Sam Dixon and Paul Kersey dissect Anthony Jacob's banned 1964 book, White Man Think Again, arguing that biological racial differences invalidate integration policies. They cite Jacob's predictions of white flight in Washington D.C. and Chicago as confirmed by modern demographics while attacking Eisenhower as a communist-influenced "white racialist" who failed Hungary in 1956. The hosts condemn liberal dogmas like "all men are created equal" for suppressing scientific evidence of intelligence gaps, framing current immigration enforcement and the treatment of Somalis as necessary defenses against a Marxist plot to eliminate white civilization. Ultimately, they present the book as an urgent manual for white survival against what they term "gay race communism." [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Favorable Sports Delusion00:07:12
Greetings to all.
This is Paul Kersey.
I am joined by Sam Dixon.
Sir, that can only mean it's time once again for the White Man's Library.
Welcome, sir.
Well, I'm glad and honored to be here.
I'm really encouraged by the response that we've gotten from longtime listeners of Radio Renaissance who have been overwhelmingly positive about our conversations we've had.
I believe this will be the fifth book that we're going to do today.
And again, we try and do some books at People have probably encountered before, but also ones that they haven't.
So, before we get into today's book, which is by a South African, which was published in the mid 1960s, we do have a question that someone brought up, and they want your thoughts.
A longtime listener writes this of Radio Renaissance Hey, Paul, loving the white man's library episodes.
Genius idea, really.
And Sam is perfect for the series.
I've long been opposed to modern organized sports because of the distance from local.
Competitors being involved as you go from high school to professional level, and for the black pet worship that saturates modern collegiate and pro sports.
But I've never heard someone have an even stronger opinion before I heard Sam say that on the recent episode.
Please ask him if he's written more about it.
I'd love to hear more from him on this subject.
Sam, jump in.
Well, it's not a popular subject.
Our people tend to be, people on our side, I say our people.
Tend to be favorable to sports.
And I'm favorable to sports if people play sports.
But spectator sports are something else.
They really are physically weakening.
Spectator sports don't do anything good for people.
And they serve as a kind of form of some sort of form of almost like masturbation.
They provide a way.
For people to act out their natural aggressiveness in totally ineffectual ways.
They get vicarious satisfaction when their team wins.
I work out at a YMCA near my house in Atlanta, and I can almost tell when the Atlanta sports teams have done well because the mood among the other guys is elevated.
And if they've done badly, they're depressed.
And it's really, you know, it's physically bad, it's mentally bad, the sports are a distraction in college.
They were bad enough when they were sort of an amateur thing back in the 1920s, of a bunch of white guys playing other white guys.
But now, like the question says, it's a matter of adoration of blacks, black athletes.
And you see this in the Republican Party in Georgia.
The Republicans very stupidly ran Herschel Walker, a famous black football star from the University of Georgia.
They ran him for the U.S. Senate.
Now, there's some kind of a delusion that.
That they get the football vote, and they probably did get some of the football vote.
But the kind of people that are really football fanatics, my guess is that they vote overwhelmingly Republican anyway.
So they were running this obviously unqualified person with a really sordid and disgraceful past of financial cheating, having multiple illegitimate children that he didn't support, and all of this.
But they were just sure that this was going to be their.
Trump card.
They were going to run the sports guy.
Everybody was going to vote for him.
And they did the same thing up in Minnesota.
They're doing it again and again and again.
They're trying to run, a lot of them want to run Vince Dooley's son for the U.S. Senate in the upcoming election.
Derek Dooley, yeah.
Yeah.
It's just, it shows how pathetic and silly a universal suffrage democracy is.
Let me jump in real quick, Sam, for our listeners who might not be familiar with that name, Vince Dooley.
Vince Dooley was a football player for Auburn University, went on to be the head coach for goodness gracious, almost three decades at the University of Georgia.
And he passed away.
He died.
Sorry, don't jump on me.
He died about six years ago.
And he's still revered, though, as one of the ultimate legends in University of Georgia lore.
He was a good guy.
I mean, I knew him slightly, and he was a nice person.
But his son is cashing in on his father's name status.
And, you know, these people are not qualified to serve in the U.S. Senate.
You know, in the original days, before everybody could vote, it already was bad enough to have people seeking election, in my weirdo opinion.
But at least then, only a small minority could vote.
And you had people like Daniel Webster, Calhoun.
Even you disagree with these people, they were thoughtful, well educated people who were mentally equipped to handle being a U.S. Senator.
These people are not mentally equipped.
They're just going to be place servers to be manipulated by somebody who's got their ear.
Herschel Walker doesn't understand things like what our foreign policy should be toward Russia and Ukraine.
He doesn't understand things like.
The impact of immigration on housing affordability.
He doesn't understand things like the deindustrialization of America that took place under Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, and the foolishness of the idea that we can become a service economy and basically give each other massages and do each other's laundry.
He doesn't grasp these things.
And we are ruled by these people that don't have the ability to deal with the issues.
And sports is an example of that.
There's all this acclaim of sports figures, and the amount of effort that people put into this, as well as money, is staggering to me.
I see families, I see a dad with three children, three sons on his way to the Braves game.
Well, you know, when you add up the amount of money, the cost of the tickets, the cost of the hot dogs, the cost of the The parking, the cost of the Coca-Colas, and all this sort of thing, that easily approaches an $800 day.
Gibbon Quotes and Knowledge00:15:56
For what?
And the time that is wasted on it.
It's really remarkable.
And what I was really meant to say was: I'm astonished at my gym at the knowledge that these white guys have about sports, that they can talk.
For long periods of time, about running averages and some game that took place in 1983, and how in the fourth inning, through the Hail Mary maneuver, the winning team got a touchdown.
It's just staggering.
It's fantastic the knowledge they have in those sports.
I really believe that they could learn nuclear physics or Homeric Greek.
With the mental effort that has been put into learning all of these statistics and the names of the athletes and who won what game 50 years ago.
It's just amazing that so much energy and mind power has been wasted on this utterly trivial and unimportant subject.
Well, I think our listener who sent in that question is going to be very glad that you provided a succinct answer.
And we appreciate all of our listeners to this growing addition to the Radio Renaissance family of podcasts.
Perhaps we'll bring this live to the 2026 New Century Foundation Conference in Tennessee.
That would be a lot of fun.
Get audience questions and stuff.
I know people love to have you just.
Uncensored and really in your element here, Sam.
Really appreciate you joining us to do this program.
If you'd like to get in touch with us to either throw in suggestions for books for us to discuss or for observations on what we have discussed, shoot me an email at becausewelivehereprotonmail.com.
Once again, that's becausewelivehereprotonmail.com.
Or you can get in touch with Mr. Dixon by email address, which is March, like the month.
