All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 26, 2024 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
51:06
Martin Sellner — “Remigration: A Hope for Europe.” (2024)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Our next speaker has to come to us via video because in the land of the free and the home of the brave, certain people who believe in free speech are often denied entry.
Martin Selmer is such a person.
He's one of the most prominent comrades in Europe.
He was born in Vienna where he studied philosophy.
He was the co-founder in 2012 of the German and Austrian identitarian movement.
And he's been active in nationalist politics ever since.
His group put on several spectacular actions.
For example, they blocked one of those NGO boats that was about to set sail so that it could help bring illegal immigrants across the Mediterranean into Europe.
They also climbed the top of the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin and unfurled a giant banner that said, secure borders, secure future.
The German authorities then clamped down on the identitarian movement, and they confiscated all of Mr. Sellner's electronic equipment.
He has been very heavily censored.
And before he lost his YouTube channel, it was probably the most effective and influential identitarian or nationalist channel in the entire German-speaking world.
He has lost or been denied accounts from more than 90 banks.
Imagine being deprived of a bank account.
He has been denied entry not just in the United States, but Canada, Britain, Switzerland, and Germany.
He now writes for the German Antios Publishing House and Compact magazine, and I'm happy to say that unlike me, he has an X account.
The intense censorship, Generation Identity.
His group has had a very strong influence on the debate in Germany, and he has probably done more than anyone to popularize terms such as fortress Europe and re-migration.
Earlier this year, his book on re-migration became an Amazon bestseller in Germany.
Even Blomberg News admitted that Martin Sellner Probably single-handedly has promoted the idea of re-migration from Europe.
You cannot keep a good man down.
And please welcome, by video, Martin Selmer.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
I hope you can hear me.
Can you maybe give me a little signal if everything is all right?
Wonderful. I have a dream, and it involves planes, ships, and buses.
I always wanted to say this line in front of an American audience, and I'm very honored to speak here as well as I'm personally angry that I can't be here with you today in flesh.
Separated by a new iron curtain put up by globalist elites, we are today merely united in our struggle for freedom and life.
And our conviction.
We might have many different ideas together in this room and in this conference today, but the survival of our peoples, our ethno-cultural identity is not negotiable.
And that unites us all.
I talked to you right after a huge electoral victory, but we don't have much time for celebration because we are being replaced.
Still at this point in the whole West, the European White West, There's no nation that has a clear policy that will protect the ethno-cultural identity of its people.
We are fading away, but we want to live.
And we will not go silently into the night of demographic replacement.
Today we can already see a silver lining.
Chair Taylor has mentioned a few of our successes in Europe.
And I want to give you today the three principles we've understood to achieve those successes.
First, there are no eternal untouchable dogmas, only a created consensus.
Second, throwing pieces of paper into a box does not create power out of thin air.
And third, politicians, including Donald Trump, are not leaders, but followers.
If we really want to win the war, not just a battle like 12 days ago, we need to become political opinion leaders.
And later in my speech, I will reveal to you A secret, a political multitude that we've been using and has been helping us a lot in this struggle.
Too many of us, of European white people, have silently made their peace with the Great Replacement.
Many people even in our movement.
They've given up on re-migration and their resignation feeds the desperation and hyper-radicalization on the other side of the right-wing political spectrum.
In this speech, I will try to cut through the middle of resignation and hyper-radicalization.
I will tell you why re-migration is possible, what are the main obstacles and how we can overcome them, and in the end, how every one of you can start to get active.
To start, what is re-migration?
I've written a book on it, Remigration, a Proposal.
It's being translated very soon into English.
And for me, I use it as an umbrella term for all legal, economic, and cultural measures that could turn the tide of migration, stop, and undo the great replacement, and thus preserve the ethno-cultural identity of our people.
But I have to say a little caveat, there's no one re-migration.
Many people have different understandings of this important term.
The mentioned great replacement is the reason why we need re-migration.
In my opinion, it's the mother of all problems.
And I want to prove and point out this bold statement.
Demography is everything.
Every decline in culture, economy, education, healthcare could be reversed.
But a demographic replacement is irreversible.
It eats away the political subject, and democracy eats our democracy alive.
We've seen this in the last election.
Every conservative in Europe is slowly and steadily adapting To the iron law of numbers.
Election cycle by election cycle, we are adapting to the new demographic status quo.
