandela.
And it's amazing to think that here's a guy who never had to even comment on politics.
He never had to take an interest in what was happening with the great replacement in Europe and just the fundamental racial changes in the United States or to.
Think about what the death of Irina Zarutska, the hand of a black career criminal, meant and what that signified.
But, Sam, he has, and this is what the Washington Post writes.
The author, by the way, there are two authors of this piece, Faiz Siddiquiou and Jeremy Merrill.
They write this, Sam Elon Musk, the world's richest person, is on the cusp of a record setting initial public offering that could soon make him a trillionaire.
But in recent months, he's been increasingly vocal about something else rallying white people.
To stand up for their race.
Quote, whites are a rapidly dying minority, Musk wrote in January 2026 in a post that garnered more than 17 million views and 150,000 likes.
In a February post, liked by more than 365,000 accounts, Musk declared that, quote, there has been unrelenting hate and poisonous propaganda in the West against anyone white, straight, or male over the past decade or more.
No more guilt trips, enough, end quote.
Sam, this was designated newsworthy in the Washington Post.
Which is owned by Jeff Bezos, who is a white competitor of SpaceX with his Blue Origin space program that he also has created, a private venture.
But this is fascinating to think that you have the guy who was on the cusp of being the first trillionaire that we probably know of.
I'm sure there are other well-moneyed institutions out there that have their money hidden in unique places.
But Musk is talking about the kind of stuff that we've always wondered: is someone going to step up and say this in a position where?
He can basically have, you know, quote unquote, you know, F you money to say something in very barbaric Lehman term.
But that's what this is.
And he's doing exactly what you said.
The people who push things forward are someone like an Elon Musk who just sees it.
And once you see it, Sam, it's hard to unsee it.
Well, I mean, you just wonder if these people are resistant to truth.
The truth is hate.
Truth is racism.
They don't engage factually.
I don't think Heidi Byrish has ever engaged factually.
Has she ever been on a podcast with Jared Taylor?
I can't imagine that she would because they can't.
They cannot allow their religious delusions to be subjected to scientific fact.
And this goes way back.
I don't know if Dr. George points this out, but it was pointed out at the time.
And made a big impression on media back when they were pushing Dr. King's solution to black problems, which was to whites who caused all this by segregation and segregation, and Dr. King was going to solve all of this.
And of course, like I said, his solution has been tried and it has completely and utterly failed.
But the point was made back then when they were saying that, well, the problem with blacks is that they're segregated and they've been discriminated against.
Well, the point was made way back then that there's an area in Canada called Chatham, Ontario.
And Chatham, Ontario was where the black slaves who fled slavery at the Underground Railroad settled.
And these probably were the brighter blacks that were more assertive, aggressive blacks that were willing to take their destiny in their own hands and flee and travel hundreds of miles to get out of the South and then out of America and seek refuge in Canada.
Well, the IQs of the descendants of the blacks in Chatham, Ontario were identical.
To the IQ of the blacks in Mississippi.
But that didn't make any difference to Gunnar Meredith.
It didn't make any difference to Earl Warren.
They just knew that Karl Marx, Thomas Jefferson, Jesus, whoever, had brought the tablets down from whatever mountain Karl Marx lived on and had established that everybody was equal and that any kind of indication of inequality was due to some bad action on the part of people who were on the top of the hill.
And you know, it's these people function on a crude basis, very easily understood terms.
If they see a fat guy standing next to a thin guy, they have to think that the fat guy got fat by taking the thin man's food.
That's how they reason.
They're resistant to facts, but really, if we have truth in packaging, the opinions in books and stuff of people like Heidi Byrish and And Gunnar Myrdal and others, they should bear on their covers fact free writing, like fat free food you see in the grocery stores.
Fact free.
And that's what they are.
They're fact free.
And they believe they can achieve a perfect world by their religiously held delusions of equality.
Like people said, Marxism, a white Russian told me, communism in Russia, these were people who had survived the 1917 revolution and fought against it.
