Jared Taylor and Paul Kersey dissect a DOJ lawsuit against the SPLC, arguing it constitutes spying rather than entrapment. They address demographic decline in U.S. cities, advocating for "remigration," while reporting on a Salisbury University protest where Taylor faced heavy security. The hosts analyze a Supreme Court ruling striking down Louisiana's racial gerrymandering and discuss ending Temporary Protective Status for millions of foreigners. They critique Gavin Newsom's $1 billion in nonprofit funds for illegal immigration, Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott's defense of luxury taxpayer spending, and Ilhan Omar's correction regarding the Alien Enemies Act. Finally, they expose Sundas Nakvi's defamation hoax involving false ICE custody claims, contrasting her actions with Jussie Smollett's incident. Ultimately, the episode frames these events as evidence of systemic bias and demographic engineering. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
SPLC Mole Allegations00:05:35
Ladies and gentlemen, dear listeners, welcome to Radio Renaissance.
I'm your host, Jared Taylor, with American Renaissance.
And today is April 30th, Anno Domini 2026.
And with me, of course, is my indispensable co host, Paul Kersey.
And as usual, we will begin with comments from listeners.
First of all, this is a reaction to something that I said about this well publicized lawsuit by the Department of Justice against the SPLC.
I said that it doesn't look to me like the charges are likely to stick insofar as the DOJ is accusing the SPLC of defrauding its donors.
It says the SPLC has been tickling the money out of their pockets by claiming to fight racism, whereas by giving money to people that it had sent in as molds, it was stimulating racism.
I don't think that's the case at all.
What they were doing was paying people to go in and spy on these various groups that they thought were. hate-mongering groups.
Now the comment refers to this and says, I can't begin to tell you how refreshing it is to hear an objective and impartial take on the SPLC revelations.
Having said that, I'm not certain I agree with you.
I ask you please to look into the definition of entrapment because I think it will be applicable to understanding the SPLC's conduct.
If the SPLC raised money on the premise of preventing things from occurring, Which they then caused to occur, that's one thing, and that would be entrapment.
On the other hand, if they simply infiltrated some enterprise that's already organically taking place, that's entirely different.
Well, it's my view that it was the latter.
The Unite the Right rally, for example, which Mr. Kersey and I urged people not to attend because we smelt danger, that was going to happen one way or the other.
And I'm personally acquainted with some of the people who were organizing it.
And they have since gone to trial.
They've been hit with bad judgments.
And I think that was just going to happen one way or the other.
And the SPLC paid somebody to go along, and maybe he got involved in doing a little bit of organizing because that's how you would throw people off the scent of a possible mole or traitor.
That is my impression of what happened.
It's not as though they were ginning up what they would consider white supremacy or racism in order to persuade donors that this is a terrible problem and they need to give money.
I mean, they're in that business one way or the other.
I mean, they have been trying to persuade donors to give them money on account of me, American Renaissance, Paul Kersey, Kevin Deanna, all of the people in our circle.
And they didn't spend money spying on us because they knew perfectly well there's nothing illegal, nothing particularly astonishing that they were ever going to find out.
So I think they were just spying on these people.
That's my view.
And I realize that makes me somewhat unpopular in some of our circles.
Next comment has to do with Mr. Kersey.
You and I talked about the British equivalent of the Academy Awards, the BAFTA.
And on the last occasion, someone with Tourette's syndrome, a guy named John Davidson, whose life had been inspired by a movie that was being nominated for an award, he shouted the N word right in the middle of the ceremony as black people were up on stage.
And as you know, people with Tourette's syndrome make sudden, involuntary, repetitive movements and sounds.
Between 10% and 30% of the people with the condition say or shout socially unacceptable words.
And this is known as coprolalia.
In any case, there he was right there in the audience in his black tie shouting unacceptable words.
And this was recorded and broadcast by BBC.
In any case, the commenter says this Reflecting back on your podcast that covered the ructions at the BAFTA wards, I have come up with a brand new acronym SOTS.
That stands for Sudden Onset Tourette's Syndrome.
It seems to me it would be a license for all manner of bad behavior, and a potential get out of jail free card beats the insanity defense.
In other words, if someone were to catch you saying an unkind or taboo word, you could say, oh, oh, well, I just suffer from sudden onset Tourette's syndrome.
It just happens occasionally.
On another note, pursues our listener, I've recently returned from a long stay in the north of England where I engaged in a bit of tobacco diplomacy.
I would strike up conversations with construction workers and pass out American cigarettes.
Sounds like GIs in the Second World War.
And I engaged, let's see, many of the young men with whom I spoke despise mass immigration, as well as the condescending politicians who make their lives increasingly difficult.
I took the liberty of introducing them to AMRAN Podcasts with some encouraging results.
Well, if any of you North of England construction lads out there are listening, Hello there, mates.
It's very good to have you listening to our program.
Another comment.
Building White Cities00:03:39
I believe in an earlier podcast you mentioned Asian cities and their homogeneity.
I realize there are practically no big U.S. cities, that is to say, over half a million people, that are overwhelmingly white.
Portland, Oregon has the biggest percentage and it's only 68% white.
This is really a shocking state of affairs.
Do you think it's possible for a big U.S. city to become overwhelmingly white again?
Is it a realistic idea for a new city to be developed?
How would you prevent unwanted people from flocking to it?
I dream of a day when our once great cities become habitable again.
Well, yes, Mr. Kersey, this really is a terrible scourge, not just on the United States, but the entire white world.
All of these newcomers come flocking into the cities where welfare benefits are the greatest, and then they turn these places into third world.
I won't call them the term that President. Trump used to describe places from which they come, but people move out.
And it's a terrible thing.