And it's this iron law of numbers that forces politicians to pander to the ethnic vote until the ethnic vote consumes ethno-cultural identity as a political goal or subject.
We have also seen this in America.
The GOP has become more and more multi-ethnic and pro-Hispanic to even form a winning coalition.
Demography is everything.
However, I don't like this word and the sentence you heard it very often.
Demography is destiny.
Because our demographic situation, whether in America or in Europe, is not destiny, it's the foreseeable and precise outcome of certain policies caused by politicians with faces and names.
Our opponents are very smart.
They are twisting democracy into a matter of fate, like ebb and flow, weather and climate, something you can't control.
And fighting against mess and replacement migration in their eyes is like Xerxes whipping the waves because they were too high.
It's just irrational.
You can't do anything.
You just need to accept and shape this endless flow of migration.
And speaking of climate, While migration apparently is a matter of fate, they turn climate into a matter of consumer decision and political duty.
We are unable to secure a border with a fence, in their opinion, but by drinking soy milk and not having the barbecue on the weekend, we'll stop global warming.
Welcome to the clown world, I can say.
And remember, there are no eternal untouchable dogmas, there are only...
There's only a dynamic-created consensus, and we have to break this consensus of migration as a matter of fate.
And even if migration was this eternal and natural flow that man cannot stop but only shape and accept, my question is, why does this eternal flow only go into one direction?
Why does it suddenly stop when a non-white person has reached a white country?
Why is migration always a one-way street?
I say, don't let them fool you.
Of course, migration always has been a part of human history.
And from the invasion of the Huns to the Moorish conquista, migration has always been part of Western and widened European history.
But so have been walls, so has been the reconquista of 1492, and so will be re-migration in the 21st century.
In a speech.
I want to decode our brains from the gaslighting they were exposed to.
How will re-migration be possible, you ask?
Just like immigration was possible by the millions.
If you don't believe me, believe me.
No one in Europe would have believed you if you told him 35 years ago that hundreds of thousands of Muslims would demonstrate for Gaza in London, Paris and Vienna.
We have to open our minds for the things that are today unbelievable.
We have to face and construct the major obstacles for re-migration.
And by facing them, by understanding them, we can make re-migration a political reality.
First of all, we can cross any logistical and legal argument against re-migration from the boards to begin with.
To make you understand this better, a little anecdote.
A few days ago, my son, Reinhard, was calling me.
He was desperate because one of his little red balls got stuck into a car.
I don't know how he managed to do that.
He was crying, fatty.
That's how he called me.
And immediately I arrived and I cleared the situation.
I knew I was able to get this red ball out because, why?
He got it in there.
And if something got in there, it's also possible to get it out.
If it was possible to get millions in here, in our countries, illegally, it will be possible to bring millions back legally.
And if it was logistically possible by human traffickers to smuggle them in secret, it will be definitely logistically possible to bring them back in the open.
Remember, we live in an age of mass mobility.
It's important to understand we have all the legal and logistical means for re-migration.
What we're lacking is the political will.
When they say we can't, they mean we, the elites, don't want to.
The deciding obstacle we have to face and deconstruct is mental.
It's this created consensus that re-migration is impossible or immoral.
Remember, there are no eternal untouchable dogmas.
With demonization and censorship, our politicians are preventing an open and reasonable debate about migration.
The result would be re-migration.
And we need to break these walls of silence and start exactly this debate.
To understand this better, this mental obstacle, I want to use an allegory: the siege of Vienna.
Because, of course, the siege of Vienna.
I'm a Viennese.
I was born in Vienna, and I'm very proud of my ancestors who fought back the Turks in 1683.
The city almost fell.
12,000 Europeans were surrounded by 300,000 Ottomans and Turks and their allies.
They were starving inside.
They were low on ammunition.
And I imagine in these last weeks of this siege, if our ancestors had a warehouse full of food, full of ammunition, modern weapon systems, like Kalashnikovs, but the mayor told them, we're not allowed to use those goods to defend our city because this would be Islamophobic and racist.
It's oversimplified, but it makes us understand.
How not using the logistical means we have to secure our border to bring illegals back really works.
L. Musk once said, teach people to hate themselves and their history, and they are defenseless against the mind virus.
They can be reprogrammed with ease.
We need political majorities in the parliament for re-migration, but these majorities are powerless.