Bloom like a flower bloom, Ling as in yearling 36 at gmail.com.
Well, I'll tell you what, today we're going to talk about a book that I guarantee you a lot of our listeners have never heard of, and that would be White Man Think Again by Anthony Jacob.
Mr. Dixon, this was a suggestion of yours because you said that for a couple of decades you'd actually been looking for your copy of this book by a South African that came out.
I believe in the mid 1960s.
It had the distinction actually of being the first right wing book to be banned in South Africa in 1966.
So, Sam, think about that.
One of the first books we talked about was Africa Dio, and that was a documentary and a book that was almost banned from being shown in Italian cinemas and worldwide cinemas because the communists in Italy said, well, you're making the blacks look too bad, the Africans look too bad.
And they countered by saying, hey, listen, guys, we kept the worst stuff off, including the cannibals in the Congo eating 13 Italian airmen.
We didn't want to show that because we didn't want to make the Africans look too bad.
But here you have a book, White Man Think Again, that was actually banned by the white South African government.
What made you want to find this book?
Talk to me about your first introduction to it.
I ordered it way back around, I guess, in the midst of 1965.
I ordered it from a bookstore in South Africa that was run by an Afrikaner family called the Fanasses, A S S, like it's an unfortunate name, or A with the S set.
I think they used the German letter for a double S.
But anyway, it had been recommended to me by a friend of mine who, amazingly enough, taught at Atlanta University, one of the historically black colleges.
And he said it was a really splendid book.
He recommended it.
And another book that you and I were talking about before we went on the air, Mr. Whiteman.
Mr. Whiteman, what now by GMS?
What now?
But anyway, I was going through boxes of papers and books, and fortunately I found Whiteman Think Again, which had been almost unavailable for a long, long time.
I found my copy that was printed by the Noontide Press, for which we can thank Willis Carter, who did so many productive things.
He had his faults, as we all do, but his greatest virtue was that he was incredibly productive.
And he printed this book with the Noontide Press.
You brought to my attention the fact that Arthur Kemp has reprinted it.
It's back in print, so it is available to our listeners.
Yeah, and again, just for clarification, because these two titles are quite similar, they were written at the exact same time by South Africans.
The book we are talking about today is White Man Think Again.
By Anthony Jacob.
And it was republished by Arthur Kemp.
Osterup Publications.
Is that the correct pronunciation?
I don't know.
But it is available.
You can find it for very inexpensive on OS.
Hold on one second.
Let me just pull it up so we get this correct.
Go to OSTARApublications.com and you can type in white man think again.
You can get a copy.
It's also actually available on PDF.
I've got a PDF.
Version that I was able to download.
So we are talking today about White Man Think Again by Anthony Jacob.
Go ahead, Mr. Dixon.
Well, Anthony Jacob, he did live in South Africa, but he was not really originally a South African.
He gives a little bit about his background.
You told me that in the new edition that Arthur Kemp published, they have a short biography of him.
Correct.
He was from England.
He was of military age during World War II.
He fought in Burma in the Asian theater.
And after the war, he traveled widely and he traveled throughout Africa.
There are about seven or eight chapters on different African nations.
And then he settled in South Africa.
He wrote this book, which is very straightforward.
It's a remarkable book.
It is thoughtful, it is compelling, but it doesn't pull any punches.
Most of our people do pull punches.
I've even been known to pull punches.
But it just sets out the stark reality.
And he makes many, many fine points.
He touches on many things that either have now been forgotten or which are covered in updated fashion, like the color of crime.
He talks in the last chapter, in the last two chapters about America, about the tremendous disproportionate role in crime.
Played by blacks and Puerto Ricans in New York City, things like that.
But in the chapters on the various African countries, he shows already the reality that was being suppressed by the standard media, the socialists and communists and leftists and Marxists that basically took command of society after World War II.
And he makes the point that the ordinary Briton or American was told he was fighting against fascism, but then later on we learned we were fighting for communism.
But he also makes a very important, firm point, very clearly and in a very straightforward manner, that it is impossible to formulate correct policy without a correct understanding of race.
And I think a lot of conservatives try to formulate policy, but don't want to talk about race.
And when you accept the founding myths of the leftists, All men are created equal, all the races are equal.
When that kind of thing is accepted, you've lost the argument.
And you can't formulate proper policy without grasping that men are not created equal, and the races are not equal.
They have differing strengths and differing weaknesses.
They're not the same.
They're not like a box of roofing tacks where one box is the same as the other box.
So it's an amazing book.
It is so well written.
It is so.
Crystal clear and unapologetic without striving to be offensive, as some people do.
There are many little points that I can make, and I guess we will make in our conversation, drawn primarily from this chapter on America.
I've flagged them with little stickums, but he touches on so many things, and I forgot that he writes extensively about Sir Richard Burton, the great Victorian linguist and explorer.
Who was also introduced to me as someone I should read by the same professor at Lally, historically black, at Lally University.
And he quotes these very, very firm things that Burton said about the liberals of his own day and how their desire to live in a dream world and to think they know about subjects that they don't know anything about.
And it's really, really.
He quotes Gibbon.
I had forgotten that Gibbon also made very firm statements about racial realities.
And he talks about the role of the communists.
He talks about.
Myrdal, Gunnar Myrdal's famous book, The American Dilemma, which was cited by the Supreme Court as sociology to support its decision banning 1780s schools.
And he, amazingly, I mean, reading it again, he sets out all the connections that Myrdal had with the communists.
And you can tell he's more or less saying that he suspects that Myrdal was a communist.
Well, this was done before.
The Swedish government revealed that Myrdal's wife was actually a Soviet spy for Stalin against Sweden.
Sweden wasn't left wing enough or socialist enough for Anna Myrdal.
She wanted the real stuff.
She wanted the really, really hard whiskey of Lenin and Stalin.
So she spied for Stalin against her own country in Sweden.
But here's some of the things he says about.
What Burton has to say says that Burton observed that the black man has had many opportunities of acquiring civilization, has been in touch with civilization for thousands of years, but civilization has never taken with them.
We see that today in Haiti, that it just doesn't work.
And he quotes, Gibbon said, Touching the African, it may be observed that there are in England at least two distinct types one, those who know him, and two, those who do not.
And he says that it's singular that ignorance, not knowledge, and sentimentality, not sense, is the public mind on the issue of race.
And that was already back in the 1800s, and it's certainly true today.
And Gibbon, of course, wrote The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire for those who.
Yeah, he quotes.
Gibbon on race also.
I think he quotes Gibbon's comments on the role of the Quakers and their delusions about the equality of man.
And already they were making their way through society.
The Quakers showed up in the first American Congress after the Constitution was adopted.