It's an absolutely terrible thing.
I think, of course, it's possible for them to become majority white again if we engage in the European practice of remigration.
Ideally, if we have a President Trump and maybe a successor president who really is serious about getting rid of all the illegals and then moving down into stripping citizenship, people who don't fit in or commit crimes, it would be possible to make our cities.
White again, make America great again, make our cities white again.
But the idea of building a new city that's white and then trying to keep the non whites from streaming into it, I don't really see that as all that practical.
Cities develop because cities develop.
And just because you say, okay, I want one here, doesn't mean one's going to happen.
But you, Mr. Kersey, you're the expert on the terrible decline in the white population of major U.S. cities.
Yeah, yeah.
You know, it's interesting.
Before we did this podcast, I just looked at the numbers for Des Moines, Iowa.
And in 1990, Mr. Taylor, the city was 88% white.
Up until about 1950, it was 99% white.
As of right now, it's 62% white, Des Moines, Iowa.
And a lot of that is factored into illegal immigration, refugee resettlement, but it's also due to blacks fleeing Chicago and Milwaukee.
And they're finding the next city where there's an ample opportunity to enjoy the bountiful welfare system that has been created once long ago to help out the citizens of Iowa.
And they're, of course, replacing them.
But no, there's no point in starting a new city that's a non starter with the Fair Housing Act. 1968, and of course, the inability for restrictive covenants to maintain the integrity of property long term.
Yep, it's just a terrible thing.
Fortunately, there's still some European cities which are more or less okay white, certainly in Eastern Europe.
People go to Warsaw, people go to Budapest, people go to Tallinn, people go to the places behind what we used to call the Iron Curtain.
Prague is still a wonderfully white country, a wonderfully white city in Czechoslovakia.
But here in the U.S., I think the only solution would really be to just drastically reduce the percentage of non whites in the country, mainly by getting rid of illegals and shipping out all of the immigrants who've come in who refuse to assimilate.
Salisbury University Speech00:15:53
But let's see, here is yet another comment.
Today, I searched Spotify for some of your podcast appearances and was surprised to stumble across a song.
It's called Jared Taylor Troublemaker, written and performed by Tony. Alderman.
I'm sorry to say the song is not supportive, but I'm happy to report it's entertaining.
Another comment.
I'm a native of South Carolina who lately had a breakthrough in racial consciousness that has brought me to my ancestors and to my heritage.
With this breakthrough, I understand it is my duty to protect white European identity for my children and spare them from the hideous invasions of Europe and the United States by foreigners.
Christianity, the Greco Roman tradition, and the classical heritage are just a few things worth protecting.
It would be dishonorable to stand by and watch our civilization be destroyed by a barbarian flood and to ignore those in power who manipulate our economy to support these mass migrations.
Well, that is great, Native South Carolina.
Those are exactly the sentiments that should motivate all of us.
And I am delighted to welcome you.
Into our circle of racially conscious white people who are conscious of our duty.
This is a very encouraging message from you.
And I would like to encourage all of our listeners to let us know what you think about our podcast, what you think about things that we should have mentioned or maybe shouldn't have mentioned, if we've made any mistakes.
And there are two ways to reach us.
You can get a message straight to me by going to our website, amren.com, and clicking on the contact us tab or Well, you can shoot me an email, ladies and gentlemen, at becausewelivehereprotonmail.com.
Once again, that email address is becausewelivehereprotonmail.com.
Great.
Well, I think I'm going to toot my own horn and make the first news item something from the Baltimore Sun.
I gave a speech at a university just yesterday, and the Baltimore Sun rushed a story into print, and you managed to have tracked it down, Mr. Kersey.
Do tell.
What did I do yesterday?
Well, apparently, you gave a speech that drew heavy security and protest at Salisbury University.
And they describe you in the opening paragraph as a white nationalist advocate, that you arrived at the university behind metal barricades, metal detectors, and a heavy police presence while hundreds of protesters waited in the rain to make sure your message of racial separation did not pass quietly through the Eastern Shore.
Eastern Shore, Maryland's pretty nice, Mr. Taylor.
Yes, it is.
It sounds like I really brought the plague, doesn't it?
Golly.
Far worse than the plague.
Sounds like you brought a horde of demons that they were trying to battle.
It states that students behind the barricades booed nearly everyone who entered Devil Bliss Hall.
Devil Biss.
I'm sorry.
Devil Biss, a weird name for the hall, but that's just so idiotic.
A student or somebody wants to go hear a lecture and people boo them as they walk in.
What?
I mean, they're dopes, they're rude dopes.
Anyway, that's what they do.
Did they throw any rotten vegetables or fruit at you as people were entering?
I wonder.
So far as I know, they did not.
Now, I was ushered quietly in through the back door by heavily armed.
I mean, that's the way the press always describes them.
That is to say, they had a pistol on their hip by armed officers.
So I was never in danger, not of high velocity fruit or even of insults, or even low velocity fruit.
Anyways, you spoke to a campus lecture hall behind more security and, of course, the sign in table.
The event was organized by The Maryland College Republicans president, Colin McEvers.
It was a makeup date after the university canceled an earlier appearance over reported safety concerns.
Now, I have to ask since we know there was no drive by fruiting, were there any safety concerns or was it just a bunch of individuals with poor hygiene booing people?
I never thought there were any safety concerns, but the university just went into freak out mode and said, no, no, no, we can't let this happen.
You need to give us time to gear up, protect the campus against this wicked white man.
But that was their excuse to delay it.
And I'm sure what they wanted was to just derail the whole thing.
But this Colin McEver's guy, he's very determined.
He's very outspoken.
He says, We're going to go through with this no matter what.
And he did.