Without a nationwide deprogramming and the healing of this mind virus.
That's why we also need movements.
We need conferences, think tanks like M.R.A.N.T.
We need a meta-political backbone on the street in the media, theory and culture.
We need a counter-narrative and a counter-elite.
The good news is we are on a good way.
We want some decisive meta-political battles in the culture war.
The left is losing authority, they're coping with censorship and repression, and they're looking ever more ridiculous.
It was our radical flank that infused the so-called podcast sphere with many important ideas.
The essence of our books, our theories, were distilled in 1,000 memes and that built even a part of the Silicon Valley elite.
And all of this also helped win the election war in 2020.
The bad news is, if you don't keep up, the success could be kidnapped and the latter could be just pulled right up in front of us.
More than ever, America now needs right-wing movements, a right-wing force, independent from big donors and from the GOP, that can hold and really...
Keep Donald Trump under our surveillance in a way and hold him accountable for all the big promises that he made.
There's a coming and inevitable shift to the right and it must not be kidnapped by grifters and by alien interests or fake and controlled opposition.
The right reaction to this danger, however, is not a sniffy pontifical elitism, but it's to get involved, to hold with the moves, but louder, to roll up our sleeves.
We have to become...
A meta-political power ourselves, a meta-political power to reckon with, that can turn the win of 2024 into a victory for our cause.
Because remember, politicians, including Donald Trump, are not leaders but followers.
They set up the sails, but they do not control the wind.
And that's why we, my friends, need to become this wind.
Let's recap.
The Great Replacement is the greatest problem.
Remigration is a possible solution and the main obstacle for remigration is not legal or logistical, it is political, metapolitical.
In order to start remigration, we need to crush the creative consensus of migration as a one-way street and demography as a gloomy fate.
We need to make remigration famous and popular, which is not the same.
A little note to my fellow shit posters.
And we need to understand our task.
We need to make the idea of re-migration very well known and then make it morally legitimate, positive and hopeful.
How would you achieve the first task?
I think that's quite easy with provocation and with the help of our unwilling allies.
I call it to witness Bloomberg and many other media outlets.
It's quite easy to make terms known because the media also loves a good right-wing story.
It creates a lot of clicks.
And I think this quote from Bloomberg will be coming to the blurb of the English edition of Remigration.
This all did not happen by accident.
And as promised, I'm now going to reveal you our political secret, our political multi-tool, which is super easy.
Like a hammer, but also super useful.
We use it action by action, video by video, and it's helping us to win the cultural war.
I call it popular provocation, and it marks the small and thin line between a grifter and a fat poster.
What does it mean?
It means every action, every tweet, every article, every press statement, every speech.
Every rally, even the way you dress, you look, you talk, has to be A, radical enough to shift the overtone window and break the consensus, and B, popular enough to convince even your own grammar.
I know this sounds a bit complicated, and it's not always easy to hit this sweet spot, and don't ask me how often I've failed in this task.
But the important thing is to always keep it in the back of your head.
If you don't always aim for it, you're going to get lost politically.
This popular provocation makes an avant-garde an avant-garde.
They push forward into ideological nomenland.
This is the provocation, but they get a critical mass to follow them, and together they are moving the overturned window.
That is what makes it popular.
If you don't use popular provocation, As a political avant-garde, you are not an avant-garde, you're just a bunch of fools lost alone in the forests.
This also marks the two pitfalls we have to avoid by trying to popularize re-migration.
First, an unrealistic hardcore version of re-migration might look brave and courageous and stunning among our mutuals in an online bubble, but it might just destroy the chances that we actually have to achieve a realistic version.
I advise you to read the art of the deal by Donald Trump.
If you go into a salary deal, salary negotiations, and you demand 500k per year to start with, you might get fired before you're hired.
You have to be realistic and achievable in our goals, otherwise what we're doing is not political activism, but political, pardon my French, masturbation.
The second pitfall It's at the moment even more dangerous in Europe.
It's the false song of pragmatism.
I will explain it in a metaphor.
Imagine you are a pizza delivery boy.
Your job is to deliver a box of pizza in it.
And to get there faster, you just throw out one slice after another of your pizza.
You might arrive there a little bit sooner, but you can't deliver.
You have nothing to offer.
And many right-wing politicians are not trying, and this is a very important point to understand, Normalize and de-demonize popular term at the moment in Europe, especially in France and Italy.