And already they were trying to use the general welfare clause part of the preamble of the Constitution as providing a legal basis.
For Congress to take over and to promote a very liberal racial program.
I'll tell you again, this is a book that it got me thinking.
And this is a question that we kind of touched on when we were preparing for the program today.
You know, this was written in the 1960s.
You don't have access to the internet to pull up all of these facts, to follow all these stories.
You've got to have a wide array of sources you can, you know, reach out to, whether it's a library, whether it's a library that has newspapers.
But we're talking about a Brit.
Writing in South Africa, where he made his residency.
He died in 1993, so he died the year before.
Unfortunately, I believe that was a year after that the South Africans had voted, regrettably, to give up their country and to go to a racial democracy, obviously controlled since in a multiracial society, blacks were numerically superior.
Thus, they would vote for their own interests over the interests of the Africaners and the British whites in South Africa.
But it's astonishing to read the Number of footnotes and the sources, and to think how would you compile all of this in a manner that would make it timely when it came out?
Because you don't have the internet, like I said.
You don't have, you have to go to a library, you have to go to sources.
You know, there might be that old term that I haven't used in years microfilm or what is it?
Microfiche.
I think I used that one time at college to research old newspapers, and now those are all available online.
It's astonishing that chapter you talked about where he's talking about the racial demographics of New York.
And to be able to have all of this, you've got to have access to so many papers.
And it made me think how in the world did people get work done before email, before the internet, before just the widespread availability of knowledge where it was all difficult to attain?
Chicago Mania and Division00:13:42
It's an amazing book.
It prefigures so many arguments that young people aren't aware were actually being made.
He talks about decades ago, he talks about the different groups that have formed a coalition behind this false thinking.
He refers to what he calls the conspiracy of the communists, the internationalism of the financiers, the sickness of the liberals, the mania of the sub races, and the defeatism of the white race.
He covers IQ tests and he quotes Dr. George, who we discussed before, on the anatomical differences between the European brain and the African brain.
All these things are just amazing.
And unfortunately, of course, for our opponents, facts don't matter.
Really, this modern liberalism and egalitarianism.
It's really a religious mania.
It's a religion.
It's not even an ideology.
It's a religion that is based upon faith and a religion whose devotees and adherents become furiously angry when you raise facts with them that dispute their deeply held religious beliefs.
You'd have a better chance, as I said before, of having a thoughtful conversation with Torquemada, the head of the Spanish Inquisition.
Than you would talking to AOC or to some of the people that are running this equality program in America.
You know, it's just astonishing to read from his chapter on America.
He, after going on about the incarceration rates for Puerto Ricans and, as he uses the word, Negroes in New York City, who constituted less than a combined 20% of the population of New York City at the time, he writes this about Chicago.
And this is important because I want to bring up the current.
Demographics of this area of Chicago that he writes about.
He wrote In Chicago, from the very beginning of the great black post war migration from the South, the white people appear to have been wide awake to their peril.
In fact, NAACP officials have charged that Chicago public schools are the most segregated of any major city outside the Deep South.
In this regard, particular attention might be paid to the Chicago district of South Deering, which has resolutely refused to submit to integration.
An editorial in the South Deering Bulletin of May 17, 1956, appealed without any beating about the bush to the Chicago citizenry.
Listen, all you good people of Chicago, we are being invaded by hordes of blacks from the South, invaded at the rate of 2,500 per month.
2,500 people make a fair sized community.
This means that room must be made to accommodate these people.
Room is being made by the white people who retreat from these oncoming hordes.
This, Mr. and Mrs. Chicago, is desertion in the face of the enemy.
Yes.
They are the enemy.
They come in and take over all the benefits that you and your forefathers have worked for.
Your homes, lawns, etc., are soon being enveloped by these invaders, enveloped by these invaders, and the surroundings brought down to their level.
The green grass soon disappears, and the homes take on the ramshackle appearance, and colors associated with the Negroes soon predominate in what were neat, orderly neighborhoods.
We are in the midst of a gigantic push by the press, radio, and TV to accept these people.
Don't be influenced by this propaganda.
Leftist minded professors in some of our universities are poising the minds of students to accept these people as our equals.
We can combat these influences by remaining steadfast.
Mr. Dixon, I have horrifying news to tell you about the current demographics of South Deering.
Those warnings went unheeded.
It is currently.
It is currently.
3.9% white, 65% black, and 29% Hispanic.
So I guess now the Hispanics are doing what they did in Compton.
They're displacing the blacks who, a couple generations ago, replaced the whites.
But it's just astonishing to think that he was able to find these sources to quote from in this book.
Now, was he saying that himself or was he quoting somebody in Chicago?
He was quoting someone from Chicago, and the writing in Chicago is brilliant.
It is as refreshing.
And as effective as his own writing.
And that's a great point to make.
I mean, it was very bombastic.
I don't mind it because I think you'd have to be straightforward at this point, but you're right.
You go on and you read the very next paragraph, sir, in this chapter on America.
And so much of this book is worth quoting, but it's interesting to point out how he was focused on the Brown versus Board of Education decision because he wrote that with regard to DC.
The situation is now a most remarkable one, as befits the modern American nation's capital.
For here, the blacks are moving in and the whites are moving out on such a scale that at the present rate, it'll soon be an all black city.
Sam, before Brown v. Board, Washington, D.C. was about 75% white.
It would get down to about, oh God, I'd want to say maybe 28% white at its worst moment before whites started gentrifying it.
But he's already noting.
What was going to happen on a larger scale to the whites, as he wrote, they're just leaving.
Of course, this was post war, so the buildup for the Department of Defense and the ancillary war departments and necessary cogs of the federal government to combat the Axis powers, that all ended.
So at the same time, you had blacks moving in.
But he wrote this when the Supreme Court handed down its Black Monday decree, President Eisenhower was the loudest voice in Washington declaring that the capital would be made the model integrated city.
Schools and all other public facilities were to be turned immediately into officially approved racial melting pots.
And when the white school children, the martyrs of the new religion, staged protests, Ike at once directed the strong arm of officialdom to crush their resistance.
But whereas these totalitarian anti white methods were effective against children, there was no method of forcing white parents who refused to make themselves guilty of collusion in a literally criminal act against their own offspring to stay in Washington, D.C. You've been to Washington a lot of times throughout your life.
Just talk to me real quick about your observations of DC from, say, the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s to today, and how it went from a city that never really recovered from the black riots after MLK was shot to what it's become now.
There have been several colossal demographic shifts all over America.
The result of the race fixing program was that whites left the cities and had to have long commutes.
To work.
And this is something that is underappreciated the cost of these commutes in terms of money, in terms of shortening people's lifestyles by the tension and stress of driving, the time they don't have to read or to enjoy themselves or to be with their families and children, the environmental damage of all these tens and tens of millions of cars belching out.