Well, Emily Organista, she's the vice president of the Organization of Latin American Students, said, We're out here to protest the white supremacist on campus.
We fight really hard to make a community for everybody here on campus.
And he just spouts hate.
I think there's no room, I'm sorry, I think there's room for free speech.
But not hate speech, Delaney Gibbons said.
Well, apparently, you spoke for 45 minutes to a lecture hall that appeared about three quarters full with an audience diverse in age and race.
McEvers warned that heckling was prohibited because classes were going on elsewhere in the building, though the hallways appeared otherwise empty.
McEvers, he's been publicly denounced earlier this month by the University of Maryland Chapter of College Republicans and last month by the Maryland Republican Party.
Also announced he is forming the Maryland White Republican Council.
He introduced Taylor as a trailblazer who founded American Renaissance in 1990, a publication which would be used to defy the mainstream norm that white folks ought to never have any pride for their heritage, for their history, for their cultural value, and ultimately for their race.
Apparently, you said this.
This is what they're reporting.
Okay.
Quote, Mr. Taylor, is there a solution to the American race problem?
Offered one answer, what he called a velvet divorce from multiracial America.
The idea that diversity is a great and wonderful gift.
Is an idea reserved exclusively for white countries.
Imagine going to China and saying, There's too damned many Chinese.
Taylor claimed the nation's founders intended to have a white country, called Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln his theological allies, and argued U.S. immigration policy was designed to keep the country European until Cold War politics changed the calculus.
Wait, I called them my theological allies.
That is what the Baltimore Sun, yes.
I guess race is your religion.
You're a theocratic dispenser of white pills.
Okay, I've never used that expression in my life, but.
But there you go.
Yeah.
I guess they're hard of hearing out there in Balto sun land.
Another quote from you.
It looked bad if people from around the world weren't even allowed to immigrate to the United States.
He mocked the idea that diversity is a strength.
Does it stop global warming?
Prevent tooth decay?
He blamed crime in large cities and violence in prisons on diverse populations.
Another quote from you.
These people are forced to live together, and some of them end up stabbing each other to death.
At one point, you singled out the New York Times reporter in the audience and cited the New York Police Department's 2024 crime and enforcement activity report.
I'd like to add, Mr. Taylor, that I've been checking to see if they're going to update the website with the 2025 crime and enforcement activity report, and it's yet to be uploaded.
The maiden Mamdani crime report is yet to be uploaded.
You're correct about that.
Last year's went up in actually February.
I remember immediately seeing it.
But, anyways, here's what you said.
I will tell you something about her city that her newspaper never will, Taylor said, citing figures he used to suggest black and brown crime widely outpaces crimes committed by whites.
It's a very simple math to figure out what the crime rates would be like in the city if you swapped out the Hispanics and the blacks and replaced them with whites who commit crimes at exactly the same rates as the white people who live there today.
You really could defund the police.
Taylor closed by calling a multiracial society a misreading of human nature.
Here's another quote from you.
If this was a marriage, we have irreconcilable differences.
I think the United States should get completely out of the business of trying to force people to live together.
But the question period belonged largely to students who challenged him, apparently.
Levi, a philosophy student, said Taylor's values were so incredibly different than my own and asked McEvers if he booked Taylor simply to incite the most rage.
Emily, an international studies student, questioned Taylor's claim that Salisbury had at least 10 exclusively black groups.
They're historically black.
Not exclusively black, she said.
Everyone is welcome.
You know, I asked her, okay, then the local NAACP chapter, do any white people ever show up?
And she sort of stammered and she hemmed and she hawed and said, well, yeah, we've had a couple of white people.
In any case, I guess everybody's welcome, but somehow most people, unless they're black, don't feel welcome.
Well, Andy Cooper, he's a white man, said he grew up in Baltimore and got bullied and pushed around and shoved by blacks, but now has a diverse set of friends.
Well, that's fantastic.
But he still got bullied and shoved around by blacks and nearly 70% black Baltimore growing up.
Anyways, he said this I'm wondering what Christ would say about us, Cooper said.
Evil, I think, is the basis for all this.
Taylor answered again with separation.
I'm sure your theological allies, Lincoln and Jefferson, would both concur.
But, anyways, in Japan, you don't have race riots.
In China, you don't have race riots because you don't have a multiracial society, Taylor said.
But then much of the audience had left.
By then, much of the audience had left.
Outside, police moved the barricades away as rain fell on a small group of protesters who remained.
One individual who asked not to be named said this Hey, I was out here because I really don't like Jared Taylor and I don't want this sort of thing to be normalized.
I support free speech, but free speech goes both ways.
I'm not really sure what that means because it sounds like he doesn't really want you to be able to have your speech normalized in a free way.
Yes, it sure sounds that way.
Yes, they'll say, I'm for free speech, but.
I'm against hate speech.
Well, gee, make up your mind.
Well, yes, yes.
Interestingly enough, that guy quoted me selectively, but accurately.
And I'm not too dissatisfied.
It is a little bit odd to make it sound as though I was such a terrifying presence.
You know, it made it sound as though I was going to show up with 25 armed men, totem rifles.
You know, they had to protect the campus from all of that.
But of course, the only reason.
That they had any kind of armed presence at all was for fear that the protesters would attack me.
But it makes it sound as though I'm this sort of source of danger.
But anyway, well, thank you for that.
Very interesting.
Very interesting.
I wonder, by the way, I wonder where that appeared in the Baltimore Sun today.
On what page?
On what page?
No, that's a good question.
When it's online, you never really know, do you?
But that's a fairly substantial article from the Sun.
And as this guy accurately mentioned, I had heard that.
There was a New York Times reporter, and she was there.