They're not trying to normalize and de-demonize ideas and words, but themselves and their political brands, by betraying these political ideas and brands, they are disappointing and hollow and useless like an empty pizza box.
The second pitfall to avoid.
And nobody has summarized this principle of popular provocation better.
Then Philippe Vardant, one of the founders of a movement in France, he said, we don't need provocateurs, we want to make our enemies afraid and not our grandparents.
And that's this political multi-tool and I really advise you to use it in your political work on a daily basis.
And the amazing thing is what they fear and why they fear generation identity and identitarians in general so much is because the people don't fear us.
They're afraid of us because we are not scary enough and we don't fit in their clichés and we say out loud what millions of people think.
The answer has been and will be overreaching, disproportional and ever more nervous repression.
This has become the story of my life.
Jared Taylor mentioned in this amazing introduction a few details.
I'm going to add some more.
There are constant lawsuits going on, house rates on a regular basis, the first one when I was 17. I was kicked out and blocked by more than 90 banks, including PayPal, Strive, but also from YouTube and Instagram.
Thanks to Elon Musk, I'm back on X. But book readings get stormed on a regular basis by now.
I can't rent an apartment, struggling to find a kindergarten.
And yeah, my car and my parents' car was set on fire by left-wing terrorists.
I was blocked temporarily from Germany and Switzerland, and I am blocked right now from the UK, Canada, and the United States of America.
Deputation is tearing families apart, you say.
Well, I have not been able to see the bigger part of my American relatives in the past years due to political persecution.
But many of you know this as well.
I'm not here to whine about repression.
The popular provocation starts to happen.
If your message is popular and clear and you have stayed strictly non-violent and avoided any useless extremism, then this repression doesn't weaken you, but it makes you even more famous.
Many important freedom fighters and movements have been created by overreaching repression.
We can use the demonization as advertisements and the persecution as fuel.
But it only works, of course, if we don't become the demons as they betray us.
So repression can also be used to our own advantage.
With this popular provocation, you can make re-migration famous, popular, and presented in a realistic, legitimate, and hopeful way, which is not complicated because, in my opinion, re-migration is realistic, legitimate, and hopeful.
And now I just want to give you a short summary.
A sketch of my proposal of immigration.
If you want to read it in detail, the book will soon come out in English.
And of course, this is focused on a European setting.
How does my realistic proposal for immigration look like?
Easy. I differentiate three target groups and three faces.
Group number one, group A, are asylum seekers or illegals.
Group B are non-citizens and foreigners.
And group C are non-assimilated citizens.
Or as we call them in Austrian Germany, Passport Germans or Austrians.
Phase one, it's quite easy.
Illegals, of course, have to go.
It's just following the law.
Millions must go because millions came illegally.
If it's easier to achieve this with incentives, that's fine.
If it doesn't work like this, they still have to go.
In Europe, non-European migration is completely stopped.
And I also would propose a quota system for migration, for coming migration styled After the U.S. Immigration Act of 1924, I expect five to seven years for this phase.
Phase two targets Group B, and you can start at the same time, this phase.
Every foreigner who is an economical, criminal, or cultural burden to a nation also eventually has to leave.
Not tomorrow, but at some point.
We start, of course, with criminals, but also unemployed people, underachievers, political, radicals, cultural burdens to a country.
We're not citizens have to leave.
Remember, studies show that non-European migrants are net negative to our economy.
We already see this in Sweden, for example, people earning less than 2,322 euros per month have to leave non-citizens.
They're losing their residence permit, and this accounts for 30% of non-citizens in Sweden.
A strict reform of citizenship law...
Also stops the mass naturalization of this group.
I expect 10 to 15 years for this phase.
Group C is the group of non-assimilated migrants who have a citizenship.
And here I have to stress again, remigration does not mean to deport people based on their skin color, religion, or just because you don't like them.
Remigration also does an equal deportation.
Economic and cultural pressure, financial incentives.
An inversion of the push and pull factors will target these parallel societies in a phase that I would see within 20 or 30 years becoming effective.
This makes these parallel societies shrink and we just have to change the wealth, no more migration of those groups and increasing the natural re-migration of these groups that already is taking place.
There are being re-migration checks handed out right now in Sweden.
A burka ban in Austria led to hundreds of fundamentalist Muslims leaving, and this was even before a real policy of re-migration has started in Europe.