You know, fumes and polluting the atmosphere, that all happened.
And Washington became an overwhelmingly black city, it was over 90% black.
And then, as is happening across America, gentrification began.
And whites began moving in, and blacks were basically priced out and driven out of the cities by price.
But that's not satisfactory.
It's nice to have a Be able to go to Washington and visit and to stay in predominantly white areas.
And it's been nice to see that in Atlanta.
But there are intrinsic problems with that.
One is that these people that are doing the gentrifying, the demographic change, they don't include any working people, it's only rich whites.
And this contributes to the division among white people, the class division that has to be overcome.
And whites have to learn to play as a team, to work as a community.
And not as members of classes.
So that's not good that the gentrification has brought rich whites in while working class whites have basically been abandoned by these, what a friend of mine calls the swells, the snotty upper class.
You see this all over America, it's going on.
But the effect of the race-fixing program has been almost entirely negative.
Like we said before, there are no studies that show that mixing the races in the school ever brought about any significant improvement in Black academic performance.
The liberals assume that so, and they get astonished when you ask them if they know of such a study.
But then you can say to these studies that no, there have been lots of studies.
And we don't hear about the studies because studies show that this three generation long program has been implemented at colossal cost in terms of money, time on the road, environmental pollution, and so on, with no results that show that the program did any good for the black people.
And so it's just fantastic.
As I said, liberals are people of faith, they have a secular religion, they're intolerant.
They believe by faith.
They're irritated when people bother their fantasies and dreams with facts.
And that's what we're up against some way to deprogram these people.
Well, here's another passage that I think is very much worth looking at based on what you said, because this follows this paragraph on the criminal act against their own offspring, keeping white children within the integrated schools there in D.C.
He wrote this As long ago as 1956, a subcommittee, the House representative, stated in the report that discipline problems and delinquency in the wake of school integration have been appalling, and sex problems have alarmed the parents of white pupils.
The report stated that the wide disparity of mental ability to learn and educational achievement between the white and Negro students has created a most difficult teaching situation, and that the morale of some teachers has been shattered and their health impaired.
The report added Integration may spur a general exodus of white citizens from the Capitol.
In the not too distant future, the District of Columbia will be a predominantly Negro community.
All youngsters arrested for murder, rape, or embezzlement in one year were Negroes.
Teacher after teacher reported an increase in stealing, vandalism, and obscenity.
One of the dangerous and deplorable developments in the District of Columbia schools is the sex attitude of the Negro.
The fact that 13 little Negro girls, six years old and under, were treated for gonorrhea in 1956 is only a sample of the sex attitude.
The Department of Health reported 854 cases of gonorrhea among school children in 1955.
97.8% were Negroes.
Sam, that was written in 1955.
If you went to 65, 75, 85, 95, 2005, 2015, 2025, the report would say the same thing about the quality of schools found where there is a predominant black population or an integrated population.
And we're kind of running out of white kids.
I just found out from a friend that schools that I used to compete against in Atlanta, Parkview and Brookwood, which were about 95% white in 2000 to about 2004, they're now.
29 and 33 percent white, respectively.
And those are in Gwinnett County, which was a county that used to be, it was 92 percent white in 1990.
It was one of the, I think it was success lives here, was what the water tower said.
And now it's about 37 percent white.
I mean, it is just extraordinary what's happening.
And those changes, as Jacob wrote about what was going to happen to DC, those same things are happening now virtually to every school in the country because we're just running out of white kids.
Well, and so many whites feel that the solution to the realities of race problems is to move a couple more exits up the expressway.
Equity Hits the Bottom00:06:07
The behavior of whites is really the problem.
I mentioned the dads with their kids going to the Braves games in Atlanta at a cost of maybe $800.
How many of them have given $100 to American Renaissance or to anything that's designed to save their civilization and provide a future for those kids?
It's just astonishing that whites are so without feelings of community and tribalism, so feeble minded, so retarded when it comes to practical politics.
And I don't know what you do with white people.
The behavior of the non whites is logical, they're behaving the way people ought to behave.
It's our race that is so odd.
And you have this.
Pretense of moral superiority.
Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, George Bush lecturing people about race and the wonders of mixing the races in school.
And they're sending little kids of their own race to schools that Hillary and Bill and George Bush would not go to themselves without bodyguards.
And they think they're morally superior.
And the media portrays them as moral paragons.
These people are morally somewhere below.
Whale guano at the bottom of the sea.
If you want to hate anybody, you shouldn't waste hatred on opposing races.
Most of us have a limited supply of hatred.
It should be applied to people like the Clintons and the Bushes.
Most of us have a limited supply of hatred.
I like the way you phrase that, anyways.
Well, I'll tell you, he has a great, he has in the same chapter, because I think it's important to keep talking about this, because this is hard for people.
Again, I'm a millennial.
41.
I know a lot of our listeners are Gen Z.
So you're talking about people Nick Fuentes' age.
Nick Fuentes is, I believe he's 28 right now.
So you think about people between 28 and 41.
Most of, and I don't want to characterize this, but I don't think I'm wrong in saying that, Sam, a lot of people just don't read anymore.
And that's in an age where TikTok and YouTube videos and Instagram reels are 30 to 45 seconds of the most compelling material from a podcast or TV show distilled down.
For mass consumption.
So they'll get a lot of clicks and hits and they'll be monetized.
You've got to get your point across quickly.
And what I'm trying to say is that it's hard for a white American now to understand just how revolutionary the decision of Brown v. Board was in 1955 in terms of you'd already had Shelley Kramer in 1948, which basically made freedom of association illegal.
You could no longer maintain the integrity of your community.
And thus, how would you create long term wealth in housing if?
You were to have blacks move in and then whites realize, oh my gosh, our property value is depreciating.
We've got to go before it hits bottom.
And so, if you're the last white person left in the neighborhood, you were the one who got to feel the economic brunt of that in terms of your equity no longer being worth what it was when it was an all white community.
But talk to me about what put the listener of this podcast into the shoes of a white person in 1955 with Brown v. Board and what Americans were told was coming with this glorious integration of schools.
They were told the same thing that they were told, and which many people, what many whites believed in 1964 about Lyndon Johnson's Civil Rights Bill and the Great Society that this was going to solve the problems of the black people.
It was going to make black people into basically chocolate covered white people.
It would end welfare.
It would save taxes.
It would eliminate racial friction.
People would all be happy, and all these good things would come from it.
It's come true.
I remember a lot of whites.
I lived in a very liberal area of Atlanta when I was a teenager called the Emory Druid Hills area, which is hugely disproportionately Methodist and dealing with Emory University.
And so they were very much in favor of this program.