I've also heard that she was taking photographs of practically everybody in the audience.
It sounds as though she was trying to dox people, just like some Antifa fanatic.
I saw a woman sort of snapping away with her telephoto lens, and I was wondering, who the heck is that?
I guess she was a New York Times reporter.
She never asked me any questions, and as far as I know, she hasn't written a story yet.
My guess is they might not write a story at all, because if they have to really quote me accurately, they'll end up with stuff like this guy from the Baltimore Sun said.
And I think, yes, I made precise those points, and I think they're irrefutable points.
Anyway, well, thank you very much for that.
Let's move on to our next story, which has to do with the Voting Rights Act.
The Supreme Court has ruled on this, and it came down on a question of congressional redistricting.
This is a case out of Louisiana after it drew a district that gave the state its second black representative in Congress.
It did this by gerrymandering the district in a deliberate effort to make a majority black district.
That's the way it is often done.
The Supreme Court decided that the map of the districts was unconstitutional because it took race into account.
And in an opinion written by Justice Samuel Leto, he said the Voting Rights Act was designed to protect voters from intentional racial discrimination.
Well, what you get with a gerrymandered Funny looking district that tries to pack as many blacks as possible into a district so that they can elect a black representative.
That is intentional racial something.
I guess it's discrimination in favor of blacks or against whites.
And he says, The heck with that.
So you've got to draw congressional districts, representational districts, without regard to race.
Well, of course, Rev Al Sharpton says the decision has, quote, put a bullet in the heart of the voting rights movement.
And former Atlanta mayor and U.S. Ambassador to the UN said, the Supreme Court will go to hell.
I guess he knows God's will, doesn't he?
Wait, I'm sorry, real quick.
Who was it?
Was that Andrew Young who said that?
Andrew Young.
Did I mispronounce his name?
You didn't actually say his name.
Oh, oh, oh.
That was silly me.
Thank you, sir.
Thank you, sir.
Losing my marbles handfuls at a time here.
Yes.
Andrew Young says the Supreme Court will go to hell.
And what about Democratic U.S. Representative Richie Torres of New York, a Hispanic?
He said, We're witnessing the evisceration of America's greatest legislative landmark.
Oh, boy.
That's the greatest legislative landmark is the Bordering Rights Act.
Well, And as a matter of fact, this change in the interpretation of the way the law should be applied could have certain implications because many states have gerrymandered their districts in order to create these artificial majority black districts.
In Florida, in a pre planned special session, they approved a brand new map they moved very quickly that could net Republicans up to four additional seats.
In Mississippi, Governor Tate Reeves has announced a special session.
To redraw maps so as to eliminate racial gerrymandering.
In Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, and South Carolina, GOP officials and candidates are publicly urging special sessions to redraw maps in a hurry, get rid of all of these majority black districts in time for the midterm elections.
So that was a pretty exciting ruling.
Ending Temporary Protected Status00:13:54
Now, you know, I'm of two minds about this.
I think that if you have a gerrymandered district, if you have, in effect, Proportional voting.
If you say, okay, blacks are, what are they, 14% of the population, they get 14% of the seats in Congress.
That is a realistic expression of racial separation.
It is not real racial separation.
It gives power in the hands of blacks or Hispanics or Asians according to their percentage of the population.
But that to me would be, it is a recognition that the races have incompatible political interests.
And that to me could be a first step towards separation.
On the other hand, so long as we're not going to have separation, Mr. Kersey, I think the idea of saying, okay, we're going to draw these special districts so that blacks can have a certain amount of representation in proportion with their numbers and population.
I don't like it.
So I'm of two minds about this.
What's your view?
I would throw out there look at what just happened in Virginia and look what happened in North Carolina a couple of years ago when both the GOP and those states ran quote unquote based, end quote, black candidates for governor.
The pastor in North Carolina was utterly destroyed, as was Winsom Sears in 2020.
2025.
Well, that's a different matter.
Republicans thinking that they're going to get blacks to vote for a black Republican, that's just cuckoo and stupid.
But this idea of recognizing that blacks want black representatives, Asians want Asian representatives.
Well, I guess that's a good principle.
It is.
I guess my point was that we're so far away from that when if you were to say, gosh, white people need their own elected representation to advocate for their interests.
And that's the point I made hey, in Virginia, they just put up this.
Base black immigrant who was a Marine who cost the state not just the election but down ballot elections as well to a deleterious effect.
Well, as we discussed many times in this podcast, yes, no, it's quite astonishing to me that in Maryland as well, there was a deputy governor, lieutenant governor candidate who was this fat black woman whose major achievement was having been a special ed teacher in school or something, just.
In any case, that was a very interesting development in the Supreme Court, ending racial gerrymandered districts.
And so we will see what kind of far reaching effects that has.
Meanwhile, in another case having to do with temporary protective status, the case under consideration had to do with Haitians and Syrians.
However, the Supreme Court indicated during oral arguments just yesterday that it will back.
Donald Trump's push to end TPS, potentially for millions of foreigners.
In one of the most significant immigration appeals to reach the high court during Trump's second term, the sixth justice conservative majority suggested that it believes federal courts might not even have the power to review any legal challenge when an administration turns TPS on or off.
Now, if that's true, it would have profound implications beyond the Haitian and Syrian cases.
That were up for argument yesterday and would effectively bar every suit against the decision to turn off TPS.
At the current time, more than a million foreigners are allowed to live and work in the U.S. under this temporary protective status.
Now, Congress apparently included a provision in the law that makes it clear that an administration's determinations are not reviewable.
So, how the heck were any of these challenged at all?
Well, A lawyer arguing on behalf of Syrian TPS beneficiaries by the name of, catch this, Ahilan Arulanantham.