They said that Leninism, Was simply a religious, it's a religion.
It was not an ideology, it was a religion.
And in Russia, in the Soviet Union, they actually borrowed part of the liturgy of the Russian Orthodox Church and incorporated it into the Communist Party.
Guilt by Association Tactics00:10:36
They had, it's a part of their Russian Orthodox liturgy, I think it's like the Roman Catholic liturgy that says, Jesus lived, Jesus lives, Jesus will live forever, or something like that.
Well, the Communists incorporated that, that Lenin, Zhil, Lenin lived, Lenin lives, Lenin will live forever.
It's a religious delusion.
Well, speaking of the religious delusion, here's her quote that's in this story.
Musk has long dispatched unfiltered thoughts to his followers, an audience now numbering more than 238 million on X. Some of the views he has recently espoused about race have ventured into more extreme territory, according to people who have studied the politics of race.
Quote, as far as I can tell, Musk at this point agrees with standard talking points of white supremacy, says Heidi Byrich, co founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, citing Musk's claim that white people are a dying minority.
Quote, you just don't get more white supremacists than the stuff Musk is signing on to or pushing, Byrich said.
You know, it might be me remembering incorrectly, but I think Mark Potock, a former SPLC employee, had a little yellow notepad.
On his office wall, where he actually noted the white percentage of the population of the US by decade.
It was from 90% in 1950 down to, I don't remember the last decade he was monitoring that percentage drop, but I think it was about 62% white in 2010.
All these people are who are supposedly purported as those who study assiduously the politics of race, all they really are is those, to continue your analogy of religion, they're just the priests of the suppression and dispossession of whites in our own nations.
And Musk's great crime.
He's bringing about this robotics revolution, the incredible things he's doing, like I said, with Tesla, SpaceX, and what he's done to enable free speech by buying Twitter.
He is now persona non grata.
He is the ultimate enemy.
And that just goes back to your concept of.
Besides that, you have to look at the whole tactic there to see how silly these people are.
Yeah, it's disappointing.
You would hope that even people of moderate intelligence, like me, Not the medical school pre med students that I was friends with in college, but the people of ordinary intelligence would see through how silly all this is because what they're practicing is an ideological guilt by association.
That, oh, white supremacists said this, so you can't say it.
If you say it, you're a white supremacist, which is not a name we've chosen for ourselves.
You see it all the time at the Southern Poverty Law Center that they say things that really are the language of mentally ill people.
They had a report on Eric Rudolph, a guy that was accused of bombing a gay nightclub and an abortion clinic and the Olympic Games.
And they said things like he lived in the area of North Carolina.
He grew up there in an area where there was a lot of white racism and activity back in the 1920s.
Really, geographic guilt by association.
And then they said that he lived, he grew up only 20 miles from where a known Holocaust denier lives.
There's no evidence that Rudolph ever met this person who died when Rudolph, by the way, was 11 years old.
But again, it's more geographic guilt by association.
And then you have audience guilt by association that they've used by the founder of American Renaissance.
They said things like when Jared Taylor spoke at such and such a college, no neo Nazis sat in the audience.
You know, whoo, boy, that really proves a lot.
And they even have quotation guilt by association.
They'll say things like, well, Dr. So and so says he's not a Nazi, but he cannot deny the fact that his research has been quoted by Nazis.
You know, this kind of thinking is not merely, you know, it's really the thinking of a deranged, disturbed mind.
I had two second cousins who were schizophrenics, and I helped with the law work of the trust that the family had over there to take care of them.
This is the way these schizophrenic distant cousins of mine were taught.
You know, so and so was driving a white Camaro, and back when I had an accident 11 years ago, and so and so else, he drives a white Camaro.
It's these facts, the connection of facts that aren't connected.
And this thing you're talking about there, Musk says things that white supremacists say.
The New York Times did the same thing to Trump in the election back in 19 and back in 2020.
They said that.
Trump attacks the news media and Hitler attacked the news media.
Well, of course.
That's a great comparison, right?
How is that a connection?