Imagine what we can do if there are right-wing governments with the right-wing meta-political task force in their back.
Those programs for voluntary return already exist.
Just like the term re-migration already existed before, we popularized it in a political way.
We just need to expand them.
We need to create re-migration centers in every problematic neighborhood.
So re-migration cannot be achieved in one way, but we can change the course and thus save our people.
A lot of historic examples like Operation Redback in 1954, with more than 1,100,000 migrants leaving in just one year, mass repatriations in Pakistan, and of course, a Hispanic caravan that turned around.
After Donald Trump's victory.
And if I was there with you now in the room, I would ask you now to give Donald Trump a hand for this act of remigration, an effective remigration.
Speaking of Hispanics, what would remigration mean in a United States setting?
I can't give you that answer.
I'm merely speaking on behalf of Europe here.
But if you allow, I'll give you a maybe...
Naive and blunt perspective from across the pond.
In the Americas, there is a total of 35 independent nations, and only two of them are white and Anglo-Saxon.
The rest of them is Latino or Spanish-influenced.
But if this ongoing trend continues, they might also disappear.
Between 2000 and 2021, the Hispanic population increased by 35 million.
Which increased from 35 million to 62.5 million, an increase in over 77%.
You know these numbers, I don't need to tell them to you.
I think there are nowhere in America more demographic experts are gathered than right here, right now in this conference room.
But if you look at California, we already have about 40% of people with an Hispanic background.
And this Californication could be the future of America.
And now to quote the 45th and 47th, some might even say the 46th president of the United States.
I love Hispanics.
He also said, the best taco balls are made in Trump Tower.
No endorsement here.
They have amazing food.
They're Catholic.
I like both of it.
But still, I would not want them to replace my indigenous population in Austria.
If I want Mexican culture, I can go to Mexico.
Don't need to go to the United States for that.
My honest question as a European is: Would it help the United States and Canada if they become the 34th and 35th Hispanic nation of the Americas?
Will this so-called browning of America help South America or the world?
And why should it be immoral to stand for the right for difference, the right to keep our demographic identity in our nations?
And even if this process was inevitable, we could do anything about it.
Why should only white people not have the right to organize and represent their interests?
You, as Americans, will have to answer these questions.
And this brings us to the last point of my speech, the moral question.
I think I made a quite realistic proposal for immigration in my book.
But isn't this mean?
Isn't it immoral to start a mass-remigration?
I say not starting re-migration would be immoral.
We have a moral duty to our ancestors and our children.
I like Edmund Burke's definition, he said:"A nation is a deep pact between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who will be born." This pact obliges us to start re-migration as soon as possible.
When I fight for it, I do it for my ancestors and their sacrifices.
I do it for the future of my people and our kind, which is now represented in flesh in my own son.
But I also do it for myself, because as a man of honor, as a believing Catholic, I would not be able to just stand by as our peoples are dying.
This might convince you, but here I'm preaching the choir, I'm afraid.
We have to make re-migration popular among those who dislike it.
This means we have to make a case for re-migration that even appears to a universalistic, left-wing, liberal, non-nativistic mindset.
And the amazing thing I have to tell you, the good news, there are plenty of arguments for that.
Because re-migration is also a net negative for the whole world.
Mass migration is no solution to declining birth rates.
And mass emigration, this exodus, is no solution to poverty.
In fact, it perpetuates it.
Some facts to be masked as humanists.
In 2000, 75% of doctors trained in Mozambique were already working abroad.
Ethiopia has lost three quarters of skilled labor in the past 10 years.
This idea of importing skilled labor is like being like a demographic vampire.
It destroys the economies abroad, and for every skilled laborer...
10 unskilled jobs are being killed, and those people obviously follow the skilled labor to our countries.
And to be honest, if I was a young man in Africa or in Guatemala, I'd probably be on my way to the United States or Europe right now.
We need to help them if we want to help them in place.
And the most immediate help for this is to cut the possibility and incentive to flee from the domestic problems.
A strong fence is the best development aid.
They need to build up their own countries.
And many examples show that it's not completely impossible.
Look at Bukele in El Salvador.
Very interesting policies and numbers don't lie.
After Bukele, migration from El Salvador went down by 60%.
I say we should stop wasting money for integration, DEI and all these useless projects and spend it on voluntary return and projects that create a perspective in the homelands of these migrants who come.