You got that?
I got that, yeah.
Clearly, a Mayflower descendant.
He said that while the final decision isn't reviewable, the process that officials use to get at it could be challenged.
And looming large in Trump's revocation of TPS for Haitians is a history of comments he's made about them.
The fact that they eat dogs and cats and that their country is describable in all sorts of four letter terms.
These comments and similar ones from DHS former Secretary Christine Nome, who was the one who formally revoked TPS for Haitians, this factored heavily into a federal judge's decision to rule that the policy change, in other words, turning off TPS for Haitians, was motivated at least in part by racial animus.
And if it were racism, Then that would mean ending TPS was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
Now, the Obama administration granted TPS of Syrians in 2012 after the crackdown on protests by former Syrian President Bashar al Assad.
And that designation, which is what?
That's 14 years ago, was repeatedly extended because the civil war went on, but Trump officials have pointed out the regime fell in 2024.
Bashar al Assad isn't around anymore, and so the Syrians can bugger off.
Now, when Joe Biden left office, the U.S. had provided or extended TPS protection for people from 17 countries.
But since Donald Trump has returned to office last year, his administration has ended or tried to end TPS designations for all 13 countries that have come up for review.
He's batting a thousand.
He's trying to get these people out, Many of these decisions are still being reviewed by federal courts.
But if the Supreme Court says, look, these decisions cannot be reviewed by federal courts, then out they will all go, Mr. Kersey.
Now, I got a list of all the countries that benefit from TPS.
It's actually shocking when you see the number one country, and I think the top five outside Ukraine.
So go ahead.
Yes.
Well, number one is Venezuela.
Exactly.
Yep.
Sheesh.
600,000.
600,000 came scampering across the border.
That was first granted in 2021 and already 600,000.
Haiti is number two, 330,000.
That was first granted in 2011 after an earthquake, an earthquake in 2010.
And 16 years later, I guess the earthquake is still quaking and they claim they shouldn't have to be sent back.
El Salvador, well, let's see, the number three country, I guess, is Ukraine, 100,000, first granted in 2022.
But then we get.
Let's see, El Salvador, 170,000.
That was 1990.
They claimed there was just unlivable because people were shooting each other.
Well, I think Detroit's unlivable because people are shooting each other.
Honduras, 51,000.
First granted in 1999, 27 years ago, because of a hurricane.
And same in Nicaragua.
There are only 2,900 of them, but Hurricane Mitch made their country unlivable and still unlivable.
I guess they haven't.
Propped up those palm trees yet?
They're still lying across all the roads, so they can't go back.
Afghanistan, that's 8,000, first granted in 2022.
Then Nepal, I didn't even know Nepal, they have protected status.
There are 7,000 of them, and that had to do with an earthquake, a 7.8 magnitude earthquake in 2015.
And of course, now the country's unlivable, permanently unlivable.
I guess they too, they haven't put the roads back in order yet.
Cameroon, 5,000 ongoing armed conflict.
Ethiopia, 4,500 armed conflict.
Burma, there are 3,600 of them, and they had a coup d'etat in 2021, and they've been in mess for a while, true.
Then Syria, Sudan, there are 2,000 of them armed conflict.
Yemen, 1,400 of them armed conflict.
Lebanon, only 140.
There are 140 Lebanese.
I wonder why there's so few.
That was first granted in 1991.
Because of the Lebanese Civil War, you'd think they'd just be swarming in, granted that long ago.
Then South Sudan, 200, Somalia, 700, and that's it.
But so there you go.
Now, if the Supreme Court decides, and let's keep our fingers crossed and hope against hope, that these decisions by the Trump administration are unappealable, then all of these are going out, except perhaps for the Ukrainians.
I suspect he will not send the 100,000 Ukrainians back.
But I think this is a very, very encouraging sign.
Now, Mr. Kersey, you sent in what struck me as an exceedingly depressing story, but we have to convey the good and the bad together.
It has to do with Ukraine and what it's doing about the fact that so many young men have been killed off.
Yeah, yeah.
I guess it's been, what, four years since the Russian Ukrainian conflict?
And of course, you said 100,000.
Ukrainians are here, TPS.
One of those used to be Irina Zarutska, but a story from Zero Hedge Zelensky's head of his presidential office in Ukraine, Krylio Budinov, has announced plans to import migrant laborers from Africa.
Essentially, this entails the Ukraine establishing new laws for legal entry and residence of foreign workers.
The government will introduce a new list of migration risk countries to facilitate this plan, according to remarks Budinov made at the CEO Club Ukraine.
Quote, they go ahead.
Oh, I'm just saying, doesn't that just warm the cockles of your little heart?
They're going to import Africans to Ukraine so that help them dig them out of their hole.
Boy, oh boy.
Anyway, so I'm somewhat chapfallen reading this story.
Yes.
I actually saw what Tucker Carlson had to say on a podcast recently where he was just up in arms over the plan to do this.
And you think about what USAID has done, although it's been turned off.
To proliferate the population within scores of countries in Africa.
And guess what?
Now they're prepared to go off to Ukraine and to Kiev.
So he said this They enter, obtain documents, and then move on.
This is a problem that creates barriers for business, Budinov reportedly said, emphasizing that Ukraine will now move to make it easier for migrants to stay and work in the Ukraine.
Rumors swirled last October that Ukraine was directly recruiting mercenaries from Latin American drug cartels to fight.
Its war against Russia.
Kiev forced conscription policies at home, which often resort to violence, have already raised numerous concerns about the brutal practices of Zelensky's military, as well as the desperate situation Ukraine is in due to the loss of life on the front lines.