Nobody can attack the news media without being a Nazi.
You think the New York Times would be ashamed to publish?
I think you and Jared Taylor, and I know myself, all of us would be embarrassed if something like that appeared above our signature.
I don't disagree at all, excuse me.
But the fact that this is appearing in what is probably the number two newspaper, the daily periodical in the country for influencing.
Individuals and for trying to scare away people because, again, you're seeing more and more individuals less apt to steer clear of this conversation.
And again, they're not even talking about the biology of the race problem as Dr. George was in his 1962 book.
They're just pointing out the consequences of not acknowledging race at all.
And that makes you a white supremacist if you do acknowledge that, you know, white people have racial interests as well, that they should be allowed to espouse and have individuals in elected positions.
Or groups that agitate and advocate for those groups that aren't then infiltrated by organizations that have paid employees who are being paid by groups that monitor and expose hate, that are getting tax deductible donations.
And Sam has an endowment of close to $800 million.
I mean, it's such an extraordinary world that we live in in 2026 when you look at a book.
That came out in 1962, which clearly and methodically lays out the case for hey, this whole campaign is sinister to begin with because there are biological differences in the race.
White people didn't create these.
We made the mistake by failing to finish the job at the American Colonization Society so that we wouldn't have to, in perpetuity, deal with the biological differences of race and the consequences of these groups interacting and that resentment that's created.
To facilitate hatred between groups.
And like you said, when you're saying all men are created equal, that goofy poetry from the Declaration of Independence, when people say we have to believe this, look at these other guys who have far more than you do.
And it creates that, well, we need to ensure that there's a proper distribution of resources and there's equity involved here.
And that's just the pernicious language we've been forced to endure because of our refusal to accept Dr. George's thesis.
Yes, and ultimately you'll just downgrade, breed the whole human race, where the whole world will be Tijuana.
There will be no Copenhagen.
There'll be no Geneva, Switzerland.
It'll be just Tijuana.
And there will be no inventors like Edison.
Everybody will be living in the slums.
The wildlife will be wiped out.
All the forests of the earth will be cut down.
All the sequoia trees will be turned into toothpicks.
Because the kind of people that care about the sequoia trees and protect the endangered species, they're not the kind of people that are reproducing.
We need a society in which the best elements are encouraged to have families, and the people who are problem causers are encouraged to limit their families.
But we have the opposite.
We have the criminal in jail that's got eight kids, and you have the brain surgeons who, on average, probably have 1.2 kids.
These guys in my class that were the pre med students, friends of mine, I used to tell them you have a duty to society.
Your duty is to produce at least a half dozen kids.
And that's the way the world ought to be run.
That's the way nature ran the world.
But we've reversed it.
Instead, we put a premium on the least desirable, most difficult, problem causing element of society, and we effectively sterilize the people who can solve the problems.
Well, here's what Dr. George laid out in his book, in which I think is one of the more intriguing chapters.
Where he talks about, for those who have their book in front of them, and again, I do recommend getting a physical copy of this.
They are hard to find.
I think it's been reprinted, but this is a book you want an original copy of.
He writes this Dr. Frank McGurk, one of the active investigators in this field, had this to say The existence of Negro white test score differences is hardly debatable.
As far as the empirical data are concerned, the literature shows.
Clearly, that Negroes as a group of subjects obtain lower mean test scores than whites as a group of subjects.
Defective Reasoning on Equality00:02:54
He says also the various differences in socioeconomic environments of the Negroes between 1918 and 1950 have not altered the Negro white test score relationship.
Sam, every year you have a story coming out about the differences in SAT scores or MCAT scores or.
GMAT scores, whatever can be measured, there is a test gap that exists.
That, again, the same thing could be said today.
The differences between 1918 and 2026 have not altered the Negro white test score relationship, even though we've dismantled segregation, even though we've outlawed freedom of association, even though we've had massive integration at the point of a bayonet, as you've stated.
Enabled the amount of research and data to showcase that what Dr. George and what he is quoting from McGurk was saying then is obviously true.