And the ideas that they have are just these very optimistic ideas.
And I think a lot of people basically were anticipating.
The demands for reparations.
And they thought, well, we're going to make peace for blacks.
We're going to level, we're going to repay them through things like Head Start, food stamps, Section 8 housing, all these other programs.
But we don't get any credit for that.
No one loves us because of that.
And this is an odd thing about white liberals.
They seem to think that they're going to be loved by these people.
They've never been loved by them.
All the stuff they've done for them has been for nothing.
Because they're still hated.
They keep doing more and more trying to be loved by these people, and they're not going to be loved.
Now, I think that's really important to understand and to come around with because he would write this, and I think these words are just as important now as they are when you're learning about how the New York City Muslim mayor, the Ugandan Indian, Mandani, he's basically creating a new program to go after the.
White, the disproportionate value of white homes versus non white owned homes, and how this is the greatest crisis befalling New York City.
Rhodesia and Anti-White Hate00:15:28
I'm sure you've read about that.
Again, it's another war in the battle for true equality and equity.
It's just getting the equity in white people's homes and redistributing it.
He wrote this The Supreme Court's decision to force white children to attend racially integrated classes has given authority to a wholly unnatural and wholly un American ideology of the most devilish variety imaginable.
It's nothing short of stupefying that the Supreme Court should have dared to usurp the powers of Congress and amend and thereby abolish the American Constitution, sheerly for the holy cause of degrading white children.
Sam, was he too harsh with that or not harsh enough?
Oh, I think he's just laying it out.
I was interested, like I said, in what he said about Gunnar Myrdal, who authored the book, The American Dilemma, that provided the sociological foundation for the Brown versus Topeka Board of Education decision in 1954.
He points out that the Supreme Court quoted this book approvingly in its decision.
When you read the book, Gunnar Myrdal hates the American Constitution.
He describes the American Constitution as a conspiracy against common people.
And he has obviously no use as a socialist for the American Constitution, but Earl Warren incited to it and approved it.
No, I don't think I like the fact that his writing is direct.
Jacob's writing is direct, it's straightforward, it's uncompromising, but it is dignified and convincing and compelling and does not engage in and show off sort of pyrotechnics of making outrageous statements in order to provoke.
It's a first class book.
Well, I don't know the reason why, and it might actually, I'm sure it's actually addressed in the Arthur Kemp 2017 version, which again is available by Astora Publications.
Again, for those who are listening and want to get a copy, I think it's available on eBay and Amazon.
You can download a PDF, but I think getting a version that's published by one of his good friends, it's the only authorized republication since the author's death.
I guess he gave Arthur Kemp the rights to publish in perpetuity.
But go to OST. A R A publications.com, and you can get a copy, an updated copy, which has the biography.
I would be fascinated to know the very reason why this was banned specifically, Sam, because we were told that South Africa was this land replete with white racism run by white racists.
And here you have a book warning people, guys, you know, the hour's late, and that's banned.
That's a story into itself, I would think.
Yes, I'm surprised that South Africa banned it, but.
But you know, this aberrant thinking about equality and the wickedness of white people as the demon race of the world, this has been around a long time and it's been firmly entrenched in the upper classes and the thinking, the chattering classes, as they call them in England, for a long time.
And I can imagine that the government in South Africa also entertained the delusion that if they banned this book, they would somehow virtue signal to all the people around the world that hated them.
Hey, we're good guys, and that never works.
You cannot abandon your friends to placate your implacable enemies.
You know, it's interesting reading this book, a term that has become increasingly popular on the right, on whatever you want to call the new right.
I hate the term dissident right because already you're almost establishing that you don't have the same morality as those in power by calling yourself a dissident.
And I hate the term alternative right for obvious reasons.
But Scott Greer has a new book coming up.
That's a good beginning, Mr. Kersey, but I don't like the whole idea of left and right, period.
I don't want to be.
Considered to be a conservative or a right winger.
I don't want those labels.
I agree.
I agree because I don't think the term, I don't think we've yet to identify what the term that's going to unify and unite the dwindling sex of whites worldwide, because that's what this is.
And that's where I'm trying to get to with my point because Scott Greer's got a book coming out, a mutual friend of ours by Passage Press called White Pill, where he's going to talk about the history of the alternative right.
But he's begun to really talk about.
He's got a big Twitter following, 250,000 followers.
He talks about race communism.
And you've probably heard people go a little bit further and call it gay race communism, is what we're facing.
And it's interesting because sometimes you read these books that are published by conservative, right of center, you know, war hawks against communists.
That word communist is used over and over again.
And it becomes sort of.
Pedantic, you're like, well, what are they really referring to?
But he really comes out, and you realize that when he talks about communists, it's just an anti white movement, it's almost a synonym for that.
And I just don't think we have, I don't think calling something anti white is strong enough in terms of what they're hoping to do because you're not just trying to destroy a person in the present, but you're trying to erase the past so they have no future.
Have you ever noticed that communists have almost nothing, Marxists and communists have almost nothing to say about their future paradise?
They're always attacking, they're always attacking the monarchy or the aristocrats or the bourgeoisie.
They're full of hate and anger, and they love to create these divisions in the white community.
But when it comes to their dream world, they don't have much to say about it.
Trotsky wrote one short story which depicts it as just the most boring, horrible, miserable existence imaginable to a normal person.
But basically, when the great paradise comes, everybody would get three meals a day and you had to walk in a park and that kind of thing.
There's nothing heroic about it, there's nothing spiritually uplifting about it.
But he's the only one that's ever written anything about it.
It's all about hate, it's all about targeting groups that they don't like.
And trying to liquidate those groups, you know, liquidate the Russian aristocracy, liquidate the priests of the Russian Orthodox Church, liquidate the kulaks, the intelligent peasants who knew how to farm, you know, liquidate the Polish officer corps at Katyn Woods.
That's in Russia.
But you have the same thinking here.
It's just all of this hate and antagonism, often based upon the horrible words of the Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal.
And people, when they think about that or talk about it, they always mean that anybody above me has no right to be above me.
They never put it in another context.
I don't want my cancer surgery done by my equal.
I want someone better than me to be my cancer surgeon.
I don't want to go to listen to the symphony and hear somebody who's as inept with music as I am.
I want to hear people that know music and can perform with the symphony.
You know, it's completely wrongheaded.
You know, the hatred of everybody above you.
It's interesting because when we were discussing which book to do, I did read Mr. White Man What Now by GMS.
And he actually has a chapter in that book.
We will talk about that book in a subsequent podcast.
He actually has a chapter in that book that deconstructs the whole concept of that wonderful poetry, as Robert Heinlein called it Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness, and just eviscerates the Declaration of Independence from a concept of whose human rights are you talking about?