Of course, elections have been suspended, so there's no way for the Ukrainian people to say, hey, we need to find a way to have peace before we have an abundance of Africans settled in the ruins of our cities and our civilization.
Zelensky's, hold on one second.
One second here.
Well, while you're one seconding, I must say this war has just been a source of constant grief to me.
Of course, of course.
What a tragedy.
White people slaughtering each other in countries with way below replacement fertility to begin with.
This is absolutely horrible.
All those young men killing each other.
I just grieve whenever I think about it.
We need to make this stop.
I don't care what it takes.
We need to make it stop.
Well, unfortunately, it hasn't stopped.
It hasn't stopped, and we have to figure out a way, too.
I agree, because Vasil Voskobogenik, president of the Ukrainian Association of Foreign Employment Agencies, said the population decline can no longer be offset by simply increasing the birth rate.
Instead, immigration from third world countries is the only solution.
We'll call him Vosko from now on.
He said the Ukrainian government must develop a migration policy by 2026 that focuses on reducing this shortage.
However, importing foreign workers and foreign warriors, who may or may not have criminal ties, will only add to concerns that Ukraine will never ever be a desired member of the European Union as the EU faces its own crisis brought on by mass immigration.
So, again, this is a story we need to keep our eye on.
Yes.
Tom Steyer Grade Inflation00:06:19
Because it's sinister in its implications.
Oh, absolutely awful.
And this looks like something that Ukrainians are willing to inflict on themselves.
Goes to show you just how utterly, horribly desperate they are.
Another consequence of this horrible, tragic war.
Anyway, let us move on to a comical story.
Harvard students have launched a petition opposing a proposed reform in the grading system.
And they argue that the policy could have racially disparate impact.
Yes.
The students want Harvard to reject a policy that would limit.
The number of top grades because this would quote mirror and reinforce existing racial and socioeconomic hierarchies.
The new grading system would limit the A grade to only about 20% of students in the class, but there'd be no cap on A grades.
So you could have 20% A and then 80% A.
Now, the plan follows internal data showing that more than 60% of grades awarded in 2025 were A's.
Back in 2010, just 15 years previous, only one third of the grades were A's.
Well, this is called grade inflation.
The idea is okay, prof, only one in five students is going to get an A.
Well, the students say that this new grading plan is blatantly racist because it would mean that our brown and black brothers wouldn't get as many A's.
And also, get this, Mr. Kersey, it would increase competition among students.
Get that?
If you know that you might have to really work hard to get an A, that might increase competition among students.
That's Harvard for you.
Now, I've got a little item here about a Democratic dunderhead by the name of Tom Steyer.
Now, he is one of the Democrats running to become governor of California because Mr. Newsom is term limited out.
And as we all know, In California, as well as some other places, there have been some very nasty accidents involving tractor trailers driven by immigrants who could barely speak English.
Well, there was a candidate debate in California on TV in which there was the following exchange Moderator, should language proficiency for truck drivers be strictly enforced?
Tom Steyer, his answer Racial profiling is illegal.
Picking on people based on the color of their skin in the state of California is illegal.
Well, that just goes to show you what a crazy guy this is.
Asking people to speak English is racial profiling.
What do you know?
Well, Steyer has also urged that ICE be abolished.
And he says people need to stop the authoritarian takeover by Trump and ICE by countering ICE head on and going after both their agents on the streets, I guess like those two nincompoops who got themselves shot in Minneapolis.
And we need to get the leadership in.
DHS and put them in jail.
That's Tom Steyer, a potential governor of the state of California.
Well, who is this guy?
Well, he is, as so many candidates seem to be these days, a billionaire.
And he's the founder of something called Farallon Capital, a San Francisco based hedge fund.
And he also started up Next Gen America, a progressive political action committee, and something called Galvanized Climate Solutions, which is a climate.
Change centered investment firm.
I don't know what that would be.
Maybe they'd be.
Oh, my goodness.
It sounds like the old ESG.
It sure does.
Environmental, societal, governance mindset, which I thought had been retired, but this guy seems to have made hundreds of millions of dollars and his portfolio was built upon, I don't know, maybe working bonds with cities.
Who knows?
But it sounds well, Farallon Capital, that's a hedge fund.
But this climate change ordered investment fund, that's a different thing.
My guess is that hasn't made him his billions.
But who knows?
In any case, this guy's a sly operator and he's very rich now.
And he has been one of the largest donors to American Democratic politics, funding both environmental causes and political campaigns.
Well, it turns out, I think he's in his 60s now, and in his late 30s, Steyer had a revelation.
That's in quotation marks in the news accounts.
And he began an involvement in the Episcopal Church.
That's the religion of his mother.
His father was a non practicing Jew.
But.
Now that he has had his revelation and gone fully Episcopal, that reportedly galvanized his political activity because, you know, it's right there in the Bible ICE must be abolished.
Meanwhile, a recent report from City Journal found that California Governor Gavin Newsom covertly spent a billion dollars importing 400,000 migrants from poor countries into the state.
And you are going to give us the details, Mr. Kersey.
Well, we can thank Chris Ruffo, who, again, he.
Continues to be a one man shop and finding the most outrageous, ludicrous, almost unbelievable stories and then giving them to us in a word you use a lot, which I love gruesome detail.
The California governor, he spent a billion dollars on nonprofits that want, among other things, to dismantle the border, abolish ICE, and help immigrants living with HIV because nothing says just superior human capital like an immigrant.
Gavin Newsom Immigration Wave00:09:46
Living with HIV.
Let's get all of America living with HIV.
Why not?
Wouldn't that be fun?
Wouldn't that be just the angel rainbow?
That would be the full rainbow country.
All living with HIV.