I mean, what we say is obviously true.
To believe what these people believe, you would have to believe that there is, they say that all the races are equal.
In other words, we all pass the evolutionary finish line.
Absolutely abreast of each other.
Our chests all touch the ribbon at the same time.
But only in respect to one organ of one species.
The human brain was magically exempted from the laws of evolution.
And even though the races differ in height, that pygmies are a lot shorter than Norwegians, that this one brain, magically, this one organ, it magically is equal.
And this is said by people who think it's chic not to believe in God.
The only way you can believe that is to believe that there was a divine power that intervened and somehow arranged things that everybody would have an equal mind.
And, you know, that's just, you know, and they don't believe that.
They like to show how broad minded they are by saying they don't believe in God.
Well, then what they're saying is just absurd.
And on an individual level, The really wild ones will tell you that every individual is the same.
Humans are like roofing tacks.
We're all exactly alike.
Well, I can tell you no amount of music lessons would ever make me into Mozart.
And I don't have any problem accepting that, that I'm not equal to Mozart.
I don't want my brain surgeon to be equal to me.
I want my brain surgeon to be superior to me.
Truth Prevails Over Delusion00:14:48
And like I've said probably on these broadcasts, when I was in high school, we didn't want the Druid Hills Red Devils to be the most equal football team in the league.
We wanted our quarterback to be better than their quarterback, our team to be better than their team.
This cult of equality is just the most puzzling thing imaginable.
It is so laughably false.
It is a delusion that is so obviously false as to make you wonder that anybody could really believe it.
And that's why I don't think they really do believe it.
I think the motivation is not really a belief in equality, motivation is hate.
Heidi Byrish is full of hate.
She's hating all day long.
She's hating people that are smarter than she is, taller than she is, better looking than she is.
She is full of hate.
She wants to pull everybody down her level, and that's what these people are.
They're not crazy, they're not delusional.
It's just that the facts don't matter to them because that's not what their goal is.
Their goal is to crush white people and to crush intelligent people and to get them out of the way.
That's their real goal.
Yeah, I guess it was about a decade later that the way that IQ was measured to determine if someone was mentally retarded.
I think it was 1973.
I forgot the organization decided to downgrade the number.
The IQ cutoff was again changed back to two standard deviations, I believe below the mean.
So it went from like 85 to 70.
And then that, of course, has gone into the court, Sam, when somebody is decided if they were intelligent enough to know what they were doing when it comes to either the death penalty or for crimes that they've committed for homicide, for theft, for any form of violent crime.
To see if they had an IQ where they actually understood the consequences of their actions.
So, this is, and this was something that was done, what, 11 years after George wrote this book.
And that was heavily done because of the racial implications of stating the mental retardation at an 85 IQ.
You read these people saying things like the SAT test is clearly racially discriminatory because Blacks go lower.
You know, they went after the traffic cameras.
I think in Chicago, because the traffic cameras showed more blacks running red lights and things like that than whites.
And therefore, the traffic cameras were racist and had to be eliminated.
You couldn't have that.
And that's how you know these people are not sincere.
Their motivation is not to help, their motivation is to lash out and punish and hurt people.
You see, you mentioned crime.
Well, they now say all the sexes are equal.
In fact, they deny sex exists like they deny race exists.
Of course.
One day you can feel you're a guy, next day you can feel a woman.
Your physical anatomy does not control.
It's all a matter of your subjective belief and your wishes, like it is with them.
So sex basically doesn't exist.
But they will insist that women are equal to men.
Women and men are equal.
And by that they mean they are fungibles, they're like roofing tacks.
Well, under their own, and they'll complain about the jails, the mass incarceration of black people.
Proves racism.
What about the mass incarceration of males?
You and I are males.
What's the percentage of males in the jail?
My understanding is like 90%.
Obviously, there's anti male discrimination.
It'd all be 50 50 because everybody's equal.
Women are equal to men.
There's no difference.
Women are going to commit as many bank robberies as men.