You know the saying?
Give a man a fish and feed him for one day.
And how does it go on?
Deport a man and you never have to feed him again.
That's obviously not how it goes.
Teach him how to fish and he can feed himself.
And that's the moral case for re-migration.
Foreign babies will not solve our own demographic crisis.
New Americans, Europeans don't need to be imported.
We can make them ourselves.
If we create conditions in which families can thrive, And if we help create these conditions at home, the migrants will stop coming.
I'm an ethnopolist.
I love diversity.
I love all cultures and nations.
And I also fight for the beauty of difference, the adventure of confrontation, the agonistic principle that polarizes the world and makes it right with meaning.
God's creation, also my personal view.
And only globalists want people constantly on the move, uprooted, atomized, with no knowledge of the tradition and faith.
People who own nothing are nothing and are becoming cattle.
We're also fighting against the global melting pot at the end of history and the mass effect of the last man-sourced drug.
It's not only Darwinian and egoistic and nativistic, it's also a higher cause we're fighting for.
I always say...
A, B, A, B, all borders are beautiful, and like to quote Jean Raspail, the author of The Camp of Saints, he wrote, I long with all my heart for a multiplication of borders ad infinitum, in whose protection the so precious differences could cease to twindle.
To summarize, the great replacement is immoral, re-emigration and local help are the realistic and moral solutions we need to make this knowledge popular with...
Popular provocation to crush the old consensus, create a new one that creates the wind on which right-wing populist politicians will have to set their sail in the future.
I could end my speech here, but words are empty if they don't lead to action.
And a speech that does not call to action is a waste of time, and the last thing you want to do is to waste your time.
At the beginning, I told you, there are no eternal and untouchable dogmas, only a created consensus.
Politicians, including Trump, are not leaders but followers.
And I now urge you at this very moment that you don't think that you've won a great victory and you can rest.
You now have to get organized, accumulate metapolitical power, and become opinion leaders.
I hear a lot of criticism today in the whole Anglosphere about power blocks controlling this new administration.
I understand the criticism.
But the answer is not to whine about it, but to become a power block of our own.
When the election campaign ends, the meta-political campaign starts.
And this election was 12 days ago.
This means we are 12 days late in our fight, and there's no time to waste, but a huge meta-political potential, slumbering, waiting to be awakened.
And there are many ways to take part in a cultural war.
Not everyone can become an influencer, but everyone can kickstart our...
Identitarian ground game.
I've talked to you about beauty, duty, honor, but I know my fellow right-wingers, especially I think in this audience, you love numbers.
So let's do the math together.
For Trump, last time I checked, they voted 74,675,378 people.
Let's just in a conservative estimation think that only 10% of them are open.
To re-migration and would be willing to get involved in our cause, this would make a mobilization potential of 7.5 million.
Imagine if only 1% of this potential would go to rally once, it would be a crowd of 75,000 rallying for our cause.
If every one of this target audience would donate only $1.89 a month, why $1.89?
That's the price of a small McDonald's fry.
This would create a huge budget of $14 million for an identitarian think tank, an action group, a cultural festival, or a media outlet.
And that's applied locally.
In Tennessee, we have 1.9 million people who voted for Trump.
How many of them are here today at this conference?
Next question.
How many of them would have loved to come, but weren't aware or informed?
How many of our 7.5 million potential would buy at least an online ticket for a livestream?
And the most important question: What would Jerry Taylor do with all of this money?
I urge you really to go tonight, or maybe in the break, to an election results map and look up, not the percentage, But the exact number and your mobilization potential in your area.
In Dickinson Country, it's 18,997 who voted for Trump, which makes 1,800 people.
These people are real.
They exist.
You can reach them.
You can talk to them.
They're waiting for you.
You have to wake them up, and you have to organize them.
If there's no identitarian action group, book club, or cigar round in your catchment area, then I have to tell you, you're doing something wrong.
You've got to catch them all.
My appeal to you from across the ocean is don't make you peace with an evil as vile as the replacement of our people.
Call it out, organize against it, and destroy it.
My motivation is our untouched potential.
The engine of a movement, in my opinion, is like a motor with 200 horsepower running at 15 miles per hour.
Let's step on the gas.
Let's make re-migration as well known as Taylor Swift and as popular as McDonald's.
If we do this, we can make immigration a reality.