One of the stories that you missed while you were in Europe, sir, Mr. Taylor, was in Minneapolis.
They're going to open up the bathhouses again because the gay Somali population has said that it's discriminatory and racist not to have the bathhouses open.
And when you looked at the story, it turns out that back in 1988, there was a white gay council member who was instrumental in getting those bathhouses shut down because of the crisis that was proliferating and growing within those bathhouses of the spread of HIV.
He would subsequently die of HIV in 1991.
But you're right.
I guess we have not enough people with HIV in the United States.
So we need some more immigrants.
And that's what California taxpayers' money is going to subsidize.
Which, again, if you subsidize something, you're going to get more of it.
So, former President Joe Biden's administration oversaw an unprecedented wave of migration across the southwestern border.
We know that migrants convoyed in caravans in hopes of overwhelming border authorities, cartels, traffic, drugs, and people.
At the height of this drama, some border states sought to stop the wave.
Texas dispatched thousands of national guards, spun razor wire.
Arizona sent construction cranes to stack hundreds of shipping containers into a makeshift border wall.
Near Yuma.
Then Governor Doug Ducey called it a border crisis.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott called it an invasion.
California, on the other hand, welcomed the flood.
In this City Journal investigation, we have traced the money and can reveal that Governor Gavin Newsom has granted approximately $1 billion to an army of nonprofits that has encouraged unchecked numbers of migrants to enter the country, fought deportation orders in the courts, and led street protests against ICE back in 2025.
These groups often operate under the guise of humanitarianism or immigration justice.
But many, as we have uncovered, are in fact left wing activist groups that use propaganda, lawfare, and street protests to transform America's demographics and build political power for California Democrats.
All, Mr. Taylor and dear listener, on the public dime.
Outrageous.
Well, here, we'll just go through a couple because this is an article I encourage all of our listeners to check out and read for themselves at City Journal.
Because this is a story of how Gavin Newsom subsidized the illegal immigration and turned a wave of Desperate people into pawns in his political game.
Well, unfortunately, they're going to be made kings once these people can vote, and then they can go from just a knight or a rook and be promoted to a king or a queen of the failed state of California.
That's true in chess.
If you make it across a certain border, if your pawn makes it across a certain border and reaches a line, then your pawn becomes a queen.
That is a wonderful analogy.
A wonderful analogy.
Well, thank you.
Thank you.
As someone with ties to California, it just is depressing every time I go and visit Orange County to see the changes from when I first started going out there in the early 2000s.
And this is one of the reasons why, because California was ground zero for the Biden era migrant wave.
The state saw an enormous number of people cross the border, including more than 400,000 illegal immigrants between 2021 and 2023 alone.
Under his leadership, the nation's largest sanctuary state granted hundreds of millions of dollars to nonprofits.
Encouraging the flow of humanity across the border, variously providing migrants with transportation, shelter, social services, and legal protection.
The expenditures, sir, have been enormous.
According to the City Journal Review of State Funding Records, since Newsom took office, California has granted massive contracts for migrant related services.
More than $250 million to Catholic charities, $85 million to Jewish family services, $12 million to Centro Legal de la Raza.
The legal center of the race.
I believe that's the Spanish translation.
Yes.
23 million to the Immigration Institute of the Bay Area and more.
Many nonprofits benefiting from these funds are shockingly radical.
Al Otrolado, a nonprofit that has been awarded more than 2 million since Newsom took office, helps migrants enter the U.S., hence the group's name, to the other side.
On social media, Al Otrolado touts its efforts to provide freedom of movement to migrants.
In addition to providing legal guidance, the group deploys Volunteers to remote migration routes to leave water, food, and essential supplies.
I guess not condoms or prep, but anyways.
No.
Adam Ryan Chang, Oasis's executive director, believes that homosexual audacity is his superpower and has framed his work with the nonprofit as part of the broader left wing campaign of liberating the LGBTQ community.
In its recent annual report, the group highlighted its work of apparently representing migrants with a Sexually transmitted disease.
In 2024, the report said one in six of new clients is living with HIV, and the rest are all at significant risk of contracting HIV.
How nice.
How nice.
Just the kind of people we need.
Yeah.
And one other thing that was unearthed by this report since the beginning of his term, Gavin Newsom has granted more than $100 million to nonprofits that fight deportation orders, sometimes even for clients with criminal convictions.
And Mr. Taylor, this is one of the reasons why, with Greg Bovino, the former head of Border Patrol, and all the claims that he's making on social media, he just did an outstanding interview.
With my good friend Dan Lyman at borderhawk.news.
It's why you wish he was still part of the admin and why they had been completely unleashed to go after California.
Wow.
You know, even if all of these illegals eventually become citizens, that's going to be some years in the future.
I don't know how quickly you can become a citizen.
Say you're an illegal, and presumably your status would have to be legalized at some point.
Then you have to live in the United States a certain amount of time without leaving the United States in order to become a citizen.
So if this is really Newsom's plan, just come on, come on, AIDS, not AIDS, homosexual, straight, whatever you are, old, young, stupid, come on, come on.
If he thinks they're all going to become Democratic voters, he's sure playing a long game.
Well, maybe he has other reasons.
Maybe he just hates the idea of the United States as being an extension of Europe.
Though the whole thing is just so utterly, utterly disgusting, it's almost hard to believe.
I'm trying to think of why a guy who is a white guy and he's got a lovely white family, you see a photograph of his family, it sure makes JD Vance look suspicious, and why he wants to fill the country up with all of this.
Well, I won't even use a noun that was about to come to mind.
It is really a mystery to me.
Is he really just looking for?
Democrat voters, because I say that's not going to happen while he's running for office.
The whole thing is just incomprehensible to me.