You know, they eat, the Congolese eat humans.
What human rights do they rep are universal in their minds?
And it's just this fascinating chapter.
And you start to think there were some really, you go back to one of the first podcasts we did on Carlton Putnam and just how accomplished he was with his position at Delta, being on numerous boards, but that he dedicated time to think rationally about where things were headed.
And in South Africa, obviously, these two guys, Jacob, who wrote White Man Think Again, the book we're talking about, whites were in firm control of the world.
When he wrote this, you didn't have the ardent pressure put on by the Carter administration, led by.
I disagree with you there.
Whites have not been in control of things for long.
Oh, in South Africa.
In South Africa.
I'm just talking about South Africa.
I'm talking about the context of South Africa.
I agree.
No, no, no.
I agree with you there.
No, no, no.
I'm just talking about a white guy.
Anthony Jacob writing in a country that was explicitly run for the interest of whites and then would soon fall under unbelievable pressure, probably commiserate with what you're seeing with Russia and Iran being ostracized with government sanctions and embargoes put on them, like Rhodesia and South Africa.
I mean, goodness gracious.
What was it?
Andrew Young, as the ambassador for Carter, his hatred for Rhodesia and South Africa was palpable.
Well, that's true, but I think you're making too rosy, painting too rosy a picture of South Africa and Rhodesia.
I remember in college, I used to get the publication that Rhodesia put out after they declared their unilateral independence.
And it was just page after page every month of articles about the new birth clinics, the new this, the new that that were being opened for Black people, how much they were doing for Black people.
A friend of mine pointed out years ago that.
The British Empire, he said, was in its death throes when they started justifying the empire based upon how much good it had done for the non whites instead of for Britain.
And I don't think that the thinking in the power structure, the financiers, the top figures in the media and elsewhere in Rhodesia and South Africa, not at all on our side.
One thing I liked about White Man Think Again was the thing that you read out about his remarks about the.
The failure of the race mixing program in Washington, D.C., and specifically how furiously Eisenhower threw himself behind the race mixing that was going to make it work.
I hear a lot of people, including our leader, Gerald Taylor, talking about Eisenhower as some kind of a white racialist.
And that just wasn't the case at all.
They say things like, well, he said he stood up for Dixie, he would stand when Dixie was played.
Well, he said that in the 1952 election when he was hoping to get some Southern votes in the Upper South, and maybe he could carry his Tennessee or Virginia or a few other Southern states.
But Eisenhower was a terrible figure.
And already in the 1950s, the parapets of power were in the hands of our enemies, and we were already on the defensive and way down compared to them.
Is the book that the JBS put out on Eisenhower worth getting, or is it just?
And I don't want to disparage the JBS, but is it just conspiratorial?
The book put out by the John Birch Society?
Correct, yes.
Actually, I read that when I was in high school.
It was a national scandal.
And, you know, I have my disagreement with the John Birch Society, which it actually, in many respects, was quite a liberal organization on the issues of race and another issue which we don't go into here.
But the, so I thought, well, I'll read the book.
And I think Welch was, I had some personal dealings with Welch, and I think he was nutty as.
Really, the liberals had him pegged as a nutcase.
But the book itself was very convincing that it had a wealth of information that was really very shocking about Eisenhower.
It's called The Politician, correct?
Yeah, The Politician.
He brings out, for instance, that Eisenhower's book, Crusade in Europe, which was a bestseller and was put out to promote him and his upcoming candidacy to the presidency, it was written by a communist.
And he was president of Columbia University, which, according to Bella Dodd, who was a high official of the Communist Party who defected, Columbia University, she said, was the most communist dominated college in America.
And Eisenhower was made its president.
We don't want to delve too much into that because that's not the subject of this podcast.
Of course, of course.
But Eisenhower's behavior in the Hungarian Revolution in 1956 is extraordinary.
As has been pointed out, Hungary broke free of communism.
For about 10 days, they were genuinely an independent country that had left the Warsaw Pact.
During that time period, they were appealing to the West for help.
Eisenhower did not send the Hungarians so much as a single round of ammunition.
You compare that to the 200 billion plus that we have spent on Ukraine to aid them against a non communist Russia.
It just went on and on with these people.
Eisenhower sent a telegram to Tito, basically inviting the Soviet Union to reoccupy Hungary.
He said that America does not look with favor upon the establishment of governments on the borders of the Soviet Union hostile to the Soviet Union.
When the Soviets invaded and the Hungarians were appealing to help the world, Henry Cabot Lodge, Eisenhower's ambassador to the UN, Move that the UN adjourn until the situation clarifies.
Minneapolis Million and Bathhouses00:04:07
You go through Eisenhower's background, he was a horrible person.
He threw himself enthusiastically into the Operation Kiev Hall after World War II, cutting down people from Eastern and Central Europe, including people that had left at the end of the Russian Civil War, to send them back so Stalin could murder them.
And Eisenhower blocked any consideration by congressional committees on this program.
He wanted it silent, and he got his way.
But anyway, that's the thing.
And of course, you had 1957, Little Rock.
This dream of let's go back to a utopian America in the Eisenhower era of the 50s, I just don't think that's tenable at all.
Well, it's not tenable and it's not desirable because it was already the failure of implementing the misguided interpretation, which had never been written in the first place life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness had already been usurped in a communist direction, if you want to put it.
Bluntly, a gay race communist direction.
And again, I kind of find that term somewhat derisive in a way, but at the same time, it does describe, I think, just what we're living under.
I mean, Mr. Dixon, I'm sure you've seen the story of the homosexual Somali population in Minnesota, in Minneapolis, is pushing to open the bathhouses again.
And no one can say, wait a second, we can't have that.
Look what happened in the 80s, because it would be racist to deny.
The Somali homosexual population access to bathhouses.
That's where we are now in 2026 America.
Well, you have to.
One of the points that Anthony Jacob makes in White Man Think Again is that various bits and pieces of the Gospels are quoted to support these anti white programs that love and think of others first and this kind of thing.
But he said, well, what about your children?
Are they not entitled to love?
Shouldn't you be thinking about their future?
But no, people don't think about that.
And these people that you see in Minneapolis today out trying to prevent the ICE agents from enforcing the law, nobody ever asks them, well, you feel 120,000 Somalis, 80% of whom are on welfare, and who have defrauded the federal government of almost $9 billion intended to help the poor and unfortunate, 120,000, not enough for you.
Are you going to be satisfied with a million?
A million of them in Minneapolis?
Are you going to be happy then?
No one ever asks them these questions.
And liberals, they don't like to think long term.
It's all a matter of their immediate feeling and their religion and their opportunity to posture as being morally superior to other people.
And they get away with it because the system media has protected them and coddled them and promoted them for so long.
That's one reason why they.