We can get our act together, bring Jared Taylor back on X, and lead back to the United States, and truly make our people great again.
And by the way, right after my speech, I will apply for a visa to the United States.
And to quote another Austrian who lives in the States and has a different opinion, I'll be back.
We will be back.
Thank you very much for your attention.
Thank you.
We don't have much time, but we'd like to have some time for questions.
Good afternoon, Hesana.
I have a regime change from Rex Gelesen, but my question for you, from the influx of Turkish men imported in the'60s, despicable actions of Angela Merkel ten years ago, every corner, every village in Europe has been affected by migrants.
How can we form coalitions with our left liberal friends and neighbors, like Sara Wagenknecht?
Remigration will not be possible if we remain isolated and extremist.
So how can we link arms with them?
Very good question.
Absolutely true.
Europe has been suffering from mass migration for decades.
Sarah Wagenknecht is less a left-wing liberal.
She's more kind of a classical, anti-imperialist, international left-winger.
But we see that the idea of re-migration and the criticism of migration is something that goes across all political parties.
I think...
I can go back to the thing that I mentioned in my speech, this political multi-tool, popular provocation.
We have to really take the idea of a re-migration, free from everything that's not necessary, like a sculptor that's creating a sculpture, and then we have to popularize it.
First of all, present it in a realistic way, cite all the facts, but then also don't understand the moral case for re-migration.
Only if we make a moral case that appeals to these masses of our own people who have been brainwashed by universalism, by left-wing liberalism for decades, only if we give them a way to, in a way, integrate re-migration in the whole mindset, I think it will get the critical mass behind it in a coming time of crisis.
So that would be my advice.
Stop. We're preaching to the choir and try to really crack up this mindset of left-wing people to make it possible for them to integrate re-migration into their whole ideology.
Considering the election of Donald Trump, the United States is, now it's kind of iffy, but the United States has always been a homogeny throughout the world.
So it's a powerful influence.
So what I'm wondering is, what effect do you think the election of Trump would have on the white identity movement in Europe?
I'll give you an example.
Elon Musk, they were saying, because they were trying to censure X in Europe, there was this thing floated that maybe the United States would pull out of NATO or use NATO.
So I was wondering what your opinion would be as to...
The anticipated effect it might have to lessen the tyranny that has taken over Europe.
I don't want to praise Moscow X too much because, as we all know, Jerry Taylor is still not back on X, which hopefully will change in the next year.
But there are certain things that I really hope for in the Trump administration.
The first is definitely freedom of speech.
I think it was really, like, very, very close if Trump would have lost.
What are the reasons why Musk and X would have been cooked?
But now Musk will be successful with his lawsuits against APEC and SLPC.
So advertisers will come back even more to X. And if Musk would be paid accordingly to the engagement, X would be a huge financial success.
It will become.
And then Zuckerberg and co.
will also move after that.
So X will have a spreading effect of freedom of speech.
I think by 2025, the whole digital environment will look differently.
We've seen Silicon Valley moving to the right in a libertarian sense of right.
First thing, freedom of speech will help us in Europe a lot.
And J.D. Vance has already said they are not willing to let European censorship hinder our European access to those platforms.
It will be kind of a color revolution and regime change in maybe a more patriotic way.
Second hope.
Mass remigrations, mass repatriations.
I hope Trump will do this.
But even by talking about it, he will normalize it globally.
Because still, even now, LibCon leaders, leaders of the fake conservative parties are adapting with the victory of Donald Trump.
And if he makes remigration, mass repatriation, building a wall of normality, this will help us metapolitically enormously.
And the third thing I hope for this election to influence the world positively, As an ethno-pluralist, I'm for a multipolar world.
And I think Donald Trump's dollar diplomacy, trade wars, and just open, as Carl Schmitt said, an antique honesty.
Open America First policy will kickstart also geopolitical consciousness in Europe.
So I think by the end, I hope the world will be freer and more multipolar after this Trump presidency.
These are hopes, and we can make them a reality.
Go back to my speech by becoming a metapolitical powerblock that influences this election the right way.
Thank you very much.
Servus Menes, did Compaq magazine get their furniture back from the German government?
Yeah. They did?
Yeah, yeah, they gave me, eventually had to give me everything back, but at the moment there are really house rates happening on the...