So, obviously, the difference shows systemic anti maleism.
We've got to fund programs to get those numbers up.
I don't know what we're doing.
I'm joking.
Going back to the book, this is a very important part because, again, I think if you were to look at these numbers today, if there was a biologist or anyone who would dare even touch this stuff, and again, I mean, Sam, going back to that Washington Post article, Musk never talks about IQ or intelligence.
Musk just talks about the consequences of a nation that no longer cares about its identity and allowing the entire world that has largely been allowed to proliferate, specifically Africa, the African nations, because of USAID.
And the misguided, altruistic funding of programs that have enabled a population growth that nature never intended.
I mean, it's astonishing to look at some of the graphs of the future and to look at the projections of the European population growth, which is not even stagnant, it's just dropping, versus the growth in the African population, which was heavily funded.
And it was basically a breeding program that USAID enabled.
And that's been one of the great things that has happened since Trump 2.0.
USAID was.
Ended.
But if you were to have a biologist summarize some of the statistics and studies that exist today, like Dr. George comments on, he writes this.
I don't think they'd be that different.
In fact, I think they'd probably be the exact same.
But then you could also factor in the Asian test scores, as of course Rushton has talked about, Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein, that they don't really touch on race in the bell curve.
There's that infamous chapter 13, which Briefly talks about, you know, intelligence being inherited.
I'm not even sure the last time you've read The Bell Curve.
Did you ever read it?
I did read it, but that's been long ago.
Well, here's what Dr. George writes The results of the researches compiled by Dr. Audrey Shuey and have been briefly summarized by Dr. Henry Garrett.
There's a name I haven't heard in a while or read in a while.
One, the IQs of American Negroes are from 15 to 20 points on the average below those of American whites.
Negro overlap of white meeting IQs ranges from 10 to 25%.
Equality would require 50%.
Three, about six times as many whites as Negroes fall in the gifted child category, which is why now, Sam, you have to have the gifted child category basically eliminated.
You have to get rid of AP classes because not enough black kids are enrolled in them.
You have to get rid of any gifted studies program because they are inherently racist, because they keep out primarily black students from being designated in said category.
Four, about six times as many Negroes as whites fall below 70 IQ, that is, in the feeble minded group.
Like I said, in the 1970s, they changed the definition of mental retardation and feeble mindedness because far, far, far too many blacks would have been classified in that category because of that IQ if it was 85 versus 70.
Five, Negro white differences in mean test score occur in all types of mental tests, but the Negro lag is greatest in tests of an abstract nature.
For example, Problem involving reasoning, deduction, comprehension.
Change the page real quick.
These are the functions called for in education above the lowest levels.
Six, differences between Negro and white children increase with chronological age, the gap in performance being largest at the high school and collegiate levels.
Seven, large and significant differences in favor of whites appear even when socioeconomic factors have been equated.
I mean, again, Sam, this stuff was known, and in the book, Dr. George spends a chapter attacking Boaznian anthropology, which is probably a podcast all of its own.
We can.
I could think of numerous books that have attacked Dr. Boas, and I believe you mentioned Myrtle as well, who wrote The American Dilemma.
But this was, Dr. George was writing some very revolutionary stuff in this book.
And yet, in 2026, we're still living not just with the consequences of ignoring what he wrote, but in spite of, despite trillions of dollars being spent to try and prove that this is all lies.
The same results keep happening.
The same results keep appearing.
And now you factor in Asian, you factor in Indian test scores.
And my gosh, in some cases, they are a little higher than whites.
How can that be?
But no one ever wants to talk about that.
It's just that white, black test gap that if we throw another trillion dollars at it, it's going to go away, we promise.
And if not, it's just because of implicit bias and systemic racism on the parts of whites.
And so it's a disparate impact.
Like I said about the jails.
They apply these principles only in a way to lash out at groups that they want to degrade and crush.
The difference in average income, wealth, that's the big thing now.
They call it generational wealth, and they blame it all on that blacks have a smaller amount of wealth because of the environment and so on.