The system media so hates social media is that social media has enabled people to strip away all of this phony air of moral superiority to these people, like I said, that want to send children into schools that they wouldn't go to without a bodyguard.
Yeah.
Yeah.
No, I'll say this.
I think the best chapter, and we'll leave this chapter to our listeners' interpretation when they read it, but it's chapter 13, Black and White.
It's the chapter immediately that precedes the chapter on the United States of America.
Again, he goes into great detail on what's going on with decolonization and the insertion of black rule in these nations, the decline of Great Britain.
Pipe Dreams of Equality00:15:58
But he does this wonderful chapter, which is it.
It's almost a tour of all the great thinkers.
You've already mentioned he mentioned that he talks about Burton and Gibbon and pulls out some of their just quotes I'd never even actually encountered before.
Some of the stuff from Gibbon is hysterical to read, actually, his observations comparing the Germans who would invade Rome to Africans.
I didn't know that he ever made that comparison before.
But he definitely is a Burton file.
He's a big fan of Richard Burton and he quotes that.
I know you are as well.
So that's probably one of the reasons you also love this book so much.
But I think that's the chapter that is really fantastic because he lays out the whole philosophy.
And he also gets into Haiti in that chapter as well.
And he just lays it out and says, You have all the evidence you need.
What more is necessary?
And it's interesting that he died in 1993 and never got to see the glorious rainbow nation of South Africa come to fruition because he already knew how it was going to end.
I'm sorry?
Because he already knew how it was going to end.
Yeah.
Well, I mean, we see that the facts are entirely on our side.
Science has absolutely put an end to any idea that there is no innate difference between the races, that they've lost out among genuine scientists.
But that has had no impact upon society at large because the gatekeepers in the media and the schools and universities go on with these little mantras and religious.
Dogmas and they infect people with them, and most people are so cowardly they don't disagree with them.
We are going to be talking soon about a book called Biology of the Race Problem by George Wesley, I believe is his name that wrote that.
Let me make sure I get that right.
I'm sorry, Wesley Grit George.
He was a biologist, a professor at Chapel Hill.
And this book was actually published in conjunction with the government of Alabama.
It always makes me proud to be both a Georgian and Alabamian when you learn of the type of That the state of Alabama and some of the things Georgia were doing during the 1950s and 60s in terms of trying to fight back, and that they actually went that next necessary step, Sam, of just saying, guys, this is the reality of racial differences.
This can't be changed by integrating the races.
You're only going to exacerbate the problem further by including people who don't belong at the same schools, and the problems you'll get with disparate impact of black truancy.
Black violence in the schools and disciplinary problems, not to mention the scholastic ineptitude when compared to what whites are able to achieve on average versus what blacks can achieve on average.
I mean, this is really the crux of the problem our inability to articulate what I just said, and that is that there are biological differences between the races.
And of course, there are.
I mean, it's astonishing that we began hearing in our schools that science had proven that the races were equal.
The first time I heard that, I thought it was a joke.
It was so preposterous.
And I laughed at it, which enraged the person that said it, who's a former Peace Corps volunteer.
But, you know, obviously, through evolution, the skin color changed, the structure of the head changed, the shape of the nose changed, the hair color, eye color changed, the texture of hair changed.
All these things changed.
But these leftists who claim to be secular and not religious people, they determinedly maintained that there was one single organ out of all the organs that remained exactly the same, and that's the brain.
That all these other things changed over the course of separate evolution, but the brain, well, that remained always the same.
Well, a theist could say that, well, Jesus arranged that, Jesus intervened into evolution to.
To make sure that the brain didn't change to everybody be equal.
You know, you can disagree with that, but at least it logically follows.
But for people who are atheists or agnostics to say that nothing intervened to protect this one organ from being differentiated, that's just crackpot stuff.
That's insane asylum stuff.
But they say that and they believe that.
Unfortunately, America has become an open air insane asylum because of our refusal to deal with the reality of racial differences when it comes to intelligence.
That last chapter that I mentioned, he quotes at length from World War I test studies done on 340,000 individuals of the aptitude and does it by a race.
It actually goes into a quarter Negro, one half Negro, three quarters Negro.
And it's fascinating that.
Over a variety of tests that were done.
He quotes one study that was done in Jamaica of whites, half whites, and then pure black.
And every study, study after study after study, it all confirms the same thing.
And these are studies I've never even actually encountered.
And yet he's quoting them as if he has just this copious library that he has access to.
That's what shocks me so much about reading a book like this, because all of the sources he's quoting from, to be able to gather all of that and put together so succinct a book.
That not only stands the test of time, but it's a reminder of probably why it was banned because he realized in the 1960s guys, you guys aren't going far enough to protect things.
It's only going to get worse as we go along because look how far gone America is.
If the president of the United States, this guy who was the head of the Allied forces, is now basically making Washington, D.C. be the poster child for integration, the United States is screwed and we don't want to go that way.
Well, as he says in his last chapter that you mentioned, he said, we have to face realities, not liberal pipe dreams.
And that's just absolutely correct.
Our government, the policies of our society, the direction of our future, all these things are being governed by these delusions, by things that are simply false.
And that being the case, the results can only be catastrophic.
Well, and those pipe dreams have.
If you had a child or a mother who had cancer, And you had some sort of E day fix, some kind of delusion that you could cure cancer by chocolate milkshakes, that was going to be your child and your mother's cure, you're going to drink chocolate milkshakes.
Obviously, your mother and child would die of cancer because it's a pipe dream.
It bears no relationship to reality that chocolate milkshakes cure cancer.
But that's the level we're on in dealing with race in our society and shaping public policies based upon.
These religious mantras, like all men are created equal.
That is just such a quintessentially nutty statement.
And I know that there are brilliant scholars on Jefferson who explain that he didn't really mean it.
Well, he shouldn't have said it.
And he did say it, and it's been a curse for us ever since.
You may remember being a Southerner that when Alexander H. Stevens was on his way, the vice president of the Confederacy was on his way to Richmond.
He stopped off and gave a speech in Savannah in which he said, We are, Savannah, Georgia, in which he said, We are fighting this war to put an end to the idea that all men are created equal.
And that idea is not only pernicious when it comes to differences between groups, it's pernicious when it comes to differences between individuals.
No amount of music training would ever have made me into Mozart.
But we have a society that wants to chain and fetter Mozart under the delusion that somehow, by punishing Mozart for being a great musician, we'll enable the Sam Dixons of the world to become like Mozart.
It's just bizarre.
Well, those same pipe dreams that the left constructed decades ago have been funneling the same fetid water that we've been forced to drink.
And as Jacob writes at the end of the book, he writes this.
White people are the only race in the whole world that is being taught to despise itself.