On a weekly basis, the last thing, there was a German retired person who said that Habeck, the vice chancellor, is a"Schwachkopf".
"Schwachkopf" is a very, very, like, not aggressive at all.
It's like a fool.
And then I house-rated him and took all of his electronic devices.
So it's really getting very, very crazy in Germany.
Hello, how are you?
Hi. Hi.
Very good, thank you.
you.
I can only speak German, but I would stay in Norddeutschland.
I was wondering, how could I potentially get involved in the movement in Norddeutschland?
No problem, just write me an email, write today, contact@martinselner.info, that's Martin Selner, written together, and I can connect you to either of the other groups in Germany's North.
Okay, and I have also another question.
You married an American, right?
Yes. But you can't come to the UK.
You're not allowed to be in America.
Yeah, there was a terrorist investigation which was completely bogus and it didn't even come to a trial.
It was completely acquitted.
But due to this, they took away my ESTA visa privileges.
I applied for a normal visa and they...
I denied this and I'm now in a special application process.
Took a while and I decided to wait up this election before I start my new application.
But at the moment it would not be possible for me to get a normal visa to come to America.
I'm afraid it will not work for the inauguration, but I hope it will work by 2025.
Hi, I'm a longtime fan.
Isn't also your wife a bit of a media star also?
I believe I've seen some of her videos on YouTube.
But my question was, could our movement succeed if we can't name who the elite are?
Are they the mega-rich?
Are they foreign influences?
Who is the elite?
And my second question is, are you aware of the public health crisis that's going on all over the West?
Some doctors have said that testosterone rates have gone down by 1% for the last 50 years.
So 20-year-olds have the testosterone rates of 40-year-olds nowadays.
I'll start by answering the latter question.
Yes, I'm very aware of it.
We have similar effects in Europe.
Maybe not that bad because I think the food is a bit different here in Europe.
At least that's what my wife always tells me.
But that's definitely the result of this.
The whole society, the nutrition, but also, obviously, internet addiction, porn addiction.
It has created, like, spew out a last man, like the back man of Nietzsche.
That's an unfortunate reality.
The fortunate thing is also that there's a counter-culture rising, reminding me of the German counter-culture between the two wars of the Wandervogel movement, Training yourself, eating in a different way, getting back to nature.
So I think there's also a very good reaction to that.
Let's see what Mr. Kennedy really can and will achieve in that sense.
When it comes to elites and naming elites, I think, yes, one should name the responsibles if you can really pin them down.
But I also think if you follow the idea of popular...
Provocation, the most important thing is to call out the issue of the problem and create a critical mass for it.
And I want to answer with a metaphor from Buddhism.
Once Buddha went through a forest and then he saw a man laying on the floor and he was hit by an arrow.
And he was dying because it was a poisonous arrow.
And he wanted to bring this man home to cure him.
But the man told him, no, I will not leave.
I need to follow the tracks.
I want to know who exactly shot this arrow.
I need to find it out.
I want to take revenge.
If I don't look after that now, I will not find the traces.
You have to come with me.
If you don't come with me, I cannot cure you.
You might die.
He said, no, I don't care.
I will follow these tracks.
And in the end, this man, I really wanted to find out who was responsible, died and wasn't able to cure his disease.
So for me, from a strategic perspective, and this is my strategic book, Regime Change from the Right.
See every question, every issue only in the sense, does it bring us closer to re-migration?
And that's what everybody has to ask, given in this national political context.
Hi, I just wanted to say thank you for that inspiring talk.
And sometimes it can be demoralizing and isolating when we don't see...
Yeah, that's a good question.
To be honest, I mean, I heard sometimes that both exist.
Some people say, we as Europeans, we should live Europe and leave Europe, pardon me, and go to America because there is much more space and you have the First and Second Amendment and we could create ethno-states there.
And then some others say, no, the Americans should come back to Europe because maybe it's easier to make the case of being indigenous in Europe.
I don't believe any white flight.
We'll solve our issues, whether white flight on a regional or national level.
You have been born in America.
Your fate is in America.
Some might, for personal reasons.
For example, like my wife, go to Europe or America.
But you as whites in America have a legacy.
You can be proud of this story.
And you need to fight for your rights and for these last two WASP nations on the Americas among 33 others.
And I think that's maybe also a good argument to bring up the question.
Would it really serve the Americas if those last two WASP nations changed?
▲
Export Selection