Or redlining.
Jews.
Have a much higher average net worth than white Christians did.
But you'll never hear Heidi Byrish talk about that.
No, she wants to keep that, but focus right on this population.
They're very careful.
Like you said, they don't look at the difference in IQ between whites and Asians.
They don't look at that.
They're very careful how they apply these things.
And their reasoning is defective.
They'll say when you read what Dr. George says about the difference in the size of the areas of the brain, they'll say things like, oh, there's no correlation between the size of the brain and intelligence.
There's just, oh, somebody established that.
It's scientifically established.
And then they'll argue based upon little examples.
And Jared once talked about this, Jared Taylor.
They'll say, well, I know a black that's intelligent.
I certainly know lots of them that are intelligent.
But the fact that you know a woman who's over six feet tall does not change the fact that the average woman is physically smaller than the average male.
But they argue from these anecdotes.
And so they argue that because there are people with small brains whose autopsies have shown small brains had high IQs, ergo, therefore, there is no connection between brain size and intelligence.
But unfortunately for them, Science shows otherwise.
And you could use their same kind of argument, like I've said before, in the gym.
If I go into the weight room at my gym, I can make a pretty accurate prediction of which guys are going to be able to press the heaviest weights based on the size of their biceps.
Now, occasionally you have a guy with smaller biceps who has stringier muscles or whatever, or tighter muscles, and you have a guy with bigger biceps who's overweight.
And so the skinny guy will be able to outpress the guy with the bigger biceps.
But these statistics are there.
I mean, anyone that's ever worked out knows that's true.
But that doesn't affect people like Heidi Byrish or Gunnar Myrdal or the New York Times writers.
They want to believe, they just have to believe.
Margaret Mead said in the sacred scripture that racism is bad, that you can't talk about differences between races.
And if Margaret Mead said it in her holy scripture, You need to burn at the stake.
People like Musk and others, and then Dr. Wesley George, who dare to blaspheme against the sacred scriptures.
That's how their brains work.
Expiation.
Sam, as we close up this conversation on the biology of the race problem by Dr. George, published in 1962, I think you found a write up by Dr. Revelo Oliver.
Did you want to mention what he pointed out?
I did.
I think that the person who has a lot of Revelo's papers.
Contacted me and said he had a box he wanted to send to me, and he sent them.
And one of them was a, all of them are identified specifically as written by Dr. Albrecht, except this one.
Maybe he got it from somebody else.
The fact that it has a religious ending would indicate that it may be by somebody else, but it's entitled, Does Integration Equal Progress?
And it's four pages long.
And I asked Dr. Kevin McDonald to put it up, and I hear that he has put it up on the Occidental Observer.
But it's very good because it just in four pages lays out all the findings by anatomy, by people like Dr. George, and by others.
It omits the psychological differences, which have been explored more recently.
But in a full page summary, it sets it all out the huge, overwhelming scientific basis that leads us to understand.
That no, unfortunately for Thomas Jefferson, all men and all women were not created equal.
There's a lot of difference between them.
And that's nature, that's reality, that's truth.
And you have to establish social policy based upon truth and not upon the sacred scriptures of Margaret Mead.
But that's what they want us to establish social policy based upon the delusions and the whimsical desires.
Of these egalitarians.
Social Policy Based on Reality00:02:50
And that's what we've done.
And it's being devastating.
It's a terrible thing.
One little thing that I got from this, which was very interesting to me, was there's an area of the brain that deals with the instinct for self preservation.
Yes.
And it doesn't dwell on this.
It's just listing what science is founded.
Well, in the African American, in the African brain, this part of the African brain is larger than in the European brain.
And so when you figure that, White people are endowed with more analytical ability, but a weaker desire for self preservation.
It helps explain the goofiness of so many white people.
We're not superior to blacks in that area.
Blacks are superior to us.
That's the observation I wanted you to end this conversation on the biology of the race problem on, because that is a problem that we as white people are going to have to address if we are to overcome this era that we still find ourselves living in.