Due to liberalism, the more intelligent of our youth are being mentally and morally destroyed at our universities.
This being the best method of destroying them, short of putting them in front of communist firing squads.
Clearly, then we now have to get rid of liberalism and liquidate its exponents, but in its stead, in its stead, have to find a positive philosophy of survival.
Equally clearly, this can be none other than the very opposite of the liberal philosophy.
I mean, this is just.
This is just really great stuff.
It's a powerful book.
It's not one that I think a lot of people are going to want to encounter because it does, like you said, it's not shadow boxing with the left.
It's saying, no, one of us is going to win.
And it's not going to be by mimicking some of your ideas to try and get adherence from your side over.
We have to accept that we have to win because.
Another thing he's very clear about is the fact that these people hate us.
Yes, it is.
That another broadcast, but they they hate us, and we're not going to mitigate the hatred of the levelers, which is a good term for these socialists and Marxists and communists and leftists.
The uh, you know, you're not going to mitigate that hatred.
They hate us, and I think it's fair to say they want us dead, and they would like to see the entire audience dead, they'd like to see the children dead, they would like to see the Katine Woods massacre perpetrated.
On a scale thousands of times bigger.
And, you know, like I said, they, you know, somebody once said that a communist is a liberal in a hurry.
And there's a lot of truth in that.
And, you know, the communists claim that they did wonderful work by destroying the upper classes in Russia.
Yeah, they destroyed the people who brought us things like Dostoevsky, Mussorgsky, you know, the great achievers of Russia.
They destroyed them all.
Isn't that great?
Has that really helped the average Russian by destroying the people that brought all of this music and art and culture?
I don't think so.
No, and again, like you said, this last chapter is one that you've got to read for yourself.
You're able to download a PDF of White Man Think Again by Anthony Jacob.
If you just go to Google and type in that term, or you can pick up a copy on eBay, very modest price, or you can go directly to Ostara Publications, Ostara Publications.
I don't know.
Arthur Kemp has a fascination with both Nordic mythology and Egyptian mythology, so I'm not sure if that's.
An ode to Nordic or Egyptian.
But then again, if you've read a lot of his Ray, he definitely thinks that the ancient Egyptians were Nordic.
But, anyways, that's a story for another day.
We probably are needing to close this podcast, but we should be grateful for men like Willis Carnot, who published this book originally.
Noontide Press, of course.
And for people like Arthur Kent that have kept it in circulation.
Let us mentally bless them both.
I completely agree.
And I do recommend checking out Arthur Kemp's page.
Again, I gave you the URL.
There are a number of very good, excellent reprints, I think is the right way to put it, of books that you wouldn't be able to find elsewhere.
And it's interesting.
I'll close with this.
You mentioned Stevens' Cornerstone speech, which I think most people really need to read because the left definitely read it.
I remember during the racial reckoning post George Floyd.
A number of blacks were talking about the main reason we need to get rid of these statues is because of that speech and because that's what these statues stood for.
And until I believe we're able to accept that that's what all of our statues stand for, it's not just Confederate monuments that are coming down, but it's monuments to all dead white males.
Yes.
It's part of the demonization of whites as the devil race of history.
Yeah, I heard someone on Nashville Radio a few weeks ago.
The fussing about the Chinese Exclusion Act and how this meant that Asians and blacks together faced the wicked white man.
The Chinese Exclusion Act prevented mass immigration of Asiatics into the country.
It was adopted in the late 1800s.
What are the chances that you and I could immigrate into China or Japan?
You're right.
That's okay for the Chinese to borrow white people, but because They're not the demon race.
They're not the devil race.
We are the devil race, and whatever we do is wrong, and we're responsible for everything that's bad in the world.
We get no credit for the medicine and all the great blessings that knights have brought to the world.
We're just utterly hated.
And we're hated really because of our virtues, as is the case with communists and Marxists and liberals and the whole tribe of levelers.
As someone said, if they see a fat man standing next to a thin man, they're convinced that the fat man got fat by stealing the thin man's food.
Well, with that, ladies and gentlemen, we come to a close.
The White Man's Library, look back at the mid 1960 publication of White Man Think Again by Anthony Jacob.
It is available from Arthur Kemp, a 2017 publication, which has an introduction and a biography of the author from Arthur Kemp.
They were personal friends, and that's worth getting the book itself just to learn more about this amazing man who was ahead of his time trying to warn us what was all coming.
And it's sad to think, sir.
I'll end with this a question for you, because I think it's somewhat of a white pill, but also at the same time, it is depressing to think that since October of 2025, 4,996 refugees out of 4,999 refugees brought to the United States have been Afrikaners.
Fascist York Times Echoes00:03:02
That's the only people basically our country is bringing in.
And if I were to tell you that 10 years ago, I think you'd believe that there'd been some form of revolution.
Am I wrong in saying that?
No, I think you're right.
And the Africana thing, it just shows how eaten up with hatred these people are.
When Trump first referred to the murders of the whites in South Africa by the independent government, the New York Times condemned this.
They said, well, this is the kind of thing that white nationalists talk about.
So you can't talk about that.
That was their position that if white people talk about it, In regard to whites not being treated fairly, then anybody that talks about it is under suspicion and is not supposed to do that.
They did the same thing with Trump's criticism of the media in the New York Times.
I read the New York Times, I subscribe to it.
And they said that Hitler attacked the news media, therefore, anyone attacking the news media must be a Nazi.
That's how these people, that's the kind of unscrupulous lying they engage in.
Look at one other example, then we really should close and let people go on their business.
Of course.
I'm grateful to anyone that's listened to this ranting now for over an hour.
Thank you.
But I remember when I was a kid, the conservatives were ridiculed about McCarthy says everybody's a communist.
Well, of course, McCarthy never said that.
But this became the stuff that lots of jokes were made of.
The right wingers and the Burchers think everybody was a communist.
Well, nowadays, Anybody that disagrees with the leftists, even someone like Bobby Kennedy Jr., they're fascists.
Fascist, fascist, fascist, fascist.
And there's absolutely no shame in the fact that they're labeling Ayn Rand libertarians as fascists.
They're labeling all kinds of diverse groups of people as fascists.
Fascist, fascist, fascist.
They never see that when they point their finger at the McCarthyites, there are three fingers pointing back at them.
Yep.
No, I'm with you.
I'm with you.
Guys, we've gone a little over.
We like to try and keep things to an hour, as Mr. Taylor has long established, is the duration of time most people are willing to give to a podcast.
And so we're going to honor that with closing of the White Man's Library.
Once again, we talked about White Man Think Again.
And guess what, guys?
It's not just a title, but it's something you should think about every day because you've got to be thinking about our future.
Because guess what?
I can tell you, our enemies are thinking of how to deprive you.