It's a kind of a death wish.
Let's all march off the cliff like lemmings together.
Gavin Newsom, mystery.
Well, I was going to say that Gavin Newsom's family makes JD Vance's family look almost ludicrous in comparison, but I guess that might be too much.
But, anyways.
No, that was my point.
That's precisely my point.
Gavin Newsom's family is sort of the ideal SS recruitment poster.
But there you go.
Well, let's see.
I think, oh, we have a story about the Baltimore mayor, Brandon Scott.
He's one of our African American fellow citizens.
He defended using more than $52,000 of taxpayer money on food, drinks, and fun in the skybox at Baltimore Orioles and Baltimore Ravens games.
After a Baltimore inspector general identified the mix of guests seemed entirely inappropriate for spending taxpayer money on, particularly donors and then city employees, their children.
And so we're wondering is it appropriate to spend city money taking these donors out to these fancy occasions?
And the inspector general's finding comes at a time when Baltimore continues to face scrutiny over all kinds of spending.
Well, Mayor Scott, Brandon Scott, African American Scott, when a reporter was asking about this, he called his questions idiotic, right wing, and racist.
Smollett Hoax Recalled00:06:06
So there you go.
That old line will never die if you criticize a black person for any reason at all, no matter how legitimate it's racism.
Well, that is like the Frankenstein monster.
It cannot be killed.
Now, Ilan Omar.
Was back on X in a big way recently in a 13 second clip that was taken from a press conference in January of last year.
And Ilan Ormoir is quoted as saying The last time the Alien Enemies Act was invoked, it was used to detain and deport German, Japanese, and Italian immigrants during World War, and then she paused, 11.
Now, this has kicked up a very considerable stink on X.
Now, for her even to have said World War 11 once is astonishing, but in all fairness to her, just a few moments later, she then decided that she was quite right about that.
She says, Oh, sorry, two.
But I think it's quite hilarious that we've got her saying, talking about World War 11.
But, you know, if you're a Muslim and if you're from Africa, Roman numerals are probably a real problem for you, and World War II might just look like World War I.
Now, here's another exciting story about a woman who claimed she was held in ICE custody for two days while she's being sued by a Wisconsin sheriff for defamation for cooking the story up.
As it turns out, Sundas Nakvi, age 28, she claimed that immigration officers stopped her at Chicago's O'Hare. Airport on March 5th.
Well, Nuckby is an American citizen.
She says federal agents took her across state lines to Dodge County Jail in Wisconsin and kept there for 43 hours.
Well, last Friday, Dodge County Sheriff Dale Schmidt said he's filing a libel and slander suit seeking a million dollars.
She was never in DHS detention at all.
She walked through the airport, and as it turned out, she checked into a Hampton Inn and In Rosemont, Illinois, for the entire duration of this alleged event.
She never set foot in Wisconsin here, but she's claiming that she was held by ice.
And Sheriff Schmidt showed WhatsApp messages from NACV on March 5th, in which she told a friend she was going to look into this hotel, later adding that she was there.
And the next day, NACV sent a message to the same person asking if she could use her credit card to pay for my spa lady and order some food.
Well, as Dodge County Sheriff Schmidt said, there is no spa lady in our jail here.
And Knockby's case has been compared to Juicy Smollett and his hoax in 2019.
Did you pronounce it Juicy?
I thought it was Jussie.
I pronounce it Juicy.
Juicy Smollett.
What?
Well, is it Smollett or Smollett?
I think there are many possibilities here.
There's different variations to the individual deploying that wonderful hoax.
Black individual.
What a lovely name.
Yes.
Well, just to refresh the recollections of our listeners, he's a guy who claimed to have been attacked by white supremacist, MAGA cap wearing white people who put a noose around his neck and threatened him with all this and that.
Of course, he had just paid blacks to do this, and he claimed it was white people.
It was all quite hilarious and awful.
In any case, when Sheriff Schmidt was asked why young Nakvi would make this up, Schmidt said he did not know of a motive.
He said, For the life of me, I can't figure out why anybody would do that.
Well, I can, Mr. Kersey.
You can too.
It's very fashionable and stylish to claim that you, as an American citizen, were persecuted by DHS and held against your will and carted across state lines and mistreated.
Oh boy, oh boy, the press will come kiss your feet if that happens to you.
But Schmidt also pointed out the past instances when Nakvi had allegedly made false accusations of abuse against a former college professor and an ex boyfriend.
Well, as it turns out, she's She sounds like a psychopath to me.
She has a cousin who's gone on social media to say she's gotten away with everything for a decade, and now she's finally been caught.
She burgled a cousin's home when she was only a teenager, and she filed false police reports more than once.
She's had ex boyfriends who say she terrorized them.
I don't know how she did that.
And she had a professor who made some kind of false sexual assault allegation that lost him his job.
It's about time that this nonsense is.
Catching up with her, I say back to Pakistan with her.
That's where she is from.
But I just thought this was an interesting story.
The idea people have these fake accusations of racism, these racism hoaxes.
Well, now we have DHS hoaxes because that can be such a source of sympathy and being slobbered over.
Well, now, Mr. Kersey, you have an interesting story about Ann Arbor.
No more.
Neighborhood Watch Crimes.
Well, Mr. Taylor, should we tease that for next week?
Because we are at the one hour mark.
Oh, my goodness, we sure are.
I was paying no attention.
Let's tease that for next week.
All right.
Yes, yes, indeed.
Yes, indeed.
We'll count on that for next week.
Ladies and gentlemen, it's always a pleasure, always a joy, and it's so much fun.
I wasn't even watching the clock.
We thank you for our attention, and we look forward to spending this time with you next week.