But it is interesting the way that you laid out.
What the amalgamation of races would mean and the loss of individuals who were pushing.
Again, at one point, this was a world that, what, in 1913, Mr. Dixon, I believe the world was what, 30, 35% white?
Now it's 8%, 7%.
And that's all really Elon Musk has noticed wow, as the world has grown to 7.9 billion people, it sure seems that most of the world wants to come to where the white people live and to have access to our resources.
Here again, highly Irish and South.
And the Southern Poverty Law Center and the New York Times, and all these people that are pushing the let's hate whitey agenda.
If they really believe that America is a racist, vicious country that's done nothing but lynch black people and segregate them and humiliate them, they should not be encouraging immigrants to come here.
They should be telling them, for God's sake, stay in Ghana, stay in Mexico, do not come to this horrible place where people will lynch you and rape you and kill you and do all these terrible things.
But that's not at all.
They know their own product is a lie.
They know it as well as we do.
It's one of the reasons why they say sending Haitians back to Haiti in 2026 would be a death sentence.
They've got to stay here.
If America was replete with white racism, why in God's name would they ever want to leave Port au Prince, Haiti, where they're safe and comfy?
National Radio's Louise Kelly had a thing in reply to Trump, and Trump said that they cast aspersions upon Somalia.
They ran a thing about how Somalia is really great.
Listener Donations and Replies00:03:48
It's just wonderful.
Why then do they want people to leave a paradise like Somalia?
Mary Louise Kelly should be packing her bags right now to move there.
She could experience the delights of Somali culture that she and her friends on Ashpart Radio told us about.
But truth, truth must always be the guiding light.
Truth, you know, is.
I like the French.
Proverb that truth without compassion is the work of the devil.
But when all is said and done, truth has to prevail.
My family are what they call septs of the Keith clan in Scotland.
And the family motto, if I had to choose one, it would come out better veritas vincit, truth conquers.
And that has to be your approach to life.
Well, that's an approach that every one of our listeners must take to heart.
I agree wholeheartedly.
And with that, we come to the conclusion of a Discussion about the biology of the race problem by Wesley Kritz George.
He was a professor a long time at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill.
His papers are actually still there in the library at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill.
Even though Silent Sam might be gone, you can still access his papers there.
Sam, this was a phenomenal conversation.
How can our listeners get in touch with you?
Well, they could email me at MarchBloomling. 36 at gmail.com.
We're going to have to get you a new email that's easier.
Just sdixon at amarin.com or something.
That doesn't exist yet, but we'll figure out a way that's a lot easier.
The internet is a great obstacle to getting things done.
I spend way too much time on the internet now.
I appreciate people writing me, but I'm Gabby and I write long replies and I end up having spent several hours a day writing replies to people.
I need to activate my Substack.
You are definitely loquacious when you should be laconic.
You can get in touch with me, ladies and gentlemen, at becausewelivehereprotonmail.com.
Once again, that email address is becausewelivehereprotonmail.com.
And I. Don't want to make a mistake not saying that.
Again, we appreciate the opportunity to come to you on the New Century Foundation's growing family of podcasts and entertainment and educational matters.
Don't hesitate when you get that tax rebate, all that money back from Uncle Sam, to think about 2026 taxes, which will be due on April 15th, 2027.
Make a tax deductible donation to offset what you owe Uncle Sam.
To the New Century Foundation.
You can even make it and you can say, hey, I'm putting this in the name of the White Man's Library, or hey, for Identity Politics, which Kevin Deanna produces three outstanding videos per week.
Either way, just go to amren.com, donate.
We appreciate that.
We're very much looking forward to seeing all of you, hopefully, in November at the upcoming conference, which will be here before you know it.
But for Mr. Dixon, this has been another edition of the White Man's Library.
Very honored to be here.
I feel sorry for our listeners that have to listen to me Babylon.
They love it.
They want more of it.
And we've got another edition we'll be doing shortly on probably the best book on Reconstruction in the South.